Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations — Brady Corporation is an international manufacturer of identification solutions and specialty materials that identify and protect premises, products and people. The ability to provide customers with a broad range of proprietary, customized, and diverse products for use in various applications, along with a commitment to quality and service, a global footprint, and multiple sales channels, have made Brady a world leader in many of its markets.

Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Brady Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Brady” or the “Company”), all of which are wholly-owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Subsequent Events — On September 6, 2012, the Company announced an increase in the annual dividend to shareholders of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, from $0.74 to $0.76 per share. A quarterly dividend of $0.19 will be paid on October 31, 2012, to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 10, 2012.

On September 6, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share buyback program for up to an additional two million shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The share repurchase plan may be implemented from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, with repurchased shares available for use in connection with the Company’s stock-based compensation plans and for other corporate purposes.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company believes the carrying amount of its financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable) is a reasonable estimate of the fair value of these instruments due to their short-term nature. See Note 5 for more information regarding the fair value of long-term debt and Note 10 for fair value measurements.

Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired to be cash equivalents, which are recorded at cost.

Accounts Receivables — Accounts receivables are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $6,006 and $6,183 as of July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. No single customer comprises more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2012, 2011, or 2010, or 10% of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable as of July 31, 2012 or 2011. Specific customer provisions are made when a review of significant outstanding amounts, utilizing information about customer creditworthiness and current economic trends, indicates that collection is doubtful. In addition, provisions are made for the remainder of accounts receivable based upon the age of the receivable and the Company’s historical collection experience.

Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for certain domestic inventories (approximately 18% of total inventories at July 31, 2012, and approximately 16% of total inventories at July 31, 2011) and the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or average cost methods for other inventories. Had all domestic inventories been accounted for on a FIFO basis instead of on a LIFO basis, the carrying value would have increased by $9,271 and $9,168 on July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Plant, Property, and Equipment — Plant, property, and equipment are recorded at cost. The cost of buildings and improvements and machinery and equipment is being depreciated over their estimated useful lives using primarily the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes. The estimated useful lives range from 3 to 33 years as shown below.

Asset Category	Range of Useful Lives
Buildings and improvements		10 to 33 Years
Computer systems		5 Years
Machinery and equipment		3 to 10 Years

Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until disposal. Upon disposal, assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the net amount, less proceeds from disposal, is charged or credited to operations. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the respective asset. Depreciation expense was $27,656, $28,997, and $31,560 for the years ended July 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets — The cost of intangible assets with determinable useful lives is amortized to reflect the pattern of economic benefits consumed on a straight-line basis, over the estimated periods benefited. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and goodwill are not subjected to amortization. These assets are assessed for impairment annually or more frequently as deemed necessary.

In the quarter ended January 31, 2012, the former North/South Asia reporting unit experienced a sales decline and margin erosion due in large part to a major customer’s loss of market share within the mobile handset industry. The impact of this sales decline was partially offset by additional opportunities within the mobile handset and other computing devices markets, but these sales were achieved at a lower gross margin percentage than was previously realized. The Company’s plans to fill capacity and absorb overhead with these additional sales opportunities were partially successful; however, increased competition from local competitors drove down unit prices. While the Company continued to capture similar dollar value of sales, the gross margins were less than what was anticipated. The Company placed increased focus on cost reduction and material procurement strategies to reduce cost of goods sold; however, these efforts were not enough to return the reporting unit to previous levels of profitability. Based upon the economic environment within the mobile handset market, management determined that the events were not temporary and gross margins in the mobile handset market were not likely to improve materially in the near term.

Due to the convergence of these events, in connection with a reforecast of expected fiscal 2012 financial results completed during the quarter ended January 31, 2012, the Company determined the foregoing circumstances to be indicators of potential impairment under the guidance of ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.” The Company completed the required initial (“Step One”) impairment test for the former North/South Asia reporting unit by preparing a discounted cash flow model taking into account updated projections, estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily included, but were not limited to, projections of revenue growth, operating earnings, discount rates, terminal growth rates, and required capital for the reporting unit. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in these estimates, actual results could differ materially from the estimates. The Company evaluated the significant assumptions used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit with the assistance of a third party valuation firm and concluded that they were reasonable.

The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was compared to the carrying amount including goodwill, and the results of the analysis indicated that the former North/South Asia reporting unit was potentially impaired. Therefore, the Company proceeded to measure the amount of the potential impairment (“Step Two”) with the assistance of a third party valuation firm. In Step Two of the goodwill impairment test, the Company determined the implied fair value of the goodwill and compared it to the carrying value of the goodwill. The Company allocated the fair value of the former North/South Asia reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of its identifiable assets and liabilities was the implied fair value of goodwill. Upon completion of the assessment, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $115,688 during the quarter ended January 31, 2012. The amount of accumulated impairments as of July 31, 2012 was $115,688. There were no accumulated impairments as of July 31, 2011.

In order to better allocate resources to align with sales growth initiatives, the Company reorganized its management reporting structure within the EMEA and Asia-Pacific operating segments. As a result of the reorganization and in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” the Company’s reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment testing were updated during the quarter ended April 30, 2012. In the EMEA operating segment, the Emerging Platforms reporting unit was consolidated into the Brady EMEA and Direct Marketing EMEA reporting units. In the Asia-Pacific operating segment, the North/South Asia reporting unit was divided into Brady North/South Asia and Die-Cut Asia. Further, Brady North/South Asia has been aggregated with Australia as part of the Brady Asia reporting unit. There were no changes to the management structure within the Americas operating segment.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

	Americas			EMEA			Asia- Pacific			Total
Balance as of July 31, 2010	$	425,018		$	163,189		$	180,393		$	768,600
Current year acquisitions		—			—			4,792			4,792
Current year divestitures		(3,696	)		(8,380	)		—			(12,076	)
Translation adjustments and other		4,256			16,429			18,342			39,027
Balance as of July 31, 2011	$	425,578		$	171,238		$	203,527		$	800,343
Current year acquisitions		—			22,844			—			22,844
Current year divestitures		—			(495	)		—			(495	)
Translation adjustments and other		(7,692	)		(18,719	)		(3,802	)		(30,213	)
Impairment charge		—			—			(115,688	)		(115,688	)
Balance as of July 31, 2012	$	417,886		$	174,868		$	84,037		$	676,791

Goodwill decreased $123,552 during fiscal 2012. Of the $123,552 decrease, $115,688 was due to the goodwill impairment charge recognized on the former North/South Asia reporting unit, and $30,185 was due to the negative effects of foreign currency translation. These declines were partially offset by the acquisitions of Grafo, Runelandhs, and Pervaco during fiscal 2012, which increased goodwill by $1,227, $8,440, and $13,177, respectively, net of the fiscal 2012 divestiture of Etimark, which decreased goodwill by $495. See Note 2, “Acquisitions and Divestitures” for further discussion.

Goodwill increased $31,743 during fiscal 2011 due to the net effects of foreign currency translation and acquisition activity, offset by divestitures. Of the $31,743 increase, $39,027 was due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation and $4,792 resulted from the acquisition of ID Warehouse during the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was offset by a $12,076 decrease in goodwill as a result of the divestiture of the Company’s Teklynx business during the second quarter of fiscal 2011.

Other intangible assets include patents, trademarks, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and other intangible assets with finite lives being amortized in accordance with accounting guidance for other intangible assets. The net book value of these assets was as follows:

	July 31, 2012									July 31, 2011
	Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value		Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Book Value
Amortized other intangible assets:
Patents		5	$	10,418	$	(9,058	)	$	1,360		5	$	9,784	$	(8,556	)	$	1,228
Trademarks and other		7		8,945		(7,094	)		1,851		7		9,448		(6,599	)		2,849
Customer relationships		7		164,392		(128,805	)		35,587		7		165,566		(119,977	)		45,589
Non-compete agreements and other		4		15,988		(15,417	)		571		4		16,432		(15,760	)		672
Unamortized other intangible assets:
Trademarks and tradenames		N/A		44,750		—			44,750		N/A		39,623		—			39,623
Total			$	244,493	$	(160,374	)	$	84,119			$	240,853	$	(150,892	)	$	89,961

The value of other intangible assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2012, differs from the value assigned to them in the allocation of purchase price due to the effect of fluctuations in the exchange rates used to translate financial statements into the United States dollar between the date of acquisition and July 31, 2012.

Amortization expense of intangible assets during fiscal 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $16,331, $19,830, and $21,462, respectively. The amortization over each of the next five fiscal years is projected to be $14,323, $6,962, $6,145, $5,957, and $2,859 for the years ending July 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Other Intangible Assets — The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining estimated useful life of long-lived and other finite-lived intangible assets may warrant revision or that the remaining balance of an asset may not be recoverable. The measurement of possible impairment is based on fair value of the assets generally estimated by the ability to recover the balance of assets from expected future operating cash flows on an undiscounted basis. If impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on the fair value of the asset.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets — Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Annual impairment tests are performed by the Company in the fourth quarter of each year.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company conducted a goodwill impairment assessment. The assessment included comparing the carrying amount of net assets, including goodwill, of each reporting unit to its respective fair value as of May 1, 2012, the Company’s assessment date. Fair value was determined using the weighted average of a discounted cash flow and market participant analysis for each reporting unit. The Company’s methodologies for valuing goodwill are applied consistently on a year-over-year basis. No indications of impairment have been identified between the date of the interim assessments and July 31, 2012.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company conducted an indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment. The assessment included comparing the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to the fair value of those assets as of May 1, 2012, the Company’s assessment date. Fair value was determined using a discounted revenue stream analysis for each indefinite-lived intangible asset based on a relief from royalty valuation methodology. The Company’s methodologies for valuing indefinite-lived intangible assets are applied consistently on a year-over-year basis. No indications of impairment have been identified between the date of the interim assessments and July 31, 2012.

Catalog Costs and Related Amortization — The Company accumulates all direct costs incurred, net of vendor cooperative advertising payments, in the development, production, and circulation of its catalogs on its balance sheet until such time as the related catalog is mailed. The catalog costs are subsequently amortized into selling, general, and administrative expense over the expected sales realization cycle, which is one year or less. Consequently, any difference between the estimated and actual revenue stream for a particular catalog and the related impact on amortization expense is neutralized within a period of one year or less. The estimate of the expected sales realization cycle for a particular catalog is based on the Company’s historical sales experience with identical or similar catalogs, and an assessment of prevailing economic conditions and various competitive factors. The Company tracks subsequent sales realization, reassesses the marketplace, and compares its findings to the previous estimate, and adjusts the amortization of future catalogs, if necessary. At July 31, 2012 and 2011, $15,011 and $11,892, respectively, of prepaid catalog costs were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Revenue Recognition — Revenue is recognized when it is both earned and realized or realizable. The Company’s policy is to recognize revenue when title to the product, ownership, and risk of loss have transferred to the customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, and collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured, all of which generally occur upon shipment of goods to customers. The majority of the Company’s revenue relates to the sale of inventory to customers, and revenue is recognized when title and the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer. Given the nature of the Company’s business and the applicable rules guiding revenue recognition, the Company’s revenue recognition practices do not contain estimates that materially affect the results of operations, with the exception of estimated returns and credit memos. The Company provides for an allowance for estimated product returns and credit memos which is recognized as a deduction from sales at the time of the sale. As of July 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had a reserve of $3,046 and $4,491, respectively. The decline from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2012 is a result of a reduction in specific reserves that were recorded at the end of fiscal 2011, as well as a decline in the product return lag.

Sales Incentives — The Company accounts for cash consideration (such as sales incentives and cash discounts) given to its customers or resellers as a reduction of revenue rather than an operating expense. Sales incentives for the years ended July 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 were $18,474, $18,826, and $12,673, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs — Amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction related to shipping and handling fees are reported as net sales and the related costs incurred for shipping and handling are reported as cost of goods sold.

Advertising Costs — Advertising costs are expensed as incurred, except catalog and mailer costs as outlined above. Advertising expense for the years ended July 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 were $74,852, $79,326, and $72,000, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation — The Company has an incentive stock plan under which the Board of Directors may grant nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock or restricted shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to employees and non-employee directors. The stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant and generally vest ratably over a three-year period, with one-third becoming exercisable one year after the grant date and one-third additional in each of the succeeding two years. Stock options issued under these plans, referred to herein as “service-based” stock options, generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. The Company also grants stock options to certain executives and key management employees that vest upon meeting certain financial performance conditions over the vesting schedule described above; these options are referred to herein as “performance-based” stock options. Performance-based stock options expire 10 years from the date of grant. Restricted shares have an issuance price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The Company granted restricted shares in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2011 that have an issuance price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The restricted shares granted in fiscal 2008 were amended in fiscal 2011 to allow for vesting after either a five-year period or a seven-year period based upon both performance and service conditions. The restricted shares granted in fiscal 2011 vest ratably at the end of years 3, 4 and 5 upon meeting certain performance and service conditions. The restricted shares granted in fiscal 2008 and 2011 are referred to herein as “performance-based restricted shares.”

As of July 31, 2012, the Company has reserved 6,555,084 shares of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock for outstanding stock options and restricted shares and 5,005,850 shares remain of Class A Nonvoting Common Stock for future issuance of stock options and restricted shares under the various plans. The Company uses treasury stock or will issue new Class A Nonvoting Common Stock to deliver shares under these plans.

The Company recognizes the compensation cost of all share-based awards on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the award. Total stock compensation expense recognized by the Company during the years ended July 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $9,735 ($5,939 net of taxes), $9,830 ($5,996 net of taxes), and $9,721 ($5,930 net of taxes), respectively. As of July 31, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation awards was $13,827 pre-tax, net of estimated forfeitures, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

The Company has estimated the fair value of its performance-based and service-based option awards granted after August 1, 2005, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model are reflected in the following table:

	2012						2011						2010
Black-Scholes Option Valuation Assumptions	Performance- Based Options			Service-Based Options			Performance- Based Options			Service-Based Options			Performance- Based Options			Service-Based Options
Expected term (in years)		6.57			5.89			6.57			5.91			6.57			5.94
Expected volatility		39.21	%		39.41	%		39.39	%		40.22	%		38.72	%		39.88	%
Expected dividend yield		1.99	%		2.07	%		1.96	%		1.94	%		3.02	%		3.01	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.05	%		1.16	%		2.35	%		1.65	%		3.03	%		2.63	%
Weighted-average market value of underlying stock at grant date	$	29.55		$	27.05		$	28.43		$	29.13		$	28.73		$	28.68
Weighted-average exercise price	$	29.55		$	27.05		$	28.35		$	29.13		$	29.78		$	28.68
Weighted-average fair value of options granted	$	10.01		$	8.42		$	9.87		$	9.59		$	8.70		$	8.77

The Company uses historical data regarding stock option exercise behaviors to estimate the expected term of options granted based on the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s historical dividend payments and historical yield. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect on the grant date for the length of time corresponding to the expected term of the option. The market value is calculated as the average of the high and the low stock price on the date of grant.

The Company granted 100,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock to Frank M. Jaehnert, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in August of 2010, with a grant price and fair value of $28.35 per share. The Company also granted 210,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock to Mr. Jaehnert and other executives during fiscal 2008, with a grant price and fair value of $32.83. As of July 31, 2012, 310,000 performance-based restricted shares were outstanding.

Effective July 20, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the fiscal 2008 performance-based restricted shares to provide for an additional two-year vesting period. These awards originally vested five years from the grant date upon meeting certain financial performance and service conditions. This modification resulted in a one-time cumulative reduction of $1.2 million in fiscal 2011 to share-based compensation expense in order to align the expense recognition with the amended vesting terms. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other three named executive officers currently have the following performance-based restricted shares affected by this amendment: Frank M. Jaehnert, 50,000 shares; Thomas J. Felmer, 35,000 shares; Peter C. Sephton, 35,000 shares; Allan J. Klotsche, 35,000 shares; and Matthew O. Williamson, 35,000 shares.

The Company granted 415,000 performance-based stock options during fiscal 2012, with a weighted average exercise price of $29.55 and a weighted average fair value of $10.01. The Company also granted 797,450 service-based stock options during fiscal 2012, with a weighted average exercise price of $27.05 and a weighted average fair value of $8.42.

Research and Development — Amounts expended for research and development are expensed as incurred.

Other comprehensive income — Other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, net unrealized gains and losses from cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, and the unamortized gain on the post-retirement medical plans net of their related tax effects.

The following table illustrates the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the periods presented. The unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges and the amortization of gain on the postretirement medical plan are presented net of tax:

	Unrealized (loss) gain  on cash flow hedges			Amortization of gain on post- retirement medical plan			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive income
Beginning balance, July 31, 2009	$	(53	)	$	1,942		$	51,162		$	53,051
Current-period change		(268	)		(585	)		(1,293	)		(2,146	)
Ending balance, July 31, 2010	$	(321	)	$	1,357		$	49,869		$	50,905
Current-period change		(833	)		831			62,995			62,993
Ending balance, July 31, 2011	$	(1,154	)	$	2,188		$	112,864		$	113,898
Current-period change		2,030			(1,210	)		(55,307	)		(54,487	)
Ending balance, July 31, 2012	$	876		$	978		$	57,557		$	59,411

The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income for the year ended July 31, 2012, as compared to the years ended July 31, 2011 was primarily due to the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against other currencies. The foreign currency translation adjustments line in the table above includes the impact of foreign currency translation, foreign currency translation on intercompany notes, and the settlements of the net investment hedges, net of tax.

Foreign Currency Translation — Foreign currency assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars at end of period rates of exchange, and income and expense accounts are translated at the weighted average rates of exchange for the period. Resulting translation adjustments are included in other comprehensive income.

Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if sustaining those positions is more likely than not. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which a change in judgment occurs.

Risk Management Activities — The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Foreign Currency Hedging — The objective of the Company’s foreign currency exchange risk management is to minimize the impact of currency movements on non-functional currency transactions and minimize the foreign currency translation impact on the Company’s foreign operations. While the Company’s risk management objectives and strategies are driven from an economic perspective, the Company attempts, where possible and practical, to ensure that the hedging strategies it engages in qualify for hedge accounting and result in accounting treatment where the earnings effect of the hedging instrument provides substantial offset (in the same period) to the earnings effect of the hedged item. Generally, these risk management transactions will involve the use of foreign currency derivatives to protect against exposure resulting from transactions in a currency differing from the respective functional currency.

The Company utilizes forward foreign exchange currency contracts to reduce the exchange rate risk of specific foreign currency denominated transactions. These contracts typically require the exchange of a foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed rate at a future date, with maturities of less than 18 months. These instruments may or may not qualify as hedges under the accounting guidance for derivative instruments and hedging activities based upon the intended objective of the contract. The fair value of these instruments at July 31, 2012 and 2011 was an asset of $953 and a liability of $6,109, respectively. As of July 31, 2012 and 2011, the notional amount of these outstanding forward exchange contracts was $61.2 million and $80.8 million. See Note 12 for more information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities.

The Company has designated a portion of its foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges and recorded these contracts at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For these instruments, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. At July 31, 2012 and July 31, 2011, unrealized gains of $1,348 and unrealized losses of $1,535 have been included in AOCI, respectively. All balances are expected to be reclassified from AOCI to earnings during the next fifteen months when the hedged transactions impact earnings.

The Company has designated a portion of its foreign exchange contracts as net investment hedges of the Company’s net investments in foreign operations and recorded these contracts at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For net investment hedges that meet the effectiveness requirements, the net gains or losses attributable to changes in spot exchange rates are recorded in cumulative translation within accumulated other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portions are to be recognized in earnings. Recognition in earnings of amounts previously recorded in cumulative translation is limited to circumstances such as complete or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. At July 31, 2012 and July 31, 2011, unrealized losses of $1,041 and $4,589 have been included in AOCI, respectively.

The Company also utilizes Euro-denominated debt designated as hedge instruments to hedge portions of the Company’s net investments in European foreign operations. As of July 31, 2012, the Company had €75.0 million foreign denominated debt outstanding designated as a net investment hedge of the Company’s net investment in its European foreign operations. See Note 12 for more information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. For net investment hedges that meet the effectiveness requirements, the net gains or losses attributable to changes in spot exchange rates are recorded in cumulative translation within accumulated other comprehensive income. Any ineffective portions are to be recognized in earnings. Recognition in earnings of amounts previously recorded in cumulative translation is limited to circumstances such as complete or substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the hedged foreign operation. At July 31, 2012 and July 31, 2011, unrealized gains of $2,635 and unrealized losses of $13,070 have been included in AOCI, respectively.

The Company also enters into forward exchange contracts to create economic hedges to manage foreign exchange risk exposure. The fair value of these instruments at July 31, 2012 and 2011 was $78 and $2, respectively. The Company has not designated these derivative contracts as hedge transactions, and accordingly, the mark-to-market impact of these derivatives is recorded each period in current earnings.

Hedge effectiveness is determined by how closely the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument offset the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is permitted only if the hedging relationship is expected to be highly effective at the inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis. Gains or losses on the derivative related to hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings. The amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not significant for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010.

New Accounting Standards — In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement,” which is intended to clarify three points that are part of FASB ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures: (1) only nonfinancial assets should be valued via a determination of their best use; (2) the value of an instrument in shareholder’s equity should be measured from the perspective of an investor or trader who owns that instrument, which is the same method for measuring a liability; and (3) businesses will have to provide data and disclose the methods used to value Level 3 assets, those that are difficult to price because they do not have observable pricing inputs since they have stopped trading in the open market. The Company adopted this ASU effective July 31, 2012; however, it does not have a material impact on the basis of reporting fair value or the related disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this standard require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Subsequently, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which indefinitely defers the requirements in ASU 2011-05 to present on the face of the financial statements adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented. The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in OCI. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the standard with its fiscal 2013 first quarter ending October 31, 2012. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-240, “Comprehensive Income – Presentation of Items Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” to solicit comments on a proposal to replace ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The proposed standard would require presentation of (1) the effects of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income for each component of accumulated OCI, (2) a tabular disclosure of how items reclassified out of accumulated OCI impact line items of net income if the item was required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified entirely into net income, and (3) references from effected components of accumulated OCI to other note disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for items not entirely reclassified into net income. Notably, the proposal specifically excludes from the new presentation requirements certain (1) postretirement benefit costs and (2) deferred acquisition costs related to certain insurance products. This update is tentatively applicable to companies with reporting periods ending after December 15, 2012, and would apply to both interim and annual reports. The Company is in the process of determining its method of presentation; however, it does not anticipate the adoption of these updates will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” to establish an optional two-step analysis for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. The two-step analysis establishes an optional qualitative assessment to precede the quantitative assessment, if necessary. In the qualitative assessment, the entity must evaluate the totality of qualitative factors, including any recent fair value measurements, that impact whether an indefinite-lived intangible asset other than goodwill has a carrying amount that more likely than not exceeds its fair value. The entity must proceed to conducting a quantitative analysis, according to which the entity would record an impairment charge for the amount of the asset’s fair value exceeding the carrying amount, if (1) the entity determines that such an impairment is more likely than not to exist, or (2) the entity foregoes the qualitative assessment entirely. The standards update will be effective for financial statements of periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.