-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FfneXOUxTqAHYF+4k0p3Vy6rQPmzMBHDz9Uo3nvNNiiXgbWXwPT35i5jscvGq+lw KsvYz+8zvSC9GfSdAyHUZA== 0000892626-99-000296.txt : 19990514 0000892626-99-000296.hdr.sgml : 19990514 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000892626-99-000296 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K405/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19981231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990513 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: JMB INCOME PROPERTIES LTD XI CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000744437 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 363254043 STATE OF INCORPORATION: IL FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K405/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15966 FILM NUMBER: 99618992 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: C/O JMB REALTY CORP STREET 2: 900 N MICHIGAN AVE CITY: CHICAGO STATE: IL ZIP: 60611 BUSINESS PHONE: 3129151700 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: C/O JMB REALTY CORP STREET 2: 900 N MICHIGAN AVE CITY: CHICAGO STATE: IL ZIP: 60611 10-K405/A 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K405/A AMENDMENT NO. 1 Filed pursuant to Section 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 Commission File Number 0-15966 JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI ------------------------------------------------------ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Illinois 36-3254043 ----------------------- ------------------------------------ (State of organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 900 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, Illinois 60611 --------------------------------------- ---------- (Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code) The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following section of its Report for the year ended December 31, 1998 on Form 10-K405 as set forth in the pages attached hereto: PART II ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Pages 11 through 15A. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI By: JMB Realty Corporation Managing General Partner GAILEN J. HULL By: Gailen J. Hull Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer Dated: May 12, 1999 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES As a result of the public offering of interests as described in Item 1, the Partnership had approximately $156,493,000 after deducting selling expenses and other offering costs, with which to make investments in commercial real property, to pay legal fees and other costs (including acquisition fees) related to such investments and for working capital. A portion of such proceeds was utilized to acquire the properties described in Item 1 above. The board of directors of JMB Realty Corporation ("JMB"), the managing general partner of the Partnership, has established a special committee (the "Special Committee") consisting of certain directors of JMB to deal with all matters relating to tender offers for Interests in the Partnership, including any and all responses to such tender offers. The Special Committee has retained independent counsel to advise it in connection with any potential tender offers for Interests and has retained Lehman Brothers Inc. as financial advisor to assist the Special Committee in evaluating and responding to these and any additional potential tender offers for Interests. During 1996, 1997 and 1998, some of the Limited Partners in the Partnership received from unaffiliated third parties unsolicited tender offers to purchase up to 4.9% of the Interests in the Partnership at between $125 and $400 per Interest. The Partnership recommended against acceptance of these offers on the basis that, among other things, the offer prices were inadequate. All of such offers expired. As of the date of this report, the Partnership is aware that 7.43% of the Interests have been purchased by such unaffiliated third parties either pursuant to such tender offers or through negotiated purchases. It is possible that other offers for Interests may be made by unaffiliated third parties in the future, although there is no assurance that any other third party will commence an offer for Interests, the terms of any such offer or whether any such offer, if made, will be consummated, amended or withdrawn. The Partnership has one remaining investment property, the Riverside Square Mall Shopping Center, which it is actively marketing for sale. There can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to complete a sale or liquidate the Partnership in the 1999-2000 time frame. At December 31, 1998, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $15,863,000. Such funds may be utilized for distributions to partners and for working capital requirements including operating deficits, costs of re-leasing vacant space, and certain capital improvements. Additionally, funds may be utilized to fund a potential theater expansion at the Riverside Square Mall investment property which would add approximately 20,000 square feet of space and would include new restaurants. The Partnership intends to fund the estimated cost of approximately $7.6 million for the expansion from its working capital reserves. However, the expansion, including the theater lease, is subject to many contingencies, including final documentation, and as such there can be no assurance that the expansion will be completed on these or any other terms. The Partnership's wholly-owned property has currently budgeted in 1999 approximately $4,274,000 for tenant improvements and other capital expenditures including the first phase of the theater expansion. Actual amounts expended in 1999 may vary depending on a number of factors including actual leasing activity, results of property operations, liquidity considerations, progression of the theater expansion and other market conditions, including the possible sale of the shopping center in 1999, over the course of the year. The source of capital for such items and for both short-term and long-term future liquidity and distributions is expected to be through net cash generated by the Riverside Square Mall and through its sale and/or refinancing. In such regard, reference is made to the Partnership's property specific discussions below and also to the Partnership's disclosure of certain property lease expirations in Item 6. 11 In February 1998, the Partnership made a distribution of sale proceeds related to the sale of the Royal Executive Park II office complex of $28,439,404 ($164 per Interest) and paid a special operating distribution of $2,774,576 ($16 per Interest), to the Limited Partners. In addition, effective in 1998, the Partnership changed from a semi-annual distribution of cash flow from operations of $6 per Interest to an annual distribution of $4 per Interest as a result of (a) the Partnership's reduction in cash flow from operations after the sales of the Royal Executive Park II office complex in December 1997 and the Park Center Financial Plaza office complex in February 1998 and (b) the need to reserve funds necessary for the potential theater/restaurant expansion at the Riverside Square Mall. The 1998 annual operating distribution of $693,644 ($4 per Interest) was made in May 1998. In addition, the Partnership made a distribution of sale proceeds of $24,277,540 ($140 per Interest) in May 1998 related to the sale in 1998 of the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza investment property. The General Partners have been deferring receipt of their distributions in accordance with the subordination requirements of the Partnership Agreement as discussed in the Notes. The Partnership's mortgage obligation is a separate non-recourse loan secured individually by the investment property. The Partnership is not personally liable for the payment of the mortgage indebtedness. SAN JOSE On February 24, 1998, San Jose sold the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza office complex to an independent third party for $76,195,000 (before selling costs). San Jose received approximately $49,537,000 of net sale proceeds at closing (after the repayment by San Jose of the mortgage loans secured by the 170 Almaden, 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings with a balance of approximately $23,281,000, loan prepayment premiums of approximately $2,422,000 and closing costs), of which the Partnership's share was approximately $24,768,500. Reference is made to the Notes for a further description of such sale. RIVERSIDE SQUARE MALL As previously disclosed, the Partnership has reached an agreement in principle with a theater operator to open a multiscreen theater complex at the mall. This expansion would add approximately 20,000 square feet of space and would include new restaurants. The Partnership intends to fund the estimated cost of approximately $7.6 million for the expansion from its working capital reserves. The Partnership received planning and zoning board approval from the City of Hackensack for such expansion in October 1998. However, this expansion, including the theater lease, is subject to many contingencies, including final documentation and the possible sale of the shopping center in 1999. As such there can be no assurance that this expansion will be completed on these or any other terms. The mortgage loan on the property in the original amount of $36,000,000 provided for rate adjustments every four years, beginning November 1, 1998. In addition, the loan allowed the Partnership to prepay the loan without penalty for a 60 day period every four years starting October 1, 1998. On May 1, 1998, in accordance with the loan documents, the lender notified the Partnership of the rate adjustment effective November 1, 1998. Given that the Partnership was actively marketing the property for sale and that the prepayment penalty would be substantial if the property were sold outside of the 60 day window provided in the loan documents, the Partnership elected not to accept the lender's rate adjustment. The election accelerated the maturity date of the loan to December 1, 1998, from December 1, 2006. On November 24, 1998, the Partnership finalized a new one-year mortgage loan in the amount of $34,000,000. The proceeds of the new loan were utilized to retire the previous mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of approximately $33,871,000. The net cost to the Partnership of refinancing, including costs and fees of approximately $255,000 was approximately $126,000. Reference is made to the Notes for a further description of such transaction. 12 GENERAL The Partnership continues to conserve its working capital. All expenditures are carefully analyzed and certain capital projects are deferred when appropriate. In an effort to reduce partnership operating expenses, the Partnership elected to make annual rather than semi-annual distributions of available operating cash flow commencing with the 1998 distribution. By conserving working capital, the Partnership will be in a better position to meet the future needs of its remaining property since the availability of satisfactory outside sources of capital may be limited given current debt levels. The Partnership has held its remaining investment property longer than originally anticipated in an effort to maximize the return to the Limited Partners. However, after reviewing the remaining property and the marketplace in which it operates, the General Partners of the Partnership expect to be able to conduct an orderly liquidation of its remaining investment portfolio as quickly as practicable upon the sale of its remaining investment property, the Riverside Square Mall, and the subsequent expiration of any representations and warranties to a potential purchaser that may be required in connection with a sale of the property. Consequently, the affairs of the Partnership are expected to be wound up in the 1999-2000 time frame, barring unforeseen economic developments. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The decrease in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the distribution in 1998 of sales proceeds related to the sale in 1997 of the Royal Executive Park II office complex as more fully discussed in the Notes. The decrease in rents and other receivables as of December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the lower occupancy levels and the timing of payment of rentals at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease in escrow deposits at December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the termination of the escrow accounts in conjunction with the November 1998 refinancing of the mortgage loan at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease in investment in unconsolidated ventures, at equity at December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the sale in 1998 of the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza investment property. The increase in current portion of long-term debt and corresponding decrease in long-term debt, less current portion as of December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the November 1999 maturity of the new mortgage loan secured by the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities as of December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is primarily due to a decrease in unearned rents due to the timing of the collection of rental income at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease is also due to an overfunding of approximately $136,000 in sale proceeds in December 1997 related to the Royal Executive Park II joint venture, which was returned to London and Leeds in January of 1998. The decrease in accrued interest payable as of December 31, 1998 as compared to December 31, 1997 is due to the variable interest rate on the new mortgage loan at the Riverside Square Mall investment property which is currently lower than the previous loan's rate. The increase in rental income for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to an increase in base rentals as a result of an increase in tenant occupancies in 1997 at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. 13 The increase in interest income for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the temporary investment of proceeds related to the 1997 sale of the Royal Executive Park II office complex and the 1998 sale of the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza office complex, which proceeds were subsequently distributed to the limited partners in February and May 1998, respectively. The decrease in depreciation expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to the Riverside Square Mall investment property being identified as held for sale or disposition as of September 30, 1997, and therefore, no longer subject to depreciation beyond such date. The decrease in property operating expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 is primarily due to a decrease in advertising expense due to the timing of promotional campaigns and also to a decrease in snow removal and certain maintenance and repair projects at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease is also due to a decrease in tenant occupancies during 1998 at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease in property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to the decrease in snow removal and other administrative expenses and certain maintenance and repair projects (partially recoverable from tenants) at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. However, the decrease is partially offset by an increase in certain other property operating expenses as a result of higher tenant occupancies in 1997 at the Riverside Square Mall investment property. The decrease in professional services for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to expenses incurred in 1996 in connection with tender offer matters as discussed above. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to the timing of the incurrence of reimbursable costs to affiliates of the General Partners. The decrease in the Partnership's share of operations of unconsolidated ventures for the twelve months ended December 31, 1998 as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 is primarily due to the sales of the Royal Executive Park II office complex and the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza office complex in December 1997 and February 1998, respectively. The increase in the Partnership's share of operations of unconsolidated ventures for the year ended December 31, 1997 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1996 is primarily due to such unconsolidated ventures being identified as held for sale or disposition as of December 31, 1996, and therefore, no longer subject to depreciation beyond such date. The Partnership's share of gain on sale of investment properties of unconsolidated venture of $20,648,190 in 1998 is due to the gain recognized on the sale of the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza investment property in February 1998. The Partnership's share of gain on sale of investment properties of unconsolidated ventures of $13,349,139 in 1997 is due to the gain recognized on the sale of the Royal Executive Park II office complex. The Partnership's share of gain on sale of investment properties of unconsolidated ventures of $1,412,610 in 1996 is due to the gain recognized on the sale of the 190 San Fernando Building and one of the parking structures at the Park Center Financial Plaza investment property. 14 The Partnership's extraordinary item from investment property is due to the write off of $237,805 of deferred mortgage expense in conjunction with the new mortgage loan put in place at the Riverside Square Mall investment property in November 1998. The Partnership's share of extraordinary loss from unconsolidated venture of $1,259,118 in 1998 comprises loan prepayment premiums of $1,211,062 and the write-off of the deferred mortgage balance of $48,056 resulting from the sale of the remaining assets of the Park Center Financial Plaza investment property in February 1998. INFLATION Due to the decrease in the level of inflation in recent years, inflation generally has not had a material effect on rental income or property operating expenses. Inflation is not expected to significantly impact future operations due to the expected liquidation of the Partnership in the 1999-2000 time frame. However, to the extent that inflation in future periods would have an adverse impact on property operating expenses, the effect would generally be offset by amounts recovered from tenants as many of the long-term leases at the Partnership's remaining commercial property have escalation clauses covering increases in the cost of operating and main- taining the property as well as real estate taxes. Therefore, there should be little effect from inflation on operating earnings if the property remains substantially occupied. In addition, substantially all of the leases at the Partnership's shopping center investment contain provisions which entitle the Partnership to participate in gross receipts of tenants above fixed minimum amounts. YEAR 2000 The year 2000 problem is the result of computer programs being written with two digits rather than four to define a year. Consequently, any computer programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations including, among other things, an inability to process transactions or engage in other normal business activities. In addition, other date- sensitive electronic devices could experience various operational difficulties as a result of not being year 2000 compliant. The Partnership uses the telephone, accounting, transfer agent and other administrative systems, which include both hardware and software, provided by affiliates of the Corporate General Partner and certain third party vendors. Except as noted in the following sentence, the Partnership or its affiliates have received representations to the effect that the telephone, accounting, transfer agent and other administrative systems are year 2000 compliant in all material respects. Both the hardware and software for individual personal computers used in the Partnership's administrative systems are expected to be tested for their year 2000 compliance during the summer of 1999. The property manager for the Riverside Square Mall has conducted an assessment of various aspects of the property's operating systems in regard to their year 2000 compliance. In general, such assessment was performed through written inquiries to third party vendors and service personnel for the property. Based on the responses to these inquiries, the Partnership believes that the major operating systems for the property, including HVAC controls, elevators and escalators, and alarm and safety systems, are or will be year 2000 compliant in all material respects. In addition, the Partnership believes that the computer hardware and software used in the administration of the property, including transaction processing and record keeping, is or will be year 2000 compliant in all material respects. 15 The Partnership does not believe that the year 2000 problem presents any material risks to its business, results of operations or financial condition and has not developed, and does not intend to develop, any contingency plans to address the year 2000 problem. Given its limited operations, the Partnership believes that its accounting, transfer agent and most of its other administrative systems functions could, if necessary, be performed manually (i.e., without significant information technology) for an extended period of time without a material increase in costs to the Partnership. The Partnership has not incurred and does not expect to incur, any material direct costs for year 2000 compliance. The Partnership is relying on the representation of various third party vendors and service personnel for the Riverside Square Mall in regard to that property's operating systems year 2000 compliance in all material respects. The Partnership is also relying on the property manager's assessment of the third party vendors and suppliers to be contacted in regard to year 2000 compliance. In the event that the Riverside Square Mall is not year 2000 compliant in all material respects, the property could experience various operational difficulties or systems failures. This could result in unanticipated remediation costs and, under certain circumstances, possible other costs and expenses. If such were to occur, there is no assurance that such costs and expenses would not, under certain circumstances, have a material adverse effect on the Partnership or its investment in the Riverside Square Mall in the event that the property is not sold during 1999. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Partnership has identified interest rate changes as a potential market risk. The Riverside Square Mall mortgage loan which matures on November 24, 1999 provides for interest only payments based on the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.3%. 15A -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----