XML 41 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Accounts Receivable (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Policies  
Accounts Receivable

Accounts Receivable

The Company extends credit to its customers, who are located nationwide.  Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms.  The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.  Management reviews accounts receivable on a regular basis, based on contractual terms and how recently payments have been received to determine if any such amounts will potentially be uncollected.  The Company includes any balances that are determined to be uncollectible in its allowance for doubtful accounts.  After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off.  The balance of the allowance account at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are $4,469 and $742 respectively.

On November 30, 2016, CLWD Operations entered into a 12-month agreement wherein amounts due from our customers were pledged to a third party, in exchange for a borrowing facility of up to $400,000.  The agreement was amended on March 23, 2017, which increased the allowable borrowing amount by $100,000, to $500,000. On November 30, 2017, the agreement renewed automatically for another twelve months.  The proceeds from the facility were determined by the amounts we invoiced our customers.  We recorded the amounts due from customers in accounts receivable and the amount due to the third party as a liability, presented under “Lines of credit” on the Balance Sheet.  During the term of this facility, the third-party lender had a first priority security interest in CLWD Operations’ assets, and therefore, we would have needed to obtain such third-party lender’s written consent to obligate CLWD Operations’ further or pledge its assets against additional borrowing facilities.  The cost of this secured borrowing facility was 0.05% of the daily balance. This borrowing facility had an expiration date of January 14, 2021 and was not renewed.  As of September 30, 2021, the balance due from this arrangement was zero.

On October 19, 2017, Parscale Digital entered into a 12-month agreement wherein amounts due from our customers were pledged to a third party, in exchange for a borrowing facility of up to $500,000. The proceeds from the facility were determined by the amounts we invoiced our customers.  The Company evaluated this facility in accordance with ASC 860, classifying it as a secured borrowing arrangement.  We recorded the amounts due from customers in accounts receivable and the amount due to the third party as a liability, presented as a “Lines of credit” on the Balance Sheet.  During the term of this facility, the third-party lender had a first priority security interest in Parscale Digital, and therefore, we would have needed to obtain such third-party lender’s written consent to obligate Parscale Digital further or pledge its assets against additional borrowing facilities.  The cost of this secured borrowing facility was 0.05% of the daily balance. On April 12, 2018, the Company amended the secured borrowing arrangement, which increased the maximum allowable balance by $250,000, to $750,000. This borrowing facility had an expiration date of November 11, 2020 and was not renewed.  As of September 30, 2021, the balance due from this arrangement was zero.

On August 2, 2018, Giles Design Bureau, WebTegrity, and Data Propria entered into 12-month agreements wherein amounts due from our customers were pledged to a third-party, in exchange for borrowing facilities of up to $150,000, $150,000 and $600,000, respectively.  The proceeds from the facility were determined by the amounts we invoiced our customers.  We evaluated these facilities in accordance with ASC 860, classifying as secured borrowing arrangements. We recorded the amounts due from customers in accounts receivable and the amount due to the third party as a liability, presented under “Lines of credit” on the Balance Sheet. During the term of these facilities, the third-party lender had a first priority security interest in the respective entities, and, therefore, we would have needed to obtain such third-party lender’s written consent to obligate the entities further or pledge our assets against additional borrowing facilities.  The cost of this secured borrowing facilities was 0.056%, 0.056% and 0.049%, respectively, of the daily balance. These three borrowing facilities had an expiration date of August 22, 2020 and were not renewed.  As of September 30, 2021, the combined balance due from these arrangement was zero.