UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2008

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                 

Commission file number 33-22224-B

Beverly National Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts	04-2832201
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
240 Cabot Street, Beverly, Massachusetts	01915
(Address of principal executive offices)	(zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 922-2100

Securities registered pursuant to Section l2(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock (Par Value $2.50)	NYSE: AMEX

Securities registered pursuant to l2(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes  ¨    No  x

Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section l3 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding l2 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨         Accelerated filer  ¨             Non-accelerated filer  ¨         Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes  ¨    No  x

As of June 30, 2008, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, is $58,248,740.

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 2,663,545 shares were outstanding as of March 12, 2009.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K are portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
ITEM 1—	BUSINESS	3
ITEM 2—	PROPERTIES	21
ITEM 3—	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	22
ITEM 4—	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	22
PART II
ITEM 5—	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	23
ITEM 7—	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	25
ITEM 7A—	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	32
ITEM 8—	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	34
ITEM 9—	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	72
ITEM 9A(T)—	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	72
ITEM 9B—	OTHER INFORMATION	73
PART III
ITEM 10—	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	74
ITEM 11—	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	74
ITEM 12—	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	74
ITEM 13—	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	75
ITEM 14—	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	75
PART IV
ITEM 15—	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	76
SIGNATURES		78

2

PART I

ITEM l. BUSINESS

Beverly National Corporation

Beverly National Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company” or the “Holding Company”), is a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Holding Company has one banking subsidiary, Beverly National Bank (the “Bank”). The principal executive office of the Company is located at 240 Cabot Street, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915, and the telephone number is (978) 922-2100. The website for the Company and the Bank is “www.beverlynational.com.” The Company provides a link on its website to its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such reports with the SEC. Also available on the website are the Company’s Code of Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Policy and Corporate Governance Policy.

The Company was incorporated in 1984 and became the bank holding company for the Bank in 1985. The Bank is believed to be among the oldest banks operating in the United States. The Bank became a national banking association on March 16, 1865. From 1802, until the creation of a national banking system in 1865, the Bank operated as a state chartered bank.

The Bank provides a broad array of consumer and commercial banking services to individuals and to small and mid-size businesses through eight full-service and two limited service branch locations in and around Essex County, Massachusetts. Seven of the full service branch locations are open six days a week and maintain “drive-through” facilities, while all eight branches have automatic teller machines (“ATMs”). The limited service branches operate under reduced hours and lack the “drive-through” infrastructure.

The Bank has made significant investments in its banking platform to enhance the long-term growth prospects of the Company. In order to implement its strategic plan, the Bank developed and implemented a growth-oriented business plan, and embarked upon a series of management initiatives designed to enhance the overall long-term profitability of the Company. As part of this plan, the Company has upgraded certain operational capabilities and business controls designed to monitor and identify underlying costs. The Company also maintains a management team comprised of banking professionals who have significant experience in the Bank’s primary market area and expertise in commercial, consumer and residential lending, along with retail operations.

The Bank has one subsidiary, Beverly National Security Corporation, which was established as a Massachusetts securities corporation for the exclusive purpose of buying, selling or holding investment securities.

The business of the Bank is not significantly affected by seasonal factors.

In the last five years the Bank derived its operating income from the following sources:

	% of Operating Income
	2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
Interest and fees on loans	84	%	65	%	68	%	63	%	58	%
Interest and dividends on securities and federal funds sold	26		19		18		19		21
Charges, fees and other sources	(10	)	16		14		18		21
	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

3

Market Area

The Company’s current primary market area is considered to be Essex County, Massachusetts. The Bank operates ten offices within the communities of Beverly, Danvers, Hamilton, Manchester, Salem and Topsfield, Massachusetts. All of the offices of the Bank are located within the North Shore Region of Massachusetts. However, as expansion of the franchise continues, the market area will likely encompass the greater North Shore Region, which is defined as Essex and Northern Middlesex counties in Massachusetts along with Southeastern New Hampshire. The Company believes that the current market area, as well as the greater North Shore Region, contains a significant number of small to mid-size businesses looking for a locally-based commercial bank that can offer an array of financial products and services that are not available at a typical community bank. The traditional banking relationships for many of these businesses have been displaced as a result of bank mergers in the area. Given the Company’s broad product offering, focus on customer service and local management, the organization can better serve the growing needs of both new and existing customers in its current and expanding market areas.

With branches located in the towns of Beverly, Danvers, Hamilton, Manchester, Salem and Topsfield in Essex County, Massachusetts, the Company operates in some of the most attractive markets in the North Shore Region. The strong concentration of wealth, coupled with the projected median household income growth of the Company’s current market area, should provide significant banking and lending opportunities for it to meet its strategic objectives. One of the goals of the Company is to leverage its brand recognition and further enhance the franchise by expanding into higher growth communities within its core Essex County marketplace.

The Company believes there is ample opportunity for it to increase its share of deposits within Essex County. As of June 30, 2008, the Bank held 2.3% of the deposits in Essex County through its ten offices. Two of the Bank’s ten offices are limited service branch facilities located within educational institutions. Of the 257 banking offices located within Essex County, recording $15.8 billion in deposits, Bank of America, TD BankNorth, Eastern Bank, Salem Five and Sovereign Bank account for 55.7% of the market.

Business Plan Initiatives and Strategy

The Company’s management team is focused on executing its business plan, and the Company has made significant investments in infrastructure and acquiring experienced lending personnel in order to enhance its long-term profitability. The overall strategy is to continue to grow the existing banking franchise to become one of the leading independent banks in the North Shore Region and to improve overall efficiency and profitability by:

• Taking advantage of opportunities created by the wealth characteristics and business activity in the North Shore Region;

• Capitalizing on the consolidation of banking institutions within the North Shore Region to attract dislocated customers and recruit experienced banking officers, directors and employees;

• Focusing on local management and a commitment to the local community in each of our market areas; and

• Attracting new customers in the markets currently served by providing personalized service in an efficient manner, together with a full range of high quality financial services and products.

Growing the Loan Portfolio and Deposits. In order to grow the Bank’s loans and deposits, the Company is undertaking the following initiatives:

• The Company is empowering Branch Managers to take a more active role in the growth of retail operations. The Company is committed to implementing a more sales oriented culture through the alignment of the incentive compensation structure with defined revenue growth and business development objectives. One major objective is to leverage customer relationships in trust and wealth

4

management services. As of December 31, 2008, there were $188 million in assets under management and $228 million in total assets in the custody of the Wealth Management Department. Given the wealth characteristics in the Company’s markets, it is developing specialized mortgage and consumer loan products to further enhance business opportunities with asset management clients.

• The Company has enhanced its overall lending capabilities through a series of initiatives, including the hiring of experienced lenders and strengthening underwriting, credit analysis and automation of certain processes. As a result, net loans have increased from $174.4 million at December 31, 2003 to $334.6 million at December 31, 2008, or 18.4% on an annualized basis.

• The commercial loan team consists of six lending officers, each with more than 15 years of operating experience in the Company’s market area. In an effort to improve operating efficiency and maximize the deposit relationships of commercial clients, the Company transferred management responsibility for commercial deposit relationships to the Senior Loan Officer and introduced a series of cash management services. These initiatives, coupled with recent improvements in the underwriting and credit administration/oversight process, will enable the Company to continue to leverage its resources as it grows its commercial loan portfolio.

Leveraging Infrastructure. The Company has made significant investments in its infrastructure consisting of its operating systems and personnel which are designed to accommodate long-term growth and profitability initiatives. As the Company grows into its infrastructure, it is expected to more effectively leverage resources while controlling expenses and maintaining a disciplined approach to control funding costs.

Maintaining Low Cost of Funds. The Bank is committed to maintaining low cost of funds and improving the composition of the deposit base by aggressively seeking core deposits. It has introduced a variety of deposit products designed to attract core deposits. These deposit products provide attractive features and benefits to customers while encouraging multiple account relationships. Lenders and relationship managers are seeking non-interest bearing deposits from new and existing lending customers. The growth of core deposits should help to achieve a lower overall cost of funds and should have a positive impact on net interest income.

Continuing Customer Orientation and Local Management. The business strategy is based on the assessment that customers prefer to conduct business with a bank that is managed by experienced local bankers. Therefore, lenders and relationship managers tend to be responsive to the needs of customers by providing them with prompt decisions and a high level of personal service.

As part of the Bank’s focus on customers, it provides a full array of financial services and products through the Bank or arrangements with third-party vendors, including:

• real estate, commercial and consumer loans;

• electronic transfer services, internet banking and bill paying services;

• deposit services;

• merchant capture;

• wealth management services; and

• ATMs, debit cards, credit cards and merchant services.

Supervision and Regulation

General

The supervision and regulation of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the Deposit Insurance Funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the banking system as a whole. The banking agencies have broad enforcement power over bank holding companies and banks, including the power to impose substantial fines and other penalties for violations of laws and regulations.

5

The following description summarizes some of the laws to which the Company and the Bank are subject. References in the following description to applicable statutes and regulations are brief summaries of these statutes and regulations, do not purport to be complete, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations. Management believes that the Company and the Bank are in compliance in all material respects with these laws and regulations.

The Company

As a bank holding company, operations are subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (“Federal Reserve Board”). The Federal Reserve Board has established capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies that are similar to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (“OCC”) capital guidelines applicable to the Bank. The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, (the “BHC Act”), limits the types of companies that a bank holding company may acquire or organize and the activities in which it or they may engage. In general, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries are only permitted to engage in, or acquire direct control of any company engaged in banking or in a business so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. Federal legislation enacted in 1999 authorizes certain entities to register as financial holding companies. Registered financial holding companies are permitted to engage in businesses, including securities and investment banking businesses, which are prohibited to bank holding companies. While the creation of financial holding companies is evolving, to date there has been no significant impact on the Company. If the Company wants to engage in businesses permitted to financial holding companies but not to bank holding companies, the Company would need to register with the Federal Reserve Board as a financial holding company.

Under the BHC Act, the Company is required to file annually with the Federal Reserve Board a report of its operations. The Company, the Bank and any other subsidiaries are subject to examination by the Federal Reserve Board. In addition, the Company will be required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board to acquire, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any bank or bank holding company, to acquire all or substantially all of the assets of a bank or to merge or consolidate with another bank holding company. Moreover, the Company, the Bank and any other subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that bank holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividend and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board has also indicated that it could be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to applicable law, the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the bank holding company’s bank subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized.”

A bank holding company is required to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated retained earnings. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Riegle-Neal Act”) was enacted to ease restrictions on interstate banking. The Riegle-Neal Act allows the Federal Reserve Board to approve an application of an adequately capitalized and adequately managed bank holding company to acquire control of, or acquire all or substantially all of the assets of, a bank located in a state other than such holding company’s state, without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited by the laws of any state. The Federal Reserve Board may

6

not approve the acquisition of a bank that has not been in existence for the minimum time period (not exceeding five years) specified by the statutory law of the host state. The Riegle-Neal Act also prohibits the Federal Reserve Board from approving an application if the applicant (and its depository institution affiliates) controls or would control more than 10% of the insured deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the deposits in the target bank’s home state or in any state in which the target bank maintains a branch. The Riegle-Neal Act does not affect the authority of states to limit the percentage of total insured deposits in the state which may be held or controlled by a bank or bank holding company to the extent that such limitation does not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies. Individual states may also waive the 30% statewide concentration limits contained in the Riegle-Neal Act.

Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries. Bank regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” to resolve problems associated with insured depository institutions whose capital declines below certain levels. In the event an institution becomes “undercapitalized,” it must submit a capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiary’s compliance with the capital restoration plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institution’s holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.

The aggregate liability of the holding company of an undercapitalized bank is limited to the lesser of 5% of the institution’s assets at the time it became undercapitalized or the amount necessary to cause the institution to be “adequately capitalized.” The bank regulators have greater power in situations where an institution becomes “significantly” or “critically” undercapitalized or fails to submit a capital restoration plan. For example, a bank holding company controlling such an institution can be required to obtain prior Federal Reserve Board approval of proposed dividends, or might be required to consent to a consolidation or to divest the troubled institution or other affiliates.

Beverly National Bank

The Bank is a nationally chartered banking association, the deposits of which are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. The Bank’s primary regulator is the OCC. By virtue of the insurance of its deposits, however, the Bank is also subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC. Such supervision and regulation subjects the Bank to certain restrictions, requirements, potential enforcement actions, and periodic examination by the OCC. Because the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Company as a holding company parent of the Bank, the Federal Reserve Board also has supervisory authority, which directly affects the Bank.

Federal and state banking regulations regulate, among other things, the scope of the business of a bank, a bank holding company or a financial holding company, the investments a bank may make, deposit reserves a bank must maintain, the nature and amount of collateral for certain loans a bank makes, the establishment of branches and the activities of a bank with respect to mergers and acquisitions. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and is subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and regulations thereunder. The Bank is subject to the federal regulations promulgated pursuant to the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act to prevent banks from engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, as well as various other federal and state laws and consumer protection laws. The Bank is also subject to the comprehensive provisions of the National Bank Act.

Branching. The establishment of a branch must be approved by the OCC, which considers a number of factors, including financial history, capital adequacy, earnings prospects, character of management, needs of the community and consistency with corporate powers.

Restrictions on Distribution of Subsidiary Bank Dividends and Assets. Dividends paid by the Bank have provided a substantial part of the Company’s operating funds, and for the foreseeable future, it is anticipated that dividends paid by the Bank to the Company will continue to be the Company’s principal source of operating funds. Capital adequacy requirements serve to limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. Until

7

capital surplus equals or exceeds capital stock, a national bank must transfer to surplus ten percent of its net income for the preceding four quarters in the case of an annual dividend or ten percent of its net income for the preceding two quarters in the case of a quarterly or semiannual dividend. At December 31, 2008, the Bank’s capital surplus exceeded its capital stock. Without prior approval, a national bank may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends declared by the bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of the bank’s retained net income for the current year and retained net income for the preceding two years. Under federal law, a bank cannot pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the bank will be “undercapitalized.” The OCC may declare a dividend payment to be unsafe and unsound even though the bank would continue to meet its capital requirements after the dividend.

Because the Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary, its right to participate in the distribution of assets of any subsidiary upon the subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. In the event of a liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors are entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of holders of any obligation of the institution to its shareholders, arising as a result of their status as shareholders, including any depository institution holding company (such as the Company) or any shareholder or creditor thereof.

Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders. Transactions between the Bank and its non-banking affiliates, including the Company, are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the bank. In general, Section 23A imposes limits on the amount of such transactions, and also requires certain levels of collateral for loans to affiliated parties. It also limits the amount of advances to third parties which are collateralized by its securities or obligations or those of its non-banking subsidiaries.

Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which generally requires that certain transactions between the Bank and its affiliates be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated persons. The Federal Reserve has issued Regulation W codifying prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and interpretive guidance with respect to affiliate transactions.

The restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests (collectively referred to herein as “insiders”) contained in the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all insured depository institutions and their subsidiaries. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot exceed the institution’s total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the OCC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions.

Capital Adequacy Requirements. Similar to the Federal Reserve Board’s requirements for bank holding companies, the OCC has adopted regulations establishing minimum requirements for the capital adequacy of national banks. The OCC may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a bank has previously received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk.

The OCC’s risk-based capital guidelines generally require national banks to have a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and a ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets was 11.45%. At December 31, 2008, the Bank’s Tier 1 capital amounted to 8.69% of average assets and risk-based capital amount of 12.61% of total risk-based assets.

The OCC’s leverage guidelines require national banks to maintain Tier 1 capital of no less than 4.0% of average total assets, except in the case of certain highly rated banks for which the requirement is 3.0% of average

8

total assets unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank’s ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total assets (leverage ratio) was 8.69%.

Corrective Measures for Capital Deficiencies. The federal banking regulators are required to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to capital-deficient institutions. Agency regulations define, for each capital category, the levels at which institutions are “well-capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “under-capitalized,” “significantly under-capitalized” and “critically under-capitalized.” A “well-capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 5.0% or higher; and is not subject to any written agreement, order or directive requiring it to maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An “adequately capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 4.0% or higher (3.0% or higher if the bank was rated a composite 1 in its most recent examination report and is not experiencing significant growth); and does not meet the criteria for a well-capitalized bank. A bank is “under-capitalized” if it fails to meet any one of the ratios required to be adequately capitalized. At December 31, 2008, the Bank met the capital requirements of a “well-capitalized” institution under applicable OCC regulations.

In addition to requiring under-capitalized institutions to submit a capital restoration plan, agency regulations authorize broad restrictions on certain activities of undercapitalized institutions including asset growth, acquisitions, branch establishment and expansion into new lines of business. With certain exceptions, an insured depository institution is prohibited from making capital distributions, including dividends, and is prohibited from paying management fees to control persons if the institution would be under-capitalized after any such distribution or payment.

As an institution’s capital decreases, the OCC’s enforcement powers become more severe. A significantly under-capitalized institution is subject to mandated capital raising activities, restrictions on interest rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of management and other restrictions.

Banks with risk-based capital and leverage ratios below the required minimums may also be subject to certain administrative actions, including the termination of deposit insurance upon notice and hearing, or a temporary suspension of insurance without a hearing in the event the institution has no tangible capital.

Community Reinvestment Act. In addition to other laws and regulations, the Company is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act, or the CRA, which requires the federal bank regulatory agencies, when considering certain applications involving the Company or the Bank, to consider their record of helping to meet the credit needs of the entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA was originally enacted because of concern over unfair treatment of prospective borrowers by banks and over unwarranted geographic differences in lending patterns. Existing banks have sought to comply with CRA in various ways; some banks have made use of more flexible lending criteria for certain types of loans and borrowers (consistent with the requirement to conduct safe and sound operations), while other banks have increased their efforts to make loans to help meet identified credit needs within the consumer community, such as those for home mortgages, home improvements and small business loans. For example, this may include participation in various government insured lending programs, such as Federal Housing Administration insured or Veterans Administration guaranteed mortgage loans, Small Business Administration loans, and participation in other types of lending programs such as high loan-to-value ratio conventional mortgage loans with private mortgage insurance. To date, the market area from which the Company draws much of its business is Essex County in Massachusetts. As the Company continues to expand, the market areas it serves will continue to evolve. The Company has not and will not adopt any policies or practices, which discourage credit applications from, or unlawfully discriminate against, individuals or segments of the communities it serves.

USA Patriot Act. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, was enacted to further strengthen domestic security following the

9

September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. This Act amends various federal banking laws, particularly the Bank Secrecy Act, with the intent to curtail money laundering and other activities that might be undertaken to finance terrorist actions. Financial institutions in the United States are required to enhance already established anti-money laundering policies, procedures and audit functions and ensure that controls are reasonably designed to detect instances of money laundering through certain correspondent or private banking accounts. Financial institutions are also required to verify customer identification, maintain verification records and cross check names of new customers against government lists of known or suspected terrorists.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The primary purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) is to protect investors through improved corporate governance and heightened responsibilities of, and disclosures by, public companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains provisions for the limitations of services that external auditors may provide as well as requirements for the credentials of audit committee members. In addition, the principal executive and principal financial officers are required to certify in quarterly and annual reports that they have reviewed the report; and based on the officers’ knowledge, the reports accurately present the financial condition and results of operations of the company and contain no untrue statement or omission of material fact. The officers also certify their responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls which insure that all material information is made known to the officers; this certification also includes the evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and their impact upon financial reporting. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that each annual report include an internal control report which states that it is the responsibility of management to establish and maintain an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting, as well as an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. This section further requires that the external auditors attest to, and report on, the assessment made by management.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and the Troubled Asset Relief Program. In response to unprecedented market turmoil and the financial crises affecting the overall banking system and financial markets in the United States, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) was enacted in October 2008. On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Stimulus Bill”) was enacted, which among other things augmented certain provisions of the EESA. Under the EESA, the Treasury Department has authority, among other things, to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage loans, mortgage-related securities and certain other financial instruments, including debt and equity securities issued by financial institutions in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (the “TARP”). The purpose of the TARP is to restore confidence and stability to the U.S. banking system and to encourage financial institutions to increase their lending to customers and to each other.

Pursuant to the EESA, the Treasury Department was initially authorized to use $350 billion for the TARP. Of this amount, the Treasury Department allocated $250 billion to the TARP Capital Purchase Program (see description below). On January 15, 2009, the second $350 billion of TARP monies was released to the Treasury Department.

The TARP Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) was developed to purchase $250 billion in senior preferred stock from qualifying financial institutions, and was designed to strengthen the capital and liquidity positions of viable institutions and to encourage banks and thrifts to increase lending to creditworthy borrowers. The amount of the Treasury Department’s preferred stock a particular qualifying financial institution could be approved to issue would be not less than 1% of risk-weighted assets and not more than the lesser of $25 billion or 3% of risk-weighted assets.

The general terms of the TARP CPP for publicly traded bank holding companies include:

• dividends on the Treasury Department’s preferred stock at a rate of five percent for the first five years and nine percent thereafter;

• common stock dividends cannot be increased for three years while the Treasury Department is an investor unless preferred stock is redeemed or consent from the Treasury is received;

10

• the Treasury Department must consent to any buyback of other stock (common or other preferred);

• the Treasury Department’s preferred stock will have the right to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for six periods;

• the Treasury Department receives warrants to purchase a number of shares of common stock having an aggregate market price for common stock equal to 15 percent of the Treasury Department’s total investment in the participating institution; and

• the participating institution and its executives must agree to compensation restrictions, and restrictions on the amount of executive compensation that is tax deductible. These provisions have been revised by Congress and the Treasury multiple times since the TARP CPP program was announced.

In November, 2008, the Company submitted an application to participate in the TARP CPP. In January, 2009, the Company filed preliminary proxy soliciting material with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to a Special Meeting of Shareholders to consider and vote upon an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Organization to enable the Company to participate in the TARP CPP. In December, 2008, the Company received preliminary approval from the Treasury to participate in the TARP CPP in an amount of $10.6 million. Throughout this period, the Company monitored the public perception of participants in the TARP CPP as well as the Company’s potential need for the TARP CPP capital.

On February 13, 2009, the Company announced that it had reevaluated its preliminary decision to participate in the TARP CPP. Management and the board believes that it would not be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to accept the investment by the U.S. Treasury. The board determined that the Company is in sound financial condition and exceeds all the capital requirements under the definition of a “well capitalized” institution and the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio as of December 31, 2008 remains strong. Given the Bank’s ability to continue to meet the banking needs of its customers and the potential for additional restrictions being placed on participants in the TARP CPP, the board determined that the level of uncertainty and potential risks of the TARP CPP exceeds the potential benefits. Therefore, the board determined that due to the Company’s current financial condition and the availability of alternative sources of capital to support asset growth, the Company will not participate in the TARP CPP.

The EESA also established a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) that gives the FDIC the ability to provide a guarantee for newly-issued senior unsecured debt and non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts at eligible insured institutions. The Company has no current plans to participate in the senior unsecured debt of the TLGP. The Company is currently participating in the guarantee program for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts. For non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, a 10 basis point annual rate surcharge will be applied to deposit amounts in excess of $250,000.

Deposit Insurance. The Bank’s deposits are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, up to the maximum applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF.

Effective January 1, 2007 the FDIC adopted a new risk-based insurance assessment system designed to tie what banks pay for deposit insurance more closely to the risks they pose. The FDIC also adopted a new base schedule of rates that the FDIC could adjust up or down, depending on the needs of the DIF, and set initial premiums for 2007 that ranged from 5 cents per $100 of domestic deposits in the lowest risk category to 43 cents per $100 of domestic deposits for banks in the highest risk category.

Recently, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan that would increase the reserve ratio to the 1.15% threshold within seven years. As part of that plan, in December, 2008, the FDIC voted to increase risk-based assessment rates uniformly, on an annual basis for the first quarter of 2009 due to deteriorating financial conditions in the banking industry. Changes to the risk-based assessment system include increasing premiums for institutions that

11

rely on excessive amounts of brokered deposits, including CDARS, increasing premiums for excessive use of secured liabilities, including Federal Home Loan Bank advances, lowering premiums for smaller institutions with very high capital levels, and adding financial ratios and debt issuer ratings to the premium calculations for banks with over $10 billion in assets, while providing a reduction for their unsecured debt. It is generally expected that rates will continue to increase in the near future due to the significant cost of bank failures beginning in the third quarter of 2008 and the increase in the number of troubled banks. The FDIC recently announced that, in view of the significant decrease in the deposit insurance funds’ reserves, it will impose a special assessment in the second quarter of 2009. Banks must continue to pay base premium rates on top of any special assessment. Furthermore, banks may be subject to an “emergency” special assessment in 2009 in addition to other special assessments and regular premium rates. The amount of an emergency special assessment imposed on a bank will be determined by the FDIC if such amount is necessary to provide sufficient assessment income to repay amounts borrowed from the Treasury; to provide sufficient assessment income to repay obligations issued to and other amounts borrowed from insured depository institutions; or for any other purpose the FDIC may deem necessary.

The enactment of the EESA (discussed above) temporarily raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. The temporary increase in deposit insurance coverage became effective on October 3, 2008. EESA provides that the basic deposit insurance limit will return to $100,000 after December 31, 2009. In addition, pursuant to the guarantee program for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts under the TLGP in which the Bank has elected to participate, which provides a temporary unlimited guarantee of funds in non-interest bearing accounts, as defined, a 10 basis point annual rate surcharge will be applied to deposit amounts in excess of $250,000.

Except for the significantly increased assessments which are associated with FDIC insurance for even well capitalized banks, the Company does not anticipate that compliance with applicable federal and state banking laws will have a material adverse effect on its business or the business of the Bank. Neither the Company nor the Bank have any material patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises, concessions and royalty agreements or labor contracts, other than the charter granted to the Bank by the OCC.

Effect on Economic Environment. The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Board, have a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the Federal Reserve Board to affect the money supply are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits.

Federal Reserve Board monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the business and earnings of the Company and that of its subsidiaries cannot be predicted.

Employees

As of December 31, 2008, the Company and the Bank employed 122 officers and employees, of which 100 were full time. Our employees are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

12

Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity;

Interest Rates and Interest Differential

The following table presents average balances, interest income, interest expense and the corresponding yields earned and rates paid for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. The total dollar amount of interest income from earning assets and the resultant yields are calculated on a tax equivalent basis.

	Year Ended December 31
	2008						2007
	Average Balance		Interest Inc/Exp		Yield/ Rate		Average Balance		Interest Inc/Exp		Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits	$	4,219	$	61	1.45	%	$	3,278	$	144	4.40	%
Investments (1)		120,813		6,673	5.52	%		120,028		6,269	5.22	%
Loans (1), (2), (3)		332,959		20,482	6.15	%		316,152		21,029	6.65	%
Total interest-earning assets	$	457,991		27,216	5.94	%	$	439,458		27,442	6.24	%
LIABILITIES
Savings deposits	$	54,493		635	1.17	%	$	48,208		390	0.81	%
NOW accounts		53,976		320	0.59	%		58,252		471	0.81	%
Money market accounts		92,004		2,228	2.42	%		86,206		3,117	3.62	%
Time deposits		85,188		3,116	3.66	%		84,792		3,962	4.67	%
Short term borrowings		78,068		2,809	3.60	%		65,338		3,073	4.70	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		363,729		9,108	2.50	%		342,796		11,013	3.21	%
Non-interest-bearing deposits		70,841		—				73,027		—
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities	$	434,570		9,108	2.10	%	$	415,823		11,013	2.65	%
Net interest income			$	18,108					$	16,429
Net interest spread					3.44	%					3.03	%
Net interest margin					3.95	%					3.74	%

(1) Interest income and yield are stated on a fully tax-equivalent basis. The total amount of adjustment for investments is $358,000 and $243,000 for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The total amount of adjustment for loans is $336,000 and $347,000 for 2008 and 2007, respectively. A federal tax rate of 34% was used in performing this calculation.

(2) Includes loan (costs) fees of ($179,000) and $112,000 for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

(3) Includes non-accruing loan balances and interest received on non-accruing loans.

13

The following table shows, for the period indicated, the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and interest rates.

	Year Ended December 31, 2008 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
	Due to a change in:
	Volume (1)			Rate (1)			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income from:
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits	$	41		$	(124	)	$	(83	)
Investments		41			363			404
Loans, net of unearned income		1,118			(1,665	)		(547	)
Total		1,200			(1,426	)		(226	)
Interest expense on:
Savings deposits		51			194			245
NOW accounts		(35	)		(116	)		(151	)
Money market accounts		210			(1,099	)		(889	)
Time deposits		18			(864	)		(846	)
Short-term Borrowings		599			(863	)		(264	)
Total		843			(2,748	)		(1,905	)
Net Interest Income	$	357		$	1,322		$	1,679

(1) The change in interest attributed to both rate and volume has been allocated to the changes in the rate and the volume on a pro-rated basis.

Investment Portfolio

The Company’s investment portfolio is managed internally pursuant to an investment policy adopted by the Board of Directors. The Bank does not utilize an investment advisory firm to manage the portfolio. The investment policy authorizes management to invest in a variety of instruments that are allowed and approved by the Bank’s primary regulatory agency. The policy has established limits as to a percentage of the portfolio and to total assets for each of the various security types and maximum size per individual investment. The investment strategy is to keep the duration of the investment portfolio within seven years, with limitations as to extension risk given changes in interest rates. The portfolio is managed to provide income through yield, while providing cash flow and maturities structured to allow for adjustment with changes in market rates and to fund future asset growth.

14

The following table shows the stated maturities, amortized cost basis and weighted average yields of the Company’s consolidated investments in available-for-sale debt, preferred stock and trust preferred securities at December 31, 2008. The yields on state and municipal securities are presented on a tax equivalent basis. A federal tax rate of 34% was used in performing this calculation. Preferred stocks with perpetual maturities have been included with securities maturing after ten years.

	Within one year				After one but within five years				After five but within ten years				After ten years
	Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield		Amount		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Maturing:
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government corporations and agencies	$	1,000	4.71	%	$	—	—		$	2,500	5.12	%	$	4,690	5.46	%
Mortgage-backed securities		195	4.65	%		13,904	4.14	%		8,630	4.46	%		47,637	5.69	%
Debt securities issued by States of the United States and political subdivisions of the States		320	5.56	%		2,320	5.02	%		357	5.16	%		9,322	5.84	%
Debt securities issued by foreign governments		400	5.05	%		—	—			—	—			—	—
Corporate debt securities		1,955	8.38	%		—	—			—	—			—	—
Preferred stocks and trust preferred securities		—	—			—	—			—	—			11,699	5.99	%
Total	$	3,870			$	16,224			$	11,487			$	73,348

Loan Portfolio

The following table summarizes the distribution of the Bank’s loan portfolio as of December 31 for the years indicated (in thousands):

	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	50,952		$	39,343		$	48,201		$	42,034		$	45,520
Real estate—construction and land development		4,326			17,042			20,890			16,413			5,786
Real estate—residential		125,281			120,512			106,930			98,007			83,954
Real estate—commercial		141,497			127,819			112,237			98,761			87,366
Consumer		2,398			2,392			3,102			4,949			6,536
Other		13,656			14,193			13,664			8,968			6,997
		338,110			321,301			305,024			269,132			236,159
Allowance for loan losses		(4,127	)		(3,614	)		(3,044	)		(2,514	)		(2,181	)
Deferred loan costs, net		656			669			687			638			652
Net Loans	$	334,639		$	318,356		$	302,667		$	267,256		$	234,630

Most of the Bank’s business activity is with customers located within Massachusetts. The majority of the Bank’s loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by real estate located in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

The types of loans offered by the Bank include a broad spectrum of commercial loans, typical of those offered by community banks, along with a broad array of residential mortgage loans and other consumer-based loans. The Bank’s residential real estate loans include both fixed and variable rate loans. The Bank also offers construction mortgage loans and revolving equity loans secured by residential mortgages.

15

In addition to relying upon the adequacy of collateral, the Bank’s primary underwriting consideration with respect to such loans are the ability of the borrower to repay the loan and the sources of available funds to repay such loans.

The Bank offers a variety of commercial loans. Generally, such loans are secured by real estate and are supported with personal guarantees. Such loans may be structured on a term or demand basis. Additional underwriting concerns by the Bank with respect to such loans include the ability of commercial borrowers to withstand interest rate increases, reduced revenue and an assessment of the borrower’s ability to complete its project management, as well as an assessment of industry and economic considerations. Generally, loan to value limits for real estate loans do not exceed 80% if the premises are owner occupied or 70% if the premises are not owner occupied. However, under certain circumstances, such as instances in which the borrowers demonstrate exceptional cash flow, such loan to value standards may be exceeded with proper authorization consistent with the Bank’s lending policies. The Bank also offers a variety of consumer loans on both a secured and unsecured basis.

Loan Maturities and Rates

The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2008 regarding the dollar amount of principal repayments becoming due during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments that significantly shorten the average life of loans and may cause actual repayment experience to differ from that shown. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less. The amounts shown below (in thousands) exclude applicable loans in process, unearned interest on consumer loans and deferred loan fees.

	Commercial		Construction		Residential Real Estate		Commercial Real Estate		Consumer		Other		Total Loans
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	25,350	$	3,718	$	25,491	$	31,023	$	2,125	$	160	$	87,867
More than one year to three years		6,928		255		21,829		35,822		106		2,999		67,939
More than three years to five years		13,296		—		14,525		29,551		167		1,610		59,149
More than five years to fifteen years		5,378		—		25,880		37,244		—		8,887		77,389
More than fifteen years		—		353		37,556		7,857		—		—		45,766
Total amount due	$	50,952	$	4,326	$	125,281	$	141,497	$	2,398	$	13,656	$	338,110

The following table sets forth the dollar amounts of all loans at December 31, 2008 that are due after December 31, 2009 and have either fixed interest rates or variable interest rates. The amounts shown below (in thousands) exclude applicable loans in process, unearned interest on consumer loans and deferred loan fees.

	Fixed Rates		Variable Rates		Total
Commercial	$	19,645	$	5,957	$	25,602
Residential Real Estate		69,868		29,922		99,790
Commercial Real Estate		47,836		63,246		111,082
Consumer		273		—		273
Other		1,381		12,115		13,496
Total loans	$	139,003	$	111,240	$	250,243

16

Non-Accrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans

It is the policy of the Bank to discontinue the accrual of interest on loans when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the full amount of interest is considered doubtful. This will generally occur once a loan has become ninety days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Restructured loans generally may have a reduced interest rate, an extension of loan maturity, future benefits for current concessions and a partial forgiveness of principal or interest; there were no restructured loans outstanding at any of the dates presented. The following table sets forth information on non-accrual and past due loans (in thousands), as of the years indicated:

	2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
Total loans, non-accrual	$	186	$	259	$	16	$	2	$	529
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	186	$	259	$	16	$	2	$	529

The amount of interest income recorded on non-accrual loans and restructured loans outstanding for the period, amounted to $0 in 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and $12,000 in 2004. Had these loans performed in accordance with their original terms, the amount recorded would have been $0 in 2008 and 2007, $2,000 in 2006 and 2005, and $83,000 in 2004.

As of December 31, 2008, there were no loans included above that were known by management to have possible credit problems of the borrowers that caused management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms.

The Bank did not have any foreclosed real estate assets or other real estate owned at any of the dates presented.

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

The following table summarizes historical data with respect to average loans outstanding, loan losses and recoveries, and the allowance for loan losses at December 31 for each of the years indicated:

	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in thousands)
Average loans outstanding, net of unearned income	$	332,959		$	316,152		$	291,982		$	248,025		$	204,651
Allowance for loan losses
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,614		$	3,044		$	2,514		$	2,181		$	2,183
(Charge-offs):
Real estate—residential		(97	)		—			—			(141	)		—
Commercial, financial & agricultural		(260	)		—			—			(242	)		(609	)
Consumer		(2	)		(15	)		(10	)		(25	)		(33	)
Recoveries:
Real estate—residential		36			142			—			—			—
Commercial, financial & agricultural		22			45			4			154			77
Consumer		—			3			3			2			3
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(301	)		175			(3	)		(252	)		(562	)
Provision for loan losses		814			395			590			585			560
Reserve for unfunded commitments reclassified to other liabilities		—			—			(57	)		—			—
Balance at period end	$	4,127		$	3,614		$	3,044		$	2,514		$	2,181
Ratio of net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans		(0.09	)%		0.06	%		—			(0.10	)%		(0.27	)%

17

Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance for loan losses is maintained to provide for losses that are currently identified or are inherent on loans in the current portfolio. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to current operations and is decreased by loan losses, net of recoveries. The provision for loan losses is based on Management’s evaluation of current and anticipated economic conditions, changes in the character and size of the loan portfolio, and other indicators. The balance in the allowance for loan losses is considered adequate by Management to absorb any reasonably foreseeable loan losses.

The following table reflects the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the percentage of loans in each category to total outstanding loans as of December 31 for each of the years indicated:

	2008				2007				2006				2005				2004
	Amount		Percent of loans in category to total loans		Amount		Percent of loans in category to total loans		Amount		Percent of loans in category to total loans		Amount		Percent of loans in category to total loans		Amount		Percent of loans in category to total loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agriculture & construction	$	860	16.3	%	$	1,169	17.6	%	$	1,152	22.6	%	$	1,147	21.7	%	$	911	21.6	%
Real estate—residential		632	37.1	%		527	37.5	%		368	35.1	%		283	36.4	%		226	35.7	%
Real estate—commercial		2,337	41.9	%		1,766	39.8	%		1,358	36.8	%		1,073	36.7	%		1,035	36.9	%
Consumer		298	0.7	%		8	0.7	%		7	1.0	%		6	1.8	%		5	2.8	%
Other		—	4.0	%		144	4.4	%		159	4.5	%		5	3.4	%		4	3.0	%
Total	$	4,127	100.0	%	$	3,614	100.0	%	$	3,044	100.0	%	$	2,514	100.0	%	$	2,181	100.0	%

The Bank formally determines the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis. This determination is based on assessment of credit quality or “risk rating” of loans by senior management, which is submitted to the Board of Directors for approval. Loans are initially risk rated when originated and reviewed periodically. If there is deterioration in the credit, the risk rating is adjusted accordingly.

The allowance also includes a component resulting from the application of the measurement criteria of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Impaired loans receive individual evaluation of the allowance necessary on a quarterly basis. The Bank’s Loan Policy states that when it is probable that the Bank will not be able to collect all principal and interest due according to the terms of the note, the loan is considered impaired.

Commercial loans and construction loans are considered to be impaired under any one of the following circumstances: non-accrual status; loans over ninety days delinquent; troubled debt restructures consummated after December 31, 1994; or loans classified as “doubtful”, meaning that they have weaknesses which make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The individual allowance for each impaired loan is based upon an assessment of the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The loss factor applied as a general allowance is determined by a periodic analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses. This analysis considers historical loan losses as well as delinquency figures and trends.

Concentrations of credit and local economic factors are also evaluated on a periodic basis. Historical average net losses by loan type are examined and any identified trends are assessed. The Bank’s loan mix over that same period of time is also analyzed. A loan loss allocation is made for each type of loan and multiplied by the loan mix percentage for each loan type to produce a weighted average factor.

18

At December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses totaled $4.1 million representing 2,219% of non-performing loans, which totaled $186,000, and 1.2% of total loans of $338.8 million. This compared to an allowance for loan losses of $3.6 million representing 1,395% of non-performing loans, which totaled $259,000, and 1.1% of total loans of $322.0 million at December 31, 2007.

The Bank charged off a total of $359,000 of loans during 2008 as compared to $15,000 charged off during 2007. A total of $58,000 was recovered on previously charged off loans during 2008 compared to $190,000 recovered during 2007. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. However, while management estimates loan losses using the best available information, no assurances can be given that future additions to the allowance will not be necessary based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions, further information obtained regarding problem loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of management’s control. Additionally, with expectations of the Bank to continue to grow its loan portfolio, ongoing periodic provisions to the allowance are likely to be necessary to maintain adequate coverage ratios.

Deposits

One of the primary strategic initiatives is to maintain a low cost of funds and improve the composition of our deposit base by aggressively seeking core deposits. The Bank has introduced a variety of deposit products designed to attract core deposits. These deposit products provide attractive features and benefits to customers while encouraging multiple account relationships. The Bank’s lenders and relationship managers seek non-interest bearing deposits from new and existing lending customers. The growth of core deposits should help to achieve a lower overall cost of funds and should have a positive impact on net interest income.

The following table summarizes the Bank’s deposits as of December 31 for the years indicated (in thousands):

	2008		% of Total		2007		% of Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Demand deposits	$	74,872	22.05	%	$	72,425	20.67	%
NOW accounts		52,380	15.43	%		58,841	16.80	%
Money market accounts		80,085	23.59	%		81,585	23.29	%
Savings deposits		60,168	17.72	%		48,336	13.80	%
Time deposits		72,028	21.21	%		89,123	25.44	%
Total	$	339,533	100.00	%	$	350,310	100.00	%

As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 and more, aggregating $23.4 million. These certificates of deposit mature as follows (in thousands):

Maturity	Amount
3 months or less	$	8,185
Over 3 months through 6 months		4,043
Over 6 months through 12 months		6,687
Over 12 months		4,514
Total	$	23,429

Other Borrowed Funds

The securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2008 are securities sold on a short-term basis by the Bank and are accounted for not as sales but as borrowings. The securities consisted of mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations, debt securities issued by states of the

19

United States and political subdivisions of the states and preferred stocks. The securities were held in the Bank’s various safekeeping accounts, which are all under the control of the Bank. The securities are pledged to the purchasers of the securities. The purchasers have agreed to sell to the Bank substantially identical securities at the maturity of the agreements. Listed below are the securities sold under agreements to repurchase for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):

	2008			2007
Average balance outstanding	$	11,148		$	9,608
Weighted average rate		2.36	%		3.59	%

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances represent daily transactions that the Bank uses to manage its funds and liquidity position to comply with regulatory requirements. Interest rates fluctuate daily, reflecting existing market conditions. Listed below is information concerning FHLB borrowings for the years indicated (dollars in thousands):

	2008			2007
Federal Home Loan Bank advances:
Average balance outstanding	$	66,920		$	55,730
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end during the period	$	84,425		$	61,406
Balance outstanding at the end of period	$	84,425		$	59,616
Weighted average interest rate during the period		3.80	%		4.89	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period		2.51	%		4.20	%

Summarized quarterly financial data for 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

	2008 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30		Sept 30			Dec 31
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	6,708	$	6,752	$	6,642		$	6,420
Interest expense		2,627		2,338		2,208			1,935
Net interest and dividend income		4,081		4,414		4,434			4,485
Provision for loan losses		128		235		225			226
Noninterest income		1,182		1,193		1,131			1,040
Write-down of available-for-sale securities		—		—		3,724			3,247
Noninterest expense		3,942		4,009		3,898			3,952
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,193		1,363		(2,282	)		(1,900	)
Income taxes		283		347		392			(2,481	)
Net income (loss)	$	910	$	1,016	$	(2,674	)	$	581
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.34	$	0.38	$	(1.00	)	$	0.22
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution	$	0.34	$	0.38	$	(1.00	)	$	0.22

20

	2007 Quarter Ended
	March 31		June 30		Sept 30		Dec 31
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	6,456	$	6,731	$	6,844	$	6,822
Interest expense		2,481		2,741		2,902		2,888
Net interest and dividend income		3,975		3,990		3,942		3,934
Provision for loan losses		150		100		75		70
Noninterest income		1,170		1,270		1,259		1,228
Noninterest expense		3,884		3,963		3,848		3,758
Income before income taxes		1,111		1,197		1,278		1,334
Income taxes		304		315		357		374
Net income	$	807	$	882	$	921	$	960
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.34	$	0.36
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution	$	0.29	$	0.32	$	0.33	$	0.36

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

All properties owned by the Company are held by the holding company, Beverly National Corporation. All properties leased are leased by the Bank.

Description	Location	Square Feet	Owned/ Leased	Lease Expiration
Main Office	240 Cabot Street, Beverly, MA	15,000	Owned	n/a
Operation Center	246 Cabot Street, Beverly, MA	12,000	Owned	n/a
South Hamilton Office	25 Railroad Avenue, South Hamilton, MA	2,382	Owned	n/a
Topsfield Office	15 Main Street, Topsfield, MA	2,310	Leased	February 2010
North Beverly Plaza Office	63 Dodge Street, Beverly, MA	3,558	Leased	October 2026
Cummings Center Office	100 Cummings Center, Suites 101M and 101N, Beverly, MA	3,502	Leased	September 2016
Manchester Office	11 Summer Street, Manchester-by-the-Sea, MA	1,250	Leased	December 2028
Danvers Office	107 High Street, Danvers, MA	6,650	Leased	August 2024
Salem Office	6 Paradise Road, Salem , MA	2,634	Leased	April 2017
Hamilton-Wenham Regional High School Branch Office	Bay Road, Hamilton, MA	340	n/a	n/a
Beverly High School Branch Office	Sohier Road, Beverly, MA	491	n/a	n/a

The Bank has fourteen ATMs in Massachusetts, of which five are stand alone. The Bank also has six cash dispensing machines at various retail locations.

See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for information about minimum rental payments in future periods on the Company’s leased facilities.

In management’s opinion, all properties occupied by the Bank are in good condition, and are adequate at present and for the foreseeable future for the purposes for which they are being used and are properly insured.

21

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank is a party or to which any of the Company’s properties are subject. There are no material proceedings known to management to be contemplated by any governmental authority. From time to time, the Company is involved in a variety of litigation in the ordinary course of business and anticipates that it will continue to become involved in new litigation matters in the future.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008.

22

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Price of Common Stock and Dividend Policy

Prior to June 19, 2006, there was limited trading in the Company’s common stock, which was not listed on any public exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers National Market System or the Small Cap Market System. Commencing June 19, 2006, the Company’s common stock trades on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) under the symbol “BNV”.

The following table sets forth, to the best knowledge of management, the representative high and low sales prices as reported for each quarterly period during 2008 and 2007, and the cash dividends declared during such periods. The sale prices of these market trades of our common stock are based on transactions reported on AMEX.

	High and Low Sales Prices Common Stock				Cash Dividends Declared
	High		Low
Fiscal Year 2007
First Quarter	$	23.75	$	21.36	$	0.20
Second Quarter		22.40		20.50		0.20
Third Quarter		22.00		19.45		0.20
Fourth Quarter		21.90		19.95		0.20
Fiscal Year 2008
First Quarter	$	21.25	$	18.36	$	0.20
Second Quarter		20.50		18.45		0.20
Third Quarter		20.24		17.39		0.20
Fourth Quarter		20.00		13.15		0.20

On March 12, 2009, there were 306 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

The Company’s policy has been to pay dividends out of funds in excess of the needs of the business. The Company has declared and paid cash dividends to its shareholders on a quarterly basis at a rate of $0.20 per share in each quarter of 2008 and 2007.

The Company’s ability to pay future dividends on its common stock depends on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. In accordance with OCC rules and regulations, the Bank may continue to pay dividends only if the total amount of all dividends that will be paid, including the proposed dividend, by the Bank in any calendar year does not exceed the total of the Bank’s retained net income of that year to date, combined with the retained net income of the preceding two years, unless the proposed dividend is approved by the OCC. In addition, the OCC and/or the FDIC may impose further restrictions on dividends. The Company currently intends to continue to pay cash dividends, subject to compliance with Federal Reserve Board policy, OCC rules and regulations, state corporation laws, financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, covenants contained in various financing agreements, management’s assessment of future capital needs and other factors considered by the board of directors.

For restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, see Note 17, of the Financial Statements.

23

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (as of December 31, 2008)

Plan Category	Equity Compensation Plan Information			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
	(a)	(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	8,635	$	14.82	18,725	(1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	4,126	$	13.37	—
Total	12,761	$	14.35	—

(1) This figure represents the 18,725 shares that may be issued as restricted stock, in accordance with Beverly National Corporation 2005 Restricted Stock Plan.

24

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing the Company’s financial statements, Management selects and applies numerous accounting policies. In applying these policies, Management must make estimates and assumptions. The accounting policy that is most susceptible to critical estimates and assumptions is the allowance for loan losses. The determination of an appropriate provision is based on a determination of the probable amount of credit losses in the loan portfolio. Many factors influence the amount of potential charge-offs of loans deemed to be uncollectible. These factors include the specific characteristics of the loan portfolio and general economic conditions nationally and locally. While Management carefully considers these factors in determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary due to changed conditions, which could have an adverse impact on reported earnings in the future. See “Provision for Loan Losses.”

General

The Company does not transact any material business other than through its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank’s results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan and investment portfolios and its cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by the Bank’s provision for loan losses, fee income from wealth management and trust services and fees generated from loan and deposit products and, when strategically appropriate, investment and loan sale activities. The Bank’s non-interest expense principally consists of compensation and employee benefits, office occupancy and equipment expense, data processing, advertising and business promotion, professional fees and other expenses. Results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may also materially impact the Bank.

The unprecedented decline in the economic condition of the United States, as well as world-wide, has created numerous challenges for the Bank. The deterioration of the United States’ housing market has caused a world-wide credit crisis and led to some of the most volatile financial markets in history. This economic uncertainty is a key factor in the financial decision-making process for both commercial and consumer banking customers.

The Company’s net income for 2008 was significantly impacted by other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges on two trust preferred pool securities and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock investments. These OTTI charges amounted to $7.0 million, $4.2 million net of tax. After these charges, the Company reported a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 of $167,000, or a basic and fully diluted loss of $0.06 per share.

Excluding the OTTI charges and related tax benefit, the Company’s core net income for the year ended December 31, 2008, would have been $4.0 million, or basic and fully diluted earnings of $1.48 per share, compared to net income of $3.6 million, or basic and fully diluted earnings of $1.31 and $1.30 per share, respectively, for the same period last year. The adjusted results for the year would have represented an 11.1% increase in net income and a 13.0% increase in earnings per share.

25

Operating Strategy

Management’s primary goal has been to maintain the Bank’s profitability, asset quality and its capital position by: (i) investing in one- to four-family loans secured by properties located in its primary market area; (ii) investing in multi-family, commercial real estate and construction and development loans secured by properties located in the Bank’s primary market area, to the extent that such loans meet the Bank’s general underwriting criteria; (iii) commercial and small business lending to businesses in the Bank’s primary market area; (iv) offering wealth management and trust services to customers in the Bank’s primary market area; (v) investing funds not utilized for loan investments in various equity and corporate debt investments and mortgage-backed and mortgage-related securities; and (vi) managing interest rate risk by emphasizing the origination of prime-based and adjustable-rate loans and short-term fixed-rate loans and investing in short-term securities and generally selling longer-term fixed-rate loans that the Bank originates. The Bank intends to continue this operating strategy in an effort to enhance its long-term profitability while maintaining a reasonable level of interest rate risk and enhance such strategy by expanding the products and services it offers, as necessary, in order to improve its market share in its primary market area. In this regard, the Bank offers 24-hour banking by telephone, debit card services and Internet banking.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

Total assets at December 31, 2008 were $485.5 million, compared to $472.8 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $12.7 million, or 2.7%. Asset growth was primarily due to the increase in the loan portfolio, which was funded by the increase in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Investments totaled $103.6 million and were all classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $11.2 million, or 9.7%, compared to $114.8 million of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2007. The decrease is a result of the write-down of other than temporarily impaired securities, totaling $7.0 million; the pay downs in the mortgage-backed securities portfolio and management’s decision to more selectively reinvest cash flows generated from the investment portfolio.

Loans receivable, net of the allowance for loan losses and unearned income, increased $16.3 million, or 5.1%, to $334.6 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $318.4 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in the loan portfolio was a net result of a $13.7 million, or 10.7%, increase in commercial real estate loans; an $11.6 million, or 29.5%, increase in commercial, financial and agricultural loans; a $4.8 million, or 4.0%, increase in residential real estate loans; and a $12.7 million, or 74.6%, decrease in real estate construction and land development loans. Due to the overall growth of the loan portfolio and the state of the economy, the allowance for loan losses increased $513,000 to $4.1 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $3.6 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of 14.2%.

Deposits decreased 3.1%, to $339.5 million at December 31, 2008 from $350.3 million at December 31, 2007. The decline in deposits was primarily the net result of decreases in time deposits and NOW accounts, which offset the increase in savings accounts, as demand deposits and money markets remained consistent. Management decided not to compete for high rate deposits, a competitive market involving both local and national banks focused on gaining market share. Instead, the Bank focused on maintaining existing customers and gathering new core deposits. This strategy included a continued investment in new retail opportunities, which is part of the Bank’s commitment to provide its customers with a broader array of products and services. The Bank has introduced a number of new products, alternative investment services, small business deposit products, commercial services and delivery channels such as home banking, on-line bill pay, and debit cards.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston totaled $84.4 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $59.6 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $24.8 million, or 41.6%. The advances were used to fund loan growth and cover deposit outflows. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $13.3 million at December 31, 2008, compared to $11.6 million at December 31, 2007, an increase of $1.7 million, or 14.2%.

26

Total stockholders’ equity was $41.0 million, or 8.5% of total assets at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $4.7 million, or 10.3%, from $45.8 million, or 9.7% of total assets at December 31, 2007. The decrease in stockholders’ equity was primarily the result of the increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss, comprised of the mark-to-market effect on the investment portfolio and the Bank’s retirement benefit plans, and the payment of dividends to shareholders. The Company’s book value per share at December 31, 2008 was $15.41, compared to $17.32 at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $1.91, or 11.0%.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $167,000, as compared to net income of $3.6 million last year. Basic loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $0.06, versus basic and diluted earnings of $1.31 and $1.30, respectively, per share for the year ended December 31, 2007. The results for 2008 were reduced by charges, net of tax, of $4.2 million for the write-down of other than temporarily impaired securities. Net income for 2008, excluding these charges, would have been $4.0 million, with basic and fully diluted earnings of $1.48 per share. These adjusted results would have resulted in a 12.0% increase in net income and a 13.0% increase in earnings per share.

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $26.5 million, compared to $26.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of 1.2%. The decrease was the result of a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets. The yield on these assets decreased 30 basis points to 5.94%, a result of lower market interest rates in 2008. The average balance of interest-earning assets increased from $439.5 million for the year 2007 to $458.0 million for the year 2008, an increase of $18.5 million, or 4.2%. This was primarily a result of an increase in average loans to $333.0 million for 2008, compared to $316.2 million for 2007, an increase of $16.8 million, or 5.3%.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $9.1 million, compared to $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of $1.9 million, or 17.3%. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the decrease in interest rates, which resulted in a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 3.21% to 2.50%. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased to $363.7 million for the year 2008, from $342.8 million for the year 2007, an increase of $20.9 million, or 6.1%.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $814,000 for the year, compared to $395,000 last year. The increase in the level of the provision for the year ended December 31, 2008 was strategic, as despite stable asset quality, the Bank was aware of the potential effect deteriorating economic conditions could have on its loan portfolio. Management believed that the increase in loans and economic uncertainty and related risks, including an increase of $344 thousand in charge-offs and a decrease of $132 thousand in reserves of previously charged-off loans, warranted an increase in the provisions for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2008. This strategy included increasing the quarterly loan loss provision, resulting in an increased coverage ratio. Management believes that the provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses are currently reasonable and adequate to cover any losses reasonably expected in the existing loan portfolio.

While management estimates loan losses using the best available information, no assurances can be given that future additions to the allowance will not be necessary based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions, further information obtained regarding problem loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of management’s control. Additionally, with the expectation of the Bank to continue the growth of its loan portfolio, future additions to the allowance will most likely be necessary to maintain adequate coverage. For further discussion, see Note 2 to the Financial Statements.

27

Noninterest Income

For the year ended December 31, 2008, noninterest income, before the write-downs of other than temporarily impaired securities, totaled $4.5 million, compared to $4.9 million last year, a decrease of $382,000, or 7.8%. The impact of the impairment write-downs, pre-tax, of $7.0 million resulted in a total noninterest charge for 2008 of $2.4 million. Also affecting total noninterest income was a decrease in Wealth Management fee income, a result of the decrease in the market value of managed assets perpetuated by volatile financial markets. The decrease in other income was due to a decrease in interest earned on cash in banks, a decrease in interchange fees resulting from the addition of a rewards program, the decrease in the market value of assets held in a Rabbit Trust and a decrease in rental income from third parties.

The following table sets forth the various components of noninterest (charges) income for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the dollar amount and percentage change between the periods:

	December 31,					Increase (Decrease)
	2008			2007		$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income from fiduciary activities	$	1,802		$	1,941	$	(139	)	-7.16	%
Fees from sale of non-deposit products		253			236		17		7.20	%
Service charges on deposit accounts		632			623		9		1.44	%
Other deposit fees		879			927		(48	)	-5.18	%
Gain on calls of available-for-sale securities, net		—			1		(1	)	-100.00	%
Writedown of available-for-sale securities		(6,971	)		—		(6,971	)	—
Gain on sales of loans, net		6			6		—		—
Income on cash surrender value of life insurance		301			232		69		29.74	%
Other income		673			962		(289	)	-30.04	%
Total noninterest (charges) income	$	(2,425	)	$	4,928	$	(7,353	)	-149.21	%

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense was $15.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, a slight increase from $15.5 million for the same period last year. The increase in 2008 was primarily due to an increase in occupancy expenses, which included a full year of operating expenses for our Salem branch, which opened in June 2007. The operation of the Salem Branch also contributed to higher salaries and employee benefits expenses. This offset a decrease in professional fees, as 2007 included a full year of expenses related to an efficiency review.

The following table sets forth the various components of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the dollar amount and percentage change between the periods:

	December 31,				Increase (Decrease)
	2008		2007		$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	8,745	$	8,527	$	218		2.56	%
Director fees		299		309		(10	)	-3.24	%
Occupancy expense		1,854		1,587		267		16.82	%
Equipment expense		902		882		20		2.27	%
Data processing fees		1,210		1,139		71		6.23	%
Marketing and public relations		417		461		(44	)	-9.54	%
Professional fees		748		907		(159	)	-17.53	%
Other expense		1,626		1,640		(14	)	-0.85	%
Total noninterest expense	$	15,801	$	15,452	$	349		2.26	%

28

Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2008, an income tax benefit of $1.5 million was provided on losses before taxes of $1.6 million. This benefit is the result of the write-down of other then temporarily impaired securities, which had a tax benefit of $2.8 million. Before this write-down and accompanying tax benefit, the effective rate would have been 25.3%, compared to $1.4 million on income before taxes of $4.9 million, for an effective rate of 27.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate is the result of increases in the average balances of tax-exempt municipal securities and preferred stocks eligible for the dividends received deduction.

Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had total capital in the amount of $41.0 million, a decrease of $4.7 million, or 10.3%, from $45.8 million at December 31, 2007. The capital ratios of the Company and the Bank exceed applicable regulatory requirements (see Note 17 to the Financial Statements).

Liquidity

Liquidity is measured by the Bank’s ability to raise funds instantaneously by converting assets or liabilities to cash at either minimum or no loss to the Bank. As a matter of policy, liquidity is managed so that general operations can be funded and any extraordinary needs can be met. The goal of the Bank’s liquidity management effort is to deploy excess funds so that profits can be maximized while the continuity of operations is maintained.

The factors that have most influenced the Bank’s liquidity policy are as follows:

(1) reliability and stability of the Bank’s deposit base

(2) quality of the asset portfolio

(3) maturity structure and pledging status of the Bank’s investment portfolio

(4) potential for loan demand

(5) possibility of extraordinary liquidity demands

(6) anticipated changes in loan repayments

(7) level of the Bank’s non-performing and non-earning assets.

In addition, it is recognized that liquidity and asset/liability management are two closely related components of the Bank’s overall financial management. If asset/liability gaps are matched, assets and liabilities will be maturing and/or re-pricing at about the same time. This will keep the Bank from becoming illiquid or vulnerable to changes in interest rates.

The Bank measures its liquidity on three distinct levels.

Primary liquidity serves as a source of funds to meet the immediate cash needs of the Bank. Primary liquidity includes cash on hand and due from banks, un-pledged securities that mature in 30 days or less, federal funds sold and the current un-advanced portion of an available line-of-credit (FHLB). Primary liquidity is calculated on at least a monthly basis and reported as part of the management ALCO reports. The current internal guideline for primary liquidity is 3% to 10% of total assets.

Secondary liquidity is intended as an additional source of funds for the Bank to meet intermediate and long-term cash needs to fund growth expectations and any unexpected funding demands on the Bank. Secondary liquidity consists of un-pledged investment securities available for sale, at current market value, and the un-advanced portion of available borrowing capacity at the FHLB. The Bank is also awaiting approval of a

29

borrowing line at the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window, which will provide the Bank with significant additional available liquidity. The current internal guideline for secondary liquidity is 5% to 20% of total assets. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had total approved borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston of $132.3 million. Total advances outstanding as of December 31, 2008 were $84.4 million, leaving available borrowing capacity of approximately $47.8 million.

Total liquidity is the combination of the primary and secondary liquidity and is the total measure of the Bank’s growth capacity before the generation of additional deposits. It is the intention of the Bank to cover all foreseeable demands for cash and still maintain a total liquidity ratio of 10% to 25% of total assets.

As of December 31, 2008 the Bank is in compliance with the established internal guidelines, with primary liquidity, secondary liquidity and total liquidity of 4.83%, 11.93% and 16.77% of total assets, respectively.

As an additional source of liquidity, the Bank has the ability to use brokered deposits as a source of funds. The Bank monitors the market for these products and if rates warrant they will be considered as an additional source of liquidity. The Bank has established a limit of 10% of deposits as a maximum level of such deposits. As of December 31, 2008 the Bank had no brokered certificates of deposit.

The primary function of liquidity management is to assure adequate liquidity and maintain an appropriate balance between interest-sensitive earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. Interest rate sensitivity management seeks to avoid fluctuating net interest margins and to enhance consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates.

Certain marketable investment securities, particularly those of shorter maturities, are the principal source of asset liquidity. The Company maintains such securities in an available-for-sale account as a liquidity resource. Securities maturing in one year or less amounted to $3.9 million at December 31, 2008; additionally, a minimum amount of contractual payments in the amount of $29.8 million for the mortgage-backed securities portfolio is due within one year at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, $58.8 million of the Bank’s certificates of deposit and $41.3 million in borrowings are expected to mature in one year or less. Assets such as federal funds sold, mortgages held for sale, pre-payments and payoffs on mortgage-backed securities, as well as maturing loans, are also sources of liquidity.

30

Gap Analysis

The Company’s objectives are to be substantially neutral with respect to interest rate sensitivity and maintain a net cumulative gap at one year of less than +/-25% of total assets. The Company’s current practices are consistent with these objectives. The Company believes that it is successfully managing its interest rate risk consistent with these goals. Listed below is a gap analysis as of December 31, 2008 by re-pricing date or maturity.

	0-31 Days			1-3 Months			3-6 Months			6-12 Months			1-5 Years			Over 5 Years
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	9		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Federal funds sold		6,550			—			—			—			—			—
Short-term investments		363			—			—			—			—			—
Investments (1)		3,826			9,491			12,387			14,426			36,737			33,383
Total loans		40,204			21,409			14,295			24,860			140,938			97,059
Total earning assets		50,952			30,900			26,682			39,286			177,675			130,442
LIABILITIES
Noninterest bearing deposits		—			—			—			—			—			74,872
Savings		—			—			—			—			—			60,168
NOW accounts		—			—			—			—			—			52,380
Money market accounts		—			29,158			3,395			6,790			40,742			—
Total time deposits		8,647			14,023			14,918			21,106			13,334			—
Total deposits		8,647			43,181			18,313			27,896			54,076			187,420
Borrowed funds		31,900			5,500			—			2,454			22,571			22,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		13,289			—			—			—			—			—
Total liabilities		53,836			48,681			18,313			30,350			76,647			209,420
Net asset (liability) gap	$	(2,884	)	$	(17,781	)	$	8,369		$	8,936		$	101,028		$	(78,978	)
Cumulative gap	$	(2,884	)	$	(20,665	)	$	(12,296	)	$	(3,360	)	$	97,668		$	18,690
% cumulative gap		-0.59	%		-4.26	%		-2.53	%		-0.69	%		20.12	%		3.85	%

(1) Includes Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. In the opinion of Management, these off-balance sheet arrangements are not likely to have a material effect on the Company’s financial conditions, results of operations, or liquidity. For a discussion of this matter, please see Note 15 to the Financial Statements.

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-K and future filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other filings, reports and press releases made or issued by the Company and the Bank, and oral statements made by executive officers of the Company and the Bank, may include forward-looking statements relating to such matters as:

(a) assumptions concerning future economic and business conditions and their effect on the economy in general and on the markets in which the Company and the Bank do business; and

31

(b) expectations for increased revenues and earnings for the Company and Bank through growth resulting from acquisitions, attraction of new deposit and loan customers and the introduction of new products and services.

Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions rather than historical or current facts and, therefore, are inherently uncertain and subject to risk. For those statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995.

The Company notes that a variety of factors could cause the actual results or experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations described or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may effect the operation, performance, development and results of the Company’s and Bank’s business include the following:

(a) the risk of adverse changes in business conditions in the banking industry generally and in the specific markets in which the Bank operates;

(b) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment that negatively impact the Company and Bank through increased operating expenses;

(c) increased competition from other financial and non-financial institutions;

(d) the impact of technological advances; and

(e) other risks detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Such developments could have an adverse impact on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial position and results of operation.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices. In particular, the market price of interest-earning assets and liabilities may be affected by changes in interest rates. Since net interest income (the difference or spread between the interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings) is the Company’s primary source of revenue, interest rate risk is the most significant non-credit related market risk to which the Company is exposed. Net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates as well as fluctuations in the level and duration of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

The Company’s average net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to 3.95%, in comparison to the 3.74% for the year ended December 31, 2007. Interest rate risk is the exposure of net interest income to movements in interest rates. In addition to directly impacting net interest income, changes in interest rates can also affect the amount of new loan originations, the ability of borrowers to repay variable rate loans, the volume of loan prepayments and re-financings, the carrying value of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and the flow and mix of deposits.

Asset/Liability Management

The Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) is comprised of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; the Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer; the Executive Vice President and Senior Loan Officer; the Executive Vice President of Retail Banking; the Senior Vice President of Operations; the Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer; and various lending and finance officers. This Committee is responsible for managing interest rate risk in accordance with policies approved by the Board of Directors regarding acceptable levels of interest rate risk, liquidity and capital. This Committee meets regularly and sets the rates on deposits and loan products, approves loan pricing strategies, reviews investment transactions and sets other strategic initiatives that relate to balance

32

sheet management and structure as considered necessary. This Asset/Liability Management Committee reports to the Board of Director ALCO Committee, which is comprised of several independent Directors and the President and Chief Executive Officer.

The Company is subject to interest rate risk in the event that interest rates increase or decrease. The two primary measurements of exposure to changes in interest rates, which the Bank manages and monitors closely, are net interest income simulation, using various interest rate scenarios, and rate shocks, and their impact on the economic value of equity, given specific interest rate scenarios.

The Bank works with an independent third party consultant to calculate and review these various measurements. The Board and Management ALCO committees meet with the third party consultant on a quarterly basis to review the results of the current period as measured against established guidelines, trends from previous analyses and the impact of the strategies put in place on actual period over period results and to formulate strategies and direction to comply with established guidelines and to adjust to current economic conditions and direction.

Net Interest Income Simulation

As part of its risk management practices, the Company runs net interest income simulations to determine the impact on net interest income given an increase or decrease in interest rates, as these changes would have an impact on future levels of net interest income. These simulations require that estimates and assumptions be made with respect to deposit pricing; including potential changes in non-maturity core deposits, and reinvestment of cash flows from the loan and investment portfolios given changes in rates both up and down. The results of the most recent simulation are as follows:

	December 31, 2008
	Projected net interest income		Change from Year 1 base case
			$			%
	(Dollars in thousands)
Year 1 Projections:
Down 100 basis points	$	18,635	$	96		0.52	%
Base		18,539		—		—
Up 200 basis points		18,086		(452	)	(2.44	)%
Year 2 Projections:
Down 100 basis points	$	17,958	$	(581	)	(3.13	)%
Base		18,207		(332	)	(1.79	)%
Up 200 basis points		17,891		(648	)	(3.49	)%

The above changes in net interest income are within the risk tolerance levels established by the Company policies.

Economic Value of Equity

In the event that interest rates increase or decrease, the economic value of equity (EVE) changes due to its inherent correlation to changes in the market value of the Company’s assets and liabilities. The Company is considered “liability sensitive” if changes in the interest rate would cause the assets of the Company to extend out, and as a result, liabilities would re-price faster than assets. Conversely, the Company is considered “asset sensitive” if interest rate changes cause liabilities to extend out, thus making assets re-price faster than liabilities.

As of December 31, 2008, the capital ratio of the Company on an EVE basis, at current rate levels, is 9.33%. Based on the most recent analysis it is estimated that an immediate increase in interest rates of 200 basis points (for example, an increase in the prime rate from 3.25% to 5.25%) would result in an EVE capital ratio of 8.69%. Alternatively, if interest rates were to decrease by 100 basis points, the EVE capital ratio is estimated to be 9.04%. These changes are within the risk tolerance levels established by the Company policies.

33

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

Description	Page Reference
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007	36
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	37
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	38-39
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	40-41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	42-68
Parent Company Only Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007	69
Parent Company Only Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	70
Parent Company Only Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007	71

34

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Beverly National Corporation

Beverly, Massachusetts

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Beverly National Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Beverly National Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts

March 24, 2009

83 PINE STREET · WEST PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960-3635 · TELEPHONE (978) 535-0206 · FACSIMILE (978) 535-9908

smc@shatswell.com                            www.shatswell.com

35

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2008			2007
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	9,628		$	10,752
Federal funds sold		6,550			3,706
Interest-bearing demand deposits with other banks		9			115
Short-term investments		363			922
Cash and cash equivalents		16,550			15,495
Investments in available-for-sale securities (at fair value)		103,623			114,793
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		4,086			3,452
Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost		553			553
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses of $4,127 and $3,614, respectively		334,639			318,356
Premises and equipment		8,386			7,321
Accrued interest receivable		1,769			1,805
Other assets		15,899			11,016
Total assets	$	485,505		$	472,791
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	74,872		$	72,425
Interest-bearing		264,661			277,885
Total deposits		339,533			350,310
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		84,425			59,616
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		13,289			11,638
Other liabilities		7,220			5,462
Total liabilities		444,467			427,026
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value per share; 300,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding none		—			—
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 2,912,437 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2,890,690 shares as of December 31, 2007; outstanding, 2,663,545 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2,641,798 shares as of December 31, 2007		7,281			7,227
Paid-in capital		22,917			22,586
Retained earnings		18,459			21,050
Treasury stock, at cost (248,892 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007)		(4,370	)		(4,370	)
Unearned shares, Restricted Stock Plan (15,755 as of December 31, 2008 and 9,005 shares as of December 31, 2007)		(323	)		(197	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,926	)		(531	)
Total stockholders’ equity		41,038			45,765
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	485,505		$	472,791

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands, except per share data)

	2008			2007
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	20,146		$	20,682
Interest on debt securities:
Taxable		4,546			4,577
Tax-exempt		481			459
Dividends on marketable equity securities		1,100			652
Other interest		249			482
Total interest and dividend income		26,522			26,852
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		6,299			7,940
Interest on other borrowed funds		2,809			3,073
Total interest expense		9,108			11,013
Net interest and dividend income		17,414			15,839
Provision for loan losses		814			395
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses		16,600			15,444
Noninterest (charges) income:
Income from fiduciary activities		1,802			1,941
Fees from sale of non-deposit products		253			236
Service charges on deposit accounts		632			623
Other deposit fees		879			927
Gain on calls of available-for-sale securities, net		—			1
Writedown of available-for-sale securities		(6,971	)		—
Gain on sales of loans, net		6			6
Income on cash surrender value of life insurance		301			232
Other income		673			962
Total noninterest (charges) income		(2,425	)		4,928
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		8,745			8,527
Director fees		299			309
Occupancy expense		1,854			1,587
Equipment expense		902			882
Data processing fees		1,210			1,139
Marketing and public relations		417			461
Professional fees		748			907
Other expense		1,626			1,640
Total noninterest expense		15,801			15,452
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense		(1,626	)		4,920
Income tax (benefit) expense		(1,459	)		1,350
Net (loss) income	$	(167	)	$	3,570
(Loss) earnings per common share	$	(.06	)	$	1.31
Earnings per common share, assuming dilution	$	—		$	1.30

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Common Stock		Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Unearned Shares, Restricted Stock Plan			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	7,093	$	21,772	$	19,694		$	(1,495	)	$	—		$	(886	)	$	46,178
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		3,570			—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect		—		—		—			—			—			355			—
Comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			—			—			3,925
Tax benefit for stock options		—		76		—			—			—			—			76
Stock awards (500 shares)		1		9		—			—			—			—			10
Dividends declared ($.80 per share)		—		—		(2,214	)		—			—			—			(2,214	)
Sale of 43,675 shares of common stock on exercise of stock options		109		534		—			—			—			—			643
Restricted stock awarded (9,275 shares)		24		179		—			—			(203	)		—			—
Vesting of restricted stock awards (270 shares)		—		—		—			—			6			—			6
Purchase of treasury stock (138,487 shares)		—		—		—			(2,875	)		—			—			(2,875	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		16		—			—			—			—			16
Balance, December 31, 2007		7,227		22,586		21,050			(4,370	)		(197	)		(531	)		45,765
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		(167	)		—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect		—		—		—			—			—			(2,395	)		—
Comprehensive loss		—		—		—			—			—			—			(2,562	)
Dividends declared ($.80 per share)		—		—		(2,115	)		—			—			—			(2,115	)
Sale of 12,747 shares of common stock on exercise of stock options		32		168		—			—			—			—			200
Restricted stock awarded (9,000 shares)		22		153		—			—			(175	)		—			—
Vesting of restricted stock awards (2,250 shares)		—		—		—			—			49			—			49
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle—initial adoption of EITF 06-4		—		—		(309	)		—			—			—			(309	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		10		—			—			—			—			10
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	7,281	$	22,917	$	18,459		$	(4,370	)	$	(323	)	$	(2,926	)	$	41,038

38

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands)

(continued)

Reclassification disclosure for the years ended December 31:

	2008			2007
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities
Net unrealized holding (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities	$	(8,697	)	$	974
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses (gains) in net income		6,971			(1	)
		(1,726	)		973
Income tax benefit (expense)		733			(349	)
		(993	)		624
Comprehensive loss—pension and postretirement benefit plans		(2,373	)		(455	)
Income tax benefit		971			186
		(1,402	)		(269	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	$	(2,395	)	$	355

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following as of December 31:

	2008			2007
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	$	(1,137	)	$	(144	)
Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit plan expenses—SFAS No. 158, net of tax		(1,789	)		(387	)
	$	(2,926	)	$	(531	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

39

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands)

	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(167	)	$	3,570
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		770			748
Stock awards		82			49
Stock-based compensation		10			16
(Accretion) amortization of securities, net		(106	)		26
Write-down of available-for-sale securities		6,971			—
Gain on calls of available-for-sale investments, net		—			(1	)
Change in deferred loan costs, net		13			18
Provision for loan losses		814			395
Deferred tax benefit		(3,104	)		(202	)
Decrease in taxes receivable		210			130
Decrease in interest receivable		36			35
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses		51			(2	)
Decrease in mortgage servicing rights		23			34
Increase in other assets		(16	)		(21	)
(Decrease) increase in interest payable		(548	)		421
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses		(157	)		117
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(252	)		173
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance		(301	)		(232	)
(Increase) decrease in RABBI Trust trading securities		(42	)		102
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,287			5,376
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(24,357	)		(25,102	)
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities		26,936			22,810
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			371
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(634	)		(320	)
Purchase of Federal Reserve Bank stock		—			(365	)
Loan originations and principal collections, net		(14,351	)		(16,027	)
Purchases of loans		(2,817	)		(265	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		58			190
Capital expenditures		(1,835	)		(1,784	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(17,000	)		(20,492	)

40

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands)

(continued)

	2008			2007
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in demand deposits, NOW and savings accounts		6,318			(11,601	)
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits		(17,095	)		9,053
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		19,570			25,500
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(12,331	)		(17,214	)
Net increase in short term FHLB advances		17,570			4,330
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		1,651			(4,734	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		200			643
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(2,875	)
Dividends paid		(2,115	)		(2,214	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,768			888
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,055			(14,228	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		15,495			29,723
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	16,550		$	15,495
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	9,656		$	10,592
Income taxes paid		1,435			1,422
Due to broker		—			(473	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

41

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1—NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Beverly National Corporation (Company) is a state chartered corporation that was organized in 1984 to become the holding company of Beverly National Bank (Bank). The Company’s primary activity is to act as the holding company for the Bank. The Bank is a federally chartered bank, which was founded in 1802 and is headquartered in Beverly, Massachusetts. The Bank operates its business from eight full service branches and two educational banking offices located in Massachusetts. The Bank is engaged principally in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and investing those deposits in residential and commercial real estate loans, and in consumer and small business loans. The Bank also operates a Wealth Management department that offers fiduciary and investment services.

NOTE 2—ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiary conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and predominant practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements were prepared using the accrual basis of accounting with the exception of fiduciary activities and certain minor sources of income which are reflected on a cash basis. The results of these activities do not differ materially from those which would result from using the accrual method. The significant accounting policies are summarized below to assist the reader in better understanding the consolidated financial statements and other data contained herein.

USE OF ESTIMATES:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary Beverly National Security Corporation. Beverly National Security Corporation was established for the exclusive purpose of buying, selling or holding securities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash items, due from banks, interest-bearing demand deposit accounts with other banks, short-term investments and federal funds sold.

Cash and due from banks as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 includes $350 and $368, respectively, which is subject to withdrawals and usage restrictions to satisfy the reserve requirements of the Federal Reserve Bank.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company has $10,104 in total cash and cash equivalents held at Eastern Bank which represents 24.6% of total stockholders’ equity.

42

SECURITIES:

Investments in debt securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts computed so as to approximate the interest method. Gains or losses on sales of investment securities are computed on a specific identification basis.

The Company classifies debt and equity securities into one of three categories: held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. These security classifications may be modified after acquisition only under certain specified conditions. In general, securities may be classified as held-to-maturity only if the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Trading securities are defined as those bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. All other securities must be classified as available-for-sale.

• Held-to-maturity securities are measured at amortized cost in the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses are not included in earnings or in a separate component of capital. They are merely disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

• Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses are not included in earnings, but are reported as a net amount (less expected tax) in a separate component of capital until realized.

• Trading securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized holding gains and losses for trading securities are included in earnings.

Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.

On December 8, 2008, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston announced a moratorium on the repurchase of excess stock held by its members. The moratorium will remain in effect indefinitely.

LOANS:

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for amounts due to borrowers on unadvanced loans, any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.

Interest on loans is recognized on a simple interest basis.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred, and the net amount amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield. The Company is amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the related loans.

Residential real estate loans are generally placed on nonaccrual when reaching 90 days past due or in process of foreclosure. All closed-end consumer loans 90 days or more past due and any equity line in the process of foreclosure are placed on nonaccrual status. Secured consumer loans are written down to realizable value and unsecured consumer loans are charged-off upon reaching 120 days past due depending on the type of loan. Commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans and leases which are 90 days or more past due are generally placed on nonaccrual status, unless secured by sufficient cash or other assets immediately convertible to cash. When a loan has been placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed against interest on loans. A loan can be returned to accrual status when collectibility of principal is reasonably assured and the loan has performed for a period of time, generally six months.

Cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans are credited to principal to the extent necessary to eliminate doubt as to the collectibility of the net carrying amount of the loan. Some or all of the cash receipts of interest income on impaired loans is recognized as interest income if the remaining net carrying amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. When recognition of interest income on an impaired

43

loan on a cash basis is appropriate, the amount of income that is recognized is limited to that which would have been accrued on the net carrying amount of the loan at the contractual interest rate. Any cash interest payments received in excess of the limit and not applied to reduce the net carrying amount of the loan are recorded as recoveries of charge-offs until the charge-offs are fully recovered.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:

Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Cost and related allowances for depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the respective accounts with any gain or loss included in income or expense. Depreciation and amortization are calculated principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

SERVICING:

Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and terms. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual stratum, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the stratum.

44

OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND IN-SUBSTANCE FORECLOSURES:

Other real estate owned includes properties acquired through foreclosure and properties classified as in-substance foreclosures in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 15, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructuring.” These properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any write down from cost to fair value required at the time of foreclosure or classification as in-substance foreclosure is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Expenses incurred in connection with maintaining these assets, subsequent write downs and gains or losses recognized upon sale are included in other expense.

In accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” the Company classifies loans as in-substance repossessed or foreclosed if the Company receives physical possession of the debtor’s assets regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place.

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures are as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair values.

Securities: Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans are estimated by discounting the future cash flows, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Accrued interest receivable: The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposit liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits, regular savings, NOW accounts, and money market accounts are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances: The carrying amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheet for these borrowings approximate their fair value.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: The carrying amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets for securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximate their fair values.

Off-balance sheet instruments: The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments and the unadvanced portion of loans, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation with the counterparties at the reporting date.

ADVERTISING:

The Company directly expenses costs associated with advertising as they are incurred.

45

INCOME TAXES:

The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the temporary differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the amounts related to such temporary differences are realized or settled. It is the Company’s policy to provide for uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION:

At December 31, 2008, the Company has five stock-based employee compensation plans which are described more fully in Note 10. The Company accounts for the plans under SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment.” During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, $10 and $16, respectively, in stock-based employee compensation was recognized. In addition, $82 and $49 of compensation cost was recognized in 2008 and 2007, respectively, for annual stock awards of 0 shares and 500 shares to an executive officer under his employment agreement and for compensation costs related to the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan.

SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN:

In connection with its Supplemental Retirement Plan, the Company established a RABBI Trust to assist in the administration of the plan. The accounts of the RABBI Trust are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Any trading securities held by the RABBI Trust are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115.

EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) on Issue No. 06-4 “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” (EITF Issue 06-4). EITF 06-4 requires companies with an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement to recognize a liability for future postretirement benefits. The effective date is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, with earlier application permitted. The Company should recognize the effects of applying this issue through either (a) a change in accounting principle through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings or (b) a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all periods. The adoption of the new issue did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. (See Note 12)

46

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The FASB’s FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, defers until January 1, 2009, the application of SFAS 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at least annually at fair value. This includes nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination or other new basis event, but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods. The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2008. See Note 14—Fair Value Measurements for additional information.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities, at specified election dates, to choose to measure certain financial instruments at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The fair value option is applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis, is irrevocable and can only be applied to an entire instrument and not to specified risks, specific cash flows, or portions of that instrument. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date and upfront fees and costs related to those items will be recognized in earnings as incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 is effective in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and may not be applied retrospectively. The adoption of the new standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 14—Fair Value Measurements for additional information.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements and Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). The new pronouncement requires all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries as a component of stockholders’ equity. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. Management does not anticipate that this statement will have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. It also amends the accounting treatment for certain specific items including acquisition costs and non controlling minority interests and includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.” This FSP provides guidance on how the transferor and transferee should separately account for a transfer of a financial asset and a related repurchase financing if certain criteria are met. This guidance will be effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of this new FSP is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The guidance in SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This

47

statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP provides guidance as to factors considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” This guidance will be effective January 1, 2009. The adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This standard formalizes minor changes in prioritizing accounting principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This standard became effective November 15, 2008.

NOTE 3—INVESTMENTS IN AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES

Debt and equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheets according to management’s intent. The amortized cost of securities and their approximate fair values are as follows as of December 31:

	Amortized Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2008:
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	8,190	$	97	$	1	$	8,286
Debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states		12,319		24		608		11,735
Corporate debt securities		1,955		—		10		1,945
Trust preferred securities		11,699		3		1,192		10,510
Marketable equity securities		681		1		7		675
Mortgage-backed securities		70,366		1,431		1,725		70,072
Debt securities issued by foreign governments		400		—		—		400
	$	105,610	$	1,556	$	3,543	$	103,623
December 31, 2007:
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	12,690	$	127	$	8	$	12,809
Debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states		12,325		24		155		12,194
Trust preferred securities		9,322		—		382		8,940
Marketable equity securities		3,645		93		7		3,731
Mortgage-backed securities		76,672		383		335		76,720
Debt securities issued by foreign governments		400		—		1		399
	$	115,054	$	627	$	888	$	114,793

48

The scheduled maturities of available-for-sale debt securities and trust preferred securities were as follows as of December 31, 2008:

	Fair Value
Due within one year	$	3,677
Due after one year through five years		2,332
Due after five years through ten years		2,914
Due in more than ten years		23,953
Mortgage-backed securities		70,072
	$	102,948

There were no sales of available-for-sale securities in 2008 and 2007.

The aggregate amortized cost basis and fair value of securities of issuers which exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity were as follows as of December 31, 2008:

Issuer	Amortized Cost Basis		Fair Value
Wells Fargo	$	7,099	$	6,210
MMCapS Funding 1 Ltd.		5,186		4,212

Total carrying amounts of $46,512 and $55,640 of securities were pledged to secure treasury tax and loan, trust funds and public funds on deposit, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In connection with its supplemental retirement plan described in Note 11, the Company set up a RABBI Trust which holds trading securities. The RABBI Trust is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The portion of trading gains for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 that relates to trading securities still held at year end amounted to $7 and $21, respectively. The fair value of trading securities held in the RABBI Trust as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $350 and $308, respectively.

49

The aggregate fair value and unrealized losses of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more, and are not other than temporarily impaired, are as follows:

	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2008:
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	999	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	999	$	1
Debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states		7,495		403		2,287		205		9,782		608
Corporate debt securities		1,945		10		—		—		1,945		10
Mortgage-backed securities		14,602		1,725		—		—		14,602		1,725
Marketable equity securities		—		—		572		7		572		7
Trust preferred securities		3,331		217		4,213		975		7,544		1,192
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	28,372	$	2,356	$	7,072	$	1,187	$	35,444	$	3,543
December 31, 2007:
Debt securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	—	$	—	$	2,992	$	8	$	2,992	$	8
Debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states		4,903		64		5,433		91		10,336		155
Mortgage-backed securities		5,241		92		30,037		243		35,278		335
Debt securities issued by foreign governments		—		—		399		1		399		1
Marketable equity securities		—		—		548		7		548		7
Trust preferred securities		8,940		382		—		—		8,940		382
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	19,084	$	538	$	39,409	$	350	$	58,493	$	888

The investments in the Company’s investment portfolio that are temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2008 consist primarily of debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies with strong credit ratings and trust preferred securities. Unrealized losses on debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states include twenty one securities, with nineteen issuers. Unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities consist mostly of six securities, with five issuers. Unrealized losses on trust preferred securities consist of five securities with three issuers. The unrealized losses in the above table are primarily attributable to changes in market interest rates and recent uncertainties in the financial markets. Company management has the ability to hold debt securities to maturity and equity securities until cost recovery occurs and does not intend to sell these securities in the near term future. Therefore, the December 31, 2008 unrealized losses are determined to be temporary.

50

NOTE 4—LOANS

Loans consisted of the following as of December 31:

	2008			2007
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	50,952		$	39,343
Real estate—construction and land development		4,326			17,042
Real estate—residential		125,281			120,512
Real estate—commercial		141,497			127,819
Consumer		2,398			2,392
Other		13,656			14,193
		338,110			321,301
Allowance for loan losses		(4,127	)		(3,614	)
Deferred loan costs, net		656			669
Net loans	$	334,639		$	318,356

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows for the years ended December 31:

	2008			2007
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,614		$	3,044
Loans charged off		(359	)		(15	)
Provision for loan losses		814			395
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		58			190
Balance at end of period	$	4,127		$	3,614

Certain directors and executive officers of the Company and companies in which they have significant ownership interest were customers of the Bank during 2008. Total loans to such persons and their companies amounted to $331 as of December 31, 2008. During 2008, principal payments and advances totaled $73 and $227, respectively.

The following table sets forth information regarding nonaccrual loans and accruing loans 90 days or more overdue as of December 31:

	2008		2007
Total nonaccrual loans	$	186	$	259
Accruing loans which are 90 days or more overdue	$	—	$	—

51

Information about loans that meet the definition of an impaired loan in SFAS No. 114 is as follows:

	December 31,
	2008				2007
	Recorded Investment In Impaired Loans		Related Allowance For Credit Losses		Recorded Investment In Impaired Loans		Related Allowance For Credit Losses
Loans for which there is a related allowance for credit losses	$	186	$	28	$	234	$	5
Loans for which there is no related allowance for credit losses		—		—		—		—
Totals	$	186	$	28	$	234	$	5
Average recorded investment in impaired loans during the year ended December 31	$	210			$	18
Related amount of interest income recognized during the time, in the year ended December 31, that the loans were impaired
Total recognized	$	—			$	—
Amount recognized using a cash-basis method of accounting	$	—			$	—

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the unpaid principal balances of loans serviced for others were $26,497 and $28,445, respectively.

Changes in mortgage servicing rights, which are included in other assets, were as follows for the years ended December 31:

	2008			2007
Balance at beginning of period	$	59		$	93
Amortization		(23	)		(34	)
Balance at end of period	$	36		$	59

No valuation allowance for the carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was recorded because management estimated that there was no impairment in the carrying amount of those rights. The fair values of these rights approximated their carrying amount.

NOTE 5—PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

The following is a summary of premises and equipment as of December 31:

	2008			2007
Land	$	364		$	364
Buildings		4,581			4,322
Furniture and equipment		6,082			5,691
Leasehold improvements		7,236			6,051
		18,263			16,428
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(9,877	)		(9,107	)
	$	8,386		$	7,321

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $770 and $748, respectively.

52

NOTE 6—DEPOSITS

The aggregate amount of time deposit accounts in denominations of $100 or more was $23,429 and $31,716 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

For time deposits as of December 31, 2008, the scheduled maturities for the years ended December 31, are:

2009	$	58,777
2010		7,936
2011		1,469
2012		3,558
2013		288
	$	72,028

Deposits from related parties held by the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $4,770 and $2,750, respectively.

NOTE 7—FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES

Advances consist of funds borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLB).

Maturities of advances from the FHLB for the years ending after December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:

2009	$	41,318
2010		8,512
2011		1,986
2012		3,327
2013		7,282
Thereafter		22,000
Total	$	84,425

At December 31, 2008, the following advances from the FHLB were redeemable at par at the option of the FHLB:

MATURITY DATE	OPTIONAL REDEMPTION DATE	AMOUNT
December 14, 2010	March 16, 2009 and quarterly thereafter	$	3,000
May 25, 2012	February 25, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		3,000
October 10, 2013	January 12, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		5,000
January 20, 2015	January 20, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		4,000
May 30, 2017	March 2, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		3,000
June 8, 2017	March 9, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		3,000
July 20, 2017	January 20, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		3,000
July 31, 2017	February 2, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		5,000
January 17, 2018	January 20, 2009 and quarterly thereafter		4,000

Amortizing advances are being repaid in equal monthly payments and are being amortized from the date of the advance to the maturity date on a direct reduction basis.

Borrowings from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral, consisting primarily of loans with first mortgages secured by one to four family properties, certain unencumbered investment securities and other qualified assets.

53

At December 31, 2008, the interest rates on FHLB advances ranged from 0.38% to 5.07%. At December 31, 2008, the weighted average interest rate on FHLB advances was 2.51%.

NOTE 8—SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

The securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31, 2008 are securities sold on a short term basis by the Bank that have been accounted for not as sales but as borrowings. The securities consisted of mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations, debt securities issued by states of the United States and political subdivisions of the states and preferred stocks. The securities were held in the Bank’s safekeeping accounts at correspondent banks under the control of the Bank, and in the Bank’s trust department. The securities are pledged to the purchasers of the securities. The purchasers have agreed to sell to the Bank substantially identical securities at the maturity of the agreements.

NOTE 9—INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE

The components of the income tax (benefit) expense are as follows for the years ended December 31:

	2008			2007
Current:
Federal	$	1,298		$	1,281
State		347			271
		1,645			1,552
Deferred:
Federal		(2,296	)		(154	)
State		(808	)		(48	)
		(3,104	)		(202	)
Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(1,459	)	$	1,350

The reasons for the differences between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:

	2008		2007
	% of Income		% of Income
Federal income tax at statutory rate	(34.0	)%	34.0	%
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
Tax-exempt income	(33.2	)	(9.5	)
Dividends paid to ESOP	(1.6	)	(0.6	)
Unallowable expenses	4.4		1.0
Other	(6.6	)	(0.5	)
State tax (benefit) expense, net of federal expense (benefit)	(18.7	)	3.0
Effective tax rates	(89.7	)%	27.4	%

54

The Company had gross deferred tax assets and gross deferred tax liabilities as follows as of December 31:

	2008		2007
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	1,583	$	1,300
Deferred compensation		882		820
Accrued retirement benefits		125		152
Accrued interest on nonperforming loans		8		2
Accrued pension		93		152
Writedown of securities		2,853		—
Unrecognized employee benefit costs under SFAS No. 158		1,239		268
Net unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities		850		117
Gross deferred tax assets		7,633		2,811
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation		60		36
Loan origination fees and costs, net		275		278
Other adjustments		26		24
Mortgage servicing rights		15		24
Gross deferred tax liabilities		376		362
Net deferred tax asset	$	7,257	$	2,449

Deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 have not been reduced by a valuation allowance because management believes that it is more likely than not that the full amount of deferred tax assets will be realized.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had no operating loss and tax credit carryovers for tax purposes.

The Company adopted FASB interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48) as of December 31, 2008. It is the Company’s policy to provide for uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon management’s assessment of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. There was no effect on the Company’s balance sheet or income statement from adoption of FIN 48.

NOTE 10—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

In 2005, the Company adopted the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan under which up to 37,000 shares of stock of the Company may be awarded to key employees or directors of the Company. In 2008, 9,000 shares of restricted stock grants were awarded at the market price of $19.50; and in 2007, 9,275 shares of restricted stock grants were awarded at the market price of $21.85. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, 2,250 shares and 270 shares, respectively, were vested. Compensation cost relating to the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan totaled $82 in 2008 and $39 in 2007. As of December 31, 2008, there was $252 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares awarded. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.25 years.

The Company has also adopted five fixed option, stock-based compensation plans. Under the 1996 amended 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees, the Company may grant up to 97,650 shares, at fair value, to key employees. Under the 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees the Company may grant up to 75,390 shares of common stock, at fair value, to key employees. Under the 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees the Company may grant up to 63,000 shares of common stock, at fair value, to present and future employees. Under the 1996, 1994 and 1993 amended 1987 Director’s plan, the Company may grant up to 113,400 shares of common stock to present and future directors at prices and exercise terms as determined by the

55

Board of Directors. Under the 1998 amended 2002 Directors’ plan, the Company may grant up to 54,521 shares of common stock to present and future Directors. Under the 1998 Directors’ Plan, stock options are granted at prices and exercise terms as determined by the Board of Directors. In 2002, the 1998 Director’s Stock Option Plan was amended so that all options granted under the plan shall immediately vest in full upon a Director reaching mandatory retirement age and that all options granted shall expire if not exercised within 90 days after the Director’s retirement.

A summary of the status of the Company’s fixed stock option plans as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:

	2008				2007
Fixed Options	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year	25,509		$	15.01	71,454		$	14.71
Exercised	(12,748	)		15.66	(43,675	)		14.73
Forfeited	—			—	(2,270	)		11.01
Outstanding at end of year	12,761			14.35	25,509			15.01
Options exercisable at year-end	10,493		$	14.48	21,297		$	15.23
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year	N/A				N/A

The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2008:

	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding as of 12/31/08	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable as of 12/31/08	Weighted-Average Exercise Price
$13.36 - 13.40	4,126	2.21 years	$	13.37	2,614	$	13.38
14.52	6,535	1.07 years		14.52	5,779		14.52
15.76	2,100	0.47 years		15.76	2,100		15.76
	12,761	1.34 years		14.35	10,493		14.48

As of December 31, 2008, there was $6 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the stock option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.28 years.

NOTE 11—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OTHER THAN POSTRETIREMENT, MEDICAL AND LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS

Defined benefit pension plan

The Company provides pension benefits for eligible employees through a defined benefit pension plan (plan).

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company suspended the plan so that participating employees no longer earn additional defined benefits for future services.

56

The following tables set forth information about the plan, using a measurement date of December 31, as of December 31 and the years then ended:

	2008			2007
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	8,178		$	7,861
Interest cost		500			494
Benefits paid		(397	)		(385	)
Actuarial (gain) loss		(61	)		208
Benefit obligation at end of year		8,220			8,178
Change in plan assets:
Plan assets at estimated fair value at beginning of year		7,356			7,362
Actual return on plan assets		(1,814	)		379
Benefits paid		(397	)		(385	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		5,145			7,356
Funded status	$	(3,075	)	$	(822	)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax effect, consist of an unrecognized net loss of $2,848 and $450 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $8,220 and $8,178 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 6.25% for 2008 and 2007.

Components of net periodic cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income:

	2008			2007
Interest cost on benefit obligation	$	500		$	494
Expected return on assets		(645	)		(646	)
Net periodic benefit		(145	)		(152	)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial loss		2,398			475
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss		2,398			475
Total recognized in plan income and other comprehensive loss	$	2,253		$	323

The estimated unrecognized net actuarial loss that is expected to be recognized into net periodic benefit or cost is $178 in 2009.

For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008		2007
Discount rate	6.25	%	6.25	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	9.00	%	9.00	%

57

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for the pension plan is based on historical returns on plan assets, current and future asset allocations, and Company management’s outlook for long-term interest rates.

Plan Assets

The Company’s pension plan asset allocations by asset category are as follows:

	December 31, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Fair Value		Percent		Fair Value		Percent
Accrued income	$	14	.3	%	$	18	.2	%
Beverly National Bank money market account		602	11.7			548	7.5
Fixed income securities		1,196	23.2			1,601	21.8
Equity securities		3,333	64.8			5,189	70.5
Total	$	5,145	100.0	%	$	7,356	100.0	%

Except for the money market account, there were no securities of the Company and related parties included in plan assets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007.

The plan’s investments are managed in accordance with the Bank’s Trust Department investment management policies and procedures. To achieve the plan’s investment objectives, assets within the plan are allocated among a number of asset classes to ensure a proper level of diversification, risk, return and liquidity. The plan’s investment portfolio is managed under a “balanced” asset allocation objective, and as of December 31, 2008 the allocation guidelines are as follows:

	Range	Long-Term Target
Equity securities	65% - 75%	70%
Fixed income securities	25% - 35%	30%

Based on current data and assumptions, the following benefits are expected to be paid for each of the following five years and in the aggregate five years thereafter:

2009	$	430
2010		426
2011		418
2012		430
2013		423
2014 – 2018		2,678

The Company does not expect to make a contribution to its pension plan in 2009.

Supplemental Retirement Plans

On December 24, 1996 the Company adopted a Supplemental Retirement Plan for two executive officers. This plan provides nonfunded retirement benefits designed to supplement benefits available through the Company’s retirement plan for employees.

58

The following tables set forth information about the plan as of December 31 and the years then ended:

	2008			2007
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	1,154		$	1,204
Interest cost		70			75
Benefit paid		(123	)		(123	)
Actuarial gain		—			(2	)
Benefit obligation at end of year		1,101			1,154
Plan assets		0			0
Funded status included in other liabilities	$	(1,101	)	$	(1,154	)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax effect, consist of an unrecognized net actuarial loss of $115 as of December 31, 2008 and an unrecognized net actuarial loss of $118 as of December 31, 2007.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the supplemental retirement plan was $1,101 and $1,154 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

	2008			2007
Components of net periodic cost:
Interest cost	$	70		$	75
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		3			3
Net periodic pension cost		73			78
Other changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss:
Net actuarial gain		0			(2	)
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss		(3	)		(3	)
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss		(3	)		(5	)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss	$	70		$	73

The estimated unrecognized net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension cost over the year ended December 31, 2009 is $5.

The discount rate used in determining the projected benefit obligation and net periodic pension cost was 6.25% for 2008 and 2007.

Estimated future benefit payments for each of the following five years and in the aggregate five years thereafter are as follows:

2009	$	123
2010		123
2011		123
2012		123
2013		123
2014 – 2018		616

Certain assets of the Company, consisting of U.S. Government obligations, corporate bonds, equity instruments and life insurance policies, are in a Rabbi Trust. The Rabbi Trust is used to assist in the administration of the plan and is subject to the claims of creditors in the case of insolvency. The fair value of the assets in the Rabbi Trust amounted to $923 and $873 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Such assets did not include any securities of the Company. See Note 3.

59

The supplemental retirement agreements under the plan provide that the officers do not have any right, title or interest in or to any specified assets of the Company, or any trust or escrow arrangement. In connection with the agreements, the Company established two trust agreements. The trustee of the trusts is another bank.

Salary Continuation Agreement

In 2003, the Company adopted a Salary Continuation Agreement for its chief executive officer. The agreement provides nonfunded retirement benefits for twenty years upon termination of employment on or after the normal retirement age. Upon a change in control, as defined in the agreement, the retirement benefits commence on the month following the executive’s normal retirement age. The agreement is unfunded and the Bank is the fiduciary and administrator.

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the liability for the agreement was $481 and $368, respectively. Expense for the agreement amounted to $113 and $92, respectively, for the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Defined Contribution Plan

The Bank has a 401(k) profit sharing plan whereby substantially all employees participate in the plan. In the plan, the Bank is making matching contributions equal to one hundred percent of salary deferral up to 4.5% of participant’s compensation. All eligible participants also receive a Bank contribution equal to two percent of compensation. Total contributions under this Plan amounted to $397 for 2008 and $367 for 2007.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

The Company sponsors an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). This plan is offered to employees who have attained age 21 and who have been employed by the Company and completed a minimum of 1,000 hours of employment. The plan entitles Company employees to common stock or cash upon retirement, disability, death or separation from service from the Company based on a vesting schedule. Benefits become 25% vested after two years of vesting service and increase to 100% vested after five years of vesting service.

The Company makes annual contributions to the ESOP in amounts determined by the board of directors, subject to a limitation based on earnings and capital of the Company. Such contributions are first made to permit required payments of amounts due under any acquisition loans. Dividends received by the ESOP on shares of the Company owned by the ESOP are used to repay any acquisition loans or are credited to the accounts of allocated shares. The ESOP may borrow money to purchase shares of the Company. The shares are pledged as collateral for its debt. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and allocated to active employees, based on the proportion of debt service paid in the year. Any debt of the ESOP is recorded as debt and the shares pledged as collateral are reported as unearned ESOP shares in the statement of financial position. There was no ESOP compensation expense in 2008 and 2007. In 2008 the ESOP purchased no shares of the Company and in 2007 the ESOP purchased 4,000 shares of the Company. No money was borrowed to fund the purchases.

The ESOP shares were as follows as of December 31:

	2008	2007
Allocated shares	90,877	101,780
Total ESOP shares	90,877	101,780

Change in Control

One of the Company’s executive officers has a change in control agreement (agreement) with the Company which states that if the executive officer’s employment is terminated within 24 months after a change in control as defined in the agreement, then the officer is entitled to a lump sum equal to the product of the average sum of

60

annual base compensation (salary plus bonus) for the five years (or the term of employment, if less) preceding a change in control multiplied by three, less one hundred dollars.

Six executive officers have change in control agreements which state that if the executive officer’s employment is terminated within 24 months after a change in control as defined in the agreement, then the officers are entitled to a lump sum equal to the product of the average sum of annual base compensation (salary plus bonus) paid to the executive officer for the five years (or the term of employment, if less) preceding a change in control multiplied by two, less one hundred dollars.

NOTE 12—POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION

The Company provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for retired employees. The Company follows the accounting guidance of SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” as amended by SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” The Company funds medical and life insurance benefit costs on a pay-as-you-go basis. Participation in this plan was frozen in 1993 to include only individuals who met certain age and service requirements. The program was adjusted in 2003 to cap the reimbursement of the Medicare Part B rate at the 2003 level for medical reimbursement and discontinue the dental coverage subsidy for all participants.

The following tables set forth information about the plan, using a measurement date of December 31, as of December 31 and the years then ended:

	2008			2007
Change in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	457		$	468
Service cost		3			3
Interest cost		29			28
Participant contributions		51			—
Actuarial (gain) loss		(83	)		13
Benefits paid		(86	)		(55	)
Benefit obligation at end of year		371			457
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		0			0
Funded status included in other liabilities	$	(371	)	$	(457	)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax effect, consist of the following as of December 31:

	2008			2007
Transition obligation	$	128		$	159
Net actuarial gain		(63	)		(72	)
	$	65		$	87

61

Components of net periodic cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss:

	2008			2007
Service cost	$	3		$	3
Interest cost on benefit obligation		29			28
Amortization of transition obligation		31			30
Amortization of actuarial gain		(109	)		(2	)
Net periodic cost		(46	)		59
Other changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss:
Amortization of transition obligation		(31	)		(30	)
Actuarial (gain) loss		(83	)		13
Amortization of actuarial gain		92			2
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss		(22	)		(15	)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss	$	(68	)	$	44

The estimated net actuarial gain and transition obligation that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the year ended December 31, 2009 are $2 and $31, respectively.

	2008		2007
Assumptions:
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31:
Discount rate	6.25	%	6.25	%
Weighted-average assumption used to determine net periodic cost for years ended December 31:
Discount rate	6.25	%	6.25	%

Assumed health care cost trend rates have no effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan.

Based on current data and assumptions, the following benefits are expected to be paid for each of the following five years and in the aggregate the five years thereafter:

2009	$	45
2010		43
2011		41
2012		39
2013		37
2014 – 2018		154

In 2008, the Company adopted EITF Issue 06-4 and recognized a liability for the Company’s future postretirement benefit obligations under endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements. The Company recognized this change in accounting principle as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $309. The total liability for the arrangements included in other liabilities was $365 at December 31, 2008. Expense under this arrangement was $60 for 2008 and life insurance income was $4.

62

NOTE 13—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

The Company is obligated under various lease agreements covering branch offices and ATM locations. The terms expire between October 31, 2009 and December 31, 2028. Options to renew for additional terms are included under the operating lease agreements. The total minimum rental due in future periods under these existing agreements is as follows as of December 31, 2008:

2009	$	692
2010		656
2011		651
2012		673
2013		673
Years thereafter		6,954
Total minimum lease payments	$	10,299

Certain leases contain provisions for escalation of minimum lease payments contingent upon increases in real estate taxes and percentage increases in the consumer price index. The total rental expense amounted to $839 for 2008 and $692 for 2007.

The Company entered into an agreement with a data processing services provider. Under the agreement, the Company is obligated to pay monthly minimum processing fees through February 2016 and the Company may cancel the agreement at any time, provided the Company pays a termination fee equal to eighty five percent (85%) of the Estimated Remaining Value as defined in the agreement.

NOTE 14—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements, which provides a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company also adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Company did not elect fair value treatment for any financial assets or liabilities upon adoption.

In accordance with SFAS 157, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 1 also includes U.S. Treasury, other U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, are not based on market exchange, dealer, or broker traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets and liabilities.

63

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value for December 31, 2008.

The Company’s cash instruments are generally classified within level 1 or level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

The Company’s investments in debt and mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For these securities, we obtain fair value measurements from independent pricing services. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. treasury yield curve, trading levels, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument’s terms and conditions.

Level 3 is for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Subsequent to inception, management only changes level 3 inputs and assumptions when corroborated by evidence such as transactions in similar instruments, completed or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalization and other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in the equity or debt markets, and changes in financial ratios or cash flows.

The Company’s impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using level 2 inputs based upon appraisals of similar properties obtained from a third party.

The following summarizes assets measured at fair value for the period ending December 31, 2008.

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	December 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3
Securities available-for-sale	$	103,623	$	2,684	$	92,437	$	8,502
Impaired loans		158		—		158		—
Trading securities		350		350		—		—
Totals	$	104,131	$	3,034	$	92,595	$	8,502

64

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3
	Available-for-Sale     Securities			Total
Beginning balance January 1, 2008	$	8,940		$	8,940
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings		(3,042	)		(3,042	)
Included in other comprehensive income		(592	)		(592	)
Amortization of securities, net		(81	)		(81	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		3,277			3,277
Ending balance, December 31, 2008	$	8,502		$	8,502
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0		$	0

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows as of December 31:

	2008				2007
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,550	$	16,550	$	15,495	$	15,495
Trading securities		350		350		308		308
Available-for-sale securities		103,623		103,623		114,793		114,793
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		4,086		4,086		3,452		3,452
Federal Reserve Bank stock		553		553		553		553
Loans, net		334,639		336,729		318,356		319,182
Accrued interest receivable		1,769		1,769		1,805		1,805
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		339,533		340,121		350,310		350,727
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		84,425		87,695		59,616		59,499
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		13,289		13,289		11,638		11,638

The carrying amounts of financial instruments shown in the above table are included in the consolidated balance sheets under the indicated captions, except for trading securities which are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Accounting policies related to financial instruments are described in Note 2.

NOTE 15—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to originate loans, standby letters of credit and unadvanced funds on loans. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

65

Commitments to originate loans are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance by a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the maximum potential amount of the Company’s obligation was $271 and $887, respectively, for financial and standby letters of credit. The Company’s outstanding letters of credit generally have a term of less than one year. If a letter of credit is drawn upon, the Company may seek recourse through the customer’s underlying line of credit. If the customer’s line of credit is also in default, the Company may take possession of the collateral, if any, securing the line of credit.

Notional amounts of financial instrument liabilities with off-balance sheet credit risk are as follows as of December 31:

	2008		2007
Commitments to originate loans	$	2,700	$	4,080
Standby letters of credit		271		887
Unadvanced portions of loans:
Consumer		867		1,758
Home equity		26,851		25,205
Commercial lines of credit		31,972		26,371
Commercial construction		1,135		3,106
Residential construction		60		507
	$	63,856	$	61,914

There is no material difference between the notional amounts and the estimated fair values of the off-balance sheet liabilities.

NOTE 16—SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within the state. There are no concentrations of credit to borrowers that have similar economic characteristics. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by real estate located in the state of Massachusetts.

NOTE 17—REGULATORY MATTERS

The Bank, as a National Bank is subject to the dividend restrictions set forth by the Comptroller of the Currency. Under such restrictions, the Bank may not, without the prior approval of the Comptroller of the Currency, declare dividends in excess of the sum of the current year’s earnings (as defined) plus the retained earnings (as defined) from the prior two years. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank could declare dividends up to $2,843 without the approval of the Comptroller of the Currency.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt

66

corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2008:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Beverly National Bank	$	45,812	12.61	%	$	29,071	>8.0	%	$	36,339	>10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Beverly National Bank		41,624	11.45			14,535	>4.0			21,803	>6.0
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Beverly National Bank		41,624	8.69			19,156	>4.0			23,945	>5.0
As of December 31, 2007:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Beverly National Bank		47,785	14.07			27,165	>8.0			33,956	>10.0
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
Beverly National Bank		44,109	12.99			13,583	>4.0			20,374	>6.0
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
Beverly National Bank		44,109	9.39			18,796	>4.0			23,495	>5.0

67

NOTE 18—(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)

Reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for net (loss) income are as follows:

	(Loss) Income (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)	Per-Share Amount
Year ended December 31, 2008
Basic EPS
Net (loss) income and income available to common stockholders	$	(167	)	2,660,918	$	(.06	)
Effect of dilutive securities, options		—		—
Diluted EPS
(Loss) income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	—		—	$	—
Year ended December 31, 2007
Basic EPS
Net income and income available to common stockholders	$	3,570		2,730,827	$	1.31
Effect of dilutive securities, options		—		15,546
Diluted EPS
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions	$	3,570		2,746,373	$	1.30

NOTE 19—RECLASSIFICATION

Certain amounts in the prior year have been reclassified to be consistent with the current year’s statement presentation.

68

NOTE 20—PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements are presented for the Beverly National Corporation (Parent Company Only) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements.

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2008 and 2007

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	2008			2007
ASSETS
Cash	$	288		$	126
Money market deposit account at Beverly National Bank		470			4
Short-term investments		343			903
Cash and cash equivalents		1,101			1,033
Investment in Beverly National Bank		38,708			43,591
Investment in available-for-sale securities (at fair value)		5			5
Premises and equipment		1,271			1,358
Interest receivable		—			4
Due from affiliates		128			—
Prepaid expenses		9			7
Total assets	$	41,222		$	45,998
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accrued and deferred taxes	$	176		$	183
Accrued audit expense		8			28
Due to affiliates		—			17
Other liabilities		—			5
Total liabilities		184			233
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value per share; 300,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding none		—			—
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 2,912,437 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2,890,690 shares as of December 31, 2007; outstanding, 2,663,545 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2,641,798 shares as of December 31, 2007		7,281			7,227
Paid-in capital		22,917			22,586
Retained earnings		18,459			21,050
Treasury stock, at cost (248,892 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007)		(4,370	)		(4,370	)
Unearned shares, Restricted Stock Plan (15,755 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 9,005 shares as of December 31, 2007)		(323	)		(197	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,926	)		(531	)
Total stockholders’ equity		41,038			45,765
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	41,222		$	45,998

69

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands)

	2008			2007
Interest and dividend income:
Interest on taxable investment securities	$	12		$	55
Interest on money market account		5			74
Total interest and dividend income		17			129
Other income:
Dividends from subsidiary Beverly National Bank		2,000			—
Rental income		196			218
Total other income		2,196			218
Expenses:
Occupancy expense		135			146
Professional fees		—			83
Other expense		83			67
Total expenses		218			296
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed net (loss) income of subsidiary		1,995			51
Income tax benefit		(27	)		(12	)
Income before equity in undistributed net (loss) income of subsidiary		2,022			63
Equity in undistributed net (loss) income of subsidiary:
Beverly National Bank		(2,189	)		3,507
Net (loss) income	$	(167	)	$	3,570

70

BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Parent Company Only)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

(In thousands)

	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(167	)	$	3,570
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Undistributed net loss (income) of subsidiary		2,189			(3,507	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		24			(6	)
Depreciation expense		87			94
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		(2	)		12
Change in due to/from affiliates		(145	)		(46	)
Decrease in interest receivable		4			—
Change in accrued and deferred taxes		(7	)		(69	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,983			48
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		200			643
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(2,875	)
Dividends paid		(2,115	)		(2,214	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,915	)		(4,446	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		68			(4,398	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		1,033			5,431
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	1,101		$	1,033
Supplemental disclosure:
Income taxes (received) paid	$	(20	)	$	57

The Parent Company Only Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity are identical to the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and therefore are not reprinted here.

71

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the Company’s two (2) most recent fiscal years.

ITEM 9A(T) CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that based upon an evaluation as of December 31, 2008, as required by Rules 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s Management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Statement of Management’s Responsibility

Management is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the consolidated financial statements and other information appearing in this Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applying estimates and management’s best judgment as required. To fulfill their responsibilities, management establishes and maintains accounting systems and practices adequately supported by internal accounting controls. These controls include the selection and training of management and supervisory personnel; an organization structure providing for delegation of authority and establishment or responsibilities; communication of requirements for compliance with approved accounting, control and business practices throughout the organization; business planning and review; and a program of internal audit. Management believes the internal accounting controls in use provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and that financial records are reliable for the purpose of preparing financial statements. Shatswell, MacLeod and Company, P.C. has been engaged to provide an independent opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Their report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 is effective.

72

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurances that: (a) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and (b) receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

73

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant required by this Item pursuant to Item 401 of Regulation S-K is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Sections “Election of Directors” and “Directors and Executive Officers,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Bank’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act: Beneficial Ownership Reporting,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 407(c)(3) of Regulation S-K regarding material changes, if any, to procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Board, is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Deadline for Submitting Shareholder Proposals,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 407(d)(4) and Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K regarding the audit committee and audit committee financial expert(s), respectively, is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Sections “Committees of the Board of Directors” and “Corporate Governance,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s Chief (Principal) Executive Officer and Chief (Principal) Financial Officer. The Code of Ethics is provided via a link on the Company’s website, www.beverlynational.com.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K regarding Directors and Executive Compensation, including the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Sections “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 403 of Regulation S-K regarding Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be

74

filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Security Ownership of Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners”, and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in Item 5 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K regarding Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item pursuant to Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K regarding the independence of directors is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Corporate Governance,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item regarding Principal Accounting Fees and Services is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Independent Accountants,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

Information required by this Item regarding pre-approval policies for audit and non-audit services is omitted from this report on Form 10-K and is contained in the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 28, 2009 to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, under the Section “Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor,” and the information included therein is incorporated by reference.

75

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1	Restated Articles of Organization of Corporation dated April 25, 2006, as amended (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 2006).
3.2	By-Laws of Corporation dated January 31, 2006, as amended September 25, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 27, 2007).
10.1	1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for December 31, 1996).
10.2	1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for December 31, 1999).
10.3	1998 Directors Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for December 31, 1999).
10.4	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and Donat A. Fournier dated July 9, 2002, as amended January 25, 2005, August 16, 2005 and January 9, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.5	Change in Control Agreement with Donat A. Fournier dated July 9, 2002, as amended January 9, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006)
10.6	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and Michael O. Gilles dated August 29, 2005, as amended January 9, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.7	Change in Control Agreement with Michael O. Gilles dated August 29, 2005, as amended January 9, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.8	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and John Putney dated October 6, 2003, as amended January 10, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.9	Change in Control Agreement with John Putney dated October 6, 2003, as amended January 10, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.10	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and John L. Good, III dated June 14, 2004, as amended January 25, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.11	Change in Control Agreement with John L. Good, III dated June 14, 2004, as amended January 10, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.12	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and Paul J. Germano dated February 23, 2000, as amended March 22, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).

76

10.13	Change in Control Agreement with Paul J. Germano dated February 23, 2000, as amended March 22, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.14	Employment Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and James E. Rich, Jr. dated February 23, 2000, as amended January 16, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.15	Change in Control Agreement with James E. Rich, Jr. dated February 23, 2000, as amended January 16, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.16	Change in Control Agreement with Lorraine E. Mitchell dated January 1, 2007 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.17	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan with Donat A. Fournier dated August 11, 2003, as amended December 19, 2006 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2006).
10.18	Form of Group Term Insurance Carve Out Plan dated June 18, 2004 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report Form 10-K for December 31, 2004).
10.19	Resignation and Consulting Agreement by and between Beverly National Corporation and Peter E. Simonsen dated April 29, 2005 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 2, 2005).
10.20	2005 Restricted Stock Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form S-8 filed by the Corporation on February 13, 2006 (File No. 333-131795)).
21.	Subsidiaries of Corporation
23.	Consent of Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e)
32.	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

77

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BEVERLY NATIONAL CORPORATION
Date: March 24, 2009	By:	/s/    DONAT A. FOURNIER
		President & CEO and Director, Principal Executive Officer

Date: March 24, 2009	By:	/s/    MICHAEL O. GILLES
		Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date	Name and Capacity
March 24, 2009	/s/    DONAT A. FOURNIER         Donat A. Fournier, President & CEO & Director, Principal Executive Officer
March 24, 2009	/s/    KEVIN BURKE         Kevin Burke—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    JOHN N. FISHER         John N. Fisher—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    MARK B. GLOVSKY         Mark B. Glovsky—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    ALICE B. GRIFFIN         Alice B. Griffin—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    SUZANNE S. GRUHL         Suzanne S. Gruhl—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    ROBERT W. LUSCINSKI         Robert W. Luscinski—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    JOHN J. MEANY         John J. Meany—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    LINDA E. SARIS         Linda E. Saris—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    PAMELA C. SCOTT         Pamela C. Scott—Director
March 24, 2009	/s/    MICHAEL F. TRIPOLI         Michael F. Tripoli—Director
March 25, 2009	/s/    CAROL A. VALLONE         Carol A. Vallone—Director

78