Litigation	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Litigation	Note 3 - Litigation The Company is engaged in various legal actions, claims and proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including claims related to breach of contracts, product liabilities and intellectual property matters resulting from the Company’s business activities. As with most actions such as these, an estimation of any possible and/or ultimate liability cannot always be determined. The following summaries highlight the current status of certain material commercial litigation in which the Company is involved. On May 17, 2013 and on January 31, 2014 the Company received demand letters from the Environmental Research Corporation, “ERC” requesting substantiation of compliance with the State of California’s Proposition 65 regulations for ten of its products. In October, while the Company was awaiting the results of the compliance testing, ERC contacted the Company again requesting settlement to their initial demand letter. And in February 2014, before compliance testing or any other demand letter validation was completed, ERC contacted the Company again requesting settlement to their second demand letter. After many discussions with ERC, a lawsuit was filed by ERC for the non-compliance issues with the State of California’ Proposition 65 regulations. Along with the company’s California counsel the company has begun the process of discovery from both sides. The Company continues to remain in communication with ERC and their counsel with the intent to settle the mutual disputes. The Company believes that there is a reasonable possibility, as defined by FASB ASC 450-20, of an unfavorable outcome. However, the range of any possible loss cannot be reasonably estimated as of the date of the financial statements. On March 24, 2014 the Company received a summons in a civil action filed by Wise Sports Nutrition, LLC claiming alleged trademark infringement for iSatori’s Garcinia Trim product. Company counsel has made contact with the plaintiff’s attorney and filed a response to the alleged trademark infringement with the Company’s counterclaims. The Company believes the counterclaims have strong merit and are pursuing their defense. Both parties have prepared responses and presented them to the court. The case has currently been stayed pending a ruling on the motion made by the Company to stay the case. The Company believes that it is too early in the proceedings to make a determination of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome. Therefore, no range of any possible gain or loss can be reasonably estimated as of the date of the financial statements.

Litigation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 3 - Litigation

The Company is engaged in various legal actions, claims and proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including claims related to breach of contracts, product liabilities and intellectual property matters resulting from the Company’s business activities. As with most actions such as these, an estimation of any possible and/or ultimate liability cannot always be determined. The following summaries highlight the current status of certain material commercial litigation in which the Company is involved.

On May 17, 2013 and on January 31, 2014 the Company received demand letters from the Environmental Research Corporation, “ERC” requesting substantiation of compliance with the State of California’s Proposition 65 regulations for ten of its products. In October, while the Company was awaiting the results of the compliance testing, ERC contacted the Company again requesting settlement to their initial demand letter. And in February 2014, before compliance testing or any other demand letter validation was completed, ERC contacted the Company again requesting settlement to their second demand letter. After many discussions with ERC, a lawsuit was filed by ERC for the non-compliance issues with the State of California’ Proposition 65 regulations. Along with the company’s California counsel the company has begun the process of discovery from both sides. The Company continues to remain in communication with ERC and their counsel with the intent to settle the mutual disputes. The Company believes that there is a reasonable possibility, as defined by FASB ASC 450-20, of an unfavorable outcome. However, the range of any possible loss cannot be reasonably estimated as of the date of the financial statements.

On March 24, 2014 the Company received a summons in a civil action filed by Wise Sports Nutrition, LLC claiming alleged trademark infringement for iSatori’s Garcinia Trim product. Company counsel has made contact with the plaintiff’s attorney and filed a response to the alleged trademark infringement with the Company’s counterclaims. The Company believes the counterclaims have strong merit and are pursuing their defense. Both parties have prepared responses and presented them to the court. The case has currently been stayed pending a ruling on the motion made by the Company to stay the case. The Company believes that it is too early in the proceedings to make a determination of either a favorable or unfavorable outcome. Therefore, no range of any possible gain or loss can be reasonably estimated as of the date of the financial statements.