XML 84 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2011
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

14   FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Concentrations of Credit Risk

   Financial instruments, which potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of accounts receivable that are concentrated in the Professional and Residential business segments. The credit risk associated with these segments is limited because of the large number of customers in the company's customer base and their geographic dispersion, except for the residential segment that has significant sales to The Home Depot.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

   The company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk arising from transactions in the normal course of business, such as sales to third party customers, sales and loans to wholly owned foreign subsidiaries, foreign plant operations, and purchases from suppliers. The company actively manages the exposure of its foreign currency exchange rate market risk by entering into various hedging instruments, authorized under company policies that place controls on these activities, with counterparties that are highly rated financial institutions. The company's hedging activities involve the primary use of forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps to offset intercompany loan exposures. The company uses derivative instruments only in an attempt to limit underlying exposure from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and to minimize earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. Decisions on whether to use such contracts are made based on the amount of exposure to the currency involved, and an assessment of the near-term market value for each currency. The company's policy is not to allow the use of derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The company's primary foreign currency exchange rate exposures are with the Euro, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Mexican peso, the Japanese yen, and the Chinese Yuan against the U.S. dollar. The company also has exposure with the Romanian New Lei against the Euro and U.S. dollar as a result of its new manufacturing facility in Romania.

Cash Flow Hedges.   The company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet and formally documents relationships between cash flow hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives to the forecasted transactions, such as sales to third parties and foreign plant operations. Derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, all changes in fair values of outstanding cash flow hedge derivatives, except the ineffective portion, are recorded in other comprehensive income ("OCI"), until net earnings is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in net earnings. The consolidated statement of earnings classification of effective hedge results is the same as that of the underlying exposure. Results of hedges of sales and foreign plant operations are recorded in net sales and cost of sales, respectively, when the underlying hedged transaction affects net earnings. The maximum amount of time the company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted trade sales and purchases is two years.

   The company formally assesses at a hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in the hedging transaction have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective as a hedge, the company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. When the company discontinues hedge accounting because it is no longer probable, but it is still reasonably possible that the forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally expected period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL") and is reclassified to net earnings when the forecasted transaction affects net earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are recognized immediately in net earnings. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the company carries the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, recognizing future changes in the fair value in other income (expense), net. For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no gains or losses on contracts reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges. As of October 31, 2011, the notional amount outstanding of forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges was $122,840.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments.   The company also enters into foreign currency contracts that include forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of hedges of recorded balance sheet positions, such as cash, receivables, payables, intercompany notes, and other various contractual claims to pay or receive foreign currencies other than the functional currency, are recognized immediately in other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of earnings together with the transaction gain or loss from the hedged balance sheet position.

   The following table presents the fair value of the company's derivatives and consolidated balance sheet location.

   

 

  Asset Derivatives     Liability Derivatives    

 

  October 31, 2011     October 31, 2010     October 31, 2011     October 31, 2010    

 

  Balance
Sheet
Location
    Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
    Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
    Fair
Value
  Balance
Sheet
Location
    Fair
Value
 
   

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

                                         

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses

 
$

 

Prepaid expenses

 
$

 

Accrued liabilities

 
$

563
 

Accrued liabilities

 
$

3,886
 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

                                         

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses

   
 

Prepaid expenses

   
 

Accrued liabilities

   
2,587
 

Accrued liabilities

   
2,626
 
   

Total Derivatives

     
$

     
$

     
$

3,150
     
$

6,512
 
   

   The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the company's derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

   

 

  Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
 
  Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
  Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
  Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion and excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
  Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion and
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
 

Fiscal years ended

    October 31,
2011
    October 31,
2010
        October 31,
2011
    October 31,
2010
        October 31,
2011
    October 31,
2010
 
   

Foreign exchange contracts

  $ 4,001   $ (6,177 )

Net sales

  $ (6,254 ) $ (1,294 )

Other income (expense), net

  $ (1,049 ) $ (55 )
                                   

Foreign exchange contracts

    (1,335 )   976  

Cost of sales

    919     272                  
                       

Total

  $ 2,666   $ (5,201 )     $ (5,335 ) $ (1,022 )                
                   

   As of October 31, 2011, the company anticipates to reclassify approximately $169 of losses from AOCL to earnings during the next twelve months.

   The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the company's derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.

   

 

      Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Net Earnings
Fiscal Year Ended
 
 

 

  Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Net Earnings
    October 31,
2011
    October 31,
2010
 
   

Foreign exchange contracts

  Other income (expense), net   $ (6,867 ) $ 1,619  
   

   During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the company entered into three treasury lock agreements based on a 30-year U.S. Treasury security with a principal balance of $30,000 for two of the agreements and $40,000 for the third agreement. These treasury lock agreements provided for a single payment at maturity, which was April 23, 2007, based on the change in value of the reference treasury security. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges and resulted in a net settlement of $182, which was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and will be amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term of the senior notes. The unrecognized loss portion of the fair value of these agreements in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of October 31, 2011 and 2010 was $155 and $161, respectively.

Fair Value

   The company categorizes its assets and liabilities into one of three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used in valuing the asset or liability. Estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are based on the framework established in the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. The framework defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value, and requires certain disclosures. The framework discusses valuation techniques such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The framework utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

   Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

   Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

   Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting management's assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

   Cash and cash equivalents are valued at their carrying amounts in the consolidated balance sheets, which are reasonable estimates of their fair value due to their short-term maturities. Foreign currency forward exchange contracts are valued at fair market value using the market approach based on exchange rates as of the reporting date, which is the amount the company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts. The unfunded deferred compensation liability is primarily subject to changes in fixed-income investment contracts based on current yields. For accounts receivable and accounts payable, carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair value given their short-term nature.

   Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of October 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are summarized below:

   

October 31, 2011

    Fair
Value
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
   

Assets:

                         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 80,886   $ 80,886          
   

Total assets

  $ 80,886   $ 80,886          
   

Liabilities:

                         

Foreign exchange contracts

  $ 3,150       $ 3,150      

Deferred compensation liabilities

    4,297         4,297      
   

Total liabilities

  $ 7,447       $ 7,447      
   

 

   

October 31, 2010

    Fair
Value
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
   

Assets:

                         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 177,366   $ 177,366          
   

Total assets

  $ 177,366   $ 177,366          
   

Liabilities:

                         

Foreign exchange contracts

  $ 6,512       $ 6,512      

Deferred compensation liabilities

    4,994         4,994      
   

Total liabilities

  $ 11,506       $ 11,506      
   

   Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis related to the company's acquisitions of Lawn Solutions and Unique Lighting, as of October 31, 2011, are summarized below:

   

 

    Fair
Value
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
   

Assets:

                         

Trade name

  $ 1,500           $ 1,500 a

Patents

    700             700 a

Non-compete agreements

    3,100             3,100 a

Customer list

    713             713 b

Developed technology

    11,250             11,250 a
   

Total assets

  $ 17,263           $ 17,263  
   

   Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more valuation techniques. The valuation techniques are identified in the table above and are as follows:

  • (a)
    The company used an internally developed income-based approach to value these assets. Inputs for this valuation model were based on internally developed forecasts and assumptions.

    (b)
    The company used a replacement cost model to value these assets. Inputs for this valuation model were based on internal estimates of the cost to recreate these assets.

   As of October 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates was $248,653 compared to its carrying amount of $228,735. As of October 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates was $227,388 compared to its carrying amount of $227,190. The fair value is estimated by discounting the projected cash flows using the rate at which similar amounts of debt could currently be borrowed.