10KSB 1 v062155_10ksb.txt ================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-KSB ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-17750 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION & MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) DELAWARE 13-3186327 (State or Other Jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of Incorporation) Identification Number) 140 BROADWAY, 46TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: None SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: COMMON STOCK $.001 PAR VALUE Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $717,878 The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 28, 2006 was $1,303,411 (based on the last reported sale price of $0.14 per share on December 20, 2006). The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of was 17,457,079 Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes [_] No [X] ================================================================================ RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION & MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS RISK FACTORS ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION PART III ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 13. EXHIBITS ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 2 THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ABOUT THE COMPANY AND ITS INDUSTRY. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE, ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY UNDERTAKES NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE PUBLICALLY ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS FOR ANY REASON EVEN IF NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE OR OTHER EVENTS OCCUR IN THE FUTURE. ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS. We are a Delaware corporation whose principal executive offices are located at 140 Broadway, 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we", "us" or "our" as used herein refer to Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and our subsidiary. OVERVIEW Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation (the "Company") is in the business of acquiring and collecting portfolios of performing, sub-performing and non-performing consumer and commercial receivables. These portfolios generally consist of one or more of the following types of consumer receivables: o charged-off receivables -- accounts that have been written-off by the originators and may have been previously serviced by collection agencies; o freshly charged-off accounts that have not been assigned for collection; o sub-performing receivables -- accounts where the debtor is currently making partial or irregular monthly payments, but the accounts may have been written-off by the originators; and o performing receivables - accounts where the debtor is making regular payments or pays upon normal and customary procedures. We generally acquire non-performing and sub-performing consumer and commercial receivable portfolios at a significant discount to the amount actually owed by the debtors or insurers. We acquire these portfolios after a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the underlying receivables and establish a purchase price based on expected recovery and our internal rate of return hurdle. After purchasing a portfolio, we outsource collections to carefully selected collection agencies and we actively monitor its performance and review and adjust our collection and servicing strategies accordingly. We purchase receivables from creditors and others through privately negotiated direct sales and auctions in which sellers of receivables seek bids from several pre-qualified debt purchasers. These receivables consist primarily of credit cards, auto deficiencies, student loans, retail installment contracts, medical and other types of receivables. We pursue new acquisitions of consumer receivable portfolios on an ongoing basis through: o our direct relationships with credit originators; and o brokers who specialize in the sale of consumer receivable portfolios. 3 Our objective is to maximize our return on investment on acquired consumer receivable portfolios. As a result, before acquiring a portfolio, we analyze the portfolio to determine how to best maximize collections in a cost efficient manner and carefully analysis of collection agencies selected to service a portfolio. We believe in outsourcing 99% of its recovery efforts. We believe that we can never be experts in collecting all the various types of debt. We retain a handful of accounts internally for benchmarking purposes. Our philosophy is to keep overhead low and concentrate on our strengths of analysis and purchasing the portfolios at the right price and managing the recovery process. The recovery process is largely done by collection agencies and law firms. Recovery process is generally handed over to lawyers when it is determined the debtor has the ability to satisfy his/her obligation but normal collection activities have not resulted in resolution. In many ways investments are tailored to coincide with our recovery partner's strengths. In the United States, we believe there are approximately 4,800 collection agencies and law firms. Most are generalists and some are specialist in the various segments of the market. In many cases we have a choice dependent upon the circumstances of the investment. We look for certain tangible and intangible qualities in our recovery partners. Companies that have made investment in infrastructure that allow them to perform on an efficient and timely basis are selected. Prior to assigning a portfolio for collection standard informal audit of the recovery partner is done. In the event of legal action, we seek attorneys/collection law firms that are located in the state of the debtor. The proximity of the agent to the debtor has a significant influence on the debtors' actions. We use an internally developed incentive-based fee structure to negotiate the contingency fees of the recovery partners. This is a tiered method of paying the partner an increasing percentage of collections if they meet pre-agreed to hurdles. These hurdles are recovery of our investment plus returns in defined time periods. In most cases, an underestimation of the collection process involves the extension of the collection horizon. For instance, a debtor that is not in a position to immediately settle their obligation at the moment the obligation is purchased, is most likely to be in a position of being able to clear his/her credit in the foreseeable future if they are capable of gainful employment or expects their financial lot to improve. We will not write off these types of debtors but may extend our collection horizon to include the moment in time when collection/settlement is possible. We continuously weigh the benefits of selling the obligations versus holding it in anticipation of settlement. If we can realize an acceptable return within the expected horizon by selling the loan, the Company will do so. In most cases an obligation becomes collectible at a point in time. Periodically, we will evaluate our portfolios to identify accounts with profiles that are inconsistent with our collection strategies. Such accounts can be offered for sale to a network of investors, collection agencies and law firms. Post acquisition administration of each portfolio and each account is vital to our business. Real time monitoring of portfolio performance and activity at the account level allows us to keep our recovery partners on their toes. The Company uses database software that has all the information of a debtor and fees, interest and collections are regularly reconciled with reports from the collection agencies. Each portfolio administrator can manage up to 25,000 accounts on an ongoing basis. The software allows us to export data into Excel for more portfolio analysis. The Company has adequate personnel in place to handle an additional 50,000 accounts. For the years ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005, our revenues were approximately $717,878 and $544,582 respectively, and our net income (loss) was approximately $48,904 and ($44,479), respectively. During these same years our cash collections were approximately $1,141,093 and $874,765 respectively and servicing incomes were approximately $332,903 and $175,645, respectively. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW The purchasing, servicing and collection of charged-off, sub-performing and performing consumer receivables is an industry that is driven by: 4 o levels of consumer debt; o defaults of the underlying receivables; and o utilization of third-party providers to collect such receivables. According to the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, consumer credit has increased from $1.2 trillion at December 31, 1997, to $3.3 trillion at October 2006. The Federal Reserve Board reported that the second-quarter charge-off rate of credit card accounts at commercial banks was 3.48%, up from 2.93% in the first quarter but down from 5.66% in the fourth quarter. The first quarter composite ratio delinquencies at September 27, 2006 are as follows: * Personal loan delinquencies edged up to 1.86 percent from 1.81 percent. * Direct auto loan delinquencies dipped to 1.72 percent from 1.78 percent. * Indirect auto loan delinquencies increased to 2.14 percent from 2.04 percent. * Recreational vehicle loan delinquencies increased slightly to 0.79 percent from 0.78 percent * Marine loan delinquencies increased to 0.98 percent from 0.94 percent. Home equity loan delinquencies fell to 1.89 from 1.94 percent. * Property improvement loan delinquencies increased to 1.48 percent from 1.42 percent. * Mobile home loan delinquencies increased to 3.61 percent from 3.37 percent. We believe that as a result of the difficulty in collecting these past due receivables and the desire of originating institutions to focus on their core businesses and to generate revenue from these receivables, originating institutions are increasingly electing to sell these portfolios. However, due to rapid rise in prices, the Company is looking for investment opportunities in Europe. STRATEGY Our strategy is to acquire portfolios and outsource collections. We believe we differentiate ourselves from the rest of the field based on the following: o knowledge of quantitative and qualitative variables o knowledge of the history of debt under consideration for purchase o understanding of portfolio's characteristics than the originator/seller of the debt. o How the debt is originated - telemarketing, direct mail solicitation, face to face in the office, home, or casual event. We further look at why the individual took on the debt - was it to buy something of need or a spontaneous purchase. o Demographic of the debtor- socio economic category. o Outsource to specialist recovery firms and avoiding pressure to keep internal collection personnel busy. We have invested significant resources in developing a proprietary analytical tool that takes into accounts all the value objects. Our proprietary database analysis application is able to cleanse and format raw data, sort and produce reports 5 and statistics that analyze the predictability of collection of a pool under consideration such as geographic dispersion, statute analysis, recovery history, etc. This is coupled with a bottom up approach resulting in selection of portfolios with highest probability of collection, and valuation and finally pricing. Final purchase decisions are based on our multiple regression models that determine the likelihood of payment by analyzing both the demographic and account-level data of a given portfolio and comparing it our database of accounts and feedback from our recovery partners This is coupled with internally developed statistical models that attempt to score and map out a potential recovery curve of a given portfolio. By implementing a multi-tier approach, our analysis will result in the selection of portfolios with highest probability of collection, and valuation and finally rational pricing. This rigorous disciplined approach does not permit paying more than established range. We believe we can grow the business by managing collections efficiently, paying the right price for portfolios, expanding relationships with credit originators, country diversification and maintaining a low fixed overhead although we cannot provide guarantees. We believe that as a result of our management's experience and expertise, and the fragmented yet growing market in which we operate, we are well-positioned to successfully implement our strategy. CONSUMER RECEIVABLES BUSINESS Due to capital constraint, the Company has not been able to purchase large portfolios and the portfolios it has acquired are through the following sources: o our relationships with industry participants, collection agencies, and resellers; o brokers who specialize in the sale of consumer and commercial receivable portfolios; and o other sources. We utilize our relationships with brokers, recovery partners and sellers of portfolios to locate portfolios for purchase. Our senior management is responsible for: o coordinating due diligence, including in some cases on-site visits to the seller's office; o stratifying and analyzing the portfolio characteristics; o valuing the portfolio; o preparing bid proposals; o negotiating pricing and terms; o closing the purchase; and o the receipt of account documentation for the acquired portfolios. The seller or broker typically supplies us with either a sample listing or the actual portfolio being sold on compact disk, a diskette or other form of media. We analyze each consumer receivable portfolio to determine if it meets our purchasing criteria. We may then prepare a bid or negotiate a purchase price. If a purchase is completed, senior management monitors the portfolio's performance and uses this information in determining future buying criteria and pricing. We purchase receivables at discounts from the balance actually owed by the consumer. We determine how much to bid on a portfolio and a purchase price by evaluating many different variables, such as: 6 o The number of collection agencies previously attempting to collect the receivables in the portfolio; o the average balance of the receivables; o the age of the receivables; o number of days since charge-off; o payments made since charge-off; and o demographics Once a receivable portfolio has been identified for potential purchase, we prepare various analyses based on extracting customer level data from external sources, other than the issuer, to analyze the potential collectibility of the portfolio. We also analyze the portfolio by comparing it to similar portfolios previously serviced by our recovery partners or potential recovery partners. In addition, we perform qualitative analyses of other matters affecting the value of portfolios, including a review of the delinquency, charge off, placement and recovery policies of the originator as well as the collection authority granted by the originator to any third party collection agencies, and, if possible, by reviewing their recovery efforts on the particular portfolio. After these evaluations are completed, members of our senior management discuss the findings, decide whether to make the purchase and finalize the price at which we are willing to purchase the portfolio. We purchase most of our consumer receivable portfolios directly from originators and other sellers including, from time to time, our recovery partners through privately negotiated direct sales or through a bidding process. In order for us to consider a potential seller as a source of receivables, a variety of factors are considered. Sellers must demonstrate that they have: o adequate internal controls to detect fraud; o the ability to provide post sale support; and o the capacity to honor buy-back and return warranty requests. Generally, our portfolio purchase agreements provide that we can return certain accounts to the seller. However, we may acquire a portfolio with few, if any, rights to return accounts to the seller. After acquiring a portfolio, we conduct a detailed analysis to determine which accounts in the portfolio should be returned to the seller. Although the terms of each portfolio purchase agreement differ, examples of accounts that may be returned to the seller include: o debts paid prior to the cutoff date; o debts in which the consumer filed bankruptcy prior to the cutoff date; o debtor is incarcerated; and o debts in which the consumer was deceased prior to cutoff date. o In case of commercial receivables, recourse is limited to fraud and lack of documentation. RECEIVABLE SERVICING Our objective is to maximize our return on investment on acquired consumer receivable portfolios. As a result, before acquiring a portfolio, we analyze the portfolio to determine how to best maximize collections in a cost efficient 7 manner. Once a portfolio has been acquired, we or our recovery partner generally download all receivable information provided by the seller into our account management system and reconcile certain information with the information provided by the seller in the purchase contract. We or our recovery partners send notification letters to obligors of each acquired account explaining, among other matters, our new ownership and asking that the obligor contact us. In addition, we notify the three major credit reporting agencies of our new ownership of the receivables. We presently outsource all our collections to collection agencies. After assignment to a collection agency we actively monitor and review the collection agency's performance on an ongoing basis. Customer Service The customer service department is responsible for: o handling incoming calls from debtors and collection agencies that are responsible for collecting on our consumer receivable portfolios; o coordinating customer inquiries and assisting the collection agencies in the collection process. o Commercial servicing is exclusively handled by servicer with limited involvement of the Company. PORTFOLIO SALES We sell portfolios if they do not meet our internal rate of return hurdle or if we can achieve our returns through a sale. MARKETING The Company has established relationships with brokers who market consumer receivable portfolios from banks, finance companies and other credit providers. The Company has exclusive marketing agreements with certain Credit Union Leagues and continues to expand in that space. In addition, the Company subscribes to national publications that list consumer receivable portfolios for sale. The Company also directly contacts banks, finance companies or other credit providers to solicit consumer receivables for sale. COMPETITION Our business of purchasing distressed consumer receivables is highly competitive and fragmented, and we expect that competition from new and existing companies will increase. We compete with: o other purchasers of consumer receivables, including third-party collection companies; and o other financial services companies who purchase consumer receivables. Some of our competitors are larger and more established and may have substantially greater financial, technological, personnel and other resources than we have, including greater access to capital markets. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS We have upgraded our information system to make tracking of collection activities more efficient. In addition, we rely on the information technology of our third-party recovery partners and periodically review their systems to ensure that they can adequately service our consumer receivable portfolios. EMPLOYEES As of September 30, 2006, we had 5 full-time employees. 8 RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider these risk factors in evaluating the Company. In addition to the following risks, there may also be risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial that may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks occur, our business, results of operation or financial condition could be adversely affected, the trading price of our common stock could decline and shareholders might lose all or part of their investment. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PURCHASE CONSUMER OR COMMERCIAL RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS AT FAVORABLE PRICES OR ON SUFFICIENTLY FAVORABLE TERMS OR AT ALL AND OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS UPON THE CONTINUED AVAILABILITY OF CONSUMER RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS THAT MEET OUR PURCHASING CRITERIA AND OUR ABILITY TO IDENTIFY AND FINANCE THE PURCHASES OF SUCH PORTFOLIOS. The availability of consumer and commercial receivable portfolios at favorable prices and on terms acceptable to us depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including: o the continuation of the current growth trend in consumer debt; o the continued volume of consumer receivable portfolios available for sale; and o competitive factors affecting potential purchasers and sellers of consumer receivable portfolios. We have seen at certain times that the market for acquiring consumer receivable portfolios is becoming more competitive, thereby possibly diminishing our ability to acquire such receivables at attractive prices in future periods. The growth in consumer debt may also be affected by: o a slowdown in the economy; o reductions in consumer spending; o changes in the underwriting criteria by originators; and o changes in laws and regulations governing consumer lending. Any slowing of the consumer debt growth trend could result in a decrease in the availability of consumer receivable portfolios for purchase that could affect the purchase prices of such portfolios. Any increase in the prices we are required to pay for such portfolios in turn will reduce the profit, if any, we generate from such portfolios. OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE AND CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE. Because of the nature of our business, our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Our results may fluctuate as a result of any of the following: o the timing and amount of collections on our consumer receivable portfolios; o our inability to identify and acquire additional consumer receivable portfolios; o a decline in the estimated value of our consumer receivable portfolio recoveries; o increases in operating expenses associated with the growth of our operations; and 9 o general and economic market conditions. o Currency fluctuations can have an impact on our recoveries from U.K. portfolios. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RECOVER SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS ON OUR CONSUMER RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS TO RECOVER THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PURCHASE OF THOSE PORTFOLIOS AND TO FUND OUR OPERATIONS. In order to operate profitably over the long term, we must continually purchase and collect on a sufficient volume of receivables to generate revenue that exceeds our costs. Our ability to recover on our portfolios and produce sufficient returns can be negatively impacted by the quality of the purchased receivables. In the normal course of our portfolio acquisitions, some receivables may be included in the portfolios that fail to conform to certain terms of the purchase agreements and we may seek to return these receivables to the seller for payment or replacement receivables. However, we cannot guarantee that any of such sellers will be able to meet their payment obligations to us. Accounts that we are unable to return to sellers may yield no return. If cash flows from operations are less than anticipated as a result of our inability to collect sufficient amounts on our receivables, our ability to satisfy our debt obligations, purchase new portfolios and our future growth and profitability may be materially adversely affected. WE ARE SUBJECT TO INTENSE COMPETITION FOR THE PURCHASE OF CONSUMER RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS AND, AS A RESULT OF THIS COMPETITION, IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PURCHASE RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS, OUR PROFITS, IF ANY, WILL BE LIMITED. We compete with other purchasers of consumer receivable portfolios, with third-party collection agencies and with financial services companies that manage their own consumer receivable portfolios. We compete on the basis of reputation, industry experience and performance. Some of our competitors have greater capital, personnel and other resources than we have. The possible entry of new competitors, including competitors that historically have focused on the acquisition of different asset types, and the expected increase in competition from current market participants may reduce our access to consumer receivable portfolios. Aggressive pricing by our competitors could raise the price of consumer receivable portfolios above levels that we are willing to pay, which could reduce the number of consumer receivable portfolios suitable for us to purchase or if purchased by us, reduce the profits, if any, generated by such portfolios. If we are unable to purchase receivable portfolios at favorable prices or at all, our revenues and earnings could be materially reduced. FAILURE OF OUR THIRD PARTY RECOVERY PARTNERS TO ADEQUATELY PERFORM COLLECTION SERVICES COULD MATERIALLY REDUCE OUR REVENUES AND OUR PROFITABILITY, IF ANY. We are dependent upon outside collection agencies to service all our consumer receivable portfolios. Any failure by our third party recovery partners to adequately perform collection services for us or remit such collections to us could materially reduce our revenues and our profitability. In addition, our revenues and profitability could be materially adversely affected if we are not able to secure replacement recovery partners and redirect payments from the debtors to our new recovery partner promptly in the event our agreements with our third-party recovery partners are terminated, our third-party recovery partners fail to adequately perform their obligations or if our relationships with such recovery partners adversely change. OUR COLLECTIONS MAY DECREASE IF BANKRUPTCY FILINGS INCREASE. During times of economic recession, the amount of defaulted consumer receivables generally increases, which contributes to an increase in the amount of personal bankruptcy filings. Under certain bankruptcy filings, a debtor's assets are sold to repay credit originators, but since the defaulted consumer receivables we purchase are generally unsecured we often would not be able to collect on those receivables. We cannot assure you that our collection experience would not decline with an increase in bankruptcy filings. If our actual collection experience with respect to a defaulted consumer receivables portfolio is significantly lower than we projected when we purchased the portfolio, our earnings could be negatively affected. 10 WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE OUR OPERATIONS IF WE ARE UNABLE TO GENERATE FUNDING FROM THIRD PARTY FINANCING SOURCES If we are unable to access external sources of financing, we may not be able to fund and grow our operations. The failure to obtain financing and capital as needed would limit our ability to: o purchase consumer receivable portfolios; and o achieve our growth plans. WE USE ESTIMATES FOR RECOGNIZING REVENUE ON A MAJORITY OF OUR CONSUMER RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND OUR EARNINGS WOULD BE REDUCED IF ACTUAL RESULTS ARE LESS THAN ESTIMATED. We recognize finance income on a majority of our consumer receivable portfolios using the interest method. We only use this method if we can reasonably estimate the expected amount and timing of cash to be collected on a specific portfolio based on historic experience and other factors. Under the interest method, we recognize finance income on the effective yield method based on the actual cash collected during a period, future estimated cash flows and the portfolio's carrying value prior to the application of the current quarter's cash collections. The estimated future cash flows are reevaluated quarterly. If future cash collections on these portfolios were less than what was estimated, we would recognize less than anticipated finance income or possibly an expense that would reduce our earnings during such periods. Any reduction in our earnings could materially adversely affect our stock price. WE MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL AT ACQUIRING RECEIVABLES OF NEW ASSET TYPES OR IN IMPLEMENTING A NEW PRICING STRUCTURE. We may pursue the acquisition of receivable portfolios of asset types in which we have little current experience. We may not be successful in completing any acquisitions of receivables of these asset types and our limited experience in these asset types may impair our ability to collect on these receivables. This may cause us to pay too much for these receivables, and consequently, we may not generate a profit from these receivable portfolio acquisitions. THE LOSS OF ANY OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS AND OUR ABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY ACQUIRE RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS. Our Chairman Gobind Sahney, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Max Khan, are responsible for making substantially all management decisions, including determining which portfolios to purchase, the purchase price and other material terms of such portfolio acquisitions. These decisions are instrumental to the success of our business. The loss of the services of Gobind Sahney or Max Khan could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our ability to successfully acquire and service receivable portfolios. GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS MAY LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO RECOVER AND ENFORCE THE COLLECTION OF OUR RECEIVABLES. Federal, state and municipal laws, rules, regulations and ordinances may limit our ability to recover and enforce our rights with respect to the receivables acquired by us. These laws include, but are not limited to, the following federal statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder and comparable statutes in states where consumers reside and/or where creditors are located: o the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; o the Federal Trade Commission Act; 11 o the Truth-In-Lending Act; o the Fair Credit Billing Act; o the Equal Credit Opportunity Act; and o the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Additional laws may be enacted that could impose additional restrictions on the servicing and collection of receivables. Such new laws may adversely affect the ability to collect the receivables. Because the receivables were originated and serviced pursuant to a variety of federal and/or state laws by a variety of entities and involved consumers in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, there can be no assurance that all original servicing entities have at all times been in substantial compliance with applicable law. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we or our recovery partners have been or will continue to be at all times in Substantial compliance with applicable law. The failure to comply with applicable law could materially adversely affect our ability to collect our receivables and could subject us to increased costs and fines and penalties. In addition, our third-party recovery partners may be subject to these and other laws and their failure to comply with such laws could also materially adversely affect our revenues and earnings. The Company is also subject to various debt collection and privacy regulations of countries where is operates. To-date we have made investments in United Kingdom and we are seeking expansion into Germany, Switzerland and Spain. CLASS ACTION SUITS AND OTHER LITIGATION IN OUR INDUSTRY COULD DIVERT OUR MANAGEMENT'S ATTENTION FROM OPERATING OUR BUSINESS AND INCREASE OUR EXPENSES. Certain originators and recovery partners in the consumer credit industry have been subject to class actions and other litigation. Claims include failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations and improper or deceptive origination and servicing practices. If we become a party to such class action suits or other litigation, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. IF A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR SHARES AVAILABLE FOR RESALE ARE SOLD IN THE PUBLIC MARKET, THE MARKET VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could cause a decrease in the market price of our common stock. We had approximately 17,457,079 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of the date hereof. In addition, options to purchase approximately 950,000 shares of our common stock were outstanding as of the date here of which 950,000 were vested. . The remainder of such options will vest over the next three years. We may also issue additional shares in connection with our business and may grant additional stock options to our employees, officers, directors and consultants under our stock option plans or warrants to third parties. As of September 30, 2006 there were 950,000 shares available for such purpose. If a significant portion of these shares were sold in the public market, the market value of our common stock could be adversely affected. ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Our executive and administrative offices are located at 140 Broadway, 46th Floor, New York, New York 10005 and 2002 Jimmy Durante Boulevard, Del Mar, California 92014, respectively. We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our current and anticipated needs. We lease our New York facilities at approximately $3000 per month and such lease expires on February 28, 2006. The Company is currently negotiating leases and the current is renewable at the Company's option. We lease our California facilities at $4,500 per month and such lease expires in March 2009. 12 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company's business. Except for the following, the Company is currently not aware of nor has any knowledge of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results: o On April 23, 2004, Reliant Industries, Inc., Michael Wong and Debbie Wong filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the State of New York Suffolk County against Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and Edward Fine. Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. is the Company's former name. The plaintiffs allege that the Company together with the other defendant committed fraud, breach of contract and negligence. The plaintiffs are seeking monetary payments for any loss that they may suffer as a result of the alleged fraud, breach of contract and negligence as well as legal fees, punitive damages and costs disbursements. The Company denies all allegations and intends to defend this action vigorously. To-date there has been no development with this lawsuit o On June 29, 2005, Allied Surgical Centers Management, LLC, et al. ("Allied") filed a complaint against the Company seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in connection with contracts entered in April 2005 between Allied and the Company pursuant to which the Company acquired various account receivables from Allied (the "Contracts"). Such compliant was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, For the County of Los Angeles, Central District. Allied is seeking a declaratory judgment from the court which would exclude various account receivables (the "Disputed Account Receivables") from the Contracts. Allied is also seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction restricting the Company from attempting to seize or collecting the Disputed Account Receivables. The Company filed a cross complaint on July 15, 2005. In the cross complaint, the Company is seeking an accounting, a mandatory injunction for specific performance of the Contracts and damages in the amount of $21,000,000 in connection with Allied's alleged breach of contract, fraud, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, breach of good faith, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and slander. The Company and Allied have reached a settlement in connection with this matter. Allied has dropped all its claims and agreed to pay all funds received since the purchase of Allied's portfolio in April 2005. The settlement agreement was executed on February 10, 2006 and the Company received the first settlement payment on March 1, 2006. Allied continues to make the monthly payment as stipulated in the settlement agreement. o On September 9, 2005, the Company filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the State of New York - County of New York against Triton Capital, Inc., Southern Capital Associates, Inc., JMS Collections, LLC., Wendt Law Office, James Roscetti, and Dave Dwyer for breach of contract, conversion, deceptive business practices and unjust enrichment. The Company is seeking an amount no less than $46,931. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY-HOLDERS. Not Applicable 13 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. Since October 2004, our common stock, par value $.001 per share, had been quoted on the Nasdaq Bulletin Board under the symbol "RCVA". Prior to May 2004, there was no market for our common stock. The last reported price as of January 8, 2007 was $0.14 per share. ---------------------- --------- -------- Quarter Ended High ($) Low ($) ---------------------- --------- -------- December 31, 2005 .25 .10 March 31, 2006 .60 .15 June 30, 2006 .40 .20 September 30, 2006 .35 .08 HOLDERS As of December 27, 2006 we had approximately 2,187 holders of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. DIVIDENDS We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the foreseeable future. In addition, any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS As of September 30, 2006, we had the following securities authorized for issuance under the equity compensation plans:
Number of securities Weighted-average remaining available exercise price for future issuance Number of Securities to be of outstanding under equity issued upon exercise of options, compensation plans outstanding options, warrants and (excluding securities Plan Category warrants and rights rights reflected in column (a) Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 2,500,000 $0.15 950,000 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders -- -- -- Total 2,500,000 $0.15 950.,000
14 ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The information in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 18 and the Risk Factors beginning on page 7. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 REVENUES Total revenue for the twelve months ended September 30, 2006 was $717,878 compared to $544,582 for the year ended September 30, 2005. Total revenue for year ended September 30, 2006, excluding gain on sale of a portfolio, increased by $15,549 or 3% to $518,287 when compared to $503,329 for the year ended September 30, 2005. The Company booked finance income from only three portfolios for the last three quarters of the year and applied the recovery method to the remaining portfolios. The servicing income was generated from Ramco Income Fund Ltd and other investment vehicles managed by the Company. The finance income is net of all collections expenses because the Company outsources all its collections on a contingency basis. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, we acquired new portfolios with a face value in excess of $16,000,000 at a cost of $974,548 compared to purchase of $21,000,000 in face value at a cost of $1,272,345 during the year ended September 30, 2005. The Company has been unable to make greater investments due to rise in prices paid for charged off consumer credit charge-offs. The face value represents the outstanding balance owed by debtors at the time of purchase and the Company expects to collect only a small percentage of the outstanding balance. The Company used the accretion method based on SOP03-3 for revenue recognition and recovery method for small portfolios. During the year ended September 30, 2006, we serviced a pool of charged-off consumer accounts on behalf of Ramco Income Fund Limited and from other investment vehicles. Servicing fees received under this arrangement rose by 20% to $212,934 in the year ended September 30, 2006 compared to $177,297 for the year ended September 30, 2005. The Fund has been redeeming investors and making limited investments, which has resulted in sharp decline in servicing fees from the Fund which has been offset by fees from other vehicles. Upon the redemption of underlying investors in the Fund, the Company will receive a majority of the residual cash flow from all portfolios acquired for each series of investors. The cumulative residual from the Fund cannot be estimated at this time. TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES Total operating expenses in the year ended September 30, 2006 rose by 11% or $65,965 to $655,026 when compared to $589,061 for the year ended September 30, 2005. The rise in expenses was largely due to significant legal and other expenses associated with the litigation against Allied Health Care Management LLC which was settled on February 10, 2006 in Company's favor. The largest component of total operating expenses is legal and accounting of approximately $127,000. Normal operating expenses related to California and New York offices, salaries and employee benefits accounted for the remainder of the Company's expenses. The Company does not expect operating expensed to change materially from the current level. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE For the year ended September 30, 2006, the Company incurred interest expense of $7,503 and interest income of $864 compared to interest income of $1,652 and no interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2005. The 15 preferred share holders are entitled to annual cash dividend of 5% payable quarterly. On October 29, 2006, the Company reached an agreement with the preferred shareholder to convert the preferred shares into common shares which eliminated accrued and future dividends. The Company has no other contingent expense. INCOME TAXES For the year ended September 30, 2006, the Company has recorded an income tax liability of $1,900. NET INCOME (LOSS) Net income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2006 was $48,904 versus a loss of ($44,479) for the twelve months ended September 30, 2005. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES LIQUIDITY For the year ended September 30, 2006 the Company had working capital of $250,631 versus $347,622 for the year ended September 30, 2005. Working capital for year ended September 30, 2006 declined by 28% or $97,607 from year ended September 30, 2005. The decline is largely due to higher legal and collection expenses, application of recovery method to most portfolios, borrowing and repurchase of additional shares. The Company had $154,640 in cash and continues to generate sufficient cash to fund operations and portfolio purchases for the foreseeable future. We expect to raise additional capital through a credit facility, and or structured notes in the next fiscal year of which we cannot provide any guarantee. CASH FLOWS AND EXPENDITURES YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 COMPARED TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 During the year ended September 30, 2006 the Company spent $974,548 on portfolio acquisitions and collected, excluding portfolio sales, $1,141,093 net of all fees compared to $1,272,345 on portfolio acquisitions and collections of $874,000 in the year ended September 30, 2005. With on going forward flow purchases, the Company will be effectively investing its cash flow on a monthly basis and have sustainable cash flow over the next twelve months. The Company has financing in place to acquire portfolios if they become available at reasonable prices. During the year we generated $212,934 in servicing revenue compared to $177,297 in 2005 primarily from Ramco Income Fund, Ltd and other investment vehicles. Servicing fees from the Fund has declined due to redemptions and limited additional investments. The decline has been offset by fees from other investment vehicles we manage. We currently utilize various business channels for the collection of charged off credit cards and other receivables. The Company is currently using ten (12) collection agencies and several law firms on a contingency basis. Cash flow from operations was negative ($9,841) in the year ended September 30, 2006 compared to negative ($217,482) in the year ended September 30, 2005. The reversal was largely due to reversal on net loss in 2005. Our primary investing activity is the purchase of new receivable portfolios. We purchase receivable portfolios directly from issuers and from resellers as well as from brokers that represent various issuers. We carefully evaluate portfolios and bid on only those that meet our selective targeted return profile. Capital expenditures for fixed assets were not material for the year ended September 30, 2006 and all purchases of capital expenditures were funded with internal cash flow. 16 Net cash from financing activities was negative ($47,943) in 2006 compared negative ($56,218) in 2005. During the twelve month ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued an eighteen month amortizing note for net proceeds of $300,000 of which approximately $160,000 was repaid during the year and also purchased and retired 1,125,000 warrants of the Company for approximately $112,600. PORTFOLIO DATA The following table shows the Company's portfolio buying activity during the quarter, among other things, the purchase price, actual cash collections and estimated cash collection as of September 30, 2006. ACTUAL CASH PURCHASE PERIOD PURCHASE PRICE(1) COLLECTIONS (2) ESTIMATED (3) 12/31/2003 $ 569,070 $1,622,539 $ 162,737 12/31/2004 $ 100,444 $ 151,958 $ 109,918 2/28/2005 $ 81,076 $ 109,082 $ 89,725 4/11/2005 $ 375,000 $ 252,754 $ 347,744 6/2/2005 $ 37,660 $ 49,854 $ 62,249 7/25/2005 $ 177,668 $ 142,412 $ 274,688 9/28/2005 $ 61,974 $ 45,512 $ 121,140 12/28/2005 $ 80,000 $ 43,624 $ 129,883 3/9/2006 $ 121,972 $ 54,072 $ 164,000 4/2/2006 $ 104,049 $ 33,690 $ 197,845 4/7/2006 $ 331,974 $ 96,352 $ 500,324 6/7/2006 $ 70,020 $ 35,452 $ 97,479 6/14/2006 $ 98,864 $ 32,011 $ 165,061 9/28/2006 $ 117,944 $ 265,374 ---------- (1) Purchase price refers to the cash paid to a seller to acquire defaulted receivables, plus certain capitalized expenses, less the purchase price refunded by the seller due to the return of non-compliant accounts (also defined as buybacks). Non-compliant refers to the contractual representations and warranties between the seller and the Company. These representations and warranties from the sellers generally cover account holders' death or bankruptcy and accounts settled or disputed prior to sale. The seller can replace or repurchase these accounts. (2) Actual cash collections net of recovery cost or sale. (3) Total estimated collections refer to the actual cash collections, including cash sales, plus estimated remaining collections of which we can provide no guarantee regarding the success of the outstanding remaining collections. The Company will take an impairment charge if the actual recoveries fall short of expected recoveries. CAPITAL RESOURCES The cash flow from portfolios currently owned and the forward flow in pipeline would be adequate to meet our operating expenses. The Company continues to explore other sources of capital for larger portfolio acquisitions. INFLATION We believe that inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2005. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company utilizes the interest method under guidance provided by the AICPA issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-03 to determine income recognized on finance receivables 17 In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-03, "Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer." This SOP proposes guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor's initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. This SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio's initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP would require that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP would freeze the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, the carrying value of a portfolio would be written down to maintain the original IRR. Increases in expected future cash flows would be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio's remaining life. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Management is in the process of evaluating the application of this SOP. SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated into this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "project," and similar expressions often characterize forward looking statements. These statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of collections, revenues, income or loss, estimates of capital expenditures, plans for future operations, products or services, and financing needs or plans, as well as assumptions relating to these matters. These statements include, among others, statements found under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business." Actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors that could affect our results and cause them to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include: o the availability of financing; o our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to operate our business including obtaining new capital to enable us to purchase new receivables; o our ability to purchase receivable portfolios on acceptable terms; o our continued servicing of the receivables in our securitization transactions and for the unrelated third party; o our ability to recover sufficient amounts on receivables to fund operations; o our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel to recover our receivables efficiently; o changes in, or failure to comply with, government regulations; and o the costs, uncertainties and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. They are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which we cannot predict or quantify. Future events and actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. When considering each forward-looking statement, you should keep in mind the risk factors and cautionary statements found throughout this Form 10-K and specifically those found below. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or for any other reason. In addition, it is our policy generally not to make any specific projections as to future earnings, and we do not endorse projections regarding future performance that may be made by third parties. 18 ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 PAGE(S) REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 20 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 21-22 Consolidated Statements of Income (Operations) For the Years Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 23 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 24 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 25 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 26-35 19 BAGELL, JOSEPHS, LEVINE & COMPANY, L.L.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS HIGH RIDGE COMMONS SUITES 400-403 200 HADDONFIELD BERLIN ROAD GIBBBSORO, NEW JERSEY 08026 (856) 346-2828 FAX (856) 346-2882 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation and Subsidiaries 140 Broadway, 46th Floor, New York, New York 10005. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income (operations), stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its consolidated operations, changes in consolidated stockholders' equity and consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /S/BAGELL, JOSEPHS, LEVINE& COMPANY, L.L.C. BAGELL, JOSEPHS, LEVINE & COMPANY, L.L.C. Certified Public Accountants Gibbsboro, New Jersey December 27, 2006 20 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 ASSETS 2006 2005 ---------- ---------- CURRENT ASSETS Cash $ 154,640 $ 212,424 Prepaid Expenses 15,000 -- Finance receivables - short term 279,703 274,663 ---------- ---------- TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 449,343 487,087 ---------- ---------- OTHER ASSETS Finance receivables - long-term 567,881 557,649 ---------- ---------- TOTAL OTHER ASSETS 567,881 557,649 ---------- ---------- TOTAL ASSETS $1,017,224 $1,044,736 ========== ========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. 21 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - CONTINUED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
2006 2005 ----------- ----------- CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable - Trade $ -- $ 18,238 Accrued and other expenses 34,052 41,187 Preferred stock dividend payable 20,000 20,000 Costs for stock to be issued 1,500 -- Note Payable -short term 141,260 60,000 Income tax expense 1,900 -- ----------- ----------- TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 198,712 139,425 ----------- ----------- LONG TERM LIABILITIES Note payable -long term -- 10,000 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES 198,712 149,425 ----------- ----------- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock, par value $10 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized and 80,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively 800,000 800,000 Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 325,000,000 shares authorized in 2006 and 2005 and 17,808,917 and 15,555,917 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively 17,809 15,556 Additional paid-in capital -- 83,144 Retained earnings (deficit) 703 (3,389) ----------- ----------- TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 818,512 895,311 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,017,224 $ 1,044,736 =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. 22 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (OPERATIONS) FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 2006 2005 ------------ ------------ REVENUES FINANCING INCOME 305,353 326,032 GAIN ON SALE OF FINANCE RECEIVABLES 199,591 41,253 SERVICE INCOME AND OTHER 212,934 177,297 ------------ ------------ TOTAL INCOME 717,878 544,582 ------------ ------------ COSTS AND EXPENSES Selling, general and administrative 655,026 589,061 ------------ ------------ TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES 655,026 589,061 ------------ ------------ NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE OTHER INCOME 62,852 (44,479) OTHER INCOME (LOSS) Other Income (loss) - Sale of Finance Recievables (5,409) -- Interest income 864 1,652 Interest expense (7,503) -- ------------ ------------ Total other Income (Loss) (12,048) 1,652 ------------ ------------ NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAX 50,804 (44,479) PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (1,900) -- ------------ ------------ NET INCOME (LOSS) 48,904 (44,479) LESS PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND (30,000) (50,000) ------------ ------------ INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK $ 18,904 $ (94,479) ------------ ------------ BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.00 $ (0.01) ============ ============ DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE $ 0.00 $ 0.00 ============ ============ WEIGHTED AVERAGE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK - BASIC 17,457,079 15,011,359 ============ ============ WEIGHTED AVERAGE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK - DILUTED 19,553,079 21,261,359 ============ ============ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. 23
RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 PREFERRED COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL ------------------------- --------------------------- PAID-IN ACCUMULATED SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT TOTAL ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 80,000 $ 800,000 $ 14,845,725 $ 14,846 $ 175,072 $ 91,090 $ 1,081,008 ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ Conversion of loan at fair market value for common stock issued -- -- 24,876 25 4,975 -- 5,000 Exercise of warrants -- -- 200,000 200 1,300 -- 1,500 Common stock cancelled -- -- (14,684) (15) (1,453) -- (1,468) Repurchase of warrants -- -- (100,000) -- (100,000) exercise of warrants at $.0075 per share for common stock -- -- 500,000 500 3,250 -- 3,750 Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferrd Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Net income loss for the year ended September 30, 2005 -- -- -- $ -- -- (44,479) (44,479) ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 80,000 $ 800,000 15,555,917 $ 15,556 $ 83,144 $ (3,389) $ 895,311 ========== ============ ============ =========== =========== ============ ============ at $.0075 per share for common stock -- -- 2,253,000 2,253 14,644 -- 16,897 Repurchase of warrants -- -- -- -- (82,500) -- (82,500) Repurchase of warrants -- -- -- -- (15,288) (4,812) (20,100) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Repurchase of warrants -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Preferred Stock Dividend -- -- -- -- -- (10,000) (10,000) Net Loss For The Year Ended September 30, 2006 -- -- -- -- -- 48,904 48,904 ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 80,000 $ 800,000 17,808,917 $ 17,809 $ -- $ 703 $ 818,512 ========== ============ ============ =========== =========== ============ ============ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
24 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
2006 2005 ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net Income (Loss) $ 48,904 $ (44,479) ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: CHANGES IN CERTAIN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Proceeds from sale of portfolio - net of gain 142,415 425,453 Acquisition of finance receivables, net of buybacks (974,548) (1,272,345) Collections applied to principal on finance receivables 816,861 645,224 (Increase) Decrease in Prepaid expenses (15,000) 97,763 (Decrease) Accounts payable - Trade (18,239) (66,247) (Decrease) Increase Accrued Expenses (12,134) 36,187 (Decrease) Increase in Income Taxes 1,900 (39,038) ----------- ----------- NET CASH (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES (9,841) (217,482) ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from exercise of warrants 1,500 70,000 Issuance of common stock 5,250 (Decrease) Notes Payable (206,843) Dividends paid (30,000) (30,000) Proceeds from Notes Payable 300,000 Repurchase of retired common stock (1,468) Repurchase of warrants (112,600) (100,000) ----------- ----------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES (47,943) (56,218) NET(DECREASE) IN CASH (57,784) (273,700) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR 212,424 486,124 ----------- ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR $ 154,640 $ 212,424 =========== =========== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION Issuance of Common Stock for: Conversion of notes payable $ 21,897 $ 5,000 =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. 25 RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 NOTE 1- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. THE COMPANY AND PRESENTATION Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") was formerly Biopharmaceutics, Inc., In June 1999 pursuant to a meeting of the Board of Directors, Biopharmaceutics Inc, adopted a resolution and filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation and changed the name of Biopharmaceutics, Inc., to Feminique Corporation. On November 25, 2003, the Feminique Corporation incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary Receivable Acquisition and Management Corp of New York. The Company purchases, manages and collects defaulted consumer receivables. On April 21, 2004, Feminique Corporation amended its certificate of incorporation to increase its authorized number of shares of common stock from 75,000,000 shares to 325,000,000 shares. This amendment was approved by Feminique Corporation's shareholders at its April 20, 2004 annual meeting. The shareholders also changed the name of Feminique Corporation to Receivable Acquisition and Management Corporation. B. FINANCE RECEIVABLES The Company on December 15, 2003, acquired defaulted consumer receivable portfolios for $569,071 with a face value of $15,985,138. Another portfolio with face value of $18,944,048 was acquired for $331,501. The Company accounts for its investment in finance receivables under the guidance of Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-3, "Accounting for Loans or Certain Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer." This SOP limits the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) to the excess of the Company's estimate of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows (cash flows expected at the acquisition to be collected) over the Company's initial investment in the finance receivables. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively through adjustment of the finance receivables yield over its remaining life. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized as impairment to the finance receivable portfolios. The Company's proprietary collections model is designed to track and adjust the yield and carrying value of the finance receivables based on the actual cash flows received in relation to the expected cash flows. The Company acquired on April 19, 2004 a third portfolio with a face value of $447,390 for $31,317. The Company, on September 16, 2004 put $97,763 on deposit for a fourth portfolio. However, the Company did not take possession of the portfolio and received a full refund in October 2004. The Company acquired on October 10, 2004 a new portfolio with a face value of $2,107,132 for $100,444. The Company will use for this portfolio the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $100,444 has been recovered. On November 23, 2004 the Company sold the portfolio with an original face value of $18,944,048 and an acquisition price of $331,051 for a sale price of $293,250. The Company recognized a gain of $87,514 on the sale. The carrying value of the portfolio at the time of sale was $205,736. 26 During the quarter ending March 31, 2005, the Company acquired portfolios for $487,280. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $487,280 has been recovered. The Company acquired on April 11, 2005 a portfolio with a face value of $5,500,000 for $375,000. The Company will apply the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $375,000 has been recovered. The Company acquired the fourth tranche of a forward flow on June 2, 2005 with a face value of $619,275 for $37,660. The Company will apply the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $37,660 has been recovered. During the quarter ending June 30, 2005, the Company acquired total portfolios for $412,660. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $412,660 has been recovered. On July 12, 2005, the Company sold the portfolio with an original face value of $3,674,498 and an acquisition price of $233,330 for a sales price of $168,767. The Company will recognize a loss in the fourth quarter. The Company retained approximately $92,000 in face value of paying accounts. During the quarter ending September 30, 2005 the Company acquired total portfolios for $239,162. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $239,162 has been recovered. On November 22, 2005 the Company sold a portfolio with an acquisition price of $172,827 for $112,290. The Company recognized a loss of $5,409 on the sale. During the quarter ending March 31, 2006, the Company acquired total portfolios for $207,459. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $207,459 has been recovered. During the quarter ending March 31, 2006 the Company sold a portfolio with a carrying value of $4,987 for $24,321. The Company recognized a gain of $19,344 on the sale. During the quarter ending June 30, 2006, the Company acquired total portfolios for $434,726. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $434,726 has been recovered. The Company sold a financial receivable portfolio on April 28, 2006. The face amount of the portfolio is $4,107,881. The portfolio was sold for $205,394 or approximately 5% of the portfolio's face value. The Company recognized a gain of $180,256 on the sale. During the quarter ending September 30, 2006, the Company acquired total portfolios for $117,944. The Company will use for these portfolios the "Recovery Method" for revenue recognition under which no revenue is recognized until the investment amount of $117,944 has been recovered. In the event that cash collections would be inadequate to amortize the carrying balance, an impairment charge would be taken with a corresponding write-off of the receivable balance. Accordingly, the Company does not maintain an allowance for credit losses. The agreements to purchase the aforementioned receivables include general representations and warranties from the sellers covering account holder death or bankruptcy, and accounts settled or 27 disputed prior to sale. The representation and warranty period permitting the return of these accounts from the Company to the seller is typically 90 to 180 days. Any funds received from the seller of finance receivables as a return of purchase price are referred to as buybacks. Buyback funds are simply applied against the finance receivable balance received. They are not included in the Company's cash collections from operations nor are they included in the Company's cash collections applied to principal amount. Gains on sale of finance receivables, representing the difference between sales price and the unamortized value of the finance receivables, are recognized when finance receivables are sold. Changes in finance receivables for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows: 2005 2004 ----------- ----------- Balance at beginning of year October 1, 2006 & 2005 $ 832,312 $ 630,641 Acquisition of finance receivables 974,548 1,272,345 Cash collections applied to principal (816,861) (645,224) Sale of portfolio - net of gain (142,415) (425,453) ----------- ----------- Balance at the end of the year $ 847,584 $ 832,309 =========== =========== Estimated Remaining Collections ("ERC")* $ 2,648,346 $ 1,955,191 =========== =========== ---------- * Estimated remaining collection refers to the sum of all future projected cash collections from acquired portfolios. ERC is not a balance sheet item, however, it is provided for informational purposes. Income recognized on finance receivables was $305,353 and $326,032 for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 respectively. Under SOP-03-3 debt security impairment is recognized only if the fair market value of the debt has declined below its amortized costs. Currently no amortized costs are below fair market value. Therefore, the Company has not recognized any impairment for the finance receivables. C. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. D. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2006. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents balances at financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company's uninsured cash balances total $80,000 and $112,424, respectively. E. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT Furniture and equipment when acquired will be stated at cost. Depreciation will be provided using straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. 28 Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations when incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset accounts and related accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved, and any gain or loss is included in operations. F. INCOME TAXES The Company has adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The statement requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes, and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting bases and tax bases of the Company's assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. G. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during this reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. H. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION Effective December 31, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payments," which establishes the accounting for employee stock-based awards. Under the provisions of SFAS No.123(R), stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite employee service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method and, as a result, periods prior to December 31, 2005 have not been restated. The Company recognized stock-based compensation for awards issued under the Company's stock option plans in other income/expenses included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Additionally, no modifications were made to outstanding stock options prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and no cumulative adjustments were recorded in the Company's financial statements. Prior to December 31, 2005, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 ("APB No. 25"), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, compensation cost was recognized based on the difference, if any, on the date of grant between the fair value of the Company's stock and the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. The Company grants stock options at an exercise price equal to 100% of the market price on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized for the stock option grants in periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based compensation under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". The fair value of the option issued is used to measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company's common stock on the date that the commitment for 29 performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty's performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital. I. REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenue is recognized based on AICPA Statement of Position 03-3, if the management is reasonably comfortable with expected cash flows. In the event, expected cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated, the Company will use the "Recovery Method" under which revenues are only recognized after the initial investment has been recovered. J. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK Historical net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. Common stock equivalents were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reported a loss because to do so would be antidilutive for periods presented. The following is a reconciliation of the computation for basic and diluted EPS: September 30, September 30, 2006 2005 ------------ ------------ Net income (loss) $ 48,904 $ (44,479) ------------ ------------ Weighted-average common shares Outstanding (Basic) 17,457,079 15,011,359 Weighted-average common stock Equivalents Stock options 950,000 950,000 Warrants 1,146,000 5,300,000 ------------ ------------ Weighted-average common shares Outstanding (Diluted) 19,553,079 21,261,359 ============ ============ K. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In October 2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-03, "Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer." This SOP proposes guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor's initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. This SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. This SOP would limit the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio's initial cost of accounts receivable acquired. The SOP would require that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP would freeze the internal rate of return, referred to as IRR, originally estimated when the accounts receivable are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the original collection estimates are not received, the carrying value of a portfolio would be 30 written down to maintain the original IRR. Increases in expected future cash flows would be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio's remaining life. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements would not need to be restated. Management has decided on the early adoption of the application of this SOP. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity". This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities, if applicable. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. The adoption of this statement did not have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position. In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" (SFAS 154), which requires a retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle for all periods presented. This statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20 which required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. The provisions of SFAS 154 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Currently there is no impact on the Company. In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). SAB 108 was issued in order to eliminate the diversity in practice surrounding how public companies quantify financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that registrants quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a misstated amount that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. SAB108 must be implemented by the end of the Company's first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect SAB 108 to have any material impact on financial reporting or disclosures. In March 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement: 1. Requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract under certain situations. 2. Requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. 3. Permits an entity to choose either the amortization method or the fair value measurement method subsequent measurement methods for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities: 4. At its initial adoption, permits a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights, without calling into question the treatment of other available-for-sale securities under Statement 115, provided that the available-for-sale securities 31 are identified in some manner as offsetting the entity's exposure to changes in fair value of servicing assets or servicing liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value. 5. Requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. We do not expect FASB No. 156 to have a material impact on our financial reporting, and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of FASB No. 156 will have on our disclosure requirements. The statement becomes effective after the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 30, 2006. In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. FASB Statement No. 157 will be effective for our financial statements issued for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 to have a material impact on our financial reporting, and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 will have on our disclosure requirements. In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" (FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material impact on our financial reporting and disclosure. L. RECLASSIFICATION Certain amounts in the September 30, 2005 Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. The reclassifications have no effect on the net loss for year ended September 30, 2005. NOTE 2- NOTES PAYABLE A. On January 29, 2004 the Company borrowed an additional $5,000 note bearing interest at 5% per annum. The note is convertible into common stock at $.20 per share. The Company issued in October 2004, 24,876 shares of common stock to satisfy the debt. B. On June 10, 2005, the Company agreed to repurchase 1,000,000 warrants at $.10 per warrant. The Company has paid $30,000 and will pay the remaining $70,000 over 16 months. The note has been paid off. C. The Company issued on April 10, 2006 a private convertible note offering in the amount of $300,000. The Company intended to repay the holder of the convertible note in 18 payments of $ 18,155 from the date of issuance of the convertible note at a rate of 11% per annum on or before October 7, 2007 (the "Maturity Date"). However the Company repaid $116,000 of the principal on 32 May 11, 2006. The repayment terms, as of May 11, 2006 were restated as $11,738, per month until October 7, 2007. The interest rate of 11% per annum will not change. NOTE 3- STOCK OPTIONS In April 2004, the Company adopted a stock option plan upon approval by the shareholders art the Annual General Meeting under which selected eligible key employees of the Company are granted the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. The plan provides that 37,500,000 shares of the Company's authorized common stock be reserved for issuance under the plan as either incentive stock options or non-qualified options. Options are granted at prices not less than 100 percent of the fair market value at the end of the date of grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years or a long as that person continues to be employed or serve on the on the Board of Directors, whichever is shorter. At September 30, 2006, the Company had 950,000 options outstanding under this plan. NOTE 4- INCOME TAXES Income Taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due. Deferred taxes related to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting will either be taxable or deductible when the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. The difference between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting are not material therefore, the provision for income taxes from operations consist of income taxes currently payable. The income tax accounting reported within these statements is summarized as follows: September 30, September 30, 2006 2005 ------------- ------------ Provision Current: Federal $ 500 $ -- State and Local 1,400 -- ------------- ------------ Total Current 1,900 -- Deferred -- -- ------------- ------------ Total provision for income taxes $ -- $ -- ============= ============ The Company's effective tax rate is different than what would be expected if the statutory rates were applied to "net income (loss) before income taxes" primarily because of expenses deductible for financial reporting purposes that are not deductible for tax purposes allowed. There was no provision for income tax for the year ended September 30, 2005. At September 30, 2005 the Company had an accumulated deficit approximating $3,389, available to offset future taxable income through 2023. 33 September 30, 2005 ------------- Deferred tax assets $ 3,389 Less: valuation allowance (3,389) ------------- Totals $ -- ============= NOTE 5- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY COMMON STOCK There were 325,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, with 17,808,917 and 15,555,997 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The par value for the common stock is $.001 per share. The following details the stock transactions for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. The Company issued 24,876 shares of common stock at $.20 per share in October 2004 to discharge a shareholders' loan of $5,000. The Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock at $.008 per share in February 2005 as a conversion of warrants into common stock. The Company repurchased 14,684 shares of common stock on June 24, 2005. The shares will be retired in August 2005. The shares were repurchased for $.10 per share for a total amount of $1,468. The Company received $3,750 for the exercise of 500,000 warrants at $.0075 per share of common stock in June 2005. The Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock in August 2005. The Company issued to the holder of the note payable, 2,253,000 shares of common stock at $0.0075 per share on November 28, 2005 as a conversion of warrants into common stock. In lieu of payment in the amount of $16,897 the shares were purchased through a $16,897 reduction of the note payable. (See Note 2. B) The Company repurchased 201,000 warrants at a price of $0.10 per warrant on November 18, 2005. The total repurchase price was $20,100. The Company repurchased 500,000 warrants at a price of $0.125 per warrant on November 18, 2005. The total repurchase price was $62,500. The Company repurchased 200,000 warrants at a price of $0.10 per warrant on November 18, 2005. The total repurchase price was $20,000. The Company repurchased 100,000 warrants at a price of $0.10 per warrant on March 16, 2006. The total repurchase price was $10,000. The Company repurchased 150,000 shares of common stock during May 2006. The shares will be retired in November 2006. Currently, the purchase is accounted for as a prepaid asset. The shares were repurchased for $.10 per share for a total amount of $15,000. 34 The Company received $1,500 for the exercise of 200,000 warrants at $.0075 per shares in September 2006. As of September 30, 2006 the shares have not been issued and are currently carried at $1,500 as a liability for stock to be issued. PREFERRED STOCK There were 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, with 80,000 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and 2005. The par value for the preferred shares is $10 per share. NOTE 6- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS CONSERVSION OF PREFERRED SHARES On October 28, 2006 the Company reached an agreement with Artemis equity Hedge Fund Ltd the holder of 80,000 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at $10 par value to convert the preferred shares into 800,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Additionally the Company agreed to issue 70,000 shares for all accrued dividends. SHARE PURCHASES On October 30, 2006 the Company reached an agreement with a shareholder to buyback 2,000,000 shares of that shareholder's common stock for a cash payment of $50,000 along with a note of $150,000 totaling $200,000. The stock purchase was completed on October 31, 2006. PURCHASES OF FINANCE RECEIVABLE PORTFOLIOS The Company acquired two more tranches under the current forward flow agreement with a credit originator in the United Kingdom. The first tranche with a face value of $598,771 was acquired on October 29, 2006 and the second tranche with a face value of $616,665 was acquired on November 15, 2006. ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. There was no change in our internal controls or in other factors that could affect these controls during our last fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 35 ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION None. PART III ITEM 9. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The following table sets forth the names, age, and position of each of our directors and executive officers. Name Age Present Principal Employment -------------- --- --------------------------------- Max Khan 40 Director, President, CEO and CFO Gobind Sahney 45 Chairman Steven Lowe 46 Director and Secretary Set forth below is biographical information for each officer and director. GOBIND SAHNEY, age 45, 1987 to 2004, Chairman & CEO, Young Entrepreneurs Society, Inc. (YES) a credit card marketing Company.1997 to 2004, Chairman & President, Sahney & Company, a corporate finance advisory firm. Mr. Sahney is a lifetime member of the National Eagle Scout Association; member Babson College Board of Trustees; the Babson College Asian Advisory Board; Mr. Sahney is a graduate of Babson College with dual degrees in Finance and Accounting. Born in 1961, Mr. Sahney lives in San Diego and has 2 children. MAX KHAN, age 40, has been in the financial industry since 1987. He began his career as a financial consultant in New York. Mr. Khan founded Alliance Global Finance Inc. in 1992 with focus on corporate finance and investment banking. Mr. Khan served as president of Alliance Global Finance from 1991 through October 2003. Mr. Khan is also the co-founder of NewTrad Investors Inc., a hedge fund advisory firm specializing in advising Japanese institutions in their diversification into alternative assets. Mr. Khan has a Bachelors Degree in Accounting and Economics from City University of New York and MBA from Pace University (New York). He is married with 2 children and lives in New York. Steven Lowe, age 46, is a practicing attorney. He is the founder of Lowe Law. Mr. Lowe graduated from Vanderbilt University and received his JD from University of Connecticut School of Law. SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock to file with the SEC and the Company reports on Form 4 and Form 5 reflecting transactions affecting beneficial ownership. Based solely on a review of the copies of the reports furnished to us, or written representations that no reports were required to be filed, we believe that during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with. ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth all compensation awarded, earned or paid for services rendered in all capacities to us during fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006 to: o Each person who served as our chief executive officer during 2004, 2005 and 2006; and 36 o Our other executive officers whose total annual salary and bonus in 2004, 2005 and 2006 exceeded $100,000.
Long-Term Salary Bonus Compensation Awards: Name and Principal Position Year Annual Compensation Securities Underlying Options --------------------------- ---- ------------------- ----------------------------- Max Khan 2005 $ 100,000 None $150,000 CEO & CFO 2006 $ 100,000 None None
EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENT The Company has an employment agreement with Max Khan. The employment agreement is for a term of 3 years terminating on April 30, 2007 and provides that Mr. Khan is entitled to receive $180,000 in annual compensation. There are no separation agreements. ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth information at September 30, 2006 concerning ownership of the Company's common shares by each director and executive officer and each person who owns of record, or is known to the Company to own beneficially, more than five percent of the Company's common shares. NAME AND ADDRESS AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICAL OWNERSHIP PERCENT OF CLASS ---------------- ------------------- ---------------- Gobind Sahney 870,000 5.80% Lisa Sahney Trust 1,740,000 11.59% Max Khan 2,900,000 19.31% Mehtab Sultana 1,300,000 8.66% Steven Lowe (1) 50,000 Claudia DiNatale 4,437,326 29.56% All Directors and Officers as a group (3 persons) 3,820,000 25.45% ---------- (1) Represents fully vested options granted in 2005. ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS None. 37 ITEM 13. EXHIBITS The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with this report as indicated below. Exhibit Number Description ------- ------------------------------------------------------------ 31.1 Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Audit and Non-Audit Fees Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the Company by Bagell, Josephs Levine & Company, L.L.C for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are set forth below. The aggregate fees included in the Audit category are fees billed for the fiscal years for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements and review of financial statements and statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The aggregate fees included in each of the other categories are fees billed in the fiscal years. (All references to "$" in this Proxy Statement are to United States dollars.) Fiscal Year Ending Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2006 September 30, 2005 Audit Fees $32,000 $20,000 Audit Related Fees $5,000 $5,500 Tax Fees $0 $0 All Other Fees $0 $0 Total $37,000 $25,500 Audit Fees for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, quarterly review of the financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB, consents, and other assistance required to complete the year end audit of the consolidated financial statements. Audit-Related Fees as of the fiscal years ended September, 2006 and 2005 were for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements and not reported under the caption Audit Fees. Tax Fees as of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were for professional services related to tax compliance, tax authority audit support and tax planning. There were no fees that were classified as All Other Fees as of the fiscal years ended September, 2005 and 2004. 38 As the Company does not have a formal audit committee, the services described above were not approved by the audit committee under the de minimus exception provided by Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) under Regulation S-X. Further, as the Company does not have a formal audit committee, the Company does not have audit committee pre-approval policies and procedures 39 SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. RECEIVABLE ACQUISITION & MANAGEMENT CORPORATION /S/ MAX KHAN --------------------------------------- By: Max Khan Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial/Accounting Officer, and Director Date: January 8, 2007 40 In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: /S/ MAX KHAN --------------------------------------- By: Max Khan Chief Executive/Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director Date: January 8, 2007 /S/ GOBIND SAHNEY --------------------------------------- By: Gobind Sahney Chairman of the Board Date: January 8, 2007 /S/ STEVEN LOWE --------------------------------------- By: Steven Lowe Director Date: January 5, 2007 41