XML 34 R56.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies (Details)
1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2010
USD ($)
Mar. 31, 2010
CAD
item
acre
Feb. 28, 2009
Mar. 31, 2010
CAD
acre
Jun. 30, 2013
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2012
item
Dec. 31, 2010
USD ($)
Mar. 23, 2012
Nov. 30, 2011
USD ($)
Aug. 24, 2011
USD ($)
Jul. 12, 2011
USD ($)
Jun. 02, 2011
USD ($)
Mar. 11, 2011
item
Nov. 30, 2010
Seventh Amended Petition [Member]
USD ($)
Feb. 28, 2009
Sixth Amended Petition [Member]
USD ($)
Unrecorded capital investments obligation, Exploration program acres coverage (acres)   2,500,000   2,500,000                      
Unrecorded capital investments obligation   47,000,000   47,000,000                      
Period licenses require capital investments be made, years       3 years                      
Number of extensions to exploration license agreememnts           2                  
Extension of exploration license, period           1 year                  
Unrecorded promissory note payable   44,500,000   44,500,000                      
Duration of firm transportation agreement, years               15 years              
Obligation under transportation agreements         3,100,000,000                    
Guarantee obligations relative to the firms transportation agreements and gathering project and services         100,000,000                    
Litigation, Allegations     plaintiff alleged that, in 2005, they provided SEPCO with proprietary data regarding two prospects in the James Lime formation pursuant to a confidentiality agreement and that SEPCO refused to return the proprietary data to the plaintiff, subsequently acquired leases based upon such proprietary data and profited therefrom.  Among other things, the plaintiff's allegations in the Sixth Petition included various statutory and common law claims, including, but not limited to claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act, breach of fiduciary duty and confidential relationships, various fraud based claims and breach of contract, including a claim of breach of a purported right of first refusal on all interests acquired by SEPCO between February 2005 and February 2006.                        
Litigation, Monetary damages claimed by plaintiffs                           46,000,000 55,000,000
Litigation settlement 11,400,000                            
Litigation, Interest and Attorney's Fees claimed by plaintiffs                   8,900,000   11,400,000      
Litigation, portion of profits considered for disgorgement             381,500,000                
Disgorgement damages awarded in favor of the plantiff and intervenor                     23,900,000        
Percentage of attorney fees recoverable by plantiff                       40      
Number of wells for constructive trust profits                         143    
Number of horizontal wells operated by SEECO in Arkansas   27                          
Value of SEPCO's supersedeas bond                 14,100,000            
Pre-judgement interest covered by SEPCO's supersedeas bond                 1,300,000            
Post-judgement interest covered by SEPCO's supersedeas bond                 1,300,000            
Litigation, SEPCO's estimated gross liability including interest and attorney's fees.         $ 45,500,000