XML 17 R50.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies (Details)
1 Months Ended 3 Months Ended 6 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2010
USD ($)
Mar. 31, 2010
CAD
Feb. 28, 2009
Mar. 31, 2010
CAD
Jun. 30, 2012
USD ($)
Dec. 31, 2010
USD ($)
Mar. 23, 2012
Nov. 30, 2011
USD ($)
Jul. 12, 2011
USD ($)
Jun. 02, 2011
USD ($)
Mar. 11, 2011
Feb. 28, 2009
Seventh Amended Petition [Member]
USD ($)
Feb. 28, 2009
Sixth Amended Petition [Member]
USD ($)
Unrecorded capital investments obligation, Exploration program acres coverage (acres in millions)   2.5   2.5                  
Unrecorded capital investments obligation   47,000,000   47,000,000                  
Period licenses require capital investments be made, years       3 years                  
Unrecorded promissory note payable   44,500,000   44,500,000                  
Length of pipeline proposal, miles             121            
Duration of firm transportation agreement, years             15 years            
SES transportation agreement, capacity per day in MMcf             150            
Obligation under transportation agreements         1,200,000,000                
Guarantee obligations relative to the firms transportation agreements and gathering project and services         100,000,000                
Litigation, Allegations     plaintiff alleged that, in 2005, they provided SEPCO with proprietary data regarding two prospects in the James Lime formation pursuant to a confidentiality agreement and that SEPCO refused to return the proprietary data to the plaintiff, subsequently acquired leases based upon such proprietary data and profited therefrom.  Among other things, the plaintiff's allegations in the Sixth Petition included various statutory and common law claims, including, but not limited to claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act, breach of fiduciary duty and confidential relationships, various fraud based claims and breach of contract, including a claim of breach of a purported right of first refusal on all interests acquired by SEPCO between February 15, 2005 and February 15, 2006.                    
Litigation, Monetary damages claimed by plaintiffs                       46,000,000 55,000,000
Litigation settlement, gross 11,400,000                        
Litigation, Interest and Attorney's Fees claimed by plaintiffs                   11,400,000      
Litigation, portion of profits considered for disgorgement           381,500,000              
Disgorgement damages awarded in favor of the plantiff and intervenor                 23,900,000        
Number of wells for constructive trust profits                     143    
Number of horizontal wells operated by SEECO in Arkansas   27                      
Value of SEPCO's supersedeas bond               14,100,000          
Pre-judgement interest covered by SEPCO's supersedeas bond               1,300,000          
Post-judgement interest covered by SEPCO's supersedeas bond               1,300,000          
Litigation, SEPCO's estimated gross liability including interest and attorney's fees.         $ 44,200,000