XML 55 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

 

(8) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Amount

 

Value

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

 41,499

 

$

 41,499

 

$

 15,627

 

$

 15,627

Restricted cash

$

 144,384

 

$

 144,384

 

$

 –  

 

$

 –  

Unsecured revolving credit facility

$

 –  

 

$

 –  

 

$

 671,500

 

$

 671,500

Senior notes

$

 1,670,011

 

$

 1,852,847

 

$

 671,800

 

$

 773,578

Derivative instruments

$

 564,707

 

$

 564,707

 

$

 704,830

 

$

 704,830

 

 

 

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, other current assets and current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. For debt and derivative instruments, the following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value:

 

Debt: The fair values of the Company’s senior notes were based on the market for the Company’s publicly-traded debt as determined based on yield of the Company’s 7.5% Senior Notes due 2018, which was 3.5% at June 30, 2012 and 4.6% at December 31, 2011, and its 4.10% Senior Notes due 2022, which was 3.9% at June 30, 2012. As such, the Company considers the fair value of its senior notes to be a Level 1 measurement on the fair value hierarchy.  The carrying value of the borrowings under the Company’s unsecured revolving credit facility at December 31, 2011 approximate fair value.

 

Derivative Instruments: The fair value of all derivative instruments is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged currently between willing parties. The amounts are based on quoted market prices, best estimates obtained from counterparties and an option pricing model, when necessary, for price option contracts.

 

GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. As presented in the tables below, this hierarchy consists of three broad levels:

 

Level 1 valuations -    Consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and have the highest priority.

 

Level 2 valuations -    Consist of quoted market information for the calculation of fair market value.

 

Level 3 valuations -    Consist of internal estimates and have the lowest priority.

 

Pursuant to GAAP, the Company has classified its derivatives into these levels depending upon the data utilized to determine their fair values. The Company’s Level 2 fair value measurements include fixed-price and floating-price swaps and are estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations using the NYMEX futures index. The Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements include costless-collars and basis swaps. The Company’s costless-collars are valued using the Black-Scholes model, an industry standard option valuation model, and takes into account inputs such as contract terms, including maturity, and market parameters, including assumptions of the NYMEX futures index, interest rates, volatility and credit worthiness. The Company’s basis swaps are estimated using internal discounted cash flow calculations based upon forward commodity price curves. 

 

The accounting group, reporting to the Chief Accounting Officer, is responsible for determining the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements.  Inputs to the Black-Scholes model, including the volatility input, which is the significant unobservable input for Level 3 fair value measurements, are obtained from a third-party pricing source, with


 

independent verification of most significant inputs on a monthly basis. An increase (decrease) in volatility would result in an increase (decrease) in fair value measurement, respectively.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using:

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Markets

 

Observable Inputs

 

Unobservable Inputs

 

Assets (Liabilities)

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

at Fair Value

Derivative assets

 

$

 –  

 

$

 465,571

 

$

 106,391

 

$

 571,962

Derivative liabilities

 

 

 –  

 

 

 (7,086)

 

 

 (169)

 

 

 (7,255)

Total

 

$

 –  

 

$

 458,485

 

$

 106,222

 

$

 564,707

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using:

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

Other

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

Markets

 

Observable Inputs

 

Unobservable Inputs

 

Assets (Liabilities)

 

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

at Fair Value

Derivative assets

 

$

 –  

 

$

 534,560

 

$

 182,783

 

$

 717,343

Derivative liabilities

 

 

 –  

 

 

 (11,849)

 

 

 (664)

 

 

 (12,513)

Total

 

$

 –  

 

$

 522,711

 

$

 182,119

 

$

 704,830

 

 

The table below presents reconciliations for the change in net fair value of derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012. The fair values of Level 3 derivative instruments are estimated using proprietary valuation models that utilize both market observable and unobservable parameters. Level 3 instruments presented in the table consist of net derivatives valued using pricing models incorporating assumptions that, in the Company’s judgment, reflect the assumptions a marketplace participant would have used at June 30, 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

$

 184,543

 

$

 85,580

 

$

 182,119

 

$

 97,677

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in earnings

 

 

 65,274

 

 

 11,682

 

 

 123,736

 

 

 27,592

Included in other comprehensive income

 

 

 (77,731)

 

 

 3,996

 

 

 (77,441)

 

 

 (11,310)

Purchases, issuances, and settlements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

Issuances

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

Settlements

 

 

 (65,864)

 

 

 (11,863)

 

 

 (122,192)

 

 

 (24,706)

Transfers into/out of Level 3

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 –  

 

 

 142

Balance at end of period

 

$

 106,222

 

$

 89,395

 

$

 106,222

 

$

 89,395

Change in unrealized gains included in earnings relating to derivatives still held as of June 30

 

$

 (590)

 

$

 (181)

 

$

 1,544

 

$

 2,886