XML 65 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Investments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]  
Investments
7. Investments
See Note 9 for information about the fair value hierarchy for investments and the related valuation methodologies.
Fixed Maturity Securities AFS
Fixed Maturity Securities AFS by Sector
The following table presents the fixed maturity securities AFS by sector at:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 

Amortized
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 

Amortized
Cost
 
Gross Unrealized
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
 
Gains
 
Temporary
Losses
 
OTTI
Losses (1)
 
Gains
 
Temporary
Losses
 
OTTI
Losses (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(In millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate
$
27,841

 
$
2,815

 
$
65

 
$

 
$
30,591

 
$
23,902

 
$
816

 
$
659

 
$

 
$
24,059

Foreign corporate
9,017

 
736

 
67

 

 
9,686

 
8,044

 
157

 
306

 

 
7,895

RMBS
8,600

 
440

 
14

 
(4
)
 
9,030

 
8,309

 
246

 
122

 
(2
)
 
8,435

U.S. government and agency
5,396

 
1,848

 

 

 
7,244

 
7,503

 
1,251

 
110

 

 
8,644

CMBS
5,460

 
263

 
9

 

 
5,714

 
5,177

 
42

 
87

 
(1
)
 
5,133

State and political subdivision
3,326

 
687

 
2

 

 
4,011

 
3,202

 
399

 
15

 

 
3,586

ABS
1,940

 
21

 
11

 

 
1,950

 
2,120

 
13

 
22

 

 
2,111

Foreign government
1,503

 
250

 
2

 

 
1,751

 
1,415

 
101

 
31

 

 
1,485

Total fixed maturity securities
$
63,083

 
$
7,060

 
$
170

 
$
(4
)
 
$
69,977

 
$
59,672

 
$
3,025

 
$
1,352

 
$
(3
)
 
$
61,348


_______________
(1)
Noncredit OTTI losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) in an unrealized gain position are due to increases in estimated fair value subsequent to initial recognition of noncredit losses on such securities.
The Company held no non-income producing fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2019. The Company held non-income producing fixed maturity securities with an estimated fair value of less than $1 million at December 31, 2018.
Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date, were as follows at December 31, 2019:
 
Due in One
Year or Less
 
Due After One
Year Through
Five Years
 
Due After Five
Years
Through Ten Years
 
Due After Ten
Years
 
Structured
Securities
 
Total Fixed
Maturity
Securities
 
(In millions)
Amortized cost
$
1,682

 
$
6,815

 
$
12,485

 
$
26,101

 
$
16,000

 
$
63,083

Estimated fair value
$
1,691

 
$
7,038

 
$
13,343

 
$
31,211

 
$
16,694

 
$
69,977

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been presented in the year of final contractual maturity. Structured Securities are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity.
Continuous Gross Unrealized Losses for Fixed Maturity Securities AFS by Sector
The following table presents the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity securities AFS in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Less than 12 Months
 
Equal to or Greater than
12 Months
 
Less than 12 Months
 
Equal to or Greater than 12
Months
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
(Dollars in millions)
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate
$
1,931

 
$
43

 
$
320

 
$
22

 
$
10,450

 
$
465

 
$
2,290

 
$
194

Foreign corporate
577

 
12

 
510

 
55

 
3,916

 
199

 
746

 
107

RMBS
802

 
6

 
346

 
4

 
1,550

 
21

 
2,567

 
99

U.S. government and agency
14

 

 

 

 
359

 
7

 
1,355

 
103

CMBS
552

 
7

 
171

 
2

 
2,264

 
52

 
800

 
34

State and political subdivision
120

 
2

 
8

 

 
346

 
7

 
158

 
8

ABS
358

 
2

 
676

 
9

 
1,407

 
21

 
70

 
1

Foreign government
65

 
2

 

 

 
520

 
25

 
132

 
6

Total fixed maturity securities
$
4,419

 
$
74

 
$
2,031

 
$
92

 
$
20,812

 
$
797

 
$
8,118

 
$
552

Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position
686

 
 
 
297

 
 
 
2,988

 
 
 
1,022

 
 

Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities
Evaluation and Measurement Methodologies
Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management’s evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic loss or has exhausted natural resources; (vi) whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to Structured Securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; (viii) the potential for impairments due to weakening of foreign currencies on non-functional currency denominated fixed maturity securities that are near maturity; and (ix) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies.
For securities in an unrealized loss position, an OTTI is recognized in earnings when it is anticipated that the amortized cost will not be recovered. When either: (i) the Company has the intent to sell the security; or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost and estimated fair value. If neither of these conditions exists, the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected is recognized as an OTTI in earnings (“credit loss”). If the estimated fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, this portion of OTTI related to other-than-credit factors (“noncredit loss”) is recorded in OCI.
Current Period Evaluation
Based on the Company’s current evaluation of its AFS securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company’s current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities decreased $1.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2019 to $166 million. The decrease in gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily attributable to decreasing longer-term interest rates and narrowing credit spreads.
At December 31, 2019, $9 million of the total $166 million of gross unrealized losses were from 12 fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater.
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage Loans by Portfolio Segment
Mortgage loans are summarized as follows at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Carrying
Value  
 
% of
Total
 
Carrying
Value
 
% of
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
$
9,694

 
61.9
 %
 
$
8,502

 
62.6
 %
Agricultural
3,326

 
21.2

 
2,874

 
21.1

Residential
2,708

 
17.3

 
2,276

 
16.7

Subtotal (1)
15,728

 
100.4

 
13,652

 
100.4

Valuation allowances (2)
(64
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(56
)
 
(0.4
)
Total mortgage loans, net
$
15,664

 
100.0
 %
 
$
13,596

 
100.0
 %
_______________
(1)
Purchases of mortgage loans from third parties were $962 million and $1.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and were primarily comprised of residential mortgage loans.
(2)
The valuation allowances were primarily from collective evaluation (non-specific loan related).
Information on commercial, agricultural and residential mortgage loans is presented in the tables below.
Valuation Allowance Methodology
Mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that, based upon current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established using the same methodology for all three portfolio segments as the excess carrying value of a loan over either (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (ii) the estimated fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral if the loan is in the process of foreclosure or otherwise collateral dependent, or (iii) the loan’s observable market price. A common evaluation framework is used for establishing non-specific valuation allowances for all loan portfolio segments; however, a separate non-specific valuation allowance is calculated and maintained for each loan portfolio segment that is based on inputs unique to each loan portfolio segment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company expects to incur a credit loss. These evaluations are based upon several loan portfolio segment-specific factors, including the Company’s experience for loan losses, defaults and loss severity, and loss expectations for loans with similar risk characteristics. These evaluations are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.
Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgage Loans
The credit quality of commercial mortgage loans was as follows at:
 
Recorded Investment
 
Estimated
Fair
Value
 
% of
Total
 
Debt Service Coverage Ratios
 
Total
 
% of
Total
 
 
> 1.20x
 
1.00x - 1.20x
 
< 1.00x
 
 
(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan-to-value ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less than 65%
$
8,300

 
$
272

 
$
158

 
$
8,730

 
90.1
%
 
$
9,142

 
90.2
%
65% to 75%
746

 
26

 
8

 
780

 
8.0

 
805

 
8.0

76% to 80%
184

 

 

 
184

 
1.9

 
184

 
1.8

Total
$
9,230

 
$
298

 
$
166

 
$
9,694

 
100.0
%
 
$
10,131

 
100.0
%
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan-to-value ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less than 65%
$
7,444

 
$
89

 
$
34

 
$
7,567

 
89.0
%
 
$
7,642

 
89.0
%
65% to 75%
762

 

 
24

 
786

 
9.2

 
797

 
9.3

76% to 80%
141

 

 
8

 
149

 
1.8

 
145

 
1.7

Total
$
8,347

 
$
89

 
$
66

 
$
8,502

 
100.0
%
 
$
8,584

 
100.0
%

Credit Quality of Agricultural Mortgage Loans
The credit quality of agricultural mortgage loans was as follows at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Recorded
Investment
 
% of
Total
 
Recorded
Investment
 
% of
Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Loan-to-value ratios:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less than 65%
$
3,130

 
94.1
%
 
$
2,551

 
88.8
%
65% to 75%
196

 
5.9

 
322

 
11.2

76% to 80%

 

 
1

 

Total
$
3,326

 
100.0
%
 
$
2,874

 
100.0
%

The estimated fair value of agricultural mortgage loans was $3.4 billion and $2.9 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Credit Quality of Residential Mortgage Loans
The credit quality of residential mortgage loans was as follows at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Recorded Investment
 
% of Total
 
Recorded Investment
 
% of Total
 
(Dollars in millions)
Performance indicators:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Performing
$
2,671

 
98.6
%
 
$
2,240

 
98.4
%
Nonperforming
37

 
1.4

 
36

 
1.6

Total
$
2,708

 
100.0
%
 
$
2,276

 
100.0
%

The estimated fair value of residential mortgage loans was $2.8 billion and $2.3 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Past Due, Nonaccrual and Modified Mortgage Loans
The Company has a high quality, well performing mortgage loan portfolio, with over 99% of all mortgage loans classified as performing at both December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company defines delinquency consistent with industry practice, when mortgage loans are past due as follows: commercial and residential mortgage loans — 60 days and agricultural mortgage loans — 90 days. The Company had no commercial mortgage loans past due or in nonaccrual status at either December 31, 2019 or 2018. Agricultural mortgage loans past due and in nonaccrual status totaled $21 million at December 31, 2019. The Company had less than $1 million past due and no agricultural mortgage loans in nonaccrual status at December 31, 2018. Residential mortgage loans past due and in nonaccrual status totaled $37 million and $36 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not have a significant amount of mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring.
Other Invested Assets
Freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values comprise over 90% of other invested assets. See Note 8 for information about freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values. Other invested assets also includes tax credit and renewable energy partnerships, leveraged leases and FHLB stock.
Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities and the effect on DAC, VOBA, DSI and future policy benefits, that would result from the realization of the unrealized gains (losses), are included in net unrealized investment gains (losses) in AOCI.
The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in AOCI, were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities
$
6,894

 
$
1,679

 
$
4,724

Equity securities

 

 
39

Derivatives
232

 
253

 
231

Other
(15
)
 
(15
)
 
(8
)
Subtotal
7,111

 
1,917

 
4,986

Amounts allocated from:
 
 
 
 
 
Future policy benefits
(2,691
)
 
(885
)
 
(2,370
)
DAC, VOBA and DSI
(332
)
 
(90
)
 
(262
)
Subtotal
(3,023
)
 
(975
)
 
(2,632
)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)
(859
)
 
(198
)
 
(494
)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)
$
3,229

 
$
744

 
$
1,860


The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Balance, December 31,
$
744

 
$
1,860

 
$
1,277

Unrealized investment gains (losses) change due to cumulative effect, net of income tax

 
(79
)
 

Balance at January 1,
744

 
1,781

 
1,277

Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year
5,194

 
(2,990
)
 
1,939

Unrealized investment gains (losses) relating to:
 
 
 
 
 
Future policy benefits
(1,806
)
 
1,485

 
(1,448
)
DAC, VOBA and DSI
(242
)
 
172

 
(67
)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)
(661
)
 
296

 
159

Balance at December 31,
$
3,229

 
$
744

 
$
1,860

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)
$
2,485

 
$
(1,037
)
 
$
583


Concentrations of Credit Risk
There were no investments in any counterparty that were greater than 10% of the Company’s equity, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, at both December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Securities Lending
Elements of the securities lending program are presented below at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Securities on loan: (1)
 
 
 
Amortized cost
$
2,031

 
$
3,056

Estimated fair value
$
2,996

 
$
3,628

Cash collateral received from counterparties (2)
$
3,074

 
$
3,646

Security collateral received from counterparties (3)
$

 
$
55

Reinvestment portfolio — estimated fair value
$
3,174

 
$
3,658

_______________
(1)
Included within fixed maturity securities.
(2)
Included within payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions.
(3)
Security collateral received from counterparties may not be sold or re-pledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected on the consolidated financial statements.
The cash collateral liability by loaned security type and remaining tenor of the agreements were as follows at:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Remaining Tenor of Securities Lending Agreements
 
 
 
Remaining Tenor of Securities Lending Agreements
 
 
 
Open (1)
 
1 Month
or Less
 
1 to 6
Months
 
Total
 
Open (1)
 
1 Month
or Less
 
1 to 6
Months
 
Total
 
(In millions)
U.S. government and agency
$
1,279

 
$
1,094

 
$
701

 
$
3,074

 
$
1,474

 
$
1,823

 
$
349

 
$
3,646

_______________
(1)
The related loaned security could be returned to the Company on the next business day which would require the Company to immediately return the cash collateral.
If the Company is required to return significant amounts of cash collateral on short notice and is forced to sell securities to meet the return obligation, it may have difficulty selling such collateral that is invested in securities in a timely manner, be forced to sell securities in a volatile or illiquid market for less than what otherwise would have been realized under normal market conditions, or both. The estimated fair value of the securities on loan related to the cash collateral on open at December 31, 2019 was $1.2 billion, all of which were U.S. government and agency securities which, if put back to the Company, could be immediately sold to satisfy the cash requirement.
The reinvestment portfolio acquired with the cash collateral consisted principally of fixed maturity securities (including agency RMBS, U.S. and foreign corporate securities, ABS, non-agency RMBS and U.S. government and agency securities) with 54% invested in agency RMBS, cash and cash equivalents and U.S. government and agency securities at December 31, 2019. If the securities on loan or the reinvestment portfolio become less liquid, the Company has the liquidity resources of most of its general account available to meet any potential cash demands when securities on loan are put back to the Company.
Invested Assets on Deposit, Held in Trust and Pledged as Collateral
Invested assets on deposit, held in trust and pledged as collateral are presented below at estimated fair value at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
(In millions)
Invested assets on deposit (regulatory deposits) (1)
$
9,345

 
$
8,172

Invested assets held in trust (reinsurance agreements) (2)
4,561

 
3,455

Invested assets pledged as collateral (3)
3,640

 
3,340

Total invested assets on deposit, held in trust and pledged as collateral
$
17,546

 
$
14,967

_______________
(1)
The Company has assets, primarily fixed maturity securities, on deposit with governmental authorities relating to certain policyholder liabilities, of which $69 million and $55 million of the assets on deposit balance represents restricted cash at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(2)
The Company has assets, primarily fixed maturity securities, held in trust relating to certain reinsurance transactions. $124 million and $87 million of the assets held in trust balance represents restricted cash at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(3)
The Company has pledged invested assets in connection with various agreements and transactions, including funding agreements (see Note 4) and derivative transactions (see Note 8).
See “— Securities Lending” for information regarding securities on loan.
Purchased Credit Impaired Investments
Investments acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the acquisition date that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) investments. For each investment, the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date over its acquisition date fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as net investment income on an effective yield basis. If, subsequently, based on current information and events, it is probable that there is a significant increase in cash flows previously expected to be collected or if actual cash flows are significantly greater than cash flows previously expected to be collected, the accretable yield is adjusted prospectively. The excess of the contractually required payments (including interest) as of the acquisition date over the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date is referred to as the nonaccretable difference, and this amount is not expected to be realized as net investment income. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected can result in OTTI.
The Company’s PCI investments had an outstanding principal and interest balance of $926 million and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which represents the contractually required principal and accrued interest, whether or not currently due; and a carrying value (estimated fair value of the investments plus accrued interest) of $761 million and $860 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Accretion of accretable yield on PCI investments recognized in earnings were $44 million and $62 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Purchases of PCI investments were insignificant in both of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Collectively Significant Equity Method Investments
The Company holds investments in limited partnerships and LLCs consisting of leveraged buy-out funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, joint ventures and other funds. The portion of these investments accounted for under the equity method had a carrying value of $2.4 billion at December 31, 2019. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to these equity method investments is limited to the carrying value of these investments plus unfunded commitments of $1.5 billion at December 31, 2019. The Company’s investments in limited partnerships and LLCs are generally of a passive nature in that the Company does not participate in the management of the entities.
As described in Note 1, the Company generally records its share of earnings in its equity method investments using a three-month lag methodology and within net investment income. Aggregate net investment income from these equity method investments exceeded 10% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income (loss) for each of the years ended 2019, 2018, and 2017. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company’s proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, or earnings of such entities.
The aggregated summarized financial data presented below reflects the latest available financial information and is as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Aggregate total assets of these entities totaled $403.6 billion and $344.6 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Aggregate total liabilities of these entities totaled $52.7 billion and $30.1 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) of these entities totaled $33.3 billion, $33.3 billion and $36.2 billion for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) from the underlying entities in which the Company invests is primarily comprised of investment income, including recurring investment income and realized and unrealized investment gains (losses).
Variable Interest Entities
The Company has invested in legal entities that are variable interest entities (“VIEs”). VIEs are consolidated when the investor is the primary beneficiary. A primary beneficiary is the variable interest holder in a VIE with both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
There were no material VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
The Company’s investments in unconsolidated VIEs are described below.
Fixed Maturity Securities
The Company invests in U.S. corporate bonds, foreign corporate bonds, and Structured Securities, issued by VIEs. The Company is not obligated to provide any financial or other support to these VIEs, other than the original investment. The Company’s involvement with these entities is limited to that of a passive investor. The Company has no unilateral right to appoint or remove the servicer, special servicer, or investment manager, which are generally viewed as having the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE, nor does the Company function in any of these roles. The Company does not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity; as a result, the Company has determined it is not the primary beneficiary, or consolidator, of the VIE. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these fixed maturity securities is limited to the amortized cost of these investments. See “— Fixed Maturity Securities AFS” for information on these securities.
Limited Partnerships and LLCs
The Company holds investments in certain limited partnerships and LLCs which are VIEs. These ventures include limited partnerships, LLCs, private equity funds, hedge funds, and to a lesser extent tax credit and renewable energy partnerships. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary, or consolidator, when its involvement takes the form of a limited partner interest and is restricted to a role of a passive investor, as a limited partner’s interest does not provide the Company with any substantive kick-out or participating rights, nor does it provide the Company with the power to direct the activities of the fund. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these investments is limited to: (i) the amount invested in debt or equity of the VIE and (ii) commitments to the VIE, as described in Note 14.
The carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss related to the VIEs in which the Company concluded that it holds a variable interest, but is not the primary beneficiary, were as follows at:
 
December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss (1)
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss (1)
 
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities
$
12,959

 
$
12,317

 
$
12,848

 
$
12,848

Limited partnerships and LLCs
1,892

 
3,065

 
1,743

 
3,130

Total
$
14,851

 
$
15,382

 
$
14,591

 
$
15,978


Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Investment income:
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities
$
2,627

 
$
2,499

 
$
2,347

Equity securities
8

 
7

 
9

Mortgage loans
676

 
538

 
450

Policy loans
46

 
62

 
49

Limited partnerships and LLCs (1)
220

 
258

 
235

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
72

 
26

 
30

Other
38

 
38

 
28

Subtotal
3,687

 
3,428

 
3,148

Less: Investment expenses
201

 
193

 
175

Net investment income
$
3,486

 
$
3,235

 
$
2,973


_______________
(1)
Includes net investment income pertaining to other limited partnership interests of $181 million, $211 million and $182 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for discussion of related party net investment income and investment expenses.
Net Investment Gains (Losses)
Components of Net Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities 
$
87

 
$
(178
)
 
$
(26
)
Equity securities
17

 
(16
)
 
22

Mortgage loans
(10
)
 
(13
)
 
(9
)
Limited partnerships and LLCs
7

 
40

 
(7
)
Other
(9
)
 
(37
)
 
(7
)
Total net investment gains (losses)
$
92

 
$
(204
)

$
(27
)

See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for discussion of related party net investment gains (losses) related to transfers of invested assets.
Sales or Disposals of Fixed Maturity Securities
Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity securities and the components of fixed maturity securities net investment gains (losses) were as shown in the table below.
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
(In millions)
Proceeds
$
8,541

 
$
11,159

 
$
11,974

Gross investment gains
$
232

 
$
101

 
$
58

Gross investment losses
(145
)
 
(279
)
 
(84
)
Net investment gains (losses)
$
87

 
$
(178
)
 
$
(26
)

Related Party Investment Transactions
All of the transactions reported as related party activity occurred prior to the MetLife Divestiture. See Note 1 regarding the MetLife Divestiture.
The Company previously transferred invested assets, primarily consisting of fixed maturity securities, to former affiliates. The estimated fair value and amortized cost of invested assets transferred to former affiliates was $292 million and $294 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The net investment gains (losses) recognized on transfers of invested assets to former affiliates was ($2) million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
In March 2017, the Company sold an operating joint venture with a book value of $89 million to MLIC for $286 million. The operating joint venture was accounted for under the equity method and included in other invested assets. This sale resulted in an increase in additional paid-in capital of $202 million in the first quarter of 2017.
The Company receives investment administrative services from MetLife Investment Management, LLC (formerly known as MetLife Investment Advisors, LLC), which was considered a related party investment manager until the completion of the MetLife Divestiture. The related investment administrative service charges were $49 million and $93 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.