DEF 14A 1 d867502ddef14a.htm DEF 14A DEF 14A
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

  Preliminary Proxy Statement
  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
  Definitive Proxy Statement
  Definitive Additional Materials
  Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

AT&T Inc.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

          

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

  No fee required.
  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  (1)  

Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

   

 

  (2)  

Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

   

 

  (3)  

Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

   

 

  (4)  

Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

 

 

   

 

  (5)   Total fee paid:
        
   

 

  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
  (1)  

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

   

 

  (2)  

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

   

 

  (3)  

Filing Party:

 

 

   

 

  (4)  

Date Filed:

 

 

   

 

 

 

 


Table of Contents

LOGO


Table of Contents

TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS

 

LOGO

Letter from the Chairman

and CEO

Dear Stockholders:

It’s a pleasure to invite you to our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. I hope you can join us on Friday, April 24, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. at the Moody Performance Hall, 2520 Flora Street, Dallas, Texas.

At this year’s meeting, we’ll update you on the progress we’re making as a modern media company.

You’ll hear about our launch plans for our innovative new streaming service, HBO Max, and why we’re so excited about its potential. We’ll also tell you how we’re building on the solid performance of our communications and entertainment businesses. And we’ll discuss our plans to grow revenues, free cash flow and earnings per share – as well as our capital allocation framework that enables us to continue investing in growth while maintaining a solid, steady dividend for you, our owners.

In recent years, you have seen us dramatically transform our company. But one thing has not – and will not – change. That’s our goal of delivering strong results for you and sustainable, long-term growth and success for AT&T. On behalf of the Board and our management team, thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

Randall Stephenson

LOGO

Letter from the Lead Director

Dear Stockholders:

As your company’s Lead Independent Director, I’m proud of AT&T’s strong commitment to sound, forward-looking governance. The Board’s role is to keep our company focused on the long term and protect the interests of our shareholders. We do that by challenging conventional thinking and offering different points of view, all while maintaining a sharp focus on creating shareholder value.

We’ve worked hard to continuously refresh our Board and have added new directors with the skills and experience to guide our evolving business strategies.

I hope you’re able to join us at our Annual Meeting. Until then, please accept the gratitude of our entire Board for your confidence in AT&T.

Sincerely,

Matthew Rose

 


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

AT&T Inc.

One AT&T Plaza

Whitacre Tower

208 S. Akard Street

Dallas, TX 75202

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

To the holders of Common Stock of AT&T Inc.:

The 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AT&T Inc. will be held as follows:

 

When:  

9:00 a.m. local time, Friday, April 24, 2020

Where:  

Moody Performance Hall

2520 Flora Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

The purpose of the annual meeting is to consider and take action on the following:

 

1.

Election of Directors

2.

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors

3.

Advisory approval of executive compensation

4.

Any other business that may properly come before the meeting, including stockholder proposals

Holders of AT&T Inc. common stock of record at the close of business on February 26, 2020, are entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment of the meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

 

LOGO

Stacey Maris

Senior Vice President – Assistant General Counsel

and Secretary

March 11, 2020

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

     

 

 

 

 

 

Please sign, date and return your proxy card or submit your proxy and/or voting instructions by telephone or through the Internet promptly so that a quorum may be represented at the meeting. Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time, and stockholders who are present at the meeting may withdraw their proxies and vote in person.

 

 

 

ATTENDING THE MEETING

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you are a registered holder and plan to attend the meeting in person, please bring the admission ticket (attached to the proxy card or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials) to the Annual Meeting. If you do not have an admission ticket, you will be admitted upon presentation of identification.

 

If you hold your shares through a bank, broker, or other institution, you may obtain admission to the meeting by providing a proxy from the institution or by presenting proof of your ownership of AT&T common stock.

 

 

   

 

Important Notice

Regarding the

Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Stockholder Meeting

To Be Held on April 24, 2020:

 

The proxy statement and

annual report to security holders

are available at

www.edocumentview.com/att

 

   
 


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

    

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Please read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

ATTENDING THE MEETING

 

 

Only AT&T stockholders may attend the meeting.

Stockholders of Record (shares are registered in your name)

An admission ticket is attached to your proxy card or Annual Meeting Notice and Admission Ticket. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please retain the admission ticket and bring it with you to the meeting. A stockholder of record who does not have an admission ticket will be admitted upon presentation of photo identification at the door.

Other Stockholders (shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other institution)

You may obtain admission to the meeting by presenting a proxy from the legal owner or by providing proof of your ownership of AT&T common stock, such as through a brokerage statement, and photo identification. To be able to vote at the meeting, you will need the bank, broker, or other record holder to give you a proxy.

VOTING RESULTS

 

 

The voting results of the Annual Meeting will be published no later than four business days after the annual meeting on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will be available in the investor relations area of our website at www.att.com.

Agenda and Voting Recommendations

 

       

Item

 

Description

  

Board Recommendation

  

    Page    

  MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS:

     

    1

 

Election of Directors

  

FOR each nominee

  

3

    2

 

Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for 2020

  

FOR

  

11

    3

 

Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

 

  

FOR

  

12

  STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS:

     

    4

 

Independent Board Chairman

  

AGAINST

  

13

    5

 

Employee Representative Director

  

AGAINST

  

14

    6

 

Improve Guiding Principles of Executive Compensation

  

AGAINST

  

15

 


 

LOGO   i

 


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

    

Corporate Governance Highlights

DIRECTOR TENURE AND DIVERSITY

 

 

AT&T is a modern media company whose mission is to inspire human progress through the power of communications and entertainment. Over the past several years, we’ve made a series of strategic investments and are executing on our long-term strategy aligned with two unassailable trends: Consumers will continue to spend more time viewing premium content where, when and how they want; and businesses and consumers alike will continue to demand more connectivity, bandwidth and mobility.

We are committed to strong corporate governance that directly aligns with our long-term strategy. Since 2012, the Board has undergone a meaningful, deliberate shift, adding ten new directors with significant experience in key areas that align to the evolution of the strategy. The ongoing refreshment of the Board promotes the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability, and builds on our environmental, social and governance leadership.

The Corporate Governance section beginning on page 16 describes our governance framework, which includes the following highlights:

 

LOGO

 

       
   Name        Director

Since

  Principal Occupation  
   Randall L. Stephenson    59   2005   Chairman of the Board and CEO, AT&T Inc.  
   Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.    69   2015   Retired Global CEO, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited  
   Richard W. Fisher    70   2015   Former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas  
   Scott T. Ford    57   2012   Member and CEO, Westrock Group, LLC  
   Glenn H. Hutchins    64   2014   Chairman, North Island and Co-Founder, Silver Lake  
   William E. Kennard    63   2014   Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission  
   Debra L. Lee    65   2019   Chief Executive Officer, Leading Women Defined, Inc.  
   Stephen J. Luczo    63   2019  

Managing Partner, Crosspoint Capital Partners, L.P.

 
   Michael B. McCallister    67   2013   Retired Chairman of the Board and CEO, Humana Inc.  
   Beth E. Mooney    65   2013   Chairman and CEO, KeyCorp  
   Matthew K. Rose    60   2010   Retired Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC  
   Cynthia B. Taylor    58   2013   President and CEO, Oil States International, Inc.  
   Laura D’Andrea Tyson*    72   1999   Distinguished Professor of the Graduate School, Haas School of Business, and Chair of the Blum Center for Developing Economies Board of Trustees at the University of California, Berkeley  
   Geoffrey Y. Yang    61   2016   Founding Partner and Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures  

All Directors are independent, except for Mr. Stephenson.

*Retiring at 2020 Annual Meeting

 


 

ii   LOGO

 


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

    

 

We are committed to strong corporate governance policies that promote the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthen Board and management accountability, and build on our environmental, social and governance leadership.. The Corporate Governance section beginning on page 16 describes our governance framework, which includes the following highlights:

 

  

  Independent Lead Director

  12 independent Director nominees

  Demonstrated Board refreshment and diversity

  Independent Audit, Human Resources, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees

    

  Regular sessions of non-management Directors

  Annual election of Directors by majority vote

  Long-standing commitment to sustainability

  Stockholder right to call special meetings

  Clawback policy

  Proxy Access

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

AT&T’s commitment to corporate responsibility means integrating it throughout our business; including how we manage environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics. The Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee assists the Board in its oversight of policies related to corporate social responsibility including public policy issues affecting AT&T, its stockholders, employees, customers, and the communities in which it operates. The Corporate Responsibility section, beginning on page 30, outlines our approach to these issues. The following is a summary of key 2019 highlights in ESG:

 

 

LOGO

 


 

LOGO   iii

 


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

 

    

Executive Compensation Highlights

2019 Program Enhancement

The Committee approved Net-Debt-to-Adjusted-EBITDA as a new performance metric to further align management’s focus on AT&T’s stated strategy to reduce debt. This metric has a 20% weighting for determining 2019 short-term incentive awards (payable 2020) for all Executive Officers.

The narrative on pages 37-63 more fully describes how the Committee, with the input of its consultant, and taking into account feedback from stockholders has designed and evolved our Executive Officer compensation and benefits program using the Committee’s guiding pay principles as the pillars of the program. We also outline how we establish pay targets and how actual Executive Officer pay is determined. Finally, we provide a description of other benefits.

 

PAY AND PERFORMANCE AT A GLANCE*

 

2019 Corporate Short Term Awards  

Long Term Award – Performance Share Component

Results for 2017-2019 Performance Period

 

  Metric

 

 

Metric

 

Weight

 

   

Attainment

 

   

Payout%

 

 

        Metric

 

 

Metric
Weight

 

   

Achievement

 

   

Payout%  

 

 

2019 EPS

 

   

 

80%

 

 

 

   

 

98%

 

 

 

  85%

 

 

3-Year ROIC

 

   

 

100%  

 

 

 

   

 

7.00%

 

 

 

  100%

 

 

2019 Net-Debt-to-Adjusted-EBITDA

 

 

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

101%

 

 

3-Year Relative TSR Payout Modifier

 

 

 

 

 

 

+10%, 0%,
or -10%  

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quartile 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

  -10%

 

Weighted Average

Payout

 

 

                  88%

 

 

 

Final Payout

 

                 

 

90%

 

                                             
  *See

performance adjustments beginning on page 48

 

    

 

Our Practices

 

 

 

What We Don’t Do

 

 

Pay for Performance: Tie compensation to performance by setting clear and challenging performance metrics/goals, including stock price performance for long term compensation.

 

Multiple Performance Metrics and Time Horizons: Use multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting timeframes to balance short- and long-term focus.

 

Stock Ownership and Holding Period Requirements: NEOs must comply with common stock ownership guidelines and hold the equivalent of 25% of post-2015 stock award distributions until termination of employment.

 

Regular Engagement with Stockholders: We regularly engage with stockholders to seek input regarding executive compensation matters.

 

Dividend Equivalents: Paid at the end of the performance period on earned Performance Shares.

 

Compensation-Related Risk Review: Performed annually to confirm that our programs do not encourage excessive risk taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Clawback Policy: Provides for the recovery of previously paid executive compensation for any fraudulent or illegal conduct.

 

Severance Policy: Limits payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus.

 

 

 

 

No “Single Trigger” Change in Control Provisions: No accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.

 

No Tax Gross-Ups, except in extenuating circumstances.

 

No Credit for Unvested Shares when determining compliance with stock ownership guidelines.

 

No Repricing or Buy-Out of underwater stock options.

 

No Hedging or Short Sales of AT&T stock or stock based awards.

 

No Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.

 

No Guaranteed Bonuses.

 

No Excessive Dilution: Our annual equity grants represent less than 1% of the total outstanding common stock each year. As of April 30, 2019, our total dilution was 1.0% of outstanding stock.

 

 

 

 


 

iv   LOGO

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

1  

GENERAL

3  

VOTING ITEMS

3  

Management Proposal – Item No. 1 - Election of Directors

11  

Management Proposal – Item No. 2 - Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst  & Young as Independent Auditors

12  

Management Proposal – Item No. 3 - Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

13  

Stockholder Proposals – Items No. 4 - 6

16  

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

16  

Role of the Board

16  

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

17  

Ethics and Compliance Program

17  

Board Leadership Structure

17  

Duties and Responsibilities

18  

Director Nomination Process

19  

Experience and Qualifications of Our Director Nominees

20  

Director Independence

21  

Board Committees

23  

Stockholder Engagement

23  

Public Policy Engagement

23  

Communicating with Your Board

24  

Annual Multi-Step Board Evaluations

25  

Related Person Transactions

26  

Director Compensation

26  

Director Plans

27  

2019 Director Compensation Table

28  

Common Stock Ownership

29  

Directors and Officers

30  

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

34  

AUDIT COMMITTEE

37  

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

38  

Executive Summary

41  

Role of the Human Resources Committee

47  

How NEOs Were Paid for Performance in 2019

54  

Named Executive Officer Compensation

59  

2019 Long Term Grants

65  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

78  

OTHER INFORMATION

78  

Availability of Corporate Government Documents

78  

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominees

78  

Householding Information

78  

Cost of Proxy Solicitation

79  

CEO Pay Ratio

80  

Annex A

 

LOGO  


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

GENERAL

 

 

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of AT&T Inc. (AT&T, the Company, or we) for use at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AT&T. The meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. local time on Friday, April 24, 2020, at the Moody Performance Hall, 2520 Flora Street, Dallas, Texas 75201.

The purpose of the meeting is set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This Proxy Statement and form of proxy are being sent or made available beginning March 11, 2020, to stockholders who were record holders of AT&T’s common stock, $1.00 par value per share, at the close of business on February 26, 2020. These materials are also available at www.edocumentview.com/att. Each share entitles the registered holder to one vote. As of February 26, 2020, there were 7,183,105,638 shares of AT&T common stock entitled to vote at the meeting.

To constitute a quorum to conduct business at the meeting, stockholders representing at least 40% of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting must be present or represented by proxy.

Each share of AT&T common stock represented at the Annual Meeting is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting. All matters, except as provided below, are determined by a majority of the votes cast, unless a greater number is required by law or our Certificate of Incorporation for the action proposed. A majority of votes cast means the number of votes cast “for” a matter exceeds the number of votes cast “against” such matter.

If the proxy is submitted and no voting instructions are provided, the person or persons designated on the card will vote the shares for the election of the Board of Directors’ nominees and in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors on the other subjects listed on the proxy card and at their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.

The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that will be presented at the meeting for action on the part of stockholders other than those described in this Proxy Statement.

Election of Directors

In the election of Directors, each Director is elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to that Director’s election. Under our Bylaws, if a nominee for Director is not elected and the nominee is

an existing Director standing for re-election (or incumbent Director), the Director must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, subject to the Board’s acceptance. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the tendered resignation, taking into account the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s recommendation, and publicly disclose (by a press release, a filing with the SEC, or other broadly disseminated means of communication) its decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in making its recommendation and the Board of Directors in making its decision may each consider any factors or other information that they consider appropriate and relevant. Any Director who tenders his or her resignation as described above will not participate in the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the decision of the Board of Directors with respect to his or her resignation.

If the number of persons nominated for election as Directors as of ten days before the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to vote at such meeting shall exceed the number of Directors to be elected, then the Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. Because no persons other than the incumbent Directors have been nominated for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting, the majority vote provisions will apply.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, and the preference of the stockholders will be determined by the choice receiving the greatest number of votes.

All Other Matters to be Voted Upon

All other matters at the 2020 Annual Meeting will be determined by a majority of the votes cast.

Abstentions

Except as noted above, shares represented by proxies marked “abstain” with respect to the proposals described on the proxy card and by proxies marked to deny discretionary authority on other matters will not be counted in determining the vote obtained on such matters.

 

 

LOGO   1


Table of Contents

GENERAL

 

 

Broker Non-Votes

Under the rules of the NYSE, on certain routine matters, brokers may, at their discretion, vote shares they hold in “street name” on behalf of beneficial owners who have not returned voting instructions to the brokers. On all other matters, brokers are prohibited from voting uninstructed shares. In instances where brokers are prohibited from exercising discretionary authority (so-called broker non-votes), the shares they hold are not included in the vote totals.

At the 2020 Annual Meeting, brokers will be prohibited from exercising discretionary authority with respect to each of the matters submitted other than the ratification of the auditors. As a result, for each of the matters upon which the brokers are prohibited from voting, the broker non-votes will have no effect on the results.

VOTING

 

 

Stockholders of Record

Stockholders whose shares are registered in their name on the Company records (also known as “stockholders of record”) will receive either a proxy card by which they may indicate their voting instructions or a notice on how they may obtain a proxy. Instead of submitting a signed proxy card, stockholders may submit their proxies by telephone or through the Internet. Telephone and Internet proxies must be used in conjunction with, and will be subject to, the information and terms contained on the form of proxy. Similar procedures may also be available to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian.

All shares represented by proxies will be voted by one or more of the persons designated on the form of proxy in accordance with the stockholders’ directions. If the proxy card is signed and returned or the proxy is submitted by telephone or through the Internet without specific directions with respect to the matters to be acted upon, it will be treated as an instruction to vote such shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before the proxy is voted at the meeting by giving written notice of revocation to the Secretary of AT&T, by submitting a later-dated proxy, or by attending the meeting and voting in person. The Chairman of the Board will announce the closing of the polls during the Annual Meeting. Proxies must be received before the closing of the polls in order to be counted.

A stockholder may designate a person or persons other than those persons designated on the form of proxy to act as the stockholder’s proxy by striking out the name(s) appearing on the proxy card, inserting the name(s) of another person(s), and delivering the signed card to that person(s). The person(s) designated by the stockholder must present the signed proxy card at the meeting in order for the shares to be voted.

Shares Held Through a Broker, Nominee, Fiduciary, or Other Custodian

Where the stockholder is not the record holder, such as where the shares are held through a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian, the stockholder must provide voting instructions to the record holder of the shares in accordance with the record holder’s requirements in order to ensure the shares are properly voted.

Shares Held on Your Behalf under Company Benefit Plans or under The DirectSERVICE Investment Program

The proxy card, or a proxy submitted by telephone or through the Internet, will also serve as voting instructions to the plan administrator or trustee for any shares held on behalf of a participant under any of the following employee benefit plans: the AT&T Retirement Savings Plan; the AT&T Savings and Security Plan; the AT&T Puerto Rico Retirement Savings Plan; and the BellSouth Savings and Security Plan. Subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations, shares in each of the above employee benefit plans for which instructions are not received will not be voted. To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees and/or administrators of the plans, your voting instructions must be received by April 21, 2020.

In addition, the proxy card or a proxy submitted by telephone or through the Internet will constitute voting instructions to the plan administrator under The DirectSERVICE Investment Program sponsored and administered by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (AT&T’s transfer agent) for shares held on behalf of plan participants.

If a stockholder participates in the plans listed above and/or maintains stockholder accounts under more than one name (including minor differences in registration, such as with or without a middle initial), the stockholder may receive more than one set of proxy materials. To ensure that all shares are voted, please submit proxies for all of the shares you own.

 

 

2   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS

 

Item No. 1 - Election of Directors

 

Under our Bylaws, the Board of Directors has the authority to determine the size of the Board and to fill vacancies. Currently, the Board is comprised of 14 Directors, one of whom is an Executive Officer of AT&T. There are no vacancies on the Board. Under AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director will not be nominated by the Board for re-election if the Director would be 72 or older at the time of the election.

Laura D’Andrea Tyson will retire at the 2020 Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election. Accordingly, the Board has voted to reduce its size to 13 Directors effective immediately before the meeting.

The Board of Directors has nominated the 13 persons listed below for election as Directors to one-year terms of office that would expire at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Each of the nominees is an incumbent Director of AT&T recommended for re-election by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In making these nominations, the Board reviewed the background of the nominees (each nominee’s biography can be found beginning on the next page) and determined to nominate each of the current Directors for re-election, other than the retiring Director.

The Board believes that each nominee has valuable individual skills, attributes, and experiences that, taken together, provide us with the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and vision necessary to provide effective oversight of a large and varied enterprise like AT&T. As indicated in the following biographies and under “Experience and Qualifications of Our Director Nominees” on page 4, the nominees have exhibited significant leadership skills and extensive experience in a variety of fields, each of which the Board believes provides valuable knowledge about important elements of AT&T’s business.

If one or more of the nominees should at the time of the meeting be unavailable or unable to serve as a Director, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted to elect the remaining nominees and any substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board. The Board knows of no reason why any of the nominees would be unavailable or unable to serve.

 

 

LOGO

  

 

The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the following candidates:

   LOGO         

 

       
  Name   Age  

Director

Since

   Principal Occupation
  Randall L. Stephenson   59   2005   

Chairman of the Board and CEO, AT&T Inc.

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.   69   2015   

Retired Global CEO, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

  Richard W. Fisher   70   2015   

Former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

  Scott T. Ford   57   2012   

Member and CEO, Westrock Group, LLC

  Glenn H. Hutchins   64   2014   

Chairman, North Island and Co-Founder, Silver Lake

  William E. Kennard   63   2014   

Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

  Debra L. Lee   65   2019   

Chief Executive Officer, Leading Women Defined, Inc.

  Stephen J. Luczo   63   2019   

Managing Partner, Crosspoint Capital Partners, L.P.

  Michael B. McCallister   67   2013   

Retired Chairman of the Board and CEO, Humana Inc.

  Beth E. Mooney   65   2013   

Chairman and CEO, KeyCorp

  Matthew K. Rose   60   2010   

Retired Chairman and CEO, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC

  Cynthia B. Taylor   58   2013   

President and CEO, Oil States International, Inc.

  Geoffrey Y. Yang

 

  61

 

 

2016

 

  

Founding Partner and Managing Director, Redpoint Ventures

 

All Director nominees are independent, except for Mr. Stephenson.

 

LOGO   3


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

SUMMARY OF BOARD NOMINEE SKILLS, ATTRIBUTES AND EXPERIENCE

 

The table below summarizes the key skills, attributes or experiences of each of our director nominees that are most relevant to their board service. The fact that a specific area of focus or experience is not designated does not mean the director nominee does not possess that attribute or expertise. Rather, the attributes or experiences noted below are those reviewed by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board in making nomination decisions and as part of the Board succession planning process.

 

                         
    LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO   LOGO

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Perspective

 

 

 

 

     

     

             

 

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

       

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Focus

 

         

         

     

 

           

Human Capital Management 

 

 

     

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

   

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

     

     

 

Media & Entertainment

 

 

             

 

                     

Technology/Innovation

 

             

         

                 

Telecom

 

     

   

             

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

RANDALL L. STEPHENSON

 

Age: 59

Director since: 2005

Occupation: Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Inc.

  

    

 

Committees:

   Executive (Chair)

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Stephenson is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Inc. and has served in this capacity since 2007, having also served as President from 2007 through September 2019. He has held a variety of high-level finance, operational, and marketing positions with AT&T, including serving as Chief Operating Officer from 2004 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in 2007 and as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He began his career with the Company in 1982. Mr. Stephenson received his B.S. in accounting from Central State University (now known as the University of Central Oklahoma) and earned his Master of Accountancy degree from the University of Oklahoma.

 

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

The Boeing Company (2016-2017); Emerson Electric Co. (2006-2017)

 

SKILL AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Stephenson has nearly 40 years of experience in the telecommunications industry and has demonstrated the ability to lead AT&T and guide its strategy and evolution in a changing industry landscape. He has intimate knowledge of our Company, values and culture through many years of executive leadership experience across various divisions of our organization, including operations and marketing.

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Media & Entertainment

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Technology/Innovation

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Consumer Focus

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Global Perspective

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Telecom

 

LOGO

  

Human Capital Management

 

         

 

4   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

SAMUEL A. DI PIAZZA, JR.

 

Age: 69

Director since: 2015

Occupation: Retired Global Chief Executive Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

  

    

 

Committees:

   Audit (Chair)

   Executive

   Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Di Piazza served as Global Chief Executive Officer of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited (an international professional services firm) from 2002 until his retirement in 2009. Mr. Di Piazza began his 36-year career with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC, formerly Coopers & Lybrand) in 1973 and was named Partner in 1979 and Senior Partner in 2000. From 1979 to 2002, Mr. Di Piazza held various regional leadership positions with PwC. After his retirement from PwC, Mr. Di Piazza joined Citigroup where he served as Vice Chairman of the Global Corporate and Investment Bank from 2011 until 2014. Since 2010, Mr. Di Piazza has served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The Mayo Clinic. He received his B.S. in accounting from the University of Alabama and earned his M.S. in tax accounting from the University of Houston. He served as a Director of DIRECTV from 2010 until the company was acquired by AT&T Inc. in 2015.

 

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated; ProAssurance Corporation; and Regions Financial Corporation

 

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

DIRECTV (2010-2015)

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Di Piazza brings significant executive and business leadership through his management of a multi-cultural, complex professional services organization serving clients around the world. He has significant global accounting, cyber and financial experience, and extensive knowledge of the entertainment business, including from his prior service as a Director of DIRECTV, a digital entertainment services company. He also has experience with sustainability and social responsibility as a former director on the UN Global Compact Board and former Chairman of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Media & Entertainment

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

LOGO

  

 

 

Global Perspective

         

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

RICHARD W. FISHER

 

Age: 70

Director since: 2015

Occupation: Former President and

Chief Executive Officer of Federal Reserve

Bank of Dallas

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance

   Corporate Governance and Nominating

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Fisher served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas from 2005 until March 2015. He has been Senior Advisor to Barclays PLC (a financial services provider) since 2015. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Fisher was Vice Chairman and Managing Partner of Kissinger McLarty Associates (a strategic advisory firm). From 1997 to 2001, Mr. Fisher served as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative with the rank of Ambassador. Previously, he served as Managing Partner of Fisher Capital Management and Fisher Ewing Partners LP (investment advisory firms) and prior to that was Senior Manager of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (a private banking firm). He is an Honorary Fellow of Hertford College, Oxford University, and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Mr. Fisher received his B.A. in economics from Harvard University and earned his M.B.A. from Stanford University.

 

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

PepsiCo, Inc.; Tenet Healthcare Corporation

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Fisher has extensive knowledge of financial matters and expertise in international markets, trade and regulatory frameworks. He brings strategy, leadership and risk oversight experience, including his prior experience chairing a Federal Reserve committee on information technology architecture and cybersecurity risks for five years.

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Global Perspective

 

    

 

LOGO   5


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

SCOTT T. FORD

 

Age: 57

Director since: 2012

Occupation: Member and Chief Executive Officer of Westrock Group, LLC

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance (Chair)

   Executive

   Human Resources

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Ford founded Westrock Group, LLC (a private investment firm in Little Rock, Arkansas) in 2013, where he has served as Member and Chief Executive Officer since its inception. Westrock Group operates Westrock Coffee Company, LLC (a fully integrated coffee company), which Mr. Ford founded in 2009, and where he has served as Chief Executive Officer since 2009. Westrock Group also operates Westrock Asset Management, LLC (a global alternative investment firm), which Mr. Ford founded in 2014, and where he has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer since 2014. Mr. Ford previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alltel Corporation (a provider of wireless voice and data communications services) from 2002 to 2009 and served as an executive member of Alltel Corporation’s board of directors from 1996 to 2009. He also served as Alltel Corporation’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Ford led Alltel through several major business transformations, culminating with the sale of the company to Verizon Wireless in 2009. Mr. Ford received his B.S. in finance from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

 

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Bear State Financial, Inc. (2011-2018)

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Ford brings extensive experience in the telecommunications industry through his leadership of a large, publicly traded wireless and wireline communications company. He has experience managing complex business operations in various regulatory environments internationally, and has led several major business transformations, including the spin-off of Windstream and Alltel.

 

LOGO

 

  

Consumer Focus

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Global Perspective

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Telecom

 

 

LOGO

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

LOGO

  

Human Capital Management

 

    

 

 

 

LOGO

 

GLENN H. HUTCHINS

 

Age: 64

Director since: 2014

Occupation: Chairman, North Island and Co-Founder, Silver Lake

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance

   Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Hutchins is Chairman of North Island (a family investment office, aka Tide Mill, LLC, based in New York, New York) and has served in this capacity since 2013. He is also a co-founder of Silver Lake (a technology investment firm based in New York, New York and Menlo Park, California), which was founded in 1999, and where Mr. Hutchins served as Co-CEO until 2011 and as Managing Director from 1999 until 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Hutchins was Senior Managing Director at The Blackstone Group (a global investment firm) from 1994 to 1999. Mr. Hutchins served as Chairman of the Board of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (a software and technology services company) from 2005 until 2015. He is a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Co-Chairman of the Brookings Institution. Previously, Mr. Hutchins served as a Special Advisor in the White House on economic and health-care policy from 1993 to 1994 and as Senior Advisor on the transition of the Administration from 1992 to 1993. He holds an A.B. from Harvard College, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

 

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Virtu Financial, Inc.

 

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Nasdaq, Inc. (2005-2017)

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Hutchins brings extensive experience in areas that intersect technology, innovation and investment, along with financial, public policy and strategic planning experience. As the co-founder and co-CEO of a global investment firm, he brings significant leadership, business planning and human capital management expertise.

 

LOGO

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

LOGO

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Technology/Innovation

 

 

6   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

WILLIAM E. KENNARD

 

Age: 63

Director since: 2014

Occupation: Former United States Ambassador to the European Union and former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Governance and Nominating

   Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

 

EXPERIENCE

Mr. Kennard served as the United States Ambassador to the European Union from 2009 to 2013. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Kennard was Managing Director of The Carlyle Group (a global asset management firm) where he led investments in the telecommunications and media sectors. Mr. Kennard served as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission from 1997 to 2001. Before his appointment as FCC Chairman, he served as the FCC’s General Counsel from 1993 until 1997. Mr. Kennard joined the FCC from the law firm of Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson and Hand (now DLA Piper) where he was a partner and member of the firm’s board of directors. Mr. Kennard received his B.A. in communications from Stanford University and earned his law degree from Yale Law School.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Duke Energy Corporation; Ford Motor Company; and MetLife, Inc.

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Kennard brings expertise in the global telecommunications and media industries including knowledge of the complex regulatory and policy landscape for communications, consumer perspective, and an understanding of the technological and strategic shifts in the industries. He also has experience in international trade and global investment.

 

 

LOGO

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Global Perspective

 

 

LOGO

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Media & Entertainment

 

 

 

LOGO

  

Telecom

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

DEBRA L. LEE

 

Age: 65

Director since: July 2019

Occupation: Chief Executive Officer of

Leading Women Defined, Inc.

  

    

 

Committees:

   Public Policy and Corporate Reputation

 

EXPERIENCE

Ms. Lee is Chief Executive Officer of Leading Women Defined, Inc. (an association of U.S. strategic thought leaders, located in Beverly Hills, California), which she founded in 2009. She has served in this capacity since June 2018. Ms. Lee served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BET Networks (a global media and entertainment subsidiary of Viacom, Inc., headquartered in New York, New York) from 2006 until her retirement in 2018. Ms. Lee joined BET Networks in 1986 and served in several leadership roles, including President and Chief Executive Officer (2005-2006), President and Chief Operating Officer (1995-2005), and Executive Vice President and General Counsel (1986-1995). Ms. Lee holds a B.A. in political science from Brown University, a master’s in public policy from Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Burberry Group plc; Marriott International, Inc.

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Revlon, Inc. (2006-2015); Twitter, Inc. (2016-2019); and WGL Holdings, Inc. (2000-2018)

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Ms. Lee has extensive leadership in the media and entertainment industry. She brings strong operational and transformational experience through the development and execution of innovative strategic plans.

 

 

LOGO

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

LOGO

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

LOGO

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

LOGO

  

Consumer Focus

 

 

LOGO

  

Media & Entertainment

    

 

LOGO   7


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

STEPHEN J. LUCZO

 

Age: 63

Director since: November 2019

Occupation: Managing Partner of

Crosspoint Capital Partners, L.P.

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance

 

EXPERIENCE

Mr. Luczo is a Managing Partner of Crosspoint Capital Partners, L.P. (a private equity investment firm focused on the cybersecurity and privacy sectors located in Woodside, California) and has served in this capacity since February 2020. He is also Chairman of the Board of Seagate Technology plc (a global provider of data storage technology and solutions in Cupertino, California) and has served in this capacity since 1998. Mr. Luczo also served as Chief Executive Officer from 1998 to 2004 and from 2009 to 2017. He joined Seagate in 1993 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development. Prior to joining Seagate, Mr. Luczo held various roles in investment banking. He holds an A.B. in economics from Stanford University and earned an M.B.A. from Stanford Graduate School of Business.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Morgan Stanley; Seagate Technology plc

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Luczo brings deep experience in technology, business development, strategic planning, and operations through his leadership at Seagate, a global technology company. He has significant experience in financial matters and executing strategic cost initiatives and transactions.

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Global Perspective

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Technology/Innovation

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

MICHAEL B. McCALLISTER

 

Age: 67

Director since: 2013

Occupation: Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Humana Inc.

  

    

 

Committees:

   Audit

   Human Resources

 

EXPERIENCE

Mr. McCallister served as Chairman of Humana Inc. (a health care company in Louisville, Kentucky) from 2010 to 2013, and as a member of Humana’s Board of Directors beginning in 2000. He also served as Humana’s Chief Executive Officer from 2000 until his retirement in 2012. During Mr. McCallister’s tenure, he led Humana through significant expansion and growth, nearly quadrupling its annual revenues between 2000 and 2012, and led the company to become a FORTUNE 100 company. Mr. McCallister received his B.S. in accounting from Louisiana Tech University and earned his M.B.A. from Pepperdine University.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Fifth Third Bancorp; Zoetis Inc.

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. McCallister has extensive leadership experience in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company with a focus on strategic planning and organic growth in the evolving health care sector. He also has deep experience in the development of customer-focused solutions.

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Consumer Focus

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

    

 

8   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

BETH E. MOONEY

 

Age: 65

Director since: 2013

Occupation: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KeyCorp

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance

   Executive

   Human Resources (Chair)

 

EXPERIENCE

Ms. Mooney is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KeyCorp (a bank holding company in Cleveland, Ohio) and has served in this capacity since 2011. She previously served as KeyCorp’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2010 to 2011. Ms. Mooney joined KeyCorp in 2006 as a Vice Chair and head of Key Community Bank. Prior to joining KeyCorp, beginning in 2000 she served as Senior Executive Vice President at AmSouth Bancorporation (now Regions Financial Corporation), where she also became Chief Financial Officer in 2004. Ms. Mooney served as a Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland in 2016 and served three one-year terms representing the Fourth Federal Reserve District on the Federal Advisory Council from 2017 to 2019. She received her B.A. in history from the University of Texas at Austin and earned her M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University. Ms. Mooney has announced her intention to retire from KeyCorp in May of 2020.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Ford Motor Company; KeyCorp

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Ms. Mooney brings executive leadership skills through the management of a large, publicly traded and highly-regulated company, knowledge of business strategy, and more than 30 years of experience in the customer-focused financial services industry.

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Consumer Focus

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Government/Regulatory

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

 

 

LOGO

 

MATTHEW K. ROSE

 

Age: 60

Director since: 2010

Occupation: Retired Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer of Burlington

Northern Santa Fe, LLC

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair)

   Executive

   Human Resources

 

EXPERIENCE

Mr. Rose served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (a freight rail system based in Fort Worth, Texas and a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., formerly known as Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation) from 2002 until his retirement in April 2019, having also served as BNSF’s President until 2010. Mr. Rose began his 26-year career with BNSF (then Burlington Northern Railroad Company) in 1993. During his tenure as CEO, Mr. Rose helped guide the acquisition of BNSF by Berkshire Hathaway in 2009. Before serving as Chairman, Mr. Rose held several leadership positions there and at its predecessors, including President and Chief Executive Officer from 2000 to 2002, President and Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2000, and Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Rose also served as Executive Chairman of BNSF Railway Company (a subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC), until his retirement in 2019, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2002 to 2013. He earned his B.S. in marketing from the University of Missouri.

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Fluor Corporation

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

BNSF Railway Company (2002-2019); Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (2000-2019)

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Rose has extensive experience in the executive oversight of a large, complex and highly-regulated organization with considerable knowledge of operations management and logistics. He brings experience overseeing long-term strategic planning and a unionized workforce.

 

 

LOGO

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Government/Regulatory

 

         

 

LOGO   9


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

LOGO

 

CYNTHIA B. TAYLOR

 

Age: 58

Director since: 2013

Occupation: President and

Chief Executive Officer of

Oil States International, Inc.

  

    

 

Committees:

   Audit

   Corporate Governance and Nominating

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Ms. Taylor is President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Oil States International, Inc. (a diversified solutions provider for the oil and gas industry in Houston, Texas) and has served in this capacity since 2007. She previously served as Oil States International, Inc.’s President and Chief Operating Officer from 2006 to 2007 and as its Senior Vice President-Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2006. Ms. Taylor was Chief Financial Officer of L.E. Simmons & Associates, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and Vice President-Controller of Cliffs Drilling Company from 1992 to 1999, and prior to that, held various management positions with Ernst & Young LLP, a public accounting firm. She received her B.B.A. in accounting from Texas A&M University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Oil States International, Inc.

 

PAST PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Tidewater Inc. (2008-2017)

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Ms. Taylor brings executive leadership skills in the oversight of a large, publicly traded company, vast experience in finance and public accounting, and her experience in international business and affairs.

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Global Perspective

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Human Capital Management

 

    

 

 

 

LOGO

 

GEOFFREY Y. YANG

 

Age: 61

Director since: 2016

Occupation: Founding Partner and

Managing Director of Redpoint Ventures

  

    

 

Committees:

   Corporate Development and Finance

   Human Resources

 

EXPERIENCE

 

Mr. Yang is a founding partner and Managing Director of Redpoint Ventures (a global private equity and venture capital firm based in Menlo Park, California) and has served in this capacity since 1999. He also founded Performance Health Sciences (d/b/a Apeiron Life), located in Menlo Park, California, where he has served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of its Board of Directors since April 2018. Prior to founding Redpoint, Mr. Yang was a General Partner with Institutional Venture Partners (a private equity investment firm in Menlo Park, California), which he joined in 1987. Mr. Yang has over 30 years of experience in the venture capital industry and has helped found or served on the boards of a variety of consumer media, internet, and infrastructure companies. He holds a B.S.E. in engineering from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

 

OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY DIRECTORSHIPS

Franklin Resources, Inc.

 

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

Mr. Yang has extensive experience in technology and innovative forms of digital media and advertising. He has helped to found, invest in, and provide strategic guidance to consumer media and entertainment companies internationally.

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Senior Leadership

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Investment/Finance

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Global Perspective

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Media & Entertainment

 

 

 

LOGO

 

  

Technology/Innovation

 

 

 

10   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

Item No. 2 - Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditors

 

This proposal would ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) to serve as independent auditors of AT&T for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. The Audit Committee’s decision to re-appoint our independent auditor was based on the following considerations:

 

 

quality and performance of the lead audit partner and the overall engagement team,

 

 

knowledge of the telecommunications, media and entertainment, and technology industries and company operations,

 

 

global capabilities and technical expertise,

 

 

auditor independence and objectivity, and

 

 

the potential impact of rotating to another independent audit firm.

The Audit Committee’s oversight of EY includes regular private sessions with EY, discussions about audit scope and business imperatives, and—as described above—a comprehensive annual evaluation to determine whether to re-engage EY. Considerations concerning auditor independence include:

 

 

Limits on non-audit services: The Audit Committee preapproves audit and permissible non-audit services provided by EY in accordance with AT&T’s pre-approval policy.

 

Audit partner rotation: EY rotates the lead audit partner and other partners on the engagement consistent with independence requirements. The Audit Committee oversees the selection of each new lead audit partner.

 

 

EY’s internal independence process: EY conducts periodic internal reviews of its audit and other work and assesses the adequacy of partners and other personnel working on the Company’s account.

 

 

Strong regulatory framework: EY, as an independent registered public accounting firm, is subject to PCAOB inspections, “Big 4” peer reviews and PCAOB and SEC oversight.

Based on these considerations, the Audit Committee believes that the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is in the best interest of the company and its stockholders. Therefore, the Audit Committee recommends that stockholders ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. If stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Committee will reconsider its decision. One or more members of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will be able to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

 

The Board recommends you vote FOR this proposal

 

LOGO   11


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

Item No. 3 - Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

 

This proposal would approve the compensation of Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative disclosures (see pages 37 through 77). These sections describe our executive compensation program.

The Human Resources Committee is responsible for executive compensation and works to structure a balanced program that addresses the dynamic, global marketplace in which AT&T competes for talent. The compensation structure includes pay-for-performance and equity-based incentive programs and seeks to reward executives for attaining performance goals.

AT&T submits this proposal to stockholders on an annual basis. While this is a non-binding, advisory vote, the Committee intends to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. AT&T is providing this vote as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.

GUIDING PAY PRINCIPLES

 

Alignment with Stockholders

Utilize compensation elements and set performance targets that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders. For example, approximately 68% of target pay for NEOs is tied to common stock price performance. In addition, we have executive common stock ownership guidelines and common stock holding requirements, as described on page 63. Each of the NEOs exceeds the minimum common stock ownership guidelines.

Competitive and Market Based

Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate peer company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T.

Pay for Performance

Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of predetermined goals and recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to our success. For example, in 2019, 94% of the CEO’s target compensation (and an average of 88% for other NEOs) was variable and tied to short- and long-term performance incentives, including common stock price performance.

Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus

Structure the compensation program to provide an appropriate balance between the achievement of short-and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigating risk.

Principled Program

Structure our programs so that it aligns with both corporate governance best practices and our strategic objectives, while remaining easy to explain and communicate.

 

 

The Board recommends you vote FOR this proposal

 

12   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Certain stockholders have advised the Company that they intend to introduce at the 2020 Annual Meeting the proposals set forth below. The names and addresses of, and the number of shares owned by each such stockholder will be provided upon request to the Secretary of AT&T at 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 2954, Dallas, Texas 75202.

 

 

 

Item No. 4 - Stockholder Proposal - Independent Board Chairman

Proposal 4 – Independent Board Chairman

Shareholders request that our Board of Directors adopt as policy, and amend our governing documents as necessary, to require that the Chairman of the Board be an independent member of the Board whenever possible. Although it would be better to have an immediate transition to an independent Board Chairman, the Board would have the discretion to phase in this policy for the next Chief Executive Officer transition.

If the Board determines that a Chairman, who was independent when selected is no longer independent, the Board shall select a new Chairman who satisfies the requirements of the policy within a reasonable amount of time. Compliance with this policy is waived if no independent director is available and willing to serve as Chairman.

This proposal topic won 50%-plus support at 5 major U.S. companies in 2013 including 73%­ support at Netflix. These 5 majority votes would have been still higher if all shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice. This proposal topic won 40%-support at our 2019 annual meeting which is a significant increase from the 23%-support at our 2016 annual meeting.

When considering a shareholder proposal such as this is good to remember the positive role that shareholder proposal have had. For instance AT&T adopted a policy requiring that senior executives retain a significant percentage of stock acquired through AT&T’s equity pay programs until one-year following the termination of their employment because Ray T. Chevedden submitted a proposal on this specific topic.

An independent Chairman is best positioned to build up the oversight capabilities of our directors while our CEO addresses the challenging day-to-day issues facing the company like the falling price of our stock over nearly 2 decades. - Our stock price was $50 in 2001! Clearly our CEO needs to focus on increasing the stock price (which has been lagging during a robust stock market) by enhancing the underlying core value of the company.

An independent board chairman would have more time to devote to improving the performance of our directors. Our combined CEO/Chairman, Randall Stephenson, received our highest negative votes and our Lead Director, Matthew Rose, received our third highest negative votes in 2019.

The negative votes received by Mr. Rose are unfortunate because the 2019 proxy hyped that Mr. Rose has “substantial responsibility for all Board matters.” Laura Tyson had more than 20-years long-tenure. Long-tenure in a director is the opposite of independence.

The roles of Chairman and CEO are fundamentally different and should be held by 2 directors, a · CEO and a Chairman who is completely independent of the CEO and our company.

Please vote yes:

 

Independent Board Chairman - Proposal 4

 

 

BOARD RESPONSE:

Randall Stephenson currently serves as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer because your Board believes that, at this juncture in the Company’s history, this structure is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders. Indeed, the proposal does not call for a different approach during Mr. Stephenson’s tenure as CEO. However, as the Company has announced publicly, the Board intends to separate the Chairman and CEO positions when Mr. Stephenson retires as CEO. At this time, the Board believes that its current approach of appointing a strong independent Lead Director, holding regular executive sessions of the non-management Directors, and composing all committees entirely of independent Directors continues to provide effective oversight of management. For more information on the duties and role of the independent Lead Director, please see page 17 in this proxy.

 

 

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal.

 

LOGO   13


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

 

Item No. 5 - Stockholder Proposal - Employee Representative Director

RESOLVED, shareholders of AT&T Inc. (“AT&T” or “the Company”) request that the Board nominate an Employee Representative Director for election to the Board by shareholders at AT&T’s 2021 annual meeting of shareholders. The Employee Representative Director shall be a current non-executive AT&T employee who consents to serve on the Board. Current employees shall be given the opportunity to suggest persons to serve as the Employee Representative Director to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which will recommend a candidate for nomination by the full Board. If the Employee Representative Director ceases to be a non-executive employee of AT&T during his or her term, the Board should appoint a replacement who satisfies the criteria set forth above.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

AT&T employees create a great deal of value for the Company and its shareholders. In last year’s annual report, AT&T noted that “Our strong position and the amazing opportunities ahead of us are only possible due to the energy and commitment of our management and employee team,” while the Company’s website asserted that “Talented, engaged employees are key to our company’s success, and we strive to be the industry’s employer of choice by investing in our people.” Clearly, the Company’s relationship with its employees is critical to long-term shareholder value.

Employee representation on AT&T’s Board would add knowledge and insight on issues critical to the success of the Company, beyond that currently present on the Board, and may result in more informed decision making. An employee perspective would be particularly useful in the Board’s oversight of corporate culture. Recent scandals, such as sexual harassment controversies at Wynn Resorts, Fox News and CBS, have shown that culture-related risk is substantial and requires board oversight. An Employee Representative on the Board has the advantage of personally observing the company’s culture on a regular basis. Moreover, employees have a sincere interest in the ongoing viability of the company, aligning their interests with those of long-term shareholders.

Several actions by A&T over the past year highlight the risks posed by a corporate culture that is out of alignment with the values of its employees:

  In August 2019, 20,000 AT&T technicians and customer service representatives in nine states went on strike to protest what they said was the Company’s refusal to negotiate in good faith.

  In October 2019, AT&T announced the sale of its Puerto Rico and US Virgin Islands wireless and wireline operations, despite the critical role its workers played in ensuring access to communications following Hurricane Maria.

  Also in October 2019, AT&T announced a capital allocation plan that embraces the short-term goals of hedge fund Elliott Management, but fails to even mention human capital investment.

AT&T has long described its culture as a competitive advantage, helping it attract and retain top talent AT&T should act to protect and strengthen its human capital, particularly given tight labor markets and intense competition for communications workers. We strongly believe the Employee Representative Director would promote AT&T’s continued success.

We urge shareholders to vote for this proposal.

 

BOARD RESPONSE:

Our Board of Directors believes the current director nominating and evaluation process allows the best and most qualified candidates to be elected to the Board of Directors. The Board believes that changing our board nomination and membership framework with respect to Company employees as outlined by this proposal is unnecessary and will not enhance stockholder value.

In identifying eligible candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers a candidate’s:

 

 

general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in the current business environment,

 

understanding of AT&T’s business,

 

educational and professional background,

 

judgment, competence, and anticipated participation in Board activities,

 

experience, geographic location, special talents or personal attributes and diversity.

Requiring the Board to limit its search for Board candidates to a select group of individuals would not allow the Board to find the best persons for the position. Further, the Board does not believe stockholders benefit from a director nominating process that favors a single constituency over the interests of other constituencies representing particular stockholder interests.

In addition, having an independent board is a core element of our governance philosophy. Under NYSE listing standards, an employee Director would not be considered independent, and adding such a Director as called for by the proposal would decrease the percentage of Directors that are considered independent. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a substantial majority of our directors must be independent. Except for our Chairman and CEO, all of our current directors are independent.

 

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal.

 

14   LOGO


Table of Contents

VOTING ITEMS

 

 

 

Item No. 6 - Stockholder Proposal - Improve Guiding Principles of Executive Compensation

 

Shareholder Proposal to Improve Guiding Principles of Executive Compensation

 

Resolved: shareholders recommend that AT&T Inc. improve guiding principles of executive compensation.

Supporting Statement:

Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act directed the SEC to amend Item 402 of Regulation S-K to require each company to disclose the annual total compensation of the CEO, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (except the CEO), and the ratio of these two amounts (CEO pay ratio). According to AT&T 2019 Proxy Statement, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (except the CEO) is $95,814, the annual total compensation of the CEO is $29,118,118, and the CEO pay ratio is 304:1 (p.78). What is the justification of such a high ratio? Amazon’s CEO pay ratio is 58:1 in 2018.

Nationwide, “Median compensation for 132 chief executives of S&P 500 companies reached $12.4 million in 2018, up from $11.7 million for the same group in 2017, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis.” (March 17, 2019). “CEOs rake in 940% more than 40 years ago, while average workers earn 12% more” (CBSNEWS August 14, 2019). America’s ballooning executive compensation is neither responsible for the society nor sustainable for the economy.

With 44,892 non-U.S. employees (p.78), AT&T is a global company, but there is not a foreign company in the peer group to assess market-based compensation for executive officers in 2018 (p.43). The executive compensation and CEO pay ratios of big Japanese and European companies are much less than one tenth of big American companies.

Reducing the CEO pay ratio should be included as a guiding principle of executive compensation . It is time for American executives as citizens to take the social responsibility on their own initiative rather than to be forced by the public. See ‘Passive Income’ to ‘Two Cents’: How Elizabeth Warren Honed Her Message, Wall Street Journal October 4, 2019.

 

BOARD RESPONSE:

The Board’s Human Resources Committee has designed an executive compensation program that encourages our leaders to produce outstanding financial and operational results, create sustainable long-term value for our stockholders, and lead the company with ethics and integrity. Our guiding pay principles are:

 

 

Alignment with Stockholders – Utilize compensation elements and set performance targets that closely align executives’ interests with those of stockholders.

 

 

Competitive and Market Based – Evaluate all components of our compensation and benefits program in light of appropriate peer company practices to ensure we are able to attract and retain world-class talent with the leadership abilities and experience necessary to develop and execute business strategies, obtain superior results, and build long-term stockholder value in an organization as large and complex as AT&T.

 

 

Pay for Performance – Tie a significant portion of compensation to the achievement of predetermined goals and recognize individual accomplishments that contribute to our success.

 

 

Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus – Ensure that the compensation program provides an appropriate balance between the achievement of short- and long-term performance objectives, with a clear emphasis on managing the sustainability of the business and mitigating risk.

 

 

Principled Program – Structure our program so that it aligns with both corporate governance best practices and our strategic objectives, while remaining easy to explain and communicate.

For more information about our guiding pay principles, see page 41 in this proxy statement.

The Board does not believe our guiding pay principles should be changed as described in this proposal. Shareholders have overwhelmingly endorsed our Company’s pay practices. At the 2019 meeting, 91% of votes cast supported our advisory proposal to approve the Company’s executive compensation, similar to the levels of support expressed at our 2018 and 2017 meetings.

For these reasons, the Board recommends a vote against this proposal.

The Board recommends you vote AGAINST this proposal.

 

LOGO   15


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

AT&T is committed to strong corporate governance principles. Effective governance protects the long-term interests of our stockholders, promotes public trust in AT&T, and strengthens management accountability. AT&T regularly reviews and updates its corporate governance practices to reflect evolving corporate governance principles and concerns identified by stockholders and other stakeholders.

THE ROLE OF THE BOARD

 

 

The Board of Directors is responsible for oversight of management and strategic direction and for establishing broad corporate policies. In addition, the Board of Directors and various committees of the Board regularly meet to review and discuss operational and financial reports presented by the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management as well as reports by experts and other advisors. Corporate review sessions are also offered to Directors to give them more detailed views of our businesses, such as corporate opportunities, technology, and operations.

Members of the Board are expected to attend Board meetings in person, unless the meeting is held by

teleconference. The Board held 12 meetings in 2019. Directors are also expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Twelve Directors were present at the 2019 Annual Meeting. In 2019, all Directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and of the Committees on which each served.

The Board oversees succession planning and talent development for senior executive positions. The Human Resources Committee has primary responsibility for developing succession plans for the CEO position.

 

 

BOARDS ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

 

 

The Board is responsible for overseeing our policies and procedures for assessing and managing risk. Management is responsible for assessing and managing our exposures to risk on a day-to-day basis, including the creation of appropriate risk management policies and procedures. Management also is responsible for informing the Board of our most significant risks and our plans for managing those risks. Annually, the Board reviews the Company’s strategic business plans, which includes evaluating the competitive, technological, economic and other risks associated with these plans.

In addition, under its charter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. This includes, among other matters, evaluating risk in the context of financial policies, counterparty and credit risk, and the appropriate mitigation of risk, including through the use of insurance where appropriate. The Audit Committee also oversees our compliance program and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The

internal audit organization provides the Committee with an assessment of the Company’s risks and conducts assurance reviews of the Company’s internal controls. The finance, compliance and internal audit organizations each provide regular updates to the Audit Committee.

The Company’s senior internal auditing executive and Chief Compliance Officer each meet annually in executive session with the Audit Committee. The senior internal auditing executive and Chief Compliance Officer review with the Audit Committee each year’s annual internal audit and compliance risk assessment, which is focused on significant financial, operating, regulatory and legal matters. The Audit Committee also receives regular reports on completed internal audits of these significant risk areas.

In addition, the Audit Committee, as well as the Board of Directors, receive reports from officers with responsibilities for cybersecurity. The AT&T Chief Security Office establishes policy and requirements for the security of AT&T’s computing and networking environments.

 

 

16   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

 

 

The Board has adopted a written Code of Ethics applicable to Directors, officers, and employees that outlines our corporate values and standards of integrity and behavior and is designed to foster a culture of integrity, drive compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and protect and promote the reputation of our Company. The full text of the Code of Ethics is posted on our website at www.att.com.

 

Our Chief Compliance Officer has responsibility to implement and maintain an effective ethics and compliance program. He also has responsibility to provide updates on our ethics and compliance programs to the Audit Committee.

 

 

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

 

 

The non-management members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session (without management Directors or management personnel present) at least four times per year. The Lead Director, who is appointed for a one-year term by the non-management Directors of the Board, presides over these sessions. Currently, Matthew K. Rose serves as Lead Director; his term is scheduled to expire January 31, 2021.

Chairman of the Board and CEO: Randall L. Stephenson

 

Lead Director: Matthew K. Rose

 

Audit, Human Resources, Corporate Governance and Nominating, Corporate Development and Finance, and Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committees composed entirely of independent Directors.

 

 

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

 

 

Chairman of the Board

Presides over meetings of the Board

Presides over meetings of stockholders

Prepares the agenda for each Board meeting

Prepares the agenda for each stockholder meeting

Chief Executive Officer

In charge of the affairs of the Company, subject to the overall direction and supervision of the Board and its committees

Consults and advises the Board and its committees on the business and affairs of the Company

Performs such other duties as may be assigned by the Board

 

 

Lead Independent Director

 

Presides at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present;

 

Presides at executive sessions of the non-management Directors;

 

Prepares the agenda for the executive sessions of the non-management Directors;

 

Acts as the principal liaison between the non-management Directors and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;

 

Coordinates the activities of the non-management Directors when acting as a group;

 

Approves the agenda for each Board meeting;

 

Approves meeting schedules to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;

 

Advises the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of the flow of information from management, including the materials provided to Directors at Board meetings;

 

Participates in engagement with major stockholders and shares feedback with the full Board;

 

Shares with other Directors, as he or she deems appropriate, letters and other contacts that he or she receives; and

In addition, the Lead Director may:

 

call meetings of the non-management Directors in addition to the quarterly meetings, and

 

require information relating to any matter be distributed to the Board

 

 

Randall Stephenson currently serves as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer because your Board believes that, at this juncture in the Company’s history, this structure is in the best interests of AT&T and its stockholders. As the Company has announced publicly, the Board intends to separate the Chairman and CEO positions when Mr. Stephenson retires as CEO. Until then, the Board believes that its current approach of appointing a strong independent Lead Director, holding regular executive sessions of the non-management Directors, and composing all committees entirely of independent Directors continues to provide effective oversight of management.

 

LOGO   17


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS

 

The Board of Directors believes that the Company benefits from having experienced Directors who bring a wide range of skills and backgrounds to the Boardroom. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying eligible candidates based on our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Committee considers a candidate’s:

 

 

general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in the current business environment;

 

understanding of our business;

 

educational and professional background;

 

judgment, competence, anticipated participation in Board activities;

 

experience, geographic location, and special talents or personal attributes

AT&T recognizes the value of diversity. Although the Committee does not have a formal diversity policy, it believes that diversity is an important factor in determining the composition of the Board and considers it in making nominee recommendations.

Stockholders who wish to suggest qualified candidates should write to the Senior Vice President—Assistant General Counsel and Secretary, AT&T Inc., 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 2954, Dallas, Texas 75202, stating in detail the qualifications of the persons proposed for consideration by the Committee.

 

18   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

EXPERIENCES AND QUALIFICATIONS OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

The Board believes that each nominee has valuable individual skills, attributes, and experiences that, taken together, provide us with the variety and depth of knowledge, judgment and vision necessary to provide effective oversight of AT&T. Listed below are the skills and experience of our nominees that benefit our current business and strategy.

 

 

Senior Leadership

 

LOGO

 

 

Extended experience in a leadership role with responsibility for business strategy and planning, operations, risk management and management development provides the qualifications and skills to advise, support and oversee management and its execution of long-term strategy

 

LOGO

 

 

Government/Regulatory

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Understanding of regulatory environments and frameworks enhances ability to provide effective oversight in industry requiring compliance with a variety of regulations across a number of federal and state jurisdictions

 

LOGO

 

 

Consumer Focus

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Experience in advertising, customer service, customer relationship management, and development of customer-focused solutions provides insights on connecting with the consumer through communications and entertainment

 

LOGO

 

 

Investment/Finance

 

LOGO

 

 

Knowledge of financial markets, operations, and accounting processes supports oversight of our financial reporting and internal controls. Experience overseeing investment decisions enhances oversight of our capital allocation and investment management and activities

 

LOGO

 

 

Technology/Innovation

 

LOGO

 

 

Experience with technological trends and changes, disruptive innovation, information systems/data management and technological investment provides advice and guidance to lead in a changing media and communications landscape

 

LOGO

 

 

Global Perspective

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Deep understanding and experience operating in international business, government affairs, economic conditions, and cultures supports oversight of our global business and strategy to provide telecommunications, media and technology services to customers globally

 

LOGO

 

 

Strategic Planning/M&A

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Ability to review and assess long-term strategic priorities and oversee execution of strategic and operational integration plans/efficiencies, such as margin improvements and organizational simplification within complex business environments, supports oversight of management’s execution of long-term strategic plan

 

LOGO

 

 

Human Capital

Management

 

LOGO

 

 

Experience in attracting, retaining and developing top talent, succession planning, implementing employee training and diversity and inclusion initiatives, and broad employee engagement assists in overseeing firm culture and human capital management

 

LOGO

 

 

Media & Entertainment

 

LOGO

 

 

 

Media experience, including the development, production and distribution of feature films, television and other content across various broadcast and digital mediums, supports oversight of the factors affecting the evolving media and entertainment landscape

 

LOGO

 

 

Telecom

 

LOGO

 

 

Experience in the telecom industry offers an understanding of products, development efforts, competing technologies and strategic planning within an evolving global communications industry

 

LOGO

 

 

LOGO   19


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a substantial majority of our Board of Directors consist of independent Directors. In addition, the NYSE Listing Standards require a majority of the Board and every member of the Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to be independent. For a Director to be “independent” under the NYSE standards, the Board must affirmatively determine that the Director has no material relationship with AT&T, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with AT&T, other than in his or her capacity as a Director of AT&T. In addition, the Director must meet certain independence standards specified by the NYSE as well as the additional standards referenced in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (found at www.att.com).

Using these standards for determining the independence of its members, the Board has determined that the following Directors are independent:

 

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

  

Michael B. McCallister

Richard W. Fisher

  

Beth E. Mooney

Scott T. Ford

  

Matthew K. Rose

Glenn H. Hutchins

  

Cynthia B. Taylor

William E. Kennard

  

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

Debra L. Lee

  

Geoffrey Y. Yang

Stephen J. Luczo

  

In addition, each member of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Human Resources Committee is independent.

In determining the independence of the Directors, the Board considered the following commercial relationships between AT&T and companies at which our Directors serve as Executive Officers or employees. AT&T participated in a structured finance program through KeyCorp, where Ms. Mooney serves as CEO. In addition, KeyCorp as well as each of the entities where Mr. Ford, Ms. Taylor, and Mr. Yang serve as executive officers purchased communications services from subsidiaries of AT&T. In each case for the year 2019:

 

 

The relevant products and services were provided by AT&T or to AT&T on terms determined on an arm’s-length basis that were comparable to the terms provided to or by similarly situated customers or suppliers;

The transactions were made in the ordinary course of business of each company; and

The total payments by AT&T to the Director’s company (for interest in the case of KeyCorp) or to AT&T by the Director’s company (for communications services) were each substantially less than 1% of the consolidated gross revenues of each of AT&T and the other company. This level is significantly below the maximum amount permitted under the NYSE listing standards for director independence (i.e., 2% of consolidated gross revenues).

In addition, the Board considered the relationship of Mr. Kennard with certain companies that engaged in commercial transactions with AT&T through a private equity investment management company. Mr. Kennard is a partner in Astra Capital Management, LLC, holding a 3.7% interest. Astra Capital is the general partner of a limited partnership that has a controlling interest in Communications Technology Services LLC (CTS) and Logix Communications L.P. (Logix), each of which has engaged in transactions with AT&T. Noting the limited ownership interest of Mr. Kennard in Astra Capital and that he is not an employee or Executive Officer of Astra Capital, CTS or Logix, together with the fact that AT&T’s revenues from and spending with each of CTS and Logix are not material to AT&T, the Board determined that Mr. Kennard is independent.

 

 

20   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

BOARD COMMITTEES

 

From time to time the Board establishes standing committees and temporary special committees to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. The Board has established six standing committees of Directors, the principal responsibilities of which are described below. The charters for each of these committees may be found on our website at www.att.com.

 

  Audit Committee

 

     

  Meetings in Fiscal 2019:  12

 

 

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Chair

  Michael B. McCallister

  Cynthia B. Taylor

  Laura D. Tyson*

 

   – Financial Expert

 

 

 

  Consists of four independent Directors.

 

     

•  Oversees:

 

- the integrity of our financial statements

 

- the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence

 

- the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors

 

- our compliance with legal and regulatory matters.

 

•  Responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the independent auditor.

 

•  The independent auditor audits the financial statements of AT&T and its subsidiaries.

 

 

  Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

     

  Meetings in Fiscal 2019:  4

 

 

  Matthew K. Rose, Chair

  Richard W. Fisher

  William E. Kennard

  Cynthia B. Taylor

 

 

 

 

  Consists of four independent Directors.

 

     

•  Responsible for recommending candidates to be nominated by the Board for election by the stockholders, or to be appointed by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies, consistent with the criteria approved by the Board, and recommending committee assignments.

 

•  Periodically assesses AT&T’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and makes recommendations to the Board for amendments and also recommends to the Board the compensation of Directors.

 

•  Takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance and oversees an annual evaluation of the Board.

 

 

  Human Resources Committee

 

     

  Meetings in Fiscal 2019:  8

 

 

  Beth E. Mooney, Chair

  Scott T. Ford

  Michael B. McCallister

  Matthew K. Rose

  Geoffrey Y. Yang

 

 

  Consists of five independent Directors.

 

     

•  Oversees the compensation practices of AT&T, including the design and administration of employee benefit plans.

 

•  Responsible for:

 

- establishing the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the other Executive Officers

 

- establishing common stock ownership guidelines for officers and developing a management succession plan.

 

LOGO   21


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

 

  Corporate Development and Finance Committee

 

     

  Meetings in Fiscal 2019:  5

 

 

  Scott T. Ford, Chair

  Richard W. Fisher

  Glenn H. Hutchins

  Stephen J. Luczo

  Beth E. Mooney

  Geoffrey Y. Yang

 

 

 

Consists of six independent Directors.

   

•  Assists the Board in its oversight of our finances, including recommending the payment of dividends and reviewing the management of our debt and investment of our cash reserves.

 

•  Reviews mergers, acquisitions, dispositions and similar transactions; reviews corporate strategy and recommends or approves transactions and investments.

 

•  Reviews and makes recommendations about the capital structure of the Company, and the evaluation, development and implementation of key technology decisions.

 

 

 

  Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee

 

 

  Meetings in Fiscal 2019:  5

 

 

  Laura D. Tyson*, Chair

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

  Glenn H. Hutchins

  William E. Kennard

  Debra L. Lee

 

 

 

Consists of five independent Directors.

   

•  Assists the Board in its oversight of policies related to corporate social responsibility, including public policy issues affecting AT&T, its stockholders, employees, customers, and the communities in which it operates.

 

•  Oversees the Company’s management of its brands and reputation.

 

•  Recommends to the Board the aggregate amount of contributions or expenditures for political purposes, and the aggregate amount of charitable contributions to be made to the AT&T Foundation.

 

•  Consults with the AT&T Foundation regarding significant grants proposed to be made by the Foundation.

 

 

 

  Executive Committee

 

 

 

  Randall L. Stephenson, Chair

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

  Scott T. Ford

  Beth E. Mooney

  Matthew K. Rose

  Laura D. Tyson*

 

 

Consists of the Chairman of the Board and the Chairperson of our five other standing committees.

   

 

•  Established to assist the Board by acting upon urgent matters when the Board is not available to meet. No meetings were held in 2019.

 

•  Has full power and authority of the Board to the extent permitted by law, including the power and authority to declare a dividend or to authorize the issuance of common stock.

 

* Retiring at 2020 Annual Meeting

 

22   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

 

AT&T has a long tradition of engaging with our stockholders. We believe it is important for our governance process to have meaningful engagement with our stockholders and understand their perspectives on corporate governance, executive compensation, and other issues that are important to them. The Company meets with institutional investors throughout the year, both in person and by teleconference. We share the

feedback from this engagement with the Board and incorporate it into our policies and practices. The Company also provides online reports designed to increase transparency on issues of importance to our investors, including sustainability, diversity, political contributions, transparency, and the Proxy Statement and Annual Report.

 

 

PUBLIC POLICY ENGAGEMENT

 

We participate in public policy dialogues around the world related to our industry and business priorities, our approximately 246,000 employees, our stockholders, and the communities we serve.

In the U.S., the Company and our affiliated political action committees are committed to compliance with applicable laws and other requirements regarding contributions to: political organizations, candidates for federal, state and local public office, ballot measure campaigns, political action committees, and trade associations. We engage with organizations and individuals to make our views clear and uphold our commitment to help support the communities in which we operate. We base our U.S. political

contributions on many considerations, supporting candidates who take reasonable positions on policies that promote economic growth as well as affect our long-term business objectives.

The Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews our advocacy efforts, including political contributions. Additional information about our public policy engagement efforts, including our Political Contributions Policy and a report of U.S. political contributions from our Company and from AT&T’s Employee Political Action Committees, can be viewed on our website at www.att.com.

 

 

COMMUNICATING WITH YOUR BOARD

 

Interested persons may contact the Lead Director or the non-management Directors by sending written comments through the Office of the Secretary of AT&T Inc., 208 S. Akard Street, Suite 2954, Dallas, Texas 75202.

 

LOGO   23


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

ANNUAL MULTI-STEP BOARD EVALUATIONS

 

Each year, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Lead Director lead the Board through three evaluations: a Board self-evaluation, Committee self-evaluations, and peer evaluations. Through this process, Directors provide feedback, assess performance, and identify areas where improvement can be made. We believe this approach supports the Board’s effectiveness and continuous improvement.

 

 

One-on-One Director Peer Evaluations

 

    

 

Committee Self-Evaluations

 

Members discuss the performance of other members of the Board including, their:

•   Understanding of the business

•   Meeting attendance

•   Preparation and participation in Board activities

•   Applicable skill set to current needs of the business

Responses are discussed with the individual Director if applicable

 

    

Candid open discussion to review the following:

•   Committee process and substance

•   Committee effectiveness, structure, composition, and culture

•   Overall Committee dynamics

•   Committee Charter

 

Ongoing Feedback

 

    

 

Board Self-Evaluation Survey

 

Directors provide ongoing, real-time feedback outside of the evaluation process.

 

Lines of communication between our directors and management are always open.

    

Evaluation survey (reviewed annually by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee) addresses key topics such as those below, among other things:

•   Process and substance

•   Effectiveness, structure, composition, culture, and overall Board dynamics

•   Performance in key areas

•   Specific issues which should be discussed in the future

•   Responses are discussed and changes and improvements are implemented, if applicable

 

24   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

 

Under the rules of the SEC, public issuers, such as AT&T, must disclose certain “Related Person Transactions.” These are transactions in which the Company is a participant where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a Director, Executive Officer, or holder of more than 5% of our common stock has a direct or indirect material interest.

AT&T has adopted a written policy requiring that each Director or Executive Officer involved in such a transaction notify the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and that each such transaction be approved or ratified by the Committee.

In determining whether to approve a Related Person Transaction, the Committee will consider the following factors, among others, to the extent relevant to the Related Person Transaction:

 

   

whether the terms of the Related Person Transaction are fair to the Company and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a related person,

 

   

whether there are business reasons for the Company to enter into the Related Person Transaction,

 

   

whether the Related Person Transaction would impair the independence of an outside director, and

 

   

whether the Related Person Transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any of our Directors or Executive Officers, taking into account the size of the transaction, the overall financial position of the Director,

   

Executive Officer or other related person, the direct or indirect nature of the Director’s, Executive Officer’s or other related person’s interest in the transaction and the ongoing nature of any proposed relationship, and any other factors the Committee deems relevant.

A Related Person Transaction entered into without the Committee’s pre-approval will not violate this policy, or be invalid or unenforceable, so long as the transaction is brought to the Committee as promptly as reasonably practical after it is entered into or after it becomes reasonably apparent that the transaction is covered by this policy.

The employment of the following persons was approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee under the Company’s Related Party Transactions Policy. The rate of pay for each of these employees is similar to those paid for comparable positions at the Company.

During 2019, a sister-in-law of John Stankey, President and Chief Operating Officer, was employed by a subsidiary with an approximate rate of pay, including commissions, of $131,959. Also, during 2019, a brother of John Donovan, former Chief Executive Officer, AT&T Communications, LLC, was employed by a subsidiary with an approximate rate of pay, including commissions, of $236,080. In addition, during 2019, a son of William Blase, former Senior Executive Vice President – Human Resources, was employed by a subsidiary with an approximate rate of pay, including commissions, of $134,775.

 

 

LOGO   25


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

DIRECTOR PLANS

 

 

The compensation of Directors is determined by the Board with the advice of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors. None of our employees serve on this Committee. The Committee’s current members are Matthew K. Rose (Chair), Richard W. Fisher, William E. Kennard and Cynthia B. Taylor. Under its charter, the Committee annually reviews the compensation and benefits provided to Directors for their service and makes recommendations to the Board for changes. This includes not only Director retainers, but also Director compensation and benefit plans.

The Committee’s charter authorizes the Committee to employ independent compensation and other consultants to assist in fulfilling its duties. From time to time, the Committee engages a compensation consultant to advise the Committee and to provide information regarding director compensation paid by other public companies, which may be used by the Committee to make compensation recommendations to the Board. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer may make recommendations to the Committee or the Board about types and amounts of appropriate compensation and benefits for Directors. Directors who are employed by us or one of our subsidiaries receive no separate compensation for serving as directors or as members of Board committees.

The Company offers Directors both cash and equity compensation. Cash compensation comes in the form of an annual cash retainer that may be deferred and earn interest at the election of a Director. Equity is offered both as an annual grant and as an opportunity to defer the cash compensation into deferred stock units. The value of deferred stock units is based on the common stock price and is converted to a cash payout after retiring from the Board.

 

  2019 Compensation

   

Amount      

($)       


Annual Retainer

    140,000      

Lead Director Retainer

    60,000      

Chair Retainer

        

Audit Committee

    30,000      

Human Resources Committee

    25,000      

Corporate Development and Finance Committee

    20,000      

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

    20,000      

Public Policy and Corporate Reputation Committee

    15,000      

Annual Award

    220,000      

Communications Equipment and Services

    up to 25,000      

Under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan (the Director Plan) each non-employee Director annually receives a grant of $220,000 in deferred stock units. The number of units granted is determined by dividing $220,000 by the closing price of AT&T common stock on the last trading day of the month in which the Annual Meeting occurs. Each deferred stock unit is equivalent to a share of AT&T common stock and earns dividend equivalents in the form of additional deferred stock units. The annual grants are fully earned and vested at issuance and are distributed beginning in the calendar year after the Director leaves the Board. At distribution, the deferred stock units are converted to cash based on the then price of AT&T common stock and are paid either in a lump sum or in up to 15 annual installments, as elected by the Director.

Additionally, Directors may annually elect to defer the receipt of their retainers into either additional deferred stock units or into a cash deferral account under the Director Plan. Directors purchase the deferred stock units at the fair market value of AT&T common stock. Deferrals into the cash deferral account under the plan earn interest during the calendar year at a rate equal to the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average for September of the preceding year (Moody’s Rate). Directors may annually choose to convert their cash deferral accounts into deferred stock units at the fair market value of our stock at the time of the conversion. Directors may also use all or part of their retainers to purchase AT&T common stock at fair market value under the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan.

To the extent earnings on cash deferrals under the Director Plan exceed the interest rate specified by the SEC for disclosure purposes, they are included in the “Director Compensation” table on page 27 under the heading “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings.”

Non-employee Directors may receive communications equipment and services pursuant to the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program. Under the program, equipment and services that may be provided to a Director, other than equipment at his or her primary residence, may not exceed $25,000 per year. All concession services must be provided by AT&T affiliates, except that the Director may use another provider for the Director’s primary residence if it is not served by an AT&T affiliate.

 

 

26   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

2019 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

      

 

The following table contains information regarding compensation provided to each person who served as a Director during 2019 (excluding Mr. Stephenson, whose compensation is included in the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure).

 

  Name

  

Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)(a)

  

Stock
Awards
($)(b)

  

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)(c)

  

All Other
Compensation
($)(d)

  

Total

($)

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

   $170,000    $220,000    $0    $15,000    $405,000  

  Richard W. Fisher

   $140,000    $220,000    $1,564    $15,000    $376,564  

  Scott T. Ford

   $160,000    $220,000    $0    $0    $380,000  

  Glenn H. Hutchins

   $140,000    $220,000    $0    $12,563    $372,563  

  William E. Kennard

   $140,000    $220,000    $0    $13,500    $373,500  

  Debra L. Lee*

   $70,000    $0    $0    $15,000    $85,000  

  Stephen J. Luczo*

   $23,333    $0    $0    $0    $23,333  

  Michael B. McCallister

   $140,000    $220,000    $0    $14,136    $374,136  

  Beth E. Mooney

   $158,750    $220,000    $0    $45,000    $423,750  

  Joyce M. Roché*

   $55,000    $0    $0    $264,700    $319,700  

  Matthew K. Rose

   $220,000    $220,000    $0    $11,734    $451,734  

  Cynthia B. Taylor

   $140,000    $220,000    $0    $0    $360,000  

  Laura D’Andrea Tyson

   $155,000    $220,000    $5,760    $0    $380,760  

  Geoffrey Y. Yang

   $140,000    $220,000    $0    $0    $360,000  

*Ms. Roché retired from the Board in April 2019. Ms. Lee joined the Board in July 2019, and Mr. Luczo joined the Board in November 2019.

Note (a). Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

The table below shows the number of deferred stock units or shares of common stock purchased in 2019 by each Director with their retainers. The deferred stock units were purchased under the Non-Employee Director Stock and Deferral Plan, and the shares of common stock were purchased under the Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan.

 

Director

  

Deferred Stock Units
Purchased in 2019

      

Director

  

Shares of Common Stock

Purchased in 2019

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

       5,139        Michael B. McCallister        2,114

  Scott T. Ford

       4,837        Geoffrey Y. Yang        4,230

  Glenn H. Hutchins

       4,232        Richard W. Fisher        2,114

  Beth E. Mooney

       4,762            

  Joyce M. Roché

       908            

  Matthew K. Rose

       6,641            

  Cynthia B. Taylor

       4,232            

Note (b). Stock Awards

Amounts in this column represent the annual grant of deferred stock units that are immediately vested but are not distributed until after the retirement of the Director. The deferred stock units will be paid out in cash in the calendar year after the Director ceases his or her service with the Board, at the times elected by the Director. The aggregate number of stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2019, for each Director can be found in the “Common Stock Ownership” section beginning on page 28.

Note (c). Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

Amounts shown represent the excess earnings, if any, based on the actual rates used to determine earnings on deferred compensation over the market interest rates determined pursuant to SEC rules.

 

LOGO   27


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

Note (d). All Other Compensation

Amounts in this column include personal benefits for Directors that in the aggregate equal or exceed $10,000, which for 2019 consisted of communications equipment and services provided under the AT&T Board of Directors Communications Concession Program (described on page 26) and miscellaneous items, as follows: Mr. Hutchins ($12,350 and $213, respectively), Mr. McCallister ($13,923 and $213, respectively), and Mr. Rose ($11,521 and $213, respectively).

All Other Compensation also includes charitable matching contributions of up to $15,000 per year made by the AT&T Foundation on behalf of Directors and employees under the AT&T Higher Education/Cultural Matching Gift Program. In 2019, charitable contributions were made on the Directors’ behalf under this program as follows:

 

Name

 

      Matching Gifts      

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.

    $ 15,000

  Richard W. Fisher

    $ 15,000

  William E. Kennard

    $ 13,500

  Debra L. Lee

    $ 15,000

  Beth E. Mooney

    $ 45,000 *

  Joyce M. Roché

    $ 14,700

*This amount relates to contributions made in 2017, 2018, and 2019.

 

In addition, a charitable contribution of $250,000 was made on behalf of Ms. Roché to the charity of her choice in connection with her retirement from the Board.

COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP

      

 

Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of each person holding more than 5% of AT&T’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2019 (based on a review of filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Schedules 13D and 13G).

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner    Amount and Nature

of Beneficial Ownership

   Percent of Class

  BlackRock, Inc.

  55 East 52nd St., New York, NY 10055

   512,914,680(1)    7.0%

  The Vanguard Group

  100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355

   578,004,318(2)    7.91%
1.

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC on February 5, 2020, which reported the following: sole voting power of 443,541,627 shares; shared voting power of 0 shares; sole dispositive power of 512,914,680 shares, and shared dispositive power of 0 shares.

2.

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 12, 2020, which reported the following: sole voting power of 10,853,145 shares; shared voting power of 2,079,676 shares; sole dispositive power of 565,743,377 shares, and shared dispositive power of 12,260,941 shares.

 

28   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

Directors and Officers

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of AT&T common stock and non-voting stock units as of December 31, 2019, held by each Director, nominee, and officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 65. As of that date, each Director and officer listed below, and all Directors and Executive Officers as a group, owned less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. Except as noted below, the persons listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities indicated.

 

  Beneficial Owner

   


Total AT&T
Beneficial

Ownership
(including

options) (1)

 
 

 
 

 

   


Non-Voting    
Deferred    
Stock    

Units (2)    

 
 
 

 

  Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr.     34,480         48,670      
  Richard W. Fisher     12,114         27,998      
  Scott T. Ford     81,319         68,344      
  Glenn H. Hutchins (3)     167,651         55,618      
  William E. Kennard     0         33,552      
  Debra L. Lee     0         0      
  Stephen J. Luczo     64,000         0      
  Michael B. McCallister     51,331         44,945      
  Beth E. Mooney     28,700         61,932      
  Matthew K. Rose     208,050         112,621      
  Cynthia B. Taylor     5,718         43,569      
  Laura D’Andrea Tyson     0         162,241      
  Geoffrey Y. Yang (4)     243,318         21,469      
  Randall L. Stephenson     2,464,172         438,872      
  John J. Stephens     704,006         160,954      
  David R. McAtee II     71,258         32,274      
  Jeffery S. McElfresh     2,871         28,686      
  John T. Stankey     548,830         43,001      
  John M. Donovan (5)     360,343         10,770      

All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (consisting of 23 persons, including those named above)

    5,145,104         1,444,765      

In addition, of the shares shown in the table above, the following persons share voting and investment power with other persons with respect to the following numbers of shares:

  Beneficial Owner

 

 

Number of
Shared Voting and
Investment Power Shares

 

  Glenn H. Hutchins

    167,651  

  Michael B. McCallister

    41,286  

  Beth E. Mooney

    28,700  

  Matthew K. Rose

    208,050  

  Cynthia B. Taylor

    196  

  Geoffrey Y. Yang

    131,035  

  Randall L. Stephenson

    2,048,393  

  John J. Stephens

    376,502  

  David R. McAtee II

    67,690  

  John T. Stankey

    537,827  

  John M. Donovan

    354,196  

Note (1).

Includes presently exercisable stock options as well as stock options that became exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. The following Executive Officers held the following numbers of options:

  Beneficial Owner

  

 

Number of Stock
Options Held

 

  Randall L. Stephenson

     408,861  

  John J. Stephens

     98,545  

  John T. Stankey

     2,326  

  All Executive Officers

     511,656  

Note (2).

Represents number of vested stock units held by the Director or Executive Officer, where each stock unit is equal in value to one share of AT&T common stock. The stock units are paid in common stock or cash depending upon the plan and the election of the participant at times specified by the relevant plan. None of the stock units listed may be converted into common stock within 60 days of the date of this table. As noted under “Compensation of Directors,” AT&T’s plans permit non-employee Directors to acquire stock units (also referred to as deferred stock units) by deferring the receipt of retainers into stock units and through a yearly grant of stock units. Officers may acquire stock units by participating in stock-based compensation deferral plans. Stock units carry no voting rights.

Note (3).

Mr. Hutchins disclaims beneficial ownership of 3,322 shares held in trust for his siblings.

Note (4).

Mr. Yang disclaims beneficial ownership of 33,558 shares held in a limited partnership.

Note (5).

Represents beneficial ownership as of September 30, 2019, the date Mr. Donovan ceased being a Named Executive Officer.

 

 

LOGO   29


Table of Contents

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

   
LOGO  

 

Governance 

 

 

 

 

AT&T’s commitment to Corporate Responsibility means integrating it into every aspect of our business, starting with governance.

   

 

LOGO

 

 

INTEGRATION

Our Corporate Responsibility strategy accounts for long-term trends and allocates resources based on both social and business impact. A commitment to addressing environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues is embedded at every level of our company, including Board oversight, officer-level involvement and a team of dedicated professionals who engage leaders across the business. Foundational policies, including the codes of business conduct that govern each operating company, put our values into action and detail our commitments to ethics, diversity, privacy, the environment and our communities. Annually, we detail our ESG performance and progress through robust public corporate responsibility reporting. Our reporting includes our approach to stakeholder engagement, alignment to the Global Reporting Initiative Standards, response to the CDP Climate Change survey (which aligns with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures), our Political Engagement Report, and detailed issue briefs covering 20 of our most important focus areas. Our work was recognized with the 2019 Corporate Governance Award for Best ESG Reporting by Corporate Secretary magazine.

 

LOGO

 

 

TRANSPARENCY

In our political spending disclosures, our objective is best- in-class transparency. Twice yearly, in accordance with applicable law, campaign finance and disclosure rules, and our own internal policies, we publicly disclose U.S. political contributions via a Political Engagement Report. We also identify organizations that report using some or all of our contributions for lobbying activities. In addition, our Board receives the full list of corporate political contributions and has an opportunity to review and provide guidance with respect to the company’s contributions. In 2019, AT&T received a score of 97.1 (out of 100) on the CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability, earning “Trendsetter” status. AT&T was also named one of the 10 most transparent S&P 500 companies for ESG reporting, according to a 2019 study commissioned by Financial Times’ Agenda.

LOGO

 

 

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

In addition to on-going dialogue with our stakeholders, every 2-3 years, we systematically engage internal and external stakeholders to capture their views on the ESG topics most important for our company to address, to help ensure our long-term business success. In 2019, we conducted our 5th such assessment. Nearly 1,000 stakeholders provided insight into the prioritization of these topics through electronic surveys and live interviews. Among the stakeholders were AT&T employees and officers, business and consumer customers, investors, suppliers, distributors, government and non-government organizations, as well as programmatic and community organizations. The results of these efforts help guide our strategic planning for development of programs and investments.

 

 

LOGO

 

DATA PRIVACY & SECURITY

Privacy is a fundamental commitment at AT&T. We have policies and procedures in place to inform customers and help them feel comfortable about how AT&T protects and uses their data. Our global privacy program is based on a set of principles that explains our commitments to our customers: (1) Transparency. We’re open and honest about how we use customers’ data. (2) Security. We use strong safeguards to keep data confidential and secure. (3) Choice and control. We give customers choices about how we use their data. This includes the ability to opt in for some programs and say no to others. (4) Integrity. We manage data in a respectful, deliberate way to maintain the trust placed in us. We do what we say. To help secure data both in transit across the network and stored in the network, AT&T has implemented a comprehensive security program that focuses on 13 major areas. The areas are derived from ISO 17799, COBIT and other industry best practices. Our Chief Security Office (CSO) promotes security being built into the fabric of every organization within AT&T. With more than 700 dedicated CSO professionals and more than 1,400 additional security specialists working in organizations across the business, AT&T is committed to the security of customer data and the protection of our global network.

 

 

30   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

   
LOGO  

 

Environment 

 

 

 

 

AT&T demonstrates corporate leadership on climate change by setting strong goals and taking purposeful action in and outside our company. Our climate change strategy is based on mitigation, resilience and enablement.

 

   

Progress Toward 2020 Targets1:

 

       LOGO

60% Energy Intensity Reduction: 130% completed

 

    

  

LOGO

30% Fleet Emissions Reduction: 86.7% completed

         

LOGO

Refurbish, reuse or recycle 200M devices: 87.5% completed

       

12019 data is still being compiled. Represents progress through end of year 2018.

 

LOGO

 

 

MITIGATING IMPACTS

In 2019, AT&T announced that our renewable energy purchases will surpass 1.5 gigawatts of clean energy capacity, solidifying our position as one of the largest corporate purchasers of renewable energy in the U.S. The total annual energy produced through these purchases is enough to power New York City for approximately 1 month, every year.2 In addition to investing in renewable energy, we also work to make our company more efficient through energy and emissions reductions projects and by incorporating environmentally sustainable practices into our daily operations. We realized $51.1 million in annual energy savings from more than 28,000 energy efficiency projects completed in 2018.

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

 

BUILDING RESILIENCE

AT&T is working to assess the risks of climate change so that we that can make smarter, climate-informed decisions for the future. We engaged the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory on an industry-leading climate resiliency project to better anticipate, prepare for and adapt to the impacts of climate change. This engagement led AT&T to develop our Climate Change Analysis Tool, which will help us visualize climate change risk on our infrastructure and operations. Instead of relying on 10-day weather forecasts and historic events, we can now model climate-related phenomena such as projected sea-level rise and the potential impact on surrounding cables, cell sites or data centers—up to 30 years into the future. These insights can help us better plan for maintenance, construction and disaster recovery efforts as we serve our customers and communities.

 

  LOGO

 

 

ENABLING REDUCTIONS

Our technology can play a role in reducing emissions beyond our walls. We are a founding member of the Net Positive Project, a collaborative effort to create positive impacts on society and the environment. That is why we committed to demonstrate how we enable carbon savings to our customers that are 10 times the footprint of our operations by 2025. We refer to this as our 10x Carbon Reduction Goal. In our progress report released in May 2019, we use customer-specific case studies to detail how we have enabled customer GHG reductions approximately 2x the footprint of our operations, well on our way to 10x.

 

 

LOGO   31


Table of Contents

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

   
LOGO  

 

Social 

 

 

 

 

AT&T focuses on issues important to our business and our communities, including safety, skills development, diversity and inclusion, and the welfare of our fellow citizens.

   

 

LOGO

 

 

COMMUNITY

AT&T’s success is inextricably tied to the health and prosperity of our local communities. We invest our company’s resources and knowledge to advance access to education and training, improve lives and strengthen communities around the world. A cornerstone of this effort is our employees’ engagement in the causes they believe in. In addition to donating time and resources to the causes important to them, employees can volunteer to mentor high school students in career readiness, as AT&T works to develop the next generation of talent through internships and apprenticeships. In 2019, employees volunteered approximately 1.3 million hours and donated over $27.5 million to more than 27,000 non-profits.

LOGO

 

AT&T Believes is an employee grassroots initiative designed to serve as a catalyst for economic growth, innovation and prosperity in the

communities where we operate. Efforts in more than 35 cities and counting focus on local needs such as homelessness, digital safety, unemployment and access to education.

 

 

LOGO

 

 

 

 

$151.7M in total was contributed or directed through corporate-, employee-, and AT&T Foundation- giving programs.3

 

 

2Based on estimates from “2018 Power Trends” by The New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).

32019 data is still being compiled. Represents progress through end of year 2018.

 

LOGO

  

DIVERSITY & INCLUSION

AT&T’s commitment to diversity and inclusion is longstanding and foundational to our business practices. From our one- hundred-year relationship with the NAACP, to being one of the first companies to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation,

 

Global Employees:

 

   LOGO

 

U.S. Employees:

 

   LOGO

 

and our continued support for the HRC’s Business Coalition for the Equality Act, AT&T continues to be consistently committed to civil rights for all individuals.

 

We develop diverse leadership within our business through programs that give access, tools, training and resources to foster growth and propel

their careers. We encourage more women, people of color and the underrepresented populations to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math. Representation in media is a specific focus of WarnerMedia’s pioneering diversity and inclusion policy that commits to advancing diversity and inclusion on both sides of the camera. In 2019, WarnerMedia released its inaugural Diversity and Inclusion Interim Report, a first for the entertainment industry. Our commitment to gender equality manifested in two additional ways: the naming of the first female chair and CEO of Warner Bros. and the first female CEO of AT&T Business. We also

inspire the next generation of workers, in collaboration with organizations such as Girls Who Code.

Additionally, AT&T’s 60 employee groups reflect our company’s diversity and culture of inclusion for employees of diverse cultural, educational and experiential backgrounds. These organizations help members grow professionally and personally—supporting cross-functional diversity around specific business issues, professional development topics and ways to serve our communities.

In 2013, AT&T announced our commitment to hire 10,000 veterans and their families. We met that goal and, in 2016, set a new target to hire an additional 10,000 veterans and their families—for a total of 20,000—by 2020. We achieved that milestone in 2019.

We’re proud our efforts were recognized by DiversityInc. with the #1 spot on their 2019 Top 50 Companies for Diversity list.

 

LOGO

  

SKILLS BUILDING AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

AT&T invests in education and job training to help develop a skilled and diverse workforce that can better prepare our country for the future. Through the AT&T Aspire initiative, we help provide access to the education and training people need to get and keep good jobs.

 

 

32   LOGO


Table of Contents

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

 

 

Our employees also mentor students across the country to help them discover their career passions and potential. Since 2008, when we launched Aspire, we have committed more than $550 million in education-centric programs.

Much of our work is in collaboration with organizations that help underrepresented students develop computer science and coding skills, including Girls Who Code, Black Girls Code and All Star Code. To promote diverse voices in the entertainment industry, we support programs such as Access to Action, Hollywood CPR and The Sundance Momentum Fellowship. In collaboration with Hello Sunshine, AT&T hosted an immersive, eight-day skills-building and mentorship program to discover and foster the next generation of young female creators. These initiatives strive to provide opportunities to those who haven’t had traditional pathways into the entertainment industry so the stories we tell are reflective of our audiences and everyone can see themselves represented on television, stage and film.

 

LOGO

  

ONLINE SAFETY

Devices have become an integral part of our lives, and it’s important that we empower customers to use our products and services—and get online—safely and securely. In collaboration with leading online safety experts, we share resources for consumers to learn how to have safe and successful online experiences.

Initiatives such as Cyber Aware, a website that provides consumer resources about email and text scams, spam, identity theft and much more, and AT&T Secure Family™, a smartphone app helping parents take charge of their family’s security, encourage safe and responsible online activity.

 

   LOGO

 

 

 

 

Cartoon Network’s Stop Bullying: Speak Up campaign is an award-winning, multi-platform pro-social initiative that addresses bullying among kids.

 

 

LOGO

  

WORKFORCE TRAINING

In 2019, AT&T invested $200 million in direct employee training and professional development programs. We’re recognized as a leader in career development because of this investment. As we work to inspire a culture of continuous learning, we offer training designed for all employees throughout their careers: new hire training, continuous training for a current role and skills transformation training for a potential future role. “Future Ready” is our plan to continue to transform our workforce and help employees develop the skills that we need today and in the future. The program focuses on 4 main areas: (1) Equipping and reskilling employees; (2) Attracting critical talent; (3) Fostering high engagement; and (4) Evolving compensation plans.

 

 

LOGO   33


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

AT&T has a separately designated standing Audit Committee. The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which may be viewed on the Company’s web site at www.att.com. The Audit Committee performs a review and reassessment of its charter annually. The Audit Committee oversees the integrity of AT&T’s financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence, the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors, and AT&T’s compliance with legal and regulatory matters.

The Audit Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the applicable independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange and AT&T. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Di Piazza (Chairman), Mr. McCallister, Ms. Taylor, and Dr. Tyson, each of whom was appointed

by the Board of Directors. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate under NYSE listing standards.

In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Di Piazza and Ms. Taylor are “audit committee financial experts.” Although the Board of Directors has determined that these individuals have the requisite attributes to be considered “audit committee financial experts” as defined under SEC rules, their responsibilities are the same as those of the other Audit Committee members. They are not AT&T’s auditors or accountants, do not perform “field work” and are not full-time employees. The SEC has determined that an audit committee member who is designated as an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose as a result of being identified as an audit committee financial expert.

 

 

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management in the preparation of AT&T’s financial statements and financial disclosures. The Audit Committee relies on the information provided by management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AT&T’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate. AT&T’s Audit Committee charter provides that these are the responsibility of management and the independent auditors.

Independent Auditor Oversight

The Audit Committee has oversight of the Company’s relationship with the independent auditor and is directly responsible for the annual appointment, compensation and retention of the independent auditor. The independent auditor reports directly to the Audit Committee.

Financial Reporting Review

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditor:

 

 

the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements;

 

 

any major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations; and

 

 

earnings press releases and other financial disclosures.

Internal Audit Oversight

The Audit Committee oversees the activities of the Company’s senior internal auditing executive, including internal audit’s assessment of operational and financial risks and associated internal controls. Significant internal

audit reports and corrective action status are regularly discussed with the Audit Committee.

Risk Review

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. This includes, among other matters, evaluating risk in the context of financial policies, counterparty and credit risk, and the appropriate mitigation of risk, including through the use of insurance where appropriate.

Compliance Oversight

The Audit Committee meets with the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) regarding the CCO’s assessment of the Company’s compliance and ethics risks, the effectiveness of the Company’s Corporate Compliance Program, and any other compliance related matters that either the Committee or the CCO deems appropriate. The Audit Committee oversees the administration and enforcement of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct, Code of Ethics, and Corporate Compliance Program.

 

 

34   LOGO


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

Ernst & Young LLP acts as AT&T’s principal auditor and provides certain audit-related, tax and other services. The Audit Committee has established a pre-approval policy for services to be performed by Ernst & Young. Under this policy, the Audit Committee approves specific engagements when the engagements have been presented in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee before services are undertaken.

This policy also allows for the approval of certain services in advance of the Audit Committee being presented details concerning the specific service to be undertaken. These services must meet service definitions and fee limitations previously established by the Audit Committee. Additionally, engagements exceeding $500,000 must receive advance concurrence from the Audit Committee Chairman. After an auditor is engaged under this authority, the services must be described in reasonable detail to the Audit Committee at the next meeting.

All pre-approved services must commence, if at all, within 14 months of the approval.

The fees for services provided by Ernst & Young (all of which were pre-approved by the Audit Committee) to AT&T in 2019 and 2018 are shown below.

 

Principal Accountant Fees (dollars in millions)   
                      Item      2019                  2018                   
  Audit Fees (a)    $ 52.1           $ 49.3            
  Audit Related Fees (b)      5.5             5.6            
  Tax Fees (c)      9.5             10.1            
  All Other Fees (d)      0.0             0.0            

Note (a). Audit Fees.

Included in this category are fees for the annual financial statement audit, quarterly financial statement reviews, audits required by Federal and state regulatory bodies, statutory audits, and comfort letters.

Note (b). Audit Related Fees.

These fees, which are for assurance and related services other than those included in Audit Fees, include charges for employee benefit plan audits, due diligence associated with acquisition and disposition activity, control reviews of AT&T service organizations, and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Note (c). Tax Fees.

These fees include charges for various Federal, state, local and international tax compliance and research projects, as well as tax services for AT&T employees working in foreign countries.

Note (d). All Other Fees.

No fees were incurred in 2019 or 2018 for services other than audit, audit related and tax.

 

LOGO   35


Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

The Audit Committee: (1) reviewed and discussed with management AT&T’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019; (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and (4) discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.

 

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, be included in AT&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

February 12, 2020

  

The Audit Committee

  
  

 

Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr., Chairman

  
  

Michael B. McCallister

  
  

Cynthia B. Taylor

  
  

Laura D’Andrea Tyson

  

 

36   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

               

Page

 

    
    Executive Summary        38    
   

Decision Making Framework

  

 

Role of the Human Resources Committee

 

  41  
  

Guiding Pay Principles

 

  41  
  

Pay Governance

 

  42  
   Stockholder Engagement   42    
    Compensation Elements and Pay Determination   

 

Elements of 2019 Compensation

 

  43  
  

Determining 2019 Target Compensation

 

  44  
  

How NEOs Were Paid for Performance in 2019

 

  47  
  

Realized Compensation for NEOs

 

  54  
   2019 Long Term Grants   59    
   

 

Benefits

 

       61    
    Policies and Risk Mitigation   

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

  63  
  

Equity Retention and Hedging Policy

 

  63  
  

Clawback Policy

 

  63  
   Risk Mitigation   63    
   

Independent Compensation

Consultant

       63    

 

Acronyms Used
          
    CAM   Career Average Minimum    NEO   Named Executive Officer
    CDP   Cash Deferral Plan    NYSE   New York Stock Exchange
    CEO   Chief Executive Officer    ROIC   Return on Invested Capital
    COO   Chief Operating Officer    RSU   Restricted Stock Unit
    DTC   Direct to Consumer    SEC   Securities and Exchange Commission
    EBITDA   Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization    SERP   Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan
    EOY   End of Year    SRIP   Supplemental Retirement Income Plan
    EPS   Earnings Per Share    STIP   Short Term Incentive Plan
    EY   Ernst & Young LLP    SPDP   Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan
    FCF   Free Cash Flow    TSR   Total Stockholder Return

    MCB

 

 

Management Cash Balance

 

        

 

LOGO   37


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

Executive Summary

Our Human Resources Committee (Committee) takes great care to develop and refine an executive compensation program that recognizes its stewardship responsibility to our stockholders while ensuring the availability of talent to support a culture of growth, innovation, and performance in an extraordinarily large and complex organization.

In this section, we summarize the elements of our compensation program, how our program supports pay for performance, and our key performance achievements.

 

Topic   Overview   More
Information  

The foundation of

our program

 

Our Committee believes that our programs should:

 

–  be aligned with stockholder interests,

 

–  be competitive and market-based,

 

–  pay for performance,

 

–  balance both short- and long-term focus, and

 

–  be aligned with generally accepted approaches.

 

To that end, we incorporate many best practices in our compensation program and avoid ones that are not aligned with our guiding pay principles.

  Page 41

Stockholder

engagement

 

Each year, we engage with stockholders to understand their views on executive compensation. In light of their feedback, results of the stockholder advisory vote on our executive compensation program, and market trends, the Committee adjusts our compensation program periodically as it determines to be appropriate.

  Page 42

Our compensation program elements and percentage of

pay tied to

performance and

common stock price

 

–  Our program includes a number of different elements, from fixed compensation (base salaries) to performance-based variable compensation (short- and long-term incentives), to key benefits, which minimize distractions and allow our executives to focus on our success.

 

–  Each element is designed for a specific purpose, with an overarching goal of encouraging a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future.

 

–  For NEOs, the combination of short- and long-term incentives ranges from 85% to 94% of target pay. Payouts are formula-driven for:

 

·  Short-term incentives; and

 

·  Performance Shares (which represent 75% of the long-term incentive).

 

–  All long-term grants are tied to our common stock price performance.

 

–  Our Committee retains the authority to increase or decrease final award payouts, after adjustment for financial performance, to ensure pay is aligned with performance.

  Pages 43, 46

How we make

compensation

decisions

 

The starting point for determining Executive Officer compensation is an evaluation of market data. Our consultant compiles compensation information for our Peer Group companies and then presents this information to our Committee for it to consider when making compensation decisions. Our Peer Group companies were chosen based on their similarity to AT&T on a number of factors, including alignment with our business, scale, and/or complexity.

 

  Page 44

 

38   LOGO

 


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

    

OUR MISSION      OUR VALUES

 

Inspire human progress through the power of communication and entertainment.

    

 

Live true.

Think big.

Pursue excellence.

Inspire imagination.

 

  

 

Be there.

Stand for equality.

Embrace freedom.

Make a difference.

 

AT&T is a modern media company whose mission is to inspire human progress through the power of communications and entertainment. We believe time spent viewing premium content and the demand for connectivity and bandwidth will continue to increase. Recognizing these trends, the Company has invested in assembling the right assets to combine premium content, direct-to-consumer relationships, next-gen high-speed networks and an ad-tech platform. Over the past year, we have worked to harness our combination of assets, consumer relationships and consumer insights, and with the businesses assembled and aligned, we can continue to execute on our long-term vision.

 

    

 

KEY 2019 INITIATIVES    2019 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

De-lever through strong free cash flow, non-core asset sales

  

 

- Record cash from operations of $48.7 billion and record free cash flow of $29.0 billion1

 

- Achieved EOY net debt to adjusted EBITDA goal2

 

- Monetized approximately $18 billion of assets (net)

Lead in network through fiber, 5G and FirstNet investments

  

- Wireless network: Nation’s best and fastest3

 

- 5G: 5G to 50 million people

 

- FirstNet: More than 10,000 agencies and more than 1 million connections; coverage 75% complete

 

- Fiber: Available to 14 million consumer customer locations and 8 million business customer locations4

Grow wireless service revenues

  

- Up 1.9% for the full year

Stabilize Entertainment Group EBITDA

  

- Stable year over year at $10.1 billion5

Deliver merger synergies, grow WarnerMedia, launch DTC

  

- EOY merger cost synergy run rate: $700 million

 

- HBO Max: Introduced October 2019; commercial launch on track for May 2020

Expand targeted advertising, data analytics

  

- Launched Community, a premium video marketplace for buyers and sellers

 

- Acquired Clypd: Enables delivery of advertising solutions across TV and digital

Notes:

  1 

Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital expenditures. See Annex A for free cash flow reconciliation.

  2 

Our Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio is calculated by dividing the Net Debt by the sum of the most recent four quarters Adjusted EBITDA. This metric was used as a performance metric; see page 48 for the performance achieved and Annex A for a reconciliation.

  3 

America’s Best Network: Based on Global Wireless Solutions OneScore Sept. 2019. Nation’s Fastest Network: Based on analysis by Ookla® of Speedtest Intelligence® data average download speeds for Q3 2019. Ookla trademarks used under license and reprinted with permission.

  4 

Includes more than 8 million U.S. business customer locations on or within 1,000 feet of our fiber.

  5 

See Annex A for EBITDA reconciliation.

 


 

LOGO   39

 


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

    

 

RETURN TO STOCKHOLDERS

 

    

 

141.7%

   

45.6%

   

2.0%

   

36

10-year TSR

at year end

2019

   

1-year TSR

at year end

2019

   

Increase in

quarterly

dividend in 2019

   

Years of

consecutive increase in quarterly dividend

 

    

 

 

SUMMARY OF INCENTIVE PAYOUTS

PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS FOR 2019 SHORT TERM AWARDS

 

 

Added Net-Debt-to-Adjusted-EBITDA as a performance metric to focus on debt reduction and earnings.

 

 

Increased the weighting of Earnings Per Share to 80% to drive profitability and long-term sustainability.

 

 

New short-term award structure more quickly rewards performance above target, but even more so significantly penalizes underperformance. See page 47 for more information.

 

 

 

 

2019 CORPORATE SHORT TERM AWARD RESULTS*

 

Metric      Metric
Weight
     Attainment      Payout % 

2019 EPS

     80%      98%          85%

2019 Net-Debt-to-Adjusted-EBITDA

     20%      100.3%          101%

Weighted Average Payout

                   88%

* Award payouts for Mr. McElfresh, Mr. Stankey, and Mr. Donovan were based on a mix of corporate and business unit performance attainment. Please see pages 47 and 48 for more information.

 

 

 

 

PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT FOR 2020 SHORT TERM AWARDS

The Committee has approved the use of growth incentives that can enhance the payout of 2020 incentive awards (payable 2021). If revenue growth objectives are met, Executive Officers can receive up to an additional 15% payout.

 

 

 

 

LONG TERM AWARD – PERFORMANCE SHARE COMPONENT

RESULTS FOR 2017-2019 PERFORMANCE PERIOD

 

Metric      Metric Weight    Achievement    Payout %

3-Year ROIC

     100%    7.00%    100%

3-Year Relative TSR Payout Modifier

     +10%, 0%, or -10%    Quartile 4    -10%

Final Payout

               90%

See page 52 for more information about our ROIC attainment. After the impact of change in common stock price over the 2017 – 2019 performance period, our NEOs received approximately 81% of their original Performance Share grant value.

 


 

40   LOGO

 


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

ROLE OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE

 

The Committee oversees the compensation and benefits program for our senior executives on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors. Its current members are: Ms. Mooney (Chairman), Mr. Ford, Mr. McCallister, Mr. Rose, and Mr. Yang. The Committee’s charter is available on our website at www.att.com. The Committee is responsible for:

 

 

Compensation-Related Tasks

 

   

Organizational Tasks

 

 

–  Determining the compensation for our Executive Officers, including salary and short- and long-term incentive opportunities;

–  Reviewing, approving, and administering our executive compensation plans, including our stock plans;

–  Establishing performance objectives under our short- and long-term incentive compensation plans;

–  Determining the attainment of performance objectives and the resulting awards to be made to our Executive Officers;

–  Evaluating Executive Officer compensation practices to ensure that they remain equitable and competitive; and

–  Approving employee benefit plans.

 

 

   

 

–  Evaluating the performance of the CEO;

 

–  Reviewing the performance and capabilities of other Executive Officers, based on input from the CEO; and

 

–  Reviewing succession planning for Executive Officer positions including the CEO’s position.

GUIDING PAY PRINCIPLES

 

The Committee has established the following guiding pay principles as the pillars of our compensation and benefits program. It evaluates changes to our program in light of these goals and the Company’s strategic objectives.

 

LOGO

 

LOGO   41


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

PAY GOVERNANCE

 

Our Committee designs our compensation and benefits program around the following market-leading practices:

 

OUR PRACTICES

  

WHAT WE DON’T DO

Pay for Performance: Tie compensation to performance by setting clear and challenging performance metrics/goals, including stock price performance for long term compensation.

 

Multiple Performance Metrics and Time Horizons: Use multiple performance metrics and multi-year vesting timeframes to balance short- and long- term focus.

 

Stock Ownership and Holding Period Requirements: NEOs must comply with common stock ownership guidelines and hold the equivalent of 25% of post-2015 stock award distributions until termination of employment.

 

Regular Engagement with Stockholders: We regularly engage with stockholders to seek input regarding executive compensation matters.

 

Dividend Equivalents: Paid at the end of the performance period on earned Performance Shares.

 

Compensation-Related Risk Review: Performed annually to confirm that our programs do not encourage excessive risk taking and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Clawback Policy: Provides for the recovery of previously paid executive compensation for any fraudulent or illegal conduct.

 

Severance Policy: Limits payments to 2.99 times salary and target bonus.

 

  

û No “Single Trigger” Change in Control Provisions: No accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a change in control.

 

ûNo Tax Gross-Ups, except in extenuating circumstances.

 

ûNo Credit for Unvested Shares when determining compliance with stock ownership guidelines.

 

ûNo Repricing or Buy-Out of underwater stock options.

 

ûNo Hedging or Short Sales of AT&T stock or stock based awards.

 

ûNo Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefits for officers promoted/hired after 2008.

 

ûNo Guaranteed Bonuses.

 

ûNo Excessive Dilution: Our annual equity grants represent less than 1% of the total outstanding common stock each year. As of April 30, 2019, our total dilution was 1.0% of outstanding stock.

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

 

We engage in annual dialogue with our stockholders to review how our compensation and benefits program supports our long-term strategic objectives and obtain feedback. The Committee considers feedback from this outreach when evaluating any potential changes to our program. Our stockholders have continued their strong support of our program with over 90% of votes cast for approval of the “say on pay” proposal over the last four years, including 91% of the votes cast at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

42   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

ELEMENTS OF 2019 COMPENSATION

 

Stockholders’ interests are best represented by a compensation program that is properly structured to attract, retain, and motivate our executives to lead the Company effectively. Our program contains various elements, each designed for a different purpose, with the overarching goal of encouraging a high level of sustainable individual and Company performance well into the future:

 

 

Focus on Current Year

Performance

 

  +  

 

Focus on Multi-Year

Performance

 

  +  

 

Focus on Attraction &

Retention

 

 

Salary and

Short-Term Incentives

 

 

Long-Term Incentives:

75% Performance Shares

25% Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 

Retirement, Deferral/Savings Plans, Benefits, and Personal Benefits

 

The chart below more fully describes the elements of total direct compensation and their link to our business and talent strategies.

 

 

Reward

Element

 

    

Form

 

     

Link to Business

and Talent Strategies

 

            
        

 

Cash

 

     

 

• Provides current compensation for the day-to-day responsibilities of the position.

Fixed Pay

 

 

Base Salary

 

    

A portion may be contributed to the AT&T stock and cash deferral plans.

 

     

 

• Current pay level recognizes experience, skill, and performance, with the goal of being market-competitive.

 

• Future adjustments may be based on individual performance, pay relative to other executives, and/or pay relative to market.

 

                        
            
 

Short-Term Incentives (see page 47)

    

 

Cash

 

     

 

• Aligns pay with the achievement of short-term Company or business unit objectives.

 

At Risk

Pay

    

 

A portion may be contributed to the AT&T stock and cash deferral plans.

     

 

• Payouts are based on achievement of predetermined goals, with potential for adjustment (up or down) by the Committee to align pay with performance.

 

            
 

Long-Term Incentives (see page 50)

    

 

Common Stock

 

       
    

75% Performance Shares (paid 34% in stock, 66% in cash) 25% Restricted Stock Units (paid in stock)

 

     

• Motivates and rewards the achievement of long-term Company objectives.

 

• Aligns executive and stockholder interests.

 

The percentage of target pay allocated to the reward elements for our NEOs is found on page 46.

 

LOGO   43


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

DETERMINING 2019 TARGET COMPENSATION

 

The Committee uses market data as the starting point for determining Executive Officer compensation. The independent consultant compiles data from peer companies using both proxy data and third-party compensation surveys.

Scale and scope of AT&T relative to peers

AT&T is a global leader in telecommunications, media, entertainment, and technology. To put in perspective the scale, scope, and complexity of our business relative to our Corporate Peer Group (shown on page 45), below is a comparison of market cap, annual revenues, and annual net income. This comparison is valuable in understanding our compensation and benefits package:

 

LOGO

How the peer groups were chosen

The Committee evaluated compensation against three peer groups in 2019: the Corporate Peer Group, the Media Peer Group, and the Large Cap Peer Group.

The Corporate Peer Group is used for corporate roles. It is based on the following criteria, with input from both the independent consultant and management, to ensure the peer group includes companies that:

 

Mirror AT&T’s strategic business mix by including telecom, media, and technology companies,

 

Are substantially similar to AT&T in terms of organizational or business complexity and/or industry,

 

Have global operations and/or diversified product lines,

 

Are able to compete with AT&T for business, executive talent, and/or investor capital, and

 

Have similar jobs in terms of complexity and scope.

 

44   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

Due to the unique pay practices in the media and entertainment industry, the consultant created a separate Media Peer Group, comprised of key organizations in the media and entertainment industry, against which to evaluate Mr. Stankey’s compensation. Similarly, because of the significant scope of Mr. McElfresh and Mr. Donovan’s jobs, their compensation was evaluated relative to a Large Cap Peer Group, comprised of companies having positions that closely resemble the scale and scope of AT&T Communications.

 

   

 

Corporate Peer Group1

 

Mr. Stephenson,

 

Mr. Stephens, and Mr. McAtee

 

 

 

Large Cap Peer Group

 

Mr. McElfresh,

 

Mr. Donovan

 

 

Media Peer Group

 

Mr. Stankey

 

       

21st Century Fox

       

IBM

       

Microsoft

       

Viacom

       

Walt Disney

         

Alphabet

       

Apple

       

Boeing

       

Charter

       

Chevron

       

Cisco

       

Exxon Mobil

       

General Electric

       

Intel

       

Oracle

       

Sprint

       

T-Mobile US

       

Verizon

       

Wal-Mart

       

Comcast

     

Amazon

     

CBS

     

AMC Networks

     

Discovery Comm.

     

Lions Gate

     

Netflix

 

         

 

  1.

These same companies are used to determine our relative TSR performance for the 2019 Performance Share grant for all NEOs.

 

 

LOGO   45


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

The Committee’s Process for Establishing 2019 Target Compensation

The Committee’s consultant reviewed market data from the applicable peer groups with members of management and the CEO (for Executive Officers other than himself) to confirm job matches and scoping of market data based on the relative value of each position and differences in responsibilities between jobs at AT&T and those in the applicable peer group. After completing this review, the consultant presented the market data to the Committee.

The Committee used the market data and the CEO’s compensation recommendations for the other Executive Officers and then applied its judgment and experience to set Executive Officer target compensation for the coming year. While the Committee does consider peer group compensation information when setting executive compensation, it does not believe it appropriate to establish compensation amounts based solely on this data. The Committee believes that compensation decisions are multi-dimensional and require consideration of additional factors, including market competition for the position and the executive’s:

-

experience, performance, and contributions;

-

long-term potential; and

-

leadership.

2019 Target Pay Mix

The Committee designs the compensation program to be heavily performance-based. The following charts depict the mix of target compensation for Mr. Stephenson, and an average for the other NEOs.

 

LOGO

*Including stock price performance

 

46   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

HOW NEOS WERE PAID FOR PERFORMANCE IN 2019

 

2019 Short-Term Incentive Awards – Performance Targets

At the beginning of 2019, after reviewing our business plan and determining the business metrics on which our Executive Officers should focus, the Committee established the following performance metrics applicable to payment of 2019 short-term awards. These metrics were chosen for their link to our corporate strategy. For 2019, the Committee added a Net-Debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA performance target to focus management on multiple initiatives intended to reduce debt.

2019 SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN METRICS1

 

LOGO

1 In each case, an overall payout cap of 150% applies to the final, weighted payout before any applicable AT&T Communications Revenue Kicker.

Each performance metric has an associated payout table, and all payout tables use the same structure. The Committee changed the payout table structure so that NEOs are rewarded more quickly for performance above the performance target and more heavily penalized for performance below target. It features more downside risk than upside potential. This change was made in 2019, the first full year of the new company structure after the Time Warner acquisition.

2019 Short Term Payout Table Structure

 

 

Payout Level

 

  

 

Attainment    

 

  

 

Payout    

 

Maximum

   110%    150%

Target

   100%    100%
   94%    50%

Threshold

   82%    30%

 

Interpolation is used to determine the payout percentages for results that fall between attainment levels shown.

 

LOGO   47


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

2019 Short-Term Incentive Awards – Performance Attainment and Associated Payout Percentages

The following charts show the performance goals, actual performance attainment and payout percentage for each of our NEO’s 2019 short-term incentive award performance metrics.

 

 

LOGO

 

48   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

LOGO

NEOs whose awards are based solely on corporate performance metrics each received a performance-adjusted award payout of 88% (Messrs. Stephenson, Stephens, and McAtee). The performance-adjusted award payout for Mr. McElfresh and Mr. Donovan was 88%, and for Mr. Stankey was 102% (see page 58 for more information on Mr. Stankey’s payout). The Committee maintains the ability to adjust the formula-driven payout as it deems appropriate in order to ensure alignment of Executive Officer pay with performance. AT&T Communications Operating Contribution was reduced by $0.5B per pre-established award terms for severance and asset abandonments and impairments.

 

LOGO   49


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Awards with Performance or Restriction Periods Ending in 2019 or Early 2020

Following is a description of the long-term awards our NEOs received:

 

Form of Award

 

 

 

Performance/Restriction Period

and Metrics

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

Performance Shares

Granted in 2017

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

 

3-year performance period

(2017-2019)

 

Performance metrics:

 

– 100% ROIC

 

– Relative TSR payout modifier*

 

Payout value based on combination of performance attainment and common stock price performance.

 

  Each Performance Share is equal in value to a share of common stock, which causes the value of the award to fluctuate directly with changes in our stock price over the performance period.

 

  Performance Shares are paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock. The amount of cash to be paid is based on our stock price on the date the award payout is approved.

 

  Awards are based on a 3-year performance period and maximize both short- and long-term performance. The impact of a single year’s performance is felt in each of the three Performance Share grants outstanding at any given time, so that strong performance must be sustained every year in order to provide favorable payouts.

 

  Dividend equivalents are paid at the end of the performance period, based on the number of Performance Shares earned.

 

 

RSUs Granted in 2016

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

 

4-year restriction period

 

Payout value based on common stock price performance.

 

 

RSUs pay in common stock at the end of the restriction period, regardless of whether they vest earlier. RSUs vest 100% after four years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier.

 

*Not applicable to Mr. McElfresh’s 2017 Performance Shares because he was not an Executive Officer at the time of the grant.

 

50   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

ROIC Payout Table and Actual Performance Attainment – 2017-2019 Performance Period

 

Determination of Performance Goal

 

Performance Below Target Range

 

We established a ROIC performance target range of 6.50% to 7.50% at the beginning of the 3-year performance period. This target range does not reward or penalize Executive Officers for performance achievement within close proximity to the midpoint of the range. The lower end of the performance target range was set so that it exceeded our internally calculated weighted average cost of capital (determined, in part, based on input from banks) by 75 basis points, ensuring a reasonable return is delivered to stockholders before Executive Officers are eligible for full payout of their target award. We calculate ROIC by taking our annual reported net income minus minority interest and adding after-tax interest expense and dividing that result by the total of the average debt and average stockholder equity for the relevant year, subject to adjustments. The ROIC for each year is then averaged over the 3-year performance period to determine the final performance.

Achievement below the target range results in decreasing levels of award payout. No payout is earned if less than 65% of the performance target range is achieved.

Performance Within Target Range

100% payout if performance falls within the target range.

Performance Above Target Range

Maximum payout of 150% is earned if 147% or more of the performance target range is achieved. Achievement above the target range provides for higher levels of award payout, up to the maximum payout.

 

 

Actual Performance

After conclusion of the performance period, the Committee determined (using the 2017 ROIC payout table summarized on the next page) that we achieved ROIC of 7.00%, which was within the target range, and 125 basis points above the weighted average cost of capital we established based on input from banks. As a result, the Committee directed that 100% of the related Performance Shares be distributed in accordance with the payout table as follows.

 

LOGO   51


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

LOGO

Relative TSR Payout Modifier - Payout Table and Actual Performance

The following chart shows the payout table and actual performance for the relative TSR modifier applicable to the 2017 Performance Share grant:

 

LOGO

 

TSR was measured relative to the following peer group, which was established at the time of grant*:

 

LOGO

*Time Warner Inc. was included in this group, but its results were removed because of AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner Inc. in 2018.

 

52   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

Percent of Grant Value Realized

Based on the combined ROIC and relative TSR performance attainment, the Committee directed that 90% of the Performance Shares be distributed. After the impact of common stock price performance over the 3-year performance period, our NEOs received 81% of the original 2017 Performance Share grant value, as follows:

2017-2019 Performance Share Grant

 

LOGO

    90% payout

1Closing common stock price on the grant date, 1/26/2017: $41.77

Closing common stock price on date payout approved, 1/30/2020: $37.43

 

2016 RSU Grant

After the impact of common stock price performance over the 4-year restriction period, our NEOs received 109% of the original 2016 RSU grant value, as follows:

2016 RSU Grant

 

LOGO

2 Closing common stock price on the grant date, 1/28/2016: $35.53

Closing common stock price on last date of restriction period, 1/28/2020: $38.58

 

LOGO   53


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

REALIZED COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

We believe it’s difficult to understand the impact of our Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy without an explanation of the compensation that our NEOs actually received (“realized compensation”) relative to their original pay targets (“target compensation”). The primary difference between realized and target compensation is stock price performance and achievement against pre-established performance goals under our short- and long- term Incentive plans. In the preceding sections we detailed our incentive award payouts. The following charts summarize the impact of these payouts on each active NEO’s total realized compensation. Note that the realized long-term values shown below do not align to what is reported in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) because the SCT reflects long-term grant values for 2019 whereas realized compensation shown below includes long-term distribution values of awards with performance/restriction periods ending in 2019 or early 2020.

 

 

Randall Stephenson

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

           LOGO

 

 

Randall Stephenson has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since 2007. Throughout his 37 years at AT&T, he has held a variety of high-level finance, operational, and marketing positions, including serving as Chief Operating Officer from 2004 to 2007, and as Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He began his career with the Company in 1982.

 

2019 Realized Compensation

 

 

Element of

Compensation

 

 

Compensation

Amount

 

 

Rationale

 

 

2019 Base Salary

 

 

$1,800,000

 

 

Mr. Stephenson’s salary did not increase in 2019.

 

 

2019 STIP

 

 

Target Award = $6,000,000

 

Final Award Paid = $5,280,000

 

88% of target award value realized

 

Mr. Stephenson’s target STIP was increased 1.7% to $6,000,000 in 2019.

 

Mr. Stephenson’s STIP payout was based on:

   A payout of 88% of his target award based on formulaic performance attainment of EPS and Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA goals.

   The Committee made no award for individual performance.

 

 

Performance Share Payout

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

(2017-2019 Performance Period)

 

 

Target Award = $12,525,000

 

Final Award Paid = $10,101,249

 

81% of grant value realized

 

Mr. Stephenson’s performance share payout was based on:

   A formulaic payout of 100% of the 299,856 shares granted, based on the Company’s performance achievement for ROIC and 10% subtracted for the relative TSR modifier, plus

   The company’s common stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which decreased the value of the shares earned by 10%.

Performance Shares were paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock.

 

 

RSU Payout

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

(2016 Grant)

 

 

Target Award = $7,750,000

 

218,126 shares paid; valued at $8,415,301

 

109% of grant value realized

 

 

 

The company’s common stock price change over the 4-year restriction period increased the value of the units granted by 9%.

 

RSUs were paid in common stock.

 

Total Realized Compensation

 

  $25,596,550    

 

54   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

John Stephens

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

           LOGO

 

 

John Stephens has 26 years of service with the Company. Mr. Stephens was appointed to his current position, Chief Financial Officer, in 2011. He has responsibility for financial planning, corporate development, accounting, tax, auditing, treasury, investor relations, corporate real estate, shared services, and disposition of all non-strategic assets. Prior to his current position, Mr. Stephens held a series of successive positions in the finance department. Before joining the Company, Mr. Stephens held a variety of roles in public accounting.

 

 

2019 Realized Compensation

 

 

Element of
Compensation

 

 

Compensation

Amount

 

 

Rationale

 

 

2019 Base Salary

 

 

$1,125,000

 

 

Mr. Stephens’ salary did not increase in 2019.

 

 

2019 STIP

 

Target Award = $2,625,000

 

Final Award Paid = $2,560,000

 

98% of target award value realized

 

Mr. Stephens’ target STIP did not increase in 2019.

 

Mr. Stephens’ STIP payout was based on:

   A payout of 88% of his target award based on formulaic performance attainment of EPS and Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA goals.

   The Committee awarded Mr. Stephens an additional $250,000 for his individual accomplishments during 2019:

-   Improved the capital structure of the Company by reducing Net-Debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA, including:

  monetization of approximately $18 billion of assets (net), and

  implementation of the Company’s first preferred stock offering.

-   Developed and externally communicated the 2020 AT&T Business Plan, financial materials for the WarnerMedia Investor Day, and the Company’s 3-year financial guidance and capital allocation strategy.

-   Drove numerous operational effectiveness initiatives ranging from real estate, benefits, taxes, and monetizing non-core businesses.

 

 

Performance Share Payout

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

(2017-2019 Performance Period)

 

Target Award = $5,250,000

 

Final Award Paid = $4,234,052

 

81% of grant value realized

 

 

Mr. Stephens’ performance share payout was based on:

   A formulaic payout of 100% of the 125,688 shares granted, based on the Company’s performance achievement for ROIC and 10% subtracted for the relative TSR modifier, plus

   The company’s common stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which decreased the value of the shares earned by 10%.

Performance Shares were paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock.

 

 

RSU Payout

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

(2016 Grant)

 

 

Target Award = $2,575,000

 

72,474 shares paid; valued at $2,796,047

 

109% of grant value realized

 

 

 

The company’s common stock price change over the 4-year restriction period increased the value of the units granted by 9%.

 

RSUs were paid in common stock.

 

Total Realized Compensation

 

  $10,715,099    

 

LOGO   55


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

David McAtee

Senior Executive Vice President and General Counsel

           LOGO

 

David McAtee has served as AT&T’s General Counsel since 2015. He has responsibility for all legal matters affecting AT&T, including the company’s litigation, regulatory, and administrative matters before various judicial and regulatory bodies, as well as all merger agreements, dispositions of non-strategic assets, commercial agreements, and labor contracts. In 2019, Mr. McAtee and his team successfully managed thousands of litigation matters, over 160 appeals to federal and state courts of appeal and the United States Supreme Court, and all legal agreements associated with the Company’s financing and asset monetization initiatives. Mr. McAtee joined the company in 2012 after 18 years in government and private practice.

 

 

2019 Realized Compensation

 

Element of
Compensation

 

 

Compensation

Amount

 

 

Rationale

 

 

2019 Base Salary

  $1,270,833  

Mr. McAtee received a 2% base salary increase from $1,250,000 to $1,275,000 in March 2019.

 

 

2019 STIP

 

Target Award = $2,295,000

 

Final Award Paid = $2,269,600

 

99% of target award value realized

 

Mr. McAtee’s target STIP was increased 2% to $2,295,000 in 2019.

 

Mr. McAtee’s STIP payout was based on:

   A payout of 88% of his target award based on formulaic performance attainment of EPS and Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA goals.

   The Committee awarded Mr. McAtee an additional $250,000 for his individual accomplishments during 2019:

-   Provided guidance on critical legal matters including the successful defense of the Department of Justice’s challenge of a lower court decision to approve the AT&T-Time Warner merger.

-   Gave strategic counsel on the Company’s capital market activities, including the Company’s first preferred stock offering, which significantly contributed to the Company’s reduction in net debt.

-   Interim leadership of the Company’s External and Legislative Affairs organization.

 

 

 

Performance

Share Payout

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

(2017-2019 Performance Period)

 

 

 

Target Award = $2,775,000

 

Final Award Paid = $2,237,996

 

81% of grant value realized

 

Mr. McAtee’s Performance Share payout was based on:

   A formulaic payout of 100% of the 66,435 shares granted, based on the Company’s performance achievement for ROIC and 10% subtracted for the relative TSR modifier, plus

   The company’s common stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which decreased the value of the shares earned by 10%.

 

Performance Shares were paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock.

 

 

RSU Payout

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

(2016 Grant)

 

 

Target Award = $1,625,000

 

45,736 shares paid;

valued at $1,764,495

 

109% of grant value realized

 

 

 

The company’s common stock price change over the 4-year restriction period increased the value of the units granted by 9%.

 

RSUs were paid in common stock.

 

Total Realized Compensation

 

 

$7,542,924

 

   

 

56   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

Jeff McElfresh

CEO, AT&T Communications, LLC

           LOGO

  

Jeff McElfresh joined the Company 24 years ago, and was appointed CEO of AT&T Communications, LLC, in October 2019. He is responsible for AT&T Communications’ consumer, business, and technology and operations groups, which provide mobile, broadband, and video services to U.S. consumers, including nearly 3.5 million businesses. He previously served as President-Technology and Operations for AT&T Communications, LLC, and as CEO of Vrio Corp, the Company’s pay-TV business in Latin America.

 

 

 

2019 Realized Compensation

 

Element of
Compensation

 

 

Compensation

Amount

 

 

Rationale

 

 

2019 Base Salary

  $568,000  

As part of his annual review, Mr. McElfresh received a 7% base salary increase from $450,000 to $480,000 in March. As a result of his new role as CEO of AT&T Communications, LLC, his base salary was increased in October to $850,000.

 

 

2019 STIP

 

Target Award = $1,212,500

 

Final Award Paid = $1,067,000

 

88% of target award value realized

 

Mr. McElfresh’s target STIP was increased by 5% to $1,000,000 as part of his annual review, and then again by 85% to $1,850,000 upon his promotion.

 

Mr. McElfresh’s STIP payout was based on:

   A payout of 88% of his target award based on formulaic performance attainment of Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA and AT&T Communications Operating Contribution goals.

   The Committee made no award for individual performance.

 

 

Performance

Share Payout

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

(2017-2019

Performance

Period)

 

 

Target Award = $461,250

 

Final Award Paid = $413,339

 

90% of grant value realized

 

 

Mr. McElfresh’s performance share payout was based on:

   A formulaic payout of 100% of the 11,043 shares granted, based on the Company’s performance achievement for ROIC, plus

   The company’s common stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which decreased the value of the shares earned by 10%.

 

Performance Shares were paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock.

 

 

RSU Payout

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

(2016 Grant)

 

 

Target Award = $300,000

 

8,444 shares paid;

valued at $325,770

 

109% of grant value realized

 

 

 

The company’s common stock price change over the 4-year restriction period increased the value of the units granted by 9%.

 

RSUs were paid in common stock.

 

Total Realized Compensation

 

 

$2,374,109

 

   

 

LOGO   57


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

John Stankey

President and Chief Operating Officer

           LOGO

 

John Stankey was appointed President and COO of AT&T Inc. in October 2019, overseeing AT&T Communications, WarnerMedia, and Xandr. He also leads WarnerMedia, which creates premium content, operates the world’s largest TV and film studio, and owns a world-class library of entertainment. Mr. Stankey has held various roles during his 33 years of service with the Company, including CEO-AT&T Entertainment Group; Chief Strategy Officer; President and CEO of AT&T Business Solutions; President and CEO of AT&T Operations; Group President-Telecom Operations; Chief Technology Officer; and Chief Information Officer.

 

 

2019 Realized Compensation

 

 

Element of
Compensation

 

 

Compensation

Amount

 

  

Rationale

 

 

2019 Base Salary

 

 

$2,900,000

 

  

Mr. Stankey’s salary did not increase in 2019.

 

 

2019 STIP

 

Target Award = $7,400,000

 

Final Award Paid = $7,566,500

 

102% of target award value realized

  

Mr. Stankey’s target STIP did not increase in 2019.

 

Mr. Stankey’s STIP payout was based on:

   A payout of 102% of his target award based on formulaic performance attainment of:

-   1Q to 3Q 2019: Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA and WarnerMedia Operating Contribution (107% payout)

-   4Q 2019: EPS and Net-Debt-to-Adj-EBITDA (88% payout)

   The Committee made no award for individual performance.

 

 

Performance

Share Payout

 

75% of 2017 Long Term Award

 

(2017-2019

Performance

Period)

 

 

Target Award = $5,250,000

 

Final Award Paid = $4,234,052

 

81% of grant value realized

  

Mr. Stankey’s performance share payout was based on:

   A formulaic payout of 100% of the 125,688 shares granted, based on the Company’s performance achievement for ROIC and 10% subtracted for the relative TSR modifier, plus

   The company’s common stock price change over the 3-year performance period, which decreased the value of the shares earned by 10%.

 

Performance Shares were paid in 66% cash and 34% common stock.

 

 

RSU Payout

 

50% of 2016 Long Term Award

 

(2016 Grant)

 

 

Target Award = $2,837,500

 

79,862 shares paid;

valued at $3,081,076

 

109% of grant value realized

 

  

 

The company’s common stock price change over the 4-year restriction period increased the value of the units granted by 9%.

 

RSUs were paid in common stock.

 

Total Realized Compensation

 

 

$17,781,628

 

    

 

58   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

2019 Long Term Grants

In 2019, the Committee granted our NEOs long-term awards in the form of:

 

 

Type of Award

 

   Weight

 

  

Performance Metrics

 

 

Vesting Period

 

     
  Performance Shares    75%   

Performance Metric - 100% ROIC

Relative TSR Payout Modifier

  3-year performance period
     
  RSUs    25%   

Payout value based on common

stock price performance only

  4-year restriction period

The associated grant values for these awards were:

2019 TARGET LONG TERM VALUES

 

  Name

  

 

Performance

 

Shares ($)1

  RSUs ($)1  

  Randall Stephenson

   14,850,000   4,950,000    

  John Stephens

     8,062,500   2,687,500    

  David McAtee

     3,750,000   1,250,000    

  Jeff McElfresh

   2,745,0002    915,0002    

  John Stankey

   7,125,0003   2,375,0003    

  John Donovan

     8,531,250   2,843,750    

1 These amounts represent the rounded value of the awards on February 28, 2019 for Mr. Stephenson and January 31, 2019 for the other NEOs, the dates the Committee authorized the awards.

2 Includes supplemental grant of $2,140,000 upon his promotion. Grant was comprised of 75% performance shares and 25% RSUs. The relative TSR payout modifier only applies to his supplemental grant.

3 Includes supplemental grant of $2,000,000 in recognition of his COO duties. Grant was comprised of 75% performance shares and 25% RSUs.

 

 

2019 PERFORMANCE SHARE GRANTS

The Performance Shares granted in 2019 are for the 2019-2021 performance period. The Committee determined that the Performance Shares would be tied to a ROIC performance metric with a payout modifier based on a comparison of AT&T’s TSR to our Corporate Peer Group (as shown on page 45).

ROIC Performance Metric

We calculate ROIC for the 2019-2021 performance period by averaging over the three-year performance period: (1) our annual reported net income plus after-tax interest expense minus minority interest, divided by (2) the total of the average debt and average stockholder equity for the relevant year. For mergers and acquisitions over $2.0 billion, we exclude the dilutive impacts of intangible amortization, asset write-offs, accelerated depreciation, and transaction and restructuring costs so that the impact of certain significant transactions, including those which may not have been contemplated in the determination of a performance metric, will not have an impact on the performance results. We also exclude the net impact of certain of the following items after taxes and available collectible insurance, if they exceed, individually or in certain combinations, $500 million in a calendar year and satisfy other conditions; changes in tax laws, changes in accounting, expenses caused by natural disasters or intentionally caused damage to the Company’s property, and non-cash accounting write-downs of goodwill, other intangible assets and fixed assets. Additionally, we disregard gains and losses related to the assets and liabilities of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans (and associated tax effects).

ROIC Payout Table Description

The ROIC target range for the 2019-2021 performance period was set 75 basis points above our cost of capital, a target that we believe to be challenging, but attainable. For performance above or below the performance target range, the number of Performance Shares are increased or reduced, respectively. Potential payouts range from 0% to 150% of the number of Performance Shares granted.

 

LOGO   59


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

TSR Performance Modifier

We believe that TSR is an important measure because it helps ensure that our executives’ interests are aligned with stockholders. This modifier provides that 2019 Performance Share Award payouts may be adjusted based on our TSR (stock appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends) performance relative to our Corporate Peer Group (as shown on page 45). TSR performance will be measured over the entire performance period.

 

TSR PERFORMANCE MODIFIER

 

 

 

2019-2021 Performance Period

 

 

 

AT&T Return vs.

 

TSR Peer Group

 

  

Payout Modifier

 

 

 

Top Quartile

 

  

 

Add 10 Percentage Points to Final ROIC Payout Percentage            

 

 

 

Quartile 2

 

Quartile 3

 

  

 

 

No Adjustment to ROIC Payout Percentage            

 

 

 

Quartile 4

 

  

 

Subtract 10 Percentage Points from Final ROIC Payout Percentage            

 

At the end of the performance period, the number of Performance Shares to be paid out, if any, will be determined by comparing the actual performance of the Company against the predetermined performance objective for ROIC, and modifying the award for relative TSR achievement, if applicable. Performance Shares, if earned, are paid 34% in common stock, 66% in cash.

2019 Restricted Stock Unit Grants

RSUs granted in 2019 vest 100% after four years or upon retirement eligibility, whichever occurs earlier, but do not pay out until the scheduled distribution date. These RSUs receive quarterly dividend equivalents, paid in cash, at the time regular dividends are paid on our common stock. RSUs pay 100% in stock to further tie executive and stockholder interests.

 

2019 Retention Grant for Mr. McElfresh

Mr. McElfresh received a retention grant of 52,812 shares of Restricted Stock, with an approximate grant date value of $2,000,000, vesting in December 2024. More information on this grant may be found on page 67.

 

60   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

BENEFITS

 

 

Benefits and Personal Benefits

Benefits are an important tool to maintain the market competitiveness of our overall compensation package. We provide personal benefits to our Executive Officers for three main reasons:

 

   

To effectively compete for talent: These benefits allow us to have a program that is competitive enough to help us in our attraction and retention efforts.

 

   

To support Executive Officers in meeting the needs of the business: We require our Executive Officers to be available around-the-clock. Therefore, we provide them benefits that allow us to have greater access to them. These benefits should not be measured solely in terms of any incremental financial cost, but rather the value they bring the Company through maximized productivity and availability.

 

   

To provide for the safety, security, and personal health of executives: We provide Executive Officers certain personal benefits to provide for their safety and personal health.

Benefits for our Executive Officers are outlined below. The Committee continues to evaluate these benefits based on needs of the business and prevailing market practices and trends.

Benefits1

 

Deferral Opportunities

Tax-qualified 401(k) Plans

Our 401(k) plans offer substantially all employees, including each of the NEOs, the opportunity to defer income and receive company matching contributions. Substantially all of our plans provide our employees the ability to invest in AT&T or other investments. We match 80% of manager contributions, limited to the first 6% of cash compensation (only base salary is matched for officers). Managers hired externally on or after January 1, 20152, do not receive a pension, and to account for the lack of a pension benefit, we increased their 401(k) match to a 7% match on the first 6% of eligible contributions to the 401(k) effective January 1, 2020.

Nonqualified Plans

We provide mid-level and above managers the opportunity for tax-advantaged savings through two nonqualified plans:

•  Stock Purchase and Deferral Plan

This is our principal nonqualified deferral program, which we use to encourage our managers to invest in and hold AT&T common stock on a tax-deferred basis. Under this plan, mid-level managers and above may annually elect to defer, through payroll deductions, up to 30% of their salary and annual bonus (officers, including the NEOs, may defer up to 95% of their short-term award, which is similar to, and paid in lieu of, the annual bonus paid to other management employees) to purchase AT&T deferred share units at fair market value on a tax-deferred basis. Participants receive a 20% match on their deferrals in the form of additional AT&T deferred share units. Participants also receive makeup matching deferred AT&T share units to replace the match that is not available in the 401(k) because of their participation in our nonqualified deferral plans or because they exceeded the IRS compensation limits for 401(k) plans. Officers do not receive the makeup match on the contribution of their short-term awards.

•  Cash Deferral Plan

Through this plan, eligible managers may also defer cash compensation in the form of salaries and bonuses. The plan pays interest at the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Yield Average, reset annually, which is a common index used by companies for deferral plans. The SEC requires disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table of any earnings on deferred compensation that exceed an amount set by the SEC.

These plans are described more fully on page 76.

Pension Benefits

We offer a tax-qualified group pension plan to a majority of our managers. Managers hired externally on or after January 1, 20152 no longer are eligible to participate in the pension plan, and instead receive an enhanced match in the 401(k) plan.

We also provided supplemental retirement benefits under nonqualified pension plans, or SERPs, to employees who became officers before 2009. In 2019, Mr. Stankey and Mr. Stephens elected to freeze their SERP benefits as if they had retired at the end of 2019. In exchange, they gave up credits under the plan for all future compensation and service. The frozen benefits will earn a fixed rate of interest equal to 3.7% which represents the discount rate used to determine lump sum benefits for participants who retired in 2019. Additional information on pension benefits, including these plans, may be found beginning on page 70, following the “Pension Benefits” table.

 

 

1WarnerMedia employees participated in pre-merger Time Warner plans in 2019.

21/1/2016 for managers hired externally by DirecTV.

 

 

LOGO   61


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

Personal Benefits

We provide our Executive Officers with other limited and market-based personal benefits, as follows:

 

Benefit/Personal Benefit

   Description         Rationale
   

Financial Counseling

  

Includes tax preparation, estate planning, and financial counseling.

       

Allows our executives to focus more on business responsibilities by providing financial counselors to help with their personal financial affairs and tax filings.

 

   

Health Coverage

  

A consumer-driven health plan for certain executives, who must pay a portion of the premiums.

       

Maintains executives’ health and welfare, helping to ensure business continuity.

Executive Physical

  

Annual physical for executives who do not receive the health coverage shown above.

    
   

Communications

  

AT&T products and services provided at little or no incremental cost to the Company.

       

Provides 24/7 connectivity and a focus on services customers purchase.

   

Automobile

   Includes allowance, fuel, and maintenance.        

Recruiting and retention tool.

   

Executive Disability

  

Provides compensation during a leave of absence due to illness or injury.

       

Provides security to executives’ family members.

Home Security

  

Residential security system and monitoring.

    

Executive Life

Insurance

  

See page 74.

    
   

Company-Owned Club

Memberships

  

In some cases, we allow personal use, but do not pay country club fees or dues for Executive Officers.

       

Affords executives the opportunity to conduct business in a more informal environment.

   

Personal Use of

Company Aircraft

  

Messrs. Stephenson, Stankey, and Stephens (and Mr. Donovan prior to his retirement) are required to reimburse the incremental Company cost of personal usage, other than for travel to outside board meetings. Other Executive Officers are also required to reimburse the incremental cost of their personal usage unless the CEO decides otherwise on a case-by-case basis. Reimbursements will not be made where prohibited by law.

 

       

Provides for safety, security, and reduced travel time so executives may focus on their responsibilities.

Certain of these benefits are also offered as post-retirement benefits to officers who meet age and service requirements. Additional information on these post-retirement benefits can be found beginning on page 73.

 

62   LOGO


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

POLICIES AND RISK MITIGATION

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Committee has established common stock ownership guidelines for all Executive Officers, as follows. We include vested shares held in our benefit plans in determining attainment of these guidelines.

 

Level    Ownership Guidelines
 

 

  CEO

  

 

6X Base Salary

 

  Executive Officers

  

Lesser of 3X Base Salary or

50,000 Shares

All Executive Officers are given 5 years from assuming their position to achieve compliance.

NEO common stock holdings as of December 31, 2019, can be found in the “Common Stock Ownership” section beginning on page 28. As of December 31, 2019, Randall Stephenson held 2,494,363 vested shares of AT&T common stock, a multiple of over 54 times his base salary, well exceeding his 6X requirement. In addition, Mr. Stephenson also holds 571,304 shares of vested RSUs, which are subject to a retention period, making his total vested shares a multiple of over 66 times his base pay.

Equity Retention

Executive Officers are required to hold shares equivalent, in the aggregate, to 25% of the AT&T shares they receive (after taxes and exercise costs) from an incentive, equity, or option award granted to them after January 1, 2012, until they terminate employment with AT&T.

Hedging Policy

Executive officers are prohibited from hedging their AT&T stock or stock-based awards, including through trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to AT&T stock.

Clawback Policy

In addition to the risk moderation actions, we intend, in appropriate circumstances, to seek restitution of any bonus, commission, or other compensation received by an employee as a result of such employee’s intentional or knowing fraudulent or illegal conduct, including the making of a material misrepresentation in our financial statements.

Risk Mitigation

By ensuring that a significant portion of compensation is based on our long-term performance, we reduce the risk that executives will place too much focus on short-term achievements to the detriment of our long-term sustainability. Our short-term incentive compensation is structured so that the accomplishment of short-term goals

supports the achievement of long-term goals. These elements work together for the benefit of AT&T and our stockholders and to reduce risk in our incentive plans.

INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

 

The Committee is authorized by its charter to employ independent compensation consultants and other advisors. The Committee has selected Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook) to serve as its independent consultant. The consultant reports directly to the Committee. Other than advising the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on director compensation, FW Cook provides no other services to AT&T.

The consultant:

 

 

Attends all Committee meetings;

 

 

Regularly updates the Committee on market trends, changing practices, and legislation pertaining to executive compensation and benefits;

 

 

Reviews the Company’s executive compensation strategy and program to ensure appropriateness and market-competitiveness;

 

 

Makes recommendations on the design of the compensation program and the balance of pay-for-performance elements;

 

 

Provides market data for jobs held by senior leaders;

 

 

Analyzes compensation from other companies’ proxy and financial statements for the Committee’s review when making compensation decisions;

 

 

 

Assists the Committee in making pay determinations for the Chief Executive Officer; and

 

 

Advises the Committee on the appropriate comparator groups for compensation and benefits as well as the appropriate peer group against which to measure long-term performance.

The Committee reviewed the following six independence factors, as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, when evaluating the consultant’s independence:

 

 

Other services provided to AT&T

 

 

Percentage of the consultant’s revenues paid by AT&T

 

 

Consultant’s policies to prevent conflicts of interest

 

 

Other relationships with compensation committee members

 

 

AT&T stock owned by the consultant

 

 

Other relationships with Executive Officers

Based on its evaluation of the consultant and the six factors listed above, the Committee has determined that the consultant met the criteria for independence.

 

 

LOGO   63


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

 

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

 

February 12, 2020

  

The Human Resources Committee

  
  

Beth E. Mooney, Chairman

  
  

Scott T. Ford

  
  

Michael B. McCallister

  
  

Matthew K. Rose

  
  

Geoffrey Y. Yang

  

 

64   LOGO


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

 

 

The table below contains information concerning the compensation provided to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the three other most highly compensated Executive Officers of AT&T and one additional Executive Officer that retired in 2019 (the Named Executive Officers). Compensation information is provided for the years each person in the table was a Named Executive Officer since 2017.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and

Principal Position

  Year    

Salary (1)

($)

   

Bonus

($)

   

Stock

Awards (2)

($)

   

Option

Awards

($)

 

Non-

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compen-

sation (1)

($)

   

 

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings (3)

($)

   

All Other

Compen-

sation (4)

($)

   

Total

($)

 

R. Stephenson

Chairman and CEO

 

 

2019

 

 

 

1,800,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

19,800,007

 

 

0

 

 

5,280,000

 

 

 

3,589,196

 

 

 

1,563,722