XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Unaudited Financial Information
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Unaudited Financial Information
Unaudited Financial Information
These consolidated interim-period financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States on the same basis as those used for the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, which appear in Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2017 (the "Fiscal 2016 Financial Statements"). In the opinion of management, all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been made to the unaudited consolidated interim-period financial statements. These consolidated interim-period financial statements are condensed as permitted by the instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with our Fiscal 2016 Financial Statements. Because of seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2017 are not indicative of our results of operations for the full 2017 fiscal year, which ends September 30, 2017.
During the third quarter, we completed a State of Texas use tax audit that covered the period from October 2011 to March 2017, which resulted in a refund of $29.8 million. We concluded the appropriate regulatory treatment of this refund was to reduce rate base. We received $18.7 million during the third quarter, which has been included in cash flows from investing activities, and recorded an $11.1 million receivable as of June 30, 2017.
On January 6, 2017, our Atmos Pipeline - Texas Division filed its statement of intent seeking $63.6 million, as adjusted in its rebuttal case, in additional annual operating income. On August 1, 2017, a final order was issued in our APT rate case resulting in a $13.0 million increase in annual operating income. No other events have occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date that would require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Significant accounting policies
Our accounting policies are described in Note 2 of our Fiscal 2016 Financial Statements.
As discussed in Note 3, due to the realignment of our reportable segments, prior periods' segment information has been recast in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. Additionally, as discussed in Note 6, due to the sale of AEM, prior period amounts have been presented as discontinued operations. The segment realignment and the presentation of discontinued operations have not impacted our reported net income, financial position or cash flows. 
During the second quarter of fiscal 2017, we completed our annual goodwill impairment assessment. Based on the assessment performed, we determined that our goodwill was not impaired.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede virtually all existing revenue recognition guidance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Under the new standard, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies may need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance. The new guidance will become effective for us October 1, 2018 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.
As of June 30, 2017, we have substantially completed the evaluation of our sources of revenue and are currently assessing the effect that the new guidance will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and business processes. The conclusion of our assessment is contingent, in part, upon the completion of deliberations currently in progress by our industry, notably in connection with efforts to produce an accounting guide intended to be developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
In association with this undertaking, the AICPA formed a number of industry task forces, including a Power & Utilities (P&U) Task Force. Industry representatives and organizations, the largest auditing firms, the AICPA’s Revenue Recognition Working Group and its Financial Reporting Executive Committee have undertaken, and continue to undertake, consideration of several items relevant to our industry as further discussed below. Where applicable or necessary, the FASB’s Transition Resource Group (TRG) is also participating.
Additionally, we are actively working with our peers in the rate-regulated natural gas industry and with the public accounting profession to conclude on the accounting treatment for several other issues that are not expected to be addressed by the P&U Task Force. Based on the progress of these deliberations to date, we currently do not believe the implementation of the new guidance will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or business processes. We are currently still evaluating the transition method we will utilize to adopt the new guidance as well as the impact to our financial statement presentation and related disclosures.
In May 2015, the FASB issued guidance removing the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The guidance was effective for us on October 1, 2016, to be applied retrospectively. We measure certain pension plan assets using the net asset value per share practical expedient, which are disclosed on an annual basis in our Form 10-K. The adoption of the new standard should have no material impact on our results of operations, consolidated balance sheets or cash flows. 
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance related to the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The amendments modify the accounting and presentation for certain financial liabilities and equity investments not consolidated or reported using the equity method. The guidance is effective for us beginning October 1, 2018; limited early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a comprehensive new leasing standard that will require lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. The new standard will be effective for us beginning on October 1, 2019; early adoption is permitted. The new leasing standard requires modified retrospective transition, which requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption. As of June 30, 2017, we had begun the process of identifying and categorizing our lease contracts, evaluating our current business processes and identifying a lease software solution. We are currently evaluating the effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which will require credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model. Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. In contrast, current U.S. GAAP is based on an incurred loss model that delays recognition of credit losses until it is probable the loss has been incurred. The new guidance also introduces a new impairment recognition model for available-for-sale securities that will require credit losses for available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance account. The new standard will be effective for us beginning on October 1, 2021; early adoption is permitted beginning on October 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued new guidance that simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The new standard will be effective for our fiscal 2021 goodwill impairment test; however, early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of the new standard will have no impact on our results of operations, consolidated balance sheets or cash flows. 
In March 2017, the FASB issued new guidance related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The new guidance requires entities to disaggregate the current service cost component of the net benefit cost from the other components and present it with other current compensation costs for related employees in the statement of income. The other components of net benefit cost will be presented outside of income from operations on the statement of income. In addition, only the service cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization (e.g., as part of inventory or property, plant, and equipment). The new guidance is effective for us in the fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2018 and for interim periods within that year. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this new guidance on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Regulatory assets and liabilities
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require cost-based, rate-regulated entities that meet certain criteria to reflect the authorized recovery of costs due to regulatory decisions in their financial statements. As a result, certain costs are permitted to be capitalized rather than expensed because they can be recovered through rates. We record certain costs as regulatory assets when future recovery through customer rates is considered probable. Regulatory liabilities are recorded when it is probable that revenues will be reduced for amounts that will be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. Substantially all of our regulatory assets are recorded as a component of deferred charges and other assets and substantially all of our regulatory liabilities are recorded as a component of deferred credits and other liabilities. Deferred gas costs are recorded either in other current assets or liabilities and the regulatory cost of removal obligation is reported separately.

Significant regulatory assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 included the following:
 
June 30,
2017
 
September 30,
2016
 
(In thousands)
Regulatory assets:
 
 
 
Pension and postretirement benefit costs(1)
$
122,202

 
$
132,348

Infrastructure mechanisms(2)
38,653

 
42,719

Deferred gas costs
16,405

 
45,184

Recoverable loss on reacquired debt
11,843

 
13,761

Deferred pipeline record collection costs
10,327

 
7,336

APT annual adjustment mechanism
4,973

 
7,171

Rate case costs
2,480

 
1,539

Other
9,949

 
13,565

 
$
216,832

 
$
263,623

Regulatory liabilities:
 
 
 
Regulatory cost of removal obligations
$
492,404

 
$
476,891

Deferred gas costs
16,753

 
20,180

Asset retirement obligations
13,404

 
13,404

Other
6,729

 
4,250

 
$
529,290

 
$
514,725


 
(1)
Includes $11.5 million and $12.4 million of pension and postretirement expense deferred pursuant to regulatory authorization.
(2)
Infrastructure mechanisms in Texas and Louisiana allow for the deferral of all eligible expenses associated with capital expenditures incurred pursuant to these rules, including the recording of interest on deferred expenses until the next rate proceeding (rate case or annual rate filing), at which time investment and costs would be recoverable through base rates.