10KSB/A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB/A

Amendment No. 1

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: November 30, 2007

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 000-12132

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.
(NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER IN ITS CHARTER)

British Columbia, Canada	98-0045034
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)
1111 West Georgia Street, Suite 1820,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada	V6E 4M3
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (800) 665-4646

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, no par value.

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, no par value	None

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]

State issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $0

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days: $58,663,794 as of February 21, 2008.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 926,270,430 common shares, no par value, outstanding as of February 21, 2008.

Documents Incorporated By Reference: None.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. is filing this Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 28, 2008, in order to restate the financial statements for the corresponding period and to address the comments of the SEC following the conclusion of its review of certain of the Company’s filings.

PART 1

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding our capital needs, business plans and expectations. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties regarding the market price of gold, availability of funds, government regulations, common share prices, operating costs, capital costs, outcomes of test mining activities and other factors. Forward-looking statements are made, without limitation, in relation to operating plans, property exploration activities, including test mining activities, availability of funds, environmental reclamation, operating costs and permit acquisition. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan”, “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” and the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors, including the risks outlined below, and, from time to time, in other reports we file with the SEC. These factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update these statements, or disclose any difference between its actual results and those reflected in these statements. The information constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

INTRODUCTION

Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. (“Silverado” or the “Company”) is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in the State of Alaska, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Silverado Gold Mines Inc., and in the development of a liquid fuel derived from low-rank coal through its other wholly-owned subsidiary, Silverado Green Fuel, Inc.

Silverado has committed over three decades of work to the exploration, development and test mining of gold properties throughout North America. In the mid-1980s, the Company decided to focus its efforts in Alaska. We have extensive experience in geological, geochemical and geophysical exploration techniques. Our mineral holdings are located in the Fairbanks Mining District and in the Koyukuk Mining District, consisting of both lode and placer mining claims. At the present time, our primary focus is the exploration and development of our Nolan Gold Project and our Hammond property located 175 miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska. We are also continuing with exploration activities on our Eagle Creek Property and our Ester Dome Project, which are both located in the Fairbanks Mining District.

Silverado has been working for seven years through its “Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel (Green Fuel)” division on the development of “Green Fuel”, a non-toxic liquid fuel product derived from sub-bituminous and lignite coal. In its finished form the fuel is a non-toxic, non-hazardous environmentally friendly strategic (liquid) fuel. Silverado is seeking financing to enable us to proceed with the construction of a commercial demonstration facility designed to document the combustion characteristics of Green Fuel. A successful demonstration project could lead to construction of a commercial production facility to manufacture the low-rank coal-water fuel as a replacement fuel for oil fired boilers and utility generators. In addition we look forward to our continued planning and progress designed to create a secondary fuel and other product facility designed to gasify and liquefy our green fuel to facilitate the creation of low cost rocket fuel, aviation fuel, gasoline, diesel fuel, synthetic natural gas, synthetic petrochemical feed–stocks, hydrogen for fuel cells, plastic, fertilizers, explosives, urea, ammonia CO2 for enhanced recovery in oil well production as well as a host of other products, all free of sulphur, heavy metals and particulate matter.

CORPORATE ORGANIZATION

Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. was incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada in June 1963. Silverado operates in the United States through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Silverado Gold Mines Inc., (incorporated May 29, 1981) and Silverado Green Fuel Inc. (incorporated August 14, 2006). We filed a transition application and notice of articles with the British Columbia Registrar of Companies on April 20, 2004 in order to replace our former memorandum adopted under the British Columbia Company Act and to alter our current articles to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with the British Columbia Business Corporations Act (the “BC Business Corporations Act”). The BC Business Corporations Act came into force in British Columbia on March 29, 2004 and replaced the former British Columbia Company Act. The transition notice and notice of articles was filed under the BC Business Corporations Act that requires any British Columbia company incorporated under the former British Columbia Company Act to effect transition under the BC Business Corporations Act by filing with the British Columbia Registrar of Companies a transition application and notice of articles within two years following the coming into force of the BC Business Corporations Act.

1

Our exploration activities are managed and conducted by affiliated companies, Tri-Con Mining Ltd. (“Tri-Con”) and Tri-Con Mining Inc., pursuant to written operating agreements. Each of Tri-Con, and Tri-Con Mining Inc. are privately-owned corporations controlled by Garry L. Anselmo, who is our president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and the chairman of our board of directors.

MINERAL EXPLORATION BUSINESS

We are an exploration stage company. All of our properties are presently in the exploration stage. We do not have any commercially viable reserves on any of our properties. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility of mining of any of our properties is determined. There is no assurance that further exploration will result in a final evaluation that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties.

We hold interests in the following four groups of mineral properties in Alaska:

1.	Nolan Gold Project;
2.	Ester Dome Gold properties;
3.	Hammond properties; and
4.	Eagle Creek properties.

A description of our operations with respect to each of these mineral properties is as follows:

1 Nolan Gold Project

The Nolan Gold Project consists of two areas of exploration and development. The Nolan Placer Gold project involves exploration and development of gold occurring in placer deposits such as stream channels or ancient remnants of placer gold deposits. The second part of the project is the Nolan Lode Gold Project. The lode gold project consists of exploration work designed to locate bedrock structures or formations of bedrock which host gold and antimony mineralization. The two facets of the Nolan Gold Project, complement each other, as every stone or pebble in a placer deposit is a piece of rock eroded from some near or distant bedrock formation, each gold nugget or grain of gold in a placer deposit was originally part of a bedrock formation or structure with lode gold mineralization. The search for a lode source is unraveling the sequences of events that caused a placer deposit to form. During 2007, we removed scrap materials and sealed the Swede Channel and Mary’s East portals as part of our reclamation obligations with the Bureau of Land Management. During 2008, we will continue to work on our reclamation obligations with the Bureau of Land Management.

1.1 Swede Channel and Mary’s East bulk sampling projects

The Swede Channel Placer Gold Deposit (“Swede Channel”) is a glacial drainage perched several hundred feet above the Nolan Creek Valley. During the ice age, a glacial event caused the Swede Gulch to rapidly erode a deep, narrow water channel across earlier gold bearing river gravel deposits. Erosion and transportation caused the gold bearing gravel to be re-concentrated due to removal of the lighter gangue minerals, while much of the heavier gold, along with boulders and coarse gravel common to a high energy drainage environment, was deposited to the Swede Channel. Subsequent post glacial uplift and erosion has established the present topography including the perched Swede Channel location on the westerly flank of Smith Dome, and overlain by up to 100 feet of overburden making it an unidentifiable surface topographic expression.

The Mary’s East Placer Gold Deposit (“Mary’s East”) is located a few hundred yards northeast of the Swede Channel and directly east of Mary’s Bench Placer Gold Deposit. Unlike the gold concentrations in the Swede Channel, the placer gold in Mary’s East is concentrated in landslide material that was deposited onto a bedrock shelf during the ice age.

There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties. Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility of mining of any of our properties is determined. There is no assurance that further exploration will result in a final evaluation that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties.

2

1.1.1 Swede Channel and Mary’s East 2007 Work

During the winter of 2006, Silverado re-opened the Swede portal and continued with its underground exploration and development program on the remaining sections of the Swede Channel until its completion by the middle of January 2007. A total of 8,963 loose cubic yards (“LCY”) of gravel material was stockpiled from the remaining Swede Channel.

In early January 2007, crews installed a portal into Mary’s East, and began an underground drift into the Mary’s East deposit. The Mary’s East project was completed at the end of March 2007 and 9,357 LCY of gravel material was stockpiled from this project.

The 2006-2007 winter stockpile contained 18,320 LCY (Swede Channel and Mary’s East combined) of gravel material, and was processed from June through July of 2007 at the existing sluice plant location, yielding 2,811.74 troy ounces of gold nugget gold and over 207 pounds of concentrate that contained gold particles smaller than ¼ inch in size. The fine concentrate yielded 915.06 troy ounces of gold (30% gold), which when combined with 2811.74 troy ounces of nugget gold recovered in 2007 totals 3726.80 troy ounces. Also, the fine concentrates yielded 65.10 troy ounces of silver or 2.15% silver.

The Swede channel and Mary’s East portals were both sealed after completion of the underground bulk sampling projects. Both sites were reclaimed in summer 2007 as required by the Bureau of Land Management.

1.2 Nolan Gold Project Exploration

1.2.1 Nolan Placer Gold Exploration

During March and April 2007, placer gold exploration focused on drilling along the left limit of Nolan Creek to explore both north and south of the Mary’s East and Swede Channel deposits. Further placer drilling was carried out within the area between the Mary’s East/Swede Channel Deposits and the Topnotch Prospect. A total of 130 drill holes were completed during that drilling program with a total drill footage of 6,005 feet. Out of the 130 drill holes, 54 show the presence of gold. 3 drill holes showed sample intervals with gold values above the cut-off grade of 0.04 troy ounces per bank cubic yard (toz/BYCD) determined for underground bulk sampling (see table below).

Drill Hole Number	From (ft)	To (ft)	Sample Length (ft)	Gold toz /BCYD
07MB34	20	25	5	0.05
07MB65	40	45	5	0.06
07MB66	40	45	5	0.30

The 2007 placer drilling program discovered an entirely new zone of placer gold which has been named Jack London Bench. Jack London Bench is located 200 feet north-east of and 50 feet above the Mary’s East Bench.

RC drilling is the principal exploration method used by Silverado in the identification of placer gold deposits. All placer drilling in 2007 was performed by a contractor using 6 inch diameter drill rods. Placer drill samples were collected in 5 foot intervals (industry standard).

1.2.2 Nolan Placer Gold Exploration 2008 Work Plan

The Company intends to carry out more placer drilling on Jack London Bench and other benches along the left limit of Nolan Creek in 2008. The drilling will be performed by a drill contractor. All of the targets are well above the elevation of Nolan Creek.

The Company also intends to carry out placer drilling in the Workman’s Bench area, located near the confluence of Smith and Nolan Creek. Workman’s Bench was mined on a small scale during 1999-2000.

Budget projections for this project are detailed under the section “Projected Annual Budget for 2008”. There is no assurance a commercially viable placer gold deposit will be developed as a result of this drilling.

1.3 Nolan Lode Gold Exploration

1.3.1 Nolan Lode Gold Exploration

During 2007, exploration for a lode gold and antimony deposit on the Company’s Nolan property focused on the Nolan Creek area within the Solomon Shear Zone and the Fortress area. The Solomon Shear Zone is a five mile long gold and antimony bearing shear zone, which is a possible source of placer gold in the Nolan valley drainages, and bench deposits such as Swede Channel, Mary’s East Bench, Mary’s Bench, Eureka Bench, and Workman’s Bench.

3

The 2007 lode exploration program consisted of extensive ground geochemical soil surveys and ground geophysical very low frequency electromagnetic (“VLF-EM”) surveys, extensive backhoe trenching and a first phase diamond core drilling program to follow up on the significant results achieved by backhoe trenching.

1.3.1.1 Nolan Creek Area

In May, June, and July, the Company undertook an extensive geochemical soil sampling campaign on the lower Smith Creek Dome hillside between Archibald Creek and Smith Creek (the “Hillside”), and south of Smith Creek in the lower western part of Midnight Dome. A total of 695 soil samples were collected during the campaign on a 196.85 x 98.43 foot grid. Assay results of the soil sampling campaign show a distinct arsenic and antimony anomalous trend on the eastern part of the Solomon Shear trend. Arsenic anomalies are strong indicators for the presence of gold.

Along with the soil sampling campaign, Silverado conducted an extensive VLF-EM ground geophysical survey (18.02 line miles) on the lower Smith Creek Dome hillside between Archibald Creek and Smith Creek, and south of Smith Creek in the lower western part of Midnight Dome, to identify structures such as shear zones, faults, and veins that occur within the bedrock. The VLF-EM survey identified structural trends in the Solomon Shear Zone that are overlain by arsenic, antimony, and gold in soil anomalies.

In June, July, and August, the Company undertook backhoe trenching on Pringle Bench and Workman’s Bench. This program was followed up by a first phase diamond core drilling program.

1.3.1.2 Pringle Bench

Pringle Bench represents an area 500 feet wide by 700 feet long and consists of a series of sub parallel gold bearing antimony-quartz veins.

In 2007, the Company followed up on the significant results achieved on Pringle Bench in 2006 and excavated six additional trenches, totaling 1296 feet, to further investigate the gold bearing antimony-quartz veins previously identified in 2006. A total of 153 combined continuous chip and select chip rock samples were collected. Continuous chip samples were collected over a defined length along the trench walls and, therefore, are representative for a specific trench interval. Continuous chip samples do contain sample material of mineralized veins if those occur within the sample interval. Select samples were collected from individual quartz and stibnite-quartz veins exposed in the trenches and, therefore, their assays represent the individual veins sampled.

The following table presents significant 2007 trench assay results for Pringle Bench:

Trench G
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
07G11	Continuous chip	16.40	0.01	4.31
07G17	Select chip	0.07	0.05	24.60
07G18	Select chip	0.07	0.08	0.15
07G19	Select chip	0.16	0.13	0.04

Trench H
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
07H02	Continuous chip	16.40	0.02	2.62
07H03	Continuous chip	16.40	5.22	8.74
07H06	Continuous chip	0.07	0.11	27.62
07H11	Select chip	0.03	0.12	0.03
07H12	Continuous chip	6.56	0.07	0.08
07H13	Select chip	0.03	0.36	0.80

Trench I
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
07I11	Continuous chip	8.20	0.00	1.11

4

07I12	Continuous chip	8.20	0.03	11.06
07I13	Select chip	3.28	0.03	18.22
07I14	Continuous chip	8.20	0.06	5.07
07I15	Select chip	1.97	0.23	26.23
07I19	Continuous chip	8.20	0.03	3.16
07I20	Select chip	1.31	0.04	30.03
07I23	Continuous chip	8.20	0.03	6.02
07I24	Select chip	5.91	0.03	30.35
07I28	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	0.88
07I29	Select chip	0.66	0.04	22.92
07I32	Continuous chip	8.20	0.04	0.51
07I33	Select chip	1.64	0.12	11.78
07I39	Continuous chip	8.20	0.03	1.76
07I45	Continuous chip	8.20	0.00	1.30
07I46	Select chip	0.16	0.05	5.90
07I58	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	2.78
07I59	Select chip	0.16	0.02	48.07
07I65	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	11.86
07I66	Select chip	0.26	0.01	59.52
07I72	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	3.87
07I73	Select chip	0.10	0.06	27.59
07I75	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	11.80
07I76	Select chip	0.13	0.01	64.76
07I78	Select chip	3.28	0.01	0.42

Trench K
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
07K05	Continuous chip	6.56	0.13	3.75
07K06	Select chip	0.33	0.28	11.74

Trench M
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
07M08	Continuous chip	6.56	0.03	13.87
07M09	Select chip	0.03	0.01	0.83
07M10	Select chip	0.33	0.05	45.09
07M11	Select chip	0.03	0.07	7.12
07M12	Select chip	0.16	0.13	32.79
07M13	Continuous chip	6.56	BDL	35.11
07M14	Select chip	0.07	0.01	5.34
07M15	Select chip	0.07	0.02	9.53
07M16	Select chip	0.07	0.03	9.33
07M17	Continuous chip	13.12	0.02	1.45
07M18	Select chip	0.03	0.07	4.48

It should be noted that Trench H revealed a 16.4 ft interval (sample number 07H03) with an erratic gold grade. The Company instructed ALS Chemex to re-assay the pulp of the specific sample which confirmed the previous gold value. The Company also decided to re-sample Trench H. Re-sampling did not reproduce the grades of the previous sampling campaign, but confirmed the presence of gold and antimony mineralization. The stibnite-quartz veins in the Nolan area are known to contain coarse gold which can result in a “nugget effect” when assayed.

Following up on the encouraging results achieved by backhoe trenching, the Company started a first phase drilling program at Pringle Bench at the end of August 2007 using its own diamond core drill rig. Eleven drill holes were drilled on Pringle Bench totaling 2,415 feet. The core drilling program was designed to check for down-dip continuity of the gold bearing antimony-quartz vein systems in the zones identified thus far. The core drilling confirmed the presence of stibnite (antimony) and quartz veins at varying depths.

5

As of November 30, 2007, assay results from the Pringle Bench drilling program were still pending. 1.3.1.3 Workman’s Bench Workman’s Bench is located near the confluence of Smith and Nolan Creek.

In July 2007, the Company excavated one trench in the old Workman’s Bench pit with a total length of 125 feet. This trench exposed the largest antimony veins discovered in the Nolan Creek area to that date. A total of 15 continuous chip samples were collected from Trench J.

The following table presents significant 2007 trench assay results for Workman’s Bench:

Trench J (Workman's Bench)
Sample Number	Sample Type	Sample Length (ft)	Au (toz/ton)	Sb (%)
0704WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.00	1.70
0710WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.00	30.30
0711WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.01	1.72
0712WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.04	11.70
0713WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.12	29.30
0714WT	Continuous chip	8.20	0.02	2.56
0715WT	Continuous chip	9.84	0.02	14.05

A first phase exploration drilling program on Workman’s Bench using the Company’s own diamond core drill rig started at the end of August 2007 and ended on October 23, 2007 due to weather conditions. Seven drill holes were drilled totaling 2,140 feet. This drilling program was designed to check for down-dip continuity of the gold bearing antimony-quartz veins previously discovered. Visual observation of the drill core had identified the presence of many antimony-quartz and quartz veins. The majority of these veins were found to be contained in an 80 foot wide zone.

At the end of November 2007, the Company started to drive a tunnel into the Workman’s Bench mineralized zone to intersect the 80 feet wide zone that contains the gold bearing antimony-quartz veins. The Company intends to collect a bulk sample from the mineralized zone for metallurgical test work. The underground exposure of the mineralized zone will play an important key role for the Company in obtaining a better understanding of the nature of the structurally controlled gold and antimony mineralization in the Solomon Shear Zone. This will significantly support Silverado’s exploration strategy.

1.3.1.4 Fortress Area

The Fortress area is located 2 miles northeast of Nolan camp and north of Smith Creek Dome. This area exposes several outcropping northwest striking quartz veins, some of which contain significant gold mineralization. The Company investigated the Fortress area in late summer 2007 and collected several quartz vein samples and confirmed anomalous gold concentrations in vein samples.

Based on the encouraging results, the Company conducted a VLF-EM ground geophysical survey (9.33 line miles) along with a ground geochemical soil survey over the central part of the Fortress area. A total of 290 soil samples were collected on a regular grid during the campaign. Interpretation of the VLF-EM survey data by the Company revealed two east-west trending fault zones that are overlain by arsenic and gold in soil anomalies. A combination of soil survey results, ground geophysical data, and surface geology suggest to Silverado that formation of northwest-trending gold-bearing quartz veins may be controlled by east-trending deformational zones.

The VLF-EM ground geophysical survey along with the ground geochemical soil survey conducted in the Fortress area, confirmed the presence of the gold-bearing antimony quartz vein system on the Saddle, as part of the Solomon Shear trend, in the southern part of the Fortress area. Interpretation of the VLF-EM survey data by the Company revealed two northeast trending deformation zones of which the southern deformation zone is overlain by antimony and arsenic in soil anomalies.

6

1.3.2 Nolan Lode Gold Exploration 2008 Work Plan

During 2008, lode exploration work will consist ground geochemical soil sampling, VLF-EM ground geophysical surveying, trenching and drilling in the five mile long gold and antimony mineralization containing Solomon Shear Zone and the gold mineralization containing Fortress area.

Hillside: A minimum of eight trenches will be excavated to expose the underlying bedrock in areas which have yielded encouraging results from geologic, geochemical and geophysical investigations. The trenches will be mapped and sampled in detail. This information will be integrated and useful in the selection targets for lode exploration drilling. Once trenching sample data has been analyzed and integrated with existing data, a series of drill holes will be drilled to identify bedrock structures and any associated mineralized bedrock formations. A minimum of 20 drill holes are planned for the hillside. Drilling will be performed with the company’s own diamond core drill rig.

Pringle Bench: A minimum of two trenches and minimum of 20 diamond core drill holes are planned for the Pringle Bench area to further investigate the gold bearing antimony-quartz vein systems in the three zones identified so far. Pringle Bench represents an area 500 feet wide by 700 feet long. Drilling will be performed with the company’s own diamond core drill rig.

Workman’s Bench: A minimum of 20 diamond core drill holes are planned for the Workman’s Bench area to further investigate the gold bearing antimony-quartz vein systems in the mineralized zone identified so far. It is further planned to continue tunneling into the Workman’s Bench mineralized zone to intersect the 80 foot wide zone that contains the gold bearing antimony-quartz veins. The Company intends to collect a bulk sample from the mineralized zone for metallurgical test work. The underground exposure of the mineralized zone will play an important key role for the Company in obtaining a better understanding of the nature of the structurally controlled gold and antimony mineralization in the Solomon Shear Zone. This will significantly support Silverado’s exploration strategy.

Fortress Area: More geochemical soil sampling along with a VLF-EM ground geophysical survey is planned for the Fortress area. The Company also plans to excavate a minimum of three trenches and plans to drill a minimum of 10 drill holes to investigate the two east-west trending fault zones that are overlain by strong arsenic and gold in soil anomalies, which are up to over 1,500 feet in length.

All primary sample preparation from both lode and placer mineral exploration programs at Nolan Creek was conducted by professional geologists employed by Silverado. All work completed on behalf of Silverado was completed by or under the supervision of a contractor of Silverado. Officers, directors, and associates of Silverado were not involved in sample preparation. Independent, off-site analytical laboratories completed additional sample preparation of samples from the lode-style deposits.

Analysis of placer samples is performed on-site by Silverado contractors. Analysis of lode-style deposit samples (core, percussion, trench, and underground channel) is performed by independent, off-site laboratories.

Sample Collection, Sample Preparation, and Analytical Procedures

Samples from placer deposits are analyzed in their entirety (i.e., no sub-sampling) to minimize potential bias from sub-sampling of material with such a large proportion of gold nuggets. The primary sample is processed through a gravity separation technique at the drill rig to separate gold nugget, fine gold, and heavy minerals from the host gangue material. A systematic procedure was developed by Tri-Con Mining geological staff for the collection and preparation of percussion drill hole samples. The sample is emitted from the drill and immediately submitted to a drill-mounted cyclone to dissipate the sample velocity, and then passed through a Jones™ splitter. The split sample is then processed through a Denver Gold Saver™. The oversize exits the revolving drum screen to a picking plate where +¼ inch nuggets are hand-picked. The – ¼ inch undersize reports to a Teflon lateral action sluice and the resultant heavy mineral concentrate is hand-panned. The gold in the concentrate is then picked with tweezers. The remaining fine heavy concentrate is treated with amalgamation and the resultant gold bead is weighed along with the hand-picked gold with a Champ™ electronic balance.

The Company judges that the combined weight of the hand-picked gold and the fine gold represents most of the gold in the sampled interval. Since there will always be some loss of gold during this analytical procedure, the gold grade in the sample is not likely to be overstated.

Silverado conducted volume measurements of samples collected during 2003 and 2004 drilling programs. Results of these measurements showed that a 5 foot sample from the Nolan Deep Channel averaged 14.80 gallons, whereas a 5 foot sample from the Mary’s East Bench deposit averaged 19.20 gallons. The Nolan Deep Channel deposits contain significant amounts of silt, sand, and clay, whereas the left limit bench deposits such as those at Mary’s East are much coarser grained. Determination of volumetric measurements results in a more accurate estimate of gold grade in the placer deposit. Hence, each placer deposit has been volume-characterized by Silverado contractors during exploration.

Sample grades for placer deposits are expressed as gold content per bank volume of material where bank volume is the in situ volume of material. To calculate the bank volume the sample volume must be factored using a predefined swell factor that quantifies how much the volume of the sample increases as a result of extraction. The weight of the gold extracted from the sample (the method of recovery which was described previously) is divided by the bank volume of the sample to determine the grade of the sample expressed in oz/cu yd Au.

7

Two methods are traditionally used by Silverado to estimate gold grades in a placer resource. One method is to calculate the amount of gold present in a bank cubic yard or ounces gold/cubic yard. When all of the values are on or near the bedrock-gravel interface, an alternative method of estimating gold quantities in a placer deposit is the amount of gold present on one square foot of surface area on bedrock, known as a bedrock square foot or ‘bsf’. Since most of the placer gold in the Nolan Deep Channel and in left limit benches are ‘bedrock placers’, some Silverado geologists have expressed gold values in exploration drill programs in ‘bsf’. This value varies with the thickness of auriferous materials both above and below the bedrock-gravel interface. Silverado has established conversion factors for converting ounces gold/bsf to ounces gold/cubic yard, which systematically varied from valley floor and bench deposits. All drill hole grade data is expressed in ounces gold per cubic yard. Sample recovery calculations have been implemented by Silverado geological staff.

The bsf method was used by the “old time miners” on the property as the steep bedrock terrain created extreme variables in vertical pay sections laying on bedrock, varying from one to fifteen feet thick. Therefore, cubic yard measurements could be misleading in estimating and measuring a deposit. Measuring deposits in valley bottoms or large bench areas allowed accurate calculations for those areas using the volumetric (i.e., bcy) method.

Diamond core samples are split in half on-site by Silverado personnel using a core saw. Half of the core is submitted to external laboratories for analysis and half is retained on site. Samples from RC drilling are split with a splitter and surface samples are split by contracted laboratory personnel.

ALS Chemex of Vancouver, Canada, an ISO 9001:2000 accredited laboratory, has analyzed most of the Silverado sample stream from lode-style deposits. More recently, Alaska Assay Laboratories LLC of Fairbanks, Alaska, an ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17035:2005 accredited laboratory, has been used by Silverado for analytical work. Both laboratories produce a coarse split from which a finely ground material to 150 mesh is analyzed. The pulverized material and the coarse reject are stored by the laboratories for possible re-analysis.

Trench and drill core samples submitted to ALS Chemex are analyzed by the following methods: ME-MS41 (41 multi element), Au-AA23 (fire assay gold to 5 ppb level), and Sb-AA65 (> 1% antimony or referred to as ‘ore grade’ antimony). Soil samples shipped to ALS Chemex are analyzed for the same packages with the exception of the ore grade antimony or Sb-AA65.

Samples submitted to Alaska Assay Laboratories LLC were analyzed using the following methods: Au-30 element (multi-element), fire assay AA for gold and silver, and ICP-4A (ore-grade antimony). The packages from each laboratory are roughly comparable in both elemental suite and analytical methods.

Quality Control and Quality Assurance

Quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) is routinely performed by Silverado exploration contractors. Standards have been obtained from Shea Clark Smith, a geochemist based in Tucson, Arizona that supplies standards for mining companies. For core intervals intersecting vein zones, two standards and one blank are randomly inserted in batches of twenty (20) sample intervals. One standard contains 0.174 oz/ton gold. The other standard contains 0.261 oz/ton gold. For core penetrating mainly wall rock zones, one standard and one blank are randomly inserted into batches of twenty (20) samples, with the standard used containing 0.174 oz/ton gold.

Core recovery is checked in every box coming off the drill rig. During 2008, Silverado's geological contractors have reported that core recovery is averaging 95% since the exploration drilling switched to NQ core. Silverado contractors have competently prepared samples analysis and dispatch to external laboratories.

Sample security is maintained by geological contractors. Samples are stored in a secure trailer at Nolan Camp. Individual samples are composited into larger rice bags and sealed with plastic tape. Samples are then transported by contractors to the ALS Chemex preparation laboratory in Fairbanks, Alaska.

The analytical package selected from external assay laboratories reflects the need to: obtain precise antimony and gold values, obtain information on trace metals such as bismuth, lead, arsenic, cadmium, and selenium, and to seek to understand background levels of other elements for environmental monitoring reasons. Because Silverado is evaluating the lode resources of the area for potential development, it is useful for Silverado to take a broad look at the elemental suite present in the affected environment in order to better design an environmental monitoring program. Data from Workman’s Bench shows Ca values as high as 17.50 percent. This may indicate a high CaCO3 content of some sample intervals.

8

In addition, marketability issues are being addressed. Some metals are considered to be deleterious in antimony purchases. For example, most antimony smelters will not accept material that exceeds 0.5% combined lead and arsenic. Smaller amounts of selenium and bismuth also pose potential limitations and may invoke smelter penalties. Hence a broader suite of elemental information has been acquired during the exploration of what is basically an antimony-gold-arsenic system.

Budget projections for this project are detailed under the section “Projected Annual Budget for 2008”.

There is no assurance that a commercially viable lode gold bearing mineral deposit exists on the Nolan Gold Project. Further exploration will be required before sufficient information is available to determine the presence of a lode gold deposit at Nolan. Even if a lode gold occurrence exists on the property, there is no assurance that it would be economically feasible as an ore deposit.

2 Ester Dome Property

2.1 Ester Dome Property 2007 Work

The properties comprising our Ester Dome gold project are discussed in detail under the heading Description of Properties in this annual report. In recent years, all exploration trenches were backfilled, stabilized, and seeded to resist surface erosion. Annual assessment work for 2008 was completed and all claim rental payments were made to maintain the property in good standing. Fairbanks North Star Borough 2007 taxes were paid on the mill facility and mine facilities in the sum of $8,535.42.

2.2 Ester Dome Property 2008 Work Plan

During 2008, we plan to continue work toward completion of the closure of the Grant Mill Tailings Pond. This pond, which is filled to capacity with tailings, will be capped and decommissioned after a final approval of the tailings pond closure plan is received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (“ADEC”). We also plan to continue reclamation work on our Ester Dome holdings during 2008.

Several large-scale projects have been proposed over the past ten years, but shelved either as a result of poor market conditions or due to internal decisions to favor shifting financial and manpower resources to the Nolan Project. One project that remains under consideration is environmentally friendly bio-degradable urea heap leaching of crushed and agglomerated gold ore after coarse gold has been recovered from the crushed ore by conventional gravity and water methods. A second project that continues under study involves mining of the O'Dea structure by underground methods. All past mining stopped at the 200 foot level of the workings, which is just above the water table. Close spaced diamond drilling between the 200 foot and 1,000 foot levels prove the existence of several significant high grade ore shoots within the O’Dea breccia zone.

3 Hammond Property

3.1 Hammond Property 2007 Work

The placer claims comprising our Hammond property are discussed in detail under the heading Description of Properties in this annual report. During 2007, rental payments were made to keep the mining claims in good standing.

3.2 Hammond Property 2008 Work Plan

RC placer drilling in 1995 and 2006 identified a channel containing placer gold that extends for a length of over 1,800 feet. The channel, named the Slisco Channel, remains open to the southeast and there is evidence of one or more tributary channels that remain to be explored in the near future. Within the Slisco Channel, the placer gold occurs on bedrock and on a second horizon about 20 feet above the bedrock channel.

The higher placer gold values in both pay layers are located within the left limit of the Slisco Channel. In addition to the encouraging drill results to date, the potential of extending the channel to the southeast plus the possibility of discovering gold bearing tributary channels, make this a prospect for additional discoveries. During the summer of 2008, a series of drill holes will be completed to explore for the extension of the Slisco Channel to the south. Presently, it has been traced for 1,800 feet. The drill program will also seek to define any gold bearing tributaries to the Slisco Channel.

This project may require the Company to secure additional funding. Even if funding is acquired, there is no guarantee that a commercial gold bearing placer deposit will be developed. Even if a gold bearing deposit is developed, additional funding will be required to mine the deposit, and until a feasibility study is completed, there is no guarantee that the deposit will be profitable to mine.

9

4 Eagle Creek Property

The properties comprising our Eagle Creek property are discussed in detail under the heading Description of Properties in this annual report. During 2007, annual assessment work was completed on the property, and rental payments were made to keep the mining claims in good standing.

4.1 Eagle Creek Property 2008 Work Plan

During 2008, annual assessment work will be completed on the property to keep the mining claims in good standing. Assessment work will be focused on the northwest part of the claim block, where drilling and trenching has defined an intrusive host rock, thought to be a sill, containing low grade gold, silver and antimony mineralization. If funding permits, the company will design a trenching and drilling program to further investigate the gold and byproduct mineral distribution of the intrusive. Additional work which includes trenching and drilling will also be completed on the Number One Vein. The Number One Vein was the lode quartz gold structure which has been mined commercially for antimony. The drilling will be performed by a drill contractor.

Completing the 2008 work plan will be contingent on available funding. Even if funding becomes available, there is no assurance that a commercial gold-silver-antimony deposit will be defined. A commercially viable economic mineral deposit has not been defined on the property, and there is no assurance that a commercially viable economic mineral deposit exists on the property.

2008 Exploration Budget

Projected Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2008

Nolan Gold Project

Drilling and Exploration Program - Nolan Gold Project	$	3,000,000
Underground mining Program - Nolan Gold Project		2,000,000
Total Costs for the Nolan Gold Project		5,000,000
Total Costs for the Eagle Creek Project		500,000
Total Costs for the Ester Dome Project		500,000
Total Costs for the Hammond Project		50,000
Administration – All Projects		500,000
Total Budget All Projects	$	6,550,000

Completion of all of the projects described in the 2008 work plan may be contingent on additional funding. There is no assurance that additional funding, if required, will be obtained. Even if the additional funding is obtained, there is no assurance that a commercial ore deposit will be developed. Revenues from any anticipated gold sales may be insufficient to cover the costs of the gold recovery.

LOW-RANK COAL-WATER FUEL BUSINESS

We commenced development of a low-rank coal-water fuel business in 2000. Our determination to enter into this business was based on a decision to broaden our business beyond mineral exploration and production. This aspect of our business is still in the start-up phase of operations and no revenues have been achieved to date. We do not anticipate that revenues from this technology will be achieved until commercialization of the technology has been established.

We entered the fuel sector in 2000 by forming a new Fuel Technology division which operates out of Fairbanks, Alaska. This division of the business is operated by our wholly owned subsidiary, Silverado Green Fuel Inc., under the supervision of Dr. Warrack Willson, Vice-President of Fuel Technology. The fuel product is called low-rank coal-water fuel (LRCWF or Green Fuel), which is a low-cost, non-toxic, non-hazardous alternative to oil fuels used in commercial boilers for the production of electricity and industrial heat. As a liquid fuel Green Fuel enjoys all the benefits of liquid handling and storage, Green Fuel allows coal to be used sight unseen and is made from coal, America’s most abundant fossil energy resource. This fuel is produced by the fine grinding of low-rank coal, and subsequent hydrothermal treatment of the finely ground coal particles. Hydrothermal treatment (HT) is an advanced technology, featuring moderate temperature/pressure, non-evaporative treatment or hot water drying, which irreversibly removes most of the inherent moisture from low-rank coal and allows the formulation of commercially viable LRCWFs. HT is similar in many respects to pressure cooking, and the product retains all of the desirable combustion characteristics of low-rank coal. When Green Fuel is injected into a boiler, the particles ignite and burn rapidly, which leads to little or no boiler de-rating when substituted for oil. We believe that demand for the Green Fuel and its production and utilization technology exists because of the high cost of oil and the desire for economical alternatives to oil that are environmentally friendly.

10

On December 18, 2006, Silverado Green Fuel Inc. announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Choctaw County, the Choctaw County Economic Development District, the Mississippi Development Authority (“MDA”) and Silverado Green Fuel Inc. The MOU is an agreement to build the country’s first Low-Rank Coal-Water fuel commercial demonstration plant at the Red Hills Ecoplex just outside of Ackerman, MS. It is anticipated that the $26 million Silverado Green Fuel Demonstration Project will be located on a 14-acre site, and is being designed to utilize the state's vast supply of low-rank coal reserves by converting them into green fuel, a new form of coal-based, environmentally friendly, low-cost, alternative fuel.

Under the terms of the MOU, Choctaw County Economic Development District will provide Silverado Green Fuel Inc. a 14 acre site at the Ecoplex. Choctaw County will clear the site in preparation for construction. The County has also agreed to construct the plant facility building based on Silverado’s specifications. The MDA will provide for the infrastructure through a series of grants. Silverado Green Fuel Inc. will provide the proprietary technology developed by Dr. Warrack Willson. Silverado will run the facility, which is expected to produce hundreds of jobs during the construction phase and 45 permanent jobs.

During late May of 2007, Silverado environmental staff met in a “pre-permitting” meeting with representatives of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”). At that meeting all the various sections of MDEQ that would be involved in the permitting of the Green Fuel industrial process were present, representatives of these sections were assigned to our project, and the lead MDEQ regulator that will serve as our point-of-contact was designated.

As we await full funding of the project, preliminary work on aspects of the various permits involved will continue during fiscal 2008. The development of an Environmental Management System (“EMS”) that was initiated in 2007 upon the signing of the MOU will also continue during fiscal 2008. Silverado has also agreed to fund a study by the University of Alaska Fairbanks of the chemical and physical characteristics of Mississippi lignite coal, and it is anticipated that that study will commence during fiscal 2008.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Silverado and its subsidiaries collectively own (or partially own), lease, and/or hold purchase options on numerous federal and state placer and lode mining claims on the Nolan, Slisco, Eagle, and Ester properties, all of which are located in Alaska. These 801 total claims consist of: (i) 672 federal mining claims, comprised of 228 federal placer claims and 444 federal lode claims, and (ii) 129 state mining claims (the state of Alaska does not distinguish between placer and lode rights within each state mining claim).

The Company’s interests with respect to each specific property are currently as follows:

º      Nolan - Silverado is the sole owner of 204 federal placer mining claims and 407 federal lode mining claims.

º      Slisco – Silverado leases 24 federal placer mining claims and 36 federal lode mining claims from Alaska Mining Company, Inc.

º      Eagle – Silverado has an equal (50%) ownership interest in 77 state mining claims with Kathleen King.

º      Ester – Silverado is party to an agreement for the conditional purchase of 22 state mining claims from Paul I. Barelka, Donald J. May, and Mark Thoennes; Silverado leases 1 federal lode mining claim and 4 state mining claims from Gilbert Dobbs; and Silverado is party to an agreement for the conditional purchase of 26 state mining claims from Roger C. Burggraf.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 are copies of various recorded documents relating to the 801 total claims, including Evidence of Maintenance Fees Paid For Federal Mining Claims, Affidavits of Annual Labor for Mining, and State Claim Rental Receipts, which collectively contain claim ownership information such as BLM serial numbers, claim names, state serial numbers, and legal descriptions.

The following is a brief description, in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of Industry Guide 7, of the title, claim, lease, and/or option instruments under which Silverado and its subsidiaries have or will have the right to hold or operate its properties, the conditions which must be met in order to obtain or retain such properties, and the expiration dates of any leases or options, as well as certain other material terms:

Lease Of Mining Claims With Option To Purchase - The Slisco Property

Pursuant to that certain Lease Of Mining Claims With Option To Purchase, effective December 14, 1994, as amended on July 5, 1996 and on August 21, 1996 (the “Lease”), Silverado leased certain unpatented placer mining claims and lode mining claims recorded in Fairbanks, Alaska (collectively, “Claims”), and obtained an option to purchase such Claims, from Alaska Mining Company, Inc. (“ALMINCO”).

11

The Lease had an initial term of five years, but has been extended on a year-to-year basis on the same terms and will be in good standing for as long as the covenants in the Lease remain satisfied.

Silverado materially covenanted to (i) perform certain work and make certain expenditures on the Claims; (ii) obtain all licenses, permits, and bonds required by law; (iii) timely complete all required annual assessment work required for the Claims; (iv) pay the rents due to the United States on the Claims each year; (v) maintain adequate workers compensation insurance; (vi) indemnify ALMINCO for all losses and injuries not due to its own negligence; (vii) carry public liability insurance of at least $500,000 and name ALMINCO as an additional insured; (viii) indemnify ALMINCO for any liabilities or fines assessed by local, state, or federal governmental agencies that result from Silverado’s operations, actions, or omissions; (ix) refrain from pledging the Lease as security for any debt or to allow any liens to remain effective against the Lease or the Claims; and (x) refrain from assigning the Lease for the benefit of creditors or to seek protection from creditors under applicable bankruptcy laws.

The Lease obliges Silverado to make royalty payments equal to 10% of gross production from certain of the Claims each year, as well as minimum royalty payments of $20,000 on the first anniversary of the Lease, $40,000 on the second anniversary, and $80,000 on each of the third and subsequent anniversaries of the Lease.

During the initial term, Silverado had an option to purchase the placer claims for $500,000 less royalty payments and an option to purchase the lode claims for $300,000, each subject to applicable price adjustments. Silverado has an option to purchase certain additional lode claims for $5,000,000.

Under the Lease, Silverado may cure any default relating to required royalty payments within thirty (30) days following notice of such default from ALMINCO, after which time ALMINCO may terminate the Lease if such default has not been cured. ALMINCO may not terminate the Lease for any other default for so long as Silverado is diligently attempting to cure such default.

Lease and Purchase Agreement (King) - The Eagle Property

Silverado has an equal (50%) ownership interest in 77 state mining claims with Kathleen King (“King”). Silverado will acquire a full (100%) ownership interest in such state mining claims upon the payment of an additional $48,000 to King in installments of $5,000 per year.

Agreement For Conditional Purchase And Sale Of Mining Property (May et. al.) - The Ester Property

Silverado is party to an Agreement For Conditional Purchase And Sale Of Mining Property (the “1979 Agreement”), dated May 12, 1979, with Donald J. May, Paul I. Barelka, and Mark Thoennes (collectively, the “Sellers”) pursuant to which Silverado agreed to conditionally purchase certain unpatented lode mining claims located in Fairbanks, Alaska (the “1979 Claims”), including all other then-owned and after-acquired mining claims or interests in mining claims within one mile of any portion of the 1979 Claims, from the Sellers.

The term of the 1979 Agreement commenced on the date Silverado took possession of the 1979 Claims and will expire upon the earlier of (i) the purchase price therefor being paid in full, or (ii) a default remaining uncured for more than sixty (60) days after the date of the written notice of such default.

Title to the 1979 Claims will vest in Silverado upon its payment in full of the purchase price of $2,000,000. The purchase price is payable at 15% of net profits (as such term is defined in the 1979 Agreement) per year, adjusted for inflation, calculated on a quarterly basis, and payable within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar quarter. Upon full payoff of the purchase price, the Sellers will be entitled to a royalty payment in the form of a carried interest of 3% of net profits from Silverado’s operations until production on the 1979 Claims is permanently terminated.

Under the 1979 Agreement, Silverado also covenanted to: (i) perform annual assessment work beginning with the assessment year ending September 1, 1980; (ii) refrain from permitting any liens or levies to be placed against the 1979 Claims, and timely pay any taxes imposed on the 1979 Claims, each until such time title is conveyed to Silverado; (iii) indemnify the Sellers from any claims arising from Silverado’s operations and conditions on the 1979 Claims arising after the date of possession; and (iv) obtain and maintain adequate insurance.

In the event of default, the Sellers must provide written notice to cure to Silverado. If Silverado fails to cure such default within sixty (60) days after the date of such notice, the non-defaulting party’s remedy is to arbitrate the issue in accordance with the terms of the 1979 Agreement.

Exploration And Mining Lease - The Ester Property

Silverado and Gilbert Dobbs (“Dobbs”) entered into an Exploration And Mining Lease (“Dobbs Lease”), dated November 6, 1984, as amended on August 4, 1996, pursuant to which Silverado leased from Dobbs three federal lode mining claims in Fairbanks, Alaska known as the Moose Claim (BLM F061722), the Rosie Claim (BLM F061724), and the Brandy Claim (BLM F061725) (collectively, the “Dobbs Claims”), and all exploration, mining, and water rights associated therewith.

12

The Dobbs Lease had an initial term of ten (10) years, with automatic renewals for additional five (5) year terms to take effect beginning on November 6, 1999 and every fifth year thereafter if, at the commencement of each renewal period, the Dobbs Lease remains in good standing and Silverado pays US $10,000 to Dobbs.

In order for the Dobbs Lease to remain in good standing and for each renewal to take effect, Silverado must make royalty payments equal to 15% of the net profits (as such term is defined in the Dobbs Lease) derived from its operations on the Dobbs Claims. Such payments are due within sixty (60) days after the end of each calendar quarter. Once Silverado has paid $1,500,000 in aggregate royalty payments to Dobbs, subsequent royalty payments will be reduced to 3% of net profits derived from operations on the Dobbs Claims.

Furthermore, Silverado must (i) perform annual assessment work beginning with the assessment year ending September 1, 1985; (ii) expend at least $1,500 per year on the Dobbs Claims until the $1,500,000 threshold is met (with such expenditures to be credited toward meeting such threshold); (iii) refrain from permitting any liens or levies to be placed against the Dobbs Claims, and timely pay any taxes imposed on the Dobbs Claims; (iv) indemnify Dobbs from any claims arising from Silverado’s operations and conditions on the Dobbs Claims arising after the date of possession; and (v) obtain and maintain adequate insurance.

In the event of default, the non-defaulting party must provide written notice to cure to the defaulting party. If the defaulting party fails to cure such default within sixty (60) days after the date of such notice, the non-defaulting party’s remedy is to arbitrate the issue in accordance with the terms of the Dobbs Lease.

Agreement For Conditional Purchase And Sale Of Mining Property (Burggraf) - The Ester Property

Silverado is party to an Agreement For Conditional Purchase And Sale Of Mining Property (the “1978 Agreement”), dated October 6, 1978, with Roger C. Burggraf (“Burggraf”) pursuant to which Silverado agreed to conditionally purchase six unpatented lode mining claims located in Fairbanks, Alaska (the “1978 Claims”), including all other subsequently located or acquired claims and interests in mining property within two miles of any portion of the 1978 Claims, from Burggraf. The 1978 Claims are identified as: Irishman No.1, Roosevelt, Banjo, O’Dea, White Rock Lode, and D. and Z.

The term of the 1978 Agreement commenced on the date Silverado took possession of the 1978 Claims and will continue until the earlier of (i) the purchase price therefor being paid in full, (ii) a default by Silverado remaining uncured for more than sixty (60) days after the date of the written notice of such default, or (iii) Silverado providing sixty (60) days notice of termination to Burggraf.

Title to the 1978 Claims will vest in Silverado upon its payment in full of the purchase price of $2,000,000. The purchase price is payable at 15% of net profits (as such term is defined in the 1978 Agreement) per year, calculated on a quarterly basis, and payable within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar quarter. The 1978 Agreement also called for Silverado to issue an aggregate of 100,000 shares of its common stock to Burggraf over the course of four (4) years from the date thereof. Once Silverado pays the purchase price in full to Burggraf, it will be obligated to make royalty payments equal to 3% of net profits derived from its operations on the 1978 Claims until production is terminated. Furthermore, if any agreement is reached with a third party concerning properties owned by such third party within two miles of any portion of the 1978 Claims, Burggraf will be entitled to royalty payments equal to 2% of net profits derived from Silverado’s operations on the 1978 Claims Silverado is also obligated to (i) perform annual assessment work beginning with the assessment year ending September 1, 1979; (ii) expend up to $15,000 per year on the 1978 Claims until the $2,000,000 purchase price is paid (with such expenditures to be credited toward Silverado’s payment of the purchase price); (iii) refrain from permitting any liens or levies to be placed against the 1978 Claims, and timely pay any taxes imposed thereon; (iv) indemnify Burggraf from any claims arising from Silverado’s operations and conditions on the 1978 Claims arising after the date of possession; and (v) obtain and maintain adequate insurance.

In the event of default, the non-defaulting party must provide written notice to cure to the defaulting party. If the defaulting party fails to cure such default within sixty (60) days after the date of such notice, the non-defaulting party’s remedy is to arbitrate the issue in accordance with the terms of the 1978 Agreement.

The maximum size of a federal placer mining claim is 20 acres, and the maximum size of a federal lode mining claim is 20.7 acres. The maximum size of a state of Alaska mining claim is 40 acres. Given the occasional necessity of forming "fractional" mining claims to infill between properties or to account for staking or survey errors, and using these maximum sizes, we estimate that Silverado either owns or leases a total of approximately 8,400 acres of federal lode claims, 4,050 acres of federal placer claims, and 5,125 acres of state mining claims.

COMPETITION

We are a mineral resource exploration company. We compete with other mineral resource exploration companies for financing and for the acquisition of new mineral properties. Many of the mineral resource exploration companies with whom we compete have greater financial and technical resources than those available to us. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, on exploration of their mineral properties and on development of their mineral properties. In addition, they may be able to afford more geological expertise in the targeting and exploration of mineral properties. This competition could result in competitors having mineral properties of greater quality and interest to prospective investors who may finance additional exploration. This competition could adversely impact on our ability to finance further exploration and to achieve the financing necessary for us to develop our mineral properties.

13

EMPLOYEES

We do not have any employees. Our operating and administrative activities are carried out through our agreement with the Tri-Con Mining Group.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES

We have spent the following amounts on research and development activities during the past two fiscal years:

		December 1, 2006		December 1, 2005
		to November 30, 2007		to November 30, 2006
Research and Development
Expenditures:	$	34,313	$	129,698

Research and development activities were primarily attributable to the pursuit of the development of our Green Fuel business. During 2004 and 2005, the majority of the research and development costs attributable to the low-rank coal-water fuel technology related to further technical work on the fuel creation temperature and the preparation of a United States grant application.

ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES

Our headquarters are located in, and our officers and directors are residents of, Canada. Further, some of our assets are, or may be, located outside the United States. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States on us or our officers and directors, or to enforce against them judgments obtained in United States courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws. There is also uncertainty as to both an investor’s ability to enforce, in an appropriate foreign court, judgments of United States courts based upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws, and an investor’s ability to bring an original action in an appropriate foreign court to enforce liabilities against us or any person based upon the United States federal securities laws. If investors have questions with respect to these issues, they should seek the advice of their legal counsel.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We face risks in completing our exploration plans and achieving revenues. The following risks are material risks that we face. If any of these risks occur, our business, our ability to achieve revenues, our ability to produce gold, our operating results and our financial condition could be seriously harmed.

If we do not obtain new financings, the amount of funds available to us to pursue exploration activities at the Nolan Gold Project and to pursue further exploration of our mineral properties will be reduced.

We have relied on recent private placement financings in order to fund exploration of the Nolan Gold Project. We will continue to require additional financing to complete our plan of operations for exploration work at the Nolan Gold Project and to carry out our exploration programs on our other mineral properties. While our financing requirements may be reduced through gold recoveries, any impairment in our ability to raise additional funds through financings would reduce the available funds for the exploration of the Nolan Gold Project, including additional test mining activities, with the result that our plan of operations may be adversely affected and potential recoveries reduced or delayed.

As we have not reported revenues in our last three fiscal years there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve the financing necessary to enable us to proceed with our exploration activities, including test mining activities.

We had working capital of $1,759,774 as of November 30, 2007. We did not report revenues in our last three fiscal years ended November 30, 2007, 2006 or 2005. Our plan of operations calls for expenditures of a minimum of $6,550,000 to be incurred by us over the next twelve months in order to continue our mining exploration activities at the Nolan Gold, Ester Dome, Eagle Creek and Hammond Projects. While we will apply proceeds from gold sales generated from our test mining activities to cover our exploration expenditures, we anticipate that proceeds from gold sales over the next twelve months may not exceed our projected expenditures during this period with the result that we will require substantial financing in order for us to pursue our plan of operations. If we do not achieve the necessary financing, then we will not be able to proceed with our planned exploration activities, including our planned test mining activities, and our financial condition, business prospects and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

14

As we have not established that there are any commercially viable mineral deposits on our Nolan property and we have not established commercially viable operations on the Nolan Gold Project, there is no assurance that any amounts we recover from test mining activities on the Nolan Gold Project will exceed the costs of recovering this gold.

Our activities at the Nolan Gold Project are in the exploration stage. While we have undertaken test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project as part of our exploration programs, we have not yet established a commercially viable operation on our Nolan Gold Project. Further, we have historically attempted to mine the placer gold deposits at the Nolan Gold Project without obtaining sufficient drilling and sampling information to meet data density standards commonly used by commercial-sized placer mining companies. We may continue with test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project without establishing that the placer deposits contain commercially viable mineral deposits. As we may proceed with these activities without first establishing that the placer deposits contain commercially viable mineral deposits, there is no assurance that we will recover quantities of gold that will enable us to achieve sales of gold that will exceed our costs of recovering the gold. In this event, our costs of exploration will exceed any amount recovered from test mining activities that we carry out as part of our exploration program on the Nolan Gold Project.

If we are unable to achieve projected gold recoveries from our test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project, then our financial condition will be adversely affected and we will have less cash with which to pursue our operations.

We plan to undertake test mining activities as part of our exploration program for the Nolan Gold Project. Our objective is to recover gold from test mining activities to offset the exploration cost of our test mining activities. As we have not established any reserves on this property, there is no assurance that actual recoveries of gold from material mined during test mining activities will equal or exceed our exploration costs. If gold recoveries are less than projected, then our gold sales will be less than anticipated and may not equal or exceed the cost of exploration and recovery in which case our operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected.

If the price of gold declines, our financial condition and ability to obtain future financings will be impaired.

Our business is extremely dependent on the price of gold. Our recoveries from sales of gold for the current fiscal year are dependent on the price of gold in addition to the quantity of gold that we are able to recover. If gold prices decline prior to the recovery and sale of gold from the Nolan Gold Project, then our recoveries from sales of gold and financial condition will be adversely impacted. We have not undertaken any hedging transactions in order to protect us from a decline in the price of gold. A decline in the price of gold may also decrease our ability to obtain future financings to fund our planned exploration programs activities.

The price of gold is affected by numerous factors, all of which are beyond our control. Factors that tend to cause the price of gold to decrease include the following:

(a)	Sales or leasing of gold by governments and central banks;
(b)	A low rate of inflation and a strong US dollar;
(c)	Speculative trading;
(d)	Decreased demand for gold’s industrial, jewellery and investment uses;
(e)	High supply of gold from production, disinvestment, scrap and hedging;
(f)	Sales by gold producers and foreign transactions and other hedging transactions;
(g)	Devaluing local currencies (relative to gold price in US dollars) leading to lower production costs and higher production in certain major gold producing regions.

If costs of gold recovery at our Nolan Gold Project are higher than anticipated, then our financial condition and ability to pursue additional exploration will be adversely affected.

We have proceeded with test mining activities on the Nolan Gold Project on the basis of estimated capital and operating costs. If capital and operating costs are greater than anticipated, then cash used in test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project will be greater than anticipated. Increased cash used in test mining activities will cause us to have less funds for other expenses, such as administrative and overhead expenses and exploration of our other mineral properties and further test mining activities on the Nolan Gold Project. In this event, our financial condition will be adversely affected and will have fewer funds with which to pursue our exploration programs.

15

If our exploration costs are higher than anticipated, then our financial condition and ability to pursue additional exploration will be adversely affected.

We are currently proceeding with exploration of our mineral properties on the basis of estimated exploration costs. This exploration program includes drilling programs at various locations within the Nolan Gold Project. If our exploration costs are greater than anticipated, then we will have fewer funds for our exploration activities, including test mining activities that we plan to carry out at our Nolan Gold Project, and for our general and administrative expenses. In this event, our financial condition will be adversely affected, our losses will increase and we will have fewer funds with which to pursue our exploration programs. Factors that could cause exploration costs to increase include adverse weather conditions, difficult terrain and shortages of qualified personnel.

Exploration activities, including test mining and operating activities are inherently hazardous.

Mineral exploration activities, including test mining activities, involve many risks that even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome.

Operations that we undertake will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration, test mining and recovery of gold and other metals, any of which could result in work stoppages, damage to property and possible environmental damage. The nature of these risks are such that liabilities might result in us being forced to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and business prospects.

There is no assurance that any of our mineral resources will ever be classified as reserves under the disclosure standards of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This annual report discusses our mineral resources in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101, as discussed under the section of this annual report entitled “Description of Properties”. Resources are classified as “measured resources”, indicated resources” and “inferred resources” under NI 43-101. However, U.S. investors are cautioned that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these resource classifications. There is no assurance that any of our mineral resources will be converted into reserves under the disclosure standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Further, “‘inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an “inferred resource” exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

If we experience exploration accidents or other adverse events at our Nolan Gold Project, then our financial condition and profitability could be adversely affected.

Our exploration activities, including test mining activities, at the Nolan Gold Project are subject to adverse operating conditions. Exploration accidents or other adverse incidents, such as cave-ins or flooding, could affect our ability to continue test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project. A particular concern at the Nolan Gold Project is warm temperatures that can reduce the winter season during which we can safely conduct underground test mining activities. The occurrence of any of these events could cause a delay in production of gold or could reduce the amount of gold that we are able to recover, with the result that our ability to achieve recoveries from gold sales and to sustain operations would be adversely impacted. Adverse operating conditions may also cause our operating costs to increase. Exploration accidents or other adverse events could also result in an adverse environmental impact to the land on which our operations are located with the result that we may become subject to the liabilities for environmental clean up and remediation.

If we become subject to increased environmental laws and regulation, our operating expenses may increase.

Our exploration activities, including test mining activities, are regulated by both US Federal and State of Alaska environmental laws that relate to the protection of air and water quality, hazardous waste management and mine reclamation. These regulations may impose operating costs on us. If the regulatory environment for our operations changes in a manner that increases costs of compliance and reclamation, then our operating expenses would increase with the result that our financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

Because of the speculative nature of exploration of mineral properties, there is no assurance that our exploration activities will result in the discovery of new commercially exploitable quantities of minerals or that we will be able to establish proven and probable reserves as a result of our exploration.

We plan to continue exploration on our mineral properties. The search for valuable minerals as a business is extremely risky. We can provide investors with no assurance that additional exploration on our properties will establish that additional commercially exploitable reserves of gold exist on our properties. Problems such as unusual or unexpected geological formations or other variable conditions are involved in exploration and often result in exploration efforts being unsuccessful. The additional potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration and attendant additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. These risks may result in us being unable to establish the presence of commercial exploitable quantities of ore on our mineral claims with the result that our ability to fund future exploration activities may be impeded.

16

As we face intense competition in the exploration industry, we will have to compete with our competitors for financing and for qualified managerial and technical employees.

The exploration industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases. Competition includes large established exploration companies with substantial capabilities and with greater financial and technical resources than we have. As a result of this competition, we may be unable to acquire additional attractive mining claims or financing on terms we consider acceptable. We also compete with other exploration companies in the recruitment and retention of qualified managerial and technical employees. If we are unable to successfully compete for financing or for qualified employees, our exploration programs may be slowed down or suspended.

Our business venture into the low rank coal water fuel business is subject to a high risk of failure.

Our business venture into the low rank coal water fuel technology business is at a very early stage and is subject to a high risk of failure. The low rank coal water fuel technology has not been proven by us to be a commercially viable fuel alternative. In order to establish commercial viability, we will have to undertake the construction and operation of the contemplated demonstration facility. The construction and three year operation of the demonstration facility would cost approximately $26 million. Even if the demonstration facility were constructed and operational, there is no assurance that the commercial viability of this process would be established or that we would be able to expand the facility into a commercially viable operation or to generate revenues from this technology. We are pursuing funding from the United States federal and state governments and from private sources to fund the construction of the demonstration facility. There is no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining government or private funding for this project. Even if funding is obtained and the demonstration facility constructed, there is no assurance that we would be able to generate profits or revenues from the operation of the demonstration facility.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our head office is located at Suite 1820, 1111 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4M3. These premises are comprised of approximately 4,752 square feet and are leased for a term expiring in July 2014.

Our four groups of mineral properties located in Alaska are described below. This disclosure incorporates the results of a technical report prepared by J.W. Murton and Associates, J.W. Murton P. Eng. in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. Murton is a “qualified person” under NI 43-101 who is independent of Silverado. This technical report is referred to as the B.C. Technical Report. The Company has filed the B.C. Technical Report with the British Columbia Securities Commission. Investors may view the B.C. Technical Report at the SEDAR web site at www.sedar.com.

The B.C. Technical Report provides disclosure regarding Silverado’s Alaska properties in accordance with NI 43-101. U.S. Investors are cautioned that the United States Securities Commission does not recognize the terms “indicated resources” and “inferred resources”, as more particularly discussed below.

NOLAN GOLD PROJECT

We do not have any commercially viable reserves on any of our properties that comprise the Nolan Gold Project or any of our other properties. We plan to carry out exploration activities on the Nolan Gold Project that are referred to as “test mining activities”. The objective of the test mining activities on the Nolan Gold Project is to expand our knowledge and geological data of the mineralization of the placer deposits and the lode mineralization occurrences on the Nolan Gold Project and to recover gold from test mining activities in order to pay for a portion of the expense associated with exploration of the Nolan Gold Project. As we have not established commercially viable reserves on the Nolan Gold Project, we anticipate that recoveries of gold from test mining activities may not be sufficient to pay for the full cost of exploration. There is no assurance that our test mining activities will result in a final evaluation that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties that comprise the Nolan Gold Project.

1. Location and Access

The properties comprising our Nolan Gold Project are located approximately 8 miles west of Wiseman, and 175 air miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska in the foothills of the Brooks Range, in an area known as the Koyukuk Mining District.

The Nolan Gold Project is accessible by the Elliott and the Dalton Highways, about 280 road miles north of Fairbanks Alaska. An all weather road connects Nolan Creek to the Dalton Highway and is suitable year-round for semi-tractors loaded with fuel and equipment. Air transportation is available by several commercial carriers on two daily flights to Coldfoot, Alaska, about 15 miles south-southeast of Nolan.

17

A map illustrating the location and access to the Nolan Gold Project is provided below:

2. Ownership Interest

The Nolan properties are comprised of four non-continuous groups of federal unpatented mining claims. There has been no legal survey on any of the claims. These groups of properties are described as follows:

(a) Nolan Gold Project Placer Property

Silverado owns 204 federal placer mining claims on the Nolan Gold Project. Over the years Silverado has conducted operations on this property entitled: the Nolan Deep Channel, Smith Creek, Thomson’s Pup, Mary’s Bench, Swede Channel, Mary’s East, Archibald Creek, Mary’s East, Workman's Bench, Upper Nolan Creek, Dolney Bench, West Block, "3B1" on Nolan Creek, and Eureka Bench, et al. The main block of contiguous Nolan Placer claims cover approximately 6 square miles of creeks and fluvial terraces and uplands.

Of these claims, the Thomson’s Pup claims consist of 6 unpatented federal placer claims registered in the name of Silverado Green Fuel. Our ownership in these claims is subject to a royalty of 3% of net profits on 80% of production payable to Frank Figlinski and Lyle R. Carlson.

18

(b) Nolan Lode

The Nolan Lode claims are comprised of 407 unpatented federal lode claims. A claim staking program added 242 of these claims during 2006, and 95 more during 2007. Ownership of these federal lode claims is in the name of Silverado Gold Mines Inc. This area encompasses approximately 11 square miles.

3. History of Operations

Placer mining on Nolan Creek and its tributaries was first recorded at about the turn of the last century. During the ensuing years and up to 1942, recoveries of approximately 120,000 oz. of placer gold were reported. This gold is well known for its coarse size and high fineness. The early miners mined Nolan Creek and its left limit tributaries, particularly Fay, Archibald and Smith creeks by surface methods on the upper areas and by underground methods in the lower reaches of the creeks when overburden became too deep. Shafts are found throughout these areas.

We first began acquiring placer claims on Nolan Creek in 1979. The following table summarizes gold production and gold recoveries by year from the Nolan properties since 1980.

YEAR	STATUS OF OPERATIONS	NATURE OF OPERATIONS	LOCATION	BCY MINED	Tr.Oz. GOLD RECOVERED	RECOVERED GRADE OZ/BCY (Bank Cubic Yards)
1980-88	Test Mining During Exploration	Surface Operations	Archibald / Fay Creek	40,000est	2,400 *	0.060est
1993	Production	Surface Operations	Thompson Pup	33,800	1,304	0.038
1994	Production	Underground Operations	Mary’s Bench Underground	16,143	2,697	0.167
1994	Production	Surface Operations	Eureka Bench Open Cut	29,300	5,733	0.196
1995	Production	Surface Operations	Phase 3 Open Cut	22,285	2,394	0.107
1995	Production	Underground Operations	3B1 Underground	12,991	1,006	0.077

19

YEAR	STATUS OF OPERATIONS	NATURE OF OPERATIONS	LOCATION	BCY MINED	Tr.Oz. GOLD RECOVERED	RECOVERED GRADE OZ/BCY (Bank Cubic Yards)
1995	Production	Surface Operations	West Block Open Cut	18,988	1,305	0.069
1995	Production	Surface Operations	Mary’s Bench hydraulic	600	27	0.045
1996	Test Mining During Exploration	Surface Operations	Dolney Bench Surface	5,042	126	0.025
1998	Test Mining During Exploration	Surface Operations	Archibald Creek Surface	5,947	128	0.022
1999	Test Mining During Exploration	Underground Operations	Swede Channel Underground	4,575	623	0.136
1999	Test Mining During Exploration	Surface Operations	Workmans Bench Open Cut	5,580	112	0.020
2000	Test Mining During Exploration	Surface Operations	Workmans Bench Open Cut	14,919	201	0.013
2003	Test Mining During Exploration	Underground Operations for Nolan Deep Channel; Surface Operations for Wooll Bench, Mary’s Bench and other	Nolan Deep Channel, Wooll, Mary’s Bench, Other	30,279	451	0.015
2006	Test Mining During Exploration	Underground Operations	Swede Channel Underground	6,843	939	0.137
2007	Test Mining During Exploration	Underground Operations	Swede Channel and Mary’s East Underground	14,092	3,726.8	0.264
TOTALS				261,384	23,172.8	0.089

*Includes 1,320 ounces produced by lessee.

We have not achieved profitability in any of the years during which we have carried out production or test mining activities at the Nolan Gold Project.

We did not carry out any gold recovery operations during 2004 and 2005 as we focused on lode exploration on the property, as opposed to test placer mining activities.

During the winter of 2005, Silverado began an underground exploration and development program on the Swede Channel. Continuing into 2006, Silverado installed about 900 feet of exploration drifts by underground tunneling methods into the Swede Channel. Prior bulk sampling had shown the channel to contain gold in the basal gravels, so the project was designed to obtain a large bulk sample from the tunnel being advanced into the channel. The 2005-2006 winter stockpile contained 8,896 LCY of gravel material, and was processed between June 28^th through July 20^th of 2006, yielding 939.07 troy ounces of gold nuggets and dust. The Swede portal was re-opened in early November of 2006, and gravel extraction on the remaining sections of the Swede Channel continued until its completion by the middle of January 2007. A total of 8,963 LCY of gravel material was stockpiled from the remaining Swede Channel.

20

In early January 2007, crews installed a portal into Mary’s East, and began an underground drift into the Mary’s East deposit. The Mary’s East project was completed at the end of March 2007 and 9,357 LCY of gravel material was stockpiled from this project.

The 2006-2007 winter stockpile contained 18,320 LCY (Swede Channel and Mary’s East combined) of gravel material, and was processed from June through July of 2007 at the existing sluice plant location, yielding 2,811.74 troy ounces of gold nugget gold and over 207 pounds of concentrate that contained gold particles smaller than ¼ inch in size. The fine concentrate yielded 915.06 try ounces of gold (30% gold), which when combined with 2811.74 troy ounces of nugget gold recovered in 2007 totals 3726.80 troy ounces. Also, the fine concentrates yielded 65.10 troy ounces of silver or 2.15% silver.

4. Present Condition of the Property and Current State of Exploration

We have spent approximately $32,700,000 over the last 19 years acquiring, exploring and undertaking test mining activities and test exploration on the Nolan Gold Project. Up to November 30, 2007, we have completed 851 placer drill holes with a cumulative total of 49,370 feet of drilling. About 219 of those drill holes were completed along the frozen gold bearing deep channel of the Nolan Creek known as the Nolan Deep Channel. We have also completed 28 lode exploration drill holes with a cumulative total of 6,870 feet of drilling.

We also have a gold recovery facility located at the Nolan Gold Project that is used to recover gold from gravel that we extract during test mining activities as part of our exploration of the Nolan Gold Project. This gold recovery facility was modernized in 2006. Our gold recovery facility incorporates nugget traps, hydraulic riffles, classification and gravity concentration processes in order to remove gold present in gravel material. The gold recovery facility has a processing rate of 75 cubic yards of gravel material per hour. The gold facility can only be operated in the late spring to early fall months when free-flowing water is available to operate the plant.

On May 17, 2007, Silverado entered into a 10-year "shared well agreement" with Sukakpak, Inc., an Alaskan corporation, through which Silverado designed, drilled and installed at its expense a high-capacity water well in the nearby rural community of Wiseman, Alaska, to serve both as a source of high-quality drinking water, and a high-volume source of sample processing water. In addition, Silverado upgraded its Nolan Gold Project drinking water storage facility to a series of three fully-enclosed 2,000-gallon plastic storage tanks, and also a modern multi-modular kitchen and dining facility. Silverado also expended approximately $85,400 for the design and installation of a state-of-the-art "fast activated sludge treatment" (FAST®) arctic-capable wastewater treatment facility designed by Lifewater Engineering Company of Fairbanks, Alaska that is capable of serving the treatment needs of up to 24 personnel, and that treats the camp's domestic wastewater to such a high quality that it can be discharged directly to the land surface. The design, construction and installation of the wastewater facility was undertaken under the approval of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC).

During the winter of 2005, Silverado began an underground exploration and development on the Swede Channel. Continuing into 2006, Silverado installed about 900 feet of exploration drifts by underground tunneling methods into the Swede Channel. Prior bulk sampling had shown the channel to contain gold in the basal gravels, so the project was designed to obtain a large bulk sample from the tunnel being advanced into the channel. The 2005-2006 winter stockpile contained 8,896 LCY of gravel material, and was processed between June 28 and July 20 of 2006, yielding 939.07 troy ounces of gold nuggets and dust. The Swede portal was reopened in early November of 2006, and gravel extraction on the remaining sections of the Swede Channel continued until its completion by the middle of January 2007. A total of 8,963 LCY of gravel material was stockpiled from the remaining Swede Channel.

In early January 2007, crews installed a portal into Mary’s East, and began an underground drift into the Mary’s East deposit. The Mary’s East Placer Deposit was discovered by drilling in 2004. Subsequent infill drilling during 2006 showed a bedrock shelf perched about 40 feet higher in elevation than the Mary’s Bench deposit, which hosted gold bearing gravel layers at the bedrock contact. The Mary’s East project was completed at the end of March 2007 and 9,357 LCY of gravel material was stockpiled from this project.

The 2006-2007 winter stockpile contained 18,320 LCY (Swede Channel and Mary’s East combined) of gravel material, and was processed from June through July of 2007 at the existing sluice plant location, yielding 2,811.74 troy ounces of gold nugget gold and over 207 pounds of concentrate that contained gold particles smaller than ¼ inch in size. The fine concentrate yielded 915.06 try ounces of gold (30% gold), which when combined with 2811.74 troy ounces of nugget gold recovered in 2007 totals 3726.80 troy ounces. Also, the fine concentrates yielded 65.10 troy ounces of silver or 2.15% silver.

21

The Nolan Gold Project does not include any commercially viable reserves and our activities at the Nolan Gold Project, including test mining activities, are exploratory in nature.

Exploration Objectives for the Nolan Gold Project

Our exploration plans are to further define gold deposits in order to provide a basis for the assessment of the feasibility of future additional test mining activities at the Nolan project. We are currently undertaking an extensive geological exploration program on the Nolan Gold Project. The program includes drilling, as well as the review of geological and geophysical data. The overall objectives of our exploration program are as follows:

1.	To identify surface or sub-surface placer deposits at our Nolan Gold Project that are prospective for test mining operations. In general, these deposits are located on benches that are ancient river beds and lakeshore deposits located above the present channel of Nolan Creek. These deposits include Mary’s Bench, Jack London Bench, Wooll Bench, Workman’s Bench, Swede Channel, Upper Nolan Creek (deep channel), Lower Nolan Bench and Mary’s East including areas adjoining to the north, east and south. The objectives of our drilling program will include the determination of the nature and extent of areas of known bench deposits that are prospects for test mining operations and the identification of new bench deposits that may be prospects for test mining operations. Mary’s Bench East and areas adjoining north, east and south as well as, the Swede Channel and the areas adjoining to the east and south, in that order, are our exploration priorities as they have showed the most positive results from earlier exploration that we have completed. Wooll Bench and Workman’s Bench have been less extensively explored with only limited drilling. The Lower Nolan Bench has not been drilled. The newly discovered Jack London Bench may also be a priority target during fiscal 2008.
2.	To determine whether there is a potential lode gold and antimony deposit which may be the source of the placer gold found on the Nolan Gold Project. A lode deposit of gold occurs when gold is present in its host rock as differentiated from placer gold which is gold that has been removed from its host rock by the process of erosion. Our reverse circulation and diamond core drilling, trenching, geologic and geophysical work will be part of our on-going investigations to determine whether there exist one or more lode deposits on the Nolan Gold project that could be the source of our placer gold deposits.
3.	To identify any placer deposits at Slisco Bench, which is located on our Hammond River property that are prospective for test mining operations. The Slisco Bench (deep channel) deposit is approximately 3 to 4 miles northeast of the Nolan Deep Channel.

We have been working on interpreting the geology of the Nolan area since 1979, when we first acquired the project. Our latest and most extensive exploration program began in early 2007 and was directed at improving our placer deposit definition and discovering potential lode sources of the placer gold. Our exploration geologists and mining engineers have worked to move this objective forward. Our exploration efforts have included the analysis of geophysical data, geochemical sampling results, company records and analysis provided by government mineral investigation efforts and publications as well as the trenching and exploration drilling of target areas.

5. Geology

The Nolan Area properties are located in the Brooks Range of northern Alaska. Regionally, the area is underlain by a series of metasedimentary rocks of the Coldfoot subterrain and Hammond subterrain of the Arctic Alaska terrain. The metasedimentary rocks have been assigned a Middle to Upper Devonian age. During Late to Early Cretaceous time, the Middle Devonian metasedimentary rocks of the Coldfoot subterrain were thrust northward onto the Middle to Upper Devonian metasedimentary rocks of the Hammond Subterrain. This is represented by a large thrust belt in the Nolan area and resulted in regional metamorphism of the continental rocks that were overridden.

The property area is underlain by gray–black phyllite, black slate and metasiltstone, gray–black and brown slate, brown micaceous schist and phyllite, gray–black micaceous schist, gray green to black muscovite schist that locally contains abundant pyrite and arsenopyrite, and banded quartzite interbedded with chloritic quartzite and quartz mica schist.

The valley bottoms and side hills are mantled by a heavy cover of glacial outwash and lake bottom sediments. Depth of overburden varies from a very few feet on the upper slopes to tens to hundreds of feet in the lower valley bottoms on the claims. Deeper areas of cover are permanently frozen. There have been four periods of glaciation on the Nolan properties and the placer gold distribution has been variously affected by the glaciation.

22

The placer deposits are of three types:

1.	Shallow placers concentrated in present stream and river valleys;
2.	Placer gold concentrated on bedrock in deeply incised bedrock channels that have been covered by 10 to 100’s of feet of gravel and organic material; and
3.	Placer deposits concentrated on benches lying anywhere from 10 to 400 feet above present stream levels. These bench gravels were deposited when streams were flowing at higher levels relative to present due to damming by glacial ice.

Placer gold, lode gold and antimony are the main type of mineralization of interest on the property. We are currently exploring for a lode source for the placer gold. Known gold-bearing lodes identified on the Nolan Lode properties consist of stibnite-bearing quartz veins, and quartz veins containing free gold, which fill fractures cutting phyllite and metasiltstones.

Analysis of obtained airborne geophysical data identified a linear resistivity low that has been named the “Solomon Shear trend”. The resistivity low is coincident with a geochemical anomaly for gold, antimony, arsenic and other indicator minerals. This anomaly trends sub-parallel to Nolan Creek along the east side from south of Smith Creek into the Hammond River drainage.

The Company has identified a new zone with anomalous gold mineralization, which has been named “the Fortress”. The Fortress area is part of an east-west tending deformation zone that is overlain by strong arsenic and gold in soil anomalies, which are up to over 1,500 feet in length.

We will continue our 2008 exploration program with the objective of identifying mineralization of commercial significance along this zone.

6. Estimates of Indicated and Inferred Resources

We have not established any commercially viable reserves on any of our properties that comprise the Nolan Gold Project.

In the B.C. Technical Report prepared by Mr. W. Murton, P. Eng., an independent qualified person under Canadian Policy NI 43 –101, he reported the following indicated and inferred resource estimates for the Nolan area properties. These resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards for reporting resources and reserves as set out in NI 43-101 and are summarized below. BCY refers to bank cubic yards in the following tables:

General Note Regarding Resource Estimates

The following information should be considered in connection with our resource estimates for Workman’s Bench, which we are disclosing in accordance with applicable SEC standards and regulations:

Assumed Prices of US $750/oz for gold and US $1.65/lb for antimony.

Process Recovery Rates of 99% for antimony and 98% for gold (as provided by Hazen Research from work done on an underground bulk sample from the D tunnel of the Workman’s Bench A vein).

Estimated Operating Costs of US $553/ton, based on operation of a 200 ton per day underground mine.

A cutoff grade of 4% antimony was used in our analysis. A 4% cutoff grade should be regarded as 4.0% antimony equivalent. No cutoff grade was used for gold, as antimony was the primary commodity being examined, and none of the resource polygons contained less than 0.05 oz/ton gold.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Indicated Resources

The following table uses the term ‘indicated resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize this term. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

Name	Location	No. of Drill Holes	Volume	Grade	Category
D Block, #1 Below Disclover, Nolan Creek	On claim Discovery & #1 Below Discovery, Nolan Creek	15	11,100 BCY	0.35 oz./BCY	Indicated Resource

23

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources

The following table uses the term ‘inferred resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. ‘Inferred resources’ have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Name	Location	No. of Drill Holes	Volume	Grade	Category
D Block #2 Below Discovery, Nolan Creek	On claim #2 Below Discovery, Nolan Creek	11	55,000 BCY	0.04 oz./BCY	Inferred Resource
3B3 Block	Nolan Creek below D Block #2	12	14,600 BCY	0.1 oz /BCY	Inferred Resource

Name	Location	No. of Drill Holes	Volume	Grade	Category
Wooll Bench	Right limit of Archibald Creek	4	26,000 BCY	0.02 oz /BCY	Inferred Resource
Swede Gulch	Left limit of Nolan Creek	5	16,000 BCY	0.13 oz/BCY	Inferred Resource
Hammond / Slisco Bench	Right limit of Hammond River and right limit of Vermont Creek	64	42,800 BCY	0.03 oz/BCY	Inferred Resource
Smith Creek Camp	Right limit of Smith Creek	5	35,500 BCY	0.03 oz/BCY	Inferred Resource

TOTAL INFERRED RESOURCE – NOLAN AREA PROPERTIES

BCY:	189,900
Grade:	0.045 oz/BCY

When estimating the above resources, emphasis was placed on reported assay values for individual drill holes. The drill hole intercept length was combined with the assay value to create a value of oz./BCY (bank cubic yard). The drill hole locations were plotted and an area of influence created around each hole to generate a total BCY figure. The density of drilling and values for contained gold were the criteria used for the final calculations.

We have discovered a number of new areas that contain placer gold mineralization on the Nolan property that are too loosely defined under NI 43-101 to allow the mineralization to be categorized as a resource. Additional exploration drilling and testing may bring these mineralized areas up to a higher level of confidence and thus a higher category which could be included in the total gold inventory of the property. There is no assurance however that this upgrade will take place.

Mr. Murton also concluded that there are indications of lode gold mineralization on the Nolan properties, but exploration is in a very early phase and more work is required before any assessment of this mineralization may be a completed.

24

HAMMOND PROPERTY (SLISCO BENCH)

1. Location and Access

Our Hammond property is located approximately 8 miles north of Wiseman, and 175 air miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska in the foothills of the Brooks Range in an area known as the Koyukuk Mining District. The Hammond property is located approximately three miles northeast of the Nolan Gold Project.

The Hammond property is accessible by the Trans-Alaska Pipeline road about 280 road miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska. An all-weather 4x4 road connects Hammond to the pipeline road.

A map illustrating the location and access to the Hammond property is provided above under the heading Nolan Gold Project.

2. Ownership Interest

Silverado leases 24 federal placer mining claims and 36 federal lode mining claims from Alaska Mining Company, Inc. (“Alminco”).

As of November 30, 2007, we were in arrears of required mineral property claims and option payments of $360,000 and therefore our rights to the property were adversely affected. We are currently re-negotiating the terms and conditions of the Alminco agreement with Alminco. Alminco has confirmed that our mineral claims and options are in good standing on the understanding we will use our best efforts to pay the minimum royalty payments, including the payments that are in arrears for the past four years, when business conditions permit, however there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully renegotiate the terms and conditions of the Alminco agreement.

3. History of Operations

In 1993 we acquired the group of placer gold mining claims overlying the Slisco Bench, and located along the right limit of the Hammond River. The Hammond River drainage has been the subject of intense exploration since the early 1900s. Poor exposures, difficult terrain, and deep overburden confronted the first explorers and early miners in the Hammond River region. Those miners who worked with persistence succeeded for the most part in developing small-scale projects constrained in scope by the inadequacies of their mechanical equipment, and the lack of technical knowledge and financial support. Nevertheless, because of the work done by these early explorers, the Hammond River has produced approximately eighty thousand ounces of placer gold, including the second largest gold nugget ever discovered in Alaska – a nugget weighing more than 135 ounces.

The Bench was first staked by Martin Slisco, and prospected by hand methods since the 1930’s, but no commercial production was recorded. During the late 1970s, placer gold, including some nuggets characteristic of the Koyukuk Mining District were recovered by open cut prospecting and bulk sampling from a prospect pit at the northern end of the bench. The prospect pit was open to bedrock and with a nominal 20 feet of overburden exposed, indications were favourable for defining a large open pit mine-able placer gold deposit. The surface topography indicates the bench could extend up to 4,500 feet southerly from the prospect pit. Beyond that distance the bench is intersected by the present Hammond River Channel where past and ongoing erosion has removed all surface expression of the bench. Below that intersection, the bench has been eroded and during 1995, Silverado completed a Phase I drill program, completing 64 drill holes to the south of the prospect pit. Analysis of the data from the Phase I program determined that the Slisco Bench surface topography conceals an ancient gold bearing channel. Depths of drilling to bedrock were much deeper than anticipated. Several hundred feet south of the prospect pit bedrock depths are about 60 feet below surface, increasing to more than 230 feet in depth at a distance of 1,200 feet south of the prospect pit. The gravel layer at bedrock was found to contain encouraging and sometimes, significant placer gold content at channel bottom intercepts.

In 2006, Silverado commenced drilling along the Slisco deep channel which completed additional 39 drill holes with a total footage of 4,782 feet. This exploration work was done to define the length of the Slisco deep channel. Phase one and Phase two drilling, sampling, and sample analysis of a total of 103 drill holes, has served to delineate the Slisco deep channel for a total length of 1800 lineal feet. Surface topography indicates that the channel could cover a length of up to 4,500 feet.

4. Present Condition of the Property and Current State of Exploration

A drilling program is planned to explore the remaining 2,700 feet extending south from the present known location of the Slisco deep channel. Additional in-fill drilling will be necessary along the length of the channel, as well as potential gold bearing tributaries, and other areas by drilling fences or lines of drill holes with close hole spacing across the channel bottom. These holes will be necessary to ascertain the width of the channel, and to collect adequate sample data at close spacing, for mining feasibility studies. After completing the Phase one and Phase two drilling, data showed the channel to be narrower than the surface topography indicated and bedrock depths increased to the south. Present known maximum depth is 230 feet. We presently estimate that as many as several hundred additional drill holes would be necessary to fully define and evaluate the Slisco deep channel. The Slisco deep channel is presently in a state of ongoing exploration, and there is no camp, production facilities, or equipment located on the property. Currently, there is no power supply to the Hammond property. All support for ongoing and planned work on the property is currently provided from the Nolan Creek Camp.

25

5. Geology

The primary areas of geological interest on the Hammond Property are the placer gold deposits, which are similar to the placer gold deposits present on the adjoining Nolan Gold Project. Geologically, the Slisco Bench gold-placer deposit is a deeply buried, permanently frozen, ancient and now abandoned river channel of the Hammond River. Subsequent to the geologic processes that forced the Hammond River to abandon its channel at Slisco Bench, glacial and peri-glacial processes (processes acting upon permanently frozen terraines ) buried the gold-bearing gravel of the Slisco deposit with as much as 230 feet of frozen sedimentary detritus. The deep thickness of frozen overburden identified probably prohibits the economical application of traditional open-pit methodologies. Underground placer gold recovery methods which we have utilized extensively would probably be used to remove the gold-bearing gravel.

Mineral investigations by our geologists in conjunction with a federal study of mineral resources in the area have revealed the presence of west-north-westerly striking gold bearing hydro-thermal quartz veins on the property. Those veins, in conjunction with a north-easterly trending shear zone are thought to have contributed, at least in part, to the placer gold found on the property.

ESTER DOME PROJECT

The Ester Dome Project encompasses all of our optioned properties on Ester Dome.

1. Location and Access

Access to the property is provided by the paved Ester Dome road and a well-maintained gravel road. The main line of the Alaska Railroad passes by the west perimeter of the property and a high capacity electrical line carrying power to the Fort Knox mill passes 300 feet below the Grant Mill on the property.

A map illustrating the location and access to the Ester Dome Project is provided below:

26

2. Ownership Interest

The Ester Dome property is comprised of 52 state mineral claims and 1 unpatented federal mineral claim. The claims are not all contiguous in that there are 5 separate blocks of claims. Silverado Gold Mines Inc. is the registered owner of all claims.

The total area of all claims equals approximately 2.5 square miles and all claims are valid until September 1, 2008. There has been no legal survey on the claims.

There are 3 separate agreements, each discussed above, covering the above mentioned 53 claims on the Ester Dome property. Each of such agreements is in good standing.

27

3. History of Operations

The Ester Dome property first became known as a result of the discovery of placer gold in the creeks draining Ester Dome in about 1902. By 1909, approximately 1.5 million oz. had been mined from alluvial deposits. Ultimately, approximately 4 million ounces of placer gold have been mined from creeks draining Ester Dome.

Shortly after the discovery of placer gold, lode claims were staked on quartz veins discovered on Ester Dome. By 1912, four stamp mills were operating in the area.

(a) Grant Mine

Work at the Grant Mine, on the eastern flank of Ester Dome, was initiated in about 1928 with the sinking of shafts to bedrock to attempt to locate buried alluvial gold. This work, while it did not locate alluvial gold, did reveal quartz rubble near bedrock containing free gold. Mr. Grant, the claim owner, sunk two shafts through about 80’ of loess (silt) cover and by 1931 had reportedly mined about 600 tons from the newly discovered Irishman Vein. This work was all completed from the only levels established, the 50, 100 and 150-foot levels. Mr. Roger Burggraf purchased the claims from Grant’s heirs in 1973 and deepened the shaft to the 200-foot level. This work revealed a new vein, the O’Dea vein which has eclipsed the Irishman vein in importance. Burggraf completed limited development on the Irishman vein and the O’Dea vein during the next 5 years, and in 1978 entered into a lease option agreement with Silverado.

Over the subsequent 8 years up to 1986, we completed an extensive surface exploration and underground development program as well as test milling the underground development muck from work on the O’Dea structure, in a small (approximately 50 tons per day) gravity mill, during 1980 – 1982. In 1984, we entered into a joint venture agreement with Aurex Inc., a subsidiary of Marubeni America Corporation to further explore and develop the Grant Mine plus a larger area of interest around the mine. Aurex withdrew from the joint venture at the end of 1985 and the mill was shut down in Jan. 1986. A total of approximately 22,000 tons of gold bearing rock were mined from the O’Dea structure during the period 1980 to January 1986, yielding 4,090 ounces of gold.

When Aurex became involved in the joint venture, a decision was made to construct a 230 ton per day gravity / cyanide mill to treat the expanded resource that had been outlined on the O’Dea structure above the 200’ level. This mill and related support facilities were constructed by Tri-con Mining Inc. for Silverado using a design provided by Melis Consulting Engineers Ltd. The completed mill was commissioned in October 1985 and was shut down in January 1986. During the short mill run, the plant operated above design capacity. Lower feed grades than had been forecast plus other underground problems caused Aurex to elect to withdraw from the project and a premature shutdown of the facility.

During the period 1987 – 1989, we decided to open pit mine the Ethel - Elmes structures, located a short distance from the mill facility on the Dobbs claims adjacent to the Grant Mine. This mining operation generated approximately 71,620 tons of gold bearing material. Combined with the previously mined stockpile from the O’Dea vein, (11,000 tons), and material from another source (Silver Dollar), the total tonnage processed amounted to 111,852 tons.

The total tonnage processed through the Grant mill up to 1989 amounts to 111,852 tons with a total of 11,215 oz. of gold produced for an average calculated recovered grade of 0.10 oz/ton. Gold recoveries from the Grant Mine are summarized as follows:

YEAR	DRY TONS MILLED	RECOVERED OZ. GOLD	RECOVERED GRADE
1980 – 1981(1)	4,170	1,424	0.341
1985 –1986	7,069	1,372	0.193
1987 - 1989	100,586	8,419	0.083
TOTALS	111,852	11,215	0.10

(1) This material was processed through a 20 ton per day pilot plant prior to the construction of the Grant Mill.

We did not make a profit from our operations at the Grant Mine during any of the above periods during which we achieved gold recoveries.

The mill has been properly secured and remains in good condition.

In June of 1990, ACNC (American Copper and Nickel Company) entered into a joint venture with us on the Grant Mine claims and a larger area of Ester Dome. This included the Dobbs, and St Paul / Barelka properties.

28

On the Grant Mine property, ACNC completed the drilling of 10 diamond drill holes and fourteen wedge cuts on the O’Dea –Irishman system totaling 10,097’. This work confirmed the previous drill grades and intercept width encountered by Silverado and helped to further define the O’Dea structure.

(b) St. Paul / Barelka

The St. Paul / Barelka claims have undergone a significant amount of exploration since the early 1980s when they were first acquired by us. The early work was in the form of electromagnetic surveys, geochemical soil sampling, trenching and diamond and percussion drilling. Most recently, in 1991-1992, ACNC completed 9 diamond drill holes and 3 rotary reverse circulation holes. Subsequent work in 1996-1997 amounted to significant trenching and 91 drill holes focusing on the St Paul structure which had been partially defined by our previous work.

(c) Dobbs

The Dobbs property contains the Ethel – Elmes vein system and structure which had been located in the first work and prospecting that took place on Ester Dome in the early 1900’s. Exploration in the 1980’s by us revealed a mineralized shear zone up to 25’ wide containing high grade quartz veins and veinlets. This was the structure mined in 1987 – 1989 which generated approximately 71,620 tons of gold bearing material. Combined with the previously mined stockpile from the O’Dea vein, (11,000 tons), a total of approximately 82,620 tons were mined and milled during 1988 – 1989 producing 7,362 oz. of gold.

4. Present Condition of the Property and Current State of Exploration

(a) Grant Mine-O’Dea Vein:

The Grant Mine operations, including camp, buildings, machine shops and related equipment, were constructed in the late 1980s. Our mill and equipment are in operating condition but are not currently operating. The mill has remained inactive since February 1989. The plant and equipment cost us $2,076,780. This amount has been written down to $nil on our audited financial statements. Power to the Grant Mine operations is provided by diesel powered generators located on site. Commercial power transmission lines cross through the property, and could provide power to the facilities for any future operations. Auxiliary power to the Grant Mine operations will be provided by diesel powered generators located on site. During fiscal 2007, our work on the property was limited to assessment work. We plan to maintain claim rental payments for the current fiscal year and to continue with assessment work.

If gold prices remain strong, we may re-commence exploratory drilling on our Ester Dome properties with the objective of increasing our database of geological information on these properties.

(b) May (St. Paul) / Barelka:

The St. Paul property is undeveloped and does not contain any open-pit or underground mines. There is no plant or equipment located on the St. Paul property. Currently, there is no power supply to the St. Paul property.

We have no plans at this time to do any work other than as required for annual claims maintenance and when we do there is no guarantee the work will present economic viability for this deposit.

(c) Dobbs:

The Dobbs property is undeveloped and does not contain any open-pit or underground mines. There is no plant or equipment located on the Dobbs property. Currently, there is no power supply to the Dobbs property.

We have no plans at this time to do any work other than as required for annual claims maintenance.

5. Geology

The Fairbanks Mining District is in the northwest part of the Yukon – Tanana metamorphic complex. This region, referred to variably as Yukon Crystalline Terrain, Yukon Cataclastic Complex or Yukon Tanana Terrain is an enormous tract of multiple deformed and metamorphosed rocks occupying much of east central Alaska and adjoining Yukon Territory.

The Fairbanks District is underlain by three metamorphosed stratigraphic packages all in apparent thrust fault contact. From oldest to youngest these are: (1) Chatanika Terrain, a Precambrian eclogite-garnet-amphibolite unit exposed on the northern edge of the district;

29

(2) Fairbanks Schist, a dominant lithology and host to the majority of gold occurrences in the district, comprised of late Proterozoic to early Paleozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks metamorphosed to greenschist facies; and (3) Chena River Sequence, an early to mid Paleozoic unit metamorphosed to lower amphibolite facies.

Stocks and dikes are common in the Fairbanks District, varying from diorite to granite. In recent years they have been conclusively linked to significant gold mineralizing systems. Mid Cretaceous ages have been determined for two of the stocks. Lamprophyre dikes are locally present in the district.

The Ester Dome property is underlain by late Proterozoic to early Paleozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks that have been metamorphosed to greenschist facies. Dominant lithologies are quartz-mica schist, graphitic phyllite and micaceous quartzite, with lesser chlorite schist and calcareous schist. The schists are locally intruded by fine grained granitic to dioritic dikes and sills with minor porphyritic phases.

Four main structural patterns that crosscut stratigraphy and folding are present on Ester Dome. The most prominent is northeast trending shearing that is probably related to northeast thrusting in the region. Most of the past and present exploration has taken place along mineralized veins and shears parallel to this trend.

6. Estimates of Indicated and Inferred Resources

We have not established any commercially viable reserves on any of our properties that comprise the Ester Dome Project.

General Note Regarding Resource Estimates

The following information should be considered in connection with our resource estimates for the Ester Dome property, which we are disclosing in accordance with applicable SEC standards and regulations:

• Assumed Price of US $750/oz for gold.
• Process Recovery Rate of 94% for gold.
• Estimated Operating Costs of US $321/ton, based on operation of a 200 ton per day underground and open pit mine during 1997.

Readers are advised that the information which the Company used to calculate the estimated operating costs for its Ester Dome property is derived from actual operating expenses of the Company for mining and milling in underground and open pit operations at the Grant Mine on Ester Dome in Alaska during the late 1990s. The Company expects to receive during early to mid-2009 an updated version of a December 9, 2004 independent technical report prepared by Mr. Thomas K. Bundtzen of Pacific Rim Geological Consulting, Inc., which will allow the Company to calculate more current estimated operating costs for Ester Dome. Following the Company’s receipt of such updated technical report, the Company will update the information set forth immediately above in its subsequent filings.

A. GRANT MINE - O’DEA STRUCTURE

The determinations of indicated resources at the Grant Mine - O’Dea Structure in the BC Technical Report are summarized as follows:

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Indicated Resources

The following table uses the term ‘indicated resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize this term. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

INDICATED	RESOURCE	ESTIMATE
BLOCK	SQ. FEET	WIDTH FEET	TONS	GRADE OZ /TON
CORE	305,620	10.9’	266,500	0.31

B. DOBBS – (ETHEL – ELMES)

The determinations of inferred resources at the Dobbs (Ethel-Elmes) property are summarized in the BC Technical Report as follows:

30

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources

The following table uses the term ‘inferred resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. ‘Inferred resources’ have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

INFERRED	RESOURCE	ESTIMATE
BLOCK	SQ. FEET	WIDTH FEET	TONS	GRADE OZ/TON
UNDER ELMES PIT	102,270	11	90,000	0.05
UNDER ETHEL PIT	102,270	11	90,000	0.05
TOTAL			180,000	0.05

C. ST. PAUL

The determinations of inferred resources at the St. Paul property are summarized in the BC Technical Report as follows:

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Indicated Resources

The following table uses the term ‘indicated resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize this term. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

INDICATED	RESOURCE	ESTIMATE
BLOCK	SQ. FEET	WIDTH FEET	TONS	GRADE OZ/TON
DRILLED OFF	62,500	40	200,000	0.08

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources

The following table uses the term ‘inferred resources’. Silverado advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. ‘Inferred resources’ have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.

U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

INFERRED	RESOURCE	ESTIMATE
BLOCK	SQ. FEET	WIDTH FEET	TONS	GRADE OZ/TON
BELOW INDICATED	24,062	40	77,000	0.08

Mr. Murton recommended that, when funds become available, Silverado reassess the voluminous data base available on the properties before planning future work. Mr. Murton concluded that the Ester Dome property does have merit and warrants additional work.

31

EAGLE CREEK PROPERTY

1. Location and Access

The Eagle Creek property is accessed by the Steese Highway, 10 miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska to Fox, Alaska, then traveling along the Elliot highway 6 miles north to Murphy Dome Road, then west along Murphy Dome Road about 5 miles to the property. A map illustrating the location and access to the Eagle Creek property is provided below:

2. Ownership Interest

Silverado has an equal (50%) ownership interest in 77 state mining claims with Kathleen King (“King”). Silverado will acquire a full (100%) ownership interest in such state mining claims upon the payment of an additional $48,000 to King in installments of $5,000 per year. As of August 10, 2007 we had continued to make option payments on the Eagle Creek property, and as a result of this all of our mineral claims and options for this property are in good standing.

32

3. History of Operations

Earliest work on the property started approximately in 1913, with the original owner exploring for antimony. A number of companies have explored the property from 1964 to the present.

During the early 1980s, geochemical surveys located anomalous gold and antimony targets. Drilling conducted on the property during 1991 and 1992 resulted in the outlining definition of gold mineralization hosted in intrusive rocks. Further in-fill drilling is necessary to determine continuity of the gold bearing sequence, and to ascertain grades of gold within the deposit. We will consider doing additional work on the gold-antimony bearing veins upon which the property was founded.

4. Present Condition of the Property and Current State of Exploration

We did not complete any exploration activity on the Eagle Creek property during 2007 other than assessment work and maintenance, however, an exploration work plan that includes trenching and drilling was developed and successfully permitted through the APMA process during 2007. However, extensive exploration drilling has shown gold mineralization throughout the property. Exploration of the Eagle Creek property is currently in the preliminary stages.

The Eagle Creek property is undeveloped and does not contain any open-pit or underground mines. There is no plant or equipment located on the Eagle Creek property. Currently, there is no power supply to the Eagle Creek property, although GVEA power transmission lines run through the property and could supply power in the event a facility is warranted for ore processing in the future. Surface exploration work, including geochemical and geophysical surveys is recommended to be continued as a means of tracing promising mineral bearing rock units. Drilling is recommended to test the subsurface continuity and gold content of the rock units.

5. Geology

The Eagle Creek property is located within the same regional geology as the Ester Dome property.

The Eagle Creek property is 90% underlain by late Proterozoic to early Paleozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks that have been metamorphosed to greenschist facies. Dominant lithologies are quartz mica schist, micaceous quartzite, graphitic phyllite and chlorite schist, with lesser calc-schist, feldspathic schist, graphitic schist and minor quartz sericite schist.

The remaining 10% of the property is underlain by felsic igneous rocks which intrude the schists in all sectors of the property. Compositions range from biotite quartz monzonite to muscovite granite. Porphyritic phases with quartz and feldspar phenocrysts are ubiquitous. Contact relations observed from mapped distribution of granitic rock fragments in soil and from diamond drill core indicate the intrusives are dikes and sills up to 200’ thick.

6. Estimates of Indicated and Inferred Resources

The BC Technical Report concluded that there are no mineral resources or mineral reserves on the Eagle Creek property.

FEDERAL CLAIM MAINTENANCE FEES AND STATE CLAIM RENTALS

We pay an annual federal claim maintenance fee to the Bureau of Land Management of $125 for each federal mineral claim that is owned by us or held under a purchase or lease agreement. We paid aggregate annual federal claim maintenance fees of $39,500 during fiscal 2005, $71,375 during fiscal 2006, and $83,750 during 2007. The annual increases are due to the continued acquisition of placer and lode claims that solidify and protect our land holdings in the Koyukuk Mining District. We anticipate an amount similar to that paid for 2007 will be due in fiscal 2008.

Annual Alaska state claim rentals are due for each state mining claim that is owned or held by us under a purchase or lease agreement. An annual fee of $130 per claim is payable by us to the Alaska Department of Revenue for each claim. We paid aggregate Alaska state claim rental fees of $15,945 during fiscal 2004, 2005 and fiscal 2006 and $16,770 in fiscal 2007. We anticipate that a similar amount will be paid in fiscal 2008.

33

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The definitions of geological and technical terms used in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are provided below:

Amphibolite Facies An assemblage of minerals formed under medium to high pressure during regional metamorphism

Arsenopyrite	Mineral composed of iron, arsenic and sulphur.
Auriferous	Containing gold.
Bedrock	Rock units which underlie unconsolidated surface overburden or soils.
Brecciated	Rock composed of angular fragments held together in a matrix.
Calcareous Schist	A laminated metamorphic rock containing calcium carbonate.
Chlorite Schist	A laminated metamorphic rock containing prominent chlorite, which is a hydrated silicate of aluminum, iron and magnesium.
Chloritic Quartzite	A metamorphic rock composed primarily of quartz (silicon dioxide) with minor chlorite (see previous entry).
Dikes	A tabular intrusive body of rock with a vertical or near vertical orientation.
Diorite	A body of intrusive rock composed of feldspars, amphibole and a small amount of quartz.
Dioritic Dikes	See dikes. See diorite.
Dominant Lithology	In a given area, the rock type occurring at the highest percentage.
Drilling	The process of boring a hole in the rock to obtain a sample for determination of metal content. “Diamond Drilling” involves the use of a hollow bit with diamonds on the cutting surface to recover a cylindrical core of rock. “Reverse Circulation Drilling” involves chips of rock being forced back through the center of the drill pipe using air or water.
Exploration	The process of using prospecting, geological mapping, geochemical and geophysical surveys, drilling, sampling and other means to detect and perform initial evaluations of mineral deposits.
Fairbanks Schist	A grouping of metasedimentary rocks which underlie much of the Fairbanks District.
Federal Lode Claims,	Mineral claims up to 20 acres, located on federal land under the U.S.
Federal Placer Claims	Exploration Law of 1872. See below for definitions of “Lode” and “Placer”.
Felsic	A mnemonic adjective derived from (fe) for feldspar. (l) for feldpathoids and (s) for silica and is applied to light-colored rocks containing an abundance of one or all of these constituents.
Geochemical Survey	Sample of soil, rock, silt, water or vegetation analyzed to detect the presence of valuable metals or other metals which may accompany them. E.g., Arsenic may indicate the presence of gold.
Geophysical Survey	Electrical, magnetic and other means used to detect features, which may be associated with mineral deposits.
Gold Deposit	A concentration of gold in rock sufficient to be of economic interest.
Granite	An intrusive rock which includes feldspar, mica and quartz.
Graphitic Phyllite	Metamorphic rock intermediate between slate and schist, and containing graphite (carbon).
Greenschist Facies	An assemblage of minerals formed under low to medium pressure during regional metamorphism.
Host Rocks	A term used for a rock unit which, as a result of favorable structural or chemical characteristics, provides an environment for precipitation or deposition of metals or other foreign materials.
Lode Source	The lode mineral deposit from which placer minerals have been derived by erosion.

34

Lode	Mineral in place in the host rock, as in “lode gold”.
Metamorphic Complex	A grouping of metamorphic rocks which have complicated structural relationships.
Metamorphism	Processes, including pressure, heat and introduction of new chemical substances, by which consolidated rocks are changed from one form to another.
Metasedimentary	Partially metamorphosed sedimentary rocks.
Metasiltsone	A rock formed from consolidated silt, which has been partially changed to schist.
Micaceous Quartzite	A metamorphic rock, mostly quartz with minor mica.
Micaceous	Containing mica, usually referring to metamorphic rocks.
Mineral Claims	General term used to describe the manner of land acquisition under which the right to explore, develop and extract metals is established.
Mineral reserve	Securities and Exchange Commission Industry Guide 7 Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations of the Securities and Exchange Commission defines a reserve’ as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Reserves consist of:
	(1) Proven (Measured) Reserves. Reserves for which: (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well- established.
	(2) Probable (Indicated) Reserves. Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection,
	sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
Mineral resource	National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators defines a “Mineral Resource” as a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized organic material in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.
	Mineral Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than an Inferred Mineral Resource but has a lower level of confidence than a Measured Mineral Resource.
	(1) Inferred Mineral Resource. An ‘Inferred Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.
	(2) Indicated Mineral Resource. An ‘Indicated Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

35

	(3) Measured Mineral Resource. A ‘Measured Mineral Resource’ is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity. Industry Guide 7 – “Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations” of the Securities and Exchange Commission does not define or recognize resources. As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, “resources” are as defined in National Instrument 43-101.
Muscovite	A light coloured mica.
Phyllite	An argillaceous rock intermediate between slate and schist.
Placer	Mineral, which has been separated from its host rock by natural processes and is often reconcentrated in streams as “placer deposits” or “placer gold”.
Porphyritic Phases	Areas of rock in which one or more minerals occur as larger crystals in a relatively finer groundmass.
Pyrite	A mineral containing iron and sulphur.
Quartzite	A metamorphic rock composed mostly of quartz (silicon dioxide)
Quartz-Mica Schist	A laminated metamorphic rock with roughly equal quartz and mica. In geophysical surveying, an area with
Resistivity Low	higher electromagnetic conductivity than the surrounding area.
Schist	Flat plate-like metamorphic rock formations, which contain primarily mica.
Slate	A metamorphosed mudstone.
State Claims	Mineral claims up to 40 acres, located on State of Alaska lands.
Stibnite	A mineral composed of antimony and sulphur.
Stocks	Small intrusive bodies of rock.
Thrust Fault Contact	One rock type pushed over top of another at a relatively low angle.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We currently are not a party to any pending legal proceedings and, to our knowledge, there are no legal proceedings are threatened or contemplated.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during our fourth quarter ended November 30, 2007.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “SLGLF,” on the Berlin Stock Exchange under the symbol “SLGL,” and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “SLGL.” The following table indicates the range of high and low bid information of our common shares for each quarter within the last two fiscal years:

36

OTCBB:
	QUARTER ENDED	HIGH BID	LOW BID
	November 30, 2005	$0.07	$0.04
	February 28, 2006	$0.21	$0.05
	May 31, 2006	$0.17	$0.10
	August 31, 2006	$0.11	$0.06
	November 30, 2006	$0.08	$0.05
	February 28, 2007	$0.14	$0.06
	May 31, 2007	$0.16	$0.09
	August 31, 2007	$0.11	$0.06
	November 30, 2007	$0.09	$0.07
BERLIN:
	QUARTER ENDED	HIGH BID	LOW BID
	November 30, 2005	$0.06	$0.03
	February 28, 2006	$0.15	$0.04
	May 31, 2006	$0.13	$0.08
	August 31, 2006	$0.08	$0.04
	November 30, 2006	$0.06	$0.04
	February 28, 2007	$0.14	$0.06
	May 31, 2007	$0.016	$0.09
	August 31, 2007	$0.11	$0.06
	November 30, 2007	$0.09	$0.07
FRANKFURT
	QUARTER ENDED	HIGH BID	LOW BID
	November 30, 2005	$0.06	$0.03
	February 28, 2006	$0.16	$0.04
	May 31, 2006	$0.13	$0.07
	August 31, 2006	$0.08	$0.05
	November 30, 2006	$0.06	$0.04
	February 28, 2007	$0.11	$0.05
	May 31, 2007	$0.12	$0.07
	August 31, 2007	$0.08	$0.04
	November 30, 2007	$0.07	$0.05

The source of the high and low bid information is the NASD OTC Bulletin Board. The market quotations provided reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders

37

As at February 21, 2008 we had 926,270,430 common shares issued and outstanding that were held by approximately 4,000 registered holders.

Dividends

We have not declared any dividends on our common stock in our two most recent fiscal years.

We are restricted in our ability to pay dividends by limitations under British Columbia law relating to the sufficiency of profits from which dividends may be paid. In addition, Silverado’s Articles (the equivalent of the Bylaws of a United States corporation) provide that no dividend shall be paid otherwise than out of funds or assets properly available for the payment of dividends and declaration by the directors as to the amount of such funds or assets available for dividends shall be conclusive.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Set forth in the table below is information regarding outstanding equity awards made through equity compensation plans as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

	Number of		Weighted	Number of
	securities to be		average exercise	securities
	issued upon		price of	available for
	exercise of		outstanding	future plan
	outstanding		options,	issuance
	options,		warrants, and
	warrants, and		rights
Plan Category	rights
Equity compensation plans	N/A		N/A	N/A
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan	N/A		N/A	25,000,000
2007 Stock Option Plan	25,000,000	$	0.07	3,500,000
2006-II Stock Option Plan	27,300,000	$	0.07	700,000
2006 Stock Option Plan	31,100,000	$	0.05	5,900,000

On August 31, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted the 2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan (the "Incentive Stock Option Plan"). The Incentive Stock Option Plan was established to encourage certain of our officers, employees, directors and consultants to acquire and hold stock in the Company as an added incentive to remain with the Company and to increase their efforts in promoting the interests of the Company, as well as to attract and retain capable individuals. A maximum of twenty-five million (25,000,000) shares of our common stock can be issued under the Incentive Stock Option Plan. The aggregate fair market value of the our common shares issued to an employee in exchange for stock options under the Incentive Stock Option Plan cannot exceed $100,000 during any calendar year. The Incentive Stock Option Plan may be terminated at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.

On January 11, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the "2007 Plan"). The 2007 Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 25,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2007 Plan. On February 20, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 25,000,000 of such shares. The 2007 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors. The 2007 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

On March 29, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006-II Stock Option Plan (the "2006-II Plan"). The 2006-II Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 28,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2006-II Plan. On March 31, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 28,000,000 of such shares. The 2006-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of one or more members of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Garry L. Anselmo and Mr. James F. Dixon were named members of the committee charged with administering the 2006-II Plan. The 2006-II Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

38

On January 4, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the "2006 Plan"). The 2006 Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 37,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2006 Plan. On April 11, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 37,000,000 of such shares. The 2006 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors. The 2006 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

We have not sold any unregistered securities during the last fiscal year other than those we previously reported in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB or Current Reports on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

PLAN OF OPERATION

Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is as follows:

The Nolan Gold Project

We are continuing our exploration program on the Nolan Gold Project. The objective of this exploration program is to continue with tunneling into the Workman’s Bench mineralized zone to intersect the 80 foot wide zone that contains gold bearing antimony-quartz veins. The company intends to collect a bulk sample from the mineralized zone for metallurgical test work. The underground exposure of the mineralized zone will play an important key role for the company in obtaining a better understanding of the nature of the structurally controlled gold and antimony mineralization in the Solomon Shear Zone. This will significantly support Silverado’s exploration strategy. The underground work will continue until the end of January, 2008.

Reclamation work will be in progress throughout the summer and into fall. Our objective will be to reclaim 10 acres of disturbed surface area, while limiting 2008 surface disturbance to 5 acres or less. We work closely with the government agencies responsible for managing the lands that we work, and pride ourselves in being responsive and responsible stewards of the land.

Our drilling program will be aimed at lode gold and antimony exploration, and placer gold exploration. Lode drilling will focus on Pringle Bench, Workman’s Bench and the Hillside along the Solomon’s Shear trend, and is designed to provide a better three dimensional understanding of the mineralized sections of the structure and how it is related to the placer gold deposits of the Nolan Creek area. Further exploration drilling will be conducted in the Fortress area which is part of a gold bearing east-west trending deformation zone. Placer drilling will focus on a series of targets on the hillside benches. Our exploration work will provide a basis for the assessment of the feasibility of future additional exploration activities, including test mining activities, at the Nolan Gold Project.

Our exploration plans are to further define gold deposits in order to provide a basis for the assessment of the feasibility of future additional test mining activities at the Nolan project. We are currently undertaking an extensive geological exploration program on the Nolan Gold Project. The program includes drilling and trenching, as well as the review of geological and geophysical data. The overall objectives of our exploration program are as follows:

1.

To identify surface or sub-surface placer deposits at our Nolan Gold Project that are prospective for test mining operations. In general, these deposits are located on benches that are ancient river beds and lakeshore deposits located above the present channel of Nolan Creek. These deposits include Mary’s Bench, Jack London Bench, Wooll Bench, Workman’s Bench, Swede Channel, Upper Nolan Creek (deep channel), Lower Nolan Bench and Mary’s East including areas adjoining to the north, east and south. The objectives of our drilling program will include the determination of the nature and extent of areas of known bench deposits that are prospects for test mining operations and the identification of new bench deposits that may be prospects for test mining operations. Mary’s Bench East and areas adjoining north, east and south as well as, the Swede Channel and the areas adjoining to the east and south, in that order, are our exploration priorities as they have showed the most positive results from earlier exploration that we have completed. Wooll Bench and Workman’s Bench have been less extensively explored with only limited drilling. The Lower Nolan Bench has not been drilled. The newly discovered Jack London Bench may also be a priority target during fiscal 2008.

2.

To determine whether there is a potential lode gold and antimony deposit which may be the source of the placer gold found on the Nolan Gold Project. A lode deposit of gold occurs when gold is present in its host rock as differentiated from placer gold which is gold that has been removed from its host rock by the process of erosion. Our reverse circulation and diamond core drilling, trenching, geologic and geophysical work will be part of our on-going

39

	investigations to determine whether there exist one or more lode deposits on the Nolan Gold project that could be the source of our placer gold deposits.
3.	To identify any placer deposits at Slisco Bench, which is located on our Hammond River property that are prospective for test mining operations. The Slisco Bench (deep channel) deposit is approximately 3 to 4 miles northeast of the Nolan Deep Channel.

We have been working on interpreting the geology of the Nolan area since 1979, when we first acquired the project. Our latest and most extensive exploration program began in early 2007 and was directed at improving our placer deposit definition and discovering potential lode sources of the placer gold. Our exploration geologists and mining engineers have worked to move this objective forward. Our exploration efforts have included the analysis of geophysical data, geochemical sampling results, company records and analysis provided by government mineral investigation efforts and publications as well as the trenching and exploration drilling of target areas.

We plan to spend up to $5,000,000 in the next twelve months in carrying out our exploration activities for the Nolan Gold Project. Of this amount, we anticipate approximately $3,000,000 will be spent on test mining activities, with the balance being spent on maintaining our properties, and other exploration activities, including placer drilling, and lode drilling and trenching on the Solomons Shear. The actual amount that we spend on exploration will depend on the actual amount of funds that we have available for exploration. We are presently seeking sufficient financing to enable us to proceed with these plans and will require additional financing if we are able to proceed with our exploration plans, including our ongoing underground test mining activities. Further, while the amount of exploration expenditures may be off-set by any recoveries from sales of gold that we may achieve from test mining activities, we anticipate that these recoveries will not exceed our costs of exploration. However, at this time we are achieving recoveries from sales of gold.

Our plan of operations at the Nolan Gold Project will be continually evaluated and modified as exploration and gold recovery results become available. Modifications to our plans will be based on many factors, including: results of exploration, assessment of data, weather conditions, exploration costs, the price of gold and available capital. Further, the extent of our exploration programs that we undertake will be dependent upon the amount of financing available to us.

We do not have any commercially viable reserves on any of our properties that comprise the Nolan Gold Project or any of our other properties. We plan to carry out exploration activities on the Nolan Gold Project that are referred to as “test mining activities”. The objective of the test mining activities on the Nolan Gold Project is to expand our knowledge of the placer deposits and lode gold occurrences on the Nolan Gold Project and to develop a cost effective method for working the deposits. While the irregular high grade nature of these deposits may preclude attainment of “reserve” categories; management does believe that we may be attaining profitability presently or soon, depending on the considerable increase of recovered gold this year anticipated over last. Profitability is the objective, while at the minimum we endeavor to pay for a portion of the expense associated with exploration of the Nolan Gold Project. As we have not established commercially viable reserves on the Nolan Gold Project, we anticipate that recoveries of gold from test mining activities may not be sufficient to pay for the full cost of exploration. There is no assurance that our test mining activities will result in a final evaluation that a commercially viable lode or placer mineral deposit exists on any of our mineral properties that comprise the Nolan Gold Project.

Ester Dome Property

During 2008, we plan to complete the closure of the Grant Mill Tailings Pond. This pond is filled to capacity, and will be capped and decommissioned after a final approval of the tailings pond closure plan is received from State of Alaska regulatory agencies. A meaningful exploration program may be completed during the summer months to explore for and identify small high-grade gold anomalies as well as larger low-grade gold anomalies.

Completing the 2008 exploration work plan will be contingent on available funding.

Hammond Property

The encouraging drill results to date, the potential of extending the Slisco Channel to the southeast plus the possibility of discovering gold bearing tributary channels, make this a prospect for additional discoveries. During the summer of 2008, a series of drill holes may be completed to explore for the extension of the Slisco Channel to the south. Presently, it has been traced for 1,800 feet. The drill program will also seek to define any gold bearing tributaries to the Slisco Channel.

This project will require additional funding for the company. Even if funding is acquired, there is no assurance that a commercial gold bearing placer deposit will be developed. Even if a gold bearing deposit is developed, additional funding will be required to mine the deposit, and until a feasibility study is completed, there is no assurance that the deposit will be profitable to mine.

40

Eagle Creek Property

During 2008, annual assessment work will be completed on the Eagle Creek property to keep the mining claims in good standing. Assessment work will be focused on the northwest part of the claim block, where drilling and trenching has defined an intrusive host rock, thought to be a sill, containing low grade gold, silver and antimony mineralization. If funding permits, the company will design a drilling program to further investigate the gold and by-product mineral distribution of the intrusive. Additional work which includes trenching and drilling will also be completed on the Number One. The Number One Vein was the lode quartz structure which has been mined commercially for antimony.

A commercially viable economic mineral deposit has not been defined on the property, and there is no assurance that a commercially viable economic mineral deposit exists on the property.

Completing the 2008 work plan will be contingent on available funding. Even if funding becomes available, there is no assurance that a commercial gold-silver-antimony deposit will

Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel Project

On December 18, 2006, Silverado Green Fuel Inc. announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Choctaw County, the Choctaw County Economic Development District, the Mississippi Development Authority (“MDA”) and Silverado Green Fuel Inc. The MOU is an agreement to build the country’s first Low-Rank Coal-Water fuel commercial demonstration plant at the Red Hills Ecoplex just outside of Ackerman, MS. The anticipated $26 million Silverado Green Fuel Demonstration Project will be located on a 14-acre site, and is being designed to utilize the state's vast supply of low-rank coal reserves by converting them into green fuel, a new form of coal-based, environmentally friendly, low-cost, alternative fuel.

During late May of 2007 Silverado environmental staff met in a “pre-permitting” meeting with representatives of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”). At that meeting all the various sections of MDEQ that would be involved in the permitting of the Green Fuel industrial process were present, representatives of these sections were assigned to our project, and the lead MDEQ regulator that will serve as our point-of-contact was designated.

As we await full funding of the project, preliminary work on aspects of the various permits involved will continue during fiscal 2008. The development of an Environmental Management System (“EMS”) that was initiated in 2007 upon the signing of the MOU will also continue during fiscal 2008. Silverado has also agreed to fund a study by the University of Alaska Fairbanks of the chemical and physical characteristics of Mississippi lignite coal, and it is anticipated that that study will commence during fiscal 2008.

There is no assurance that any financing will be obtained from either government or private sources to fund this project. It is the case, however, that two divisions of the state of Mississippi government have agreed to begin funding the start-up of our demonstration facility subject to certain terms and conditions as outlined in the MOU.

We expect to spend approximately $171,500 to fund the research into lignite coal conversion in conjunction with the University of Fairbanks, Alaska, referred to above, and the preparation of a Phase I feasibility study and cost estimate for the Mississippi Commercial Low Rank Coal Water Fuel plant. In addition we expect to incur administration costs of approximately $150,000 relating to the Green Fuel project.

Cash Requirements and Additional Financings

At November 30, 2007, we had working capital of $1,759,774. During the first quarter of 2008 we raised $3,860,388 in additional share capital. Our plan of mining operations in Alaska anticipates that we will expend $6,550,000 during fiscal year 2008. In addition, we expect to spend $321,500 on research and development for the Green Fuel project and approximately $2,000,000 on administrative costs in the Company’s Vancouver office.

Our management is confident that they will be able to raise additional capital during the second, third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2008 to cover the resulting anticipated shortfall of approximately $3,250,000. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to raise the financing necessary to enable us to implement our business plan.

Planned operations as described above could be curtailed if funding were not available. In addition, as of the date of this filing gold is trading above the spot price used to value the Company's inventory at November 30, 2007. Furthermore, historically, the Company has sold its gold inventory at a premium to the spot price. These benefits, although presently determinable, would serve to further reduce the anticipated shortfall.

41

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Exploration Stage Company

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Exchange Act Guide 7 “Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations” requires that mining companies in the exploration stage should not refer to themselves as development stage companies in their financial statements, even though such companies should comply with Financial Accounting Board Statement No. 7, if applicable. We are an exploration stage company under the SEC’s Guide 7 and accordingly, we have not been referred to as a development stage company in our financial statements. Accumulated results of operations are presented from December 1, 2001, the date we re-entered the exploration stage.

Mineral rights payments and exploration costs

Pursuant to EITF 04-02, “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets and Related Issues”, the Company has modified its accounting policy with respect to mineral claim payments, retroactively effective to June 1, 2004, to capitalize the direct costs to acquire or lease mineral properties and mineral rights as tangible assets. The direct costs include the costs of signature (lease) bonuses, options to purchase or lease properties, and brokers’ and legal fees. If the acquired mineral rights relate to unproven properties, the Company does not amortize the capitalized mineral costs, but evaluates the capitalized mineral costs periodically for impairment. The Company expenses all costs related to the exploration of mineral claims in which it had secured exploration rights prior to establishment of proven and probable reserves.

Asset retirement obligation

Effective December 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and normal use of the asset.

SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, we will recognize a gain or loss on settlement.

Stock Based Compensation

Effective December 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) (Share-based Compensation) requiring equity awards granted under its stock option plan to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award. Prior to December 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards granted under its stock option plans utilizing the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), and related interpretations, and provided the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123), as amended. Under the existing stock option plans, all options vest entirely on the grant date. Therefore, there were no partially vested options outstanding as of the SFAS 123(R) adoption date.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, and that would be considered material to investors.

42

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Our audited financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2007, as set forth below, are included with this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A. Our audited financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in U.S. dollars.

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2007 and 2006	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations and other Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 and for the period since Recommencement of Exploration Stage, December 1, 2001, to November 30, 2007	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the years from Recommencement of Exploration Stage, December 1, 2001, to November 30, 2007	F-4 to F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 and for the period since Recommencement of Exploration Stage, December 1, 2001, to November 30, 2007	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8 to F-27

43

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. and Subsidiaries (An Exploration Stage Company) as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. Our opinion on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the period since recommencement of the exploration stage, December 1, 2001 to November 30, 2007 insofar as it relates to amounts for the prior periods through November 30, 2004 is based on the reports of other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. and Subsidiaries (An Exploration Stage Company) as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in note 2, the consolidated balance sheets as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period since recommencement of the exploration stage on December 1, 2001 to November 30, 2007 have been restated.

/s/ Berkovits & Company, LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
February 21, 2008, except for
Note 2 which is as of
January 20, 2009

F-1

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

		2007			2006
		(Restated)			(Restated)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,073,457		$	3,509,418
Gold inventory		1,969,870			493,188
Other receivables		294,505			9,972
Total Current Assets		3,337,832			4,012,578
Mineral rights		1,012,316			802,991
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,158,379			1,053,533
Total Assets	$	6,508,527		$	5,869,102
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	210,404		$	332,229
Mineral claims royalty payable		360,000			380,000
Payable to related party		1,214,717			359,834
Convertible debentures		140,000			140,000
Capital lease obligation, current portion		31,013			129,286
Total Current Liabilities		1,956,134			1,341,349
Asset retirement obligation		529,311			521,058
Capital lease obligations		-			247,129
Total Liabilities		2,485,445			2,109,536
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock
Authorized: unlimited common shares with no par value
Issued and outstanding:
785,607,717 common shares (2006: 630,785,052)		89,374,641			82,538,598
Additional paid-in capital		1,200,408			466,314
Common stock to be issued		275,136			273,600
Accumulated deficit during exploration stage		(86,827,103	)		(79,518,946	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		4,023,082			3,759,566
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	6,508,527		$	5,869,102

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-2

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE GAIN (LOSS)

for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

								Period Since
								Recommencement
								Of
								Exploration Stage
		Years ended November 30						December 1, 2001
								To November 30,
		2007			2006			2007
		(Restated)			(Restated)			(Restated)
General and Administrative Expenses
Accounting and audit	$	106,298		$	109,623		$	389,935
Advertising and promotion		928,416			327,082			2,733,015
Consulting fees		1,157,569			1,223,060			6,763,859
Depreciation, accretion and impairment		255,264			226,587			2,225,511
Exploration expenses		3,075,868			2,538,706			12,427,615
Financing activities		50,000			-			302,003
Legal		175,758			264,169			711,415
Management services		1,820,129			1,028,066			4,764,707
Office		1,041,794			941,372			3,770,110
Related party charges in excess of costs incurred		1,243,430			760,324			3,766,942
Reporting and investor relations		228,604			197,147			540,390
Research		34,313			129,698			769,690
Transfer agent fees and mailing		59,443			60,688			211,480
Write-off of mineral claim expenditures		-			-			1,159,529
Write-down of property, plant and equipment		-			-			285,875
Total General and Administrative Expenses		10,176,886			7,806,522			40,822,076
Loss from Operations		(10,176,886	)		(7,806,522	)		(40,822,076	)
Gold extraction and gold sales during the exploration stage
Gold sale proceeds		1,169,509			87,357			1,461,313
Cost of gold sold		(1,012,443	)		(114,743	)		(1,286,819	)
Gold inventory addition from gold extraction		2,489,124			585,510			3,248,056
Total gold income earned during the exploration stage		2,646,190			558,124			3,422,550
Interest income (expenses)
Interest and other income		18,689			145,189			256,668
Interest on capital lease obligations		(16,518	)		(43,187	)		(317,294	)
Interest on convertible debentures		(11,200	)		(11,200	)		(695,807	)
Other interest and bank charges		(10,990	)		(8,845	)		(47,472	)
Total interest (expenses) / income		(20,019	)		81,957			(803,905	)
Net loss before cumulative effect of accounting change		(7,550,715	)		(7,166,441	)		(38,203,431	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-			-			(99,481	)
Net loss		(7,550,715	)		(7,166,441	)		(38,302,912	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss)
Gain (Loss) on foreign exchange		242,558			(4,878	)		380,753
Comprehensive loss for the period	$	(7,308,157	)	$	(7,171,319	)	$	(37,922,159	)
Net loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of
common shares outstanding		700,523,325			532,400,802

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-3

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

for the years from December 1, 2001 to November 30, 2007

(Stated in United States Dollars)

													Accumulated
													Deficit
	Number of		Common			Common		Additional					during
	Common		Shares -			Stock to be		Paid in		Deferred			Exploration
	Shares		Amount			Issued		Capital		Compensation			Stage			Total
													(Restated)			(Restated)
Balance, November 30, 2001	42,423,988	$	47,056,285		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	(48,904,944	)	$	(1,848,659	)
Shares issued:
For options exercised
January 2002 @ $0.15 per share	3,700,000		555,000			-		-		-			-			555,000
April 2002 @ $0.11 per share	2,000,000		220,000			-		-		-			-			220,000
May 2002 @ $0.125 per share	1,200,000		150,000			-		-		-			-			150,000
For warrants exercised
March 2002 @ $0.05 per share	5,300,000		265,000			-		-		-			-			265,000
April 2002 @ $0.08 per share	2,000,000		160,000			-		-		-			-			160,000
July 2002 @ $0.35 per share	1,800,000		630,000			-		-		-			-			630,000
July 2002 @ $0.20 per share	2,000,000		400,000			-		-		-			-			400,000
August 2002 @ $0.10 per share	5,150,000		515,000			-		-		-			-			515,000
For consulting fees
February 2002 @ $0.11 per share	1,091,667		120,084			-		-		-			-			120,084
April 2002 @ $0.12 per share	350,000		42,000			-		-		-			-			42,000
May 2002 @ $0.13 per share	308,333		40,083			-		-		-			-			40,083
May 2002 @ $0.15 per share	391,667		60,000			-		-		-			-			60,000
February 2002 @ $0.18 per share	350,000		63,000			-		-		-			-			63,000
June 2002 @ $0.23 per share	308,333		70,917			-		-		-			-			70,917
August 2002 @ $0.34 per share	300,000		102,000			-		-		-			-			102,000
August 2002 @ $0.35 per share	41,667		14,583			-		-		-			-			14,583
June 2002 @ $0.38 per share	41,667		14,583			-		-		-			-			14,583
July 2002 @ $0.39 per share	83,333		32,500			-		-		-			-			32,500
October 2002 @ $0.40 per share	41,667		16,667			-		-		-			-			16,667
November 2002 @ $0.41 per share	268,333		109,217			-		-		-			-			109,217
September 2002 @ $0.43 per share	925,005		397,752			-		-		-			-			397,752
October 2002 @ $0.44 per share	50,000		22,000			-		-		-			-			22,000
September 2002 @ $0.46 per share	41,667		19,167			-		-		-			-			19,167
September 2002 @ $0.48 per share	100,000		48,000			-		-		-			-			48,000
November 2002 @ $0.60 per share	99,996		59,998			-		-		-			-			59,998
For private placements, net of
commissions
December 2002 @ $0.04 per share	2,500,000		100,000			-		-		-			-			100,000
February 2002 @ $0.05 per share	5,300,000		265,000			-		-		-			-			265,000
April 2002 @ $0.09 per share	2,000,000		180,000			-		-		-			-			180,000
May 2002 @ $0.10 per share	2,000,000		200,000			-		-		-			-			200,000
June 2002 @ $0.15 per share	4,000,000		600,000			-		-		-			-			600,000
July 2002 @ $0.26 per share	250,000		65,000			-		-		-			-			65,000
July 2002 @ $0.30 per share	1,200,000		360,000			-		-		-			-			360,000
September 2002 @ $0.38 per share	400,000		152,000			-		-		-			-			152,000
November 2002 @ $0.32 per share	3,125,000		1,000,000			-		-		-			-			1,000,000
In lieu of payment for debentures
December 2002 @ $0.10 per share	1,628,971		162,897			-		-		-			-			162,897
June 2002 @ $0.11 per share	1,437,520		158,127			-		-		-			-			158,127
March 2002 @ $0.13 per share	1,234,710		160,512			-		-		-			-			160,512
September 2002 @ $0.37 per share	2,643,107		984,391			-		-		-			-			984,391
Subscriptions received	-		-			268,613		-		-			-			268,613
Stock option granted	-		-			-		292,320		(164,213	)		-			128,107
Net loss for the year	-		-			-		-		-			(6,965,911	)		(6,965,911	)
Balance, November 30, 2002	98,086,631		55,571,763			268,613		292,320		(164,213	)		(55,870,855	)		97,628
Shares issued:
For private placements (net)
December 2002 @ $0.50 per share	5,500,000		2,750,000			-		-		-			-			2,750,000
January 2003 @ $0.55 per share	909,091		500,000			-		-		-			-			500,000
April 2003 @ $0.33 per share	3,525,582		1,163,400			-		-		-			-			1,163,400
July 2003 @ $0.15 per share	1,666,667		250,000			-		-		-			-			250,000
August 2003 @ $0.10 per share	13,050,000		1,305,000			-		-		-			-			1,305,000
Commissions paid	-		(641,155	)		-		-		-			-			(641,155	)
For options exercised
December 2002 @ $0.35 per share	200,000		70,000			-		-		-			-			70,000
For warrants exercised
August 2003 @ $0.08 per share	10,864,539		884,121			-		-		-			-			884,121
July 2003 @ $0.12 per share	954,546		114,546			-		-		-			-			114,546
September 2003 @ $0.10 per share	3,459,086		345,908			-		-		-			-			345,908

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-4

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

for the years from December 1, 2001 to November 30, 2007

(Stated in United States Dollars)

										Accumulated
										Deficit
	Number of	Common		Common		Additional				during
	Common	Shares -		Stock to be		Paid in	Deferred			Exploration
	Shares	Amount		Issued		Capital	Compensation			Stage		Total
										(Restated)		(Restated)
For consulting fees
November 2003 @ $0.22 per share	2,511,668	554,085		(268,613	)	-	-			-		285,472
In lieu of payment for debentures
December 2002 @ $0.38 per share	372,818	141,671		-		-	-			-		141,671
April 2003 @ $0.18 per share	3,274,865	588,893		-		-	-			-		588,893
August 2003 @ $0.14 per share	913,551	127,897		-		-	-			-		127,897
November 2003 @ $0.46 per share	738,308	340,006		-		-	-			-		340,006
Subscriptions received	-	-		115,000		-	-			-		115,000
Amortization of stock-based
compensation	-	-		-		-	129,397			-		129,397
Stock option granted	-	-		-		171,994	(42,896	)		-		129,098
Net loss for the year	-	-		-		-	-			(8,519,169	)	(8,519,169	)
Balance, November 30, 2003	146,027,352	64,066,135		115,000		464,314	(77,712	)	$	(64,390,024	)	177,713
Shares issued:
For private placements
December 2003 @ $0.075 per share	1,533,894	115,000		(115,000	)	-	-			-		-
February 2004 @ $0.075 per share	15,390,070	1,154,255		-		-	-			-		1,154,255
June 2004 @ $0.05 per share	21,666,667	1,083,334		-		-	-			-		1,083,334
September 2004 @ $0.04 per share	2,500,000	100,000		-		-	-			-		100,000
September 2004 @ $0.035 per	2,857,143	100,000		-		-	-			-		100,000
share
October 2004 @ $0.06 per share	1,166,667	70,000		-		-	-			-		70,000
November 2004 @ $0.03 per share	10,000,000	300,000		-		-	-			-		300,000
Commissions paid	-	(357,690	)	-		-	-			-		(357,690	)
For warrants exercised
January 2004 @ $0.075per share	8,876,597	665,745		-		-	-			-		665,745
November 2004 @ $0.03 per share	6,000,000	180,000		-		-	-			-		180,000
For consulting fees
January 2004 @ $0.14 per share	495,000	69,300		-		-	-			-		69,300
April 2004 @ $0.09 per share	750,000	67,500		-		-	-			-		67,500
April 2004 @ $0.10 per share	50,000	5,000		-		-	-			-		5,000
April 2004 @ $0.137 per share	720,000	98,640		-		-	-			-		98,640
June 2004 @ $0.12 per share	410,000	49,200		-		-	-			-		49,200
August 2004 @ $0.07 per share	150,000	10,500		-		-	-			-		10,500
November 2004 @ $0.06 per share	1,516,667	91,000		-		-	-			-		91,000
November 2004 @ $0.06 per share	2,325,000	186,000		-		-	-			-		186,000
In lieu of payment for debentures
December 2003 @ $0.11 per share	1,119,342	123,128		-		-	-			-		123,128
February 2004 @ $0.10 per share	559,915	55,992		-		-	-			-		55,992
June 2004 @ $0.067 per share	248,685	16,660		-		-	-			-		16,660
September 2004 @ $0.049 per	86,588	4,243		-		-	-			-		4,243
share
Subscriptions received	-	-		70,000		-	-			-		70,000
Amortization of stock-based
compensation		-		-		-	77,712			-		77,712
Stock-based compensation	-	-		-		2,000	-			-		2,000
Net loss for the year	-	-		-		-	-			(4,836,363	)	(4,836,363	)
Balance, November 30, 2004 (Restated)	224,449,587	68,253,942		70,000		466,314	-			(69,226,387	)	(436,131	)
Shares issued:
For private placements
December 2004 @ $0.032 per share	3,076,924	100,000		(70,000	)	-	-			-		30,000
February 2005 @ $0.04 per share	562,500	22,500		-		-	-			-		22,500
October 2005 @ $0.0275 per share	5,454,546	150,000		-		-	-			-		150,000
November 2005 @ $0.02 per share	8,250,000	165,000		-		-	-			-		165,000
November 2005 @ $0.025 per	8,000,000	200,000		-		-	-			-		200,000
share
November 2005 @ $0.03 per share	38,540,338	1,156,210		-		-	-			-		1,156,210
November 2005 @ $0.032 per	56,335,379	1,267,546		-		-	-			-		1,267,546
share
Commissions paid	-	(325,363	)	-		-	-			-		(325,363	)
For consulting fees
December 2004 @ $0.025 per share	2,000,000	50,000		-		-	-			-		50,000
December 2004 @ $0.033 per share	1,150,000	38,000		-		-	-			-		38,000
January 2005 @ $0.06 per share	420,000	25,200		-		-	-			-		25,200
January 2005 @ $0.07 per share	160,000	11,200		-		-	-			-		11,200
January 2005 @ $0.09 per share	160,000	14,400		-		-	-			-		14,400
February 2005 @ $0.05 per share	1,450,000	72,500		-		-	-			-		72,500
February 2005 @ $0.08 per share	895,000	71,600		-		-	-			-		71,600
May 2005 @ $0.04 per share	50,000	2,000		-		-	-			-		2,000
Subscriptions received	-	-		54,500		-	-			-		54,500
Stock-based compensation

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-5

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

for the years from December 1, 2001 to November 30, 2007

(Stated in United States Dollars)

												Accumulated
												Deficit
	Number of		Common			Common			Additional			during
	Common		Shares -			Stock to be			Paid in	Deferred		Exploration
	Shares		Amount			Issued			Capital	Compensation		Stage			Total
												(Restated)			(Restated)
December 2004 @ $0.07 per share	600,001		42,000			-			-	-		-			42,000
December 2004 @ $0.06 per share	3,500,000		210,003			-			-	-		-			210,003
Net loss for the year	-		-			-			-	-		(3,394,107	)		(3,394,107	)
Balance, November 30, 2005	355,054,275		71,526,738			54,500			466,314	-		(72,620,494	)		(572,942	)
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net	-		-			-			-	-		272,867			272,867
of income taxes, refer to Note 2, below
Shares issued:
For private placements
December 2005 @ $0.028 per share	4,285,715		120,000			-			-	-		-			120,000
December 2005 @ $0.035 per share	428,573		15,000			(15,000	)		-	-		-			-
January 2006 @ $0.025 per share	85,806,201		2,145,145			-			-	-		-			2,145,145
January 2006 @ $0.03 per share	14,020,000		420,600			(8,000	)		-	-		-			412,600
January 2006 @ $0.0325 per share	4,776,924		155,250			-			-	-		-			155,250
January 2006 @ $0.038 per share	1,914,475		72,750			-			-	-		-			72,750
February 2006 @ $0.114 per share	788,782		90,000			-			-	-		-			90,000
April 2006 @ $0.06 per share	71,626,667		4,297,600			-			-	-		-			4,297,600
April 2006 @ $0.07 per share	9,900,001		693,000			-			-	-		-			693,000
May 2006 @ $0.08 per share	5,650,000		452,000			-			-	-		-			452,000
May 2006 @ $0.10 per share	4,000,000		400,000			-			-	-		-			400,000
October 2006 @ $0.0285 per share	35,087,719		1,000,000			-			-	-		-			1,000,000
Commissions paid	-		(1,170,791	)		-			-	-		-			(1,170,791	)
For warrants exercised
December 2005 @ $0.0225 per share	1,400,000		31,500			(31,500	)		-	-		-			-
July 2006 @ $0.04 per share	18,888,888		755,556			-			-	-		-			755,556
July 2006 @ $0.069 per share	11,081,832		767,000			-			-	-		-			767,000
For consulting fees
March 2006 to November 2006 @
$0.13 per share	6,075,000		767,250			-			-	-		-			767,250
Subscriptions received	-		-			273,600			-	-		-			273,600
Net loss for the year, as restated	-		-			-			-	-		(7,171,319	)		(7,171,319	)
Balance, November 30, 2006, as restated	630,785,052		82,538,598			273,600			466,314	-		(79,518,946	)		3,759,566
Shares issued
For private placements
September 2007 @ $0.0321 per share	59,166,669		1,900,000												1,900,000
November 2007 @ $0.035 per share	4,700,000		164,500												164,500
Commissions Paid			(408,458	)											(408,458	)
For warrants exercised
January 2007 @ $0.06 per share	2,500,000		150,000												150,000
February 2007 @ $0.03 per share	11,500,000		345,000												345,000
March 2007 @ $0.07 per share	17,343,359		1,214,035												1,214,035
May 2007 @ $0.05 per share	34,411,028		1,720,551												1,720,551
For Options exercised
December 2006 @ $0.05 per share	500,000		25,000												25,000
March 2007 @ $0.05 per share	1,300,000		65,000												65,000
April 2007 @ $0.0505 per share	8,500,000		429,000												429,000
May 2007 @ $0.05 per share	1,280,000		64,000												64,000
September 2007 @ $0.058 per share	500,000		29,000												29,000
October 2007 @ $0.05 per share	600,000		30,000												30,000
For Consulting fees
December 2006 @ $0.13 per share	200,000		26,000												26,000
January 2007 @ $0.0814 per share	4,375,000		356,250			(273,600	)								82,650
February 2007 @ $0.13 per share	200,000		26,000												26,000
March 2007 @ $0.0959 per share	1,370,067		131,401												131,401
April 2007 @ $0.1435 per share	575,000		82,500												82,500
May 2007 @ $0.1009 per share	834,251		84,154												84,154
June 2007 @ $0.1 per share	200,000		20,000												20,000
July 2007 @ $0.09 per share	975,000		87,750												87,750
August 2007 @ $0.09 per share	600,000		54,000												54,000
September 2007 @ $0.07 per share	1,492,291		104,460												104,460
November 2007 @ $0.0799 per share	1,700,000		135,900												135,900
Amortization of stock-based compensation
									734,094						734,093
Subscriptions received						275,136									275,136
Net Loss for the year, as restated												(7,308,157	)		(7,308,157	)
Balance, November 30, 2007, as restated	785,607,717	$	89,374,641		$	275,136		$	1,200,408	-	$	$ (86,827,103	)	$	4,023,082

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-6

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

								Period Since
								Recommencement
								Of Exploration
								Stage
		Years Ended November 30						December 1, 2001
		2007			2006			to November 30,
		(Restated)			(Restated)			2007 (Restated)
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$	(7,308,157	)	$	(7,171,319	)	$	(37,922,159	)
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change		-			-			99,481
Depreciation, accretion and impairment		255,264			226,587			2,225,511
Stock based compensation		734,094			-			3,375,644
Stock issued for debentures		-			-			217,687
Non-cash consulting and legal expense		1,108,416			1,040,850			2,737,706
Non-cash financing expense		-			-			252,003
Interest accrued		-			-			486,370
Write-off of mineral claim expenditures		-			-			1,159,529
Write-down of property, plant and equipment		-			-			285,875
Changes in non-cash operating working capital:
Other receivables		(284,533	)		(3,378	)		(291,630	)
Gold inventory		(1,476,682	)		(470,767	)		(1,961,237	)
Prepaid expense		-			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(113,572	)		(79,222	)		(396,129	)
Net cash used in Operating Activities		(7,085,170	)		(6,457,249	)		(29,731,349	)
Cash Flows (used in) provided by Investing Activities
Investment in mineral properties		(229,325	)		(544,629	)		(968,816	)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(1,360,110	)		(49,604	)		(2,744,419	)
Disposal of property, plant and equipment		-			55,037			207,289
Net cash (used in) provided by Investing Activities		(1,589,435	)		539,196			(3,505,946	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Common stock issued for cash (net of share issue		5,727,627			10,190,110			34,580,040
costs)
Share subscriptions received		1,536			-			1,536
Repayment of convertible debentures		-			(36,652	)		(74,999	)
Repayment of loans payable		-			-			(35,729	)
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(345,402	)		(345,734	)		(1,100,594	)
Advanced from related party		854,883			289,550			923,405
Net cash provided by Financing Activities		6,238,644			10,097,274			34,293,659
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(2,435,961	)		3,100,829			1,056,364
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		3,509,418			408,589			17,093
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	1,073,457		$	3,509,418		$	1,073,457
Supplemental information:
Interest paid during the year	$	27,718		$	54,387		$	1,103,101
Mineral claims royalty payable changes during the year		(20,000	)		(20,000	)		43,500

THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-7

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Note 1	Nature and Continuance of Operations
	Silverado Gold Mines Ltd, “the Company”, is an exploration stage company in the process of exploring its resource properties and has not yet determined whether these properties contain reserves that are economically recoverable. The company is also engaged in the research and development of low-rank coal-water fuel as a replacement fuel for oil fired boilers and utility generators.
	The Company’s operations have been funded primarily from sales of its stock and the sale of gold extracted during exploration activities. Management anticipates that the cash generated from operating activities, together with additional funding commitments will be sufficient to finance the Company’s operations over the next twelve months.
Note 2	Changes in Significant Accounting Policies, Restatements and Reclassifications
	Following the conclusion of a review of certain of the Company’s filings by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company determined to make the following accounting policies changes, restatements and reclassifications to the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
	a)	Gold Inventory
		The Company’s test production in past years has yielded gold dust and gold nuggets. Gold dust has yielded sales prices equivalent to the spot gold price. Gold nuggets, however, are considered to be gem or jewelry items, which in the industry sell at a higher price than the spot price. They are valued according to weight, purity, character, and relative flatness (wearing quality). Historically, the Company’s gold nuggets have sold at prices above the spot gold price.
		Since December 1, 2001, recommencement of exploration stage, the Company had valued its gold inventory using the spot gold price at the end of the reporting period and directly applied the gold extraction and the revaluation difference to exploration costs. In addition, proceeds from sales of gold extracted during exploration and test mining had been recorded as a reduction of exploration costs during the exploration stage period.
		Retroactively effective from the period since recommencement of exploration stage from December 1, 2001, the Company has modified the accounting policy in the gold inventory to measure the gold inventories at the lower of cost or market. The Company is still in the exploration stage. By definition, the Company’s direct and absorbed costs would exceed the market value of any gold recovery. Therefore, the Company has retroactively set up inventory groups from December 1, 2001, valued each group at the spot price as of the date of the addition to the gold inventory, and record the costs of gold inventory sold on a first-in first-out basis. Gold sale proceeds and cost of gold sold are now recorded as other income earned during the exploration stage.
	b)	Revenue Recognition
		Proceeds on gold recoveries from test mining were recorded as a reduction of exploration costs during the period the Company is in the exploration stage. This accounting policy has been changed and now proceeds on gold recoveries from test mining are recorded as other income earned during the exploration stage, retroactively effective from the period since recommencement of exploration stage from December 1, 2001.
	c)	Mineral Rights Payments and Exploration Costs
		Since December 1, 2001, recommencement of exploration stage, the Company had expensed all costs related to the acquisition, maintenance and exploration of mineral claims in which it had secured exploration rights prior to establishment of proven and probable reserves.
		Pursuant to EITF 04-02, “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets and Related Issues”, the Company has modified its accounting policy with respect to mineral claim payments, retroactively effective to June 1, 2004, to capitalize the direct costs to acquire or lease mineral properties and mineral rights as tangible assets. The direct costs include the costs of signature (lease) bonuses, options to purchase or lease properties, and brokers’ and legal fees. If the acquired mineral rights relate to unproven properties, the Company does not amortize the capitalized mineral costs, but evaluates the capitalized mineral costs periodically for impairment. The Company expenses all costs related to the exploration of mineral claims in which it had secured exploration rights prior to establishment of proven and probable reserves.

F-8

d)	Restatements and Reclassifications
	The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated to give effect to the capitalization of direct costs to acquire or lease mineral properties and mineral rights previously expensed and to value gold inventories at the lower of cost or market previously valued at the spot gold price at the end of reporting period. We have also made certain reclassification to include gold sale proceeds and gold extractions on a first-in and first-out basis as other income earned in the exploration stage previously recorded as a reduction of exploration costs, to separately report related party charges in excess of costs incurred on the face of our consolidated financial statements, and to group interest expenses and bank charges with interest and other income.
	The effect of the restatements on total assets for the periods presented is as follows:

		2007			2006
Total Assets, as previously stated	$	5,874,287		$	5,084,552
Gold inventory as previously stated at spot price		(2,347,946	)		(511,629	)
Gold inventory, as restated at the lower of cost or market		1,969,870			493,188
Mineral rights costs previously expensed		1,012,316			802,991
Total Assets, as restated	$	6,508,527		$	5,869,102

The effect of the restatements and reclassifications on the results of operations and accumulated losses is as follows:

								Period Since
								Recommencem
								ent Of
								Exploration
								Stage
		Years ended November 30						December 1,
								2001
								To November
								30,
		2007			2006			2007
Net loss for the period, as previously stated	$	(7,157,847	)	$	(7,683,002	)	$	(38,612,651	)
Changes in exploration expenses:
Capitalized mineral rights costs		209,325			524,629			1,012,316
Gold sale proceeds previously stated as a reduction		(1,169,509	)		(87,357	)		(1,461,313	)
Reclassification of gold inventory change previously		(1,836,316	)		(483,713	)		(2,336,806	)
included
Related party charges reclassified		961,813			760,055			3,479,049
		(1,834,687	)		713,614			693,246
Changes in management services:
Related party charges reclassified		281,617			269			287,893
Reclassification of stock based compensation		(734,094	)		-			(734,094	)
		(452,477	)		269			(446,201	)
Reclassification for related party charges in
excess of costs incurred		(1,243,430	)		(760,324	)		(3,766,942	)
Reclassification for Stock-based compensation reclassified to
management services		734,094			-			734,094

F-9

Gold extraction and gold sales during the exploration stage
Gold sale proceeds		1,169,509			87,357			1,461,313
Cost of gold sold		(1,012,443	)		(114,743	)		(1,286,819	)
Gold inventory addition from gold extraction		2,489,124			585,510			3,248,056
Total gold income earned during the exploration stage		2,646,190			558,124			3,422,550
Cumulative effect of accounting policy changes in gold
inventory		-			-			53,745
Comprehensive loss for the period, as restated	$	(7,308,157	)	$	(7,171,319	)	$	(37,922,159	)

Note 3	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	These consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with United States of America generally accepted
	accounting principles. The application of Canadian generally accepted accounting principles to these financial statements
	would not result in material measurement or disclosure differences.
	The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within the framework of the significant
	accounting policies summarized below:

a)	Basis of Consolidation
	These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Silverado Gold Mines Inc. and Silverado Green Fuel Inc. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated.
b)	Environmental Costs
	Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Company’s commitment to a plan of action based on the then known facts.
c)	Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
	Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive securities were exercised or converted to common stock. The dilutive effect of options and warrants and their equivalent is computed by application of the treasury stock method and the effect of convertible securities by the “if converted” method. Fully diluted amounts are not presented when the effects of the computations are anti-dilutive due to the losses incurred. Accordingly, there is no difference in the amounts presented for basic and diluted loss per share.

F-10

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

d)	Financial Instruments
	The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and loans payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for convertible debentures approximate their fair values as they bear interest at rates which approximate market rates. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.
e)	Income Taxes
	The Company uses the assets and liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Under the assets and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
f)	Exploration Stage Company
	The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Exchange Act Guide 7, “Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to be Engaged in Significant Mining Operations” requires that mining companies in the exploration stage should not refer to themselves as development stage companies in the financial statements, even though such companies should comply with Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 7, if applicable. Accordingly, the Company has not been referred to as being a development stage company. Accumulated results of operations are presented from December 1, 2001, the date the Company re-entered the exploration stage.
g)	Gold Inventory
	The Company values its gold inventories at the lower of cost or market. The Company is still in the exploration stage. By definition, the Company’s direct and absorbed costs would exceed the market value of any gold recovery. Therefore, the Company values gold inventory additions from gold extraction at the spot price as of the date of the addition to the gold inventory, and records the costs of gold inventory sold on a first-in first-out basis. Gold sale proceeds and cost of gold sold are recorded as other income earned during the exploration stage.
h)	Mineral Rights Payments and Exploration Costs
	Pursuant to EITF 04-02, “Whether Mineral Rights are Tangible or Intangible Assets and Related Issues”, the Company has modified its accounting policy with respect to mineral claim payments, retroactively effective to June 1, 2004, to capitalize the direct costs to acquire or lease mineral properties and mineral rights as tangible assets. The direct costs include the costs of signature (lease) bonuses, options to purchase or lease properties, and brokers’ and legal fees. If the acquired mineral rights relate to unproven properties, the Company does not amortize the capitalized mineral costs, but evaluates the capitalized mineral costs periodically for impairment. The Company expenses all costs related to the exploration of mineral claims in which it had secured exploration rights prior to establishment of proven and probable reserves.
i)	Asset Retirement Obligation
	Effective December 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated retirement costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and normal use of the asset.

F-11

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

	SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the Company will recognize a gain or loss on settlement.
j)	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
k)	Property, Plant and Equipment
	Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis as follows:

Mining equipment	10 years
Auto and trucks	5 years
Computer equipment	3 years
Computer software	1 year
Leasehold improvements	5 – 7 years
Furniture and fittings	10 years

l)	Cash and Cash Equivalents
	Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost and they comprise cash on hand, deposits held with banks and other highly liquid investments. Highly liquid investments are readily convertible to cash and generally have maturities of three months or less from the time acquired. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions which the Company believes limits credit risks.
m)	Concentration of Credit Risk
	Financial Instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash in banks. At times during the year, the Company maintained deposits in excess of insured limits provided by FDIC and CDIC. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions which the Company believes limits these risks.
n)	Foreign Currency Translation
	The Company considers its functional currency to be the U.S. dollar for its U.S. and Canadian operations. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the year- end. Non-monetary assets and revenue and expense transactions are translated at the rate in effect at the time at which the transactions took place. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of results from operations for the year as other comprehensive loss.

F-12

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

o)	Revenue Recognition
	During the period the Company is in the exploration stage, proceeds on gold recoveries from test mining are recorded as other income earned during the exploration stage.
p)	Research Expenditures
	Research expenditures are expensed in the year incurred.
q)	Accounting for Stock-based Compensation
	Effective December 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) (Share-based Compensation) requiring equity awards granted under its stock option plan to be accounted for under the fair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award. Prior to December 1, 2006, the Company accounted for awards granted under its stock option plans utilizing the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), and related interpretations, and provided the required pro forma disclosures prescribed by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123), as amended. Under the existing stock option plans, all options vest entirely on the grant date. Therefore, there were no partially vested options outstanding as of the SFAS 123(R) adoption date.
r)	Long Lived Asset Impairment
	In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, long- lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
s)	Reclassifications
	Certain prior periods’ comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation adopted for this period
t)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “Establishing the Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 was to permit all entities to choose to elect, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. An entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred and not deferred. SFAS No. 159 applies to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted for an equity that has also elected to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. An entity is prohibited from retrospectively applying SFAS No. 159, unless it chooses early adoption. SFAS No. 159 also applies to eligible items existing at November 15, 2007 (or early adoption date). The Company is evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
	In December 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Staff Position (FSP) EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements”. This FSP specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2006. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-13

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

In September 2006 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157), which provides expanded guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchy for data used to value assets and liabilities, and requires additional disclosures about the extent to which a company measures assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. Implementation of SFAS 157 is required on December 1, 2007. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 157 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, including issues relating to financial statement recognition and measurement. FIN 48 provides that the tax effects from an uncertain tax position can be recognized in the financial statements only if the position is “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained if the position were to be challenged by a taxing authority. The assessment of the tax position is based solely on the technical merits of the position, without regard to the likelihood that the tax position may be challenged. If an uncertain tax position meets the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being recognized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority, is recorded. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.

Note 4 Gold Inventory

Gold Inventory consists of the following at November 30, 2007 and 2006:

	Troy			Weighted		Value
	Ounces			Average price		(Restated)
Balance as of November 30, 2005, as restated	56			398.38	$	22,421
Additions from gold extraction	939			623.50		585,510
Cost of gold sold	(204	)		561.50		(114,743	)
Balance as of November 30, 2006, as restated	791			623.50		493,188
Additions from gold extraction	3,778			656.12		2,489,124
Cost of gold sold	(1,573	)		619.61		(1,012,443	)
Balance as of November 30, 2007, as restated	2,996		$	657.50	$	1,969,870

During the year ended November 30, 2007, the Company sold 1,573 troy ounces of gold (2006: 204 troy ounces) at an average price of $743.49 (2006: $428.22) per troy ounce for proceeds of $1,169,509 (2006: $87,357), which was recorded as other income earned during the exploration stage.

F-14

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Note 5	Property, Plant and Equipment
	Property, plant and equipment primarily include capital expenditure associated with the Company’s Vancouver office, and mining equipment and camp facilities at the Nolan Gold Project in Alaska.

		2007
				Accumulated
				Depreciation
				and		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Offices
Office leasehold improvements	$	612,117	$	21,861	$	590,256
Computer Equipment and software		105,797		73,022		32,775
Furniture and Fittings		394,358		389,006		5,352
Mining Project
Nolan Gold Project buildings		63,000		63,000		-
Leasehold improvements		48,123		2,406		45,717
Nolan mining equipment		1,489,962		632,029		857,934
Nolan mining equipment under capital lease		819,842		216,923		602,919
Other equipment		27,200		3,773		23,427
	$	3,560,399	$	1,402,020	$	2,158,379

				2006
				Accumulated
				Depreciation
				and		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Mining Project
Nolan Gold Project buildings	$	63,000	$	63,000	$	-
Nolan mining equipment		869,630		431,754		437,876
Nolan mining equipment
under capital lease		819,842		216,923		602,919
Other equipment		447,047		434,309		12,738
	$	2,199,519	$	1,145,986	$	1,053,533

Note 6 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of:

		2007		2006
Accounts payable	$	100,777	$	233,802
Accrued interest		109,627		98,427
	$	210,404	$	332,229

F-15

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Note 7	Asset Retirement Obligations
	The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on December 1, 2002. Upon adoption the Company increased its reclamation liability by $270,000, increased the carrying value of assets by $116,774 and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $153,226.
	Asset retirement obligations relate to the closure and reclamation of the Grant Mine Tailing Pond, and to the reclamation work associated with the Nolan Gold Project consisting of dismantling and removal of site structures and equipment, and reshaping and revegetating the disturbed areas. The Grant Mine assets were written off as impaired effective December 1, 2001 and an amount of $47,378 was also charged to operations in the year ended November 30, 2003 for the increase in the asset retirement obligations related to those Grant Mine assets. The Company has no assets legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations.
	Reconciliation of asset retirement obligation for the year ended November 30, 2007:

		Grant		Nolan
		Mine		Project			Total
Balance, December 1, 2006	$	347,287	$	173,771		$	521,058
Accretion expense				26,053			26,053
Liabilities settled		-		(17,801	)		(17,801	)
Balance, November 30, 2007	$	347,287	$	182,023		$	529,310

Note 8	Convertible Debentures
	Convertible debentures outstanding at November 30, 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following:

		2007			2006
Issued in 1994	$	140,000		$	140,000
Less: current portion		(140,000	)		(140,000	)
	$	-		$	-

a)

On March 1, 2001, the Company completed negotiations to restructure its $1,860,000 convertible debentures. The replacement debentures aggregated $2,384,892 and consisted of the original $1,860,000 principal amount plus all accrued interest to March 1, 2001. The debentures bear interest of 8.0% per annum. Interest is due and payable on a quarterly basis on February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30. If the Company fails to make any payment of principal or interest, the Company must issue shares equivalent in value to the unpaid amounts of 20% below the average market price.

Remaining debentures of $140,000 plus accrued interest of $109,627 are in default; however it is unclear whether they will be exchanged for replacement debentures as the bond holders could not be identified or did not respond to the Company’s restructuring proposal.

F-16

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Note 9 Capital Lease Obligations

a)	On October 11, 2002, the Company entered into a lease purchase agreement whereby the Company would purchase mining equipment valued at a total of $1,496,150. The agreement required payment upon signing of $550,000 (paid), $100,000 (paid) on or before December 1, 2004 and 24 equal payments thereafter for the balance of the purchase price plus interest at a rate of 12% per annum.
b)	On February 14, 2003, the Company entered into a three-year lease agreement whereby the company would purchase mining equipment valued at a total of $250,170. The agreement required payment upon signing of $105,000 (paid), $25,000 on or before December 4, 2004 and 24 equal payments for the balance of the purchase price plus interest at a rate of 12% per annum.

During the year ended November 30, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to combine the two lease agreements. The new agreement required payment upon signing of $50,000 (paid), monthly payments of $25,000 until July 2007 for the balance of principal plus interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum.

The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the asset. The assets are amortized over their estimated productive lives which are estimated to be 10 years. Amortization of assets under capital leases charged to expense in 2007 was $0 (2006: $70,112).

The last payments to the above capital lease of $31,013 will be made in fiscal 2008

Note 10 Related Party Transactions

The Company has had related party transactions with Tri-Con Mining Ltd., Tri-Con Mining Inc. and Tri- Con Mining Alaska Inc. (collectively the “Tri-Con Group”), all of which are controlled by an officer and director of the Company.

The Tri-Con Group are operations, exploration and development contractors and have been employed by the Company under contract since 1972 to carry out all the Company’s fieldwork and to provide field administrative and management services. Under the current contract dated January, 1997, work is charged at cost plus 25% for exploration and cost plus 15% for development and mining. Cost includes out-of- pocket or actual cost plus 15% charge for office overhead including stand-by and contingencies. There is no mark-up on capital purchases. The Tri-Con Group does not charge the Company for the services of its directors who are also directors of the Company. For the year ended November 30, 2007, the Tri-Con Group’s services focused mainly on corporate planning, mining, engineering and preparation for year round production on the Company’s Nolan property; mining administration services at both the field and corporate offices, and administration services connected with the Low-Rank Coal-Water fuel project.

The aggregate amounts paid to the Tri-Con Group for disbursements and for services rendered by the Tri- Con Group personnel and interest charged on outstanding balances at the Tri-Con Group’s borrowing rate are shown below:

F-17

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

		2007		2006
Exploration, development and field services	$	5,557,108	$	3,687,946
Office, Administrative and Management services		1,355,619		1,093,858
Research		-		129,698
	$	6,912,727	$	4,911,502
Amount of total charges in excess of Tri-Con
costs incurred	$	1,243,430	$	760,324
Excess amount charged as a percentage of actual
costs incurred		21.93%		18.32%

The amounts charged for services by the Tri-Con Group approximate the fair value of these costs had they been performed by arm’s length parties and are included in various captions of the Statements of Operations. At November 30, 2007 the Company owed the Tri-Con Group $1,214,717 (2006: $359,834) for services provided. The amounts are non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Note 11 Common Stock

a)	Stock Options:
	On January 11, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase the Company’s common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. The Company reserved 25,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors. The 2007 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.
	A summary of the change in stock options for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 is presented below:

			Weighted
	Number		Average
	of		Exercise
	Options		Price
2007:
Outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2006	63,180,000	$	0.07
Granted	21,500,000	$	0.07
Exercised	12,180,000	$	0.05
Expired	-
Outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2007	72,500,000	$	0.06

F-18

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

				Weighted
	Number			Average
	of			Exercise
	Options			Price
2006:
Outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2005	32,630,000		$	0.07
Granted	31,100,000		$	0.05
Exercised	-
Expired	(550,000	)	$	0.07
Outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2006	63,180,000		$	0.07

As of November 30, 2007 the following stock options were outstanding:

Number of	Exercise Price	Expiration Date
Options
600,000	$0.15	February 1, 2008
4,500,000	$0.05	December 4, 2008
4,200,000	$0.05	January 8, 2011
12,500,000	$0.05	June 30, 2011
29,800,000	$0.05	January 4, 2013
20,900,000	$0.07	January 11, 2013
72,500,000

In January 2007, 21,500,000 stock options were granted to directors as well as to employees of the Tri-Con Group at an exercise price of $0.07 with a six year term expiring January 11, 2013. The prevailing market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant was $0.067. The Company recognized stock compensation expense of $734,094 based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model input variables used are as follows:

Risk free interest rate	5.10%
Dividend free yield	0%
Expected volatility	74.5%
Expected term of stock option	3 years

The exercise price of all options issued under our 2007 Stock Option Plan was $0.07 per share. The expected term was calculated using the simplified approach as outlined in SAB 107.

Expected volatility is based on historical volatility. Because trading tends to be thin, in relation to the total shares outstanding, average weekly stock prices were used to calculate volatility. Management believes that the annualized weekly average of volatility is the best measure of expected volatility.

U.S. Treasury constant maturity rates were utilized with maturities most closely approximating the expected term of the option.

F-19

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

The expected term of the options was calculated using the alternative simplified method permitted by SAB 107, which defines the expected life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches.

In 2006 the Company granted 49,400,000 stock options to directors of the Company and 7,100,000 stock options to certain employees of the Tri-Con Group. The Company did not record a compensation expense on the granting of stock options to employees and directors, but provided disclosure of the pro forma loss per share information had the Company elected to follow the fair value method. Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model the pro forma information was as follows:

		2006
		(Restated)
Comprehensive loss for the year, as restated	$	(7,171,319	)
Stock-based compensation		(1,637,692	)
Pro forma comprehensive loss for the year	$	(8,809,011	)
Pro forma basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.02	)

The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes model to calculate the 2006 charge:

Risk free interest rate	4.31%
Dividend free yield	0%
Expected volatility	107%
Weighted average expected stock option life	2.6 years

The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted to directors of the Company and certain employees of the Tri-Con Group was $0.08 per share.

Expected volatility is based on historical volatility. Because trading tends to be thin, in relation to the total shares outstanding, average weekly stock prices were used to calculate volatility.

U.S. Treasury constant maturity rates were utilized with maturities most closely approximating the expected term of the option.

The expected term of the options was calculated using the alternative simplified method permitted by SAB 107, which defines the expected life as the average of the contractual term of the options and the weighted average vesting period for all option tranches.

F-20

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

b)	Warrants:
	Warrants outstanding as at November 30, 2007 are exercisable into one common share for each warrant held and are summarized as follows:

	Exercise
	Price per
Number of	Warrant
Warrants	$	Expiration Date
13,833,333	0.1200	March 31, 2008
8,458,000	0.1200	April 4, 2008
5,188,334	0.1200	April 7, 2008
4,950,001	0.1200	April 25, 2008
12,500,001	0.1000	September 4, 2008
10,833,334	0.1000	September 17, 2008
6,250,000	0.1000	September 24, 2008
62,013,003

In November 2007, the Company reduced the exercise price of 16,513,024 of its common stock purchase warrants from $0.12 to $0.035 per common share, and such warrants are subsequently exercised in December 2007. Subsequent to the fiscal year-end, in December 2007, the Company reduced the exercise price of 990,001 of its common stock purchase warrants from $0.12 to $0.035 per common share and 495,001 of its common share purchase warrants from $0.06 to $0.035 per common share, of which a total of 1,484,563 were subsequently exercised in January 2008, and the remaining 439 warrants expired subsequently.

Subsequent to fiscal year-end, in December 2007, the Company reduced the exercise price of 4,166,667 of its common share purchase warrants from $0.10 to $0.035 per common share, and such warrants were subsequently exercised in February 2008.

In fiscal year 2006 and 2007, the Company completed private placements resulting in the issuance of units consisting of one share of Company restricted common stock and one half-warrant (with each whole warrant exercisable for one share of Company restricted common stock). The warrants referenced above were issued during such private placements. There was no value assigned to these warrants when they were granted. The exercise price reduction incentivized the holders to exercise the warrants, which assisted the Company in meeting its working capital requirements. The Company received less proceeds from these exercised warrants due to the price reductions, but the Company believed these warrants would have been left to expire had the Company not effected the exercise price reductions.

c) Convertible Debentures – Note 7

Note 12 Equity Compensation Plan

In 2007 the Company established an Equity Compensation Plan (“the Plan”) to encourage certain directors, officers, employees, employees of affiliated companies and consultants to acquire and hold stock in the Company as an added incentive to remain with the Company, and to enable the Company to attract and retain capable individuals. The number of shares issued under the Plan may not exceed 25,000,000 in aggregate. Options granted under the Plan may include non-qualified stock options as well as incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Each stock option plan agreement specifies when all or any installment of the option becomes exercisable.

In January 2007, 21,500,000 stock options were granted to directors and certain employees of the Tri- Con Group.

F-21

Note 13 Income Taxes

Tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets at November 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

		2007			2006
		(Restated)			(Restated)
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	18,673,000		$	14,989,000
Temporary differences arising from mineral
properties and building, plant and equipment		2,655,000			2,027,000
Valuation allowance		(21,328,000	)		(17,016,000	)
Net future tax asset	$	-		$	-

F-22

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

At November 30, 2007, the Company had losses carried forward totaling $28,807,000 available to reduce future years’ income for U.S. income tax purposes which expire in various years to 2027. In addition, we had losses carried forward in Canada totaling CDN$20,490,000 which expire in various years to 2027.

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the Canadian statutory federal income tax rate of 34.12% (2006: 38%) to net loss before provision for income taxes. The sources and tax effects of the differences are as follows:

		2007			2006
		(Restated)			(Restated)
Computed “expected” tax benefit	$	(2,664,000	)	$	(2,533,000	)
Tax loss expired during the year		550,000			449,000
Temporary differences and other		198,000			185,000
Change in valuation allowance and other		1,916,000			1,899,000
Income tax provision	$	-		$	-

Note 14	Commitments and Contingencies
	a)	Contingent payments on Mineral Claims Properties
		1)	Ester Dome Gold Project, Fairbanks Mining District, Alaska
			The Ester Dome Gold Project encompasses all of the Company’s properties on Ester Dome, which is accessible by road 10 miles northwest of Fairbanks, Alaska. The specific properties at this site are as follows:
			i)	Grant Mine
				This property consists of 26 state mineral claims subject to payments of 15% of net profits until $2,000,000 has been paid and 3% of net profits thereafter.
			ii)	May (St. Paul)/Barelka:
				This gold property consists of 22 state mineral claims subject to payments of 15% of net profits until $2,000,000 (inflation indexed from 1979) has been paid and 3% of net profits thereafter.
			iii)	Dobb’s:
				This property consists of 1 unpatented Federal mineral claim and 4 State mineral claims subject to payments of 15% of net profits until $1,500,000 has been paid and 3% of net profits thereafter.
		2)	Nolan Gold Project, Wiseman Mining District, Alaska
			The Nolan Gold Project consists of 4 contiguous properties covering approximately 6 square miles, 8 miles west of Wiseman and 175 miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska. The specific properties at this site are as follows:
			i)	Nolan Placer:
				This property consists of 148 unpatented Federal placer claims.
			ii)	Thompson’s Pup:
				This property consists of 6 unpatented Federal placer claims and is subject to a royalty of 3% of net profits on 80% of production.

F-23

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

iii)	Dionne (Mary’s Bench):
	This property consists of 15 unpatented Federal placer claims.
iv)	Smith Creek:
	This property consists of 35 unpatented Federal placer claims.
v)	Nolan Lode:
	This property consists of 67 unpatented Federal lode claims. The lode claims overlie much of the placer properties and extend beyond them.
	During the year ended November 30, 2003, the Company staked 36 unpatented Federal lode claims.

3)	Hammond Property, Wiseman Mining District, Alaska
	This property consists of 24 Federal placer claims and 36 Federal lode claims covering one and one- half square miles and adjoining the Nolan Gold Properties. The Company is obligated to pay a royalty equal to 10% of gross production and is subject to a minimum royalty of $80,000 per year. As at November 30, 2007, royalty payments totaling $360,000 (2006: $380,000) are unpaid, in arrears, and included in mineral claims payable.
4)	Eagle Creek Property, Fairbanks Mining District, Alaska
	This property consists of 77 state mineral claims. The Company has an option agreement to purchase a 100% interest in the property for $400,000 of which $68,000 remains to be paid. The amount of $5,000 per year is required to be paid to keep the agreement in good standing.

b)	Severance Agreements with Directors
	The Company has entered into compensation agreements with two officers and directors of the Company. The agreements provide for severance arrangements where a change of control of the Company occurs, as defined, and the directors are terminated. The compensation payable to the two directors aggregates $4,100,000 (2006: $4,100,000) plus the amount of annual bonuses and other benefits that they would have received in the eighteen months following termination.
c)	Consulting Agreements
	The Company has entered into consulting agreements with two individuals for various corporate planning and business development services to the Company. Under the terms of the agreements, the Company will issue 10,600,000 shares in aggregate over the length of the contracts which range in length from six months to two years, concluding in January 2008.
	The value of consulting fees paid in shares is calculated by multiplying the number of shares issued by the closing price on the day the shares were issued.
d)	Office Lease
	The Company entered into a seven year office lease agreement expiring in July 2014 for its Vancouver office when obliged to vacate its previous lease location at the expiry of the lease. The Company’s future minimum lease payments under this lease are as follows:

Years ending November 30, 2008 - 2011	$	494,728
Year ending November 30, 2012		125,664

Year ending November 30, 2013 128,439

F-24

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Year ending November 30, 2014		74,923
&n bsp;	$	823,754

The Company entered into a five year office lease agreement expiring in February 2012 for its Fairbanks, Alaska office at an annual lease cost of $18,000 subject to a 4% increase per annum The Company’s future minimum lease payments under this lease are as follows:

Year ending November 30, 2008	$	18,660
Year ending November 30, 2009		19,406
Year ending November 30, 2010		20,183
Year ending November 30, 2011		20,990
Year ending November 30, 2012		3,510
	$	82,749

Annual rent payments in the current year amounted to $165,679 (2006: $143,635).

Note 15	Segment Disclosures
	a)	Reportable Segments
		The Company operates in one reportable segment being the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company’s development of low-rank coal-water fuel is in its initial stages and is not a reportable segment.
	b)	Geographical Information
		The following presents financial information about geographical areas:

		2007		2006
		(Restated)		(Restated)
Comprehensive loss for the year
Canada	$	3,985,004	$	2,218,513
United States, as restated		3,323,153		4,952,806
Total	$	7,308,157	$	7,171,319
Long-lived Assets
Canada	$	628,383	$	12,738
United States, as restated		2,542,312		1,843,786
Total	$	3,170,695	$	1,856,524

F-25

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

Note 16	Non-Cash Transactions
	Investing and financing activities that do not have a direct impact on current cash flows are excluded from the cash flow statements. The following transactions were excluded from the statements of cash flows: During the year ended November 30, 2007 the Company:

a)	Issued 9,285,000 shares at various prices for total proceeds of $872,400 pursuant to payment of consulting fees;
b)	Issued 2,696,609 shares at various prices for total proceeds of $236,016 in settlement of accounts payable for legal fees;
c)	Utilized prior year’s share subscriptions of $237,600 for the issuance of common shares.

During the year ended November 30, 2006 the Company:

a)	Issued 6,075,000 common shares at various prices for total proceeds of $767,250 pursuant to payment of consulting fees;
b)	Utilized prior year’s share subscriptions of $54,500 for the issuance of common shares.

Note 17 Subsequent Events

Subsequent to November 30, 2007, the Company:

a)	Issued 59,198,460 units at an average price of $0.0336 for the aggregate purchase price of $1,991,546 in February 2008. Each unit consists of one share of restricted common stock and one half-warrant, with a full warrant (consisting of two half-warrants) being exercisable for a period of one year for the purchase of one share of restricted common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.07.
b)	Issued 4,166,667 shares at $0.035 totaling $145,833 in February 2008 pursuant to the exercise of common stock purchase warrants.
c)	Issued 500,000 shares at an average of $0.06 totaling $30,000 pursuant to consulting agreements in February 2008.
d)	Issued 44,000,000 units at $0.0312 for the aggregate purchase price of $1,375,000 in January 2008. Each unit consists of one share of restricted common stock and one half-warrant, with a full warrant (consisting of two half- warrants) being exercisable for a period of one year for the purchase of one share of restricted common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.07.
e)	Issued 1,484,563 shares at $0.035 totaling $51,960 in January 2008 pursuant to the exercise of common stock purchase warrants.
f)	Issued 2,300,000 shares at an average of $0.068 totaling $156,000 pursuant to consulting agreements in January 2008.
g)	Issued 8,458,023 units at $0.035 per unit totaling $296,031 in December 2007 pursuant to the exercise of common stock purchase warrants.
h)	Issued 13,000,000 units at $0.03 per unit for the aggregate purchase price of $390,000 in December

F-26

SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

November 30, 2007 and 2006

(Stated in United States Dollars)

	2007. Each such unit consists of one share of restricted common stock and one half-warrant, with a full warrant (consisting of two half-warrants) being exercisable for a period of one year for the purchase of one share of restricted common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.07.
i)	Issued 8,055,000 shares at $0.0342 totaling $275,136 in December 2007 pursuant to the exercise in November 2007 of common stock purchase warrants.
j)	Entered into a lease purchase agreement in December 2007 to purchase mining equipment valued at $555,385. The agreement requires payment upon signature of $55,538 (paid), and 36 equal payments commencing upon delivery. The annual percentage rate implicit in the lease will be the rate prevailing at the time of delivery.
k)	Sold 465.89 troy ounces of gold for proceeds of $372,593 in December 2007.

F-27

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

We have not had any disagreements with our former accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2007, being the date of our most recently completed fiscal year end. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Garry L. Anselmo. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting are effective to ensure, among other things, that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated, recorded, processed, communicated, and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The term “internal control over financial reporting” is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of assets;
(2)	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
(3)	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

During our most recently completed fiscal year ended November 30, 2007, there were no changes that had a material effect on, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

Our current executive officers, directors, and significant employees are:

Name	Age	Position
Garry L. Anselmo	64	Chairman of the Board of Directors; President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
James F. Dixon (1)	60	Director
Stuart C. McCulloch (1)	72	Director
John R. Mackay	75	Secretary
Dr. Karsten Eden	36	Vice President, Exploration of Silverado Gold Mines Inc.
Dr. Warrack G. Willson	64	Vice-President, Fuel Technology of Silverado Green Fuel Inc.
Daniel L. Basketfield, P.E.	54	Vice President, Environmental Engineering, Silverado Gold Mines Inc. and Silverado Green Fuel Inc.
Irma Mungal	55	Vice-President, Administration

(1) Member of Silverado's Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

44

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our executive officers, directors, and significant employees for the past five years:

Garry L. Anselmo

Mr. Anselmo is presently the chairman of our board of directors and is our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Mr. Anselmo is also the chairman of the board of directors and the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our wholly owned subsidiary, Silverado Green Fuel Inc. Mr. Anselmo has been the chairman of our board of directors and our chief operating officer since 1973. Mr. Anselmo has been our president, chief executive officer and chief financial officer from 1973 to 1994 and from 1997 to present. Mr. Anselmo founded Tri-Con Mining Ltd., a private exploration service company, in 1968, and is currently a shareholder, director, and president of Tri-Con Ltd. He is also the chairman and director of Tri-Con Ltd.’s United States operating subsidiaries, Tri-Con Mining Inc. and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc. Mr. Anselmo obtained his bachelor of arts degree from Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada.

James F. Dixon

Mr. Dixon has been one of our directors since May 6, 1988. Mr. Dixon is presently a lawyer and a partner in the law firm of Shandro Dixon Edgson, Barristers and Solicitors, of Vancouver, British Columbia. Mr. Dixon has been engaged in the practice of law since 1973. Mr. Dixon holds a bachelor of commerce degree and a bachelor of law degree.

Stuart C. McCulloch

Mr. McCulloch has been one of our directors since December 14, 1998. Mr. McCulloch is also a director of our subsidiary, Silverado Green Fuel Inc. Mr. McCulloch retired as district manager from Canada Safeway in January, 1991.

John R. Mackay

Mr. Mackay has served as our corporate secretary since June 1998. Mr. Mackay is a lawyer who practiced as a sole practitioner from March 1993 to June 1998 prior to joining Silverado. Prior to 1993, Mr. Mackay was a lawyer and partner in the law firm Davis and Company, Barristers and Solicitors, of Vancouver, British Columbia where he practiced for 35 years.

Dr. Karsten Eden

Dr. Eden was appointed our vice-president exploration, Silverado Gold Mines Inc., in July 2006. Dr. Eden holds a Master’s Degree in Economic Geology from the Technical University of Clausthal. He focused his thesis on the “Geology and Gold Mineralization of the Nolan Area in the Brooks Range, Alaska”. Dr. Eden also holds a doctorate in Exploration Geology with an emphasis on GIS applications in mineral exploration from the University of Technology Aachen. He has received two internationally recognized research awards for his academic achievements.

Dr. Warrack G. Willson

Dr. Willson was appointed our vice-president, fuel technology, in March 2000, to lead the conversion of the Grant Mill into a commercial level Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel plant. Dr. Willson received a supervisory chemical engineering rating from the US Civil Service Commission in 1978, a PhD in physical chemistry from the University of Wyoming in 1970 and a bachelor of arts in chemistry and mathematics from the University of Northern Colorado in 1965. He founded Coal-Water Fuel Services in 1994, which provides engineering services to develop clean coal conversion projects to develop low cost and non-hazardous alternatives to oil.

Daniel L. Basketfield, P.E.

Daniel L. Basketfield, P.E., appointed in March of 2007 as Silverado Gold Mines Inc. and Green Fuel Inc. Vice President, Environmental Engineering, brings the Company public, private, and industry expertise gained through more than 19 years of experience as a practicing professional engineer. A licensed civil engineer in the states of Washington, Alaska and Hawaii, and licensed agricultural engineer in the State of Oregon. Mr. Basketfield was educated as an Agricultural Engineer (B.S., M.S) at Oregon State University, and engaged in additional study at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Across his career he has served in various positions that include Senior Water Resources Engineer and Acting Water Resources Business Area Manager for Seattle Public Utilities, co-founder of a private engineering firm specializing in Interior Alaska water and wastewater systems, Senior Environmental Engineer for Tri-con Mining Alaska Inc., Environmental Engineer and Interior District Contaminated Sites Coordinator for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, and Tribal Agricultural Engineer for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Northwest Montana. Mr. Basketfield has also had the opportunity to engage in work with NOAA’s Climate Change Science Program as an advisor and contributing author on decision support systems, and has independently co-authored several papers on topics that include the non-linear analysis of hydrologic and climatic data.

45

Irma Mungal

Ms. Irma Mungal was appointed our Vice-President Administration of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. in November of 2007. Ms. Mungal holds degrees in Human Resource Management and Business Administration with majors in Management. She has also engaged in studies in Labor Relations, and is a registered School Teacher in the Caribbean. Ms. Mungal has also been licensed with the Manitoba Securities Commission, and the British Columbia Securities Commission. As a representative of a leading financial institution Ms. Mungal was responsible for operations risk management across western Canada. She also served various roles including as an investment adviser and retirement planner.

Family Relationships

Mr. Anselmo and Mr. McCulloch, each of whom is one of our directors, are cousins. Mr. Anselmo and Ms. Mungal are husband and wife.

There are no other family relationships among any of our directors, executive officers, or persons nominated or chosen as our directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None.

Terms of Office

Our directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors to hold office until their successors are appointed. The last annual meeting of our shareholders was held on May 17, 2004.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee is comprised of James Dixon and Stuart McCulloch. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our audit committee is independent as that term is defined in Rule 121 of the American Stock Exchange listing standards. Our board of directors has determined none of the directors on our audit committee presently meets the definition of a “financial expert” based on their respective experience and qualification. Our audit committee presently does not include a member who has been determined by our board of directors to qualify as a “financial expert”. Our board of directors is presently looking for a suitable candidate to join as a member of our board of directors and who would meet the definition of “financial expert”. We were unable to identify such a candidate during our last fiscal year.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and certain other finance executives, which is a "code of ethics" as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. If we make any amendments to our Code of Ethics other than technical, administrative, or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of our Code of Ethics to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or certain other finance executives, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies on our website at www.silverado.com or in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Based on its review of any copies of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereto) received by the Company with respect to its most recent fiscal year, the Company believes that all applicable filing requirements were complied with by reporting persons.

46

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Executive Compensation

The following summary compensation table sets forth certain compensation information for Mr. Garry L. Anselmo, our principal executive officer. No other executive officer of the Company received compensation in excess of $100,000 during our last completed fiscal year.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name principal position (a)	and Year (b)	Salary ($) (c)	Bonus ($) (d)	Stock Awards ($) (e)	Option Awards ($) (f)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (g)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (h)	All Other Compensation ($) (i)	Total ($) (j)
Garry L Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer	2007	0	0	0	341,439 (1)	0	0	0	341,439
	2006	0	0	0	663,283 (2)	0	0	0	663,283

1)	Mr. Anselmo was granted 10,000,000 options on January 11, 2007. The options have an exercise price of $0.07, vested immediately, and expire on January 11, 2013. The value of the option award was computed in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R.
2)	Mr. Anselmo was granted 15,000,000 options on January 4, 2006. The options have an exercise price of $0.05, vested immediately, and expire on January 4, 2013. The value of the option award was computed in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R.

We are party to a compensation agreement with Mr. Anselmo. The agreement provides for severance arrangements if a change of control of the Company occurs, as defined, and he is terminated. The compensation payable to Mr. Anselmo would include a lump sum payment of $4,000,000 plus the amount of annual bonuses that Mr. Anselmo would be entitled to receive for the eighteen month period following termination, plus benefits for the eighteen month period following termination.

Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards of Mr. Anselmo at our fiscal year-end. No other executive officer of the Company received compensation in excess of $100,000 during our last completed fiscal year..

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDS						STOCK AWARDS
Name (a)	Number Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (b)	of Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (c)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (d)	Option Exercise Price ($) (e)	Option Expiration Date (f)	Number Shares Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g)	of or Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (h)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (i)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (j)
Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Executive Officer	10,000,000	0	0	0.07	January 11, 2013	0	0	0	0
	15,000,000	0	0	0.05	January 4, 2013	0	0	0	0
	3,000,000	0	0	0.05	December 4, 2008	0	0	0	0
	2,500,000	0	0	0.05	January 8, 2011	0	0	0	0
	6,000,000	0	0	0.05	July 8, 2011	0	0	0	0
Total	36,500,000	0	0			0	0	0	0

47

Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth certain compensation information for the members of our Board of Directors.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name (a)	Fees Earned Paid Cash ($) (b)	or in Stock Awards ($) (c)	Option Awards ($) (d)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (e)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (f)	All Other Compensation ($) (g)	Total ($) (j)
Stuart C. McCulloch	0	0	68,288 (1)	0	0	0	68,288
James F. Dixon	0	0	68,288 (2)	0	0	0	68,288

1)	Mr. McCulloch was granted 2,000,000 options on January 11, 2007. The options have an exercise price of $0.07, vested immediately, and expire on January 11, 2013. The value of the option award was computed in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R.
2)	Mr. Dixon was granted 2,000,000 options on January 11, 2007. The options have an exercise price of $0.07, vested immediately, and expire on January 11, 2013. The value of the option award was computed in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R.

With the exception of periodic grants of stock incentive options, we do not compensate our directors for serving in such capacities. Our 2006 Stock Option Plan, our 2006-II Stock Option Plan, our 2007 Stock Option Plan, and our 2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan each permit the grant of incentive stock options to our directors.

We have entered into a compensation agreement with Mr. Dixon. The agreement provides for severance arrangements if a change of control of Silverado occurs and Mr. Dixon is terminated. The compensation payable to Mr. Dixon would include a lump sum payment of $100,000 plus the amount of annual bonuses that Mr. Dixon would be entitled to receive for the eighteen month period following termination, plus benefits for the eighteen month period following termination. The compensation that would be payable to the directors (including the compensation provided for in the agreement with Mr. Anselmo detailed above) aggregates to $4,100,000 plus the amount of annual bonuses and other benefits that they would have received in the eighteen months following termination.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Company’s common shares owned beneficially as of February 15, 2008 by: (i) each person (including any “group”) known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of any class of the Company’s voting securities, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each executive officer of the Company, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. As of February 15, 2008 no person is known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Common Shares	Percentage of Common Shares(1)
Common Shares	Garry L. Anselmo, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer	40,550,007(2)	4.5%
Common Shares	James F. Dixon, Director	8,814,484(3)	1.0%
Common Shares	Stuart McCulloch, Director	7,058,400(4)	0.8%

48

Common Shares	John R. Mackay, Secretary	5,100,000(5)	0.6%
Common Shares	All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (4 persons)	61,522,891(6)	6.9%

(1)	Under Rule 13d-3, a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise has or shares: (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of shares; and (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. Certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of common stock actually outstanding on February 15, 2007. As of February 15, 2007, there were 904,231,969 common shares of the Company issued and outstanding.
(2)	Consists of 4,050,000 shares held by Garry L. Anselmo, 7 shares owned by Tri-Con Mining Ltd, and 36,500,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. Anselmo upon exercise of options to purchase shares held by Mr. Anselmo within 60 days of the date hereof.
(3)	Consists of 214,484 shares held directly and indirectly by James F. Dixon and 8,600,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. Dixon upon exercise of options to purchase shares held by Mr. Dixon within 60 days of the date hereof.
(4)	Consists of 158,400 shares held by Stuart McCulloch and 6,900,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. McCulloch upon exercise of options to purchase shares held by Mr. McCulloch within 60 days of the date hereof.
(5)	Consists of 100,000 shares held by Mr. Mackay and 5,000,000 shares that can be acquired by Mr. Mackay upon exercise of options to purchase shares held by Mr. Mackay within 60 days of the date hereof.
(6)	Consists of 4,522,891 shares held by our directors and executive officers and 57,000,000 shares that can be acquired by our directors and executive officers upon exercise of options to purchase shares held by our directors and executive officers within 60 days of the date hereof.

Changes in Control

We are not aware of any arrangement that may result in a change in control.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Set forth in the table below is information regarding outstanding equity awards made through equity compensation plans as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal year.

	Number of		Weighted	Number of
	securities to be		average exercise	securities
	issued upon		price of	available for
	exercise of		outstanding	future plan
	outstanding		options,	issuance
	options,		warrants, and
	warrants, and		rights
	rights
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans	N/A		N/A	N/A
approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan	N/A		N/A	25,000,000
2007 Stock Option Plan	25,000,000	$	0.07	3,500,000
2006-II Stock Option Plan	27,300,000	$	0.07	700,000
2006 Stock Option Plan	31,100,000	$	0.05	5,900,000

49

On August 31, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted the 2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Stock Option Plan”). The Incentive Stock Option Plan was established to encourage certain of our officers, employees, directors and consultants to acquire and hold stock in the Company as an added incentive to remain with the Company and to increase their efforts in promoting the interests of the Company, as well as to attract and retain capable individuals. A maximum of twenty-five million (25,000,000) shares of our common stock can be issued under the Incentive Stock Option Plan. The aggregate fair market value of the our common shares issued to an employee in exchange for stock options under the Incentive Stock Option Plan cannot exceed $100,000 during any calendar year. The Incentive Stock Option Plan may be terminated at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company.

On January 11, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 25,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2007 Plan. On February 20, 2007, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 25,000,000 of such shares. The 2007 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors. The 2007 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

On March 29, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006-II Stock Option Plan (the “2006-II Plan”). The 2006-II Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 28,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2006-II Plan. On March 31, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 28,000,000 of such shares. The 2006-II Plan is to be administered by a committee of one or more members of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Garry L. Anselmo and Mr. James F. Dixon were named members of the committee charged with administering the 2006-II Plan. The 2006-II Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

On January 4, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase our common stock to directors, officers, employees, and eligible consultants. We reserved 37,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2006 Plan. On April 11, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all 37,000,000 of such shares. The 2006 Plan is to be administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors. The 2006 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which can only be granted to employees) and non-qualified stock options. The committee shall determine the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term (which may be no more than ten years), and terms and conditions of exercisability.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Tri-Con Mining Group

We have had related party transactions with Tri-Con Mining Ltd., Tri-Con Mining Inc., and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc. (collectively, the “Tri-Con Mining Group”). Each of Tri-Con Mining Ltd., Tri-Con Mining Inc. and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc. are owned and controlled by Mr. Garry Anselmo, our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and, the chairman of our board of directors. We are party to three separate contracts dated January 1, 1997 with the Tri-Con Mining Group, one with each of Tri-Con Mining Ltd., Tri-Con Mining Inc. and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc.

The Tri-Con Mining Group are operations, exploration and development contractors, and have been employed by us under contract since 1972 to carry out all of our fieldwork and to provide administrative and management services. Under the current contract dated January 1, 1997, work is charged at cost plus 25% for property acquisition, exploration and development and cost plus 15% for mining operations and reclamation. Cost includes out of pocket or actual cost plus 15% charge for office overhead including stand by and contingencies. Capital purchases are exempt from any support charges. Services of the directors of the Tri-Con Mining Group are charged at a rate of $75 CDN per hour. Services of the directors of the Tri-Con Mining Group who are also our directors, namely Mr. Anselmo, are not charged. In addition, each agreement requires us to pay a base fee of $10,000 CDN (equal to approximately $10,000 US) per month to each of Tri-Con Mining Ltd., Tri-Con Mining Inc. and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc. However, the Tri-Con Mining Group has waived payment of the base fee under two of the agreements and is only paid $10,000 CDN (equal to approximately $10,000 US) per month in total.

We are in arrears in the amount of $1,214,717 to the Tri-Con Group as of November 30, 2007 in connection with exploration activities on the Nolan Gold Project during fiscal 2007. At November 30, 2006, we were in arrears $359,834 to the Tri-Con Mining Group for exploration, development and administration services. For the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 the Tri-Con Mining Group’s services focused mainly on test mining activities on the Nolan property, the low-rank coal-water fuel program as well as corporate planning, exploration, engineering, and, and administration services at both our field and corporate offices.

50

The aggregate amounts paid to the Tri-Con Mining Group in each of the late two fiscal years, by category, including amounts relating to the Grant Mine Project and Nolan properties, for disbursements and for services rendered by the Tri-Con Mining Group personnel working on the Company’s projects, and include interest charged on outstanding balances at the Tri-Con Mining Group’s borrowing costs, are shown below:

		2007		2006
Exploration, development and field services	$	5,522,795	$	3,687,946
Office, Administrative and Management services		1,355,619		1,093,858
Research		34,313		129,698
	$	6,912,727	$	4,911,502
Amount of total charges in excess of Tri-Con
costs incurred	$	1,234,430	$	760,324
Excess amount charged as a percentage of actual
costs incurred		21.93%		18.32%

Stock Option Grants

We granted options to purchase an aggregate of 2,700,000 common shares to the following individuals on January 11, 2007 as follows. All options are fully vested and are exercisable at a price of $0.07 per share for a six year term from the date of grant:

Name	Options
John McKay, Secretary	700,000
Warrack Willson, Vice-President of Silverado Green Fuel Inc.	2,000,000

Director Independence

As our common stock is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, we are not subject to the rules of any national securities exchange which require that a majority of a listed company’s directors and specified committees of the board of directors meet independence standards prescribed by such rules. For the purpose of preparing the disclosures in this Report on Form 10-KSB regarding director independence, we have used the definition of “independent director” set forth in the Marketplace Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market, which defines an “independent director” generally as a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Consistent with these standards, we believe that James Dixon and Stuart McCulloch are independent directors.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

Number	Description of Exhibit
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Company (1)
3.2	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company (2)
3.3	Altered Memorandum of the Company (3)
3.4	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of the Company (7)
4.1	Share certificate representing common shares of the capital of the Company (1)
10.1	Agreement for Conditional Purchase and Sale of Mining Property between the Company and Roger C. Burggraf dated October 6, 1978 – Grant Mine Property (1)
10.2	Agreement for Conditional Purchase and Sale of Mining Property between the Company and Paul Barelka, Donald May and Mark Thoennes dated May 12, 1979 – St. Paul Property (1)
10.3	Lease of Mining Claims with Option to Purchase between the Company and Alaska Mining Company, Inc. dated February 3, 1995 – Hammond Property (4)
10.4	Change of Control Agreement between the Company and Garry L. Anselmo dated May, 1995(6)
10.5	Change of Control Agreement between the Company and James Dixon dated May, 1995 (6)
10.6	Amendment to Change of Control Agreement between the Company and Garry L. Anselmo (6)
10.7	Operating Agreement between the Company and Tri-Con Mining Ltd. Dated January 1, 1997 (5)

51

10.8	Operating Agreement between the Company and Tri-Con Mining Inc. dated January 1, 1997 (6)
10.9	Operating Agreement between the Company and Tri-Con Mining Alaska Inc. dated January 1, 1997 (6)
10.10	Contract between the Company and Dr. Warrack Willson dated March 19, 2001 (6)
10.11	Equipment Lease Agreement between the Company and Airport Equipment Rentals Inc. dated October 11, 2002 (6)
10.12	Form of Warrant Exercise Agreement between the Company and certain of the selling security holders (8)
10.13	Form of Delay Agreement between the Company and certain of the Selling Shareholders (8)
10.14	2006 Stock Option Plan (10)
10.15	2006-II Stock Option Plan (11)
10.16	2007 Stock Option Plan (12)
10.17 *	Shared Well Agreement between the Company and Sukakpak, Inc., dated May 17, 2007
10.18	2007-1 Equity Compensation Plan (13)
14.1	Code of Ethics (9)
31.1 *	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 *	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 *	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 *	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1 *	Recorded Documents Relating to Federal and State Mining Claims

(1)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed initially on May 11, 1984, as amended.
(2)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 15, 1997.
(3)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2002.
(4)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1995.
(5)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1996.
(6)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2002
(7)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2003.
(8)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on May 19, 2004.
(9)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on July 15, 2004.
(10)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 11, 2006.
(11)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 31, 2006.
(12)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on February 20, 2007.
(13)	Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on September 7, 2007. * Filed herewith.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth information regarding the amount billed to us by our independent auditor, Berkovits & Company, LLP for each of our last two fiscal years:

		Fiscal years ended
		November 30
		2007		2006
Audit Fees:	$	62,419	$	40,000
Audit Related Fees:	$	46,262	$	34,900
Tax Fees:		NIL		NIL
All Other Fees:		NIL		NIL
Total:	$	108,681	$	74,900

Audit Fees

Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed by our independent auditor for the audit of our consolidated annual financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-Related Fees are fees charged by our independent auditor for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under "Audit Fees." This category comprises fees billed for independent accountant review of our interim financial statements and management discussion and analysis, as well as advisory services associated with our financial reporting.

52

Policy on Pre-Approval by Audit Committee of Services Performed by Independent Auditors

Our Audit Committee pre-approves all audit services to be provided to us by our independent auditors. Our Audit Committee’s policy regarding the pre-approval of non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent auditors is that all such services shall be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Non-audit services that are prohibited to be provided by our independent auditors may not be pre-approved. In addition, prior to the granting of any pre-approval, our Audit Committee must be satisfied that the performance of the services in question will not compromise the independence of the independent auditors.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.
Date: January 21, 2009	By: /s/ Garry L. Anselmo
	Garry L. Anselmo,
	President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
	Executive Officer), and Chief Financial
	Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date: January 21, 2009	By: /s/ Garry L. Anselmo
	Garry L. Anselmo,
	President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
	Executive Officer), and Chief Financial
	Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: January 21, 2009	By: /s/ James F. Dixon
	James F. Dixon,
	Director
Date: January 21, 2009	By: /s/ Stuart McCulloch
	Stuart McCulloch,
	Director

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and.

          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

January 21, 2009

/s/ Garry L. Anselmo                    
Garry L. Anselmo,
Principal Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Garry L. Anselmo, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and.

          (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

January 21, 2009

/s/ Garry L. Anselmo                    
Garry L. Anselmo,
Principal Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Silverado Gold Mines, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Garry L. Anselmo                    
Garry L. Anselmo,
Principal Executive Officer

January 21, 2009

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Silverado Gold Mines, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry L. Anselmo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Garry L. Anselmo                    
Garry L. Anselmo,
Principal Financial Officer

January 21, 2009

EX-99.1

EX-10.17

   Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. - Exhibit 10.17