XML 39 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE
Note Q - Fair Value
 
 Under ASC 820, fair value measurements for items measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
Significant Other
 
Significant Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Observable
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Identical Assets
 
Inputs
 
Inputs
 
(In thousands)
 
Measurements
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
At December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for sale securities (1)
 
$
955,804
 
$
6,600
 
$
949,204
 
$
0
 
Loans held for sale (2)
 
 
24,306
 
 
0
 
 
24,306
 
 
0
 
Loans (3)
 
 
4,192
 
 
0
 
 
3,454
 
 
738
 
Other real estate owned (4)
 
 
7,640
 
 
0
 
 
60
 
 
7,580
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for sale securities (1)
 
$
950,503
 
$
100
 
$
950,403
 
$
0
 
Loans held for sale (2)
 
 
15,332
 
 
0
 
 
15,332
 
 
0
 
Loans (3)
 
 
4,120
 
 
0
 
 
3,170
 
 
950
 
Other real estate owned (4)
 
 
9,949
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
9,949
 
 
(1)
See Note D for further detail of fair value of individual investment categories.
(2)
Recurring fair value basis determined using observable market data.
(3)
See Note E. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans identified as impaired reflect full or partial write- downs that are based on the loan’s observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral in accordance with ASC 310.
(4)
Fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with ASC 360.
 
The fair value of impaired loans which are not troubled debt restructurings is based on recent real estate appraisals less estimated costs of sale. For residential real estate impaired loans, appraised values or internal evaluation are based on the comparative sales approach. These impaired loans are considered level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For commercial and commercial real estate impaired loans, evaluations may use either a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, such as comparative sales, cost and/or income approach. A significant unobservable input in the income approach is the estimated capitalization rate for a given piece of collateral. At December 31, 2017 the range of capitalization rates utilized to determine fair value of the underlying collateral averaged approximately 7.8%. Adjustments to comparable sales may be made by an appraiser to reflect local market conditions or other economic factors and may result in changes in the fair value of an asset over time. As such, the fair value of these impaired loans is considered level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans measured at fair value totaled $4.2 million with a specific reserve of $2.4 million at December 31, 2017, compared to $4.1 million with a specific reserve of $0.4 million at December 31, 2016. 
 
Fair value of available for sale securities are determined using valuation techniques for individual investments as described in Note A.
 
When appraisals are used to determine fair value and the appraisals are based on a market approach, the fair value of OREO is classified as level 2. When the fair value of OREO is based on appraisals which require significant adjustments to market-based valuation inputs or apply an income approach based on unobservable cash flows, the fair value of OREO is classified as Level 3.
 
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with the Company's monthly and/or quarter valuation process.
 
 For loans classified as level 3 additions totaled $0.4 million consisting of loans that became impaired during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. Reductions were $0.6 million, primarily principal payments totaling $0.5 million.
 
Charge-offs recognized upon loan foreclosures are generally offset by general or specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses and generally do not, and did not during the reported periods, significantly impact the Company's provision for loan losses.
 
For OREO classified as level 3 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, foreclosed loans added $1.7 million and migrated branches taken out of service added $1.2 million. Reductions summed to $5.3 million and consisted almost entirely of sales of $5.0 million.
 
The carrying amount and fair value of the Company's other significant financial instruments that were not disclosed previously in the balance sheet and for which carrying amount is not fair value as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in
 
Significant Other
 
Significant Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
Active Markets for
 
Observable
 
Unobservable
 
 
 
Carrying
 
Identical Assets
 
Inputs
 
Inputs
 
(In thousands)
 
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
At December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities held to maturity (1)
 
$
416,863
 
$
0
 
$
414,472
 
$
0
 
Time deposits with other banks
 
 
12,553
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
12,493
 
Loans, net
 
 
3,786,063
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
3,760,754
 
Financial Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
4,592,720
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
4,588,515
 
Subordinated debt
 
 
70,521
 
 
0
 
 
61,530
 
 
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities held to maturity (1)
 
$
372,498
 
$
0
 
$
369,881
 
$
0
 
Loans, net
 
 
2,852,016
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
2,840,993
 
Financial Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
3,523,245
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
3,523,322
 
Subordinated debt
 
 
70,241
 
 
0
 
 
54,908
 
 
0
 
 
(1)
See Note D for further detail of recurring fair value basis of individual investment categories.
 
The short maturity of Seacoast’s assets and liabilities results in having a significant number of financial instruments whose fair value equals or closely approximates carrying value. Such financial instruments are reported in the following balance sheet captions: cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits with other banks, federal funds purchased, FHLB borrowings, and securities sold under agreement to repurchase, maturing within 30 days.
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
Securities: U.S. Treasury securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. Other securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.
 
The Company reviews the prices supplied by the independent pricing service, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies, for reasonableness and to ensure such prices are aligned with traditional pricing matrices. In general, the Company does not purchase investment portfolio securities that are esoteric or that have a complicated structure. The Company’s entire portfolio consists of traditional investments, the majority of which are U.S. Treasury obligations, federal agency bullet, mortgage pass-through securities, or general obligation or revenue based municipal bonds. Pricing for such instruments is fairly generic and is easily obtained. The fair value of the collateralized loan obligations is determined from broker quotes. From time to time, the Company will validate, on a sample basis, prices supplied by brokers and the independent pricing service by comparison to prices obtained from other brokers and third-party sources or derived using internal models.
 
Loans: Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, mortgage, etc. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans, except residential mortgages, is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan. For residential mortgage loans, fair value is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusting for prepayment assumptions using discount rates based on secondary market sources. The estimated fair value is not an exit price fair value under ASC 820 when this valuation technique is used.
 
Loans held for sale: Fair values are based upon estimated values to be received from independent third party purchasers. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on contractual terms of the loan in accordance with Company policy on loans held for investment. None of the loans are 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual as of:
 
 
 
December 31, 
 
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
Aggregate fair value
 
$
24,306
 
$
15,332
 
Contractual balance
 
 
23,627
 
 
14,904
 
Excess
 
 
679
 
 
428
 
 
Deposit Liabilities: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for funding of similar remaining maturities.