XML 71 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.3
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2024
Jul. 31, 2023
Jul. 31, 2022
Jul. 31, 2021
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
The SEC has adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of
pay-versus-performance
which shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the Company’s performance. The following pay versus performance disclosure is based on permitted methodology, pursuant to the SEC guidance under Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
 
                 
 YEAR
(1)
  
Summary
Compensation Table
Total for PEO
(2)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
(3)
  
Average Summary
Compensation Table
Total for non-PEO

Named Executive
Officers
(2)
  
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
non-PEO Named

Executive Officers
(4)
  
Total
Shareholder
Return
(5)
  
Peer Group Total
Shareholder
Return
(6)
  
Net Income
(in millions)
  
Company
Adjusted NBT
(in millions)
(7)
2024
    
 
$10,574,521
    
 
$10,397,043
    
 
$3,038,549
    
 
$2,955,006
    
 
$100.36
    
 
$110.39
    
 
$265
    
 
$335
2023
    
 
$10,567,489
    
 
$19,019,951
    
 
$3,432,237
    
 
$5,647,940
    
 
$107.17
    
 
$118.08
    
 
$374
    
 
$518
2022
    
 
$15,866,718
    
 
$14,952,360
    
 
$4,173,100
    
 
$3,818,733
    
 
$76.59
    
 
$114.50
    
 
$1,138
    
 
$1,512
2021
    
 
$19,085,967
    
 
$16,384,052
    
 
$4,444,238
    
 
$3,924,886
    
 
$105.45
    
 
$129.51
    
 
$660
    
 
$834
(1) Robert W. Martin served as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) for the entirety of Fiscal Years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. The Company’s other NEOs for the applicable years were as follows:
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2024 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, Trevor Q. Gasper, and Michele McDermott
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2023 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Trevor Q. Gasper
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2022 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Trevor Q. Gasper
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2021 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Josef Hjelmaker
(2) Amounts reported in these columns represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year in the case of our PEO, Mr. Martin; and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s NEOs other than the PEO for the applicable year.
(3) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid, as defined by the SEC, to Mr. Martin as the Company’s PEO in the indicated fiscal years, as calculated in the table below:
 
         
PEO
    
2024
    
2023
    
2022
    
2021
 
Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation
(a)
    
 
$10,574,521
 
  
 
$10,567,489
 
  
 
$15,866,718
 
  
 
$19,085,967
 
-
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(b)
    
 
$5,657,619
 
  
 
$5,621,179
 
  
 
$7,391,246
 
  
 
$8,648,124
 
+
Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(c)
    
 
$6,308,962
 
  
 
$11,398,863
 
  
 
$6,057,340
 
  
 
$6,360,666
 
+
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Year
(d)
    
 
($1,141,663
  
 
$3,077,766
 
  
 
($2,231,755
  
 
$441,414
 
+
Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year
(e)
    
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
+
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year
(f)
    
 
$312,842
 
  
 
($402,988
  
 
$2,651,303
 
  
 
($855,871
-
 Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
(g)
    
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
= Compensation Actually Paid
    
 
$10,397,043
 
  
 
$19,019,951
 
  
 
$14,952,360
 
  
 
$16,384,052
 
(a) Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.
(b) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to Mr. Martin during the indicated fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(c) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal
year-end
of Mr. Martin’s outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the number of shares that would be awarded on a multi-year cycle if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met for the applicable multi-year cycle.
 
(d) Represents the aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards held by Mr. Martin as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the change in value of a target number of shares that would be achieved on a multi-year basis if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(e) Represents the aggregate fair value of vesting of stock awards that were granted to Mr. Martin and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(f) Represents the aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal
year-end
to the vesting date, of each stock award held by Mr. Martin that was granted in a prior year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of Mr. Martin’s stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(4) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs other than Mr. Martin in the indicated fiscal year, based on the average total compensation for such NEOs reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year and adjusted as shown on the table below:
 
         
OTHER NEOs AVERAGE
(a)
  
2024
   
2023
   
2022
   
2021
 
Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation
(b)
  
 
$3,038,549
 
 
 
$3,432,237
 
 
 
$4,173,100
 
 
 
$4,444,238
 
-
 Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(c)
  
 
$1,305,140
 
 
 
$1,770,885
 
 
 
$2,031,800
 
 
 
$2,108,683
 
+
Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(d)
  
 
$1,400,029
 
 
 
$3,330,125
 
 
 
$1,506,155
 
 
 
$1,679,617
 
+
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Year
(e)
  
 
($211,127
 
 
$755,887
 
 
 
($542,115
 
 
$111,754
 
+
Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year
(f)
  
 
$92,814
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
+
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year
(g)
  
 
($60,119
 
 
($99,424
 
 
$713,393
 
 
 
($202,040
-
 Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
(h)
  
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
= Compensation Actually Paid
  
 
$2,955,006
 
 
 
$5,647,940
 
 
 
$3,818,733
 
 
 
$3,924,886
 
(a) Please see footnote 1 above for the NEOs included in the average for each indicated fiscal year.
(b) Represents average Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year.
(c) Represents the average aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(d) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal
year-end
of the reported NEO’s outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the number of shares that would be awarded on a multi-year cycle if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(e) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards held by the reported NEOs as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the change in value of a target number of shares that would be achieved on a multi-year basis if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(f) Represents the average aggregate fair value of vesting of stock awards that were granted to the reported NEOs and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal
year-end
to the vesting date, of each stock award held by the reported NEOs that was granted in a prior year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(h) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the reported NEOs’ stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and
which
failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(5) Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on July 31, 2020, in our Common Stock. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
(6) The TSR Peer Group consists of Winnebago Industries (“WGO”), LCI Industries (“LCII”), and The Shyft Group (“SHYF”), the same peer group historically utilized in the stock price performance graph of the Company’s Annual Report.
(7) For Fiscal Year 2024, Company Adjusted NBT continues to be viewed as the core driver of the Company’s performance and stockholder value creation. Company Adjusted NBT is a
non-GAAP
financial measure. Please see Appendix A for a reconciliation of this
non-GAAP
financial measure.
     
Company Selected Measure Name Company Adjusted NBT      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote
(1) Robert W. Martin served as the Company’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) for the entirety of Fiscal Years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. The Company’s other NEOs for the applicable years were as follows:
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2024 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, Trevor Q. Gasper, and Michele McDermott
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2023 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Trevor Q. Gasper
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2022 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Trevor Q. Gasper
 
 
 
Fiscal Year 2021 – Colleen Zuhl, Todd Woelfer, Kenneth D. Julian, and Josef Hjelmaker
     
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote
(6) The TSR Peer Group consists of Winnebago Industries (“WGO”), LCI Industries (“LCII”), and The Shyft Group (“SHYF”), the same peer group historically utilized in the stock price performance graph of the Company’s Annual Report.
     
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 10,574,521 $ 10,567,489 $ 15,866,718 $ 19,085,967
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 10,397,043 19,019,951 14,952,360 16,384,052
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote
(3) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid, as defined by the SEC, to Mr. Martin as the Company’s PEO in the indicated fiscal years, as calculated in the table below:
 
         
PEO
    
2024
    
2023
    
2022
    
2021
 
Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation
(a)
    
 
$10,574,521
 
  
 
$10,567,489
 
  
 
$15,866,718
 
  
 
$19,085,967
 
-
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(b)
    
 
$5,657,619
 
  
 
$5,621,179
 
  
 
$7,391,246
 
  
 
$8,648,124
 
+
Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(c)
    
 
$6,308,962
 
  
 
$11,398,863
 
  
 
$6,057,340
 
  
 
$6,360,666
 
+
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Year
(d)
    
 
($1,141,663
  
 
$3,077,766
 
  
 
($2,231,755
  
 
$441,414
 
+
Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year
(e)
    
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
+
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year
(f)
    
 
$312,842
 
  
 
($402,988
  
 
$2,651,303
 
  
 
($855,871
-
 Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
(g)
    
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
  
 
$0
 
= Compensation Actually Paid
    
 
$10,397,043
 
  
 
$19,019,951
 
  
 
$14,952,360
 
  
 
$16,384,052
 
(a) Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year.
(b) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to Mr. Martin during the indicated fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(c) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal
year-end
of Mr. Martin’s outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the number of shares that would be awarded on a multi-year cycle if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met for the applicable multi-year cycle.
 
(d) Represents the aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards held by Mr. Martin as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the change in value of a target number of shares that would be achieved on a multi-year basis if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(e) Represents the aggregate fair value of vesting of stock awards that were granted to Mr. Martin and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(f) Represents the aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal
year-end
to the vesting date, of each stock award held by Mr. Martin that was granted in a prior year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of Mr. Martin’s stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 3,038,549 3,432,237 4,173,100 4,444,238
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 2,955,006 5,647,940 3,818,733 3,924,886
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote
(4) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs other than Mr. Martin in the indicated fiscal year, based on the average total compensation for such NEOs reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year and adjusted as shown on the table below:
 
         
OTHER NEOs AVERAGE
(a)
  
2024
   
2023
   
2022
   
2021
 
Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation
(b)
  
 
$3,038,549
 
 
 
$3,432,237
 
 
 
$4,173,100
 
 
 
$4,444,238
 
-
 Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(c)
  
 
$1,305,140
 
 
 
$1,770,885
 
 
 
$2,031,800
 
 
 
$2,108,683
 
+
Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
(d)
  
 
$1,400,029
 
 
 
$3,330,125
 
 
 
$1,506,155
 
 
 
$1,679,617
 
+
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Year
(e)
  
 
($211,127
 
 
$755,887
 
 
 
($542,115
 
 
$111,754
 
+
Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year
(f)
  
 
$92,814
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
+
Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year
(g)
  
 
($60,119
 
 
($99,424
 
 
$713,393
 
 
 
($202,040
-
 Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal
Year-End
of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
(h)
  
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
 
 
$0
 
= Compensation Actually Paid
  
 
$2,955,006
 
 
 
$5,647,940
 
 
 
$3,818,733
 
 
 
$3,924,886
 
(a) Please see footnote 1 above for the NEOs included in the average for each indicated fiscal year.
(b) Represents average Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year.
(c) Represents the average aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards granted to the reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(d) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal
year-end
of the reported NEO’s outstanding and unvested stock awards granted during such fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the number of shares that would be awarded on a multi-year cycle if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(e) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested stock awards held by the reported NEOs as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year. PSU amounts were calculated based on the change in value of a target number of shares that would be achieved on a multi-year basis if target ROIC and FCF objectives are met.
(f) Represents the average aggregate fair value of vesting of stock awards that were granted to the reported NEOs and vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(g) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal
year-end
to the vesting date, of each stock award held by the reported NEOs that was granted in a prior year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(h) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the reported NEOs’ stock awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and
which
failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return LOGO      
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income LOGO      
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure LOGO      
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group LOGO      
Tabular List, Table
TABULAR LIST OF
COMPANY
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
For Fiscal Year 2024, Company Adjusted NBT is identified as the most important financial performance measure in linking “Compensation Actually Paid” to our performance. Company Adjusted NBT was the only performance measure used in determining MIP in Fiscal Year 2024 and was utilized in determining the RSU portion of our LTI. Per the table below, the other financial measure used in Fiscal Year 2024 in linking “Compensation Actually Paid” to our performance
were
ROIC and FCF.
 
 
 Most Important Measures
(1) Company Adjusted NBT
(2) ROIC
(3) FCF
(4)
Non-financial
ESG target related to employee culture and retention
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 100.36 107.17 76.59 105.45
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 110.39 118.08 114.5 129.51
Net Income (Loss) $ 265,000,000 $ 374,000,000 $ 1,138,000,000 $ 660,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 335,000,000 518,000,000 1,512,000,000 834,000,000
PEO Name Robert W. Martin      
Measure:: 1        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Company Adjusted NBT      
Non-GAAP Measure Description
(7) For Fiscal Year 2024, Company Adjusted NBT continues to be viewed as the core driver of the Company’s performance and stockholder value creation. Company Adjusted NBT is a
non-GAAP
financial measure. Please see Appendix A for a reconciliation of this
non-GAAP
financial measure.
     
Measure:: 2        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name ROIC      
Measure:: 3        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name FCF      
Measure:: 4        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Non-financial ESG target related to employee culture and retention      
PEO | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (5,657,619) $ (5,621,179) $ (7,391,246) $ (8,648,124)
PEO | Fair Value at Fiscal YearEnd of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 6,308,962 11,398,863 6,057,340 6,360,666
PEO | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (1,141,663) 3,077,766 (2,231,755) 441,414
PEO | Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 312,842 (402,988) 2,651,303 (855,871)
PEO | Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal YearEnd of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (1,305,140) (1,770,885) (2,031,800) (2,108,683)
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value at Fiscal YearEnd of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 1,400,029 3,330,125 1,506,155 1,679,617
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (211,127) 755,887 (542,115) 111,754
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value of Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 92,814 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years for Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (60,119) (99,424) 713,393 (202,040)
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal YearEnd of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0