10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-03140

Northern States Power Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wisconsin	39-0508315
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1414 West Hamilton Avenue
Eau Claire, Wisconsin	54701
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(715) 737-2625

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes  ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 and Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  x Yes  ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes  x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at April 27, 2018
Common Stock, $100 par value	933,000 shares

Northern States Power Company (a Wisconsin corporation) meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction H (2) to such Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item l    —	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Item 2   —	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 4   —	Controls and Procedures	23
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1    —	Legal Proceedings	23
Item 1A —	Risk Factors	24
Item 6    —	Exhibits	24
SIGNATURES		25

Certifications Pursuant to Section 302	1
Certifications Pursuant to Section 906	1
Statement Pursuant to Private Litigation	1

This Form 10-Q is filed by Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation (NSP-Wisconsin).  NSP-Wisconsin is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc.  Xcel Energy Inc. wholly owns the following subsidiaries: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (NSP-Minnesota); Southwestern Public Service Company, a New Mexico corporation (SPS); Public Service Company of Colorado, a Colorado corporation (PSCo); and NSP-Wisconsin.  NSP-Minnesota, NSP-Wisconsin, PSCo and SPS are also referred to collectively as utility subsidiaries.  The electric production and transmission system of NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin, which is operated on an integrated basis and is managed by NSP-Minnesota, is referred to collectively as the NSP System. Additional information on Xcel Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, Xcel Energy) is available on various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NSP-WISCONSIN AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018			2017
Operating revenues
Electric	$	216,366		$	216,309
Natural gas	56,500			48,347
Other	278			275
Total operating revenues	273,144			264,931
Operating expenses
Electric fuel and purchased power, non-affiliates	2,898			2,873
Purchased power, affiliates	101,311			106,458
Cost of natural gas sold and transported	28,723			25,987
Operating and maintenance expenses	50,344			49,184
Conservation expenses	2,978			3,054
Depreciation and amortization	30,587			27,049
Taxes (other than income taxes)	7,313			6,873
Total operating expenses	224,154			221,478
Operating income	48,990			43,453
Other (expense), net	(359		)	(432		)
Allowance for funds used during construction — equity	1,855			1,287
Interest charges and financing costs
Interest charges — includes other financing costs of $478 and $456, respectively	9,595			8,682
Allowance for funds used during construction — debt	(836		)	(550		)
Total interest charges and financing costs	8,759			8,132
Income before income taxes	41,727			36,176
Income taxes	10,310			13,757
Net income	$	31,417		$	22,419

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

3

NSP-WISCONSIN AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018		2017
Net income	$	31,417	$	22,419
Other comprehensive income
Derivative instruments:
Reclassification of losses to net income, net of tax of $8 and $12, respectively	23		19
Other comprehensive income	23		19
Comprehensive income	$	31,440	$	22,438

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4

NSP-WISCONSIN AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018			2017
Operating activities
Net income	$	31,417		$	22,419
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	30,987			27,425
Deferred income taxes	1,843			11,348
Amortization of investment tax credits	(131		)	(131		)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	(1,855		)	(1,287		)
Net derivative losses	154			166
Other	511			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(9,504		)	(10,867		)
Accrued unbilled revenues	12,026			12,986
Inventories	6,103			4,806
Other current assets	5,854			4,305
Accounts payable	(15,873		)	19,809
Net regulatory assets and liabilities	10,518			656
Other current liabilities	(1,837		)	(9,158		)
Pension and other employee benefit obligations	(9,200		)	(8,860		)
Change in other noncurrent assets	157			(294		)
Change in other noncurrent liabilities	(474		)	(800		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	60,696			72,523
Investing activities
Utility capital/construction expenditures	(58,488		)	(47,999		)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	1,855			1,287
Other, net	(197		)	(159		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(56,830		)	(46,871		)
Financing activities
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net	11,000			(27,000		)
Repayments of long-term debt	(6		)	(13		)
Capital contributions from parent	3,326			12,282
Dividends paid to parent	(15,481		)	(10,729		)
Other, net	(331		)	(70		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(1,492		)	(25,530		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	2,374			122
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	1,403			1,546
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,777		$	1,668
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)	$	(5,751	)	$	(6,020	)
Cash paid for income taxes, net	(7,038		)	(11,489		)
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:
Property, plant and equipment additions in accounts payable	$	21,757		$	15,150

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5

NSP-WISCONSIN AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,777		$	1,403
Accounts receivable, net	69,378			63,200
Accrued unbilled revenues	47,982			60,008
Other receivables	15,256			15,144
Inventories	11,655			17,758
Regulatory assets	22,922			23,113
Prepaid taxes	17,768			23,606
Prepayments and other	3,262			3,450
Total current assets	192,000			207,682
Property, plant and equipment, net	2,116,095			2,088,728
Other assets
Regulatory assets	281,875			282,217
Other investments	3,089			2,892
Other	147			201
Total other assets	285,111			285,310
Total assets	$	2,593,206		$	2,581,720
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	151,074		$	151,080
Short-term debt	22,000			11,000
Notes payable to affiliates	500			500
Accounts payable	40,301			58,365
Accounts payable to affiliates	25,823			29,628
Dividends payable to parent	16,042			15,481
Regulatory liabilities	25,032			20,712
Environmental liabilities	12,386			10,469
Accrued interest	10,682			8,025
Other	29,239			34,474
Total current liabilities	333,079			339,734
Deferred credits and other liabilities
Deferred income taxes	258,599			256,687
Deferred investment tax credits	7,383			7,514
Regulatory liabilities	396,304			386,807
Environmental liabilities	20,378			19,190
Customer advances	16,448			16,325
Pension and employee benefit obligations	40,668			50,027
Other	18,322			18,747
Total deferred credits and other liabilities	758,102			755,297
Commitments and contingencies
Capitalization
Long-term debt	610,038			610,100
Common stock — 1,000,000 shares authorized of $100 par value; 933,000 shares outstanding at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively	93,300			93,300
Additional paid in capital	449,350			449,350
Retained earnings	349,383			334,008
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(46		)	(69		)
Total common stockholder’s equity	891,987			876,589
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,593,206		$	2,581,720

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6

NSP-WISCONSIN AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (UNAUDITED)

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), the financial position of NSP-Wisconsin and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017; the results of its operations, including the components of net income and comprehensive income, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017; and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. Management has also evaluated the impact of events occurring after March 31, 2018 up to the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. These statements contain all necessary adjustments and disclosures resulting from that evaluation. The Dec. 31, 2017 balance sheet information has been derived from the audited 2017 consolidated financial statements included in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017. These notes to the consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP on an annual basis have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on Feb. 26, 2018. Due to the seasonality of NSP-Wisconsin’s electric and natural gas sales, interim results are not necessarily an appropriate base from which to project annual results.

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of accounting policies and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued

Leases —In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Leases, Topic 842 (Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02), which for lessees requires balance sheet recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for most leases. This guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2018. NSP-Wisconsin has not yet fully determined the impacts of implementation. However, adoption is expected to occur on Jan. 1, 2019 utilizing the practical expedients provided by the standard and proposed in Targeted Improvements, Topic 842 (Proposed ASU 2018-200). As such, agreements entered into prior to Jan. 1, 2019 that are currently considered leases are expected to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheet, including contracts for use of office space, equipment and natural gas storage assets, as well as certain purchased power agreements (PPAs) for natural gas-fueled generating facilities. NSP-Wisconsin expects that similar agreements entered into after Dec. 31, 2018 will generally qualify as leases under the new standard.

Recently Adopted

Revenue Recognition— In May 2014, the FASB issued Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Topic 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), which provides a new framework for the recognition of revenue. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the guidance on a modified retrospective basis on Jan. 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after Dec. 31, 2017 are presented in accordance with Topic 606, while prior period results have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with prior accounting guidance. Other than increased disclosures regarding revenues related to contracts with customers, the implementation did not have a significant impact on NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated financial statements. For related disclosures, see Note 13.

Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments — In January 2016, the FASB issued Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Subtopic 825-10 (ASU No. 2016-01), which eliminated the available-for-sale classification for marketable equity securities and also replaced the cost method of accounting for non-marketable equity securities with a model for recognizing impairments and observable price changes. Under the new standard, other than when the consolidation or equity method of accounting is utilized, changes in the fair value of equity securities are recognized in earnings. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the guidance on Jan. 1, 2018 and the implementation did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

7

Presentation of Net Periodic Benefit Cost —In March 2017, the FASB issued Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, Topic 715 (ASU No. 2017-07), which establishes that only the service cost element of pension cost may be presented as a component of operating income in the income statement. Also under the guidance, only the service cost component of pension cost is eligible for capitalization. As a result of application of accounting principles for rate regulated entities, a similar amount of pension cost, including non-service components, will be recognized consistent with the historical ratemaking treatment, and the impacts of adoption will be limited to changes in classification of non-service costs in the consolidated statement of income. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the new guidance on Jan. 1, 2018, and as a result, $0.7 million of pension costs were retrospectively reclassified from operating and maintenance expenses to other income, net on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Under a practical expedient permitted by the standard, NSP-Wisconsin used benefit cost amounts disclosed for prior periods as the basis for retrospective application.

3. Selected Balance Sheet Data

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Accounts receivable, net (a)
Accounts receivable	$	74,732		$	68,073
Less allowance for bad debts	(5,354		)	(4,873		)
	$	69,378		$	63,200

^(a)  Accounts receivable, net includes an immaterial amount and $3.4 million due from affiliates as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively.

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Inventories
Materials and supplies	$	7,015	$	6,916
Fuel	3,842		3,866
Natural gas	798		6,976
	$	11,655	$	17,758

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Property, plant and equipment, net
Electric plant	$	2,619,336		$	2,602,671
Natural gas plant	330,055			326,723
Common and other property	182,685			181,105
Construction work in progress	178,000			148,770
Total property, plant and equipment	3,310,076			3,259,269
Less accumulated depreciation	(1,193,981		)	(1,170,541		)
	$	2,116,095		$	2,088,728

4. Income Taxes

Except to the extent noted below, Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 appropriately represents, in all material respects, the current status of other income tax matters, and are incorporated herein by reference.

8

Total income tax expense from operations differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income tax expense. The following reconciles such differences:

	Three Months ended March 31
		2018		2017
Federal statutory rate		21.0	%	35.0	%
State tax, net of federal tax effect		6.2		5.1
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
Regulatory differences - ARAM (a)		(4.7	)	(0.2	)
Regulatory differences - ARAM deferral (b)		4.6		—
Regulatory differences - other utility plant items		(1.7	)	(1.3	)
Other tax credits, net of federal income tax expense		(0.8	)	(0.7	)
Other, net		0.1		0.1
Effective income tax rate		24.7	%	38.0	%

^(a)   The average rate assumption method (ARAM); a method to flow back excess deferred taxes to customers.

^(b) As we receive further clarity or direction from our commissions regarding the flow back to customers of excess deferred taxes resulting from the TCJA, the ARAM deferral may decrease during the year, which would result in a reduction to tax expense with a correlating reduction to revenue.

Federal Audits— NSP-Wisconsin is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return. The statute of limitations applicable to Xcel Energy’s federal income tax returns expire as follows:

Tax Year(s)	Expiration
2009 - 2011	December 2018
2012 - 2013	October 2018
2014	September 2018
2015	September 2019
2016	September 2020

In 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of tax years 2010 and 2011, including the 2009 carryback claim. The IRS proposed an adjustment to the federal tax loss carryback claims and in 2015 the IRS forwarded the issue to the Office of Appeals (“Appeals”). In 2017 Xcel Energy and Appeals reached an agreement and the benefit related to the agreed upon portions was recognized. NSP-Wisconsin did not accrue any income tax benefit related to this adjustment. As of March 31, 2018, the case has been forwarded to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

In the third quarter of 2015, the IRS commenced an examination of tax years 2012 and 2013. In the third quarter of 2017, the IRS concluded the audit of tax years 2012 and 2013 and proposed an adjustment that would impact Xcel Energy’s net operating loss (NOL) and effective tax rate (ETR). After evaluating the proposed adjustment Xcel Energy filed a protest with the IRS. Xcel Energy anticipates the issue will be forwarded to Appeals. As of March 31, 2018, Xcel Energy has recognized its best estimate of income tax expense that will result from a final resolution of this issue; however, the outcome and timing of a resolution is uncertain.

State Audits— NSP-Wisconsin is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files consolidated state income tax returns. As of March 31, 2018, NSP-Wisconsin’s earliest open tax year that is subject to examination by state taxing authorities under applicable statutes of limitations is 2012. In 2016, the state of Wisconsin began an audit of years 2012 and 2013. As of March 31, 2018, Wisconsin had not proposed any material adjustments, and there were no other state income tax audits in progress.

Unrecognized Benefits— The unrecognized tax benefit balance includes permanent tax positions, which if recognized would affect the annual ETR. In addition, the unrecognized tax benefit balance includes temporary tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. A change in the period of deductibility would not affect the ETR but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.

9

A reconciliation of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions	$	1.5	$	1.4
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions	1.0		1.0
Total unrecognized tax benefit	$	2.5	$	2.4

The unrecognized tax benefit amounts were reduced by the tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The amounts of tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards are as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
NOL and tax credit carryforwards	$	(1.9	)	$	(1.9	)

It is reasonably possible that NSP-Wisconsin’s amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change in the next 12 months as the IRS Appeals progresses and audit resumes, the Wisconsin audit progresses, and other state audits resume. As the IRS Appeals and Wisconsin audits progress, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit could decrease up to approximately $1 million.

The payable for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits is partially offset by the interest benefit associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The payables for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017 were not material. No amounts were accrued for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2018 or Dec. 31, 2017.

5. Rate Matters

Except to the extent noted below, the circumstances set forth in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of other rate matters, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Tax Reform — Regulatory Proceedings

The specific impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) on customer rates are subject to regulatory approval. Each of the states in NSP-Wisconsin’s service areas have opened dockets to address the impacts of the TCJA. NSP-Wisconsin has made filings and is working with various stakeholders in its jurisdictions to determine the appropriate treatment for the TCJA.

In January 2018, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) issued an order requiring public utilities to apply deferred accounting for the impacts of the TCJA. In March 2018, NSP-Wisconsin filed recommended plans for Wisconsin, which for electric operations included an option for an immediate bill credit for a portion of the tax savings in 2018 and 2019, while deferring the remainder until NSP-Wisconsin’s 2020 electric rate case. For the natural gas operations, NSP-Wisconsin proposed using the TCJA to reduce the unamortized regulatory asset for the Ashland/Northern States Power Lakefront Superfund Site (the Site) clean-up. A PSCW decision on the regulatory treatment of the TCJA is anticipated later in 2018.

For Michigan, NSP-Wisconsin has reached settlement in its electric rate case, which reflects the impacts of the TCJA, and has proposed customer refunds for natural gas operations.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Formula Rates — The FERC has not yet issued guidance on how or when electric utilities should reflect the impacts of the TCJA in FERC jurisdictional wholesale rates. The FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in March 2018 seeking comments on how to reflect TCJA impacts in wholesale rates, in particular changes to accumulated deferred income taxes and bonus depreciation. Comments for the NOI are due in May 2018. However, FERC-approved formula rates for wholesale customers are generally adjusted on an annual basis for certain changes in rate base and actual operating expenses, including income taxes. As a result, these revenues would be subject to an automatic reduction for the effect of the TCJA corporate tax rate change through the annual true-up process, absent specific FERC action.

NSP-Wisconsin was a party to a February 2018 FERC filing by certain transmission owner (TO) members of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) proposing to commence early reductions to transmission formula rates in 2018 for corporate tax rate impacts of the TCJA. In March 2018, the FERC issued orders granting MISO TO waiver requests so that 2018 rates will reflect the lower federal corporate tax rate.

10

Recently Concluded Regulatory Proceeding — Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC)

Michigan 2018 Electric Gas Rate Case— In November 2017, NSP-Wisconsin filed a request with the MPSC to increase rates for electric service by $1 million, or 7.1 percent. The filing was based on a 2018 forecast test year, a 10.1 percent return on equity (ROE), an equity ratio of 52.5 percent and a forecasted average rate base of approximately $43 million. The primary driver of the requested increase is continuing investment in transmission and distribution infrastructure. The filing also included a request for step increases in 2019 and 2020 related to electric distribution system investments in those years. In addition to the MPSC staff, intervenors in the case include the Michigan Attorney General and the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, a voluntary association of large industrial businesses.

In March 2018, NSP-Wisconsin reached a settlement in principle with the parties authorizing a 2018 rate increase of approximately $300 thousand, or approximately 2.0 percent, which reflects a portion of the TCJA benefits. The settlement was based on a 9.8 percent ROE and a 52.5 percent equity ratio. In April 2018, the MPSC issued an order approving the settlement agreement, and new rates are expected to be implemented on May 1, 2018.

Pending Regulatory Proceeding — FERC

MISO ROE Complaints — In November 2013, a group of customers filed a complaint at the FERC against MISO TOs, including NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin. The complaint argued for a reduction in the ROE in transmission formula rates in the MISO region from 12.38 percent to 9.15 percent, and the removal of ROE adders (including those for Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) membership), effective Nov. 12, 2013.

In September 2016, the FERC approved an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommendation that MISO TOs be granted a 10.32 percent base ROE using the methodology adopted by FERC in June 2014 (Opinion 531). This ROE would be applicable for the 15-month refund period from Nov. 12, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2015, and prospectively from the date of the FERC order. The total prospective ROE would be 10.82 percent, including a 50 basis point adder for RTO membership. Various parties requested rehearing of the September 2016 order. The requests are pending FERC action.

In February 2015, a second complaint seeking to reduce the MISO ROE from 12.38 percent to 8.67 percent prior to any RTO adder was filed, resulting in a second period of potential refunds from Feb. 12, 2015 to May 11, 2016. In June 2016, an ALJ recommended a base ROE of 9.7 percent, applying the FERC Opinion 531 methodology. Various parties filed exceptions to the ALJ recommendation, and FERC action is pending. In April 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated and remanded Opinion 531. It is unclear how the D.C. Circuit’s opinion to vacate and remand Opinion 531 will affect the September 2016 FERC order or the timing and outcome of the second ROE complaint.

NSP-Minnesota has recognized a current refund liability consistent with the best estimate of the final ROE for the Feb. 12, 2015 to May 11, 2016 complaint period.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

Except to the extent noted below and in Note 5 above, the circumstances set forth in Notes 10 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of commitments and contingent liabilities and are incorporated herein by reference. The following include commitments, contingencies and unresolved contingencies that are material to NSP-Wisconsin’s financial position.

Guarantees

NSP-Wisconsin provides a guarantee for payment of customer loans related to NSP-Wisconsin’s farm rewiring program. NSP-Wisconsin’s exposure under the guarantee is based upon the net liability under the agreement. The guarantee issued by NSP-Wisconsin has a stated maximum amount. The guarantee contains no recourse provisions and requires no collateral. These agreements have expiration dates through 2020.

11

The following table presents the guarantee issued and outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Guarantee issued and outstanding	$	1.0	$	1.0
Current exposure under this guarantee	—		—

Environmental Contingencies

Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site — NSP-Wisconsin was named a potentially responsible party for contamination at a site in Ashland, Wis. The Site includes NSP-Wisconsin property, previously operated as a MGP facility (the Upper Bluff), and two other properties: an adjacent city lakeshore park area (Kreher Park); and an area of Lake Superior’s Chequamegon Bay adjoining the park.

In January 2017, NSP-Wisconsin agreed to remediate the Phase II Project Area (the Sediments), under a settlement agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency. The settlement agreements were approved by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. NSP-Wisconsin initiated a full scale wet dredge remedy of the Sediments in 2017. Under the current plan, NSP-Wisconsin anticipates completion of restoration activities of the Sediments in 2018 with finalization of Phase I Project Area (which includes the Upper Bluff and Kreher Park areas of the Site) construction and restoration activities in early 2019 although April weather may challenge that schedule. Groundwater treatment activities at the Site will continue.

The current cost estimate for the remediation of the entire site (both Phase I Project Area and the Sediments) is approximately $172 million, of which approximately $139 million has been spent. As of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, NSP-Wisconsin had recorded a total liability of $33 million and $30 million, respectively, for the entire site.

NSP-Wisconsin has deferred the unrecovered portion of the estimated Site remediation costs as a regulatory asset. The PSCW has authorized NSP-Wisconsin rate recovery for all remediation costs incurred at the Site. In 2012, the PSCW agreed to allow NSP-Wisconsin to pre-collect certain costs, to amortize costs over a ten-year period and to apply a three percent carrying cost to the unamortized regulatory asset. In December 2017, the PSCW approved an NSP-Wisconsin natural gas rate case, which included recovery of additional expenses associated with remediating the Site. The annual recovery of MGP clean-up costs increased from $12 million in 2017 to $18 million in 2018.

Other MGP, Landfill or Disposal Sites — In addition to the site in Ashland, Wis., NSP-Wisconsin is currently involved in investigating and/or remediating an MGP, landfill or other disposal sites. NSP-Wisconsin has identified one site where contamination is present and where investigation and/or remediation activities are currently underway. Other parties may have responsibility for some portion of the investigation and/or remediation activities that are underway. NSP-Wisconsin anticipates that these investigation or remediation activities will continue through at least 2018. NSP-Wisconsin had accrued $0.1 million for this site as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017. NSP-Wisconsin anticipates that any amounts spent will be fully recovered from customers.

Legal Contingencies

NSP-Wisconsin is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for such losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories. In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on NSP-Wisconsin’s financial statements. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal fees are expensed as incurred.

12

Employment, Tort and Commercial Litigation

Gas Trading Litigation — e prime, inc. (e prime) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy. e prime was in the business of natural gas trading and marketing but has not engaged in natural gas trading or marketing activities since 2003.  Thirteen lawsuits were commenced against e prime and Xcel Energy (and NSP-Wisconsin, in two instances) between 2003 and 2009 alleging fraud and anticompetitive activities in conspiring to restrain the trade of natural gas and manipulate natural gas prices.

e prime, Xcel Energy Inc. and its other affiliates were sued along with several other gas marketing companies. These cases were all consolidated in the U.S. District Court in Nevada. Six of the cases remain active, which includes a multi-district litigation (MDL) matter consisting of a Colorado class (Breckenridge), a Wisconsin class (Arandell Corp.), a Missouri class, a Kansas class, and two other cases identified as “Sinclair Oil” and “Farmland.” In March 2017, summary judgment was granted by the MDL judge in favor of Xcel Energy and e prime in the Sinclair Oil and Farmland cases. In November 2017, the U.S District Court in Nevada granted summary judgment against two plaintiffs in the Arandell Corp. case in favor of Xcel Energy and NSP-Wisconsin, leaving only three individual plaintiffs remaining in the litigation. In addition, the plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and remand back to originating courts in these cases were denied in March 2017. Plaintiffs have appealed the summary judgment motions granted in the Farmland and Sinclair Oil cases and the denial of class certification and remand to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit). Oral arguments were heard before the Ninth Circuit in February 2018. In March 2018, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the summary judgment in the Farmland case. The Farmland defendants subsequently filed a request for further review by the Ninth Circuit. In light of the decision in the Farmland case, the Sinclair plaintiffs have requested the Ninth Circuit to reverse the grant of summary judgment without hearing. Final rulings on all pending motions and appeals are expected by the end of 2018. Xcel Energy, NSP-Wisconsin and e prime have concluded that a loss is remote.

7. Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments

Commercial Paper — NSP-Wisconsin meets its short-term liquidity requirements primarily through the issuance of commercial paper and borrowings under its credit facility. Commercial paper outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin was as follows:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
Borrowing limit	$	150		$	150
Amount outstanding at period end	22			11
Average amount outstanding	18			52
Maximum amount outstanding	46			129
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis	1.80		%	1.23		%
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.24			1.73

Letters of Credit— NSP-Wisconsin uses letters of credit, generally with terms of one year, to provide financial guarantees for certain operating obligations. At March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, there were no letters of credit outstanding.

Credit Facility — In order to use its commercial paper program to fulfill short-term funding needs, NSP-Wisconsin must have a revolving credit facility in place at least equal to the amount of its commercial paper borrowing limit and cannot issue commercial paper in an aggregate amount exceeding available capacity under this credit facility.  The line of credit provides short-term financing in the form of notes payable to banks, letters of credit and back-up support for commercial paper borrowings.

At March 31, 2018, NSP-Wisconsin had the following committed credit facility available (in millions of dollars):

Credit Facility (a)		Drawn(b)		Available
$	150	$	22	$	128

^(a)  This credit facility expires in June 2021.

^(b)  Includes outstanding commercial paper.

All credit facility bank borrowings, outstanding letters of credit and outstanding commercial paper reduce the available capacity under the credit facility. NSP-Wisconsin had no direct advances on the credit facility outstanding at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017.

13

Other Short-Term Borrowings— The following table presents the notes payable of Clearwater Investments, Inc., a NSP-Wisconsin subsidiary, to Xcel Energy Inc.:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Notes payable to affiliates	$	0.5		$	0.5
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.34		%	1.73		%

8. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a single definition of fair value and requires certain disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  A hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value is established by this guidance. The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts or priced with models using highly observable inputs.

Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those valued with models requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents— The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.

Interest rate derivatives— The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on broker quotes that utilize current market interest rate forecasts.

Commodity derivatives— The methods used to measure the fair value of commodity derivative forwards and options utilize forward prices and volatilities, as well as pricing adjustments for specific delivery locations, and are generally assigned a Level 2 classification.  When contractual settlements extend to periods beyond those readily observable on active exchanges or quoted by brokers, the significance of the use of less observable forecasts of long-term forward prices and volatilities on a valuation is evaluated and may result in Level 3 classification.

Derivative Instruments Fair Value Measurements

NSP-Wisconsin enters into derivative instruments, including forward contracts, futures, swaps and options, for trading purposes and to manage risk in connection with changes in interest rates and utility commodity prices.

Interest Rate Derivatives — NSP-Wisconsin enters into various instruments that effectively fix the interest payments on certain floating rate debt obligations or effectively fix the yield or price on a specified benchmark interest rate for an anticipated debt issuance for a specific period.  These derivative instruments are generally designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

At March 31, 2018, accumulated other comprehensive loss related to interest rate derivatives included immaterial net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as the related hedged interest rate transactions impact earnings, including forecasted amounts for unsettled hedges, as applicable.

Commodity Derivatives — NSP-Wisconsin may enter into derivative instruments to manage variability of future cash flows from changes in commodity prices in its electric and natural gas operations, as well as for trading purposes. This could include the purchase or sale of natural gas to generate electric energy and natural gas for resale.

14

The following table details the gross notional amounts of commodity options at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017:

(Amounts in Thousands)(a)(b)	March 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Million British thermal units of natural gas	—	42

^(a)  Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.

^(b)  Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis, but are weighted for the probability of exercise.

Impact of Derivative Activities on Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — There were immaterial pre-tax losses related to interest rate derivatives reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of natural gas commodity derivatives resulted in immaterial and $0.1 million of net losses, respectively, recognized as regulatory assets and liabilities. The classification as a regulatory asset or liability is based on commission approved regulatory recovery mechanisms.

There were no natural gas commodity derivative settlement gains or losses recognized and $0.2 million of losses recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and were subject to purchased natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, which result in reclassifications of derivative settlement gains and losses out of income to a regulatory asset or liability, as appropriate.

NSP-Wisconsin had no derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. Therefore, no gains or losses from fair value hedges or related hedged transactions were recognized for these periods.

Consideration of Credit Risk and Concentrations—NSP-Wisconsin continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the counterparties to its interest rate derivatives and commodity derivative contracts prior to settlement, and assesses each counterparty’s ability to perform on the transactions set forth in the contracts. Given this assessment, as well as an assessment of the impact of NSP-Wisconsin’s own credit risk when determining the fair value of derivative liabilities, the impact of credit risk was immaterial to the fair value of unsettled commodity derivatives presented in the consolidated balance sheets.

NSP-Wisconsin employs additional credit risk control mechanisms when appropriate, such as letters of credit, parental guarantees, standardized master netting agreements and termination provisions that allow for offsetting of positive and negative exposures. Credit exposure is monitored and, when necessary, the activity with a specific counterparty is limited until credit enhancement is provided.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements — The following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	March 31, 2018
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	11

	Dec. 31, 2017
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14

^(a)  NSP-Wisconsin nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017.  The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.

^(b)  Included in prepayments and other current assets balance of $3.3 million and $3.5 million at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

15

Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

As of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:

	March 31, 2018				Dec. 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Long-term debt, including current portion	$	761,112	$	827,506	$	761,180	$	856,106

The fair value of NSP-Wisconsin’s long-term debt is estimated based on recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities. The fair value estimates are based on information available to management as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, and given the observability of the inputs to these estimates, the fair values presented for long-term debt have been assigned a Level 2.

9. Other (Expense), Net

Other (expense), net consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31
(Thousands of Dollars)	2018			2017
Interest income	$	156		$	143
Other nonoperating income	6			155
Benefits non-service cost	(471		)	(678		)
Insurance policy expense	(47		)	(49		)
Other nonoperating expense	(3		)	(3		)
Other (expense), net	$	(359	)	$	(432	)

10. Segment Information

Operating results from the regulated electric utility and regulated natural gas utility are each separately and regularly reviewed by NSP-Wisconsin’s chief operating decision maker.  NSP-Wisconsin evaluates performance based on profit or loss generated from the product or service provided.  These segments are managed separately because the revenue streams are dependent upon regulated rate recovery, which is separately determined for each segment.

NSP-Wisconsin has the following reportable segments: regulated electric utility, regulated natural gas utility and all other.

• NSP-Wisconsin’s regulated electric utility segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity primarily in portions of Wisconsin and Michigan. 

• NSP-Wisconsin’s regulated natural gas utility segment purchases, transports, stores and distributes natural gas primarily in portions of Wisconsin and Michigan.

• Revenues from operating segments not included above are below the necessary quantitative thresholds and are therefore included in the all other category.  Those primarily include investments in rental housing projects that qualify for low-income housing tax credits.

Asset and capital expenditure information is not provided for NSP-Wisconsin’s reportable segments because as an integrated electric and natural gas utility, NSP-Wisconsin operates significant assets that are not dedicated to a specific business segment, and reporting assets and capital expenditures by business segment would require arbitrary and potentially misleading allocations which may not necessarily reflect the assets that would be required for the operation of the business segments on a stand-alone basis.

To report income from operations for regulated electric and regulated natural gas utility segments, the majority of costs are directly assigned to each segment.  However, some costs, such as common depreciation, common operating and maintenance expenses and interest expense are allocated based on cost causation allocators.  A general allocator is used for certain general and administrative expenses, including office supplies, rent, property insurance and general advertising.

16

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	—		$	273,144
Intersegment revenues	109		148		—		(257		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,475	$	56,648	$	278	$	(257	)	$	273,144
Net income	$	20,444	$	10,399	$	574	$	—		$	31,417

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	—		$	264,931
Intersegment revenues	96		114		—		(210		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,405	$	48,461	$	275	$	(210	)	$	264,931
Net income	$	15,470	$	6,545	$	404	$	—		$	22,419

^(a)  Operating revenues include $38 million and $42 million of affiliate electric revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

11. Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018			2017			2018			2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Health Care Benefits
Service cost	$	1,195		$	1,154		$	9		$	7
Interest cost (a)	1,360			1,554			142			148
Expected return on plan assets (a)	(2,256		)	(2,295		)	(16		)	(8		)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (a)	(8		)	35			(88		)	(88		)
Amortization of net loss (a)	1,418			1,462			139			109
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,709		$	1,910		$	186		$	168
Credits not recognized due to the effects of regulation	$	221		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net benefit cost recognized for financial reporting	$	1,930		$	1,910		$	186		$	168

a) The components of net periodic cost other than the service cost component are included in the line item “other income, net” in the

income statement or capitalized on the balance sheet as a regulatory asset.

In January 2018, contributions of $150 million were made across four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans, of which $10.0 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin. Xcel Energy does not expect additional pension contributions during 2018.

12. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1	$	(69	)	$	(133	)
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss	23			19
Net current period other comprehensive income	23			19
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31	$	(46	)	$	(114	)

17

Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018				Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Losses on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate derivatives	$	31		(a)	$	31		(a)
Total, pre-tax	31				31
Tax benefit	(8		)		(12		)
Total amounts reclassified, net of tax	$	23			$	19

^(a)  Included in interest charges.

13. Revenues

NSP-Wisconsin principally generates revenue from the transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas to retail customers. Performance obligations related to the sale of energy are satisfied as energy is delivered to customers. NSP-Wisconsin recognizes revenue in an amount that corresponds directly to the price of the energy delivered to the customer. The measurement of energy sales to customers is generally based on the reading of their meters, which occurs on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recognized. Contract terms are generally short-term in nature, and as such NSP-Wisconsin does not recognize a separate financing component of its collections from customers. NSP-Wisconsin presents its revenues net of any excise or other fiduciary-type taxes or fees.

NSP-Wisconsin has various rate-adjustment mechanisms in place that provide for the recovery of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased energy costs. These cost-adjustment tariffs may increase or decrease the level of revenue collected from customers and are revised periodically for differences between the total amount collected under the clauses and the costs incurred. When applicable,

under governing regulatory commission rate orders, fuel cost over-recoveries (the excess of fuel revenue billed to customers over fuel

costs incurred) are deferred as regulatory liabilities and under-recoveries (the excess of fuel costs incurred over fuel revenues billed to

customers) are deferred as regulatory assets. NSP-Wisconsin must submit a forward looking fuel cost plan annually for approval by the PSCW. The rules also allow for deferral of any under-recovery or over-recovery of fuel costs in excess of a two percent annual tolerance band, for future rate recovery or refund, subject to PSCW approval.

Certain rate rider mechanisms qualify as alternative revenue programs under GAAP. These mechanisms arise from costs imposed upon the utility by action of a regulator or legislative body related to an environmental, public safety or other mandate. When certain criteria are met (including collection within 24 months), revenue is recognized equal to the revenue requirement, which may include return on rate base items and incentives. The mechanisms are revised periodically for differences between the total amount collected and the revenue recognized, which may increase or decrease the level of revenue collected from customers. Alternative revenue is recorded on a gross basis and is disclosed separate from revenue from contracts with customers in the period earned.

In the following tables, revenue is classified by the type of goods/services rendered and market/customer type. The tables also reconcile revenue to the reportable segments.

18

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	67,803	$	30,326	$	16	$	98,145
Commercial and industrial (C&I)	104,817		24,550		25		129,392
Other	1,606		—		237		1,843
Total retail	174,226		54,876		278		229,380
Interchange	37,674		—		—		37,674
Other	1,504		1,007		—		2,511
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,404		55,883		278		269,565
Alternative revenue and other	2,962		617		—		3,579
Total revenues	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	273,144

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	66,043	$	26,628	$	20	$	92,691
C&I	102,380		20,258		24		122,662
Other	1,520		—		231		1,751
Total retail	169,943		46,886		275		217,104
Interchange	42,378		—		—		42,378
Other	969		908		—		1,877
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,290		47,794		275		261,359
Alternative revenue and other	3,019		553		—		3,572
Total revenues	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	264,931

Item 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Discussion of financial condition and liquidity for NSP-Wisconsin is omitted per conditions set forth in general instructions H (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-Q for wholly owned subsidiaries. It is replaced with management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations set forth in general instructions H (2) (a) of Form 10-Q for wholly owned subsidiaries (reduced disclosure format).

Financial Review

The following discussion and analysis by management focuses on those factors that had a material effect on NSP-Wisconsin’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows during the periods presented, or are expected to have a material impact in the future. It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Due to the seasonality of NSP-Wisconsin’s electric and natural gas sales, such interim results are not necessarily an appropriate base from which to project annual results.

19

Forward-Looking Statements

Except for the historical statements contained in this report, the matters discussed herein, are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such forward-looking statements including the TCJA’s impact to NSP-Wisconsin and its customers, as well as assumptions and other statements are intended to be identified in this document by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “possible,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions. Actual results may vary materially. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information. The following factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other securities filings (including NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2017 and subsequent securities filings), could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations as suggested by such forward-looking information: general economic conditions, including inflation rates, monetary fluctuations and their impact on capital expenditures and the ability of NSP-Wisconsin and its subsidiaries to obtain financing on favorable terms; business conditions in the energy industry; including the risk of a slow down in the U.S. economy or delay in growth, recovery, trade, fiscal, taxation and environmental policies in areas where NSP-Wisconsin has a financial interest; customer business conditions; actions of credit rating agencies; competitive factors including the extent and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets served by NSP-Wisconsin and its subsidiaries; unusual weather; effects of geopolitical events, including war and acts of terrorism; cyber security threats and data security breaches; state, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rates or have an impact on asset operation or ownership or impose environmental compliance conditions; structures that affect the speed and degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas markets; costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; financial or regulatory accounting policies imposed by regulatory bodies; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; availability or cost of capital; and employee work force factors.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The following discussion includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures such as electric margin and natural gas margin.  Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are adjusted from the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. NSP-Wisconsin’s management uses non-GAAP measures internally for financial planning and analysis, for reporting of results to the Board of Directors and when communicating its earnings outlook to analysts and investors. Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to supplement investors’ understanding of our operating performance and should not be considered alternatives for financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. These measures are discussed in more detail below and may not be comparable to other companies’ similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures.

Electric margin is presented as electric revenues less electric fuel and purchased power expenses and natural gas margin is presented as natural gas revenues less the cost of natural gas sold and transported. Expenses incurred for electric fuel and purchased power and the cost of natural gas sold and transported are generally recovered through various recovery mechanisms, and as a result, changes in these expenses are offset in operating revenues. Management believes electric and natural gas margins provide the most meaningful basis for evaluating our operations because they exclude the revenue impact of fluctuations in these expenses. These margins can be reconciled to operating income, a GAAP measure, by including other operating revenues, O&M expenses, conservation expenses, depreciation and amortization and taxes (other than income taxes).

Results of Operations

NSP-Wisconsin’s net income was approximately $31 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared with approximately $22 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was driven by higher natural gas and electric rates and the impact of favorable weather, partially offset by additional depreciation and amortization expense related to higher invested capital.

20

Electric Revenues and Margin

Electric production expenses tend to vary with the quantity of electricity sold and changes in the unit costs of fuel and purchased power. The electric fuel and purchased power cost recovery mechanism of the Wisconsin jurisdiction may not allow for complete recovery of all expenses and, therefore, changes in fuel or purchased power costs can impact earnings. The following table details the electric revenues and margin:

	Three Months Ended March 31
(Millions of Dollars)	2018			2017
Electric revenues	$	221		$	216
Electric fuel and purchased power	(104		)	(109		)
Electric Margin before impact of the TCJA	$	117		$	107
Impact of the TCJA	(5		)	—
Electric margin	$	112		$	107

The following tables summarize the components of the changes in electric revenues and electric margin for the three months ended

March 31, 2018:

Electric Revenues

(Millions of Dollars)	2018 vs. 2017
Retail rate increase (Wisconsin)	$	5
Estimated impact of weather	3
Interchange agreement billings with NSP-Minnesota	(5		)
Other, net	2
Total increase in electric revenues before impact of the TCJA	$	5
Impact of TCJA (offset as a reduction in income tax expense)	(5		)
Total increase in electric revenues	$	—

Electric Margin

(Millions of Dollars)	2018 vs. 2017
Retail rate increase (Wisconsin)	$	5
Estimated impact of weather	3
Purchased capacity costs	2
Interchange agreement billings with NSP-Minnesota	1
Other, net	(1		)
Total increase in electric margin before impact of the TCJA	$	10
Impact of TCJA (offset as a reduction in income tax expense)	(5		)
Total increase in electric margin	$	5

Natural Gas Revenues and Margin

Total natural gas expense tends to vary with changing sales requirements and the cost of natural gas purchases. However, due to the design of purchased natural gas cost recovery mechanisms to recover current expenses for sales to retail customers, fluctuations in the cost of natural gas have little effect on natural gas margin. The following table details the natural gas revenues and margin:

	Three Months Ended March 31
(Millions of Dollars)	2018			2017
Natural gas revenues	$	57		$	48
Cost of natural gas sold and transported	(29		)	(26		)
Natural gas margin before impact of the TCJA	$	28		$	22
Impact of the TCJA (offset as a reduction in income tax expense)	(1		)	—
Natural gas margin	$	27		$	22

21

The following tables summarize the components of the changes in natural gas revenues and natural gas margin for the three months endedMarch 31, 2018:

Natural Gas Revenues

(Millions of Dollars)	2018 vs. 2017
Retail rate increase (Wisconsin and Michigan)	$	3
Estimated impact of weather	3
Purchased natural gas adjustment clause recovery	2
Other, net	1
Total increase in natural gas revenues before impact of the TCJA	$	9
Impact of TCJA (offset as a reduction in income tax expense)	(1		)
Total increase in natural gas revenues	$	8

Natural Gas Margin

(Millions of Dollars)	2018 vs. 2017
Retail rate increase (Wisconsin and Michigan)	$	3
Estimated impact of weather	3
Total increase in natural gas margin before impact of the TCJA	$	6
Impact of TCJA (offset as a reduction in income tax expense)	(1		)
Total increase in natural gas margin	$	5

Non-Fuel Operating Expenses and Other Items

Depreciation and Amortization — Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4 million, or 13.1 percent for the first quarter of 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to capital investments due to planned system investments and increased amortization at the Ashland/Northern States Power Lakefront Superfund Site.

Income Taxes — Income tax expense decreased $3 million for the first quarter of 2018 compared with the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in the federal tax rate due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and an increase in plant-related regulatory differences related to ARAM. These were partially offset by the deferral of the effects of ARAM. The ETR was 24.7 percent for the first quarter of 2018 compared with 38.0 percent for the same period in 2017. The lower ETR in 2018 is primarily due to the items referenced above.

Public Utility Regulation

Except to the extent noted below, the circumstances set forth in Public Utility Regulation included in Item 1 of NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of public utility regulation and are incorporated herein by reference.

2017 Electric Fuel Cost Recovery —NSP-Wisconsin’s electric fuel costs for 2017 were lower than authorized in rates and outside the two percent annual tolerance band, primarily due to lower purchased power costs coupled with moderate weather and generation sales into the MISO market. Under the fuel cost recovery rules, NSP-Wisconsin may retain approximately $4 million of fuel costs and defer the amount of over-recovery in excess of the two percent annual tolerance band for future refund to customers. In March 2018, NSP-Wisconsin filed a reconciliation of 2017 fuel costs with the PSCW indicating a refund liability of approximately $10 million. The final amount of the refund is subject to review and approval by the PSCW, which is expected in mid- 2018.

22

Summary of Recent Federal Regulatory Developments

FERC

The FERC has jurisdiction over rates for electric transmission service in interstate commerce and electricity sold at wholesale, hydro facility licensing, natural gas transportation, asset transactions and mergers, accounting practices and certain other activities of NSP-Wisconsin, including enforcement of North American Electric Reliability Corporation mandatory electric reliability standards. State and local agencies have jurisdiction over many of NSP-Wisconsin’s activities, including regulation of retail rates and environmental matters. See additional discussion in the summary of recent federal regulatory developments and public utility regulation sections of the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017. In addition to the matters discussed below, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of other regulatory matters.

Xcel Energy, which includes NSP-Wisconsin, attempts to mitigate the risk of regulatory penalties through formal training on

prohibited practices and a compliance function that reviews interaction with the markets under FERC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission jurisdictions. Public campaigns are conducted to raise awareness of the public safety issues of interacting with our electric systems. While programs to comply with regulatory requirements are in place, there is no guarantee the compliance programs or other measures will be sufficient to ensure against violations.

FERC Order, ROE Policy — In June 2014, the FERC adopted a two-step ROE methodology for electric utilities in an order (Opinion 531) issued in a complaint proceeding involving New England Transmission Owners (NETOs). The issue of how to apply the FERC ROE methodology has been contested in various complaint proceedings, including two ROE complaints involving the MISO TOs, which include NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin. In April 2017, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the June 2014 ROE order. The D.C. Circuit found that the FERC had not properly determined that the ROE authorized for the NETOs prior to June 2014 was unjust and unreasonable. The D.C. Circuit also found that the FERC failed to justify the new ROE methodology. The FERC has yet to act on the D.C. Circuit’s decision. See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of the D.C. Circuit’s decision and the impact on the MISO ROE Complaints.

Item 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

NSP-Wisconsin maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of March 31, 2018, based on an evaluation carried out under the supervision and with the participation of NSP-Wisconsin’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and the procedures, the CEO and CFO have concluded that NSP-Wisconsin’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No changes in NSP-Wisconsin’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NSP-Wisconsin’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

NSP-Wisconsin is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for such losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories. In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss.

23

Additional Information

See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of legal claims and environmental proceedings. See Part I Item 2 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of proceedings involving utility rates and other regulatory matters.

Item 1A — RISK FACTORS

NSP-Wisconsin’s risk factors are documented in Item 1A of Part I of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Form 10-K.

Item 6 — EXHIBITS

* Indicates incorporation by reference

3.01*	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of NSP-Wisconsin (Exhibit 3.01 to Form S-4 (file no. 333-112033) dated Jan. 21, 2004).
3.02*	By-Laws of Northern States Power Co. (a Wisconsin corporation) as Amended and Restated on Sept. 26, 2013 (Exhibit 3.02 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2013 (file no. 001-03140)).
4.01*	Supplemental and Restated Indenture, dated March 1, 1991, between Northern States Power Company and First Wisconsin Trust Company, providing for the issuance of First Mortgage Bonds (Exhibit 4(c)(3) to Form S-3 of Xcel Energy filed April 18, 2018 (file no. 333-224333)).
31.01	Principal Executive Officer’s certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.02	Principal Financial Officer’s certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.01	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.01	Statement pursuant to Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
101	The following materials from NSP-Wisconsin’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):  (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) document and entity information.

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Northern States Power Company (a Wisconsin corporation)
April 27, 2018	By:	/s/ JEFFREY S. SAVAGE
		Jeffrey S. Savage
		Senior Vice President, Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)
		/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL
		Robert C. Frenzel
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
		(Principal Financial Officer)

25

EX-31.01

Exhibit 31.01

CERTIFICATION

I, Ben Fowke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Northern States Power Company (a Wisconsin corporation);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 27, 2018

/s/ BEN FOWKE

Ben Fowke

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

1

EX-31.02

Exhibit 31.02

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert C. Frenzel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Northern States Power Company (a Wisconsin corporation);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 27, 2018

/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL

Robert C. Frenzel

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer)

2

EX-32.01

Exhibit 32.01

OFFICER CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin Corporation (NSP-Wisconsin) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (Form 10-Q), each of the undersigned officers of NSP-Wisconsin certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSP-Wisconsin as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Form 10-Q.

Date: April 27, 2018

/s/ BEN FOWKE

Ben Fowke

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ ROBERT C. FRENZEL

Robert C. Frenzel

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NSP-Wisconsin and will be retained by NSP-Wisconsin and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

1

EX-99.01

Exhibit 99.01

NSP-Wisconsin Cautionary Factors

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage disclosures without the threat of litigation, providing those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful, cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected in the statement. Forward-looking statements are made in written documents and oral presentations of NSP-Wisconsin, Xcel Energy Inc. or any of its other subsidiaries. These statements are based on management’s beliefs as well as assumptions and information currently available to management.  Such forward-looking statements are intended to be identified in this document by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” “possible,” “potential,” “should” and similar expressions.  In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could cause NSP-Wisconsin’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

• Economic conditions, including inflation rates, monetary fluctuations and their impact on capital expenditures;

• The risk of a significant slowdown in growth or decline in the U.S. economy, the risk of delay in growth recovery in the U.S. economy or the risk of increased cost for insurance premiums, security and other items as a consequence of past or future terrorist attacks;

• Trade, monetary, fiscal, taxation and environmental policies of governments, agencies and similar organizations in geographic areas where NSP-Wisconsin has a financial interest;

• Customer business conditions, including demand for their products or services and supply of labor and materials used in creating their products and services;

• Financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by the FASB, the SEC, the FERC and similar entities with regulatory oversight;

• Availability of cost or capital such as changes in: interest rates; market perceptions of the utility industry, NSP-Wisconsin, Xcel Energy Inc. or any of its other subsidiaries; or security ratings;

• Factors affecting utility and nonutility operations such as unusual weather conditions; catastrophic weather-related damage; unscheduled generation outages, maintenance or repairs; unanticipated changes to fossil fuel, nuclear fuel or natural gas supply costs or availability due to higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other developments; nuclear or environmental incidents; cyber incidents; or electric transmission or natural gas pipeline constraints;

• Employee workforce factors, including loss or retirement of key executives, collective-bargaining agreements with union employees, or work stoppages;

• Increased competition in the utility industry or additional competition in the markets served by NSP-Wisconsin, Xcel Energy Inc. and its other subsidiaries;

• State, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment recovery, have an impact on rate structures and affect the speed and degree to which competition enters the electric and natural gas markets; industry restructuring initiatives; transmission system operation and/or administration initiatives; recovery of investments made under traditional regulation; nature of competitors entering the industry; retail wheeling; a new pricing structure; and former customers entering the generation market;

• Environmental laws and regulations, including legislation and regulations relating to climate change, and the associated cost of  compliance;

• Rate-setting policies or procedures of regulatory entities, including environmental externalities, which are values established by regulators assigning environmental costs to each method of electricity generation when evaluating generation resource options;

• Nuclear regulatory policies and procedures, including operating regulations and spent nuclear fuel storage;

• Social attitudes regarding the utility and power industries;

• Cost and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;

• Technological developments that result in competitive disadvantages and create the potential for impairment of existing assets;

• Risks associated with implementations of new technologies; and

• Other business or investment considerations that may be disclosed from time to time in NSP-Wisconsin’s SEC filings, including “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of NSP-Wisconsin’s Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, or in other publicly disseminated written documents.

NSP-Wisconsin undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as exhaustive.

1

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Apr. 27, 2018
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	NORTHERN STATES POWER CO /WI/
Entity Central Index Key	0000072909
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2018
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2018
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		933,000
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Operating revenues
Electric	$ 216,366	$ 216,309
Natural gas	56,500	48,347
Other	278	275
Total operating revenues	273,144	264,931
Operating expenses
Electric fuel and purchased power, non-affiliates	2,898	2,873
Purchased power, affiliates	101,311	106,458
Cost of natural gas sold and transported	28,723	25,987
Operating and maintenance expenses	50,344	49,184
Conservation expenses	2,978	3,054
Depreciation and amortization	30,587	27,049
Taxes (other than income taxes)	7,313	6,873
Total operating expenses	224,154	221,478
Operating income	48,990	43,453
Other (expense), net	(359)	(432)
Allowance for funds used during construction — equity	1,855	1,287
Interest charges and financing costs
Interest charges — includes other financing costs of $478 and $456, respectively	9,595	8,682
Allowance for funds used during construction — debt	(836)	(550)
Total interest charges and financing costs	8,759	8,132
Income before income taxes	41,727	36,176
Income taxes	10,310	13,757
Net income	$ 31,417	$ 22,419

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Interest charges and financing costs
Other financing costs	$ 478	$ 456

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Comprehensive income:
Net income	$ 31,417	$ 22,419
Derivative instruments:
Reclassification of losses to net income, net of tax of $8 and $12, respectively	23	19
Other comprehensive income	23	19
Comprehensive income	$ 31,440	$ 22,438

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED) (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Derivative instruments:
Reclassification of losses to net income, tax	$ 8	$ 12

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Operating activities
Net income	$ 31,417	$ 22,419
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	30,987	27,425
Deferred income taxes	1,843	11,348
Amortization of investment tax credits	(131)	(131)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	(1,855)	(1,287)
Net derivative losses	154	166
Other, net	511	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(9,504)	(10,867)
Accrued unbilled revenues	12,026	12,986
Inventories	6,103	4,806
Other current assets	5,854	4,305
Accounts payable	(15,873)	19,809
Net regulatory assets and liabilities	10,518	656
Other current liabilities	(1,837)	(9,158)
Pension and other employee benefit obligations	(9,200)	(8,860)
Change in other noncurrent assets	157	(294)
Change in other noncurrent liabilities	(474)	(800)
Net cash provided by operating activities	60,696	72,523
Investing activities
Utility capital/construction expenditures	(58,488)	(47,999)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	1,855	1,287
Other, net	(197)	(159)
Net cash used in investing activities	(56,830)	(46,871)
Financing activities
Proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings, net	11,000	(27,000)
Repayments of long-term debt	(6)	(13)
Capital contributions from parent	3,326	12,282
Dividends paid to parent	(15,481)	(10,729)
Other, net	(331)	(70)
Net cash used in financing activities	(1,492)	(25,530)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	2,374	122
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	1,403	1,546
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	3,777	1,668
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)	(5,751)	(6,020)
Cash paid for income taxes, net	(7,038)	(11,489)
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:
Property, plant and equipment additions in accounts payable	$ 21,757	$ 15,150

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,777	$ 1,403
Accounts receivable, net	69,378	63,200
Accrued unbilled revenues	47,982	60,008
Other Receivables	15,256	15,144
Inventories	11,655	17,758
Regulatory assets	22,922	23,113
Prepaid taxes	17,768	23,606
Prepayments and other	3,262	3,450
Total current assets	192,000	207,682
Property, plant and equipment, net	2,116,095	2,088,728
Other assets
Regulatory assets	281,875	282,217
Other investments	3,089	2,892
Other	147	201
Total other assets	285,111	285,310
Total assets	2,593,206	2,581,720
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	151,074	151,080
Short-term debt	22,000	11,000
Notes payable to affiliates	500	500
Accounts payable	40,301	58,365
Accounts payable to affiliates	25,823	29,628
Dividends payable to parent	16,042	15,481
Regulatory liabilities	25,032	20,712
Environmental liabilities	12,386	10,469
Accrued interest	10,682	8,025
Other	29,239	34,474
Total current liabilities	333,079	339,734
Deferred credits and other liabilities
Deferred income taxes	258,599	256,687
Deferred investment tax credits	7,383	7,514
Regulatory liabilities	396,304	386,807
Environmental liabilities	20,378	19,190
Customer advances	16,448	16,325
Pension and employee benefit obligations	40,668	50,027
Other	18,322	18,747
Total deferred credits and other liabilities	758,102	755,297
Commitments and contingencies
Capitalization
Long-term debt	610,038	610,100
Common stock — 1,000,000 shares authorized of $100 par value; 933,000 shares outstanding at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively	93,300	93,300
Additional paid in capital	449,350	449,350
Retained earnings	349,383	334,008
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(46)	(69)
Total common stockholder’s equity	891,987	876,589
Total liabilities and equity	$ 2,593,206	$ 2,581,720

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Capitalization
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	1,000,000	1,000,000
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 100	$ 100
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	933,000	933,000

XML

Management's Opinion

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Management's Opinion

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), the financial position of NSP-Wisconsin and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017; the results of its operations, including the components of net income and comprehensive income, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017; and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. Management has also evaluated the impact of events occurring after March 31, 2018 up to the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. These statements contain all necessary adjustments and disclosures resulting from that evaluation. The Dec. 31, 2017 balance sheet information has been derived from the audited 2017 consolidated financial statements included in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017. These notes to the consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP on an annual basis have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, filed with the SEC on Feb. 26, 2018. Due to the seasonality of NSP-Wisconsin’s electric and natural gas sales, interim results are not necessarily an appropriate base from which to project annual results.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the NSP-Wisconsin Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of accounting policies and are incorporated herein by reference.

XML

Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Abstract]

Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued

Leases —In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Leases, Topic 842 (Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02), which for lessees requires balance sheet recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for most leases. This guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2018. NSP-Wisconsin has not yet fully determined the impacts of implementation. However, adoption is expected to occur on Jan. 1, 2019 utilizing the practical expedients provided by the standard and proposed in Targeted Improvements, Topic 842 (Proposed ASU 2018-200). As such, agreements entered into prior to Jan. 1, 2019 that are currently considered leases are expected to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheet, including contracts for use of office space, equipment and natural gas storage assets, as well as certain purchased power agreements (PPAs) for natural gas-fueled generating facilities. NSP-Wisconsin expects that similar agreements entered into after Dec. 31, 2018 will generally qualify as leases under the new standard.

Recently Adopted

Revenue Recognition— In May 2014, the FASB issued Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Topic 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), which provides a new framework for the recognition of revenue. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the guidance on a modified retrospective basis on Jan. 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after Dec. 31, 2017 are presented in accordance with Topic 606, while prior period results have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with prior accounting guidance. Other than increased disclosures regarding revenues related to contracts with customers, the implementation did not have a significant impact on NSP-Wisconsin’s consolidated financial statements. For related disclosures, see Note 13.

Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments — In January 2016, the FASB issued Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Subtopic 825-10 (ASU No. 2016-01), which eliminated the available-for-sale classification for marketable equity securities and also replaced the cost method of accounting for non-marketable equity securities with a model for recognizing impairments and observable price changes. Under the new standard, other than when the consolidation or equity method of accounting is utilized, changes in the fair value of equity securities are recognized in earnings. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the guidance on Jan. 1, 2018 and the implementation did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Presentation of Net Periodic Benefit Cost —In March 2017, the FASB issued Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, Topic 715 (ASU No. 2017-07), which establishes that only the service cost element of pension cost may be presented as a component of operating income in the income statement. Also under the guidance, only the service cost component of pension cost is eligible for capitalization. As a result of application of accounting principles for rate regulated entities, a similar amount of pension cost, including non-service components, will be recognized consistent with the historical ratemaking treatment, and the impacts of adoption will be limited to changes in classification of non-service costs in the consolidated statement of income. NSP-Wisconsin implemented the new guidance on Jan. 1, 2018, and as a result, $0.7 million of pension costs were retrospectively reclassified from operating and maintenance expenses to other income, net on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Under a practical expedient permitted by the standard, NSP-Wisconsin used benefit cost amounts disclosed for prior periods as the basis for retrospective application.

XML

Selected Balance Sheet Data

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Balance Sheet Related Disclosures [Abstract]

Selected Balance Sheet Data

Selected Balance Sheet Data

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Accounts receivable, net (a)
Accounts receivable	$	74,732		$	68,073
Less allowance for bad debts	(5,354		)	(4,873		)
	$	69,378		$	63,200

^(a)  Accounts receivable, net includes an immaterial amount and $3.4 million due from affiliates as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively.

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Inventories
Materials and supplies	$	7,015	$	6,916
Fuel	3,842		3,866
Natural gas	798		6,976
	$	11,655	$	17,758

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Property, plant and equipment, net
Electric plant	$	2,619,336		$	2,602,671
Natural gas plant	330,055			326,723
Common and other property	182,685			181,105
Construction work in progress	178,000			148,770
Total property, plant and equipment	3,310,076			3,259,269
Less accumulated depreciation	(1,193,981		)	(1,170,541		)
	$	2,116,095		$	2,088,728

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Except to the extent noted below, Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 appropriately represents, in all material respects, the current status of other income tax matters, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Total income tax expense from operations differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income tax expense. The following reconciles such differences:

	Three Months ended March 31
		2018		2017
Federal statutory rate		21.0	%	35.0	%
State tax, net of federal tax effect		6.2		5.1
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
Regulatory differences - ARAM (a)		(4.7	)	(0.2	)
Regulatory differences - ARAM deferral (b)		4.6		—
Regulatory differences - other utility plant items		(1.7	)	(1.3	)
Other tax credits, net of federal income tax expense		(0.8	)	(0.7	)
Other, net		0.1		0.1
Effective income tax rate		24.7	%	38.0	%

^(a)   The average rate assumption method (ARAM); a method to flow back excess deferred taxes to customers.

^(b) As we receive further clarity or direction from our commissions regarding the flow back to customers of excess deferred taxes resulting from the TCJA, the ARAM deferral may decrease during the year, which would result in a reduction to tax expense with a correlating reduction to revenue.

Federal Audits— NSP-Wisconsin is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return. The statute of limitations applicable to Xcel Energy’s federal income tax returns expire as follows:

Tax Year(s)	Expiration
2009 - 2011	December 2018
2012 - 2013	October 2018
2014	September 2018
2015	September 2019
2016	September 2020

In 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an examination of tax years 2010 and 2011, including the 2009 carryback claim. The IRS proposed an adjustment to the federal tax loss carryback claims and in 2015 the IRS forwarded the issue to the Office of Appeals (“Appeals”). In 2017 Xcel Energy and Appeals reached an agreement and the benefit related to the agreed upon portions was recognized. NSP-Wisconsin did not accrue any income tax benefit related to this adjustment. As of March 31, 2018, the case has been forwarded to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

In the third quarter of 2015, the IRS commenced an examination of tax years 2012 and 2013. In the third quarter of 2017, the IRS concluded the audit of tax years 2012 and 2013 and proposed an adjustment that would impact Xcel Energy’s net operating loss (NOL) and effective tax rate (ETR). After evaluating the proposed adjustment Xcel Energy filed a protest with the IRS. Xcel Energy anticipates the issue will be forwarded to Appeals. As of March 31, 2018, Xcel Energy has recognized its best estimate of income tax expense that will result from a final resolution of this issue; however, the outcome and timing of a resolution is uncertain.

State Audits— NSP-Wisconsin is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files consolidated state income tax returns. As of March 31, 2018, NSP-Wisconsin’s earliest open tax year that is subject to examination by state taxing authorities under applicable statutes of limitations is 2012. In 2016, the state of Wisconsin began an audit of years 2012 and 2013. As of March 31, 2018, Wisconsin had not proposed any material adjustments, and there were no other state income tax audits in progress.

Unrecognized Benefits— The unrecognized tax benefit balance includes permanent tax positions, which if recognized would affect the annual ETR. In addition, the unrecognized tax benefit balance includes temporary tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. A change in the period of deductibility would not affect the ETR but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.

A reconciliation of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions	$	1.5	$	1.4
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions	1.0		1.0
Total unrecognized tax benefit	$	2.5	$	2.4

The unrecognized tax benefit amounts were reduced by the tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The amounts of tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards are as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
NOL and tax credit carryforwards	$	(1.9	)	$	(1.9	)

It is reasonably possible that NSP-Wisconsin’s amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change in the next 12 months as the IRS Appeals progresses and audit resumes, the Wisconsin audit progresses, and other state audits resume. As the IRS Appeals and Wisconsin audits progress, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefit could decrease up to approximately $1 million.

The payable for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits is partially offset by the interest benefit associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The payables for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017 were not material. No amounts were accrued for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2018 or Dec. 31, 2017.

XML

Rate Matters Rate Matters

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Abstract]

Rate Matters

Rate Matters

Except to the extent noted below, the circumstances set forth in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of other rate matters, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Tax Reform — Regulatory Proceedings

The specific impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) on customer rates are subject to regulatory approval. Each of the states in NSP-Wisconsin’s service areas have opened dockets to address the impacts of the TCJA. NSP-Wisconsin has made filings and is working with various stakeholders in its jurisdictions to determine the appropriate treatment for the TCJA.

In January 2018, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) issued an order requiring public utilities to apply deferred accounting for the impacts of the TCJA. In March 2018, NSP-Wisconsin filed recommended plans for Wisconsin, which for electric operations included an option for an immediate bill credit for a portion of the tax savings in 2018 and 2019, while deferring the remainder until NSP-Wisconsin’s 2020 electric rate case. For the natural gas operations, NSP-Wisconsin proposed using the TCJA to reduce the unamortized regulatory asset for the Ashland/Northern States Power Lakefront Superfund Site (the Site) clean-up. A PSCW decision on the regulatory treatment of the TCJA is anticipated later in 2018.

For Michigan, NSP-Wisconsin has reached settlement in its electric rate case, which reflects the impacts of the TCJA, and has proposed customer refunds for natural gas operations.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Formula Rates — The FERC has not yet issued guidance on how or when electric utilities should reflect the impacts of the TCJA in FERC jurisdictional wholesale rates. The FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) in March 2018 seeking comments on how to reflect TCJA impacts in wholesale rates, in particular changes to accumulated deferred income taxes and bonus depreciation. Comments for the NOI are due in May 2018. However, FERC-approved formula rates for wholesale customers are generally adjusted on an annual basis for certain changes in rate base and actual operating expenses, including income taxes. As a result, these revenues would be subject to an automatic reduction for the effect of the TCJA corporate tax rate change through the annual true-up process, absent specific FERC action.

NSP-Wisconsin was a party to a February 2018 FERC filing by certain transmission owner (TO) members of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) proposing to commence early reductions to transmission formula rates in 2018 for corporate tax rate impacts of the TCJA. In March 2018, the FERC issued orders granting MISO TO waiver requests so that 2018 rates will reflect the lower federal corporate tax rate.

Recently Concluded Regulatory Proceeding — Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC)

Michigan 2018 Electric Gas Rate Case— In November 2017, NSP-Wisconsin filed a request with the MPSC to increase rates for electric service by $1 million, or 7.1 percent. The filing was based on a 2018 forecast test year, a 10.1 percent return on equity (ROE), an equity ratio of 52.5 percent and a forecasted average rate base of approximately $43 million. The primary driver of the requested increase is continuing investment in transmission and distribution infrastructure. The filing also included a request for step increases in 2019 and 2020 related to electric distribution system investments in those years. In addition to the MPSC staff, intervenors in the case include the Michigan Attorney General and the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, a voluntary association of large industrial businesses.

In March 2018, NSP-Wisconsin reached a settlement in principle with the parties authorizing a 2018 rate increase of approximately $300 thousand, or approximately 2.0 percent, which reflects a portion of the TCJA benefits. The settlement was based on a 9.8 percent ROE and a 52.5 percent equity ratio. In April 2018, the MPSC issued an order approving the settlement agreement, and new rates are expected to be implemented on May 1, 2018.

Pending Regulatory Proceeding — FERC

MISO ROE Complaints — In November 2013, a group of customers filed a complaint at the FERC against MISO TOs, including NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin. The complaint argued for a reduction in the ROE in transmission formula rates in the MISO region from 12.38 percent to 9.15 percent, and the removal of ROE adders (including those for Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) membership), effective Nov. 12, 2013.

In September 2016, the FERC approved an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recommendation that MISO TOs be granted a 10.32 percent base ROE using the methodology adopted by FERC in June 2014 (Opinion 531). This ROE would be applicable for the 15-month refund period from Nov. 12, 2013 to Feb. 11, 2015, and prospectively from the date of the FERC order. The total prospective ROE would be 10.82 percent, including a 50 basis point adder for RTO membership. Various parties requested rehearing of the September 2016 order. The requests are pending FERC action.

In February 2015, a second complaint seeking to reduce the MISO ROE from 12.38 percent to 8.67 percent prior to any RTO adder was filed, resulting in a second period of potential refunds from Feb. 12, 2015 to May 11, 2016. In June 2016, an ALJ recommended a base ROE of 9.7 percent, applying the FERC Opinion 531 methodology. Various parties filed exceptions to the ALJ recommendation, and FERC action is pending. In April 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated and remanded Opinion 531. It is unclear how the D.C. Circuit’s opinion to vacate and remand Opinion 531 will affect the September 2016 FERC order or the timing and outcome of the second ROE complaint.

NSP-Minnesota has recognized a current refund liability consistent with the best estimate of the final ROE for the Feb. 12, 2015 to May 11, 2016 complaint period.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

Except to the extent noted below and in Note 5 above, the circumstances set forth in Notes 10 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements included in NSP-Wisconsin’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, appropriately represent, in all material respects, the current status of commitments and contingent liabilities and are incorporated herein by reference. The following include commitments, contingencies and unresolved contingencies that are material to NSP-Wisconsin’s financial position.

Guarantees

NSP-Wisconsin provides a guarantee for payment of customer loans related to NSP-Wisconsin’s farm rewiring program. NSP-Wisconsin’s exposure under the guarantee is based upon the net liability under the agreement. The guarantee issued by NSP-Wisconsin has a stated maximum amount. The guarantee contains no recourse provisions and requires no collateral. These agreements have expiration dates through 2020.

The following table presents the guarantee issued and outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Guarantee issued and outstanding	$	1.0	$	1.0
Current exposure under this guarantee	—		—

Environmental Contingencies

Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site — NSP-Wisconsin was named a potentially responsible party for contamination at a site in Ashland, Wis. The Site includes NSP-Wisconsin property, previously operated as a MGP facility (the Upper Bluff), and two other properties: an adjacent city lakeshore park area (Kreher Park); and an area of Lake Superior’s Chequamegon Bay adjoining the park.

In January 2017, NSP-Wisconsin agreed to remediate the Phase II Project Area (the Sediments), under a settlement agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency. The settlement agreements were approved by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. NSP-Wisconsin initiated a full scale wet dredge remedy of the Sediments in 2017. Under the current plan, NSP-Wisconsin anticipates completion of restoration activities of the Sediments in 2018 with finalization of Phase I Project Area (which includes the Upper Bluff and Kreher Park areas of the Site) construction and restoration activities in early 2019 although April weather may challenge that schedule. Groundwater treatment activities at the Site will continue.

The current cost estimate for the remediation of the entire site (both Phase I Project Area and the Sediments) is approximately $172 million, of which approximately $139 million has been spent. As of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, NSP-Wisconsin had recorded a total liability of $33 million and $30 million, respectively, for the entire site.

NSP-Wisconsin has deferred the unrecovered portion of the estimated Site remediation costs as a regulatory asset. The PSCW has authorized NSP-Wisconsin rate recovery for all remediation costs incurred at the Site. In 2012, the PSCW agreed to allow NSP-Wisconsin to pre-collect certain costs, to amortize costs over a ten-year period and to apply a three percent carrying cost to the unamortized regulatory asset. In December 2017, the PSCW approved an NSP-Wisconsin natural gas rate case, which included recovery of additional expenses associated with remediating the Site. The annual recovery of MGP clean-up costs increased from $12 million in 2017 to $18 million in 2018.

Other MGP, Landfill or Disposal Sites — In addition to the site in Ashland, Wis., NSP-Wisconsin is currently involved in investigating and/or remediating an MGP, landfill or other disposal sites. NSP-Wisconsin has identified one site where contamination is present and where investigation and/or remediation activities are currently underway. Other parties may have responsibility for some portion of the investigation and/or remediation activities that are underway. NSP-Wisconsin anticipates that these investigation or remediation activities will continue through at least 2018. NSP-Wisconsin had accrued $0.1 million for this site as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017. NSP-Wisconsin anticipates that any amounts spent will be fully recovered from customers.

Legal Contingencies

NSP-Wisconsin is involved in various litigation matters that are being defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for such losses that are probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories. In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, arising from such current proceedings would have a material effect on NSP-Wisconsin’s financial statements. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal fees are expensed as incurred.

Employment, Tort and Commercial Litigation

Gas Trading Litigation — e prime, inc. (e prime) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy. e prime was in the business of natural gas trading and marketing but has not engaged in natural gas trading or marketing activities since 2003.  Thirteen lawsuits were commenced against e prime and Xcel Energy (and NSP-Wisconsin, in two instances) between 2003 and 2009 alleging fraud and anticompetitive activities in conspiring to restrain the trade of natural gas and manipulate natural gas prices.

e prime, Xcel Energy Inc. and its other affiliates were sued along with several other gas marketing companies. These cases were all consolidated in the U.S. District Court in Nevada. Six of the cases remain active, which includes a multi-district litigation (MDL) matter consisting of a Colorado class (Breckenridge), a Wisconsin class (Arandell Corp.), a Missouri class, a Kansas class, and two other cases identified as “Sinclair Oil” and “Farmland.” In March 2017, summary judgment was granted by the MDL judge in favor of Xcel Energy and e prime in the Sinclair Oil and Farmland cases. In November 2017, the U.S District Court in Nevada granted summary judgment against two plaintiffs in the Arandell Corp. case in favor of Xcel Energy and NSP-Wisconsin, leaving only three individual plaintiffs remaining in the litigation. In addition, the plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and remand back to originating courts in these cases were denied in March 2017. Plaintiffs have appealed the summary judgment motions granted in the Farmland and Sinclair Oil cases and the denial of class certification and remand to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit). Oral arguments were heard before the Ninth Circuit in February 2018. In March 2018, the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the summary judgment in the Farmland case. The Farmland defendants subsequently filed a request for further review by the Ninth Circuit. In light of the decision in the Farmland case, the Sinclair plaintiffs have requested the Ninth Circuit to reverse the grant of summary judgment without hearing. Final rulings on all pending motions and appeals are expected by the end of 2018. Xcel Energy, NSP-Wisconsin and e prime have concluded that a loss is remote.

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments

Commercial Paper — NSP-Wisconsin meets its short-term liquidity requirements primarily through the issuance of commercial paper and borrowings under its credit facility. Commercial paper outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin was as follows:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
Borrowing limit	$	150		$	150
Amount outstanding at period end	22			11
Average amount outstanding	18			52
Maximum amount outstanding	46			129
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis	1.80		%	1.23		%
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.24			1.73

Letters of Credit— NSP-Wisconsin uses letters of credit, generally with terms of one year, to provide financial guarantees for certain operating obligations. At March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, there were no letters of credit outstanding.

Credit Facility — In order to use its commercial paper program to fulfill short-term funding needs, NSP-Wisconsin must have a revolving credit facility in place at least equal to the amount of its commercial paper borrowing limit and cannot issue commercial paper in an aggregate amount exceeding available capacity under this credit facility.  The line of credit provides short-term financing in the form of notes payable to banks, letters of credit and back-up support for commercial paper borrowings.

At March 31, 2018, NSP-Wisconsin had the following committed credit facility available (in millions of dollars):

Credit Facility (a)		Drawn(b)		Available
$	150	$	22	$	128

^(a)  This credit facility expires in June 2021.

^(b)  Includes outstanding commercial paper.

All credit facility bank borrowings, outstanding letters of credit and outstanding commercial paper reduce the available capacity under the credit facility. NSP-Wisconsin had no direct advances on the credit facility outstanding at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017.

Other Short-Term Borrowings— The following table presents the notes payable of Clearwater Investments, Inc., a NSP-Wisconsin subsidiary, to Xcel Energy Inc.:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Notes payable to affiliates	$	0.5		$	0.5
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.34		%	1.73		%

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures provides a single definition of fair value and requires certain disclosures about assets and liabilities measured at fair value.  A hierarchical framework for disclosing the observability of the inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value is established by this guidance. The three levels in the hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices.

Level 2 — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts or priced with models using highly observable inputs.

Level 3 — Significant inputs to pricing have little or no observability as of the reporting date.  The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those valued with models requiring significant management judgment or estimation.

Specific valuation methods include the following:

Cash equivalents— The fair values of cash equivalents are generally based on cost plus accrued interest; money market funds are measured using quoted net asset values.

Interest rate derivatives— The fair values of interest rate derivatives are based on broker quotes that utilize current market interest rate forecasts.

Commodity derivatives— The methods used to measure the fair value of commodity derivative forwards and options utilize forward prices and volatilities, as well as pricing adjustments for specific delivery locations, and are generally assigned a Level 2 classification.  When contractual settlements extend to periods beyond those readily observable on active exchanges or quoted by brokers, the significance of the use of less observable forecasts of long-term forward prices and volatilities on a valuation is evaluated and may result in Level 3 classification.

Derivative Instruments Fair Value Measurements

NSP-Wisconsin enters into derivative instruments, including forward contracts, futures, swaps and options, for trading purposes and to manage risk in connection with changes in interest rates and utility commodity prices.

Interest Rate Derivatives — NSP-Wisconsin enters into various instruments that effectively fix the interest payments on certain floating rate debt obligations or effectively fix the yield or price on a specified benchmark interest rate for an anticipated debt issuance for a specific period.  These derivative instruments are generally designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.

At March 31, 2018, accumulated other comprehensive loss related to interest rate derivatives included immaterial net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as the related hedged interest rate transactions impact earnings, including forecasted amounts for unsettled hedges, as applicable.

Commodity Derivatives — NSP-Wisconsin may enter into derivative instruments to manage variability of future cash flows from changes in commodity prices in its electric and natural gas operations, as well as for trading purposes. This could include the purchase or sale of natural gas to generate electric energy and natural gas for resale.

The following table details the gross notional amounts of commodity options at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017:

(Amounts in Thousands)(a)(b)	March 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Million British thermal units of natural gas	—	42

^(a)  Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.

^(b)  Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis, but are weighted for the probability of exercise.

Impact of Derivative Activities on Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — There were immaterial pre-tax losses related to interest rate derivatives reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of natural gas commodity derivatives resulted in immaterial and $0.1 million of net losses, respectively, recognized as regulatory assets and liabilities. The classification as a regulatory asset or liability is based on commission approved regulatory recovery mechanisms.

There were no natural gas commodity derivative settlement gains or losses recognized and $0.2 million of losses recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and were subject to purchased natural gas cost recovery mechanisms, which result in reclassifications of derivative settlement gains and losses out of income to a regulatory asset or liability, as appropriate.

NSP-Wisconsin had no derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. Therefore, no gains or losses from fair value hedges or related hedged transactions were recognized for these periods.

Consideration of Credit Risk and Concentrations—NSP-Wisconsin continuously monitors the creditworthiness of the counterparties to its interest rate derivatives and commodity derivative contracts prior to settlement, and assesses each counterparty’s ability to perform on the transactions set forth in the contracts. Given this assessment, as well as an assessment of the impact of NSP-Wisconsin’s own credit risk when determining the fair value of derivative liabilities, the impact of credit risk was immaterial to the fair value of unsettled commodity derivatives presented in the consolidated balance sheets.

NSP-Wisconsin employs additional credit risk control mechanisms when appropriate, such as letters of credit, parental guarantees, standardized master netting agreements and termination provisions that allow for offsetting of positive and negative exposures. Credit exposure is monitored and, when necessary, the activity with a specific counterparty is limited until credit enhancement is provided.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements — The following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	March 31, 2018
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	11

	Dec. 31, 2017
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14

^(a)  NSP-Wisconsin nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017.  The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.

^(b)  Included in prepayments and other current assets balance of $3.3 million and $3.5 million at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value of Long-Term Debt

As of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:

	March 31, 2018				Dec. 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Long-term debt, including current portion	$	761,112	$	827,506	$	761,180	$	856,106

The fair value of NSP-Wisconsin’s long-term debt is estimated based on recent trades and observable spreads from benchmark interest rates for similar securities. The fair value estimates are based on information available to management as of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, and given the observability of the inputs to these estimates, the fair values presented for long-term debt have been assigned a Level 2.

XML

Other Income, Net

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Other Income and Expenses [Abstract]

Other Income, Net

Other (Expense), Net

Other (expense), net consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31
(Thousands of Dollars)	2018			2017
Interest income	$	156		$	143
Other nonoperating income	6			155
Benefits non-service cost	(471		)	(678		)
Insurance policy expense	(47		)	(49		)
Other nonoperating expense	(3		)	(3		)
Other (expense), net	$	(359	)	$	(432	)

XML

Segment Information

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Information

Segment Information

Operating results from the regulated electric utility and regulated natural gas utility are each separately and regularly reviewed by NSP-Wisconsin’s chief operating decision maker.  NSP-Wisconsin evaluates performance based on profit or loss generated from the product or service provided.  These segments are managed separately because the revenue streams are dependent upon regulated rate recovery, which is separately determined for each segment.

NSP-Wisconsin has the following reportable segments: regulated electric utility, regulated natural gas utility and all other.

• NSP-Wisconsin’s regulated electric utility segment generates, transmits and distributes electricity primarily in portions of Wisconsin and Michigan. 

• NSP-Wisconsin’s regulated natural gas utility segment purchases, transports, stores and distributes natural gas primarily in portions of Wisconsin and Michigan.

• Revenues from operating segments not included above are below the necessary quantitative thresholds and are therefore included in the all other category.  Those primarily include investments in rental housing projects that qualify for low-income housing tax credits.

Asset and capital expenditure information is not provided for NSP-Wisconsin’s reportable segments because as an integrated electric and natural gas utility, NSP-Wisconsin operates significant assets that are not dedicated to a specific business segment, and reporting assets and capital expenditures by business segment would require arbitrary and potentially misleading allocations which may not necessarily reflect the assets that would be required for the operation of the business segments on a stand-alone basis.

To report income from operations for regulated electric and regulated natural gas utility segments, the majority of costs are directly assigned to each segment.  However, some costs, such as common depreciation, common operating and maintenance expenses and interest expense are allocated based on cost causation allocators.  A general allocator is used for certain general and administrative expenses, including office supplies, rent, property insurance and general advertising.

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	—		$	273,144
Intersegment revenues	109		148		—		(257		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,475	$	56,648	$	278	$	(257	)	$	273,144
Net income	$	20,444	$	10,399	$	574	$	—		$	31,417

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	—		$	264,931
Intersegment revenues	96		114		—		(210		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,405	$	48,461	$	275	$	(210	)	$	264,931
Net income	$	15,470	$	6,545	$	404	$	—		$	22,419

^(a)  Operating revenues include $38 million and $42 million of affiliate electric revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

XML

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018			2017			2018			2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Health Care Benefits
Service cost	$	1,195		$	1,154		$	9		$	7
Interest cost (a)	1,360			1,554			142			148
Expected return on plan assets (a)	(2,256		)	(2,295		)	(16		)	(8		)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (a)	(8		)	35			(88		)	(88		)
Amortization of net loss (a)	1,418			1,462			139			109
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,709		$	1,910		$	186		$	168
Credits not recognized due to the effects of regulation	$	221		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net benefit cost recognized for financial reporting	$	1,930		$	1,910		$	186		$	168

a) The components of net periodic cost other than the service cost component are included in the line item “other income, net” in the

income statement or capitalized on the balance sheet as a regulatory asset.

In January 2018, contributions of $150 million were made across four of Xcel Energy’s pension plans, of which $10.0 million was attributable to NSP-Wisconsin. Xcel Energy does not expect additional pension contributions during 2018.

XML

Other Comprehensive Income

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]

Other Comprehensive Income

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1	$	(69	)	$	(133	)
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss	23			19
Net current period other comprehensive income	23			19
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31	$	(46	)	$	(114	)

Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018				Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Losses on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate derivatives	$	31		(a)	$	31		(a)
Total, pre-tax	31				31
Tax benefit	(8		)		(12		)
Total amounts reclassified, net of tax	$	23			$	19

^(a)  Included in interest charges.

XML

Revenues

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]

Revenues

Revenues

NSP-Wisconsin principally generates revenue from the transmission, distribution and sale of electricity and the transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas to retail customers. Performance obligations related to the sale of energy are satisfied as energy is delivered to customers. NSP-Wisconsin recognizes revenue in an amount that corresponds directly to the price of the energy delivered to the customer. The measurement of energy sales to customers is generally based on the reading of their meters, which occurs on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, amounts of energy delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recognized. Contract terms are generally short-term in nature, and as such NSP-Wisconsin does not recognize a separate financing component of its collections from customers. NSP-Wisconsin presents its revenues net of any excise or other fiduciary-type taxes or fees.

NSP-Wisconsin has various rate-adjustment mechanisms in place that provide for the recovery of natural gas, electric fuel and purchased energy costs. These cost-adjustment tariffs may increase or decrease the level of revenue collected from customers and are revised periodically for differences between the total amount collected under the clauses and the costs incurred. When applicable,

under governing regulatory commission rate orders, fuel cost over-recoveries (the excess of fuel revenue billed to customers over fuel

costs incurred) are deferred as regulatory liabilities and under-recoveries (the excess of fuel costs incurred over fuel revenues billed to

customers) are deferred as regulatory assets. NSP-Wisconsin must submit a forward looking fuel cost plan annually for approval by the PSCW. The rules also allow for deferral of any under-recovery or over-recovery of fuel costs in excess of a two percent annual tolerance band, for future rate recovery or refund, subject to PSCW approval.

Certain rate rider mechanisms qualify as alternative revenue programs under GAAP. These mechanisms arise from costs imposed upon the utility by action of a regulator or legislative body related to an environmental, public safety or other mandate. When certain criteria are met (including collection within 24 months), revenue is recognized equal to the revenue requirement, which may include return on rate base items and incentives. The mechanisms are revised periodically for differences between the total amount collected and the revenue recognized, which may increase or decrease the level of revenue collected from customers. Alternative revenue is recorded on a gross basis and is disclosed separate from revenue from contracts with customers in the period earned.

In the following tables, revenue is classified by the type of goods/services rendered and market/customer type. The tables also reconcile revenue to the reportable segments.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	67,803	$	30,326	$	16	$	98,145
Commercial and industrial (C&I)	104,817		24,550		25		129,392
Other	1,606		—		237		1,843
Total retail	174,226		54,876		278		229,380
Interchange	37,674		—		—		37,674
Other	1,504		1,007		—		2,511
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,404		55,883		278		269,565
Alternative revenue and other	2,962		617		—		3,579
Total revenues	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	273,144

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	66,043	$	26,628	$	20	$	92,691
C&I	102,380		20,258		24		122,662
Other	1,520		—		231		1,751
Total retail	169,943		46,886		275		217,104
Interchange	42,378		—		—		42,378
Other	969		908		—		1,877
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,290		47,794		275		261,359
Alternative revenue and other	3,019		553		—		3,572
Total revenues	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	264,931

XML

Selected Balance Sheet Data (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Balance Sheet Related Disclosures [Abstract]

Accounts Receivable, Net

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Accounts receivable, net (a)
Accounts receivable	$	74,732		$	68,073
Less allowance for bad debts	(5,354		)	(4,873		)
	$	69,378		$	63,200

Inventories

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Inventories
Materials and supplies	$	7,015	$	6,916
Fuel	3,842		3,866
Natural gas	798		6,976
	$	11,655	$	17,758

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

(Thousands of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Property, plant and equipment, net
Electric plant	$	2,619,336		$	2,602,671
Natural gas plant	330,055			326,723
Common and other property	182,685			181,105
Construction work in progress	178,000			148,770
Total property, plant and equipment	3,310,076			3,259,269
Less accumulated depreciation	(1,193,981		)	(1,170,541		)
	$	2,116,095		$	2,088,728

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation [Table Text Block]

Total income tax expense from operations differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income tax expense. The following reconciles such differences:

	Three Months ended March 31
		2018		2017
Federal statutory rate		21.0	%	35.0	%
State tax, net of federal tax effect		6.2		5.1
Increases (decreases) in tax from:
Regulatory differences - ARAM (a)		(4.7	)	(0.2	)
Regulatory differences - ARAM deferral (b)		4.6		—
Regulatory differences - other utility plant items		(1.7	)	(1.3	)
Other tax credits, net of federal income tax expense		(0.8	)	(0.7	)
Other, net		0.1		0.1
Effective income tax rate		24.7	%	38.0	%

^(a)   The average rate assumption method (ARAM); a method to flow back excess deferred taxes to customers.

^(b) As we receive further clarity or direction from our commissions regarding the flow back to customers of excess deferred taxes resulting from the TCJA, the ARAM deferral may decrease during the year, which would result in a reduction to tax expense with a correlating reduction to revenue.

Summary of Statute of Limitations Applicable to Open Tax Years [Table Text Block]

NSP-Wisconsin is a member of the Xcel Energy affiliated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return. The statute of limitations applicable to Xcel Energy’s federal income tax returns expire as follows:

Tax Year(s)	Expiration
2009 - 2011	December 2018
2012 - 2013	October 2018
2014	September 2018
2015	September 2019
2016	September 2020

Reconciliation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits

A reconciliation of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit is as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions	$	1.5	$	1.4
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions	1.0		1.0
Total unrecognized tax benefit	$	2.5	$	2.4

Tax Benefits Associated with NOL and Tax Credit Carryforwards

The unrecognized tax benefit amounts were reduced by the tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards. The amounts of tax benefits associated with NOL and tax credit carryforwards are as follows:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
NOL and tax credit carryforwards	$	(1.9	)	$	(1.9	)

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Guarantees Issued and Outstanding

The following table presents the guarantee issued and outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin:

(Millions of Dollars)	March 31, 2018		Dec. 31, 2017
Guarantee issued and outstanding	$	1.0	$	1.0
Current exposure under this guarantee	—		—

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments [Abstract]

Credit Facilities

At March 31, 2018, NSP-Wisconsin had the following committed credit facility available (in millions of dollars):

Credit Facility (a)		Drawn(b)		Available
$	150	$	22	$	128

^(a)  This credit facility expires in June 2021.

^(b)  Includes outstanding commercial paper.

Commercial Paper

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments [Abstract]

Short-Term Borrowings

Commercial paper outstanding for NSP-Wisconsin was as follows:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Year Ended Dec. 31, 2017
Borrowing limit	$	150		$	150
Amount outstanding at period end	22			11
Average amount outstanding	18			52
Maximum amount outstanding	46			129
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis	1.80		%	1.23		%
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.24			1.73

Notes Payable To Affiliates

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments [Abstract]

Short-Term Borrowings

Other Short-Term Borrowings— The following table presents the notes payable of Clearwater Investments, Inc., a NSP-Wisconsin subsidiary, to Xcel Energy Inc.:

(Amounts in Millions, Except Interest Rates)	March 31, 2018			Dec. 31, 2017
Notes payable to affiliates	$	0.5		$	0.5
Weighted average interest rate at period end	2.34		%	1.73		%

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Gross Notional Amounts of Commodity Forwards and Options

The following table details the gross notional amounts of commodity options at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017:

(Amounts in Thousands)(a)(b)	March 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Million British thermal units of natural gas	—	42

^(a)  Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.

^(b)  Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis, but are weighted for the probability of exercise.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis by Hierarchy Level

Recurring Fair Value Measurements — The following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, NSP-Wisconsin’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	March 31, 2018
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	11

	Dec. 31, 2017
	Fair Value						Fair Value Total		Counterparty Netting(a)		Total(b)
(Thousands of Dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Current derivative assets
Natural gas commodity	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	14

^(a)  NSP-Wisconsin nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017.  The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.

^(b)  Included in prepayments and other current assets balance of $3.3 million and $3.5 million at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

Carrying Amount and Fair Value of Long-term Debt

As of March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, other financial instruments for which the carrying amount did not equal fair value were as follows:

	March 31, 2018				Dec. 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Long-term debt, including current portion	$	761,112	$	827,506	$	761,180	$	856,106

XML

Other Income, Net (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Other Income and Expenses [Abstract]

Other Income, Net

Other (expense), net consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended March 31
(Thousands of Dollars)	2018			2017
Interest income	$	156		$	143
Other nonoperating income	6			155
Benefits non-service cost	(471		)	(678		)
Insurance policy expense	(47		)	(49		)
Other nonoperating expense	(3		)	(3		)
Other (expense), net	$	(359	)	$	(432	)

XML

Segment Information (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Results from Operations by Reportable Segment

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	—		$	273,144
Intersegment revenues	109		148		—		(257		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,475	$	56,648	$	278	$	(257	)	$	273,144
Net income	$	20,444	$	10,399	$	574	$	—		$	31,417

(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Reconciling Eliminations			Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Operating revenues (a)	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	—		$	264,931
Intersegment revenues	96		114		—		(210		)	—
Total revenues	$	216,405	$	48,461	$	275	$	(210	)	$	264,931
Net income	$	15,470	$	6,545	$	404	$	—		$	22,419

^(a)  Operating revenues include $38 million and $42 million of affiliate electric revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

XML

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Retirement Benefits [Abstract]

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2018			2017			2018			2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Health Care Benefits
Service cost	$	1,195		$	1,154		$	9		$	7
Interest cost (a)	1,360			1,554			142			148
Expected return on plan assets (a)	(2,256		)	(2,295		)	(16		)	(8		)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (a)	(8		)	35			(88		)	(88		)
Amortization of net loss (a)	1,418			1,462			139			109
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,709		$	1,910		$	186		$	168
Credits not recognized due to the effects of regulation	$	221		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net benefit cost recognized for financial reporting	$	1,930		$	1,910		$	186		$	168

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018			Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at Jan. 1	$	(69	)	$	(133	)
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss	23			19
Net current period other comprehensive income	23			19
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31	$	(46	)	$	(114	)

Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(Thousands of Dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018				Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Losses on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate derivatives	$	31		(a)	$	31		(a)
Total, pre-tax	31				31
Tax benefit	(8		)		(12		)
Total amounts reclassified, net of tax	$	23			$	19

^(a)  Included in interest charges.

XML

Revenues (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2018

Revenue from Contract with Customer [Abstract]

Disaggregation of Revenue [Table Text Block]

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	67,803	$	30,326	$	16	$	98,145
Commercial and industrial (C&I)	104,817		24,550		25		129,392
Other	1,606		—		237		1,843
Total retail	174,226		54,876		278		229,380
Interchange	37,674		—		—		37,674
Other	1,504		1,007		—		2,511
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,404		55,883		278		269,565
Alternative revenue and other	2,962		617		—		3,579
Total revenues	$	216,366	$	56,500	$	278	$	273,144

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
(Thousands of Dollars)	Regulated Electric		Regulated Natural Gas		All Other		Total
Major revenue types
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Residential	$	66,043	$	26,628	$	20	$	92,691
C&I	102,380		20,258		24		122,662
Other	1,520		—		231		1,751
Total retail	169,943		46,886		275		217,104
Interchange	42,378		—		—		42,378
Other	969		908		—		1,877
Total revenue from contracts with customers	213,290		47,794		275		261,359
Alternative revenue and other	3,019		553		—		3,572
Total revenues	$	216,309	$	48,347	$	275	$	264,931

XML

Accounting Pronouncements Accounting Pronouncements (Details) - Accounting Standards Update 2017-07 $ in Millions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Operating and Maintenance Expense
New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)	$ (0.7)
Other Income
New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)	$ 0.7

XML

Selected Balance Sheet Data, Accounts Receivable (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounts receivable	$ 74,732	$ 68,073
Less allowance for bad debts	(5,354)	(4,873)
Accounts receivable, net	$ 69,378	$ 63,200

XML

Selected Balance Sheet Data, Inventory (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Public Utilities, Inventory [Line Items]
Inventories	$ 11,655	$ 17,758
Materials and supplies
Public Utilities, Inventory [Line Items]
Inventories	7,015	6,916
Fuel
Public Utilities, Inventory [Line Items]
Inventories	3,842	3,866
Natural gas
Public Utilities, Inventory [Line Items]
Inventories	$ 798	$ 6,976

XML

Selected Balance Sheet Data, Property, Plant and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Public Utility, Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	$ 3,310,076	$ 3,259,269
Less accumulated depreciation	(1,193,981)	(1,170,541)
Property, plant and equipment, net	2,116,095	2,088,728
Electric plant
Public Utility, Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	2,619,336	2,602,671
Natural gas plant
Public Utility, Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	330,055	326,723
Common and other property
Public Utility, Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	182,685	181,105
Construction work in progress
Public Utility, Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross	$ 178,000	$ 148,770

XML

Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($)		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2017
Income Tax Examination [Line Items]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent		21.00%	35.00%
Tax Audits [Abstract]
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, State and Local Income Taxes, Percent		6.20%	5.10%
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Change in Enacted Tax Rate, Percent	[1]	(4.70%)	(0.20%)
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Change in Tax Rate, Percent	[2]	4.60%	0.00%
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Other Regulatory Items, Percent		(1.70%)	(1.30%)
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation Regulatory Differences Utility Plant Items		(0.80%)	(0.70%)
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Other Adjustments, Percent		0.10%	0.10%
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Percent		24.70%	38.00%
Unrecognized Tax Benefits [Abstract]
Unrecognized tax benefit — Permanent tax positions		$ 1,500,000					$ 1,400,000
Unrecognized tax benefit — Temporary tax positions		1,000,000					1,000,000
Total unrecognized tax benefit		2,500,000					2,400,000
NOL and tax credit carryforwards		(1,900,000)					(1,900,000)
Upper bound of decrease in unrecognized tax benefit that is reasonably possible		1,000,000
Amounts accrued for penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits		$ 0					$ 0
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Tax Audits [Abstract]
Year(s) under examination				2012 and 2013		2010 and 2011
Year of carryback claim under examination						2009
State Jurisdiction (Wisconsin)
Tax Audits [Abstract]
Year(s) under examination					2012 and 2013
Earliest year subject to examination		2012

[1] The average rate assumption method (ARAM); a method to flow back excess deferred taxes to customers.

[2] As we receive further clarity or direction from our commissions regarding the flow back to customers of excess deferred taxes resulting from the TCJA, the ARAM deferral may decrease during the year, which would result in a reduction to tax expense with a correlating reduction to revenue.

XML

Rate Matters Rate Matters (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended						3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Nov. 30, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Feb. 28, 2015	Nov. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2018
NSP-Wisconsin | MPSC Proceeding - Michigan 2018 Electric Rate Case [Member]
Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Line Items]
Public Utilities, Requested Rate Increase (Decrease), Amount		$ 1,000
Public Utilities, Requested Rate Increase (Decrease), Percentage		7.10%
Public Utilities, Requested Return on Equity, Percentage		10.10%
Public Utilities, Requested Rate Base, Amount		$ 43,000
Public Utilities, Requested Equity Capital Structure, Percentage		52.50%
NSP-Wisconsin | MPSC Staff [Member] | MPSC Proceeding - Michigan 2018 Electric Rate Case [Member]
Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Line Items]
Public Utilities, Requested Return on Equity, Percentage	9.80%
Public Utilities, Rate Increase Under the Settlement	$ 300
Public Utilities, Rate Increase Under the Settlement, Percentage	2.00%
Public Utilities, Requested Equity Capital Structure, Percentage	52.50%
NSP-Minnesota | FERC Proceeding, MISO ROE Complaint
Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Line Items]
Public Utilities, Base Return On Equity Charged To Customers Through Transmission Formula Rates					12.38%	12.38%
Public Utilities, ROE Applicable To Transmission Formula Rates In The Regional Transmission Operator's Region, Recommended By Third Parties					8.67%	9.15%
NSP-Minnesota | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) | FERC Proceeding, MISO ROE Complaint
Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Line Items]
Public Utilities, ROE Applicable To Transmission Formula Rates In The MISO Region, Approved			10.32%
Public Utilities, Length of Refund Period, In Months			15 months
Public Utilities, ROE Applicable To Transmission Formula Rates In The MISO Region, with RTO Adder, Approved							10.82%
Public Utilities, ROE Basis Point Adder, Approved							50
NSP-Minnesota | Administrative Law Judge | FERC Proceeding, MISO ROE Complaint
Public Utilities, General Disclosures [Line Items]
Public Utilities, ROE Applicable To Transmission Formula Rates In The Regional Transmission Operator's Region, Recommended By Third Parties				9.70%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies, Guarantees and Indemnifications (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items]
Assets Held As Collateral	$ 0	$ 0
Payment or Performance Guarantee | Customer Loans for Farm Rewiring Program
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items]
Payment Guarantee Expiration (year)	2020
Guarantee issued and outstanding	$ 1,000,000	1,000,000
Current exposure under this guarantee	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Commitments and Contingencies, Environmental Contingencies - Site Contingencies (Details) $ in Millions	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018 USD ($) Site	Dec. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Ashland MGP Site
Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site [Abstract]
Number of properties not owned included in superfund site | Site	2
Current Cost Estimate for Site Remediation	$ 172.0
Estimated amount spent on cleanup	139.0
Accrual for Environmental Loss Contingencies, Gross	$ 33.0	$ 30.0
Approved amortization period for recovery of remediation costs in natural gas rates (in years)	10 years
Carrying cost percentage to be applied to unamortized regulatory asset	3.00%
Other MGP Sites [Member]
Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site [Abstract]
Accrual for Environmental Loss Contingencies, Gross	$ 0.1	0.1
Number of identified MGP sites under current investigation and/or remediation in addition to those separately disclosed	1
PSCW Proceeding - Gas Rate Case 2017 - Gas Rates 2017 [Member] | Ashland MGP Site
Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site [Abstract]
Public Utilities, Approved annual recovery collected through base rates		$ 12.0
PSCW Proceeding - Gas Rate Case 2017 - Gas Rates 2018 [Member] | Ashland MGP Site
Ashland Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site [Abstract]
Public Utilities, Requested annual recovery collected through base rates	$ 18.0

XML

Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Contingencies (Details) - Gas Trading Litigation	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2009
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss Contingency, Pending Claims, Number	6	13
Loss Contingency, Subset of Cases within Multi-District Litigation, Number	2
NSP-Wisconsin
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss Contingency, Pending Claims, Number		2

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments, Commercial Paper (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Amount outstanding at period end	$ 22,000,000	$ 11,000,000
Commercial Paper
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Borrowing limit	150,000,000	150,000,000
Amount outstanding at period end	22,000,000	11,000,000
Average amount outstanding	18,000,000	52,000,000
Maximum amount outstanding	$ 46,000,000	$ 129,000,000
Weighted average interest rate, computed on a daily basis (percentage)	1.80%	1.23%
Weighted average interest rate at period end (percentage)	2.24%	1.73%

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments, Letters of Credit (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Amount outstanding at period end	$ 22,000	$ 11,000
Letter of Credit
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Amount outstanding at period end	$ 0	$ 0
Letter of Credit | Letter of Credit
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Term of letters of credit (in years)	1 year

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments, Credit Facility (Details) - Credit Facility - USD ($)		3 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Credit Facility	[1]	$ 150,000,000
Drawn	[2]	22,000,000
Available		$ 128,000,000
Maturity Date		Jun. 30, 2021
Direct advances on the credit facility outstanding		$ 0	$ 0

[1] This credit facility expires in June 2021.

[2] Includes outstanding commercial paper.

XML

Borrowings and Other Financing Instruments, Intercompany Borrowing Arrangement and Other Short-Term Borrowings (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Notes payable to affiliates	$ 500	$ 500
Notes Payable To Affiliates
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Notes payable to affiliates	$ 500	$ 500
Weighted average interest rate at period end (percentage)	2.34%	1.73%

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities, Derivative Instruments (Details) - MMBTU MMBTU in Thousands		Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Natural Gas Commodity (in million British thermal units)
Gross Notional Amounts of Commodity Options [Abstract]
Derivative, Nonmonetary Notional amount	[1],[2]	0	42

[1] Amounts are not reflective of net positions in the underlying commodities.

[2] Notional amounts for options are included on a gross basis, but are weighted for the probability of exercise.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities, Impact of Derivative Activity (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Financial Impact of Qualifying Fair Value Hedges on Earnings [Abstract]
Derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges	$ 0	$ 0
Recognized gains (losses) from fair value hedges or related hedged transactions	0	0
Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Pre-tax fair value gains (losses) recognized during the period in regulatory (assets) and liabilities		(100,000)
Pre-tax (gains) losses reclassified into income during the period from regulatory assets and (liabilities)	$ 0	$ 200,000

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities, Derivative Assets and Liabilities at Fair Value (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Prepayments and other		$ 3,262	$ 3,450
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis | Other Current Assets | Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset	[1]	11	14
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Liability and Obligation to Return Cash, Offset	[2]	0	0
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis | Level 1 | Other Current Assets | Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		11	0
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis | Level 2 | Other Current Assets | Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		0	14
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis | Level 3 | Other Current Assets | Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		0	0
Estimate of Fair Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Prepayments and other		3,300	3,500
Estimate of Fair Value Measurement [Member] | Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis | Other Current Assets | Other Derivative Instruments | Natural Gas Commodity
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]
Derivative Asset, Fair Value, Gross Asset		$ 11	$ 14

[1] Included in prepayments and other current assets balance of $3.3 million and $3.5 million at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets.

[2] NSP-Wisconsin nets derivative instruments and related collateral in its consolidated balance sheet when supported by a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and all derivative instruments and related collateral amounts were subject to master netting agreements at March 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2017. The counterparty netting amounts presented exclude settlement receivables and payables and non-derivative amounts that may be subject to the same master netting agreements.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities, Fair Value of Long-Term Debt (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Carrying Amount
Financial Liabilities, Balance Sheet Groupings [Abstract]
Long-term debt, including current portion	$ 761,112	$ 761,180
Fair Value
Financial Liabilities, Balance Sheet Groupings [Abstract]
Long-term debt, including current portion	$ 827,506	$ 856,106

XML

Other Income, Net (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Other Income and Expenses [Abstract]
Interest income	$ 156	$ 143
Other nonoperating income	6	155
Defined Benefit Plan, Non-service Costs	(471)	(678)
Insurance policy expense	(47)	(49)
Other nonoperating expense	(3)	(3)
Other (expense), net	$ (359)	$ (432)

XML

Segment Information (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		$ 273,144	$ 264,931
Net income (loss)		31,417	22,419
Affiliate electric revenue		38,000	42,000
Regulated Electric
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		216,475	216,405
Net income (loss)		20,444	15,470
Regulated Natural Gas
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		56,648	48,461
Net income (loss)		10,399	6,545
All Other
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		278	275
Net income (loss)		574	404
Operating Segments
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues	[1]	273,144	264,931
Operating Segments | Regulated Electric
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues	[1]	216,366	216,309
Operating Segments | Regulated Natural Gas
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		56,500	48,347
Operating Segments | All Other
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		278	275
Intersegment Eliminations
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		(257)	(210)
Net income (loss)		0	0
Intersegment Eliminations | Regulated Electric
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		109	96
Intersegment Eliminations | Regulated Natural Gas
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		148	114
Intersegment Eliminations | All Other
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Operating revenues		$ 0	$ 0

[1] (a) Operating revenues include $38 million and $42 million of affiliate electric revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

XML

Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits (Details) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2018 USD ($) Plan	Mar. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)
Pension Plan [Member]
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost [Abstract]
Service cost		$ 1,195	$ 1,154
Interest cost		1,360	1,554
Expected return on plan assets		(2,256)	(2,295)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		(8)	35
Amortization of net loss		1,418	1,462
Defined Benefit Plan Net Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized Before Regulatory Adjustments		1,709	1,910
Defined Benefit Plan Credits Not Recognized Due To Effects of Regulation		221	0
Defined Benefit Plan, Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)		1,930	1,910
Total contributions to the pension plans during the period	$ 10,000
Other Postretirement Benefits Plan [Member]
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost [Abstract]
Service cost		9	7
Interest cost		142	148
Expected return on plan assets		(16)	(8)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)		(88)	(88)
Amortization of net loss		139	109
Defined Benefit Plan Net Benefit Cost (Credit) Recognized Before Regulatory Adjustments		186	168
Defined Benefit Plan Credits Not Recognized Due To Effects of Regulation		0	0
Defined Benefit Plan, Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)		$ 186	$ 168
Xcel Energy Inc. | Pension Plan [Member]
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost [Abstract]
Total contributions to the pension plans during the period	$ 150,000
Number of Xcel Energy's pension plans to which contributions were made | Plan	4

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Roll Forward]
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of period	$ 876,589
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period	891,987
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Roll Forward]
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of period	(69)	$ (133)
Losses reclassified from net accumulated other comprehensive loss	23	19
Net current period other comprehensive income	23	19
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period	$ (46)	$ (114)

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (Reclassification from AOCI) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]
Total, pre-tax		$ (41,727)	$ (36,176)
Tax benefit		10,310	13,757
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]
Total, pre-tax		31	31
Tax benefit		(8)	(12)
Total, net of tax		23	19
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Interest Rate Derivatives | Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Reclassification Adjustment out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Line Items]
Interest charges	[1]	$ 31	$ 31

[1] Included in interest charges.

XML

Revenues (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2017
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		$ 269,565	$ 261,359
Alternative revenue and other		3,579	3,572
Total operating revenues		$ 273,144	264,931
Maximum number of months following end of annual period in which revenues are earned to be included in incentive programs		24 months
Tolerance band		2
Operating Segments
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total operating revenues	[1]	$ 273,144	264,931
Retail
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		229,380	217,104
Retail | Residential
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		98,145	92,691
Retail | Commercial and industrial (C&I)
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		129,392	122,662
Retail | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		1,843	1,751
Interchange
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		37,674	42,378
Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		2,511	1,877
Regulated Electric
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		213,404	213,290
Alternative revenue and other		2,962	3,019
Total operating revenues		216,475	216,405
Regulated Electric | Operating Segments
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total operating revenues	[1]	216,366	216,309
Regulated Electric | Retail
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		174,226	169,943
Regulated Electric | Retail | Residential
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		67,803	66,043
Regulated Electric | Retail | Commercial and industrial (C&I)
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		104,817	102,380
Regulated Electric | Retail | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		1,606	1,520
Regulated Electric | Interchange
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		37,674	42,378
Regulated Electric | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		1,504	969
Regulated Natural Gas
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		55,883	47,794
Alternative revenue and other		617	553
Total operating revenues		56,648	48,461
Regulated Natural Gas | Operating Segments
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total operating revenues		56,500	48,347
Regulated Natural Gas | Retail
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		54,876	46,886
Regulated Natural Gas | Retail | Residential
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		30,326	26,628
Regulated Natural Gas | Retail | Commercial and industrial (C&I)
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		24,550	20,258
Regulated Natural Gas | Retail | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		0	0
Regulated Natural Gas | Interchange
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		0	0
Regulated Natural Gas | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		1,007	908
All Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		278	275
Alternative revenue and other		0	0
Total operating revenues		278	275
All Other | Operating Segments
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total operating revenues		278	275
All Other | Retail
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		278	275
All Other | Retail | Residential
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		16	20
All Other | Retail | Commercial and industrial (C&I)
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		25	24
All Other | Retail | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		237	231
All Other | Interchange
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		0	0
All Other | Other
Disaggregation of Revenue [Line Items]
Total revenue from contracts with customers		$ 0	$ 0

[1] (a) Operating revenues include $38 million and $42 million of affiliate electric revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.