INVESTMENTS

Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities

The following table provides information relating to fixed maturities and equity securities classified as AFS:



Available-for-Sale Securities by Classification
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		OTTI in AOCI(3)
					(In Millions)
December 31, 2015
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Public corporate	$	12,890	$	688	$	202	$	13,376	$	—
Private corporate	6,818		232		124		6,926		—
U.S. Treasury, government and agency	8,800		280		305		8,775		—
States and political subdivisions	437		68		1		504		—
Foreign governments	397		36		18		415		—
Commercial mortgage-backed	591		29		87		533		9
Residential mortgage-backed⁽¹⁾	608		32		—		640		—
Asset-backed⁽²⁾	68		10		1		77		3
Redeemable preferred stock	592		57		2		647		—
Total Fixed Maturities	31,201		1,432		740		31,893		12
Equity securities	34		—		2		32		—
Total at December 31, 2015	$	31,235	$	1,432	$	742	$	31,925	$	12
December 31, 2014:
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Public corporate	$	13,808	$	1,140	$	51	$	14,897	$	—
Private corporate	6,934		409		20		7,323		—
U.S. Treasury, government and agency	6,685		672		26		7,331		—
States and political subdivisions	441		78		—		519		—
Foreign governments	405		48		7		446		—
Commercial mortgage-backed	855		22		142		735		10
Residential mortgage-backed⁽¹⁾	752		43		—		795		—
Asset-backed⁽²⁾	86		14		1		99		3
Redeemable preferred stock	829		70		10		889		—
Total Fixed Maturities	30,795		2,496		257		33,034		13
Equity securities	36		2		—		38		—
Total at December 31, 2014	$	30,831	$	2,498	$	257	$	33,072	$	13


(1)	Includes publicly traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.


(2)	Includes credit-tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages and other asset types and credit tenant loans.


(3)	Amounts represent OTTI losses in AOCI, which were not included in earnings (loss) in accordance with current accounting guidance.

The contractual maturities of AFS fixed maturities (excluding redeemable preferred stock) at December 31, 2015 are shown in the table below. Bonds not due at a single maturity date have been included in the table in the final year of maturity. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



Available-for-Sale Fixed Maturities
Contractual Maturities at December 31, 2015
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In Millions)
Due in one year or less	$	1,469	$	1,486
Due in years two through five	7,012		7,395
Due in years six through ten	10,429		10,406
Due after ten years	10,432		10,709
Subtotal	29,342		29,996
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	591		533
Residential mortgage-backed securities	608		640
Asset-backed securities	68		77
Total	$	30,609	$	31,246

The following table shows proceeds from sales, gross gains (losses) from sales and OTTI for AFS fixed maturities during 2015, 2014 and 2013:



	December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
	(In Millions)
Proceeds from sales	$	979		$	716		$	3,220
Gross gains on sales	$	33		$	21		$	71
Gross losses on sales	$	(8	)	$	(9	)	$	(88	)
Total OTTI	$	(41	)	$	(72	)	$	(81	)
Non-credit losses recognized in OCI	—			—			15
Credit losses recognized in earnings (loss)	$	(41	)	$	(72	)	$	(66	)

The following table sets forth the amount of credit loss impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company at the dates indicated and the corresponding changes in such amounts.

Fixed Maturities - Credit Loss Impairments



	2015			2014
	(In Millions)
Balances at January 1,	$	(254	)	$	(370	)
Previously recognized impairments on securities that matured, paid, prepaid or sold	97			188
Recognized impairments on securities impaired to fair value this period⁽¹⁾	(11		)	—
Impairments recognized this period on securities not previously impaired	(22		)	(41		)
Additional impairments this period on securities previously impaired	(8		)	(31		)
Increases due to passage of time on previously recorded credit losses	—			—
Accretion of previously recognized impairments due to increases in expected cash flows	—			—
Balances at December 31,	$	(198	)	$	(254	)


(1)	Represents circumstances where the Company determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost.

Net unrealized investment gains (losses) on fixed maturities and equity securities classified as AFS are included in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of AOCI. The table below presents these amounts as of the dates indicated:



	December 31,
	2015			2014
	(In Millions)
AFS Securities:
Fixed maturities:
With OTTI loss	$	16		$	10
All other	676			2,229
Equity securities	(2		)	2
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	$	690		$	2,241

Changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) recognized in AOCI include reclassification adjustments to reflect amounts realized in Net earnings (loss) for the current period that had been part of OCI in earlier periods. The tables that follow below present a rollforward of net unrealized investment gains (losses) recognized in AOCI, split between amounts related to fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized, and all other:

Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Fixed Maturities with OTTI Losses



	Net Unrealized Gain (Losses) on Investments			DAC			Policyholders Liabilities			Deferred Income Tax Asset (Liability)			AOCI Gain (Loss) Related to Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
	(In Millions)
Balance, January 1, 2015	$	10		$	—		$	—		$	(4	)	$	6
Net investment gains (losses) arising during the period	(7		)	—			—			—			(7		)
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses:
Included in Net earnings (loss)	13			—			—			—			13
Excluded from Net earnings (loss)⁽¹⁾	—			—			—			—			—
Impact of net unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
DAC	—			—			—			—			—
Deferred income taxes	—			—			—			(1		)	(1		)
Policyholders liabilities	—			—			(4		)	—			(4		)
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	16		$	—		$	(4	)	$	(5	)	$	7
Balance, January 1, 2014	$	(28	)	$	2		$	10		$	5		$	(11	)
Net investment gains (losses) arising during the period	(1		)	—			—			—			(1		)
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses:
Included in Net earnings (loss)	39			—			—			—			39
Excluded from Net earnings (loss)⁽¹⁾	—			—			—			—			—
Impact of net unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
DAC	—			(2		)	—			—			(2		)
Deferred income taxes	—			—			—			(9		)	(9		)
Policyholders liabilities	—			—			(10		)	—			(10		)
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	10		$	—		$	—		$	(4	)	$	6


(1)	Represents “transfers in” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings (loss) for securities with no prior OTTI loss.

All Other Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses) in AOCI



	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments			DAC			Policyholders Liabilities			Deferred Income Tax Asset (Liability)			AOCI Gain (Loss) Related to Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
	(In Millions)
Balance, January 1, 2015	$	2,231		$	(122	)	$	(368	)	$	(610	)	$	1,131
Net investment gains (losses) arising during the period	(1,562		)	—			—			—			(1,562		)
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses:
Included in Net earnings (loss)	5			—			—			—			5
Excluded from Net earnings (loss)⁽¹⁾	—			—			—			—			—
Impact of net unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
DAC	—			40			—			—			40
Deferred income taxes	—			—			—			477			477
Policyholders liabilities	—			—			155			—			155
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	674		$	(82	)	$	(213	)	$	(133	)	$	246
Balance, January 1, 2014	$	607		$	(107	)	$	(245	)	$	(90	)	$	165
Net investment gains (losses) arising during the period	1,606			—			—			—			1,606
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses:
Included in Net earnings (loss)	18			—			—			—			18
Excluded from Net earnings (loss)⁽¹⁾	—			—			—			—			—
Impact of net unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
DAC	—			(15		)	—			—			(15		)
Deferred income taxes	—			—			—			(520		)	(520		)
Policyholders liabilities	—			—			(123		)	—			(123		)
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	2,231		$	(122	)	$	(368	)	$	(610	)	$	1,131


(1)	Represents “transfers out” related to the portion of OTTI losses during the period that were not recognized in earnings (loss) for securities with no prior OTTI loss.

The following tables disclose the fair values and gross unrealized losses of the 810 issues at December 31, 2015 and the 601 issues at December 31, 2014 of fixed maturities that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the specified periods at the dates indicated:



	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
December 31, 2015:
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Public corporate	$	3,091	$	129	$	359	$	73	$	3,450	$	202
Private corporate	1,926		102		184		22		2,110		124
U.S. Treasury, government and agency	3,538		305		—		—		3,538		305
States and political subdivisions	19		1		—		—		19		1
Foreign governments	73		7		39		11		112		18
Commercial mortgage-backed	67		2		261		85		328		87
Residential mortgage-backed	11		—		29		—		40		—
Asset-backed	11		—		17		1		28		1
Redeemable preferred stock	43		—		40		2		83		2
Total	$	8,779	$	546	$	929	$	194	$	9,708	$	740
December 31, 2014:
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Public corporate	$	687	$	18	$	794	$	33	$	1,481	$	51
Private corporate	627		11		254		9		881		20
U.S. Treasury, government and agency	280		6		373		20		653		26
States and political subdivisions	21		—		—		—		21		—
Foreign governments	27		1		65		6		92		7
Commercial mortgage-backed	37		2		355		140		392		142
Residential mortgage-backed	—		—		35		—		35		—
Asset-backed	—		—		20		1		20		1
Redeemable preferred stock	42		—		169		10		211		10
Total	$	1,721	$	38	$	2,065	$	219	$	3,786	$	257

The Company’s investments in fixed maturity securities do not include concentrations of credit risk of any single issuer greater than 10% of the consolidated equity of AXA Equitable, other than securities of the U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, and certain securities guaranteed by the U.S. government. The Company maintains a diversified portfolio of corporate securities across industries and issuers and does not have exposure to any single issuer in excess of 0.3% of total investments. The largest exposures to a single issuer of corporate securities held at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were $157 million and $146 million, respectively. Corporate high yield securities, consisting primarily of public high yield bonds, are classified as other than investment grade by the various rating agencies, i.e., a rating below Baa3/BBB- or the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) designation of 3 (medium grade), 4 or 5 (below investment grade) or 6 (in or near default). At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, approximately $1,310 million and $1,788 million, or 4.2% and 5.8%, of the $31,201 million and $30,795 million aggregate amortized cost of fixed maturities held by the Company were considered to be other than investment grade. These securities had net unrealized losses of $97 million and $85 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the $194 million and $219 million of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in corporate and commercial mortgage-backed securities. In accordance with the policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment to earnings for OTTI for these securities was not warranted at either December 31, 2015 or 2014. As of December 31, 2015, the Company did not intend to sell the securities nor will it likely be required to dispose of the securities before the anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost basis.

The Company does not originate, purchase or warehouse residential mortgages and is not in the mortgage servicing business. The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio includes residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) backed by subprime and Alt-A residential mortgages, comprised of loans made by banks or mortgage lenders to residential borrowers with lower credit ratings. The criteria used to categorize such subprime borrowers include Fair Isaac Credit Organization (“FICO”) scores, interest rates charged, debt-to-income ratios and loan-to-value ratios. Alt-A residential mortgages are mortgage loans where the risk profile falls between prime and subprime; borrowers typically have clean credit histories but the mortgage loan has an increased risk profile due to higher loan-to-value and debt-to-income ratios and/or inadequate documentation of the borrowers’ income. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company owned $7 million and $8 million in RMBS backed by subprime residential mortgage loans, and $6 million and $7 million in RMBS backed by Alt-A residential mortgage loans. RMBS backed by subprime and Alt-A residential mortgages are fixed income investments supporting General Account liabilities.

At December 31, 2015, the carrying value of fixed maturities that were non-income producing for the twelve months preceding that date was $8 million.

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the amortized cost of the Company’s trading account securities was $6,866 million and $5,160 million with respective fair values of $6,805 million and $5,143 million. Also at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, Other equity investments included the General Account’s investment in Separate Accounts which had carrying values of $82 million and $197 million and costs of $72 million and $185 million as well as other equity securities with carrying values of $32 million and $38 million and costs of $34 million and $36 million.

Net unrealized and realized gains (losses) on trading account equity securities are included in Net investment income (loss) in the consolidated statements of earnings (loss). The table below shows a breakdown of Net investment income from trading account securities during the year ended 2015 and 2014:

Net Investment Income (Loss) from Trading Securities



	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
	(In Millions)
Net investment gains (losses) recognized during the period on securities held at the end of the period	$	(63	)	$	—
Net investment gains (losses) recognized on securities sold during the period	20			22
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on trading securities	(43		)	22
Interest and dividend income from trading securities	60			41
Net investment income (loss) from trading securities	$	17		$	63

Mortgage Loans

The payment terms of mortgage loans may from time to time be restructured or modified.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The investment in troubled debt restructured mortgage loans, based on amortized cost, amounted to $16 million and $93 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Gross interest income on these loans included in net investment income (loss) totaled $1 million, $1 million and $2 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Gross interest income on restructured mortgage loans that would have been recorded in accordance with the original terms of such loans amounted to $0 million, $4 million and $7 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The TDR mortgage loan shown in the table below has been modified four times since 2011. The modifications were to extend the maturity from its original maturity of November 5, 2014 to December 5, 2016 and to extend interest only payments through maturity. In November 2015, the recorded investment was reduced by $45 million in conjunction with the sale of majority of the underlying collateral and $32 million from a charge-off. The remaining $16 million mortgage loan balance reflects the value of the remaining underlying collateral and cash held in escrow, supporting the mortgage loan. Since the fair market value of the underlying real estate and cash held in escrow collateral is the primary factor in determining the allowance for credit losses, modifications of loan terms typically have no direct impact on the allowance for credit losses, and therefore, no impact on the financial statements.

Troubled Debt Restructuring - Modifications

December 31, 2015



	Number	Outstanding Recorded Investment
	of Loans	Pre-Modification		Post - Modification
		(Dollars In Millions)
Commercial mortgage loans	1	$	16	$	16

There were no default payments on the above loan during 2015. There were no agricultural troubled debt restructuring mortgage loans in 2015.

Valuation Allowances for Mortgage Loans:

Allowance for credit losses for mortgage loans for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Commercial Mortgage Loans
	2015			2014			2013
Allowance for credit losses:	(In Millions)
Beginning Balance, January 1,	$	37		$	42		$	34
Charge-offs	(32		)	(14		)	—
Recoveries	(1		)	—			(2		)
Provision	2			9			10
Ending Balance, December 31,	$	6		$	37		$	42
Ending Balance, December 31,:
Individually Evaluated for Impairment	$	6		$	37		$	42

There were no allowances for credit losses for agricultural mortgage loans in 2015, 2014 and 2013.

The following tables provide information relating to the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The values used in these ratio calculations were developed as part of the periodic review of the commercial and agricultural mortgage loan portfolio, which includes an evaluation of the underlying collateral value.

Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value and Debt Service Coverage Ratios

December 31, 2015



	Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Loan-to-Value Ratio:⁽²⁾	Greater than 2.0x		1.8x to 2.0x		1.5x to 1.8x		1.2x to 1.5x		1.0x to 1.2x		Less than 1.0x		Total Mortgage Loans
	(In Millions)
Commercial Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	533	$	—	$	102	$	12	$	24	$	—	$	671
50% - 70%	1,392		353		741		853		77		—		3,416
70% - 90%	141		—		206		134		124		46		651
90% plus	63		—		—		46		—		—		109
Total Commercial Mortgage Loans	$	2,129	$	353	$	1,049	$	1,045	$	225	$	46	$	4,847
Agricultural Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	204	$	116	$	277	$	432	$	256	$	51	$	1,336
50% - 70%	146		80		192		298		225		47		988
70% - 90%	—		—		2		4		—		—		6
90% plus	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total Agricultural Mortgage Loans	$	350	$	196	$	471	$	734	$	481	$	98	$	2,330
Total Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	737	$	116	$	379	$	444	$	280	$	51	$	2,007
50% - 70%	1,538		433		933		1,151		302		47		4,404
70% - 90%	141		—		208		138		124		46		657
90% plus	63		—		—		46		—		—		109
Total Mortgage Loans	$	2,479	$	549	$	1,520	$	1,779	$	706	$	144	$	7,177


(1)	The debt service coverage ratio is calculated using the most recently reported net operating income results from property operations divided by annual debt service.


(2)	The loan-to-value ratio is derived from current loan balance divided by the fair market value of the property. The fair market value of the underlying commercial properties is updated annually.

Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value and Debt Service Coverage Ratios

December 31, 2014



	Debt Service Coverage Ratio
Loan-to-Value Ratio:⁽²⁾	Greater than 2.0x		1.8x to 2.0x		1.5x to 1.8x		1.2x to 1.5x		1.0x to 1.2x		Less than 1.0x		Total Mortgage Loans
	(In Millions)
Commercial Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	335	$	—	$	—	$	59	$	34	$	—	$	428
50% - 70%	963		440		872		839		54		—		3,168
70% - 90%	211		—		61		265		79		—		616
90% plus	156		—		—		—		—		47		203
Total Commercial Mortgage Loans	$	1,665	$	440	$	933	$	1,163	$	167	$	47	$	4,415
Agricultural Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	184	$	100	$	232	$	408	$	206	$	50	$	1,180
50% - 70%	143		87		201		223		204		47		905
70% - 90%	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
90% plus	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total Agricultural Mortgage Loans	$	327	$	187	$	433	$	631	$	410	$	97	$	2,085
Total Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾
0% - 50%	$	519	$	100	$	232	$	467	$	240	$	50	$	1,608
50% - 70%	1,106		527		1,073		1,062		258		47		4,073
70% - 90%	211		—		61		265		79		—		616
90% plus	156		—		—		—		—		47		203
Total Mortgage Loans	$	1,992	$	627	$	1,366	$	1,794	$	577	$	144	$	6,500


(1)	The debt service coverage ratio is calculated using the most recently reported net operating income results from property operations divided by annual debt service.


(2)	The loan-to-value ratio is derived from current loan balance divided by the fair market value of the property. The fair market value of the underlying commercial properties is updated annually.

The following table provides information relating to the aging analysis of past due mortgage loans at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Age Analysis of Past Due Mortgage Loan



	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days Or >		Total		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
	(In Millions)
December 31, 2015:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	30	$	30	$	4,817	$	4,847	$	—
Agricultural	12		7		4		23		2,307		2,330		4
Total Mortgage Loans	$	12	$	7	$	34	$	53	$	7,124	$	7,177	$	4
December 31, 2014:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,415	$	4,415	$	—
Agricultural	1		7		3		11		2,074		2,085		3
Total Mortgage Loans	$	1	$	7	$	3	$	11	$	6,489	$	6,500	$	3

The following table provides information relating to impaired mortgage loans at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.



			Impaired Mortgage Loans
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance			Average Recorded Investment⁽¹⁾		Interest Income Recognized
	(In Millions)
December 31, 2015:
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial mortgage loans - other	$	46	$	46	$	—		$	15	$	—
Agricultural mortgage loans	—		—		—			—		—
Total	$	46	$	46	$	—		$	15	$	—
With related allowance recorded:
Commercial mortgage loans - other	$	63	$	63	$	(6	)	$	137	$	4
Agricultural mortgage loans	—		—		—			—		—
Total	$	63	$	63	$	(6	)	$	137	$	4
December 31, 2014:
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial mortgage loans - other	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Agricultural mortgage loans	—		—		—			—		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
With related allowance recorded:
Commercial mortgage loans - other	$	156	$	156	$	(37	)	$	148	$	2
Agricultural mortgage loans	—		—		—			—		—
Total	$	156	$	156	$	(37	)	$	148	$	2


(1)	Represents a five-quarter average of recorded amortized cost.

Equity Method Investments

Included in other equity investments are limited partnership interests and investment companies accounted for under the equity method with a total carrying value of $1,363 million and $1,490 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company’s total equity in net earnings (losses) for these limited partnership interests was $71 million, $206 million and $206 million, respectively, for 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Derivatives and Offsetting Assets and Liabilities

The Company uses derivatives as part of its overall asset/liability risk management primarily to reduce exposures to equity market and interest rate risks. Derivative hedging strategies are designed to reduce these risks from an economic perspective and are all executed within the framework of a “Derivative Use Plan” approved by the NYDFS. Operation of these hedging programs is based on models involving numerous estimates and assumptions, including, among others, mortality, lapse, surrender and withdrawal rates, election rates, fund performance, market volatility and interest rates. A wide range of derivative contracts are used in these hedging programs, including exchange traded equity, currency and interest rate futures contracts, total return and/or other equity swaps, interest rate swap and floor contracts, swaptions, variance swaps, equity options as well as repo transactions, that collectively are managed in an effort to reduce the economic impact of unfavorable changes in guaranteed benefits’ exposures attributable to movements in capital markets.

Derivatives utilized to hedge exposure to Variable Annuities with Guarantee Features

The Company has issued and continues to offer certain variable annuity products with GMDB, GMIB and GIB features. The Company had previously issued certain variable annuity products with GWBL, guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) and GMAB features (collectively, “GWBL and Other Features”). The risk associated with the GMDB feature is that under-performance of the financial markets could result in GMDB benefits, in the event of death, being higher than what accumulated policyholders’ account balances would support. The risk associated with the GMIB feature is that under-performance of the financial markets could result in the present value of GMIB benefits, in the event of annuitization, being higher than what accumulated policyholders’ account balances would support, taking into account the relationship between current annuity purchase rates and the GMIB guaranteed annuity purchase rates. The risk associated with the GIB and GWBL and Other Features is that under-performance of the financial markets could result in the GIB and GWBL and Other Features’ benefits being higher than what accumulated policyholders’ account balances would support.

For GMDB, GMIB, GIB and GWBL and Other Features, the Company retains certain risks including basis, credit spread and some volatility risk and risk associated with actual versus expected assumptions for mortality, lapse and surrender, withdrawal and contractholder election rates, among other things. The derivative contracts are managed to correlate with changes in the value of the GMDB, GMIB, GIB and GWBL and Other Features that result from financial markets movements. A portion of exposure to realized equity volatility is hedged using equity options and variance swaps and a portion of exposure to credit risk is hedged using total return swaps on fixed income indices. Additionally, the Company is party to total return swaps for which the reference U.S. Treasury securities are contemporaneously purchased from the market and sold to the swap counterparty. As these transactions result in a transfer of control of the U.S. Treasury securities to the swap counterparty, the Company derecognizes these securities with consequent gain or loss from the sale. The Company has also purchased reinsurance contracts to mitigate the risks associated with GMDB features and the impact of potential market fluctuations on future policyholder elections of GMIB features contained in certain annuity contracts issued by the Company.

The Company has in place a hedge program utilizing interest rate swaps to partially protect the overall profitability of future variable annuity sales against declining interest rates.

Derivatives utilized to hedge crediting rate exposure on SCS, SIO, MSO and IUL products/investment options

The Company hedges crediting rates in the Structured Capital Strategies® (“SCS”) variable annuity, Structured Investment Option in the EQUI-VEST® variable annuity series (“SIO”), Market Stabilizer Option® (“MSO”) in the variable life insurance products and Indexed Universal Life (“IUL”) insurance products. These products permit the contract owner to participate in the performance of an index, ETF or commodity price movement up to a cap for a set period of time. They also contain a protection feature, in which the Company will absorb, up to a certain percentage, the loss of value in an index, ETF or commodity price, which varies by product segment.

In order to support the returns associated with these features, the Company enters into derivative contracts whose payouts, in combination with fixed income investments, emulate those of the index, ETF or commodity price, subject to caps and buffers.

Derivatives utilized to hedge risks associated with interest margins on Interest Sensitive Life and Annuity Contracts

Margins or “spreads” on interest-sensitive life insurance and annuity contracts are affected by interest rate fluctuations as the yield on portfolio investments, primarily fixed maturities, is intended to support required payments under these contracts, including interest rates credited to their policy and contract holders. From time to time, the Company uses interest rate swaptions and other instruments to reduce the risk associated with minimum guarantees on these interest-sensitive contracts. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no positions outstanding for these programs.

Derivatives utilized to hedge equity market risks associated with the General Account’s seed money investments in Separate Accounts, retail mutual funds and Separate Account fee revenue fluctuations

The Company’s General Account seed money investments in Separate Account equity funds and retail mutual funds exposes the Company to market risk, including equity market risk, which is partially hedged through equity-index futures contracts to minimize such risk.

In second quarter 2015, the Company entered into futures on equity indices to mitigate the impact on net earnings from Separate Account fee revenue fluctuations due to movements in the equity markets. These positions partially cover fees expected to be earned through the current year from the Company’s Separate Account products.

Derivatives utilized for General Account Investment Portfolio

Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, the Company implemented a strategy in its General Account investment portfolio to replicate the credit exposure of fixed maturity securities otherwise permissible under its investment guidelines through the sale of credit default swaps (“CDSs”). Under the terms of these swaps, the Company receives quarterly fixed premiums that, together with any initial amount paid or received at trade inception, replicate the credit spread otherwise currently obtainable by purchasing the referenced entity’s bonds of similar maturity. These credit derivatives have remaining terms of five years or less and are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value, including the yield component that emerges from initial amounts paid or received, reported in Net investment income (loss). The Company manages its credit exposure taking into consideration both cash and derivatives based positions and selects the reference entities in its replicated credit exposures in a manner consistent with its selection of fixed maturities. In addition, the Company has transacted the sale of CDSs exclusively in single name reference entities of investment grade credit quality and with counterparties subject to collateral posting requirements. If there is an event of default by the reference entity or other such credit event as defined under the terms of the swap contract, the Company is obligated to perform under the credit derivative and, at the counterparty’s option, either pay the referenced amount of the contract less an auction-determined recovery amount or pay the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the defaulted or similar security of the reference entity for recovery by sale at the contract settlement auction. To date, there have been no events of default or circumstances indicative of a deterioration in the credit quality of the named referenced entities to require or suggest that the Company will have to perform under these CDSs. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these credit derivatives is limited to the par value of the referenced securities which is the dollar-equivalent of the derivative notional amount. The Standard North American CDS Contract (“SNAC”) under which the Company executes these CDS sales transactions does not contain recourse provisions for recovery of amounts paid under the credit derivative.

Periodically, the Company purchases 30-year, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”) and other sovereign inflation bonds as General Account investments and enters into asset swaps, to result in payment of the variable principal at maturity and semi-annual coupons of the bonds to the swap counterparty (pay variable) in return for fixed amounts (receive fixed). These asset swaps, when considered in combination with the bonds, together result in a net position that is intended to replicate a dollar-denominated fixed-coupon cash bond with a yield higher than a term-equivalent U.S. Treasury bond.

In third quarter of 2014, the Company implemented a strategy to hedge a portion of the credit exposure in its General Account investment portfolio by buying protection through a swap. These are swaps on the “super senior tranche” of the investment grade credit default swap index (“CDX index”). Under the terms of these swaps, the Company pays quarterly fixed premiums that, together with any initial amount paid or received at trade inception, serve as premiums paid to hedge the risk arising from multiple defaults of bonds referenced in the CDX index. These credit derivatives have remaining terms of five years or less and are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value, including the yield component that emerges from initial amounts paid or received, reported in Net investment income (loss) from derivative instruments.

The tables below present quantitative disclosures about the Company’s derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts required to be accounted for as derivative instruments.

Derivative Instruments by Category

At or For the Year Ended December 31, 2015



			Fair Value
	Notional Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Gains (Losses) Reported In Earnings (Loss)
	(In Millions)
Freestanding derivatives:
Equity contracts:⁽¹⁾
Futures	$	7,089	$	2	$	3	$	(84	)
Swaps	1,359		8		21		(45		)
Options	7,358		1,042		652		14
Interest rate contracts:⁽¹⁾
Floors	1,800		61		—		12
Swaps	13,718		351		108		(8		)
Futures	8,685		—		—		(81		)
Swaptions	—		—		—		118
Credit contracts:⁽¹⁾
Credit default swaps	2,442		16		38		(14		)
Other freestanding contracts:⁽¹⁾
Foreign currency Contracts	263		5		4		7
Net investment income (loss)							(81		)
Embedded derivatives:
GMIB reinsurance contracts	—		10,570		—		(141		)
GIB and GWBL and other features⁽²⁾	—		—		184		(56		)
SCS, SIO, MSO and IUL indexed features⁽³⁾	—		—		310		(38		)
Balances, December 31, 2015	$	42,714	$	12,055	$	1,320	$	(260	)


(1)	Reported in Other invested assets in the consolidated balance sheets.


(2)	Reported in Future policy benefits and other policyholders’ liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	SCS and SIO indexed features are reported in Policyholders’ account balances; MSO and IUL indexed features are reported in Future policyholders’ benefits and other policyholders’ liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Derivative Instruments by Category

At or For the Year Ended December 31, 2014



			Fair Value
	Notional Amount		Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Gains (Losses) Reported In Earnings (Loss)
	(In Millions)
Freestanding derivatives:
Equity contracts:⁽¹⁾
Futures	$	5,933	$	1	$	2	$	(522	)
Swaps	1,169		22		15		(88		)
Options	6,896		1,215		742		196
Interest rate contracts:⁽¹⁾
Floors	2,100		120		—		9
Swaps	11,608		605		15		1,507
Futures	10,647		—		—		459
Swaptions	4,800		72		—		37
Credit contracts:⁽¹⁾
Credit default swaps	1,942		9		27		4
Other freestanding contracts:⁽¹⁾
Foreign currency Contracts	149		2		—		3
Net investment income (loss)							1,605
Embedded derivatives:
GMIB reinsurance contracts	—		10,711		—		3,964
GIB and GWBL and other features⁽²⁾	—		—		128		(128		)
SCS, SIO, MSO and IUL indexed features⁽³⁾	—		—		380		(199		)
Balances, December 31, 2014	$	45,244	$	12,757	$	1,309	$	5,242


(1)	Reported in Other invested assets in the consolidated balance sheets.


(2)	Reported in Future policy benefits and other policyholders’ liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	SCS and SIO indexed features are reported in Policyholders’ account balances; MSO and IUL indexed features are reported in Future policyholders’ benefits and other policyholders’ liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Equity-Based and Treasury Futures Contracts

All outstanding equity-based and treasury futures contracts at December 31, 2015 are exchange-traded and net settled daily in cash. At December 31, 2015, the Company had open exchange-traded futures positions on: (i) the S&P 500, Russell 2000, NASDAQ 100 and Emerging Market indices, having initial margin requirements of $276 million, (ii) the 2-year, 5-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes on U.S. Treasury bonds and ultra-long bonds, having initial margin requirements of $33 million and (iii) the Euro Stoxx, FTSE 100, Topix, ASX 200, and European, Australasia, and Far East (“EAFE”) indices as well as corresponding currency futures on the Euro/U.S. dollar, Pound/U.S. dollar, Australian dollar/U.S. dollar, and Yen/U.S. dollar, having initial margin requirements of $49 million.

Credit Risk

Although notional amount is the most commonly used measure of volume in the derivatives market, it is not used as a measure of credit risk. A derivative with positive fair value (a derivative asset) indicates existence of credit risk because the counterparty would owe money to the Company if the contract were closed at the reporting date. Alternatively, a derivative contract with negative fair value (a derivative liability) indicates the Company would owe money to the counterparty if the contract were closed at the reporting date. To reduce credit exposures in OTC derivative transactions the Company generally enters into master agreements that provide for a netting of financial exposures with the counterparty and allow for collateral arrangements as further described below under “ISDA Master Agreements.” The Company further controls and minimizes its counterparty exposure through a credit appraisal and approval process.

ISDA Master Agreements

Netting Provisions. The standardized “ISDA Master Agreement” under which the Company conducts its OTC derivative transactions includes provisions for payment netting. In the normal course of business activities, if there is more than one derivative transaction with a single counterparty, the Company will set-off the cash flows of those derivatives into a single amount to be exchanged in settlement of the resulting net payable or receivable with that counterparty. In the event of default, insolvency, or other similar event pre-defined under the ISDA Master Agreement that would result in termination of OTC derivatives transactions before their maturity, netting procedures would be applied to calculate a single net payable or receivable with the counterparty.

Collateral Arrangements. The Company generally has executed a CSA under the ISDA Master Agreement it maintains with each of its OTC derivative counterparties that requires both posting and accepting collateral either in the form of cash or high-quality securities, such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government and government agency securities and investment grade corporate bonds. These CSAs are bilateral agreements that require collateral postings by the party “out-of-the-money” or in a net derivative liability position. Various thresholds for the amount and timing of collateralization of net liability positions are applicable. Consequently, the credit exposure of the Company’s OTC derivative contracts is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of those contracts at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements and any collateral received pursuant to CSAs. Derivatives are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and are reported either as assets in Other invested assets or as liabilities in Other liabilities, except for embedded insurance-related derivatives as described above and derivatives transacted with a related counterparty. The Company nets the fair value of all derivative financial instruments with counterparties for which an ISDA Master Agreement and related CSA have been executed.

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company held $655 million and $1,225 million in cash and securities collateral delivered by trade counterparties, representing the fair value of the related derivative agreements. This unrestricted cash collateral is reported in Cash and cash equivalents, and the obligation to return it is reported in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The aggregate fair value of all collateralized derivative transactions that were in a liability position with trade counterparties December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were $5 million and $28 million, for which the Company posted collateral of $5 million and $36 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, in the normal operation of its collateral arrangements. Certain of the Company’s ISDA Master Agreements contain contingent provisions that permit the counterparty to terminate the ISDA Master Agreement if the Company’s credit rating falls below a specified threshold, however, the occurrence of such credit event would not impose additional collateral requirements.

Securities Repurchase and Reverse Repurchase Transactions

Securities repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions are conducted by the Company under a standardized securities industry master agreement, amended to suit the specificities of each respective counterparty. These agreements generally provide detail as to the nature of the transaction, including provisions for payment netting, establish parameters concerning the ownership and custody of the collateral securities, including the right to substitute collateral during the term of the agreement, and provide for remedies in the event of default by either party. Amounts due to/from the same counterparty under these arrangements generally would be netted in the event of default and subject to rights of set-off in bankruptcy. The Company’s securities repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured borrowing or lending arrangements respectively, and are reported in the consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis. The Company obtains or posts collateral generally in the form of cash, U.S. Treasury, corporate and government agency securities. The fair value of the securities to be repurchased or resold are monitored on a daily basis with additional collateral posted or obtained as necessary. Securities to be repurchased or resold are the same, or substantially the same, as those initially transacted under the arrangement. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the balance outstanding under reverse repurchase transactions was $79 million and $0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the balance outstanding under securities repurchase transactions was $1,890 million and $950 million, respectively. The Company utilized these repurchase agreements for asset liability management purposes. For other instruments used for asset liability management purposes, see “Policyholders’ Account Balances and Future Policy Benefits” included in Note 2.

The following table presents information about the Insurance Segment’s offsetting of financial assets and liabilities and derivative instruments at December 31, 2015.

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Liabilities and Derivative Instruments

At December 31, 2015



	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets		Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets
	(In Millions)
ASSETS⁽¹⁾
Description
Derivatives:
Equity contracts	$	1,049	$	673	$	376
Interest rate contracts	389		104		285
Credit contracts	14		37		(23		)
Total Derivatives, subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	1,452		814		638
Total Derivatives, not subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	20		—		20
Total Derivatives	1,472		814		658
Other financial instruments^{(2) (4)}	1,271		—		1,271
Other invested assets⁽²⁾	$	2,743	$	814	$	1,929

Securities purchased under agreement to resell	$	79	—		$	79



	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets		Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets
	(In Millions)
LIABILITIES⁽³⁾
Description
Derivatives:
Equity contracts	$	673	$	673	$	—
Interest rate contracts	104		104		—
Credit contracts	37		37		—
Total Derivatives, subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	814		814		—
Total Derivatives, not subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	—		—		—
Total Derivatives	814		814		—
Other financial liabilities	2,586		—		2,586
Other liabilities	$	3,400	$	814	$	2,586

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	$	1,890	$	—	$	1,890


(1)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s $13 million net derivative assets, $6 million long exchange traded options and $75 million of securities borrowed.


(2)	Includes $141 million of accrued interest related to derivative instruments reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s $12 million net derivative liabilities, $1 million short exchange traded options and $10 million of securities loaned.


(4)	Includes margin of $(2) million related to derivative instruments.

The following table presents information about the Insurance segment’s gross collateral amounts that are not offset in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015.

Gross Collateral Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets

At December 31, 2015



	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets			Collateral (Received)/Held
	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets			Financial Instruments			Cash			Net Amounts
	(In Millions)
ASSETS⁽¹⁾
Counterparty A	$	52		$	—		$	(52	)	$	—
Counterparty B	9			—			(7		)	2
Counterparty C	61			—			(58		)	3
Counterparty D	222			—			(218		)	4
Counterparty E	53			—			(53		)	—
Counterparty F	(2		)	—			2			—
Counterparty G	129			—			(129		)	—
Counterparty H	16			(11		)	(5		)	—
Counterparty I	44			—			(39		)	5
Counterparty J	19			—			(13		)	6
Counterparty K	17			—			(17		)	—
Counterparty L	7			—			(7		)	—
Counterparty M	11			—			(10		)	1
Counterparty N	20			—			—			20
Counterparty Q	—			—			—			—
Counterparty T	(3		)	—			3			—
Counterparty U	—			—			1			1
Counterparty V	3			—			(3		)	—
Total Derivatives	$	658		$	(11	)	$	(605	)	$	42
Other financial instruments^{(2) (4)}	1,271			—			—			1,271
Other invested assets⁽²⁾	$	1,929		$	(11	)	$	(605	)	$	1,313

Counterparty M	$	28		$	(28	)	$	—		$	—
Counterparty V	51			(51		)	—			—
Securities purchased under agreement to resell	$	79		$	(79	)	$	—		$	—



	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets		Collateral (Received)/Held
	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets		Financial Instruments			Cash			Net Amounts
	(In Millions)
LIABILITIES⁽³⁾
Counterparty D	$	234	$	(234	)	$	—		—
Counterparty C	1,033		(1,016		)	(17		)	—
Counterparty M	623		(611		)	(12		)	—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	$	1,890	$	(1,861	)	$	(29	)	$	—


(1)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s cash collateral received of $2 million related to derivative assets and $75 million related to securities borrowed.


(2)	Includes $141 million of accrued interest related to derivative instruments reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s cash collateral pledged of $12 million related to derivative liabilities and $10 million related to securities loaned.


(4)	Includes margin of $(2) million related to derivative instruments.

The following table presents information about repurchase agreements accounted for as secured borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015.

Repurchase Agreement Accounted for as Secured Borrowings⁽¹⁾



	At December 31, 2015
	Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
	Overnight and Continuous			Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater Than 90 days		Total
			(In Millions)
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	—		$	1,865	$	25	$	—	$	1,890
Total	$	—		$	1,865	$	25	$	—	$	1,890
Securities purchased under agreement to resell
Corporate securities	$	—		$	79	$	—	$	—	$	79
Total	$	—		$	79	$	—	$	—	$	79


(1)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s $75 million of securities borrowed.

The following table presents information about the Insurance segment’s offsetting of financial assets and liabilities and derivative instruments at December 31, 2014.

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Liabilities and Derivative Instruments

At December 31, 2014



	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets		Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets
	(In Millions)
ASSETS⁽¹⁾
Description
Derivatives:
Equity contracts	$	1,236	$	753	$	483
Interest rate contracts	755		12		743
Credit contracts	7		27		(20		)
Total Derivatives, subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	1,998		792		1,206
Total Derivatives, not subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	40		—		40
Total Derivatives	2,038		792		1,246
Other financial instruments⁽²⁾	852		—		852
Other invested assets⁽²⁾	$	2,890	$	792	$	2,098



	Gross Amounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheets		Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets
	(In Millions)
LIABILITIES⁽³⁾
Description
Derivatives:
Equity contracts	$	753	$	753	$	—
Interest rate contracts	12		12		—
Total Derivatives, subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	765		765		—
Total Derivatives, not subject to an ISDA Master Agreement	—		—		—
Total Derivatives	765		765		—
Other financial liabilities	2,939		—		2,939
Other liabilities	$	3,704	$	765	$	2,939

Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	$	950	$	—	$	950


(1)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s $8 million net derivative assets, $22 million long exchange traded options and $158 million of securities borrowed.


(2)	Includes $120 million related to accrued interest related to derivative instruments reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s $9 million net derivative liabilities, $7 million short exchange traded options and $34 million of securities loaned.

The following table presents information about the Insurance segment’s gross collateral amounts that are not offset in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2014.

Gross Collateral Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets

At December 31, 2014



	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets		Collateral (Received)/Held
	Net Amounts Presented in the Balance Sheets		Financial Instruments			Cash			Net Amounts
	(In Millions)
ASSETS⁽¹⁾
Counterparty A	$	62	$	—		$	(62	)	$	—
Counterparty B	102		—			(95		)	7
Counterparty C	111		—			(110		)	1
Counterparty D	228		—			(224		)	4
Counterparty E	60		—			(59		)	1
Counterparty F	63		—			(60		)	3
Counterparty G	145		(145		)	—			—
Counterparty H	31		(31		)	—			—
Counterparty I	136		—			(134		)	2
Counterparty J	28		—			(22		)	6
Counterparty K	44		—			(44		)	—
Counterparty L	113		(113		)	—			—
Counterparty M	76		—			(68		)	8
Counterparty N	40		—			—			40
Counterparty Q	4		—			(4		)	—
Counterparty T	3		—			(3		)	—
Total Derivatives	$	1,246	$	(289	)	$	(885	)	$	72
Other financial instruments⁽²⁾	852		—			—			852
Other invested assets⁽²⁾	$	2,098	$	(289	)	$	(885	)	$	924

LIABILITIES⁽³⁾
Counterparty D	$	450	$	(450	)	$	—		—
Counterparty C	500		(500		)	—			—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase	$	950	$	(950	)	$	—		$	—


(1)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s cash collateral received of $1 million related to derivative assets and $158 million related to securities borrowed.


(2)	Includes $120 million of accrued interest related to derivative instruments reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.


(3)	Excludes Investment Management segment’s cash collateral pledged of $10 million related to derivative liabilities and $34 million related to securities loaned.

Net Investment Income (Loss)

The following table breaks out Net investment income (loss) by asset category:



	2015			2014			2013
	(In Millions)
Fixed maturities	$	1,420		$	1,431		$	1,462
Mortgage loans on real estate	338			306			284
Repurchase agreement	1			—			—
Other equity investments	84			200			228
Policy loans	213			216			219
Derivative investments	(81		)	1,605			(2,866		)
Trading securities	17			63			54
Other investment income	40			49			50
Gross investment income (loss)	2,032			3,870			(569		)
Investment expenses	(53		)	(53		)	(57		)
Interest expense	(3		)	(2		)	(3		)
Net Investment Income (Loss)	$	1,976		$	3,815		$	(629	)

For 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, Net investment income (loss) from derivatives included $474 million, $899 million and $(2,829) million of realized gains (losses) on contracts closed during those periods and $(555) million, $706 million and $(37) million of unrealized gains (losses) on derivative positions at each respective year end.

Investment Gains (Losses), Net

Investment gains (losses), net including changes in the valuation allowances and OTTI are as follows:



	2015			2014			2013
	(In Millions)
Fixed maturities	$	(17	)	$	(54	)	$	(75	)
Mortgage loans on real estate	(1		)	(3		)	(7		)
Other equity investments	(5		)	(2		)	(17		)
Other	3			1			—
Investment Gains (Losses), Net	$	(20	)	$	(58	)	$	(99	)

For 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, investment results passed through to certain participating group annuity contracts as interest credited to policyholders’ account balances totaled $4 million, $5 million and $8 million.