XML 87 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Derivative instruments enable the Company to manage its exposure to various market risks. The value of such instruments is derived from an underlying variable or multiple variables, including equity and interest rate indices or prices. The Company primarily enters into derivative agreements for risk management purposes related to the Company’s products and operations.
The Company’s freestanding derivatives are recorded at fair value and are reflected in other assets or other liabilities. The Company’s freestanding derivative instruments are all subject to master netting arrangements. The Company’s policy on the recognition of derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is to not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivatives and collateral arrangements executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement. See Note 12 for additional information regarding the estimated fair value of the Company’s freestanding derivatives after considering the effect of master netting arrangements and collateral.
The Company currently uses derivatives as economic hedges and accounting hedges. The following table presents the balance sheet location and the gross fair value of derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives:
 
 
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Liabilities
Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
June 30,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
(in millions)
GMWB and GMAB
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Interest rate contracts
 
Other assets
 
$
1,585

 
$
1,484

 
Other liabilities
 
$
1,306

 
$
1,672

Equity contracts
 
Other assets
 
1,642

 
1,741

 
Other liabilities
 
2,767

 
2,918

Credit contracts
 
Other assets
 
—

 
3

 
Other liabilities
 
—

 
—

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Other assets
 
2

 
2

 
Other liabilities
 
—

 
—

Embedded derivatives(1)
 
N/A
 
—

 
—

 
Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims(2)
 
(347
)
 
(575
)
Total GMWB and GMAB
 
 
 
3,229

 
3,230

 
 
 
3,726

 
4,015

Other derivatives:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Equity
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

EIA embedded derivatives
 
N/A
 
—

 
—

 
Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims
 
5

 
5

IUL
 
Other assets
 
33

 
27

 
Other liabilities
 
11

 
13

IUL embedded derivatives
 
N/A
 
—

 
—

 
Policyholder account balances, future policy benefits and claims
 
184

 
125

Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Macro hedge program
 
Other assets
 
1

 
4

 
Other liabilities
 
13

 
29

Total other
 
 
 
34

 
31

 
 
 
213

 
172

Total derivatives
 
 
 
$
3,263

 
$
3,261

 
 
 
$
3,939

 
$
4,187

N/A
Not applicable.
(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.
(2)
The fair value of the GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives was a net asset at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the amount is reported as a contra liability.
See Note 11 for additional information regarding the Company’s fair value measurement of derivative instruments.
The following table presents a summary of the impact of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income:
 
 
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives
Recognized in Income
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
GMWB and GMAB
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest rate contracts
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
$
245

 
$
(380
)
 
$
509

 
$
(512
)
Equity contracts
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
(197
)
 
12

 
(387
)
 
(480
)
Credit contracts
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
(12
)
 
8

 
(22
)
 
8

Foreign exchange contracts
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
—

 
2

 
(1
)
 
7

Embedded derivatives(1)
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
(124
)
 
255

 
(228
)
 
822

Total GMWB and GMAB
 
 
 
(88
)
 
(103
)
 
(129
)
 
(155
)
Other derivatives:
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tax hedge
 
Net investment income
 
—

 
—

 
3

 
—

Equity
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

EIA
 
Interest credited to fixed accounts
 
1

 
—

 
1

 
1

EIA embedded derivatives
 
Interest credited to fixed accounts
 
(1
)
 
—

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
IUL
 
Interest credited to fixed accounts
 
6

 
2

 
11

 
6

IUL embedded derivatives
 
Interest credited to fixed accounts
 
5

 
2

 
11

 
5

Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Macro hedge program
 
Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses
 
(10
)
 
—

 
3

 
—

Total other
 
 
 
1

 
4


28


11

Total derivatives
 
 
 
$
(87
)
 
$
(99
)
 
$
(101
)
 
$
(144
)
(1)
The fair values of GMWB and GMAB embedded derivatives fluctuate based on changes in equity, interest rate and credit markets.
The Company holds derivative instruments that either do not qualify or are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. These derivative instruments are used as economic hedges of equity, interest rate, credit and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to various products and transactions of the Company.
Certain annuity contracts contain GMWB or GMAB provisions, which guarantee the right to make limited partial withdrawals each contract year regardless of the volatility inherent in the underlying investments or guarantee a minimum accumulation value of consideration received at the beginning of the contract period, after a specified holding period, respectively. The Company economically hedges the exposure related to non-life contingent GMWB and GMAB provisions primarily using various futures, options, interest rate swaptions, interest rate swaps, total return swaps and variance swaps. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the gross notional amount of derivative contracts for the Company’s GMWB and GMAB provisions was $133.0 billion and $142.4 billion, respectively.
The deferred premium associated with certain of the above options is paid or received semi-annually over the life of the option contract or at maturity. The following is a summary of the payments the Company is scheduled to make and receive for these options:
 
 
Premiums Payable
 
Premiums Receivable
 
 
(in millions)
2014(1)
 
$
185

 
$
56

2015
 
355

 
67

2016
 
313

 
54

2017
 
242

 
53

2018
 
194

 
56

2019-2026
 
512

 
82

  Total
 
$
1,801

 
$
368

(1)
2014 amounts represent the amounts payable and receivable for the period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.
Actual timing and payment amounts may differ due to future contract settlements, modifications or exercises of options prior to the full premium being paid or received.
During 2013, the Company transferred net derivative liabilities with a fair value of $94 million, consisting of long-dated options, along with cash payment of the same amount to Ameriprise Financial. The transaction improves the risk management profile of statutory tail scenario risk for the Company’s variable annuities. 
The Company has a macro hedge program to provide protection against the statutory tail scenario risk arising from variable annuity reserves on its statutory surplus and to cover some of the residual risks not covered by other hedging activities. As a means of economically hedging these risks, the Company uses a combination of options and/or swaps. Certain of the macro hedge derivatives used contain settlement provisions linked to both equity returns and interest rates; the remaining are interest rate contracts or equity contracts. The gross notional amount of these derivative contracts was $829 million and $710 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
EIA and IUL products have returns tied to the performance of equity markets. As a result of fluctuations in equity markets, the obligation incurred by the Company related to EIA and IUL products will positively or negatively impact earnings over the life of these products. As a means of economically hedging its obligations under the provisions of these products, the Company enters into index options and futures contracts. The gross notional amount of these derivative contracts was $702 million and $512 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Embedded Derivatives
Certain annuities contain GMAB and non-life contingent GMWB provisions, which are considered embedded derivatives. In addition, the equity component of the EIA and IUL product obligations are also considered embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are bifurcated from their host contracts for valuation purposes and reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. As discussed above, the Company uses derivatives to mitigate the financial statement impact of these embedded derivatives.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company has amounts classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) related to gains and losses associated with the effective portion of previously designated cash flow hedges. The Company reclassifies these amounts into income as the forecasted transactions impact earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company held no derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges.
At June 30, 2014, the Company expects to reclassify $6 million of deferred loss on derivative instruments from AOCI to earnings during the next 12 months that will be recorded in net investment income. These were originally losses on derivative instruments related to interest rate swaptions. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, no hedge relationships were discontinued due to forecasted transactions no longer being expected to occur according to the original hedge strategy. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, amounts recognized in earnings on derivative transactions that were ineffective were not material.
The following table presents a rollforward of unrealized derivative losses related to cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
 
(in millions)
Net unrealized derivative losses at January 1
 
$
(17
)
 
$
(21
)
Reclassification of realized losses(1)
 
3

 
4

Income tax benefit
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Net unrealized derivative losses at June 30
 
$
(15
)
 
$
(18
)
(1)
Loss reclassified from AOCI to net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Currently, the longest period of time over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows is five years and relates to interest credited on forecasted fixed premium product sales.
Credit Risk
Credit risk associated with the Company’s derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. To mitigate such risk, the Company has established guidelines and oversight of credit risk through a comprehensive enterprise risk management program that includes members of senior management. Key components of this program are to require preapproval of counterparties and the use of master netting arrangements and collateral arrangements whenever practical. See Note 12 for additional information on the Company’s credit exposure related to derivative assets.
Certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company’s financial strength rating (or based on the debt rating of the Company’s parent, Ameriprise Financial). Additionally, certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company does not maintain a specific financial strength rating or Ameriprise Financial’s debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating). If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company’s counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts in a net liability position containing such credit contingent provisions was $739 million and $950 million, respectively. The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $739 million and $940 million, respectively. If the credit contingent provisions of derivative contracts in a net liability position at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were triggered, the aggregate fair value of additional assets that would be required to be posted as collateral or needed to settle the instruments immediately would have been nil and $10 million, respectively.