XML 23 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]  
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

NOTE 2: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS 

 

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-01, “Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.” The amendments in this ASU modify the conditions that a reporting entity must meet to be eligible to use a method other than the equity or cost methods to account for qualified affordable housing project investments. If the modified conditions are met, the amendments permit an entity to amortize the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the amount of tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognize the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). Additionally, the amendments introduce new recurring disclosures about all investments in qualified affordable housing projects irrespective of the method used to account for the investments.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for public entities for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. In the first quarter of 2014, we early adopted this ASU for the reporting of our equity investments in qualified affordable housing projects.  The investments are recorded using the proportional amortization method whereby an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognizes the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit)The application of this standard reduced total noninterest expense by $327 and $270 thousand for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively, and increased income tax expense by an equivalent amount.  The application of the standard also increased our effective tax rate to 24% and 26% from 18% and 22% for the same periods.  This ASU was applied retrospectively and prior periods have been reclassified accordingly.