NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The significant accounting policies of the Company, as summarized below, conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and reflect practices appropriate to the Company’s businesses.

Nature of Operations and Reclassifications—Tribune Media Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a diversified media and entertainment company. The Company’s business consists of Television and Entertainment operations and the management of certain owned real estate assets. The Company also holds a variety of investments, including equity method investments in Television Food Network, G.P. (“TV Food Network”) and CareerBuilder, LLC (through our investment in Camaro Parent, LLC) (“CareerBuilder”) and a cost method investment in New Cubs LLC (as defined and described in Note 8).

Television and Entertainment, a reportable segment, provides audiences across the country with news, entertainment and sports programming on Tribune Broadcasting’s 42 local television stations (that are either owned by the Company or owned by others but to which the Company provides certain services) and their websites, a national general entertainment cable network (WGN America), a radio station and other digital assets.

The Company reports and includes under Corporate and Other the management of certain owned real estate assets, including revenues from leasing the Company-owned office and production facilities and any gains or losses from sales of real estate, as well as certain administrative activities associated with operating corporate office functions and managing its predominantly frozen company-sponsored defined benefit pension plans.

Prior to entering into a share purchase agreement to sell substantially all of the Digital and Data business on December 19, 2016 (the “Gracenote Sale,” as further defined and described in Note 2), the Company was also engaged in providing innovative technology and services that collected, created and distributed video, music, sports and entertainment data.

Prior to the Gracenote Sale, which was completed on January 31, 2017, the Company reported its operations through the following reportable segments: Television and Entertainment and Digital and Data. The Company’s Digital and Data reportable segment consisted of several businesses driven by the Company’s expertise in collection, creation and distribution of data and innovation in unique services and recognition technology that used data, including Gracenote Video, Gracenote Music and Gracenote Sports.

The historical results of operations for the businesses included in the Gracenote Sale are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 2). Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016, the Television and Entertainment reportable segment includes the operations of Covers Media Group (“Covers”), a business-to-consumer website, which was previously included in the Digital and Data reportable segment. Beginning in fiscal 2015, the Television and Entertainment reportable segment includes the Company’s Screener (formerly Zap2it.com) entertainment content business, which was also previously included in the Digital and Data reportable segment. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation; the impact of this reclassification was immaterial.

Sinclair Merger Agreement—On May 8, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (“Sinclair”), providing for the acquisition by Sinclair of all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A common stock (“Class A Common Stock”) and Class B common stock (“Class B Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”) by means of a merger of Samson Merger Sub Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Sinclair, with and into Tribune Media Company (the “Merger”), with Tribune Media Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Sinclair.

In the Merger, each share of the Company’s Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive (i) $35.00 in cash, without interest and less any required withholding taxes (such amount, the “Cash Consideration”), and (ii) 0.2300 (the “Exchange Ratio”) of a validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Sinclair Common Stock”), of Sinclair (the “Stock Consideration,” and together with the Cash Consideration, the “Merger Consideration”). The Merger Agreement provides that each holder of an outstanding Tribune Media Company stock option (whether or not vested) will receive, for each share of the Company’s Common Stock subject to such stock option, a cash payment equal to the excess, if any, of the value of the Merger Consideration (with the Stock Consideration valued over a specified period prior to the consummation of the Merger) and the exercise price per share of such option, without interest and less any required withholding taxes. Each outstanding Tribune Media Company restricted stock unit award will be converted into a cash-settled restricted stock unit award reflecting a number of shares of Sinclair Common Stock equal to the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to such award multiplied by a ratio equal to (a) the sum of (i) the Exchange Ratio plus (ii) the Cash Consideration divided by (b) the trading value of the Sinclair Common Stock over a specified period prior to the consummation of the Merger. Otherwise, each such award will continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as such award was subject prior to the Merger. Each outstanding Tribune Media Company performance stock unit (other than supplemental performance stock units) will automatically become vested at “target” level of performance and will be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to (a) the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that are subject to such unit as so vested multiplied by (b) the sum of (i) the Cash Consideration and (ii) the Exchange Ratio multiplied by the trading value of the Sinclair Common Stock over a specified period prior to the consummation of the Merger without interest and less any required withholding taxes. Each holder of an outstanding Tribune Media Company supplemental performance stock unit that will vest in accordance with its existing terms will be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to (a) the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that are subject to such unit as so vested multiplied by (b) the sum of (i) the Cash Consideration and (ii) the Exchange Ratio multiplied by the trading value of the Sinclair Common Stock over a specified period prior to the consummation of the Merger without interest and less any required withholding taxes. Any supplemental performance stock units that do not vest in accordance with their terms will be canceled without any consideration. Each holder of an outstanding Tribune Media Company deferred stock unit will be entitled to receive an amount of cash equal to (a) the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that are subject to such unit multiplied by (b) the sum of (i) the Cash Consideration and (ii) the Exchange Ratio multiplied by the trading value of the Sinclair Common Stock over a specified period prior to the consummation of the Merger without interest and subject to all applicable withholding. Each outstanding Tribune Media Company Warrant will become a warrant exercisable, at its current exercise price, for the Merger Consideration in respect of each share of the Company’s Common Stock subject to the Warrant prior to the Merger.

The consummation of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain important conditions, including, among others: (i) the approval of the Merger by the Company’s stockholders, (ii) the receipt of approval from the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) and the expiration or termination of the waiting period applicable to the Merger under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), (iii) the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 registering the Sinclair Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Merger and no stop order or proceedings seeking the same having been initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), (iv) the listing of the Sinclair Common Stock to be issued in the Merger on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and (v) the absence of certain legal impediments to the consummation of the Merger.

On September 6, 2017, Sinclair’s registration statement on Form S-4 registering the Sinclair Common Stock to be issued in the Merger was declared effective by the SEC.

On October 19, 2017, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting as a single class, voted on and approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement at a duly called special meeting of Tribune Media Company shareholders.

The applications seeking FCC approval of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Applications”) were filed on June 26, 2017, and the FCC issued a public notice of the filing of the Applications and established a comment cycle on July 6, 2017. Several petitions to deny the Applications, and numerous other comments, both opposing and supporting the transaction, were filed in response to the public notice. Sinclair and Tribune jointly filed an opposition to the petitions to deny on August 22, 2017 (the “Joint Opposition”). Petitioners and others filed replies to the Joint Opposition on August 29, 2017. On September 14, 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued a Request for Information (“RFI”) seeking additional information regarding certain matters discussed in the Applications. Sinclair submitted a response to the RFI on October 5, 2017. On October 18, 2017, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued a public notice pausing the FCC’s 180-day transaction review “shot-clock” for 15 days to afford interested parties an opportunity to comment on the response to the RFI. On January 11, 2018, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued a public notice pausing the FCC’s shot-clock as of January 4, 2018 until Sinclair has filed amendments to the Applications along with divestiture applications and the FCC staff has had an opportunity to review any such submissions. On February 20, 2018, the parties filed an amendment to the Applications that, among other things, (1) requested authority under the Duopoly Rule for Sinclair to own two top four rated stations in each of three television markets and (2) identified stations (the “Divestiture Stations”) in 11 television markets that Sinclair proposes to divest in order for the Merger to comply with the Duopoly Rule and the National Television Multiple Ownership Rule. Concurrently, Sinclair filed applications proposing to place certain of the Divestiture Stations in an FCC-approved divestiture trust, if and as necessary, in order to facilitate the orderly divestiture of those stations following the consummation of the Merger.

On August 2, 2017, the Company received a request for additional information and documentary material, often referred to as a “second request,” from the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) in connection with the Merger Agreement. The second request was issued under the HSR Act. Sinclair received a substantively identical request for additional information and documentary material from the DOJ in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Issuance of the second request extends the waiting period under the HSR Act until 30 days after Sinclair and the Company have substantially complied with the second request, unless the waiting period is terminated earlier by the DOJ or the parties voluntarily extend the time for closing. The parties entered into an agreement with the DOJ on September 15, 2017 (the “DOJ Timing Agreement”), by which they agreed not to consummate the Merger Agreement before December 31, 2017, or 60 days following the date on which both parties have certified compliance with the second request, whichever is later. In addition, the parties agreed to provide the DOJ with 10 calendar days notice prior to consummating the Merger Agreement. The DOJ Timing Agreement has been amended twice, on October 30, 2017, to extend the date before which the parties may not consummate the Merger Agreement to January 30, 2018, and on January 27, 2018, to extend that date to February 11, 2018. The DOJ Timing Agreement thus currently provides that the parties will not consummate the Merger Agreement before February 11, 2018, or 60 days following the date on which both parties have certified compliance with the second request, whichever is later, and that the parties will provide the DOJ with 10 days notice before consummating the Merger Agreement.

Sinclair’s and the Company’s respective obligation to consummate the Merger are also subject to certain additional customary conditions, including (i) material accuracy of representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement of the other party, (ii) performance by the other party of its covenants in the Merger Agreement in all material respects and (iii) since the date of the Merger Agreement, no material adverse effect with respect to the other party having occurred.

If the Merger Agreement is terminated (i) by either the Company or Sinclair because the Merger has not occurred by the end date described below or (ii) by Sinclair in respect of a willful breach of the Company’s covenants or agreements that would give rise to the failure of a closing condition that is incapable of being cured within the time periods prescribed by the Merger Agreement, and an alternative acquisition proposal has been made to the Company and publicly announced and not withdrawn prior to the termination, and within twelve months after termination of the Merger Agreement, the Company enters into a definitive agreement with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal (and subsequently consummates such transaction) or consummates a transaction with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal, the Company will pay Sinclair $135.5 million less Sinclair’s costs and expenses paid.

In addition to the foregoing termination rights, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated on or before May 8, 2018, with an automatic extension to August 8, 2018, if necessary to obtain regulatory approval under circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement.

Change in Accounting Principle— In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017. The Company made a policy election to account for forfeitures of equity awards as they occur and implemented this provision using a modified retrospective transition method. The cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings in the first quarter of 2017 as a result of this election was immaterial. The Company adopted the other provisions of ASU 2016-09 on a prospective basis. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350).” The Company adopted the standard on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2017. The standard simplifies the subsequent measure of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2017-04, companies should recognize an impairment charge for the amount the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. However, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” The Company adopted the standard on a prospective basis, effective April 1, 2017. The standard addresses the diversity in practice of when companies apply modification accounting when there are changes in terms or conditions to share-based payment awards. The guidance states that a company should consider changes as a modification unless all of the following are met (i) there is no change in the fair value of the award as a result of the modification, (ii) the vesting conditions have not changed and (iii) the classification of the award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument has not changed. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Fiscal Year—On April 16, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved the change of the Company’s fiscal year end from the last Sunday in December of each year to December 31 of each year and to change the Company’s fiscal quarter end to the last calendar day of each quarter. This change in fiscal year end was effective with the second fiscal quarter of 2015, which ended on June 30, 2015. As a result of this change, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 includes two less days compared to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

Principles of Consolidation and Variable Interest Entities—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tribune Media Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries, as well as any variable interests for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All material intercompany transactions are eliminated. In general, unless otherwise required by ASC Topic 323 “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures,” investments comprising between 20 percent to 50 percent of the voting stock of companies and certain partnership interests are accounted for using the equity method. All other investments are generally accounted for using the cost method.

The Company evaluates its investments and other transactions to determine whether any entities associated with the investments or transactions should be consolidated under the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810, “Consolidation.” ASC Topic 810 requires an ongoing qualitative assessment of variable interest entities (“VIEs”) to assess which entity is the primary beneficiary as it has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of a VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The Company consolidates VIEs when it is the primary beneficiary.

On April 14, 2015, the Company entered into a real estate venture agreement with a third party to redevelop one of the Company’s Florida properties and formed a new limited liability company, TREH 200E Las Olas Venture, LLC (“Las Olas LLC”). The Company contributed land with an agreed-upon value between the parties of $15 million and a carrying value of $10 million, resulting in an initial 92% interest in the Las Olas LLC. As further disclosed in Note 6, on December 19, 2017, the Company sold the property owned by Las Olas LLC for net pretax proceeds of $21 million and recognized a pretax gain of $6 million, of which less than $1 million is attributable to a noncontrolling interest. The Las Olas LLC was determined to be a VIE where the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of this VIE.

On November 12, 2015, the Company executed an agreement with a third party developer to redevelop one of the Company’s California properties. The Company contributed land, building and improvements with an agreed-upon value between the parties of $39 million and a carrying value of $35 million, resulting in an initial 90% interest in the TREH/Kearny Costa Mesa, LLC (“Costa Mesa LLC”). As further disclosed in Note 6, on November 15, 2017, the Company sold the properties owned by Costa Mesa LLC for net pretax proceeds of $62 million and recognized a pretax gain of $22 million, of which $3 million is attributable to a noncontrolling interest. The Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of Costa Mesa LLC as it has the majority ownership.

Prior to September 2, 2015, the Company held a variable interest in Newsday Holdings LLC (“NHLLC”). On September 2, 2015, all of the outstanding equity interests of NHLLC were acquired by CSC Holdings, LLC (“CSC”).

At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company indirectly held a variable interest in Topix, LLC (“Topix”) through its investment in TKG Internet Holdings II LLC. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of Topix and therefore has not consolidated it as of and for the periods presented in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.

The Company holds a variable interest in Dreamcatcher Broadcasting LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Dreamcatcher”) and is the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations and the financial position of Dreamcatcher. See below for further information on the Company’s transactions with Dreamcatcher and the carrying amounts and classification of the assets and liabilities of Dreamcatcher which have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The assets of the consolidated VIE can only be used to settle the obligations of the VIE.

Dreamcatcher—Pursuant to an asset purchase agreement dated as of July 15, 2013, between the Company, an affiliate of Oak Hill Capital Partners and Dreamcatcher, an entity formed in 2013 specifically to comply with FCC cross-ownership rules, on December 27, 2013, Dreamcatcher acquired the FCC licenses, retransmission consent agreements, network affiliation agreements, contracts for broadcast rights and selected personal property (including transmitters, antennas and transmission lines) of Local TV’s television stations WTKR-TV, Norfolk, VA, WGNT-TV, Portsmouth, VA, and WNEP-TV, Scranton, PA (collectively the “Dreamcatcher Stations”) for $27 million (collectively, the “Dreamcatcher Transaction”). The Dreamcatcher Transaction was funded by the Dreamcatcher Credit Facility which was guaranteed by the Company. In 2017, Dreamcatcher received pretax proceeds from the counterparty in a spectrum sharing arrangement of $26 million as one of the Dreamcatcher stations will act as host station. The payments have been recorded as deferred revenue and began amortizing to the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations upon commencement of the sharing arrangement in December 2017. See Note 12 for additional information regarding the Company’s participation in the FCC spectrum auction. The Company used after-tax proceeds from the FCC spectrum auction to prepay the Dreamcatcher Credit Facility in the third quarter of 2017, as further described in Note 9. The Company made the final payment to pay off the Dreamcatcher Credit Facility in full in September 2017.

The Company provides certain services to support the operations of the Dreamcatcher Stations, but, in compliance with FCC regulations, Dreamcatcher has responsibility for and control over programming, finances, personnel and operations of the Dreamcatcher Stations. In connection with Dreamcatcher’s operation of the Dreamcatcher Stations, the Company entered into shared services agreements (“SSAs”) with Dreamcatcher pursuant to which it provides technical, promotional, back-office, distribution and limited programming services to the Dreamcatcher Stations in exchange for the Company’s right to receive certain payments from Dreamcatcher after satisfaction of operating costs and debt obligations. Pursuant to SSAs, Dreamcatcher is guaranteed a minimum annual cumulative net cash flow of $0.2 million. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations and the financial position of Dreamcatcher, a fully-consolidated VIE. For financial reporting purposes, Dreamcatcher is considered a VIE as a result of (1) shared service agreements that the Company has with the Dreamcatcher Stations, (2) the Company having power over significant activities affecting Dreamcatcher’s economic performance, and (3) purchase option granted by Dreamcatcher which permits the Company to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of each Dreamcatcher Station at any time, subject to FCC’s consent and other conditions described below. The purchase option is freely exercisable or assignable by the Company without consent or approval by Dreamcatcher or its members for consideration equal to the total outstanding balance of debt guaranteed by the Company, plus a fixed escalation fee.

Net revenues of the Dreamcatcher stations included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $72 million, $73 million and $65 million, respectively, and operating profit was $12 million, $16 million and $12 million, respectively.

The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 includes the following assets and liabilities of the Dreamcatcher stations (in thousands):



	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	—	$	91
Broadcast rights	2,622		2,634
Other intangible assets, net	71,914		82,442
Other assets	6,852		134
Total Assets	$	81,388	$	85,301

Debt due within one year	$	—	$	4,003
Contracts payable for broadcast rights	2,691		2,758
Long-term debt	—		10,767
Long-term deferred revenue	25,030		—
Other liabilities	1,017		85
Total Liabilities	$	28,738	$	17,613

Revenue Recognition—The Company’s primary sources of revenue related to Television and Entertainment are from local and national broadcasting and cable advertising and retransmission and carriage fee revenues on the Company’s television, cable and radio stations as well as from direct and indirect display advertising. The Company also recognizes revenues from leases of its owned real estate.

The Company recognizes revenue when the following conditions are met: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered, (iii) the fees are fixed or determinable and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting when the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. Revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”).

Television and Entertainment advertising revenue is recorded, net of agency commissions, when commercials are aired. Television operations may trade certain advertising time for products or services, as well as barter advertising time for program material. Trade transactions are generally reported at the estimated fair value of the product or services received, while barter transactions are reported at the Company’s estimate of the value of the advertising time exchanged, which approximates the fair value of the program material received. Barter/trade revenue is reported when commercials are broadcast and expenses are reported when products or services are utilized or when programming airs. The Company records rebates when earned as a reduction of advertising revenue. Retransmission revenue represent revenue that the Company earns from multichannel video programming distributors (“MVPDs”) for the distribution of the Company’s television stations’ broadcast programming. Retransmission revenue is recognized over the contract period, generally based on a negotiated fee per subscriber. Carriage fees represent fees that the Company earns from MVPDs for the carriage of the Company’s cable channel. Carriage fees are recognized over the contract period, generally based on the number of subscribers and negotiated rates.

Derivative Instruments—The Company’s earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in interest rates. The Company’s risk management policy allows for the use of derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate exposures and does not permit derivatives to be used for speculative purposes.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking the derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions or variability of cash flow. The Company also formally assesses, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the designated derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of hedged items as well as monitors the credit worthiness of the counterparties to ensure no issues exist which would affect the value of the derivatives. When a derivative is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer probable, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively, in accordance with derecognition criteria for hedge accounting.

The Company records derivative financial instruments at fair value in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in either other current liabilities or other noncurrent assets. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge, to the extent that the hedge is effective, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and reclassified to earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Cash flows from derivative financial instruments are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows based on the nature of the derivative contract.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value. Investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents—Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of funds that are not available for general corporate use and primarily consist of restricted cash held by the Company to satisfy the remaining claim obligations pursuant to the Plan (as defined and described in Note 3). At both December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, restricted cash held by the Company to satisfy such obligations totaled $18 million.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The Company’s accounts receivable are primarily due from advertisers and MVPDs. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition, and generally collateral is not required. The Company maintains an allowance for uncollectible accounts, rebates, volume discounts and sales allowances. This allowance is determined based on historical write-off experience, sales adjustments and any known specific collectability exposures.

A summary of the activity with respect to the accounts receivable allowances is as follows (in thousands):



Accounts receivable allowance balance at December 28, 2014	$	6,795
2015 additions charged to revenues, costs and expenses	5,277
2015 deductions	(6,529		)
Accounts receivable allowance balance at December 31, 2015	$	5,543
2016 additions charged to revenues, costs and expenses	14,009
2016 deductions	(7,048		)
Accounts receivable allowance balance at December 31, 2016	$	12,504
2017 additions charged to revenues, costs and expenses	14,786
2017 deductions	(22,476		)
Accounts receivable allowance balance at December 31, 2017	$	4,814

Broadcast Rights—The Company acquires rights to broadcast syndicated programs, original licensed series and feature films. Pursuant to ASC Topic 920, “Entertainment-Broadcasters,” these rights and the related liabilities are recorded as an asset and a liability when the license period has begun, the cost of the program is determinable and the program is accepted and available for airing. The current portion of programming inventory includes those rights available for broadcast that are expected to be amortized in the succeeding year.

The Company amortizes its broadcast rights costs over the period in which an economic benefit is expected to be derived based on the timing of the usage and benefit from such programming. Newer licensed/acquired programming and original produced programming are generally amortized on an accelerated basis as the episodes are aired. For certain categories of licensed programming and feature films that have been exploited through previous cycles, amortization expense is recorded on a straight-line basis. Program amortization for certain categories of programming is calculated on either an accelerated or straight-line basis based upon the greater amortization resulting from either the number of episodes aired or the portion of the license period consumed. The Company also has commitments for network and sports programming that are expensed on a straight-line basis as the programs are available to air. Management’s judgment is required in determining the timing of the expensing of these costs, and includes analyses of historical and estimated future revenue and ratings patterns for similar programming. The Company regularly reviews, and revises when necessary, its revenue estimates, which may result in a change in the rate of amortization. Amortization of broadcast rights are expensed to programming in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company carries its broadcast rights at the lower of unamortized cost or estimated net realizable value. The Company evaluates the net realizable value of broadcast rights on a daypart, series, or title-by-title basis, as appropriate. Changes in management’s intended usage of a specific daypart, series, or program would result in a reassessment of the net realizable value, which could result in an impairment. The Company determines the net realizable value and estimated fair value, as appropriate, based on a projection of the estimated advertising revenues and carriage/retransmission revenues, less certain direct costs of delivery, expected to be generated by the program material, all of which are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. If the Company’s estimates of future revenues decline, amortization expense could be accelerated or impairment adjustments may be required. The Company assesses future seasons of syndicated programs that the Company is committed to acquire for impairment as they become available to the Company for airing. Any impairments of programming rights are expensed to programming in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a result of the evaluation of the recoverability of the unamortized costs associated with broadcast rights, the Company recognized impairment charges at WGN America of $80 million for the syndicated programs Elementary and Person of Interest in 2017, $37 million for the syndicated program Elementary in 2016 and $74 million for the syndicated programs Person of Interest and Elementary in 2015.

Production Costs—In accordance with ASC Topic 926, “Entertainment-Films,” the Company estimates total revenues to be earned and costs to be incurred throughout the life of each television program it produces. Estimates for remaining total lifetime revenues are limited to the amount of revenue contracted for each episode in the initial market (which is the US television market). Accordingly, television programming costs and participation costs incurred in excess of the amount of revenue contracted in the initial market are expensed as incurred. Estimates for all secondary market revenues such as domestic and foreign syndication, digital streaming, home entertainment and merchandising are included in the estimated lifetime revenues of such television programming once it can be demonstrated that a program can be successfully licensed in such secondary market. Television programming costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of the secondary market are initially capitalized and amortized based on the proportion that current period revenues bear to the estimated remaining total lifetime revenues. Production costs are expensed to programming in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Advertising Costs—The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising expense was $34 million, $42 million and $39 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Advertising costs are expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Properties—The estimated useful lives of the Company’s property, plant and equipment in service currently ranges as follows: 3 to 44 years for buildings and 1 to 30 years for all other equipment.

Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets—Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are summarized in Note 7. The Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired, in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.” Under ASC Topic 350, the impairment review of goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization must be based on estimated fair values.

The Company’s annual impairment review measurement date is in the fourth quarter of each year. In performing the annual assessment, the Company has the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that a reporting unit has been impaired. As part of the qualitative assessment for the reporting units, the Company evaluates the impact of factors that are specific to the reporting units as well as industry and macroeconomic factors. The reporting unit specific factors include a comparison of the current year results to prior year, current year budget and the budget for next fiscal year. The Company also considers the significance of the excess fair value over the carrying value reflected in prior quantitative assessments, the changes to the reporting units’ carrying values since the last impairment test and the change in the overall enterprise value of the Company compared to the prior year.

If the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit is impaired or if the Company elects not to perform the optional qualitative assessment, a quantitative assessment is performed. For the quantitative assessment, the estimated fair values of the reporting units to which goodwill has been allocated are determined using many critical factors, including projected future operating cash flows, revenue and market growth, market multiples, discount rates and consideration of market valuations of comparable companies. The estimated fair values of other intangible assets subject to the annual impairment review, which include FCC licenses and a trade name, are generally calculated based on projected future discounted cash flow analyses. The development of estimated fair values requires the use of assumptions, including assumptions regarding revenue and market growth as well as specific economic factors in the broadcasting industry. These assumptions reflect the Company’s best estimates, but these items involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions generally outside of the Company’s control.

Adverse changes in expected operating results and/or unfavorable changes in other economic factors used to estimate fair values could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future under ASC Topic 350.

Impairment Review of Long-Lived Assets—In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” the Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group may be impaired. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is considered impaired when the projected future undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the asset or asset group over its remaining depreciable life are less than its current carrying value. The Company measures impairment based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset or asset group. The fair value is determined primarily by using the projected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved as well as market valuations. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that the fair values are reduced for an estimate of the cost to dispose or abandon.

Adverse changes in expected operating results and/or unfavorable changes in other economic factors used to estimate future undiscounted cash flows could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future under ASC Topic 360.

Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits—Retirement benefits are provided to employees through pension plans sponsored either by the Company or by unions. Under the Company-sponsored plans, pension benefits are primarily a function of both the years of service and the level of compensation for a specified number of years, depending on the plan. It is the Company’s policy to fund the minimum for Company-sponsored pension plans as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). Contributions made to union-sponsored plans are based upon collective bargaining agreements. The Company also provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. The expected cost of providing these benefits is accrued over the years that the employees render services. It is the Company’s policy to fund postretirement benefits as claims are incurred.

The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which changes occur through comprehensive income (loss). Additional information pertaining to the Company’s pension plans and other postretirement benefits is provided in Note 14.

Self-Insurance—The Company self-insures for certain employee medical and disability income benefits, workers’ compensation costs and automobile and general liability claims. The recorded liabilities for self-insured risks are calculated using actuarial methods. The Company carries insurance coverage to limit exposure for self-insured workers’ compensation costs and automobile and general liability claims. The Company’s deductibles under these coverages are generally $1 million per occurrence, depending on the applicable policy period. The recorded liabilities for self-insured risks totaled $24 million at December 31, 2017 and $26 million at December 31, 2016.

Deferred Revenue—Deferred revenue arises in the normal course of business from advances from customers for the Company’s products and services and from the long-term spectrum sharing arrangements where the Company is the host. Revenue associated with deferred revenue is recognized in the period it is earned. See above for further information on the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Stock-Based Compensation—In accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation,” the Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date for equity-classified awards and at the end of each reporting period for liability-classified awards based on the estimated fair value of the awards. ASC Topic 718 requires stock-based compensation expense to be recognized over the period from the date of grant to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional service (the “substantive vesting period”). Additional information pertaining to the Company’s stock-based compensation is provided in Note 16.

Income Taxes—Provisions for federal and state income taxes are calculated on reported pretax earnings based on current tax laws and also include, in the current period, the cumulative effect of any changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred tax assets and liabilities. Taxable income reported to the taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates often differs from pretax earnings because some items of income and expense are recognized in different time periods for income tax purposes. The Company provides deferred taxes on these temporary differences in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Taxable income also may differ from pretax earnings due to statutory provisions under which specific revenues are exempt from taxation and specific expenses are not allowable as deductions. The consolidated tax provision and related accruals include estimates of the potential taxes and related interest as deemed appropriate. These estimates are reevaluated and adjusted, if appropriate, on a quarterly basis. Although management believes its estimates and judgments are reasonable, the resolutions of the Company’s tax issues are unpredictable and could result in tax liabilities that are significantly higher or lower than that which has been provided by the Company.

ASC Topic 740 addresses the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Under ASC Topic 740, a company may recognize the tax benefit of an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. ASC Topic 740 requires the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements to be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure. See Note 13 for further discussion.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)—Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting shareholder’s equity that, under U.S. GAAP, are excluded from net income. The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in unrecognized benefit plan gains and losses, unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale, unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging instruments and foreign currency translation adjustments. The activity for each component of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) is summarized in Note 18.

New Accounting Standards—In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).” The standard allows entities, at their option, to reclassify from AOCI to retained earnings stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See Note 13 for further details regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2018-02 should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the new federal corporate income tax rate is recognized. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2018-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” The standard simplifies the application of the hedge accounting guidance and enables entities to better portray the economic results of their risk management activities in the financial statements. The new guidance eliminates the requirement and the ability to separately record ineffectiveness on cash flow and net investment hedges and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The standard requires certain additional disclosures that focus on the effect of hedge accounting whereas the disclosure of hedge ineffectiveness is eliminated. The amendments expand the types of permissible hedging strategies. Additionally, the amendment makes the hedge documentation and effectiveness assessment less complex. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 related to cash flow hedge relationships that exist on the date of adoption should be applied using a modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2017-12 at the date of initial application. The presentation and disclosure requirements apply prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2017-12 on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715).” The standard changes how employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other postretirement benefit plans present the net periodic benefit cost in the statement of operations. Under the new guidance, employers are required to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same statement of operations caption as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. Employers are required to present the other components of the net periodic benefit cost separately from the caption that includes the service costs and outside of any subtotal of operating profit and are required to disclose the caption used to present the other components of net periodic benefit cost, if not presented separately on the statement of operations. Additionally, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-07 must be applied retrospectively. Upon adoption, the Company is required to provide the relevant disclosures under Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The Company will retrospectively adopt ASU 2017-07 effective in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s historically reported net income (loss) but will result in a presentation reclassification which will reduce the Company’s historically reported operating profit by $23 million in 2017, $25 million in 2016 and $29 million in 2015.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20).” The standard clarifies that ASC 610-20 provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. As a result of the new guidance, the guidance specific to real estate sales in ASC 360-20 will be eliminated. Instead, sales and partial sales of real estate will be subject to the same recognition model as all other nonfinancial assets. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and the interim periods within those fiscal periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-05 may be applied either retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2017-05 at the date of initial application. The Company will adopt ASU 2017-05 effective in the first quarter of 2018 using a modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230).” The standard addresses the diversity in classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The standard requires restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. In addition, transfers between cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents are not reported as cash flow activities. The standard also requires additional disclosures related to a reconciliation of the balance sheet line items related to cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to the statement of cash flows, which can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or separately in the notes to the financial statements. The amendments in this ASU should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will retrospectively adopt ASU 2016-18 effective in the first quarter of 2018. The Company’s restricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $18 million at both December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230).” The standard addresses several specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash activities are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The cash flow issues addressed include debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement of debt instruments with coupon rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, distributions received from equity method investees and cash receipts and payments that may have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted but all of the guidance must be adopted in the same period. The Company will retrospectively adopt ASU 2016-15 effective in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326).” The standard requires entities to estimate loss of financial assets measured at amortized cost, including trade receivables, debt securities and loans, using an expected credit loss model. The expected credit loss differs from the previous incurred losses model primarily in that the loss recognition threshold of “probable” has been eliminated and that expected loss should consider reasonable and supportable forecasts in addition to the previously considered past events and current conditions. Additionally, the guidance requires additional disclosures related to the further disaggregation of information related to the credit quality of financial assets by year of the asset’s origination for as many as five years. Entities must apply the standard provision as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Subtopic 842).” The new guidance requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from leases as well as extensive quantitative and qualitative disclosures. A lessee will need to recognize on its balance sheet a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for the majority of its leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The lease liabilities will be equal to the present value of lease payments. The right-of-use asset will be measured at the lease liability amount, adjusted for lease prepayment, lease incentives received and the lessee’s initial direct costs. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-02 is required to be applied using the modified retrospective approach for all leases existing as of the effective date and provides for certain practical expedients. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842) - Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842,” which provides an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under the current leases guidance in Topic 840. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2018-01 are the same as ASU 2016-02. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02 and ASU 2018-01 on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” The new guidance requires entities to measure equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income and requires entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. Further, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified today as available for sale in other comprehensive income and they will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. However, certain entities will be able to elect to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment, and plus or minus subsequent adjustments for observable price changes. Entities that elect this measurement alternative will report changes in the carrying value of these investments in current earnings. The guidance has additional amendments to presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-01 effective in the first quarter of 2018 using a modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company’s equity investments as of December 31, 2017 do not have readily determinable fair values because they are not publicly traded companies and do not have an active market for their securities or membership interests. However, should fair values of certain equity investments become readily available in future reporting periods, the Company’s consolidated financial statements may be materially affected.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The amendments in ASU 2014-09 create Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within that reporting period. However, in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Deferral of the Effective Date,” which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, while allowing early adoption as of the original public entity date. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which amends the revenue recognition guidance on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations as well as clarifies when a promised good or service is separately identifiable. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” which provides clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas such as an assessment of collectibility, presentation of sales taxes, noncash consideration, and completed contracts and contract modifications at transition as well as adds some practical expedients. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” to clarify or to correct unintended applications of Topic 606, including disclosure requirements related to performance obligations. The amendments in ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 may be applied either retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 at the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company will adopt the new revenue guidance effective in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed at that date. The only identified impact to the Company’s financial statements relates to barter revenue and expense as well as barter related broadcast rights and contracts payable for broadcast rights which will no longer be recognized. Barter revenue and expense for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $28 million, $30 million and $29 million, respectively. Barter-related broadcast rights and contracts payable for broadcast rights on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets were $45 million and $37 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The broadcast rights and contracts payable for broadcast rights will be written off at adoption. The standard also requires capitalization of certain costs; however, as part of the implementation process, the Company did not identify any costs that should be capitalized under the new guidance. The following is a summary of the evaluation by revenue stream within the Television and Entertainment segment.

Advertising Revenues—Under the new guidance, advertising revenue will be recognized over time primarily as ads are aired or impressions are delivered, which is consistent with current practice. Advertising revenue will continue to be recognized net of agency commissions.

Retransmission Revenues and Carriage Fees—Revenue under the Company’s retransmission and carriage agreements are considered licenses of functional intellectual property under the new guidance. Based on the guidance, the Company will recognize revenue at the point in time the content is transferred to the customer, which will result in revenue recognition that is consistent with current practice.

The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting.