XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
 
All financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) have been classified within the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the consolidated condensed balance sheet date. These financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below: 
 
As of August 31, 2016
 (In thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
99,209

 
$

 
$

 
$
99,209

Marketable securities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Canadian treasury securities

 
64,558

 

 
64,558

Total assets at fair value
$
99,209

 
$
64,558

 
$

 
$
163,767

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term accrued liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Interest rate lock agreement
$

 
$
38,827

 
$

 
$
38,827

Total liabilities at fair value
$

 
$
38,827

 
$

 
$
38,827

 
As of May 31, 2016
 (In thousands)
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
139,357

 
$

 
$

 
$
139,357

Marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canadian treasury securities

 
70,405

 

 
70,405

Total assets at fair value
$
139,357

 
$
70,405

 
$

 
$
209,762

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term accrued liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Interest rate lock agreement
$

 
$
19,628

 
$

 
$
19,628

Total liabilities at fair value
$

 
$
19,628

 
$

 
$
19,628


 
Cintas’ cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial instruments classified as Level 1 are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and financial instruments classified as Level 2 are based on quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of financial instruments Cintas classifies within Level 1 include most bank deposits and money market securities. Cintas does not adjust the quoted market price for such financial instruments.

The types of financial instruments Cintas classifies within Level 2 are primarily high grade domestic commercial paper and Canadian treasury securities (federal). The valuation technique used for Cintas’ marketable securities classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy is primarily the market approach. The primary inputs to value Cintas’ marketable securities are the respective instrument's future cash flows based on its stated yield and the amount a market participant would pay for a similar instrument. Primarily all of Cintas’ marketable securities are actively traded and the recorded fair value reflects current market conditions. However, due to the inherent volatility in the investment market, there is at least a possibility that recorded investment values may change in the near term.

The funds invested in Canadian treasury securities are not presently expected to be repatriated, but instead are expected to be invested indefinitely in foreign subsidiaries. Interest, realized gains and losses and declines in value determined to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income or expense. The cost of the securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The amortized cost basis of marketable securities as of August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016 was $64.6 million and $70.4 million, respectively. All outstanding marketable securities as of August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016 had contractual maturities due within one year.

At both August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016, long-term accrued liabilities include interest rate lock agreements. The fair value of Cintas' interest rate lock agreements are based on similar exchange traded derivatives (market approach) and are, therefore, included within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. All other amounts included in long-term liabilities are not recorded at fair value.

The methods described above may produce a fair value that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while Cintas believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the consolidated condensed balance sheet date.
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company records assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as required under GAAP. The Company's acquisition of ZEE Medical Inc. (ZEE) on August 1, 2015 was recorded at fair value. See Note 9 entitled Acquisitions for additional information on the measurement of the ZEE assets acquired and liabilities assumed.