XML 54 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND RESTRICTIONS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND RESTRICTIONS [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND RESTRICTIONS
NOTE J:  COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND RESTRICTIONS

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments consist primarily of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee.  These commitments consist principally of unused commercial and consumer credit lines.  Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of an underlying contract with a third party.  The credit risks associated with commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to customers and are subject to the Company’s normal credit policies.  Collateral may be obtained based on management’s assessment of the customer’s creditworthiness.  The fair value of the standby letters of credit is immaterial for disclosure.

The contract amount of commitments and contingencies are as follows:

(000's omitted)
June 30,
 2014
December 31,
2013
Commitments to extend credit
$706,390
$704,904
Standby letters of credit
24,253
24,449
Total
$730,643
$729,353
 
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. As of June 30, 2014, management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising out of litigation pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position. On at least a quarterly basis the Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with such legal proceedings. For those matters where it is probable that the Company will incur losses and the amounts of the losses can be reasonably estimated, the Company records an expense and corresponding liability in its consolidated financial statements. To the extent the pending or threatened litigation could result in exposure in excess of that liability, the amount of such excess is not currently estimable. The range of reasonably possible losses for matters where an exposure is not currently estimatable or considered probable , beyond the existing recorded liability, is between $0 and $5 million in the aggregate. Although the Company does not believe that the outcome of pending litigation will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, it cannot rule out the possibility that such outcomes will be material to the consolidated results of operations for a particular reporting period in the future.

The Bank was named a defendant in an action commenced October 30, 2013 which is pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.  The complaint, as amended, alleges that the notices provided by the Bank in connection with the repossession of plaintiff’s automobile failed to comply with certain requirements of the Pennsylvania and New York Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).  Plaintiff seeks to pursue the action as a class action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated plaintiffs who had their automobiles repossessed and seeks to recover statutory damages under the UCC. The Bank was named in a separate action filed on May 29, 2014 containing similar allegations in which the plaintiff also seeks to pursue the action as a class action. The related complaint is also pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The Bank contests the allegations in the actions that the repossession notices were deficient and intends to assert various legal defenses and oppose class certification in both cases.  In response, the Bank has also asserted counterclaims for breach of contract and set-off against plaintiffs, individually and as representatives of the putative class, in both actions and has filed a motion to dismiss the initial action. Plaintiffs have further filed various motions which are pending before the Court. As set forth in the preceding paragraph, all current litigation matters, including this action, are within a range of reasonably possible losses for such matters in the aggregate, beyond the existing recorded liability, and are included in the range of reasonably possible losses set forth above.