XML 82 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Note 10.  Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
 
Objective and Strategies for Using Derivative Instruments   In order to mitigate the effect of commodity price uncertainty and enhance the predictability of cash flows relating to the marketing of our crude oil and natural gas, we enter into crude oil and natural gas price hedging arrangements with respect to a portion of our expected production. The derivative instruments we use include variable to fixed price commodity swaps, two-way and three-way collars and basis swaps.
 
The fixed price swap, two-way collar, and basis swap contracts entitle us (floating price payor) to receive settlement from the counterparty (fixed price payor) for each calculation period in amounts, if any, by which the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable for each calculation period is less than the fixed strike price or floor price. We would pay the counterparty if the settlement price for the scheduled trading days applicable for each calculation period is more than the fixed strike price or ceiling price. The amount payable by us, if the floating price is above the fixed or ceiling price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess of the floating price over the fixed or ceiling price in respect of each calculation period. The amount payable by the counterparty, if the floating price is below the fixed or floor price, is the product of the notional quantity per calculation period and the excess of the fixed or floor price over the floating price in respect of each calculation period.
 
A three-way collar consists of a two-way collar contract combined with a put option contract sold by us with a strike price below the floor price of the two-way collar.  We receive price protection at the purchased put option floor price of the two-way collar if commodity prices are above the sold put option strike price. If commodity prices fall below the sold put option strike price, we receive the cash market price plus the delta between the two put option strike prices. This type of instrument allows us to capture more value in a rising commodity price environment, but limits our benefits in a downward commodity price environment.
 
We have also entered into forward contracts to hedge anticipated exposure to interest rate risk associated with public debt financing.
 
 
While these instruments mitigate the cash flow risk of future reductions in commodity prices or increases in interest rates, they may also curtail benefits from future increases in commodity prices or decreases in interest rates.
 
See Note 16. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures for a discussion of methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of our derivative instruments.
 
Counterparty Credit Risk   Derivative instruments expose us to counterparty credit risk. Our commodity derivative instruments are currently with a diversified group of highly rated major banks or market participants, and we monitor and manage our level of financial exposure. Our commodity derivative contracts are executed under master agreements which allow us, in the event of default, to elect early termination of all contracts with the defaulting counterparty. If we choose to elect early termination, all asset and liability positions with the defaulting counterparty would be net settled at the time of election.
 
We monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties. However, we are not able to predict sudden changes in counterparties' creditworthiness. In addition, even if such changes are not sudden, we may be limited in our ability to mitigate an increase in counterparty credit risk. Possible actions would be to transfer our position to another counterparty or request a voluntary termination of the derivative contracts resulting in a cash settlement. Should one of these financial counterparties not perform, we may not realize the benefit of some of our derivative instruments under lower commodity prices or higher interest rates, and could incur a loss. 
 
Interest Rate Derivative Instrument   In January 2010, we entered into an interest rate forward starting swap to effectively fix the cash flows related to interest payments on our anticipated March 2011 debt issuance. On February 15, 2011 we settled the interest rate swap, which had a net liability position of $40 million. Approximately $26 million, net of tax, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) and is being reclassified to interest expense over the term of the notes. The ineffective portion of the interest rate swap was de minimis.   See Note 12. Long-Term Debt.
 
Unsettled Derivative Instruments   As of December 31, 2011, we have entered into the following crude oil derivative instruments:

          
Swaps
  
Collars
 
Period
Type of Contract
Index
 
Bbls Per
 Day
  
Weighted
Average
 Fixed
 Price
  
Weighted
 Average
 Short Put
Price
  
Weighted
Average
Floor
Price
  
Weighted
 Average
Ceiling
Price
 
2012
Swaps
 NYMEX WTI
  5,000  $91.84  $-  $-  $- 
2012
Swaps
Dated Brent
  8,000   89.06   -   -   - 
2012
Three-Way Collars
 NYMEX WTI
  23,000   -   61.09   83.04   101.66 
2012
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  3,000   -   70.00   95.83   105.00 
2013
Swaps
 Dated Brent
  3,000   98.03   -   -   - 
2013
Three-Way Collars
 NYMEX WTI
  5,000   -   65.00   85.00   113.63 
2013
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  23,000   -   82.61   100.32   127.62 
2014
Three-Way Collars
 Dated Brent
  5,000   -   80.00   92.00   130.50 
Instruments entered into during January 1-31, 2012
                 
2013
Three-Way Collars
Dated Brent
  5,000   -   90.00   105.00   127.97 
 
As of December 31, 2011, we have entered into the following natural gas derivative instruments:
 
          
Swaps
  
Collars
 
Period
Type of Contract
Index
 
MMBtu Per
 Day
  
Weighted
Average
 Fixed
Price
  
Weighted
Average
 Short Put
 Price
  
Weighted
Average
 Floor
 Price
  
Weighted
Average
Ceiling
 Price
 
2012
Swaps
NYMEX HH
  30,000  $5.10  $-  $-  $- 
2012
Two-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  40,000   -   -   3.25   5.14 
2012
Three-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  110,000   -   4.44   5.25   6.66 
2013
Swaps
NYMEX HH
  30,000   5.25   -   -   - 
2013
Two-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  40,000   -   -   3.25   5.14 
2013
Three-Way Collars
NYMEX HH
  100,000   -   3.88   4.75   5.63 

As of December 31, 2011, we have entered into the following natural gas basis swaps:
 
Period
Index
Index Less Differential
MMBtu Per Day
 
Weighted Average
 Differential
        
2012
IFERC CIG (1)
 NYMEX HH
150,000
  $
(0.52)
 
 
(1) 
Colorado Interstate Gas – Northern System

Fair Value Amounts and Gains and Losses on Derivative Instruments   The fair values of derivative instruments in our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
   
Asset Derivative Instruments
 
Liability Derivative Instruments
 
   
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
   
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
   
Balance
 Sheet
 Location
 
Fair
 Value
 
Balance
Sheet
Location
 
Fair
 Value
 
Balance
Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
Balance
 Sheet
Location
 
Fair
Value
 
(millions)
                     
Commodity Derivative Instruments (Not Designated as Hedging Instruments)
 
Current Assets
 $10 
Current Assets
 $62 
Current Liabilities
 $76 
Current Liabilities
 $24 
   
Noncurrent Assets
  37 
Noncurrent Assets
  - 
Noncurrent Liabilities
  7 
Noncurrent Liabilities
  51 
Interest Rate Derivative Instrument (Designated as Hedging Instrument)
 
Current Assets
  - 
Current Assets
  - 
Current Liabilities
  - 
Current Liabilities
  63 
   
Total
 $47 
Total
 $62 
Total
 $83 
Total
 $138 
 
The effect of derivative instruments on our consolidated statements of operations was as follows:
 
Commodity Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss on Derivative Instruments Recognized in Income
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2011
  
2010
  
2009
 
(millions)
         
Realized Mark-to-Market (Gain)
 $(64) $(87) $(496)
Unrealized Mark-to-Market (Gain) Loss
  22   (70)  606 
Total (Gain) Loss on Commodity Derivative Instruments
 $(42) $(157) $110 
 
Derivative Instruments in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss on
 Derivative Instruments
 Recognized in Other
Comprehensive (Income) Loss
  
Amount of (Gain) Loss on
 Derivative Instruments
 Reclassified from Accumulated
 Other Comprehensive Loss
 
   
2011
  
2010
  
2009
  
2011
  
2010
  
2009
 
(millions)
                        
Commodity Derivative Instruments in Previously
                        
Designated Cash Flow Hedging Relationships (1)
                        
Crude Oil
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $19  $58 
Natural Gas
  -   -   -   -   1   - 
Interest Rate Derivative Instruments in
                        
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
  (23)  63   -   1   1   1 
Total
 $(23) $63  $-  $1  $21  $59 
 
(1)
Includes effect of commodity derivative instruments previously accounted for as cash flow hedges. All net derivative gains and losses that were deferred in AOCL as a result of previous cash flow hedge accounting, had been reclassified to earnings by December 31, 2010.
 
 
AOCL – Interest Rate Derivative Instruments   At December 31, 2011, AOCL included deferred losses of $26 million, net of tax, related to interest rate derivative instruments. This amount will be reclassified to earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the terms of our senior notes due April 2014 and March 2041.  Approximately $2 million of deferred losses (net of tax) will be reclassified to earnings during the next 12 months and will be recorded as an increase in interest expense.