(14) Recent Accounting Pronouncements	12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Notes
(14) Recent Accounting Pronouncements	(14) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This Update clarifies the accounting for equity awards in which the performance target (ie IPO) could be achieved after the requisite service period. The guidance require a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the service period be treated as a performance condition and not be reflected in the fair value of the award. Therefore, the compensation costs will begin to be recognized when it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. If the requisite service period is complete, the entire amount of compensation costs should be recognized at that time. This Update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company currently does not have any stock-based awards meeting the criteria noted so the Company doesn’t expect this Update to have a significant impact on its financials However, it will evaluate new grants and ensure the guidance is followed if these types of grants are made. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. This Update eliminates different accounting treatments for repurchase agreements so the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity and linked repurchase financings to secured borrowings is consistent with other repurchase agreements. The amendment also requires an entity to disclose information on transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements and increased transparency about the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements and similar transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. This Update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Since the Company does not have the repurchase agreements identified in the Update, the Company doesn’t expect this Update to have a significant impact on its financials. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (Topic 606). This Update provides new revenue recognition guidance that will be applicable for all industries and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP and IFRS. The main purpose of the new guidance is to remove inconsistencies, provide a more robust framework, improve comparability among industries, improve disclosure requirements and reduce the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The guidance outlines the following five steps that should be followed in recognizing revenue: 1. Identify contract with customer 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract 5. Recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied. The update also provides disclosure requirements requiring entities to provide sufficient information to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This Update is effective for public entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for all other entities, it is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Due to the extensive nature of this Update, the Company is evaluating the impact this new guidance will have on its financials. In March 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-07, Applying Variable Interest Entities Guidance to Common Control Leasing Arrangements. Under the amendments in this update, a private company could elect, when certain conditions exist, not to apply VIE guidance to a lessor entity under common control. This update is not applicable to public business entities; therefore, the update is not applicable to our Company. In March 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-06, Technical Corrections and Improvements Related to Glossary Terms. The amendments in this update represent changes to clarify the Master Glossary of the Codification, consolidate multiple instances of the same term into a single definition, or make minor improvements to the Master Glossary that are not expected to result in substantive changes to the application of existing guidance or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Additionally, the amendments will make the Master Glossary easier to understand, as well as reduce the number of terms appearing in the Master Glossary. The amendments in this update are effective immediately. The Company reviewed and noted the changes made in this update, which can be categorized into four sections: 1) Deletion of Master Glossary Terms, 2) Addition of Master Glossary Term Links, 3) Duplicate Master Glossary Terms, and 4) Other Technical Corrections Related to Glossary Terms. The Company implemented the update upon issuance, but the changes did not have a significant impact on our financial statements. In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-05, Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853) a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. Current U.S. GAAP does not contain specific guidance for the accounting for service concession arrangements. Depending on the terms of a service concession arrangement, an operating entity may or may not conclude that a service concession arrangement meets the lease criteria in Topic 840. Consequently, the amendments in this update improve financial reporting by clarifying that a service concession arrangement within the scope of this update should not be accounted for as a lease in accordance with Topic 840 and, thereby, alleviates the confusion that arises for preparers when determining whether a service concession arrangement is a lease. A service concession arrangement is an arrangement between a public-sector entity grantor and an operating entity under which the operating entity operates the grantor’s infrastructure (for example, airports, roads, and bridges). The operating entity also may provide the construction, upgrading, or maintenance services of the grantor’s infrastructure. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not receive any service concession arrangements from any public-sector entity; therefore, the Company does not believe this update will have a significant impact on our financial statements. In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This update indicates that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset except in circumstances where a net operating loss carryforward or tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction. This update is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2013 for public companies. The adoption of this pronouncement had no significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.

(14) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This Update clarifies the accounting for equity awards in which the performance target (ie IPO) could be achieved after the requisite service period. The guidance require a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the service period be treated as a performance condition and not be reflected in the fair value of the award. Therefore, the compensation costs will begin to be recognized when it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. If the requisite service period is complete, the entire amount of compensation costs should be recognized at that time. This Update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company currently does not have any stock-based awards meeting the criteria noted so the Company doesn’t expect this Update to have a significant impact on its financials However, it will evaluate new grants and ensure the guidance is followed if these types of grants are made.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. This Update eliminates different accounting treatments for repurchase agreements so the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity and linked repurchase financings to secured borrowings is consistent with other repurchase agreements. The amendment also requires an entity to disclose information on transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements and increased transparency about the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements and similar transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. This Update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Since the Company does not have the repurchase agreements identified in the Update, the Company doesn’t expect this Update to have a significant impact on its financials.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customer (Topic 606). This Update provides new revenue recognition guidance that will be applicable for all industries and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP and IFRS. The main purpose of the new guidance is to remove inconsistencies, provide a more robust framework, improve comparability among industries, improve disclosure requirements and reduce the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. The guidance outlines the following five steps that should be followed in recognizing revenue:

1. Identify contract with customer

2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract

3. Determine the transaction price

4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

5. Recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied.

The update also provides disclosure requirements requiring entities to provide sufficient information to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This Update is effective for public entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and for all other entities, it is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Due to the extensive nature of this Update, the Company is evaluating the impact this new guidance will have on its financials.

In March 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-07, Applying Variable Interest Entities Guidance to Common Control Leasing Arrangements. Under the amendments in this update, a private company could elect, when certain conditions exist, not to apply VIE guidance to a lessor entity under common control. This update is not applicable to public business entities; therefore, the update is not applicable to our Company.

In March 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-06, Technical Corrections and Improvements Related to Glossary Terms. The amendments in this update represent changes to clarify the Master Glossary of the Codification, consolidate multiple instances of the same term into a single definition, or make minor improvements to the Master Glossary that are not expected to result in substantive changes to the application of existing guidance or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Additionally, the amendments will make the Master Glossary easier to understand, as well as reduce the number of terms appearing in the Master Glossary. The amendments in this update are effective immediately. The Company reviewed and noted the changes made in this update, which can be categorized into four sections: 1) Deletion of Master Glossary Terms, 2) Addition of Master Glossary Term Links, 3) Duplicate Master Glossary Terms, and 4) Other Technical Corrections Related to Glossary Terms. The Company implemented the update upon issuance, but the changes did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-05, Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853) a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. Current U.S. GAAP does not contain specific guidance for the accounting for service concession arrangements. Depending on the terms of a service concession arrangement, an operating entity may or may not conclude that a service concession arrangement meets the lease criteria in Topic 840. Consequently, the amendments in this update improve financial reporting by clarifying that a service concession arrangement within the scope of this update should not be accounted for as a lease in accordance with Topic 840 and, thereby, alleviates the confusion that arises for preparers when determining whether a service concession arrangement is a lease. A service concession arrangement is an arrangement between a public-sector entity grantor and an operating entity under which the operating entity operates the grantor’s infrastructure (for example, airports, roads, and bridges). The operating entity also may provide the construction, upgrading, or maintenance services of the grantor’s infrastructure. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not receive any service concession arrangements from any public-sector entity; therefore, the Company does not believe this update will have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. This update indicates that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset except in circumstances where a net operating loss carryforward or tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction. This update is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2013 for public companies. The adoption of this pronouncement had no significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.