485APOS 1 main.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-1A

REGISTRATION STATEMENT (No. 002-84130)

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

[X]

Pre-Effective Amendment No.

[ ]

Post-Effective Amendment No. 81

[X]

and

REGISTRATION STATEMENT (No. 811-03759)

UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

[X]

Amendment No. 81

[X]

Variable Insurance Products Fund IV

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

82 Devonshire St., Boston, Massachusetts 02109

(Address Of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number: 617-563-7000

Eric D. Roiter, Secretary

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02109

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

It is proposed that this filing will become effective

( )

immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b).

(X)

on April 11, 2006 pursuant to paragraph (b) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

( )

60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

( )

on ( ) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 485 at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

( )

75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

( )

on ( ) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485 at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

If appropriate, check the following box:

( )

this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED January 26, 2006. The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Each fund offers its shares only to separate accounts of insurance companies that offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products. A fund may not be available in your state due to various insurance regulations. Please check with your insurance company for availability. If a fund in this prospectus is not available in your state, this prospectus is not to be considered a solicitation with respect to that fund. Please read this prospectus together with your variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Fidelity®

Variable Insurance Products

Investor Class

FundsManager 20% Portfolio

FundsManager 50% Portfolio

FundsManager 70% Portfolio

FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Prospectus

April ___, 2006

(fidelity_logo_graphic)

82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

Contents

Fund Summary

<Click Here>

Investment Summary

<Click Here>

Performance

<Click Here>

Fee Table

Fund Basics

<Click Here>

Investment Details

<Click Here>

Valuing Shares

Shareholder Information

<Click Here>

Buying and Selling Shares

<Click Here>

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

<Click Here>

Tax Consequences

Fund Services

<Click Here>

Fund Management

<Click Here>

Fund Distribution

Appendix

22

Underlying Fidelity Funds

Prospectus

Fund Summary

Investment Summary

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManagerSM  20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity retail and Variable Insurance Products (VIP) funds (underlying Fidelity funds).
  • Using a target asset allocation as of __________, 2006, of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of ___________, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of ___________, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

Prospectus

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally Investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of _______, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Performance

Performance history will be available for each fund after each fund has been in operation for one calendar year.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that are incurred, directly or indirectly, when a variable product owner buys, holds, or redeems interests in a separate account that invests in a class of a fund, but does not reflect the effect of any fees or other expenses of any variable annuity or variable life insurance product. The annual class operating expenses provided below for Investor Class are based on estimated expenses.

Investor
Class

Sales charge (load) on purchases and reinvested distributions

Not Applicable

Deferred sales charge (load) on redemptions

Not Applicable

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

Annual operating expenses (paid from class assets)

Investor
Class

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None

Other expenses

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.25%

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None

Other expenses

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.25%

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None

Other expenses

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.25%

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None

Other expenses

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.25%

A VIP FundsManager Portfolio may incur redemption fees (short-term trading fees), if applicable, when it invests in underlying Fidelity funds.

In addition to the total operating expenses shown above, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, as a shareholder in an underlying Fidelity fund, will indirectly bear its pro rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity fund, and each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment return will be net of underlying Fidelity fund expenses.

The combined total expense ratios of each class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio (calculated as a percentage of average net assets) are as follows:

Combined total expense ratio after expense reimbursements and expense reductions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and the underlying Fidelity fundsA

Combined total expense ratio before expense reimbursements and expense reductions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and the underlying Fidelity fundsA

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Investor Class

0.69%

0.80%

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Investor Class

0.80%

0.90%

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Investor Class

0.90%

0.98%

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Investor Class

0.97%

1.03%

A Estimated

This example helps you compare the cost of investing in the VIP FundsManager Portfolios with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that Investor Class's annual return is 5% and that the fees are exactly as described in the fee table, and that Investor Class's combined total expense ratio includes Investor Class's annual operating expenses exactly as described in the fee table and the weighted average of the total operating expenses of each of the underlying Fidelity funds, before expense reimbursements and expense reductions. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. This example does not reflect the effect of any fees or other expenses of any variable annuity or variable life insurance product. For every $10,000 invested, here's how much a variable product owner would pay in total expenses if all interests in the separate account that invests in a class of the fund were redeemed at the end of each time period indicated:

Prospectus

Investor
Class

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

1 year

$ 82

3 years

$ 255

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

1 year

$ 92

3 years

$ 287

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

1 year

$ 100

3 years

$ 312

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

1 year

$ 105

3 years

$ 328

Prospectus

Fund Basics

Investment Details

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

20%

International Equity Funds

0%

Underlying Fixed-Income Funds

50%

Underlying Money Market Funds

30%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 20% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

45%

International Equity Funds

5%

Underlying Fixed Income Funds

40%

Underlying Money Market Funds

10%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 50% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

60%

International Equity Funds

10%

Underlying Fixed Income Funds

25%

Underlying Money Market Funds

5%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 70% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

70%

International Equity Funds

15%

Underlying Fixed-Income Funds

15%

Underlying Money Market Funds

0%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 85% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Principal Investment Risks

Many factors affect each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's share price changes daily based on the performance of the underlying Fidelity funds in which it invests. The ability of each fund to meet its investment objective is directly related to its target asset allocation among underlying Fidelity funds and the ability of those funds to meet their investment objectives. When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means that the shareholder could lose money.

Prospectus

There is additional risk for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio with respect to aggregation of holdings of underlying Fidelity fund holdings, which may result in a VIP FundsManager Portfolio indirectly concentrating assets in a particular industry or group of industries, or in a single issuer. Such indirect concentration may have the effect of increasing the volatility of the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's returns. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios do not control the investments of the underlying Fidelity funds and any indirect concentration is a result of the underlying Fidelity funds pursuing their own investment objectives.

The following factors can significantly affect a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance:

Stock Market Volatility. The value of equity securities fluctuates in response to issuer, political, market, and economic developments. In the short term, equity prices can fluctuate dramatically in response to these developments. Different parts of the market and different types of equity securities can react differently to these developments. For example, large cap stocks can react differently from small cap stocks, and "growth" stocks can react differently from "value" stocks. Issuer, political, or economic developments can affect a single issuer, issuers within an industry or economic sector or geographic region, or the market as a whole.

Interest Rate Changes. Debt and money market securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a debt or money market security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities, mortgage securities, and the securities of issuers in the financial services sector can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. In other words, the longer the maturity of a security, the greater the impact a change in interest rates could have on the security's price. In addition, short-term and long-term interest rates do not necessarily move in the same amount or the same direction. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates, and long-term securities tend to react to changes in long-term interest rates.

Foreign Exposure. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations, and securities for which an entity located in a foreign country provides credit support or a maturity-shortening structure can involve additional risks relating to political, economic, or regulatory conditions in foreign countries. These risks include fluctuations in foreign currencies; withholding or other taxes; trading, settlement, custodial, and other operational risks; and the less stringent investor protection and disclosure standards of some foreign markets. All of these factors can make foreign investments, especially those in emerging markets, more volatile and potentially less liquid than U.S. investments. In addition, foreign markets can perform differently from the U.S. market.

Investing in emerging markets can involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. The extent of economic development; political stability; market depth, infrastructure, and capitalization; and regulatory oversight can be less than in more developed markets. Emerging market economies can be subject to greater social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties. All of these factors can make emerging market securities more volatile and potentially less liquid than securities issued in more developed markets.

Prepayment. Many types of debt securities, including mortgage securities, are subject to prepayment risk. Prepayment risk occurs when the issuer of a security can repay principal prior to the security's maturity. Securities subject to prepayment can offer less potential for gains during a declining interest rate environment and similar or greater potential for loss in a rising interest rate environment. In addition, the potential impact of prepayment features on the price of a debt security can be difficult to predict and result in greater volatility.

Issuer-Specific Changes. Changes in the financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic or political conditions that affect a particular type of security or issuer, and changes in general economic or political conditions can affect a security's or instrument's credit quality or value. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure also can be affected by these types of changes. If the structure of a security fails to function as intended, the security could decline in value. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can be more volatile than that of larger issuers. Smaller issuers can have more limited product lines, markets, or financial resources. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities tend to be particularly sensitive to these changes.

Lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities often fluctuates in response to company, political, or economic developments and can decline significantly over short periods of time or during periods of general or regional economic difficulty.

"Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. "Growth" stocks tend to be more expensive relative to their earnings or assets compared to other types of stocks. As a result, "growth" stocks tend to be sensitive to changes in their earnings and more volatile than other types of stocks.

"Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. "Value" stocks tend to be inexpensive relative to their earnings or assets compared to other types of stocks. However, "value" stocks can continue to be inexpensive for long periods of time and may not ever realize their full value.

Quantitative Investing. The value of securities selected using quantitative analysis can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole or securities selected using only fundamental analysis. The factors used in quantitative analysis and the weight placed on those factors may not be predictive of a security's value. In addition, factors that affect a security's value can change over time and these changes may not be reflected in the quantitative model.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can be more volatile than that of larger issuers and can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. Smaller issuers can have more limited product lines, markets, and financial resources.

In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, Strategic Advisers may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes. If Strategic Advisers does so, different factors could affect a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance and the fund may not achieve its investment objective.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The policies discussed below are fundamental, that is, subject to change only by shareholder approval.

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Each of VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio, VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio, and VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Valuing Shares

Each fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open.

A class's net asset value per share (NAV) is the value of a single share. Fidelity normally calculates Investor Class's NAV as of the close of business of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. However, NAV may be calculated earlier if trading on the NYSE is restricted or as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Each fund's assets are valued as of this time for the purpose of computing Investor Class's NAV.

To the extent that each fund's assets are traded in other markets on days when the fund is not open for business, the value of the fund's assets may be affected on those days. In addition, trading in some of a fund's assets may not occur on days when the fund is open for business.

The assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consist primarily of shares of the underlying Fidelity funds, which are valued at their respective NAVs. A money market underlying Fidelity fund's assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. Other underlying Fidelity fund assets are valued primarily on the basis of market quotations, official closing prices, or on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service. Certain short-term securities are valued on the basis of amortized cost. If market quotations, official closing prices, or information furnished by a pricing service is not readily available or does not accurately reflect fair value for a security held by an underlying Fidelity fund or if the value of a security held by an underlying Fidelity fund has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, that security will be valued by another method that the Board of Trustees believes accurately reflects fair value in accordance with the Board's fair value pricing policies. For example, arbitrage opportunities may exist when trading in a portfolio security or securities held by an underlying Fidelity fund is halted and does not resume before the fund calculates its NAV. These arbitrage opportunities may enable short-term traders to dilute the NAV of long-term investors. Securities trading in overseas markets present time zone arbitrage opportunities when events affecting portfolio security values occur after the close of the overseas market but prior to the close of the U.S. market. Fair value pricing may be used for high yield debt and floating rate loans held by an underlying fund, when available pricing information is stale or is determined for other reasons not to accurately reflect fair value. A security's valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. Fair valuation of an underlying fund's portfolio securities can serve to reduce arbitrage opportunities available to short-term traders, but there is no assurance that fair value pricing policies will prevent dilution of the fund's NAV by short-term traders. While each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and each underlying fund (other than any underlying money market funds) has policies regarding excessive trading, these too may not be effective to prevent short-term NAV arbitrage trading, particularly in regard to omnibus accounts.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information

Buying and Selling Shares

Insurance companies offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products through separate accounts. Separate accounts - not variable product owners - are the shareholders of the funds. Variable product owners hold interests in separate accounts. The terms of the offering of interests in separate accounts are included in the variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Only separate accounts of insurance companies that have signed the appropriate agreements with the funds can buy or sell shares of the funds.

A fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase orders, including exchanges.

For example, a fund may reject any purchase orders, including exchanges, from market timers or investors that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to that fund.

Frequent purchases and sales of fund shares resulting from purchase, exchange, or withdrawal transactions can harm variable product owners in various ways, including reducing the returns to long-term variable product owners by increasing costs paid by the fund (such as brokerage commissions), disrupting portfolio management strategies, and diluting the value of the shares of long-term variable product owners in cases in which fluctuations in markets are not fully priced into the fund's NAV. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees has adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage frequent large-scale purchases and sales of shares at the separate account level for each fund, but has not adopted policies at the variable product owner level. Purchase and redemption transactions submitted to a fund by insurance company separate accounts reflect the transactions of multiple variable product owners whose individual transactions are not disclosed to the fund. Therefore, a fund generally cannot detect short-term trading by individual variable product owners and relies in large part on the rights, ability, and willingness of insurance companies to detect and deter short-term trading. The funds' policies are separate from, and in addition to, any policies and procedures applicable to variable product owner transactions. The variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus will contain a description of the insurance company's policies and procedures, if any, with respect to short-term trading. However, there is the significant risk that the funds' and insurance company's policies and procedures will prove ineffective in whole or in part to detect or prevent frequent trading. A fund may alter its policies at any time without prior notice to shareholders. The funds' Treasurer is authorized to suspend the funds' policies during periods of severe market turbulence or national emergency.

The funds' transfer agent monitors each separate account's daily purchases and sales orders, which reflect the aggregate and net result of all purchase, redemption, and exchange activity of all variable product owners in that separate account. Redemption transactions that are greater than a certain dollar amount, or greater than a certain percentage of the total of the separate account's holdings of a fund, will trigger a review of the separate account's prior history. If, in the opinion of a funds' transfer agent, the history may be consistent with a pattern of disruptive trading by variable product owners, the funds' transfer agent or distributor will notify the insurance company and inquire about the source of the activity. These policies will be applied uniformly to all insurance companies. However, there is no assurance that the insurance company will investigate the activity or stop any activity that proves to be inappropriate. Each fund reserves the right, but does not have the obligation, to reject purchase orders from, or to stop or limit the offering of shares to, insurance company separate accounts. In addition, each fund reserves the right to impose restrictions on purchases at any time or conditions that are more restrictive on disruptive, excessive, or short-term trading than those that are otherwise stated in this prospectus.

The price to buy one share of Investor Class is the class's NAV. Investor Class's shares are sold without a sales charge.

Shares will be bought at the next NAV calculated after an order is received in proper form.

A fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase orders.

For example, a fund may reject any purchase orders, from market timers or investors that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to that fund.

Each fund may stop offering shares completely or may offer shares only on a limited basis, for a period of time or permanently.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, purchase orders may be suspended, restricted, or canceled and the monies may be withheld.

The price to sell one share of Investor Class is the class's NAV.

If appropriate to protect shareholders, each fund may impose a redemption fee (trading fee) on redemptions from the fund.

Shares will be sold at the next NAV calculated after an order is received in proper form. Normally, redemptions will be processed by the next business day, but it may take up to seven days to pay the redemption proceeds if making immediate payment would adversely affect a fund.

Redemptions may be suspended or payment dates postponed when the NYSE is closed (other than weekends or holidays), when trading on the NYSE is restricted, or as permitted by the SEC.

Under certain circumstances (for example, at the request of a shareholder), redemption proceeds may be paid in securities or other property rather than in cash if FMR determines it is in the best interests of a fund.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, redemption requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

Each fund offers its shares to separate accounts of insurance companies that may be affiliated or unaffiliated with FMR and/or each other. Each fund currently does not foresee any disadvantages to variable product owners arising out of the fact that the fund offers its shares to separate accounts of insurance companies that offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products. Nevertheless, the Board of Trustees that oversees each fund intends to monitor events to identify any material irreconcilable conflicts that may possibly arise and to determine what action, if any, should be taken in response.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Variable product owners may be asked to provide additional information in order for Fidelity to verify their identities in accordance with requirements under anti-money laundering regulations. Accounts may be restricted and/or closed, and the monies withheld, pending verification of this information or as otherwise required under these and other federal regulations.

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio earns dividends, interest, and other income from its investments, and distributes this income (less expenses) to shareholders as dividends. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio also realizes capital gains from its investments, and distributes these gains (less any losses) to shareholders as capital gain distributions.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio normally pays dividends and capital gain distributions at least annually, in February.

Dividends and capital gain distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional Investor Class shares of the fund.

Tax Consequences

Variable product owners seeking to understand the tax consequences of their investment should consult with their tax advisers or the insurance company that issued their variable product, or refer to their variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Insurance company separate accounts generally do not pay tax on dividends or capital gain distributions from a fund.

Prospectus

Fund Services

Fund Management

Each fund is a mutual fund, an investment that pools shareholders' money and invests it toward a specified goal.

Strategic Advisers is each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment manager. The address of Strategic Advisers and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated below, is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), an affiliate of Strategic Advisers, is each underlying Fidelity fund's manager.

As of March 31, 2005, Strategic Advisers had approximately $64.4 billion in discretionary assets under management.

As of March 31, 2005, FMR had approximately $9.1 billion in discretionary assets under management.

As the manager, Strategic Advisers administers the asset allocation program for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

As the manager for the underlying Fidelity funds, FMR is responsible for choosing each fund's investments and handling its business affairs. FMR is also responsible for handling the business affairs for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

Scott Kuldell is manager of VIP FundsManager Portfolios (20%, 50%, 70%, and 85%), which he has managed since their inception. He also manages other Fidelity funds. Since joining Fidelity Investments in 1987, Mr. Kuldell has worked as a quantitative analyst, currency strategist, portfolio manager, director of Asset Management Consulting and senior portfolio strategist.

The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) provides additional information about the compensation of, any other accounts managed by, and any fund shares held by Mr. Kuldell.

From time to time a manager, analyst, or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays a management fee to Strategic. The management fee is calculated and paid to Strategic every month.

Strategic is responsible for the payment of all other expenses of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio with limited exceptions.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's annual management fee rate is 0.25% of its average net assets.

Strategic Advisers pays FMR an administration fee for handling the business affairs for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

FMR may, from time to time, agree to reimburse a class for management fees above a specified limit. FMR retains the ability to be repaid by a class if expenses fall below the specified limit prior to the end of the fiscal year. Reimbursement arrangements, which may be discontinued by FMR at any time, can decrease a class's expenses and boost its performance.

Fund Distribution

Each fund is composed of multiple classes of shares. All classes of a fund have a common investment objective and investment portfolio.

Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) distributes Investor Class's shares.

The insurance companies and their affiliated broker-dealers (intermediaries) may receive from FMR, FDC and/or their affiliates compensation for their services intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund. This compensation may take the form of:

  • distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees
  • payments for additional distribution-related activities and/or shareholder services
  • payments for educational seminars and training, including seminars sponsored by FMR or an affiliate, or by an intermediary

These payments are described in more detail on the following pages and in the SAI.

Investor Class of each fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) that recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenues, as well as its past profits or its resources from any other source, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Investor Class shares and/or support services that benefit variable product owners. FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, such as insurance companies, broker-dealers, and other service-providers, that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees of each fund has authorized such payments for Investor Class. These payments are not charged to a fund and do not directly increase a fund's total expenses.

If payments made by FMR to FDC or to intermediaries under the Investor Class Distribution and Service Plan were considered to be paid out of the Class's assets on an ongoing basis, they might increase the cost of a shareholder's investment and might cost a shareholder more than paying other types of sales charges.

To receive payments made pursuant to a Distribution and Service Plan, intermediaries must sign the appropriate agreement with FDC in advance.

Prospectus

Fund Services - continued

The SAI contains further details about the payments made by FMR, FDC and their affiliates and the services provided by certain intermediaries. Please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

If mutual fund sponsors and their affiliates make distribution and/or non-distribution related payments in varying amounts, certain intermediaries and investment professionals that receive these payments may have an incentive to recommend one mutual fund or one share class over another.

In addition, the funds' transfer agent may also make payments and reimbursements from its own resources to intermediaries for performing recordkeeping and administrative services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts, which the funds' transfer agent or an affiliate would otherwise have to perform directly. These payments are not charged to a fund and do not directly increase a fund's total expenses. Please see "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" in the SAI for more information.

No dealer, sales representative, or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained in this prospectus and in the related SAI, in connection with the offer contained in this prospectus. If given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the funds or FDC. This prospectus and the related SAI do not constitute an offer by the funds or by FDC to sell shares of the funds to or to buy shares of the funds from any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer.

Prospectus

Appendix

Underlying Fidelity Funds

The underlying Fidelity funds in which each VIP FundsManager Portfolio invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries, or in a single issuer. Strategic Advisers may adjust a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's underlying Fidelity fund holdings at any time and may invest each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

Of the potential underlying Fidelity funds in which a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest as of the date of this prospectus, the underlying Fidelity funds that may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries are as follows:

Fund

Industry or Industries in which it concentrates

Fidelity Canada Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Canadian market.

Fidelity Cash Reserves

Financial Services

Fidelity China Region Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Hong Kong, Taiwanese, and Chinese market.

Fidelity International Real Estate Fund

Real Estate

Fidelity Latin America Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Latin American market.

Fidelity Money Market Fund

Financial Services

Fidelity Nordic Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Nordic market.

Fidelity OTC Portfolio

Technology

Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund

Real Estate

Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio

Real Estate

Fidelity Select Air Transportation Portfolio

Air Transportation

Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio

Automotive

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio

Banking

Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio

Biotechnology

Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio

Brokerage and Investment Management

Fidelity Select Business Services and Outsourcing Portfolio

Business Services and Outsourcing

Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio

Chemical

Fidelity Select Computers Portfolio

Computer

Fidelity Select Construction and Housing Portfolio

Construction and Housing

Fidelity Select Consumer Industries Portfolio

Consumer

Fidelity Select Cyclical Industries Portfolio

Cyclical

Fidelity Select Defense and Aerospace Portfolio

Defense and Aerospace

Fidelity Select Developing Communications Portfolio

Developing Communications

Fidelity Select Electronics Portfolio

Electronics

Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio

Energy

Fidelity Select Energy Service Portfolio

Energy Service

Fidelity Select Environmental Portfolio

Environmental

Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio

Financial Services

Fidelity Select Food and Agriculture Portfolio

Food and Agriculture

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio

Gold

Fidelity Select Health Care Portfolio

Health Care

Fidelity Select Home Finance Portfolio

Home Finance

Fidelity Select Industrial Equipment Portfolio

Industrial Equipment

Fidelity Select Industrial Materials Portfolio

Industrial Materials

Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio

Insurance

Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio

Leisure

Fidelity Select Medical Delivery Portfolio

Medical Delivery

Fidelity Select Medical Equipment and Systems Portfolio

Medical Equipment and Systems

Fidelity Select Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Fidelity Select Multimedia Portfolio

Multimedia

Fidelity Select Natural Gas Portfolio

Natural Gas

Fidelity Select Natural Resources Portfolio

Natural Resources

Fidelity Select Networking and Infrastructure Portfolio

Networking and Infrastructure

Fidelity Select Paper and Forest Products Portfolio

Paper and Forest Products

Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio

Pharmaceuticals

Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio

Retail

Fidelity Select Software and Computer Services Portfolio

Software and Computer Services

Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio

Technology

Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Telecommunications

Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio

Transportation

Fidelity Select Utilities Growth Portfolio

Utilities

Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio

Wireless

Fidelity Utilities Fund

Utilities

Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Prime Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Retirement Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Consumer Industries Portfolio

Consumer

VIP Cyclical Industries Portfolio

Cyclical

VIP Financial Services Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Health Care Portfolio

Health Care

VIP Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Natural Resources Portfolio

Natural Resources

VIP Real Estate Portfolio

Real Estate

VIP Technology Portfolio

Technology

VIP Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio

Utilities

Information on each potential underlying Fidelity fund is available in its prospectus. For a copy of any underlying Fidelity fund's prospectus, please visit www.fidelity.com or, for VIP funds, advisor.fidelity.com.

Prospectus

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT

To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.

For variable product owners: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license.

For insurance separate accounts: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and may be requested to provide information on persons with authority or control over the account such as name, residential address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.

You can obtain additional information about the fund. A description of the fund's policies and procedures for disclosing its holdings is available in its SAI and on Fidelity's web sites. The SAI also includes more detailed information about the fund and its investments. The SAI is incorporated herein by reference (legally forms a part of the prospectus). A financial report will be available once the fund has completed its first annual or semi-annual period. The fund's annual and semi-annual reports also include additional information. The fund's annual report includes a discussion of the fund's holdings and recent market conditions and the fund's investment strategies that affected performance.

For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about a fund, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098. In addition, you may visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI, or annual or semi-annual report or to request other information.

The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-0102. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.

Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number, 811-03759

Fidelity and Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design are registered trademarks of FMR Corp.

The term "VIP" as used in this document refers to Fidelity Variable Insurance Products.

1.818790.100 VIPFM-RED-0106

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATED January 26, 2006. The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This statement of additional information is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

FIDELITY® VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS

FUNDSMANAGER 20% PORTFOLIO, FUNDSMANAGER 50% PORTFOLIO,
FUNDSMANAGER 70% PORTFOLIO, and FUNDSMANAGER 85% PORTFOLIO

Funds of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV
Investor Class

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

April __, 2006

This statement of additional information (SAI) is not a prospectus. An annual report for each fund will be available once the fund has completed its first annual period.

To obtain a free additional copy of the prospectus or SAI, dated April __, 2006, please call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098 or visit Fidelity's web site at www.advisor.fidelity.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Investment Policies and Limitations

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding Canada

18

Special Considerations Regarding Europe

18

Special Considerations Regarding Japan

19

Special Considerations Regarding Asia Pacific Region (ex Japan)

19

Special Considerations Regarding Latin America

20

Special Considerations Regarding Russia

20

Portfolio Transactions

<Click Here>

Valuation

<Click Here>

Buying and Selling Information

<Click Here>

Distributions and Taxes

<Click Here>

Trustees and Officers

<Click Here>

Control of Investment Advisers

<Click Here>

Management Contracts

<Click Here>

Board Approval of the Existing Investment Advisory Contracts

<Click Here>

Proxy Voting Guidelines

<Click Here>

Distribution Services

<Click Here>

Transfer and Service Agent Agreements

<Click Here>

Description of the Trust

<Click Here>

Fund Holdings Information

<Click Here>

Appendix

<Click Here>

VIPFM-REDB-0106
1.818791.100

(fidelity_logo_graphic)

82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

INVESTMENT POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS

The following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of a VIP FundsManagerSM  Portfolio's assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be considered when determining whether the investment complies with the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment policies and limitations.

A VIP FundsManager Portfolio's fundamental investment policies and limitations cannot be changed without approval by a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act)) of the fund. However, except for the fundamental investment limitations listed below, the investment policies and limitations described in this SAI are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

The following are each fund's fundamental investment limitations set forth in their entirety.

Diversification

For each fund:

The fund may not with respect to 75% of the fund's total assets, purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, (a) more than 5% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer, or (b) the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer.

For purposes of each fund's diversification limitation discussed above, the extent to which the fund may invest in the securities of a single issuer or a certain number of issuers is limited by the diversification requirements imposed by Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, which are in addition to the diversification requirements described in the above limitation.

Senior Securities

For each fund:

The fund may not issue senior securities, except in connection with the insurance program established by the fund pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission or as otherwise permitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may not borrow money, except that the fund may borrow money for temporary or emergency purposes (not for leveraging or investment) in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount will be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation.

Underwriting

For each fund:

The fund may not underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that the fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with investments in other investment companies.

Concentration

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of companies whose principal business activities are in the same industry (provided that investments in other investment companies shall not be considered an investment in any particular industry for purposes of this investment limitation).

Real Estate

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business).

Commodities

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from purchasing or selling options and futures contracts or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities).

Loans

For each fund:

The fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities or to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.

The following investment limitations are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

Short Sales

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short, and provided that transactions in futures contracts and options are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.

Margin Purchases

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase securities on margin, except that the fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of transactions, and provided that margin payments in connection with futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may borrow money only (a) from a bank or from a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements with any party (reverse repurchase agreements are treated as borrowings for purposes of the fundamental borrowing investment limitation).

Illiquid Securities

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase any security if, as a result, more than 10% of its net assets would be invested in securities that are deemed to be illiquid because they are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale or because they cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued.

For purposes of each fund's illiquid securities limitation discussed above, if through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, the fund were in a position where more than 10% of its net assets were invested in illiquid securities, it would consider appropriate steps to protect liquidity.

Loans

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to lend assets other than securities to other parties, except by (a) lending money (up to 15% of the fund's net assets) to a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) assuming any unfunded commitments in connection with the acquisition of loans, loan participations, or other forms of debt instruments. (This limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities, to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.)

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration Programs

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to invest in oil, gas, or other mineral exploration or development programs or leases.

In addition to each fund's fundamental and non-fundamental limitations discussed above:

Pursuant to certain state insurance regulations, any repurchase agreements or foreign repurchase agreements a fund enters into will be secured by collateral consisting of liquid assets having a market value of not less than 102% of the cash or assets transferred to the other party.

For a fund's limitations on futures and options transactions, see the section entitled "Limitations on Futures and Options Transactions" on page 5.

Notwithstanding the foregoing investment limitations, the underlying Fidelity funds in which the VIP FundsManager Portfolios may invest have adopted certain investment limitations that may be more or less restrictive than those listed above, thereby permitting a VIP FundsManager Portfolio to engage indirectly in investment strategies that are prohibited under the investment limitations listed above. The investment limitations of each underlying Fidelity fund are set forth in its SAI.

In accordance with each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment program as set forth in the prospectus, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest more than 25% of its assets in any one underlying Fidelity fund. While each VIP FundsManager Portfolio does not intend to concentrate its investments in a particular industry, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may indirectly concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries through its investments in one or more underlying Fidelity funds. Each of the underlying Fidelity funds (other than as indicated in the Appendix to the prospectus) will not concentrate more than 25% of its total assets in any one industry.

Investment Practices of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest, strategies Strategic Advisers, Inc. (Strategic Advisers®) may employ in pursuit of a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. Strategic Advisers may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help a VIP FundsManager Portfolio achieve its goal.

Borrowing. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements. If a fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation until the borrowing is paid off. If a fund makes additional investments while borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash or can invest it in cash equivalents such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of money market or short-term bond funds. Generally, these securities offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.

Central Funds are money market or short-term bond funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. The money market central funds seek to earn a high level of current income (free from federal income tax in the case of a municipal money market fund) while maintaining a stable $1.00 share price. The money market central funds comply with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of their investments. The short-term bond central funds seek to obtain a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest their assets allocated to debt in a central fund. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in debt.

Dollar-Weighted Average Maturity is derived by multiplying the value of each investment by the time remaining to its maturity, adding these calculations, and then dividing the total by the value of the fund's portfolio. An obligation's maturity is typically determined on a stated final maturity basis, although there are some exceptions to this rule.

For example, if it is probable that the issuer of an instrument will take advantage of a maturity-shortening device, such as a call, refunding, or redemption provision, the date on which the instrument will probably be called, refunded, or redeemed may be considered to be its maturity date. Also, the maturities of mortgage securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, and some asset-backed securities are determined on a weighted average life basis, which is the average time for principal to be repaid. For a mortgage security, this average time is calculated by estimating the timing of principal payments, including unscheduled prepayments, during the life of the mortgage. The weighted average life of these securities is likely to be substantially shorter than their stated final maturity.

Futures Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. The price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures contracts are based on specific securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or notes, and some are based on indices of securities prices, such as the Standard & Poor's 500SM  Index (S&P 500®). Futures can be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out before then if a liquid secondary market is available.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase a fund's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument directly. When a fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the underlying instrument had been sold.

Limitations on Futures and Options Transactions. The trust, on behalf of each fund, intends to file with the National Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term "commodity pool operator" (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission promulgated thereunder, with respect to each fund's operation, before engaging in any purchases or sales of commodity futures contracts or commodity options contracts. Accordingly, each fund will not be subject to registration or regulation as a CPO.

Each fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, or write call options if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and options under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts or write put options if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options would exceed 25% of its total assets under normal conditions; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to options.

The above limitations on the funds' investments in futures contracts and options, and the funds' policies regarding futures contracts and options discussed elsewhere in this SAI may be changed as regulatory agencies permit.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR, on behalf of Strategic Advisers, determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, FMR may consider various factors, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the cost of bank loans, and will lend through the program only when the returns are higher than those available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.

Investment-Grade Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt instruments that are of medium and high-quality. Investment-grade debt securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities, non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a fund can perfect a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an investment-grade rating. Some investment-grade debt securities may possess speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by Moody's® Investors Service, Standard & Poor's® (S&P®), Fitch Inc., Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, or another credit rating agency designated as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) by the SEC, or is unrated but considered to be of equivalent quality by FMR.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR on behalf of Strategic Advisers.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR on behalf of Strategic Advisers. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities Lending. A fund may lend securities to parties such as broker-dealers or other institutions, including Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (FBS LLC). FBS LLC is a member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and an indirect subsidiary of FMR Corp.

Securities lending allows a fund to retain ownership of the securities loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. The borrower provides the fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The fund maintains the ability to obtain the right to vote or consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities loaned. If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, a fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, a fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the time the replacement investment is purchased. Loans will be made only to parties deemed by Strategic Advisers to be in good standing and when, in Strategic Advisers' judgment, the income earned would justify the risks.

Cash received as collateral through loan transactions may be invested in other eligible securities, including shares of a money market fund. Investing this cash subjects that investment, as well as the securities loaned, to market appreciation or depreciation.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. For purposes of making initial and ongoing minimal credit risk determinations, Strategic Advisers may rely on FMR's or its affiliates' evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Temporary Defensive Policies. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio reserves the right to invest without limitation in money market funds for temporary, defensive purposes.

Investment Practices of the Underlying Fidelity Funds

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which an underlying Fidelity fund may invest, strategies FMR may employ in pursuit of an underlying Fidelity fund's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. FMR may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help an underlying Fidelity fund achieve its goal.

Affiliated Bank Transactions. A fund may engage in transactions with financial institutions that are, or may be considered to be, "affiliated persons" of the fund under the 1940 Act. These transactions may involve repurchase agreements with custodian banks; short-term obligations of, and repurchase agreements with, the 50 largest U.S. banks (measured by deposits); municipal securities; U.S. Government securities with affiliated financial institutions that are primary dealers in these securities; short-term currency transactions; and short-term borrowings. In accordance with exemptive orders issued by the SEC, the Board of Trustees has established and periodically reviews procedures applicable to transactions involving affiliated financial institutions.

Asset-Backed Securities represent interests in pools of mortgages, loans, receivables, or other assets. Payment of interest and repayment of principal may be largely dependent upon the cash flows generated by the assets backing the securities and, in certain cases, supported by letters of credit, surety bonds, or other credit enhancements. Asset-backed security values may also be affected by other factors including changes in interest rates, the availability of information concerning the pool and its structure, the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the loans or receivables, or the entities providing the credit enhancement. In addition, these securities may be subject to prepayment risk.

Borrowing. Each fund may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements. If a fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation until the borrowing is paid off. If a fund makes additional investments while borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash or can invest it in cash equivalents such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of money market or short-term bond funds. Generally, these securities offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.

Central Funds are money market or short-term bond funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. The money market central funds seek to earn a high level of current income (free from federal income tax in the case of a municipal money market fund) while maintaining a stable $1.00 share price. The money market central funds comply with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of their investments. The short-term bond central funds seek to obtain a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest their assets allocated to debt in a central fund. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in debt.

Central Investment Portfolios (CIPs) are funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. High income CIPs seek a high level of income, and may also seek capital appreciation. Investment-grade CIPs seek a high level of current income. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest some or all of their assets allocated to high income and/or investment-grade debt in CIPs. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified high income and/or investment-grade bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in high income and/or investment-grade debt.

Common Stock represents an equity or ownership interest in an issuer. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds and preferred stock take precedence over the claims of those who own common stock.

Convertible Securities are bonds, debentures, notes, or other securities that may be converted or exchanged (by the holder or by the issuer) into shares of the underlying common stock (or cash or securities of equivalent value) at a stated exchange ratio. A convertible security may also be called for redemption or conversion by the issuer after a particular date and under certain circumstances (including a specified price) established upon issue. If a convertible security held by a fund is called for redemption or conversion, the fund could be required to tender it for redemption, convert it into the underlying common stock, or sell it to a third party.

Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain or loss than common stocks. Convertible securities generally provide yields higher than the underlying common stocks, but generally lower than comparable non-convertible securities. Because of this higher yield, convertible securities generally sell at prices above their "conversion value," which is the current market value of the stock to be received upon conversion. The difference between this conversion value and the price of convertible securities will vary over time depending on changes in the value of the underlying common stocks and interest rates. When the underlying common stocks decline in value, convertible securities will tend not to decline to the same extent because of the interest or dividend payments and the repayment of principal at maturity for certain types of convertible securities. However, securities that are convertible other than at the option of the holder generally do not limit the potential for loss to the same extent as securities convertible at the option of the holder. When the underlying common stocks rise in value, the value of convertible securities may also be expected to increase. At the same time, however, the difference between the market value of convertible securities and their conversion value will narrow, which means that the value of convertible securities will generally not increase to the same extent as the value of the underlying common stocks. Because convertible securities may also be interest-rate sensitive, their value may increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Convertible securities are also subject to credit risk, and are often lower-quality securities.

Companies "Principally Engaged" in a Designated Business Activity. For purposes of a fund's policy of investing at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies principally engaged in the business activities identified for the fund, FMR considers a company to be principally engaged in a designated business activity if: (i) at least 50% of a company's assets, income, sales, or profits are committed to, or derived from, the business activity, or (ii) a third party has given the company an industry or sector classification consistent with the designated business activity.

Companies "Principally Engaged" in the Real Estate Industry. For funds that invest at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies principally engaged in the real estate industry and other real estate related investments, FMR considers a company to be principally engaged in the real estate industry if at least 50% of its assets (marked to market), gross income, or net profits are attributable to ownership, construction, management, or sale of residential, commercial, or industrial real estate.

Country or Geographic Region. FMR considers a number of factors to determine whether an investment is tied economically to a particular country or region including: whether the investment is issued or guaranteed by a particular government or any of its agencies, political subdivisions, or instrumentalities; whether the investment has its primary trading market in a particular country or region; whether the issuer is organized under the laws of, derives at least 50% of its revenues from, or has at least 50% of its assets in a particular country or region; whether the investment is included in an index representative of a particular country or region; and whether the investment is exposed to the economic fortunes and risks of a particular country or region.

Debt Securities are used by issuers to borrow money. The issuer usually pays a fixed, variable, or floating rate of interest, and must repay the amount borrowed, usually at the maturity of the security. Some debt securities, such as zero coupon bonds, do not pay interest but are sold at a deep discount from their face values. Debt securities include corporate bonds, government securities, repurchase agreements, and mortgage and other asset-backed securities.

Dollar-Weighted Average Maturity is derived by multiplying the value of each investment by the time remaining to its maturity, adding these calculations, and then dividing the total by the value of the fund's portfolio. An obligation's maturity is typically determined on a stated final maturity basis, although there are some exceptions to this rule.

For example, if it is probable that the issuer of an instrument will take advantage of a maturity-shortening device, such as a call, refunding, or redemption provision, the date on which the instrument will probably be called, refunded, or redeemed may be considered to be its maturity date. Also, the maturities of mortgage securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, and some asset-backed securities are determined on a weighted average life basis, which is the average time for principal to be repaid. For a mortgage security, this average time is calculated by estimating the timing of principal payments, including unscheduled prepayments, during the life of the mortgage. The weighted average life of these securities is likely to be substantially shorter than their stated final maturity.

Domestic and Foreign Investments (money market funds only) include U.S. dollar-denominated time deposits, certificates of deposit, and bankers' acceptances of U.S. banks and their branches located outside of the United States, U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks, and foreign branches of foreign banks. Domestic and foreign investments may also include U.S. dollar-denominated securities issued or guaranteed by other U.S. or foreign issuers, including U.S. and foreign corporations or other business organizations, foreign governments, foreign government agencies or instrumentalities, and U.S. and foreign financial institutions, including savings and loan institutions, insurance companies, mortgage bankers, and real estate investment trusts, as well as banks.

The obligations of foreign branches of U.S. banks may not be obligations of the parent bank in addition to the issuing branch, and may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and by governmental regulation. Payment of interest and repayment of principal on these obligations may also be affected by governmental action in the country of domicile of the branch (generally referred to as sovereign risk) or by war or civil conflict. In addition, settlement of trades may occur outside of the United States and evidence of ownership of portfolio securities may be held outside of the United States. Accordingly, a fund may be subject to the risks associated with the settlement of trades and the holding of such property overseas. Various provisions of federal law governing the establishment and operation of U.S. branches do not apply to foreign branches of U.S. banks.

Obligations of U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks may be general obligations of the parent bank in addition to the issuing branch, or may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and by federal and state regulation, as well as by governmental action in the country in which the foreign bank has its head office.

Obligations of foreign issuers involve certain additional risks. These risks may include future unfavorable political and economic developments, withholding taxes, seizures of foreign deposits, currency controls, interest limitations, or other governmental restrictions that might affect repayment of principal or payment of interest, or the ability to honor a credit commitment. Additionally, there may be less public information available about foreign entities. Foreign issuers may be subject to less governmental regulation and supervision than U.S. issuers. Foreign issuers also generally are not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers.

Exposure to Foreign Markets. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, and securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Foreign investments involve risks relating to local political, economic, regulatory, or social instability, military action or unrest, or adverse diplomatic developments, and may be affected by actions of foreign governments adverse to the interests of U.S. investors. Such actions may include expropriation or nationalization of assets, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on U.S. investment or on the ability to repatriate assets or convert currency into U.S. dollars, or other government intervention. Additionally, governmental issuers of foreign debt securities may be unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due and may require that the conditions for payment be renegotiated. There is no assurance that FMR will be able to anticipate these potential events or counter their effects. In addition, the value of securities denominated in foreign currencies and of dividends and interest paid with respect to such securities will fluctuate based on the relative strength of the U.S. dollar.

It is anticipated that in most cases the best available market for foreign securities will be on an exchange or in over-the-counter (OTC) markets located outside of the United States. Foreign stock markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers. Foreign security trading, settlement and custodial practices (including those involving securities settlement where fund assets may be released prior to receipt of payment) are often less developed than those in U.S. markets, and may result in increased risk or substantial delays in the event of a failed trade or the insolvency of, or breach of duty by, a foreign broker-dealer, securities depository, or foreign subcustodian. In addition, the costs associated with foreign investments, including withholding taxes, brokerage commissions, and custodial costs, are generally higher than with U.S. investments.

Foreign markets may offer less protection to investors than U.S. markets. Foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers. Adequate public information on foreign issuers may not be available, and it may be difficult to secure dividends and information regarding corporate actions on a timely basis. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, and listed companies than in the United States. OTC markets tend to be less regulated than stock exchange markets and, in certain countries, may be totally unregulated. Regulatory enforcement may be influenced by economic or political concerns, and investors may have difficulty enforcing their legal rights in foreign countries.

Some foreign securities impose restrictions on transfer within the United States or to U.S. persons. Although securities subject to such transfer restrictions may be marketable abroad, they may be less liquid than foreign securities of the same class that are not subject to such restrictions.

American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) as well as other "hybrid" forms of ADRs, including European Depositary Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs), are certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer. These certificates are issued by depository banks and generally trade on an established market in the United States or elsewhere. The underlying shares are held in trust by a custodian bank or similar financial institution in the issuer's home country. The depository bank may not have physical custody of the underlying securities at all times and may charge fees for various services, including forwarding dividends and interest and corporate actions. ADRs are alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign securities in their national markets and currencies. However, ADRs continue to be subject to many of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities. These risks include foreign exchange risk as well as the political and economic risks of the underlying issuer's country.

The risks of foreign investing may be magnified for investments in emerging markets. Security prices in emerging markets can be significantly more volatile than those in more developed markets, reflecting the greater uncertainties of investing in less established markets and economies. In particular, countries with emerging markets may have relatively unstable governments, may present the risks of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and prohibitions on the repatriation of assets, and may have less protection of property rights than more developed countries. The economies of countries with emerging markets may be based on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable to changes in local or global trade conditions, and may suffer from extreme and volatile debt burdens or inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult or impossible at times.

Foreign Currency Transactions. A fund (other than a money market fund) may conduct foreign currency transactions on a spot (i.e., cash) or forward basis (i.e., by entering into forward contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies). Although foreign exchange dealers generally do not charge a fee for such conversions, they do realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the counterparty desire to resell that currency to the dealer. Forward contracts are customized transactions that require a specific amount of a currency to be delivered at a specific exchange rate on a specific date or range of dates in the future. Forward contracts are generally traded in an interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. The parties to a forward contract may agree to offset or terminate the contract before its maturity, or may hold the contract to maturity and complete the contemplated currency exchange.

The following discussion summarizes the principal currency management strategies involving forward contracts that could be used by a fund. A fund may also use swap agreements, indexed securities, and options and futures contracts relating to foreign currencies for the same purposes.

A "settlement hedge" or "transaction hedge" is designed to protect a fund against an adverse change in foreign currency values between the date a security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received. Entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale of the amount of foreign currency involved in an underlying security transaction for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars "locks in" the U.S. dollar price of the security. Forward contracts to purchase or sell a foreign currency may also be used by a fund in anticipation of future purchases or sales of securities denominated in foreign currency, even if the specific investments have not yet been selected by FMR.

A fund may also use forward contracts to hedge against a decline in the value of existing investments denominated in foreign currency. For example, if a fund owned securities denominated in pounds sterling, it could enter into a forward contract to sell pounds sterling in return for U.S. dollars to hedge against possible declines in the pound's value. Such a hedge, sometimes referred to as a "position hedge," would tend to offset both positive and negative currency fluctuations, but would not offset changes in security values caused by other factors. A fund could also hedge the position by selling another currency expected to perform similarly to the pound sterling. This type of hedge, sometimes referred to as a "proxy hedge," could offer advantages in terms of cost, yield, or efficiency, but generally would not hedge currency exposure as effectively as a direct hedge into U.S. dollars. Proxy hedges may result in losses if the currency used to hedge does not perform similarly to the currency in which the hedged securities are denominated.

A fund may enter into forward contracts to shift its investment exposure from one currency into another. This may include shifting exposure from U.S. dollars to a foreign currency, or from one foreign currency to another foreign currency. This type of strategy, sometimes known as a "cross-hedge," will tend to reduce or eliminate exposure to the currency that is sold, and increase exposure to the currency that is purchased, much as if a fund had sold a security denominated in one currency and purchased an equivalent security denominated in another. Cross-hedges protect against losses resulting from a decline in the hedged currency, but will cause a fund to assume the risk of fluctuations in the value of the currency it purchases.

Successful use of currency management strategies will depend on FMR's skill in analyzing currency values. Currency management strategies may substantially change a fund's investment exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and could result in losses to a fund if currencies do not perform as FMR anticipates. For example, if a currency's value rose at a time when FMR had hedged a fund by selling that currency in exchange for dollars, a fund would not participate in the currency's appreciation. If FMR hedges currency exposure through proxy hedges, a fund could realize currency losses from both the hedge and the security position if the two currencies do not move in tandem. Similarly, if FMR increases a fund's exposure to a foreign currency and that currency's value declines, a fund will realize a loss. There is no assurance that FMR's use of currency management strategies will be advantageous to a fund or that it will hedge at appropriate times.

Foreign Repurchase Agreements. Foreign repurchase agreements involve an agreement to purchase a foreign security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price in either U.S. dollars or foreign currency. Unlike typical U.S. repurchase agreements, foreign repurchase agreements may not be fully collateralized at all times. The value of a security purchased by a fund may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to repurchase the security. In the event of default by the counterparty, the fund may suffer a loss if the value of the security purchased is less than the agreed-upon repurchase price, or if the fund is unable to successfully assert a claim to the collateral under foreign laws. As a result, foreign repurchase agreements may involve higher credit risks than repurchase agreements in U.S. markets, as well as risks associated with currency fluctuations. In addition, as with other emerging market investments, repurchase agreements with counterparties located in emerging markets or relating to emerging markets may involve issuers or counterparties with lower credit ratings than typical U.S. repurchase agreements.

Funds' Rights as Investors. The funds do not intend to direct or administer the day-to-day operations of any company. A fund, however, may exercise its rights as a shareholder or lender and may communicate its views on important matters of policy to management, the Board of Directors, shareholders of a company, and holders of other securities of the company when FMR determines that such matters could have a significant effect on the value of the fund's investment in the company. The activities in which a fund may engage, either individually or in conjunction with others, may include, among others, supporting or opposing proposed changes in a company's corporate structure or business activities; seeking changes in a company's directors or management; seeking changes in a company's direction or policies; seeking the sale or reorganization of the company or a portion of its assets; supporting or opposing third-party takeover efforts; supporting the filing of a bankruptcy petition; or foreclosing on collateral securing a security. This area of corporate activity is increasingly prone to litigation and it is possible that a fund could be involved in lawsuits related to such activities. FMR will monitor such activities with a view to mitigating, to the extent possible, the risk of litigation against a fund and the risk of actual liability if a fund is involved in litigation. No guarantee can be made, however, that litigation against a fund will not be undertaken or liabilities incurred. The funds' proxy voting guidelines are included in this SAI.

Futures, Options, and Swaps. The following paragraphs pertain to futures, options, and swaps: Combined Positions, Correlation of Price Changes, Futures Contracts, Futures Margin Payments, Limitations on Futures, Options, and Swap Transactions, Liquidity of Options and Futures Contracts, Options and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies, OTC Options, Purchasing Put and Call Options, Writing Put and Call Options, and Swap Agreements.

Combined Positions involve purchasing and writing options in combination with each other, or in combination with futures or forward contracts, to adjust the risk and return characteristics of the overall position. For example, purchasing a put option and writing a call option on the same underlying instrument would construct a combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar to selling a futures contract. Another possible combined position would involve writing a call option at one strike price and buying a call option at a lower price, to reduce the risk of the written call option in the event of a substantial price increase. Because combined options positions involve multiple trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to open and close out.

Correlation of Price Changes. Because there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded options and futures contracts, it is likely that the standardized contracts available will not match a fund's current or anticipated investments exactly. A fund may invest in options and futures contracts based on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from the securities in which the fund typically invests, which involves a risk that the options or futures position will not track the performance of the fund's other investments.

Options and futures prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if the underlying instruments match a fund's investments well. Options and futures prices are affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates, changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way. Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the options and futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how options and futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price fluctuation limits or trading halts. A fund may purchase or sell options and futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to compensate for differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in a fund's options or futures positions are poorly correlated with its other investments, the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not offset by gains in other investments.

Futures Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. The price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures contracts are based on specific securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or notes, some are based on indices of securities prices, such as the S&P 500, and some are based on Eurodollars. Futures can be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out before then if a liquid secondary market is available.

Futures may be based on foreign indexes such as the Compagnie des Agents de Change 40 Index (CAC 40) in France, the Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX 30) in Germany, the Financial Times Stock Exchange Eurotop 100 Index (FTSE Eurotop 100) in Europe, the IBEX 35 Index (IBEX 35) in Spain, the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index (FTSE 100) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Stock Exchange All Ordinaries Index (ASX All Ordinaries) in Australia, the Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong, and the Nikkei Stock Average (Nikkei 225), the Nikkei Stock Index 300 (Nikkei 300), and the Tokyo Stock Exchange Stock Price Index (TOPIX) in Japan.

Positions in Eurodollar futures reflect market expectations of forward levels of three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rates.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase a fund's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument directly. When a fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the underlying instrument had been sold.

Futures Margin Payments. The purchaser or seller of a futures contract is not required to deliver or pay for the underlying instrument unless the contract is held until the delivery date. However, both the purchaser and seller are required to deposit "initial margin" with a futures broker, known as a futures commission merchant (FCM), when the contract is entered into. Initial margin deposits are typically equal to a percentage of the contract's value. If the value of either party's position declines, that party will be required to make additional "variation margin" payments to settle the change in value on a daily basis. The party that has a gain may be entitled to receive all or a portion of this amount. Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing securities on margin for purposes of a fund's investment limitations. In the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of an FCM that holds margin on behalf of a fund, the fund may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the FCM's other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the fund. A fund is required to segregate liquid assets equivalent to the fund's outstanding obligations under the contract in excess of the initial margin and variation margin, if any.

Although futures exchanges generally operate similarly in the United States and abroad, foreign futures exchanges may follow trading, settlement, and margin procedures that are different from those for U.S. exchanges. Futures contracts traded outside the United States may involve greater risk of loss than U.S.-traded contracts, including potentially greater risk of losses due to insolvency of a futures broker, exchange member, or other party that may owe initial or variation margin to a fund. Because initial and variation margin payments may be measured in foreign currency, a futures contract traded outside the United States may also involve the risk of foreign currency fluctuation.

Limitations on Futures, Options, and Swap Transactions. Each trust, on behalf of each equity and bond fund, has filed with the National Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term "commodity pool operator" (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission promulgated thereunder, with respect to each fund's operation. Accordingly, each equity and bond fund is not subject to registration or regulation as a CPO.

Each investment-grade bond fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, write call options, or enter into swap agreements if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and/or options and/or swap agreements under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts, write put options, or enter into swap agreements (other than swaps entered into for hedging purposes under (a)) if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options plus the notional amount of any such swaps would exceed 25% of its total assets; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to futures, options, or swaps.

Each growth and growth & income fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, or write call options if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and options under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts or write put options if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options would exceed 25% of its total assets under normal conditions; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to options.

The above limitations on the funds' (other than a money market fund's) investments in futures contracts, options, and swaps, and the funds' policies regarding futures contracts, options, and swaps discussed elsewhere in this SAI are not fundamental policies and may be changed as regulatory agencies permit.

Liquidity of Options and Futures Contracts. There is no assurance a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular options or futures contract at any particular time. Options may have relatively low trading volume and liquidity if their strike prices are not close to the underlying instrument's current price. In addition, exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits for options and futures contracts, and may halt trading if a contract's price moves upward or downward more than the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed, it may be impossible to enter into new positions or close out existing positions. If the secondary market for a contract is not liquid because of price fluctuation limits or otherwise, it could prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions, and potentially could require a fund to continue to hold a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its value. As a result, a fund's access to other assets held to cover its options or futures positions could also be impaired.

Options and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies. Currency futures contracts are similar to forward currency exchange contracts, except that they are traded on exchanges (and have margin requirements) and are standardized as to contract size and delivery date. Most currency futures contracts call for payment or delivery in U.S. dollars. The underlying instrument of a currency option may be a foreign currency, which generally is purchased or delivered in exchange for U.S. dollars, or may be a futures contract. The purchaser of a currency call obtains the right to purchase the underlying currency, and the purchaser of a currency put obtains the right to sell the underlying currency.

The uses and risks of currency options and futures are similar to options and futures relating to securities or indices, as discussed above. A fund may purchase and sell currency futures and may purchase and write currency options to increase or decrease its exposure to different foreign currencies. Currency options may also be purchased or written in conjunction with each other or with currency futures or forward contracts. Currency futures and options values can be expected to correlate with exchange rates, but may not reflect other factors that affect the value of a fund's investments. A currency hedge, for example, should protect a Yen-denominated security from a decline in the Yen, but will not protect a fund against a price decline resulting from deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness. Because the value of a fund's foreign-denominated investments changes in response to many factors other than exchange rates, it may not be possible to match the amount of currency options and futures to the value of the fund's investments exactly over time.

OTC Options. Unlike exchange-traded options, which are standardized with respect to the underlying instrument, expiration date, contract size, and strike price, the terms of OTC options (options not traded on exchanges) generally are established through negotiation with the other party to the option contract. While this type of arrangement allows the purchaser or writer greater flexibility to tailor an option to its needs, OTC options generally are less liquid and involve greater credit risk than exchange-traded options, which are guaranteed by the clearing organization of the exchanges where they are traded.

Purchasing Put and Call Options. By purchasing a put option, the purchaser obtains the right (but not the obligation) to sell the option's underlying instrument at a fixed strike price. In return for this right, the purchaser pays the current market price for the option (known as the option premium). Options have various types of underlying instruments, including specific securities, indices of securities prices, and futures contracts. The purchaser may terminate its position in a put option by allowing it to expire or by exercising the option. If the option is allowed to expire, the purchaser will lose the entire premium. If the option is exercised, the purchaser completes the sale of the underlying instrument at the strike price. A purchaser may also terminate a put option position by closing it out in the secondary market at its current price, if a liquid secondary market exists.

The buyer of a typical put option can expect to realize a gain if security prices fall substantially. However, if the underlying instrument's price does not fall enough to offset the cost of purchasing the option, a put buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the amount of the premium, plus related transaction costs).

The features of call options are essentially the same as those of put options, except that the purchaser of a call option obtains the right to purchase, rather than sell, the underlying instrument at the option's strike price. A call buyer typically attempts to participate in potential price increases of the underlying instrument with risk limited to the cost of the option if security prices fall. At the same time, the buyer can expect to suffer a loss if security prices do not rise sufficiently to offset the cost of the option.

Writing Put and Call Options. The writer of a put or call option takes the opposite side of the transaction from the option's purchaser. In return for receipt of the premium, the writer assumes the obligation to pay the strike price for the option's underlying instrument if the other party to the option chooses to exercise it. The writer may seek to terminate a position in a put option before exercise by closing out the option in the secondary market at its current price. If the secondary market is not liquid for a put option, however, the writer must continue to be prepared to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding, regardless of price changes. When writing an option on a futures contract, a fund will be required to make margin payments to an FCM as described above for futures contracts.

If security prices rise, a put writer would generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it received. If security prices remain the same over time, it is likely that the writer will also profit, because it should be able to close out the option at a lower price. If security prices fall, the put writer would expect to suffer a loss. This loss should be less than the loss from purchasing the underlying instrument directly, however, because the premium received for writing the option should mitigate the effects of the decline.

Writing a call option obligates the writer to sell or deliver the option's underlying instrument, in return for the strike price, upon exercise of the option. The characteristics of writing call options are similar to those of writing put options, except that writing calls generally is a profitable strategy if prices remain the same or fall. Through receipt of the option premium, a call writer mitigates the effects of a price decline. At the same time, because a call writer must be prepared to deliver the underlying instrument in return for the strike price, even if its current value is greater, a call writer gives up some ability to participate in security price increases.

Swap Agreements can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Depending on their structure, swap agreements may increase or decrease a fund's exposure to long- or short-term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), foreign currency values, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices or inflation rates. Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names, including interest rate swaps (where the parties exchange a floating rate for a fixed rate), total return swaps (where the parties exchange a floating rate for the total return of a security or index), and credit default swaps (where one party pays a fixed rate and the other agrees to buy a specific issuer's debt at par upon the occurrence of certain agreed events, including for example, if the issuer is bankrupt, defaults on any of its debt obligations or makes arrangements with a creditor to modify a debt obligation).

In a typical cap or floor agreement, one party agrees to make payments only under specified circumstances, usually in return for payment of a fee by the other party. For example, the buyer of an interest rate cap obtains the right to receive payments to the extent that a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed-upon level, while the seller of an interest rate floor is obligated to make payments to the extent that a specified interest rate falls below an agreed-upon level. An interest rate collar combines elements of buying a cap and selling a floor.

Swap agreements will tend to shift a fund's investment exposure from one type of investment to another. For example, if the fund agreed to exchange payments in dollars for payments in foreign currency, the swap agreement would tend to decrease the fund's exposure to U.S. interest rates and increase its exposure to foreign currency and interest rates. Caps and floors have an effect similar to buying or writing options. Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a fund's investments and its share price and yield.

Swap agreements also may allow a fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer. The most significant factor in the performance of swap agreements is the change in the factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from a fund. If a swap agreement calls for payments by the fund, the fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. In the case of a physically settled credit default swap written by the fund, the fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of eligible debt of a defaulted issuer. If a swap counterparty's creditworthiness declines, the risk that they may not perform may increase, potentially resulting in a loss to the fund. In the case of a credit default swap written by the fund, the fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the underlying referenced entity (the debt issuer as to which credit protection has been written) has deteriorated. Although there can be no assurance that the fund will be able to do so, the fund may be able to reduce or eliminate its exposure under a swap agreement either by assignment or other disposition, or by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or a similarly creditworthy party. The fund may have limited ability to eliminate its exposure under a credit default swap if the credit of the underlying referenced entity has declined.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, FMR may consider various factors, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Indexed Securities are instruments whose prices are indexed to the prices of other securities, securities indices, currencies, precious metals or other commodities, or other financial indicators. Indexed securities typically, but not always, are debt securities or deposits whose value at maturity or coupon rate is determined by reference to a specific instrument or statistic.

Mortgage-indexed securities, for example, could be structured to replicate the performance of mortgage securities and the characteristics of direct ownership.

Gold-indexed securities typically provide for a maturity value that depends on the price of gold, resulting in a security whose price tends to rise and fall together with gold prices. Securities indexed to gold or other precious metals involve risks and pricing characteristics similar to direct investments in precious metals. The securities generally will earn a nominal rate of interest while held by the fund, and may have maturities of one year or more. In addition, the securities may be subject to being put by a fund to the issuer, with payment to be received on no more than seven days' notice. The put feature would ensure the liquidity of the notes in the absence of an active secondary market.Currency-indexed securities typically are short-term to intermediate-term debt securities whose maturity values or interest rates are determined by reference to the values of one or more specified foreign currencies, and may offer higher yields than U.S. dollar-denominated securities. Currency-indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed; that is, their maturity value may increase when the specified currency value increases, resulting in a security that performs similarly to a foreign-denominated instrument, or their maturity value may decline when foreign currencies increase, resulting in a security whose price characteristics are similar to a put on the underlying currency. Currency-indexed securities may also have prices that depend on the values of a number of different foreign currencies relative to each other.

The performance of indexed securities depends to a great extent on the performance of the security, currency, or other instrument to which they are indexed, and may also be influenced by interest rate changes in the United States and abroad. Indexed securities may be more volatile than the underlying instruments. Indexed securities are also subject to the credit risks associated with the issuer of the security, and their values may decline substantially if the issuer's creditworthiness deteriorates. Recent issuers of indexed securities have included banks, corporations, and certain U.S. Government agencies.

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the cost of bank loans, and will lend through the program only when the returns are higher than those available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.

Investment-Grade Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt instruments that are of medium and high-quality. Investment-grade debt securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities, non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a fund can perfect a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an investment-grade rating. Some investment-grade debt securities may possess speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by Moody's Investors Service, S&P, Fitch Inc., Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, or another credit rating agency designated as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) by the SEC, or is unrated but considered to be of equivalent quality by FMR.

Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental, or other borrower to lenders or lending syndicates (loans and loan participations), to suppliers of goods or services (trade claims or other receivables), or to other parties. Direct debt instruments involve a risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the borrower and may offer less legal protection to the purchaser in the event of fraud or misrepresentation, or there may be a requirement that a fund supply additional cash to a borrower on demand.

Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of interest and repayment of principal. If scheduled interest or principal payments are not made, the value of the instrument may be adversely affected. Loans that are fully secured provide more protections than an unsecured loan in the event of failure to make scheduled interest or principal payments. However, there is no assurance that the liquidation of collateral from a secured loan would satisfy the borrower's obligation, or that the collateral could be liquidated. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. Direct indebtedness of developing countries also involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable, or unwilling, to pay interest and repay principal when due.

Investments in loans through direct assignment of a financial institution's interests with respect to a loan may involve additional risks. For example, if a loan is foreclosed, the purchaser could become part owner of any collateral, and would bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. In addition, it is conceivable that under emerging legal theories of lender liability, a purchaser could be held liable as a co-lender. Direct debt instruments may also involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other intermediary.

A loan is often administered by a bank or other financial institution that acts as agent for all holders. The agent administers the terms of the loan, as specified in the loan agreement. Unless, under the terms of the loan or other indebtedness, the purchaser has direct recourse against the borrower, the purchaser may have to rely on the agent to apply appropriate credit remedies against a borrower. If assets held by the agent for the benefit of a purchaser were determined to be subject to the claims of the agent's general creditors, the purchaser might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on the loan or loan participation and could suffer a loss of principal or interest.

Direct indebtedness may include letters of credit, revolving credit facilities, or other standby financing commitments that obligate purchasers to make additional cash payments on demand. These commitments may have the effect of requiring a purchaser to increase its investment in a borrower at a time when it would not otherwise have done so, even if the borrower's condition makes it unlikely that the amount will ever be repaid.

Each fund limits the amount of total assets that it will invest in any one issuer or in issuers within the same industry (see each fund's investment limitations). For purposes of these limitations, a fund generally will treat the borrower as the "issuer" of indebtedness held by the fund. In the case of loan participations where a bank or other lending institution serves as financial intermediary between a fund and the borrower, if the participation does not shift to the fund the direct debtor-creditor relationship with the borrower, SEC interpretations require a fund, in appropriate circumstances, to treat both the lending bank or other lending institution and the borrower as "issuers" for these purposes. Treating a financial intermediary as an issuer of indebtedness may restrict a fund's ability to invest in indebtedness related to a single financial intermediary, or a group of intermediaries engaged in the same industry, even if the underlying borrowers represent many different companies and industries.

Lower-Quality Debt Securities. Lower-quality debt securities include all types of debt instruments that have poor protection with respect to the payment of interest and repayment of principal, or may be in default. These securities are often considered to be speculative and involve greater risk of loss or price changes due to changes in the issuer's capacity to pay. The market prices of lower-quality debt securities may fluctuate more than those of higher-quality debt securities and may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty, which may follow periods of rising interest rates.

The market for lower-quality debt securities may be thinner and less active than that for higher-quality debt securities, which can adversely affect the prices at which the former are sold. Adverse publicity and changing investor perceptions may affect the liquidity of lower-quality debt securities and the ability of outside pricing services to value lower-quality debt securities.

Because the risk of default is higher for lower-quality debt securities, FMR's research and credit analysis are an especially important part of managing securities of this type. FMR will attempt to identify those issuers of high-yielding securities whose financial condition is adequate to meet future obligations, has improved, or is expected to improve in the future. FMR's analysis focuses on relative values based on such factors as interest or dividend coverage, asset coverage, earnings prospects, and the experience and managerial strength of the issuer.

A fund may choose, at its expense or in conjunction with others, to pursue litigation or otherwise to exercise its rights as a security holder to seek to protect the interests of security holders if it determines this to be in the best interest of the fund's shareholders.

Money Market Securities are high-quality, short-term obligations. Money market securities may be structured to be, or may employ a trust or other form so that they are, eligible investments for money market funds. For example, put features can be used to modify the maturity of a security or interest rate adjustment features can be used to enhance price stability. If a structure fails to function as intended, adverse tax or investment consequences may result. Neither the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) nor any other regulatory authority has ruled definitively on certain legal issues presented by certain structured securities. Future tax or other regulatory determinations could adversely affect the value, liquidity, or tax treatment of the income received from these securities or the nature and timing of distributions made by the funds.

Mortgage Securities are issued by government and non-government entities such as banks, mortgage lenders, or other institutions. A mortgage security is an obligation of the issuer backed by a mortgage or pool of mortgages or a direct interest in an underlying pool of mortgages. Some mortgage securities, such as collateralized mortgage obligations (or "CMOs"), make payments of both principal and interest at a range of specified intervals; others make semiannual interest payments at a predetermined rate and repay principal at maturity (like a typical bond). Mortgage securities are based on different types of mortgages, including those on commercial real estate or residential properties. Stripped mortgage securities are created when the interest and principal components of a mortgage security are separated and sold as individual securities. In the case of a stripped mortgage security, the holder of the "principal-only" security (PO) receives the principal payments made by the underlying mortgage, while the holder of the "interest-only" security (IO) receives interest payments from the same underlying mortgage.

Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs are pass-through securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, respectively. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee payment of interest and repayment of principal on Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs, respectively, are federally chartered corporations supervised by the U.S. Government that act as governmental instrumentalities under authority granted by Congress. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are authorized to borrow from the U.S. Treasury to meet their obligations. Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

The value of mortgage securities may change due to shifts in the market's perception of issuers and changes in interest rates. In addition, regulatory or tax changes may adversely affect the mortgage securities market as a whole. Non-government mortgage securities may offer higher yields than those issued by government entities, but also may be subject to greater price changes than government issues. Mortgage securities are subject to prepayment risk, which is the risk that early principal payments made on the underlying mortgages, usually in response to a reduction in interest rates, will result in the return of principal to the investor, causing it to be invested subsequently at a lower current interest rate. Alternatively, in a rising interest rate environment, mortgage security values may be adversely affected when prepayments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security's effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The prices of stripped mortgage securities tend to be more volatile in response to changes in interest rates than those of non-stripped mortgage securities.

To earn additional income for a fund, FMR may use a trading strategy that involves selling (or buying) mortgage securities and simultaneously agreeing to purchase (or sell) mortgage securities on a later date at a set price. This trading strategy may increase interest rate exposure and result in an increased turnover of the fund's portfolio which increases costs and may increase taxable gains.

Municipal Securities are issued to raise money for a variety of public or private purposes, including general financing for state and local governments, or financing for specific projects or public facilities. They may be issued in anticipation of future revenues and may be backed by the full taxing power of a municipality, the revenues from a specific project, or the credit of a private organization. The value of some or all municipal securities may be affected by uncertainties in the municipal market related to legislation or litigation involving the taxation of municipal securities or the rights of municipal securities holders. A municipal security may be owned directly or through a participation interest.

Precious Metals. Precious metals, such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, at times have been subject to substantial price fluctuations over short periods of time and may be affected by unpredictable monetary and political policies such as currency devaluations or revaluations, economic and social conditions within a country, trade imbalances, or trade or currency restrictions between countries. The prices of gold and other precious metals, however, are less subject to local and company-specific factors than securities of individual companies. As a result, precious metals may be more or less volatile in price than securities of companies engaged in precious metals-related businesses. Investments in precious metals can present concerns such as delivery, storage and maintenance, possible illiquidity, and the unavailability of accurate market valuations. Although precious metals can be purchased in any form, including bullion and coins, FMR intends to purchase only those forms of precious metals that are readily marketable and that can be stored in accordance with custody regulations applicable to mutual funds. A fund may incur higher custody and transaction costs for precious metals than for securities. Also, precious metals investments do not pay income.

For a fund to qualify as a regulated investment company under current federal tax law, gains from selling precious metals may not exceed 10% of the fund's gross income for its taxable year. This tax requirement could cause a fund to hold or sell precious metals or securities when it would not otherwise do so.

Preferred Securities represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer that pays dividends at a specified rate and that has precedence over common stock in the payment of dividends. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds take precedence over the claims of those who own preferred securities and common stock.

Put Features entitle the holder to sell a security back to the issuer or a third partyat any time or at specified intervals. In exchange for this benefit, a fund may accept a lower interest rate. Securities with put features are subject to the risk that the put provider is unable to honor the put feature (purchase the security). Put providers often support their ability to buy securities on demand by obtaining letters of credit or other guarantees from other entities. Demand features, standby commitments, and tender options are types of put features.

Real Estate Investment Trusts. Equity real estate investment trusts own real estate properties, while mortgage real estate investment trusts make construction, development, and long-term mortgage loans. Their value may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property of the trusts, the creditworthiness of the issuer, property taxes, interest rates, and tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment. Both types of trusts are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation, and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free status of income under the Internal Revenue Code and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The funds will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act, or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The funds will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and a fund's yield and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities Lending. A fund may lend securities to parties such as broker-dealers or other institutions, including FBS LLC. FBS LLC is a member of the NYSE and an indirect subsidiary of FMR Corp.

Securities lending allows a fund to retain ownership of the securities loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. The borrower provides the fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The fund maintains the ability to obtain the right to vote or consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities loaned. If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, a fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, a fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the time the replacement investment is purchased. Loans will be made only to parties deemed by FMR to be in good standing and when, in FMR's judgment, the income earned would justify the risks.

Cash received as collateral through loan transactions may be invested in other eligible securities, including shares of a money market fund. Investing this cash subjects that investment, as well as the securities loaned, to market appreciation or depreciation.

Securities of Other Investment Companies, including shares of closed-end investment companies, unit investment trusts, and open-end investment companies, represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the investment company-level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.

The extent to which a fund can invest in securities of other investment companies is limited by federal securities laws.

Short Sales "Against the Box" are short sales of securities that a fund owns or has the right to obtain (equivalent in kind or amount to the securities sold short). If a fund enters into a short sale against the box, it will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold such securities while the short sale is outstanding.

Short sales against the box could be used to protect the NAV of a money market fund in anticipation of increased interest rates, without sacrificing the current yield of the securities sold short. A money market fund will incur transaction costs in connection with opening and closing short sales against the box. A fund (other than a money market fund) will incur transaction costs, including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales against the box.

Short Sales. Stocks underlying a fund's convertible security holdings can be sold short. For example, if FMR anticipates a decline in the price of the stock underlying a convertible security held by a fund, it may sell the stock short. If the stock price subsequently declines, the proceeds of the short sale could be expected to offset all or a portion of the effect of the stock's decline on the value of the convertible security. Each fund currently intends to hedge no more than 15% of its total assets with short sales on equity securities underlying its convertible security holdings under normal circumstances.

A fund will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to those sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold them aside while the short sale is outstanding. A fund will incur transaction costs, including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. FMR may rely on its evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider in determining whether to purchase or hold a security supported by such enhancement. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Sovereign Debt Obligations are issued or guaranteed by foreign governments or their agencies, including debt of Latin American nations or other developing countries. Sovereign debt may be in the form of conventional securities or other types of debt instruments such as loans or loan participations. Sovereign debt of developing countries may involve a high degree of risk, and may be in default or present the risk of default. Governmental entities responsible for repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to repay principal and pay interest when due, and may require renegotiation or rescheduling of debt payments. In addition, prospects for repayment of principal and payment of interest may depend on political as well as economic factors. Although some sovereign debt, such as Brady Bonds, is collateralized by U.S. Government securities, repayment of principal and payment of interest is not guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

Stripped Securities are the separate income or principal components of a debt security. The risks associated with stripped securities are similar to those of other debt securities, although stripped securities may be more volatile, and the value of certain types of stripped securities may move in the same direction as interest rates. U.S. Treasury securities that have been stripped by a Federal Reserve Bank are obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury.

Privately stripped government securities are created when a dealer deposits a U.S. Treasury security or other U.S. Government security with a custodian for safekeeping. The custodian issues separate receipts for the coupon payments and the principal payment, which the dealer then sells.

Because the SEC does not consider privately stripped government securities to be U.S. Government securities for purposes of Rule 2a-7, a fund must evaluate them as it would non-government securities pursuant to regulatory guidelines applicable to money market funds.

Temporary Defensive Policies. In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, a fund may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes.

Each investment-grade bond fund reserves the right to invest without limitation in investment-grade money market or short-term debt instruments for temporary, defensive purposes.

Variable and Floating Rate Securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest rate paid on the security. Variable rate securities provide for a specified periodic adjustment in the interest rate, while floating rate securities have interest rates that change whenever there is a change in a designated benchmark rate or the issuer's credit quality. Some variable or floating rate securities are structured with put features that permit holders to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest from the issuers or certain financial intermediaries.

Warrants. Warrants are instruments which entitle the holder to buy an equity security at a specific price for a specific period of time. Changes in the value of a warrant do not necessarily correspond to changes in the value of its underlying security. The price of a warrant may be more volatile than the price of its underlying security, and a warrant may offer greater potential for capital appreciation as well as capital loss.

Warrants do not entitle a holder to dividends or voting rights with respect to the underlying security and do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuing company. A warrant ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. These factors can make warrants more speculative than other types of investments.

When-Issued and Forward Purchase or Sale Transactions involve a commitment to purchase or sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield in which payment and delivery take place after the customary settlement period for that type of security. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is delivered.

When purchasing securities pursuant to one of these transactions, the purchaser assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risks of price and yield fluctuations and the risk that the security will not be issued as anticipated. Because payment for the securities is not required until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with a fund's investments. If a fund remains substantially fully invested at a time when a purchase is outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage. When a fund has sold a security pursuant to one of these transactions, the fund does not participate in further gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, a fund could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or suffer a loss.

A fund may renegotiate a when-issued or forward transaction and may sell the underlying securities before delivery, which may result in capital gains or losses for the fund.

Zero Coupon Bonds do not make interest payments; instead, they are sold at a discount from their face value and are redeemed at face value when they mature. Because zero coupon bonds do not pay current income, their prices can be more volatile than other types of fixed-income securities when interest rates change. In calculating a fund's dividend, a portion of the difference between a zero coupon bond's purchase price and its face value is considered income.

The following pages contain detailed information about special considerations of underlying international Fidelity funds, in which certain VIP FundsManager Portfolios may invest.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING CANADA

Political. Canada's parliamentary system of government is, in general, stable. One of the provinces, Quebec, which has a predominantly French-speaking population, does have a "separatist" opposition party whose objective is to achieve sovereignty and increased self-governing legal and financial powers. To date, referendums on Quebec sovereignty have been defeated, but the issue remains unresolved. The Supreme Court of Canada decided in August 1998 that if there was a "clear answer" to a "clear question" in a referendum, then the federal government would be obliged to negotiate with Quebec.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. Canada is a major producer of commodities such as forest products, metals, agricultural products, and energy related products like oil, gas, and hydroelectricity. Accordingly, changes in the supply and demand of base commodity resources and industrial and precious metals and materials, both domestically and internationally, can have a significant effect on Canadian market performance.

The United States is Canada's largest trading partner and developments in economic policy do have a significant impact on the Canadian economy. The expanding economic and financial integration of the United States, Canada, and Mexico through the NAFTA Agreement will likely make the Canadian economy and securities market more sensitive to North American trade patterns. Growth in developing nations overseas, particularly China, will likely change the composition of Canada's trade and foreign investment composition in the near future.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EUROPE

The European Union (EU) is an intergovernmental and supranational union of 25 European countries, known as member states. A key activity of the EU is the establishment and administration of a common single market, consisting of, among other things, a single currency and a common trade policy. The most widely used currency in the EU (and the unit of currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)) is the euro, which is in use in 12 of the 25 member states. In addition to adopting a single currency, member countries no longer control their own monetary policies. Instead, the authority to direct monetary policy is exercised by the new European Central Bank.

While economic and monetary convergence in the EU may offer new opportunities for those investing in the region, investors should be aware that the success of the EU is not wholly assured. Europe must grapple with a number of challenges, any one of which could threaten the survival of this monumental undertaking. Twelve disparate economies must adjust to a unified monetary system, the absence of exchange rate flexibility, and the loss of economic sovereignty. Europe's economies are diverse, its governments are decentralized, and its cultures differ widely. Unemployment is historically high and could pose political risk. One or more member countries might exit the union, placing the currency and banking system in jeopardy. Major issues currently facing the EU cover its membership, structure, procedures and policies; they include the adoption, abandonment or adjustment of the new constitutional treaty, the EU's enlargement to the south and east, and resolving the EU's problematic fiscal and democratic accountability. Efforts of the member states to continue to unify their economic and monetary policies may increase the potential for similarities in the movements of European markets and reduce the benefit of diversification within the region.

Political. The EU has been extending its influence to the east. It has accepted several new members that were previously behind the Iron Curtain, and has plans to accept several more in the medium-term. It is hoped that membership for these states will help cement economic and political stability. For these countries, membership serves as a strong political impetus to employ tight fiscal and monetary policies. Nevertheless, eight of the new entrants are former Soviet satellites and remain burdened to various extents by the inherited inefficiencies of centrally planned economies similar to what existed under the old Soviet Union. Further eastward expansion has long-term economic benefits, but the remaining European countries are not viewed as currently suitable for membership, especially the troubled economies of countries further east. Also, as the EU continues to enlarge eastward, the candidate countries' accessions tend to grow more controversial. For example, some member states, especially Austria, repudiate Turkey joining the EU, and the possible economic, immigration, and cultural implications that may bring. The current and future status of the EU therefore continues to be the subject of political controversy, with widely differing views both within and between member states. For example, in the United Kingdom, currently holding the EU presidency, one poll suggested that around 75% of the population is indifferent or opposed to the EU. However, other countries are more in favor of European integration.

At the same time, there could become an increasingly widening gap between rich and poor within the EU's member countries, and particularly among new members that have not met the requirements for joining the EMU. Realigning traditional alliances could alter trading relationships and potentially provoke divisive socioeconomic splits.

In the transition to the single economic system, significant political decisions will be made which will affect the market regulation, subsidization, and privatization across all industries, from agricultural products to telecommunications.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. The EU has the largest economy in the world according to the International Monetary Fund. The EU economy is expected to grow further over the next decade as more countries join the EU - especially considering that the new member states are usually poorer than the EU average, and hence the expected fast GDP growth will help achieve the dynamic of the united Europe. The EU set itself an objective under the Lisbon Strategy to make the EU "the world's most dynamic and competitive economy" by the year 2010, but it is now generally accepted that this target will not be met. The EU's economic growth has been below that of the United States most years since 1990, and the economic performance of several of its key members, including Germany and Italy, is a matter of serious concern to policy makers.

As economic conditions across member states vary from robust to dismal, there is continued concern about national-level support for the currency and the accompanying coordination of fiscal and wage policy among the 12 EMU member nations. According to the Maastricht treaty, member countries must maintain inflation below 3.3%, public debt below 60% of GDP, and a deficit of 3% or less of GDP to qualify for participation in the euro. These requirements severely limit member countries' ability to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions. Countries that did not qualify for the euro risk being left farther behind.

Currency. Investing in euro-denominated securities entails risk of being exposed to a new currency that may not fully reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the disparate economies that make up the EU. This had been the case in years 1999 through 2002, when the initial exchange rates of the euro versus many of the world's major currencies steadily declined. In this environment, U.S. and other foreign investors experienced erosion of their investment returns in the region. In addition, many European countries rely heavily upon export dependent businesses and any strength in the exchange rate between the euro and the dollar can have either a positive or a negative effect upon corporate profits.

Nordic Countries. Faced with stronger global competition, the Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden - have had to scale down their historically generous welfare programs, resulting in drops in domestic demand and increased unemployment. Major industries in the region, such as forestry, agriculture, and oil, are heavily resource-dependent and face pressure as a result of high labor costs. Pension reform, union regulation, and further cuts in liberal social programs will likely need to be addressed as the Nordic countries face increased international competition.

Eastern Europe. Investing in the securities of Eastern European issuers is highly speculative and involves risks not usually associated with investing in the more developed markets of Western Europe. Political and economic reforms are too recent to establish a definite trend away from centrally planned economies and state-owned industries.

The economies of the Eastern European nations are embarking on the transition from communism to market economics at different paces with appropriately different characteristics. Most Eastern European markets suffer from thin trading activity, dubious investor protections, and often a dearth of reliable corporate information. Information and transaction costs, differential taxes, and sometimes political or transfer risk give a comparative advantage to the domestic investor rather than the foreign investor. In addition, these markets are particularly sensitive to political, economic, and currency events in Russia and have recently suffered heavy losses as a result of their trading and investment links to the troubled Russian economy and currency.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING JAPAN

Government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, emphasis on education, and a comparatively small defense allocation have helped Japan advance with extraordinary speed to become one of the largest economic powers along with the United States and the EU. Despite its impressive history, investors face special risks when investing in Japan.

Economic. For three decades overall real economic growth had been spectacular: a 10% average in the 1960s, a 5% average in the 1970s, and a 4% average in the 1980s. Growth slowed markedly in the 1990s, averaging just 1.7%, largely because of the after effects of overinvestment during the late 1980s and contractionary domestic policies intended to wring speculative excesses from the stock and real estate markets. From 2000 to 2003, government efforts to revive economic growth met with little success and were further hampered by the slowing of the US, European, and Asian economies. In 2004, growth improved and the lingering fears of deflation in prices and economic activity lessened. Japan's huge government debt, which totals more than 160% of GDP, and the aging of the population are two major long-run problems. A rise in taxes could be viewed as endangering the revival of growth.

Overseas trade is important to Japan's economy. Japan has few natural resources and must export to pay for its imports of these basic requirements. Trade sanctions or other protectionist measures could adversely impact Japan's economy. Japan has experienced earthquakes and tidal waves of varying degrees of severity, and the risks of such phenomena and the resulting damage continue to exist.

The most pressing need for action is the daunting task of overhauling the nation's financial institutions and securing public support for taxpayer-funded bailouts. Banks, in particular, must dispose of their huge overhang of bad loans and trim their balance sheets in preparation for greater competition from foreign institutions as more areas of the financial sector are opened. Successful financial sector reform would allow Japan's financial institutions to act as a catalyst for economic recovery at home and across the troubled Asian region. Internal conflict over the proper way to reform the ailing banking system continues.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ASIA PACIFIC REGION (EX JAPAN)

Many countries in the region have historically faced political uncertainty, corruption, military intervention, and social unrest. Examples include the ethnic, sectarian, and separatist violence found in Indonesia, and the nuclear arms threats between India and Pakistan. To the extent that such events continue in the future, they can be expected to have a negative effect on economic and securities market conditions in the region.

Economic. The economies of many countries in the region are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the U.S., Japan, China, and the EU.

Korea. Since 1997, Korea's robust economy has been buffeted by a financial crisis marked by significant capital outflows, sharp depreciation of the won, and severe distress in the corporate and financial sectors. The severe disruption and loss of confidence because of the crisis, however, led to Korea's worst recession in over three decades. The nation's economic difficulties were a direct result of Asia's economic and currency crisis and the way Korea conducts its business at home and abroad. While steps have been initiated to remedy many of the causes of Korea's recent economic problems, their successful implementation is not assured. Investors should be aware that investing in Korea involves risks not typically associated with investing in the U.S. securities markets.

China Region. As with all transition economies, China's ability to develop and sustain a credible legal, regulatory, monetary, and socioeconomic system could influence the course of outside investment. Hong Kong is closely tied to China, economically and through China's 1997 acquisition of the country as a Special Autonomous Region (SAR). Hong Kong's success depends, in large part, on its ability to retain the legal, financial, and monetary systems that allow economic freedom and market expansion.

In addition to the risks inherent in investing in the emerging markets, the risks of investing in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan merit special consideration.

People's Republic of China. The government of the People's Republic of China is dominated by the one-party rule of the Chinese Communist Party.

China's economy has transitioned from a rigidly central-planned state-run economy to one that has been only partially reformed by more market-oriented policies. Although the Chinese government has implemented economic reform measures, reduced state ownership of companies and established better corporate governance practices, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. The government continues to exercise significant control over regulating industrial development and, ultimately, control over China's economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

Growth has also put a strain on China's aging infrastructure. Over the past year, the government has attempted to slow down the pace of growth through administrative measures. An interest rate increase was also meant to tighten access to capital, but Chinese state-owned banks often care little about risk and profitability.

As with all transition economies, China's ability to develop and sustain a credible legal, regulatory, monetary, and socioeconomic system could influence the course of outside investment. The Chinese legal system, in particular, constitutes a significant risk factor for investors. The Chinese legal system is based on statutes. Over the past 25 years, Chinese legislative bodies have promulgated laws and regulations dealing with various economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation, and trade. However, these laws are relatively new and published court decisions based on these laws are limited and non-binding. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations are uncertain.

Hong Kong. In 1997, Great Britain handed over control of Hong Kong to the Chinese mainland government. Since that time, Hong Kong has been governed by a semi-constitution known as the Basic Law, which guarantees a high degree of autonomy in certain matters until 2047, while defense and foreign affairs are the responsibility of the central government in Beijing. The chief executive of Hong Kong is appointed by the Chinese government. Hong Kong is able to participate in international organizations and agreements and it continues to function as an international financial center, with no exchange controls, free convertibility of the Hong Kong dollar and free inward and outward movement of capital. The Basic Law guarantees existing freedoms, including free speech and assembly, press, religion, and the right to strike and travel. Business ownership, private property, the right of inheritance and foreign investment are also protected by law. China has committed by treaty to preserve Hong Kong's autonomy until 2047; however, if China were to exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political, or legal structures or the existing social policy of Hong Kong, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance.

Taiwan. For decades, a state of hostility has existed between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China. Beijing has long deemed Taiwan a part of the "one China" and has made a nationalist cause of recovering it. In the past, China has staged frequent military provocations off the coast of Taiwan and made threats of full-scale military action. Foreign trade has been the engine of rapid growth in Taiwan and has transformed the island into one of Asia's great exporting nations. As an export-oriented economy, Taiwan depends on an open world trade regime and remains vulnerable to downturns in the world economy. Taiwanese companies continue to compete mostly on price, producing generic products or branded merchandise on behalf of multinational companies. Accordingly, these businesses can be particularly vulnerable to currency volatility and increasing competition from neighboring lower-cost countries. Moreover, many Taiwanese companies are heavily invested in mainland China and other countries throughout Southeast Asia, making them susceptible to political events and economic crises in these parts of the region.

Southeast Asia. In addition to the risks inherent in investing in the emerging markets, the risks of investing in Southeast Asia merit special consideration. Indonesia has restored financial stability and pursued sober fiscal policies since the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, but many economic development problems remain, including high unemployment, a fragile banking sector, endemic corruption, inadequate infrastructure, a poor investment climate, and unequal resource distribution among regions. Keys to future growth remain internal reform, building up the confidence of international and domestic investors, and strong global economic growth. In late December 2004, a major tsunami took nearly 127,000 lives, left more than 93,000 missing and nearly 441,000 displaced, and destroyed $4.5 to $5.0 billion worth of property.

Thailand has a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, and welcomes foreign investment. Increased consumption and investment spending and strong export growth pushed GDP growth up to 6.9% in 2003 and 6.1% in 2004, despite a sluggish global economy. The highly popular government's expansionist policy, including major support of village economic development, has raised concerns about fiscal discipline and the health of financial institutions. Bangkok has pursued preferential trade agreements with a variety of partners in an effort to boost exports and maintain high growth, and in 2004 began negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. The December 2004 tsunami took 8,500 lives in Thailand and caused massive destruction of property in the southern provinces of Krabi, Phangnga, and Phuket.

The Philippines' consistently large budget deficit has produced a high debt level and has forced Manila to spend a large portion of the national government budget on debt service. Large, unprofitable public enterprises, especially in the energy sector, contribute to the government's debt because of slow progress on privatization. Credit rating agencies are increasingly concerned about the Philippines' ability to sustain the debt; legislative progress on new revenue measures will weigh heavily on credit rating decisions.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING LATIN AMERICA

As an emerging market, Latin America has long suffered from political, economic, and social instability. For investors, this has meant additional risk caused by periods of regional conflict, political corruption, totalitarianism, protectionist measures, nationalization, hyperinflation, debt crises, sudden and large currency devaluation, and intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres. However, much has changed in the past decade. Democracy is beginning to become well established in some countries. A move to a more mature and accountable political environment is well under way. Domestic economies have been deregulated, privatization of state-owned companies is almost completed and foreign trade restrictions have been relaxed. Nonetheless, to the extent that events such as those listed above continue in the future, they could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers, and result in significant disruption in securities markets in the region. Investors in the region continue to face a number of potential risks.

Argentina's recent bankruptcy and the spreading financial turmoil in its neighboring countries are just the latest chapters in Latin America's long history of foreign debt and default. Almost all of the region's economies have become highly dependent upon foreign credit and loans from external sources to fuel their state-sponsored economic plans. Government profligacy and ill-conceived plans for modernization have exhausted these resources with little benefit accruing to the economy and most countries have been forced to restructure their loans or risk default on their debt obligations. In addition, interest on the debt is subject to market conditions and may reach levels that would impair economic activity and create a difficult and costly environment for borrowers. Accordingly, these governments may be forced to reschedule or freeze their debt repayment, which could negatively affect the stock market.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EMERGING MARKETS

Investing in companies domiciled in emerging market countries may be subject to potentially higher risks than investments in developed countries. These risks include: i) less social, political, and economic stability; ii) greater illiquidity and price volatility due to smaller or limited local capital markets for such securities, or low or non-existent trading volumes; iii) foreign exchanges and broker-dealers may be subject to less scrutiny and regulation by local authorities; iv) local governments may decide to seize or confiscate securities held by foreign investors and/or local governments may decide to suspend or limit an issuer's ability to make dividend or interest payments; v) local governments may limit or entirely restrict repatriation of invested capital, profits, and dividends; vi) capital gains may be subject to local taxation, including on a retroactive basis; vii) issuers facing restrictions on dollar or euro payments imposed by local governments may attempt to make dividend or interest payments to foreign investors in the local currency; viii) investors may experience difficulty in enforcing legal claims related to the securities and/or local judges may favor the interests of the issuer over those of foreign investors; ix) bankruptcy judgments may only be permitted to be paid in the local currency; x) limited public information regarding the issuer may result in greater difficulty in determining market valuations of the securities, and xi) lax financial reporting on a regular basis, substandard disclosure, and differences in accounting standards may make it difficult to ascertain the financial health of an issuer.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING RUSSIA

Investing in Russian securities is highly speculative and involves significant risks and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities markets of the U.S. and most other developed countries.

Political. Over the past century, Russia has experienced political and economic turbulence and has endured decades of communist rule under which tens of millions of its citizens were collectivized into state agricultural and industrial enterprises. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia's government has been faced with the daunting task of stabilizing its domestic economy, while transforming it into a modern and efficient structure able to compete in international markets and respond to the needs of its citizens. However, to date, many of the country's economic reform initiatives have floundered as the proceeds of IMF and other economic assistance have been squandered or stolen. In this environment, there is always the risk that the nation's government will abandon the current program of economic reform and replace it with radically different political and economic policies that would be detrimental to the interests of foreign investors. This could entail a return to a centrally planned economy and nationalization of private enterprises similar to what existed under the old Soviet Union.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. Many of Russia's businesses have failed to mobilize the available factors of production because the country's privatization program virtually ensured the predominance of the old management teams that are largely non-market-oriented in their management approach. Poor accounting standards, inept management, pervasive corruption, insider trading and crime, and inadequate regulatory protection for the rights of investors all pose a significant risk, particularly to foreign investors. In addition, there is the risk that the Russian tax system will not be reformed to prevent inconsistent, retroactive, and/or exorbitant taxation, or, in the alternative, the risk that a reformed tax system may result in the inconsistent and unpredictable enforcement of the new tax laws.

Compared to most national stock markets, the Russian securities market suffers from a variety of problems not encountered in more developed markets. There is little long-term historical data on the Russian securities market because it is relatively new and a substantial proportion of securities transactions in Russia are privately negotiated outside of stock exchanges. The inexperience of the Russian securities market and the limited volume of trading in securities in the market may make obtaining accurate prices on portfolio securities from independent sources more difficult than in more developed markets. Additionally, there is little solid corporate information available to investors. As a result, it may be difficult to assess the value or prospects of an investment in Russian companies.

Because of the recent formation of the Russian securities market as well as the underdeveloped state of the banking and telecommunications systems, settlement, clearing and registration of securities transactions are subject to significant risks. Ownership of shares (except where shares are held through depositories that meet the requirements of the 1940 Act is defined according to entries in the company's share register and normally evidenced by extracts from the register or by formal share certificates. However, there is no central registration system for shareholders and these services are carried out by the companies themselves or by registrars located throughout Russia. These registrars are not necessarily subject to effective state supervision nor are they licensed with any governmental entity and it is possible for a fund to lose its registration through fraud, negligence, or even mere oversight. While a fund will endeavor to ensure that its interest continues to be appropriately recorded either itself or through a custodian or other agent inspecting the share register and by obtaining extracts of share registers through regular confirmations, these extracts have no legal enforceability and it is possible that subsequent illegal amendment or other fraudulent act may deprive a fund of its ownership rights or improperly dilute its interests. In addition, while applicable Russian regulations impose liability on registrars for losses resulting from their errors, it may be difficult for a fund to enforce any rights it may have against the registrar or issuer of the securities in the event of loss of share registration. Furthermore, significant delays or problems may occur in registering the transfer of securities, which could cause a fund to incur losses due to a counterparty's failure to pay for securities the fund has delivered or the fund's inability to complete its contractual obligations because of theft or other reasons.

The Russian economy is heavily dependent upon the export of a range of commodities including most industrial metals, forestry products, oil, and gas. Accordingly, it is strongly affected by international commodity prices and is particularly vulnerable to any weakening in global demand for these products.

Currency. Foreign investors also face a high degree of currency risk when investing in Russian securities and a lack of available currency hedging instruments. In a surprise move in August 1998, Russia devalued the ruble, defaulted on short-term domestic bonds, and imposed a moratorium on the repayment of its international debt and the restructuring of the repayment terms. These actions have negatively affected Russian borrowers' ability to access international capital markets and have had a damaging impact on the Russian economy. In light of these and other recent government actions, foreign investors face the possibility of further devaluations. In addition, there is the risk the government may impose capital controls on foreign portfolio investments in the event of extreme financial or political crisis. Such capital controls would prevent the sale of a portfolio of foreign assets and the repatriation of investment income and capital.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

All orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities (normally, shares of the underlying Fidelity funds) are placed on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio by Strategic Advisers, either itself or through its affiliates, pursuant to authority contained in each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's management contract. A VIP FundsManager Portfolio will not incur any commissions or sales charges when it invests in underlying Fidelity funds, but it may incur such costs if it invests directly in other types of securities.

Strategic Advisers may also be responsible for the placement of portfolio transactions for other investment companies and investment accounts for which it has or its affiliates have investment discretion. If selecting brokers or dealers (including affiliates of Strategic Advisers), Strategic Advisers generally considers: the execution price; the size and type of the transaction; the nature and character of the markets for the security to be purchased or sold; the execution efficiency, settlement capability, and financial condition of the firm; the execution services rendered on a continuing basis; the reasonableness of any compensation paid; and the provision of additional brokerage and research products and services, if applicable.

For futures transactions, the selection of an FCM is generally based on the overall quality of execution and other services provided by the FCM.

Purchases and sales of securities on a securities exchange are effected through brokers who receive compensation for their services. Compensation may also be paid in connection with riskless principal transactions (in both OTC securities and securities listed on an exchange) and agency OTC transactions executed with an electronic communications network (ECN) or an alternative trading system.

Securities may be purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees.

Generally, compensation relating to investments traded on foreign exchanges will be higher than for investments traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be subject to negotiation.

Futures transactions are executed and cleared through FCMs who receive compensation for their services.

The VIP FundsManager Portfolios may execute portfolio transactions with brokers or dealers (who are not affiliates of Strategic Advisers) that provide products and services. These products and services may include: economic, industry, or company research reports or investment recommendations; subscriptions to financial publications or research data compilations; compilations of securities prices, earnings, dividends, and similar data; computerized databases; quotation equipment and services; research or analytical computer software and services; products or services that assist in effecting transactions, including services of third-party computer systems developers directly related to research and brokerage activities; and effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto (such as clearance and settlement). The receipt of these products and services has not reduced Strategic Advisers' normal research activities in providing investment advice to the funds. Strategic Advisers' expenses could be increased, however, if it attempted to generate these additional products and services through its own efforts.

Certain of the products and services Strategic Advisers may receive from brokers or dealers are furnished by brokers or dealers on their own initiative, either in connection with a particular transaction or as part of their overall services. In addition, Strategic Advisers may request a broker or dealer to provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service. While Strategic Advisers may take into account the products and services provided by a broker or dealer in determining whether compensation paid is reasonable, neither Strategic Advisers nor a fund incurs an obligation to the broker, dealer, or third party to pay for any product or service (or portion thereof) by generating a certain amount of compensation or otherwise.

Brokers or dealers that execute transactions for a fund may receive compensation that is in excess of the amount of compensation that other brokers or dealers might have charged, in recognition of the products and services they have provided. Before causing a fund to pay such higher compensation, Strategic Advisers will make a good faith determination that the compensation is reasonable in relation to the value of the products and services provided viewed in terms of the particular transaction for the fund or Strategic Advisers' overall responsibilities to the fund or other investment companies and investment accounts. Typically, these products and services assist Strategic Advisers or its affiliates in terms of its overall investment responsibilities to the fund and other investment companies and investment accounts; however, each product or service received may not benefit the fund.

Strategic Advisers may place trades with certain brokers with which it is under common control, including National Financial Services LLC (NFS), provided it determines that these affiliates' trade execution abilities and costs are comparable to those of non-affiliated, qualified brokerage firms. Strategic Advisers does not allocate trades to NFS in exchange for brokerage and research products and services of the type sometimes known as "soft dollars." Strategic Advisers trades with its affiliated brokers on an execution-only basis.

The Trustees of each fund periodically review Strategic Advisers' performance of its responsibilities in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, respectively, and review the compensation paid by the fund over representative periods of time to determine if they are reasonable in relation to the benefits to the fund.

A fund may pay compensation including both commissions and spreads in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions.

The Trustees of each fund have approved procedures in conformity with Rule 10f-3 under the 1940 Act whereby a fund may purchase securities that are offered in underwritings in which an affiliate of FMR participates. These procedures prohibit the funds from directly or indirectly benefiting an FMR affiliate in connection with such underwritings. In addition, for underwritings where an FMR affiliate participates as a principal underwriter, certain restrictions may apply that could, among other things, limit the amount of securities that the funds could purchase in the underwritings.

From time to time the Trustees will review whether the recapture for the benefit of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios of some portion of the compensation paid by the funds on portfolio transactions is legally permissible and advisable. The Trustees intend to continue to review whether recapture opportunities are available and are legally permissible and, if so, to determine in the exercise of their business judgment whether it would be advisable for each fund to participate, or continue to participate, in the commission recapture program.

Although the Trustees and officers of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio are substantially the same as those of other funds managed by Strategic Advisers or its affiliates, investment decisions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio are made independently from those of other funds or investment accounts (including proprietary accounts) managed by Strategic Advisers or its affiliates. The same security is often held in the portfolio of more than one of these funds or investment accounts. Simultaneous transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are managed by the same investment adviser, or an affiliate thereof, particularly when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one fund or investment account.

When two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, including a futures contract, the prices and amounts are allocated in accordance with procedures believed to be appropriate and equitable to each fund or investment account. In some cases this system could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security as far as each fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability of the funds to participate in volume transactions will produce better executions and prices for the funds. It is the current opinion of the Trustees that the desirability of retaining Strategic Advisers as investment adviser to each VIP FundsManager Portfolio outweighs any disadvantages that may be said to exist from exposure to simultaneous transactions.

VALUATION

The class's NAV is the value of a single share. The NAV of Investor Class is computed by adding the Investor Class's pro rata share of the value of the applicable fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting Investor Class's pro rata share of the applicable fund's liabilities, subtracting the liabilities allocated to Investor Class, and dividing the result by the number of Investor Class shares outstanding.

The assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consist primarily of shares of the underlying Fidelity funds, which are valued at their respective NAVs.

Valuation of Underlying Fidelity Funds

Growth and Growth & Income Funds. Portfolio securities are valued by various methods depending on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Most equity securities for which the primary market is the United States are valued at the official closing price, last sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the closing bid price. Most equity securities for which the primary market is outside the United States are valued using the official closing price or the last sale price in the principal market in which they are traded. If the last sale price (on the local exchange) is unavailable, the last evaluated quote or closing bid price normally is used. Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

Debt securities and other assets for which market quotations are readily available may be valued at market values determined by such securities' most recent bid prices (sales prices if the principal market is an exchange) in the principal market in which they normally are traded, as furnished by recognized dealers in such securities or assets. Or, debt securities and convertible securities may be valued on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service that uses a valuation matrix which incorporates both dealer-supplied valuations and electronic data processing techniques. Use of pricing services has been approved by the Board of Trustees. A number of pricing services are available, and the funds may use various pricing services or discontinue the use of any pricing service.

Futures contracts and options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available.

Independent brokers or quotation services provide prices of foreign securities in their local currency. Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC) gathers all exchange rates daily at the close of the NYSE using the last quoted price on the local currency and then translates the value of foreign securities from their local currencies into U.S. dollars. Any changes in the value of forward contracts due to exchange rate fluctuations and days to maturity are included in the calculation of NAV. If an event that is expected to materially affect the value of a portfolio security occurs after the close of an exchange or market on which that security is traded, then that security will be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees.

Short-term securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less for which market quotations and information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available are valued either at amortized cost or at original cost plus accrued interest, both of which approximate current value.

The procedures set forth above need not be used to determine the value of the securities owned by a fund if, in the opinion of a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees, some other method would more accurately reflect the fair value of such securities. For example, securities and other assets for which there is no readily available market value may be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees. In making a good faith determination of the value of a security, the committee may review price movements in futures contracts and ADRs, market and trading trends, the bid/ask quotes of brokers and off-exchange institutional trading.

Income/Taxable Bond Funds. Portfolio securities are valued by various methods depending on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt securities and other assets for which market quotations are readily available may be valued at market values determined by such securities' most recent bid prices (sales prices if the principal market is an exchange) in the principal market in which they normally are traded, as furnished by recognized dealers in such securities or assets. Or, debt securities and convertible securities may be valued on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service that uses a valuation matrix which incorporates both dealer-supplied valuations and electronic data processing techniques. Use of pricing services has been approved by the Board of Trustees. A number of pricing services are available, and the funds may use various pricing services or discontinue the use of any pricing service.

Most equity securities for which the primary market is the United States are valued at the official closing price, last sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the closing bid price. Most equity securities for which the primary market is outside the United States are valued using the official closing price or the last sale price in the principal market in which they are traded. If the last sale price (on the local exchange) is unavailable, the last evaluated quote or closing bid price normally is used.

Futures contracts and options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available. Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

Independent brokers or quotation services provide prices of foreign securities in their local currency. FSC gathers all exchange rates daily at the close of the NYSE using the last quoted price on the local currency and then translates the value of foreign securities from their local currencies into U.S. dollars. Any changes in the value of forward contracts due to exchange rate fluctuations and days to maturity are included in the calculation of NAV. If an event that is expected to materially affect the value of a portfolio security occurs after the close of an exchange or market on which that security is traded, then that security will be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees.

Short-term securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less for which market quotations and information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available are valued either at amortized cost or at original cost plus accrued interest, both of which approximate current value.

The procedures set forth above need not be used to determine the value of the securities owned by a fund if, in the opinion of a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees, some other method would more accurately reflect the fair value of such securities. For example, securities and other assets for which there is no readily available market value may be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees. In making a good faith determination of the value of a security, the committee may review price movements in futures contracts and ADRs, market and trading trends, the bid/ask quotes of brokers and off-exchange institutional trading.

Money Market Funds Portfolio securities and other assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. This technique involves initially valuing an instrument at its cost as adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount rather than its current market value. The amortized cost value of an instrument may be higher or lower than the price a fund would receive if it sold the instrument.

Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

At such intervals as they deem appropriate, the Trustees consider the extent to which NAV calculated by using market valuations would deviate from the $1.00 per share calculated using amortized cost valuation. If the Trustees believe that a deviation from a fund's amortized cost per share may result in material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders, the Trustees have agreed to take such corrective action, if any, as they deem appropriate to eliminate or reduce, to the extent reasonably practicable, the dilution or unfair results. Such corrective action could include selling portfolio instruments prior to maturity to realize capital gains or losses or to shorten average portfolio maturity; withholding dividends; redeeming shares in kind; establishing NAV by using available market quotations; and such other measures as the Trustees may deem appropriate.

BUYING AND SELLING INFORMATION

Under certain circumstances (for example, at the request of a shareholder), a fund may make redemption payments in whole or in part in readily marketable securities or other property pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund. Such securities or other property will be valued for this purpose as they are valued in computing the class's NAV. Shareholders that receive securities or other property will realize, upon receipt, a gain or loss for tax purposes, and will incur additional costs and be exposed to market risk prior to and upon sale of such securities or other property.

DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES

The following information is only a summary of some of the tax consequences affecting insurance company separate accounts invested in the VIP FundsManager Portfolios. No attempt has been made to discuss tax consequences affecting variable product owners. Variable product owners seeking to understand the tax consequences of their investment should consult with their tax advisers or the insurance company that issued their variable product, or refer to their variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio intends to qualify each year as a "regulated investment company" under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code so that it will not be liable for federal tax on income and capital gains distributed to insurance company separate accounts invested in the fund. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, and avoid being subject to federal income or excise taxes at the fund level, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains within each calendar year as well as on a fiscal year basis, and intends to comply with other tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies. If a fund failed to qualify as a "regulated investment company" in any year, among other consequences, each insurance company separate account invested in the fund would fail to satisfy the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio also intends to satisfy the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. These diversification requirements, which are in addition to the diversification requirements of Subchapter M, place certain limitations on the assets of an insurance company separate account that may be invested in the securities of a single issuer or a certain number of issuers. Because Section 817(h) and the regulations thereunder treat the assets of each fund as the assets of the related insurance company separate account, each fund must also satisfy these requirements. If a fund failed to satisfy these requirements, a variable annuity or variable life insurance product supported by an insurance company separate account invested in the fund would not be treated as an annuity or as life insurance for tax purposes and would no longer be eligible for tax deferral.

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

The Trustees, Member of the Advisory Board, and executive officers of the trust and funds, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, and review each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance. If the interests of a VIP FundsManager Portfolio and an underlying Fidelity fund were to diverge, a conflict of interest could arise and affect how the Trustees and Member of the Advisory Board fulfill their fiduciary duties to the affected funds. Strategic Advisers has structured the VIP FundsManager Portfolios to avoid these potential conflicts, although there may be situations where a conflict of interest is unavoidable. In such instances, Strategic Advisers, the Trustees, and Member of the Advisory Board would take reasonable steps to minimize and, if possible, eliminate the conflict. Except for William O. McCoy and Albert R. Gamper, Jr., each of the Trustees oversees 322 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. McCoy oversees 328 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. Gamper oversees 235 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.

The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust. Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) (Independent Trustee), shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 72nd birthday occurs. The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees. The executive officers and Advisory Board Member hold office without limit in time, except that any officer and Advisory Board Member may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years.

Interested Trustees*:

Correspondence intended for each Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Edward C. Johnson 3d (75)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1983

Mr. Johnson is Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Johnson serves as Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and a Director of FMR Corp.; a Director and Chairman of the Board and of the Executive Committee of FMR; Chairman and a Director of Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc.; Chairman and a Director of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc.; and Chairman (2001-present) and a Director (2000-present) of FMR Co., Inc.

Stephen P. Jonas (52)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Mr. Jonas is Senior Vice President of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% (2006), VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% (2006), VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% (2006), and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% (2006). He also serves as Senior Vice President of other Fidelity funds (2005-present). Mr. Jonas is Executive Director of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Jonas served as President of Fidelity Enterprise Operations and Risk Services (2004-2005), Chief Administrative Officer (2002-2004), and Chief Financial Officer of FMR Co. (1998-2000). Mr. Jonas has been with Fidelity Investments since 1987 and has held various financial and management positions including Chief Financial Officer of FMR. In addition, he serves on the Boards of Boston Ballet (2003-present) and Simmons College (2003-present).

Robert L. Reynolds (53)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2003

Mr. Reynolds is a Director (2003-present) and Chief Operating Officer (2002-present) of FMR Corp. He also serves on the Board at Fidelity Investments Canada, Ltd. (2000-present). Previously, Mr. Reynolds served as President of Fidelity Investments Institutional Retirement Group (1996-2000).

* Trustees have been determined to be "Interested Trustees" by virtue of, among other things, their affiliation with the trust or various entities under common control with FMR.

Independent Trustees:

Correspondence intended for each Independent Trustee (that is, the Trustees other than the Interested Trustees) may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Dennis J. Dirks (57)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Prior to his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Dirks was Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) (1999-2003). He also served as President, Chief Operating Officer, and Board member of The Depository Trust Company (DTC) (1999-2003) and President and Board member of the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) (1999-2003). In addition, Mr. Dirks served as Chief Executive Officer and Board member of the Government Securities Clearing Corporation (2001-2003) and Chief Executive Officer and Board member of the Mortgage-Backed Securities Clearing Corporation (2001-2003). Mr. Dirks also serves as a Trustee of Manhattan College (2005-present).

Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (63)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Mr. Gamper also serves as a Trustee (2006-present) or Member of the Advisory Board (2005-present) of other investment companies advised by FMR. Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (1989-2002). He currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2001-present), Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-present), and Chairman of the Board of Saint Barnabas Health Care System.

Robert M. Gates (62)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1997

Dr. Gates is Chairman of the Independent Trustees (2006-present). Dr. Gates is President of Texas A&M University (2002-present). He was Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1991 to 1993. From 1989 to 1991, Dr. Gates served as Assistant to the President of the United States and Deputy National Security Advisor. Dr. Gates is a Director of NACCO Industries, Inc. (mining and manufacturing), Parker Drilling Co., Inc. (drilling and rental tools for the energy industry, 2001-present), and Brinker International (restaurant management, 2003-present). Previously, Dr. Gates served as a Director of LucasVarity PLC (automotive components and diesel engines), a Director of TRW Inc. (automotive, space, defense, and information technology), and Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University (1999-2001). Dr. Gates also is a Trustee of the Forum for International Policy.

George H. Heilmeier (69)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2004

Dr. Heilmeier is Chairman Emeritus of Telcordia Technologies (communication software and systems), where prior to his retirement, he served as company Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of The Mitre Corporation (systems engineering and information technology support for the government), and HRL Laboratories (private research and development, 2004-present). He is Chairman of the General Motors Science & Technology Advisory Board and a Life Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (2000-present). Dr. Heilmeier is a member of the Defense Science Board and the National Security Agency Advisory Board. He is also a member of the National Academy of Engineering, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Board of Overseers of the School of Engineering and Applied Science of the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, Dr. Heilmeier served as a Director of TRW Inc. (automotive, space, defense, and information technology, 1992-2002), Compaq (1994-2002), Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) (technology-based business outsourcing, 1995-2002), INET Technologies Inc. (telecommunications network surveillance, 2001-2004), and Teletech Holdings (customer management services). He is the recipient of the 2005 Kyoto Prize in Advanced Technology for his invention of the liquid display.

Marie L. Knowles (59)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company. She served as a Director of ARCO from 1996 to 1998. She currently serves as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing) and McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, 2002-present). Ms. Knowles is a Trustee of the Brookings Institution and the Catalina Island Conservancy and also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California.

Ned C. Lautenbach (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2000

Mr. Lautenbach has been a partner of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (private equity investment firm) since September 1998. Previously, Mr. Lautenbach was with the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) from 1968 until his retirement in 1998. Mr. Lautenbach serves as a Director of Italtel Holding S.p.A. (telecommunications (Milan, Italy), 2004-present) and Eaton Corporation (diversified industrial) as well as the Philharmonic Center for the Arts in Naples, Florida. He also is a member of the Board of Trustees of Fairfield University (2005-present), as well as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

William O. McCoy (72)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1997

Prior to his retirement in December 1994, Mr. McCoy was Vice Chairman of the Board of BellSouth Corporation (telecommunications) and President of BellSouth Enterprises. He is currently a Director of Liberty Corporation (holding company), Duke Realty Corporation (real estate), and Progress Energy, Inc. (electric utility). He is also a partner of Franklin Street Partners (private investment management firm) and a member of the Research Triangle Foundation Board. In addition, Mr. McCoy served as the Interim Chancellor (1999-2000) and a member of the Board of Visitors for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and currently serves on the Board of Directors of the University of North Carolina Health Care System and the Board of Visitors of the Kenan-Flagler Business School (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). He also served as Vice President of Finance for the University of North Carolina (16-school system).

Cornelia M. Small (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Ms. Small is a member (2000-present) and Chairperson (2002-present) of the Investment Committee, and a member (2002-present) of the Board of Trustees of Smith College. Previously, she served as Chief Investment Officer (1999-2000), Director of Global Equity Investments (1996-1999), and a member of the Board of Directors of Scudder, Stevens & Clark (1990-1997) and Scudder Kemper Investments (1997-1998). In addition, Ms. Small served as Co-Chair (2000-2003) of the Annual Fund for the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

William S. Stavropoulos (66)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Mr. Stavropoulos is Chairman of the Board (2000-present) and a Member of the Board of Directors of The Dow Chemical Company. Since joining The Dow Chemical Company in 1967, Mr. Stavropoulos served in numerous senior management positions, including President (1993-2000; 2002-2003), CEO (1995-2000; 2002-2004), and Chairman of the Executive Committee (2000-2004). Currently, he is a Director of NCR Corporation (data warehousing and technology solutions), BellSouth Corporation (telecommunications), Chemical Financial Corporation, Maersk Inc. (industrial conglomerate, 2002-present), and Metalmark Capital (private equity investment firm, 2005-present). He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. In addition, Mr. Stavropoulos is a member of The Business Council, J.P. Morgan International Council and the University of Notre Dame Advisory Council for the College of Science.

Kenneth L. Wolfe (66)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Prior to his retirement in 2001, Mr. Wolfe was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hershey Foods Corporation (1993-2001). He currently serves as a member of the boards of Adelphia Communications Corporation (2003-present), Bausch & Lomb, Inc., and Revlon Inc. (2004-present).

Advisory Board Member and Executive Officers:

Correspondence intended for each executive officer and Mr. Lynch may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Peter S. Lynch (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2003

Member of the Advisory Board of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV. Vice Chairman and a Director of FMR, and Vice Chairman (2001-present) and a Director (2000-present) of FMR Co., Inc. Previously, Mr. Lynch served as a Trustee of the Fidelity funds (1990-2003). In addition, he serves as a Trustee of Boston College, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Historic Deerfield, John F. Kennedy Library, and the Museum of Fine Arts of Boston.

Boyce I. Greer (49)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Vice President of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Greer also serves as Vice President of the Fidelity Select Portfolios (2005-present), certain Asset Allocation Funds (2005-present), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR (2003-present), and a member of the FMR senior management team (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Greer served as a Director and Managing Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2002-2005), Executive Vice President (2000-2002), and Money Market Group Leader (1997-2002) of the Fidelity Investments Fixed Income Division. He also served as Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (1997-2002), Senior Vice President of FMR (1997-2002), and Vice President of FIMM (1998-2002).

Eric D. Roiter (57)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Secretary of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. He also serves as Secretary of other Fidelity funds; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR Co., Inc. (2001-present) and FMR; Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (2001-present), Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. (2001-present), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2001-present). Mr. Roiter is an Adjunct Member, Faculty of Law, at Boston College Law School (2003-present). Previously, Mr. Roiter served as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (1998-2005).

Stuart Fross (46)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Secretary of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Fross also serves as Assistant Secretary of other Fidelity funds (2003-present), Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005-present), and is an employee of FMR.

Christine Reynolds (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

President, Treasurer, and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Ms. Reynolds also serves as President, Treasurer, and AML officer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is a Vice President (2003) and an employee (2002) of FMR. Before joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Reynolds worked at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) (1980-2002), where she was most recently an audit partner with PwC's investment management practice.

Paul M. Murphy (58)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Chief Financial Officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr.Murphy also serves as Chief Financial Officer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present). He also serves as Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services Group (FPCMS).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber (58)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Chief Compliance Officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Rathgeber also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and Executive Vice President of Risk Oversight for Fidelity Investments (2002). Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc. (1998-2002).

John R. Hebble (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Hebble also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2003), and is an employee of FMR. Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Hebble worked at Deutsche Asset Management where he served as Director of Fund Accounting (2002-2003) and Assistant Treasurer of the Scudder Funds (1998-2003).

Bryan A. Mehrmann (44)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Mehrmann also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR. Previously, Mr. Mehrmann served as Vice President of Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Group (FIIS)/Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Corporation, Inc. (FIIOC) Client Services (1998-2004).

Kimberley H. Monasterio (42)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Ms. Monasterio also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is an employee of FMR (2004). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Monasterio served as Treasurer (2000-2004) and Chief Financial Officer (2002-2004) of the Franklin Templeton Funds and Senior Vice President of Franklin Templeton Services, LLC (2000-2004).

Kenneth B. Robins (36)

Year of Election or Appointment:2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Robins also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2004-present). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Robins worked at KPMG LLP, where he was a partner in KPMG's department of professional practice (2002-2004) and a Senior Manager (1999-2000). In addition, Mr. Robins served as Assistant Chief Accountant, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2000-2002).

Robert G. Byrnes (39)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Byrnes also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Byrnes served as Vice President of FPCMS (2003-2005). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Byrnes worked at Deutsche Asset Management where he served as Vice President of the Investment Operations Group (2000-2003).

John H. Costello (59)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Costello also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds and is an employee of FMR.

Peter L. Lydecker (51)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Lydecker also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is an employee of FMR.

Mark Osterheld (50)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Osterheld also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2002) and is an employee of FMR.

Gary W. Ryan (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Ryan also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Ryan served as Vice President of Fund Reporting in FPCMS (1999-2005).

Salvatore Schiavone (40)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Schiavone also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Schiavone worked at Deutsche Asset Management, where he most recently served as Assistant Treasurer (2003-2005) of the Scudder Funds and Vice President and Head of Fund Reporting (1996-2003).

Standing Committees of the Funds' Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established various committees to support the Independent Trustees in acting independently in pursuing the best interests of the Fidelity funds and their shareholders. The committees facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to Independent Trustees, each fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Currently, the Board of Trustees has 12 standing committees. The members of each committee are Independent Trustees.

The Operations Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Dr. Gates currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair, and serves as a forum for consideration of issues of importance to, or calling for particular determinations by, the Independent Trustees. The committee also considers matters involving potential conflicts of interest between the funds and FMR and its affiliates and reviews proposed contracts and the proposed continuation of contracts between the Fidelity funds and FMR and its affiliates, and annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding contracts with third parties unaffiliated with FMR, including insurance coverage and custody agreements. The committee also monitors additional issues including the nature, levels and quality of services provided to shareholders, significant litigation, and the voting of proxies of portfolio companies. The committee also has oversight of compliance issues not specifically within the scope of any other committee. The committee is also responsible for definitive action on all compliance matters involving the potential for significant reimbursement by FMR. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 12 meetings.

The Fair Value Oversight Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Dr. Gates currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets quarterly, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The Fair Value Oversight Committee monitors and establishes policies concerning procedures and controls regarding the valuation of fund investments and their classification as liquid or illiquid and monitors matters of disclosure to the extent required to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. The committee provides oversight regarding the investment policies relating to, and Fidelity funds' investment in, non-traditional securities. The committee also reviews actions taken by FMR's Fair Value Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held four meetings.

The Board of Trustees has established three Fund Oversight Committees: the Equity Committee (composed of Messrs. Lautenbach (Chair), Gamper, and Stavropoulos), the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee (composed of Mr. Dirks (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Ms. Small), and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee (composed of Mr. Wolfe (Chair), Dr. Heilmeier, and Mr. McCoy). Each committee normally meets in conjunction with in-person meetings of the Board of Trustees, or more frequently as called by the Chair of the respective committee. Each committee develops an understanding of and reviews the investment objectives, policies, and practices of each fund under its oversight. Each committee also monitors investment performance, compliance by each relevant Fidelity fund with its investment policies and restrictions and reviews appropriate benchmarks, competitive universes, unusual or exceptional investment matters, the personnel and other resources devoted to the management of each fund and all other matters bearing on each fund's investment results. The Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee also receives reports required under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act and has oversight of research bearing on credit quality, investment structures and other fixed-income issues, and of international research. The Select and Asset Allocation Committee has oversight of FMR's equity investment research. Each committee will review and recommend any required action to the Board in respect of specific funds, including new funds, changes in fundamental and non-fundamental investment policies and restrictions, partial or full closing to new investors, fund mergers, fund name changes, and liquidations of funds. The members of each committee may organize working groups to make recommendations concerning issues related to funds that are within the scope of the committee's review. These working groups report to the committee or to the Independent Trustees, or both, as appropriate. Each working group may request from FMR such information from FMR as may be appropriate to the working group's deliberations. Prior to July 2005, the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee was known as the Fixed-Income and International Committee, and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee was known as the Select and Special Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the Equity Committee held 10 meetings, the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee held 12 meetings, and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee held nine meetings.

The Board of Trustees has established two Fund Contract Committees: the Equity Contract Committee (composed of Messrs. Lautenbach (Chair), Gamper, Stavropoulos, and Mr. Wolfe) and the Fixed-Income Contract Committee (composed of Mr. Dirks (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Ms. Small). Each committee will ordinarily meet as needed to consider matters related to the renewal of fund investment advisory agreements. The committees will assist the Independent Trustees in their consideration of investment advisory agreements of each fund. Each committee receives information on and makes recommendations concerning the approval of investment advisory agreements between the Fidelity funds and FMR and its affiliates and any non-FMR affiliate that serves as a sub-adviser to a Fidelity fund (collectively, investment advisers) and the annual review of these contracts. The Fixed-Income Contract Committee will be responsible for investment advisory agreements of the fixed-income funds. The Equity Contract Committee will be responsible for the investment advisory agreements of all other funds. With respect to each fund under its purview, each committee: requests and receives information on the nature, extent, and quality of services provided to the shareholders of the Fidelity funds by the investment advisers and their respective affiliates, fund performance, the investment performance of the investment adviser, and such other information as the committee determines to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the investment advisory agreements; considers the cost of the services to be provided and the profitability and other benefits that the investment advisers and their respective affiliates derive or will derive from their contractual arrangements with each of the funds (including tangible and intangible "fall-out benefits"); considers the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the funds grow and whether fee levels reflect those economies of scale for the benefit of fund investors; considers methodologies for determining the extent to which the funds benefit from economies of scale and refinements to these methodologies; considers information comparing the services to be rendered and the amount to be paid under the funds' contracts with those under other investment advisory contracts entered into with FMR and its affiliates and other investment advisers, such as contracts with other registered investment companies or other types of clients; considers such other matters and information as may be necessary and appropriate to evaluate investment advisory agreements of the funds; and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the approval or renewal of investment advisory agreements. Each committee will consult with the other committees of the Board of Trustees, and in particular with the Audit Committee and the applicable Fund Oversight Committees, in carrying out its responsibilities. Each committee's responsibilities are guided by Sections 15(c) and 36(b) of the 1940 Act. While each committee consists solely of Independent Trustees, its meetings may, depending upon the subject matter, be attended by one or more senior members of FMR's management or representatives of a sub-adviser not affiliated with FMR. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, each Fund Contract Committee held three meetings.

The Shareholder, Distribution and Brokerage Committee is composed of Messrs. Stavropoulos (Chair), Dirks, and Lautenbach, and Ms. Small. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair. Regarding shareholder services, the committee considers the structure and amount of the Fidelity funds' transfer agency fees and fees, including direct fees to investors (other than sales loads), such as bookkeeping and custodial fees, and the nature and quality of services rendered by FMR and its affiliates or third parties (such as custodians) in consideration of these fees. The committee also considers other non-investment management services rendered to the Fidelity funds by FMR and its affiliates, including pricing and bookkeeping services. Regarding brokerage, the committee monitors and recommends policies concerning the securities transactions of the Fidelity funds. The committee periodically reviews the policies and practices with respect to efforts to achieve best execution, commissions paid to firms supplying research and brokerage services or paying fund expenses, and policies and procedures designed to assure that any allocation of portfolio transactions is not influenced by the sale of Fidelity fund shares. The committee also monitors brokerage and other similar relationships between the Fidelity funds and firms affiliated with FMR that participate in the execution of securities transactions. Regarding the distribution of fund shares, the committee considers issues bearing on the various distribution channels employed by the Fidelity funds, including issues regarding Rule 18f-3 plans and related consideration of classes of shares, sales load structures (including breakpoints), load waivers, selling concessions and service charges paid to intermediaries, Rule 12b-1 plans, contingent deferred sales charges, and finders' fees, and other means by which intermediaries are compensated for selling fund shares or providing shareholder servicing, including revenue sharing. The committee also considers issues bearing on the preparation and use of advertisements and sales literature for the Fidelity funds, policies and procedures regarding frequent purchase of Fidelity fund shares, and selective disclosure of portfolio holdings. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, the Shareholder, Distribution and Brokerage Committee held 11 meetings.

The Audit Committee is composed of Ms. Knowles (Chair), Mr. Gamper, Dr. Heilmeier, and Messrs. McCoy and Wolfe). All committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. At least one committee member will be an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC. The committee will have at least one committee member in common with the Compliance Committee. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee meets separately at least four times a year with the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, with personnel responsible for the internal audit function of FMR Corp., and with the Fidelity funds' outside auditors. The committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the outside auditors employed by the Fidelity funds. The committee assists the Trustees in overseeing and monitoring: (i) the systems of internal accounting and financial controls of the Fidelity funds and the funds' service providers, (ii) the financial reporting processes of the Fidelity funds, (iii) the independence, objectivity and qualification of the auditors to the Fidelity funds, (iv) the annual audits of the Fidelity funds' financial statements, and (v) the accounting policies and disclosures of the Fidelity funds. The committee considers and acts upon (i) the provision by any outside auditor of any non-audit services for any Fidelity fund, and (ii) the provision by any outside auditor of certain non-audit services to Fidelity fund service providers and their affiliates to the extent that such approval (in the case of this clause (ii)) is required under applicable regulations of the SEC. In furtherance of the foregoing, the committee has adopted (and may from time to time amend or supplement) and provides oversight of policies and procedures for non-audit engagements by outside auditors of the Fidelity funds. It is responsible for approving all audit engagement fees and terms for the Fidelity funds, resolving disagreements between a fund and any outside auditor regarding any fund's financial reporting, and has sole authority to hire and fire any auditor. Auditors of the funds report directly to the committee. The committee will obtain assurance of independence and objectivity from the outside auditors, including a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditor and the Fidelity funds and any service providers consistent with Independent Standards Board Standard No. 1. The committee will receive reports of compliance with provisions of the Auditor Independence Regulations relating to the hiring of employees or former employees of the outside auditors. It oversees and receives reports on the Fidelity funds' service providers' internal controls and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the service providers' accounting and financial controls, including: (i) any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Fidelity funds' ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; (ii) any change in the fund's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the fund's internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) any fraud, whether material or not, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Fidelity funds' or service providers internal controls over financial reporting. The committee will review with counsel any legal matters that may have a material impact on the Fidelity funds' financial statements and any material reports or inquiries received from regulators or governmental agencies. These matters may also be reviewed by the Compliance Committee or the Operations Committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee will coordinate with the Chair of the Compliance Committee, as appropriate. The committee reviews at least annually a report from each outside auditor describing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control, peer review, or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board examination of the auditing firm and any material issues raised by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities of the auditing firm and in each case any steps taken to deal with such issues. The committee will oversee and receive reports on the Fidelity funds' financial reporting process, will discuss with FMR, the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, outside auditors and, if appropriate, internal audit personnel of FMR Corp. their qualitative judgments about the appropriateness and acceptability of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed for adoption by the Fidelity funds, and will review with FMR, the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, outside auditor, and internal auditor personnel of FMR Corp. (to the extent relevant) the results of audits of the Fidelity funds' financial statements. The committee will review periodically the Fidelity funds' major internal controls exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 14 meetings.

The Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Dr. Gates (Chair) and Messrs. Lautenbach and Stavropoulos. The committee meets as called by the Chair. With respect to fund governance and board administration matters, the committee periodically reviews procedures of the Board of Trustees and its committees (including committee charters) and periodically reviews compensation of Independent Trustees. The committee monitors corporate governance matters and makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees on the frequency and structure of the Board of Trustee meetings and on any other aspect of Board procedures. It acts as the administrative committee under the retirement plan for Independent Trustees who retired prior to December 30, 1996 and under the fee deferral plan for Independent Trustees. It reviews the performance of legal counsel employed by the Fidelity funds and the Independent Trustees. On behalf of the Independent Trustees, the committee will make such findings and determinations as to the independence of counsel for the Independent Trustees as may be necessary or appropriate under applicable regulations or otherwise. The committee is also responsible for Board administrative matters applicable to Independent Trustees, such as expense reimbursement policies and compensation for attendance at meetings, conferences and other events. The committee monitors compliance with, acts as the administrator of, and makes determinations in respect of, the provisions of the code of ethics and any supplemental policies regarding personal securities transactions applicable to the Independent Trustees. The committee monitors the functioning of each Board committee and makes recommendations for any changes, including the creation or elimination of standing or ad hoc Board committees. The committee monitors regulatory and other developments to determine whether to recommend modifications to the committee's responsibilities or other Trustee policies and procedures in light of rule changes, reports concerning "best practices" in corporate governance and other developments in mutual fund governance. The committee meets with Independent Trustees at least once a year to discuss matters relating to fund governance. The committee recommends that the Board establish such special or ad hoc Board committees as may be desirable or necessary from time to time in order to address ethical, legal, or other matters that may arise. The committee also oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board of Trustees and establishes procedures to allow it to exercise this oversight function. In conducting this oversight, the committee shall address all matters that it considers relevant to the performance of the Board of Trustees and shall report the results of its evaluation to the Board of Trustees, including any recommended amendments to the principles of governance, and any recommended changes to the Fidelity funds' or the Board of Trustees' policies, procedures, and structures. The committee reviews periodically the size and composition of the Board of Trustees as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board of Trustees reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of Independent Trustees required by law. The committee makes nominations for the election or appointment of Independent Trustees and non-management Members of any Advisory Board, and for membership on committees. The committee shall have authority to retain and terminate any third-party advisers, including authority to approve fees and other retention terms. Such advisers may include search firms to identify Independent Trustee candidates and board compensation consultants. The committee may conduct or authorize investigations into or studies of matters within the committee's scope of responsibilities, and may retain, at the Fidelity funds' expense, such independent counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary. The committee will consider nominees to the Board of Trustees recommended by shareholders based upon the criteria applied to candidates presented to the committee by a search firm or other source. Recommendations, along with appropriate background material concerning the candidate that demonstrates his or her ability to serve as an Independent Trustee of the Fidelity funds, should be submitted to the Chair of the committee at the address maintained for communications with Independent Trustees. If the committee retains a search firm, the Chair will generally forward all such submissions to the search firm for evaluation. With respect to the criteria for selecting Independent Trustees, it is expected that all candidates will possess the following minimum qualifications: (i) unquestioned personal integrity; (ii) not an interested person of FMR or its affiliates within the meaning of the 1940 Act; (iii) does not have a material relationship (e.g., commercial, banking, consulting, legal, or accounting) that could create an appearance of lack of independence in respect of FMR and its affiliates; (iv) has the disposition to act independently in respect of FMR and its affiliates and others in order to protect the interests of the funds and all shareholders; (v) ability to attend 11 meetings per year; (vi) demonstrates sound business judgment gained through broad experience in significant positions where the candidate has dealt with management, technical, financial, or regulatory issues; (vii) sufficient financial or accounting knowledge to add value in the complex financial environment of the Fidelity funds; (viii) experience on corporate or other institutional oversight bodies having similar responsibilities, but which board memberships or other relationships could not result in business or regulatory conflicts with the funds; and (ix) capacity for the hard work and attention to detail that is required to be an effective Independent Trustee in light of the Fidelity funds' complex regulatory, operational, and marketing setting. The Governance and Nominating Committee may determine that a candidate who does not have the type of previous experience or knowledge referred to above should nevertheless be considered as a nominee if the Governance and Nominating Committee finds that the candidate has additional qualifications such that his or her qualifications, taken as a whole, demonstrate the same level of fitness to serve as an Independent Trustee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 12 meetings.

The Board of Trustees established the Compliance Committee (composed of Ms. Small (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Messrs. Lautenbach and Stavropoulos) in May 2005. The committee normally meets quarterly, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee oversees the administration and operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the Fidelity funds and their service providers as required by Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act. The committee is responsible for the review and approval of policies and procedures relating to (i) provisions of the Code of Ethics, (ii) anti-money laundering requirements, (iii) compliance with investment restrictions and limitations, (iv) privacy, (v) recordkeeping, and (vi) other compliance policies and procedures which are not otherwise delegated to another committee. The committee has responsibility for recommending to the Board the designation of a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) of the Fidelity funds. The committee serves as the primary point of contact between the CCO and the Board, it oversees the annual performance review and compensation of the CCO, and if required, makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the removal of the appointed CCO. The committee receives reports of significant correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies, employee complaints or published reports which raise concerns regarding compliance matters, and copies of significant non-routine correspondence with the SEC. The committee receives reports from the CCO including the annual report concerning the funds' compliance policies as required by Rule 38a-1, quarterly reports in respect of any breaches of fiduciary duty or violations of federal securities laws, and reports on any other compliance or related matters that may have a significant impact on the funds. The committee will recommend to the Board, what actions, if any, should be taken with respect to such reports. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held eight meetings.

The Proxy Voting Committee is composed of Dr. Heilmeier (Chair), Mr. Lautenbach, and Ms. Small. The committee will meet as needed to review the fund's proxy voting policies, consider changes to the policies, and review the manner in which the policies have been applied. The committee will receive reports on the manner in which proxy votes have been cast under the proxy voting policies and reports on consultations between the fund's investment advisers and portfolio companies concerning matters presented to shareholders for approval. The committee will address issues relating to the fund's annual voting report filed with the SEC. The committee will receive reports concerning the implementation of procedures and controls designed to ensure that the proxy voting policies are implemented in accordance with their terms. The committee will consider FMR's recommendations concerning certain non-routine proposals not covered by the proxy voting policies. The committee will receive reports with respect to steps taken by FMR to assure that proxy voting has been done without regard to any other FMR relationships, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company. The committee will make recommendations to the Board concerning the casting of proxy votes in circumstances where FMR has determined that, because of a conflict of interest, the proposal to be voted on should be reviewed by the Board. The Board of Trustees established the Proxy Voting Committee in January 2006. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held no meetings.

The following table sets forth information describing the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in each fund and in all funds in the aggregate within the same fund family overseen by the Trustee for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005.

Interested Trustees

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Stephen P. Jonas

Robert L. Reynolds

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

Independent Trustees

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Dennis J. Dirks

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.

Robert M. Gates

George H. Heilmeier

Marie L. Knowles

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Ned C. Lautenbach

William O. McCoy

Cornelia M. Small

William S.
Stavropoulos

Kenneth L. Wolfe

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

The following table sets forth information describing the compensation of each Trustee and Member of the Advisory Board for his or her services for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Compensation Table1

AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

J. Michael
Cook2

Ralph F.
Cox
2

Dennis J. Dirks3

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.4

Robert M.
Gates

George H.
Heilmeier

Donald J.
Kirk2

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEXA

$ 0

$ 0

$ 378,500

$ 203,250

$ 373,000

$ 373,000

$ 0

AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

Marie L.
Knowles

Ned C.
Lautenbach

Marvin L.
Mann
5

William O.
McCoy

Cornelia M. Small6

William S.
Stavropoulos

Kenneth L. Wolfe7

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEXA

$ 399,000

$ 373,000

$ 502,500

$ 415,500B

$ 378,500

$ 379,000

$ 370,000

1 Edward C. Johnson 3d, Abigail P. Johnson, Stephen P. Jonas, Peter S. Lynch, and Robert L. Reynolds are interested persons and are compensated by FMR.

2 Mr. Cook, Mr. Cox, and Mr. Kirk served on the Board of Trustees through December 31, 2004.

3 During the period from July 1, 2004, through December 13, 2004, Mr. Dirks served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective December 14, 2004, Mr. Dirks serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

4 During the period from June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, Mr. Gamper served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2006, Mr. Gamper serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

5 Mr. Mann served on the Board of Trustees through December 31, 2005.

6 During the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, Ms. Small served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2005, Ms. Small serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

7 During the period from October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, Mr. Wolfe served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2005, Mr. Wolfe serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

+ Estimated for the fund's first full year.

A Information is for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 for 324 funds of 58 trusts in the fund complex. Compensation figures include cash, amounts required to be deferred, and may include amounts deferred at the election of Trustees. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2005, the Trustees accrued required deferred compensation from the funds as follows: Dennis J. Dirks, $148,500; Robert M. Gates, $148,500; George H. Heilmeier, $148,500; Marie L. Knowles, $163,500; Ned C. Lautenbach, $148,500; Marvin L. Mann, $198,500; William O. McCoy, $148,500;Cornelia M. Small, $148,500; William S. Stavropoulos, $148,500; and Kenneth L. Wolfe, $148, 500. Certain of the Independent Trustees elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Ned C. Lautenbach, $48,134; and William O. McCoy, $93,634.

B Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts deferred at Mr. McCoy's election under a deferred compensation plan adopted by the other open-end registered investment companies in the fund complex (Other Open-End Funds). Pursuant to the deferred compensation plan, Mr. McCoy, as an Independent Trustee, may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his annual fees. Amounts deferred under the deferred compensation plan are credited to an account established for Mr. McCoy on the books of the Other Open-End Funds. Interest is accrued on amounts deferred under the deferred compensation plan. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2005, Mr. McCoy voluntarily elected to defer $45,500.

Under a deferred compensation plan adopted in September 1995 and amended in November 1996 and January 2000 (the Plan), Independent Trustees must defer receipt of a portion of, and may elect to defer receipt of an additional portion of, their annual fees. Amounts deferred under the Plan are treated as though equivalent dollar amounts had been invested in shares of a cross-section of Fidelity funds including funds in each major investment discipline and representing a majority of Fidelity's assets under management (the Reference Funds). The amounts ultimately received by the Independent Trustees under the Plan will be directly linked to the investment performance of the Reference Funds. Deferral of fees in accordance with the Plan will have a negligible effect on a fund's assets, liabilities, and net income per share, and will not obligate a fund to retain the services of any Independent Trustee or to pay any particular level of compensation to the Independent Trustee. A fund may invest in the Reference Funds under the Plan without shareholder approval.

As of the public offering of shares of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, 100% of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's total outstanding shares was held by FMR. FMR Corp. is the ultimate parent company of FMR. By virtue of his ownership interest in FMR Corp., as described in the "Control of Investment Advisers" section below, Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d, Trustee, may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of these shares.

CONTROL OF INVESTMENT ADVISERS

FMR Corp., organized in 1972, is the ultimate parent company of FMR and Strategic Advisers. The voting common stock of FMR Corp. is divided into two classes. Class B is held predominantly by members of the Edward C. Johnson 3d family and is entitled to 49% of the vote on any matter acted upon by the voting common stock. Class A is held predominantly by non-Johnson family member employees of FMR Corp. and its affiliates and is entitled to 51% of the vote on any such matter. The Johnson family group and all other Class B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Class B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Class B shares. Under the 1940 Act, control of a company is presumed where one individual or group of individuals owns more than 25% of the voting stock of that company. Therefore, through their ownership of voting common stock and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the 1940 Act, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR Corp.

At present, the primary business activities of FMR Corp. and its subsidiaries are: (i) the provision of investment advisory, management, shareholder, investment information and assistance and certain fiduciary services for individual and institutional investors; (ii) the provision of securities brokerage services; (iii) the management and development of real estate; and (iv) the investment in and operation of a number of emerging businesses.

FMR, Strategic Advisers (the Investment Advisers), FDC, and the funds have adopted a code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that sets forth employees' fiduciary responsibilities regarding the funds, establishes procedures for personal investing, and restricts certain transactions. Employees subject to the code of ethics, including Fidelity investment personnel, may invest in securities for their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the funds.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a management contract with Strategic Advisers, pursuant to which Strategic Advisers furnishes investment advisory and other services.

Management Services. Under the terms of its management contract with each fund, Strategic Advisers acts as investment adviser and, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, directs the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective, policies and limitations. Strategic Advisers is authorized, in its discretion, to allocate each fund's assets among the underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund may invest. Strategic Advisers also provides each fund with all necessary office facilities and personnel for servicing the fund's investments and compensates all personnel of each fund or Strategic Advisers performing services relating to research, statistical and investment activities.

Strategic Advisers in turn has entered into an administration agreement with FMR on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. Under the terms of each administration agreement, FMR or its affiliates provide the management and administrative services (other than investment advisory services) necessary for the operation of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. These services include providing facilities for maintaining each fund's organization; supervising relations with custodians, transfer and pricing agents, accountants, underwriters and other persons dealing with each fund; preparing all general shareholder communications and conducting shareholder relations; maintaining each fund's records and the registration of each fund's shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings under state laws; developing management and shareholder services for each fund; and furnishing reports, evaluations and analyses on a variety of subjects to the Trustees.

Management-Related Expenses. Under the terms of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's management contract, Strategic Advisers, either itself or through an affiliate, is responsible for payment of all operating expenses of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio or each class thereof, as applicable, with certain exceptions. Under the terms of each administration agreement, FMR pays all management and administrative expenses (other than investment advisory expenses) for which Strategic Advisers is responsible. Specific expenses payable by FMR include expenses for typesetting, printing, and mailing proxy materials to shareholders, legal expenses, fees of the custodian and auditor, and each fund's proportionate share of insurance premiums and Investment Company Institute dues. Each administration agreement further provides that FMR will pay for typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, notices, and reports to shareholders; however, under the terms of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's transfer agent agreement, the transfer agent bears these costs. In addition, FMR compensates all officers of each fund and all Trustees who are interested persons of the trust, Strategic Advisers, or FMR. FMR also pays all fees associated with transfer agent, dividend disbursing, and shareholder services, pricing and bookkeeping services, and the cost of administration of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays the following expenses: fees and expenses of the Independent Trustees, interest on borrowings, taxes, brokerage commissions (if any), shareholder charges (if any) associated with investing in the underlying Fidelity funds, and such non-recurring expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which a fund may be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify the officers and Trustees with respect to litigation. Each fund also pays the costs related to the solicitation of fund proxies from variable product owners.

Management Fees. For the services of Strategic Advisers under each management contract, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays Strategic Advisers a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets throughout the month. The management fee paid to Strategic Advisers by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio is reduced by an amount equal to the fees and expenses paid by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio to the Independent Trustees.

For the services of FMR under each administration agreement, Strategic Advisers pays FMR a monthly administration fee equal to the monthly management fee received by Strategic Advisers from each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, minus an amount equal to an annual rate of 0.02% of that fund's average net assets throughout the month.

FMR may, from time to time, voluntarily reimburse all or a portion of a class's operating expenses (exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, shareholder charges, and extraordinary expenses), which is subject to revision or discontinuance. FMR retains the ability to be repaid for these expense reimbursements in the amount that expenses fall below the limit prior to the end of the fiscal year.

Expense reimbursements by FMR will increase a class's returns and repayment of the reimbursement by a class will lower its returns.

Scott Kuldell is the portfolio manager of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios and receives compensation for his services. As of December 31, 2005, portfolio manager compensation generally consists of a fixed base salary determined periodically (typically annually), a bonus and, in certain cases, participation in several types of equity-based compensation plans. A portion of the portfolio manager's compensation may be deferred based on criteria established by FMR or at the election of the portfolio manager. The portfolio manager's base salary is determined by level of responsibility and tenure at FMR or its affiliates.

Mr. Kuldell is an employee of Strategic Advisers, Inc., a subsidiary of FMR Corp and an affiliate of FMR. Strategic Advisors, Inc. is the adviser to the VIP FundsManager Portfolios. The primary components of the portfolio manager's bonus are based on (i) the pre-tax investment performance of the portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) relative to a defined peer group assigned to each fund or account, and (ii) the investment performance of a broad range of other Strategic Adviser funds and accounts. Accounts may include model portfolios designed for asset allocation, retirement planning, or tax-sensitive goals. The pre-tax investment performance of the portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) is weighted according to his tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) and the average asset size of those fund(s) and account(s) over his tenure. Each component is calculated separately over the portfolio manager's tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) over a measurement period that initially is contemporaneous with his tenure, but that eventually encompasses rolling periods of up to five years for the comparison to a defined peer group. A smaller, subjective component of the portfolio manager's bonus is based on the portfolio manager's overall contribution to management of Strategic. The portion of the portfolio manager's bonus that is linked to the investment performance of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios is based on each fund's pre-tax investment performance against a combined peer group median, which consists of the median score of all funds in the Morningstar and Lipper fund categories identified below for each fund. The portfolio manager also is compensated under equity-based compensation plans linked to increases or decreases in the net asset value of the stock of FMR Corp., FMR's parent company. FMR Corp. is a diverse financial services company engaged in various activities that include fund management, brokerage, retirement and employer administrative services.

The combined peer group median for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consists of funds in the following Morningstar and Lipper fund categories:

Portfolio

Morningstar/Lipper Fund Categories

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value

The portfolio manager's compensation plan may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. The portfolio manager's base pay tends to increase with additional and more complex responsibilities that include increased assets under management and a portion of the bonus relates to marketing efforts, which together indirectly link compensation to sales. When a portfolio manager takes over a fund or an account, the time period over which performance is measured may be adjusted to provide a transition period in which to assess the portfolio. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In addition, a fund's trade allocation policies and procedures may give rise to conflicts of interest if the fund's orders do not get fully executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts managed by FMR. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the fund. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the fund may outperform the securities selected for the fund. Portfolio managers may be permitted to invest in the funds they manage, even if a fund is closed to new investors. Personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; trading in personal accounts is restricted by the fund's Code of Ethics.

The following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Mr. Kuldell as of December 31, 2005:

Registered
Investment
Companies*

Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles

Other
Accounts

Number of Accounts Managed

4

2,000

none

Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees

none

none

none

Assets Managed (in millions)

none

$ 611

none

Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)

none

none

none

* Includes VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed), VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed), VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed) and VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed). Each of these funds is expected to commence operations on ________.

The following table sets forth the dollar range of shares of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios beneficially owned by the portfolio manager as of December 31, 2005:

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES OWNED AS OF 12/31/05

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

BOARD APPROVAL OF THE EXISTING INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACTS

Matters Considered by the Board. The mutual funds for which the members of the Board of Trustees serve as Trustees are referred to herein as the "Fidelity funds." The Board of Trustees is scheduled to meet 11 times a year. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, believes that matters bearing on each fund's advisory contracts are considered at most, if not all, of its meetings. While the full Board of Trustees or the Independent Trustees, as appropriate, act on all major matters, a significant portion of the activities of the Board of Trustees (including certain of those described herein) is conducted through committees. The Independent Trustees meet frequently in executive session and are advised by independent legal counsel selected by the Independent Trustees.

Information Received by the Board of Trustees. In connection with their meetings, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, received materials specifically relating to the existing management contracts and administration agreements (the Investment Advisory Contracts). These materials included (i) information on the investment performance of Fidelity funds, peer groups of funds and appropriate indices or combinations of indices, (ii) sales and redemption data in respect of Fidelity funds, and (iii) the economic outlook and the general investment outlook in the markets in which each fund invests. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considers periodically other material facts such as (1) the Investment Advisers' results and financial condition, (2) arrangements in respect of the distribution of each fund's shares, (3) the procedures employed to determine the value of each fund's assets, (4) the allocation of each fund's brokerage, if any, including allocations to brokers affiliated with the Investment Advisers, the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research and brokerage services, and the use of brokerage commissions to pay fund expenses , (5) the Investment Advisers' management of the relationships with each fund's custodian and subcustodians, (6) the resources devoted to and the record of compliance with each fund's investment policies and restrictions and with policies on personal securities transactions, and (7) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by the Investment Advisers and their affiliates.

Additional information was furnished by the Investment Advisers including, among other items, information on and analysis of (a) the overall organization of the Investment Advisers, (b) investment performance, (c) the impact of performance adjustments to management fees, (d) the choice of performance indices and benchmarks, (e) the composition of peer groups of funds, (f) transfer agency and bookkeeping fees paid to affiliates of the Investment Advisers, (g) investment management staffing, (h) the potential for achieving further economies of scale, (i) operating expenses paid to third parties, and (j) the information furnished to investors, including each fund's shareholders.

In considering the Investment Advisory Contracts, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, did not identify any single factor as all-important or controlling, and the following summary does not detail all the matters considered. Matters considered by the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, in connection with its approval of the Investment Advisory Contracts include the following:

Benefits to Shareholders. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the benefit to shareholders of investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds offering a variety of investment disciplines and providing for a large variety of fund and shareholder services.

The Investment Advisers' Personnel and Methods. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, reviews at least annually the background of each fund's portfolio manager and each fund's investment objective and discipline. The Independent Trustees have also had discussions with senior management of the Investment Advisers responsible for investment operations and the senior management of Fidelity's equity group. Among other things they considered the size, education and experience of the Investment Advisers' investment staff, their use of technology, and the Investment Advisers' approach to recruiting, training and retaining portfolio managers and other research, advisory and management personnel.

Nature and Quality of Other Services. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the nature, quality, cost and extent of administrative and shareholder services performed by the Investment Advisers and affiliated companies, under the existing Investment Advisory Contracts and under separate agreements covering transfer agency functions and pricing, bookkeeping and securities lending services, if any. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, has also considered the nature and extent of the Investment Advisers' supervision of third party service providers, principally custodians and subcustodians.

Expenses. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered each fund's expense ratio, and expense ratios of a peer group of funds. It also considered the amount and nature of fees paid by shareholders.

Economies of Scale. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered whether there have been economies of scale in respect of the management of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds have appropriately benefitted from any economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, has concluded that any potential economies of scale are being shared between fund shareholders and the Investment Advisers in an appropriate manner.

Other Benefits to the Investment Advisers. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considered the character and amount of fees paid by each fund and each fund's shareholders for services provided by the Investment Advisers and their affiliates, including fees for services like transfer agency, fund accounting, and direct shareholder services. It also considered the allocation of fund brokerage to brokers affiliated with the Investment Advisers, the receipt of sales loads and payments under Rule 12b-1 plans in respect of certain of the Fidelity funds, and benefits to the Investment Advisers from the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research and brokerage services. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considered the revenues and profitability of the Investment Advisers' businesses other than their mutual fund business, including the Investment Advisers' retail brokerage, correspondent brokerage, capital markets, trust, investment advisory, pension record keeping, insurance, publishing, real estate, international research and investment funds, and others. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the intangible benefits that accrue to the Investment Advisers and their affiliates by virtue of their relationship with each fund.

Conclusion. Based on its evaluation of all material factors and assisted by the advice of independent counsel, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, concluded that the existing advisory fee structures are fair and reasonable, and that the existing Investment Advisory Contracts should be approved.

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

The following Proxy Voting Guidelines were established by the Board of Trustees of the funds, after consultation with Fidelity. (The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Fidelity and by the Independent Trustees of the Fidelity funds, and, accordingly, are subject to change.)

I. General Principles

A. Except as set forth herein, FMR will generally vote in favor of routine management proposals. FMR will generally oppose shareholder proposals that do not appear reasonably likely to enhance the economic returns or profitability of the portfolio company or to maximize shareholder value.

B. Non-routine proposals will generally be voted in accordance with the guidelines.

C. Non-routine proposals not covered by the following guidelines or other special circumstances will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from the appropriate FMR analyst or portfolio manager, as applicable, subject to review by the General Counsel or Compliance Officer of FMR or the General Counsel of FMR Corp. A significant pattern of such proposals or other special circumstances will be referred to the Operations Committee or its designee.

D. Voting of shares will be conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of mutual fund shareholders as follows: (i) securities of a portfolio company will generally be voted in a manner consistent with the Proxy Voting Guidelines; and (ii) voting will be done without regard to any other Fidelity companies' relationship, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company.

E. The FMR Investment & Advisor Compliance Department votes proxies. In the event an Investment & Advisor Compliance employee has a personal conflict with a portfolio company or an employee or director of a portfolio company, that employee will withdraw from making any proxy voting decisions with respect to that portfolio company. A conflict of interest arises when there are factors that may prompt one to question whether a Fidelity employee is acting solely in the best interests of Fidelity and its customers. Employees are expected to avoid situations that could present even the appearance of a conflict between their interests and the interests of Fidelity and its customers.

II. Definitions (as used in this document)

A. Large capitalization company - a company included in the Russell 1000 stock index.

B. Small capitalization company - a company not included in the Russell 1000 stock index.

C. Anti-takeover plan - includes fair price amendments; classified boards; "blank check" preferred stock; golden and tin parachutes; supermajority provisions; poison pills; and any other plan that eliminates or limits shareholder rights.

D. Poison Pill Plan - a strategy employed by a potential take-over/target company to make its stock less attractive to an acquirer. Such plans are generally designed to dilute the acquirer's ownership and value in the event of a take-over.

E. Golden parachute - accelerated options and/or employment contracts for officers and directors that will result in a lump sum payment of more than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) in the event of termination following a change in control.

F. Tin parachute - accelerated options and/or employment contracts for employees beyond officers and directors that will result in a lump sum payment in the event of termination.

G. Sunset provision - a condition in a charter or plan that specifies an expiration date.

H. Greenmail - payment of a premium to a raider trying to take over a company through a proxy contest or other means.

III. Directors

A. Incumbent Directors

FMR will generally vote in favor of incumbent and nominee directors except where one or more such directors clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable judgment. FMR will also generally withhold authority on the election of directors if:

1. An anti-takeover provision was introduced, an anti-takeover provision was extended, or a new anti-takeover provision was adopted upon the expiration of an existing anti-takeover provision, without shareholder approval except as set forth below.

With respect to poison pills, FMR will consider not withholding authority on the election of directors if all of the following conditions are met when a poison pill is introduced, extended, or adopted:

a. The poison pill includes a sunset provision of less than 5 years;

b. The poison pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; and

c. Shareholder approval is required to reinstate the poison pill upon expiration.

FMR will also consider not withholding authority on the election of directors when one or more of the conditions above are not met if the board is willing to strongly consider seeking shareholder ratification of, or adding a sunset provision meeting the above conditions to, an existing poison pill. In such a case, if the company does not take appropriate action prior to the next annual shareholder meeting, FMR will withhold authority on the election of directors.

2. The company refuses, upon request by FMR, to amend a Poison Pill Plan to allow Fidelity to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

3. Within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options held by officers and directors which, together with all other options repriced under the same stock option plan (whether held by officers, directors, or other employees) exceed 5% (for a large capitalization company) or 10% (for a small capitalization company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.

4. The company failed to act in the best interests of shareholders when approving executive compensation, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company used an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee engaged independent compensation consultants.

B. Indemnification

FMR will generally vote in favor of charter and by-law amendments expanding the indemnification of Directors and/or limiting their liability for breaches of care unless FMR is otherwise dissatisfied with the performance of management or the proposal is accompanied by anti-takeover measures.

C. Independent Chairperson

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson. However, FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson appears likely to further the interests of shareholders and to promote effective oversight of management by the board of directors.

IV. Compensation

A. Equity Award Plans (including stock options, restricted stock awards, and other stock awards)

FMR will generally vote against Equity Award Plans or amendments to authorize additional shares under such plans if:

1. (a) The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other stock plans, is greater than 10% (for large capitalization companies) or 15% (for small capitalization companies) and (b) there were no circumstances specific to the company or the plans that lead FMR to conclude that the level of dilution in the Plan or the amendments is acceptable.

2. In the case of stock option plans, (a) the offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus; (b) the plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options; or (c) the Board/Committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past 2 years.

However, option repricing may be acceptable if all of the following conditions, as specified by the plan's express terms or board resolution, are met:

a. The repricing is rarely used and, when used, is authorized by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors to fulfill a legitimate corporate purpose such as retention of a key employee;

b. The repricing is limited to no more than 5% (large capitalization company) or 10% (small capitalization company) of the shares currently authorized for grant under the plan.

3. The Board may materially alter the plan without shareholder approval, including by increasing the benefits accrued to participants under the plan; increasing the number of securities which may be issued under the plan; modifying the requirements for participation in the plan; or including a provision allowing the Board to lapse or waive restrictions at its discretion.

4. The granting of awards to non-employee directors is subject to management discretion.

5. In the case of stock awards, the restriction period, or holding period after exercise, is less than 3 years for non-performance-based awards, and less than 1 year for performance-based awards.

FMR will consider approving an Equity Award Plan or an amendment to authorize additional shares under such plan if, without complying with guidelines 2(a), 3, and 4 immediately above, the following two conditions are met:

1. The shares are granted by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors; and

2. The shares are limited to 5% (large capitalization company) and 10% (small capitalization company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.

B. Equity Exchanges and Repricing

FMR will generally vote in favor of a management proposal to exchange shares or reprice outstanding options if the proposed exchange or repricing is consistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as:

1. Whether the proposal excludes senior management and directors;

2. Whether the equity proposed to be exchanged or repriced exceeded FMR's dilution thresholds when initially granted;

3. Whether the exchange or repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable pricing model;

4. The company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries;

5. Economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and

6. Any other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether an exchange or repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.

C. Employee Stock Purchase Plans

FMR will generally vote against employee stock purchase plans if the plan violates any of the criteria in section IV(A) above, except that the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity. In the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, FMR may permit a lower minimum stock purchase price equal to the prevailing "best practices" in the relevant non-U.S. market, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.

D. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

FMR will generally vote in favor of non-leveraged ESOPs. For leveraged ESOPs, FMR may examine the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. FMR may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. FMR will generally vote against leveraged ESOPs if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon change in control.

E. Executive Compensation

FMR will generally vote against management proposals on stock-based compensation plans or other compensation plans if such proposals are inconsistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company has an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee has authority to engage independent compensation consultants.

V. Anti-Takeover Plans

FMR will generally vote against a proposal to adopt or approve the adoption of an anti-takeover plan unless:

A. The proposal requires that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on the adoption of anti-takeover provision amendments.

B. The anti-takeover plan includes the following:

1. the board has adopted an anti-takeover plan with a sunset provision of no greater than 5 years;

2. the anti-takeover plan is linked to a business strategy that is expected to result in greater value for the shareholders;

3. shareholder approval is required to reinstate the anti-takeover plan upon expiration;

4. the anti-takeover plan contains a provision suspending its application, by shareholder referendum, in the event a potential acquirer announces a bona fide offer, made for all outstanding shares; and

5. the anti-takeover plan allows the Fidelity funds to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

C. It is an anti-greenmail proposal that does not include other anti-takeover provisions.

D. It is a fair price amendment that considers a two-year price history or less.

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to eliminate anti-takeover plans. In the case of proposals to declassify a board of directors, FMR will generally vote against such a proposal if the issuer's Articles of Incorporation or applicable statutes include a provision whereby a majority of directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by written consent, or other reasonable procedures, by a majority of shareholders entitled to vote for the election of directors.

VI. Capital Structure/Incorporation

A. Increases in Common Stock

FMR will generally vote against a provision to increase a Company's common stock if such increase is greater than 3 times outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares, including stock options, except in the case of real estate investment trusts, where an increase of up to 5 times is generally acceptable.

B. New Classes of Shares

FMR will generally vote against the introduction of new classes of stock with differential voting rights.

C. Cumulative Voting Rights

FMR will generally vote in favor of introduction and against elimination of cumulative voting rights where this is determined to enhance portfolio interests of minority shareholders.

D. Acquisition or Business Combination Statutes

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to opt out of the control shares acquisition or business combination statutes.

E. Incorporation or Reincorporation in Another State or Country

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending that a portfolio company reincorporate in the United States and vote in favor of management proposals to reincorporate in a jurisdiction outside the United States if (i) it is lawful under United States, state and other applicable law for the company to be incorporated under the laws of the relevant foreign jurisdiction and to conduct its business and (ii) reincorporating or maintaining a domicile in the United States would likely give rise to adverse tax or other economic consequences detrimental to the interests of the company and its shareholders. However, FMR will consider supporting such shareholder proposals and opposing such management proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, reincorporating in or maintaining a domicile in the relevant foreign jurisdiction gives rise to significant risks or other potential adverse consequences that appear reasonably likely to be detrimental to the interests of the company or its shareholders.

VII. Auditors

A. FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending periodic rotation of a portfolio company's auditor. FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, a company's board of directors and audit committee clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable business judgment in the selection of the company's auditor.

B. FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the prohibition or limitation of the performance of non-audit services by a portfolio company's auditor. FMR will also generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending removal of a company's auditor due to, among other reasons, the performance of non-audit work by the auditor. FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, a company's board of directors and audit committee clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable business judgment in the oversight of the performance of the auditor of audit or non-audit services for the company.

VIII. Other

A. Voting Process

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.

B. Regulated Industries

Voting of shares in securities of any regulated industry (e.g. U.S. banking) organization shall be conducted in a manner consistent with conditions that may be specified by the industry's regulator (e.g. the Federal Reserve Board) for a determination under applicable law (e.g. federal banking law) that no Fund or group of Funds has acquired control of such organization.

To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a distribution agreement with FDC, an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR. The principal business address of FDC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. FDC is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. The distribution agreements call for FDC to use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of each fund, which are continuously offered at NAV. Promotional and administrative expenses in connection with the offer and sale of shares are paid by Strategic Advisers or FMR.

The Trustees have approved Distribution and Service Plans on behalf of Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio (the Plans) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the Rule). The Rule provides in substance that a mutual fund may not engage directly or indirectly in financing any activity that is primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund except pursuant to a plan approved on behalf of the fund under the Rule. The Plans, as approved by the Trustees, allow Investor Class, Strategic Advisers, and FMR to incur certain expenses that might be considered to constitute indirect payment by the funds of distribution expenses.

Under each Investor Class Plan, if the payment of management fees by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio to Strategic Advisers, or the payment of administration fees by Strategic Advisers to FMR out of the management fees, is deemed to be indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment is authorized by the Plan. Each Investor Class Plan specifically recognizes that Strategic Advisers or FMR may use its past profits or its other resources, including management fees paid to Strategic Advisers by the funds, or administration fees paid to FMR by Strategic Advisers out of the management fees, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Investor Class shares and/or support services that benefit variable product owners. In addition, each Investor Class Plan provides that Strategic Advisers or FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, primarily insurance companies or their affiliated broker-dealers or other service-providers, that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for Investor Class shares of the VIP FundManager Portfolios.

Prior to approving each Plan, the Trustees carefully considered all pertinent factors relating to the implementation of the Plan, and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and variable product owners. In particular, the Trustees noted that each Plan does not authorize payments by Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio other than those made to Strategic Advisers under its management contract or administrative agreement with the fund. To the extent that each Plan gives Strategic Advisers, FMR, and FDC greater flexibility in connection with the distribution of class shares, additional sales of class shares or stabilization of cash flows may result. Furthermore, certain support services that benefit variable product owners may be provided more effectively under the Plans by insurance companies and their affiliates with whom variable product owners have other relationships.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio may execute portfolio transactions with, and purchase securities issued by, depository institutions that receive payments under the Plans. No preference for the instruments of such depository institutions will be shown in the selection of investments.

FDC or an affiliate may compensate intermediaries (primarily insurance companies or their affiliated broker-dealers or other service-providers) that distribute and/or service the funds. A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. Such factors may include, without limitation, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of assets or sale of shares, the placing of the funds on a preferred or recommended fund list, access to an intermediary's personnel, and other factors. The total amount paid to intermediaries in the aggregate currently will not exceed 0.10% of the total assets of all VIP Funds on an annual basis. In addition to such payments, FDC or an affiliate may offer other incentives such as sponsorship of educational or client seminars relating to current products and issues, assistance in training and educating the intermediaries' personnel, payments or reimbursements for travel and related expenses associated with due diligence trips that an intermediary may undertake in order to explore possible business relationships with affiliates of FDC, and/or payments of costs and expenses associated with attendance at seminars, including travel, lodging, entertainment and meals. FDC anticipates that payments will be made to over a hundred intermediaries, including some of the largest broker-dealers and other financial firms, and these payments may be significant to the intermediaries. As permitted by SEC and National Association of Securities Dealers rules and other applicable laws and regulations, FDC or an affiliate may pay or allow other incentives or payments to intermediaries.

These additional payments and expenses, which are sometimes referred to as "revenue sharing," may represent a premium over payments made by other fund families, and investment professionals may have an added incentive to sell or recommend a fund or a share class over others offered by competing fund families.

The funds' transfer agent or affiliate may also make payments and reimbursements from their own resources to certain intermediaries for performing recordkeeping and other services. Please see "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" in this SAI for more information.

TRANSFER AND SERVICE AGENT AGREEMENTS

Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a transfer agent agreement with Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (FIIOC), an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR, which is located at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Under the terms of the agreements, FIIOC (or an agent, including an affiliate) performs transfer agency, dividend disbursing, and shareholder services for Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

For providing transfer agency services, FIIOC receives no fees from each VIP FundsManager Portfolio; however, each underlying Fidelity fund pays its respective transfer, dividend disbursing, and shareholder servicing agent (either FSC or FIIOC or an affiliate of FSC or FIIOC, as applicable) fees based, in part, on the number of positions in and assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio invested in such underlying Fidelity fund.

FIIOC pays out-of-pocket expenses associated with providing transfer agent services. In addition, FIIOC bears the expense of typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, and all other reports, notices, and statements to existing shareholders, with the exception of proxy statements.

FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments out of its own resources to intermediaries for transfer agency and related recordkeeping services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts in amounts that do not exceed the total transfer agent fee paid by Investor Class of each fund. Because intermediaries may be paid varying amounts for recordkeeping and administrative services, such payments may provide incentives for intermediaries to favor one fund family over another.

FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments out of its own resources to Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company (FILI) for transfer agency and related separate account services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts, in amounts that do not exceed the total transfer agent fee by Investor Class of each fund.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has also entered into a service agent agreement with FSC, an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR (or an agent, including an affiliate). Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has also entered into a securities lending administration agreement with FSC. Under the terms of the agreements, FSC calculates the NAV and dividends for Investor Class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, maintains each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's portfolio and general accounting records, and administers each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program.

For providing pricing and bookkeeping services, FSC receives a monthly fee based on each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's average daily net assets throughout the month.

For administering each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program, FSC is paid based on the number and duration of individual securities loans.

FMR bears the cost of pricing and bookkeeping services and administration of the securities lending program under the terms of its administration agreements with Strategic Advisers.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST

Trust Organization. FundsManager 20% Portfolio, FundsManager 50% Portfolio, FundsManager 70% Portfolio, and FundsManager 85% Portfolio are funds of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV, an open-end management investment company created under an initial declaration of trust dated June 1, 1983. On December 14, 2000, Variable Insurance Products Fund IV changed its name from Fidelity Advisor Series VI to Variable Insurance Products Fund IV. Currently, there are 33 funds offered in Variable Insurance Products Fund IV: Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, FundsManager 20% Portfolio, FundsManager 50% Portfolio, FundsManager 70% Portfolio, FundsManager 85% Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Investor Freedom Income Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio. The Trustees are permitted to create additional funds in the trust and to create additional classes of the funds.

The assets of the trust received for the issue or sale of shares of each of its funds and all income, earnings, profits, and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of creditors, are allocated to such fund, and constitute the underlying assets of such fund. The underlying assets of each fund in the trust shall be charged with the liabilities and expenses attributable to such fund, except that liabilities and expenses may be allocated to a particular class. Any general expenses of the trust shall be allocated between or among any one or more of its funds or classes.

Shareholder Liability. The trust is an entity commonly known as a "Massachusetts business trust." Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of such a trust may, under certain circumstances, be held personally liable for the obligations of the trust.

The Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for the debts, liabilities, obligations, and expenses of the trust or fund. The Declaration of Trust provides that the trust shall not have any claim against shareholders except for the payment of the purchase price of shares and requires that each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by the trust or the Trustees relating to the trust or to a fund shall include a provision limiting the obligations created thereby to the trust or to one or more funds and its or their assets. The Declaration of Trust further provides that shareholders of a fund shall not have a claim on or right to any assets belonging to any other fund.

The Declaration of Trust provides for indemnification out of each fund's property of any shareholder or former shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the fund solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason. The Declaration of Trust also provides that each fund shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of the fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which a fund itself would be unable to meet its obligations. Strategic Advisers believes that, in view of the above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is remote. Claims asserted against one class of shares may subject holders of another class of shares to certain liabilities.

Voting Rights. Each fund's capital consists of shares of beneficial interest. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value they own. The voting rights of shareholders can be changed only by a shareholder vote. Shares may be voted in the aggregate, by fund, and by class.

The shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set forth under the heading "Shareholder Liability" above.

On matters submitted for consideration by shareholders of any underlying fund, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio will vote its shares in proportion to the vote of all other holders of shares of that underlying fund.

The trust or a fund or a class may be terminated upon the sale of its assets to, or merger with, another open-end management investment company, series, or class thereof, or upon liquidation and distribution of its assets. The Trustees may reorganize, terminate, merge, or sell all or a portion of the assets of the trust or a fund or a class without prior shareholder approval. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of the trust, shareholders of each of its funds are entitled to receive the underlying assets of such fund available for distribution. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of a fund or a class, shareholders of that fund or that class are entitled to receive the underlying assets of the fund or class available for distribution.

Custodians. ____________ is custodian of the assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. The custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of a fund's assets and the appointment of any subcustodian banks and clearing agencies. The Bank of New York and JPMorgan Chase Bank, each headquartered in New York, also may serve as special purpose custodians of certain assets in connection with repurchase agreement transactions.

FMR, its officers and directors, its affiliated companies, Members of the Advisory Board, and Members of the Board of Trustees may, from time to time, conduct transactions with various banks, including banks serving as custodians for certain funds advised by FMR. Transactions that have occurred to date include mortgages and personal and general business loans. In the judgment of FMR, the terms and conditions of those transactions were not influenced by existing or potential custodial or other fund relationships.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. ____________, independent registered public accounting firm, examines financial statements for each fund and provides other audit, tax, and related services.

FUND HOLDINGS INFORMATION

Each fund views holdings information as sensitive and limits its dissemination. The Board authorized FMR to establish and administer guidelines for the dissemination of fund holdings information, which may be amended at any time without prior notice. FMR's Disclosure Policy Committee (comprised of executive officers of FMR and its affiliates) evaluates disclosure policy with the goal of serving a fund's best interests by striking an appropriate balance between providing information about a fund's portfolio and protecting a fund from potentially harmful disclosure. The Board reviews the administration and modification of these guidelines and receives reports from the funds' chief compliance officer periodically.

Each fund will provide a full list of holdings as of the end of the fund's fiscal quarter on www.fidelity.com (Research > Annuities) 60 days after its fiscal quarter-end. Each fund will also provide a list of the underlying funds it holds as of the end of the calendar quarter on Fidelity's web site 15 or more days after the calendar quarter-end.

This information will be available on the web site until updated for the next applicable period.

The Use of Holdings In Connection With Fund Operations. Material non-public holdings information may be provided as part of the investment activities of each fund to: entities which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their respective duties to the fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed; other parties if legally required; or persons FMR believes will not misuse the disclosed information. These entities include: a fund's trustees; a fund's manager, its sub-adviser and its affiliates whose access persons are subject to a code of ethics; a fund's auditors; a fund's custodians; proxy voting service providers; financial printers; pricing service vendors; broker-dealers in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities; securities lending agents; counsel to a fund or its Independent Trustees; regulatory authorities; stock exchanges and other listing organizations; parties to litigation; an issuer, regarding the number of shares of the issuer (or percentage of outsourcing shares) held by a fund; and third-parties in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding relating to a fund holding.

Other Uses Of Holdings Information. In addition, each fund may provide material non-public holdings information to (i) third-parties that calculate information derived from holdings for use by FMR or its affiliates, (ii) third parties that supply their analyses of holdings (but not the holdings themselves) to their clients (including sponsors of retirement plans or their consultants), (iii) ratings and rankings organizations, and (iv) an investment adviser, trustee, or their agents to whom holdings are disclosed for due diligence purposes or in anticipation of a merger involving a fund. Each individual request is reviewed by the Disclosure Policy Committee which must find, in its sole discretion that, based on the specific facts and circumstances, the disclosure appears unlikely to be harmful to a fund. Entities receiving this information must have in place control mechanisms to reasonably ensure or otherwise agree that, (a) the holdings information will be kept confidential, (b) no employee shall use the information to effect trading or for their personal benefit, and (c) the nature and type of information that they, in turn, may disclose to third-parties is limited. FMR relies primarily on the existence of non-disclosure agreements and/or control mechanisms when determining that disclosure is not likely to be harmful to a fund.

At this time, the entities receiving information described in the preceding paragraph are: Factset (full holdings daily, on the next day); iMoneynet (aggregate holdings weekly, one day after the end of the week); Kynex (full holdings weekly, one day after the end of the week); Vestek (full holdings, as of the end of the calendar quarter, 15 days after the calendar quarter-end); S&P (full holdings weekly, six days after the end of the week); and Moody's Investor Services (full holdings weekly, six days after the end of the week).

FMR, its affiliates, or the funds will not enter into any arrangements with third-parties from which they derive consideration for the disclosure of material non-public holdings information. If, in the future, FMR desired to make such an arrangement, it would seek prior Board approval and any such arrangements would be disclosed in the funds' SAI.

There can be no assurance that the funds' policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of fund portfolio holdings will prevent the misuse of such information by individuals and firms that receive such information.

APPENDIX

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, and Strategic Advisers are registered trademarks of FMR Corp.

VIP FundsManager Portfolio is a service mark of FMR Corp.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

The term "VIP" as used in this document refers to Fidelity Variable Insurance Products.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED January 26, 2006. The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Each fund offers its shares only to separate accounts of insurance companies that offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products. A fund may not be available in your state due to various insurance regulations. Please check with your insurance company for availability. If a fund in this prospectus is not available in your state, this prospectus is not to be considered a solicitation with respect to that fund. Please read this prospectus together with your variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Like securities of all mutual funds, these securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission has not determined if this prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Fidelity®

Variable Insurance Products

Service Class and Service Class 2

FundsManager 20% Portfolio

FundsManager 50% Portfolio

FundsManager 70% Portfolio

FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Prospectus

April ___, 2006

(fidelity_logo_graphic)

82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

Contents

Fund Summary

<Click Here>

Investment Summary

<Click Here>

Performance

<Click Here>

Fee Table

Fund Basics

<Click Here>

Investment Details

<Click Here>

Valuing Shares

Shareholder Information

<Click Here>

Buying and Selling Shares

<Click Here>

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

<Click Here>

Tax Consequences

Fund Services

<Click Here>

Fund Management

<Click Here>

Fund Distribution

Appendix

22

Underlying Fidelity Funds

Prospectus

Fund Summary

Investment Summary

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManagerSM  20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity retail and Variable Insurance Products (VIP) funds (underlying Fidelity funds).
  • Using a target asset allocation as of __________, 2006, of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of ___________, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of ___________, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

Prospectus

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally Investing in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds.
  • Using a target asset allocation as of _______, 2006 of approximately:



  • Actively managing underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to the VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index.
  • Using both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research to select underlying funds.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Stock Market Volatility. Stock markets are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Different parts of the market can react differently to these developments.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a debt or money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Foreign markets, particularly emerging markets, can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market.
  • Prepayment. The ability of an issuer of a debt security to repay principal prior to a security's maturity can cause greater price volatility if interest rates change.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. The value of an individual security or particular type of security can be more volatile than the market as a whole and can perform differently from the value of the market as a whole. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or the provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities can be more volatile due to increased sensitivity to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.
  • "Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than other types of stocks.
  • "Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time.
  • Quantitative Investing. Securities selected using quantitative analysis can perform differently from the market as a whole as a result of the factors used in the analysis, the weight placed on each factor, and changes in the factors' historical trends.
  • Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can perform differently from the market as a whole and other types of stocks and can be more volatile than that of larger issuers.

When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means the shareholder could lose money.

Performance

Performance history will be available for each fund after each fund has been in operation for one calendar year.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that are incurred, directly or indirectly, when a variable product owner buys, holds, or redeems interests in a separate account that invests in a class of a fund, but does not reflect the effect of any fees or other expenses of any variable annuity or variable life insurance product. The annual class operating expenses provided below for each class are based on estimated expenses.

Service Class

Service Class 2

Sales charge (load) on purchases and reinvested distributions

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Deferred sales charge (load) on redemptions

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Annual operating expenses (paid from class assets)

Service Class

Service Class 2

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

0.10%

0.25%

Other expenses

0.00%

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.35%

0.50%

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

0.10%

0.25%

Other expenses

0.00%

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.35%

0.50%

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

0.10%

0.25%

Other expenses

0.00%

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.35%

0.50%

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Management fee

0.25%

0.25%

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

0.10%

0.25%

Other expenses

0.00%

0.00%

Total annual class operating expenses

0.35%

0.50%

A VIP FundsManager Portfolio may incur redemption fees (short-term trading fees), if applicable, when it invests in underlying Fidelity funds.

In addition to the total operating expenses shown above, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, as a shareholder in an underlying Fidelity fund, will indirectly bear its pro rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity fund, and each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment return will be net of underlying Fidelity fund expenses.

The combined total expense ratios of each class of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio (calculated as a percentage of average net assets) are as follows:

Combined total expense ratio after expense reimbursements and expense reductions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and the underlying Fidelity fundsA

Combined total expense ratio before expense reimbursements and expense reductions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and the underlying Fidelity fundsA

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Service Class

0.79%

0.90%

Service Class 2

0.94%

1.05%

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Service Class

0.90%

1.00%

Service Class 2

1.05%

1.15%

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Service Class

1.00%

1.08%

Service Class 2

1.15%

1.23%

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Service Class

1.07%

1.13%

Service Class 2

1.22%

1.28%

A Estimated

This example helps you compare the cost of investing in the VIP FundsManager Portfolios with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that each class's annual return is 5% and that the fees are exactly as described in the fee table, and that each class's combined total expense ratio includes each class's annual operating expenses exactly as described in the fee table and the weighted average of the total operating expenses of each of the underlying Fidelity funds, before expense reimbursements and expense reductions. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. This example does not reflect the effect of any fees or other expenses of any variable annuity or variable life insurance product. For every $10,000 invested, here's how much a variable product owner would pay in total expenses if all interests in the separate account that invests in a class of the fund were redeemed at the end of each time period indicated:

Prospectus

Service Class

Service Class 2

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

1 year

$ 92

$ 107

3 years

$ 287

$ 334

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

1 year

$ 102

$ 117

3 years

$ 318

$ 365

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

1 year

$ 110

$ 125

3 years

$ 343

$ 390

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

1 year

$ 115

$ 130

3 years

$ 359

$ 406

Prospectus

Fund Basics

Investment Details

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

20%

International Equity Funds

0%

Underlying Fixed-Income Funds

50%

Underlying Money Market Funds

30%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 20% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 20% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

45%

International Equity Funds

5%

Underlying Fixed Income Funds

40%

Underlying Money Market Funds

10%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 50% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 50% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

60%

International Equity Funds

10%

Underlying Fixed Income Funds

25%

Underlying Money Market Funds

5%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 70% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 70% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Investment Objective

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Principal Investment Strategies

Strategic Advisers normally invests the fund's assets in a combination of underlying Fidelity funds. The fund's approximate minimum target asset allocation to underlying equity funds is reflected in its name. As of _________, 2006, the fund's approximate target asset allocation was as follows:

Funds:

Target Asset Allocation:

Underlying Equity Funds

Domestic Equity Funds

70%

International Equity Funds

15%

Underlying Fixed-Income Funds

15%

Underlying Money Market Funds

0%

Strategic Advisers may underweight or overweight fund types at any time, although it normally expects to invest at least approximately 85% in underlying equity funds.

Strategic Advisers intends to actively manage underlying Fidelity fund holdings to achieve portfolio characteristics similar to that of VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index. VIP FundsManager 85% Composite Index is a hypothetical representation of the performance of the asset classes in which the underlying Fidelity funds invest, based on combinations of the following unmanaged indices: Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite IndexSM  (equities); Lehman Brothers® Universal Bond Index (bonds); and Lehman Brothers 3-Month T-Bill (short-term investments).

The underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than the fund's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. The Appendix contains a list, as of _________, 2006, of the underlying Fidelity funds with policies to concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries. Strategic Advisers may adjust the fund's portfolio at any time and may invest the fund's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. The fund normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

In buying and selling underlying Fidelity funds, Strategic Advisers relies on both quantitative and fundamental, bottom-up, proprietary mutual fund research in its fund selection process. Factors considered when investing in underlying funds include fund performance, a fund manager's experience and investment style, and fund characteristics such as expense ratio, asset size, and portfolio turnover. Strategic Advisers pursues a disciplined, benchmark-driven approach to portfolio construction, and monitors and adjusts allocations to underlying funds as necessary to attempt to control overall fund risk and pursue appropriate returns.

Principal Investment Risks

Many factors affect each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's share price changes daily based on the performance of the underlying Fidelity funds in which it invests. The ability of each fund to meet its investment objective is directly related to its target asset allocation among underlying Fidelity funds and the ability of those funds to meet their investment objectives. When a shareholder sells shares they may be worth more or less than what the shareholder paid for them, which means that the shareholder could lose money.

Prospectus

There is additional risk for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio with respect to aggregation of underlying Fidelity fund holdings, which may result in a VIP FundsManager Portfolio indirectly concentrating assets in a particular industry or group of industries, or in a single issuer. Such indirect concentration may have the effect of increasing the volatility of the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's returns. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios do not control the investments of the underlying Fidelity funds and any indirect concentration is a result of the underlying Fidelity funds pursuing their own investment objectives.

The following factors can significantly affect a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance:

Stock Market Volatility. The value of equity securities fluctuates in response to issuer, political, market, and economic developments. In the short term, equity prices can fluctuate dramatically in response to these developments. Different parts of the market and different types of equity securities can react differently to these developments. For example, large cap stocks can react differently from small cap stocks, and "growth" stocks can react differently from "value" stocks. Issuer, political, or economic developments can affect a single issuer, issuers within an industry or economic sector or geographic region, or the market as a whole.

Interest Rate Changes. Debt and money market securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a debt or money market security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities, mortgage securities, and the securities of issuers in the financial services sector can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. In other words, the longer the maturity of a security, the greater the impact a change in interest rates could have on the security's price. In addition, short-term and long-term interest rates do not necessarily move in the same amount or the same direction. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates, and long-term securities tend to react to changes in long-term interest rates.

Foreign Exposure. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations, and securities for which an entity located in a foreign country provides credit support or a maturity-shortening structure can involve additional risks relating to political, economic, or regulatory conditions in foreign countries. These risks include fluctuations in foreign currencies; withholding or other taxes; trading, settlement, custodial, and other operational risks; and the less stringent investor protection and disclosure standards of some foreign markets. All of these factors can make foreign investments, especially those in emerging markets, more volatile and potentially less liquid than U.S. investments. In addition, foreign markets can perform differently from the U.S. market.

Investing in emerging markets can involve risks in addition to and greater than those generally associated with investing in more developed foreign markets. The extent of economic development; political stability; market depth, infrastructure, and capitalization; and regulatory oversight can be less than in more developed markets. Emerging market economies can be subject to greater social, economic, regulatory, and political uncertainties. All of these factors can make emerging market securities more volatile and potentially less liquid than securities issued in more developed markets.

Prepayment. Many types of debt securities, including mortgage securities, are subject to prepayment risk. Prepayment risk occurs when the issuer of a security can repay principal prior to the security's maturity. Securities subject to prepayment can offer less potential for gains during a declining interest rate environment and similar or greater potential for loss in a rising interest rate environment. In addition, the potential impact of prepayment features on the price of a debt security can be difficult to predict and result in greater volatility.

Issuer-Specific Changes. Changes in the financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic or political conditions that affect a particular type of security or issuer, and changes in general economic or political conditions can affect a security's or instrument's credit quality or value. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure also can be affected by these types of changes. If the structure of a security fails to function as intended, the security could decline in value. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can be more volatile than that of larger issuers. Smaller issuers can have more limited product lines, markets, or financial resources. Lower-quality debt securities (those of less than investment-grade quality) and certain types of other securities tend to be particularly sensitive to these changes.

Lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities involve greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer. The value of lower-quality debt securities and certain types of other securities often fluctuates in response to company, political, or economic developments and can decline significantly over short periods of time or during periods of general or regional economic difficulty.

"Growth" Investing. "Growth" stocks can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. "Growth" stocks tend to be more expensive relative to their earnings or assets compared to other types of stocks. As a result, "growth" stocks tend to be sensitive to changes in their earnings and more volatile than other types of stocks.

"Value" Investing. "Value" stocks can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. "Value" stocks tend to be inexpensive relative to their earnings or assets compared to other types of stocks. However, "value" stocks can continue to be inexpensive for long periods of time and may not ever realize their full value.

Quantitative Investing. The value of securities selected using quantitative analysis can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole or securities selected using only fundamental analysis. The factors used in quantitative analysis and the weight placed on those factors may not be predictive of a security's value. In addition, factors that affect a security's value can change over time and these changes may not be reflected in the quantitative model.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Small Cap Investing. The value of securities of smaller, less well-known issuers can be more volatile than that of larger issuers and can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole and other types of stocks. Smaller issuers can have more limited product lines, markets, and financial resources.

In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, Strategic Advisers may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes. If Strategic Advisers does so, different factors could affect a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance and the fund may not achieve its investment objective.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The policies discussed below are fundamental, that is, subject to change only by shareholder approval.

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio seeks high current income and, as a secondary objective, capital appreciation.

Each of VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio, VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio, and VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio seeks high total return.

Valuing Shares

Each fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open.

A class's net asset value per share (NAV) is the value of a single share. Fidelity normally calculates each class's NAV as of the close of business of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. However, NAV may be calculated earlier if trading on the NYSE is restricted or as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Each fund's assets are valued as of this time for the purpose of computing each class's NAV.

To the extent that each fund's assets are traded in other markets on days when the fund is not open for business, the value of the fund's assets may be affected on those days. In addition, trading in some of a fund's assets may not occur on days when the fund is open for business.

The assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consist primarily of shares of the underlying Fidelity funds, which are valued at their respective NAVs. A money market underlying Fidelity fund's assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. Other underlying Fidelity fund assets are valued primarily on the basis of market quotations, official closing prices, or on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service. Certain short-term securities are valued on the basis of amortized cost. If market quotations, official closing prices, or information furnished by a pricing service is not readily available or does not accurately reflect fair value for a security held by an underlying Fidelity fund or if the value of a security held by an underlying Fidelity fund has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, that security will be valued by another method that the Board of Trustees believes accurately reflects fair value in accordance with the Board's fair value pricing policies. For example, arbitrage opportunities may exist when trading in a portfolio security or securities held by an underlying Fidelity fund is halted and does not resume before the fund calculates its NAV. These arbitrage opportunities may enable short-term traders to dilute the NAV of long-term investors. Securities trading in overseas markets present time zone arbitrage opportunities when events affecting portfolio security values occur after the close of the overseas market but prior to the close of the U.S. market. Fair value pricing may be used for high yield debt and floating rate loans held by an underlying fund, when available pricing information is stale or is determined for other reasons not to accurately reflect fair value. A security's valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value. Fair valuation of an underlying fund's portfolio securities can serve to reduce arbitrage opportunities available to short-term traders, but there is no assurance that fair value pricing policies will prevent dilution of the fund's NAV by short-term traders. While each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and each underlying fund (other than any underlying money market funds) has policies regarding excessive trading, these too may not be effective to prevent short-term NAV arbitrage trading, particularly in regard to omnibus accounts.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information

Buying and Selling Shares

Insurance companies offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products through separate accounts. Separate accounts - not variable product owners - are the shareholders of the funds. Variable product owners hold interests in separate accounts. The terms of the offering of interests in separate accounts are included in the variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Only separate accounts of insurance companies that have signed the appropriate agreements with the funds can buy or sell shares of the funds.

A fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase orders, including exchanges.

For example, a fund may reject any purchase orders, including exchanges, from market timers or investors that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to that fund.

Frequent purchases and sales of fund shares resulting from purchase, exchange, or withdrawal transactions can harm variable product owners in various ways, including reducing the returns to long-term variable product owners by increasing costs paid by the fund (such as brokerage commissions), disrupting portfolio management strategies, and diluting the value of the shares of long-term variable product owners in cases in which fluctuations in markets are not fully priced into the fund's NAV. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees has adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage frequent large-scale purchases and sales of shares at the separate account level for each fund, but has not adopted policies at the variable product owner level. Purchase and redemption transactions submitted to a fund by insurance company separate accounts reflect the transactions of multiple variable product owners whose individual transactions are not disclosed to the fund. Therefore, a fund generally cannot detect short-term trading by individual variable product owners and relies in large part on the rights, ability, and willingness of insurance companies to detect and deter short-term trading. The funds' policies are separate from, and in addition to, any policies and procedures applicable to variable product owner transactions. The variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus will contain a description of the insurance company's policies and procedures, if any, with respect to short-term trading. However, there is the significant risk that the funds' and insurance company's policies and procedures will prove ineffective in whole or in part to detect or prevent frequent trading. A fund may alter its policies at any time without prior notice to shareholders. The funds' Treasurer is authorized to suspend the funds' policies during periods of severe market turbulence or national emergency.

The funds' transfer agent monitors each separate account's daily purchases and sales orders, which reflect the aggregate and net result of all purchase, redemption, and exchange activity of all variable product owners in that separate account. Redemption transactions that are greater than a certain dollar amount, or greater than a certain percentage of the total of the separate account's holdings of a fund, will trigger a review of the separate account's prior history. If, in the opinion of a funds' transfer agent, the history may be consistent with a pattern of disruptive trading by variable product owners, the funds' transfer agent or distributor will notify the insurance company and inquire about the source of the activity. These policies will be applied uniformly to all insurance companies. However, there is no assurance that the insurance company will investigate the activity or stop any activity that proves to be inappropriate. Each fund reserves the right, but does not have the obligation, to reject purchase orders from, or to stop or limit the offering of shares to, insurance company separate accounts. In addition, each fund reserves the right to impose restrictions on purchases at any time or conditions that are more restrictive on disruptive, excessive, or short-term trading than those that are otherwise stated in this prospectus.

The price to buy one share of each class is the class's NAV. Each class's shares are sold without a sales charge.

Shares will be bought at the next NAV calculated after an order is received in proper form.

A fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase orders.

For example, a fund may reject any purchase orders, from market timers or investors that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to that fund.

Each fund may stop offering shares completely or may offer shares only on a limited basis, for a period of time or permanently.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, purchase orders may be suspended, restricted, or canceled and the monies may be withheld.

The price to sell one share of each class is the class's NAV.

If appropriate to protect shareholders, each fund may impose a redemption fee (trading fee) on redemptions from the fund.

Shares will be sold at the next NAV calculated after an order is received in proper form. Normally, redemptions will be processed by the next business day, but it may take up to seven days to pay the redemption proceeds if making immediate payment would adversely affect a fund.

Redemptions may be suspended or payment dates postponed when the NYSE is closed (other than weekends or holidays), when trading on the NYSE is restricted, or as permitted by the SEC.

Under certain circumstances (for example, at the request of a shareholder), redemption proceeds may be paid in securities or other property rather than in cash if FMR determines it is in the best interests of a fund.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, redemption requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

Each fund offers its shares to separate accounts of insurance companies that may be affiliated or unaffiliated with FMR and/or each other. Each fund currently does not foresee any disadvantages to variable product owners arising out of the fact that the fund offers its shares to separate accounts of insurance companies that offer variable annuity and variable life insurance products. Nevertheless, the Board of Trustees that oversees each fund intends to monitor events to identify any material irreconcilable conflicts that may possibly arise and to determine what action, if any, should be taken in response.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Variable product owners may be asked to provide additional information in order for Fidelity to verify their identities in accordance with requirements under anti-money laundering regulations. Accounts may be restricted and/or closed, and the monies withheld, pending verification of this information or as otherwise required under these and other federal regulations.

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio earns dividends, interest, and other income from its investments, and distributes this income (less expenses) to shareholders as dividends. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio also realizes capital gains from its investments, and distributes these gains (less any losses) to shareholders as capital gain distributions.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio normally pays dividends and capital gain distributions at least annually, in February.

Dividends and capital gain distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of the same class of the fund.

Tax Consequences

Variable product owners seeking to understand the tax consequences of their investment should consult with their tax advisers or the insurance company that issued their variable product, or refer to their variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Insurance company separate accounts generally do not pay tax on dividends or capital gain distributions from a fund.

Prospectus

Fund Services

Fund Management

Each fund is a mutual fund, an investment that pools shareholders' money and invests it toward a specified goal.

Strategic Advisers is each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment manager. The address of Strategic Advisers and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated below, is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), an affiliate of Strategic Advisers, is each underlying Fidelity fund's manager.

As of March 31, 2005, Strategic Advisers had approximately $64.4 billion in discretionary assets under management.

As of March 31, 2005, FMR had approximately $9.1 billion in discretionary assets under management.

As the manager, Strategic Advisers administers the asset allocation program for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

As the manager for the underlying Fidelity funds, FMR is responsible for choosing each fund's investments and handling its business affairs. FMR is also responsible for handling the business affairs for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

Scott Kuldell is manager of VIP FundsManager Portfolios (20%, 50%, 70%, and 85%), which he has managed since their inception. He also manages other Fidelity funds. Since joining Fidelity Investments in 1987, Mr. Kuldell has worked as a quantitative analyst, currency strategist, portfolio manager, director of Asset Management Consulting and senior portfolio strategist.

The Statement of Additional Information (SAI) provides additional information about the compensation of, any other accounts managed by, and any fund shares held by Mr. Kuldell.

From time to time a manager, analyst, or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays a management fee to Strategic. The management fee is calculated and paid to Strategic every month.

Strategic is responsible for the payment of all other expenses of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio with limited exceptions.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's annual management fee rate is 0.25% of its average net assets.

Strategic Advisers pays FMR an administration fee for handling the business affairs for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

FMR may, from time to time, agree to reimburse a class for management fees above a specified limit. FMR retains the ability to be repaid by a class if expenses fall below the specified limit prior to the end of the fiscal year. Reimbursement arrangements, which may be discontinued by FMR at any time, can decrease a class's expenses and boost its performance.

Fund Distribution

Each fund is composed of multiple classes of shares. All classes of a fund have a common investment objective and investment portfolio.

Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) distributes Investor Class's shares.

The insurance companies and their affiliated broker-dealers (intermediaries) may receive from FMR, FDC and/or their affiliates compensation for their services intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund. This compensation may take the form of:

  • distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees
  • payments for additional distribution-related activities and/or shareholder services
  • payments for educational seminars and training, including seminars sponsored by FMR or an affiliate, or by an intermediary

These payments are described in more detail on the following pages and in the SAI.

Service Class of each fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). Under the plan, Service Class of each fund is authorized to pay FDC a 12b-1 (service) fee as compensation for providing support services that benefit variable product owners. Service Class of each fund may pay this 12b-1 (service) fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets, or such lesser amount as the Trustees may determine from time to time. Service Class of each fund currently pays FDC a 12b-1 (service) fee at an annual rate of 0.10% of its average net assets throughout the month. Service Class's 12b-1 (service) fee rate for each fund may be increased only when the Trustees believe that it is in the best interests of variable product owners to do so.

Service Class 2 of each fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the plan, Service Class 2 of each fund is authorized to pay FDC a 12b-1 (service) fee as compensation for providing support services that benefit variable product owners. Service Class 2 of each fund currently pays FDC a 12b-1 (service) fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets throughout the month.

FDC may reallow up to the full amount of these 12b-1 (service) fees to intermediaries (such as insurance companies, broker-dealers, and other service-providers), including its affiliates, for providing support services that benefit variable product owners.

Prospectus

Fund Services - continued

In addition, each of the Service Class and Service Class 2 plans specifically recognizes that FMR may make payments from its management fee revenue, past profits, or other resources to FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Service Class and Service Class 2 shares and/or support services that benefit variable product owners, including payments of significant amounts made to intermediaries that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees of each fund has authorized such payments for Service Class and Service Class 2. These payments are not charged to a fund and do not directly increase a fund's total expenses.

If payments made by FMR to FDC or to intermediaries under the Service Class and Service Class 2 Distribution and Service Plan were considered to be paid out of a Class's assets on an ongoing basis, they might increase the cost of a shareholder's investment and might cost a shareholder more than paying other types of sales charges.

To receive payments made pursuant to a Distribution and Service Plan, intermediaries must sign the appropriate agreement with FDC in advance.

The SAI contains further details about the payments made by FMR, FDC and their affiliates and the services provided by certain intermediaries. Please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

If mutual fund sponsors and their affiliates make distribution and/or non-distribution related payments in varying amounts, certain intermediaries and investment professionals that receive these payments may have an incentive to recommend one mutual fund or one share class over another.

In addition, the funds' transfer agent may also make payments and reimbursements from its own resources to intermediaries for performing recordkeeping and administrative services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts, which the funds' transfer agent or an affiliate would otherwise have to perform directly. These payments are not charged to a fund and do not directly increase a fund's total expenses. Please see "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" in the SAI for more information.

No dealer, sales representative, or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained in this prospectus and in the related SAI, in connection with the offer contained in this prospectus. If given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the funds or FDC. This prospectus and the related SAI do not constitute an offer by the funds or by FDC to sell shares of the funds to or to buy shares of the funds from any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer.

Prospectus

Appendix

Underlying Fidelity Funds

The underlying Fidelity funds in which each VIP FundsManager Portfolio invests may have investment limitations that are more or less restrictive than each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's, and may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries, or in a single issuer. Strategic Advisers may adjust a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's underlying Fidelity fund holdings at any time and may invest each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's assets in other Fidelity retail or VIP funds created in the future, as determined from time to time by Strategic Advisers, but does not intend to invest in any actively managed investment-grade bond funds. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio normally will invest in 10-25 underlying Fidelity funds at any given time.

Of the potential underlying Fidelity funds in which a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest as of the date of this prospectus, the underlying Fidelity funds that may concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries are as follows:

Fund

Industry or Industries in which it concentrates

Fidelity Canada Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Canadian market.

Fidelity Cash Reserves

Financial Services

Fidelity China Region Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Hong Kong, Taiwanese, and Chinese market.

Fidelity International Real Estate Fund

Real Estate

Fidelity Latin America Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Latin American market.

Fidelity Money Market Fund

Financial Services

Fidelity Nordic Fund

Invests up to 35% of total assets in any industry that acounts for more than 20% of the Nordic market.

Fidelity OTC Portfolio

Technology

Fidelity Real Estate Income Fund

Real Estate

Fidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio

Real Estate

Fidelity Select Air Transportation Portfolio

Air Transportation

Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio

Automotive

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio

Banking

Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio

Biotechnology

Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio

Brokerage and Investment Management

Fidelity Select Business Services and Outsourcing Portfolio

Business Services and Outsourcing

Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio

Chemical

Fidelity Select Computers Portfolio

Computer

Fidelity Select Construction and Housing Portfolio

Construction and Housing

Fidelity Select Consumer Industries Portfolio

Consumer

Fidelity Select Cyclical Industries Portfolio

Cyclical

Fidelity Select Defense and Aerospace Portfolio

Defense and Aerospace

Fidelity Select Developing Communications Portfolio

Developing Communications

Fidelity Select Electronics Portfolio

Electronics

Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio

Energy

Fidelity Select Energy Service Portfolio

Energy Service

Fidelity Select Environmental Portfolio

Environmental

Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio

Financial Services

Fidelity Select Food and Agriculture Portfolio

Food and Agriculture

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio

Gold

Fidelity Select Health Care Portfolio

Health Care

Fidelity Select Home Finance Portfolio

Home Finance

Fidelity Select Industrial Equipment Portfolio

Industrial Equipment

Fidelity Select Industrial Materials Portfolio

Industrial Materials

Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio

Insurance

Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio

Leisure

Fidelity Select Medical Delivery Portfolio

Medical Delivery

Fidelity Select Medical Equipment and Systems Portfolio

Medical Equipment and Systems

Fidelity Select Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Fidelity Select Multimedia Portfolio

Multimedia

Fidelity Select Natural Gas Portfolio

Natural Gas

Fidelity Select Natural Resources Portfolio

Natural Resources

Fidelity Select Networking and Infrastructure Portfolio

Networking and Infrastructure

Fidelity Select Paper and Forest Products Portfolio

Paper and Forest Products

Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio

Pharmaceuticals

Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio

Retail

Fidelity Select Software and Computer Services Portfolio

Software and Computer Services

Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio

Technology

Fidelity Select Telecommunications Portfolio

Telecommunications

Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio

Transportation

Fidelity Select Utilities Growth Portfolio

Utilities

Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio

Wireless

Fidelity Utilities Fund

Utilities

Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Prime Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

Retirement Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Consumer Industries Portfolio

Consumer

VIP Cyclical Industries Portfolio

Cyclical

VIP Financial Services Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Health Care Portfolio

Health Care

VIP Money Market Portfolio

Financial Services

VIP Natural Resources Portfolio

Natural Resources

VIP Real Estate Portfolio

Real Estate

VIP Technology Portfolio

Technology

VIP Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio

Utilities

Information on each potential underlying Fidelity fund is available in its prospectus. For a copy of any underlying Fidelity fund's prospectus, please visit www.fidelity.com or, for VIP funds, advisor.fidelity.com.

Prospectus

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT

To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.

For variable product owners: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license.

For insurance separate accounts: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and may be requested to provide information on persons with authority or control over the account such as name, residential address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.

You can obtain additional information about the fund. A description of the fund's policies and procedures for disclosing its holdings is available in its SAI and on Fidelity's web sites. The SAI also includes more detailed information about the fund and its investments. The SAI is incorporated herein by reference (legally forms a part of the prospectus). A financial report will be available once the fund has completed its first annual or semi-annual period. The fund's annual and semi-annual reports also include additional information. The fund's annual report includes a discussion of the fund's holdings and recent market conditions and the fund's investment strategies that affected performance.

For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about a fund, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098. In addition, you may visit Fidelity's web site at www.advisor.fidelity.com for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI, or annual or semi-annual report or to request other information.

The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-0102. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.

Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number, 811-03759

Fidelity and Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design are registered trademarks of FMR Corp.

The term "VIP" as used in this document refers to Fidelity Variable Insurance Products.

1.827144.100 VFMSCSC2-RED-0106

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATED January 26, 2006. The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This statement of additional information is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

FIDELITY® VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS

FUNDSMANAGER 20% PORTFOLIO, FUNDSMANAGER 50% PORTFOLIO,
FUNDSMANAGER 70% PORTFOLIO, and FUNDSMANAGER 85% PORTFOLIO

Funds of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV
Service Class and Service Class 2

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

April __, 2006

This statement of additional information (SAI) is not a prospectus. An annual report for each fund will be available once the fund has completed its first annual period.

To obtain a free additional copy of the prospectus or SAI, dated April __, 2006, please call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098 or visit Fidelity's web site at www.advisor.fidelity.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Investment Policies and Limitations

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding Canada

18

Special Considerations Regarding Europe

18

Special Considerations Regarding Japan

19

Special Considerations Regarding Asia Pacific Region (ex Japan)

19

Special Considerations Regarding Latin America

20

Special Considerations Regarding Russia

20

Portfolio Transactions

<Click Here>

Valuation

<Click Here>

Buying and Selling Information

<Click Here>

Distributions and Taxes

<Click Here>

Trustees and Officers

<Click Here>

Control of Investment Advisers

<Click Here>

Management Contracts

<Click Here>

Board Approval of the Existing Investment Advisory Contracts

<Click Here>

Proxy Voting Guidelines

<Click Here>

Distribution Services

<Click Here>

Transfer and Service Agent Agreements

<Click Here>

Description of the Trust

<Click Here>

Fund Holdings Information

<Click Here>

Appendix

<Click Here>

VFMSCSC2-REDB-0106
1.827145.100

(fidelity_logo_graphic)

82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

INVESTMENT POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS

The following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of a VIP FundsManagerSM  Portfolio's assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be considered when determining whether the investment complies with the VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment policies and limitations.

A VIP FundsManager Portfolio's fundamental investment policies and limitations cannot be changed without approval by a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act)) of the fund. However, except for the fundamental investment limitations listed below, the investment policies and limitations described in this SAI are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

The following are each fund's fundamental investment limitations set forth in their entirety.

Diversification

For each fund:

The fund may not with respect to 75% of the fund's total assets, purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, (a) more than 5% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer, or (b) the fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer.

For purposes of each fund's diversification limitation discussed above, the extent to which the fund may invest in the securities of a single issuer or a certain number of issuers is limited by the diversification requirements imposed by Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, which are in addition to the diversification requirements described in the above limitation.

Senior Securities

For each fund:

The fund may not issue senior securities, except in connection with the insurance program established by the fund pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission or as otherwise permitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may not borrow money, except that the fund may borrow money for temporary or emergency purposes (not for leveraging or investment) in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount will be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation.

Underwriting

For each fund:

The fund may not underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that the fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with investments in other investment companies.

Concentration

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of companies whose principal business activities are in the same industry (provided that investments in other investment companies shall not be considered an investment in any particular industry for purposes of this investment limitation).

Real Estate

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business).

Commodities

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from purchasing or selling options and futures contracts or from investing in securities or other instruments backed by physical commodities).

Loans

For each fund:

The fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities or to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.

The following investment limitations are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

Short Sales

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short, and provided that transactions in futures contracts and options are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.

Margin Purchases

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase securities on margin, except that the fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of transactions, and provided that margin payments in connection with futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may borrow money only (a) from a bank or from a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements with any party (reverse repurchase agreements are treated as borrowings for purposes of the fundamental borrowing investment limitation).

Illiquid Securities

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase any security if, as a result, more than 10% of its net assets would be invested in securities that are deemed to be illiquid because they are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale or because they cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued.

For purposes of each fund's illiquid securities limitation discussed above, if through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, the fund were in a position where more than 10% of its net assets were invested in illiquid securities, it would consider appropriate steps to protect liquidity.

Loans

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to lend assets other than securities to other parties, except by (a) lending money (up to 15% of the fund's net assets) to a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) assuming any unfunded commitments in connection with the acquisition of loans, loan participations, or other forms of debt instruments. (This limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities, to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.)

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration Programs

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to invest in oil, gas, or other mineral exploration or development programs or leases.

In addition to each fund's fundamental and non-fundamental limitations discussed above:

Pursuant to certain state insurance regulations, any repurchase agreements or foreign repurchase agreements a fund enters into will be secured by collateral consisting of liquid assets having a market value of not less than 102% of the cash or assets transferred to the other party.

For a fund's limitations on futures and options transactions, see the section entitled "Limitations on Futures and Options Transactions" on page 5.

Notwithstanding the foregoing investment limitations, the underlying Fidelity funds in which the VIP FundsManager Portfolios may invest have adopted certain investment limitations that may be more or less restrictive than those listed above, thereby permitting a VIP FundsManager Portfolio to engage indirectly in investment strategies that are prohibited under the investment limitations listed above. The investment limitations of each underlying Fidelity fund are set forth in its SAI.

In accordance with each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment program as set forth in the prospectus, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest more than 25% of its assets in any one underlying Fidelity fund. While each VIP FundsManager Portfolio does not intend to concentrate its investments in a particular industry, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may indirectly concentrate in a particular industry or group of industries through its investments in one or more underlying Fidelity funds. Each of the underlying Fidelity funds (other than as indicated in the Appendix to the prospectus) will not concentrate more than 25% of its total assets in any one industry.

Investment Practices of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which a VIP FundsManager Portfolio may invest, strategies Strategic Advisers, Inc. (Strategic Advisers®) may employ in pursuit of a VIP FundsManager Portfolio's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. Strategic Advisers may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help a VIP FundsManager Portfolio achieve its goal.

Borrowing. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements. If a fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation until the borrowing is paid off. If a fund makes additional investments while borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash or can invest it in cash equivalents such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of money market or short-term bond funds. Generally, these securities offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.

Central Funds are money market or short-term bond funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. The money market central funds seek to earn a high level of current income (free from federal income tax in the case of a municipal money market fund) while maintaining a stable $1.00 share price. The money market central funds comply with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of their investments. The short-term bond central funds seek to obtain a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest their assets allocated to debt in a central fund. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in debt.

Dollar-Weighted Average Maturity is derived by multiplying the value of each investment by the time remaining to its maturity, adding these calculations, and then dividing the total by the value of the fund's portfolio. An obligation's maturity is typically determined on a stated final maturity basis, although there are some exceptions to this rule.

For example, if it is probable that the issuer of an instrument will take advantage of a maturity-shortening device, such as a call, refunding, or redemption provision, the date on which the instrument will probably be called, refunded, or redeemed may be considered to be its maturity date. Also, the maturities of mortgage securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, and some asset-backed securities are determined on a weighted average life basis, which is the average time for principal to be repaid. For a mortgage security, this average time is calculated by estimating the timing of principal payments, including unscheduled prepayments, during the life of the mortgage. The weighted average life of these securities is likely to be substantially shorter than their stated final maturity.

Futures Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. The price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures contracts are based on specific securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or notes, and some are based on indices of securities prices, such as the Standard & Poor's 500SM  Index (S&P 500®). Futures can be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out before then if a liquid secondary market is available.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase a fund's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument directly. When a fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the underlying instrument had been sold.

Limitations on Futures and Options Transactions. The trust, on behalf of each fund, intends to file with the National Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term "commodity pool operator" (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission promulgated thereunder, with respect to each fund's operation, before engaging in any purchases or sales of commodity futures contracts or commodity options contracts. Accordingly, each fund will not be subject to registration or regulation as a CPO.

Each fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, or write call options if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and options under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts or write put options if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options would exceed 25% of its total assets under normal conditions; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to options.

The above limitations on the funds' investments in futures contracts and options, and the funds' policies regarding futures contracts and options discussed elsewhere in this SAI may be changed as regulatory agencies permit.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR, on behalf of Strategic Advisers, determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, FMR may consider various factors, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the cost of bank loans, and will lend through the program only when the returns are higher than those available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.

Investment-Grade Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt instruments that are of medium and high-quality. Investment-grade debt securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities, non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a fund can perfect a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an investment-grade rating. Some investment-grade debt securities may possess speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by Moody's® Investors Service, Standard & Poor's® (S&P®), Fitch Inc., Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, or another credit rating agency designated as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) by the SEC, or is unrated but considered to be of equivalent quality by FMR.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR on behalf of Strategic Advisers.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The VIP FundsManager Portfolios will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR on behalf of Strategic Advisers. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities Lending. A fund may lend securities to parties such as broker-dealers or other institutions, including Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (FBS LLC). FBS LLC is a member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and an indirect subsidiary of FMR Corp.

Securities lending allows a fund to retain ownership of the securities loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. The borrower provides the fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The fund maintains the ability to obtain the right to vote or consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities loaned. If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, a fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, a fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the time the replacement investment is purchased. Loans will be made only to parties deemed by Strategic Advisers to be in good standing and when, in Strategic Advisers' judgment, the income earned would justify the risks.

Cash received as collateral through loan transactions may be invested in other eligible securities, including shares of a money market fund. Investing this cash subjects that investment, as well as the securities loaned, to market appreciation or depreciation.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. For purposes of making initial and ongoing minimal credit risk determinations, Strategic Advisers may rely on FMR's or its affiliates' evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Temporary Defensive Policies. Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio reserves the right to invest without limitation in money market funds for temporary, defensive purposes.

Investment Practices of the Underlying Fidelity Funds

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which an underlying Fidelity fund may invest, strategies FMR may employ in pursuit of an underlying Fidelity fund's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. FMR may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help an underlying Fidelity fund achieve its goal.

Affiliated Bank Transactions. A fund may engage in transactions with financial institutions that are, or may be considered to be, "affiliated persons" of the fund under the 1940 Act. These transactions may involve repurchase agreements with custodian banks; short-term obligations of, and repurchase agreements with, the 50 largest U.S. banks (measured by deposits); municipal securities; U.S. Government securities with affiliated financial institutions that are primary dealers in these securities; short-term currency transactions; and short-term borrowings. In accordance with exemptive orders issued by the SEC, the Board of Trustees has established and periodically reviews procedures applicable to transactions involving affiliated financial institutions.

Asset-Backed Securities represent interests in pools of mortgages, loans, receivables, or other assets. Payment of interest and repayment of principal may be largely dependent upon the cash flows generated by the assets backing the securities and, in certain cases, supported by letters of credit, surety bonds, or other credit enhancements. Asset-backed security values may also be affected by other factors including changes in interest rates, the availability of information concerning the pool and its structure, the creditworthiness of the servicing agent for the pool, the originator of the loans or receivables, or the entities providing the credit enhancement. In addition, these securities may be subject to prepayment risk.

Borrowing. Each fund may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements. If a fund borrows money, its share price may be subject to greater fluctuation until the borrowing is paid off. If a fund makes additional investments while borrowings are outstanding, this may be considered a form of leverage.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash or can invest it in cash equivalents such as money market securities, repurchase agreements, or shares of money market or short-term bond funds. Generally, these securities offer less potential for gains than other types of securities.

Central Funds are money market or short-term bond funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. The money market central funds seek to earn a high level of current income (free from federal income tax in the case of a municipal money market fund) while maintaining a stable $1.00 share price. The money market central funds comply with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of their investments. The short-term bond central funds seek to obtain a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest their assets allocated to debt in a central fund. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in debt.

Central Investment Portfolios (CIPs) are funds managed by FMR or its affiliates. High income CIPs seek a high level of income, and may also seek capital appreciation. Investment-grade CIPs seek a high level of current income. Certain Fidelity funds are permitted to invest some or all of their assets allocated to high income and/or investment-grade debt in CIPs. Such an investment allows a fund to obtain the benefits of a fully diversified high income and/or investment-grade bond portfolio regardless of the amount of assets the fund invests in high income and/or investment-grade debt.

Common Stock represents an equity or ownership interest in an issuer. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds and preferred stock take precedence over the claims of those who own common stock.

Convertible Securities are bonds, debentures, notes, or other securities that may be converted or exchanged (by the holder or by the issuer) into shares of the underlying common stock (or cash or securities of equivalent value) at a stated exchange ratio. A convertible security may also be called for redemption or conversion by the issuer after a particular date and under certain circumstances (including a specified price) established upon issue. If a convertible security held by a fund is called for redemption or conversion, the fund could be required to tender it for redemption, convert it into the underlying common stock, or sell it to a third party.

Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain or loss than common stocks. Convertible securities generally provide yields higher than the underlying common stocks, but generally lower than comparable non-convertible securities. Because of this higher yield, convertible securities generally sell at prices above their "conversion value," which is the current market value of the stock to be received upon conversion. The difference between this conversion value and the price of convertible securities will vary over time depending on changes in the value of the underlying common stocks and interest rates. When the underlying common stocks decline in value, convertible securities will tend not to decline to the same extent because of the interest or dividend payments and the repayment of principal at maturity for certain types of convertible securities. However, securities that are convertible other than at the option of the holder generally do not limit the potential for loss to the same extent as securities convertible at the option of the holder. When the underlying common stocks rise in value, the value of convertible securities may also be expected to increase. At the same time, however, the difference between the market value of convertible securities and their conversion value will narrow, which means that the value of convertible securities will generally not increase to the same extent as the value of the underlying common stocks. Because convertible securities may also be interest-rate sensitive, their value may increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Convertible securities are also subject to credit risk, and are often lower-quality securities.

Companies "Principally Engaged" in a Designated Business Activity. For purposes of a fund's policy of investing at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies principally engaged in the business activities identified for the fund, FMR considers a company to be principally engaged in a designated business activity if: (i) at least 50% of a company's assets, income, sales, or profits are committed to, or derived from, the business activity, or (ii) a third party has given the company an industry or sector classification consistent with the designated business activity.

Companies "Principally Engaged" in the Real Estate Industry. For funds that invest at least 80% of its assets in securities of companies principally engaged in the real estate industry and other real estate related investments, FMR considers a company to be principally engaged in the real estate industry if at least 50% of its assets (marked to market), gross income, or net profits are attributable to ownership, construction, management, or sale of residential, commercial, or industrial real estate.

Country or Geographic Region. FMR considers a number of factors to determine whether an investment is tied economically to a particular country or region including: whether the investment is issued or guaranteed by a particular government or any of its agencies, political subdivisions, or instrumentalities; whether the investment has its primary trading market in a particular country or region; whether the issuer is organized under the laws of, derives at least 50% of its revenues from, or has at least 50% of its assets in a particular country or region; whether the investment is included in an index representative of a particular country or region; and whether the investment is exposed to the economic fortunes and risks of a particular country or region.

Debt Securities are used by issuers to borrow money. The issuer usually pays a fixed, variable, or floating rate of interest, and must repay the amount borrowed, usually at the maturity of the security. Some debt securities, such as zero coupon bonds, do not pay interest but are sold at a deep discount from their face values. Debt securities include corporate bonds, government securities, repurchase agreements, and mortgage and other asset-backed securities.

Dollar-Weighted Average Maturity is derived by multiplying the value of each investment by the time remaining to its maturity, adding these calculations, and then dividing the total by the value of the fund's portfolio. An obligation's maturity is typically determined on a stated final maturity basis, although there are some exceptions to this rule.

For example, if it is probable that the issuer of an instrument will take advantage of a maturity-shortening device, such as a call, refunding, or redemption provision, the date on which the instrument will probably be called, refunded, or redeemed may be considered to be its maturity date. Also, the maturities of mortgage securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations, and some asset-backed securities are determined on a weighted average life basis, which is the average time for principal to be repaid. For a mortgage security, this average time is calculated by estimating the timing of principal payments, including unscheduled prepayments, during the life of the mortgage. The weighted average life of these securities is likely to be substantially shorter than their stated final maturity.

Domestic and Foreign Investments (money market funds only) include U.S. dollar-denominated time deposits, certificates of deposit, and bankers' acceptances of U.S. banks and their branches located outside of the United States, U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks, and foreign branches of foreign banks. Domestic and foreign investments may also include U.S. dollar-denominated securities issued or guaranteed by other U.S. or foreign issuers, including U.S. and foreign corporations or other business organizations, foreign governments, foreign government agencies or instrumentalities, and U.S. and foreign financial institutions, including savings and loan institutions, insurance companies, mortgage bankers, and real estate investment trusts, as well as banks.

The obligations of foreign branches of U.S. banks may not be obligations of the parent bank in addition to the issuing branch, and may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and by governmental regulation. Payment of interest and repayment of principal on these obligations may also be affected by governmental action in the country of domicile of the branch (generally referred to as sovereign risk) or by war or civil conflict. In addition, settlement of trades may occur outside of the United States and evidence of ownership of portfolio securities may be held outside of the United States. Accordingly, a fund may be subject to the risks associated with the settlement of trades and the holding of such property overseas. Various provisions of federal law governing the establishment and operation of U.S. branches do not apply to foreign branches of U.S. banks.

Obligations of U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks may be general obligations of the parent bank in addition to the issuing branch, or may be limited by the terms of a specific obligation and by federal and state regulation, as well as by governmental action in the country in which the foreign bank has its head office.

Obligations of foreign issuers involve certain additional risks. These risks may include future unfavorable political and economic developments, withholding taxes, seizures of foreign deposits, currency controls, interest limitations, or other governmental restrictions that might affect repayment of principal or payment of interest, or the ability to honor a credit commitment. Additionally, there may be less public information available about foreign entities. Foreign issuers may be subject to less governmental regulation and supervision than U.S. issuers. Foreign issuers also generally are not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers.

Exposure to Foreign Markets. Foreign securities, foreign currencies, and securities issued by U.S. entities with substantial foreign operations may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Foreign investments involve risks relating to local political, economic, regulatory, or social instability, military action or unrest, or adverse diplomatic developments, and may be affected by actions of foreign governments adverse to the interests of U.S. investors. Such actions may include expropriation or nationalization of assets, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on U.S. investment or on the ability to repatriate assets or convert currency into U.S. dollars, or other government intervention. Additionally, governmental issuers of foreign debt securities may be unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due and may require that the conditions for payment be renegotiated. There is no assurance that FMR will be able to anticipate these potential events or counter their effects. In addition, the value of securities denominated in foreign currencies and of dividends and interest paid with respect to such securities will fluctuate based on the relative strength of the U.S. dollar.

It is anticipated that in most cases the best available market for foreign securities will be on an exchange or in over-the-counter (OTC) markets located outside of the United States. Foreign stock markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers. Foreign security trading, settlement and custodial practices (including those involving securities settlement where fund assets may be released prior to receipt of payment) are often less developed than those in U.S. markets, and may result in increased risk or substantial delays in the event of a failed trade or the insolvency of, or breach of duty by, a foreign broker-dealer, securities depository, or foreign subcustodian. In addition, the costs associated with foreign investments, including withholding taxes, brokerage commissions, and custodial costs, are generally higher than with U.S. investments.

Foreign markets may offer less protection to investors than U.S. markets. Foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to U.S. issuers. Adequate public information on foreign issuers may not be available, and it may be difficult to secure dividends and information regarding corporate actions on a timely basis. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, and listed companies than in the United States. OTC markets tend to be less regulated than stock exchange markets and, in certain countries, may be totally unregulated. Regulatory enforcement may be influenced by economic or political concerns, and investors may have difficulty enforcing their legal rights in foreign countries.

Some foreign securities impose restrictions on transfer within the United States or to U.S. persons. Although securities subject to such transfer restrictions may be marketable abroad, they may be less liquid than foreign securities of the same class that are not subject to such restrictions.

American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) as well as other "hybrid" forms of ADRs, including European Depositary Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs), are certificates evidencing ownership of shares of a foreign issuer. These certificates are issued by depository banks and generally trade on an established market in the United States or elsewhere. The underlying shares are held in trust by a custodian bank or similar financial institution in the issuer's home country. The depository bank may not have physical custody of the underlying securities at all times and may charge fees for various services, including forwarding dividends and interest and corporate actions. ADRs are alternatives to directly purchasing the underlying foreign securities in their national markets and currencies. However, ADRs continue to be subject to many of the risks associated with investing directly in foreign securities. These risks include foreign exchange risk as well as the political and economic risks of the underlying issuer's country.

The risks of foreign investing may be magnified for investments in emerging markets. Security prices in emerging markets can be significantly more volatile than those in more developed markets, reflecting the greater uncertainties of investing in less established markets and economies. In particular, countries with emerging markets may have relatively unstable governments, may present the risks of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and prohibitions on the repatriation of assets, and may have less protection of property rights than more developed countries. The economies of countries with emerging markets may be based on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable to changes in local or global trade conditions, and may suffer from extreme and volatile debt burdens or inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult or impossible at times.

Foreign Currency Transactions. A fund (other than a money market fund) may conduct foreign currency transactions on a spot (i.e., cash) or forward basis (i.e., by entering into forward contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies). Although foreign exchange dealers generally do not charge a fee for such conversions, they do realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the counterparty desire to resell that currency to the dealer. Forward contracts are customized transactions that require a specific amount of a currency to be delivered at a specific exchange rate on a specific date or range of dates in the future. Forward contracts are generally traded in an interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. The parties to a forward contract may agree to offset or terminate the contract before its maturity, or may hold the contract to maturity and complete the contemplated currency exchange.

The following discussion summarizes the principal currency management strategies involving forward contracts that could be used by a fund. A fund may also use swap agreements, indexed securities, and options and futures contracts relating to foreign currencies for the same purposes.

A "settlement hedge" or "transaction hedge" is designed to protect a fund against an adverse change in foreign currency values between the date a security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received. Entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale of the amount of foreign currency involved in an underlying security transaction for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars "locks in" the U.S. dollar price of the security. Forward contracts to purchase or sell a foreign currency may also be used by a fund in anticipation of future purchases or sales of securities denominated in foreign currency, even if the specific investments have not yet been selected by FMR.

A fund may also use forward contracts to hedge against a decline in the value of existing investments denominated in foreign currency. For example, if a fund owned securities denominated in pounds sterling, it could enter into a forward contract to sell pounds sterling in return for U.S. dollars to hedge against possible declines in the pound's value. Such a hedge, sometimes referred to as a "position hedge," would tend to offset both positive and negative currency fluctuations, but would not offset changes in security values caused by other factors. A fund could also hedge the position by selling another currency expected to perform similarly to the pound sterling. This type of hedge, sometimes referred to as a "proxy hedge," could offer advantages in terms of cost, yield, or efficiency, but generally would not hedge currency exposure as effectively as a direct hedge into U.S. dollars. Proxy hedges may result in losses if the currency used to hedge does not perform similarly to the currency in which the hedged securities are denominated.

A fund may enter into forward contracts to shift its investment exposure from one currency into another. This may include shifting exposure from U.S. dollars to a foreign currency, or from one foreign currency to another foreign currency. This type of strategy, sometimes known as a "cross-hedge," will tend to reduce or eliminate exposure to the currency that is sold, and increase exposure to the currency that is purchased, much as if a fund had sold a security denominated in one currency and purchased an equivalent security denominated in another. Cross-hedges protect against losses resulting from a decline in the hedged currency, but will cause a fund to assume the risk of fluctuations in the value of the currency it purchases.

Successful use of currency management strategies will depend on FMR's skill in analyzing currency values. Currency management strategies may substantially change a fund's investment exposure to changes in currency exchange rates and could result in losses to a fund if currencies do not perform as FMR anticipates. For example, if a currency's value rose at a time when FMR had hedged a fund by selling that currency in exchange for dollars, a fund would not participate in the currency's appreciation. If FMR hedges currency exposure through proxy hedges, a fund could realize currency losses from both the hedge and the security position if the two currencies do not move in tandem. Similarly, if FMR increases a fund's exposure to a foreign currency and that currency's value declines, a fund will realize a loss. There is no assurance that FMR's use of currency management strategies will be advantageous to a fund or that it will hedge at appropriate times.

Foreign Repurchase Agreements. Foreign repurchase agreements involve an agreement to purchase a foreign security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price in either U.S. dollars or foreign currency. Unlike typical U.S. repurchase agreements, foreign repurchase agreements may not be fully collateralized at all times. The value of a security purchased by a fund may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to repurchase the security. In the event of default by the counterparty, the fund may suffer a loss if the value of the security purchased is less than the agreed-upon repurchase price, or if the fund is unable to successfully assert a claim to the collateral under foreign laws. As a result, foreign repurchase agreements may involve higher credit risks than repurchase agreements in U.S. markets, as well as risks associated with currency fluctuations. In addition, as with other emerging market investments, repurchase agreements with counterparties located in emerging markets or relating to emerging markets may involve issuers or counterparties with lower credit ratings than typical U.S. repurchase agreements.

Funds' Rights as Investors. The funds do not intend to direct or administer the day-to-day operations of any company. A fund, however, may exercise its rights as a shareholder or lender and may communicate its views on important matters of policy to management, the Board of Directors, shareholders of a company, and holders of other securities of the company when FMR determines that such matters could have a significant effect on the value of the fund's investment in the company. The activities in which a fund may engage, either individually or in conjunction with others, may include, among others, supporting or opposing proposed changes in a company's corporate structure or business activities; seeking changes in a company's directors or management; seeking changes in a company's direction or policies; seeking the sale or reorganization of the company or a portion of its assets; supporting or opposing third-party takeover efforts; supporting the filing of a bankruptcy petition; or foreclosing on collateral securing a security. This area of corporate activity is increasingly prone to litigation and it is possible that a fund could be involved in lawsuits related to such activities. FMR will monitor such activities with a view to mitigating, to the extent possible, the risk of litigation against a fund and the risk of actual liability if a fund is involved in litigation. No guarantee can be made, however, that litigation against a fund will not be undertaken or liabilities incurred. The funds' proxy voting guidelines are included in this SAI.

Futures, Options, and Swaps. The following paragraphs pertain to futures, options, and swaps: Combined Positions, Correlation of Price Changes, Futures Contracts, Futures Margin Payments, Limitations on Futures, Options, and Swap Transactions, Liquidity of Options and Futures Contracts, Options and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies, OTC Options, Purchasing Put and Call Options, Writing Put and Call Options, and Swap Agreements.

Combined Positions involve purchasing and writing options in combination with each other, or in combination with futures or forward contracts, to adjust the risk and return characteristics of the overall position. For example, purchasing a put option and writing a call option on the same underlying instrument would construct a combined position whose risk and return characteristics are similar to selling a futures contract. Another possible combined position would involve writing a call option at one strike price and buying a call option at a lower price, to reduce the risk of the written call option in the event of a substantial price increase. Because combined options positions involve multiple trades, they result in higher transaction costs and may be more difficult to open and close out.

Correlation of Price Changes. Because there are a limited number of types of exchange-traded options and futures contracts, it is likely that the standardized contracts available will not match a fund's current or anticipated investments exactly. A fund may invest in options and futures contracts based on securities with different issuers, maturities, or other characteristics from the securities in which the fund typically invests, which involves a risk that the options or futures position will not track the performance of the fund's other investments.

Options and futures prices can also diverge from the prices of their underlying instruments, even if the underlying instruments match a fund's investments well. Options and futures prices are affected by such factors as current and anticipated short-term interest rates, changes in volatility of the underlying instrument, and the time remaining until expiration of the contract, which may not affect security prices the same way. Imperfect correlation may also result from differing levels of demand in the options and futures markets and the securities markets, from structural differences in how options and futures and securities are traded, or from imposition of daily price fluctuation limits or trading halts. A fund may purchase or sell options and futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge or intends to purchase in order to attempt to compensate for differences in volatility between the contract and the securities, although this may not be successful in all cases. If price changes in a fund's options or futures positions are poorly correlated with its other investments, the positions may fail to produce anticipated gains or result in losses that are not offset by gains in other investments.

Futures Contracts. In purchasing a futures contract, the buyer agrees to purchase a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. In selling a futures contract, the seller agrees to sell a specified underlying instrument at a specified future date. The price at which the purchase and sale will take place is fixed when the buyer and seller enter into the contract. Some currently available futures contracts are based on specific securities, such as U.S. Treasury bonds or notes, some are based on indices of securities prices, such as the S&P 500, and some are based on Eurodollars. Futures can be held until their delivery dates, or can be closed out before then if a liquid secondary market is available.

Futures may be based on foreign indexes such as the Compagnie des Agents de Change 40 Index (CAC 40) in France, the Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX 30) in Germany, the Financial Times Stock Exchange Eurotop 100 Index (FTSE Eurotop 100) in Europe, the IBEX 35 Index (IBEX 35) in Spain, the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index (FTSE 100) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Stock Exchange All Ordinaries Index (ASX All Ordinaries) in Australia, the Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong, and the Nikkei Stock Average (Nikkei 225), the Nikkei Stock Index 300 (Nikkei 300), and the Tokyo Stock Exchange Stock Price Index (TOPIX) in Japan.

Positions in Eurodollar futures reflect market expectations of forward levels of three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rates.

The value of a futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase a fund's exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if it had purchased the underlying instrument directly. When a fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the underlying instrument had been sold.

Futures Margin Payments. The purchaser or seller of a futures contract is not required to deliver or pay for the underlying instrument unless the contract is held until the delivery date. However, both the purchaser and seller are required to deposit "initial margin" with a futures broker, known as a futures commission merchant (FCM), when the contract is entered into. Initial margin deposits are typically equal to a percentage of the contract's value. If the value of either party's position declines, that party will be required to make additional "variation margin" payments to settle the change in value on a daily basis. The party that has a gain may be entitled to receive all or a portion of this amount. Initial and variation margin payments do not constitute purchasing securities on margin for purposes of a fund's investment limitations. In the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of an FCM that holds margin on behalf of a fund, the fund may be entitled to return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the FCM's other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the fund. A fund is required to segregate liquid assets equivalent to the fund's outstanding obligations under the contract in excess of the initial margin and variation margin, if any.

Although futures exchanges generally operate similarly in the United States and abroad, foreign futures exchanges may follow trading, settlement, and margin procedures that are different from those for U.S. exchanges. Futures contracts traded outside the United States may involve greater risk of loss than U.S.-traded contracts, including potentially greater risk of losses due to insolvency of a futures broker, exchange member, or other party that may owe initial or variation margin to a fund. Because initial and variation margin payments may be measured in foreign currency, a futures contract traded outside the United States may also involve the risk of foreign currency fluctuation.

Limitations on Futures, Options, and Swap Transactions. Each trust, on behalf of each equity and bond fund, has filed with the National Futures Association a notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of the term "commodity pool operator" (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission promulgated thereunder, with respect to each fund's operation. Accordingly, each equity and bond fund is not subject to registration or regulation as a CPO.

Each investment-grade bond fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, write call options, or enter into swap agreements if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and/or options and/or swap agreements under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts, write put options, or enter into swap agreements (other than swaps entered into for hedging purposes under (a)) if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options plus the notional amount of any such swaps would exceed 25% of its total assets; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to futures, options, or swaps.

Each growth and growth & income fund will not: (a) sell futures contracts, purchase put options, or write call options if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be hedged with futures and options under normal conditions; (b) purchase futures contracts or write put options if, as a result, the fund's total obligations upon settlement or exercise of purchased futures contracts and written put options would exceed 25% of its total assets under normal conditions; or (c) purchase call options if, as a result, the current value of option premiums for call options purchased by the fund would exceed 5% of the fund's total assets. These limitations do not apply to options attached to or acquired or traded together with their underlying securities, and do not apply to securities that incorporate features similar to options.

The above limitations on the funds' (other than a money market fund's) investments in futures contracts, options, and swaps, and the funds' policies regarding futures contracts, options, and swaps discussed elsewhere in this SAI are not fundamental policies and may be changed as regulatory agencies permit.

Liquidity of Options and Futures Contracts. There is no assurance a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular options or futures contract at any particular time. Options may have relatively low trading volume and liquidity if their strike prices are not close to the underlying instrument's current price. In addition, exchanges may establish daily price fluctuation limits for options and futures contracts, and may halt trading if a contract's price moves upward or downward more than the limit in a given day. On volatile trading days when the price fluctuation limit is reached or a trading halt is imposed, it may be impossible to enter into new positions or close out existing positions. If the secondary market for a contract is not liquid because of price fluctuation limits or otherwise, it could prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions, and potentially could require a fund to continue to hold a position until delivery or expiration regardless of changes in its value. As a result, a fund's access to other assets held to cover its options or futures positions could also be impaired.

Options and Futures Relating to Foreign Currencies. Currency futures contracts are similar to forward currency exchange contracts, except that they are traded on exchanges (and have margin requirements) and are standardized as to contract size and delivery date. Most currency futures contracts call for payment or delivery in U.S. dollars. The underlying instrument of a currency option may be a foreign currency, which generally is purchased or delivered in exchange for U.S. dollars, or may be a futures contract. The purchaser of a currency call obtains the right to purchase the underlying currency, and the purchaser of a currency put obtains the right to sell the underlying currency.

The uses and risks of currency options and futures are similar to options and futures relating to securities or indices, as discussed above. A fund may purchase and sell currency futures and may purchase and write currency options to increase or decrease its exposure to different foreign currencies. Currency options may also be purchased or written in conjunction with each other or with currency futures or forward contracts. Currency futures and options values can be expected to correlate with exchange rates, but may not reflect other factors that affect the value of a fund's investments. A currency hedge, for example, should protect a Yen-denominated security from a decline in the Yen, but will not protect a fund against a price decline resulting from deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness. Because the value of a fund's foreign-denominated investments changes in response to many factors other than exchange rates, it may not be possible to match the amount of currency options and futures to the value of the fund's investments exactly over time.

OTC Options. Unlike exchange-traded options, which are standardized with respect to the underlying instrument, expiration date, contract size, and strike price, the terms of OTC options (options not traded on exchanges) generally are established through negotiation with the other party to the option contract. While this type of arrangement allows the purchaser or writer greater flexibility to tailor an option to its needs, OTC options generally are less liquid and involve greater credit risk than exchange-traded options, which are guaranteed by the clearing organization of the exchanges where they are traded.

Purchasing Put and Call Options. By purchasing a put option, the purchaser obtains the right (but not the obligation) to sell the option's underlying instrument at a fixed strike price. In return for this right, the purchaser pays the current market price for the option (known as the option premium). Options have various types of underlying instruments, including specific securities, indices of securities prices, and futures contracts. The purchaser may terminate its position in a put option by allowing it to expire or by exercising the option. If the option is allowed to expire, the purchaser will lose the entire premium. If the option is exercised, the purchaser completes the sale of the underlying instrument at the strike price. A purchaser may also terminate a put option position by closing it out in the secondary market at its current price, if a liquid secondary market exists.

The buyer of a typical put option can expect to realize a gain if security prices fall substantially. However, if the underlying instrument's price does not fall enough to offset the cost of purchasing the option, a put buyer can expect to suffer a loss (limited to the amount of the premium, plus related transaction costs).

The features of call options are essentially the same as those of put options, except that the purchaser of a call option obtains the right to purchase, rather than sell, the underlying instrument at the option's strike price. A call buyer typically attempts to participate in potential price increases of the underlying instrument with risk limited to the cost of the option if security prices fall. At the same time, the buyer can expect to suffer a loss if security prices do not rise sufficiently to offset the cost of the option.

Writing Put and Call Options. The writer of a put or call option takes the opposite side of the transaction from the option's purchaser. In return for receipt of the premium, the writer assumes the obligation to pay the strike price for the option's underlying instrument if the other party to the option chooses to exercise it. The writer may seek to terminate a position in a put option before exercise by closing out the option in the secondary market at its current price. If the secondary market is not liquid for a put option, however, the writer must continue to be prepared to pay the strike price while the option is outstanding, regardless of price changes. When writing an option on a futures contract, a fund will be required to make margin payments to an FCM as described above for futures contracts.

If security prices rise, a put writer would generally expect to profit, although its gain would be limited to the amount of the premium it received. If security prices remain the same over time, it is likely that the writer will also profit, because it should be able to close out the option at a lower price. If security prices fall, the put writer would expect to suffer a loss. This loss should be less than the loss from purchasing the underlying instrument directly, however, because the premium received for writing the option should mitigate the effects of the decline.

Writing a call option obligates the writer to sell or deliver the option's underlying instrument, in return for the strike price, upon exercise of the option. The characteristics of writing call options are similar to those of writing put options, except that writing calls generally is a profitable strategy if prices remain the same or fall. Through receipt of the option premium, a call writer mitigates the effects of a price decline. At the same time, because a call writer must be prepared to deliver the underlying instrument in return for the strike price, even if its current value is greater, a call writer gives up some ability to participate in security price increases.

Swap Agreements can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Depending on their structure, swap agreements may increase or decrease a fund's exposure to long- or short-term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), foreign currency values, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices or inflation rates. Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names, including interest rate swaps (where the parties exchange a floating rate for a fixed rate), total return swaps (where the parties exchange a floating rate for the total return of a security or index), and credit default swaps (where one party pays a fixed rate and the other agrees to buy a specific issuer's debt at par upon the occurrence of certain agreed events, including for example, if the issuer is bankrupt, defaults on any of its debt obligations or makes arrangements with a creditor to modify a debt obligation).

In a typical cap or floor agreement, one party agrees to make payments only under specified circumstances, usually in return for payment of a fee by the other party. For example, the buyer of an interest rate cap obtains the right to receive payments to the extent that a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed-upon level, while the seller of an interest rate floor is obligated to make payments to the extent that a specified interest rate falls below an agreed-upon level. An interest rate collar combines elements of buying a cap and selling a floor.

Swap agreements will tend to shift a fund's investment exposure from one type of investment to another. For example, if the fund agreed to exchange payments in dollars for payments in foreign currency, the swap agreement would tend to decrease the fund's exposure to U.S. interest rates and increase its exposure to foreign currency and interest rates. Caps and floors have an effect similar to buying or writing options. Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a fund's investments and its share price and yield.

Swap agreements also may allow a fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer. The most significant factor in the performance of swap agreements is the change in the factors that determine the amounts of payments due to and from a fund. If a swap agreement calls for payments by the fund, the fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. In the case of a physically settled credit default swap written by the fund, the fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of eligible debt of a defaulted issuer. If a swap counterparty's creditworthiness declines, the risk that they may not perform may increase, potentially resulting in a loss to the fund. In the case of a credit default swap written by the fund, the fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the underlying referenced entity (the debt issuer as to which credit protection has been written) has deteriorated. Although there can be no assurance that the fund will be able to do so, the fund may be able to reduce or eliminate its exposure under a swap agreement either by assignment or other disposition, or by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or a similarly creditworthy party. The fund may have limited ability to eliminate its exposure under a credit default swap if the credit of the underlying referenced entity has declined.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, FMR may consider various factors, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Indexed Securities are instruments whose prices are indexed to the prices of other securities, securities indices, currencies, precious metals or other commodities, or other financial indicators. Indexed securities typically, but not always, are debt securities or deposits whose value at maturity or coupon rate is determined by reference to a specific instrument or statistic.

Mortgage-indexed securities, for example, could be structured to replicate the performance of mortgage securities and the characteristics of direct ownership.

Gold-indexed securities typically provide for a maturity value that depends on the price of gold, resulting in a security whose price tends to rise and fall together with gold prices. Securities indexed to gold or other precious metals involve risks and pricing characteristics similar to direct investments in precious metals. The securities generally will earn a nominal rate of interest while held by the fund, and may have maturities of one year or more. In addition, the securities may be subject to being put by a fund to the issuer, with payment to be received on no more than seven days' notice. The put feature would ensure the liquidity of the notes in the absence of an active secondary market.Currency-indexed securities typically are short-term to intermediate-term debt securities whose maturity values or interest rates are determined by reference to the values of one or more specified foreign currencies, and may offer higher yields than U.S. dollar-denominated securities. Currency-indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed; that is, their maturity value may increase when the specified currency value increases, resulting in a security that performs similarly to a foreign-denominated instrument, or their maturity value may decline when foreign currencies increase, resulting in a security whose price characteristics are similar to a put on the underlying currency. Currency-indexed securities may also have prices that depend on the values of a number of different foreign currencies relative to each other.

The performance of indexed securities depends to a great extent on the performance of the security, currency, or other instrument to which they are indexed, and may also be influenced by interest rate changes in the United States and abroad. Indexed securities may be more volatile than the underlying instruments. Indexed securities are also subject to the credit risks associated with the issuer of the security, and their values may decline substantially if the issuer's creditworthiness deteriorates. Recent issuers of indexed securities have included banks, corporations, and certain U.S. Government agencies.

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the cost of bank loans, and will lend through the program only when the returns are higher than those available from an investment in repurchase agreements. Interfund loans and borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed. Any delay in repayment to a lending fund could result in a lost investment opportunity or additional borrowing costs.

Investment-Grade Debt Securities. Investment-grade debt securities include all types of debt instruments that are of medium and high-quality. Investment-grade debt securities include repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by equity securities, non-investment-grade debt, and all other instruments in which a fund can perfect a security interest, provided the repurchase agreement counterparty has an investment-grade rating. Some investment-grade debt securities may possess speculative characteristics and may be more sensitive to economic changes and to changes in the financial conditions of issuers. An investment-grade rating means the security or issuer is rated investment-grade by Moody's Investors Service, S&P, Fitch Inc., Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, or another credit rating agency designated as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) by the SEC, or is unrated but considered to be of equivalent quality by FMR.

Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental, or other borrower to lenders or lending syndicates (loans and loan participations), to suppliers of goods or services (trade claims or other receivables), or to other parties. Direct debt instruments involve a risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the borrower and may offer less legal protection to the purchaser in the event of fraud or misrepresentation, or there may be a requirement that a fund supply additional cash to a borrower on demand.

Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of interest and repayment of principal. If scheduled interest or principal payments are not made, the value of the instrument may be adversely affected. Loans that are fully secured provide more protections than an unsecured loan in the event of failure to make scheduled interest or principal payments. However, there is no assurance that the liquidation of collateral from a secured loan would satisfy the borrower's obligation, or that the collateral could be liquidated. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. Direct indebtedness of developing countries also involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the repayment of the debt may be unable, or unwilling, to pay interest and repay principal when due.

Investments in loans through direct assignment of a financial institution's interests with respect to a loan may involve additional risks. For example, if a loan is foreclosed, the purchaser could become part owner of any collateral, and would bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. In addition, it is conceivable that under emerging legal theories of lender liability, a purchaser could be held liable as a co-lender. Direct debt instruments may also involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other intermediary.

A loan is often administered by a bank or other financial institution that acts as agent for all holders. The agent administers the terms of the loan, as specified in the loan agreement. Unless, under the terms of the loan or other indebtedness, the purchaser has direct recourse against the borrower, the purchaser may have to rely on the agent to apply appropriate credit remedies against a borrower. If assets held by the agent for the benefit of a purchaser were determined to be subject to the claims of the agent's general creditors, the purchaser might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on the loan or loan participation and could suffer a loss of principal or interest.

Direct indebtedness may include letters of credit, revolving credit facilities, or other standby financing commitments that obligate purchasers to make additional cash payments on demand. These commitments may have the effect of requiring a purchaser to increase its investment in a borrower at a time when it would not otherwise have done so, even if the borrower's condition makes it unlikely that the amount will ever be repaid.

Each fund limits the amount of total assets that it will invest in any one issuer or in issuers within the same industry (see each fund's investment limitations). For purposes of these limitations, a fund generally will treat the borrower as the "issuer" of indebtedness held by the fund. In the case of loan participations where a bank or other lending institution serves as financial intermediary between a fund and the borrower, if the participation does not shift to the fund the direct debtor-creditor relationship with the borrower, SEC interpretations require a fund, in appropriate circumstances, to treat both the lending bank or other lending institution and the borrower as "issuers" for these purposes. Treating a financial intermediary as an issuer of indebtedness may restrict a fund's ability to invest in indebtedness related to a single financial intermediary, or a group of intermediaries engaged in the same industry, even if the underlying borrowers represent many different companies and industries.

Lower-Quality Debt Securities. Lower-quality debt securities include all types of debt instruments that have poor protection with respect to the payment of interest and repayment of principal, or may be in default. These securities are often considered to be speculative and involve greater risk of loss or price changes due to changes in the issuer's capacity to pay. The market prices of lower-quality debt securities may fluctuate more than those of higher-quality debt securities and may decline significantly in periods of general economic difficulty, which may follow periods of rising interest rates.

The market for lower-quality debt securities may be thinner and less active than that for higher-quality debt securities, which can adversely affect the prices at which the former are sold. Adverse publicity and changing investor perceptions may affect the liquidity of lower-quality debt securities and the ability of outside pricing services to value lower-quality debt securities.

Because the risk of default is higher for lower-quality debt securities, FMR's research and credit analysis are an especially important part of managing securities of this type. FMR will attempt to identify those issuers of high-yielding securities whose financial condition is adequate to meet future obligations, has improved, or is expected to improve in the future. FMR's analysis focuses on relative values based on such factors as interest or dividend coverage, asset coverage, earnings prospects, and the experience and managerial strength of the issuer.

A fund may choose, at its expense or in conjunction with others, to pursue litigation or otherwise to exercise its rights as a security holder to seek to protect the interests of security holders if it determines this to be in the best interest of the fund's shareholders.

Money Market Securities are high-quality, short-term obligations. Money market securities may be structured to be, or may employ a trust or other form so that they are, eligible investments for money market funds. For example, put features can be used to modify the maturity of a security or interest rate adjustment features can be used to enhance price stability. If a structure fails to function as intended, adverse tax or investment consequences may result. Neither the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) nor any other regulatory authority has ruled definitively on certain legal issues presented by certain structured securities. Future tax or other regulatory determinations could adversely affect the value, liquidity, or tax treatment of the income received from these securities or the nature and timing of distributions made by the funds.

Mortgage Securities are issued by government and non-government entities such as banks, mortgage lenders, or other institutions. A mortgage security is an obligation of the issuer backed by a mortgage or pool of mortgages or a direct interest in an underlying pool of mortgages. Some mortgage securities, such as collateralized mortgage obligations (or "CMOs"), make payments of both principal and interest at a range of specified intervals; others make semiannual interest payments at a predetermined rate and repay principal at maturity (like a typical bond). Mortgage securities are based on different types of mortgages, including those on commercial real estate or residential properties. Stripped mortgage securities are created when the interest and principal components of a mortgage security are separated and sold as individual securities. In the case of a stripped mortgage security, the holder of the "principal-only" security (PO) receives the principal payments made by the underlying mortgage, while the holder of the "interest-only" security (IO) receives interest payments from the same underlying mortgage.

Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs are pass-through securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, respectively. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee payment of interest and repayment of principal on Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs, respectively, are federally chartered corporations supervised by the U.S. Government that act as governmental instrumentalities under authority granted by Congress. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are authorized to borrow from the U.S. Treasury to meet their obligations. Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.

The value of mortgage securities may change due to shifts in the market's perception of issuers and changes in interest rates. In addition, regulatory or tax changes may adversely affect the mortgage securities market as a whole. Non-government mortgage securities may offer higher yields than those issued by government entities, but also may be subject to greater price changes than government issues. Mortgage securities are subject to prepayment risk, which is the risk that early principal payments made on the underlying mortgages, usually in response to a reduction in interest rates, will result in the return of principal to the investor, causing it to be invested subsequently at a lower current interest rate. Alternatively, in a rising interest rate environment, mortgage security values may be adversely affected when prepayments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security's effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The prices of stripped mortgage securities tend to be more volatile in response to changes in interest rates than those of non-stripped mortgage securities.

To earn additional income for a fund, FMR may use a trading strategy that involves selling (or buying) mortgage securities and simultaneously agreeing to purchase (or sell) mortgage securities on a later date at a set price. This trading strategy may increase interest rate exposure and result in an increased turnover of the fund's portfolio which increases costs and may increase taxable gains.

Municipal Securities are issued to raise money for a variety of public or private purposes, including general financing for state and local governments, or financing for specific projects or public facilities. They may be issued in anticipation of future revenues and may be backed by the full taxing power of a municipality, the revenues from a specific project, or the credit of a private organization. The value of some or all municipal securities may be affected by uncertainties in the municipal market related to legislation or litigation involving the taxation of municipal securities or the rights of municipal securities holders. A municipal security may be owned directly or through a participation interest.

Precious Metals. Precious metals, such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, at times have been subject to substantial price fluctuations over short periods of time and may be affected by unpredictable monetary and political policies such as currency devaluations or revaluations, economic and social conditions within a country, trade imbalances, or trade or currency restrictions between countries. The prices of gold and other precious metals, however, are less subject to local and company-specific factors than securities of individual companies. As a result, precious metals may be more or less volatile in price than securities of companies engaged in precious metals-related businesses. Investments in precious metals can present concerns such as delivery, storage and maintenance, possible illiquidity, and the unavailability of accurate market valuations. Although precious metals can be purchased in any form, including bullion and coins, FMR intends to purchase only those forms of precious metals that are readily marketable and that can be stored in accordance with custody regulations applicable to mutual funds. A fund may incur higher custody and transaction costs for precious metals than for securities. Also, precious metals investments do not pay income.

For a fund to qualify as a regulated investment company under current federal tax law, gains from selling precious metals may not exceed 10% of the fund's gross income for its taxable year. This tax requirement could cause a fund to hold or sell precious metals or securities when it would not otherwise do so.

Preferred Securities represent an equity or ownership interest in an issuer that pays dividends at a specified rate and that has precedence over common stock in the payment of dividends. In the event an issuer is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of owners of bonds take precedence over the claims of those who own preferred securities and common stock.

Put Features entitle the holder to sell a security back to the issuer or a third partyat any time or at specified intervals. In exchange for this benefit, a fund may accept a lower interest rate. Securities with put features are subject to the risk that the put provider is unable to honor the put feature (purchase the security). Put providers often support their ability to buy securities on demand by obtaining letters of credit or other guarantees from other entities. Demand features, standby commitments, and tender options are types of put features.

Real Estate Investment Trusts. Equity real estate investment trusts own real estate properties, while mortgage real estate investment trusts make construction, development, and long-term mortgage loans. Their value may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property of the trusts, the creditworthiness of the issuer, property taxes, interest rates, and tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment. Both types of trusts are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation, and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free status of income under the Internal Revenue Code and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The funds will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act, or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The funds will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and a fund's yield and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities Lending. A fund may lend securities to parties such as broker-dealers or other institutions, including FBS LLC. FBS LLC is a member of the NYSE and an indirect subsidiary of FMR Corp.

Securities lending allows a fund to retain ownership of the securities loaned and, at the same time, earn additional income. The borrower provides the fund with collateral in an amount at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The fund maintains the ability to obtain the right to vote or consent on proxy proposals involving material events affecting securities loaned. If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, a fund could experience delays and costs in recovering the securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral. These delays and costs could be greater for foreign securities. If a fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, a fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement investment in the market. The value of the collateral could decrease below the value of the replacement investment by the time the replacement investment is purchased. Loans will be made only to parties deemed by FMR to be in good standing and when, in FMR's judgment, the income earned would justify the risks.

Cash received as collateral through loan transactions may be invested in other eligible securities, including shares of a money market fund. Investing this cash subjects that investment, as well as the securities loaned, to market appreciation or depreciation.

Securities of Other Investment Companies, including shares of closed-end investment companies, unit investment trusts, and open-end investment companies, represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the investment company-level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.

The extent to which a fund can invest in securities of other investment companies is limited by federal securities laws.

Short Sales "Against the Box" are short sales of securities that a fund owns or has the right to obtain (equivalent in kind or amount to the securities sold short). If a fund enters into a short sale against the box, it will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold such securities while the short sale is outstanding.

Short sales against the box could be used to protect the NAV of a money market fund in anticipation of increased interest rates, without sacrificing the current yield of the securities sold short. A money market fund will incur transaction costs in connection with opening and closing short sales against the box. A fund (other than a money market fund) will incur transaction costs, including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales against the box.

Short Sales. Stocks underlying a fund's convertible security holdings can be sold short. For example, if FMR anticipates a decline in the price of the stock underlying a convertible security held by a fund, it may sell the stock short. If the stock price subsequently declines, the proceeds of the short sale could be expected to offset all or a portion of the effect of the stock's decline on the value of the convertible security. Each fund currently intends to hedge no more than 15% of its total assets with short sales on equity securities underlying its convertible security holdings under normal circumstances.

A fund will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to those sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold them aside while the short sale is outstanding. A fund will incur transaction costs, including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. FMR may rely on its evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider in determining whether to purchase or hold a security supported by such enhancement. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Sovereign Debt Obligations are issued or guaranteed by foreign governments or their agencies, including debt of Latin American nations or other developing countries. Sovereign debt may be in the form of conventional securities or other types of debt instruments such as loans or loan participations. Sovereign debt of developing countries may involve a high degree of risk, and may be in default or present the risk of default. Governmental entities responsible for repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to repay principal and pay interest when due, and may require renegotiation or rescheduling of debt payments. In addition, prospects for repayment of principal and payment of interest may depend on political as well as economic factors. Although some sovereign debt, such as Brady Bonds, is collateralized by U.S. Government securities, repayment of principal and payment of interest is not guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

Stripped Securities are the separate income or principal components of a debt security. The risks associated with stripped securities are similar to those of other debt securities, although stripped securities may be more volatile, and the value of certain types of stripped securities may move in the same direction as interest rates. U.S. Treasury securities that have been stripped by a Federal Reserve Bank are obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury.

Privately stripped government securities are created when a dealer deposits a U.S. Treasury security or other U.S. Government security with a custodian for safekeeping. The custodian issues separate receipts for the coupon payments and the principal payment, which the dealer then sells.

Because the SEC does not consider privately stripped government securities to be U.S. Government securities for purposes of Rule 2a-7, a fund must evaluate them as it would non-government securities pursuant to regulatory guidelines applicable to money market funds.

Temporary Defensive Policies. In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, a fund may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes.

Each investment-grade bond fund reserves the right to invest without limitation in investment-grade money market or short-term debt instruments for temporary, defensive purposes.

Variable and Floating Rate Securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest rate paid on the security. Variable rate securities provide for a specified periodic adjustment in the interest rate, while floating rate securities have interest rates that change whenever there is a change in a designated benchmark rate or the issuer's credit quality. Some variable or floating rate securities are structured with put features that permit holders to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest from the issuers or certain financial intermediaries.

Warrants. Warrants are instruments which entitle the holder to buy an equity security at a specific price for a specific period of time. Changes in the value of a warrant do not necessarily correspond to changes in the value of its underlying security. The price of a warrant may be more volatile than the price of its underlying security, and a warrant may offer greater potential for capital appreciation as well as capital loss.

Warrants do not entitle a holder to dividends or voting rights with respect to the underlying security and do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuing company. A warrant ceases to have value if it is not exercised prior to its expiration date. These factors can make warrants more speculative than other types of investments.

When-Issued and Forward Purchase or Sale Transactions involve a commitment to purchase or sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield in which payment and delivery take place after the customary settlement period for that type of security. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is delivered.

When purchasing securities pursuant to one of these transactions, the purchaser assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risks of price and yield fluctuations and the risk that the security will not be issued as anticipated. Because payment for the securities is not required until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with a fund's investments. If a fund remains substantially fully invested at a time when a purchase is outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage. When a fund has sold a security pursuant to one of these transactions, the fund does not participate in further gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, a fund could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or suffer a loss.

A fund may renegotiate a when-issued or forward transaction and may sell the underlying securities before delivery, which may result in capital gains or losses for the fund.

Zero Coupon Bonds do not make interest payments; instead, they are sold at a discount from their face value and are redeemed at face value when they mature. Because zero coupon bonds do not pay current income, their prices can be more volatile than other types of fixed-income securities when interest rates change. In calculating a fund's dividend, a portion of the difference between a zero coupon bond's purchase price and its face value is considered income.

The following pages contain detailed information about special considerations of underlying international Fidelity funds, in which certain VIP FundsManager Portfolios may invest.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING CANADA

Political. Canada's parliamentary system of government is, in general, stable. One of the provinces, Quebec, which has a predominantly French-speaking population, does have a "separatist" opposition party whose objective is to achieve sovereignty and increased self-governing legal and financial powers. To date, referendums on Quebec sovereignty have been defeated, but the issue remains unresolved. The Supreme Court of Canada decided in August 1998 that if there was a "clear answer" to a "clear question" in a referendum, then the federal government would be obliged to negotiate with Quebec.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. Canada is a major producer of commodities such as forest products, metals, agricultural products, and energy related products like oil, gas, and hydroelectricity. Accordingly, changes in the supply and demand of base commodity resources and industrial and precious metals and materials, both domestically and internationally, can have a significant effect on Canadian market performance.

The United States is Canada's largest trading partner and developments in economic policy do have a significant impact on the Canadian economy. The expanding economic and financial integration of the United States, Canada, and Mexico through the NAFTA Agreement will likely make the Canadian economy and securities market more sensitive to North American trade patterns. Growth in developing nations overseas, particularly China, will likely change the composition of Canada's trade and foreign investment composition in the near future.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EUROPE

The European Union (EU) is an intergovernmental and supranational union of 25 European countries, known as member states. A key activity of the EU is the establishment and administration of a common single market, consisting of, among other things, a single currency and a common trade policy. The most widely used currency in the EU (and the unit of currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)) is the euro, which is in use in 12 of the 25 member states. In addition to adopting a single currency, member countries no longer control their own monetary policies. Instead, the authority to direct monetary policy is exercised by the new European Central Bank.

While economic and monetary convergence in the EU may offer new opportunities for those investing in the region, investors should be aware that the success of the EU is not wholly assured. Europe must grapple with a number of challenges, any one of which could threaten the survival of this monumental undertaking. Twelve disparate economies must adjust to a unified monetary system, the absence of exchange rate flexibility, and the loss of economic sovereignty. Europe's economies are diverse, its governments are decentralized, and its cultures differ widely. Unemployment is historically high and could pose political risk. One or more member countries might exit the union, placing the currency and banking system in jeopardy. Major issues currently facing the EU cover its membership, structure, procedures and policies; they include the adoption, abandonment or adjustment of the new constitutional treaty, the EU's enlargement to the south and east, and resolving the EU's problematic fiscal and democratic accountability. Efforts of the member states to continue to unify their economic and monetary policies may increase the potential for similarities in the movements of European markets and reduce the benefit of diversification within the region.

Political. The EU has been extending its influence to the east. It has accepted several new members that were previously behind the Iron Curtain, and has plans to accept several more in the medium-term. It is hoped that membership for these states will help cement economic and political stability. For these countries, membership serves as a strong political impetus to employ tight fiscal and monetary policies. Nevertheless, eight of the new entrants are former Soviet satellites and remain burdened to various extents by the inherited inefficiencies of centrally planned economies similar to what existed under the old Soviet Union. Further eastward expansion has long-term economic benefits, but the remaining European countries are not viewed as currently suitable for membership, especially the troubled economies of countries further east. Also, as the EU continues to enlarge eastward, the candidate countries' accessions tend to grow more controversial. For example, some member states, especially Austria, repudiate Turkey joining the EU, and the possible economic, immigration, and cultural implications that may bring. The current and future status of the EU therefore continues to be the subject of political controversy, with widely differing views both within and between member states. For example, in the United Kingdom, currently holding the EU presidency, one poll suggested that around 75% of the population is indifferent or opposed to the EU. However, other countries are more in favor of European integration.

At the same time, there could become an increasingly widening gap between rich and poor within the EU's member countries, and particularly among new members that have not met the requirements for joining the EMU. Realigning traditional alliances could alter trading relationships and potentially provoke divisive socioeconomic splits.

In the transition to the single economic system, significant political decisions will be made which will affect the market regulation, subsidization, and privatization across all industries, from agricultural products to telecommunications.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. The EU has the largest economy in the world according to the International Monetary Fund. The EU economy is expected to grow further over the next decade as more countries join the EU - especially considering that the new member states are usually poorer than the EU average, and hence the expected fast GDP growth will help achieve the dynamic of the united Europe. The EU set itself an objective under the Lisbon Strategy to make the EU "the world's most dynamic and competitive economy" by the year 2010, but it is now generally accepted that this target will not be met. The EU's economic growth has been below that of the United States most years since 1990, and the economic performance of several of its key members, including Germany and Italy, is a matter of serious concern to policy makers.

As economic conditions across member states vary from robust to dismal, there is continued concern about national-level support for the currency and the accompanying coordination of fiscal and wage policy among the 12 EMU member nations. According to the Maastricht treaty, member countries must maintain inflation below 3.3%, public debt below 60% of GDP, and a deficit of 3% or less of GDP to qualify for participation in the euro. These requirements severely limit member countries' ability to implement monetary policy to address regional economic conditions. Countries that did not qualify for the euro risk being left farther behind.

Currency. Investing in euro-denominated securities entails risk of being exposed to a new currency that may not fully reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the disparate economies that make up the EU. This had been the case in years 1999 through 2002, when the initial exchange rates of the euro versus many of the world's major currencies steadily declined. In this environment, U.S. and other foreign investors experienced erosion of their investment returns in the region. In addition, many European countries rely heavily upon export dependent businesses and any strength in the exchange rate between the euro and the dollar can have either a positive or a negative effect upon corporate profits.

Nordic Countries. Faced with stronger global competition, the Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden - have had to scale down their historically generous welfare programs, resulting in drops in domestic demand and increased unemployment. Major industries in the region, such as forestry, agriculture, and oil, are heavily resource-dependent and face pressure as a result of high labor costs. Pension reform, union regulation, and further cuts in liberal social programs will likely need to be addressed as the Nordic countries face increased international competition.

Eastern Europe. Investing in the securities of Eastern European issuers is highly speculative and involves risks not usually associated with investing in the more developed markets of Western Europe. Political and economic reforms are too recent to establish a definite trend away from centrally planned economies and state-owned industries.

The economies of the Eastern European nations are embarking on the transition from communism to market economics at different paces with appropriately different characteristics. Most Eastern European markets suffer from thin trading activity, dubious investor protections, and often a dearth of reliable corporate information. Information and transaction costs, differential taxes, and sometimes political or transfer risk give a comparative advantage to the domestic investor rather than the foreign investor. In addition, these markets are particularly sensitive to political, economic, and currency events in Russia and have recently suffered heavy losses as a result of their trading and investment links to the troubled Russian economy and currency.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING JAPAN

Government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, emphasis on education, and a comparatively small defense allocation have helped Japan advance with extraordinary speed to become one of the largest economic powers along with the United States and the EU. Despite its impressive history, investors face special risks when investing in Japan.

Economic. For three decades overall real economic growth had been spectacular: a 10% average in the 1960s, a 5% average in the 1970s, and a 4% average in the 1980s. Growth slowed markedly in the 1990s, averaging just 1.7%, largely because of the after effects of overinvestment during the late 1980s and contractionary domestic policies intended to wring speculative excesses from the stock and real estate markets. From 2000 to 2003, government efforts to revive economic growth met with little success and were further hampered by the slowing of the US, European, and Asian economies. In 2004, growth improved and the lingering fears of deflation in prices and economic activity lessened. Japan's huge government debt, which totals more than 160% of GDP, and the aging of the population are two major long-run problems. A rise in taxes could be viewed as endangering the revival of growth.

Overseas trade is important to Japan's economy. Japan has few natural resources and must export to pay for its imports of these basic requirements. Trade sanctions or other protectionist measures could adversely impact Japan's economy. Japan has experienced earthquakes and tidal waves of varying degrees of severity, and the risks of such phenomena and the resulting damage continue to exist.

The most pressing need for action is the daunting task of overhauling the nation's financial institutions and securing public support for taxpayer-funded bailouts. Banks, in particular, must dispose of their huge overhang of bad loans and trim their balance sheets in preparation for greater competition from foreign institutions as more areas of the financial sector are opened. Successful financial sector reform would allow Japan's financial institutions to act as a catalyst for economic recovery at home and across the troubled Asian region. Internal conflict over the proper way to reform the ailing banking system continues.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ASIA PACIFIC REGION (EX JAPAN)

Many countries in the region have historically faced political uncertainty, corruption, military intervention, and social unrest. Examples include the ethnic, sectarian, and separatist violence found in Indonesia, and the nuclear arms threats between India and Pakistan. To the extent that such events continue in the future, they can be expected to have a negative effect on economic and securities market conditions in the region.

Economic. The economies of many countries in the region are heavily dependent on international trade and are accordingly affected by protective trade barriers and the economic conditions of their trading partners, principally, the U.S., Japan, China, and the EU.

Korea. Since 1997, Korea's robust economy has been buffeted by a financial crisis marked by significant capital outflows, sharp depreciation of the won, and severe distress in the corporate and financial sectors. The severe disruption and loss of confidence because of the crisis, however, led to Korea's worst recession in over three decades. The nation's economic difficulties were a direct result of Asia's economic and currency crisis and the way Korea conducts its business at home and abroad. While steps have been initiated to remedy many of the causes of Korea's recent economic problems, their successful implementation is not assured. Investors should be aware that investing in Korea involves risks not typically associated with investing in the U.S. securities markets.

China Region. As with all transition economies, China's ability to develop and sustain a credible legal, regulatory, monetary, and socioeconomic system could influence the course of outside investment. Hong Kong is closely tied to China, economically and through China's 1997 acquisition of the country as a Special Autonomous Region (SAR). Hong Kong's success depends, in large part, on its ability to retain the legal, financial, and monetary systems that allow economic freedom and market expansion.

In addition to the risks inherent in investing in the emerging markets, the risks of investing in China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan merit special consideration.

People's Republic of China. The government of the People's Republic of China is dominated by the one-party rule of the Chinese Communist Party.

China's economy has transitioned from a rigidly central-planned state-run economy to one that has been only partially reformed by more market-oriented policies. Although the Chinese government has implemented economic reform measures, reduced state ownership of companies and established better corporate governance practices, a substantial portion of productive assets in China are still owned by the Chinese government. The government continues to exercise significant control over regulating industrial development and, ultimately, control over China's economic growth through the allocation of resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies.

Growth has also put a strain on China's aging infrastructure. Over the past year, the government has attempted to slow down the pace of growth through administrative measures. An interest rate increase was also meant to tighten access to capital, but Chinese state-owned banks often care little about risk and profitability.

As with all transition economies, China's ability to develop and sustain a credible legal, regulatory, monetary, and socioeconomic system could influence the course of outside investment. The Chinese legal system, in particular, constitutes a significant risk factor for investors. The Chinese legal system is based on statutes. Over the past 25 years, Chinese legislative bodies have promulgated laws and regulations dealing with various economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce, taxation, and trade. However, these laws are relatively new and published court decisions based on these laws are limited and non-binding. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations are uncertain.

Hong Kong. In 1997, Great Britain handed over control of Hong Kong to the Chinese mainland government. Since that time, Hong Kong has been governed by a semi-constitution known as the Basic Law, which guarantees a high degree of autonomy in certain matters until 2047, while defense and foreign affairs are the responsibility of the central government in Beijing. The chief executive of Hong Kong is appointed by the Chinese government. Hong Kong is able to participate in international organizations and agreements and it continues to function as an international financial center, with no exchange controls, free convertibility of the Hong Kong dollar and free inward and outward movement of capital. The Basic Law guarantees existing freedoms, including free speech and assembly, press, religion, and the right to strike and travel. Business ownership, private property, the right of inheritance and foreign investment are also protected by law. China has committed by treaty to preserve Hong Kong's autonomy until 2047; however, if China were to exert its authority so as to alter the economic, political, or legal structures or the existing social policy of Hong Kong, investor and business confidence in Hong Kong could be negatively affected, which in turn could negatively affect markets and business performance.

Taiwan. For decades, a state of hostility has existed between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China. Beijing has long deemed Taiwan a part of the "one China" and has made a nationalist cause of recovering it. In the past, China has staged frequent military provocations off the coast of Taiwan and made threats of full-scale military action. Foreign trade has been the engine of rapid growth in Taiwan and has transformed the island into one of Asia's great exporting nations. As an export-oriented economy, Taiwan depends on an open world trade regime and remains vulnerable to downturns in the world economy. Taiwanese companies continue to compete mostly on price, producing generic products or branded merchandise on behalf of multinational companies. Accordingly, these businesses can be particularly vulnerable to currency volatility and increasing competition from neighboring lower-cost countries. Moreover, many Taiwanese companies are heavily invested in mainland China and other countries throughout Southeast Asia, making them susceptible to political events and economic crises in these parts of the region.

Southeast Asia. In addition to the risks inherent in investing in the emerging markets, the risks of investing in Southeast Asia merit special consideration. Indonesia has restored financial stability and pursued sober fiscal policies since the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, but many economic development problems remain, including high unemployment, a fragile banking sector, endemic corruption, inadequate infrastructure, a poor investment climate, and unequal resource distribution among regions. Keys to future growth remain internal reform, building up the confidence of international and domestic investors, and strong global economic growth. In late December 2004, a major tsunami took nearly 127,000 lives, left more than 93,000 missing and nearly 441,000 displaced, and destroyed $4.5 to $5.0 billion worth of property.

Thailand has a well-developed infrastructure, a free-enterprise economy, and welcomes foreign investment. Increased consumption and investment spending and strong export growth pushed GDP growth up to 6.9% in 2003 and 6.1% in 2004, despite a sluggish global economy. The highly popular government's expansionist policy, including major support of village economic development, has raised concerns about fiscal discipline and the health of financial institutions. Bangkok has pursued preferential trade agreements with a variety of partners in an effort to boost exports and maintain high growth, and in 2004 began negotiations on a Free Trade Agreement with the U.S. The December 2004 tsunami took 8,500 lives in Thailand and caused massive destruction of property in the southern provinces of Krabi, Phangnga, and Phuket.

The Philippines' consistently large budget deficit has produced a high debt level and has forced Manila to spend a large portion of the national government budget on debt service. Large, unprofitable public enterprises, especially in the energy sector, contribute to the government's debt because of slow progress on privatization. Credit rating agencies are increasingly concerned about the Philippines' ability to sustain the debt; legislative progress on new revenue measures will weigh heavily on credit rating decisions.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING LATIN AMERICA

As an emerging market, Latin America has long suffered from political, economic, and social instability. For investors, this has meant additional risk caused by periods of regional conflict, political corruption, totalitarianism, protectionist measures, nationalization, hyperinflation, debt crises, sudden and large currency devaluation, and intervention by the military in civilian and economic spheres. However, much has changed in the past decade. Democracy is beginning to become well established in some countries. A move to a more mature and accountable political environment is well under way. Domestic economies have been deregulated, privatization of state-owned companies is almost completed and foreign trade restrictions have been relaxed. Nonetheless, to the extent that events such as those listed above continue in the future, they could reverse favorable trends toward market and economic reform, privatization, and removal of trade barriers, and result in significant disruption in securities markets in the region. Investors in the region continue to face a number of potential risks.

Argentina's recent bankruptcy and the spreading financial turmoil in its neighboring countries are just the latest chapters in Latin America's long history of foreign debt and default. Almost all of the region's economies have become highly dependent upon foreign credit and loans from external sources to fuel their state-sponsored economic plans. Government profligacy and ill-conceived plans for modernization have exhausted these resources with little benefit accruing to the economy and most countries have been forced to restructure their loans or risk default on their debt obligations. In addition, interest on the debt is subject to market conditions and may reach levels that would impair economic activity and create a difficult and costly environment for borrowers. Accordingly, these governments may be forced to reschedule or freeze their debt repayment, which could negatively affect the stock market.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING EMERGING MARKETS

Investing in companies domiciled in emerging market countries may be subject to potentially higher risks than investments in developed countries. These risks include: i) less social, political, and economic stability; ii) greater illiquidity and price volatility due to smaller or limited local capital markets for such securities, or low or non-existent trading volumes; iii) foreign exchanges and broker-dealers may be subject to less scrutiny and regulation by local authorities; iv) local governments may decide to seize or confiscate securities held by foreign investors and/or local governments may decide to suspend or limit an issuer's ability to make dividend or interest payments; v) local governments may limit or entirely restrict repatriation of invested capital, profits, and dividends; vi) capital gains may be subject to local taxation, including on a retroactive basis; vii) issuers facing restrictions on dollar or euro payments imposed by local governments may attempt to make dividend or interest payments to foreign investors in the local currency; viii) investors may experience difficulty in enforcing legal claims related to the securities and/or local judges may favor the interests of the issuer over those of foreign investors; ix) bankruptcy judgments may only be permitted to be paid in the local currency; x) limited public information regarding the issuer may result in greater difficulty in determining market valuations of the securities, and xi) lax financial reporting on a regular basis, substandard disclosure, and differences in accounting standards may make it difficult to ascertain the financial health of an issuer.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING RUSSIA

Investing in Russian securities is highly speculative and involves significant risks and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities markets of the U.S. and most other developed countries.

Political. Over the past century, Russia has experienced political and economic turbulence and has endured decades of communist rule under which tens of millions of its citizens were collectivized into state agricultural and industrial enterprises. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia's government has been faced with the daunting task of stabilizing its domestic economy, while transforming it into a modern and efficient structure able to compete in international markets and respond to the needs of its citizens. However, to date, many of the country's economic reform initiatives have floundered as the proceeds of IMF and other economic assistance have been squandered or stolen. In this environment, there is always the risk that the nation's government will abandon the current program of economic reform and replace it with radically different political and economic policies that would be detrimental to the interests of foreign investors. This could entail a return to a centrally planned economy and nationalization of private enterprises similar to what existed under the old Soviet Union.

Geo-Political. Terrorism and related geo-political risks have led, and may in the future lead, to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on world economies and markets generally.

Economic. Many of Russia's businesses have failed to mobilize the available factors of production because the country's privatization program virtually ensured the predominance of the old management teams that are largely non-market-oriented in their management approach. Poor accounting standards, inept management, pervasive corruption, insider trading and crime, and inadequate regulatory protection for the rights of investors all pose a significant risk, particularly to foreign investors. In addition, there is the risk that the Russian tax system will not be reformed to prevent inconsistent, retroactive, and/or exorbitant taxation, or, in the alternative, the risk that a reformed tax system may result in the inconsistent and unpredictable enforcement of the new tax laws.

Compared to most national stock markets, the Russian securities market suffers from a variety of problems not encountered in more developed markets. There is little long-term historical data on the Russian securities market because it is relatively new and a substantial proportion of securities transactions in Russia are privately negotiated outside of stock exchanges. The inexperience of the Russian securities market and the limited volume of trading in securities in the market may make obtaining accurate prices on portfolio securities from independent sources more difficult than in more developed markets. Additionally, there is little solid corporate information available to investors. As a result, it may be difficult to assess the value or prospects of an investment in Russian companies.

Because of the recent formation of the Russian securities market as well as the underdeveloped state of the banking and telecommunications systems, settlement, clearing and registration of securities transactions are subject to significant risks. Ownership of shares (except where shares are held through depositories that meet the requirements of the1940 Act is defined according to entries in the company's share register and normally evidenced by extracts from the register or by formal share certificates. However, there is no central registration system for shareholders and these services are carried out by the companies themselves or by registrars located throughout Russia. These registrars are not necessarily subject to effective state supervision nor are they licensed with any governmental entity and it is possible for a fund to lose its registration through fraud, negligence, or even mere oversight. While a fund will endeavor to ensure that its interest continues to be appropriately recorded either itself or through a custodian or other agent inspecting the share register and by obtaining extracts of share registers through regular confirmations, these extracts have no legal enforceability and it is possible that subsequent illegal amendment or other fraudulent act may deprive a fund of its ownership rights or improperly dilute its interests. In addition, while applicable Russian regulations impose liability on registrars for losses resulting from their errors, it may be difficult for a fund to enforce any rights it may have against the registrar or issuer of the securities in the event of loss of share registration. Furthermore, significant delays or problems may occur in registering the transfer of securities, which could cause a fund to incur losses due to a counterparty's failure to pay for securities the fund has delivered or the fund's inability to complete its contractual obligations because of theft or other reasons.

The Russian economy is heavily dependent upon the export of a range of commodities including most industrial metals, forestry products, oil, and gas. Accordingly, it is strongly affected by international commodity prices and is particularly vulnerable to any weakening in global demand for these products.

Currency. Foreign investors also face a high degree of currency risk when investing in Russian securities and a lack of available currency hedging instruments. In a surprise move in August 1998, Russia devalued the ruble, defaulted on short-term domestic bonds, and imposed a moratorium on the repayment of its international debt and the restructuring of the repayment terms. These actions have negatively affected Russian borrowers' ability to access international capital markets and have had a damaging impact on the Russian economy. In light of these and other recent government actions, foreign investors face the possibility of further devaluations. In addition, there is the risk the government may impose capital controls on foreign portfolio investments in the event of extreme financial or political crisis. Such capital controls would prevent the sale of a portfolio of foreign assets and the repatriation of investment income and capital.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

All orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities (normally, shares of the underlying Fidelity funds) are placed on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio by Strategic Advisers, either itself or through its affiliates, pursuant to authority contained in each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's management contract. A VIP FundsManager Portfolio will not incur any commissions or sales charges when it invests in underlying Fidelity funds, but it may incur such costs if it invests directly in other types of securities.

Strategic Advisers may also be responsible for the placement of portfolio transactions for other investment companies and investment accounts for which it has or its affiliates have investment discretion. If selecting brokers or dealers (including affiliates of Strategic Advisers), Strategic Advisers generally considers: the execution price; the size and type of the transaction; the nature and character of the markets for the security to be purchased or sold; the execution efficiency, settlement capability, and financial condition of the firm; the execution services rendered on a continuing basis; the reasonableness of any compensation paid; and the provision of additional brokerage and research products and services, if applicable.

For futures transactions, the selection of an FCM is generally based on the overall quality of execution and other services provided by the FCM.

Purchases and sales of securities on a securities exchange are effected through brokers who receive compensation for their services. Compensation may also be paid in connection with riskless principal transactions (in both OTC securities and securities listed on an exchange) and agency OTC transactions executed with an electronic communications network (ECN) or an alternative trading system.

Securities may be purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees.

Generally, compensation relating to investments traded on foreign exchanges will be higher than for investments traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be subject to negotiation.

Futures transactions are executed and cleared through FCMs who receive compensation for their services.

The VIP FundsManager Portfolios may execute portfolio transactions with brokers or dealers (who are not affiliates of Strategic Advisers) that provide products and services. These products and services may include: economic, industry, or company research reports or investment recommendations; subscriptions to financial publications or research data compilations; compilations of securities prices, earnings, dividends, and similar data; computerized databases; quotation equipment and services; research or analytical computer software and services; products or services that assist in effecting transactions, including services of third-party computer systems developers directly related to research and brokerage activities; and effecting securities transactions and performing functions incidental thereto (such as clearance and settlement). The receipt of these products and services has not reduced Strategic Advisers' normal research activities in providing investment advice to the funds. Strategic Advisers' expenses could be increased, however, if it attempted to generate these additional products and services through its own efforts.

Certain of the products and services Strategic Advisers may receive from brokers or dealers are furnished by brokers or dealers on their own initiative, either in connection with a particular transaction or as part of their overall services. In addition, Strategic Advisers may request a broker or dealer to provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service. While Strategic Advisers may take into account the products and services provided by a broker or dealer in determining whether compensation paid is reasonable, neither Strategic Advisers nor a fund incurs an obligation to the broker, dealer, or third party to pay for any product or service (or portion thereof) by generating a certain amount of compensation or otherwise.

Brokers or dealers that execute transactions for a fund may receive compensation that is in excess of the amount of compensation that other brokers or dealers might have charged, in recognition of the products and services they have provided. Before causing a fund to pay such higher compensation, Strategic Advisers will make a good faith determination that the compensation is reasonable in relation to the value of the products and services provided viewed in terms of the particular transaction for the fund or Strategic Advisers' overall responsibilities to the fund or other investment companies and investment accounts. Typically, these products and services assist Strategic Advisers or its affiliates in terms of its overall investment responsibilities to the fund and other investment companies and investment accounts; however, each product or service received may not benefit the fund.

Strategic Advisers may place trades with certain brokers with which it is under common control, including National Financial Services LLC (NFS), provided it determines that these affiliates' trade execution abilities and costs are comparable to those of non-affiliated, qualified brokerage firms. Strategic Advisers does not allocate trades to NFS in exchange for brokerage and research products and services of the type sometimes known as "soft dollars." Strategic Advisers trades with its affiliated brokers on an execution-only basis.

The Trustees of each fund periodically review Strategic Advisers' performance of its responsibilities in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, respectively, and review the compensation paid by the fund over representative periods of time to determine if they are reasonable in relation to the benefits to the fund.

A fund may pay compensation including both commissions and spreads in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions.

The Trustees of each fund have approved procedures in conformity with Rule 10f-3 under the 1940 Act whereby a fund may purchase securities that are offered in underwritings in which an affiliate of FMR participates. These procedures prohibit the funds from directly or indirectly benefiting an FMR affiliate in connection with such underwritings. In addition, for underwritings where an FMR affiliate participates as a principal underwriter, certain restrictions may apply that could, among other things, limit the amount of securities that the funds could purchase in the underwritings.

From time to time the Trustees will review whether the recapture for the benefit of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios of some portion of the compensation paid by the funds on portfolio transactions is legally permissible and advisable. The Trustees intend to continue to review whether recapture opportunities are available and are legally permissible and, if so, to determine in the exercise of their business judgment whether it would be advisable for each fund to participate, or continue to participate, in the commission recapture program.

Although the Trustees and officers of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio are substantially the same as those of other funds managed by Strategic Advisers or its affiliates, investment decisions for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio are made independently from those of other funds or investment accounts (including proprietary accounts) managed by Strategic Advisers or its affiliates. The same security is often held in the portfolio of more than one of these funds or investment accounts. Simultaneous transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are managed by the same investment adviser, or an affiliate thereof, particularly when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one fund or investment account.

When two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, including a futures contract, the prices and amounts are allocated in accordance with procedures believed to be appropriate and equitable to each fund or investment account. In some cases this system could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security as far as each fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability of the funds to participate in volume transactions will produce better executions and prices for the funds. It is the current opinion of the Trustees that the desirability of retaining Strategic Advisers as investment adviser to each VIP FundsManager Portfolio outweighs any disadvantages that may be said to exist from exposure to simultaneous transactions.

VALUATION

Each class's NAV is the value of a single share. The NAV of each class is computed by adding the class's pro rata share of the value of the applicable fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting the class's pro rata share of the applicable fund's liabilities, subtracting the liabilities allocated to the class, and dividing the result by the number of shares of that class that are outstanding.

The assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consist primarily of shares of the underlying Fidelity funds, which are valued at their respective NAVs.

Valuation of Underlying Fidelity Funds

Growth and Growth & Income Funds. Portfolio securities are valued by various methods depending on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Most equity securities for which the primary market is the United States are valued at the official closing price, last sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the closing bid price. Most equity securities for which the primary market is outside the United States are valued using the official closing price or the last sale price in the principal market in which they are traded. If the last sale price (on the local exchange) is unavailable, the last evaluated quote or closing bid price normally is used. Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

Debt securities and other assets for which market quotations are readily available may be valued at market values determined by such securities' most recent bid prices (sales prices if the principal market is an exchange) in the principal market in which they normally are traded, as furnished by recognized dealers in such securities or assets. Or, debt securities and convertible securities may be valued on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service that uses a valuation matrix which incorporates both dealer-supplied valuations and electronic data processing techniques. Use of pricing services has been approved by the Board of Trustees. A number of pricing services are available, and the funds may use various pricing services or discontinue the use of any pricing service.

Futures contracts and options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available.

Independent brokers or quotation services provide prices of foreign securities in their local currency. Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC) gathers all exchange rates daily at the close of the NYSE using the last quoted price on the local currency and then translates the value of foreign securities from their local currencies into U.S. dollars. Any changes in the value of forward contracts due to exchange rate fluctuations and days to maturity are included in the calculation of NAV. If an event that is expected to materially affect the value of a portfolio security occurs after the close of an exchange or market on which that security is traded, then that security will be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees.

Short-term securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less for which market quotations and information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available are valued either at amortized cost or at original cost plus accrued interest, both of which approximate current value.

The procedures set forth above need not be used to determine the value of the securities owned by a fund if, in the opinion of a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees, some other method would more accurately reflect the fair value of such securities. For example, securities and other assets for which there is no readily available market value may be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees. In making a good faith determination of the value of a security, the committee may review price movements in futures contracts and ADRs, market and trading trends, the bid/ask quotes of brokers and off-exchange institutional trading.

Income/Taxable Bond Funds. Portfolio securities are valued by various methods depending on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt securities and other assets for which market quotations are readily available may be valued at market values determined by such securities' most recent bid prices (sales prices if the principal market is an exchange) in the principal market in which they normally are traded, as furnished by recognized dealers in such securities or assets. Or, debt securities and convertible securities may be valued on the basis of information furnished by a pricing service that uses a valuation matrix which incorporates both dealer-supplied valuations and electronic data processing techniques. Use of pricing services has been approved by the Board of Trustees. A number of pricing services are available, and the funds may use various pricing services or discontinue the use of any pricing service.

Most equity securities for which the primary market is the United States are valued at the official closing price, last sale price or, if no sale has occurred, at the closing bid price. Most equity securities for which the primary market is outside the United States are valued using the official closing price or the last sale price in the principal market in which they are traded. If the last sale price (on the local exchange) is unavailable, the last evaluated quote or closing bid price normally is used.

Futures contracts and options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available. Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

Independent brokers or quotation services provide prices of foreign securities in their local currency. FSC gathers all exchange rates daily at the close of the NYSE using the last quoted price on the local currency and then translates the value of foreign securities from their local currencies into U.S. dollars. Any changes in the value of forward contracts due to exchange rate fluctuations and days to maturity are included in the calculation of NAV. If an event that is expected to materially affect the value of a portfolio security occurs after the close of an exchange or market on which that security is traded, then that security will be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees.

Short-term securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less for which market quotations and information furnished by a pricing service are not readily available are valued either at amortized cost or at original cost plus accrued interest, both of which approximate current value.

The procedures set forth above need not be used to determine the value of the securities owned by a fund if, in the opinion of a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees, some other method would more accurately reflect the fair value of such securities. For example, securities and other assets for which there is no readily available market value may be valued in good faith by a committee appointed by the Board of Trustees. In making a good faith determination of the value of a security, the committee may review price movements in futures contracts and ADRs, market and trading trends, the bid/ask quotes of brokers and off-exchange institutional trading.

Money Market Funds Portfolio securities and other assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. This technique involves initially valuing an instrument at its cost as adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount rather than its current market value. The amortized cost value of an instrument may be higher or lower than the price a fund would receive if it sold the instrument.

Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

At such intervals as they deem appropriate, the Trustees consider the extent to which NAV calculated by using market valuations would deviate from the $1.00 per share calculated using amortized cost valuation. If the Trustees believe that a deviation from a fund's amortized cost per share may result in material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders, the Trustees have agreed to take such corrective action, if any, as they deem appropriate to eliminate or reduce, to the extent reasonably practicable, the dilution or unfair results. Such corrective action could include selling portfolio instruments prior to maturity to realize capital gains or losses or to shorten average portfolio maturity; withholding dividends; redeeming shares in kind; establishing NAV by using available market quotations; and such other measures as the Trustees may deem appropriate.

BUYING AND SELLING INFORMATION

Under certain circumstances (for example, at the request of a shareholder), a fund may make redemption payments in whole or in part in readily marketable securities or other property pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund. Such securities or other property will be valued for this purpose as they are valued in computing the class's NAV. Shareholders that receive securities or other property will realize, upon receipt, a gain or loss for tax purposes, and will incur additional costs and be exposed to market risk prior to and upon sale of such securities or other property.

DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES

The following information is only a summary of some of the tax consequences affecting insurance company separate accounts invested in the VIP FundsManager Portfolios. No attempt has been made to discuss tax consequences affecting variable product owners. Variable product owners seeking to understand the tax consequences of their investment should consult with their tax advisers or the insurance company that issued their variable product, or refer to their variable annuity or variable life insurance product prospectus.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio intends to qualify each year as a "regulated investment company" under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code so that it will not be liable for federal tax on income and capital gains distributed to insurance company separate accounts invested in the fund. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, and avoid being subject to federal income or excise taxes at the fund level, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains within each calendar year as well as on a fiscal year basis, and intends to comply with other tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies. If a fund failed to qualify as a "regulated investment company" in any year, among other consequences, each insurance company separate account invested in the fund would fail to satisfy the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio also intends to satisfy the diversification requirements of Section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. These diversification requirements, which are in addition to the diversification requirements of Subchapter M, place certain limitations on the assets of an insurance company separate account that may be invested in the securities of a single issuer or a certain number of issuers. Because Section 817(h) and the regulations thereunder treat the assets of each fund as the assets of the related insurance company separate account, each fund must also satisfy these requirements. If a fund failed to satisfy these requirements, a variable annuity or variable life insurance product supported by an insurance company separate account invested in the fund would not be treated as an annuity or as life insurance for tax purposes and would no longer be eligible for tax deferral.

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

The Trustees, Member of the Advisory Board, and executive officers of the trust and funds, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, and review each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's performance. If the interests of a VIP FundsManager Portfolio and an underlying Fidelity fund were to diverge, a conflict of interest could arise and affect how the Trustees and Member of the Advisory Board fulfill their fiduciary duties to the affected funds. Strategic Advisers has structured the VIP FundsManager Portfolios to avoid these potential conflicts, although there may be situations where a conflict of interest is unavoidable. In such instances, Strategic Advisers, the Trustees, and Member of the Advisory Board would take reasonable steps to minimize and, if possible, eliminate the conflict. Except for William O. McCoy and Albert R. Gamper, Jr., each of the Trustees oversees 322 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. McCoy oversees 328 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. Gamper oversees 235 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.

The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust. Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) (Independent Trustee), shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 72nd birthday occurs. The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees. The executive officers and Advisory Board Member hold office without limit in time, except that any officer and Advisory Board Member may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years.

Interested Trustees*:

Correspondence intended for each Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Edward C. Johnson 3d (75)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1983

Mr. Johnson is Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Mr. Johnson serves as Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and a Director of FMR Corp.; a Director and Chairman of the Board and of the Executive Committee of FMR; Chairman and a Director of Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc.; Chairman and a Director of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc.; and Chairman (2001-present) and a Director (2000-present) of FMR Co., Inc.

Stephen P. Jonas (52)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Mr. Jonas is Senior Vice President of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% (2006), VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% (2006), VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% (2006), and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% (2006). He also serves as Senior Vice President of other Fidelity funds (2005-present). Mr. Jonas is Executive Director of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Jonas served as President of Fidelity Enterprise Operations and Risk Services (2004-2005), Chief Administrative Officer (2002-2004), and Chief Financial Officer of FMR Co. (1998-2000). Mr. Jonas has been with Fidelity Investments since 1987 and has held various financial and management positions including Chief Financial Officer of FMR. In addition, he serves on the Boards of Boston Ballet (2003-present) and Simmons College (2003-present).

Robert L. Reynolds (53)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2003

Mr. Reynolds is a Director (2003-present) and Chief Operating Officer (2002-present) of FMR Corp. He also serves on the Board at Fidelity Investments Canada, Ltd. (2000-present). Previously, Mr. Reynolds served as President of Fidelity Investments Institutional Retirement Group (1996-2000).

* Trustees have been determined to be "Interested Trustees" by virtue of, among other things, their affiliation with the trust or various entities under common control with FMR.

Independent Trustees:

Correspondence intended for each Independent Trustee (that is, the Trustees other than the Interested Trustees) may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Dennis J. Dirks (57)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Prior to his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Dirks was Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) (1999-2003). He also served as President, Chief Operating Officer, and Board member of The Depository Trust Company (DTC) (1999-2003) and President and Board member of the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) (1999-2003). In addition, Mr. Dirks served as Chief Executive Officer and Board member of the Government Securities Clearing Corporation (2001-2003) and Chief Executive Officer and Board member of the Mortgage-Backed Securities Clearing Corporation (2001-2003). Mr. Dirks also serves as a Trustee of Manhattan College (2005-present).

Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (63)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Mr. Gamper also serves as a Trustee (2006-present) or Member of the Advisory Board (2005-present) of other investment companies advised by FMR. Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (1989-2002). He currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2001-present), Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-present), and Chairman of the Board of Saint Barnabas Health Care System.

Robert M. Gates (62)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1997

Dr. Gates is Chairman of the Independent Trustees (2006-present). Dr. Gates is President of Texas A&M University (2002-present). He was Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1991 to 1993. From 1989 to 1991, Dr. Gates served as Assistant to the President of the United States and Deputy National Security Advisor. Dr. Gates is a Director of NACCO Industries, Inc. (mining and manufacturing), Parker Drilling Co., Inc. (drilling and rental tools for the energy industry, 2001-present), and Brinker International (restaurant management, 2003-present). Previously, Dr. Gates served as a Director of LucasVarity PLC (automotive components and diesel engines), a Director of TRW Inc. (automotive, space, defense, and information technology), and Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University (1999-2001). Dr. Gates also is a Trustee of the Forum for International Policy.

George H. Heilmeier (69)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2004

Dr. Heilmeier is Chairman Emeritus of Telcordia Technologies (communication software and systems), where prior to his retirement, he served as company Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He currently serves on the Boards of Directors of The Mitre Corporation (systems engineering and information technology support for the government), and HRL Laboratories (private research and development, 2004-present). He is Chairman of the General Motors Science & Technology Advisory Board and a Life Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (2000-present). Dr. Heilmeier is a member of the Defense Science Board and the National Security Agency Advisory Board. He is also a member of the National Academy of Engineering, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Board of Overseers of the School of Engineering and Applied Science of the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, Dr. Heilmeier served as a Director of TRW Inc. (automotive, space, defense, and information technology, 1992-2002), Compaq (1994-2002), Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) (technology-based business outsourcing, 1995-2002), INET Technologies Inc. (telecommunications network surveillance, 2001-2004), and Teletech Holdings (customer management services). He is the recipient of the 2005 Kyoto Prize in Advanced Technology for his invention of the liquid display.

Marie L. Knowles (59)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company. She served as a Director of ARCO from 1996 to 1998. She currently serves as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing) and McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, 2002-present). Ms. Knowles is a Trustee of the Brookings Institution and the Catalina Island Conservancy and also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California.

Ned C. Lautenbach (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2000

Mr. Lautenbach has been a partner of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. (private equity investment firm) since September 1998. Previously, Mr. Lautenbach was with the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) from 1968 until his retirement in 1998. Mr. Lautenbach serves as a Director of Italtel Holding S.p.A. (telecommunications (Milan, Italy), 2004-present) and Eaton Corporation (diversified industrial) as well as the Philharmonic Center for the Arts in Naples, Florida. He also is a member of the Board of Trustees of Fairfield University (2005-present), as well as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

William O. McCoy (72)

Year of Election or Appointment: 1997

Prior to his retirement in December 1994, Mr. McCoy was Vice Chairman of the Board of BellSouth Corporation (telecommunications) and President of BellSouth Enterprises. He is currently a Director of Liberty Corporation (holding company), Duke Realty Corporation (real estate), and Progress Energy, Inc. (electric utility). He is also a partner of Franklin Street Partners (private investment management firm) and a member of the Research Triangle Foundation Board. In addition, Mr. McCoy served as the Interim Chancellor (1999-2000) and a member of the Board of Visitors for the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and currently serves on the Board of Directors of the University of North Carolina Health Care System and the Board of Visitors of the Kenan-Flagler Business School (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). He also served as Vice President of Finance for the University of North Carolina (16-school system).

Cornelia M. Small (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Ms. Small is a member (2000-present) and Chairperson (2002-present) of the Investment Committee, and a member (2002-present) of the Board of Trustees of Smith College. Previously, she served as Chief Investment Officer (1999-2000), Director of Global Equity Investments (1996-1999), and a member of the Board of Directors of Scudder, Stevens & Clark (1990-1997) and Scudder Kemper Investments (1997-1998). In addition, Ms. Small served as Co-Chair (2000-2003) of the Annual Fund for the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

William S. Stavropoulos (66)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Mr. Stavropoulos is Chairman of the Board (2000-present) and a Member of the Board of Directors of The Dow Chemical Company. Since joining The Dow Chemical Company in 1967, Mr. Stavropoulos served in numerous senior management positions, including President (1993-2000; 2002-2003), CEO (1995-2000; 2002-2004), and Chairman of the Executive Committee (2000-2004). Currently, he is a Director of NCR Corporation (data warehousing and technology solutions), BellSouth Corporation (telecommunications), Chemical Financial Corporation, Maersk Inc. (industrial conglomerate, 2002-present), and Metalmark Capital (private equity investment firm, 2005-present). He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. In addition, Mr. Stavropoulos is a member of The Business Council, J.P. Morgan International Council and the University of Notre Dame Advisory Council for the College of Science.

Kenneth L. Wolfe (66)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Prior to his retirement in 2001, Mr. Wolfe was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hershey Foods Corporation (1993-2001). He currently serves as a member of the boards of Adelphia Communications Corporation (2003-present), Bausch & Lomb, Inc., and Revlon Inc. (2004-present).

Advisory Board Member and Executive Officers:

Correspondence intended for each executive officer and Mr. Lynch may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

Peter S. Lynch (61)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2003

Member of the Advisory Board of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV. Vice Chairman and a Director of FMR, and Vice Chairman (2001-present) and a Director (2000-present) of FMR Co., Inc. Previously, Mr. Lynch served as a Trustee of the Fidelity funds (1990-2003). In addition, he serves as a Trustee of Boston College, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Historic Deerfield, John F. Kennedy Library, and the Museum of Fine Arts of Boston.

Boyce I. Greer (49)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Vice President of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Greer also serves as Vice President of the Fidelity Select Portfolios (2005-present), certain Asset Allocation Funds (2005-present), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR (2003-present), and a member of the FMR senior management team (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Greer served as a Director and Managing Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2002-2005), Executive Vice President (2000-2002), and Money Market Group Leader (1997-2002) of the Fidelity Investments Fixed Income Division. He also served as Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (1997-2002), Senior Vice President of FMR (1997-2002), and Vice President of FIMM (1998-2002).

Eric D. Roiter (57)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Secretary of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. He also serves as Secretary of other Fidelity funds; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR Co., Inc. (2001-present) and FMR; Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (2001-present), Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. (2001-present), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2001-present). Mr. Roiter is an Adjunct Member, Faculty of Law, at Boston College Law School (2003-present). Previously, Mr. Roiter served as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (1998-2005).

Stuart Fross (46)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Secretary of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Fross also serves as Assistant Secretary of other Fidelity funds (2003-present), Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005-present), and is an employee of FMR.

Christine Reynolds (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

President, Treasurer, and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Ms. Reynolds also serves as President, Treasurer, and AML officer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is a Vice President (2003) and an employee (2002) of FMR. Before joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Reynolds worked at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) (1980-2002), where she was most recently an audit partner with PwC's investment management practice.

Paul M. Murphy (58)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Chief Financial Officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr.Murphy also serves as Chief Financial Officer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present). He also serves as Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services Group (FPCMS).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber (58)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Chief Compliance Officer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Rathgeber also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and Executive Vice President of Risk Oversight for Fidelity Investments (2002). Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc. (1998-2002).

John R. Hebble (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Hebble also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2003), and is an employee of FMR. Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Hebble worked at Deutsche Asset Management where he served as Director of Fund Accounting (2002-2003) and Assistant Treasurer of the Scudder Funds (1998-2003).

Bryan A. Mehrmann (44)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Mehrmann also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR. Previously, Mr. Mehrmann served as Vice President of Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Group (FIIS)/Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Corporation, Inc. (FIIOC) Client Services (1998-2004).

Kimberley H. Monasterio (42)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Ms. Monasterio also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is an employee of FMR (2004). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Monasterio served as Treasurer (2000-2004) and Chief Financial Officer (2002-2004) of the Franklin Templeton Funds and Senior Vice President of Franklin Templeton Services, LLC (2000-2004).

Kenneth B. Robins (36)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Deputy Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Robins also serves as Deputy Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2004-present). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Robins worked at KPMG LLP, where he was a partner in KPMG's department of professional practice (2002-2004) and a Senior Manager (1999-2000). In addition, Mr. Robins served as Assistant Chief Accountant, United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2000-2002).

Robert G. Byrnes (39)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Byrnes also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Byrnes served as Vice President of FPCMS (2003-2005). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Byrnes worked at Deutsche Asset Management where he served as Vice President of the Investment Operations Group (2000-2003).

John H. Costello (59)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Costello also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds and is an employee of FMR.

Peter L. Lydecker (51)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Lydecker also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2004) and is an employee of FMR.

Mark Osterheld (50)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Osterheld also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2002) and is an employee of FMR.

Gary W. Ryan (47)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Ryan also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Ryan served as Vice President of Fund Reporting in FPCMS (1999-2005).

Salvatore Schiavone (40)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Assistant Treasurer of VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%, VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%, and VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%. Mr. Schiavone also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2005-present) and is an employee of FMR (2005-present). Before joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Schiavone worked at Deutsche Asset Management, where he most recently served as Assistant Treasurer (2003-2005) of the Scudder Funds and Vice President and Head of Fund Reporting (1996-2003).

Standing Committees of the Funds' Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established various committees to support the Independent Trustees in acting independently in pursuing the best interests of the Fidelity funds and their shareholders. The committees facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to Independent Trustees, each fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Currently, the Board of Trustees has 12 standing committees. The members of each committee are Independent Trustees.

The Operations Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Dr. Gates currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair, and serves as a forum for consideration of issues of importance to, or calling for particular determinations by, the Independent Trustees. The committee also considers matters involving potential conflicts of interest between the funds and FMR and its affiliates and reviews proposed contracts and the proposed continuation of contracts between the Fidelity funds and FMR and its affiliates, and annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding contracts with third parties unaffiliated with FMR, including insurance coverage and custody agreements. The committee also monitors additional issues including the nature, levels and quality of services provided to shareholders, significant litigation, and the voting of proxies of portfolio companies. The committee also has oversight of compliance issues not specifically within the scope of any other committee. The committee is also responsible for definitive action on all compliance matters involving the potential for significant reimbursement by FMR. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 12 meetings.

The Fair Value Oversight Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Dr. Gates currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets quarterly, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The Fair Value Oversight Committee monitors and establishes policies concerning procedures and controls regarding the valuation of fund investments and their classification as liquid or illiquid and monitors matters of disclosure to the extent required to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. The committee provides oversight regarding the investment policies relating to, and Fidelity funds' investment in, non-traditional securities. The committee also reviews actions taken by FMR's Fair Value Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held four meetings.

The Board of Trustees has established three Fund Oversight Committees: the Equity Committee (composed of Messrs. Lautenbach (Chair), Gamper, and Stavropoulos), the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee (composed of Mr. Dirks (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Ms. Small), and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee (composed of Mr. Wolfe (Chair), Dr. Heilmeier, and Mr. McCoy). Each committee normally meets in conjunction with in-person meetings of the Board of Trustees, or more frequently as called by the Chair of the respective committee. Each committee develops an understanding of and reviews the investment objectives, policies, and practices of each fund under its oversight. Each committee also monitors investment performance, compliance by each relevant Fidelity fund with its investment policies and restrictions and reviews appropriate benchmarks, competitive universes, unusual or exceptional investment matters, the personnel and other resources devoted to the management of each fund and all other matters bearing on each fund's investment results. The Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee also receives reports required under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act and has oversight of research bearing on credit quality, investment structures and other fixed-income issues, and of international research. The Select and Asset Allocation Committee has oversight of FMR's equity investment research. Each committee will review and recommend any required action to the Board in respect of specific funds, including new funds, changes in fundamental and non-fundamental investment policies and restrictions, partial or full closing to new investors, fund mergers, fund name changes, and liquidations of funds. The members of each committee may organize working groups to make recommendations concerning issues related to funds that are within the scope of the committee's review. These working groups report to the committee or to the Independent Trustees, or both, as appropriate. Each working group may request from FMR such information from FMR as may be appropriate to the working group's deliberations. Prior to July 2005, the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee was known as the Fixed-Income and International Committee, and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee was known as the Select and Special Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the Equity Committee held 10 meetings, the Fixed-Income, International, and Special Committee held 12 meetings, and the Select and Asset Allocation Committee held nine meetings.

The Board of Trustees has established two Fund Contract Committees: the Equity Contract Committee (composed of Messrs. Lautenbach (Chair), Gamper, Stavropoulos, and Mr. Wolfe) and the Fixed-Income Contract Committee (composed of Mr. Dirks (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Ms. Small). Each committee will ordinarily meet as needed to consider matters related to the renewal of fund investment advisory agreements. The committees will assist the Independent Trustees in their consideration of investment advisory agreements of each fund. Each committee receives information on and makes recommendations concerning the approval of investment advisory agreements between the Fidelity funds and FMR and its affiliates and any non-FMR affiliate that serves as a sub-adviser to a Fidelity fund (collectively, investment advisers) and the annual review of these contracts. The Fixed-Income Contract Committee will be responsible for investment advisory agreements of the fixed-income funds. The Equity Contract Committee will be responsible for the investment advisory agreements of all other funds. With respect to each fund under its purview, each committee: requests and receives information on the nature, extent, and quality of services provided to the shareholders of the Fidelity funds by the investment advisers and their respective affiliates, fund performance, the investment performance of the investment adviser, and such other information as the committee determines to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the investment advisory agreements; considers the cost of the services to be provided and the profitability and other benefits that the investment advisers and their respective affiliates derive or will derive from their contractual arrangements with each of the funds (including tangible and intangible "fall-out benefits"); considers the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the funds grow and whether fee levels reflect those economies of scale for the benefit of fund investors; considers methodologies for determining the extent to which the funds benefit from economies of scale and refinements to these methodologies; considers information comparing the services to be rendered and the amount to be paid under the funds' contracts with those under other investment advisory contracts entered into with FMR and its affiliates and other investment advisers, such as contracts with other registered investment companies or other types of clients; considers such other matters and information as may be necessary and appropriate to evaluate investment advisory agreements of the funds; and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the approval or renewal of investment advisory agreements. Each committee will consult with the other committees of the Board of Trustees, and in particular with the Audit Committee and the applicable Fund Oversight Committees, in carrying out its responsibilities. Each committee's responsibilities are guided by Sections 15(c) and 36(b) of the 1940 Act. While each committee consists solely of Independent Trustees, its meetings may, depending upon the subject matter, be attended by one or more senior members of FMR's management or representatives of a sub-adviser not affiliated with FMR. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, each Fund Contract Committee held three meetings.

The Shareholder, Distribution and Brokerage Committee is composed of Messrs. Stavropoulos (Chair), Dirks, and Lautenbach, and Ms. Small. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair. Regarding shareholder services, the committee considers the structure and amount of the Fidelity funds' transfer agency fees and fees, including direct fees to investors (other than sales loads), such as bookkeeping and custodial fees, and the nature and quality of services rendered by FMR and its affiliates or third parties (such as custodians) in consideration of these fees. The committee also considers other non-investment management services rendered to the Fidelity funds by FMR and its affiliates, including pricing and bookkeeping services. Regarding brokerage, the committee monitors and recommends policies concerning the securities transactions of the Fidelity funds. The committee periodically reviews the policies and practices with respect to efforts to achieve best execution, commissions paid to firms supplying research and brokerage services or paying fund expenses, and policies and procedures designed to assure that any allocation of portfolio transactions is not influenced by the sale of Fidelity fund shares. The committee also monitors brokerage and other similar relationships between the Fidelity funds and firms affiliated with FMR that participate in the execution of securities transactions. Regarding the distribution of fund shares, the committee considers issues bearing on the various distribution channels employed by the Fidelity funds, including issues regarding Rule 18f-3 plans and related consideration of classes of shares, sales load structures (including breakpoints), load waivers, selling concessions and service charges paid to intermediaries, Rule 12b-1 plans, contingent deferred sales charges, and finders' fees, and other means by which intermediaries are compensated for selling fund shares or providing shareholder servicing, including revenue sharing. The committee also considers issues bearing on the preparation and use of advertisements and sales literature for the Fidelity funds, policies and procedures regarding frequent purchase of Fidelity fund shares, and selective disclosure of portfolio holdings. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, the Shareholder, Distribution and Brokerage Committee held 11 meetings.

The Audit Committee is composed of Ms. Knowles (Chair), Mr. Gamper, Dr. Heilmeier, and Messrs. McCoy and Wolfe). All committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. At least one committee member will be an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC. The committee will have at least one committee member in common with the Compliance Committee. The committee normally meets monthly (except August), or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee meets separately at least four times a year with the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, with personnel responsible for the internal audit function of FMR Corp., and with the Fidelity funds' outside auditors. The committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the outside auditors employed by the Fidelity funds. The committee assists the Trustees in overseeing and monitoring: (i) the systems of internal accounting and financial controls of the Fidelity funds and the funds' service providers, (ii) the financial reporting processes of the Fidelity funds, (iii) the independence, objectivity and qualification of the auditors to the Fidelity funds, (iv) the annual audits of the Fidelity funds' financial statements, and (v) the accounting policies and disclosures of the Fidelity funds. The committee considers and acts upon (i) the provision by any outside auditor of any non-audit services for any Fidelity fund, and (ii) the provision by any outside auditor of certain non-audit services to Fidelity fund service providers and their affiliates to the extent that such approval (in the case of this clause (ii)) is required under applicable regulations of the SEC. In furtherance of the foregoing, the committee has adopted (and may from time to time amend or supplement) and provides oversight of policies and procedures for non-audit engagements by outside auditors of the Fidelity funds. It is responsible for approving all audit engagement fees and terms for the Fidelity funds, resolving disagreements between a fund and any outside auditor regarding any fund's financial reporting, and has sole authority to hire and fire any auditor. Auditors of the funds report directly to the committee. The committee will obtain assurance of independence and objectivity from the outside auditors, including a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditor and the Fidelity funds and any service providers consistent with Independent Standards Board Standard No. 1. The committee will receive reports of compliance with provisions of the Auditor Independence Regulations relating to the hiring of employees or former employees of the outside auditors. It oversees and receives reports on the Fidelity funds' service providers' internal controls and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the service providers' accounting and financial controls, including: (i) any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Fidelity funds' ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; (ii) any change in the fund's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the fund's internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) any fraud, whether material or not, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Fidelity funds' or service providers internal controls over financial reporting. The committee will review with counsel any legal matters that may have a material impact on the Fidelity funds' financial statements and any material reports or inquiries received from regulators or governmental agencies. These matters may also be reviewed by the Compliance Committee or the Operations Committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee will coordinate with the Chair of the Compliance Committee, as appropriate. The committee reviews at least annually a report from each outside auditor describing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control, peer review, or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board examination of the auditing firm and any material issues raised by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities of the auditing firm and in each case any steps taken to deal with such issues. The committee will oversee and receive reports on the Fidelity funds' financial reporting process, will discuss with FMR, the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, outside auditors and, if appropriate, internal audit personnel of FMR Corp. their qualitative judgments about the appropriateness and acceptability of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed for adoption by the Fidelity funds, and will review with FMR, the Fidelity funds' Treasurer, outside auditor, and internal auditor personnel of FMR Corp. (to the extent relevant) the results of audits of the Fidelity funds' financial statements. The committee will review periodically the Fidelity funds' major internal controls exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 14 meetings.

The Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Dr. Gates (Chair) and Messrs. Lautenbach and Stavropoulos. The committee meets as called by the Chair. With respect to fund governance and board administration matters, the committee periodically reviews procedures of the Board of Trustees and its committees (including committee charters) and periodically reviews compensation of Independent Trustees. The committee monitors corporate governance matters and makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees on the frequency and structure of the Board of Trustee meetings and on any other aspect of Board procedures. It acts as the administrative committee under the retirement plan for Independent Trustees who retired prior to December 30, 1996 and under the fee deferral plan for Independent Trustees. It reviews the performance of legal counsel employed by the Fidelity funds and the Independent Trustees. On behalf of the Independent Trustees, the committee will make such findings and determinations as to the independence of counsel for the Independent Trustees as may be necessary or appropriate under applicable regulations or otherwise. The committee is also responsible for Board administrative matters applicable to Independent Trustees, such as expense reimbursement policies and compensation for attendance at meetings, conferences and other events. The committee monitors compliance with, acts as the administrator of, and makes determinations in respect of, the provisions of the code of ethics and any supplemental policies regarding personal securities transactions applicable to the Independent Trustees. The committee monitors the functioning of each Board committee and makes recommendations for any changes, including the creation or elimination of standing or ad hoc Board committees. The committee monitors regulatory and other developments to determine whether to recommend modifications to the committee's responsibilities or other Trustee policies and procedures in light of rule changes, reports concerning "best practices" in corporate governance and other developments in mutual fund governance. The committee meets with Independent Trustees at least once a year to discuss matters relating to fund governance. The committee recommends that the Board establish such special or ad hoc Board committees as may be desirable or necessary from time to time in order to address ethical, legal, or other matters that may arise. The committee also oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board of Trustees and establishes procedures to allow it to exercise this oversight function. In conducting this oversight, the committee shall address all matters that it considers relevant to the performance of the Board of Trustees and shall report the results of its evaluation to the Board of Trustees, including any recommended amendments to the principles of governance, and any recommended changes to the Fidelity funds' or the Board of Trustees' policies, procedures, and structures. The committee reviews periodically the size and composition of the Board of Trustees as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board of Trustees reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of Independent Trustees required by law. The committee makes nominations for the election or appointment of Independent Trustees and non-management Members of any Advisory Board, and for membership on committees. The committee shall have authority to retain and terminate any third-party advisers, including authority to approve fees and other retention terms. Such advisers may include search firms to identify Independent Trustee candidates and board compensation consultants. The committee may conduct or authorize investigations into or studies of matters within the committee's scope of responsibilities, and may retain, at the Fidelity funds' expense, such independent counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary. The committee will consider nominees to the Board of Trustees recommended by shareholders based upon the criteria applied to candidates presented to the committee by a search firm or other source. Recommendations, along with appropriate background material concerning the candidate that demonstrates his or her ability to serve as an Independent Trustee of the Fidelity funds, should be submitted to the Chair of the committee at the address maintained for communications with Independent Trustees. If the committee retains a search firm, the Chair will generally forward all such submissions to the search firm for evaluation. With respect to the criteria for selecting Independent Trustees, it is expected that all candidates will possess the following minimum qualifications: (i) unquestioned personal integrity; (ii) not an interested person of FMR or its affiliates within the meaning of the 1940 Act; (iii) does not have a material relationship (e.g., commercial, banking, consulting, legal, or accounting) that could create an appearance of lack of independence in respect of FMR and its affiliates; (iv) has the disposition to act independently in respect of FMR and its affiliates and others in order to protect the interests of the funds and all shareholders; (v) ability to attend 11 meetings per year; (vi) demonstrates sound business judgment gained through broad experience in significant positions where the candidate has dealt with management, technical, financial, or regulatory issues; (vii) sufficient financial or accounting knowledge to add value in the complex financial environment of the Fidelity funds; (viii) experience on corporate or other institutional oversight bodies having similar responsibilities, but which board memberships or other relationships could not result in business or regulatory conflicts with the funds; and (ix) capacity for the hard work and attention to detail that is required to be an effective Independent Trustee in light of the Fidelity funds' complex regulatory, operational, and marketing setting. The Governance and Nominating Committee may determine that a candidate who does not have the type of previous experience or knowledge referred to above should nevertheless be considered as a nominee if the Governance and Nominating Committee finds that the candidate has additional qualifications such that his or her qualifications, taken as a whole, demonstrate the same level of fitness to serve as an Independent Trustee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held 12 meetings.

The Board of Trustees established the Compliance Committee (composed of Ms. Small (Chair), Ms. Knowles, and Messrs. Lautenbach and Stavropoulos) in May 2005. The committee normally meets quarterly, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee oversees the administration and operation of the compliance policies and procedures of the Fidelity funds and their service providers as required by Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act. The committee is responsible for the review and approval of policies and procedures relating to (i) provisions of the Code of Ethics, (ii) anti-money laundering requirements, (iii) compliance with investment restrictions and limitations, (iv) privacy, (v) recordkeeping, and (vi) other compliance policies and procedures which are not otherwise delegated to another committee. The committee has responsibility for recommending to the Board the designation of a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) of the Fidelity funds. The committee serves as the primary point of contact between the CCO and the Board, it oversees the annual performance review and compensation of the CCO, and if required, makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the removal of the appointed CCO. The committee receives reports of significant correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies, employee complaints or published reports which raise concerns regarding compliance matters, and copies of significant non-routine correspondence with the SEC. The committee receives reports from the CCO including the annual report concerning the funds' compliance policies as required by Rule 38a-1, quarterly reports in respect of any breaches of fiduciary duty or violations of federal securities laws, and reports on any other compliance or related matters that may have a significant impact on the funds. The committee will recommend to the Board, what actions, if any, should be taken with respect to such reports. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held eight meetings.

The Proxy Voting Committee is composed of Dr. Heilmeier (Chair), Mr. Lautenbach, and Ms. Small. The committee will meet as needed to review the fund's proxy voting policies, consider changes to the policies, and review the manner in which the policies have been applied. The committee will receive reports on the manner in which proxy votes have been cast under the proxy voting policies and reports on consultations between the fund's investment advisers and portfolio companies concerning matters presented to shareholders for approval. The committee will address issues relating to the fund's annual voting report filed with the SEC. The committee will receive reports concerning the implementation of procedures and controls designed to ensure that the proxy voting policies are implemented in accordance with their terms. The committee will consider FMR's recommendations concerning certain non-routine proposals not covered by the proxy voting policies. The committee will receive reports with respect to steps taken by FMR to assure that proxy voting has been done without regard to any other FMR relationships, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company. The committee will make recommendations to the Board concerning the casting of proxy votes in circumstances where FMR has determined that, because of a conflict of interest, the proposal to be voted on should be reviewed by the Board. The Board of Trustees established the Proxy Voting Committee in January 2006. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the committee held no meetings.

The following table sets forth information describing the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in each fund and in all funds in the aggregate within the same fund family overseen by the Trustee for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005.

Interested Trustees

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Stephen P. Jonas

Robert L. Reynolds

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

Independent Trustees

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Dennis J. Dirks

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.

Robert M. Gates

George H. Heilmeier

Marie L. Knowles

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Ned C. Lautenbach

William O. McCoy

Cornelia M. Small

William S.
Stavropoulos

Kenneth L. Wolfe

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70%

none

none

none

none

none

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85%

none

none

none

none

none

AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000

The following table sets forth information describing the compensation of each Trustee and Member of the Advisory Board for his or her services for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

Compensation Table1

AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

J. Michael
Cook2

Ralph F.
Cox
2

Dennis J. Dirks3

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.4

Robert M.
Gates

George H.
Heilmeier

Donald J.
Kirk2

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 14

$ 11

$ 11

TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEXA

$ 0

$ 0

$ 378,500

$ 203,250

$ 373,000

$ 373,000

$ 0

AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

Marie L.
Knowles

Ned C.
Lautenbach

Marvin L.
Mann
5

William O.
McCoy

Cornelia M. Small6

William S.
Stavropoulos

Kenneth L. Wolfe7

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 20% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 50% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 70% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

VIP FundsManager Portfolio 85% +

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

$ 11

TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEXA

$ 399,000

$ 373,000

$ 502,500

$ 415,500B

$ 378,500

$ 379,000

$ 370,000

1 Edward C. Johnson 3d, Abigail P. Johnson, Stephen P. Jonas, Peter S. Lynch, and Robert L. Reynolds are interested persons and are compensated by FMR.

2 Mr. Cook, Mr. Cox, and Mr. Kirk served on the Board of Trustees through December 31, 2004.

3 During the period from July 1, 2004, through December 13, 2004, Mr. Dirks served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective December 14, 2004, Mr. Dirks serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

4 During the period from June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, Mr. Gamper served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2006, Mr. Gamper serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

5 Mr. Mann served on the Board of Trustees through December 31, 2005.

6 During the period from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, Ms. Small served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2005, Ms. Small serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

7 During the period from October 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, Mr. Wolfe served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective January 1, 2005, Mr. Wolfe serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.

+ Estimated for the fund's first full year.

A Information is for the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 for 324 funds of 58 trusts in the fund complex. Compensation figures include cash, amounts required to be deferred, and may include amounts deferred at the election of Trustees. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2005, the Trustees accrued required deferred compensation from the funds as follows: Dennis J. Dirks, $148,500; Robert M. Gates, $148,500; George H. Heilmeier, $148,500; Marie L. Knowles, $163,500; Ned C. Lautenbach, $148,500; Marvin L. Mann, $198,500; William O. McCoy, $148,500;Cornelia M. Small, $148,500; William S. Stavropoulos, $148,500; and Kenneth L. Wolfe, $148, 500. Certain of the Independent Trustees elected voluntarily to defer a portion of their compensation as follows: Ned C. Lautenbach, $48,134; and William O. McCoy, $93,634.

B Compensation figures include cash and may include amounts deferred at Mr. McCoy's election under a deferred compensation plan adopted by the other open-end registered investment companies in the fund complex (Other Open-End Funds). Pursuant to the deferred compensation plan, Mr. McCoy, as an Independent Trustee, may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his annual fees. Amounts deferred under the deferred compensation plan are credited to an account established for Mr. McCoy on the books of the Other Open-End Funds. Interest is accrued on amounts deferred under the deferred compensation plan. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2005, Mr. McCoy voluntarily elected to defer $45,500.

Under a deferred compensation plan adopted in September 1995 and amended in November 1996 and January 2000 (the Plan), Independent Trustees must defer receipt of a portion of, and may elect to defer receipt of an additional portion of, their annual fees. Amounts deferred under the Plan are treated as though equivalent dollar amounts had been invested in shares of a cross-section of Fidelity funds including funds in each major investment discipline and representing a majority of Fidelity's assets under management (the Reference Funds). The amounts ultimately received by the Independent Trustees under the Plan will be directly linked to the investment performance of the Reference Funds. Deferral of fees in accordance with the Plan will have a negligible effect on a fund's assets, liabilities, and net income per share, and will not obligate a fund to retain the services of any Independent Trustee or to pay any particular level of compensation to the Independent Trustee. A fund may invest in the Reference Funds under the Plan without shareholder approval.

As of the public offering of shares of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, 100% of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's total outstanding shares was held by FMR. FMR Corp. is the ultimate parent company of FMR. By virtue of his ownership interest in FMR Corp., as described in the "Control of Investment Advisers" section below, Mr. Edward C. Johnson 3d, Trustee, may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of these shares.

CONTROL OF INVESTMENT ADVISERS

FMR Corp., organized in 1972, is the ultimate parent company of FMR and Strategic Advisers. The voting common stock of FMR Corp. is divided into two classes. Class B is held predominantly by members of the Edward C. Johnson 3d family and is entitled to 49% of the vote on any matter acted upon by the voting common stock. Class A is held predominantly by non-Johnson family member employees of FMR Corp. and its affiliates and is entitled to 51% of the vote on any such matter. The Johnson family group and all other Class B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Class B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Class B shares. Under the 1940 Act, control of a company is presumed where one individual or group of individuals owns more than 25% of the voting stock of that company. Therefore, through their ownership of voting common stock and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the 1940 Act, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR Corp.

At present, the primary business activities of FMR Corp. and its subsidiaries are: (i) the provision of investment advisory, management, shareholder, investment information and assistance and certain fiduciary services for individual and institutional investors; (ii) the provision of securities brokerage services; (iii) the management and development of real estate; and (iv) the investment in and operation of a number of emerging businesses.

FMR, Strategic Advisers (the Investment Advisers), FDC, and the funds have adopted a code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that sets forth employees' fiduciary responsibilities regarding the funds, establishes procedures for personal investing, and restricts certain transactions. Employees subject to the code of ethics, including Fidelity investment personnel, may invest in securities for their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the funds.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a management contract with Strategic Advisers, pursuant to which Strategic Advisers furnishes investment advisory and other services.

Management Services. Under the terms of its management contract with each fund, Strategic Advisers acts as investment adviser and, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, directs the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective, policies and limitations. Strategic Advisers is authorized, in its discretion, to allocate each fund's assets among the underlying Fidelity funds in which the fund may invest. Strategic Advisers also provides each fund with all necessary office facilities and personnel for servicing the fund's investments and compensates all personnel of each fund or Strategic Advisers performing services relating to research, statistical and investment activities.

Strategic Advisers in turn has entered into an administration agreement with FMR on behalf of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. Under the terms of each administration agreement, FMR or its affiliates provide the management and administrative services (other than investment advisory services) necessary for the operation of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. These services include providing facilities for maintaining each fund's organization; supervising relations with custodians, transfer and pricing agents, accountants, underwriters and other persons dealing with each fund; preparing all general shareholder communications and conducting shareholder relations; maintaining each fund's records and the registration of each fund's shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings under state laws; developing management and shareholder services for each fund; and furnishing reports, evaluations and analyses on a variety of subjects to the Trustees.

Management-Related Expenses. Under the terms of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's management contract, Strategic Advisers, either itself or through an affiliate, is responsible for payment of all operating expenses of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio or each class thereof, as applicable, with certain exceptions. Under the terms of each administration agreement, FMR pays all management and administrative expenses (other than investment advisory expenses) for which Strategic Advisers is responsible. Specific expenses payable by FMR include expenses for typesetting, printing, and mailing proxy materials to shareholders, legal expenses, fees of the custodian and auditor, and each fund's proportionate share of insurance premiums and Investment Company Institute dues. Each administration agreement further provides that FMR will pay for typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, notices, and reports to shareholders; however, under the terms of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's transfer agent agreement, the transfer agent bears these costs. In addition, FMR compensates all officers of each fund and all Trustees who are interested persons of the trust, Strategic Advisers, or FMR. FMR also pays all fees associated with transfer agent, dividend disbursing, and shareholder services, pricing and bookkeeping services, and the cost of administration of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays the following expenses: fees and expenses of the Independent Trustees, interest on borrowings, taxes, brokerage commissions (if any), shareholder charges (if any) associated with investing in the underlying Fidelity funds, and such non-recurring expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which a fund may be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify the officers and Trustees with respect to litigation. Each fund also pays the costs related to the solicitation of fund proxies from variable product owners.

Management Fees. For the services of Strategic Advisers under each management contract, each VIP FundsManager Portfolio pays Strategic Advisers a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets throughout the month. The management fee paid to Strategic Advisers by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio is reduced by an amount equal to the fees and expenses paid by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio to the Independent Trustees.

For the services of FMR under each administration agreement, Strategic Advisers pays FMR a monthly administration fee equal to the monthly management fee received by Strategic Advisers from each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, minus an amount equal to an annual rate of 0.02% of that fund's average net assets throughout the month.

FMR may, from time to time, voluntarily reimburse all or a portion of a class's operating expenses (exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, shareholder charges, and extraordinary expenses), which is subject to revision or discontinuance. FMR retains the ability to be repaid for these expense reimbursements in the amount that expenses fall below the limit prior to the end of the fiscal year.

Expense reimbursements by FMR will increase a class's returns and repayment of the reimbursement by a class will lower its returns.

Scott Kuldell is the portfolio manager of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios and receives compensation for his services. As of December 31, 2005, portfolio manager compensation generally consists of a fixed base salary determined periodically (typically annually), a bonus and, in certain cases, participation in several types of equity-based compensation plans. A portion of the portfolio manager's compensation may be deferred based on criteria established by FMR or at the election of the portfolio manager. The portfolio manager's base salary is determined by level of responsibility and tenure at FMR or its affiliates.

Mr. Kuldell is an employee of Strategic Advisers, Inc., a subsidiary of FMR Corp and an affiliate of FMR. Strategic Advisors, Inc. is the adviser to the VIP FundsManager Portfolios. The primary components of the portfolio manager's bonus are based on (i) the pre-tax investment performance of the portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) relative to a defined peer group assigned to each fund or account, and (ii) the investment performance of a broad range of other Strategic Adviser funds and accounts. Accounts may include model portfolios designed for asset allocation, retirement planning, or tax-sensitive goals. The pre-tax investment performance of the portfolio manager's fund(s) and account(s) is weighted according to his tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) and the average asset size of those fund(s) and account(s) over his tenure. Each component is calculated separately over the portfolio manager's tenure on those fund(s) and account(s) over a measurement period that initially is contemporaneous with his tenure, but that eventually encompasses rolling periods of up to five years for the comparison to a defined peer group. A smaller, subjective component of the portfolio manager's bonus is based on the portfolio manager's overall contribution to management of Strategic. The portion of the portfolio manager's bonus that is linked to the investment performance of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios is based on each fund's pre-tax investment performance against a combined peer group median, which consists of the median score of all funds in the Morningstar and Lipper fund categories identified below for each fund. The portfolio manager also is compensated under equity-based compensation plans linked to increases or decreases in the net asset value of the stock of FMR Corp., FMR's parent company. FMR Corp. is a diverse financial services company engaged in various activities that include fund management, brokerage, retirement and employer administrative services.

The combined peer group median for each VIP FundsManager Portfolio consists of funds in the following Morningstar and Lipper fund categories:

Portfolio

Morningstar/Lipper Fund Categories

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value, Lipper Money Market Funds

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

Morningstar Intermediate-Term Bond, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Value, Morningstar Foreign Small/Mid Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Blend, Morningstar Foreign Large Growth, Morningstar Foreign Large Value, Morningstar Large Blend, Morningstar Large Growth, Morningstar Large Value, Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend, Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth, Morningstar Mid-Cap Value, Morningstar Small Blend, Morningstar Small Growth, Morningstar Small Value

The portfolio manager's compensation plan may give rise to potential conflicts of interest. The portfolio manager's base pay tends to increase with additional and more complex responsibilities that include increased assets under management and a portion of the bonus relates to marketing efforts, which together indirectly link compensation to sales. When a portfolio manager takes over a fund or an account, the time period over which performance is measured may be adjusted to provide a transition period in which to assess the portfolio. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as a portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. In addition, a fund's trade allocation policies and procedures may give rise to conflicts of interest if the fund's orders do not get fully executed due to being aggregated with those of other accounts managed by FMR. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the fund. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the fund may outperform the securities selected for the fund. Portfolio managers may be permitted to invest in the funds they manage, even if a fund is closed to new investors. Personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; trading in personal accounts is restricted by the fund's Code of Ethics.

The following table provides information relating to other accounts managed by Mr. Kuldell as of December 31, 2005:

Registered
Investment
Companies*

Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles

Other
Accounts

Number of Accounts Managed

4

2,000

none

Number of Accounts Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees

none

none

none

Assets Managed (in millions)

none

$ 611

none

Assets Managed with Performance-Based Advisory Fees (in millions)

none

none

none

* Includes VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed), VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed), VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed) and VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio ($_____ (in millions) assets managed). Each of these funds is expected to commence operations on ________.

The following table sets forth the dollar range of shares of the VIP FundsManager Portfolios beneficially owned by the portfolio manager as of December 31, 2005:

DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES OWNED AS OF 12/31/05

VIP FundsManager 20% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 50% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 70% Portfolio

VIP FundsManager 85% Portfolio

BOARD APPROVAL OF THE EXISTING INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTRACTS

Matters Considered by the Board. The mutual funds for which the members of the Board of Trustees serve as Trustees are referred to herein as the "Fidelity funds." The Board of Trustees is scheduled to meet 11 times a year. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, believes that matters bearing on each fund's advisory contracts are considered at most, if not all, of its meetings. While the full Board of Trustees or the Independent Trustees, as appropriate, act on all major matters, a significant portion of the activities of the Board of Trustees (including certain of those described herein) is conducted through committees. The Independent Trustees meet frequently in executive session and are advised by independent legal counsel selected by the Independent Trustees.

Information Received by the Board of Trustees. In connection with their meetings, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, received materials specifically relating to the existing management contracts and administration agreements (the Investment Advisory Contracts). These materials included (i) information on the investment performance of Fidelity funds, peer groups of funds and appropriate indices or combinations of indices, (ii) sales and redemption data in respect of Fidelity funds, and (iii) the economic outlook and the general investment outlook in the markets in which each fund invests. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considers periodically other material facts such as (1) the Investment Advisers' results and financial condition, (2) arrangements in respect of the distribution of each fund's shares, (3) the procedures employed to determine the value of each fund's assets, (4) the allocation of each fund's brokerage, if any, including allocations to brokers affiliated with the Investment Advisers, the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research and brokerage services, and the use of brokerage commissions to pay fund expenses , (5) the Investment Advisers' management of the relationships with each fund's custodian and subcustodians, (6) the resources devoted to and the record of compliance with each fund's investment policies and restrictions and with policies on personal securities transactions, and (7) the nature, cost and character of non-investment management services provided by the Investment Advisers and their affiliates.

Additional information was furnished by the Investment Advisers including, among other items, information on and analysis of (a) the overall organization of the Investment Advisers, (b) investment performance, (c) the impact of performance adjustments to management fees, (d) the choice of performance indices and benchmarks, (e) the composition of peer groups of funds, (f) transfer agency and bookkeeping fees paid to affiliates of the Investment Advisers, (g) investment management staffing, (h) the potential for achieving further economies of scale, (i) operating expenses paid to third parties, and (j) the information furnished to investors, including each fund's shareholders.

In considering the Investment Advisory Contracts, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, did not identify any single factor as all-important or controlling, and the following summary does not detail all the matters considered. Matters considered by the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, in connection with its approval of the Investment Advisory Contracts include the following:

Benefits to Shareholders. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the benefit to shareholders of investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds offering a variety of investment disciplines and providing for a large variety of fund and shareholder services.

The Investment Advisers' Personnel and Methods. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, reviews at least annually the background of each fund's portfolio manager and each fund's investment objective and discipline. The Independent Trustees have also had discussions with senior management of the Investment Advisers responsible for investment operations and the senior management of Fidelity's equity group. Among other things they considered the size, education and experience of the Investment Advisers' investment staff, their use of technology, and the Investment Advisers' approach to recruiting, training and retaining portfolio managers and other research, advisory and management personnel.

Nature and Quality of Other Services. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the nature, quality, cost and extent of administrative and shareholder services performed by the Investment Advisers and affiliated companies, under the existing Investment Advisory Contracts and under separate agreements covering transfer agency functions and pricing, bookkeeping and securities lending services, if any. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, has also considered the nature and extent of the Investment Advisers' supervision of third party service providers, principally custodians and subcustodians.

Expenses. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered each fund's expense ratio, and expense ratios of a peer group of funds. It also considered the amount and nature of fees paid by shareholders.

Economies of Scale. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered whether there have been economies of scale in respect of the management of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds have appropriately benefitted from any economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, has concluded that any potential economies of scale are being shared between fund shareholders and the Investment Advisers in an appropriate manner.

Other Benefits to the Investment Advisers. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considered the character and amount of fees paid by each fund and each fund's shareholders for services provided by the Investment Advisers and their affiliates, including fees for services like transfer agency, fund accounting, and direct shareholder services. It also considered the allocation of fund brokerage to brokers affiliated with the Investment Advisers, the receipt of sales loads and payments under Rule 12b-1 plans in respect of certain of the Fidelity funds, and benefits to the Investment Advisers from the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research and brokerage services. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, also considered the revenues and profitability of the Investment Advisers' businesses other than their mutual fund business, including the Investment Advisers' retail brokerage, correspondent brokerage, capital markets, trust, investment advisory, pension record keeping, insurance, publishing, real estate, international research and investment funds, and others. The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered the intangible benefits that accrue to the Investment Advisers and their affiliates by virtue of their relationship with each fund.

Conclusion. Based on its evaluation of all material factors and assisted by the advice of independent counsel, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, concluded that the existing advisory fee structures are fair and reasonable, and that the existing Investment Advisory Contracts should be approved.

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

The following Proxy Voting Guidelines were established by the Board of Trustees of the funds, after consultation with Fidelity. (The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Fidelity and by the Independent Trustees of the Fidelity funds, and, accordingly, are subject to change.)

I. General Principles

A. Except as set forth herein, FMR will generally vote in favor of routine management proposals. FMR will generally oppose shareholder proposals that do not appear reasonably likely to enhance the economic returns or profitability of the portfolio company or to maximize shareholder value.

B. Non-routine proposals will generally be voted in accordance with the guidelines.

C. Non-routine proposals not covered by the following guidelines or other special circumstances will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from the appropriate FMR analyst or portfolio manager, as applicable, subject to review by the General Counsel or Compliance Officer of FMR or the General Counsel of FMR Corp. A significant pattern of such proposals or other special circumstances will be referred to the Operations Committee or its designee.

D. Voting of shares will be conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of mutual fund shareholders as follows: (i) securities of a portfolio company will generally be voted in a manner consistent with the Proxy Voting Guidelines; and (ii) voting will be done without regard to any other Fidelity companies' relationship, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company.

E. The FMR Investment & Advisor Compliance Department votes proxies. In the event an Investment & Advisor Compliance employee has a personal conflict with a portfolio company or an employee or director of a portfolio company, that employee will withdraw from making any proxy voting decisions with respect to that portfolio company. A conflict of interest arises when there are factors that may prompt one to question whether a Fidelity employee is acting solely in the best interests of Fidelity and its customers. Employees are expected to avoid situations that could present even the appearance of a conflict between their interests and the interests of Fidelity and its customers.

II. Definitions (as used in this document)

A. Large capitalization company - a company included in the Russell 1000 stock index.

B. Small capitalization company - a company not included in the Russell 1000 stock index.

C. Anti-takeover plan - includes fair price amendments; classified boards; "blank check" preferred stock; golden and tin parachutes; supermajority provisions; poison pills; and any other plan that eliminates or limits shareholder rights.

D. Poison Pill Plan - a strategy employed by a potential take-over/target company to make its stock less attractive to an acquirer. Such plans are generally designed to dilute the acquirer's ownership and value in the event of a take-over.

E. Golden parachute - accelerated options and/or employment contracts for officers and directors that will result in a lump sum payment of more than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) in the event of termination following a change in control.

F. Tin parachute - accelerated options and/or employment contracts for employees beyond officers and directors that will result in a lump sum payment in the event of termination.

G. Sunset provision - a condition in a charter or plan that specifies an expiration date.

H. Greenmail - payment of a premium to a raider trying to take over a company through a proxy contest or other means.

III. Directors

A. Incumbent Directors

FMR will generally vote in favor of incumbent and nominee directors except where one or more such directors clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable judgment. FMR will also generally withhold authority on the election of directors if:

1. An anti-takeover provision was introduced, an anti-takeover provision was extended, or a new anti-takeover provision was adopted upon the expiration of an existing anti-takeover provision, without shareholder approval except as set forth below.

With respect to poison pills, FMR will consider not withholding authority on the election of directors if all of the following conditions are met when a poison pill is introduced, extended, or adopted:

a. The poison pill includes a sunset provision of less than 5 years;

b. The poison pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; and

c. Shareholder approval is required to reinstate the poison pill upon expiration.

FMR will also consider not withholding authority on the election of directors when one or more of the conditions above are not met if the board is willing to strongly consider seeking shareholder ratification of, or adding a sunset provision meeting the above conditions to, an existing poison pill. In such a case, if the company does not take appropriate action prior to the next annual shareholder meeting, FMR will withhold authority on the election of directors.

2. The company refuses, upon request by FMR, to amend a Poison Pill Plan to allow Fidelity to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

3. Within the last year and without shareholder approval, the company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options held by officers and directors which, together with all other options repriced under the same stock option plan (whether held by officers, directors, or other employees) exceed 5% (for a large capitalization company) or 10% (for a small capitalization company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.

4. The company failed to act in the best interests of shareholders when approving executive compensation, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company used an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee engaged independent compensation consultants.

B. Indemnification

FMR will generally vote in favor of charter and by-law amendments expanding the indemnification of Directors and/or limiting their liability for breaches of care unless FMR is otherwise dissatisfied with the performance of management or the proposal is accompanied by anti-takeover measures.

C. Independent Chairperson

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson. However, FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson appears likely to further the interests of shareholders and to promote effective oversight of management by the board of directors.

IV. Compensation

A. Equity Award Plans (including stock options, restricted stock awards, and other stock awards)

FMR will generally vote against Equity Award Plans or amendments to authorize additional shares under such plans if:

1. (a) The dilution effect of the shares authorized under the plan, plus the shares reserved for issuance pursuant to all other stock plans, is greater than 10% (for large capitalization companies) or 15% (for small capitalization companies) and (b) there were no circumstances specific to the company or the plans that lead FMR to conclude that the level of dilution in the Plan or the amendments is acceptable.

2. In the case of stock option plans, (a) the offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus; (b) the plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options; or (c) the Board/Committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past 2 years.

However, option repricing may be acceptable if all of the following conditions, as specified by the plan's express terms or board resolution, are met:

a. The repricing is rarely used and, when used, is authorized by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors to fulfill a legitimate corporate purpose such as retention of a key employee;

b. The repricing is limited to no more than 5% (large capitalization company) or 10% (small capitalization company) of the shares currently authorized for grant under the plan.

3. The Board may materially alter the plan without shareholder approval, including by increasing the benefits accrued to participants under the plan; increasing the number of securities which may be issued under the plan; modifying the requirements for participation in the plan; or including a provision allowing the Board to lapse or waive restrictions at its discretion.

4. The granting of awards to non-employee directors is subject to management discretion.

5. In the case of stock awards, the restriction period, or holding period after exercise, is less than 3 years for non-performance-based awards, and less than 1 year for performance-based awards.

FMR will consider approving an Equity Award Plan or an amendment to authorize additional shares under such plan if, without complying with guidelines 2(a), 3, and 4 immediately above, the following two conditions are met:

1. The shares are granted by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors; and

2. The shares are limited to 5% (large capitalization company) and 10% (small capitalization company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.

B. Equity Exchanges and Repricing

FMR will generally vote in favor of a management proposal to exchange shares or reprice outstanding options if the proposed exchange or repricing is consistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as:

1. Whether the proposal excludes senior management and directors;

2. Whether the equity proposed to be exchanged or repriced exceeded FMR's dilution thresholds when initially granted;

3. Whether the exchange or repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable pricing model;

4. The company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries;

5. Economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and

6. Any other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether an exchange or repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.

C. Employee Stock Purchase Plans

FMR will generally vote against employee stock purchase plans if the plan violates any of the criteria in section IV(A) above, except that the minimum stock purchase price may be equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value if the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity. In the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, FMR may permit a lower minimum stock purchase price equal to the prevailing "best practices" in the relevant non-U.S. market, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.

D. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

FMR will generally vote in favor of non-leveraged ESOPs. For leveraged ESOPs, FMR may examine the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. FMR may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. FMR will generally vote against leveraged ESOPs if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon change in control.

E. Executive Compensation

FMR will generally vote against management proposals on stock-based compensation plans or other compensation plans if such proposals are inconsistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company has an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee has authority to engage independent compensation consultants.

V. Anti-Takeover Plans

FMR will generally vote against a proposal to adopt or approve the adoption of an anti-takeover plan unless:

A. The proposal requires that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on the adoption of anti-takeover provision amendments.

B. The anti-takeover plan includes the following:

1. the board has adopted an anti-takeover plan with a sunset provision of no greater than 5 years;

2. the anti-takeover plan is linked to a business strategy that is expected to result in greater value for the shareholders;

3. shareholder approval is required to reinstate the anti-takeover plan upon expiration;

4. the anti-takeover plan contains a provision suspending its application, by shareholder referendum, in the event a potential acquirer announces a bona fide offer, made for all outstanding shares; and

5. the anti-takeover plan allows the Fidelity funds to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

C. It is an anti-greenmail proposal that does not include other anti-takeover provisions.

D. It is a fair price amendment that considers a two-year price history or less.

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to eliminate anti-takeover plans. In the case of proposals to declassify a board of directors, FMR will generally vote against such a proposal if the issuer's Articles of Incorporation or applicable statutes include a provision whereby a majority of directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by written consent, or other reasonable procedures, by a majority of shareholders entitled to vote for the election of directors.

VI. Capital Structure/Incorporation

A. Increases in Common Stock

FMR will generally vote against a provision to increase a Company's common stock if such increase is greater than 3 times outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares, including stock options, except in the case of real estate investment trusts, where an increase of up to 5 times is generally acceptable.

B. New Classes of Shares

FMR will generally vote against the introduction of new classes of stock with differential voting rights.

C. Cumulative Voting Rights

FMR will generally vote in favor of introduction and against elimination of cumulative voting rights where this is determined to enhance portfolio interests of minority shareholders.

D. Acquisition or Business Combination Statutes

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to opt out of the control shares acquisition or business combination statutes.

E. Incorporation or Reincorporation in Another State or Country

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending that a portfolio company reincorporate in the United States and vote in favor of management proposals to reincorporate in a jurisdiction outside the United States if (i) it is lawful under United States, state and other applicable law for the company to be incorporated under the laws of the relevant foreign jurisdiction and to conduct its business and (ii) reincorporating or maintaining a domicile in the United States would likely give rise to adverse tax or other economic consequences detrimental to the interests of the company and its shareholders. However, FMR will consider supporting such shareholder proposals and opposing such management proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, reincorporating in or maintaining a domicile in the relevant foreign jurisdiction gives rise to significant risks or other potential adverse consequences that appear reasonably likely to be detrimental to the interests of the company or its shareholders.

VII. Auditors

A. FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending periodic rotation of a portfolio company's auditor. FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, a company's board of directors and audit committee clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable business judgment in the selection of the company's auditor.

B. FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the prohibition or limitation of the performance of non-audit services by a portfolio company's auditor. FMR will also generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending removal of a company's auditor due to, among other reasons, the performance of non-audit work by the auditor. FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, a company's board of directors and audit committee clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable business judgment in the oversight of the performance of the auditor of audit or non-audit services for the company.

VIII. Other

A. Voting Process

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to adopt Confidential Voting and Independent Vote Tabulation practices.

B. Regulated Industries

Voting of shares in securities of any regulated industry (e.g. U.S. banking) organization shall be conducted in a manner consistent with conditions that may be specified by the industry's regulator (e.g. the Federal Reserve Board) for a determination under applicable law (e.g. federal banking law) that no Fund or group of Funds has acquired control of such organization.

To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, if applicable, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a distribution agreement with FDC, an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR. The principal business address of FDC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. FDC is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. The distribution agreements call for FDC to use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of each fund, which are continuously offered at NAV. Promotional and administrative expenses in connection with the offer and sale of shares are paid by Strategic Advisers or FMR.

The Trustees have approved Distribution and Service Plans on behalf of Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio (the Plans) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the Rule). The Rule provides in substance that a mutual fund may not engage directly or indirectly in financing any activity that is primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund except pursuant to a plan approved on behalf of the fund under the Rule. The Plans, as approved by the Trustees, allow Service Class and Service Class 2, Strategic Advisers, and FMR to incur certain expenses that might be considered to constitute direct or indirect payment by the funds of distribution expenses.

The Rule 12b-1 Plan adopted for Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio is described in the prospectus for that class.

Under each Service Class and Service Class 2 Plan, if the payment of management fees by each VIP FundsManager Portfolio to Strategic Advisers, or the payment of administration fees by Strategic Advisers to FMR out of the management fees, is deemed to be indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment is authorized by the Plan. Each Service Class and Service Class 2 Plan specifically recognizes that Strategic Advisers or FMR may use its past profits or its other resources, including management fees paid to Strategic Advisers by the funds, or administration fees paid to FMR by Strategic Advisers out of the management fees, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Service Class and Service Class 2 shares and/or support services that benefit variable product owners. In addition, each Investor Class Plan provides that Strategic Advisers or FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, primarily insurance companies or their affiliated broker-dealers or other service-providers, that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for Service Class and Service Class 2 shares of the VIP FundManager Portfolios.

Prior to approving each Plan, the Trustees carefully considered all pertinent factors relating to the implementation of the Plan, and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio and variable product owners. To the extent that each Plan gives Strategic Advisers, FMR, and FDC greater flexibility in connection with the distribution of class shares, additional sales of class shares or stabilization of cash flows may result. Furthermore, certain support services that benefit variable product owners may be provided more effectively under the Plans by insurance companies and their affiliates with whom variable product owners have other relationships.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio may execute portfolio transactions with, and purchase securities issued by, depository institutions that receive payments under the Plans. No preference for the instruments of such depository institutions will be shown in the selection of investments.

FDC or an affiliate may compensate intermediaries (primarily insurance companies or their affiliated broker-dealers or other service-providers) that distribute and/or service the funds. A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. Such factors may include, without limitation, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of assets or sale of shares, the placing of the funds on a preferred or recommended fund list, access to an intermediary's personnel, and other factors. The total amount paid to intermediaries in the aggregate currently will not exceed 0.10% of the total assets of all VIP Funds on an annual basis. In addition to such payments, FDC or an affiliate may offer other incentives such as sponsorship of educational or client seminars relating to current products and issues, assistance in training and educating the intermediaries' personnel, payments or reimbursements for travel and related expenses associated with due diligence trips that an intermediary may undertake in order to explore possible business relationships with affiliates of FDC, and/or payments of costs and expenses associated with attendance at seminars, including travel, lodging, entertainment and meals. FDC anticipates that payments will be made to over a hundred intermediaries, including some of the largest broker-dealers and other financial firms, and these payments may be significant to the intermediaries. As permitted by SEC and National Association of Securities Dealers rules and other applicable laws and regulations, FDC or an affiliate may pay or allow other incentives or payments to intermediaries.

These additional payments and expenses, which are sometimes referred to as "revenue sharing," may represent a premium over payments made by other fund families, and investment professionals may have an added incentive to sell or recommend a fund or a share class over others offered by competing fund families.

The funds' transfer agent or affiliate may also make payments and reimbursements from their own resources to certain intermediaries for performing recordkeeping and other services. Please see "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" in this SAI for more information.

TRANSFER AND SERVICE AGENT AGREEMENTS

Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has entered into a transfer agent agreement with Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (FIIOC), an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR, which is located at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Under the terms of the agreements, FIIOC (or an agent, including an affiliate) performs transfer agency, dividend disbursing, and shareholder services for Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio.

For providing transfer agency services, FIIOC receives no fees from each VIP FundsManager Portfolio; however, each underlying Fidelity fund pays its respective transfer, dividend disbursing, and shareholder servicing agent (either FSC or FIIOC or an affiliate of FSC or FIIOC, as applicable) fees based, in part, on the number of positions in and assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio invested in such underlying Fidelity fund.

FIIOC pays out-of-pocket expenses associated with providing transfer agent services. In addition, FIIOC bears the expense of typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, and all other reports, notices, and statements to existing shareholders, with the exception of proxy statements.

FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments out of its own resources to intermediaries for transfer agency and related recordkeeping services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts in amounts that do not exceed the total transfer agent fee paid by Service Class and Service Class 2 of each fund. Because intermediaries may be paid varying amounts for recordkeeping and administrative services, such payments may provide incentives for intermediaries to favor one fund family over another.

FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments out of its own resources to Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company (FILI) for transfer agency and related separate account services with respect to insurance contract owners' accounts, in amounts that do not exceed the total transfer agent fee by Service Class and Service Class 2 of each fund.

Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has also entered into a service agent agreement with FSC, an affiliate of Strategic Advisers and FMR (or an agent, including an affiliate). Each VIP FundsManager Portfolio has also entered into a securities lending administration agreement with FSC. Under the terms of the agreements, FSC calculates the NAV and dividends for Service Class and Service Class 2 of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio, maintains each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's portfolio and general accounting records, and administers each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program.

For providing pricing and bookkeeping services, FSC receives a monthly fee based on each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's average daily net assets throughout the month.

For administering each VIP FundsManager Portfolio's securities lending program, FSC is paid based on the number and duration of individual securities loans.

FMR bears the cost of pricing and bookkeeping services and administration of the securities lending program under the terms of its administration agreements with Strategic Advisers.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST

Trust Organization. FundsManager 20% Portfolio, FundsManager 50% Portfolio, FundsManager 70% Portfolio, and FundsManager 85% Portfolio are funds of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV, an open-end management investment company created under an initial declaration of trust dated June 1, 1983. On December 14, 2000, Variable Insurance Products Fund IV changed its name from Fidelity Advisor Series VI to Variable Insurance Products Fund IV. Currently, there are 33 funds offered in Variable Insurance Products Fund IV: Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, FundsManager 20% Portfolio, FundsManager 50% Portfolio, FundsManager 70% Portfolio, FundsManager 85% Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Investor Freedom Income Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio. The Trustees are permitted to create additional funds in the trust and to create additional classes of the funds.

The assets of the trust received for the issue or sale of shares of each of its funds and all income, earnings, profits, and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of creditors, are allocated to such fund, and constitute the underlying assets of such fund. The underlying assets of each fund in the trust shall be charged with the liabilities and expenses attributable to such fund, except that liabilities and expenses may be allocated to a particular class. Any general expenses of the trust shall be allocated between or among any one or more of its funds or classes.

Shareholder Liability. The trust is an entity commonly known as a "Massachusetts business trust." Under Massachusetts law, shareholders of such a trust may, under certain circumstances, be held personally liable for the obligations of the trust.

The Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for the debts, liabilities, obligations, and expenses of the trust or fund. The Declaration of Trust provides that the trust shall not have any claim against shareholders except for the payment of the purchase price of shares and requires that each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by the trust or the Trustees relating to the trust or to a fund shall include a provision limiting the obligations created thereby to the trust or to one or more funds and its or their assets. The Declaration of Trust further provides that shareholders of a fund shall not have a claim on or right to any assets belonging to any other fund.

The Declaration of Trust provides for indemnification out of each fund's property of any shareholder or former shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the fund solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason. The Declaration of Trust also provides that each fund shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of the fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which a fund itself would be unable to meet its obligations. Strategic Advisers believes that, in view of the above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is remote. Claims asserted against one class of shares may subject holders of another class of shares to certain liabilities.

Voting Rights. Each fund's capital consists of shares of beneficial interest. Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value they own. The voting rights of shareholders can be changed only by a shareholder vote. Shares may be voted in the aggregate, by fund, and by class.

The shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set forth under the heading "Shareholder Liability" above.

On matters submitted for consideration by shareholders of any underlying fund, a VIP FundsManager Portfolio will vote its shares in proportion to the vote of all other holders of shares of that underlying fund.

The trust or a fund or a class may be terminated upon the sale of its assets to, or merger with, another open-end management investment company, series, or class thereof, or upon liquidation and distribution of its assets. The Trustees may reorganize, terminate, merge, or sell all or a portion of the assets of the trust or a fund or a class without prior shareholder approval. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of the trust, shareholders of each of its funds are entitled to receive the underlying assets of such fund available for distribution. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of a fund or a class, shareholders of that fund or that class are entitled to receive the underlying assets of the fund or class available for distribution.

Custodians. ____________ is custodian of the assets of each VIP FundsManager Portfolio. The custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of a fund's assets and the appointment of any subcustodian banks and clearing agencies. The Bank of New York and JPMorgan Chase Bank, each headquartered in New York, also may serve as special purpose custodians of certain assets in connection with repurchase agreement transactions.

FMR, its officers and directors, its affiliated companies, Members of the Advisory Board, and Members of the Board of Trustees may, from time to time, conduct transactions with various banks, including banks serving as custodians for certain funds advised by FMR. Transactions that have occurred to date include mortgages and personal and general business loans. In the judgment of FMR, the terms and conditions of those transactions were not influenced by existing or potential custodial or other fund relationships.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. ____________, independent registered public accounting firm, examines financial statements for each fund and provides other audit, tax, and related services.

FUND HOLDINGS INFORMATION

Each fund views holdings information as sensitive and limits its dissemination. The Board authorized FMR to establish and administer guidelines for the dissemination of fund holdings information, which may be amended at any time without prior notice. FMR's Disclosure Policy Committee (comprised of executive officers of FMR and its affiliates) evaluates disclosure policy with the goal of serving a fund's best interests by striking an appropriate balance between providing information about a fund's portfolio and protecting a fund from potentially harmful disclosure. The Board reviews the administration and modification of these guidelines and receives reports from the funds' chief compliance officer periodically.

Each fund will provide a full list of holdings as of the end of the fund's fiscal quarter on www.advisor.fidelity.com (Literature) 60 days after its fiscal quarter-end. Each fund will also provide a list of the underlying funds it holds as of the end of the calendar quarter on Fidelity's web site 15 or more days after the calendar quarter-end.

This information will be available on the web site until updated for the next applicable period.

The Use of Holdings In Connection With Fund Operations. Material non-public holdings information may be provided as part of the investment activities of each fund to: entities which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their respective duties to the fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed; other parties if legally required; or persons FMR believes will not misuse the disclosed information. These entities include: a fund's trustees; a fund's manager, its sub-adviser and its affiliates whose access persons are subject to a code of ethics; a fund's auditors; a fund's custodians; proxy voting service providers; financial printers; pricing service vendors; broker-dealers in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities; securities lending agents; counsel to a fund or its Independent Trustees; regulatory authorities; stock exchanges and other listing organizations; parties to litigation; an issuer, regarding the number of shares of the issuer (or percentage of outsourcing shares) held by a fund; and third-parties in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding relating to a fund holding.

Other Uses Of Holdings Information. In addition, each fund may provide material non-public holdings information to (i) third-parties that calculate information derived from holdings for use by FMR or its affiliates, (ii) third parties that supply their analyses of holdings (but not the holdings themselves) to their clients (including sponsors of retirement plans or their consultants), (iii) ratings and rankings organizations, and (iv) an investment adviser, trustee, or their agents to whom holdings are disclosed for due diligence purposes or in anticipation of a merger involving a fund. Each individual request is reviewed by the Disclosure Policy Committee which must find, in its sole discretion that, based on the specific facts and circumstances, the disclosure appears unlikely to be harmful to a fund. Entities receiving this information must have in place control mechanisms to reasonably ensure or otherwise agree that, (a) the holdings information will be kept confidential, (b) no employee shall use the information to effect trading or for their personal benefit, and (c) the nature and type of information that they, in turn, may disclose to third-parties is limited. FMR relies primarily on the existence of non-disclosure agreements and/or control mechanisms when determining that disclosure is not likely to be harmful to a fund.

At this time, the entities receiving information described in the preceding paragraph are: Factset (full holdings daily, on the next day); iMoneynet (aggregate holdings weekly, one day after the end of the week); Kynex (full holdings weekly, one day after the end of the week); Vestek (full holdings, as of the end of the calendar quarter, 15 days after the calendar quarter-end); S&P (full holdings weekly, six days after the end of the week); and Moody's Investor Services (full holdings weekly, six days after the end of the week).

FMR, its affiliates, or the funds will not enter into any arrangements with third-parties from which they derive consideration for the disclosure of material non-public holdings information. If, in the future, FMR desired to make such an arrangement, it would seek prior Board approval and any such arrangements would be disclosed in the funds' SAI.

There can be no assurance that the funds' policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of fund portfolio holdings will prevent the misuse of such information by individuals and firms that receive such information.

APPENDIX

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, and Strategic Advisers are registered trademarks of FMR Corp.

VIP FundsManager Portfolio is a service mark of FMR Corp.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

The term "VIP" as used in this document refers to Fidelity Variable Insurance Products.

Variable Insurance Products Fund IV

Post-Effective Amendment No. 81

PART C. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 23. Exhibits

(a) (1) Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated February 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 53.

(2) Amendment to the Declaration of Trust, dated December 14, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(b) Bylaws of the Trust, as amended and dated June 17, 2004, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (b) of Fidelity Summer Street Trust's (File No. 002-58542) Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(c) Not applicable.

(d) (1) Management Contract between Consumer Industries Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(2) Management Contract between Cyclical Industries Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(3) Management Contract between Financial Services Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(4) Management Contract between Growth Stock Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated November 14, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(5) Management Contract between Health Care Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(6) Management Contract between International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(7) Management Contract between Natural Resources Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(5) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(8) Management Contract between Real Estate Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated July 18, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit d(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(9) Management Contract between Strategic Income Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(8) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(10) Management Contract between Technology Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(11) Management Contract between Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(12) Management Contract between Value Leaders Portfolio and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated April 17, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(13) Management Contract between Freedom 2005 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(13) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(14) Management Contract between Freedom 2010 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(14) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(15) Management Contract between Freedom 2015 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(15) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(16) Management Contract between Freedom 2020 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(16) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(17) Management Contract between Freedom 2025 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(18) Management Contract between Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(18) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(19) Management Contract between Freedom Income Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(19) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(20) Form of Management Contract between Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(21) Form of Management Contract between Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(21) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(22) Form of Management Contract between Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(22) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(23) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(23) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(24) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(24) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(25) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(25) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(26) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(26) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(27) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(27) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(28) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(28) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(29) Form of Management Contract between Investor Freedom Income Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(29) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(30) Form of Management Contract between FundsManager 20% Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(30).

(31) Form of Management Contract between FundsManager 50% Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(31).

(32) Form of Management Contract between FundsManager 70% Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(32).

(33) Form of Management Contract between FundsManager 85% Portfolio and Strategic Advisers, Inc., is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(33).

(34) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2005 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(30) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(35) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2010 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(31) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(36) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2015 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(32) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(37) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2020 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(38) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2025 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(34) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(39) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom 2030 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(35) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(40) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company, dated March 17, 2005, for Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(36) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(41) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(37) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(42) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(38) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(43) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(39) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(44) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(40) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(45) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(41) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(46) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(42) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(47) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(43) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(48) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(44) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(49) Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, dated June 16, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(45) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(50) Form of Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for FundsManager 20% Portfolio is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(50).

(51) Form of Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for FundsManager 50% Portfolio is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(51).

(52) Form of Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for FundsManager 70% Portfolio is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(52).

(53) Form of Administration Agreement between Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Fidelity Management & Research Company for FundsManager 85% Portfolio is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(53).

(54) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(55) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Cyclical Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(13) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(56) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Financial Services Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(16) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(57) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Growth Stock Portfolio, dated November 14, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(58) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Health Care Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(19) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(59) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(18) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(60) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(22) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(61) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Real Estate Portfolio, dated July 18, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit d(22) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(62) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(19) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(63) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Technology Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(25) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(64) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(28) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(65) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. on behalf of Value Leaders Portfolio, dated April 17, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(66) Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated August 1, 2001, between Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. and Fidelity Investments Japan Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(17) of Fidelity Hastings Street Trust's (File No. 002-11517) Post-Effective Amendment No. 108.

(67) Schedule A, dated December 16, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated August 1, 2001, between Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. and Fidelity Investments Japan Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is filed herein as exhibit (d)(60).

(68) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(11) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(69) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Cyclical Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(14) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(70) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Financial Services Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(71) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Growth Stock Portfolio, dated November 14, 2002 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(27) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(72) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Health Care Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(73) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(74) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(23) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(75) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Real Estate Portfolio, dated July 18, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(31) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(76) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(77) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Technology Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(26) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(78) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(29) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(79) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. on behalf of Value Leaders Portfolio, dated April 17, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(32) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(80) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(12) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(81) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Cyclical Industries Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(15) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(82) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Financial Services Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(18) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(83) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Growth Stock Portfolio dated November 14, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(37) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(84) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Health Care Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(21) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(85) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(45) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(86) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(24) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(87) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Real Estate Portfolio, dated July 18, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(40) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(88) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(44) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(89) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Technology Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(27) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(90) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(30) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(91) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and FMR Co., Inc. on behalf of Value Leaders Portfolio, dated April 17, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(42) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(92) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(48) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(93) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity International Investment Advisors on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(66) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(94) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity International Investment Advisors on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(49) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 65.

(95) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(68) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(96) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(50) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 65.

(97) Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Investments Japan Limited and Fidelity International Investment Advisors on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(56) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(98) Master International Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity International Investment Advisors, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(19) of Fidelity Hastings Street Trust's (File No. 002-11517) Post-Effective Amendment No. 110.

(99) Schedule A, dated December 16, 2004, to the Master International Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity International Investment Advisors, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Aprreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit d(60) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(100) Sub-Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(21) of Fidelity Hastings Street Trust's (File No. 002-11517) Post-Effective Amendment No. 110.

(101) Schedule A, dated November 18, 2004, to the Sub-Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit d(94) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(102) Sub-Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity Investments Japan Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(23) of Fidelity Hastings Street Trust's (File No. 002-11517) Post-Effective Amendment No. 110.

(103) Schedule A, dated November 18, 2004, to the Sub-Research Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors and Fidelity Investments Japan Limited, on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is filed herein as Exhibit (d)(96).

(104) Form of Sub-Advisory Agreement between Fidelity Investments Japan Limited and Fidelity Internation Investment Advisors on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(58) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(e) (1) General Distribution Agreement between Consumer Industries Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(2) General Distribution Agreement between Cyclical Industries Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(3) General Distribution Agreement between Financial Services Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(4) General Distribution Agreement between Growth Stock Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated November 14, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(5) General Distribution Agreement between Health Care Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(6) General Distribution Agreement between International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated November 18, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(7) General Distribution Agreement between Natural Resources Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(5) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(8) General Distribution Agreement between Real Estate Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated July 18, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(9) General Distribution Agreement between Strategic Income Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated November 20, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(8) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(10) General Distribution Agreement between Technology Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(11) General Distribution Agreement between Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated June 15, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(12) General Distribution Agreement between Value Leaders Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated April 17, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(13) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2005 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(13) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(14) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2010 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(14) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(15) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2015 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(15) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(16) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2020 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(16) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(17) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2025 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(17) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(18) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, dated March 17, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(18) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(19) General Distribution Agreement between Freedom Income Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit e(19) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(20) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(21) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(21) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(22) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(22) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(23) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(23) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(24) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(24) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(25) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(25) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(26) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(26) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(27) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(27) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(28) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(28) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(29) Form of General Distribution Agreement between Investor Freedom Income Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(29) of Post-Effective Amendment 78.

(30) Form of General Distribution Agreement between FundsManager 20% Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is filed herein as Exhibit (e)(30).

(31) Form of General Distribution Agreement between FundsManager 50% Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is filed herein as Exhibit (e)(31).

(32) Form of General Distribution Agreement between FundsManager 70% Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is filed herein as Exhibit (e)(32).

(33) Form of General Distribution Agreement between FundsManager 85% Portfolio and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is filed herein as Exhibit (e)(33).

(34) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Initial Class shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(8) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(35) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Service Class shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(9) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(36) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Service Class 2 shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(37) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Initial Class R shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit e(16) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(38) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Service Class R shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(39) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Service Class 2 R shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(18) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(40) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Investor Class shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(26) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 77.

(41) Form of Service Contract between Fidelity Distributors Corporation and "Qualified Recipients" with respect to Investor Class R shares is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(27) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 77.

(f) The Fee Deferral Plan for Non-Interested Person Directors and Trustees of the Fidelity Funds, effective as of September 15, 1995 and amended through January 1, 2000, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (f)(1) of Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-75537) Post-Effective Amendment No. 39.

(g) (1) Custodian Agreement and Appendix C, dated July 1, 2001, between Brown Brothers Harriman & Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Value Leaders Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(5) of Fidelity Advisor Series VII's (File No. 002-67004) Post-Effective Amendment No. 46.

(2) Appendix A, dated December 21, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Brown Brothers Harriman & Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference by Exhibit (g)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 72.

(3) Appendix B, dated April 7, 2003, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Brown Brothers Harriman & Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(3) of Fidelity Advisor Series VIII's (File No. 002-86711) Post-Effective Amendment No. 73.

(4) Appendix D, dated June 1, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Brown Brothers Harriman & Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(4) of Fidelity Securities Fund's (File No. 002-93601) Post-Effective Amendment No. 60.

(5) Custodian Agreement and Appendix C, dated July 1, 2001, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (currently known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, and Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(1) of Fidelity Advisor Series VII's (File No. 002-67004) Post-Effective Amendment No. 46.

(6) Appendix A, dated October 27, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (currently known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, and Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(6) of Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust's (File No. 002-79755) Post-Effective Amendment No. 43.

(7) Appendix B, dated October 10, 2003, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (currently known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, and Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(11) of Variable Insurance Products Fund II's (File No. 003-20773) Post-Effective Amendment No. 42.

(8) Appendix D, dated June 1, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (currently known as JPMorgan Chase Bank) and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, and Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(4) of Fidelity Revere Street Trust's (File No. 811-07807) Amendment No. 20.

(9) Custodian Agreement and Appendix C, dated July 1, 2001, between Mellon Bank, N.A. and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, and Strategic Income Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(9) of Fidelity Capital Trust's (File No. 002-61760) Post-Effective Amendment No. 81.

(10) Appendix A, dated April 21, 2005, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Mellon Bank, N.A. and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, and Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(18) of Fidelity Securities Fund's (File No. 002-93601) Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(11) Appendix B, dated August 25, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Mellon Bank, N.A. and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, and Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(19) of Fidelity Securities Fund's (File No. 002-93601) Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(12) Appendix D, dated June 1, 2004, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between Mellon Bank, N.A. and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, and Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(11) of Fidelity Advisor Series II's (File No. 033-06516) Post-Effective Amendment No. 69.

(13) Custodian Agreement and Appendix C, dated July 1, 2001, between State Street Bank and Trust Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(9) of Fidelity Advisor Series VII's (File No. 002-67004) Post-Effective Amendment No. 46.

(14) Appendix A, dated February 27, 2002, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between State Street Bank and Trust Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(2) of Fidelity Magellan Fund's (File No. 002-21461) Post-Effective Amendment No. 50.

(15) Appendix B, dated April 7, 2003, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between State Street Bank and Trust Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(15) of Fidelity Securities Fund's (File No. 002-93601) Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(16) Appendix D, dated February 20, 2002, to the Custodian Agreement, dated July 1, 2001, between State Street Bank and Trust Company and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Natural Resources Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(14) of Variable Insurance Products Fund's (File No. 002-75010) Post-Effective Amendment No. 52.

(17) Forms of Custodian Agreement, Appendix B, Appendix C, and Appendix D between Mellon Bank N.A. and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(18) Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated February 12, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(d) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(19) Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated February 12, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(e) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(20) Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated November 13, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(f) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(21) Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated November 13, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(g) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(22) Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated May 11, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(h) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(23) First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, dated July 14, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(i) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(24) Schedule A-1, dated December 12, 2003, to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreements, Schedule 1s to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreements, Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement, and First Amendment to the Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement, between the respective parties and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(19) of Fidelity Devonshire Trust's (File No. 002-24389) Post-Effective Amendment No. 107.

(25) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(29) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(26) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(30) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(27) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(31) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(28) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(32) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(29) Form of Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(30) Form of First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Strategic Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(34) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 63.

(31) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(31) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(32) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(32) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(33) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(34) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(34) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(35) Form of Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(35) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(36) Form of First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of International Capital Appreciation Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(36) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 66.

(37) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(37) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(38) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(38) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(39) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(39) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(40) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(40) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(41) Form of Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(41) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(42) Form of First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(42) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 68.

(43) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(44) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(44) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(45) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(45) Form of Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(46) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(46) Form of Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(47) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(47) Form of Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(48) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(48) Form of First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York and Variable Insurance Products Fund IV on behalf of Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(49) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(h) Not applicable.

(i) Not applicable.

(j) To be filed by subsequent amendment.

(k) Not applicable.

(l) Not applicable.

(m) (1) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Consumer Industries Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(2) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Cyclical Industries Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(3) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Financial Services Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(4) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Growth Stock Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 59.

(5) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Health Care Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(6) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(7) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Initial Class R is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(8) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Natural Resources Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(5) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(9) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Real Estate Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(10) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Strategic Income Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(8) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 64.

(11) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Technology Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(6) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(12) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(7) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(13) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Value Leaders Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(14) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Consumer Industries Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(8) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(15) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Cyclical Industries Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(9) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(16) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Financial Services Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(10) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(17) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Growth Stock Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(13) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 59.

(18) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Health Care Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(11) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(19) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(19) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(20) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Service Class R is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(21) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Natural Resources Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(12) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(22) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Real Estate Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(16) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(23) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Strategic Income Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(19) of Post-Effective No. 64.

(24) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Technology Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(13) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(25) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(14) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(26) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Value Leaders Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(27) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Consumer Industries Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(15) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(28) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Cyclical Industries Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(16) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(29) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Financial Services Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(17) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(30) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Growth Stock Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(22) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 59.

(31) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Health Care Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(18) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(32) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(32) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(33) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Service Class 2 R is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(33) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 67.

(34) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Natural Resources Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(19) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(35) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Real Estate Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(25) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(36) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Strategic Income Portfolio: Service Class 2 is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(36).

(37) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Technology Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(20) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(38) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(21) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 54.

(39) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Value Leaders Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(30) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(40) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2005 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(40) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(41) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2005 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(41) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(42) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2005 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(42) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(43) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2010 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(43) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(44) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2010 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(44) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(45) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2010 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(45) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(46) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2015 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(46) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(47) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2015 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(47) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(48) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2015 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(48) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(49) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2020 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(49) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(50) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2020 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(50) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(51) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2020 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(51) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(52) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2025 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(52) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(53) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2025 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(53) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(54) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2025 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(54) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(55) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2030 Portfolio: Initial Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(55) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(56) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2030 Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(56) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(57) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom 2030 Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(57) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(58) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Income Portfolio: Inital Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(58) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(59) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Income Portfolio: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(59) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(60) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Income Portfolio: Service Class 2 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(60) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 76.

(61) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Consumer Industries Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(61) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(62) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Cyclical Industries Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(62) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79).

(63) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Financial Services Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(63) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(64) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Growth Stock Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(64) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(65) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Health Care Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(65) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(66) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for International Capital Appreciation Portfolio: Investor Class R is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(66) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(67) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Natural Resources Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(67) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(68) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Real Estate Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(68) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(69) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Strategic Income Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(69) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(70) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Technology Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(70) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(71) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(71) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(72) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Value Leaders Portfolio: Investor Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(72) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(73) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(73) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(74) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(74) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(75) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(75) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(76) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(76) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(77) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(77) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(78) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(78) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(79) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(79) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(80) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(80) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(81) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(81) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(82) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Investor Freedom Income Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(82) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 80.

(83) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 20% Portfolio: Investor Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(83).

(84) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 20% Portfolio: Service Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(84).

(85) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 20% Portfolio: Service Class 2 is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(85).

(86) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 50% Portfolio: Investor Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(86).

(87) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 50% Portfolio: Service Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(87).

(88) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 50% Portfolio: Service Class 2 is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(88).

(89) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 70% Portfolio: Investor Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(89).

(90) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 70% Portfolio: Service Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(90).

(91) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 70% Portfolio: Service Class 2 is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(91).

(92) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 85% Portfolio: Investor Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(92).

(93) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 85% Portfolio: Service Class is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(93).

(94) Form of Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for FundsManager 85% Portfolio: Service Class 2 is filed herein as Exhibit (m)(94).

(n) (1) Multiple Class of Shares Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3 for VIP Funds on behalf Variable Insurance Products Fund IV, dated May 19, 2005, on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit n(1) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(2) Schedule I to the Multiple Class of Shares Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3 for VIP Funds on behalf of Variable Insurance Products Fund IV, dated May 19, 2005, on behalf of Consumer Industries Portfolio, Cyclical Industries Portfolio, Financial Services Portfolio, Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Growth Stock Portfolio, Health Care Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, Technology Portfolio, Telecommunications & Utilities Growth Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio is incorporated herein by reference to exhibit n(2) of post-effective amendment no. 80.

(p) (1) Code of Ethics, dated January 1, 2005, adopted by each fund and Fidelity Management & Research Company, Strategic Advisers, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc., FMR Co., Inc., Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc., Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc., and Fidelity Distributors Corporation pursuant to Rule 17j-1 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (p)(1) of Fidelity Financial Trust's (File No. 811-03587) Post-Effective Amendment No. 43.

(2) Code of Ethics, dated January 1, 2005, adopted by Fidelity International Limited (FIL), Fidelity Gestion, Fidelity Investments Japan Limited, Fidelity International Investment Advisors, and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited pursuant to Rule 17j-1 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (p)(2) of Fidelity Financial Trust's (File No. 811-03587) Post-Effective Amendment No. 43.

Item 24. Trusts Controlled by or under Common Control with this Trust

The Board of Trustees of the Trust is the same as the board of other Fidelity funds, each of which has Fidelity Management & Research Company, or an affiliate, as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Trust are substantially identical to those of the other Fidelity funds. Nonetheless, the Trust takes the position that it is not under common control with other Fidelity funds because the power residing in the respective boards and officers arises as the result of an official position with the respective trusts.

Item 25. Indemnification

Article XI, Section 2 of the Declaration of Trust sets forth the reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification shall be provided to any past or present Trustee or officer. It states that the Trust shall indemnify any present or past trustee or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability, and all expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of his or her service as a trustee or officer and against any amount incurred in settlement thereof. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudged by a court or other adjudicatory body to be liable to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his or her duties (collectively, "disabling conduct"), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination, as specified in the Declaration of Trust, that the officer or trustee did not engage in disabling conduct.

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Distributor and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Trust (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Trust does not agree to indemnify the Distributor or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Trust by or on behalf of the Distributor. In no case is the indemnity of the Trust in favor of the Distributor or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Distributor or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which the Distributor or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.

Pursuant to the agreement by which Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. ("FIIOC") is appointed transfer agent, the Registrant agrees to indemnify and hold FIIOC harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities or expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) resulting from:

(1) any claim, demand, action or suit brought by any person other than the Registrant, including by a shareholder, which names FIIOC and/or the Registrant as a party and is not based on and does not result from FIIOC's willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties, and arises out of or in connection with FIIOC's performance under the Transfer Agency Agreement; or

(2) any claim, demand, action or suit (except to the extent contributed to by FIIOC's willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties) which results from the negligence of the Registrant, or from FIIOC's acting upon any instruction(s) reasonably believed by it to have been executed or communicated by any person duly authorized by the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOC's acting in reliance upon advice reasonably believed by FIIOC to have been given by counsel for the Registrant, or as a result of FIIOC's acting in reliance upon any instrument or stock certificate reasonably believed by it to have been genuine and signed, countersigned or executed by the proper person.

Item 26. Business and Other Connections of Investment Advisers

(1) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY (FMR)

FMR serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies. The directors and officers of the Adviser have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC), Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. (FMR Far East), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM); Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director of FMR Corp.; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

Abigail P. Johnson

Previously served as President and Director of FMR, FMRC, FIMM and Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR (2005); Trustee of funds advised by FMR; Director of FMR Corp.; President of Fidelity Employer Service Co. (FESCO) (2005).

Peter S. Lynch

Vice Chairman and Director of FMR and FMRC and member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR (2003). Previously served as Trustee of funds advised by FMR (2003).

Robert L. Reynolds

President and Director of FMR, FMRC, and FIMM (2005); Director and Chief Operating Officer of FMR Corp.

Stephen P. Jonas

Executive Director of FMR and FMRC (2005); Director of FIMM (2005), and FMR Corp.; Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Thomas Allen

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Paul Antico

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Ramin Arani

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

John Avery

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

David Bagnani

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Robert Bertelson

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Stephen Binder

Vice President of FMR, FMRC and a fund advised by FMR.

William Bower

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Philip L. Bullen

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC; Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR; President and Director of FMR Far East and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.); Previously served as Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Steve Buller

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

John J. Burke

Vice President of FMR (2004).

John H. Carlson

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Stephen Calhoun

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2005), and funds advised by FMR.

James Catudal

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Ren Y. Cheng

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

C. Robert Chow

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Dwight D. Churchill

Executive Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Senior Vice President of FIMM and Vice President of Equity funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR (2005).

Timothy Cohen

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

Katherine Collins

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003); Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Michael Connolly

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Matthew Conti

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

William Danoff

Senior Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Joseph Day

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Scott E. DeSano

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Penelope Dobkin

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Julie Donovan

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Walter C. Donovan

Executive Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Vice President of High-Yield and Fixed-Income funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Bettina Doulton

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Stephen DuFour

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

William Eigen

Previously served as Vice President of FMR, FMRC, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and funds advised by FMR (2005).

Michael Elizondo

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Bahaa Fam

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Jeffrey Feingold

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Robert Scott Feldman

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Richard B. Fentin

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Keith Ferguson

Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Karen Firestone

Previously served as Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR (2005).

Jay Freedman

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC and Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC); Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and FMR Corp.

Christopher J. Goudie

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Boyce I. Greer

Executive Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Vice President of the Select and Asset Allocation funds advised by FMR.

Bart A. Grenier

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC, Vice President of certain Equity and High Income funds advised by FMR, and President and Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Robert J. Haber

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Richard C. Habermann

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

John F. Haley

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Karen Hammond

Executive Vice President of FMR (2005); Previously served as Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM, Vice President of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc., and Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp. (2005).

Brian J. Hanson

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

James Harmon

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Lionel Harris

Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Ian Hart

Vice President of FMR, FMRC and funds advised by FMR.

Teresa A. Hassara

Vice President of FMR (2005).

Timothy F. Hayes

Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

John Hebble

Vice President of FMR (2003).

Timothy Heffernan

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Thomas Hense

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Cesar Hernandez

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Bruce T. Herring

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Adam Hetnarski

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Frederick D. Hoff, Jr.

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Brian Hogan

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Michael T. Jenkins

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

David B. Jones

Vice President of FMR.

Rajiv Kaul

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

Steven Kaye

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Jonathan Kelly

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

William Kennedy

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Francis V. Knox, Jr.

Previously served as Vice President of FMR and Assistant Treasurer of funds advised by FMR (2005).

Harry W. Lange

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Harley Lank

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Thomas P. Lavin

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Maxime Lemieux

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Harris Leviton

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Douglas Lober

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

James MacDonald

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR (2005).

Robert B. MacDonald

Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004); Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2004).

Richard R. Mace

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Charles A. Mangum

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Kevin McCarey

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Christine McConnell

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and a fund advised by FMR.

John B. McDowell

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR.

Neal P. Miller

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Peter J. Millington

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Jeffrey Mitchell

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2003).

Eric M. Mollenhauer

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Charles S. Morrison

Vice President of FMR and Bond funds advised by FMR; Senior Vice President of FIMM (2003); Previously served as Vice President of FIMM (2003).

David L. Murphy

Executive Vice President of FMR (2005); Vice President of Fixed-Income and Money Market funds advised by FMR; Senior Vice President of FIMM (2003); Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005) and FIMM (2003).

Steve Neff

Senior Vice President of FMR (2005).

Mark Notkin

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Scott Offen

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and a fund advised by FMR.

Fatima Penrose

Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

Stephen Petersen

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

John R. Porter

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

Keith Quinton

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Alan Radlo

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Larry Rakers

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

William R. Ralls

Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Christine Reynolds

Vice President of FMR (2003); President and Treasurer of funds advised by FMR (2004); Anti-Money Laundering Officer (2004).

Kennedy Richardson

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Clare S. Richer

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of FMR Corp. (2005).

Eric D. Roiter

Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR and FMRC; Secretary of funds advised by FMR; Assistant Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM; Previously served as Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005).

Stephen Rosen

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2004), and a fund advised by FMR.

Louis Salemy

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Lee H. Sandwen

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Peter Saperstone

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Beso Sikharulidze

Previously served as Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR (2005).

Carol A. Smith-Fachetti

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Steven J. Snider

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and a fund advised by FMR.

Mark P. Snyderman

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2004), and a fund advised by FMR.

Thomas T. Soviero

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005).

Robert E. Stansky

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Nicholas E. Steck

Vice President of FMR (2003); Compliance Officer of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005), and FMR Corp.

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp.

Yolanda Taylor

Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Victor Thay

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

Joel C. Tillinghast

Senior Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Matthew C. Torrey

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Robert Tuckett

Vice President of FMR.

Jennifer Uhrig

Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Vice President of FMRC and funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

George A. Vanderheiden

Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

Robert B. Von Rekowsky

Vice President of FMR, FMRC (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

Jason Weiner

Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Ellen Wilson

Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2004); Executive Vice President, Human Resources, of FMR Corp. (2004).

Steven S. Wymer

Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Vice President of FMRC and a fund advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

JS Wynant

Vice President of FMR and FMRC; Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM.

Derek L. Young

Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

(2) FMR CO., INC. (FMRC)

FMRC provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of FMRC, FMR, FMR Far East, and FIMM ; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR Corp.; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

Abigail P. Johnson

Previously served as President and Director of FMRC, FMR, FIMM, and Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR (2005); Trustee of funds advised by FMR; Director of FMR Corp.; President of FESCO (2005).

Peter S. Lynch

Vice Chairman and Director of FMRC and FMR and member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR (2003). Previously served as Trustee of funds advised by FMR (2003).

Robert L. Reynolds

President and Director of FMRC, FMR, and FIMM (2005); Director and Chief Operating Officer of FMR Corp.

Stephen P. Jonas

Executive Director of FMRC and FMR (2005); Director of FIMM (2005), and FMR Corp.; Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Thomas Allen

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Paul Antico

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Ramin Arani

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

John Avery

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

David Bagnani

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Robert Bertelson

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Stephen Binder

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

William Bower

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Philip L. Bullen

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR; Vice President of certain Equity Funds advised by FMR; President and Director of FMR Far East and FMR U.K.; Previously served as Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Steve Buller

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Steven Calhoun

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2005), and funds advised by FMR.

John H. Carlson

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

James Catudal

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Ren Y. Cheng

Vice President of FMRC, FMR and funds advised by FMR.

C. Robert Chow

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Dwight D. Churchill

Executive Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005); Senior Vice President of FIMM and Vice President of Equity funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR (2005).

Timothy Cohen

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

Katherine Collins

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003); Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Michael Connolly

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Matthew Conti

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

William Danoff

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Joseph Day

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Scott E. DeSano

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Penelope Dobkin

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Julie Donovan

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Walter C. Donovan

Executive Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005); Vice President of High-Yield and Fixed-Income funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Bettina Doulton

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Stephen DuFour

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

William Eigen

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC, FMR, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and funds advised by FMR (2005).

Michael Elizondo

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Bahaa Fam

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Jeffrey Feingold

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Robert Scott Feldman

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Richard B. Fentin

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Keith Ferguson

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Karen Firestone

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR (2005).

Jay Freedman

Assistant Secretary of FMRC, FMR and FDC; Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and FMR Corp.

Christopher J. Goudie

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Boyce I. Greer

Executive Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005); Vice President of the Select and Asset Allocation funds advised by FMR.

Bart A. Grenier

Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR, Vice President of certain Equity and High Income funds advised by FMR, and President and Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Robert J. Haber

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR; Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Richard C. Habermann

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

John F. Haley

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Karen Hammond

Previously served as Assistant Treasurer of FMRC, FMR, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM, Vice President of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc., and Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp.(2005); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

Brian J. Hanson

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

James Harmon

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Lionel Harris

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Ian Hart

Vice President of FMRC, FMR and funds advised by FMR.

Timothy Heffernan

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Thomas Hense

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Cesar Hernandez

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Bruce T. Herring

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Adam Hetnarski

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Frederick D. Hoff, Jr.

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Brian Hogan

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Michael T. Jenkins

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Rajiv Kaul

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and funds advised by FMR.

Steven Kaye

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Jonathan Kelly

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

William Kennedy

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Harry W. Lange

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Harley Lank

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Thomas P. Lavin

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Maxime Lemieux

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Harris Leviton

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Douglas Lober

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Robert B. MacDonald

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004); Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2004).

Richard R. Mace

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Charles A. Mangum

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Kevin McCarey

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Christine McConnell

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and a fund advised by FMR.

John B. McDowell

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR.

Neal P. Miller

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Peter J. Millington

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Jeffrey Mitchell

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2003).

Eric M. Mollenhauer

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Mark Notkin

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Scott Offen

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and a fund advised by FMR.

Shep Perkins

Vice President of FMRC (2004).

Stephen Petersen

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

John R. Porter

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

Keith Quinton

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Alan Radlo

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Larry Rakers

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMRC, FMR, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Kennedy Richardson

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Eric D. Roiter

Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMRC and FMR; Secretary of funds advised by FMR; Assistant Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM; Previously served as Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005).

Stephen Rosen

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2004), and a fund advised by FMR.

Louis Salemy

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Lee H. Sandwen

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Peter Saperstone

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Beso Sikharulidze

Previously served as Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR (2005).

Carol A. Smith-Fachetti

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Steven J. Snider

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and a fund advised by FMR.

Mark P. Snyderman

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2004), and a fund advised by FMR.

Thomas T. Soviero

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005); Vice President of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2005).

Robert E. Stansky

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of FMRC, FMR, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp.

Yolanda Taylor

Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Victor Thay

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2003), and a fund advised by FMR.

Joel C. Tillinghast

Senior Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and Vice President of a fund advised by FMR.

Matthew C. Torrey

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

Jennifer Uhrig

Vice President of FMRC and funds advised by FMR; Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

George A. Vanderheiden

Senior Vice President of FMRC and FMR.

Robert B. Von Rekowsky

Vice President of FMRC, FMR (2004), and funds advised by FMR.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMRC, FMR, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

Jason Weiner

Vice President of FMRC, FMR, and funds advised by FMR.

Steven S. Wymer

Vice President of FMRC and a fund advised by FMR; Senior Vice President of FMR (2005); Previously served as Vice President of FMR (2005).

JS Wynant

Vice President of FMRC and FMR; Treasurer of FMRC, FMR, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM.

Derek L. Young

Vice President of FMRC and FMR (2004).

(3) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (U.K.) INC. (FMR U.K.)

FMR U.K. provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management Trust Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Simon Fraser

Director, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer of FMR U.K.; Previously served as Director and President of Fidelity International Investment Advisors (FIIA) (2005), Director and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited (FIIA(U.K.)L) (2005), and Senior Vice President of FMR U.K. (2003).

Philip Bullen

President and Director of FMR U.K. and FMR Far East; Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC; Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Andrew Flaster

Compliance Officer of FMR U.K.

Jay Freedman

Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp.; Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, and FDC.

Karen Hammond

Previously served as Assistant Treasurer of FMR U.K., FMR, FMRC, FMR Far East, and FIMM, Vice President of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc., and Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp. (2005); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR U.K., FMR, FMRC, FMR Far East, FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Eric D. Roiter

Assistant Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR and FMRC; Secretary of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005).

Nicholas E. Steck

Compliance Officer of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005) and FMR Corp.; Vice President of FMR (2003).

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of FMR U.K., FMR, FMRC, FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR U.K., FMR, FMRC, FMR Far East, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

JS Wynant

Treasurer of FMR U.K., FMR, FMRC, FMR Far East, and FIMM; Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

(4) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (Far East) INC. (FMR Far East)

FMR Far East provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management Trust Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, and FIMM; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR Corp.; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

Philip Bullen

President and Director of FMR Far East and FMR U.K.; Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC; Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Jay Freedman

Secretary of FMR Far East, FMR U.K., FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and FMR Corp.; Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, and FDC.

Karen Hammond

Previously served as Assistant Treasurer of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., and FIMM, Vice President of FMR Far East, FMR U.K., FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc., and Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp. (2005); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FIMM, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Eric D. Roiter

Assistant Secretary of FMR Far East, FMR U.K., and FIMM; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR and FMRC; Secretary of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005).

Nicholas E. Steck

Compliance Officer of FMR Far East, FMR U.K., Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005) and FMR Corp.; Vice President of FMR (2003).

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

Billy W. Wilder

Previously served as Vice President of FMR Far East; Representative Director and President of Fidelity Investments Japan Limited (FIJ)(2004).

JS Wynant

Treasurer of FMR Far East, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., and FIMM; Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

(5) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS MONEY MANAGEMENT, INC. (FIMM)

FIMM provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, and FMR Far East; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director of FMR Corp.; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

Abigail P. Johnson

Previously served as President and Director of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, and Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR (2005); Trustee of funds advised by FMR; Director of FMR Corp.; President of FESCO (2005).

Robert L. Reynolds

President and Director of FIMM, FMR, and FMRC (2005); Director and Chief Operating Officer of FMR Corp.

Stephen P. Jonas

Director of FIMM (2005), and FMR Corp.; Executive Director of FMR and FMRC (2005); Senior Vice President of funds advised by FMR.

Dwight D. Churchill

Senior Vice President of FIMM; Executive Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2005); Vice President of Equity funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Senior Vice President of FMR (2005).

Jay Freedman

Secretary of FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, Strategic Advisers, Inc., and FMR Corp.; Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, and FDC.

Stanley N. Griffith

Previously served as Assistant Secretary of FIMM, and Assistant Vice President of Fixed-Income funds advised by FMR (2003).

Karen Hammond

Previously served as Assistant Treasurer of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., and FMR Far East, Vice President of FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. and Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp. (2005); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

Michael Kearney

Assistant Treasurer of FIMM (2005).

Charles S. Morrison

Senior Vice President of FIMM (2003); Vice President of FMR and Bond funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FIMM (2003).

David L. Murphy

Senior Vice President of FIMM (2003); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005); Vice President of Fixed-Income and Money Market funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President of FIMM (2003) and FMR (2005).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Eric D. Roiter

Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR U.K., and FMR Far East; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of FMR and FMRC; Secretary of funds advised by FMR; Previously served as Vice President and Secretary of FDC (2005).

Thomas J. Silvia

Senior Vice President of FIMM (2005); Vice President of Fixed-Income funds advised by FMR.

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, and FMR Corp.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

JS Wynant

Treasurer of FIMM, FMR, FMRC, FMR U. K., and FMR Far East; Vice President of FMR and FMRC.

(6) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (FIIA)

The directors and officers of FIIA have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Michael Gordon

President (2005) and Director (2002) of FIIA; President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of FIIA (U.K.)L (2005).

Simon Fraser

Previously served as Director and President of FIIA (2005), Director and Chief Executive Officer of FIIA(U.K.)L (2005), and Senior Vice President of FMR U.K. (2003); Director, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer of FMR U.K.

Brett Goodin

Director of FIIA.

Simon M. Haslam

Director of FIIA and FIJ.

Matthew Heath

Previously served as Secretary of FIIA (2004).

David Holland

Director and Vice President of FIIA.

Kathryn Matthews

Director of FIIA (2005).

Samantha Miller

Previously served as HK Compliance Officer of FIIA (2005).

Frank Mutch

Director of FIIA.

David J. Saul

Director of FIIA.

Peter Phillips

Director of FIIA.

Rosalie Powell

Assistant Secretary of FIIA.

Graham Seed

Secretary of FIIA (2004).

Andrew Steward

Chief Financial Officer of FIIA; Director of FIIA(U.K.)L and FIGEST (2004).

Robert Stewart

Director of FIIA (2004).

Ann Stock

Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA (2005); Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2003).

Andrew Wells

Director of FIIA (2005).

Nigel White

Previously served as Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA (2005).

(7) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (U.K.) LIMITED (FIIA(U.K.)L)

The directors and officers of FIIA(U.K.)L have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Michael Gordon

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of FIIA (U.K.)L (2005); President (2005) and Director (2002) of FIIA.

Gareth Adams

Previously served as Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2003).

Simon Fraser

Previously served as Director and Chief Executive Officer of FIIA(U.K.)L (2005), Director and President of FIIA (2005), and Senior Vice President of FMR U.K. (2003); Director, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer of FMR U.K.

Ian Jones

Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA(U.K.)L (2004).

Andrew Steward

Director of FIIA(U.K.)L and FIGEST (2004); Chief Financial Officer of FIIA.

Ann Stock

Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2003); Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA (2005).

Richard Wane

Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2003).

(8) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS JAPAN LIMITED (FIJ)

The directors and officers of FIJ have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Simon M. Haslam

Director of FIJ and FIIA.

Yoshito Hirata

Representative Executive Officer of FIJ (2005); Previously served as President, Representative Director

(2005), and Head of Compliance and Legal of FIJ (2004).

David Holland

Director of FIJ (2005).

Yasuo Kuramoto

Previously served as Director and Vice Chairman of FIJ (2005).

Jonathan O'Brien

Previously served as Representative Director of FIJ (2004).

Takeshi Okazaki

Director and Executive Officer of FIJ (2005); Previously served as Head of Institutional Sales of FIJ (2005).

Yoshishige Saigusa

Director and Executive Officer of FIJ (2005).

Billy W. Wilder

Previously served as President and Representative Director of FIJ and Vice President of FMR Far East (2004).

Hiroshi Yamashita

Director of FIJ; Previously served as Counselor of FIJ (2005).

(9) STRATEGIC ADVISERS, INC.

<R> Strategic Advisers, Inc. serves as investment adviser to Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, and Investor Freedom Income Portfolio and provides investment supervisory services to individuals, banks, thrifts, pension and profit sharing plans, trusts, estates, charitable organizations, corporations, and other business organizations, and provides a variety of publications on investment and personal finance. The directors and officers of Strategic Advisers have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.</R>

Richard A. Spillane Jr.

President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Jeffrey Carney

Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005); President and Director of FDC (2003).

Bart Grenier

Previously served as President and Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc., Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC, Vice President of certain Equity and High Income funds advised by FMR (2005).

William V. Harlow III

Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc.; Previously served as Chief Investment Officer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Philip Bullen

Previously served as Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005); Senior Vice President of FMR and FMRC; Vice President of certain Equity funds advised by FMR; President and Director of FMR Far East and FMR U.K.

G. Robert Bristow

Previously served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2004).

Ren Y. Cheng

Previously served as Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

William Eigen

Previously served as Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005); Vice President of FMR, FMRC, and funds advised by FMR.

Jay Freedman

Secretary of Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, and FMR Corp.; Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, and FDC;

Howard Galligan

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2004).

Boyce I. Greer

Previously served as Director and Managing Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005).

Karen Hammond

Previously served as Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc., Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. and FMR Corp., Vice President of FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM and Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM (2005); Executive Vice President of FMR (2005).

Patricia Hurley

Senior Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Alice Lowenstein

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Robert B. MacDonald

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2004); Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2004).

Katherine Sikora Nelson

Previously served as Assistant Clerk of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2003).

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FIMM (2005).

Jeffrey Resnik

Senior Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Roger T. Servison

Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Nicholas E. Steck

Compliance Officer of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2005), FMR U.K., FMR Far East, and FMR Corp.; Vice President of FMR (2003).

Michele A. Stecyk

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Geoff Stein

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary of Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, FDC, and FMR Corp.

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FMR Far East, FIMM, FDC, and FMR Corp. (2003); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR Corp.

Jonathan Weed

Vice President of Strategic Advisers, Inc.

Principal business addresses of the investment adviser, sub-advisers and affiliates.

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR)
One Federal Street
Boston, MA 02109

FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC)
One Federal Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.)
One Federal Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Management & Research (Far East) Inc. (FMR Far East)
One Federal Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM)
One Spartan Way
Merrimack, NH 03054

Fidelity International Investment Advisors (FIIA)
Pembroke Hall,
42 Crow Lane,
Pembroke HM19, Bermuda

Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited (FIIA(U.K.)L)
25 Cannon Street
London, England EC4M5TA

Fidelity Investments Japan Limited (FIJ)
Shiroyama JT Mori Building, 19th Floor
4-3-1, Toranomon, Minato-ku,
Tokyo, Japan 105-6019

Fidelity Gestion (FIGEST)
Washington Plaza
29 rue de Berri
Paris, France 75008

Strategic Advisers, Inc.
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

FMR Corp.
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Item 27. Principal Underwriters

(a) Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) acts as distributor for all funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.

(b)

Name and Principal

Positions and Offices

Positions and Offices

Business Address*

with Underwriter

with Fund

Jeffrey Carney

Director and President (2003)

None

Susan Boudrot

Chief Compliance Officer (2004)

None

Jay Freedman

Assistant Secretary

None

Stuart Fross

Vice President and Secretary (2005)

Assistant Secretary of funds advised by FMR.

Jane Greene

Treasurer and Controller

None

Donald C. Holborn

Executive Vice President

None

William F. Loehning

Executive Vice President (2003)

None

Ellyn A. McColgan

Director

None

Susan Sturdy

Assistant Secretary

None

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer

None

* 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA

(c) Not applicable.

Item 28. Location of Accounts and Records

<R> All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder are maintained by Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Service Company, Inc. or Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc., 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109, or the funds' respective custodians, JPMorgan Chase Bank, 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., 40 Water Street, Boston, MA, State Street Bank & Trust Company, 1776 Heritage Drive, Quincy, MA, and Mellon Bank, One Mellon Center, 500 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, headquartered in New York, also may serve as a special purpose custodian of certain assets of Growth Stock Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Investor Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Investor Freedom Income Portfolio, Freedom 2005 Portfolio, Freedom 2010 Portfolio, Freedom 2015 Portfolio, Freedom 2020 Portfolio, Freedom 2025 Portfolio, Freedom 2030 Portfolio, Freedom Income Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income I Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income II Portfolio, Freedom Lifetime Income III Portfolio, International Capital Appreciation Portfolio, Natural Resources Portfolio, Real Estate Portfolio, Strategic Income Portfolio, and Value Leaders Portfolio in connection with repurchase agreement transactions. The Bank of New York, headquartered in New York, also may serve as a special purpose custodian of certain assets in connection with repurchase agreement transactions.</R>

Item 29. Management Services

Not applicable.

Item 30. Undertakings

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 81 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 26th day of January 2006.

Variable Insurance Products Fund IV

By

/s/Christine Reynolds

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Christine Reynolds, President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

(Signature)

(Title)

(Date)

/s/Christine Reynolds

President and Treasurer

January 26, 2006

Christine Reynolds

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/Paul M. Murphy

Chief Financial Officer

January 26, 2006

Paul M. Murphy

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/Edward C. Johnson 3d

(dagger)

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Edward C. Johnson 3d

/s/Dennis J. Dirks

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Dennis J. Dirks

/s/Robert M. Gates

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Robert M. Gates

/s/George H. Heilmeier

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

George H. Heilmeier

/s/ Stephen P. Jonas

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Stephen P. Jonas

/s/Marie L. Knowles

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Marie L. Knowles

/s/Ned C. Lautenbach

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Ned C. Lautenbach

/s/William O. McCoy

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

William O. McCoy

/s/Robert L. Reynolds

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Robert L. Reynolds

/s/Cornelia M. Small

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Cornelia M. Small

/s/William S. Stavropoulos

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

William S. Stavropoulos

/s/Kenneth L. Wolfe

*

Trustee

January 26, 2006

Kenneth L. Wolfe

* Signature affixed by Abigail P. Johnson, pursuant to a power of attorney dated June 14, 2001 and filed herewith.

* By: /s/Margery K. Neale
Margery K. Neale, pursuant to a power of attorney dated January 1, 2005 and filed herewith.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

I, the undersigned President and Director, Trustee, or General Partner, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:

Colchester Street Trust

Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust

Fidelity Advisor Series I

Fidelity Advisor Series II

Fidelity Advisor Series III

Fidelity Advisor Series IV

Fidelity Advisor Series VI

Fidelity Advisor Series VII

Fidelity Advisor Series VIII

Fidelity Beacon Street Trust

Fidelity Boston Street Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Capital Trust

Fidelity Charles Street Trust

Fidelity Commonwealth Trust

Fidelity Concord Street Trust

Fidelity Congress Street Fund

Fidelity Contrafund

Fidelity Court Street Trust

Fidelity Court Street Trust II

Fidelity Covington Trust

Fidelity Destiny Portfolios

Fidelity Devonshire Trust

Fidelity Exchange Fund

Fidelity Financial Trust

Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust

Fidelity Garrison Street Trust

Fidelity Government Securities Fund

Fidelity Hastings Street Trust

Fidelity Hereford Street Trust

Fidelity Income Fund

Fidelity Institutional Tax-Exempt Cash Portfolios

Fidelity Investment Trust

Fidelity Magellan Fund

Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust

Fidelity Money Market Trust

Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust II

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Oxford Street Trust

Fidelity Phillips Street Trust

Fidelity Puritan Trust

Fidelity Revere Street Trust

Fidelity School Street Trust

Fidelity Securities Fund

Fidelity Select Portfolios

Fidelity Summer Street Trust

Fidelity Trend Fund

Fidelity U.S. Investments-Bond Fund, L.P.

Fidelity U.S. Investments-Government Securities

Fund, L.P.

Fidelity Union Street Trust

Fidelity Union Street Trust II

Newbury Street Trust

Variable Insurance Products Fund

Variable Insurance Products Fund II

Variable Insurance Products Fund III

Variable Insurance Products Fund IV

in addition to any other investment company for which Fidelity Management & Research Company or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and for which the undersigned individual serves as President and Director, Trustee, or General Partner (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby constitute and appoint Abigail P. Johnson my true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to said attorney-in-fact to sign for me and in my name in the appropriate capacity, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, Form N-8A, or any successor thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements on Form N-1A, Form N-8A, or any successor thereto, any Registration Statements on Form N-14, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in my name and on my behalf in connection therewith as said attorney-in-fact deems necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. I hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney-in-fact or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after June 15, 2001.

WITNESS my hand on the date set forth below.

/s/Edward C. Johnson 3d

June 14, 2001

Edward C. Johnson 3d

POWER OF ATTORNEY


We, the undersigned Directors, Trustees, or General Partners, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:

Colchester Street Trust

Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust

Fidelity Advisor Series I

Fidelity Advisor Series II

Fidelity Advisor Series IV

Fidelity Advisor Series VII

Fidelity Advisor Series VIII

Fidelity Beacon Street Trust

Fidelity Boston Street Trust

Fidelity Boylston Street Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Capital Trust

Fidelity Charles Street Trust

Fidelity Commonwealth Trust

Fidelity Concord Street Trust

Fidelity Congress Street Fund

Fidelity Contrafund

Fidelity Court Street Trust

Fidelity Court Street Trust II

Fidelity Covington Trust

Fidelity Destiny Portfolios

Fidelity Devonshire Trust

Fidelity Exchange Fund

Fidelity Financial Trust

Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust

Fidelity Garrison Street Trust

Fidelity Hanover Street Trust

Fidelity Hastings Street Trust

Fidelity Hereford Street Trust

Fidelity Income Fund

Fidelity Investment Trust

Fidelity Magellan Fund

Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust

Fidelity Money Market Trust

Fidelity Mt. Vernon Street Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust II

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Oxford Street Trust

Fidelity Phillips Street Trust

Fidelity Puritan Trust

Fidelity Revere Street Trust

Fidelity School Street Trust

Fidelity Securities Fund

Fidelity Select Portfolios

Fidelity Summer Street Trust

Fidelity Trend Fund

Fidelity Union Street Trust

Fidelity Union Street Trust II

Newbury Street Trust

Variable Insurance Products Fund

Variable Insurance Products Fund II

Variable Insurance Products Fund III

Variable Insurance Products Fund IV

plus any other investment company for which Fidelity Management & Research Company or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors, Trustees, or General Partners (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving the Funds and hereby constitute and appoint Barry P. Barbash, Maria Gattuso, Craig S. Tyle, Margery K. Neale and Karen H. McMillan, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, Form N-8A or any successor thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements on Form N-1A or any successor thereto, any Registration Statements on Form N-14, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after January 1, 2005.

WITNESS our hands on this first day of January 2005.

/s/Laura B. Cronin

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

/s/Marvin L. Mann

Laura B. Cronin

Marvin L. Mann

/s/Dennis J. Dirks

/s/William O. McCoy

Dennis J. Dirks

William O. McCoy

/s/Robert M. Gates

/s/Robert L. Reynolds

Robert M. Gates

Robert L. Reynolds

/s/George H. Heilmeier

/s/Cornelia M. Small

George H. Heilmeier

Cornelia M. Small

/s/Abigail P. Johnson

/s/William S. Stavropoulos

Abigail P. Johnson

William S. Stavropoulos

/s/Marie L. Knowles

/s/Kenneth L. Wolfe

Marie L. Knowles

Kenneth L. Wolfe

/s/Ned C. Lautenbach

Ned C. Lautenbach