-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, BdP4LOGfh1+tBgl4bkPE1hM36M0X3gPokSTIq4NX4LGZC8fIzwTh43BoAqTB/rr8 18FaFolc+H8+lPjuXO9cFw== 0000720005-04-000075.txt : 20041208 0000720005-04-000075.hdr.sgml : 20041208 20041208162707 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000720005-04-000075 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 11 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040924 FILED AS OF DATE: 20041208 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20041208 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000720005 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SECURITY BROKERS, DEALERS & FLOTATION COMPANIES [6211] IRS NUMBER: 591517485 STATE OF INCORPORATION: FL FISCAL YEAR END: 0930 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-09109 FILM NUMBER: 041191145 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 880 CARILLON PKWY STREET 2: P O BOX 12749 CITY: ST PETERSBURG STATE: FL ZIP: 33716 BUSINESS PHONE: 727-567-1000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: P O BOX 12749 CITY: ST. PETERSBURG STATE: FL ZIP: 33716 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: RJ FINANCIAL CORP/FL DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19870303 10-K 1 k102004.htm RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. 10-K Raymond James Financial, Inc. 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark one)
FORM 10-K
 

x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED)
 

For the fiscal year ended    September 24, 2004

OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED)
 
For the transition period from            to

Commission file number        1-9109

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.       
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida
 
No. 59-1517485
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)

880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, Florida
 
33716
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code
(727) 567-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
 
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 26, 2004: $1,421,357,000

Number of common shares outstanding (December 1, 2004): 73,813,000

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 17, 2005. (The Company intends to file with the Commission a definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A prior to January 20, 2005.)



 
     

 



 
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   
Page
PART I
   
     
Item 1
Business
2
Item 2
Properties
13
Item 3
Legal Proceedings
13
Item 4
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
13
     
PART II
   
     
Item 5
Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters
14
Item 6
Selected Financial Data
15
Item 7
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and
  Financial Condition
16
Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
30
Item 8
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
36
Item 9
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
  Financial Disclosure
65
Item 9A
Controls and Procedures
65
     
PART III
   
     
Item 10
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
65
Item 11
Executive Compensation
66
Item 12
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
  Stockholder Matters
66
Item 13
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
66
Item 14
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
66
     
PART IV
   
     
Item 15
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
66
     


 
     

 

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Raymond James Financial, Inc. (“RJF”) is a Florida-based holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in various financial services businesses. Its principal subsidiaries include Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJA”), Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (“RJFS”), Raymond James Ltd. ("RJ Ltd."), Eagle Asset Management, Inc. (“Eagle”), Heritage Asset Management, Inc. (“Heritage”) and Raymond James Bank, FSB (“RJBank”). All of these subsidiaries are wholly-owned by RJF. RJF and its subsidiaries are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Company”.

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

RJF's principal subsidiary, RJA is the largest full service brokerage and investment firm headquartered in the state of Florida and one of the larger retail brokerage firms in North America. RJA is a self-clearing broker-dealer engaged in most aspects of securities distribution, trading, investment banking and asset management. RJA also offers financial planning services for individuals and provides clearing services for RJFS, other affiliated entities and several unaffiliated broker-dealers. RJA is a member of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), American Stock Exchange, and most regional exchanges. It is also a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) and Securities Investors Protection Corporation (“SIPC”).

RJFS is an independent contractor broker-dealer subsidiary, and one of the largest independent contractor firms in the United States of America. Financial Advisors affiliated with RJFS may offer their clients all products and services offered by RJA. RJFS also has four institutional sales offices in Europe. RJFS is a member of the NASD and SIPC, but not of any exchange, as it clears all of its business on a fully-disclosed basis through RJA.

RJ Ltd. is the Company's Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary which engages in both retail and institutional distribution and investment banking. RJ Ltd. is a member of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the Investment Dealers Association of Canada ("IDA"). Its U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary is a member of the NASD.

Eagle is a registered investment advisor serving as the discretionary manager for individual and institutional equity and fixed income portfolios.

Heritage acts as the manager of the Company's internally sponsored Heritage Family of Mutual Funds.

RJBank provides traditional banking products and services to the clients of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries and to the general public.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company's business has five segments: Private Client Group; Capital Markets; Asset Management; RJBank; and several operations combined in the "Other" segment. Financial information concerning RJF for each of the fiscal years ended September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002 is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Such information is hereby incorporated by reference.

PRIVATE CLIENT GROUP

The Company provides securities transaction and financial planning services to over one million client accounts through the RJA, RJFS, RJ Ltd., and Raymond James Investment Services (“RJIS") Private Client Group branch systems. The Company's Financial Advisors offer a broad range of financial alternatives and services, including both third party and proprietary products, while applying disciplines rooted in financial planning practices. In most cases, the Company charges commissions for sales of investment products to its Private Client Group clients based on an established commission schedule. Varying discounts, may be given, generally based upon the client's level of business, the trade size, service level provided, and other relevant factors. An increasing number of clients are electing asset-based fee alter natives instead of the traditional commission structure; in fiscal year 2004 asset-based fees from such accounts represented 20% of the Private Client Group's commission and fees.

The majority of U.S. Financial Advisors are also licensed to sell insurance and annuity products through the Company's general insurance agency, Planning Corporation of America (“PCA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RJA. Through the Financial Advisors of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries, PCA provides product and marketing support for a broad range of insurance products, principally fixed and variable annuities, life insurance, disability insurance and long-term care coverage.

 
  2  

 

The Company's Financial Advisors offer a number of professionally managed load mutual funds, as well as a selection of no-load funds. RJA maintains dealer-sales agreements with most major distributors of mutual fund shares sold through broker-dealers, including funds managed by Heritage. Commissions on such sales generally range from 1% to 5% of the dollar value of the transaction. Sales compensation structures typically include front-end charges, “back-end” or contingent deferred sales charges, and an annual charge in the form of a fund expense.

No single client accounts for a material percentage of this segment's total business.

Private Client Group Securities Commission and Fees
For the Fiscal Years Ended:
             
 
Sept. 24,
% of
Sept. 26,
% of
Sept. 27,
% of
 
2004
Total
2003
Total
2002
Total
 
($ in 000's)
             
Listed equity
$ 154,374
15%
$ 126,410
16%
$ 115,847
15%
OTC equities
68,223
7%
46,099
6%
50,164
6%
Fixed income *
49,075
5%
53,834
6%
43,978
6%
Mutual funds
228,001
22%
179,119
22%
195,919
25%
Asset management
251,967
25%
170,625
21%
179,658
23%
Insurance and annuity products
212,747
21%
191,283
24%
177,686
23%
UW sales credits
51,614
5%
39,539
5%
17,573
2%
Other
-
0%
-
0%
426
0%
Total Private Client Group
commissions and fees
$1,016,001
100% 
$ 806,909
100% 
$ 781,251
100% 

* Fixed Income products include municipal, corporate, government agency and mortgage-backed bonds, preferred stocks, certificates of deposits, and unit investment trusts.

Raymond James & Associates

RJA employs 861 Financial Advisors, with 76 retail branches and 18 satellites concentrated in the South, Midwest and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States of America. RJA's Financial Advisors work in a traditional branch setting supported by local management and administrative staffs. The number of Financial Advisors per office ranges from one to 30, with the average branch supporting approximately 12 Financial Advisors.

Raymond James Financial Services

RJFS supports its 3,809 independent contractor Registered Representatives in providing products and services to their Private Client Group clients in 1,565 offices and 592 satellite offices throughout all 50 states. The number of Financial Advisors in RJFS offices ranges from one to 21. The independent contractor Financial Advisors offer individual securities and investment advice primarily to individual investors. Independent contractors are responsible for all of their direct costs and, accordingly, are paid a larger percentage of commissions and fees. They are permitted to conduct other businesses unrelated to their RJFS activities such as offering fixed insurance products, independent registered investment advisory services, and accounting and tax services, among others.

Through its Financial Institutions Division, RJFS offers securities to customers of financial institutions such as banks, thrifts and credit unions and has 536 Financial Advisors in 469 locations. RJFS also provides custodial, trading and other support services to unaffiliated independent investment advisors through its Investment Advisor Division. Through this program, in which there are currently 36 registered investment advisory firms, the investment advisors are able to conduct daily business online with RJFS, including trading and access to their client's account information. They also have available to them the services of RJA Asset Management.

Raymond James Ltd.

RJ Ltd. is a self-clearing broker-dealer with its own operations and information processing personnel. RJ Ltd. has 43 private client branches with 183 employee Financial Advisors and 76 independent Financial Advisors, all located in Canada.

 
  3  

 

Raymond James Investment Services Limited

The Company is a 75% shareholder of Raymond James Investment Services Limited. This entity operates an independent contractor network in the United Kingdom, and currently has 32 branch locations and 60 Financial Advisors.

RJA - Operations

RJA's operations personnel are responsible for the execution of orders, processing of securities transactions, custody of client securities, receipt, identification and delivery of funds and securities, compliance with certain regulatory and legal requirements, internal financial accounting and controls and general office administration for most of the Company's securities brokerage operations. At September 24, 2004, RJA employed 834 persons in its operations areas who provide services primarily to the Private Client Group, but also support the Company's other segments.

The Company's businesses are supported by, and are dependent upon, an extensive system of electronic data processing. These computer systems are largely developed and maintained by the 658 employees in the Company’s information technology department, most of whom are located in St. Petersburg.

The Company has developed a business continuity plan that is designed to permit continued operation of business critical functions in the event of disruptions to the St. Petersburg facility; all mission critical business departments have developed operational plans for such disruptions, and the Company has a staff who devote their full time to monitoring and facilitating those plans. In that connection, the Company maintains redundant computer capacity at its Detroit location, and conducts some of its daily operational activities from that site. Systems have been designed so that the Company can transfer all mission critical processing activities to Detroit, and personnel have been identified who are assigned responsibility for this role, including some personnel who will be required for a limited period of time t o relocate to Detroit to carry out these activities if necessary.

The Company's operations were not adversely affected by the series of hurricanes that Florida experienced during the 2004 season. However, the Company did implement certain aspects of its business continuity plan to deal with the possible impact of these hurricanes. Based on this experience, the Company plans to enhance its business continuity plan to provide for a significant expansion of its operational and processing capabilities in Detroit. This process will be implemented over several years.

Clients' transactions in securities are effected on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, the client pays a portion of the purchase price, and RJA makes a loan to the client for the balance, collateralized by the securities purchased or by other securities owned by the client. Interest is charged to clients on the amount borrowed to finance margin transactions. The financing of margin purchases is an important source of revenue to RJA, since the interest rate paid by the client on funds loaned by RJA exceeds RJA's cost of short-term funds. The interest rate charged to a client on a margin loan depends on the average loan balance in the client's account.

Typically, broker-dealers utilize bank borrowings and equity capital as the primary sources of funds to finance clients' margin account borrowings. RJA's primary source of funds to finance clients' margin account balances has been cash balances in clients' accounts (Client Interest Program), which are funds awaiting investment. In addition, pursuant to written agreements with clients, broker-dealers are permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NYSE rules to lend client securities in margin accounts to other financial institutions. SEC regulations, however, restrict the use of clients' funds derived from pledging and lending clients' securities, as well as funds awaiting investment, to the financing of margin account balances, and to the extent not so used, such funds are required t o be deposited in a special segregated account for the benefit of clients. The regulations also require broker-dealers, within designated periods of time, to obtain possession or control of, and to segregate, clients' fully paid and excess margin securities.


 
  4  

 

CAPITAL MARKETS

Capital Markets activities primarily consist of equity and fixed income products and services. No single client accounts for a material percentage of this segment's total business.

Capital Markets Commissions
For the Fiscal Years Ended:
   
 
Sept. 24,
% of
Sept. 26,
% of
Sept. 27,
% of
 
2004
Total
2003
Total
2002
Total
 
(($ in 000's)
             
Equity
$ 173,594
69%
$ 95,926
48%
$ 93,215
48%
Fixed Income
77,972
31%
102,832
52%
100,144
52%
             
Total commissions
$ 251,566
100%
$198,758
100%
$193,359
100%

Institutional Sales

Institutional sales commissions account for a significant portion of the segment's revenue, which is fueled by a combination of general market activity, and by the Capital Markets group’s ability to find attractive investment opportunities and promote those opportunities. The Company's institutional clients are serviced by the RJA and RJ Ltd. Institutional Equity Departments, the RJA Fixed Income Department, the European offices of RJFS, and Raymond James Financial International Ltd, an institutional UK broker-dealer located in London. In providing securities brokerage services to its institutional clients, the Company charges its commissions on equity transactions based on trade size and the amount of business conducted annually with each institution.

The 97 domestic and overseas professionals in RJA's Institutional Equity Sales and Sales Trading Departments maintain relationships with over 1,600 institutional clients, principally in North America and Europe. In addition to the Company's headquarters in St. Petersburg, FL, RJA has institutional equity sales offices in New York, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, London and Geneva. RJ Ltd. has 28 institutional equity sales and trading professionals servicing predominantly Canadian institutional investors from offices in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. RJFS has institutional equity sales offices in Brussels, Dusseldorf, Luxembourg and Paris. Europe an offices also provide services to high net worth clients.

RJA distributes to its institutional clients both taxable and tax-exempt fixed income products, primarily municipal, corporate, government agency and mortgage-backed bonds. RJA carries inventory positions of taxable and tax-exempt securities in both the primary and secondary markets to facilitate its institutional sales activities. In addition to St. Petersburg, the Fixed Income Department maintains institutional sales and trading offices in New York, Chicago and 19 other cities throughout the United States of America. To assist institutional clients, the Fixed Income Research Group provides portfolio strategy analysis and municipal bond research.

Equity Research Department

The 45 domestic senior analysts in RJA's research department support the Company's institutional and retail sales efforts and publish research on approximately 573 predominantly U.S. companies. This research primarily focuses on companies in specific industries including Technology, Telecommunications, Consumer, Financial Services, Healthcare, Real Estate, Energy and Industrial Growth. Proprietary industry studies and company-specific research reports are made available to both institutional and individual clients. RJ Ltd. has an additional 16 analysts who publish research on approximately 180 companies primarily focused in the Energy, Energy Services, Mining, Forest Products, Biotechnology, Technology, Consumer and Industrial Products, REIT and Income Trust sectors.

Equity Trading

Trading equity securities in the over-the-counter ("OTC") market involves the purchase of securities from, and the sale of securities to, clients of the Company or other dealers who may be purchasing or selling securities for their own account or acting as agent for their clients. Profits and losses are derived from the spreads between bid and asked prices, as well as market trends for the individual securities during the holding period. RJA makes markets in approximately 273 common stocks in the OTC market. Similar to the equity research department, this operation serves to support both the Company's institutional and Private Client Group sales efforts.


 
  5  

 


Equity Investment Banking

The 57 professionals of RJA's Investment Banking Group, located primarily in St. Petersburg with additional offices in Atlanta, Nashville, Chicago, Princeton, Dallas, and Houston, are involved in a variety of activities including public and private equity financing for corporate clients, and merger and acquisition advisory services. RJ Ltd.'s Investment Banking Group consists of 20 professionals located in Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver providing equity financing and financial advisory services to corporate clients. The Company's investment banking activities focus on the same industries as those followed by the Equity Research department.

Syndicate Department

The Syndicate Department coordinates the marketing, distribution, pricing and stabilization of RJA's lead and co-managed equity underwritings. In addition to RJA's managed and co-managed offerings, this department coordinates the firm's syndicate and selling group activities in transactions managed by other investment banking firms.

Fixed Income Trading

RJA trades both taxable and tax-exempt fixed income products. The 36 taxable and 29 tax exempt RJA fixed income traders purchase and sell corporate (including high yield), municipal, government, government agency, and mortgage-backed bonds, asset backed securities, preferred stock and certificates of deposit from/to clients of the Company or other dealers who may be purchasing or selling securities for their own account or acting as an agent for their clients. RJA enters into future commitments such as forward contracts and “to be announced” securities (e.g. securities having a stated coupon and original term to maturity, although the issuer and/or the specific pool of mortgage loans is not known at the time of the transaction). In addition, a subsidiary of RJF participates in the interest rate swaps marke t as a principal, both for economically hedging RJA fixed income inventory and in transactions with customers.

Fixed Income Investment Banking

Fixed income investment banking includes public finance and structured finance activities. The 32 professionals in the RJA Public Finance division operate out of 7 offices (2 located in Florida, one each in Birmingham, New York, Chicago, Atlanta, and San Antonio). The Company acts as a Financial Advisor or underwriter to various municipal agencies or political subdivisions, housing developers and non-profit health care institutions. The Structured Finance Group works with a variety of issuers in the sale of asset backed securities.

In addition, RJA acts as an underwriter or selling group member for corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities, agency bonds, preferred stock and unit investment trusts. When underwriting new issue securities, RJA agrees to purchase the issue through a negotiated sale or submits a competitive bid.

Partnership Syndication Activities

Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc. (“RJTCF”) creates multi-family real estate entities that qualify for tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code.  RJTCF has been an active participant in the tax credit program since its inception in 1986, and currently sponsors institutional tax credit funds that invest in a portfolio of tax credit multi-family apartments.  The only expected return on investment from these funds for institutional investors are tax credits and tax losses that can be used to reduce federal tax liability.  The primary business functions of RJTCF consist of the following: identify real estate investment opportunities that meet a general set of institutional underwriting guidelines; raise equity from institutional investors for these investments; provide asse t management (property oversight of the portfolio for a 15-year compliance period); and report financial results to the investors. During fiscal 2004, RJTCF invested over $200 million for major corporations in approximately 100 real estate transactions located throughout the United States of America.  From inception, RJTCF has raised nearly $1 billion in equity and has sponsored 27 tax credit funds, with investments in over 900 tax credit projects in 43 states.

ASSET MANAGEMENT

The Company's asset management segment includes proprietary asset management operations, internally sponsored mutual funds, several small proprietary hedge funds, non-affiliated private account portfolio management alternatives, and other asset-based wrap fee programs. No single client accounts for a material percentage of this segment's total business.

 
  6  

 


Eagle Asset Management, Inc.

Eagle is a registered investment advisor with approximately $8.8 billion under management at September 24, 2004 including approximately $1.1 billion for the Heritage Family of Mutual Funds. Eagle offers a variety of equity and fixed income objectives managed by 6 portfolio management teams. Eagle's clients include individuals, pension and profit sharing plans, retirement funds, foundations, endowments, variable annuities and mutual fund portfolios. Accounts are managed on a discretionary basis in accordance with the investment objective(s) specified by the client. Eagle manages approximately $5.1 billion for institutional clients, including funds managed for Heritage, and approximately $3.7 billion for private client accounts.

Eagle's investment management fee generally ranges from .30% to 1.0% of asset balances per year depending upon the size and investment objective of the account.

Heritage Asset Management, Inc.

Heritage serves as investment advisor to the Heritage Family of Mutual Funds. Heritage also serves as transfer agent for all of the funds and as fund accountant for all Heritage funds except the International Equity Fund. Heritage internally manages the largest of its portfolios, the Heritage Cash Trust-Money Market Fund, which has $5.2 billion in assets, and also the Intermediate Government Fund. Portfolio management for the Diversified Growth Fund, Growth Equity Fund, and the Mid-Cap Stock Fund are subcontracted to Eagle Asset Management, Inc. Portfolio management for the Small Cap Stock Fund is subcontracted to both Eagle and the Company's Awad Asset Management subsidiary. Unaffiliated advisors are employed for the Municipal Money Market Fund, Capital Appreciation Trust, High Yield Bond Fund, Growth and Income Fund, Value Equity Fund, and the International Equity Fund.

Heritage also serves as an advisor to RJBank to make recommendations and monitor the Bank's investment portfolio of mortgage-backed securities.

Total assets under management at September 24, 2004 were $8.1 billion, of which approximately $6 billion were money market funds.

Awad Asset Management, Inc.

Awad is a registered investment advisor which primarily manages small cap equity portfolios. At September 24, 2004 Awad had approximately $1.3 billion under management, including approximately $136 million for the Heritage Small Cap Stock Fund. Awad's clients include individuals, pension and profit sharing plans, retirement funds, foundations, endowments, variable annuities and mutual fund portfolios. Accounts are managed on a discretionary basis in accordance with the investment objective(s) specified by the client. Management fees generally range from .30% to 1.0% of asset balances annually depending upon the size and investment objective of the account.

RJA - Asset Management Services

RJA's Asset Management Services (“AMS”) Department manages programs which offer investment advisory services, as well as certain non-advisory programs which offer fee-based alternatives to traditional commission charges for transactions. The primary advisory services offered are the Raymond James Consulting Services (“RJCS”), which offers a variety of both affiliated and non-affiliated advisors, and the Eagle High Net Worth (“EHNW”) programs. Both programs maintain an approved list of investment managers, provide asset allocation model portfolios, establish custodial facilities, monitor performance of client accounts, provide clients with accounting and other administrative services, and assist investment managers with certain trading management activities. AMS earns fees generally rang ing from .35% to .85% of asset balances per annum, a portion of which is paid to the investment managers who direct the investment of the clients' accounts. At September 24, 2004, these programs had approximately $4.8 billion in assets under management through agreements with 40 independent investment advisors, Eagle Asset Management and Awad Asset Management. Additional advisory programs offered through AMS are Freedom (managed portfolios of mutual funds) and the Managed Investment Program, where the Financial Advisor serves as the portfolio manager.

 
  7  

 


Commission alternative programs, such as Passport, Ambassador and Opportunity, allow clients to pay a quarterly fee (and in some cases a low transaction charge) in lieu of commissions. Fees are based on the individual account size and are also dependent on the type of securities in the accounts. For these accounts, clients receive quarterly performance reporting and other services. As of September 24, 2004, these programs, along with Freedom and the Managed Investment Program, had approximately $12 billion in assets serviced by Financial Advisors.

In addition to the foregoing programs, AMS also administers fee-based programs for clients who have contracted for portfolio management services from nonaffiliated investment advisors that are not part of the RJCS program.

RJFS - Asset Management Services


RJFS offers a wrap fee program similar to Passport called IMPAC. As of September 24, 2004, IMPAC had $5.3 billion in assets serviced by RJFS Financial Advisors.

Raymond James Trust Company
Raymond James Trust Company West

Raymond James Trust Company and Raymond James Trust Company West provide personal trust services primarily to existing clients of the broker-dealer subsidiaries. Portfolio management of trust assets is often subcontracted to the asset management operations of the Company. These two subsidiaries had a combined total of approximately $950 million in client assets at September 24, 2004, including $25 million in the donor-advised charity known as the Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund.

Proprietary Private Equity Funds

The Company has sponsored two private equity funds to date: Raymond James Capital Partners, L.P., a merchant banking limited partnership; and Ballast Point Ventures, L.P., a venture capital limited partnership (the “Funds”). The Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, earns management fees for services provided to the Funds and participates in profits or losses through both general and limited partnership interests.

RAYMOND JAMES BANK

RJBank is a federally chartered savings bank, regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision which provides residential, consumer and commercial loans, as well as FDIC-insured deposit accounts, to clients of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries and to the general public. RJBank also purchases residential whole loan packages and is active in bank participations and corporate loan syndications. RJBank generates revenue principally through the interest income earned on the transactions noted above, offset by the interest expense it incurs on client deposits and on it's borrowings.

Access to RJBank's products and services is available nationwide through the offices of its affiliated broker-dealer firms as well as through convenient telephonic and electronic banking services. As of September 24, 2004, RJBank had total assets of $925 million, with 79% of the bank's $773 million in deposits representing cash balances swept from wrap fee ERISA and IRA accounts, most of which are managed by Eagle and RJA - Asset Management Services. Other than the foregoing, no single client accounts for a material percentage of the segment's total business.

OTHER

The Other segment principally represents securities lending activity and investments in international joint ventures.

 
  8  

 


RJA - Securities Lending

This activity involves the borrowing and lending of securities from and to other broker-dealers, financial institutions and other counterparties, generally as an intermediary. The borrower of the securities puts up a cash deposit, commonly 102% of the market value of the securities, on which interest is earned. Accordingly, the lender receives cash and pays interest. These cash deposits are adjusted daily to reflect changes in current market value. The net revenues of this operation are the interest spread generated.

Raymond James International Holdings, Inc.

Raymond James International Holdings, Inc. (“RJIH”) currently has invested approximately $4.5 million in joint ventures in Argentina, France, India, Turkey, and Uruguay. These joint ventures operate in securities brokerage, investment banking and asset management. In addition, RJIH owns Raymond James Global Securities, Inc. (“RJGS”), a broker-dealer which currently clears business for predominantly Latin American entities. RJGS is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and obtains correspondent clearing services from RJA.

COMPETITION

The Company is engaged in intensely competitive businesses. The Company competes with many larger, better capitalized providers of financial services, including other securities firms, some of which are affiliated with major financial services companies, insurance companies, banking institutions and other organizations. The Company also competes with a number of firms offering on-line financial services and discount brokerage services, usually with lower levels of service, to individual clients. The Company competes principally on the basis of quality of associates, service, product selection, location and reputation in local markets.

In the financial services industry, there is significant competition for qualified associates. The Company's ability to compete effectively in its businesses is substantially dependent on its continuing ability to attract, retain, and motivate qualified associates, including successful Financial Advisors, investment bankers, trading professionals, portfolio managers and other revenue-producing or specialized personnel.

REGULATION

The following discussion sets forth some of the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to the financial services industry and provides some specific information relevant to the Company. The regulatory framework is intended primarily for the protection of customers and the securities markets, depositors and the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund and not for the protection of creditors or shareholders. Under certain circumstances, these rules may limit the ability of the Company to make capital withdrawals from its broker-dealer subsidiaries.

To the extent that the following information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions. A change in applicable statutes, regulations or regulatory policy may have a material effect on the Company’s business.

The financial services industry in the United States of America is subject to extensive regulation under federal and state laws. The SEC is the federal agency charged with administration of the federal securities laws. Financial services firms are also subject to regulation by state securities commissions in those states in which they conduct business. RJA and RJFS are currently registered as broker-dealers in all 50 states. In addition, financial services firms are subject to regulation by various foreign governments, securities exchanges, central banks and regulatory bodies, particularly in those countries where they have established offices. RJA, RJFS and certain joint ventures in which the Company is a participant, have offices in France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxemburg, Turkey, Ar gentina, India and Uruguay.

Much of the regulation of broker-dealers, however, has been delegated to self-regulatory organizations ("SRO's"), principally the NASD, the NYSE and other securities exchanges. These SRO's adopt and amend rules (which are subject to approval by the SEC) for governing the industry and conduct periodic examinations of member broker-dealers.

 
  9  

 


The financial services industry in Canada is subject to comprehensive regulation under both federal and provincial laws. Securities Commissions have been established in 13 provinces and territorial jurisdictions and are charged with the administration of securities laws. RJ Ltd. is currently registered in all Canadian jurisdictions. Securities dealers in Canada are also subject to regulation by SRO's which are responsible for the enforcement of and conformity with securities legislation for their members and have been granted the powers to prescribe their own rules of conduct and financial requirements of members. RJ Ltd. is regulated by the Securities Commissions in the jurisdictions of registration as well as by the SRO's, the Investment Dealers Association ("IDA") and Market Regulation Services Inc.

Broker-dealers are subject to regulations that cover all aspects of the securities business, including:

·   sales methods
·   trading practices
·   uses and safekeeping of clients' funds and securities
·   capital structure and financial soundness of securities firms
·   record keeping
·   the conduct of directors, officers and employees
·   internal controls
·   insurance requirements

The SEC, SRO's and state securities commissions may conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer, its officers or employees. Such administrative proceedings, whether or not resulting in adverse findings, can require substantial expenditures and can have an adverse impact on the reputation of a broker-dealer.

The Company's U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are required by federal law to belong to SIPC. When the SIPC fund falls below a certain amount, members are required to pay annual assessments of up to 1% of adjusted gross revenues. As a result of adequate fund levels, each of the Company's two domestic broker-dealer subsidiaries was required to pay only the minimum annual assessment of $150 in fiscal 2004. The SIPC fund provides protection for securities held in customer accounts up to $500,000 per customer, with a limitation of $100,000 on claims for cash balances. In December 2003, RJA joined with other major U.S. securities brokerage firms to form Customer Asset Protection Company (“CAPCO”), a licensed New York insurance company, to continue to provide excess SIPC coverage. CAPCO provides account protect ion for the total net equity of client accounts of participating firms. CAPCO has received a financial strength rating of A+ from Standard and Poor’s.

RJ Ltd. is required by the IDA to belong to the Canadian Investors Protection Fund ("CIPF"), whose primary role is investor protection. The CIPF may charge member firms assessments based on revenues and risk premiums based on capital deficiencies. The CIPF provides protection for securities and cash held in client accounts up to CDN$1,000,000 per client with separate coverage of CDN$1,000,000 for certain types of accounts. This coverage does not protect against market fluctuations.

See Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on SEC and IDA regulations pertaining to broker-dealer regulatory minimum net capital requirements.

The Company's investment advisory operations, including the Company-sponsored mutual funds, are also subject to extensive regulation. The Company's U.S. asset managers are registered as investment advisors with the SEC and are also required to make notice filings in certain states. Virtually all aspects of the asset management business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to benefit the asset management clients and generally grant supervisory agencies and bodies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict an investment advisor from conducting its asset management business in the event that it fails to comply with such laws and regulations. Possible sanctions that may be imposed for a failure include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on the asset managers engaging in the asset management business for specified periods of time, the revocation of registrations, and other censures and fines. A regulatory proceeding, regardless of whether it results in a sanction, can require substantial expenditures and can have an adverse effect on the reputation of an asset manager.

 
  10  

 


RJBank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements established by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on RJBank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, RJBank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of RJBank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. RJBank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established b y regulation to ensure capital adequacy require RJBank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations). See Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information and capital analysis.

The Company's two state-chartered trust companies are subject to regulation by the states in which they are chartered. These regulations focus on, among other things, the soundness of internal controls in place at the trust companies.

As a public company, the Company is subject to corporate governance requirements established by SEC and New York Stock Exchange, as well as Federal and State law. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Company is required to meet certain requirements regarding business dealings with members of the Board of Directors, the structure of its Audit Committee, and ethical standards for its senior financial officers, among other things. Under SEC and New York Stock Exchange rules, the Company is required to comply with other standards of corporate governance, including having a majority of independent directors serve on its Board of Directors, and the establishment of independent audit, compensation and corporate governance committees.

Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Company will be required to complete an assessment of its internal controls for fiscal 2005 and will be required to obtain reports from its independent auditors regarding their view of management's assessment of internal controls and their opinion regarding the Company's internal controls. To comply with this requirement the Company will incur additional costs, including internal staff and management time, as well as additional audit fees and fees for outside service providers and consultants.

As previously reported, RJFS and the SEC staff were unable to reach a resolution regarding a proposed enforcement action alleging fraud and failure to supervise a former Financial Advisor in the RJFS Rhode Island office. On September 30, 2004, the SEC issued an order instituting public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and section 203(f) of the Investment advisor Act of 1940 against RJFS, its former President and a former branch manager.  The Company has made provision in its financial statements for its estimate of the reasonable potential exposure for this claim; the matter is scheduled for a hearing before an administrative law judge in February 2005.

As disclosed in the previous year's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company undertook a review of sales of Class A load mutual funds in excess of $2,500 since January 1, 1999 and has refunded to clients any identified overcharges plus applicable interest arising from the failure to afford applicable discounts to clients. The refunds, including interest, aggregated $10,211,000. Of the total refunds, the Company has estimated that it will recover $5,369,000 from its Financial Advisors (of which $4,427,000 has already been collected) and $774,000 from mutual fund companies. The Company had made adequate provisions in its fiscal 2003 consolidated financial statements reflecting the net impact of these refunds. In addition, RJFS paid fines aggregating $2,595,000 to the SEC and the NASD relating to this matter.

 
  11  

 


OTHER INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE BY THE COMPANY

The Company's internet address is www.raymondjames.com. The Company makes available, free of charge, through links to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and our proxy statements. Investors can find this information under “About Our Company - Financial Results and SEC Filings”. These reports are available through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electr onically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. Additionally, the Company's code of ethics for senior financial officers - including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller - is filed as an exhibit to this report and is made available on our website under “About Our Company - Inside Raymond James - Corporate Governance”, also available at that site are the charters of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee. Printed copies of these documents will be furnished to any shareholders who requests them. The information on the Company's websites is not incorporated by reference into this report.

Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”

From time to time, the Company may publish “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or make verbal statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from the an ticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company's forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company's control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets; (ii) the volatility of the securities markets; (iii) fluctuations in interest rates; (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business or the profitability of certain segments of the Company's business; (v) fluctuations in currency rates; (vi) general economic conditions, both domestic and international; (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and related impact on securities markets; (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other new participants in the securities markets; (ix) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the Company or the securities industry generally; (x) changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products sold by the Company; (xi) natura l and other disasters; (xii) political and military events which would affect the United States of America or world markets, or which could disrupt the Company's communications and securities processing capabilities or other operations; and (xiii) changes in investor confidence which could adversely affect the sale of the Company's products and services. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.



 
  12  

 

ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES

The Company's headquarters is located on approximately 55 acres within the Carillon office park in St. Petersburg, Florida. The headquarters complex currently includes four main towers which encompass a total of 884,000 square feet of office space, the Raymond James Bank building, which is a 26,000-square-foot two-story building, and two five-story parking garages. Raymond James also has 30,000 square feet of leased space near Carillon.  In addition, the Company owns a 45,000 square foot building and leases 20,000 square feet at its Detroit operations center. The Company intends to expand its operational activities in Detroit and is seeking a larger site.

With the exception of a Company-owned RJA branch office building in Crystal River, FL, RJA branches are leased with various expiration dates through 2008. RJ Ltd. leases premises for main offices in Vancouver, Calgary, and Toronto and for branch offices throughout Canada. These leases have various expiration dates through 2013. RJ Ltd. does not own any land or buildings. The RJFS office in Atlanta and Raymond James Trust Company West facility in Tacoma are also under lease. See Note 11 to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Company's leases.

Leases for branch offices of RJFS and of the independent contractors of RJ Ltd. and RJIS are the responsibility of the respective independent contractor registered representatives.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits and arbitrations incidental to its securities business.  Like others in the retail securities industry, the Company has experienced a significant increase in the number of claims seeking recovery due to portfolio losses.

As previously reported, the Company and RJFS are defendants in a series of lawsuits and arbitrations relating to an alleged mortgage lending program known as the "Premiere 72" program, that was administered by a company owned in part by two individuals who were registered as Financial Advisors with RJFS in Houston. The lawsuits are pending in various courts, and several of the arbitration claims relating to this matter have been settled by RJFS for amounts consistent with its evaluation of those claims. In the first arbitration to reach a hearing, claimants sought approximately $1.8 million dollars in damages plus punitive damages.  The panel entered an order, subject to a final award being rendered, requiring RJFS to pay its clients their losses through a formula which includes the assignment to RJFS of thei r interests in the real estate transactions. The amounts due under the formula are still being calculated and appear to result in an amount substantially less than the claimants sought.   The panel denied any recovery to non-clients.    The Company does not believe that this order represents a precedent that would govern future decisions.  Arbitration proceedings for other claimants are currently scheduled through November 2006.

Although the total amount funded by participants in this lending program may exceed $150 million, the amount of actual loss of the claimants is not determinable at this time because the participants are actively attempting to realize value from the underlying real estate collateral. Based on discovery to date, the Company and RJFS believe they have strong defenses to these claims and are vigorously contesting them.

See "Regulation" above for a description of certain pending regulatory proceedings.

The Company is contesting the allegations in these and other cases and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each of these lawsuits and arbitrations.  In view of the number and diversity of claims against the Company, the number of jurisdictions in which litigation is pending and the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and other claims, the Company cannot state with certainty what the eventual outcome of pending litigation or other claims will be.  In the opinion of the Company's management, based on current available information, review with outside legal counsel, and consideration of amounts provided for in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these matters, ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse impact on th e Company's financial position or results of operations.  However, resolution of one or more of these matters may have a material effect on the results of operations in any future period, depending upon the ultimate resolution of those matters and upon the level of income for such period.

ITEM 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     None.

 
  13  

 


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “RJF”. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low trades for the common stock (as adjusted for the three-for-two stock split in March 2004).


 
2004
2003
 
High
Low
High
Low
First Quarter
$ 27.54
$ 23.83
$21.97
$15.39
Second Quarter
26.78
22.85
21.69
15.18
Third Quarter
26.53
23.93
23.11
17.06
Fourth Quarter
26.66
21.77
25.65
21.57

See Quarterly Financial Information in Item 8 for the amount of the quarterly dividends paid (page 64).

The Company expects to continue paying cash dividends. However, the payment and rate of dividends on the Company's common stock is subject to several factors including operating results, financial requirements of the Company, and the availability of funds from the Company's subsidiaries, including the broker-dealer subsidiaries, which may be subject to restrictions under the net capital rules of the SEC, NYSE and the IDA; and RJBank, which may be subject to restrictions by federal banking agencies. Such restrictions have never become applicable with respect to the Company's dividend payments. (See Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the capital restrictions placed on RJBank and the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries).

At December 1, 2004 there were approximately 13,000 holders of the Company's common stock.


 
  14  

 


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
Year Ended
 
Sept. 24,
Sept. 26,
Sept. 27,
Sept. 28,
Sept. 29,
 
2004
2003
2002
2001 (ii)
2000 (i)
 
(in 000's, except per share data)
Operating Results:
         
           
Gross revenues
$1,829,776
$1,497,571
$1,517,423
$1,670,990
$1,707,441
Net revenues
$1,781,259
$1,451,960
$1,441,088
$1,442,639
$1,478,789
Net income
$ 127,575
$ 86,317
$ 79,303
$ 96,410
$ 125,195
Net income per
         
Share - basic: *
$ 1.74
$ 1.19
$ 1.09
$ 1.35
$ 1.80
Net income per
         
Share - diluted: *
$ 1.72
$ 1.17
$ 1.07
$ 1.32
$ 1.78
           
Weighted average
         
Common shares
         
Outstanding - basic: *
73,395
72,824
73,011
71,495
69,437
Weighted average common and common
         
equivalent shares
         
outstanding - diluted: *
74,402
73,749
74,444
73,199
70,301
           
           
Cash dividends declared
         
per share *
$ .28
$ .24
$ .24
$ .24
$ .20
           
Financial Condition:
         
           
Total assets
$7,617,457
$6,911,638
$6,040,303
$6,372,054
$6,308,816
Long-term debt
$ 129,973
$ 167,013
$ 147,153
$ 147,879
$ 98,555
           
Shareholders' equity
$ 1,065,213
$ 924,735
$ 839,636
$ 770,876
$ 650,518
Shares outstanding *
73,846
72,765
73,011
72,321
69,431
           
Equity per share *
         
at end of period
$ 14.42
$ 12.71
$ 11.50
$ 10.66
$ 9.37

*    Gives effect to the three-for-two stock split paid on March 24, 2004.

  (i) Amounts include a $20 million charge to increase legal reserves related to the Corporex case. Excluding this charge, net income was $136,354 and basic and diluted net income per share were $1.96 and $1.94, respectively.

  (ii) Amounts include a $16 million reversal of a legal reserve related to the settlement of the Corporex case. Excluding this reversal, net income was $87,678 for the year and basic and diluted net income per share were $1.23 and $1.20, respectively.


 
  15  

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

The Company’s overall financial results continue to be highly and directly correlated to the direction of the equity markets. Each of the Company’s three largest business segments has significant operating leverage that is generally evident when the equity markets rise. While these markets were strong for only a little more than half of fiscal 2004, the Company achieved record revenues and earnings as a result of organizational and operational improvements undertaken during the market downturn in 2001-2003.

There were several factors which depressed investor activity during the last half of fiscal 2004. The anticipation of rising interest rates dampened the demand for fixed income products, and the Federal Reserve commenced a series of rate hikes during the fourth fiscal quarter. The demanding regulatory environment remained in the spotlight and focused on the financial services industry, resulting in an increase in the cost of compliance and also impacting public trust and confidence. Finally, there was uncertainty over the then-upcoming Presidential election and the various economic policies which might be endorsed.

Results of Operations - Total Company

The following table presents segment and consolidated financial information for the Company for the years indicated:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
 
September 26,
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
(in 000's)
Total Company
         
Revenues
$ 1,829,776
 
$ 1,497,571
 
$ 1,517,423
Pre-tax earnings
204,121
 
138,275
 
131,516
           
Private Client Group
         
Revenues
1,223,458
 
994,815
 
991,158
Pre-tax earnings
109,743
 
73,440
 
72,494
           
Capital Markets
         
Revenues
400,787
 
330,966
 
332,346
Pre-tax earnings
57,910
 
37,532
 
38,032
           
Asset Management
         
Revenues
148,160
 
123,647
 
129,731
Pre-tax earnings
27,875
 
18,730
 
20,257
           
RJBank
         
Revenues
28,104
 
28,699
 
31,056
Pre-tax earnings
8,824
 
10,182
 
7,188
           
Other
         
Revenues
29,267
 
19,444
 
33,132
Pre-tax earnings (loss)
(231)
 
(1,609)
 
(6,455)

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - Total Company

Total revenues increased 22% to a record $1.83 billion, as each of the Company’s three largest segments contributed to the growth. Net revenues rose 23%, as interest expense grew only 6%. Scattered throughout several segments, net interest earnings continue to be an important source of profits to the Company (see the chart below). Significantly, the upward trend of the equity markets during most of fiscal 2004 led many individual investors to return to the market, which in turn led to a steady rise in margin debits throughout the year. These balances are the Company’s best interest spread product, as the risk is well controlled and they are funded by relatively low cost client funds awaiting investment. Margin loan growth is largely responsible for the overall 5% improvement in net interest income.

 
  16  

 


 
Year Ended
 
September 24, 2004
 
September 26, 2003
 
September 27, 2002
 
($ in 000's)
Interest Revenue
         
Margin balances:
         
Average balance
$ 1,006,007
 
$ 887,376
 
$ 978,163
Average rate
4.0%
 
4.1%
 
4.8%
Interest revenue - margin balances
39,750
 
36,614
 
46,854
           
Assets segregated pursuant to federal regulations:
         
Average balance
2,288,593
 
2,244,959
 
1,981,562
Average rate
1.1%
 
1.2%
 
1.8%
Interest revenue - segregated assets
24,832
 
27,164
 
36,172
           
Stock borrowed:
         
Average balance
1,291,636
 
908,275
 
1,246,681
Average rate
1.1%
 
1.2%
 
1.7%
Interest revenue - stock borrowed
14,625
 
10,531
 
21,386
           
Raymond James Bank, FSB interest income
27,318
 
26,743
 
29,837
Other interest revenue
28,239
 
26,655
 
25,554
           
Total interest revenue
$ 134,764
 
$ 127,707
 
$ 159,803
           
Interest Expense
         
Client interest program:
         
Average balance
$ 2,715,667
 
$2,667,517
 
$2,522,479
Average rate
0.4%
 
0.6%
 
1.3%
Interest expense - client interest program
11,659
 
15,685
 
33,977
           
Stock loaned:
         
Average balance
1,387,818
 
954,394
 
1,343,782
Average rate
0.9%
 
0.9%
 
1.4%
Interest expense - stock loaned
12,406
 
8,817
 
19,311
           
Raymond James Bank, FSB interest expense
9,863
 
10,469
 
15,859
Other interest expense
14,589
 
10,640
 
7,188
           
Total interest expense
$ 48,517
 
$ 45,611
 
$ 76,335
Net interest income
$ 86,247
 
$ 82,096
 
$ 83,468


Overall expenses grew by 20%, primarily in the variable expense categories related to higher commission and transaction volumes. As a result, net income rose 48% to a record $127.6 million, or $1.72 per diluted share.

Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - Total Company

Total revenues declined $19.9 million, or 1%, for fiscal year 2003; however, taking into consideration the decrease in interest expense, net revenues (total revenues less interest expense) actually increased by $10.9 million, or 1%. Both interest revenue and interest expense were down in the current year, resulting in a decline of $1.4 million in net interest income. The decrease is primarily due to declining interest rates, combined with lower margin and stock borrowed/loaned balances, net of increased cash deposited with the Company by brokerage clients (see the chart below). The decline in margin balances is attributed to the economic environment and the poor performance of the securities markets through the first half of fisc al year 2003, which resulted in customers generally not committing new investment funds to the securities market and a tendency to reduce risk by employing less margin borrowing. The equity market conditions also led to a continued decline in the security lending business, as the sluggish securities market resulted in depressed demand for securities.

 
  17  

 


The modest decline in net interest income was offset by increases in financial service fees and other revenue of $9.1 million and $9.7 million, respectively. The increase in financial service fees was driven by increased fees from the addition of IRA, Passport, and Freedom accounts (the latter two being wrap fee accounts which generate transaction processing fees for trades executed), as well as higher money market processing fees driven by the increase in the Company's money market assets in the current year. The increase in earnings is attributable primarily to the first quarter gain of $5.3 million from the sale of RJ Ltd.'s shares of TSX (formerly its Toronto Stock Exchange seats) and an increase of $2.7 million in mutual fund networking fees, which is due to an increased number of accounts with networked mutu al fund companies which pay the Company to include their fund positions and activity on the brokerage statements, thus eliminating the need for the mutual fund companies to send confirmations and statements to their clients.

Net income increased $7 million, or 9%, to $86.3 million, or $1.17 per diluted share, from $79.3 million, or $1.07 per diluted share for the prior fiscal year. The increase in earnings is primarily attributable to a decrease in net litigation reserve expense in the current year, as the increase in compensation expense offset the increase in net revenues.

Results of Operations - Private Client Group

The following table presents consolidated financial information for the Private Client Group segment for the years indicated:
 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
 
 
% Incr.
 
September 26,
 
 
% Incr.
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
 
($ in 000's)
Revenues:
                 
Securities commissions and fees
$ 1,016,001
 
25% 
 
$ 811,655
 
1% 
 
$ 803,160
Interest
74,839
 
3% 
 
72,371
 
(21%)
 
91,371
Financial service fees
74,076
 
10% 
 
67,172
 
12% 
 
59,716
Other
58,542
 
34% 
 
43,617
 
18% 
 
36,911
Total revenue
1,223,458
 
23% 
 
994,815
 
0% 
 
991,158
                   
Interest expense
13,730
 
(16%)
 
16,375
 
(49%)
 
32,067
                   
Net revenues
1,209,728
 
24% 
 
978,440
 
2% 
 
959,091
                   
Non-interest expenses:
                 
Sales commissions
735,194
 
27% 
 
578,786
 
2% 
 
565,125
Admin & incentive comp and benefit costs
187,469
 
16% 
 
161,784
 
4% 
 
155,018
Communications and information processing
39,968
 
5% 
 
37,978
 
(12%)
 
43,390
Occupancy and equipment
48,685
 
14% 
 
42,637
 
2% 
 
41,790
Business development
37,798
 
19% 
 
31,707
 
2% 
 
31,093
Clearance and other
50,871
 
(2%)
 
52,108
 
4% 
 
50,181
                   
Total non-interest expenses
1,099,985
 
22% 
 
905,000
 
2% 
 
886,597
Pre-tax earnings
$ 109,743
 
49% 
 
$ 73,440
 
1% 
 
$ 72,494

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - Private Client Group

The 25% increase in Private Client Group commission revenues was attributable to the combination of several factors. First, there was a modest net increase in financial advisor headcount of 118, or 2.5%, to 4,929 in our wholly-owned subsidiaries. More importantly, the process of upgrading the sales force by terminating lower producers continued in earnest. Thus, the overall composition of the sales force was improved from the prior year. Finally, there were 7½ months of strong market activity during 2004 as compared to approximately 6 strong months in 2003. The aforementioned improved quality of the sales force amplified the effect on revenues of the longer duration of good market conditions.

 
  18  

 


The improved interest spread was due to the steady rise in margin debits throughout the year. The increase in financial service fees was a result of the increased number of transaction fees from trades in fee-based accounts and a higher amount of IRA fees as the number of such accounts grew. Other revenues increased due to higher mutual fund networking fees and greater meeting sponsorship revenues.

Administrative compensation costs reflect increased home office staffing in the domestic independent contractor subsidiary and higher incentive compensation accruals as profits were significantly improved. Business development expenses rose due primarily to the cost of promoting the AdvisorChoice platform. Most notably, other expenses, including legal expenses and reserves, declined by one third from the prior year.

As is the case in all of the Company’s major businesses, there is significant operating leverage in the Private Client Group, particularly with increases in financial advisor average production. Accordingly, the 23% increase in net revenues led to a surge in pretax income of 49%.

Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - Private Client Group

Private Client Group total revenues increased by approximately $3.7 million for fiscal year 2003, with net revenues increasing by $19.4 million. The increase in net revenues is attributed to the modest increase in commissions and the gains in financial service fees and other, offset by a decrease in net interest income. The increase in commission revenue is primarily attributable to improved market conditions in the second half of fiscal 2003, which resulted in retail investors, who had been reluctant to invest during fiscal year 2002 and the first half of fiscal 2003, returning to the securities market with a renewed interest in both equity and fixed-income products. Additionally, in the second half of fiscal 2003 there were two consecutive quarters of increased assets in fee-based accounts. As the individual fee-based accounts are billed on beginning-of-quarter balances, this increase in assets resulted in increased revenue only for the fourth quarter of 2003. In addition, there was an increase in commissions from investment banking activity, which is due to an increase in the number and dollar volume of lead and co-managed public equity offerings in the current year (for more information on investment banking activities see the “Results of Operations - Capital Markets” discussion below). The increase in financial service fees is attributable to the aforementioned increase in fees from additional IRA, Passport, and Freedom accounts, as well as the increased fees received by the broker-dealer subsidiaries for the distribution of mo ney market accounts and mutual funds. The increase in other revenue is primarily due to an increase in service fees received from mutual fund companies which serve to partially reimburse the Company for its processing costs related to items such as statement preparation and tax reporting. The decrease in net interest income of $3.3 million is attributable to declining interest rates, as well as declining average margin balances and segregated assets, offset by declining payables under the client interest program.

Pre-tax earnings for the Private Client Group were consistent with the prior year, reflecting the increase in net revenues offset by an increase in sales commission expense and other compensation expenses of $13.7 million and $6.8 million, respectively. Commission expense increased due to the increase in independent contractor revenue, on which there is a higher payout to Financial Advisors than to employee Financial Advisors. The higher payout is used to offset the independent contractor Financial Advisors' responsibility to cover their own branch operating expenses, which are paid by the Company in the employee model.


 
  19  

 


Results of Operations - Capital Markets

The following table presents consolidated financial information for the Capital Markets segment for the years indicated:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
 
% Incr.
 
September 26,
 
% Incr.
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
 
($ in 000's)
Revenues:
                 
Institutional sales commissions:
Equity
$ 174,464
 
 
59% 
 
$ 109,417
 
 
(13%)
 
$ 125,928
Fixed income
77,102
 
(30%) 
 
109,841
 
10% 
 
100,144
Underwriting fees
53,142
 
65% 
 
32,057
 
15% 
 
27,773
Mergers & acquisitions fees
21,928
 
11% 
 
19,676
 
(31%)
 
28,698
Private placement fees
9,958
 
28% 
 
7,758
 
27% 
 
6,085
Trading profits
20,579
 
22% 
 
16,929
 
(13%)
 
19,469
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds
20,513
 
26% 
 
16,333
 
86% 
 
8,771
Other
23,100
 
22% 
 
18,955
 
22% 
 
15,478
Total revenue
400,787
 
21% 
 
330,966
 
0% 
 
332,346
                   
Interest expense
11,543
 
24% 
 
9,312
 
19% 
 
7,800
Net Revenues
389,244
 
21% 
 
321,654
 
(1%)
 
324,546
                   
Non-interest expenses
                 
Sales commissions
90,184
 
1% 
 
89,227
 
(7%)
 
95,926
Admin & incentive comp and benefit costs
177,168
 
35% 
 
131,713
 
2% 
 
128,588
Communications and information processing
23,447
 
4% 
 
22,485
 
1% 
 
22,331
Occupancy and equipment
12,252
 
(5%)
 
12,837
 
(2%)
 
13,155
Business development
17,957
 
18% 
 
15,259
 
10% 
 
13,904
Clearance and other
10,326
 
(18%)
 
12,601
 
0% 
 
12,610
Total non-interest expense
331,334
 
17% 
 
284,122
 
(1%)
 
286,514
Pre-tax earnings
$ 57,910
 
54% 
 
$ 37,532
 
(1%)
 
$ 38,032

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - Capital Markets

Despite a significant decline in fixed income sales volume, the unprecedented activity levels of the Equity Capital Markets operations propelled this segment to record revenues and profits. Most notably, the Company was lead or co-manager for 120 public offerings for the year, nearly double the number in 2003, as market conditions were conducive for several of the industries on which these efforts are focused. This deal flow was a major contributing factor to the increase in institutional equity sales commissions. The decline in fixed income commissions reflects investors’ hesitancy to commit funds while anticipating a rising interest rate environment. The rise in interest expense represents the financing costs of the higher average fixed income inventory balances.

Commission expense was nearly flat despite the 15% rise in commission revenues as fixed income commissions carry a higher payout than equities. The increase in administrative expense is primarily attributable to higher profit-based incentive compensation in equity capital markets departments. The operating leverage in this segment was dramatic as the average production of institutional equity salesmen, sales traders and investment bankers rose sharply. As a result, record profits of $57.9 million were 54% higher than in the prior year.

 
  20  

 


Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - Capital Markets

Although net revenues for the Capital Markets segment were down slightly from the prior year, the fixed income portion of this segment continued to perform well in 2003. Institutional sales commissions excluding underwriting sales credits (which declined) remained strong and were up by 3% over the prior year, driven by increases in sales of over-the-counter equity and a variety of fixed income securities. Also, the Company has continued to grow its business in the syndication of investment partnerships designed to yield returns in the form of low-income housing tax credits, which resulted in an increase in revenue of $7.6 million in 2003. Equity investment banking, however, experienced mixed results in the current year. The number of U.S. lead and co-managed underwritings increased to 58 from 50 in the prior year, w hile the dollar volume of these transactions increased to $8.7 billion from $7.0 billion. As a result, underwriting fees increased by $4.3 million. The increase in underwriting transactions, however, did not translate into an equivalent increase in underwriting sales commissions as the Company acted as the lead manager on fewer deals in the current year. Additionally, investment banking was negatively affected by lower merger and acquisition fees, which declined $9 million due to the combination of one large transaction in Canada during the prior year and a general decline in the Company's merger and acquisition activity. Volatility in interest rates resulted in a 13% decrease in trading profits in 2003, driven primarily by declines in taxable fixed-income products.

Pre-tax earnings for the Capital Markets segment were down slightly from the prior year due to the $2.9 million decrease in net revenues offset by a $2.4 million reduction in expenses. The primary contributor to the reduction in expenses was compensation, with sales commissions decreasing by $6.7 million and administrative and other compensation increasing by $3.1 million. The decline in commission expense is due to lower underwriting sales credits, while the increase in other compensation is primarily attributed to concentrated efforts to grow the public finance department, as well as the formation of a structured finance department in the current year.

Results of Operations - Asset Management

The following table presents consolidated financial information for the Asset Management segment for the years indicated:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
 
% Incr.
 
September 26,
 
% Incr.
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
 
($ in 000's)
Revenues
                 
Investment advisory fees
$ 128,696
 
23% 
 
$ 105,015
 
(6%)
 
$ 111,979
Other
19,464
 
4% 
 
18,632
 
5% 
 
17,752
Total revenue
148,160
 
20% 
 
123,647
 
(5%)
 
129,731
                   
Expenses
                 
Admin & incentive comp and benefit costs
54,776
 
25% 
 
43,970
 
(2%)
 
44,753
Communications and information processing
14,284
 
12% 
 
12,721
 
(2%)
 
13,015
Occupancy and equipment
3,502
 
11% 
 
3,150
 
(14%)
 
3,642
Business development
5,493
 
5% 
 
5,250
 
(1%)
 
5,298
Other
42,230
 
6% 
 
39,826
 
(7%)
 
42,766
Total expenses
120,285
 
15% 
 
104,917
 
(4%)
 
109,474
Pre-tax earnings
$ 27,875
 
49% 
 
$ 18,730
 
(8%)
 
$ 20,257


 
  21  

 


The following table presents assets under management for the years indicated:

 
Sept. 24,
 
% Incr.
 
Sept. 26,
 
% Incr.
 
Sept. 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
Assets Under Management:
($ in 000's)
                   
Eagle Asset Mgmt., Inc.
                 
Retail
$ 3,761,898
 
23% 
 
$ 3,051,468
 
17% 
 
$ 2,610,024
Institutional
5,080,713
 
22% 
 
4,149,000
 
60% 
 
2,594,790
Total Eagle
8,842,611
 
23% 
 
7,200,468
 
38% 
 
5,204,814
                   
Heritage Family of Mutual Funds
                 
Money Market
6,071,532
 
(7%)
 
6,516,443
 
7% 
 
6,078,062
Other
1,983,580
 
22% 
 
1,629,363
 
36% 
 
1,199,958
Total Heritage
8,055,112
 
(1%)
 
8,145,806
 
12% 
 
7,278,020
                   
Raymond James Consulting Services
4,810,935
 
32% 
 
3,653,276
 
22% 
 
3,000,303
Awad Asset Management
1,349,040
 
50% 
 
901,224
 
34% 
 
673,549
Freedom Accounts
988,010
 
108% 
 
475,465
 
218% 
 
149,420
                   
Total Assets Under Management
24,045,708
 
18% 
 
20,376,239
 
25% 
 
16,306,106
Less: Asset Managed for Related Parties
1,728,788
 
52% 
 
1,134,555
 
33% 
 
851,830
                   
Third Party Assets Under Management
$22,316,920
 
16% 
 
$19,241,684
 
24% 
 
$15,454,276

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - Asset Management

Investment advisory fees rose at a rate higher than that of assets under management primarily because the increase in assets consisted entirely of equity accounts, which bear a higher management fee than fixed income and money market assets. In addition, the Company earned approximately $930,000 more in performance fees from managed hedge funds than in the prior year. Money market fund balances were the only category that declined, as investors gained confidence in the equity markets and shifted some of these funds accordingly.

The increase in administrative expense relates primarily to performance based and profit-based incentive compensation accruals. Once again, operating leverage was evident as a modest increase in revenues led to significant rise in pretax income.
  
Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - Asset Management

Revenues for the Asset Management segment declined $6.1 million. Slightly more than half of the Company's assets under management are billed based on beginning-of-quarter balances; the average beginning of the quarter balances for those assets was $936 million lower during fiscal year 2003 than during fiscal year 2002. The remaining assets under management are billed based on average daily balances. The average balance for those assets increased $617 million for the year ended September 26, 2003 as compared to the year ended September 27, 2002. The combined effect of the changes in assets under management resulted in the decrease in investment advisory fees of $7 million, or 6%. Nearly all of the portfolio managers at Eagle Asset Management continue to outperform their benchmark averages, resulting in positive net s ales. Additionally, Heritage’s funds continued to perform well during fiscal 2003. For the year ended September 2003, assets under management increased 23%, which is comprised of both positive net sales and market appreciation. The overall segment's pre-tax income declined at a slower rate than revenues due to cost control measures implemented in the current year, which have held compensation flat and reduced operating expenses.


 
  22  

 


Results of Operations - RJBank

The following table presents consolidated financial information for RJBank for the years indicated:

 
For the Years Ended
 
September 24,
 
% Incr.
 
September 26,
 
% Incr.
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
 
($ in 000's)
Interest income and expense
                 
Interest income
$ 27,318
 
2% 
 
$ 26,743
 
(10%)
 
$ 29,837
Interest expense
9,863
 
(6%)
 
10,469
 
(34%)
 
15,859
Net interest income
17,455
 
7% 
 
16,274
 
16% 
 
13,978
                   
Other income
786
 
(60%)
 
1,956
 
60% 
 
1,219
Net revenues
18,241
 
0% 
 
18,230
 
20% 
 
15,197
                   
Non-interest expense
                 
Employee compensation and benefits
4,686
 
11% 
 
4,237
 
16% 
 
3,650
Communications and information processing
758
 
55%
 
488
 
(15%)
 
575
Occupancy and equipment
347
 
(18%)
 
422
 
(8%)
 
459
Other
3,626
 
25%
 
2,901
 
(13%)
 
3,325
Total non-interest expense
9,417
 
17% 
 
8,048
 
0% 
 
8,009
Pre-tax earnings
$ 8,824
 
(13%)
 
$ 10,182
 
42% 
 
$ 7,188

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - RJBank

The improvement in net interest income was a result of further progress in loan growth as a percentage of total assets. The decline in other income reflects the slowdown of refinancing activity, which led to fewer mortgage originations and lower fees from the subsequent sales of originated fixed rate loans.

The increase in other expense encompasses a $1.4 million higher provision for loan losses due to the increased levels of purchased whole loan pools and outstanding commercial loan balances.

RJBank’s policy is to maintain a substantially duration-matched portfolio of assets and liabilities. As the vast majority of liabilities are floating rate demand deposits, certain asset purchases are hedged through entering into interest rate swap contracts. Interest spreads have been negatively impacted by the effect of interest rate swaps which were put in place several years ago to hedge fixed rate assets against interest rate increases; substantially all of these contracts expire by the end of calendar 2005.

The combination of the factors discussed above resulted in a 13% decline in pretax income. As mentioned in previous years, current results are negatively impacted during periods of significant net loan growth as a provision for loan losses is recorded in the period of origination or purchase, while the benefit of the higher interest earnings is recognized over subsequent periods.

 
  23  

 


Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - RJBank

Interest rates continued to fall during 2003, which resulted in lower mortgage rates and continued refinancings. Heavy prepayments due to refinancings affected both the residential loan portfolio and mortgage-backed securities. As a result, portfolio loans and investments continued to be replaced with lower yielding assets. However, RJBank increased its loans as a percent of total assets from 54% at September 2002 to 62% at September 2003. Loans produce a higher yield than mortgage-backed securities, which has allowed RJBank to reduce the impact of the decline in interest rates. Additionally, interest rates began to stabilize in the second half of fiscal 2003, resulting in an increase in interest spreads to an average of 1.65% for fiscal 2003 versus 1.46% for fiscal 2002. Non-interest income increased by approximate ly 60% in the current year due to income from the sale of originated fixed-rate mortgage loans, which increased 116% over the prior year. RJBank has controlled non-interest expenses during the current year, with those expenses increasing at a rate significantly below the 20% increase in net revenues. The only significant increase in non-interest expense in 2003 was employee compensation, which increased due to an increase in staffing to meet the demands of heavier volume in retail lending and to further develop the commercial lending department. Net revenues per employee, however, increased by 20% over the prior year. The combination of managing loan runoff, the stabilization of interest rates, increases in fee income from loans sold, and the emphasis on cost control resulted in a $3 million increase in pre-tax earnings in fiscal 2003.

Results of Operations - Other

The following table presents consolidated financial information for the Other segment for the years indicated:

 
For the Years Ended
 
September 24,
 
% Incr.
 
September 26,
 
% Incr.
 
September 27,
 
2004
 
(Decr.)
 
2003
 
(Decr.)
 
2002
 
($ in 000's)
Interest income and expense
                 
Interest income
$ 18,154 
 
43% 
 
$ 12,661 
 
(50%) 
 
$ 25,246 
Interest expense
13,378 
 
42% 
 
9,447 
 
(57%) 
 
21,821 
 Net interest income
4,776 
 
49% 
 
3,214 
 
(6%) 
 
3,425 
                   
Other income
11,113 
 
64% 
 
6,783 
 
(14%) 
 
7,886 
Net revenues
15,889 
 
59% 
 
9,997 
 
(12%) 
 
11,311 
                   
 Other expense
16,120 
 
39% 
 
11,606 
 
(35%) 
 
17,766 
Pre-tax (loss) earnings
$ (231)
 
86% 
 
$ (1,609)
 
(75%) 
 
$ (6,455)

Year ended September 24, 2004 Compared with the Year ended September 26, 2003 - Other

Net interest income improved as securities lending balances were much higher than in the prior year and the balance of free cash was also higher, enough so that the parent company’s term loan ($50 million balance at payoff) was repaid in August 2004, more than a year ahead of maturity. Other income reflects the improved performance of the Company’s consolidated joint ventures in emerging markets, particularly in Turkey.

Year ended September 26, 2003 Compared with the Year ended September 27, 2002 - Other

Net interest income was relatively flat with the prior year. The overall decrease in gross interest income and interest expense is attributable to a sluggish equity market, which depressed demand for securities lending activity, as evidenced by the decline in the average balance of stocks borrowed/loaned. Additionally, the average interest rates earned/charged on stock borrowed/loaned transactions declined by 0.50%, contributing further to the current year reduction in gross interest income and expense. Other Income decreased by 14% due to a decline in income from the Company's international joint ventures, offset by the current year gain of $5.3 million on the sale of RJ Ltd.'s shares of TSX (formerly its Toronto Stock Exchange seats).

 
  24  

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of the Company's critical accounting policies. For a full description of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, those described below involve a high degree of judgment and complexity. These critical accounting policies require estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the consolidated financial statements. Due to their nature, estimates involve judgment based upon available information. Actual results or amounts could differ from estimates and the difference could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, understanding these policies is important in understandin g the reported results of operations and the financial position of the Company.

Valuation of Securities and Other Assets

“Trading account securities” and “Available for sale securities” are reflected in the consolidated statement of financial condition at fair value or amounts that approximate fair value. In accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”, unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected in net earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on the underlying purpose of the instrument. The following table presents our trading and available for sale securities segregated into cash (i.e., non-derivative) trading instruments, derivative contra cts, and available for sale securities:

 
September 24, 2004
 
 
Financial
Instruments Owned
 
Financial
Instruments Sold
but not yet Purchased
 
(in 000’s)
Trading account securities:
     
Cash trading instruments
$ 315,294
 
$ 113,355
Derivative contracts
14,567
 
8,926
Available for sale securities
208,022
 
-
Total
$ 537,883
 
$ 122,281

Cash Trading Instruments and Available for Sale Securities

When available, the Company uses prices from independent sources such as listed market prices, or broker dealer price quotations to derive the fair value of the instruments. For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable fair values, the Company uses estimated fair values as determined by management. The following table presents the carrying value of cash trading and available for sale securities for which fair value is measured based on quoted prices or other independent sources versus those for which fair value is determined by management:

 
September 24, 2004
 
 
Financial
Instruments Owned
 
Financial
Instruments Sold
but not yet Purchased
 
(in 000’s)
Fair value based on quoted prices and   independent sources
 
$ 506,323
 
 
$ 122,281
Fair value determined by Management
31,560
 
-
Total
$ 537,883
 
$ 122,281

Derivative Contracts

Fair value for derivative contracts, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps, are obtained from pricing models that consider current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments or commodities, as well as time value and yield curve or volatility factors underlying the positions.

Investment in Leveraged Leases

The Company is the lessor in two leveraged commercial aircraft transactions with two major domestic airlines (Delta and Continental). The Company's combined equity investments represented 21% of the aggregate purchase prices; the remaining 79% was funded by public debt issued in the form of equipment trust certificates. The residual values of the aircrafts at the end of an average lease term of 20 years are projected to be an average of 10% of the original cost. The leases expire in September 2013 and June 2016, respectively.

 
  25  

 


The Company's ability to realize its expected return is dependent upon the airlines' ability to fulfill its lease obligations. In the event that the airlines default on their lease commitments and the Company is unable to re-lease or sell the planes with adequate terms, the Company would suffer a loss of some or all of its investment. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a $4 million charge related to its investment in the leveraged lease of an aircraft to Delta Airlines. Although Delta has not defaulted on its obligations under this lease, Delta's financial condition has continued to deteriorate. If the situation worsens, additional charges may be recorded in future periods to further write down the remaining investment balance for this lease of $6.8 million.

Goodwill

Intangible assets consist predominantly of goodwill related to the acquisitions of Roney & Co. (now part of RJA) and Goepel McDermid, Inc. (now called Raymond James Ltd). This goodwill, totaling $63 million, was allocated to the reporting units within the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized.

The Company reviews its goodwill on at least an annual basis in order to determine whether its value is impaired. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. When available, the Company uses recent, comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the respective reporting units. The company calculates an estimated fair value based on multiples of revenues, earnings, and book value of comparable transactions. However, when such comparable transactions are not available or have become outdated, the Company uses discounted cash flow scenarios to estimate the fair value of the reporting units. As of September 24, 2004, goodwill had been allocated to the following reporting units as identified by the Company: the Private Client Group of RJA, as well as, the Private Client Group and Capital Markets segments of RJ Ltd. As of the most recent impairment test, the Company determined that the carrying value of the goodwill for each reporting unit had not been impaired. However, changes in current circumstances or business conditions could result in an impairment of goodwill. As required, the Company will continue to perform impairment testing on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

Reserves

The Company records reserves related to legal proceedings in "other payables". Such reserves are established and maintained in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies", and Financial Interpretation No. 14. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on the part of management. Management considers many factors including, but not limited to: the amount of the claim; the amount of the loss in the client's account; the basis and validity of the claim; the possibility of wrongdoing on the part of an associate of the Company; previous results in similar cases; and legal precedents and case law. Each legal proceeding is reviewed with counsel in each accounting period and the reserve is adjusted as deemed appropriate by management. Lastly, each case is review to determine if it is probable that insurance coverage will apply, in which case the reserve is reduced accordingly. Any change in the reserve amount is recorded in the consolidated financial statements and is recognized as a charge/credit to earnings in that period. The assumptions of management in determining the estimates of reserves may prove to be incorrect, which could materially affect results in the period the expenses are ultimately determined.

The Company also records reserves or allowances for doubtful accounts related to client receivables and loans. Client receivables at the broker-dealers are generally collateralized by securities owned by the brokerage clients. Therefore, when a receivable is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is generally measured based on the fair value of the securities acting as collateral, which is measured based on current prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker-dealer price quotations.

Client loans at RJBank are generally collateralized by real estate or other property. RJBank provides for both an allowance for losses in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”, and a reserve for individually impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by a Creditor for Impairment of a Loan”. The calculation of the SFAS No. 5 allowance is subjective as management segregates the loan portfolio into different classes and assigns each class an allowance percentage based on the perceived risk associated with that class of loans. The factors taken into consideration when assigning the reserve pe rcentage to each class include trends in delinquencies; volume and terms; changes in geographic distribution, lending policies, local, regional, and national economic conditions; and past loss history. For individual loans identified as impaired, RJBank measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At September 24, 2004, the amortized cost of all RJBank loans was $694 million and an allowance for loan losses of $7.6 million was recorded against that balance. The allowance for loan losses is approximately 1.17% of the amortized cost of the loan portfolio and has not changed significantly since the prior year.

 
  26  

 


The Company also makes loans or pays advances to Financial Advisors, primarily for recruiting and retention purposes. The Company provides for a general allowance for loan losses on such receivables based on historical collection experience. Additionally, the Company provides for a specific reserve on these receivables if a Financial Advisor is no longer associated with the Company and it is determined that it is probable the amount will not be collected. At September 24, 2004 the receivable from Financial Advisors was $44.5 million, which is net of an allowance of $7.8. million for estimated uncollectibility.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2004 was approximately $183 million. Cash was provided by earnings and increased client cash balances. Cash was used for loans to clients and the purchase of securities inventories. The remainder of the cash used is attributed to the net fluctuations in various other asset and liability accounts.

Investing activities provided $11 million in cash, which is primarily due to the maturation and repayments of mortgage-backed securities, net of reinvestment and capital expenditures. The Company re-invested approximately two thirds of the $99 million in proceeds from these repayments in additional mortgage-backed securities. Also, additions to fixed assets consumed $22 million related primarily to the completion of a fourth headquarters building in St. Petersburg, FL.

Financing activities used $39 million, the result of the payment of cash dividends, the net repayment of borrowings, and net cash provided from the of the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases.

The Company has loans payable consisting primarily of a $72 million mortgage on its headquarters office complex, and $60 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances at RJBank. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries have the following lines of credit: RJF has a $100 million line of credit, RJA has uncommitted bank lines of credit aggregating $505 million with commercial banks, Raymond James Credit Corporation has a line of credit for $25 million, and RJ Ltd. has a CDN$40 million line of credit. At September 24, 2004, the Company had approximately $4.1 million in outstanding loans against these lines of credit. Additionally, RJBank had $213 million in credit available from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") at September 24, 2004.

The Company has committed a total of $30.9 million, in amounts ranging from $500,000 to $1,500,000, to 33 different independent venture capital or private equity partnerships. As of September 24, 2004, the Company had invested $24.5 million of that amount. Additionally, the Company is the general partner in two internally sponsored private equity limited partnerships to which it has committed $14 million. Of that amount, the Company has invested $8.8 million as of September 24, 2004.

Management has been authorized by the Board of Directors to repurchase its common stock at their discretion for general corporate purposes. There is no formal stock repurchase plan at this time. In May 2004 the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of shares. As of September 24, 2004 the unused portion of this authorization was $73.3 million.

The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to requirements of the SEC and the IDA relating to liquidity and capital standards. The domestic broker-dealer subsidiaries of the Company are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. RJA, a member firm of the NYSE, is also subject to the rules of the NYSE, whose requirements are substantially the same. Rule 15c3-1 requires that aggregate indebtedness, as defined, not exceed fifteen times net capital, as defined. Rule 15c3-1 also provides for an “alternative net capital requirement”, which both RJA and RJFS have elected. It requires that minimum net capital, as defined, be equal to the greater of $250,000 or two percent of Aggregate Debit Items arising from client transactions. T he NYSE may require a member firm to reduce its business if its net capital is less than four percent of Aggregate Debit Items and may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business and declaring cash dividends if its net capital is less than five percent of Aggregate Debit Items.

 
  27  

 


RJ Ltd. is subject to the Minimum Capital Rule (By-Law No. 17 of the IDA) and the Early Warning System (By-Law No. 30 of the IDA). The Minimum Capital Rule requires that every member shall have and maintain at all times Risk Adjusted Capital greater than zero calculated in accordance with Form 1 (Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report) and with such requirements as the Board of Directors of the IDA may from time to time prescribe. Insufficient Risk Adjusted Capital may result in suspension from membership in the stock exchanges or the IDA. The Early Warning System is designed to provide advance warning that a member firm is encountering financial difficulties. This system imposes certain sanctions on members who are designated in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 according to its capital, profitability, liquidity position, frequency of designation or at the discretion of the IDA. Restrictions on business activities and capital transactions, early filing requirements, and mandated corrective measures are sanctions that may be imposed as part of the Early Warning System. RJ Ltd. was not in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 during fiscal 2004 or 2003.

RJBank is subject to various regulatory and capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, RJBank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of RJBank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. RJBank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require RJBank to maintain minimum amounts an d ratios of Total and Tier I Capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 24, 2004, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

Effects of recently issued accounting standards

On October 13, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) on EITF issue 04-10, “Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments that do not meet the Quantitative Thresholds.” The task force concluded that operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds established by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” can be aggregated only if aggregation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of SFAS No. 131, the segments have similar economic characteristics, and the segments share a majority of the aggregation criteria listed in SFAS No. 131. This EITF becomes app licable for fiscal years ending after October 13, 2004. The Company does not believe that the EITF will have a material effect on its segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131.

On March 9, 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments”. SAB No. 105 applies to those loan commitments that are accounted for as derivatives in accordance with paragraph three of SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and contains specific guidance on measuring those loan commitments at fair value. Additionally, it requires registrants to disclose their accounting policies related to loan commitments accounted for as derivatives, including the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the commitments, as well as any associated hedging strategies. SAB No. 105 is effective for new loan commitments entered into subsequent to March 31, 2004. The adoption of SAB 105 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

On March 31, 2004, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF in issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments” on the guidance to be used in determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. This consensus ratified by the FASB on March 31, 2004 was effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, the guidance contained in paragraphs 10 - 20 of EITF 03-1, related to determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary and measuring the related impairment loss, has been delayed by F ASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF Issue 03-1-1, "Effective Date of Paragraphs 10 - 20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1.” The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of paragraphs 10 - 20 of this EITF on its consolidated financial statements.

The FASB had previously ratified in November 2003, the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 related to investments with unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The disclosures must include the amount of unrealized losses, the related fair value of the investments with unrealized losses, and must be “segregated by those investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer.” The disclosure requirements were implemented in the Company’s fiscal year 2004 annual financial statements.

 
  28  

 


On March 31, 2004 the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force on EITF Issue 03-16, “Accounting for Investments in Limited Liability Companies.” This EITF issues requires “that an investment in a Limited Liability Company (“LLC”) that maintains a “specific ownership account” for each investor - similar to a partnership capital account structure - should be viewed as similar to an investment in a limited partnership for purposes of determining whether a noncontrolling investment in an LLC should be accounted for using the cost method or the equity method.” These requirements are applicable for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The adoption of EITF 03-16 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial stat ements.
 
In December 2003, the SEC issued SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.” SAB No. 104 revises or rescinds portions of the interpretative guidance included in SAB No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” in order to make this interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulations. SAB No. 101, which was issued in December 1999, provides guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenues in the financial statements of SEC registrants. The provisions of SAB No. 104 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. The statement specifies how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The statement was effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and was effective for pre-existing instruments as of the Company’s fourth quarter of 2003. However, the effective date of certain provisions of SFAS No. 150 for certain mandatorily redeemable financial instruments has been deferred by FSP FAS 150-3. Under this FSP, certain mandatorily redeemable shares are subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 150 for the first fiscal period beginning after December 15, 2004. Other manda torily redeemable shares are deferred indefinitely but may be subject to classification or disclosure provisions of the Statement. Adoption of the applicable provisions of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, the Company does not expect that the deferred provisions will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which provides guidance on the consolidation of certain entities in which the equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. Such entities are referred to as variable interest entities (“VIE’s”). FIN 46 requires that a VIE be consolidated by a business enterprise if that enterprise is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. FIN 46 was effective January 31, 2003 for the Company with respect to interest in VIE’s that were obtained after that date. With respect to interests in VIE’s e xisting prior to February 1, 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) (“FIN 46R”), which provides technical corrections and extended the effective date of FIN 46 to the first reporting period that ended after March 15, 2004. The Company fully adopted FIN 46R in the second quarter of the current year. The provisions of FIN 46R resulted in the consolidation of several entities see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information concerning the Company's off balance sheet arrangements are included in Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Such information is hereby incorporated by reference.

 
  29  

 


Contractual Obligations

The Company has contractual obligations to make future payments in connection with its short and long-term debt, non-cancelable lease agreements, partnership investments, commitments to extend credit, and a naming rights agreement (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Company's commitments). The following table sets forth these contractual obligations by fiscal year (in 000's):

 
Total
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Thereafter
Long-term debt
$ 132,276
$ 2,303
$ 2,438
$ 2,580
$ 7,731
$ 2,891
$114,333
Short-term debt
4,117
4,117
-
-
-
-
-
Operating leases
77,219
20,126
16,921
14,146
10,083
6,179
9,764
Investments - private equity
partnerships(1)
11,600
11,600
-
-
-
-
-
Certificates of deposit
140,981
61,351
23,831
10,987
16,990
27,822
-
Commitments to extend
credit - RJBank(2)
225,134
225,134
-
-
-
-
-
Naming rights for Raymond
James Stadium
19,447
2,802
2,914
3,031
3,152
3,278
4,270
Total
$ 610,774
$ 327,433
$ 46,104
$ 30,744
$ 37,956
$ 40,170
$128,367
               

  (1) The Company has committed a total of $30.9 million, in amounts ranging from $500,000 to $1,500,000, to 33 different independent venture capital or private equity partnerships. As of September 24, 2004, the Company had invested $24.5 million of that amount. Additionally, the Company is the general partner in two internally sponsored private equity limited partnerships to which it has committed $14 million. Of that amount, the Company has invested $8.8 million as of September 24, 2004. Although the combined remaining balance of $11.6 million has been included in fiscal year 2005 above, the contributions to the partnerships may occur after that time and are dependent upon the timing of the capital calls by the general partners.
  (2) Because many commitments expire without being funded in whole or part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows.

Effects of Inflation

The Company's assets are primarily liquid in nature and are not significantly affected by inflation. Management believes that the replacement cost of property and equipment would not materially affect operating results. However, the rate of inflation affects the Company's expenses, including employee compensation and benefits, communications and occupancy, which may not be readily recoverable through charges for services provided by the Company.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

RISK MANAGEMENT

Risks are an inherent part of the Company's business and activities. Management of these risks is critical to the Company's fiscal soundness and profitability. Risk management at the Company is a multi-faceted process that requires communication, judgment and knowledge of financial products and markets. The Company's senior management takes an active role in the risk management process and requires specific administrative and business functions to assist in the identification, assessment, monitoring and control of various risks. The principal risks involved in the Company's business activities are market, credit, operational, and regulatory and legal.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss to the Company resulting from changes in interest rates and equity prices. The Company has exposure to market risk primarily through its broker-dealer and banking operations. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries trade tax exempt and taxable debt obligations and act as an active market maker in approximately 300 over-the-counter equity securities. In connection with these activities, the Company maintains inventories in order to ensure availability of securities and to facilitate client transactions. Additionally, the Company, primarily within its Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary, invests for its own proprietary equity investment account.

 
  30  

 


The following table represents the carrying value of trading inventories as of fiscal year end associated with the Company's broker-dealer client facilitation, market-making activities and proprietary trading activities:

 
September 24, 2004
September 26, 2003
   
Securities
 
Securities
   
Sold but
 
Sold but
 
Trading
Not yet
Trading
Not yet
 
Securities
Purchased
Securities
Purchased
 
(in 000's)
Marketable:
       
Municipal
$ 192,099
-
$ 97,225
$ 5
Corporate
26,216
3,522
15,728
598
Government
52,335
66,073
24,947
29,008
Total debt securities
270,650
69,595
137,900
29,611
         
Equity & other securities
59,211
52,686
44,047
41,820
Total
$329,861
$122,281
$181,947
$ 71,431

Changes in value of the Company's trading inventory may result from fluctuations in interest rates, credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices and the correlation among these factors. The Company manages its trading inventory by product type and has established trading divisions that have responsibility for each product type. The Company's primary method of controlling risk in its trading inventory is through the use of limits. As of September 24, 2004, the absolute (total long positions plus total short positions) fixed income and (total net positions) equity inventory limits were $1,237,000,000 and $69,358,000, respectiv ely. The Company's total outstanding trading inventories were well within these limits at September 24, 2004. Additionally, for its derivative activities, primarily interest rate swaps, the company has established a limit structure that is based on factors such as interest rate risk and spread exposure. Position limits in trading inventory accounts are monitored on a daily basis. Consolidated position and exposure reports are prepared and distributed to senior management. Limit violations are carefully monitored. Management monitors inventory levels and trading results, as well as inventory aging, pricing, concentration and securities ratings. Summarized results are reviewed and a valuation adjustment is determined by management to record the instrument at estimated fair value.

Interest Rate Risk

RJBank maintains an investment portfolio that is comprised of mortgage-backed securities, as well as mortgage, consumer and commercial loans. Those investments are funded in part by its client obligations, including demand deposits, money market accounts, savings accounts, and certificates of deposit. Based on the banking industry and the current investment portfolio of RJBank, market risk for RJBank is limited primarily to interest rate risk. RJBank reviews interest rate risk based on net interest income, which is the net amount of interest received and interest paid. The following table represents the carrying value of RJBank's assets and liabilities that are subject to market risk.

 
  31  

 


RJBank Financial Instruments with Market Risk:
   
   
September 24, 2004
 
September 30, 2003
   
(in 000's)
Debt securities:
       
  Mortgage-backed securities
 
$ 213,401
 
$ 241,211
  Municipal obligations
 
41
 
90
    Total debt securities
 
213,442
 
241,301
         
  Loans available for sale
 
694
 
1,038
         
Equity securities
 
5,260
 
3,484
         
    Total assets with market risk
 
$ 219,396
 
$ 245,823

         
  Certificates of deposit
 
140,980
 
105,888
  Federal home loan bank advances
 
60,000
 
60,000
         
    Total liabilities with market risk
 
$ 200,980
 
$ 165,888

RJA is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of maintaining trading inventories of fixed income instruments, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The Company monitors, on a daily basis, the Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) in its institutional Fixed Income trading portfolios (cash instruments and interest rate derivatives held either as economic hedges or as customer-related positions). Using a variance/covariance methodology, VaR is a technique for estima ting the potential loss in the Company's fixed income portfolio due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level.

A standard regulatory-type data set is used (one year historical observation period, 0% exponential decay) and the results are compared daily against those obtained using corresponding data with a 6% exponential decay factor. VaR is reported at a 99% confidence level, based on a 1-day holding period; this is consistent with the Company's high-turnover trading activity, which is based on supporting client sales activity. This means that there is a one in 100 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. However, shortfalls on a single day can exceed reported VaR by significant amounts. Shortfalls can also accumulate over a longer time horizon, such as a number of consecutive trading days.

The following table sets forth the high, low and average VaR for the Company's overall portfolio during the fiscal year ended September 24, 2004, with the corresponding dollar value of the Company's portfolio:

   
Highest Daily VaR
 
Lowest Daily VaR
 
Daily Averages
VaR
 
$ 1,160,000
 
$ 235,000
 
$ 642,000
Portfolio value (net)
 
$ 178,823,000
 
$ 72,590,000
 
$ 105,695,000
VaR as a percent of portfolio value
 
0.65%
 
0.32%
 
0.64%


 
  32  

 


The modeling of the risk characteristics of trading positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While management believes that its assumptions and approximations are reasonable, there is no uniform industry methodology for estimating VaR, and different assumptions and/or approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. Given its reliance on historical data, VaR is most effective in estimating risk exposures in markets in which there are no sudden fundamental changes or shifts in market conditions. An inherent limitation of VaR is that the distribution of past changes in market risk factors may not produce accurate predictions of future market risk. Moreover, VaR calculated for a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or offset with hedges within one day. Accordingly, management also monitors the risk in its trading activities by establishing position limits and daily review of trading results, inventory aging, pricing, concentration and securities ratings.

Additional information is discussed under Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.

As noted above, RJBank reviews interest rate risk based on net interest income and equity valuation. One of the core objectives of RJBank's Asset/Liability Management Committee is to manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The Asset/Liability Management Committee uses several measures to monitor and limit RJBank's interest rate risk including scenario analysis, interest repricing gap analysis and limits, and net portfolio value limits. Model-based scenario analysis is used to monitor and report the interest rate risk positions, and analyze alternative strategies.

Net interest income is the net amount of interest received less interest paid. This involves large volumes of contracts and transactions, and numerous products. Simulation models and estimation techniques are used to assess the sensitivity of the net interest income stream to movements in interest rates. Assumptions about consumer behavior play an important role in these calculations; this is particularly relevant for loans such as mortgages where the client has the right, but not the obligation, to repay before the scheduled maturity. On the liability side, the re-pricing characteristics of deposits are based on estimates since the rates are not coupled to a specified market rate.

The sensitivity of net interest income to interest rate conditions is estimated for a variety of scenarios. Assuming an immediate and lasting shift of 100 basis points in the term structure of interest rates, RJBank's sensitivity analysis indicates that an upward movement would decrease RJBank's net interest income by 6.1% in the first year after the rate jump, whereas a downward shift of the same magnitude would decrease RJBank's net interest income by 4.7%. These sensitivity figures are based on positions as of September 30, 2004, and are subject to certain simplifying assumptions, including that management takes no corrective action. Normally, a decline in rates would increase net interest income, but due to the historically low levels of interest rates in the United States, there is only limited opportunity to a djust rates downward on the liability side.

Equity Price Risk

The Company is exposed to equity price risk as a consequence of making markets in equity securities and the investment activities of RJA and RJ Ltd. RJA's activities are client-driven, with the objective of meeting clients' needs while earning a trading profit to compensate for the risk associated with carrying inventory. The Company attempts to reduce the risk of loss inherent in its inventory of equity securities by monitoring those security positions constantly throughout each day and establishing position limits. The Company's Canadian broker-dealer has a proprietary trading business with 23 traders. The average aggregate inventory held for proprietary trading during the year ended September 24, 2004 was CDN$4,424,000 (US $3,352,000). The Company's equity securities inventories are priced on a regular basis an d there are no material unrecorded gains or losses.

Credit Risk

The Company is engaged in various trading and brokerage activities whose counterparties primarily include broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions. In the event counterparties do not fulfill their obligations, the Company may be exposed to risk. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and/or the issuer of the instrument. The Company manages this risk by imposing and monitoring individual and aggregate position limits within each business segment for each counterparty, conducting regular credit reviews of financial counterparties, reviewing security and loan concentrations, holding and marking to market collateral on certain transactions and conducting business through clearing organizations, which guarantee performance.

 
  33  

 


The Company's client activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various transactions on behalf of its clients. Client activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. Credit exposure associated with the Company's Private Client Group consists primarily of customer margin accounts, which are monitored daily and are collateralized. When clients execute a purchase on margin the Company is at some risk that the client will renege on the trade. If this occurs, the Company may have to liquidate the position at a loss. However, for over three quarters of the private client group purchase transactions, clients have available funds in the account before the trade is executed. The Company monitors exposure to industry sectors and individual securities and performs analysis on a regular basis i n connection with its margin lending activities. The Company adjusts its margin requirements if it believes its risk exposure is not appropriate based on market conditions.

In addition, RJBank offers a variety of loan products including mortgage, commercial real estate, and consumer loans, which are collateralized, and corporate loans for which the borrower is carefully evaluated and monitored. RJBank's policy is to require customers to provide collateral prior to the disbursement of approved loans. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by RJBank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial properties. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, RJBank exposes itself to credit risk with those counterparties also. RJBank minimizes the credit or r epayment risk of derivative instruments by entering into transactions only with high-quality counterparties whose credit rating is investment grade.

The Company is subject to concentration risk if it holds large positions, extends large loans to, or has large commitments with a single counterparty, borrower, or group of similar counterparties or borrowers (e.g. in the same industry). Securities purchased under agreements to resell consist entirely of securities issued by the U.S. government. Receivables from and payables to clients and stock borrow and lending activities are conducted with a large number of clients and counterparties and potential concentration is carefully monitored. Inventory and investment positions taken and commitments made, including underwritings, may involve exposure to individual issuers and businesses. The Company seeks to limit this risk through careful review of the underlying business and the use of limits established by senior ma nagement, taking into consideration factors including the financial strength of the company, the size of the position or commitment, the expected duration of the position or commitment and other positions or commitments outstanding.

The Company is the lessor in two leveraged commercial aircraft transactions with two major domestic airlines (Continental and Delta). The Company's ability to realize its expected return is dependent upon the airlines' ability to fulfill its lease obligations. In the event that the airlines default on their lease commitments and the Company is unable to re-lease or sell the planes with adequate terms, the Company would suffer a loss of some or all of its investment. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a $4 million charge related to a write-down of its investment in the leveraged lease of an aircraft to Delta Airlines. Although Delta has not defaulted on its obligations under this lease, Delta's financial condition has continued to deteriorate, thus increasing the likelihood of such a default .

Operational Risk

Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from the Company's operations, including, but not limited to, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in the Company's technology or financial operating systems and inadequacies or breaches in the company's control processes. The Company operates different businesses in diverse markets and is reliant on the ability of its employees and systems to process a large number of transactions. These risks are less direct than credit and market risk, but managing them is critical, particularly in a rapidly changing environment with increasing transaction volumes. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems or improper action by employees, the Company could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions and damage to its reputation. Business continuity plans exist for critical systems, and redundancies are built into the systems as deemed appropriate. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Company has developed and continues to enhance specific policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization and within such departments as Accounting, Operations, Information Technology, Legal, Compliance and Internal Audit. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational policies and procedures are being followed and that the Company's various businesses are operating within established corporate policies and limits.

A Compliance and Standards Committee comprised of senior executives meets monthly to consider policy issues. The Committee reviews material customer complaints and litigation, as well as issues in operating departments, for the purpose of identifying issues that present risk exposure to customers or to the Company. The Committee adopts policies to deal with these issues, which are then disseminated throughout the Company.

 
  34  

 


The Company has established a Quality of Markets Committee that meets regularly to review execution of customer orders by the OTC, Option and Listed trading departments. This Committee is comprised of representatives from the Correspondent Services, Compliance and Legal Departments and is under the direction of a senior officer of RJF. This Committee reviews reports from OTC, Option and Listed trading departments and recommends action for improvement when necessary.

Regulatory and Legal Risk

Legal risk includes the risk of Private Client Group customer claims, the possibility of sizable adverse legal judgments and non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements. The Company is generally subject to extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts business. Regulatory oversight of the securities industry has become increasingly demanding over the past several years and the Company, as well as others in the industry, has been directly affected by this increased regulatory scrutiny.

The Company’s subsidiaries have designated Anti-money Laundering Compliance Officers who monitor compliance with regulations adopted under the U.S.A. Patriot Act. The Company has comprehensive procedures addressing issues such as regulatory capital requirements, sales and trading practices, use of and safekeeping of customer funds, extension of credit, collection activities, money-laundering and record keeping. The Company acts as an underwriter or selling group member in both equity and fixed income product offerings. Particularly when acting as lead or co-lead manager, the Company has legal exposure. To manage this exposure, a committee o f senior executives reviews proposed underwriting commitments to assess the quality of the offering and the adequacy of due diligence investigation.

The Company's major business units have compliance departments that are responsible for regularly reviewing and revising compliance and supervisory procedures to conform to changes in applicable regulations.

The Company experienced an increase in the number of Private Client Group claims beginning in fiscal year 2001 as a result of the downturn in the equity markets; the number of claims has begun to decline but is still above historic levels. While these claims may not be the result of any wrongdoing, the Company does, at a minimum, incur costs associated with investigating and defending against such claims. See further discussion on the Company's reserve policy under "Critical Accounting Policies"; see also "Legal Proceedings" and "Regulation".


 
  35  

 


ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Raymond James Financial, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in fiscal year 2003 the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

KPMG LLP

Tampa, Florida
December 6, 2004


 
  36  

 

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
ASSETS
   
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 528,823 
$ 734,631 
Assets segregated pursuant to federal regulations:
   
Cash and cash equivalents
2,322,402 
1,000,101 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
1,236,265 
Securities owned:
   
Trading account securities, at fair value
329,861 
181,947 
Available for sale securities, at fair value
208,022 
241,323 
Receivables:
   
Clients
1,961,553 
1,652,218 
Stock borrowed
1,536,879 
1,208,562 
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
125,544 
126,715 
Other
169,577 
150,100 
Property and equipment, net
122,750 
118,285 
Deferred income taxes, net
73,559 
68,465 
Deposits with clearing organizations
28,466 
29,438 
Goodwill
62,575 
62,575 
Investment in leveraged leases
20,160 
24,947 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
131,675 
76,066 
     
 
$7,621,846 
$6,911,638 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
   
Loans payable
$ 136,393 
$ 167,210 
Payables:
   
Clients
4,121,713 
3,983,610 
Stock loaned
1,597,117 
1,227,151 
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
74,258 
154,757 
Trade and other
195,291 
147,162 
Trading account securities sold but not yet
   
purchased
122,281 
71,431 
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits
256,062 
199,017 
Income taxes payable
32,145 
26,017 
     
 
6,535,260 
5,976,355 
     
Minority Interests
21,373 
10,548 
     
Shareholders' equity
   
Preferred stock; $.10 par value; authorized
   
10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding -0- shares
Common Stock; $.01 par value; authorized
   
100,000,000 shares; issued 75,321,926 at
753 
497 
Sept. 24, 2004 and 49,691,528 at Sept. 26, 2003
Shares exchangeable into common stock; 285,325
5,493 
6,450 
at Sept. 24, 2004 and 219,477 at Sept. 26, 2003
Additional paid-in capital
127,405 
101,298 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
3,875 
604 
Retained earnings
957,317 
850,656 
 
1,094,843 
959,505 
Less: 1,761,322 and 1,400,521 common shares
   
in treasury, at cost
29,630 
34,770 
 
1,065,213 
924,735 
     
 
$7,621,846 
$6,911,638 
     
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 
  37  

 

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
       
Revenues:
     
Securities commissions and fees
$ 1,290,344
$1,045,071 
$1,042,924 
Investment banking
106,350
71,317 
73,056 
Investment advisory fees
134,447
112,126 
117,054 
Interest
134,764
127,707 
159,803 
Net trading profits
23,565
20,615 
22,650 
Financial service fees
80,431
69,536 
60,449 
Other
59,875
51,199 
41,487 
 
 
   
Total revenues
1,829,776
1,497,571 
1,517,423 
       
Interest expense
48,517
45,611 
76,335 
Net revenues
1,781,259
1,451,960 
1,441,088 
 
 
   
Non-Interest Expenses:
     
Compensation, commissions and benefits
1,273,420
1,034,676 
1,022,157 
Communications and information processing
82,186
77,016 
79,245 
Occupancy and equipment costs
61,339
61,520 
61,038 
Clearance and floor brokerage
20,773
17,729 
15,630 
Business development
59,963
51,332 
49,675 
Other
79,457
71,412 
81,827 
Total non-interest expenses
1,577,138
1,313,685 
1,309,572 
 
 
   
Income before provision for income taxes
204,121
138,275 
131,516 
       
Provision for income taxes
76,546
51,958 
52,213 
       
       
Net income
$ 127,575  
$ 86,317 
$ 79,303 
       
Net income per share-basic
$ 1.74
$ 1.19 
$ 1.09 
Net income per share-diluted
$ 1.72
$ 1.17 
$ 1.07 
Weighted average common shares
     
outstanding-basic
73,395 
72,824 
73,011 
Weighted average common and common
     
equivalent shares outstanding-diluted
74,402 
73,479 
74,444 
       
       
Net income
$ 127,575 
$ 86,317 
$ 79,303 
Other Comprehensive Income:
     
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities
     
available for sale, net of tax
(112)
(231)
22 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on interest
     
rate swaps accounted for as hedges
2,184 
1,575 
(555)
Net change in currency translations
1,199 
9,417 
(2,743)
Total comprehensive income
$ 130,846 
$ 97,078 
$ 76,027 
       

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



 
  38  

 


RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
                     
 
Common Stock
Exchangeable Shares
Additional
 
Other
Treasury Stock
Total
 
 
 
 
 
Paid-in
Retained
Comprehensive
Common
 
Shareholders'
 
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income
Shares
AAAAmount aAAA
Equity
Balances at September 26, 2001
48,998 
$ 490 
219 
$ 6,423 
$ 67,464 
$ 721,183 
$ (6,881)
(1,002)
$ (17,803)
$ 770,876 
Net income fiscal 2002
         
79,303 
     
79,303 
Cash dividends - common stock
                   
($.36 per share)
         
(18,508)
     
(18,508)
Purchase of treasury shares
             
(359)
(9,147)
(9,147)
Exchangeable shares
   
(47)
$ (1,366)
500 
   
47 
866 
Employee stock purchases
       
1,390 
   
208 
4,058 
5,448 
Exercise of stock options
       
(1,805)
   
462 
8,396 
6,591 
Grant of restricted shares
       
2,251 
   
148 
2,711 
4,962 
Non-qualified option expense
       
2,390 
       
2,390 
Tax benefit related to non-qualified
                   
option exercises
       
997 
       
997 
Net unrealized gain on securities
                   
available for sale, net of tax
           
22 
   
22 
Net unrealized (loss) on interest
                   
rate swaps accounted for as hedges
           
(555)
   
(555)
Net change in currency translations
           
(2,743)
   
(2,743)
Balances at September 27, 2002
48,998 
$ 490 
172 
$ 5,057 
$ 73,187 
$ 781,978 
$ (10,157)
(496)
$ (10,919)
$ 839,636 
                     
Net income fiscal 2003
         
86,317 
     
86,317 
Cash dividends - common stock
                   
($.36 per share)
         
(17,639)
     
(17,639)
Purchase of treasury shares
             
(1,445)
(35,964)
(35,964)
Exchangeable shares
243 
47 
$ 1,393 
7,139 
   
 
 
8,534 
Employee stock purchases
175 
   
4,430 
   
34 
750 
5,182 
Exercise of stock options
275 
   
6,137 
   
334 
7,367 
13,507 
Grant of restricted shares
       
1,092 
   
172 
3,996 
5,088 
Non-qualified option expense
       
8,913 
       
8,913 
Tax benefit related to non-qualified
                   
option exercises
       
400 
       
400 
Net unrealized loss on securities
                   
available for sale, net of tax
           
(231)
   
(231)
Net unrealized gain on interest
                   
rate swaps accounted for as hedges
           
1,575 
   
1,575 
Net change in currency translations
           
9,417 
   
9,417 
Balances at September 26, 2003
49,691 
$ 497 
219 
$ 6,450 
$ 101,298 
$ 850,656 
$ 604 
(1,401)
$ (34,770)
$ 924,735 
                     
Net income fiscal 2004
         
127,575 
     
127,575 
Cash dividends - common stock
                   
($.36 per share)
         
(20,664)
     
(20,664)
Purchase of treasury shares
             
(84)
(1,955)
(1,955)
Exchangeable shares
36 
(36)
$ (957)
957 
         
3-for-2 stock split
25,002 
250 
102 
   
(250)
 
(593)
   
Employee stock purchases
274 
   
7,096 
       
 7,099 
Exercise of stock options
319 
   
5,247 
   
106 
2,271 
7,521 
Grant of restricted shares
       
2,432 
   
211 
4,824 
7,256 
Non-qualified option expense
       
10,375 
       
10,375 
Net unrealized loss on securities
                   
available for sale, net of tax
           
(112)
   
(112)
Net unrealized gain on interest
                   
rate swaps accounted for as hedges
           
2,184 
   
2,184 
Net change in currency translations
           
1,199 
   
1,199 
Balances at September 24, 2004
75,322 
$ 753 
285
$ 5,493 
$ 127,405 
$957,317 
$ 3,875 
(1,761)
$ (29,630)
$1,065,213 
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



 
  39  

 


RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(continued on next page)

 
Year ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
Cash Flows from operating activities:
     
Net Income
$ 127,575 
$ 86,317 
$ 79,303 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
     
cash provided by operating activities:
     
Depreciation and amortization
16,827 
18,344 
22,813 
Deferred income taxes
(5,094)
(14,731)
(15,917)
Unrealized (gain) loss on investment account securities
(55)
(362)
Unrealized (gain) loss and premium amortization
     
on Available for Sale Securities
(1,603)
(216)
(582)
Ineffectiveness of interest rate swaps accounted for as cash low hedges
(392)
(525)
(498)
Loss on sale of investment account securities
4,000 
323 
Loss on sale of property and equipment
1,696 
469 
2,494 
Provision for bad debts and other accruals
26,076 
40,048 
35,675 
Stock and option compensation expense
17,631 
14,401 
8,349 
Minority Interest
10,825 
152 
3,796 
       
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
     
Assets segregated pursuant to federal regulations
(86,036)
(150,439)
(340,343)
Receivables:
     
Clients, net
(311,142)
(129,442)
79,506 
Stock borrowed
(328,317)
(432,176)
475,168 
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
1,171 
(38,837)
93,835 
Other
(19,477)
(17,789)
2,776 
Trading securities, net
(97,065)
106,019 
13,864 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(54,354)
(12,568)
17,911 
       
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
     
Payables:
     
Clients
138,103 
235,666 
136,350 
Stock loaned
369,966 
392,772 
(430,710)
Brokers-dealers and clearing organizations
(80,499)
116,946 
(130,590)
Trade and other
23,860 
(36,092)
(23,300)
Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits
57,045 
10,157 
1,115 
Income taxes payable
6,128 
2,769 
23,248 
Total adjustments
(310,651)
104,873 
(25,079)
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(183,076)
191,190 
54,224 


 
  40  

 


 
Year ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
       
Cash Flows from investing activities:
     
Additions to property and equipment, net
(22,028)
(28,775)
(26,390)
Sales of investment account securities
1,154 
Sales of available for sale securities
65,149 
Purchases of investment account securities
(591)
Purchases of available for sale securities
(66,011)
(97,708)
(251,855)
Security maturations and repayments
98,730 
207,965 
199,971 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
10,691 
80,891 
(11,971)
       
       
Cash Flows from financing activities:
     
Proceeds from borrowed funds
80,198 
307,540 
184,457 
Repayments of mortgage and borrowings
(111,014)
(289,893)
(197,320)
Exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases
14,620 
18,689 
12,039 
Purchase of treasury stock
(1,955)
(35,964)
(9,147)
Cash dividends on common stock
(20,664)
(17,639)
(18,508)
       
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(38,815)
(17,267)
(28,479)
       
Currency adjustment:
     
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
5,392 
10,318 
(2,743)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(205,808)
265,132 
11,031 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
734,631 
469,499 
458,468 
       
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$ 528,823 
$ 734,631 
$ 469,499 
       
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
     
Cash paid for interest
$ 48,229 
$ 48,537 
$ 77,133 
Cash paid for taxes
$ 75,511 
$ 63,920 
$ 43,032

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


 
  41  

 

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

Raymond James Financial, Inc. is a holding company, which, through its subsidiaries, is engaged principally in the securities brokerage business, including the underwriting, distribution, trading and brokerage of equity and debt securities and the sale of mutual funds and other investment products. In addition, it provides investment management services for retail and institutional clients and banking and trust services for retail clients. The accounting and reporting policies of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the more significant of which are summarized below:

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Raymond James Financial, Inc., whose subsidiaries are generally controlled through a majority voting interest. All material consolidated subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Management Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Reporting Period

The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Friday in September of each year. Two of the Company's subsidiaries, RJBank and RJ Ltd., have fiscal years that end on the last day of September. Any individually material transactions are reviewed and recorded in the appropriate fiscal year.

Recognition of Revenues

Securities transactions and related commission revenues and expenses are recorded on a trade date basis.

Investment banking revenues are recorded at the time the transaction is completed and the related income is reasonably determinable. Investment banking revenues include management fees and underwriting fees earned in connection with the distribution of the underwritten securities, merger and acquisition fees, private placement fees and limited partnership distributions.

The Company earns an investment advisory fee based on a client's portfolio value on portfolios managed by its investment advisor subsidiaries. These fees are recorded ratably over the period earned.

Financial service fees include interest income and expense, and per account fees such as IRA fees, transaction fees on wrap fee accounts, service fees and distributions fees received from mutual funds.

Under clearing agreements, the Company clears trades for unaffiliated correspondent brokers and retains a portion of commissions as a fee for its services. Correspondent clearing revenues are recorded net of commissions remitted and included in other revenue. Total commissions generated by correspondents were $24,289,000, $16,140,000, and $15,836,000 and commissions remitted totaled $19,719,000, $12,494,000, and $12,117,000 for the years ended September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003, and September 27, 2002, respectively.


 
  42  

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, other than those used for trading purposes.

Assets Segregated Pursuant to Federal Regulations

In accordance with Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Raymond James & Associates (“RJA”), as a broker-dealer carrying client accounts, is subject to requirements related to maintaining cash or qualified securities in a segregated reserve account for the exclusive benefit of its clients. Segregated assets at September 24, 2004 consist of cash and cash equivalents; segregated assets at September 26, 2003 consist of cash, cash equivalents and securities purchased under agreements to resell.

Repurchase Agreements

The Company invests in short-term securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”), which are included in cash and cash equivalents and assets segregated pursuant to federal regulations. Additionally, the Company enters into securities sold under agreements to repurchase transactions (“repurchase agreements”). These transactions are included in trading account securities sold but not yet purchased. Both reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements are accounted for as collateralized financings and are carried at contractual amounts plus accrued interest. It is the Company's policy to obtain possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned under the reverse repurchase agreements. To ensure that the market value of the underlying collateral remains sufficient, the collateral is valued daily, and the Company may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral (or may return collateral to counterparties) when appropriate.

Securities Owned

Trading account securities are comprised primarily of the financial instruments held by the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries. These instruments are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected in current period earnings. Fair values are generally based on prices from independent sources, such as listed market prices or broker or dealer price quotations. For investments in illiquid and privately held securities that do not have readily determinable fair values through quoted market prices, the determination of fair value is based upon consideration of available information, including types of securities, current financial information, restrictions on dispositions, market values of underlying securities and quotations for similar instruments.

Available for sale securities are comprised primarily of CMO, mortgage related debt, and certain equity securities of the Company's non-broker-dealer subsidiaries. Debt and equity securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred taxes, reported in shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Any unrealized losses deemed to be other than temporary are included in current period earnings. Additionally, all realized gains and losses, determined on a specific identification basis, are included in current period earnings.

Client Receivables and Allowance for Losses

Client receivables include receivables of the Company's asset management subsidiaries, broker-dealer subsidiaries, and RJBank. The receivables from asset management clients are primarily for accrued asset management service fees, while the receivables from broker-dealer clients are principally for amounts due on cash and margin transactions and are generally collateralized by securities owned by the clients. Both the receivables from the asset management and broker-dealer clients are reported at their outstanding principal balance, adjusted for any allowance for doubtful accounts or write-offs. When a broker-dealer receivable is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is generally measured based on the fair value of the securities acting as collateral, which is measured based on current prices from independent sources such as listed market prices or broker-dealer price quotations. Securities owned by customers, including those that collateralize margin or other similar transactions, are not reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition.

The client receivables of RJBank are primarily comprised of loans originated or purchased by the bank, and include commercial and residential mortgage loans, as well as consumer loans. The Company records these loans at amortized cost, adjusted for an allowance for doubtful accounts and any write-offs. Included in amortized cost are any deferred fees or loan origination costs plus the unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.

Loan origination fees, net of related costs, are capitalized and recognized in interest income using the interest method or on a straight-line basis, which approximates the interest method over the contractual life of the loans, adjusted for prepayments.

 
  43  

 


The Company also provides for an allowance for losses inherent in the RJBank loan portfolio. The allowance is calculated based upon consideration of historical analysis and a supplemental portion based upon inherent risk and losses. The calculation of an allowance for inherent risk and losses is particularly subjective and requires judgments based on qualitative factors that do not lend themselves to exact mathematical calculations, such as trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals; migration trends in the portfolio; trends in volume, terms, and portfolio mix; new credit products and/or changes in the geographic distribution of those products; changes in lending policies and procedures; loan review reports on the efficacy of the risk identification process; changes in the outlook for local, regional, and national ec onomic conditions; and concentrations of credit risk.

Additionally, the Company reviews the individual RJBank loans and considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest. When a loan is considered to be impaired, the amount of the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the observable market value of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans. Regardless of the measurement method originally selected, the Company measures impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when it is determined that foreclosure is probable.

Once RJBank has identified a loan as impaired the accrual of interest on the loan is discontinued when either principal or interest becomes 90 days past due or when the full timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued and unpaid interest receivable is written off and accretion of the net deferred loan origination fees cease. The loan is accounted for on the cash or cost recovery method thereafter until qualifying for return to accrual status.

The Company also provides for an allowance for losses on its receivables from Financial Advisors based on historical collection experience. Additionally, when the Financial Advisor is no longer associated with the Company or it is determined that it is probable that the amount will not be collected, the Company provides for a specific allowance on the receivable.

Securities Borrowed and Securities Loaned

Securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are reported as collateralized financings and recorded at the amount of collateral advanced or received. Securities borrowed transactions generally require the Company to deposit cash with the lender. With respect to securities loaned, the Company generally receives collateral in the form of cash in an amount in excess of the market value of securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and loaned on a daily basis, with additional collateral obtained or refunded, as necessary.

Property and Equipment

Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of assets is primarily provided for using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from two to five years for software, furniture and equipment and fifteen to thirty-one years for buildings and land improvements. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets.

Additions, improvements and expenditures for repairs and maintenance that significantly extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Other expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations in the period incurred. Gains and losses on disposals of property and equipment are reflected in income in the period realized.

Goodwill

In accordance with SFAS No. 142 goodwill is not amortized, instead it is reviewed, on at least an annual basis, for impairment. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. When available, the Company uses current, comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the respective reporting units. The company calculates an estimated fair value based on multiples of revenues, earnings, and book value of the comparable transactions. However, when such comparable transactions are not available or may have become outdated, the Company uses discounted cash flow scenarios to estimate the fair value of the reporting units. The effect of any impairment is recorded in earnings in the period it is determined.

 
  44  

 


Exchange Memberships 

Exchange memberships are carried at cost or, if an “other than temporary” impairment in value has occurred, at a value that reflects management's estimate of the impairment. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company sold its shares in the Toronto Stock Exchange for a realized gain of $5,300,000. The remaining membership interests, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets at a cost of $2,711,000 and $3,389,000 at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively, had an aggregate determinable market value of $5,471,000 and $6,323,000 at September 24. 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively. The market value of the exchange memberships is determined based on the last reported sale.

Legal Reserves

The Company recognizes liabilities for contingencies when there is an exposure that, when fully analyzed, indicates it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. When a range of probable loss can be estimated, the Company accrues the most likely amount, if not determinable, the Company accrues at least the minimum of the range of probable loss.

The Company records reserves related to legal proceedings in "other payables". Such reserves are established and maintained in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies", and Financial Interpretation No. 14.The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on the part of management. Management considers many factors including, but not limited to: the amount of the claim; the amount of the loss in the client's account; the basis and validity of the claim; the possibility of wrongdoing on the part of an employee of the Company; previous results in similar cases; and legal precedents and case law. Each legal proceeding is reviewed with counsel in each accounting period and the reserve is adjusted as deemed appropriate by management. Lastly, each case is reviewed to determine if it is probable that insurance coverage will apply, in which case the reserve is reduced accordingly. Any change in the reserve amount is recorded in the consolidated financial statements and is recognized as a charge/credit to earnings in that period.

Stock Compensation

At September 24, 2004, the Company had eight stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior to fiscal 2003, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations as permitted by SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. In accordance with APB No. 25, stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options was not reflected in net income for fiscal year 2002, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective September 28, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123. Under the modified prospective method of adoption selected by the Company within the provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure", the recognition of compensation cost in fiscal 2004 and 2003 is the same as that which would have been recognized had the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied since the date of grant for all outstanding options. Results for prior years have not been restated. See Note 13, “Employee Benefit Plans”, for a tabular presentation that illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

Compensation expense is recognized immediately for restricted stock units for which future service is not a required condition to the delivery of the underlying shares of common stock. For restricted stock units with future service requirements, compensation expense is recognized over the relevant vesting period.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company makes limited use of derivative financial instruments. Certain derivative financial instruments are used to manage well-defined interest rate risk at RJBank, while others are used to economically hedge fixed income inventories. These derivative financial instruments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as subsequently amended by SFAS 137 and SFAS 138, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activities. This statement establishes standards for designating a derivative as a hedge. Derivatives in a broker-dealer or derivatives that do not meet the criteria for designation as a hedge are accounted for as trading account assets.

To manage interest rate exposures, RJBank uses interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps are agreements to exchange interest rate payment streams based on a notional principal amount. RJBank specifically designates interest rate swaps as hedges of the variability in interest rates on the deposit base utilized to fund the purchase of loan pools that initially carry a fixed rate, and recognizes interest differentials as adjustments to net interest income in the period they occur.

 
  45  

 


All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, RJBank designates the derivative as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to a recognized liability ("cash flow hedge”). RJBank formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific liabilities on the balance sheet. RJBank also formally assesses, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedg ed items.

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. Any ineffectiveness resulting from the cash flow hedge is recorded in RJBank's non-interest income or expense at the end of each hedging period.

RJBank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, because management determines that the designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, RJBank continues to carry the derivative at its fair value in the statement of financial condition, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings.

The Company also uses interest rate swaps to economically hedge certain fixed income inventory positions. The economically hedged positions and the swaps are marked to market with the gain or loss recorded in income for the period. In addition to these economic hedging transactions the Company enters into swaps with some of its institutional customers. The Company's management performs evaluations of its potential interest rate risk, including an exposure analysis on municipal bond inventories.

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company consolidates its foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures. The statement of financial condition of the subsidiaries and joint ventures are translated at exchange rates as of the period end. The statements of operations are translated at an average exchange rate for the period. The gains or losses resulting from translating foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Income Taxes

The Company utilizes the asset and liability approach defined in SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.

Net Income per Share

Net income per share is computed using weighted average common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding. Common stock equivalents include shares issuable under stock options and are determined under the treasury stock method.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified for consistency with current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the consolidated financial statements.


 
  46  

 


NOTE 2 - RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO CLIENTS: 

Receivables from Clients

Receivables from clients include amounts arising from normal cash and margin transactions, bank loans receivable, and fees receivable. Margin receivables are collateralized by securities owned by brokerage clients, while bank loans are collateralized by first or second mortgage on residential property, real property, or the general assets of the borrower. Such collateral is not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The amount receivable from clients at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003 is as follows:


 
September 24,
2004
September 26,
2003
 
(in 000's)
     
Client receivables - gross (1)
$ 1,973,632 
$ 1,661,032 
Allowance for loan losses and doubtful accounts
(12,079)
(8,814)
Client receivables - net
$ 1,961,553 
$ 1,652,218 
     

  (1) Includes loans available for sale by RJBank of $695,000 and $1,038,000 at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of RJBank's loans receivable (included within client receivables above) at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
     
Residential mortgage loans (1)
$ 456,515 
$ 388,298 
Commercial loans
234,713 
174,939 
Consumer loans
2,280 
2,038 
 
693,508 
565,275 
     
Allowance for loan losses
(7,642)
(5,910)
Purchase premium
2,525 
2,715 
Purchase discount
(1,542)
(826)
Deferred origination fees and costs, net
(871) 
(621)
 
$ 685,978 
$ 560,633 

  (1) Pledged to secure borrowings of $60 million at September 24, 2004.


Changes in the allowance for loan losses at RJBank for the years ended September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, are as follows:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
     
Balance, beginning of year
$ 5,910
$ 5,109
Provision charged to operations
2,232
801
Charge-offs
-
-
Balance, end of year
$ 8,142
$ 5,910

The average balance of impaired loans at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, along with the related interest income recognized on these loans, was immaterial to the financial statements.

 
  47  

 


Payables to Clients

Payables to clients include brokerage client funds on deposit awaiting reinvestment and bank savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The following table presents a summary of client payables at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
Balance
Weighted Average Rate
Balance
Weighted Average Rate
 
(in 000's)
Brokerage client payables:
       
Interest bearing
$ 2,970,919
0.45%
$ 2,844,125
0.60%
Non-interest bearing
375,504
350,645
Total brokerage client payables
3,346,423
0.40%
3,194,770
0.53%
         
Bank client payables:
       
Demand deposits - interest bearing
4,379
0.21%
7,040
0.28%
Demand deposits - non-interest bearing
2,776
1,342
Money market accounts
16,454
0.14%
19,681
0.25%
Savings accounts
608,447
0.26%
645,563
0.32%
Certificates of deposit (1)
140,980
3.71%
105,889
4.49%
Total bank client payables
773,036
0.89%
779,515
0.88%
         
Other client payables - non-interest bearing
2,254
9,325
         
Total client payables
$ 4,121,713
0.56%
$ 3,983,610
0.60%

  (1) Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003 were $37,893,000 and $27,796,000, respectively.

Certificate of deposits issued have remaining maturities at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, as follows:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's):
     
Year one
$ 61,351
$ 45,691
Year two
23,831
24,259
Year three
10,987
15,147
Year four
16,990
5,800
Year five and thereafter
27,821
14,992
Total
$140,980
$105,889

Interest expense on client accounts is comprised of the following for the years ended September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003:


 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
     
Brokerage clients payables
$ 14,101
$ 17,685
     
Bank clients payables
   
Demand deposits
9
9
Money market accounts
27
58
Savings accounts
1,617
2,472
Certificate accounts
5,101
4,910
 
$ 20,855
$ 25,134

 
  48  

 


NOTE 3 - TRADING SECURITIES AND TRADING SECURITIES SOLD BUT NOT YET PURCHASED: 

 
September 24, 2004
September 26, 2003
   
Securities
 
Securities
   
Sold but
 
Sold but
 
Trading
Not yet
Trading
Not yet
 
Securities
Purchased
Securities
Purchased
 
(in 000's)
Marketable:
       
Equities
$ 33,910
$ 32,950
$ 34,318
$ 36,243
Municipal obligations
192,099
-
97,225
5
Corporate obligations
26,216
3,522
15,728
598
Government obligations
52,335
66,073
24,947
29,008
Other
17,886
19,736
7,495
5,577
Non-marketable
7,415
-
2,234
-
 
$329,861
$122,281
$181,947
$ 71,431


NOTE 4 - AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES: 

The amortized cost and estimated market values of securities available for sale at September 24, 2004 are as follows:

   
Gross
Gross
Estimated
 
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Market
 
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
 
(in 000's)
         
Mortgage-backed securities
$ 207,804
$ 428
$(273)
$207,960
Municipal bonds
40
1
41
Other
3
-
18 
21
 
$ 207,847
$ 429
$(255)
$208,022
         

The amortized cost and estimated market values of securities available for sale at September 26, 2003 are as follows:

   
Gross
Gross
Estimated
 
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Market
 
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
 
(in 000's)
         
Mortgage-backed securities
$ 240,873
$ 540
$(201)
$241,212
Municipal bonds
90
-
90
Other
3
18
21
 
$ 240,966
$ 558
$(201)
$241,323
         

There were no proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale for the years ended September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively.

 
  49  

 


The following table shows the Bank’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2004.

 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or more
 
Total
 
Estimated
     
Estimated
     
Estimated
   
 
market
 
Unrealized
 
market
 
Unrealized
 
market
 
Unrealized
     
value
 
losses
 
value
 
losses
 
value
 
losses
Mortgage backed
                     
securities
$27,631,210
 
(110,295)
 
$18,422,445
 
(16,233)
 
$46,053,655
 
(126,528)
Collateralized
                     
mortgage obligations
-
 
-
 
6,440,153
 
(146,099)
 
6,440,153
 
(146,099)
Total temporarily
                     
impaired
                     
securities
$27,631,210
 
(110,295)
 
$24,862,598
 
(162,332)
 
$52,493,808
 
(272,627)

NOTE 5 - VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (“VIE’S”)

Under the provisions of FASB Interpretation 46R ("FIN 46R") the Company determined that Raymond James Employee Investment Funds I and II (the “Funds”) and Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. (“CSS”) are VIE’s. The Funds are limited partnerships, for which the Company is the general partner, that invest in the merchant banking and private equity activities of the Company and other unaffiliated venture capital limited partnerships. Both Funds were established as compensation and retention measures for certain qualified key employees of the Company. The Company makes non-recourse loans to these employees for two thirds of the purchase price per unit. The loans and applicable interest are to be repaid based solely on distributions from the Funds. The Company is deemed to be the primary benefi ciary, and accordingly, consolidates the Funds, which have combined assets of approximately $10 million at September 24, 2004. None of those assets act as collateral for any obligations of the Funds. The Company's exposure to loss is limited to its contributions and the loans it funded to the employee investors. At September 24, 2004, that exposure is approximately $9.4 million.

CSS was formed by a group of broker-dealer firms, including the Company, to develop a back-office software system. CSS is currently funded by capital contributions and loans from its owners. CSS had assets of $5.8 million and negative net equity at September 24, 2004. The Company's exposure to loss is limited to its capital contributions and amounts loaned. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of CSS and, therefore, accounts for its investment using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in CSS was zero at September 24, 2004.

NOTE 6 - LEVERAGED LEASES: 

The Company is the lessor in two leveraged commercial aircraft transactions with two major domestic airlines (Delta and Continental). The Company's combined equity investments represented 21% of the aggregate purchase prices; the remaining 79% was funded by public debt issued in the form of equipment trust certificates. The residual values of the aircrafts at the end of an average lease term of 20 years are projected to be an average of 10% of the original cost. The leases expire in September 2013 and June 2016, respectively.

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
Rents receivable (net of principal and
   
interest on the non-recourse debt)
$ 16,161 
$ 20,948 
Unguaranteed residual values
10,719 
10,719 
Unearned income
(6,720)
(6,720)
Investment in leveraged leases
20,160 
24,947 
     
Deferred taxes arising from leveraged leases
(25,294)
(28,162)
Net investment in leveraged leases
$ (5,134)
$ (3,215)


 
  50  

 


The Company's ability to realize its expected return is dependent upon the airlines' ability to fulfill its lease obligations. In the event that the airlines default on their lease commitments and the Company is unable to re-lease or sell the planes with adequate terms, the Company would suffer a loss of some or all of its investment. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a $4 million charge related to its investment in the leveraged lease of an aircraft to Delta Airlines. Although Delta has not defaulted on its obligations under this lease, Delta's financial condition has continued to deteriorate.

NOTE 7 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000's)
     
Land
$ 19,244 
$ 19,244 
Construction in process
2,146 
23,226 
Buildings, leasehold and land improvements
119,358 
89,408 
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
137,309 
134,846 
 
278,057 
266,724 
Less:  accumulated depreciation
   
and amortization
(155,307)
(148,439)
 
$ 122,750 
$ 118,285 

NOTE 8 - BORROWINGS:

Borrowings at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003 are presented below:

 
September 24,
2004
September 26,
2003
 
(in 000's)
Short-term Borrowings:
   
Borrowings on lines of credit (1)
$ 4,117
$ 197
Current portion of mortgage note payable
2,303
-
Total short-term borrowings
6,420
197
     
Long-term Borrowings:
   
Mortgage note payable (2)
72,276
47,013
Term loan (3)
-
60,000
Federal home loan bank advances (4)
60,000
60,000
Total long-term borrowings
129,973
167,013
     
  Total borrowings
$136,393
$167,210
     

(1)    The Company and its subsidiaries maintain one committed and several uncommitted lines of credit denominated in US dollars and one line of credit denominated in Canadian dollars with an aggregate available balance of $630 million and CDN$40 million, respectively. The interest rates for the lines of credit are variable and are based on the Fed Funds rate, LIBOR, and Canadian prime rate. During fiscal year 2004 interest rates on the lines of credit ranged from 1.47% to 3.50%. During fiscal year 2003 interest rates on the lines of credit ranged from 1.52% to 3.50%

(2)    The mortgage note payable is for the financing of the Company's home office complex. The Company refinanced its existing mortgage in January 2003 and borrowed an additional $27,000,000 upon the completion of a fourth headquarters building in January 2004. The mortgage bears interest at 5.7% and is secured by land, buildings, and improvements with a net book value of $76,914,000 at September 24, 2004.

(3)    The term loan bore interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%. The loan was paid in full in August 2004. During fiscal year 2004 interest rates on the term loan ranged from 2.37% to 2.91%. The term loan required that the Company maintain a certain net worth and that the Company follow certain other sound business practices. The $100 million committed line of credit to the parent company also has these requirements.

(4)    RJBank has $60 million in Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") advances outstanding at September 24, 2004, which bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 4.03% to 5.67% and mature between May 2008 and March 2011. These advances are secured by a blanket lien on the Bank's residential loan portfolio issued to FHLB at September 24, 2004.

 
  51  

 



Long-term borrowings at September 24, 2004, based on their contractual terms, mature as follows (in 000's):

2006
2,438
2007
2,580
2008
7,731
2009
2,891
2010 and thereafter
114,333
Total
$129,973

NOTE 9 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

The Company makes limited use of derivative financial instruments in certain of its businesses. Certain derivative financial instruments are used to manage well-defined interest rate risk at RJBank, while others are designed to offset risk within fixed income inventories. In addition, the Company acts as a dealer/agent in matched book swap transactions. The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", as subsequently amended by SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statements No. 133", SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities", and SFAS No. 149, "Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activities. These statements establish standards for designating a derivative as a hedge. Derivatives in a broker-dealer or those that do not meet the criteria for designation as a hedge are accounted for as trading account assets, and recorded at fair value in the statement of financial condition with the gain or loss recorded in the statement of operations for the period.

RJBank uses variable-rate deposits to finance the purchase of certain loan pools that are fixed for the first five years of their life. The funding sources expose RJBank to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. Management believes it is prudent to limit the variability of its interest payments. To meet this objective, management enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from interest rate risk. These swaps change the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the funding sources to fixed cash flows. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, RJBank receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate funding. At September 30, 2004 and 2003, RJBank was party to $48.9 millio n and $84.5 million, respectively, in notional amount of interest rate swap agreements, and had cash of $1.9 million and $5.7 million, respectively, pledged as interest-bearing collateral for such agreements.

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective, as defined by SFAS 133, and that is designated and qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item. Any ineffectiveness resulting from the cash flow hedge is recorded in income or expense at the end of each reporting period. When hedge accounting is discontinued, RJBank continues to carry the derivative at its fair value in the statement of financial condition, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings. . For the years ended September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003, and September 27, 2002, RJBank recorded $391,651, $524,800, and $497,753, respectively, in income from ineffective cash flow hedges.

The Company also uses interest rate swaps to offset risk in certain fixed income inventory positions. The economically hedged positions and the swaps are marked to market with the gain or loss recorded in the statement of operations for the period. At September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, the Company had notional values of $33 million and $23 million, respectively, in interest rate swaps designed to offset risk in its fixed income trading inventory. In addition to these economically hedged transactions, the Company enters into interest rate swaps with some of its institutional clients. The net market value of all open swap positions at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003 was $5,074,000 and $534,000, respectively.

The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its interest rate swap agreements. The Company performs a credit evaluation of counterparties prior to entering into swap transactions. Currently, the Company anticipates that all counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under those agreements. The Company may require collateral from counterparties to support these obligations as established by the credit threshold specified by the agreement and/or as a result of monitoring the credit standing of the counterparties. However, state laws may prohibit municipalities and other governmental entities from posting collateral in these transactions.

 
  52  

 

NOTE 10 - FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAXES: 

The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
   
(in 000’s)
 
Current provision:
     
Federal
$ 74,385 
$ 57,590 
$ 53,985 
State
13,722 
8,388 
10,298 
 
88,107 
65,978 
64,283 
Deferred provision (benefit):
     
Federal
(5,664)
(12,846)
(10,010)
State
(5,897)
(1,174)
(2,060)
 
(11,561)
(14,020)
(12,070)
 
$ 76,546 
$ 51,958 
$ 52,213 

The Company's income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate due to the following:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
   
(in 000’s)
 
       
Provision calculated at statutory rates
$ 71,442 
$ 48,643 
$ 46,030 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
5,085 
4,689 
5,355 
Other
19 
(1,374)
828 
 
$ 76,546 
$ 51,958 
$ 52,213 

The major deferred tax asset (liability) items, as computed under SFAS 109, are as follows:

 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(in 000’s)
Deferred tax assets:
   
Deferred compensation
$ 43,034 
$ 38,958 
Capital expenditures
8,044 
9,533 
Accrued expenses
46,778 
43,194 
Unrealized (Gain)/Loss
204 
2,043 
Other
793 
2,899 
Total deferred tax assets
98,853 
96,627 
     
Deferred tax liabilities:
   
Aircraft leases
(25,294)
(28,162)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(25,294)
(28,162)
Net deferred tax assets
$ 73,559 
$ 68,465 

The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003. No valuation allowance as defined by SFAS 109 is required for the years then ended. Management believes that a valuation allowance is not necessary because it is more likely than not the deferred tax asset is realizable.

NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS:

Long-term lease agreements expire at various times through 2014. Minimum annual rentals under such agreements for the succeeding five fiscal years are approximately: $20,125,737 in 2005, $16,920,763 in 2006, $14,145,593 in 2007, $10,082,544 in 2008, $6,178,772 in 2009 and $9,763,728 thereafter. Rental expense incurred under all leases, including equipment under short-term agreements, aggregated $31,396,000, $30,657,364, and $28,003,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively

 
  53  

 

RJBank has outstanding at any time a significant number of commitments to extend credit. These arrangements are subject to strict credit control assessments and each client's credit worthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A summary of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit outstanding are as follows:

   
September 24, 2004
 
September 26, 2003
   
(in 000's)
         
Standby letters of credit
 
$ 7,917
 
$ 4,740
Consumer lines of credit
 
31,708
 
9,759
Commercial lines of credit
 
62,085
 
54,764
Unfunded loan commitments - variable rate
 
119,669
 
148,071
Unfunded loan commitments - fixed rate
 
3,755
 
2,687

Because many commitments expire without being funded in whole or part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows. The majority of loan commitments have terms of up to one year.

In the normal course of business, RJBank issues, or participates in the issuance of, financial standby letters of credit whereby it provides an irrevocable guarantee of payment in the event the letter of credit is drawn down by the beneficiary. As of September 30, 2004, $7.9 million of such letters of credit were outstanding. Of the letters of credit outstanding, $4.7 million are underwritten as part of a larger corporate credit relationship, and the remaining $3.2 million are fully secured by cash or securities. In the event that a letter of credit is drawn down, RJBank would pursue repayment from the account party under the existing borrowing relationship, or would liquidate collateral, or both. The proceeds from repayment or liquidation of collateral are expected to cover the maximum potential amount of any futur e payments of amounts drawn down under the existing letters of credit.

At September 24, 2004, no securities were pledged by RJBank as collateral with the Federal Home Loan Bank of ("FHLB") for advances. In lieu of pledging securities for advances, RJBank provided the FHLB with a lien against RJBank's portfolio of residential mortgages. At September 26, 2003, securities with carrying values of $72,811,000 were pledged as collateral for advances with FHLB.

As part of an effort to increase brand awareness, the Company entered into a stadium naming rights contract in July 1998. The contract has a thirteen-year term with a five-year renewal option and a 4% annual escalator. Expenses of $2,694,000, $2,590,000, and $2,491,000 were recognized in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into underwriting commitments. Transactions relating to such commitments that were open at September 24, 2004 and were subsequently settled had no material effect on the consolidated financial statements as of that date.

The Company utilizes client marginable securities to satisfy deposits with clearing organizations. At September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, the Company had client margin securities valued at $90.2 million and $97.8 million, respectively, on deposit with a clearing organization.

The Company has guaranteed lines of credit for various foreign joint ventures as follows: three lines of credit totaling $12.5 million in Turkey and one line of credit totaling $1.3 million in Argentina. At September 24, 2004, there were no outstanding balances on these lines of credit. In addition, the Company has guaranteed the completion of trades with counterparties in Turkey and Argentina not to exceed $23 million.

The Company has committed a total of $30.9 million, in amounts ranging from $500,000 to $1,500,000, to 33 different independent venture capital or private equity partnerships. As of September 24, 2004, the Company had invested $24.5 million of that amount. Additionally, the Company is the general partner in two internally sponsored private equity limited partnerships to which it has committed $14 million. Of that amount, the Company has invested $8.8 million as of September 24, 2004.

At September 24, 2004, the approximate market values of collateral received that can be repledged by the Company, were:

Sources of collateral (in 000's):
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$ 57,082
Securities received in securities borrowed vs. cash transactions
1,536,879
Collateral received in margin loans
1,365,411
Total
$2,959,372


 
  54  

 


During the year certain collateral was repledged. At September 24, 2004, the approximate market values of this portion of collateral and financial instruments owned that were repledged by the Company, were:

Uses of collateral and trading securities (in 000's):
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$ 57,082
Securities received in securities borrowed vs. cash transactions
1,536,879
Collateral received in margin loans
242,150
Total
$1,836,111

In the normal course of business, certain subsidiaries of the Company, which continue to act as general partner, may be contingently liable for activities of various limited partnerships syndicated several years ago. These partnerships engaged primarily in securities investments and real estate activities. In the opinion of the Company, such liabilities, if any, for the obligations of the partnerships will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position.

The Company guarantees certain obligations of subsidiaries as follows: the guarantee of the existing mortgage debt of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. ("RJA") of $72.3 million, the guarantee of the interest rate swap obligations of RJ Capital Services, Inc. (a maximum market exposure of $20 million) and the guarantee of the debt ($191,000 at September 24, 2004) of Raymond James Credit Corporation, Inc., which is secured by securities held as collateral for customer borrowings. The Company has also committed to lend to or guarantee obligations of RJ Tax Credit of up to $90 million upon request. RJ Tax Credit may borrow in order to fund the purchase and development of properties qualifying for tax credits, which are then sold to third parties. This commitment is reviewed and renewed annually. The borrowings are se cured by real estate properties. At September 24, 2004, there were guarantees outstanding to third parties of $14.4 million and cash funded to purchase properties of $34.2 million. In addition, at September 24, 2004, RJ Tax Credit is committed to purchase properties, subject to due diligence, totaling $48.5 million.

NOTE 12 - LEGAL AND REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS:


As a result of the extensive regulation of the securities industry, the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regular reviews and inspections by regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations, which can result in the imposition of sanctions for regulatory violations, ranging from non-monetary censure to fines and, in serious cases, temporary or permanent suspension from business. In addition, from time to time regulatory agencies and self-regulatory organizations institute investigations into industry practices, which can also result in the imposition of such sanctions.

As previously reported, the Company and RJFS are defendants in a series of lawsuits and arbitrations relating to an alleged mortgage lending program known as the "Premiere 72" program, that was administered by a company owned in part by two individuals who were registered as Financial Advisors with RJFS in Houston. The lawsuits are pending in various courts, and several of the arbitration claims relating to this matter have been settled by RJFS for amounts consistent with its evaluation of those claims. In the first arbitration to reach a hearing, claimants sought approximately $1.8 million dollars in damages plus punitive damages. The panel entered an order, subject to a final award being rendered, requiring RJFS to pay its clients their losses through a formula which includes the assignment to RJFS of their inte rests in the real estate transactions. The amounts due under the formula are still being calculated and appear to result in an amount substantially less than the claimants sought.   The panel denied any recovery to non-clients.    The Company does not believe that this order represents a precedent that would govern future decisions.  Arbitration proceedings for other claimants are currently scheduled through November 2006. Although the total amount funded by participants in this lending program may exceed $150 million, the amount of actual loss of the claimants is not determinable at this time because the participants are actively attempting to realize value from the underlying real estate collateral. Based on discovery to date, the Company and RJFS believe they have strong defenses to these claims and are vigorously contesting them.

As previously reported, RJFS and the SEC staff were unable to reach a resolution regarding a proposed enforcement action alleging fraud and failure to supervise a former Financial Advisor in the RJFS Rhode Island office. On September 30, 2004, the SEC issued an order instituting public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings pursuant to section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and section 203(f) of the Investment advisor Act of 1940 against RJFS, its former President and a former branch manager.  The Company has made provision in its financial statements for its estimate of the reasonable potential exposure for this claim; the matter is scheduled for a hearing before an administrative law judge in February 2005.

 
  55  

 


The Company is a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits and arbitrations incidental to its securities business. The Company is contesting the allegations of the complaints in these cases and believes that there are meritorious defenses in each of these lawsuits. In view of the number and diversity of claims against the Company, the number of jurisdictions in which litigation is pending and the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and other claims, the Company cannot state with certainty what the eventual outcome of pending litigation or other claims will be. In the opinion of the Company's management, based on currently available information, review with outside legal counsel, and consideration of amounts provided for with respect to these matters in the Company's financial statements, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not result in a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company. However, resolution of one or more of these matters may have a material effect on the results of operations in any future period depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters and upon the level of income for such period.

NOTE 13 - CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS:

At their meeting on February 12, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 stock split. The additional shares were distributed on March 24, 2004, to shareholders of record on March 4, 2004. All references in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to amounts per share and to the number of shares outstanding have been restated to give retroactive effect to the stock split.

The following table presents information on a monthly basis for purchases of the Company’s stock for the quarter ended September 24, 2004:

 
Number of
 
Average
 
Shares Purchased (1)
 
Price Per Share
       
July
- 
 
- 
August
75,000
 
$22.41
September
 
Total
75,000
 
$22.41

The Company does not have a formal stock repurchase plan. Shares are repurchased at the discretion of management pursuant to prior authorization from the board of directors. On May 20, 2004, the board of directors authorized purchases of up to $75 million. 75,000 shares have been purchased for a total of $1.7 million since that date. Leaving $73.3 million available to repurchase shares. Historically the Company has considered such purchases when the price of its stock reaches or approaches 1.5 times book value. The decision to repurchase shares is subject to cash availability and other factors. During 2004 and 2003, 86,057 and 1,444,537 shares, were repurchased at an average price of $23.17 and $16.60, respectively.

NOTE 14 - EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:

The Company's profit sharing plan and employee stock ownership plan provide certain death, disability or retirement benefits for all employees who meet certain service requirements. Such benefits become fully vested after seven years of qualified service. The Company also offers a plan pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides for the Company to match 100% of the first $500 and 50% of the next $500 of compensation deferred by each participant annually. The Company's Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that provides benefits to employees who meet certain compensation or production requirements. The Company has purchased and holds life insurance on the lives of most of those employees participating in the LTIP, to earn a competitive ra te of return for participants and to provide a source of funds available to satisfy its obligations under this plan. Contributions to the qualified plans and the LTIP contribution for management are made in amounts approved annually by the Board of Directors. Compensation expense includes aggregate contributions to these plans of $22,265,000, $14,431,000, and $14,196,000 for fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

 
  56  

 


Stock Compensation Plans

At September 24, 2004, the Company has eight stock-based compensation plans, which are described below. Prior to fiscal 2003, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations. In accordance with APB No. 25, stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options was not reflected in net income prior to fiscal year 2003, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective September 28, 2002, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Under the modified prospective method of adoption selected by the Company under the provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure", the recognition of compensation cost in fiscal years 2004 and 2003 is the same as that which would have been recognized had the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied since the date of grant for all outstanding options. Results for fiscal 2002 have not been restated. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.


 
Year ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
 
(in 000's except per share data)
       
Net income, as reported
$ 127,575 
$ 86,317 
$ 79,303 
Add: Stock-based employee compensation
     
expense included in reported net income
16,159 
6,950 
-
 
     
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
     
compensation expense determined under
     
fair value based method for all awards
(16,159)
(6,950)
(3,967)
Pro forma net income
$ 127,575 
$ 86,317 
$ 75,336 
       
Earnings per share:
     
Basic - as reported
$ 1.74 
$ 1.78 
$ 1.63 
 
     
Basic - pro forma
$ 1.74 
$ 1.78 
$ 1.55 
       
Diluted - as reported
$ 1.72 
$ 1.76 
$ 1.60 
       
Diluted - pro forma
$ 1.72 
$ 1.76 
$ 1.52 

These amounts may not be representative of future stock-based compensation expense since the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized to expense over the vesting period and additional options may be granted in future years. The fair value of each fixed option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for stock option grants in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002:

 
2004
2003
2002
Dividend Yield
1.10%
1.10%
1.10%
Expected Volatility
39.16%
43.18%
44.10%
Risk-free Interest Rate
3.96%
2.88%
4.09%
Expected Lives
4.9 yrs
4.73 yrs
4.91 yrs

Fixed Stock Option Plans

The Company has two qualified and three non-qualified fixed stock option plans. Under the 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan, the Company may grant options to its management personnel for up to 6,000,000 shares of common stock. The 2002 Plan was established to replace, on substantially the same terms and conditions, the 1992 Plan. Options are granted to key administrative employees and Financial Advisors of Raymond James & Associates, Inc. who achieve certain gross commission levels. Options are exercisable in the 36th to 72nd months following the date of grant and only in the event that the grantee is an employee of the Company at that time, disabled or recently retired.

 
  57  

 


As noted above, the Company has three non-qualified fixed stock option plans. Under the first of those plans, the Company may grant up to 3,417,188 shares of common stock to independent contractor Financial Advisors. Options are exercisable five years after grant date provided that the Financial Advisors are still associated with the Company. Under the Company's second non-qualified stock option plan, the Company may grant up to 569,532 shares of common stock to the Company's outside directors. Options vest over a five-year period from grant date provided that the director is still serving on the Board of the Company. Under the Company's third non-qualified stock option plan, the Company may grant up to 1,687,500 shares of common stock to key management personnel. Option terms are specified in individual agreements and expire on a date no later than the tenth anniversary of the grant date. Under all plans, the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company's stock on the date of grant and an option's maximum term is 10 years.

A summary of the status of the Company's five fixed stock option plans as of September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003, and September 27, 2002 and changes during the years ended on those dates is presented below:


 
2004
2003
2002
 
Shares
Weighted
Shares
Weighted
Shares
Weighted
   
Average
 
Average
 
Average
   
Exercise
 
Exercise
 
Exercise
   
Price
 
Price
 
Price
Outstanding at
           
beginning of year
4,666,890 
$ 18.65 
5,147,723 
$ 17.86
4,249,641 
$ 15.15 
Granted
1,533,898 
25.13 
728,625 
19.71
1,725,750 
21.19 
Canceled
(225,724)
19.43 
(295,500)
19.85
(133,784)
18.19 
Exercised
(546,009)
13.67 
(913,958)
14.78
(693,884)
9.50 
Outstanding at
           
Year end
5,429,055 
$20.95 
4,666,890 
$ 18.65
5,147,723 
$ 17.86 
             
Options exercisable
           
at year end
580,247 
 
401,465 
 
522,173 
 
Weighted average
           
fair value of
           
options granted
           
during the year
$ 8.39 
 
$ 7.56 
 
$ 8.33 
 

The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options outstanding at September 24, 2004:

 
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
           
Range of
Number
Weighted
Weighted
Number
Weighted
Exercise
Outstanding
Average
Average
Exercisable
Average
Prices
at 9/24/04
Remaining
Exercise
at 9/24/04
Exercise
   
Contractual
Price
 
Price
   
Life
     
$    0.0000 - 7.6800
0
0.0
$ 0.00
0
$ 0.00
$  7.6801 - 10.2400
6,875
0.3
8.41
6,875
8.41
$10.2401 - 12.8000
374,550
1.1
12.56
42,750
12.29
$12.8001 - 15.3600
473,569
0.6
13.76
291,154
13.82
$15.3601 - 17.9200
276,775
3.1
17.30
39,032
17.62
$17.9201 - 20.4800
435,920
3.5
19.05
45,336
19.58
$20.4801 - 23.0400
1,706,843
2.5
21.27
8,850
21.05
$23.0401 - 25.6000
2,154,523
3.9
24.64
146,250
23.68
 
5,429,055
2.9
$20.95
580,247
$16.94


 
  58  

 


Restricted Stock Plan

Under the 1999 Restricted Stock Plan the Company is authorized to issue up to 1,500,000 restricted shares of common stock to employees and independent contractors. Awards under this plan may be granted by various departments of the Company in connection with initial employment or under various retention plans for individuals who are responsible for a contribution to the management growth, and/or profitability of the Company. These shares are forfeitable in the event of voluntary termination. The compensation cost is recognized over the vesting period of the shares and is calculated as the market value of the shares on the date of grant. As of September 24, 2004, 1,052,176 shares had been granted at an average market price of $20.91 with a future service period of 5 years. Expense of $3 million, $2.0 million, and $2. 6 million was recorded in the years ended September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003 and September 27, 2002, respectively, related to this plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Company is authorized to issue up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock to its full-time employees, nearly all of whom are eligible to participate. Under the terms of the Plans, employees can choose each year to have up to 20% of their annual compensation specified to purchase the Company's common stock. Share purchases in any calendar year are limited to the lesser of 1,000 shares or shares with a market value of $25,000. The purchase price of the stock is 85% of the market price on the day prior to the purchase date. Under the Plan, and its expired predecessor plan, the Company sold 332,098, 314,394, and 312,695 shares to employees in fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The compensation cost is calculated as the value of the 15% discount from market value and was $1,252,186 for fiscal year 2004.

Stock Bonus Plan

The Company's 1999 Stock Bonus Plan authorizes the Company to issue up to 1,500,000 restricted shares to officers and certain other employees in lieu of cash for 10% to 20% of annual bonus amounts in excess of $250,000. Under the plan the restricted stock is granted at a 20% discount in determining the number of shares to be granted and the shares are generally restricted for a three year period, during which time the shares are forfeitable in the event of voluntary termination. The compensation cost is recognized over the three-year vesting period based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant. As of September 24, 2004, 660,280 shares had been granted at an average market price of $21.96. Expense of $2.7 million, $3.5 million, and $1.3 million was recorded in the years ended September 24, 2004, September 26, 2003, and September 27, 2002, respectively, related to this plan.

Employee Investment Funds

Certain key employees of the Company participate in the Raymond James Employee Investment Funds I and II, limited partnerships that invest in the merchant banking and venture capital activities of the Company and other unaffiliated venture capital limited partnerships. The Company makes non-recourse loans to these employees for two thirds of the purchase price per unit. The loans and applicable interest are to be repaid based solely on the distributions from of the funds.


NOTE 15 - REGULATIONS AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS:

The broker-dealer subsidiaries of the Company are subject to the requirements of the Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJA”), a member firm of the NYSE, is also subject to the rules of the NYSE, whose requirements are substantially the same. Rule 15c3-1 requires that aggregate indebtedness, as defined, not exceed fifteen times net capital, as defined. Rule 15c3-1 also provides for an “alternative net capital requirement”, which both RJA and RJFS have elected. It requires that minimum net capital, as defined, be equal to the greater of $250,000 or two percent of Aggregate Debit Items arising from client transactions. The NYSE may require a member firm to reduce its business if its net capital is less than four p ercent of Aggregate Debit Items and may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business and declaring cash dividends if its net capital is less than five percent of Aggregate Debit Items. The net capital positions of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were as follows:

 
  59  

 


 
September 24,
 
September 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.:
($ in 000's)
(alternative method elected)
     
Net capital as a percent of Aggregate
     
Debit Items
28% 
 
31% 
Net capital
$ 363,049 
 
$ 354,013 
Less: required net capital
(25,840)
 
(23,206)
Excess net capital
$ 337,209 
 
$ 330,807 

RJFS elected the alternative net capital requirement beginning for the month ended September 26, 2003. At September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, RJFS had no Aggregate Debit Items and therefore the minimum net capital of $250,000 was applicable. The net capital position of RJFS at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003 was as follows:

 
September 24,
 
September 26,
 
2004
 
2003
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.:
(in 000's)
(alternative method elected)
     
Net capital
$ 39,663 
 
$ 18,837
Less: required net capital
(250)
 
(250)
Excess net capital
$ 39,413 
 
$ 18,587

Raymond James Ltd. is subject to the Minimum Capital Rule (By-Law No. 17 of the IDA) and the Early Warning System (By-Law No. 30 of the IDA). The Minimum Capital Rule requires that every member shall have and maintain at all times Risk Adjusted Capital greater than zero calculated in accordance with Form 1 (Joint Regulatory Financial Questionnaire and Report) and with such requirements as the Board of Directors of the IDA may from time to time prescribe. Insufficient Risk Adjusted Capital my result in suspension from membership in the stock exchanges or the IDA.

The Early Warning System is designed to provide advance warning that a member firm is encountering financial difficulties. This system imposes certain sanctions on members who are designated in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 according to its capital, profitability, liquidity position, frequency of designation or at the discretion of the IDA. Restrictions on business activities and capital transactions, early filing requirements, and mandated corrective measures are sanctions that may be imposed as part of the Early Warning System. The Company was not in Early Warning level 1 or level 2 at September 30, 2004 or 2003.

The Risk Adjusted Capital of RJ Ltd. was CDN$20,422,000 and CDN$11,337,000 at September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively.

RJBank is subject to various regulatory and capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, RJBank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of RJBank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. RJBank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require RJBank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I Capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Management believes that, as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of September 30, 2004, the most recent notification from the Office of Thrift Supervision categorized RJBank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized”, RJBank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.

 
  60  

 


     
To be well capitalized
   
Requirement for capital
under prompt
   
adequacy
corrective action
 
Actual
purposes
provisions
 
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
 
(in 000's)
As of September 30, 2004:
           
Total capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
$ 84,278
15.1%
$ 44,666
8.0%
$ 55,832
10.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
77,299
13.8%
22,333
4.0%
33,499
6.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
average assets)
77,299
8.0%
38,468
4.0%
48,084
5.0%
             
As of September 30, 2003:
           
Total capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
$ 77,291
16.8%
$ 36,756
8.0%
$ 45,945
10.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
risk-weighted assets)
72,182
15.7%
18,378
4.0%
27,567
6.0%
Tier I capital (to
           
average assets)
72,182
7.9%
36,556
4.0%
45,695
5.0%

NOTE 16 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK:

In the normal course of business, the Company purchases and sells securities as either principal or agent on behalf of its clients. If either the client or a counterparty fails to perform, the Company may be required to discharge the obligations of the nonperforming party. In such circumstances, the Company may sustain a loss if the market value of the security or futures contract is different from the contract value of the transaction.

The Company also acts as an intermediary between broker-dealers and other financial institutions whereby the Company borrows securities from one broker-dealer and then lends them to another. Securities borrowed and securities loaned are carried at the amounts of cash collateral advanced and received in connection with the transactions. The Company measures the market value of the securities borrowed and loaned against the cash collateral on a daily basis. The market value of securities borrowed and securities loaned was $1,493,810,000 and $1,542,953,000, respectively, at September 24, 2004 and $1,159,128,000 and $1,171,345,000, respectively, at September 26, 2003. Additional cash is obtained as necessary to ensure such transactions are adequately collateralized. If another party to the transaction fails to perform a s agreed (for example failure to deliver a security or failure to pay for a security), the Company may incur a loss if the market value of the security is different from the contract amount of the transaction.

The Company has also loaned, to brokers-dealers and other financial institutions, securities owned by clients and others for which it has received cash or other collateral. If a borrowing institution or broker-dealer does not return a security, the Company may be obligated to purchase the security in order to return it to the owner. In such circumstances, the Company may incur a loss equal to the amount by which the market value of the security on the date of nonperformance exceeds the value of the collateral received from the financial institution or the broker or dealer.

The Company has sold securities that it does not currently own, and will therefore, be obligated to purchase such securities at a future date. The Company has recorded $122 million and $71 million at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively, which represents the market value of the related securities at such dates. The Company is subject to loss if the market price of those securities not covered by a hedged position increases subsequent to fiscal yearend. The Company utilizes short government obligations and equity securities to hedge long proprietary inventory positions. At September 24, 2004, the Company had $66,073,000 in short government obligations and $19,788,000 in short equity securities, which represented hedge positions. At September 26, 2003, the Company had $24,216,000 in short government obligations and $11,846,000 in short equity securities which represented hedge positions.

 
  61  

 


The Company enters into security transactions involving forward settlement. The Company has recorded transactions with contract values of $2,062,855 and $2,047,082,000 and market values of $2,405,369,000 and $2,222,522,000 as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively. Transactions involving future settlement give rise to market risk, which represents the potential loss that can be caused by a change in the market value of a particular financial instrument. The Company's exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, composition and diversification of positions held, the absolute and relative levels of interest rates, and market volatility.

The majority of the Company's transactions, and consequently, the concentration of its credit exposure is with clients, broker-dealers and other financial institutions in the United States of America. These activities primarily involve collateralized arrangements and may result in credit exposure in the event that the counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company's exposure to credit risk can be directly impacted by volatile securities markets, which may impair the ability of counterparties to satisfy their contractual obligations. The Company seeks to control its credit risk through a variety of reporting and control procedures, including establishing credit limits based upon a review of the counterparties' financial condition and credit ratings. The Company monitors collateral levels on a dai ly basis for compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines and requests changes in collateral levels as appropriate.

NOTE 17 - EARNINGS PER SHARE:

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

 
Year Ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
 
(in 000”s except per share amounts)
       
Net income
$ 127,575
$ 86,317
$ 79,303
       
Weighted average common shares
     
outstanding during the period
73,395
72,824
73,011
       
Additional shares assuming
     
Exercise of stock options (1)
1,007
655
983
Issuance of contingent exchangeable shares (2)
-
-
450
       
Weighted average diluted common
     
shares (1)
74,402
73,479
74,444
       
Net income per share - basic
$ 1.74
$ 1.19
$ 1.09
       
Net income per share - diluted (1)
$ 1.72
$ 1.17
$ 1.07
       
Securities excluded from weighted average
     
common shares because their effect
     
would be antidulitive
1,080
1,621
1,235

(1) Represents the number of shares of common stock issuable on the exercise of dilutive employee stock options less the number of shares of common stock which could have been purchased with the proceeds from the exercise of such options. These purchases were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common stock during the period, or that part of the period for which the option was outstanding.

(2) Represents the exchangeable shares issued on January 2, 2001 in connection with the acquisition of Goepel McDermid Inc. They are exchangeable on a one-for-one basis and entitle holders to dividends equivalent to that paid on shares of common stock.

 
  62  

 


NOTE 18 - SEGMENT ANALYSIS:

The Company currently operates through the following five business segments: Private Client Group, Capital Markets, Asset Management, RJBank, and Other. The business segments are based upon factors such as the services provided and the distribution channels served and are consistent with how the Company assesses performance and determines how to allocate resources throughout the Company and its subsidiaries. The financial results of the Company's segments are presented using the same policies as those described in Note 1, ”Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”. Segment data includes charges allocating corporate overhead and benefits to each segment. Intersegment revenues, charges, receivables and payables are eliminated between segments.

The Private Client Group segment includes the retail branches of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries located throughout the U.S., Canada and the U.K. These branches provide securities brokerage services including the sale of equities, mutual funds, fixed income products and insurance products to their clients. The segment includes net interest earnings/expense on client margin loans and cash balances. Additionally, this segment includes the correspondent clearing services that the Company provides to other broker-dealer firms.
 
The Capital Markets segment includes institutional sales and trading in the U.S., Canada and Europe. It provides securities brokerage services, as well as trading and research services to institutions with an emphasis on the sale of U.S. and Canadian equities and fixed income products. This segment also includes the Company's management of and participation in underwritings, merger and acquisition services, public finance activities, and Raymond James Tax Credit Funds.

The Asset Management segment includes investment portfolio management services of Eagle Asset Management, Inc., Awad Asset Management, Inc., and the Raymond James & Associates asset management services division, mutual fund management by Heritage Asset Management, Inc., private equity management by Raymond James Capital, Inc. and Raymond James Ventures, LLC and the trust services of Raymond James Trust Company and Raymond James Trust Company West. In addition to the asset management services noted above, this segment also offers fee-based programs to clients who have contracted for portfolio management services from outside money managers.

Raymond James Bank, FSB, is a separate segment, which provides residential, consumer, and commercial loans, as well as FDIC-insured deposit accounts, to clients of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries and to the general public.

The Other segment includes the Company's securities lending business and the activities of the consolidated foreign joint ventures in emerging market countries.

In the current year the Company modified the method used to allocate certain corporate compensation costs to the segments consistent with the approach used internally by management in evaluating the segments . Prior years results have been adjusted to reflect the current management allocation methodology.

Information concerning operations in the Company's segments is as follows:

 
Year ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
 
(000's)
Revenues:
     
Private Client Group
$ 1,223,458 
$ 994,815 
$ 991,158 
Capital Markets
400,787 
330,966 
332,346 
Asset Management
148,160 
123,647 
129,731 
RJBank
28,104 
28,699 
31,056 
Other
29,267 
19,444 
33,132 
Total
$ 1,829,776 
$1,497,571 
$1,517,423 
       
Pre-tax Income:
     
Private Client Group
$ 109,743 
$ 73,440 
$ 72,494 
Capital Markets
57,910 
37,532 
38,032 
Asset Management
27,875 
18,730 
20,257 
RJBank
8,824 
10,182 
7,188 
Other
(231)
(1,609)
(6,455)
Total
$ 204,121 
$ 138,275 
$ 131,516 


 
  63  

 

The following table presents the Company's total assets on a segment basis:
     
 
September 24,
September 26,
 
2004
2003
 
(000's)
Total Assets: 
   
Private Client Group *
$ 3,945,968 
$ 3,713,602 
Capital Markets **
740,210 
621,068 
Asset Management
81,559 
56,563 
RJBank
924,747 
911,211 
Other***
1,929,362 
1,609,194 
Total
$ 7,621,846 
$ 6,911,638 

  * Includes $46 million of goodwill allocated pursuant to SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".
  ** Includes $17 million of goodwill allocated pursuant to SFAS No. 142.
  *** Includes stock borrowed balance of $1,536,879 and $1,208,562 at September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively.

The Company has operations in the U.S., Canada, Europe and consolidated joint ventures in India, France, Turkey, and Argentina. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the U.S. The following table presents revenues by country for the years indicated:

 
Year ended
 
September 24,
September 26,
September 27,
 
2004
2003
2002
 
(000's)
Revenue: 
     
United States
$ 1,651,474
$ 1,369,131
$ 1,392,255
Canada
115,880
85,538
83,625
Europe
39,890
24,633
24,874
Other
22,532
18,269
16,669
Total
$ 1,829,776
$ 1,497,571
$ 1,517,423

While the dollar amount invested in emerging market joint ventures is only $4.5 million, these investments carry greater risk than amounts invested in developed markets.
*****
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(unaudited)

2004
1st Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
4th Qtr.
 
(In 000's, except per share data)
         
Revenues
$ 424,660
$ 491,373
$ 451,535
$ 462,209
Net Revenues
413,987
480,448
440,111
446,713
Non-Interest expenses
375,032
413,541
392,397
396,169
Income before income taxes
38,955
66,907
47,714
50,544
Net income(1)
24,230
43,068
29,613
30,664
Net income per share - basic
.33
.59
.40
.42
Net income per share - diluted(1)
.33
.58
.40
.41
Dividends declared per share
.06
.06
.07
.07
         
2003
1st Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
4th Qtr.
 
(In 000's, except per share data)
         
Revenues
$ 344,608
$ 350,497
$ 389,767
$ 412,699
Net Revenues
331,395
339,819
377,991
402,756
Non-interest expenses
308,030
315,548
339,847
350,261
Income before income taxes(1)
23,365
24,271
38,144
52,495
Net income
14,428
15,194
23,562
33,134
Net income per share - basic
.20
.21
.33
.46
Net income per share - diluted
.19
.21
.32
.45
Dividends declared per share
.06
.06
.06
.06

(1)    Due to rounding the quarterly results do not add to the total for the year.

 
  64  

 


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls are procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as the Company's are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. No significant changes were made in the internal controls or in othe r factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Executive officers of the registrant (including its significant subsidiaries) who are not Directors of the registrant are as follows:

Jennifer C. Ackart
40
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
     
Barry S. Augenbraun
65
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary
     
Richard G. Averitt, III
59
Chairman and CEO - Raymond James Financial Services, Inc
     
Tim Eitel
55
Chief Information Officer - Raymond James & Associates
     
Jeffrey P. Julien
48
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Director and/or officer of several RJF subsidiaries
     
Paul L. Matecki
49
General Counsel, Director of Compliance - RJF
     
Richard K. Riess
55
Executive Vice President - RJF,
 
 
CEO and Director of both Eagle and Heritage
     
Van C. Sayler
49
Senior Vice President - Fixed Income, Raymond James & Associates
     
Thomas R. Tremaine
48
Executive Vice President - Operations and Administration, Raymond James & Associates
     
Jeffrey E. Trocin
45
Executive Vice President - Equity Capital Markets, Raymond James & Associates
     
Dennis W. Zank
50
President - Raymond James & Associates

The information required by Item 10 relating to Directors of the registrant is incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such proxy statement will be filed with the SEC prior to January 20, 2005.

 
  65  

 

ITEMS 11, 12 13 AND 14.

The information required by Items 11, 12. 13 and 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Such proxy statement will be filed with the SEC prior to January 20, 2005.
PART IV

ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)    Exhibits and financial statement schedules.

1. Financial Statements 
PAGE(S)
   
Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
36
   
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003
37
   
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three Years Ended
 
September 24, 2004
38
   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Three Years Ended
 
September 24, 2004
39
   
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended September 24, 2004
40
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
42
   
3. Exhibits
 

3.1
Amended and restated Articles of Incorporation of Raymond James Financial, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State Florida on March 21, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 as filed with Form 10-K on December 21, 2001.
 
     
3.2
Amended and restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 as filed with Form 10-Q on February 9, 1998.
 
     
3.2.1
Amended Article IV Section 8 of the By-Laws approved on November 29, 2000 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 as filed with Form 10-K on December 22, 2000.
 
     
3.2.2
Amended Article IV Section 2 of the By-Laws approved on February 9, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.2 as filed with Form 10-K on December 21, 2001.
 
     
3.2.3
Amended Article VII, Section I of the By-Laws approved on February 14, 2003 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 filed with Form 10-Q on May 9, 2003.
 
     
3.2.4
Amended Article IV, Section I2 of the By-Laws approved on August 26, 2004 and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 as filed with the Company's 8-K report on August 27, 2004.
 
     
10.1*
Raymond James Financial, Inc. 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan effective February 14, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-98537 filed August 22, 2002.
 
     
10.2*
Raymond James Financial, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan and Stock Bonus Plan effective October 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2, respectively to Registration Statement on Form S-8, No. 333-74716 filed December 7, 2001.
 

 
  66  

 


     
10.3
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan effective November 19, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registration statement on Form S-8, No. 333-68821, filed December 14, 1998.
 
     
10.4
Purchase agreement between BANK ONE CORPORATION as seller, and Raymond James Financial, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 as filed with the Company's Form 10-Q on May 7, 1999.
 
     
10.5
Revolving Credit Agreement for $100 million dated as of October 26, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 as filed with Form 10-K on December 22, 1999.
 
     
10.6
Waiver and Amendment No. 1 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 13, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 as filed with Form 10-K on December 22, 2000.
 
     
10.7
Amendment No. 2 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 24, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 as filed with Form 10-K on December 22, 2000.
 
     
10.8
Amendment No. 3 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of May 24, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 as filed with Form 10-K on December 21, 2001.
 
     
10.9
Amendment No. 4 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 23, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 as filed with Form 10-K on December 21, 2001.
 
     
10.10
Amendment No. 5 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 21, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 as filed with Form 10-K on December 23, 2002.
 
     
10.11
Amendment No. 6 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 17, 2003.
 
     
10.12
Amendment No. 7 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of October 15, 2004, filed herewith.
 
     
10.13
Amendment No. 8 to the Revolving Credit Agreement (dated as of October 26, 1999) dated as of November 5, 2004, filed herewith.
 
     
10.14
Arrangement Agreement between Goepel McDermid Inc. as seller, and Raymond James Holdings (Canada), Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on December 14, 2000.
 
     
10.15
Mortgage Agreement for $75 million dated as of December 13, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10 as filed with form 10-K on December 23, 2002.
 
     
10.16*
Raymond James Financial, Inc.'s Stock Option Plan for Key Management Personnel effective November 21, 1996, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-103277, filed February 18, 2003.
 
     
10.17
Raymond James Financial, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement Form S-8, No. 333-103280, filed February 18, 2003.
 
     
10.18
Form of Indemnification Agreement with Directors, filed herewith.
 

 
  67  

 


     
11
Computation of Earnings per Share is set forth in Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K
 
     
14
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, filed herewith
 
     
21
List of Subsidiaries
 
     
23
Consent of Independent Auditors
 
     
31
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
     
32
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
     
99.1C
Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as revised on November 30, 2004, filed herewith.
 

*    Executive Compensation Plans or Arrangements.

All schedules and exhibits not included are not applicable, not required or would contain information which is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, or the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



 
  68  

 


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of St. Petersburg, State of Florida, on the 8th day of December, 2004.
   
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
 
By /s/ THOMAS A. JAMES
 
Thomas A. James, Chairman
 
   

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

     
Signature
Title
Date
     
/s/ THOMAS A. JAMES
Chairman and Chief
December 8, 2004
Thomas A. James
Executive Officer, Director
 
     
/s/ CHET B. HELCK
President and Chief Operating Officer, Director
December 8, 2004
Chet B. Helck
   
     
/s/ FRANCIS S. GODBOLD
Vice Chairman and Director
December 8, 2004
Francis S. Godbold
   
     
/s/ JEFFREY P. JULIEN
Senior Vice President - Finance
December 8, 2004
Jeffrey P. Julien
and Chief Financial Officer
 
     
/s/ JENNIFER C. ACKART
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
December 8, 2004
Jennifer C. Ackart
 
 
     
/s/ ANGELA M. BIEVER
Director
December 8, 2004
Angela M. Biever
   
     
/s/ JONATHAN A. BULKLEY
Director
December 8, 2004
Jonathan A. Bulkley
   
     
/s/ H. WILLIAM HABERMEYER
Director
December 8, 2004
H. William Habermeyer
   
     
/s/ HARVARD H. HILL, JR.
Director
December 8, 2004
Harvard H. Hill, Jr.
   
     
/s/ PAUL W. MARSHALL
Director
December 8, 2004
Paul W. Marshall
   
     
/s/ KENNETH A. SHIELDS
Director
December 8, 2004
Kenneth A. Shields
   
     
/s/ ADELAIDE SINK
Director
December 8, 2004
Adelaide Sink
   
     
/s/ HARDWICK SIMMONS
Director
December 8, 2004
Hardwick Simmons
   



 
  69  

 


EXHIBIT 21

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following listing includes all of the registrant's subsidiaries, which are included in the consolidated financial statements:

 
Place of
Subsidiary or
Name of Company
Incorporation
Joint Venture of
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJA”)
Florida
Raymond James
   
Financial, Inc. (“RJF”)
ASK-Raymond James Securities India Ltd.
India
HIL
Awad & Associates, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Awad Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Ballast Point Venture Partners, LLC
Florida
RJF
Canada Inc. 3814041
Canada
RJF
EA Management I, LLC
Florida
RJF
EB Management I LLC
Florida
RJF
Eagle Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Gateway Assignor Corporation, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Geovest Energy, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Heritage Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Heritage Fund Distributors, LLC
Florida
RJA
Heritage International, Ltd. (“HIL”)
Mauritius
RJIH
Investment Management & Research, Inc.
Florida
RJF
IT Asset Management
France
RJAMI
Nova Scotia 3051862
Canada
RJ Canada, Inc.
Nova Scotia 3051863
Canada
Nova Scotia 3051862
PCA Insurance Agency of Michigan, Inc.
Florida
PCA
PCAF, Inc.
Florida
PCA
Planning Corporation of America (“PCA”)
Florida
RJA
Raymond James Holdings (Canada), Inc. ("RJ Holdings")
Canada
RJF
Raymond James Argentina Sociedad De Bolsa, S.A.
Argentina
RJSAH
Raymond James Asset Management Int'l., S.A. (“RJAMI”)
France
RJIH
Raymond James Bank, FSB
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Capital, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Capital Partners LP
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Credit Corporation
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Dublin, Ltd.
Ireland
RJIH
Raymond James European Holdings, Inc. (“RJEH”)
Florida
RJIH
Raymond James Financial International, Ltd.
United Kingdom
RJIH
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Geneva, S.A.
Switzerland
RJF
Raymond James Global Securities Limited
British Virgin Isles ("BVI")
RJIH
Raymond James International Holdings, Inc. (“RJIH”)
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Investment Services Ltd.
United Kingdom
Killik
Raymond James Killik (Holdings) Ltd. ("Killik")
United Kingdom
RJF
Raymond James Latin American Advisors Limited
BVI
RJSAH
Raymond James Ltd. ("RJ Ltd.")
Canada
RJ Holdings
Raymond James Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Patrimoine S.A.S.
France
RJIH
Raymond James Securities Turkey
Turkey
RJEH
Raymond James South American Holdings, Inc. (“RJSAH”)
Florida
RJIH
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Trust Company
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Trust Company West
Washington
RJF
RJ Canada LP
Alberta
Nova Scotia 3051863
RJ Canada, Inc. (USA)
Florida
RJF
RJ Capital Partners, LP
Florida
RJC


 
  70  

 


RJ Capital Services, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
RJ Communication, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Equities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Equities-2, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Government Securities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Health Properties, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Leasing, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Leasing-2, Inc.
Florida
RJ Leasing, Inc.
RJ Medical Investors, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Mortgage Acceptance Corporation
Delaware
RJF
RJ Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Properties, Inc. (“RJP”)
Florida
RJF
RJ Realty, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Specialist Corp.
Florida
RJF
RJ Structured Finance, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
RJ Ventures LLC
Florida
RJF
RJC Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJEIF, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Value Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF


 
  71  

 

EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Raymond James Financial, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (No. 333-68821, 333-59449, 333-74716, 333-103280, 333-103277 and 333-98537) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-51840) on Form S-3 of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated December 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2004, which report appears in the September 24, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc.

Our report refers to a change in fiscal year 2003 in the Company's method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

KPMG LLP


Tampa, Florida
December 8, 2004


 
  72  

 

EXHIBIT 31.1
 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Thomas A. James, certify that:
 
 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: December 8, 2004
 
 
/s/ THOMAS A. JAMES        
 
 
Thomas A. James
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
  73  

 

 

 
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Jeffrey P. Julien, certify that:
 
 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: December 8, 2004
 
 
/s/ JEFFREY P. JULIEN
 
 
Jeffrey P. Julien
 
 
Senior Vice President - Finance
 
 
and Chief Financial Officer
 






 
  74  

 


EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial Inc. for the year ended September 24, 2004 containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 
/s/ Thomas A. James
 
Thomas A. James
 
Chief Executive Officer
   
   
 
/s/ Jeffrey P. Julien
 
Jeffrey P. Julien
 
Chief Financial Officer


 
  75  
EX-10.12 2 exhibit10_12.htm AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
 
This AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 7”) is dated as of October 15, 2004 by and among RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC., a Florida corporation (the “Borrower”), the Lenders named on the signature page hereto (the “Lenders”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, individually and as administrative agent (the “Agent”) for the Lenders.
 
W I T N E S S E T H:
 
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Agent and the Lenders are, or upon execution of this Amendment shall become, parties to that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 26, 1999, as amended by that certain (i) Waiver and Amendment dated as of October 13, 2000, (ii) Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 24, 2000, (iii) Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2001, (iv) Amendment No. 4 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 23, 2001, (v) Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002 and (vi) Amendment No. 6 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 (such Revolving Credit Agreement as so amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, the “Credit Agreement”); and
 
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain modifications to the Credit Agreement, including an extension of the Facility Termination Date to October 13, 2005.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
 
I.   Defined Terms
 
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used with the meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement.
 
II.   Amendments to the Credit Agreement
 
2.1.  Effective as of the date hereof,
 
(a)  Each of JPMorgan Chase Bank and Citibank, N.A., as an extending Lender, shall reduce the amount of its Commitment from $33,000,000 to $25,000,000.
 
(b)  The Commitment of Bank One, NA shall terminate, and any obligations owing to Bank One, NA as a non-extending Lender shall be repaid.
 
(c)  JPMorgan Chase Bank hereby (i) accepts appointment by the Lenders as successor Agent under the Credit Agreement and (ii) resigns as Documentation Agent under the Credit Agreement.
 
(d)  Each of Bank of New York and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association shall become a party to the Credit Agreement as a Lender and shall have all of the rights and obligations of a Lender for all purposes of the Credit Agreement to the same extent as if originally a party thereto, with a Commitment of $25,000,000 each as set forth on the signature page hereto. Each of Bank of New York and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (i) represents and warrants that it is legally authorized to enter into its Commitment and this Amendment No. 7; (ii) confirms that it has received a copy of the Credit Agreement, together with copies of the financial statements and such other documents and information as it has deemed appropriate to make its own credit analysis and decision to enter into its Commitment and this Amendment No. 7; (iii) agrees that it will, independently and without reliance upon the Agent or any other Lender and based on such documents and information as it shall deem appropriate at the time, continue to make its own credit decisions in taking or not taking action under the Credit Agreement; (iv) appoints and authorizes the Agent to take such action as contractual representative on its behalf and to exercise such powers and discretion under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents as are delegated to the Agent by the terms thereof, together with such powers as are reasonably incidental thereto; and (v) agrees that it will perform in accordance with its terms all of the obligations which by the terms of the Credit Agreement are required to be performed by it as a Lender.
 
2.2.  The definition of “Agent” in Article I of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“‘Agent’ means JPMorgan Chase Bank in its capacity as administrative agent for the Lenders pursuant to Article X, and not in its individual capacity as a Lender, and any successor administrative agent appointed pursuant to Article X.”
 
2.3.  The definition of “Agents” in Article I of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“‘Agent’ means and includes the Agent, the Syndication Agent and the Co-Documentation Agents.”
 
2.4.  The definition of “Facility Termination Date” in Article I of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“‘Facility Termination Date’ means October 13, 2005 or any later date as may be specified as the Facility Termination Date in accordance with Section 2.18 or any earlier date on which the Aggregate Commitment is reduced to zero or otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms hereof.”
 
2.5.  Subsection 6.16(e) of the Credit Agreement (relating to Borrower guarantees of certain net performance obligations of RJ Capital Services, Inc. owed to counterparties under interest rate swap transactions) is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “up to $20,000,000 in the aggregate” at the end of such subsection.
 
2.6.  Section 6.21.1 of the Credit Agreement entitled “Minimum Tangible Net Worth” is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“6.21.1. Minimum Tangible Net Worth. The Borrower on a consolidated basis with its Subsidiaries at all times after October 15, 2004 shall maintain Tangible Net Worth of not less than (i) $780,000,000 plus (ii) 50% of cumulative Net Income (if positive) earned after June 25, 2004.”
 
2.7.  The Credit Agreement is hereby amended by inserting a new Section 9.17 therein to read as follows:
 
“9.17. USA Patriot Act. Each Lender that is subject to the requirements of the USA Patriot Act (Title III of Pub. L. 107-56 (signed into law October 26, 2001)) (the “Act”) hereby notifies the Borrower that pursuant to the requirements of the Act, it is required to obtain, verify and record information that identifies the Borrower, which information includes the name and address of the Borrower and other information that will allow such Lender to identify the Borrower in accordance with the Act.”
 
2.8.  Section 10.15 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended to substitute the phrase (a) “Co-Documentation Agents” for “Documentation Agent” in the caption and (b) “Co-Documentation Agent” for “Documentation Agent” in the first sentence of such Section.
 
III.   Borrower Representations
 
In order to induce the Lenders and the Agent to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 7, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders that, both before and after giving effect to this Amendment No. 7, (i) there exists no Default or Unmatured Default on the date hereof, (ii) each of the representations and warranties contained in Article V of the Credit Agreement (other than in Sections 5.6, 5.9 (to the extent additional subsidiaries have been formed and are listed in the Borrower’s Annual Report on Form 10-K) and 5.16) is true and correct on the date hereof, (iii) the execution and delivery by the Borrower of this Amendment No. 7 have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate proceedings, (iv) this Amendment No. 7 and the other Loan Documents to which the Borrower is a party constitute t he legal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, (v) no authorization or approval of, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or other Person is required for the due execution, delivery or performance of this Amendment No. 7 by the Borrower, and (vi) no material adverse change in the business, Property, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole has occurred since September 26, 2003.
 
IV.   Effectiveness
 
This Amendment No. 7 shall become effective as of the date first above written upon fulfillment of the following conditions (and when notice thereof shall have been given by the Agent to the Borrower and the Lenders):
 
(i)  the Borrower shall have paid any Obligations owing to Bank One, NA as a non-extending Lender, and Bank One, NA shall have submitted its resignation as Agent;
 
(ii)  the Agent shall have received counterparts of this Amendment No. 7 duly executed by the Borrower and the Lenders;
 
(iii)  the Borrower shall have delivered to the Agent a certificate of Borrower’s Secretary and a certificate of Borrower’s Chief Financial Officer in form and substance satisfactory to the Agent and its counsel; and
 
(iv)  all accrued fees and expenses of the Agent (including the accrued fees and expenses of counsel to the Agent invoiced on or prior to the date hereof) shall have been paid by the Borrower.
 
V.   Ratification
 
Except as specifically provided herein, (a) the Credit Agreement shall otherwise remain unaltered and in full force and effect, and the respective terms, conditions and covenants thereof are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects as originally executed, and (b) this Amendment No. 7 shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of any Lender or the Agent under any of the Loan Documents. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment No. 7, each reference in the Credit Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereof”, “herein”, “hereunder” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.
 
VI.   Governing Law
 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 7 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.
 
VII.   Execution in Counterparts
 
This Amendment No. 7 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
 
[signature pages follow]
 

  
     

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 7 as of the date first above written.




 
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
Commitment:
$25,000,000
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, Individually and as Administrative Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
Commitment:
$25,000,000
CITIBANK, N.A., Individually and as Syndication Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:



  
     

 


Commitment:
$25,000,000
BANK OF NEW YORK, Individually and as Co-Documentation Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
Address for Notices:
One Wall Street, 42nd Floor
New York, NY 10286
Attention: Joe Ciacciarelli
Telephone: (212) 635-6823
Facsimile: (212) 809-9566
 
Commitment:
$25,000,000
WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association, Individually and as Co-Documentation Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
Address for Notices:
Wells Fargo Center
Sixth and Marquette
Minneapolis, MN 55479
Attention: Financial Institutions Division
Telephone: (612) 667-9293
Facsimile: (612) 667-7251
Aggregate Commitment:
$100,000,000
 

EX-10.13 3 exhibit10_13.htm AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT



AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
 
This AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 8”) is dated as of November 5, 2004 by and among RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC., a Florida corporation (the “Borrower”), the Lenders named in the Revolving Credit Agreement referred to below (the “Lenders”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, individually and as administrative agent (the “Agent”) for the Lenders.
 
W I T N E S S E T H:
 
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Agent and the Lenders are parties to that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 26, 1999, as amended by that certain (i) Waiver and Amendment dated as of October 13, 2000, (ii) Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 24, 2000, (iii) Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2001, (iv) Amendment No. 4 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 23, 2001, (v) Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 21, 2002, (vi) Amendment No. 6 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 17, 2003 and (vii) Amendment No. 7 to Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004 (such Revolving Credit Agreement as so amended, supplemented or otherwise modified, the “Credit Agreement”); and
 
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make a modification to the Credit Agreement.
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
 
I.   Defined Terms
 
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used with the meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement.
 
II.   Amendment to the Credit Agreement
 
Section 6.21.4 of the Credit Agreement entitled “RJFS Net Capital” is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
RJFS Net Capital. The Borrower shall cause RJFS at all times after September 24, 2004 to maintain Net Capital of not less than $5,000,000.”
 
III.   Borrower Representations
 
In order to induce the Lenders and the Agent to execute and deliver this Amendment No. 8, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Lenders that, both before and after giving effect to this Amendment No. 8, (i) there exists no Default or Unmatured Default on the date hereof, (ii) each of the representations and warranties contained in Article V of the Credit Agreement (other than in Sections 5.6, 5.9 (to the extent additional subsidiaries have been formed and are listed in the Borrower’s Annual Report on Form 10-K) and 5.16) is true and correct on the date hereof, (iii) the execution and delivery by the Borrower of this Amendment No. 8 have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate proceedings, (iv) this Amendment No. 8 and the other Loan Documents to which the Borrower is a party constitute the le gal, valid and binding obligations of the Borrower enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, (v) no authorization or approval of, and no notice to or filing with, any Governmental Authority or other Person is required for the due execution, delivery or performance of this Amendment No. 8 by the Borrower, and (vi) no material adverse change in the business, Property, condition (financial or otherwise) or results of operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole has occurred since September 26, 2003.
 
IV.   Effectiveness
 
This Amendment No. 8 shall become effective as of the date first above written upon receipt by the Agent of counterparts of this Amendment No. 8 duly executed by the Borrower and the Lenders (and when notice thereof shall have been given by the Agent to the Borrower and the Lenders).
 
V.   Ratification
 
Except as specifically provided herein, (a) the Credit Agreement shall otherwise remain unaltered and in full force and effect, and the respective terms, conditions and covenants thereof are hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects as originally executed, and (b) this Amendment No. 8 shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of any Lender or the Agent under any of the Loan Documents. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment No. 8, each reference in the Credit Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereof”, “herein”, “hereunder” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.
 
VI.   Governing Law
 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 8 SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.
 
VII.   Execution in Counterparts
 
This Amendment No. 8 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
 
[signature pages follow]
 

  
     

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 8 as of the date first above written.


 
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
 
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, Individually and as Administrative Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
 
CITIBANK, N.A., Individually and as Syndication Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
 
BANK OF NEW YORK, Individually and as Co-Documentation Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association, Individually and as Co-Documentation Agent
 
 
By:
 
Title:
 
 
By:
 
Title:





     
EX-14 4 exhibit14.htm CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS



Introduction

The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Raymond James Financial, Inc. ("RJF") has adopted the following Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Members of the Board of Directors (the "Code"). Directors are expected to comply with the letter and spirit of this Code. No code or policy can anticipate every situation that may arise. This Code is designed to maintain high standards of professional business ethics at Raymond James. Accordingly, this Code is intended to serve as a set of guiding principles for Directors. Directors must conduct themselves accordingly and seek to avoid even the appearance of improper behavior. Directors are encouraged to bring questions about particular circumstances that may involve one or more of the provisions of this Code to the attentio n of the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee. Directors who also serve as officers or employees of RJF or any of its affiliates must also comply with the RJF Business Ethics and Corporate Policy.

1.    Ethical Standards and Compliance with Laws, Rules and Regulations

RJF expects its Directors to exercise the highest degree of professional and business ethics in all actions they undertake on behalf of RJF. All Directors are expected to conduct all their business and affairs in full compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, and shall encourage and promote such behavior for themselves, officers and employees.

2.    Conflicts of Interest

Directors must avoid any conflicts of interest between themselves and RJF. A "conflict of interest" exists when a Director's personal or professional interest is adverse to - or may appear to be adverse to - the interests of RJF. Conflicts of interest may also arise when a Director, or members of his or her family, or an organization with which the Director is affiliated receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position as a Director of RJF. Conflicts of interest should be promptly disclosed to the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee.

3.    Insider Trading

The securities laws impose severe sanctions upon any individual who uses "inside information" for his or her own benefit or discloses it to others for their use. Directors who have access to confidential information as a result of their Board service are not permitted to use or share that information for securities trading purposes or for any other purpose except the conduct of RJF's business. All non-public information about RJF should be considered confidential information. To use non-public information for personal financial benefit or to "tip" others who might make an investment decision on the basis of this information is not only unethical but also illegal.

4.    Corporate Opportunities

Directors are prohibited from taking for themselves personally or for the organizations with which they are affiliated opportunities that are discovered through the use of RJF property, information or position without the consent of the Board of Directors. No Director may use RJF property, information, or position for improper personal gain. Directors owe a duty to RJF to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity to do so arises.

5.    Competition and Fair Dealing

RJF adheres to a policy of fair dealing in all its activities. Directors shall endeavor to deal fairly with RJF's customers, suppliers, competitors and employees. No Director should take unfair advantage of anyone through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts, or any other intentional unfair-dealing practice.

The purpose of business entertainment and gifts in a commercial setting is to create goodwill and sound working relationships. It is not to gain unfair advantage with customers. Directors and members of their immediate families may not accept gifts from persons or entities where any such gift is being made in order to influence the Director's actions as a member of the Board, or where acceptance of the gifts could create the appearance of such influence.

6.    Confidentiality

Directors must maintain the confidential information entrusted to them by RJF and its customers, except when disclosure is required by law or regulation. Confidential information includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors, or harmful to RJF, if disclosed. It also includes information that vendors have entrusted to RJF.

7.    Protection and Proper Use of RJF Assets

Directors may not use RJF assets, labor or information for personal use, unless approved by the Corporate Governance Committee, or as part of a compensation or expense reimbursement available to all Directors.

8.    Waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Any waiver of this Code may be made only by the Board and will be promptly publicly disclosed.

9.    Reporting any Illegal or Unethical Behavior

Directors should promote ethical behavior and encourage an environment in which RJF encourages employees to talk to supervisors, managers or other appropriate personnel about observed illegal or unethical behavior and, when in doubt, about the best course of action in a particular situation. It is the policy of RJF to not permit retaliation for reports of misconduct by others made in good faith.

10.    Enforcement of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board shall determine appropriate actions to be taken in the event of violations of this Code. Such actions shall be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote accountability for adherence to the Code. In determining what action is appropriate in a particular case, the Board shall take into account all relevant information, including the nature and severity of the violation, whether the violation appears to have been intentional or inadvertent, and whether the individual in question had been advised prior to the violation as to the proper course of action.

11.    Annual Review

The Board shall review and reassess the adequacy of the Code annually and make any amendments to the Code that the Board deems appropriate.




2



     
EX-21 5 exhibit21.htm LIST OF SUBSIDARIES LIST OF SUBSIDARIES

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following listing includes all of the registrant's subsidiaries, which are included in the consolidated financial statements:

 
Place of
Subsidiary or
Name of Company
Incorporation
Joint Venture of
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“RJA”)
Florida
Raymond James
   
Financial, Inc. (“RJF”)
ASK-Raymond James Securities India Ltd.
India
HIL
Awad & Associates, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Awad Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Ballast Point Venture Partners, LLC
Florida
RJF
Canada Inc. 3814041
Canada
RJF
EA Management I, LLC
Florida
RJF
EB Management I LLC
Florida
RJF
Eagle Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Gateway Assignor Corporation, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Geovest Energy, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Heritage Asset Management, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Heritage Fund Distributors, LLC
Florida
RJA
Heritage International, Ltd. (“HIL”)
Mauritius
RJIH
Investment Management & Research, Inc.
Florida
RJF
IT Asset Management
France
RJAMI
Nova Scotia 3051862
Canada
RJ Canada, Inc.
Nova Scotia 3051863
Canada
Nova Scotia 3051862
PCA Insurance Agency of Michigan, Inc.
Florida
PCA
PCAF, Inc.
Florida
PCA
Planning Corporation of America (“PCA”)
Florida
RJA
Raymond James Holdings (Canada), Inc. ("RJ Holdings")
Canada
RJF
Raymond James Argentina Sociedad De Bolsa, S.A.
Argentina
RJSAH
Raymond James Asset Management Int'l., S.A. (“RJAMI”)
France
RJIH
Raymond James Bank, FSB
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Capital, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Capital Partners LP
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Credit Corporation
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Dublin, Ltd.
Ireland
RJIH
Raymond James European Holdings, Inc. (“RJEH”)
Florida
RJIH
Raymond James Financial International, Ltd.
United Kingdom
RJIH
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Geneva, S.A.
Switzerland
RJF
Raymond James Global Securities Limited
British Virgin Isles ("BVI")
RJIH
Raymond James International Holdings, Inc. (“RJIH”)
Delaware
RJF
Raymond James Investment Services Ltd.
United Kingdom
Killik
Raymond James Killik (Holdings) Ltd. ("Killik")
United Kingdom
RJF
Raymond James Latin American Advisors Limited
BVI
RJSAH
Raymond James Ltd. ("RJ Ltd.")
Canada
RJ Holdings
Raymond James Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Patrimoine S.A.S.
France
RJIH
Raymond James Securities Turkey
Turkey
RJEH
Raymond James South American Holdings, Inc. (“RJSAH”)
Florida
RJIH
Raymond James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Trust Company
Florida
RJF
Raymond James Trust Company West
Washington
RJF
RJ Canada LP
Alberta
Nova Scotia 3051863
RJ Canada, Inc. (USA)
Florida
RJF
RJ Capital Partners, LP
Florida
RJC


  
     

 


RJ Capital Services, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
RJ Communication, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Equities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Equities-2, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Government Securities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Health Properties, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Leasing, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Leasing-2, Inc.
Florida
RJ Leasing, Inc.
RJ Medical Investors, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Mortgage Acceptance Corporation
Delaware
RJF
RJ Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Properties, Inc. (“RJP”)
Florida
RJF
RJ Realty, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJ Specialist Corp.
Florida
RJF
RJ Structured Finance, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
RJ Ventures LLC
Florida
RJF
RJC Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF
RJEIF, Inc.
Delaware
RJF
Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.
Florida
RJF
Value Partners, Inc.
Florida
RJF

EX-23 6 exhibit23.htm CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Raymond James Financial, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (No. 333-68821, 333-59449, 333-74716, 333-103280, 333-103277 and 333-98537) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-51840) on Form S-3 of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated December 6, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 24, 2004 and September 26, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 24, 2004, which report appears in the September 24, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc.

Our report refers to a change in fiscal year 2003 in the Company's method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

KPMG LLP


Tampa, Florida
December 8, 2004
EX-31.1 7 exhibit31_1.htm CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Thomas A. James, certify that:
 
 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: December 8, 2004
 
 
/s/ THOMAS A. JAMES        
 
 
Thomas A. James
 
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

EX-31.2 8 exhibit31_2.htm CERTIFICATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 
CERTIFICATIONS 
 
 
I, Jeffrey P. Julien, certify that:
 
 
1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial, Inc;
 
 
  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 
  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 
(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 
(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 
  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 
(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 
(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Date: December 8, 2004
 
 
/s/ JEFFREY P. JULIEN
 
 
Jeffrey P. Julien
 
 
Senior Vice President - Finance
 
 
and Chief Financial Officer
 






 
2
     

 


EX-10.18 9 exhibit10_18.htm INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

Indemnification Agreement
This Indemnification Agreement is entered into, effective as of the _____day of September 2004 between Raymond James Financial, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) and ________________________(“Indemnitee”).
 
Recitals
 
A.     It is essential to the Company that it attracts and retains capable persons as directors, including directors who are also officers.
 
B.    Both the Company and Indemnitee recognize that given the uncertainties of the business, corporate governance and legal climate, directors and officers of publicly held corporations face greater risks of personal liability in the current business climate arising from their service as directors or officers of such corporations.
 
C.    Indemnitee is a director of the Company, member of various committees of the Board of Directors of the Company, and presently serves as and as such is performing a valuable service to or on behalf of the Company.
 
D.   In recognition of Indemnitee’s need for protection against personal liability, and in order to enhance Indemnitee’s continued and effective service to or for the Company, in whatever capacity he may serve from time to time, whether:
 
(1) at the request of the Company, as a member of the Board of Directors, a member or officer of any committee of the Board of Directors, an officer, fiduciary, employee, agent or advisor of the Company, as a director, officer, fiduciary, employee, agent or advisor of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other enterprise that is an Affiliate of the Company or any employee benefit plan or trust sponsored by the Company or any such Affiliate; or
 
(2) at the written request of the Company, as a member of the board of directors, a member of any committee of the board of directors, an officer, fiduciary employee, agent or advisor of any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other enterprise that is not an Affiliate of the Company;
 
the Company wishes to provide in this Agreement, in addition to indemnification for which Indemnitee is entitled under the Company’s articles or incorporation or bylaws, for the indemnification of and the advancement of expenses to Indemnitee, and other rights, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
 
Operative Terms
 
In consideration of the above recitals and of Indemnitee’s continuing to serve the Company directly or, at its request, another enterprise, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:
 
1.   Certain Definitions:
 
Affiliate”: (a) any entity which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the referenced individual or entity, or (b) any individual who, directly or indirectly, controls the referenced entity. For purposes of this definition, the terms “control”, "controlled by" and “under common control with” mean the power, directly or indirectly, to: (i) vote 10% or more of the securities (including, without limitation, convertible securities) having ordinary voting power; or (ii) direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of an entity whether by contract or otherwise.
 
Applicable Expenses: any expense, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees and expenses of experts, including, without limitation, accountants and other advisors, travel expenses, duplicating costs, postage, delivery service fees, filing fees, and all other disbursements or expenses reasonably paid or incurred in connection with investigating, defending, being a witness in, or participating in (including, without limitation, on appeal), or preparing for any of the foregoing in, any Proceeding relating to an Indemnifiable Event, and any such expenses reasonably paid or incurred in establishing a right to indemnification under Sections 2, 4 or 5 of this Agreement.
 
Board: the Board of Directors of the Company.
 
Change in Control: shall be deemed to have occurred if: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act, other than any one or more of the Excluded Persons, is or becomes the Beneficial Owner (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under such Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% or more of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding Voting Securities; or (ii) during any period of 25 consecutive calendar months, beginning on the date of this Agreement, those individuals (the “Continuing Directors”), who (A) were directors of the Company on the first day of any such period or (B) subsequently became direc tors of the Company and whose initial election or initial nomination for election subsequent to that date was approved by a majority of the Continuing Directors then on the Board, cease to constitute a majority of the Board; or (iii) the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation or entity, other than a merger or consolidation that would result in the Voting Securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into Voting Securities of the surviving entity) at least 80% of the total voting power represented by the Voting Securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or (iv) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company (in one transaction or a series of transactions) of all or substantially all of t he Company’s assets; or (v) a liquidator, trustee or other similar person is appointed for all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company.
 
Company: Raymond James Financial, Inc. and any of its successors or permitted assigns under this Agreement.
 
Disinterested Director: a director of the Company who is not an employee of the Company or any of its Affiliates and who, in the event that a Proceeding has been initiated, is not a party to the Proceeding in respect of which indemnification is sought by Indemnitee.
 
Exchange Act: the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
Excluded Persons: shall consist of Thomas A. James, the wife, children and grandchildren of Thomas A. James, the Robert A. and Helen James’ Children Annuity Trust, any estate planning trust established by Thomas A. James as the grantor, or any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company 
 
Indemnifiable Event: any event or occurrence that takes place either prior to or after the execution of this Agreement that is: (i) related to the fact that Indemnitee is or was serving (A) at the request of the Company, as a member of the Board of Directors, a member or officer of any committee of the Board of Directors, an officer, fiduciary, employee, agent or advisor of the Company, as a director, officer, fiduciary, employee, agent or advisor of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other enterprise that is an Affiliate of the Company or any employee benefit plan or trust sponsored by the Company or any s uch Affiliate; or (B) at the written request of the Company, as a member of the board of directors, a member of any committee of the board of directors, an officer, fiduciary employee, agent or advisor of any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other enterprise that is not an Affiliate of the Company, or (ii) related to any act or omission, or alleged act or omission, by Indemnitee in any capacity described in clause (i) of this definition, whether or not any basis of the Proceeding is the acts or omissions or alleged acts or omissions of Indemnitee, and whether or not such acts or omissions were, or are alleged to have been, committed in any official capacity described in clause (i) of this definition); provided, however, that an Indemnifiable Event shall not mean any claim against Indemnitee for an accounting of profits made for the purchase or sale by Indemnitee of securities of the Corporation in violation of the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act or similar provisions of any federal, state or local statutory law.
 
Indemnitee: shall be as defined in the opening paragraph of this Agreement.
 
Independent Counsel: a law firm, or a member of a law firm, that is experienced in matters of corporation and securities law and neither at the time of designation is, nor in the three years immediately preceding such designation was, retained to represent: (i) the Company or Indemnitee in any matter material to either such party; or (ii) any other party to the Proceeding giving rise to a claim for indemnification under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term “Independent Counsel” shall not include any person who, under the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing, would have a conflict of interest in representing either the Company or Indemnitee in an action to determi ne Indemnitee’s rights to indemnification under this Agreement, regardless of when Indemnitee’s act or failure to act occurred or is alleged to have occurred.
 
Proceeding: any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute mechanism, administrative or legislative hearing, inquiry or investigation including, without limitation, any appeal, whether conducted by or on behalf of the Company or by or on behalf of any other party, whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative, or other, and whether or not commenced prior to, on or after the date of this Agreement, that relates to an Indemnifiable Event.
 
Reviewing Party: the person or body making the determination, under Section 3(a) or 3(b), as to Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification.
 
Voting Securities: any securities of the Company that vote generally in the election of directors.
 
2.    Agreement to Indemnify.
 
(a)    General Agreement. In the event Indemnitee was, is, or becomes a party to or witness or other participant in, or is threatened to be made a party to or witness or other participant in, a Proceeding by reason of (or arising in whole or in part out of) an Indemnifiable Event, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against any and all Applicable Expenses, liabilities, losses, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes and penalties, amounts paid or to be paid in settlement, and any interest, assessments, or other charges imposed thereon, to the fulle st extent permitted by applicable law to be indemnified by agreement, as such applicable law exists or may hereafter be amended or interpreted (but in the case of any such amendment or interpretation, only to the extent that such amendment or interpretation permits the Company to provide broader indemnification rights than were permitted prior thereto). The parties hereto intend that this Agreement shall provide for indemnification in excess of that expressly permitted by statute in the absence of an agreement.
 
(b)    Expense Advances. If so requested by Indemnitee, the Company shall advance to Indemnitee any and all Applicable Expenses incurred by Indemnitee (an “Expense Advance”) within thirty (30) calendar days after the receipt by the Company of a statement or statements from Indemnitee requesting such Expense Advance (together with reasonable supporting documentation in the possession of Indemnitee or available to Indemnitee with respect to the Applicable Expenses incurred), whether prior to or after final disposition of any Proceeding. Any Expense Advance shall be made without regard to Indemnitee’s ability to repay the amount of the Expense Advance and without regard to Indemnitee’s ultimate entitlement to indemnification under the provisions of this Agreement. Indemnitee hereby agrees to repay the Expense Advance if and to the extent that it is ultimately determined by a final judicial determination (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or have lapsed) that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification by the Company under this Agreement. If Indemnitee has commenced legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to secure a determination that Indemnitee is entitled, under applicable law, to be indemnified under this Agreement, as provided in Section 4, any determination made by the Reviewing Party that Indemnitee is not entitled, under applicable law, to be indemnified under this Agreement shall not be binding and Indemnitee shall not be required to reimburse the Company for any Expense Advance un til a final judicial determination (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or have lapsed) is made that Indemnitee is not entitled, under applicable law, to be indemnified under this Agreement. Indemnitee’s obligation to reimburse the Company for any Expense Advance shall be unsecured and no interest shall be charged thereon.
 
(c)    Mandatory Indemnification. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee has been successful on the merits in defense of any Proceeding relating in whole or in part to an Indemnifiable Event or in defense of any issue or matter in such Proceeding, Indemnitee shall be indemnified with respect to all Applicable Expenses incurred in connection therewith.
 
(d)    Partial Indemnification. If Indemnitee is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to be indemnified by the Company for some or a portion of Applicable Expenses, but not, however, for the total amount thereof, the Company shall indemnify Indemnitee for the portion thereof to which Indemnitee is entitled to be indemnified.
 
(e)    Limitations on Indemnification. Notwithstanding the preceding portions of this Section 2, no indemnification or Expense Advance shall be made under this Agreement to or on behalf of Indemnitee to the extent that such indemnification or Expense Advance is prohibited by law, if so established by a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to Indemnitee.
 
3.    Reviewing Party.
 
(a)    Prior to any Change in Control, the determination, if such a determination is required under applicable law, as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, shall be made by: (i) the Board acting by a majority vote of Disinterested Directors, whether or not such majority constitutes a quorum of the Board; (ii) a committee of Disinterested Directors designated by a majority vote of Disinterested Directors, whether or not such majority constitutes a quorum of the Board; or (iii) if there are no Disinterested Directors or if the Disinterested Directors so direct, by the Independent Counsel.
 
(b)    After a Change in Control, the determination, if such a determination is required under applicable law, as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, shall be made by Independent Counsel unless Indemnitee shall request that the determination be made by the Board or the board of directors of the surviving corporation (in the event that the Company is not the surviving corporation as a result of such Change in Control).
 
(c)    The Company agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Counsel and to indemnify fully such counsel against any and all expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses), claims, liabilities, losses, and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the engagement of the Independent Counsel pursuant hereto.
 
4.    Indemnification Process and Appeal.
 
(a)    Indemnification Payment. Indemnitee shall be entitled to indemnification of Applicable Expenses, and shall receive payment thereof, from the Company in accordance with this Agreement within thirty (30) calendar days after Indemnitee has made written demand on the Company for indemnification (which written demand shall include reasonable supporting documentation in the possession of Indemnitee or available to Indemnitee with respect to Indemnitee’s demand for indemnification), unless the Reviewing Party has provided to the Company and In demnitee, within such thirty (30) calendar days, a written determination that Indemnitee’s entitlement to indemnification under this Agreement is required to be determined under applicable law, and that the Reviewing Party has determined that Indemnitee is not entitled, under applicable law, to indemnification under this Agreement.
 
(b)    Suit to Enforce Rights. If (i) Indemnitee has not received payment of Applicable Expenses within thirty (30) calendar days after Indemnitee has made written demand on the Company for indemnification in accordance with Section 4(a), and no written determination, as described in Section 4(a) has been provided by the Reviewing Party to the Company and Indemnitee, within such thirty (30) calendar days, (ii) a written adverse determination, as described in Section 4(a), has been provided by the Reviewing Party to the Company and Indemnitee within such thirty (30) calendar days, or (iii) Indemnitee has not received an Expense Advance within thirty (30) calendar days after making such a request in accordance with Section 2(b), then Indemnitee shall have the right to enforce its indemnification rights or rights to an Expense Advance under this Agreement by commencing litigation seeking a determination by the court or challenging any determination by the Reviewing Party or any aspect thereof. The Company hereby consents to service of process and agrees to appear in any such proceeding. Any determination by the Reviewing Party not challenged by Indemnitee on or before the first anniversary of the date of the Reviewing Party’s determination shall be binding on the Company and Indemnitee. The remedy provided for in this Section 4 shall be in addition to any other remedies available to Indemnitee at law or in equity. In the event that a court issues an order or judgment in favor of Indemnitee in such proceeding, the Company shall have the right to stay the execution of such order or judgment pending an appeal if the Company files a timely appeal of such order or judgment and complies with all requirements including, without limitation, the posting of any required bond, to stay such execution.
 
(c)    Presumptions; Burden of Proof; and Evidentiary Matters.
 
(i)    To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, in making a determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification or an Expense Advance under this Agreement, the Reviewing Party shall presume that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or an Expense Advance under this Agreement if Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification in accordance with Section 4(a) of this Agreement, or a request for an Expense Advance under Section 2(b), and the Company shall have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption in connection with the making by the Reviewing Party of any determination contrary to that presumption.< /DIV>
 
(ii)    In connection with any action brought pursuant to Section 4(b) as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to be indemnified or to an Expense Advance under this Agreement, the burden of proving that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification or an Expense Advance under this Agreement shall be on the Company.
 
(iii)    Neither the failure of the Reviewing Party to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such action by Indemnitee that indemnification under this Agreement is permitted under applicable law, nor an actual determination by the Reviewing Party that indemnification under this Agreement is not permitted under applicable law, shall be admissible as evidence in any such action; provided, however, that if either party alleges, in any litigation, the bad faith of the other party, then either party may seek to admit such determination into evidence in such litigation for the sole purpose of seeking to prove bad faith or the absenc e of bad faith.
 
(iv)    For purposes of this Agreement, the termination of any claim, action, suit, or proceeding, by judgment, order, settlement (whether with or without court approval), conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not create a presumption that Indemnitee did not meet any particular standard of conduct or have any particular belief or that a court has determined that indemnification is not permitted by applicable law.
 
5.    Indemnification for Expenses Incurred in Enforcing Rights. The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee against any and all Applicable Expenses and, if requested by Indemnitee, shall advance such Applicable Expenses to Indemnitee on such terms and conditions as the Board reasonably determines appropriate, that are incurred by Indemnitee in connection with any claim asserted against or action brought by Indemnitee for:
 
(a)    enforcement of this Agreement;
 
(b)    Expense Advances, or indemnification of Applicable Expenses, by the Company under this Agreement or any other agreement, under applicable law, or under the Company’s articles of incorporation or bylaws, now or hereafter in effect relating to indemnification of Indemnitee; or
 
(c)    recovery under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies maintained by the Company.
 
6.    Notification and Defense of Proceeding.
 
(a)    Notice. Indemnitee will notify the Company of the commencement of any Proceeding within ten (10) days after Indemnitee has actually received notice of such commencement; provided, however, that the failure so to notify the Company will not relieve the Company from any liability that it may have to Indemnitee, except to the extent that the Company may have been prejudiced as a result of such failure.
 
(b)    Defense. With respect to any Proceeding as to which Indemnitee notifies the Company of the commencement thereof, the Company will be entitled to participate in the Proceeding at its own expense and, except as otherwise provided below, to the extent the Company so wishes, it may assume the defense thereof with counsel reasonably satisfactory to Indemnitee. After notice from the Company to Indemnitee of its election to assume the defense of any Proceeding, the Company will not be liable to Indemnitee under this Agreement or otherwise for any A pplicable Expenses (except for reasonable costs and expenses of Indemnitee in cooperating in the defense of such proceeding) subsequently incurred by Indemnitee in connection with the defense of such Proceeding, except as otherwise provided below. Indemnitee shall have the right to employ his own counsel in such Proceeding, but all Applicable Expenses related thereto (other than those described in the parenthetical of the immediately preceding sentence) incurred after notice from the Company of its assumption of the defense shall be at Indemnitee’s expense unless: (i) the employment of counsel by Indemnitee has been authorized by the Company; (ii) the counsel selected by the Company (or any insurer) to handle such defense has determined that there may be a conflict of interest related to the defense of the Proceeding between Indemnitee and the Company or between Indemnitee and other individuals who are being represented by such counsel with respect to such Proceeding; (iii) after a Change in Control, th e employment of counsel by Indemnitee has been approved by the Independent Counsel; or (iv) within thirty (30) calendar days after Indemnitee has given notice to the Company of such Proceeding, the Company (or any insurer) shall not have employed counsel reasonably satisfactory to Indemnitee to assume the defense of such Proceeding or shall not thereafter continue to provide a defense in such Proceeding; and in each of such cases, all Applicable Expenses with respect to the Proceeding shall be borne by the Company. The Company and Indemnitee shall cooperate reasonably with each other with respect to the defense of the Proceeding, including, without limitation, making documents, witnesses and other reasonable information related to the defense available to the Company or Indemnitee, as the case may be, pursuant to joint-defense agreements or confidentiality agreements, as appropriate (and subject to the advice of counsel based on attorney-client privilege or differing interests of the Company and Indemnitee o r Indemnitee and other indemnitees).
 
(c)    Settlement of Claims. The Company shall not be liable to indemnify Indemnitee under this Agreement or otherwise for any amounts paid by Indemnitee in settlement of any Proceeding effected without the Company’s written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; provided, however, that if a Change in Control has occurred, the Company shall be liable for indemnification of Indemnitee for amounts paid by Indemnitee in settlement if the Reviewing Party has approved the settlement. The Company shall not settle any P roceeding in any manner without Indemnitee’s prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed provided that, as a result of such settlement, Indemnitee shall suffer no (i) financial obligation, or (ii) limitation on Indemnitee’s exercise of his business or professional activities unless Indemnitee has consented in writing to such limitation.
 
7.    Non-Exclusivity. The rights of Indemnitee under this Agreement shall be in addition to any other rights Indemnitee may have under applicable law, the Company’s articles of incorporation, bylaws, other written agreement between the Company and Indemnitee, or otherwise. To the extent that a change in applicable law (whether by statute or judicial decision) permits greater indemnification by agreement than would be afforded currently under the Company’s articles of incorporation, bylaws, this Agreement or any other written agreement be tween the Company and Indemnitee, it is the intent of the parties that Indemnitee enjoy the greater benefits so afforded by such change.
 
8.     Liability Insurance. To the extent the Company maintains an insurance policy or policies providing directors’ or officers’ liability insurance, Indemnitee shall be covered by such policy or policies, in accordance with its or their terms, to the maximum extent of the coverage available for any Company director or officer.
 
9.    Claims Against Indemnitee. No legal action shall be brought and no claim shall be asserted by or on behalf of the Company or any Affiliate of the Company against Indemnitee, Indemnitee’s spouse, heirs, executors, or personal or legal representatives unless notice of such claim is given to Indemnitee within a reasonable time (not to exceed three months) after any senior manager of the Company or an Affiliate becomes aware of such claim, but in no event shall suit on such claim be commenced by the Company or any Affiliate more than one yea r after notice of such claim has been given to Indemnitee unless a longer period is required by federal or state law with respect to such claim. Nothing in this Section is intended as an agreement to lengthen or extend any statute of limitation or statute of repose.
 
10.    Amendment of this Agreement. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding on the parties unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall operate as a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar), nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, no failure to exercise or any delay in exercising any right or remedy under this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any suc h right or remedy.
 
11.    No Duplication of Payments. The Company shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment in connection with any claim made against Indemnitee to the extent Indemnitee has otherwise actually received payment (under any insurance policy, bylaw, or otherwise) of the amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder.
 
12.    Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, including, without limitation, any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company, spouses, heirs, and personal and legal representatives. The Company shall require and cause any successor (whether direct or indirect by purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise) to all, subst antially all, or a substantial part, of the business or assets of the Company, by written agreement in form and substance satisfactory to Indemnitee, expressly to assume and agree to perform this Agreement. This Agreement shall continue in effect regardless of whether Indemnitee continues to serve in any capacity described in Recital D above.
 
13.    Severability. If any provision (or portion thereof) of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction (as to which all rights of appeal therefrom have been exhausted or have lapsed) to be invalid, void, or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. Furthermore, to the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation, each portion of this Agreement containing any provision held to be invalid, void, or otherwise un enforceable, that is not itself invalid, void, or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to give effect to the intent manifested by the provision held invalid, void, or unenforceable.
 
14.    Governing Law; and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida applicable to contracts made and to be performed in such State without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws.    Any litigation arising out of or relating to this Agreement may be brought solely in the courts of the State of Florida, in Hillsborough County or Pinellas County, or, if it has or can acquire jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, and each of the parties waives any objection it may have to venue or to convenience of forum as to such courts.
 
15.    Notices. All notices, demands, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be made in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand, by reputable overnight or courier service, or mailed, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, and addressed:
 
if to the Company at:
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
880 Carillon Parkway
St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
Attn: Legal Department
-or-
if to Indemnitee at:
_______________________
_______________________
Notice of change of address shall be effective only when given in accordance with this Section. All notices complying with this Section shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date of delivery or on the third business day after mailing.
 
The parties have duly executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day specified above.
 
Company:
Raymond James Financial, Inc., a Florida corporation
 
By:________________________________________
Printed Name:_________________________________
Title:________________________________________
 
Indemnitee:
 
_____________________________________________
 
Printed Name: ________________________________

 
     
EX-99.1A CHARTER 10 exhibit99_a.htm CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

As Revised by the Board of Directors on November 30, 2004

CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1.    Mission Statement
The Audit Committee serves as the principal agent of the Board of Directors in fulfilling the Board's oversight responsibilities with respect to the integrity of the Company's financial reporting, the independent auditor's qualifications and independence, the Company's systems of internal controls, the functioning of the Company's Internal Audit Department and the Company's procedures for establishing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
2.    Responsibilities and Duties
The Committee's responsibility is oversight, and it recognizes that the Company's management is responsible for preparing the Company's financial statements. Additionally, the Committee recognizes that financial management (including the internal audit staff), as well as the independent accountants, have more knowledge of accounting and auditing requirements and more detailed information about the Company than do the members of the Committee; consequently, in carrying out its oversight responsibilities the Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to the Company's financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent accountants' work.
3.    Membership
The Audit Committee (the Committee) shall be comprised of at least three independent directors (in accordance with the independence standards adopted from time to time by the NYSE and SEC). The members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee and shall be persons who are financially literate, in the judgment of the Board of Directors. At least one of the members of the Committee shall be a person who, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, has accounting or financial management expertise. At least one of the members of the Committee shall be a person who, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, is qualified to serve as an audit committee financial expert under NYSE and SEC rule s.
4.    Meetings and Discussions
Generally, the Audit Committee shall hold formal meetings prior to each quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors and telephone meetings with the Company's Chief Financial Officer and the independent accountants prior to the release of quarterly financial results. Additional meetings, either in person or by telephone, may be held from time to time as determined by the Chair of the Committee. In addition, members of the Audit Committee are free to contact members of management including financial managers, compliance managers, the Director of Internal Audit, the Senior Vice President for Risk Management, the Company's internal and outside counsel and the Company's independent accountants whenever they consider appropriate; the Committee may request reports or prese ntations at Committee Meetings from any of these individuals. The Committee shall meet periodically with senior management responsible for the Company's financial reporting.
5.    Financial Reporting Oversight; Relationship with Company's
Independent Accountants
a.    The Company's independent accountants are ultimately accountable to the Board of Directors, as representative of the Company's shareholders. The Audit Committee exercises the responsibility of the Board of Directors in that oversight role.
b.    The Audit Committee shall be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent accountants employed by the Company (including resolution of disagreements between management and the auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. In that connection, the independent accountants shall report directly to the Audit Committee and the Committee shall determine appropriate funding for payment of compensation to the Company's independent accountants..
c.    In connection with the appointment and reappointment of the independent accountants, the Committee shall review their independence and obtain written disclosures from them regarding all relationships with the Company that could affect their independence. In that connection at least annually the Committee shall obtain and review a report by the independent accountants describing: the firm's internal quality-control procedures; any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities, within the preceding five ye ars, respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm, and any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and (to assess their independence) all relationships between the independent accountants and the company.
d.    The Audit Committee shall approve in advance any audit and non-audit services, including tax services, to be performed for the Company by its independent accountants, except for services that were not recognized at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services and for which the compensation does not exceed 5% of the total revenues paid to the independent accountants by the Company during the fiscal year; provided, however, that such "de minimis" services are approved by the Audit Committee or one or more members to whom authority has been granted to make such approval prior to completion of the audit. In that connection, the Committee shall receive from the independent accountants, at least annually, a written statement setting out all relationships between them and the Company and the fees paid for those services.
e.    The Committee shall meet with the independent accountants on a regular basis, as it determines appropriate. At least once a year, the Committee shall meet with representatives of the independent accountants without the presence of management representatives.
f.    The Committee, or one of its members, shall meet with the representatives of the independent accountants prior to commencement of the annual audit in order to review the audit scope and approach, and any specific areas of risk that the auditors propose to focus on.
g.    Following conclusion of the year-end audit, but prior to release of the financial statements, the Committee, or one of its members, shall discuss with representatives of the independent accountants the financial statements and the results of the audit, including any disagreements with management regarding audit scope or accounting presentation.
h.    Prior to release of the financial results for each quarter and the fiscal year the Committee, or one of its members, shall review them with management and representatives of the independent accountants, and shall review with them the "Management's Discussion and Analysis" section of the Company's filings with the SEC.
i.    At least annually, the Committee shall review with representatives of the independent accountants their judgments concerning the quality of the Company's accounting principles as reflected in its financial reporting, whether those principles are consistent with industry standards or represent minority positions, and the clarity of disclosure of information. The Committee shall also review with the independent accountants their views regarding any significant estimates made by management which are reflected in the financial statements.
In that connection, the Audit Committee shall review with the independent accountants:
(1)    all critical accounting policies and practices to be used;
(2)    all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management officials of the Company, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the independent accountants; and
(3)    other material written communications between the independent accountants and the management of the Company, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences.
Based on the review and discussions described above, the Committee shall recommend to the Board of Directors whether the financial statements should be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
j.    At least annually, the Committee shall receive from the independent accountants a report of their recommendations to improve the Company's internal control structure and operational efficiency. The Committee shall obtain and review management's response to these recommendations.
k.    The Committee shall approve in advance any proposed hiring by the Company of an employee or former employee of the Company's independent accountants.
6. Oversight of the Internal Audit Department, Internal Controls and Risk Management
a.    The Committee shall have oversight responsibility with respect to the Company's Internal Audit Department. In that connection, the Committee shall maintain regular contact with the Director of Internal Audit and meet with her/him at least once a year without the presence of management representatives.
b.    The Committee shall receive and review reports from the Internal Audit Department with respect to the results of audits undertaken and management's response to recommendations from the Department. The Committee shall have the authority to direct the Internal Audit Department to undertake specific projects, including review of specific departments of the Company.
c.    The Committee shall receive regular reports from the Senior Vice President for Risk Management and review periodically the Company's policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.
d.    The director of internal audit and Senior Vice President for Risk Management shall have access to the members of the Audit Committee on a direct basis as necessary, and shall attend meetings of the Committee as requested by the Committee.
7.    Oversight of the Compliance Departments of Major Subsidiaries and Divisions, and Legal and Regulatory Matters.
a.    The Committee shall receive reports from the Company's General Counsel regarding activities of the compliance directors of the broker-dealers and major subsidiaries and divisions of the Company. At least once a year, the compliance directors shall submit reports to the Committee on activities undertaken during the year, any regulatory problems encountered and regulatory issues that may affect the C ompany in the future.
b.    The Committee shall receive regular reports from the Company's General Counsel regarding material legal and regulatory matters.

8.    Other Responsibilities
a.    The Committee shall establish and review procedures for:
(1)     the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and
(2)     the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
b.    At least annually, the Committee shall receive reports from Senior Financial Officers of the Company regarding their compliance with the code of ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The Committee shall report material violations of the Code of Ethics that are brought to their attention to the Board of Directors with a recommendation for appropriate action.
c.    At least annually, the Committee shall review with the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer the certifications they sign in SEC reports regarding the Company's disclosure controls, the design and operation of the Company's internal controls and any material weaknesses they have identified, or any fraud involving management or other employees they have identified during the course of their review of the Company's controls.
d.    The Committee shall prepare an annual report to be included in the Company's annual proxy statement to shareholders.
9.    General
a.    In exercising its oversight responsibility, the Committee shall have access to members of management and may inquire into any issues that it considers to be of material concern to the Committee or the Board of Directors.
b.    The Committee shall have authority to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within its scope of responsibilities and to retain advisers, including counsel and other professionals, to assist in the conduct of any investigation and determine their compensation.
c.    The Committee shall report regularly to the Board of Directors with respect to its activities.
d.    The Committee shall review this charter annually and make changes as it considers appropriate.
e.    The Committee shall participate in an annual performance evaluation of its activities by the Board of Directors.
EX-32 11 exhibit32.htm 906 CERTIFICATION 906 CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


We hereby certify to the best of our knowledge that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Raymond James Financial Inc. for the year ended September 24, 2004 containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 
/s/ Thomas A. James
 
Thomas A. James
 
Chief Executive Officer
   
   
 
/s/ Jeffrey P. Julien
 
Jeffrey P. Julien
 
Chief Financial Officer


-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----