Note 12 - Fair Value Measurement

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Note 12.    Fair Value Measurement

The table below sets forth our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis and the fair value calculation input hierarchy level that we have determined applies to each asset and liability category (in thousands).

Description	Balance at March 31, 2014		Balance at December 31, 2013		Input Hierarchy Level
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds and other bank deposits	$	207,642	$	212,175	Level 1
Available for sale securities:
Equity securities – mining industry		8,730		7,019	Level 1
Trade accounts receivable:
Receivables from provisional concentrate sales		26,159		17,672	Level 2
Restricted cash balances:
Certificates of deposit and other bank deposits		7,702		5,217	Level 1
Derivative contracts:
Metal forward contracts		13,308		4,461	Level 2
Total assets	$	263,541	$	246,544

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds and are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

Current and non-current restricted cash balances consist primarily of certificates of deposit and U.S. Treasury securities and are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

Our current and non-current investments consist of marketable equity securities which are valued using quoted market prices for each security.

Trade accounts receivable include amounts due to us for shipments of concentrates and doré sold to smelters and refiners.  Revenues and the corresponding accounts receivable for sales of concentrates and doré are recorded when title and risk of loss transfer to the customer (generally at the time of loading on truck or ship).  Sales of concentrates are recorded using estimated forward prices for the anticipated month of settlement applied to our estimate of payable metal quantities contained in each shipment.  Sales are recorded net of estimated treatment and refining charges, which are also impacted by changes in metals prices and quantities of contained metals.  We estimate the prices at which sales of our concentrates will be settled due to the time elapsed between shipment and final settlement with the smelter.  Receivables for previously recorded concentrate sales are adjusted to reflect estimated forward metals prices at the end of each period until final settlement by the smelter.  We obtain the forward metals prices used each period from a pricing service.  Changes in metal prices between shipment and final settlement result in changes to revenues previously recorded upon shipment.  The embedded derivative contained in our concentrate sales is adjusted to fair market value through earnings each period prior to final settlement.

We utilize financially-settled forward contracts to manage the exposure to changes in prices of zinc and lead contained in our concentrate shipments that have not reached final settlement.  We also utilize financially-settled forward contracts to manage the exposure to changes in prices of zinc and lead contained in our forecasted future concentrate shipments. In the third quarter of 2013, we began to also utilize financially-settled forward contracts to manage the exposure to changes in prices of silver and gold in our concentrate shipments (see Note 11 for more information). These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, and are marked-to-market through earnings each period.  The fair value of each contract represents the difference between the forward metal price for the contract settlement period as of the measurement date and the contract settlement metal price, multiplied by the quantity of metal involved in the contract.

Our Senior Notes issued in April 2013, which were recorded at their carrying value of $491.0 million, net of unamortized initial purchaser discount at March 31, 2014, had a fair value of $488.8 million at March 31, 2014. Quoted market prices, which we consider to be Level 1 inputs, are utilized to estimate fair values of the Notes. In January 2014, we completed an exchange offer to register the Notes under the Securities Act, with 99.99% of the Notes tendered for exchange. Prior to completion of the exchange offer, the fair value of the Notes was estimated using third-party quotes which we considered to be Level 2 inputs. See Note 9 for more information.