-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, PHIyGljnuWTAvvyxvmPNNgP1bJWPDgrvkneCnHfcK3XRIL2SiJ/jtITsbh9diaZs eZnVfQwaot47uUEg2aCiuQ== 0000000000-05-025692.txt : 20060612 0000000000-05-025692.hdr.sgml : 20060612 20050524175231 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000000000-05-025692 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: UPLOAD PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050524 FILED FOR: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: HECLA MINING CO/DE/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000719413 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MINING, QUARRYING OF NONMETALLIC MINERALS (NO FUELS) [1400] IRS NUMBER: 820126240 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: UPLOAD BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6500 N MINERAL DRIVE SUITE 200 STREET 2: NONE CITY: COEUR D'ALENE STATE: ID ZIP: 83815-9408 BUSINESS PHONE: 2087694100 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6500 N MINERAL DRIVE SUITE 200 STREET 2: NONE CITY: COEUR D'ALENE STATE: ID ZIP: 83815-9408 LETTER 1 filename1.txt May 24, 2005 via facsimile and U.S. mail Mr. Lewis E. Walde Chief Financial Officer Hecla Mining Company 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200 Coeur d`Alene, Idaho 83815 Re: Hecla Mining Company Form 10-K, Filed March 16, 2005 Response letter dated April 27, 2005 Form 10-Q, Filed May 10, 2005 File No. 001-08491 Dear Mr. Walde: We have reviewed the above filings and response letter and have the following comments. Our review has been limited to the areas commented on below. Where indicated, we think you should revise your documents in response to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may or may not raise additional comments. Please understand that the purpose of our review process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filings. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or on any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed at the end of this letter. 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 Management`s Discussion and Analysis, page 52 General 1. We have given consideration to your response to prior comment 5 regarding your treatment of gold as a by-product at the San Sebastian unit and believe that, in addition to your non-GAAP reconciliation table, you should expand your MD&A to clearly indicate that you generate by-product revenues on certain of your operating units. In addition, explain why you believe that presentation of these revenue streams as a by-product is appropriate, given the percentages at the San Sebastian unit of the by-product to total revenue previously identified in our prior comment 5. 2. Include a trend analysis to identify the amount and type of by- product revenue generated for each period presented and indicate whether or not you believe, based on your best estimate, that presentation of these revenue streams as by-products will be continue to be appropriate in the future. Refer to Item 303(a)(3)(ii) of Regulation S-K for guidance. Reconciliation of Total Cash Costs (non-GAAP) to Cost of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs (GAAP), pages 67-69 3. We have reviewed the revised reconciliation that you will present in an amendment to your 2004 Form 10-K in response to prior comment 4 and continue to believe that presenting a reconciliation to a GAAP measure that is not fully burdened with depreciation, depletion and amortization is not the most directly comparable GAAP measure and is not contemplated by SAB Topic 11:B. 4. Tell us and clarify within your disclosure whether the non-GAAP measure, Total Cash Costs, is a liquidity or a performance measure. Critical Accounting Policies, page 73 Revenue Recognition 5. We note your intention to change your accounting policy footnote to accurately describe your current use of the forward rate for provisionally priced contracts at the Greens Creek unit and for the Lucky Friday unit, beginning January 1, 2005. Please submit a sample of your intended disclosure. Note that we believe a description of how provisionally priced sales contracts are accounted for is beneficial to the reader and should include a description of how the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative instrument pursuant to SFAS 133. Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, page F-8 L. Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable, page F-13 6. We note from your response to prior comment 5 that you will expand your revenue recognition policy to indicate that your by-product sales are also recorded as revenues. Please expand this policy footnote to identify the operating units that generate by-product revenue. 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 Controls and Procedures, page 45 7. We note your disclosure that based on your evaluation of the design and operation of your disclosure controls and procedures, your Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that your disclosure controls and procedures "were effective as of March 31, 2005, in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed in this report has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods." Revise to clarify, if true, that your officers concluded that your disclosure controls and procedures are also effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that you file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to your management, including your chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. See Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Closing Comments As appropriate, please amend your filings and respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. You may wish to provide us with marked copies of your amendment to expedite our review. Please furnish a cover letter with your amendment that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemental information. Detailed cover letters greatly facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have additional comments after reviewing your amendments and responses to our comments. You may contact Jennifer Goeken at (202) 551-3721, or in her absence, Jill Davis at (202) 551-3683, if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact me at (202) 551-3740 with any other questions. Direct all correspondence to the following ZIP code: 20549-0405. Sincerely, H. Roger Schwall Assistant Director ?? ?? ?? ?? Hecla Mining Company May 24, 2005 page 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-0405 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----