Note 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Sep. 28, 2013

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

3. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company accounts for the fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis as required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). This guidance establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

Following is a brief description of these three levels:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level (with “3” being the lowest) of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value.

Cash value of life insurance policy: Valued at the cash surrender value of the life insurance policy as of the last business day of the fiscal year, as determined by the issuer of the insurance policy, which approximates fair value.

The method described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although we believe our valuation method is appropriate and consistent with methods used by other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following table summarizes information on the fair value measurement of the Company’s assets as of September 28, 2013 and September 29, 2012, grouped by the categories described above:

		Total		Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable  inputs (Level 3)
Cash value of life insurance policy	2013	$	2,318,721		-	$	2,318,721		-
	2012	$	2,133,935		-	$	2,133,935		-