XML 29 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Feb. 25, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
1
1
. Commitments and Contingencies
 
The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues, and, in the past used perchloroethylene and other dry cleaning solvents. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.
 
US GAAP requires that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants in its consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances before recording a contingent liability. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, risk-free interest rates, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, the input of the Company’s attorneys and outside consultants or other factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.
 
Under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate
may
be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on, or in, or emanating from, such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of, or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to
third
-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Somerville, Massachusetts, Springfield, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Stockton, California,
three
sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont, as well as sites located in Goldsboro, North Carolina, Wilmington, North Carolina, Landover, Maryland and Syracuse, New York.
 
The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company has potential exposure related to a parcel of land (the "Central Area") related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site mentioned above. Currently, the consent decree for the Woburn site does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") has provided the Company and other signatories to the consent decree with comments on the design and implementation of groundwater and soil remedies at the Woburn site and investigation of environmental conditions in the Central Area. The Company, and other signatories, have implemented and proposed to do additional work at the Woburn site but many of the EPA’s comments remain to be resolved. The Company has accrued costs to perform certain work responsive to EPA's comments. The Company has implemented mitigation measures and continues to monitor environmental conditions at the Somerville, Massachusetts site. In addition, the Company has received demands from the local transit authority for reimbursement of certain costs associated with its construction of a new municipal transit station in the area of the Company’s Somerville site. This station is part of a planned extension of the transit system. Due to cost projections of the extension which now substantially exceed original estimates, the local transit authority has placed the extension on hold pending its redesign and receipt of related state and federal approvals and funding increases. The Company has reserved for costs in connection with this matter; however, in light of the uncertainties associated with this matter, these costs and the related reserve
may
change. The Company has also received notice that the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection is conducting an audit of the Company’s investigation and remediation work with respect to the Somerville site.
 
During the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2016,
the Company entered into a settlement related to environmental litigation which resulted in a
$15.9
million gain that was recorded as a reduction of selling and administrative expenses. This gain consisted of amounts previously received but not recognized into income as well as amounts that the Company received in
September
2016.
 
The Company routinely reviews and evaluates sites that
may
require remediation and monitoring and determines its estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using its internal sources or by
third
party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:
 
 
Management’s judgment and experience in remediating and monitoring the Company’s sites;
 
 
Information available from regulatory agencies as to costs of remediation and monitoring;
 
 
The number, financial resources and relative degree of responsibility of other potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) who
may
be liable for remediation and monitoring of a specific site; and
 
 
The typical allocation of costs among PRPs.
  
There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. In accordance with US GAAP, the Company’s accruals reflect the amount within the range that it believes is the best estimate or the low end of a range of estimates if no point within the range is a better estimate. Where it believes that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, the Company adjusts the cost in current dollars using a rate of
3%
for inflation until the time of expected payment and discounts the cost to present value using current risk-free interest rates. As of
February
25,
2017,
the risk-free interest rates utilized by the Company ranged from
2.3%
to
3.0%.
 
For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, the Company includes interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in selling and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The changes to the Company’s environmental liabilities for the
twenty
-
six
weeks ended
February
25,
2017
were as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
February 25,
2017
 
Beginning balance as of August 27, 2016
  $
26,748
 
Costs incurred for which reserves had been provided
   
(1,020
)
Insurance proceeds
   
69
 
Interest accretion
   
300
 
Change in discount rates
   
(1,434
)
         
Balance as of February 25, 2017
  $
24,663
 
 
Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of
February
25,
2017,
for the next
five
fiscal years and thereafter, as measured in current dollars, are reflected below.
 
(In thousands)
 
201
7
 
 
201
8
 
 
201
9
 
 
20
20
 
 
202
1
 
 
Thereafter
 
 
Total
 
Estimated costs – current dollars
  $
8,653
    $
1,859
    $
1,492
    $
1,284
    $
1,172
    $
12,392
    $
26,852
 
                                                         
Estimated insurance proceeds
   
(104
)
   
(159
)
   
(173
)
   
(159
)
   
(173
)
   
(1,130
)
   
(1,898
)
                                                         
Net anticipated costs
  $
8,549
    $
1,700
    $
1,319
    $
1,125
    $
999
    $
11,262
    $
24,954
 
                                                         
Effect of inflation
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
7,556
 
Effect of discounting
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
(7,847
)
                                                         
Balance as of February 25, 2017
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
    $
24,663
 
 
 
Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $
0.3
million are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for
three
sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and
may
be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year
2027.
As of
February
25,
2017,
the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet, was approximately $
3.4
million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from
three
insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.
 
The Company’s nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. The Company also has nuclear garment decontamination facilities in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. These facilities are licensed and regulated by the respective country’s applicable federal agency. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Company’s garment decontamination business.
 
From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.
 
While it is impossible for the Company to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance have been properly accrued in accordance with US GAAP. It is possible, however, that the future financial position and/or results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in the Company’s assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Company’s control.