XML 20 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as majority-owned subsidiaries that the Company controls, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year-ended December 31, 2016 (“2016 Form 10-K”).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.  These consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim reporting with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  As such, they do not include all information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. We believe that we have included all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. Operating results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto. Significant estimates include (i) projections we make regarding the recoverability and impairment of our assets (including goodwill and intangibles), (ii) valuations of our derivative instruments, (iii) recoverability of our deferred tax assets, (iv) estimation of gift card and gift certificate breakage which we concluded to have remote likelihood of redemption, and (v) allocation of insurance proceeds to various recoverable components. Actual results may differ from those estimates.



Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2016 comparative information in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to conform to the 2017 presentation.  These reclassifications relate to the following items, for which we assessed to be allowable under Regulation S-X, Rule 10.01 due to immaterial balances:



(i)

reclassification of Investment in Reading International Trust I as part of “Other assets” line in our consolidated balance sheets;

(ii)

net-off of interest income against interest expense in our consolidated statements of income;

(iii)

combination of certain components in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income into one line, called “Others”; and,

(iv)

combination of certain amortization items in our consolidated statement of cash flows (under Operating Activities section) into a singular line, called “Other amortization”.



Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Pronouncements



Adopted:

On January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09,  Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  This new guidance, which became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, provides for the simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including (i) accounting for tax benefits in excess of compensation cost and tax deficiencies, (ii) accounting for forfeitures, and (iii) classification on the statement of cash flows. The only significant impact of the adoption of this new guidance to us is the immediate recognition of excess tax benefits (or “windfalls”) and tax deficiencies (or “shortfalls”) in the consolidated statement of income.  Previously, (i) tax windfalls were recorded in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity and (ii) tax shortfalls were recorded in APIC to the extent of previous windfalls and then to the consolidated statement of income. 

Issued:

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.  The amendments in this Update (i) require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost, and (ii) provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement and allow only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization.  The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.  Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance.  We do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2017-07 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.  This new guidance removes the second step of the two-step impairment test for measuring goodwill and is to be applied on a prospective basis only. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within the year of adoption.  Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  We do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Also, in January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.  This ASU provides that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the asset is not a business”, thus reducing the number of transactions that need further evaluation for business combination.   This becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.   We do not expect the ASU 2017-01 to be applicable to our consolidated financial statements in the near term unless we enter into a definitive business acquisition transaction.

Further, in January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 EITF Meetings.  This ASU requires issuers to disclose the effect that recently issued accounting standards will have on their financial statements when adopted in a future period.   In accordance with this disclosure requirement, we provide below our initial analysis of the impact of the following recently issued standards (including any amendments prior to adoption) that are effective in future periods:

1.

ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – FASB issued this new guidance, which becomes effective for us beginning January 1, 2018, to achieve a consistent application of revenue recognition within the U.S., resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by reporting companies under U.S. GAAP.  We do not currently believe the proposed guidance will have a material impact to our cinema exhibition business.  We are in the process of completing an analysis to ensure full compliance prior to the effective date.  In regards to ASUs subsequently issued that amend or are related to ASU 2014-09, we disclose our initial analysis as follows:



·

ASU 2016-04, Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products (Subtopic 405-20) – FASB issued this new guidance on extinguishment of liabilities, which becomes effective to us beginning January 1, 2018, related to prepaid stored-value products (such as our gift cards and gift certificates) based on the same breakage model required by Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  Accordingly, issuers will be required to recognize the expected breakage amount (i.e., derecognize the liability) either (1) proportionally in earnings as redemptions occur, or (2) when redemption is remote. While this guidance is not applicable until 2018, we have effectively applied this through our recording of the gift card breakage income as a change in accounting policy as reported in our 2016 Form 10-K with retrospective application to January 1, 2014. As a result, we do not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-04 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.



·

ASU 2016-08, Principal vs Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (Topic 606) – FASB issued this amendment to the principal versus agent guidance in the new revenue standard to clarify that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer.  We do not anticipate that the adoption of ASU 2016-08 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.



2.

ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) – This new guidance, which becomes effective for us by January 1, 2019, establishes a right-of-use ("ROU") model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees with capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.  While we are still evaluating the impact of our pending adoption of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements, we expect that upon adoption we will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and that the amounts could be material since a majority of our operating cinemas are on a leased-facility model.  We have developed an implementation plan. Significant implementation matters that we are addressing include(i) assessment of lease population, (ii) determination of appropriate discount rate to use and (ii) assessment of renewal options to include in the initial lease term.