XML 19 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.3
Basis of Presentation
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., United Insurance Solutions, LLC., Luzerne Bank, and Jersey Shore State Bank (Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are referred to together as the “Banks”) and Jersey Shore State Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”).  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The interim financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods.  The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.

CECL Adoption and Updated Significant Accounting Policy
On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (ASC Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the incurred loss methodology, and is referred to as CECL. The measurement of expected credit losses under CECL is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loans and HTM debt securities. It also applies to off-balance sheet (“OBS”) credit exposures (loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other similar instruments.

The Company adopted CECL using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost, net of investments in leases and OBS credit exposures. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2023 are presented under CECL, while prior period results are reported in accordance with the previously applicable incurred loss methodology. The Company recorded an overall decrease of $3,789,000 to the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) on January 1, 2023 as a result of the adoption of CECL with an associated increase to retained earnings of $2,993,000 and decrease to deferred tax assets of $796,000. The Company also recorded a liability of $1,703,000 for OBS credit exposures that resulted in a decrease to retained earnings of $1,346,000 and an increase to deferred tax assets of $357,000.

Allowance for Credit Losses: The discussion that follows describes the methodology for determining the ACL under the CECL model that was adopted effective January 1, 2023. The allowance methodology for prior periods is disclosed in the Company’s 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company has elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the measurement of its ACL. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any outstanding accrued interest is reversed against interest income.

Loans: The ACL for loans is an estimate of the expected losses to be realized over the life of the loans in the portfolio. The ACL is determined for two distinct categories of loans: 1) loans evaluated collectively for expected credit losses and 2) loans evaluated individually for expected credit losses. The ACL also includes certain qualitative adjustments to the CECL model.

Loans Evaluated Collectively: Management believes that internal credit ratings are the most relevant credit quality indicator for these types of loans, however; the Company does not assign internal credit ratings to smaller balance, homogeneous loans, such as home equity, residential mortgage, and consumer automobile loans. For these loans, the most relevant credit quality indicator is delinquency status and management evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan. In order to determine the ACL:
Loans aggregated into pools based on similar risk characteristics.
The probability of default "PD" and loss given default rate "LGD" CECL model components are determined based on loss estimates driven by historical experience at the input level.
The PD model component uses "through the economic cycle transition" matrices based on the Company's historical loan and transaction data across each pool of loans.
The LGD model component calculates a lifetime LGD estimate across each pool of loans utilizing a nonparametric loss curve modeling approach.
Reasonable and supportable forecasts are incorporated into the PD model component.
Cash flow assumptions are established for each loan using maturity date, amortization schedule and interest rate.
A constant prepayment rate is calculated for each loan pool in the CECL model.
Loans Evaluated Individually: Loans evaluated individually for expected credit losses include loans determined to be collateral-dependant.

Loans evaluated individually may have specific allocations assigned. For loans measured using the fair value of collateral, if the analysis determines that sufficient collateral value would be available for repayment of the debt, then no allocations would be assigned to those loans. Collateral could be in the form of real estate or business assets, such as accounts receivable or inventory, in the case of commercial and industrial loans.

For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined through appraisals performed by third-party appraisers or third party evaluations for commercial real estate loans and our internal appraisal department for 1-4 family real estate secured loans, discounted to arrive at expected net sale proceeds. For collateral dependent loans, estimated real estate fair values are also net of estimated selling costs. When a real estate secured loan is impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including: the age of the most recent appraisal; the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal; the condition of the property; the Company’s experience and knowledge of the real estate market; the purpose of the loan; market factors; payment status; the strength of any guarantors; and the existence and age of other indications of value such as broker price opinions, among others. The Company generally obtains updated evaluations for collateral dependent loans secured predominantly by real estate every 12 months.

When updated evaluations are not obtained for loans secured by real estate, fair values are estimated based on the original appraisal values, as long as the original appraisal indicated an acceptable loan-to-value position and there has not been a significant deterioration in the collateral value since the original appraisal was performed.

Management regularly reviews loans in the portfolio to assess credit quality indicators and to determine appropriate loan classification. For commercial loans, commercial mortgages and construction loans to commercial borrowers, an internal credit rating process is used. The Company believes that internal credit ratings are the most relevant credit quality indicator for these types of loans. The migration of loans through the various internal credit rating categories is a significant component of the ACL methodology for these loans, which bases the PD on this migration. Assigning credit ratings involves judgment. Credit ratings may be changed based on ongoing monitoring procedures, or if specific loan review assessments identify a deterioration or an improvement in the loan.

The following is a summary of the Company's internal credit rating categories:
Pass: These loans do not currently pose undue credit risk and can range from the highest to average quality, depending on the degree of potential risk.
Special Mention: These loans have a heightened credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a classification of Substandard. Loans in this category are currently acceptable, but are nevertheless potentially weak.
Substandard or Lower: There exists a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the normal repayment of the debt.

The allocation of the ACL is reviewed to evaluate its appropriateness in relation to the overall risk profile of the loan portfolio. The Company considers risk factors such as: local and national economic conditions; trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans; the diversity of borrower industry types; and the composition of the portfolio by loan type.

Qualitative and Other Adjustments to ACL: In addition to the quantitative credit loss estimates for loans evaluated collectively, qualitative factors that may not be fully captured in the quantitative results are also evaluated. These include changes in lending policy, volume of the portfolio, economy conditions, credit concentrations, level of problem loans, loan review, collateral value, and experience of credit staff. Qualitative adjustments are judgmental and are based on Management’s knowledge of the portfolio and the markets in which the Company operates. Qualitative adjustments are evaluated and approved on a quarterly basis.
OBS Credit Exposures: The ACL for OBS credit exposures is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. This ACL represents management’s estimate of expected losses in its unfunded loan commitments and other OBS credit exposures, such as letters of credit and credit recourse on sold residential mortgage loans. The ACL specific to unfunded commitments is determined by estimating future draws and applying the expected loss rates on those draws. Future draws are based on historical averages of utilization rates (i.e., the likelihood of draws taken). The ACL for OBS credit exposures is increased or decreased by charges or reductions to expense, through the provision for credit losses.

The impact from the adoption of CECL is shown below:
January 1, 2023
(In Thousands)Pre-AdoptionAdoption ImpactAs Reported
Assets
ACL on loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural$1,914 $2,656 $4,570 
Real estate mortgage:
Residential5,061 (3,893)1,168 
Commercial6,110 (2,660)3,450 
Construction188 (96)92 
Consumer automobile loans1,617 240 1,857 
Other consumer installment loans109 602 711 
Unallocated638 (638)— 
Liabilities
ACL for unfunded commitments143 1,703 1,846 
$15,780 $(2,086)$13,694