XML 68 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3
Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

EVIO, Inc., a Colorado corporation and its subsidiaries (“the Company”, “EVIO”, “EVIO Labs”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) provide analytical testing and advisory services to the developing legalized cannabis and hemp industries. The Company operates both corporate owned and licensed laboratories through-out North America. Our laboratories provide testing for both cannabis and hemp products at all our labs.

 

Oregon: The Company operates two OLCC licensed and ORELAP accredited laboratories in Oregon. EVIO Labs Portland, located in Tigard, OR, is 100% owned by EVIO. EVIO Labs Medford, located in Central Point, OR is 80% owned by EVIO.

 

California: The Company operates one BCC licensed and ISO 17025 accredited laboratory in Berkeley serving both the cannabis and hemp markets in the state and the hemp market nationwide. EVIO owns 90% of this company.

 

Massachusetts: The Company is completing the relocation and re-accreditation of our laboratory in the state.

 

Florida: The Company licenses its brand to Kaycha Holdings, which operates two ISO 17025 accredited laboratories in the state.

 

Colorado: The Company licenses its brand to Kaycha Holdings, which operates one ISO 17025 accredited laboratory in the state.

 

Canada: The Company operates one Health Canada licensed, GMP certified laboratory, in Edmonton, Alberta. EVIO owns 50% of this company.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s most recent Annual Financial Statements filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim period presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal period, as reported in the Form 10-K, have been omitted.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the new revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

 

Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Step 3: Determine the transaction price
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
Step 5: Recognize revenue when the company satisfies a performance obligation

 

The Company generates revenue from consulting services, licensing agreements and testing of cannabis and hemp products for medicinal and adult-use consumption.

 

The Company accounts for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

 

The Company evaluates the services promised in each contract at inception to determine whether the contract should be accounted for as having one or more performance obligations. The Company’s services included in its contracts are distinct from one another.

 

The Company determines the transaction price for each contract based on the consideration it expects to receive for the distinct services being provided under the contract.

 

The Company recognizes revenue as performance obligations are satisfied and the customer obtains control of the services provided. In determining when performance obligations are satisfied, the Company considers factors such as contract terms, payment terms and whether there is an alternative future use of the service.

 

The Company recognizes revenue from testing services upon delivery of its testing results to the client. Customer orders for testing services are generally completed within two weeks of receiving the order.

 

Consulting engagements may vary in length and scope, but will generally include the review and/or preparation of regulatory filings, business plans and financial models, operating plans, and technology support to customers within the same industry. Revenue from consulting services is recognized upon completion of deliverables as outlined in the consulting agreement.

 

The Company recognizes revenue from right of use license agreements upon transfer of control of the functional intellectual property. In certain licensing agreements, the Company may receive royalty revenues based upon performance metrics which are recognized as earned over time.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The functional currency of the Company’s subsidiary in Canada is the Canadian Dollar. The subsidiary’s assets and liabilities have been translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates. Statements of operations amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate for each period. Resulting gains or losses from translating foreign currency financial statements are recorded as other comprehensive income (loss).

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company has adopted the guidance under ASC Topic 820 for financial instruments measured on a fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

 

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net income, or loss, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income, or loss, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. There were 24,753,819 and 11,713,103 potentially dilutive common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Because of the net losses incurred during the six months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the impacts of dilutive instruments would have been anti-dilutive for the period presented and have been excluded from the diluted loss per share calculations.

 

Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entity financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2016-02 was further clarified and amended within ASU 2018-01, ASU 2018-10, ASU 2018-11 and ASU 2018-20 which included provisions that would provide us with the option to adopt the provisions of the new guidance using a modified retrospective transition approach, without adjusting the comparative periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2016-02 and its impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The amendments in this update simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. This update is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing after January 1, 2017. The Company notes that this guidance applies to its reporting requirements and will implement the new guidance accordingly in performing goodwill impairment testing; however, the Company does not believe this update will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption