XML 77 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Asset Quality
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Asset Quality [Abstract]  
Asset Quality ASSET QUALITY
We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk. Trends in delinquency rates may be a key indicator, among other considerations, of credit risk within the loan portfolios. The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent.

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases, other real estate owned (OREO) and foreclosed assets. Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost whose credit quality has deteriorated to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. Interest income is not recognized on these loans. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are reported as performing loans. However, when nonaccrual criteria is met, interest income is not recognized on these loans. Additionally, certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest. Purchased impaired loans are excluded from nonperforming loans as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans.

See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information on our loan related policies.
The following tables display the delinquency status of our loans and our nonperforming assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table 39: Analysis of Loan Portfolio (a)
 
 
Accruing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dollars in millions
 
Current or Less
Than 30 Days
Past Due

 
30-59
Days
Past Due

 
60-89
Days
Past Due

 
90 Days
Or More
Past Due

 
Total
Past
Due (b)

 
 
Nonperforming
Loans

 
Fair Value
Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (c)

 
Purchased
Impaired
Loans

 
Total
Loans (d)

December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Lending
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
124,695

 
$
102

 
$
30

 
$
85

 
$
217

  
 
$
425

 
 
 
 
 
$
125,337

Commercial real estate
 
28,061

 
4

 
1

 
 
 
5

  
 
44

 
 
 
 
 
28,110

Equipment lease
financing
 
7,069

 
49

 
5

 
 
 
54

  
 
32

 
 
 
 
 
7,155

Total commercial lending
 
159,825

 
155

 
36

 
85

 
276

  
 
501

 


 


 
160,602

Consumer Lending
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
 
23,791

 
58

 
24

 
 
 
82

  
 
669

 
 
 
$
543

 
25,085

Residential real estate
 
19,640

 
140

 
69

 
315

 
524

(b) 
 
315

 
$
166

 
1,176

 
21,821

Automobile
 
16,376

 
178

 
47

 
18

 
243

  
 
135

 
 
 
 
 
16,754

Credit card
 
7,133

 
60

 
37

 
67

 
164

  
 
11

 
 
 
 
 
7,308

Education
 
3,156

 
55

 
34

 
91

 
180

(b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,336

Other consumer
 
4,898

 
15

 
11

 
9

 
35

 
 
4

 
 
 
 
 
4,937

Total consumer lending
 
74,994

 
506

 
222

 
500

 
1,228

  
 
1,134

 
166

 
1,719

 
79,241

Total
 
$
234,819

 
$
661

 
$
258

 
$
585

 
$
1,504

  
 
$
1,635

 
$
166

 
$
1,719

 
$
239,843

Percentage of total loans
 
97.90
%
 
.28
%
 
.11
%
 
.24
%
 
.63
%
 
 
.68
%
 
.07
%
 
.72
%
 
100.00
%
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial Lending
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
116,300

 
$
82

 
$
54

 
$
52

 
$
188

  
 
$
346

 
 
 
 
 
$
116,834

Commercial real estate
 
28,056

 
6

 
3

 
 
 
9

  
 
75

 
 
 
 
 
28,140

Equipment lease
financing
 
7,229

 
56

 
12

 
 
 
68

  
 
11

 
 
 
 
 
7,308

Total commercial lending
 
151,585

 
144

 
69

 
52

 
265

  
 
432

 


 


 
152,282

Consumer Lending
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
 
24,556

 
66

 
25

 
 
 
91

  
 
797

 
 
 
$
679

 
26,123

Residential real estate
 
16,216

 
135

 
73

 
363

 
571

(b) 
 
350

 
$
182

 
1,338

 
18,657

Automobile
 
14,165

 
113

 
29

 
12

 
154

 
 
100

 
 
 
 
 
14,419

Credit card
 
6,222

 
46

 
29

 
53

 
128

  
 
7

 
 
 
 
 
6,357

Education
 
3,571

 
69

 
41

 
141

 
251

(b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,822

Other consumer
 
4,552

 
12

 
5

 
8

 
25

 
 
8

 
 
 
 
 
4,585

Total consumer lending
 
69,282

 
441

 
202


577


1,220

  
 
1,262

 
182

 
2,017

 
73,963

Total
 
$
220,867

 
$
585

 
$
271


$
629

 
$
1,485

  
 
$
1,694

 
$
182

 
$
2,017

 
$
226,245

Percentage of total loans
 
97.62
%
 
.26
%
 
.12
%

.28
%
 
.66
%
 
 
.75
%
 
.08
%
 
.89
%
 
100.00
%
(a)
Amounts in table represent recorded investment and exclude loans held for sale. Recorded investment does not include any associated valuation allowance.
(b)
Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we are currently accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. Past due loan amounts include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate loans totaling $.4 billion and $.5 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and Education loans totaling $.2 billion at both December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(c)
Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(d)
Net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans totaling $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

In the normal course of business, we originate or purchase loan products with contractual characteristics that, when concentrated, may increase our exposure as a holder of those loan products. Possible product features that may create a concentration of credit risk would include a high original or updated loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, terms that may expose the borrower to future increases in repayments above increases in market interest rates, and interest-only loans, among others.
We originate interest-only loans to commercial borrowers. Such credit arrangements are usually designed to match borrower cash flow expectations (e.g., working capital lines, revolvers). These products are standard in the financial services industry and product features
are considered during the underwriting process to mitigate the increased risk that the interest-only feature may result in borrowers not being able to make interest and principal payments when due. We do not believe that these product features create a concentration of credit risk.
At December 31, 2019, we pledged $16.9 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank and $68.0 billion of residential real estate and other loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2018 were $17.3 billion and $63.2 billion, respectively. Amounts pledged reflect the unpaid principal balances.
Table 40: Nonperforming Assets
Dollars in millions
 
December 31
2019

 
December 31
2018

 
Nonperforming loans
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial lending
 
$
501

 
$
432

 
Total consumer lending (a)
 
1,134

 
1,262

 
Total nonperforming loans
 
1,635

 
1,694

 
OREO and foreclosed assets
 
117

 
114

 
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
1,752

 
$
1,808

 
Nonperforming loans to total loans
 
.68
%
 
.75
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets
 
.73
%
 
.80
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total assets
 
.43
%
 
.47
%
 
Interest on nonperforming loans (b)
 
 
 
 
 
Computed on original terms
 
$
124

 
$
123

 
Recognized prior to nonperforming status
 
$
17

 
$
17

 
(a)
Excludes most unsecured consumer loans and lines of credit, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status.
(b)
Amounts are for the year ended.

Nonperforming loans also include certain loans whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of this Note 4 for additional information on TDRs.

Total nonperforming loans in Table 40 include TDRs of $.9 billion at both December 31, 2019 and 2018. TDRs that are performing, including consumer credit card TDR loans, totaled $.8 billion and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and are excluded from nonperforming loans.

Additional Asset Quality Indicators

We have two portfolio segments – Commercial Lending and Consumer Lending. Each of these segments comprises multiple loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in initial measurement, risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk. The Commercial Lending segment is composed of the commercial, commercial real estate and equipment lease financing loan classes. The Consumer Lending segment is composed of the home equity, residential real estate, automobile, credit card, education and other consumer loan classes.

Commercial Lending Loan Classes

Commercial Loan Class
For commercial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign internal risk ratings reflecting our estimates of the borrower’s PD and LGD for each related credit facility. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides granularity in the risk monitoring process on an ongoing basis. These ratings are reviewed and updated, generally at least once per year. Additionally, no less frequently than on an annual basis, we review PD rates related to each rating grade based upon internal historical data. These rates are updated as needed and augmented by market data as deemed necessary. For small balance homogeneous pools of commercial loans, mortgages and leases, we apply statistical modeling to assist in determining the PD within these pools. Further, on a periodic basis, we update our LGD estimation methodology based upon historical data. The combination of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to commercial loans, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in event of default, reflects the relative estimated likelihood of loss at the reporting date. In general, loans with better PD and LGD tend to have a lower likelihood of loss compared to loans with worse PD and LGD. The loss amount also considers an estimate of EAD, which we also periodically update based upon historical data.
Based upon the amount of the lending arrangement and our risk rating assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic review. Quarterly, we conduct formal reviews of a market’s or business unit’s loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be of higher risk, based upon PDs and LGDs, or loans for which credit quality is weakening. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.
Commercial Real Estate Loan Class
We manage credit risk associated with our commercial real estate loan class similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD. Additionally, risks associated with commercial real estate activities tend to be correlated to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk.
As with the commercial class, a formal schedule of periodic review is also performed to assess market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, increased scrutiny can be placed on areas of higher risk, including adverse changes in risk ratings, deteriorating operating trends, and/or areas that concern management. These reviews are designed to assess risk and take actions to mitigate our exposure to such risks.
Equipment Lease Financing Loan Class
We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease financing loan class similar to commercial loans by analyzing PD and LGD.

Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic review. Generally, this occurs quarterly, although we have established practices to review such credit risk more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk and guarantor requirements as applicable.
Table 41: Commercial Lending Asset Quality Indicators (a)
In millions
 
Pass Rated
 
Criticized
 
Total Loans
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
119,761

 
$
5,576

 
$
125,337

Commercial real estate
 
27,424

 
686

 
28,110

Equipment lease financing
 
6,891

 
264

 
7,155

Total commercial lending
 
$
154,076

 
$
6,526

 
$
160,602

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
111,276

 
$
5,558

 
$
116,834

Commercial real estate
 
27,682

 
458

 
28,140

Equipment lease financing
 
7,180

 
128

 
7,308

Total commercial lending
 
$
146,138

 
$
6,144

 
$
152,282

(a)
Loans are classified as Pass Rated and Criticized based on the regulatory classification definitions. The Criticized classification includes loans that were rated special mention, substandard or doubtful as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. We use PD and LGD to rate loans in the commercial lending portfolio.

Consumer Lending Loan Classes

Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Loan Classes
We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, and originated and updated LTV ratios to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. A summary of asset quality indicators follows:

Delinquency/Delinquency Rates: We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 39 for additional information.

Nonperforming Loans: We monitor trending of nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 39 for additional information.

Credit Scores: We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity loans and lines of credit and residential real estate loans at least quarterly. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes.

LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions): At least annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, more frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.

We use a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management and reporting purposes (e.g., line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates, given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon management’s assumptions (e.g., if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party service provider, house price index (HPI) changes will be incorporated in arriving at management’s estimate of updated LTV).

Updated LTV is estimated using modeled property values. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models, broker price opinions, HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. We generally utilize origination lien balances provided by a third-party, where applicable, which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of the calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon lien balances held by others, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we refine our methodology.
The following table presents certain asset quality indicators for the home equity and residential real estate loan classes.
Table 42: Asset Quality Indicators for Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Loans
 
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
 
Home equity

Residential real estate

Home equity

Residential real estate

In millions
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
 
 
Greater than or equal to 125%
$
366

$
112

$
461

$
116

Greater than or equal to 100% to less than 125%
877

221

1,020

255

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
1,047

340

1,174

335

Less than 90%
22,068

19,305

22,644

15,922

No LTV ratio available
184

83

145

6

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584


685

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

679

1,338

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821

$
26,123

$
18,657

Updated FICO Scores
 
 


 
Greater than 660
$
22,245

$
19,341

$
22,996

$
15,956

Less than or equal to 660
2,019

569

2,210

585

No FICO score available
278

151

238

93

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584


685

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

679

1,338

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821

$
26,123

$
18,657


Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer Loan Classes
We monitor a variety of asset quality information in the management of these consumer loan classes. For all loan types, we generally use a combination of internal loan parameters as well as an updated FICO score. We use FICO scores as a primary asset quality indicator for automobile and credit card loans, as well as non-government guaranteed or non-insured education loans and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Internal credit metrics, such as delinquency status, are relied upon heavily as asset quality indicators for government guaranteed or insured education loans and consumer loans to high net worth individuals, as internal credit metrics tend to be more relevant than FICO scores for these types of loans.

Along with the monitoring of delinquency trends and losses for each class, FICO credit score updates are obtained at least quarterly along with a variety of credit bureau attributes. Loans with high FICO scores tend to have a lower likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with low FICO scores tend to have a higher likelihood of loss.
Table 43: Asset Quality Indicators for Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer Loans
Dollars in millions
 
Automobile
Credit Card
Education
Other Consumer
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
 
$
9,232

$
3,867

$
1,139

$
1,421

650 to 719
 
4,577

2,326

197

843

620 to 649
 
1,001

419

25

132

Less than 620
 
1,603

544

27

143

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
341

152

15

27

Total loans using FICO credit metric
 
16,754

7,308

1,403

2,566

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics
 
 
 
1,933

2,371

Total loans
 
$
16,754

$
7,308

$
3,336

$
4,937

Weighted-average updated FICO score (b)
 
726

724

773

727

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
 
$
7,740

$
3,809

$
1,240

$
1,280

650 to 719
 
4,365

1,759

194

641

620 to 649
 
1,007

280

26

106

Less than 620
 
1,027

332

24

105

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
280

177

57

25

Total loans using FICO credit metric
 
14,419

6,357

1,541

2,157

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics
 

 
2,281

2,428

Total loans
 
$
14,419

$
6,357

$
3,822

$
4,585

Weighted-average updated FICO score (b)
 
726

733

774

732

(a)
Loans with no FICO score available or required generally refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for which we cannot obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan category and, when necessary, takes actions to mitigate the credit risk.
(b)
Weighted-average updated FICO score excludes accounts with no FICO score available or required.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. TDRs result from our loss mitigation activities, and include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization, and extensions, which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Additionally, TDRs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to us. In those situations where principal is forgiven, the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off.

Some TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as restructured, and result in potential incremental losses. These potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall ALLL estimate. The level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions. Once a loan becomes a TDR, it will continue to be reported as a TDR until it is ultimately repaid in full, the collateral is foreclosed upon, or it is fully charged off. We held specific reserves in the ALLL of $.1 billion and $.2 billion at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, for the total TDR portfolio.

Table 44 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as TDRs as well as the change in the loans’ recorded investment as a result of becoming a TDR during 2019, 2018 and 2017. Additionally, the table provides information about the types of TDR concessions. The Principal Forgiveness TDR category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness. The Rate Reduction TDR category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral. The Other TDR category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to us, as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers.

In some cases, there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan. This is most common within the commercial loan portfolio. When there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio, the principal forgiveness concession was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in Table 44. Second in priority would be rate reduction. In the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan, concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through Chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to us would be prioritized and included in the Other type of concession
in Table 44. After that, consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio.
Table 44: Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type (a)
 
 
Number
of Loans

 
 
Pre-TDR
Recorded
Investment (b)

 
 
Post-TDR Recorded Investment (c)
During the year ended December 31, 2019
Dollars in millions
 
 
Principal
Forgiveness

 
Rate
Reduction

 
Other

 
 
Total

Total commercial lending
 
75

 
 
$
278

 
 
 
 
$
11

 
$
241

 
 
$
252

Total consumer lending
 
14,548

 
 
172

 
 
 
 
97

 
64

 
 
161

Total TDRs
 
14,623

 
 
$
450

 
 


 
$
108

 
$
305

 
 
$
413

During the year ended December 31, 2018
Dollars in millions
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
Total commercial lending
 
85

 
 
$
272

 
 
$
2

 
$
67

 
$
179

 
 
$
248

Total consumer lending
 
12,096

 
 
163

 
 
1

 
86

 
63

 
 
150

Total TDRs
 
12,181

 
 
$
435


 
$
3

 
$
153

 
$
242

 
 
$
398

During the year ended December 31, 2017
Dollars in millions
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
Total commercial lending
 
120

 
 
$
293

 
 
$
18

 
$
7

 
$
227

 
 
$
252

Total consumer lending
 
11,993

 
 
248

 
 


 
146

 
97

 
 
243

Total TDRs
 
12,113

 
 
$
541

 
 
$
18

 
$
153

 
$
324

 
 
$
495

(a)
Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(b)
Represents the recorded investment of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
(c)
Represents the recorded investment of the TDRs as of the end of the quarter in which the TDR occurs, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
After a loan is determined to be a TDR, we continue to track its performance under its most recent restructured terms. We consider a TDR to have subsequently defaulted when it becomes 60 days past due after the most recent date the loan was restructured. The recorded investment of loans that were both (i) classified as TDRs or were subsequently modified during each 12-month period preceding January 1, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and (ii) subsequently defaulted during the 12-month period following each of January 1, 2019, 2018 and 2017, totaled $.1 billion for all periods presented.

Impaired Loans

Impaired loans include commercial and consumer nonperforming loans and TDRs, regardless of nonperforming status. TDRs that were previously recorded at amortized cost and are now classified and accounted for as held for sale are also included. Excluded from impaired loans are nonperforming leases, loans accounted for as held for sale other than the TDRs described in the preceding sentence, loans accounted for under the fair value option, smaller balance homogeneous type loans and purchased impaired loans. We did not recognize any interest income on impaired loans that have not returned to performing status, while they were impaired during 2019 and 2018. Table 45 provides further detail on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment and the associated ALLL. Certain commercial and consumer impaired loans do not have a related ALLL as the valuation of these impaired loans exceeded the recorded investment.
Table 45: Impaired Loans
In millions
 
Unpaid Principal Balance

 
Recorded Investment

 
Associated Allowance

 
Average Recorded Investment (a)

December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans with an associated allowance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial lending
 
$
527

 
$
386

 
$
98

 
$
371

Total consumer lending
 
702

 
668

 
93

 
753

Total impaired loans with an associated allowance
 
1,229

 
1,054

 
191

 
1,124

Impaired loans without an associated allowance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial lending
 
228

 
195

 
 
 
276

Total consumer lending
 
1,022

 
635

 
 
 
623

Total impaired loans without an associated allowance
 
1,250

 
830

 


 
899

Total impaired loans
 
$
2,479

 
$
1,884

 
$
191

 
$
2,023

December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impaired loans with an associated allowance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial lending
 
$
440

 
$
315

 
$
73

 
$
349

Total consumer lending
 
863

 
817

 
136

 
904

Total impaired loans with an associated allowance
 
1,303

 
1,132

 
209

 
1,253

Impaired loans without an associated allowance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total commercial lending
 
413

 
326

 
 
 
294

Total consumer lending
 
1,042

 
625

 
 

 
645

Total impaired loans without an associated allowance
 
1,455

 
951

 


 
939

Total impaired loans
 
$
2,758

 
$
2,083

 
$
209

 
$
2,192

(a)
Average recorded investment is for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.