XML 31 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Asset Quality [Abstract]  
Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses
NOTE 4 Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses

Loan Portfolio
Our loan portfolio consists of two portfolio segments – Commercial and Consumer. Each of these segments comprises multiple loan classes. Classes are characterized by similarities in risk attributes and the manner in which we monitor and assess credit risk.
Commercial
 
Consumer
 
• Commercial and industrial
 
• Home equity
• Commercial real estate
 
• Residential real estate
• Equipment lease financing
 
• Automobile
 
 
• Credit card
 
 
• Education
 
 
• Other consumer
 
 
 
See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information on our loan related policies.

Credit Quality
We closely monitor economic conditions and loan performance trends to manage and evaluate our exposure to credit risk within the loan portfolio based on our defined loan classes. In doing so, we use several credit quality indicators, including trends in delinquency rates, nonperforming status, analysis of PD and LGD ratings, updated credit scores, and originated and updated LTV ratios.

The measurement of delinquency status is based on the contractual terms of each loan. Loans that are 30 days or more past due in terms of payment are considered delinquent. With the adoption of the CECL standard, accruing loans past due as of June 30, 2020 include PCD loans, while amounts as of December 31, 2019 excluded purchased impaired loans. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to the adoption of this standard, including the discontinuation of purchased impaired loan accounting.

The following table presents the composition and delinquency status of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Pursuant to the interagency guidance issued in April 2020 and in connection with the credit reporting rules from the CARES Act, the delinquency status of loans modified due to COVID-19 related hardships are being reported as of June 30, 2020 in alignment with the rules set forth for banks to report delinquency status to the credit agencies. These rules require that COVID-19 related loan modifications be reported as follows: (i) if current at the time of modification, the loan remains current throughout the modification period, (ii) if delinquent at the time of modification and the borrower was not made current as part of the modification, the loan maintains its reported as delinquent status during the modification period, or (iii) if delinquent at the time of modification and the borrower was made current as part of the modification or became current during the modification period, the loan is reported as current. As a result, certain loans modified due to COVID-19 related hardships are not being reported as past due as of June 30, 2020 based on the contractual terms of the loan, even where borrowers may not be making payments on their loans during the modification period.
Table 44: Analysis of Loan Portfolio
 
Accruing
 
 
 
 
 
Dollars in millions
Current or Less
Than 30 Days
Past Due

30-59
Days
Past Due

60-89
Days
Past Due

90 Days
Or More
Past Due

Total
Past
Due (c)

 
Nonperforming
Loans

Fair Value
Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (d)

Total Loans
(e)(f)

 
June 30, 2020 (a) (b)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
143,531

$
49

$
28

$
34

$
111

  
$
693

 
$
144,335

 
Commercial real estate
28,665

51

4

 
55

  
43

 
28,763

 
Equipment lease financing
7,058

8

9

 
17

  
22

 
7,097

 
Total commercial
179,254

108

41

34

183

  
758

 
180,195

 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
24,089

70

27

 
97

  
636

$
57

24,879

 
Residential real estate
21,141

198

93

264

555

(c) 
305

468

22,469

 
Automobile
15,843

105

34

19

158

  
156

 
16,157

 
Credit card
6,408

53

38

61

152

  
15

 
6,575

 
Education
3,004

39

23

66

128

(c)
 
 
3,132

 
Other consumer
4,786

17

8

12

37

 
6

 
4,829

 
Total consumer
75,271

482

223

422

1,127

  
1,118

525

78,041

 
Total
$
254,525

$
590

$
264

$
456

$
1,310

  
$
1,876

$
525

$
258,236

 
Percentage of total loans
98.56
%
.23
%
.10
%
.18
%
.51
%
 
.73
%
.20
%
100.00
%
 
(a)
Amounts in table represent loans held for investment and do not include any associated valuation allowance.
(b)
The accrued interest associated with our loan portfolio at June 30, 2020 totaled $.7 billion and is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(c)
Past due loan amounts include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate loans and Education loans totaling $.4 billion and $.1 billion, respectively, at June 30, 2020.
(d)
Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(e)
Net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans totaling $1.6 billion at June 30, 2020.
(f)
Collateral dependent loans totaled $1.1 billion at June 30, 2020. The majority of these loans are within the Home equity and Residential real estate loan classes and are secured by consumer real estate.

 
Accruing
 
  
  
  
  
 
Dollars in millions
Current or Less
Than 30 Days
Past Due

30-59 Days
Past Due

60-89 Days
Past Due

90 Days
Or More
Past Due

Total Past
Due (h)

 
Nonperforming
Loans

Fair Value
Option
Nonaccrual
Loans (i)

Purchased
Impaired
Loans

Total
Loans (j)

 
December 31, 2019 (g)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
124,695

$
102

$
30

$
85

$
217

 
$
425

 
 
$
125,337

 
Commercial real estate
28,061

4

1

 
5

 
44

 
 
28,110

 
Equipment lease financing
7,069

49

5

 
54

 
32

 
 
7,155

 
Total commercial
159,825

155

36

85

276

 
501

 
 
160,602

 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home equity
23,791

58

24

 
82

 
669

 
$
543

25,085

 
Residential real estate
19,640

140

69

315

524

(h) 
315

$
166

1,176

21,821

 
Automobile
16,376

178

47

18

243

 
135

 
 
16,754

 
Credit card
7,133

60

37

67

164

 
11

 
 
7,308

 
Education
3,156

55

34

91

180

(h) 
 
 
 
3,336

 
Other consumer
4,898

15

11

9

35

 
4

 
 
4,937

 
Total consumer
74,994

506

222

500

1,228

 
1,134

166

1,719

79,241

 
Total
$
234,819

$
661

$
258

$
585

$
1,504

 
$
1,635

$
166

$
1,719

$
239,843

 
Percentage of total loans
97.90
%
.28
%
.11
%
.24
%
.63
%
 
.68
%
.07
%
.72
%
100.00
%
 
(g)
Amounts in table represent recorded investment and exclude loans held for sale. Recorded investment does not include any associated valuation allowance.
(h)
Past due loan amounts exclude purchased impaired loans, even if contractually past due (or if we do not expect to receive payment in full based on the original contractual terms), as we accreted interest income over the expected life of the loans. Past due loan amounts include government insured or guaranteed Residential real estate loans totaling $.4 billion and Education loans totaling $.2 billion at December 31, 2019.
(i)
Consumer loans accounted for under the fair value option for which we do not expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are subject to nonaccrual accounting and classification upon meeting any of our nonaccrual policies. Given that these loans are not accounted for at amortized cost, these loans have been excluded from the nonperforming loan population.
(j)
Net of unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans totaling $1.1 billion at December 31, 2019.

At June 30, 2020, we pledged $34.3 billion of commercial loans to the Federal Reserve Bank and $70.2 billion of residential real estate and other loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the ability to borrow, if necessary. The comparable amounts at December 31, 2019 were $16.9 billion and $68.0 billion, respectively. Amounts pledged reflect the unpaid principal balances.

Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and leases, OREO and foreclosed assets. Nonperforming loans are those loans accounted for at amortized cost whose credit quality has deteriorated to the extent that full collection of contractual principal and interest is not probable. Interest income is not recognized on these loans. Loans accounted for under the fair value option are reported as performing loans, however, when nonaccrual criteria is met interest income is not recognized on these loans. Additionally, certain government insured or guaranteed loans for which we expect to collect substantially all principal and interest are not reported as nonperforming loans and continue to accrue interest.

With the adoption of the CECL standard, nonperforming loans as of June 30, 2020 include PCD loans. Amounts as of December 31, 2019 excluded purchased impaired loans as we were accreting interest income over the expected life of the loans. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to the adoption of this standard and our nonperforming loan and lease policies.
The following table presents our nonperforming assets as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Table 45: Nonperforming Assets
Dollars in millions
 
June 30
2020

 
December 31
2019

 
Nonperforming loans
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
$
758

 
$
501

 
Consumer (a)
 
1,118

 
1,134

 
Total nonperforming loans (b)
 
1,876

 
1,635

 
OREO and foreclosed assets
 
79

 
117

 
Total nonperforming assets
 
$
1,955

 
$
1,752

 
Nonperforming loans to total loans
 
.73
%
 
.68
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total loans, OREO and foreclosed assets
 
.76
%
 
.73
%
 
Nonperforming assets to total assets
 
.43
%
 
.43
%
 
(a)
Excludes most unsecured consumer loans and lines of credit, which are charged off after 120 to 180 days past due and are not placed on nonperforming status.
(b)
Nonperforming loans for which there is no related ALLL totaled $.6 billion at June 30, 2020, and is primarily comprised of loans with a valuation that exceeds the amortized cost basis.

Nonperforming loans also include certain loans whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, these loans are considered TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies and the TDR section of this Note 4 for additional information on TDRs.

Total nonperforming loans in Table 45 include TDRs of $.9 billion at both June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. TDRs that are performing, including consumer credit card TDR loans, totaled $.7 billion and $.8 billion at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, and are excluded from nonperforming loans.

Additional Credit Quality Indicators by Loan Class
Commercial and Industrial
For commercial and industrial loans, we monitor the performance of the borrower in a disciplined and regular manner based upon the level of credit risk inherent in the loan. To evaluate the level of credit risk, we assign an internal risk rating reflecting the borrower’s PD and LGD. This two-dimensional credit risk rating methodology provides granularity in the risk monitoring process. These ratings are reviewed and updated, generally at least once per year. For small balance homogeneous pools of commercial and industrial loans, mortgages and leases, we apply scoring techniques to assist in determining the PD. Further, on a periodic basis, we update our LGD estimates associated with each rating grade based upon historical data. The combination of the PD and LGD ratings assigned to commercial and industrial loans, capturing both the combination of expectations of default and loss severity in event of default, reflects credit quality characteristics as of the reporting date and are used as inputs into our loss forecasting process.
Based upon the amount of the lending arrangement and our risk rating assessment, we follow a formal schedule of written periodic review. Quarterly, we conduct formal reviews of a market’s or business unit’s loan portfolio, focusing on those loans which we perceive to be of higher risk, based upon PDs and LGDs, or loans for which credit quality is weakening. If circumstances warrant, it is our practice to review any customer obligation and its level of credit risk more frequently. We attempt to proactively manage our loans by using various procedures that are customized to the risk of a given loan, including ongoing outreach, contact, and assessment of obligor financial conditions, collateral inspection and appraisal.
Commercial Real Estate
We manage credit risk associated with our commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgages similar to commercial and industrial loans by evaluating PD and LGD. Risks associated with commercial real estate projects and commercial mortgage activities tend to be correlated to the loan structure and collateral location, project progress and business environment. As a result, these attributes are also monitored and utilized in assessing credit risk.
As with the commercial and industrial loan class, a formal schedule of periodic review is also performed to assess market/geographic risk and business unit/industry risk. Often as a result of these overviews, more in-depth reviews and increased scrutiny are placed on areas of higher risk, such as adverse changes in risk ratings, deteriorating operating trends, and/or areas that concern management. These reviews are designed to assess risk and facilitate actions to mitigate such risks.
Equipment Lease Financing
We manage credit risk associated with our equipment lease financing loan class similar to commercial and industrial loans by analyzing PD and LGD.

Based upon the dollar amount of the lease and the level of credit risk, we follow a formal schedule of periodic review. Generally, this occurs quarterly, although we have established practices to review such credit risk more frequently if circumstances warrant. Our review process entails analysis of the following factors: equipment value/residual value, exposure levels, jurisdiction risk, industry risk, guarantor requirements, and regulatory compliance as applicable.
Table 46: Commercial Credit Quality Indicators (a)
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
June 30, 2020 - In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total
Loans

Commercial and industrial
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
$
24,271

$
17,179

$
10,823

$
7,171

$
5,013

$
11,039

$
60,961

$
59

$
136,516

Criticized
218

524

656

463

247

517

5,177

17

7,819

Total commercial and industrial
24,489

17,703

11,479

7,634

5,260

11,556

66,138

76

144,335

Commercial real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
1,797

7,027

4,054

3,652

2,734

8,347

216

 
27,827

Criticized
3

73

26

64

252

422

96

 
936

Total commercial real estate
1,800

7,100

4,080

3,716

2,986

8,769

312


28,763

Equipment lease financing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pass Rated
736

1,385

1,179

969

631

1,909

 
 
6,809

Criticized
15

87

97

39

19

31

 
 
288

Total equipment lease financing
751

1,472

1,276

1,008

650

1,940


 
7,097

Total commercial
$
27,040

$
26,275

$
16,835

$
12,358

$
8,896

$
22,265

$
66,450

$
76

$
180,195

December 31, 2019 - In millions
 
Pass Rated

 
Criticized

 
Total Loans

 
Commercial and industrial
 
$
119,761

 
$
5,576

 
$
125,337

 
Commercial real estate
 
27,424

 
686

 
28,110

 
Equipment lease financing
 
6,891

 
264

 
7,155

 
Total commercial
 
$
154,076

 
$
6,526

 
$
160,602

 
(a)
Loans in our commercial portfolio are classified as Pass Rated or Criticized based on the regulatory definitions, which are driven by the PD and LGD ratings that we assign. The Criticized classification includes loans that were rated special mention, substandard or doubtful as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Home Equity and Residential Real Estate
We use several credit quality indicators, including delinquency information, nonperforming loan information, updated credit scores, originated and updated LTV ratios to monitor and manage credit risk within the home equity and residential real estate loan classes. A summary of credit quality indicators follows:
Delinquency/Delinquency Rates: We monitor trending of delinquency/delinquency rates for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 44 for additional information.
Nonperforming Loans: We monitor trending of nonperforming loans for home equity and residential real estate loans. See Table 44 for additional information.
Credit Scores: We use a national third-party provider to update FICO credit scores for home equity and residential real estate loans at least quarterly. The updated scores are incorporated into a series of credit management reports, which are utilized to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
LTV (inclusive of combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for first and subordinate lien positions): At least annually, we update the property values of real estate collateral and calculate an updated LTV ratio. For open-end credit lines secured by real estate in regions experiencing significant declines in property values, more frequent valuations may occur. We examine LTV migration and stratify LTV into categories to monitor the risk in the loan classes.
We use a combination of original LTV and updated LTV for internal risk management and reporting purposes (e.g., line management, loss mitigation strategies). In addition to the fact that estimated property values by their nature are estimates, given certain data limitations it is important to note that updated LTVs may be based upon management’s assumptions (i.e., if an updated LTV is not provided by the third-party service provider, HPI changes will be incorporated in arriving at management’s estimate of updated LTV).
Updated LTV is estimated using modeled property values. The related estimates and inputs are based upon an approach that uses a combination of third-party automated valuation models, broker price opinions, HPI indices, property location, internal and external balance information, origination data and management assumptions. We generally utilize origination lien balances provided by a third-party, where applicable, which do not include an amortization assumption when calculating updated LTV. Accordingly, the results of the calculations do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral or updated LTV based upon lien balances held by others, and as such, are necessarily imprecise and subject to change as we refine our methodology.
The following table presents credit quality indicators for the home equity and residential real estate loan classes.
Table 47: Home Equity and Residential Real Estate Credit Quality Indicators
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
June 30, 2020 – In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total Loans

Home equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
.
Greater than or equal to 100%
 
$
33

$
26

$
24

$
14

$
127

$
677

$
365

$
1,266

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
$
4

77

32

16

12

82

693

247

1,163

Less than 90%
1,779

2,363

688

972

818

4,563

8,177

3,090

22,450

Total home equity
$
1,783

$
2,473

$
746

$
1,012

$
844

$
4,772

$
9,547

$
3,702

$
24,879

Updated FICO scores
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than 660
$
1,738

$
2,353

$
685

$
949

$
792

$
4,287

$
9,085

$
2,832

$
22,721

Less than or equal to 660
45

120

61

62

51

475

449

780

2,043

No FICO score available
 
 
 
1

1

10

13

90

115

Total home equity
$
1,783

$
2,473

$
746

$
1,012

$
844

$
4,772

$
9,547

$
3,702

$
24,879

Residential real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than or equal to 100%
 
$
19

$
44

$
68

$
52

$
226

 
 
$
409

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
$
7

54

57

55

43

131

 
 
347

Less than 90%
3,872

5,526

1,598

2,475

2,535

5,128

 
 
21,134

Government insured or guaranteed loans
1

10

13

17

26

512

 
 
579

Total residential real estate
$
3,880

$
5,609

$
1,712

$
2,615

$
2,656

$
5,997

 
 
$
22,469

Updated FICO scores
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Greater than 660
$
3,858

$
5,530

$
1,655

$
2,538

$
2,548

$
4,704

 
 
$
20,833

Less than or equal to 660
20

64

36

39

68

632

 
 
859

No FICO score available
1

5

8

21

14

149

 
 
198

Government insured or guaranteed loans
1

10

13

17

26

512

 
 
579

Total residential real estate
$
3,880

$
5,609

$
1,712

$
2,615

$
2,656

$
5,997

 
 
$
22,469


 
Home equity
Residential real estate

December 31, 2019 - In millions
Current estimated LTV ratios
 
 
Greater than or equal to 100%
$
1,243

$
333

Greater than or equal to 90% to less than 100%
1,047

340

Less than 90%
22,068

19,305

No LTV ratio available
184

83

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821

Updated FICO Scores
 
 
Greater than 660
$
22,245

$
19,341

Less than or equal to 660
2,019

569

No FICO score available
278

151

Government insured or guaranteed loans
 
584

Purchased impaired loans
543

1,176

Total loans
$
25,085

$
21,821



Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer
We monitor a variety of credit quality information in the management of these consumer loan classes. For all loan types, we generally use a combination of internal loan parameters as well as an updated FICO score. We use FICO scores as a primary credit quality indicator for automobile and credit card loans, as well as non-government guaranteed or non-insured education loans and other secured and unsecured lines and loans. Internal credit metrics, such as delinquency status, are heavily relied upon as credit quality indicators for government guaranteed or insured education loans and consumer loans to high net worth individuals, as internal credit metrics are more relevant than FICO scores for these types of loans.

Along with the monitoring of delinquency trends and losses for each class, FICO credit score updates are obtained at least quarterly along with a variety of credit bureau attributes. Loans with high FICO scores tend to have a lower likelihood of loss. Conversely, loans with low FICO scores tend to have a higher likelihood of loss.
The following table presents credit quality indicators for the automobile, credit card, education and other consumer loan classes.

Table 48: Credit Quality Indicators for Automobile, Credit Card, Education and Other Consumer Loan Classes
 
Term Loans by Origination Year
 
 
 
June 30, 2020 - In millions
2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

Prior

Revolving Loans

Revolving Loans Converted to Term

Total Loans

Automobile
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
1,816

$
3,802

$
1,814

$
1,042

$
606

$
201

 
 
$
9,281

650 to 719
561

1,868

1,062

481

207

75

 
 
4,254

620 to 649
73

445

257

104

39

15

 
 
933

Less than 620
58

653

579

252

102

45

 
 
1,689

Total automobile
$
2,508

$
6,768

$
3,712

$
1,879

$
954

$
336

 
 
$
16,157

Credit card
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,395

$
11

$
3,406

650 to 719
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,152

30

2,182

620 to 649
 
 
 
 
 
 
378

12

390

Less than 620
 
 
 
 
 
 
462

46

508

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
86

3

89

Total credit card
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
6,473

$
102

$
6,575

Education
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
13

$
90

$
119

$
92

$
75

$
674

 
 
$
1,063

650 to 719
3

12

16

10

7

112

 
 
160

620 to 649
 
1

2

1

 
18

 
 
22

Less than 620
 
 
1

1

1

22

 
 
25

No FICO score available or required (a)
2

10

7

6

1

1

 
 
27

Total loans using FICO credit metric
18

113

145

110

84

827

 
 
1,297

Other internal credit metrics
18

59

 
 
 
1,758

 
 
1,835

Total education
$
36

$
172

$
145

$
110

$
84

$
2,585

 
 
$
3,132

Other consumer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FICO score greater than 719
$
297

$
545

$
188

$
60

$
19

$
80

$
212

$
1

$
1,402

650 to 719
117

313

134

31

9

23

143

1

771

620 to 649
13

51

24

5

1

4

22

 
120

Less than 620
8

48

33

10

3

7

36

1

146

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
 
 
 
 
2

6

 
8

Total loans using FICO credit metric
435

957

379

106

32

116

419

3

2,447

Other internal credit metrics
20

73

46

32

67

81

2,059

4

2,382

Total other consumer
$
455

$
1,030

$
425

$
138

$
99

$
197

$
2,478

$
7

$
4,829

 
 
 
 
December 31, 2019 - In millions
 
Automobile
Credit Card
Education
Other Consumer
FICO score greater than 719
 
$
9,232

$
3,867

$
1,139

$
1,421

650 to 719
 
4,577

2,326

197

843

620 to 649
 
1,001

419

25

132

Less than 620
 
1,603

544

27

143

No FICO score available or required (a)
 
341

152

15

27

Total loans using FICO credit metric
 
16,754

7,308

1,403

2,566

Consumer loans using other internal credit metrics
 
 
 
1,933

2,371

Total loans
 
$
16,754

$
7,308

$
3,336

$
4,937

Weighted-average updated FICO score (b)
 
726

724

773

727

(a)
Loans with no FICO score available or required generally refers to new accounts issued to borrowers with limited credit history, accounts for which we cannot obtain an updated FICO score (e.g., recent profile changes), cards issued with a business name and/or cards secured by collateral. Management proactively assesses the risk and size of this loan category and, when necessary, takes actions to mitigate the credit risk.
(b)
Weighted-average updated FICO score excludes accounts with no FICO score available or required.

Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs)
A TDR is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty. Loans that have been restructured for COVID-19 related hardships and meet certain criteria under the CARES Act are not categorized as TDRs. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for additional information related to TDRs.
Table 49 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as TDRs as well as the change in the loans’ balance as a result of becoming a TDR during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019. Additionally, the table provides information about the types of TDR concessions. See Note 3 Asset Quality in our 2019 Form 10-K for additional details on these TDR concessions.
Table 49: Financial Impact and TDRs by Concession Type
 
 
 
Pre-TDR
Amortized Cost Basis (b)

 
Post-TDR Amortized Cost Basis (c)
 
During the three months ended June 30, 2020 (a)
Dollars in millions
Number
of Loans
 
 
Principal
Forgiveness

 
Rate
Reduction

 
Other

 
Total

 
Commercial
 
29

 
$
147

 
$
33

 
 
 
$
125

 
$
158

 
Consumer
 
3,589

 
57

 
 
 
$
19

 
35

 
54

 
Total TDRs
 
3,618

 
$
204

 
$
33

 
$
19

 
$
160

 
$
212

 
During the six months ended June 30, 2020
Dollars in millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
42

 
$
209

 
$
39

 
 
 
$
162

 
$
201

 
Consumer
 
7,156

 
93

 


 
$
41

 
45

 
86

 
Total TDRs
 
7,198

 
$
302

 
$
39

 
$
41

 
$
207

 
$
287

 

(a) Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(b) Represents the amortized cost basis of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation.
(c) Represents the amortized cost basis of the TDRs as of the end of the quarter in which the TDR occurs.
 
 
 
Pre-TDR
Recorded
Investment (e)

 
Post-TDR Recorded Investment (f)
 
During the three months ended June 30, 2019 (d)
Dollars in millions
Number
of Loans
 
 
Principal
Forgiveness
 
Rate
Reduction

 
Other

 
Total

 
Commercial

15

 
$
31

 
 
 
$
1

 
$
27

 
$
28

 
Consumer
 
3,539

 
44

 
 
 
24

 
16

 
40

 
Total TDRs
 
3,554

 
$
75

 

 
$
25

 
$
43

 
$
68

 
During the six months ended June 30, 2019
Dollars in millions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial
 
37

 
$
136

 

 
$
1

 
$
136

 
$
137

 
Consumer
 
7,353

 
86

 

 
48

 
32

 
80

 
Total TDRs
 
7,390

 
$
222

 

 
$
49

 
$
168

 
$
217

 
(d) Impact of partial charge-offs at TDR date are included in this table.
(e) Represents the recorded investment of the loans as of the quarter end prior to TDR designation, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
(f) Represents the recorded investment of the TDRs as of the end of the quarter in which the TDR occurs, and excludes immaterial amounts of accrued interest receivable.
After a loan is determined to be a TDR, we continue to track its performance under its most recent restructured terms. We consider a TDR to have subsequently defaulted when it becomes 60 days past due after the most recent date the loan was restructured. The following table provides a summary of TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the periods presented and were classified as
TDRs during the applicable 12-month period preceding June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019.

Table 50: Subsequently Defaulted TDRs
In millions
 
2020

 
2019

Three months ended June 30
 
$
22

 
$
28

Six months ended June 30
 
$
37

 
$
39


Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain the ACL related to loans at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb expected credit losses in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. See Note 1 Accounting Policies for a discussion of the methodologies used to determine this allowance. A rollforward of the ACL related to loans follows.
Table 51: Rollforward of Allowance for Credit Losses
 
Six months ended June 30, 2020
In millions
Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance for loan and lease losses
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
$
1,812

$
930

$
2,742

Adoption of ASU 2016-13 (a)
(304
)
767

463

January 1, 2020
1,508

1,697

3,205

Charge-offs
(205
)
(413
)
(618
)
Recoveries
39

131

170

Net (charge-offs)
(166
)
(282
)
(448
)
Provision for credit losses
2,039

1,133

3,172

Other
(1
)
 
(1
)
June 30, 2020
$
3,380

$
2,548

$
5,928

Allowance for unfunded lending related commitments (b)
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
$
316

$
2

$
318

Adoption of ASU 2016-13 (a)
53

126

179

January 1, 2020
369

128

497

Provision for (recapture of) credit losses
179

(14
)
165

June 30, 2020
$
548

$
114

$
662

Allowance for credit losses at June 30
$
3,928

$
2,662

$
6,590

(a)
Represents the impact of adopting ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses on January 1, 2020 and our transition from an incurred loss methodology for our reserves to an expected credit loss methodology.
(b)
See Note 9 Commitments for additional information about the underlying commitments related to this allowance.
The following presents an analysis of changes impacting the ACL related to loans for the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Table 52: Analysis of Changes in the Allowance for Credit Losses (a)
In millions
chart-0bcb09362e3d5e328e0a02.jpg(a) Excludes allowances for investment securities and other financial assets.
(b) Represents changes in the portfolio such as the impact of increases/decreases in loan balances, age and mix due to new originations/purchases, as well as credit quality and net charge-off activity.
(c) Economic factors represent our evaluation and determination of an economic forecast applied to our loan portfolio.



The $2.9 billion increase in the ACL since January 1, 2020 was driven by the following factors in the commercial and consumer portfolios:
Commercial reserves increased $2.1 billion attributable to the significantly adverse economic impact of the pandemic and its resulting effects on credit quality and loan growth.
Consumer reserves increased $.8 billion primarily reflecting the significantly adverse economic impact of the pandemic.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Prior to January 1, 2020, we maintained our ALLL at levels we believed to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date. We used the two main portfolio segments - Commercial and Consumer, and developed and documented the ALLL under separate methodologies for each of these portfolio segments. See Note 1 Accounting Policies in our 2019 Form 10-K for a description of the accounting policies for ALLL.
A rollforward of the ALLL and associated loan data follows:

Table 53: Rollforward of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Associated Loan Data
At or for the six months ended June 30, 2019
Dollars in millions
Commercial

Consumer

Total

Allowance for loan and lease losses
 
 
 
January 1, 2019
$
1,663

$
966

$
2,629

Charge-offs
(84
)
(358
)
(442
)
Recoveries
40

124

164

Net (charge-offs)
(44
)
(234
)
(278
)
Provision for credit losses
187

182

369

Net decrease in allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters
    of credit
(7
)
1

(6
)
Other


7

7

June 30, 2019
$
1,799

$
922

$
2,721

TDRs individually evaluated for impairment
$
33

$
123

$
156

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment
53



53

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1,713

517

2,230

Purchased impaired loans


282

282

June 30, 2019
$
1,799

$
922

$
2,721

Loan portfolio
 
 
 
TDRs individually evaluated for impairment
$
396

$
1,381

$
1,777

Other loans individually evaluated for impairment
287



287

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
160,920

71,605

232,525

Fair value option loans (a)


755

755

Purchased impaired loans


1,871

1,871

June 30, 2019
$
161,603

$
75,612

$
237,215

(a) Loans accounted for under the fair value option were not evaluated for impairment as these loans are accounted for at fair value. Accordingly, there was no allowance recorded on those loans.