XML 43 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2014
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
G. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We measure our investments based on a fair value hierarchy disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. A number of factors affect market price observability, including the type of asset or liability and its characteristics. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

 

    Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

 

    Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

 

    Level 3—Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

The following is a general description of the valuation methodologies we use for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Cash Equivalents—Cash equivalents include investments in government obligation based money-market funds, other money market instruments and interest-bearing deposits with initial terms of three months or less. The fair value of cash equivalents approximates its carrying value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Marketable Securities—Marketable securities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active exchange-traded equity securities and equity index funds, and most U.S. Government debt securities, as these securities all have quoted prices in active markets. Marketable securities utilizing Level 2 inputs include municipal bonds. We value these securities using market-corroborated pricing or other models that use observable inputs such as yield curves.

 

The following tables present our assets and liabilities that we measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2014 and April 30, 2014, respectively, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we used to determine such fair value (in thousands):

 

     October 31, 2014  
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Balance  

Cash equivalents

   $ 38,140       $ —         $ —         $ 38,140   

Marketable securities

     8,314         20,304         —          28,618   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 46,454       $ 20,304       $ —         $ 66,758   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     April 30, 2014  
     Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
     Balance  

Cash equivalents

   $ 51,561       $ —        $ —         $ 51,561   

Marketable securities

     8,338         15,167         —          23,505   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 59,899       $ 15,167       $ —         $ 75,066   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

In addition to cash equivalents and marketable securities classified as trading securities, we also have an equity method investment valued at approximately $263,000 and $266,000 as of October 31, 2014 and April 30, 2014, respectively, that is not recorded at fair value and thus is not included in the tables above.