10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

Or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number 001-11138

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	25-1428528
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
22 North Sixth Street, Indiana, PA	15701
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

724-349-7220

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  x    Smaller reporting company  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares outstanding of issuer’s common stock, $1.00 par value, as of May 4, 2012, was 105,198,546.

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		PAGE
PART I.	Financial Information
ITEM 1.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
	Included in Part I of this report:
	First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited)		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)		6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		7
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		43
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		61
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		61
PART II.	Other Information
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings		62
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors		62
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		62
ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		62
ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		62
ITEM 5.	Other Information		62
ITEM 6.	Exhibits		63
	Signatures		64

2

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(dollars in thousands, except share data)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	74,889		$	74,967
Interest-bearing bank deposits		6,663			3,511
Securities available for sale, at fair value		1,206,943			1,142,776
Other investments		37,806			39,796
Loans held for sale		8,076			13,412
Loans:
Portfolio loans		4,128,588			4,043,643
Allowance for credit losses		(60,732	)		(61,234	)
Net loans		4,067,856			3,982,409
Premises and equipment, net		67,482			66,755
Other real estate owned		21,335			30,035
Goodwill		159,956			159,956
Amortizing intangibles, net		3,472			3,843
Other assets		314,166			323,662
Total assets	$	5,968,644		$	5,841,122
Liabilities
Deposits (all domestic):
Noninterest-bearing	$	818,896		$	780,377
Interest-bearing		3,814,935			3,724,307
Total deposits		4,633,831			4,504,684
Short-term borrowings		309,373			312,777
Subordinated debentures		105,750			105,750
Other long-term debt		101,018			101,664
Total long-term debt		206,768			207,414
Other liabilities		51,314			57,704
Total liabilities		5,201,286			5,082,579
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		0			0
Common stock, $1 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 105,563,455 shares issued at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and 105,050,018 and 104,916,994 shares outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		105,563			105,563
Additional paid-in capital		365,707			365,868
Retained earnings		301,194			294,056
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		3,040			2,001
Treasury stock (513,437 and 646,461 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		(7,046	)		(7,345	)
Unearned ESOP shares		(1,100	)		(1,600	)
Total shareholders' equity		767,358			758,543
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	5,968,644		$	5,841,122

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands, except share data)
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	48,040		$	50,883
Interest and dividends on investments:
Taxable interest		8,549			8,374
Interest exempt from federal income taxes		5			186
Dividends		21			17
Interest on bank deposits		1			9
Total interest income		56,616			59,469
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits		6,247			9,536
Interest on short-term borrowings		227			185
Interest on subordinated debentures		1,433			1,383
Interest on other long-term debt		539			496
Total interest on long-term debt		1,972			1,879
Total interest expense		8,446			11,600
Net Interest Income		48,170			47,869
Provision for credit losses		3,787			13,817
Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses		44,383			34,052
Noninterest Income
Changes in fair value on impaired securities		1,498			1,869
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)		(1,498	)		(1,869	)
Net impairment losses		0			0
Net securities gains		0			577
Trust income		1,542			1,718
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,502			3,426
Insurance and retail brokerage commissions		1,424			1,562
Income from bank owned life insurance		1,445			1,357
Income from other real estate owned		964			0
Gain on sale of assets		2,115			231
Card related interchange income		3,114			2,800
Other income		3,274			2,657
Total noninterest income		17,380			14,328
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		21,758			21,128
Net occupancy expense		3,404			3,732
Furniture and equipment expense		3,184			3,180
Data processing expense		1,563			1,424
Pennsylvania shares tax expense		1,183			1,178
Intangible amortization		371			390
Collection and repossession expense		2,699			1,316
Other professional fees and services		1,199			1,125
FDIC insurance		1,237			1,835
Loss on sale or write-down of assets		3,289			301
Unfunded commitments reserve		913			(357	)
Other operating expenses		5,952			6,177
Total noninterest expense		46,752			41,429
Income Before Income Taxes		15,011			6,951
Income tax provision		3,960			1,705
Net Income	$	11,051		$	5,246
Average Shares Outstanding		104,810,727			104,618,499
Average Shares Outstanding Assuming Dilution		104,816,442			104,623,518
Per Share Data:
Basic Earnings per Share	$	0.11		$	0.05
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	0.11		$	0.05
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share	$	0.03		$	0.03

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Net Income	$	11,051	$	5,246
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax expense (benefit):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities arising during the period		99		(1,616	)
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold		1,498		1,869
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses on securities included in net income		0		(577	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax expense (benefit)		1,597		(324	)
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)		558		(113	)
Comprehensive Income	$	12,090	$	5,035

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

	Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in- Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net			Treasury Stock			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Shareholders' Equity
	(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2011		104,916,994	$	105,563	$	365,868		$	294,056		$	2,001		$	(7,345	)	$	(1,600	)	$	758,543
Net income									11,051												11,051
Other comprehensive income												1,039									1,039
Cash dividends declared ($0.03 per share)									(3,147	)											(3,147	)
Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares																		500			500
ESOP market value adjustment ($242, net of $85 tax benefit)						(157	)														(157	)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases						(16	)														(16	)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised						1															1
Treasury stock reissued		33,024				0			(163	)					373						210
Restricted stock		100,000				11			(603	)					(74	)					(666	)
Balance at March 31, 2012		105,050,018	$	105,563	$	365,707		$	301,194		$	3,040		$	(7,046	)	$	(1,100	)	$	767,358
	Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in- Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net			Treasury Stock			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Shareholders' Equity
		(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Balance at December 31, 2010		104,846,194	$	105,515	$	366,488		$	291,492		$	(2,458	)	$	(7,660	)	$	(3,600	)	$	749,777
Net income									5,246												5,246
Other comprehensive loss												(211	)								(211	)
Cash dividends declared ($0.03 per share)									(3,138	)											(3,138	)
Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares																		500			500
ESOP market value adjustment ($226, net of $79 tax benefit)						(147	)														(147	)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases						(16	)														(16	)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised						6															6
Treasury stock reissued		13,760							(82	)					156						74
Restricted stock						7									34						41
Balance at March 31, 2011		104,859,954	$	105,515	$	366,338		$	293,518		$	(2,669	)	$	(7,470	)	$	(3,100	)	$	752,132

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	11,051		$	5,246
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses		3,787			13,817
Deferred tax expense		671			14
Depreciation and amortization		1,520			2,407
Net losses (gains) on securities and other assets		567			(535	)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities		287			215
Net accretion of premiums and discounts on long-term debt		(28	)		(42	)
Income from increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(1,445	)		(1,357	)
Decrease in interest receivable		352			78
Decrease in interest payable		(1,177	)		(1,098	)
Increase in income taxes payable		9,569			1,587
Other-net		(5,439	)		(970	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		19,715			19,362
Investing Activities
Transactions with securities available for sale:
Proceeds from sales		0			54,965
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions		149,201			69,702
Purchases		(212,061	)		(165,377	)
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock		1,990			2,443
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance		0			88
Proceeds from sale of loans		6,809			4,402
Proceeds from sales of other assets		8,135			2,076
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(90,600	)		124,940
Purchases of premises and equipment		(2,804	)		(1,470	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(139,330	)		91,769
Financing Activities
Net decrease in federal funds purchased		(43,800	)		(12,800	)
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings		40,396			(19,719	)
Net increase in deposits		129,163			12,143
Repayments of other long-term debt		(118	)		(24,213	)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases		(16	)		(16	)
Dividends paid		(3,147	)		(3,138	)
Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock		210			73
Stock option tax benefit		1			0
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		122,689			(47,670	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		3,074			63,461
Cash and cash equivalents at January 1		78,478			69,858
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31	$	81,552		$	133,319

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (“First Commonwealth” or “Company”) conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual realized amounts could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of First Commonwealth’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity as of and for the periods presented.

The results of operations for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year of 2012. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with First Commonwealth’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K which is available on First Commonwealth’s website at http://www.fcbanking.com.

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing bank deposits. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.

Note 2 Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures

The following table identifies the related tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012							2011
	Pretax Amount		Tax (Expense) Benefit			Net of Tax Amount		Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			Net of Tax Amount
	(dollars in thousands)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities arising during the period	$	99	$	(34	)	$	65	$	(1,616	)	$	565		$	(1,051	)
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold		1,498		(524	)		974		1,869			(654	)		1,215
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses on securities included in net income		0		0			0		(577	)		202			(375	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities		1,597		(558	)		1,039		(324	)		113			(211	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,597	$	(558	)	$	1,039	$	(324	)	$	113		$	(211	)

8

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3 Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The following table presents information related to cash paid during the period for interest and income taxes as well as detail on non-cash investing and financing activities for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	9,668		$	12,765
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
ESOP loan reductions	$	500		$	500
Loans transferred to other real estate owned and repossessed assets		2,561			6,197
Other real estate owned sold and settled out of period		(48	)		0
Gross increase (decrease) in market value adjustment to securities available for sale		1,597			(334	)

Note 4 Earnings per Share

The following table summarizes the composition of the weighted-average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Weighted average common shares issued		105,563,455			105,515,079
Average treasury shares		(542,326	)		(663,993	)
Averaged unearned ESOP shares		(84,989	)		(214,917	)
Average unearned nonvested shares		(125,413	)		(17,670	)
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share		104,810,727			104,618,499
Additional common stock equivalents (nonvested stock) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		5,715			0
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		0			5,019
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share		104,816,442			104,623,518

The following table shows the number of shares and the price per share related to common stock equivalents that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-months ended March 31, because to do so would have been antidilutive.

	2012						2011
			Price Range						Price Range
	Shares		From		To		Shares		From		To
Stock Options		380,677	$	6.36	$	14.55		484,439	$	6.90	$	14.55
Restricted Stock		68,995		5.96		6.82		12,550		5.70		5.70

Note 5 Variable Interest Entities

As defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for

9

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5 Variable Interest Entities (Continued)

business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. Under ASC 810-10, an entity that holds a variable interest in a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE if the entity is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, which generally means it is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns, or both.

First Commonwealth’s VIEs are evaluated under the guidance included in FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-17. These VIEs include qualified affordable housing projects that First Commonwealth has invested in as part of its community reinvestment initiatives. We periodically assess whether or not our variable interests in the VIE, based on qualitative analysis, provide us with a controlling interest in the VIE. The analysis includes an assessment of the characteristics of the VIE. We do not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE, which would require consolidation of the VIE, as we do not have the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

First Commonwealth’s maximum potential exposure is equal to its carrying value and is summarized in the table below:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Low Income Housing Limited Partnership Investments	$	556	$	667

Note 6 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Commitments and letters of credit

Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by First Commonwealth to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The contract or notional amount of these instruments reflects the maximum amount of future payments that First Commonwealth could be required to pay under the guarantees if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties, without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. In addition, many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The following table identifies the notional amount of those instruments at:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	1,571,673	$	1,495,009
Financial standby letters of credit		54,164		53,689
Performance standby letters of credit		64,045		76,371
Commercial letters of credit		769		1,297

10

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Continued)

Commitments and letters of credit (Continued)

The current notional amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2012 include financial standby letters of credit of $0.1 million, and performance standby letters of credit of $3.6 million, issued during the first three months of 2012. A liability of $0.2 million and $0.1 million has been recorded as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, which represents the estimated fair value of letters of credit issued. The fair value of letters of credit is estimated based on the unrecognized portion of fees received at the time the commitment was issued.

Unused commitments and letters of credit provide exposure to future credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower or guaranteed parties. Management’s evaluation of the credit risk in these commitments resulted in the recording of a liability of $2.4 million as of March 31, 2012 and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2011. The credit risk evaluation incorporated probability of default, loss given default and estimated utilization for the next twelve months for each loan category and the letters of credit.

Legal proceedings

McGrogan v. First Commonwealth Bank is a class action that was filed on January 12, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The action alleges that First Commonwealth Bank (the “Bank”) promised class members a minimum interest rate of 8% on its IRA Market Rate Savings Account for as long as the class members kept their money on deposit in the IRA account. The class asserts that the Bank committed fraud, breached its modified contract with the class members, and violated the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law when it resigned as custodian of the IRA Market Rate Savings Accounts in 2008 and offered the class members a roll-over IRA account with a 3.5% interest rate. At that time, there were 237 account holders with an average age of 64, and the aggregate balances in the IRA Market Rate Savings accounts totaled approximately $11.5 million. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages for the alleged breach of contract, punitive damages for the alleged fraud and Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law violations and attorney’s fees. On July 27, 2011, the court granted class certification as to the breach of modified contract claim and denied class certification as to the fraud and Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law claims. The breach of contract claim is predicated upon a letter sent to customers in 1998 which reversed an earlier decision by the Bank to reduce the rate paid on the accounts. The letter stated, in relevant part, “This letter will serve as notification that a decision has been made to re-establish the rate on your account to eight percent (8%). This rate will be retroactive to your most recent maturity date and will continue going forward on deposits presently in the account and on annual additions.” In granting class certification, the court found that the letter could constitute a modification of the original IRA contract that would obligate the Bank to pay a minimum rate of 8% until the accounts are closed. Plaintiffs and the Bank have filed motions for summary judgment. In support of its motion, the Bank has asserted that the 1998 letter did not alter the Bank’s right to resign as custodian and close the accounts, which the Bank exercised in 2008. Oral argument on the motions for summary judgment was held on April 4, 2012, and a decision is currently pending. The amount of the Bank’s liability, if any, will depend upon information which is not presently known to the Bank, including the court’s interpretation of the 1998 letter, each class member’s life expectancy and pace of distributions from the IRA account, and the extent to which damages were or could have been mitigated through alternative investments. Accordingly, the Company is unable to estimate the amount or range of a reasonably possible loss.

Other matters

There are no other material legal proceedings to which First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries are a party, or of which their property is the subject, except proceedings which arise in the normal course of business and, in the

11

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Continued)

Other Matters (Continued)

opinion of management, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations or financial position of First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries.

Note 7 Investment Securities

Below is an analysis of the amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available for sale at:

	March 31, 2012									December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
								(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	31,994	$	4,026	$	(12	)	$	36,008	$	32,139	$	4,061	$	(6	)	$	36,194
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		834,125		29,678		(319	)		863,484		771,196		29,835		0			801,031
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		185		1		0			186		193		1		(1	)		193
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		267,904		732		(110	)		268,526		267,807		973		(132	)		268,648
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		443		11		0			454		444		15		0			459
Corporate Securities		11,803		174		(60	)		11,917		11,811		162		(562	)		11,411
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		54,471		112		(30,075	)		24,508		54,762		3		(31,785	)		22,980
Total Debt Securities		1,200,925		34,734		(30,576	)		1,205,083		1,138,352		35,050		(32,486	)		1,140,916
Equities		1,860		0		0			1,860		1,860		0		0			1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	1,202,785	$	34,734	$	(30,576	)	$	1,206,943	$	1,140,212	$	35,050	$	(32,486	)	$	1,142,776

12

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7 Investment Securities (Continued)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale at March 31, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	7,364	$	7,384
Due after 1 but within 5 years		260,983		261,596
Due after 5 but within 10 years		0		0
Due after 10 years		66,274		36,425
		334,621		305,405
Mortgage-Backed Securities (a)		866,304		899,678
Total Debt Securities	$	1,200,925	$	1,205,083

(a) Mortgage Backed Securities include an amortized cost of $32.0 million and a fair value of $36.0 million for Obligations of U.S. Government agencies issued by Ginnie Mae and Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which had an amortized cost of $834.3 million and a fair value of $863.7 million.

Proceeds from sale, gross gains (losses) realized on sales, maturities and other-than-temporary impairment charges related to securities available for sale were as follows for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Proceeds from sale	$	0	$	54,965
Gross gains (losses) realized:
Sales Transactions:
Gross gains	$	0	$	832
Gross losses		0		(258	)
		0		574
Maturities and impairment
Gross gains		0		3
Gross losses		0		0
Other-than-temporary impairment		0		0
		0		3
Net gains and impairment	$	0	$	577

Securities available for sale with a fair value of $647.6 million and $668.8 million were pledged as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

13

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7 Investment Securities (Continued)

There were no held-to-maturity debt securities as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no gains or losses for debt securities held-to-maturity.

Note 8 Other Investments

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), First Commonwealth is required to purchase and hold stock in the FHLB to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. This stock is restricted in that it can only be sold to the FHLB or to another member institution, and all sales of FHLB stock must be at par. As a result of these restrictions, FHLB stock is unlike other investment securities insofar as there is no trading market for FHLB stock and the transfer price is determined by FHLB membership rules and not by market participants. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our FHLB stock totaled $37.8 million and $39.8 million, respectively and is included in “Other investments” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

During the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the FHLB repurchased excess stock from its members by repurchasing the lessor of 5% of the members’ total capital stock outstanding or its total excess capital stock. As a result, during the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, stock repurchases occurred in the amounts of $2.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. In addition, the FHLB paid a cash dividend of $0.10 per share, or $10 thousand, during the first quarter 2012. This was the first dividend paid by FHLB since December 2008. Decisions regarding any future repurchases of excess capital stock and dividend payments will be made by the FHLB on a quarterly basis. Management reviewed the FHLB’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2012.

FHLB stock is held as a long-term investment and its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. First Commonwealth evaluates impairment quarterly. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that reflects our view of the FHLB’s long-term performance, which includes factors such as the following:

• its operating performance;

• the severity and duration of declines in the fair value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount;

• its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance;

• the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the FHLB, and accordingly, on the members of FHLB; and

• its liquidity and funding position.

After evaluating all of these considerations, First Commonwealth concluded that the par value of its investment in FHLB stock will be recovered. Accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded on these securities for the three-months ended March 31, 2012. Our evaluation of the factors described above in future periods could result in the recognition of impairment charges on FHLB stock.

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities

As required by FASB ASC Topic 320, “Investments – Debt and Equity Securities,” credit related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities is recognized in earnings while non-credit related other-than-temporary

14

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

impairment on debt securities not expected to be sold is recognized in OCI. In the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, no other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized and $1.5 and $1.9 million, respectively, in non-credit related gains on our trust preferred collateralized debt obligations that were determined to be impaired in previous periods was recorded in OCI. All of the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded were classified as available for sale securities.

First Commonwealth utilizes the specific identification method to determine the net gain or loss on debt securities and the average cost method to determine the net gain or loss on equity securities.

In the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, the “Changes in fair value on impaired securities” line represents the change in fair value of securities impaired in the current or previous periods. The change in fair value includes both non-credit and credit related gains or losses. Credit related losses occur when the entire amortized cost of the security will not be recovered. The “Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)” line represents the gains and losses on the securities resulting from factors other than credit. The non-credit related gain or loss is disclosed in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and recognized through other comprehensive income. The “Net impairment losses” line represents the credit related losses recognized in total noninterest income for the related period.

We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and whether we are more likely than not to sell the security. We evaluate whether we are more likely than not to sell debt securities based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy, tax position and interest rate risk position. In addition, the risk of future other-than-temporary impairment may be influenced by additional bank failures, weakness in the U.S. economy, changes in real estate values and additional interest deferrals in our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are beneficial interests in securitized financial assets within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325, “Investments – Other,” and are therefore evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using management’s best estimate of future cash flows. If these estimated cash flows indicate that it is probable that an adverse change in cash flows has occurred, then other-than-temporary impairment would be recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 320. There is a risk that First Commonwealth will record other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future. See Note 12, “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities,” for additional information.

15

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values at March 31, 2012 by investment category and time frame for which securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	2,186	$	(12	)	$	16	$	0	(a)	$	2,202	$	(12	)
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	75,998	$	(319	)	$	0	$	0		$	75,998	$	(319	)
Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises		83,490		(110	)		0		0			83,490		(110	)
Corporate Securities		5,032		(60	)		0		0			5,032		(60	)
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0			24,106		(30,075	)		24,106		(30,075	)
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	166,706	$	(501	)	$	24,122	$	(30,075	)	$	190,828	$	(30,576	)

(a) Gross unrealized losses related to these types of securities are less than $1 thousand.

At March 31, 2012, pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations accounted for 98% of total unrealized losses, fixed income securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises accounted for 2% and corporate fixed income comprised less than one percent of unrealized losses. There were no equity securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, our corporate securities had an amortized cost and an estimated fair value of $11.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and were comprised of single issue trust preferred securities issued primarily by money center and large regional banks. As of December 31, 2011, the same portion of the portfolio had an amortized cost of $11.8 million and an estimated fair value of $11.4 million. Included in the corporate securities portfolio are investments which had a gross unrealized loss of $60 thousand as of March 31, 2012 and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2011. After a review of each of the issuer’s asset quality, earnings trend and capital position, it was determined that none of the issues in an unrealized loss position were other-than-temporarily impaired. Additionally, all interest payments on these securities are being made as contractually required.

16

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values at December 31, 2011 by investment category and time frame for which securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More						Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	1,086	$	(6	)	$	16		$	0	(a)	$	1,102	$	(6	)
Obligations of U.S. Government- Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		25		0			0	(a)		0			25		0
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		151		(1	)		0			0			151		(1	)
Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises		55,969		(132	)		0			0			55,969		(132	)
Corporate Securities		4,536		(562	)		0			0			4,536		(562	)
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0			22,927			(31,785	)		22,927		(31,785	)
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	61,767	$	(701	)	$	22,943		$	(31,785	)	$	84,710	$	(32,486	)

(a) Gross unrealized losses related to these types of securities are less than $1 thousand.

As of March 31, 2012, the book value of our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations totaled $54.5 million with an estimated fair value of $24.5 million, which includes securities comprised of 348 banks and other financial institutions. Two of our pooled securities are senior tranches and the remainders are mezzanine tranches, three of which have no senior class remaining in the issue. Two of the pooled issues, representing $5.3 million of the $54.5 million book value, remain above investment grade. At the time of initial issue, the subordinated tranches ranged in size from approximately 7% to 35% of the total principal amount of the respective securities and no more than 5% of any pooled security consisted of a security issued by any one institution. As of March 31, 2012, after taking into account management’s best estimates of future interest deferrals and defaults, seven of our securities had no excess subordination in the tranches we own and seven of our securities had excess subordination which ranged from 5% to 263% of the current performing collateral.

17

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

The following table provides information related to our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations as of March 31, 2012:

Deal	Class	Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Moody's/ Fitch Ratings	Number of Banks		Deferrals and Defaults as a % of Current Collateral			Excess Subordination as a % of Current Performing Collateral
(dollars in thousands)
Pre TSL I	Senior	$	1,581	$	1,519	$	(62	)	Aa3/BBB		20		39.50	%		218.93	%
Pre TSL IV	Mezzanine		1,830		664		(1,166	)	Ca/CCC		6		27.07			96.28
Pre TSL V	Mezzanine		50		50		0		Caa3/D		3		100.00			0.00
Pre TSL VI	Mezzanine		240		352		112		Ca/D		5		12.27			205.63
Pre TSL VII	Mezzanine		4,026		3,070		(956	)	Ca/C		17		52.13			0.00
Pre TSL VIII	Mezzanine		1,715		968		(747	)	C/C		35		45.91			0.00
Pre TSL IX	Mezzanine		2,241		812		(1,429	)	Ca/C		48		26.21			7.25
Pre TSL X	Mezzanine		1,377		909		(468	)	C/C		53		44.67			0.00
Pre TSL XII	Mezzanine		5,502		2,960		(2,542	)	Ca/C		76		31.86			0.00
Pre TSL XIII	Mezzanine		12,121		4,241		(7,880	)	Ca/C		63		35.82			0.00
Pre TSL XIV	Mezzanine		12,819		4,302		(8,517	)	Ca/C		63		38.55			24.36
MMCap I	Senior		3,766		3,470		(296	)	A3/BBB		21		37.69			262.60
MMCap I	Mezzanine		842		437		(405	)	Ca/C		21		37.69			5.47
MM Comm IX	Mezzanine		6,361		754		(5,607	)	Ca/D		31		46.50			0.00
Total		$	54,471	$	24,508	$	(29,963	)

Lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, credit rating downgrades and market uncertainties related to the financial industry are factors contributing to the impairment on these securities.

On a quarterly basis we evaluate our debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment. During the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. When evaluating these investments we determine a credit related portion and a non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment. The credit related portion is recognized in earnings and represents the difference between book value and the present value of future cash flows. The non-credit related portion is recognized in OCI and represents the difference between the fair value of the security and the amount of credit related impairment. A discounted cash flow analysis provides the best estimate of credit related other-than-temporary impairment for these securities.

Additional information related to the discounted cash flow analysis follows:

Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are measured for other-than-temporary impairment within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325 by determining whether it is probable that an adverse change in estimated cash flows has occurred. Determining whether there has been an adverse change in estimated cash

18

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

flows from the cash flows previously projected involves comparing the present value of remaining cash flows previously projected against the present value of the cash flows estimated at March 31, 2012. We consider the discounted cash flow analysis to be our primary evidence when determining whether credit related other-than-temporary impairment exists.

Results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows, credit worthiness of the underlying banks and determination of probability of default of the underlying collateral. The following provides additional information for each of these variables:

• Estimate of Future Cash Flows – Cash flows are constructed in an INTEX cash flow model which includes each deal’s structural features. For collateral issued by financial institutions with over $15 billion in asset size, we consider the alternative cost of funding and if that rate is less than the current rate being paid, we incorporate a prepayment in our estimate of future cash flows. The prepayment rates used are 20% in years 2 and 3 and a 2% prepayment rate thereafter. The modeled cash flows are then used to estimate if all the scheduled principal and interest payments of our investments will be returned.

• Credit Analysis – A quarterly credit evaluation is performed for each of the 348 banks comprising the collateral across the various pooled trust preferred securities. Our credit evaluation considers all evidence available to us and includes the nature of the issuer’s business, its years of operating history, corporate structure, loan composition, loan concentrations, deposit mix, asset growth rates, geographic footprint and local economic environment. Our analysis focuses on profitability, return on assets, shareholders’ equity, net interest margin, credit quality ratios, operating efficiency, capital adequacy and liquidity.

• Probability of Default – A probability of default is determined for each bank and is used to calculate the expected impact of future deferrals and defaults on our expected cash flows. Each bank in the collateral pool is assigned a probability of default for each year until maturity. Currently, any bank that is in default is assigned a 100% probability of default and a 0% projected recovery rate. All other banks in the pool are assigned a probability of default based on their unique credit characteristics and market indicators with a 10% projected recovery rate. For the majority of banks currently in deferral we assume the bank continues to defer and will eventually default and, therefore, a 100% probability of default is assigned. However, for some deferring collateral there is the possibility that they become current on interest or principal payments at some point in the future and in those cases a probability that the deferral will ultimately cure is assigned. The probability of default is updated quarterly. As of March 31, 2012, default probabilities for performing collateral ranged from 0.33% to 75%.

Our credit evaluation provides a basis for determining deferral and default probabilities for each underlying piece of collateral. Using the results of the credit evaluation, the next step of the process is to look at pricing of senior debt or credit default swaps for the issuer (or where such information is unavailable, for companies having similar credit profiles as the issuer). The pricing of these market indicators provides the information necessary to determine appropriate default probabilities for each bank.

In addition to the above factors, our evaluation of impairment also includes a stress test analysis which provides an estimate of excess subordination for each tranche. We stress the cash flows of each pool by increasing current default assumptions to the level of defaults which results in an adverse change in estimated cash flows. This stressed breakpoint is then used to calculate excess subordination levels for each pooled trust preferred security. The results of the stress test allows management to identify those pools that are at a greater risk for a future break in cash flows so that we can monitor banks in those pools more closely for potential deterioration of credit quality.

19

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities (Continued)

Our cash flow analysis as of March 31, 2012, indicates that no credit related other-than-temporary impairment has occurred on our pooled trust preferred securities since December 31, 2011. Based upon the analysis performed by management, it is probable that seven of our pooled trust preferred securities will experience principal and interest shortfalls and therefore appropriate other-than-temporary charges were recorded in prior years. These securities are identified in the table on page 18 with 0% “Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral.” For the remaining securities listed in that table, our analysis as of March 31, 2012 indicates it is probable that we will collect all contractual principal and interest payments.

During 2008, 2009 and 2010, other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized on all of our pooled trust preferred securities, except for PreTSL I, PreTSL IV and MMCap I-Senior. Our cash flow analysis as of March 31, 2012, for all of these impaired securities indicates that it is now probable we will collect principal and interest in excess of what was estimated at the time other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded. This change can be attributed to improvement in the underlying collateral for these securities and has resulted in our current book value being below the present value of estimated future principal and interest payments. The excess for each bond of the present value of future cash flows over our current book value ranges from 19% to 136% and will be recognized as an adjustment to yield over the remaining life of these securities. During the three-months ended March 31, 2012, $0.2 million of the excess was recognized as an adjustment to yield on these securities.

The following provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings for debt securities held and not intended to be sold for the three-months ended March 31:

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning (a)	$	44,736		$	44,850
Credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		0			0
Additional credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		0			0
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected, recognized over the remaining life of the security (b)		(235	)		0
Balance, ending	$	44,501		$	44,850

(a) The beginning balance represents credit related losses included in other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on debt securities in prior periods.

(b) Represents the increase in cash flows recognized in interest income during the period.

In the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, no other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded on equity securities. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates equity securities for other-than-temporary impairment by reviewing the severity and duration of decline in estimated fair value, research reports, analysts’ recommendations, credit rating changes, news stories, annual reports, regulatory filings, impact of interest rate changes and other relevant information. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, there are no equity securities in an unrealized loss position.

20

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The following table provides outstanding balances related to each of our loan types:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,051,209	$	996,739
Real estate construction		64,158		76,564
Residential real estate		1,174,572		1,137,059
Commercial real estate		1,264,060		1,267,432
Loans to individuals		574,589		565,849
Total loans and leases net of unearned income		4,128,588	$	4,043,643

During the three-months ended March 31, 2012, loans increased $84.9 million or 2% compared to balances outstanding at December 31, 2011. Decreases in the real estate construction and commercial real estate categories can be attributed to our continued focus of managing down our large credit exposures while increases in residential real estate and loans to individuals are primarily due to growth in home equity loans and indirect auto lending.

Credit Quality Information

As part of the on-going monitoring of credit quality within the loan portfolio, the following credit worthiness categories are used in grading our loans:

Pass	Acceptable levels of risk exist in the relationship. Includes all loans not adversely classified as OAEM, substandard or doubtful.
Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM)
	Potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. The potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects or weaken the Bank’s credit position at some future date. The credit risk may be relatively minor, yet constitute an undesirable risk in light of the circumstances surrounding the specific credit. No loss of principal or interest is expected.
Substandard	Well-defined weakness or a weakness that jeopardizes the repayment of the debt. A loan may be classified as substandard as a result of deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition and repayment capacity. Loans for which repayment plans have not been met or collateral equity margins do not protect the Company may also be classified as substandard.
Doubtful	Loans with the characteristics of substandard loans with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of presently existing facts and conditions, is highly improbable.

The use of creditworthiness categories to grade loans permits management’s use of migration analysis to estimate a portion of credit risk. The Company’s internal creditworthiness grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans. Category ratings are reviewed each quarter, at which time management analyzes the

21

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Credit Quality Information (Continued)

results, as well as other external statistics and factors, to track the migration of loan performance. Loans that migrate towards higher risk rating levels generally have an increased risk of default, whereas, loans that migrate toward lower risk ratings generally will result in a lower risk factor being applied to those related loan balances.

The following tables represent our credit risk profile by creditworthiness:

	March 31, 2012
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		Real estate construction		Residential real estate		Commercial real estate		Loans to individuals		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Pass	$	956,928	$	36,011	$	1,162,979	$	1,132,559	$	574,585	$	3,863,062
Non-Pass
OAEM		27,792		798		5,213		53,898		4		87,705
Substandard		62,138		21,638		6,380		77,603		0		167,759
Doubtful		4,351		5,711		0		0		0		10,062
Total Non-Pass		94,281		28,147		11,593		131,501		4		265,526
Total	$	1,051,209	$	64,158	$	1,174,572	$	1,264,060	$	574,589	$	4,128,588

	December 31, 2011
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		Real estate construction		Residential real estate		Commercial real estate		Loans to individuals		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Pass	$	904,057	$	44,914	$	1,126,143	$	1,110,664	$	565,842	$	3,751,620
Non-Pass
OAEM		27,627		4,238		5,484		61,855		7		99,211
Substandard		60,114		21,701		5,432		94,913		0		182,160
Doubtful		4,941		5,711		0		0		0		10,652
Total Non-Pass		92,682		31,650		10,916		156,768		7		292,023
Total	$	996,739	$	76,564	$	1,137,059	$	1,267,432	$	565,849	$	4,043,643

Portfolio Risks

Credit quality measures as of March 31, 2012 improved compared to December 31, 2011 as criticized loans decreased $26.5 million, or 9%, to $265.5 million. Further indications of improvement in credit quality can be seen in the $10.2 million, or 29% decrease in delinquency on accruing loans. For this same period, nonaccrual loans decreased $0.4 million as a result of payments and charge-offs during the quarter.

Charge-offs for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $5.0 million compared to $8.6 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. The most significant charge-off during the three months ended March 31,

22

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Portfolio Risks (Continued)

2012 was a $1.2 million charge taken on a $2.0 million commercial loan. During the three-months ended March 31, 2011, the most significant charge-offs totaled $4.9 million and related to construction loan projects in Florida, western Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Criticized loans, or loans designated OAEM, substandard or doubtful, totaled $265.5 million at March 31, 2012 and represented 6% of the loan portfolio, compared to 7% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2011. These loans have been evaluated when determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, which we believe is adequate at this time. However, changes in economic conditions, interest rates, borrower financial condition, delinquency trends or previously established fair values of collateral factors could significantly change those judgmental estimates.

Credit quality of our loan portfolio represents significant risk to our earnings, capital, regulatory agency relationships, investment community and shareholder returns. First Commonwealth devotes a substantial amount of resources to managing this risk primarily through our credit administration department that develops and administers policies and procedures for underwriting, maintaining, monitoring and collecting activities. Credit administration is independent of lending departments and oversight is provided by the Credit Committee of the First Commonwealth Board of Directors.

Risk factors associated with commercial real estate and construction related loans are monitored closely since this is an area that represents the most significant portion of the loan portfolio and has experienced the most stress during the economic downturn and evidenced little recovery strength.

In addition, during the first three months of 2012, one relationship consisting of two loans, was classified as troubled debt restructuring. These loans increased the nonperforming loan balance by $53 thousand with no increase in specific reserves.

23

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans by Segment

The following tables delineate the aging analysis of the recorded investments in past due loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also included in these tables are loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing because they are well-secured and in the process of collection.

	March 31, 2012
	30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		90 days and greater and still accruing		Nonaccrual		Total past due and nonaccrual		Current		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,517	$	670	$	410	$	31,921	$	34,518	$	1,016,691	$	1,051,209
Real estate construction		0		0		0		13,951		13,951		50,207		64,158
Residential real estate		6,378		1,521		5,353		3,995		17,247		1,157,325		1,174,572
Commercial real estate		3,389		1,257		620		28,228		33,494		1,230,566		1,264,060
Loans to individuals		1,866		563		1,743		0		4,172		570,417		574,589
Total	$	13,150	$	4,011	$	8,126	$	78,095	$	103,382	$	4,025,206	$	4,128,588

	December 31, 2011
	30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		90 days and greater and still accruing		Nonaccrual		Total past due and nonaccrual		Current		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	5,433	$	824	$	287	$	33,459	$	40,003	$	956,736	$	996,739
Real estate construction		0		180		0		14,911		15,091		61,473		76,564
Residential real estate		7,144		2,100		8,767		3,153		21,164		1,115,895		1,137,059
Commercial real estate		3,671		1,241		157		26,953		32,022		1,235,410		1,267,432
Loans to individuals		2,952		962		1,804		0		5,718		560,131		565,849
Total	$	19,200	$	5,307	$	11,015	$	78,476	$	113,998	$	3,929,645	$	4,043,643

The previous tables summarizes nonaccrual loans by loan segment. The Company generally places loans on nonaccrual status when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred or the loans reach a certain number of days past due. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status.

Nonaccrual Loans

When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, the accrued unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income and all future payments received are applied as a reduction to the loan principal. Generally, the loan is returned to

24

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Nonaccrual Loans (Continued)

accrual status when (a) all delinquent interest and principal become current under the terms of the loan agreement or (b) the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection and collectability is no longer doubtful.

Impaired Loans

Management considers loans to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. Determination of impairment is treated the same across all loan segments. When management identifies a loan as impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except when the sole source or repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of collateral. When the loan is collateral dependent, the appraised value less cost to sell is utilized. If management determines the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.

When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal, under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is not in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, contractual interest is credited to interest income when received, under the cash basis method.

Nonperforming loans, excluding loans held for sale, decreased $17.2 million to $81.6 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $98.8 million at December 31, 2011. Contributing to this decrease was the payoff of an $11.3 million loan to a waste management company and the transfer to OREO of collateral for a $1.2 million loan. The most significant loans placed into nonperforming status during the first quarter of 2012 included $1.3 million for a consumer mortgage loan and $1.0 million for a western Pennsylvania commercial real estate loan.

The specific allowance for nonperforming loans decreased by $1.3 million at March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Unfunded commitments related to nonperforming loans were $10.0 million at March 31, 2012 and an off balance sheet reserve of $0.2 million has been established for these commitments.

Loans held for sale totaled $8.1 million and $13.4 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The entire balance of loans held for sale in both of these periods was considered nonperforming. While these loans are considered to be nonperforming, they are not taken into consideration when determining the allowance for credit losses as they are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.

Significant nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2012, include the following;

• $19.6 million, the remaining portion of a $44.1 million unsecured loan to a western Pennsylvania real estate developer. This loan was originated in the first quarter of 2004 and was placed in nonaccrual status in the fourth quarter of 2009. A settlement plan with the borrower and three other lenders was reached in the fourth quarter of 2010 and resulted in an $8.0 million principal payment and a $15.4 million partial charge-off.

25

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

• $16.6 million commercial real estate loan for a real estate developer in eastern Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in the third quarter of 2007 and restructured in the fourth quarter of 2011 and resulted in a charge-off of $4.2 million. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the third quarter of 2011.

• $9.1 million to an information technology company in Maryland. This loan was originated in the fourth quarter of 2007 and was placed in nonaccrual in the second quarter of 2011.

• $5.7 million, the remaining portion of a $20.8 million construction loan for a Florida condominium project. This loan was originated in the second quarter of 2007. Charge-offs of $15.1 million have been recorded on this loan. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011.

• $4.1 million commercial real estate loan for retail development in western Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in the third quarter of 2008 and transferred to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2011. When transferred to held for sale, the fair value of this loan was determined by a discounted cash flow analysis. The sale of this loan was completed in April 2012 and resulted in a gain of $1.2 million which will be reflected in the Company’s second quarter net income.

Compared to December 31, 2011, there were no changes in the composition of the most significant nonaccrual loans.

The following tables include the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also presented are the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized while the loan was considered impaired. Average balances are calculated based on month-end balances of the loans of the period reported.

	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	2,282	$	3,267	$	0	$	2,010	$	3,418	$	0
Real estate construction		3,571		6,546		0		10,814		20,161		0
Residential real estate		3,048		3,479		0		3,125		3,513		0
Commercial real estate		23,702		24,950		0		36,777		41,974		0
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		32,603		38,242		0		52,726		69,066		0

26

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(dollars in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		30,139		31,457		7,555		34,056		34,341		9,069
Real estate construction		10,380		31,375		2,891		6,298		21,402		2,960
Residential real estate		1,823		1,823		553		955		955		93
Commercial real estate		6,632		8,295		921		4,717		4,863		1,114
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		48,974		72,950		11,920		46,026		61,561		13,236
Total	$	81,577	$	111,192	$	11,920	$	98,752	$	130,627	$	13,236

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012				2011
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	3,258	$	18	$	1,408	$	3
Real estate construction		3,646		0		15,738		0
Residential real estate		3,354		5		1,938		1
Commercial real estate		24,275		23		18,989		11
Loans to individuals		0		0		25		0
Subtotal		34,533		46		38,098		15
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		30,350		3		25,911		2
Real estate construction		10,432		0		30,061		1
Residential real estate		952		7		375		0
Commercial real estate		5,889		9		32,242		13
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		47,623		19		88,589		16
Total	$	82,156	$	65	$	126,687	$	31

Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the financial difficulties experienced by the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternate financing sources.

27

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

The following table provides detail as to the total troubled debt restructured loans and total commitments outstanding on troubled debt restructured loans:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Troubled debt restructured loans
Accrual status	$	3,482	$	20,276
Nonaccrual status		41,690		44,841
Total	$	45,172	$	65,117
Commitments
Letters of credit	$	2	$	12,580
Unused lines of credit		0		42
Total	$	2	$	12,622

At March 31, 2012, troubled debt restructured loans on accruing status decreased $16.8 million compared to December 31, 2011 and commitments related to troubled debt restructured loans decreased $12.6 million for the same period. These decreases are primarily a result of the payoff of an $11.3 million loan to a waste management company in Pennsylvania as a result of the sale of the business. In addition, a $2.2 million loan to a retail development company in western Pennsylvania paid off during the first quarter. During 2012, a $42 thousand charge-off was recorded as part of the restructuring for one borrower. The remainder of changes in loan balances for 2012 between the pre-modification balance and the post-modification balance is due to customer payments.

During 2011, the changes between pre-modification balances and post-modification balances are due to customer payments.

28

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

The following tables provide detail, including specific reserve and reasons for modification, related to loans identified as troubled debt restructurings during the three-months ended March 31:

	2012
			Type of Modification
	Number of Contracts		Extend Maturity		Modify Rate		Modify Payments		Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Specific Reserve
									(dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate		2	$	0	$	97	$	0	$	97	$	53	$	0

	2011
			Type of Modification
	Number of Contracts		Extend Maturity		Modify Rate		Modify Payments		Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Specific Reserve
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		9	$	100	$	105	$	2,168	$	2,373	$	2,372	$	708
Real estate construction		3		354		0		0		354		364		18
Residential real estate		1		0		12		0		12		12		0
Commercial real estate		11		7,130		199		648		7,977		7,972		1,554
Total		24	$	7,584	$	316	$	2,816	$	10,716	$	10,720	$	2,280

The troubled debt restructurings included in the above tables are also included in the impaired loan tables provided earlier in this footnote. Loans defined as modified due to a change in rate include loans that were modified for a change in rate as well as a reamortization of the principal and an extension of the maturity. For the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of total rate modifications represent loans with modifications to the rate as well as payment due to reamortization.

29

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

A troubled debt restructuring is considered to be in default when a restructured loan is 90 days or more past due. The following restructured loans were considered to default during the three-months ended March 31:

	2012				2011
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		0	$	0		1	$	150
Real estate construction		0		0		1		88
Residential real estate		0		0		0		0
Commercial real estate		2		980		0		0
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0
Total		2	$	980		2	$	238

The following tables provide detail related to the allowance for credit losses:

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other			Real estate construction			Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Loans to individuals			Unallocated		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	18,200		$	6,756		$	8,237		$	18,961		$	4,244		$	4,836	$	61,234
Charge-offs		(1,914	)		(190	)		(1,712	)		(235	)		(941	)		0		(4,992	)
Recoveries		238			56			133			158			118			0		703
Provision		1,619			(195	)		44			487			831			1,001		3,787
Ending Balance	$	18,143		$	6,427		$	6,702		$	19,371		$	4,252		$	5,837	$	60,732
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired	$	7,555		$	2,891		$	553		$	921		$	0		$	0	$	11,920
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		10,588			3,536			6,149			18,450			4,252			5,837		48,812
Loans:
Ending balance		1,051,209			64,158			1,174,572			1,264,060			574,589					4,128,588
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired		31,599			13,800			3,217			28,874			0					77,490
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		1,019,610			50,358			1,171,355			1,235,186			574,589					4,051,098

30

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses (Continued)

Impaired Loans (Continued)

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other			Real estate construction			Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Loans to individuals			Unallocated			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	21,700		$	18,002		$	5,454		$	16,913		$	4,215		$	4,945		$	71,229
Charge-offs		(960	)		(4,999	)		(1,104	)		(766	)		(779	)		0			(8,608	)
Recoveries		104			0			19			76			155			0			354
Provision		1,592			5,776			2,313			3,951			270			(85	)		13,817
Ending Balance	$	22,436		$	18,779		$	6,682		$	20,174		$	3,861		$	4,860		$	76,792
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired	$	8,280		$	14,168		$	2		$	9,915		$	0		$	0		$	32,365
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		14,156			4,611			6,680			10,259			3,861			4,860			44,427
Loans:
Ending balance		906,824			184,904			1,102,459			1,336,903			543,180						4,074,270
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired		29,165			45,915			946			60,941			0						136,967
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		877,659			138,989			1,101,513			1,275,962			543,180						3,937,303

Note 11 Income Taxes

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, First Commonwealth had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. If applicable, First Commonwealth will record interest and penalties as a component of noninterest expense. Federal and state tax years 2008 through 2011 were open for examination as of March 31, 2012.

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” requires disclosures for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). All non-financial assets are included either as a separate line item on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition or in the “Other assets” category of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Currently, First Commonwealth does not have any non-financial liabilities to disclose.

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments” permits entities to irrevocably elect to measure select financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The unrealized gains and losses are required to be included in earnings each reporting period for the items that fair value measurement is elected. First Commonwealth has

31

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

elected not to measure any existing financial instruments at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825; however, in the future we may elect to adopt this guidance for select financial instruments.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, First Commonwealth groups financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the principal markets in which the assets and liabilities are transacted and the observability of the data points used to determine fair value. These levels are:

• Level 1 – Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 securities include equity holdings comprised of publicly traded bank stocks which were priced using quoted market prices.

• Level 2 – Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained for identical or comparable assets or liabilities from alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Level 2 includes Obligations of U.S. Government securities issued by Agencies and Sponsored Enterprises, Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, certain corporate securities, certain equity securities, FHLB stock, interest rate derivatives that include interest rate swaps and risk participation agreements, certain other real estate owned and certain impaired loans.

Level 2 investment securities are valued by a recognized third party pricing service using observable inputs. The model used by the pricing service varies by asset class and incorporates available market, trade and bid information as well as cash flow information when applicable. Because many fixed-income investment securities do not trade on a daily basis, the model uses available information such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like investment securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. The model will also use processes such as an option adjusted spread to assess the impact of interest rates and to develop prepayment estimates. Market inputs normally used in the pricing model include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications.

Management validates the market values provided by the third party service by having another recognized pricing service price a random sample of securities each quarter, monthly monitoring of variances from prior period pricing and, on a monthly basis, evaluating pricing changes compared to expectations based on changes in the financial markets.

The equity investments included in Level 2 are based on broker prices and are included in Level 2 because they are not traded on an active exchange market.

Other investments are comprised of FHLB stock whose fair value is based on its par value. Additional information on FHLB stock is provided in Note 8, “Other Investments.”

Interest rate derivatives are reported at an estimated fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs and are included in other assets and other liabilities and consist of interest rate swaps where there is no significant deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit risk since origination of the interest rate swap. First Commonwealth values its interest rate swap positions using a yield curve by taking market prices/rates for an appropriate set of

32

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

instruments. The set of instruments currently used to determine the U.S. Dollar yield curve includes cash LIBOR rates from overnight to three months, Eurodollar futures contracts and swap rates from three years to thirty years. These yield curves determine the valuations of interest rate swaps. Interest rate derivatives are further described in Note 13, “Derivatives.”

For purposes of potential valuation adjustments to our derivative positions, First Commonwealth evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties as well as our own credit risk. Accordingly, we have considered factors such as the likelihood of default, expected loss given default, net exposures and remaining contractual life, among other things, in determining if any fair value adjustments related to credit risk are required. We review our counterparty exposure quarterly, and when necessary, appropriate adjustments are made to reflect the exposure.

We also utilize this approach to estimate our own credit risk on derivative liability positions. In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparty’s inability to pay any net uncollateralized position.

The fair value for other real estate owned included in Level 2 is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less costs to sell or an executed sales agreement.

• Level 3 – Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. If the inputs used to provide the valuation are unobservable and/or there is very little, if any, market activity for the security or similar securities, the securities would be considered Level 3 securities. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. The assets included in Level 3 are pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, non-marketable equity investments, loans held for sale and certain interest rate derivatives.

Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are collateralized by the trust preferred securities of individual banks, thrifts and bank holding companies in the U.S. There has been little or no active trading in these securities since 2009; therefore it was more appropriate to determine fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis. Detail on our process for determining the appropriate cash flows for this analysis is provided in Note 9, “Impairment of Investment Securities.” The discount rate applied to the cash flows is determined by evaluating the current market yields for comparable corporate and structured credit products along with an evaluation of the risks associated with the cash flows of the comparable security. Due to the fact that there is no active market for the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, one key reference point is the market yield for the single issue trust preferred securities issued by banks and thrifts for which there is more activity than for the pooled securities. Adjustments are then made to reflect the credit and structural differences between these two security types.

Management validates the fair value of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations by monitoring the performance of the underlying collateral, discussing the discount rate, cash flow assumptions and general market trends with the specialized third party and confirming changes in the underlying collateral to the trustee reports. Management’s monitoring of the underlying collateral includes deferrals of interest payments, payment defaults, cures of previously deferred interest payments, any regulatory filings or actions and general news

33

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

related to the underlying collateral. Management also evaluates fair value changes compared to expectations based on changes in the interest rates used in determining the discount rate and general financial markets.

The estimated fair value of the non-marketable equity investments included in level 3 is based on par value.

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value with the fair value being the expected sales price of the loan. The estimated fair value of the loans currently held for sale was determined by calculating the discounted expected future cash flows of the loan. The discount rate applied to the future cash flows was determined based on a risk based expected return and capital structure of potential buyers. If a sales agreement has been executed, the fair value is equal to the sales price.

For interest rate derivatives included in Level 3, the fair value incorporates credit risk by considering such factors as likelihood of default and expected loss given default based on the credit quality of the underlying counterparties (loan customers).

In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparty’s inability to pay any net uncollateralized position. However, as the result of deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit quality for certain interest rate derivatives, future amounts previously believed to be collectible under the terms of the interest rate derivative have now been deemed to be uncollectible.

In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides information related to quantitative inputs and assumptions used in Level 3 fair value measurements.

	Fair Value (in thousands)	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range/ (weighted average)
Pooled Trust Preferred Securities	$24,508	Discounted Cash Flow	Probability of default		0% -100% - (35.23%)
			Prepayment rates		0% - 100% (10.51%)
			Discount rates		6.75% - 20%(a)
Loans Held for Sale	$ 3,959(b)	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate		16%(c)
Other Investments	$1,420	Par Value	N/A		N/A
Interest Rate Swap	$0	Option model	Counterparty credit risk		62.80% - 197.43%(d)
Impaired Loans	$ 20,157(e)	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate		8.42% - 21%
Other Real Estate Owned	$596	Internal Valuation	N/A		N/A

(a) incorporates premium related to credit quality and illiquidity of securities.

(b) the remainder of the balance of loans held for sale is not included in this disclosure as that balance represents loans valued at cost, which is lower than fair value.

(c) incorporates premium related to credit quality of loans.

(d) represents the range of the credit spread curve used in valuation.

(e) the remainder of impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs are not included in this disclosure as the values of those loans are based on bankruptcy agreement documentation.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of pooled trust preferred securities are the probability of default, discount rates and prepayment rates. Significant increases in the probability of default or

34

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

discount rate used would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of these securities while decreases in these variables would result in higher fair value measurements. In general, a change in the assumption of probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the discount rate. In most cases, increases in the prepayment rate assumptions would result in a higher estimated fair value for these securities while decreases would provide for a lower value. The direction of this change is somewhat dependent on the structure of the investment and the amount of the investment tranches senior to our position.

The discount rate is the significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of loans held for sale and impaired loans. Significant increases in this rate would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the loans, while a decrease in this rate would result in higher fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of interest rate swaps classified as Level 3 is counterparty credit risk and the resulting range of the credit spread curve used in the valuation. Higher credit risk would result in an increased credit spread, which would reduce the fair value of the interest rate swap.

The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	0	$	36,008	$	0	$	36,008
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		0		863,484		0		863,484
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		0		186		0		186
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		0		268,526		0		268,526
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		0		454		0		454
Corporate Securities		0		11,917		0		11,917
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0		24,508		24,508
Total Debt Securities		0		1,180,575		24,508		1,205,083
Equities		440		0		1,420		1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale		440		1,180,575		25,928		1,206,943
Other Investments		0		37,806		0		37,806
Loans Held for Sale		0		0		8,076		8,076
Other Assets (a)		0		15,303		0		15,303
Total Assets	$	440	$	1,233,684	$	34,004	$	1,268,128
Other Liabilities (a)	$	0	$	17,686	$	0	$	17,686
Total Liabilities	$	0	$	17,686	$	0	$	17,686

(a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives

35

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	0	$	36,194	$	0	$	36,194
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		0		801,031		0		801,031
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		0		193		0		193
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		0		268,648		0		268,648
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		0		459		0		459
Corporate Securities		0		11,411		0		11,411
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0		22,980		22,980
Total Debt Securities		0		1,117,936		22,980		1,140,916
Equities		440		0		1,420		1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale		440		1,117,936		24,400		1,142,776
Other Investments		0		39,796		0		39,796
Loans Held for Sale		0		0		13,412		13,412
Other Assets (a)		0		16,064		0		16,064
Total Assets	$	440	$	1,173,796	$	37,812	$	1,212,048
Other Liabilities (a)	$	0	$	18,986	$	0	$	18,986
Total Liabilities	$	0	$	18,986	$	0	$	18,986

(a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives

For the three-month periods ended March 31, changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

	2012
	Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations			Equities		Loans Held for Sale			Other Assets			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	22,980		$	1,420	$	13,412		$	0		$	37,812
Total gains or losses
Included in earnings		0			0		1,768			(461	)		1,307
Included in other comprehensive income		2,268			0		0			0			2,268
Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements
Purchases		0			0		0			0			0
Issuances		0			0		0			0			0
Sales		0			0		(6,809	)		0			(6,809	)
Settlements		(740	)		0		(295	)		0			(1,035	)
Transfers into Level 3		0			0		0			461			461
Balance, end of period	$	24,508		$	1,420	$	8,076		$	0			34,004

36

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

	2011
	Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions			Corporate Securities			Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations			Equities		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	343		$	21,376		$	26,352		$	1,570	$	49,641
Total gains or losses
Included in earnings		4			314			0			0		318
Included in other comprehensive income		(20	)		(175	)		2,122			0		1,927
Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements
Purchases		0			0			0			0		0
Issuances		0			0			0			0		0
Sales		(327	)		(6,700	)		0			0		(7,027	)
Settlements		0			0			(809	)		0		(809	)
Transfers from Level 3		0			0			0			0		0
Balance, end of period	$	0		$	14,815		$	27,665		$	1,570	$	44,050

For the three-months ended March 31, 2012, there were no transfers between fair value Levels 1 and 2. However, $0.5 million of interest rate swaps were transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 due to deterioration of the counterparty’s credit risk. Because the credit quality of the underlying counterparty declined below investment grade, the swaps were valued utilizing more than interest rate yield curves. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. There were no gains or losses included in earnings for the periods presented that are attributable to the change in realized gains (losses) relating to assets held at March 31, 2012 and 2011.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at:

	March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	0	$	44,112	$	25,545	$	69,657
Other real estate owned		0		21,398		596		21,994
Total Assets	$	0	$	65,510	$	26,141	$	91,651

	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	0	$	73,783	$	26,349	$	100,132
Other real estate owned		0		31,232		438		31,670
Total Assets	$	0	$	105,015	$	26,787	$	131,802

37

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

The following losses were realized on the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Impaired loans	$	(376	)	$	(13,261	)
Other real estate owned		(2,909	)		0
Total losses	$	(3,285	)	$	(13,261	)

Impaired loans over $0.1 million are individually reviewed to determine the amount of each loan considered to be at risk of non-collection. The fair value for impaired loans that are collateral based is determined by reviewing real property appraisals, equipment valuations, accounts receivable listings and other financial information. A discounted cash flow analysis is performed to determine fair value for impaired loans when an observable market price or a current appraisal is not available. First Commonwealth’s loan policy requires updated appraisals be obtained at least every twelve months on all impaired loans with balances of $250 thousand and over.

The fair value for other real estate owned is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less costs to sell or an executed sales agreement and is classified as Level 2. Other real estate owned has a book cost of $21.3 million as of March 31, 2012 and consisted primarily of a manufacturing plant in northern Pennsylvania, residential real estate in eastern Pennsylvania and a hotel/resort in Illinois. During the first quarter of 2012, the sale of an office building in western Pennsylvania which was previously in OREO for $6.8 million was completed and resulted in a $0.3 million loss at the time of sale. We review whether events and circumstances subsequent to a transfer to other real estate owned have occurred that indicate the balance of those assets may not be recoverable. If events and circumstances indicate further impairment we will record a charge to the extent that the carrying value of the assets exceed their fair values, less cost to sell, as determined by valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances.

Certain other assets and liabilities, including goodwill and core deposit intangibles, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. Additional information related to goodwill is provided in Note 14, “Goodwill.” There were no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three-months ended March 31, 2012.

FASB ASC 825-10, “Transition Related to FSP FAS 107-1” and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are as discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below.

Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank deposits: The carrying amounts for cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank deposits approximate the estimated fair values of such assets.

38

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

Securities: Fair values for securities available for sale are based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. Pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations values are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. These valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to each instrument. The carrying value of other investments, which includes FHLB stock, is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated utilizing a present value of future discounted cash flows of the loan utilizing a risk based expected return to discount the value unless a sales agreement has been executed, in which case the sales price would equal fair value.

Loans: The fair values of all loans are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality adjusted for past due and nonperforming loans, which is not an exit price under FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

Off-balance sheet instruments: Many of First Commonwealth’s off-balance sheet instruments, primarily loan commitments and standby letters of credit, are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. FASB ASC Topic 460, “Guarantees” clarified that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The carrying amount and fair value for standby letters of credit was $0.2 million at March 31, 2012 and $0.1 million at December 31, 2011. See Note 6, “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities,” for additional information.

Deposit liabilities: Management estimates that the fair value of deposits is based on a market valuation of similar deposits. The carrying value of variable rate time deposit accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the report date. Also, fair values of fixed rate time deposits for both periods are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using interest rates currently being offered and a schedule of aggregated expected maturities.

Short-term borrowings: The fair values of borrowings from the FHLB were estimated based on the estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowings. The carrying amounts of other short-term borrowings such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase were used to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the borrowings.

Long-term debt and subordinated debt: The fair value of long-term debt and subordinated debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using First Commonwealth’s estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

39

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

The following table presents carrying amounts and fair values of First Commonwealth’s financial instruments:

	March 31, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	74,889	$	74,889	$	74,889	$	0	$	0
Interest-bearing deposits		6,663		6,663		6,663		0		0
Securities available for sale		1,206,943		1,206,943		440		1,180,575		25,928
Other investments		37,806		37,806		0		37,806		0
Loans held for sale		8,076		9,231		0		5,272		3,959
Loans		4,128,588		4,198,278		0		44,112		4,154,166
Financial liabilities
Deposits		4,633,831		4,577,192		0		4,577,192		0
Short-term borrowings		309,373		309,368		0		309,368		0
Long-term debt		101,018		103,470		0		103,470		0
Subordinated debt		105,750		76,812		0		0		76,812

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	74,967	$	74,967
Interest-bearing deposits		3,511		3,511
Securities available for sale		1,142,776		1,142,776
Other investments		39,796		39,796
Loans held for sale		13,412		13,412
Loans		4,043,643		4,113,525
Financial liabilities
Deposits		4,504,684		4,452,235
Short-term borrowings		312,777		312,777
Long-term debt		101,664		103,749
Subordinated debt		105,750		75,310

Note 13 Derivatives

First Commonwealth is a party to interest rate derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivatives relate to interest rate swaps that First Commonwealth enters into with customers to allow customers to convert variable rate loans to a fixed rate. First Commonwealth pays interest to the customer at a floating rate on the notional amount and receives interest from the customer at a fixed rate for the same notional amount. At

40

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 13 Derivatives (Continued)

the same time the interest rate swap is entered into with the customer, an offsetting interest rate swap is entered into with another financial institution. First Commonwealth pays the other financial institution interest at the same fixed rate on the same notional amount as the swap entered into with the customer, and receives interest from the financial institution for the same floating rate on the same notional amount. The changes in the fair value of the swaps offset each other, except for the credit risk of the counterparties, which is determined by taking into consideration the risk rating, probability of default and loss of given default for all counterparties.

We have nine risk participation agreements with financial institution counterparties for interest rate swaps related to loans in which we are a participant. The risk participation agreements provide credit protection to the financial institution should the borrower fail to perform on its interest rate derivative contract with the financial institution.

The fee received, less the estimate of the loss for the credit exposure, was recognized in earnings at the time of the transaction.

The following table depicts the credit value adjustment recorded related to the notional amount of derivatives outstanding as well as the notional amount of risk participation agreements participated to other banks:

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Credit value adjustment	$	(2,356	)	$	(2,963	)
Notional Amount:
Interest rate derivatives		176,106			187,368
Risk participation agreements		146,166			128,098
Sold credit protection on risk participation agreements		(22,049	)		(22,147	)

The table below presents the amount representing the change in the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities attributable to credit risk included in other income on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Non-hedging interest rate derivatives:
Increase in other income	$	606	$	209

During 2012, total credit risk income of $0.9 million was recognized, offset by $0.3 million in expense relates to three interest rate swaps that were downgraded during the first quarter to a below investment grade rating. As a result of the deterioration of credit risk related to the counterparty, a larger mark-to-market adjustment was recorded. The fair value of our derivatives is included in a table in Note 12 “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities,” in the line items other assets and other liabilities.

Note 14 Goodwill

FASB ASC Topic 350-20, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” requires an annual valuation of the fair value of a reporting unit that has goodwill and a comparison of the fair value to the book value of equity to determine whether the goodwill has been impaired. Goodwill is also required to be tested on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has been incurred. When triggering

41

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

(Unaudited) (Continued)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14 Goodwill (Continued)

events or circumstances indicate goodwill testing is required, an assessment of qualitative factors can be completed before performing the two step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 provides that if an assessment of qualitative factors determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then the two step goodwill impairment test is not required.

First Commonwealth is considered to be one reporting unit. The carrying amount of goodwill as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $159.9 million. No impairment charges on goodwill or other intangible assets were incurred in 2012 or 2011.

We test goodwill for impairment as of November 30th each year and again at any quarter-end if any material events occur during a quarter that may affect goodwill. An assessment of qualitative factors was completed as of March 31, 2012 and indicated that it is more likely than not that the fair value of First Commonwealth exceeds its carrying amount, therefore the two step goodwill impairment test was not considered necessary. The assessment of qualitative factors incorporated the results of the step 2 goodwill impairment test completed as of December 31, 2011 as well as macroeconomic factors, industry and market considerations, the company’s overall financial performance, and other company specific events occurring during the first quarter of 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, goodwill was not considered impaired; however, changing economic conditions that may adversely affect our performance, fair value of our assets and liabilities, or stock price could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods. Management will continue to monitor events that could impact this conclusion in the future.

42

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and the related financial data are presented to assist in the understanding and evaluation of the consolidated financial condition and the results of operations of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation including its subsidiaries (“First Commonwealth”) for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-Q.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to our anticipated future financial performance, projected growth and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations and financial condition from developments or events, our business and growth strategies.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, and could be affected by many factors. The following list, which is not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties affecting us, summarizes several factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or expected in these forward-looking statements:

• continued weakness in economic and business conditions, both nationally and in our markets, which could cause deterioration in credit quality, a further reduction in demand for credit and/or a further decline in real estate values;

• further declines in the market value of investment securities that are considered to be other-than-temporary, which would negatively impact our earnings and capital levels;

• increases in defaults by borrowers and other delinquencies, which could result in increases in our provision for credit losses and related expenses;

• fluctuations in interest rates and market prices, which could reduce our net interest margin and asset valuations and increase our expenses;

• further declines in the valuations of real estate, which could negatively affect the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of collateral securing our loans;

• the assumptions used in calculating the appropriate amount to be placed into our allowance for credit losses may prove to be inaccurate;

• restrictions or conditions imposed by our regulators on our operations may make it more difficult for us to achieve our goals;

• legislative and regulatory changes, including the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related regulations, subject us to additional regulatory oversight which may result in increased compliance costs and/or require us to change our business model;

• changes in accounting standards and compliance requirements may have an adverse affect on our operating results and financial condition;

43

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Forward-Looking Statements (Continued)

• competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions, some of whom may have greater financial resources or more attractive product or service offerings, may adversely affect growth or profitability of our products and services; and

• other risks and uncertainties described in this report and in the other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements in this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Explanation of Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measure

In addition to the results of operations presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), First Commonwealth management uses, and this quarterly report contains or references, certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis. We believe this non-GAAP financial measure provides information useful to investors in understanding our underlying operational performance and our business and performance trends as it facilitates comparison with the performance of others in the financial services industry. Although we believe that this non-GAAP financial measure enhances investors’ understanding of our business and performance, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered an alternative to GAAP.

We believe the presentation of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources and is consistent with industry practice. Interest income per the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income is reconciled to net interest income adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent basis on page 45 for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Results of Operations

Net Income

For the three-months ended March 31, 2012, First Commonwealth had net income of $11.1 million, or $0.11 per share, compared to net income of $5.2 million or $0.05 per share in the three-months ended March 31, 2011. The increase in net income is primarily the result of a lower provision for credit losses and higher gains recognized on the sale of assets offset by losses recognized on the sale or write-down of assets.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was $49.4 million in the first quarter of 2012, which is consistent with the same period in 2011. Net interest income comprises a majority of our operating revenue (net interest income before the provision plus noninterest income) at 73% and 77% for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 3.75% for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 compared to 3.87% for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. The net interest margin is affected by both changes in the level of interest rates and the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The taxable equivalent yield on interest-earning assets was 4.39% for the three-months ended March 31, 2012, a decrease of 38 basis points from the 4.77% for the same period in 2011. This decline can be attributed to the repricing of our variable rate assets in a declining rate environment as well as lower interest rates available on new investments and loans. Reductions in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities partially offset the impact of lower yields on interest-earning assets. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was .79% for the three

44

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Net Interest Income (Continued)

months ended March 31, 2012, compared to 1.10% for the same period in 2011. Also, impacting the net interest margin in the first quarter of 2012 was the recognition of $1.0 million in interest income related to the payoff of a loan that was previously in nonaccrual status. This contributed 8 basis points to the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Comparing the three months ended March 31, 2012 with the same period in 2011, changes in interest rates negatively impacted net interest income by $1.6 million. The lower yield on interest-earning assets adversely impacted net interest income by $3.9 million, while the decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities had a positive impact of $2.3 million. We have been able to partially mitigate the impact of lower interest rates and the effect on net interest income through improving the mix of deposit and borrowed funds, disciplined pricing strategies and increasing our investment volumes within established interest rate risk management guidelines.

While decreases in interest rates and yields compressed the interest rate margin, increases in average interest-earning assets and low cost average interest-bearing liabilities neutralized the effect on net interest income. Changes in the volumes of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities positively impacted net interest income by $1.5 million in the three-months ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Higher levels of interest-earning assets resulted in an increase of $0.7 million in interest income, while volume changes primarily attributed to the mix of deposits reduced interest expense by $0.8 million

Positively affecting net interest income was a $74.9 million increase in average net free funds at March 31, 2012 as compared to March 31, 2011. Average net free funds are the excess of noninterest-bearing demand deposits, other noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders’ equity over noninterest-earning assets. The largest component of the increase in net free funds was an increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposit average balances as a result of marketing promotions aimed at attracting new and retaining existing customers.

The following table reconciles interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income to net interest income adjusted to a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest income per Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	$	56,616	$	59,469
Adjustment to fully taxable equivalent basis		1,217		1,530
Interest income adjusted to fully taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP)		57,833		60,999
Interest expense		8,446		11,600
Net interest income adjusted to fully taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP)	$	49,387	$	49,399

45

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Net Interest Income (Continued)

The following is an analysis of the average balance sheets and net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012								2011
	Average Balance			Income/ Expense (a)		Yield or Rate			Average Balance			Income/ Expense (a)		Yield or Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	$	3,776		$	1		0.11	%	$	11,163		$	9		0.34	%
Tax-free investment securities		457			8		7.04			17,358			286		6.69
Taxable investment securities		1,178,774			8,570		2.92			983,352			8,391		3.46
Loans, net of unearned income (b)(c)		4,115,483			49,254		4.81			4,171,083			52,313		5.09
Total interest-earning assets		5,298,490			57,833		4.39			5,182,956			60,999		4.77
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash		73,673								73,902
Allowance for credit losses		(64,458	)							(76,030	)
Other assets		593,648								591,216
Total noninterest-earning assets		602,863								589,088
Total Assets	$	5,901,353							$	5,772,044
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits (d)	$	624,519		$	96		0.06	%	$	585,820		$	134		0.09	%
Savings deposits (d)		1,951,740			1,305		0.27			1,866,142			1,966		0.43
Time deposits		1,203,668			4,846		1.62			1,471,492			7,436		2.05
Short-term borrowings		334,454			227		0.27			172,440			185		0.43
Long-term debt		207,338			1,972		3.83			185,142			1,879		4.12
Total interest-bearing liabilities		4,321,719			8,446		0.79			4,281,036			11,600		1.10
Noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits (d)		764,667								687,041
Other liabilities		50,312								48,587
Shareholders' equity		764,655								755,380
Total noninterest-bearing funding sources		1,579,634								1,491,008
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	5,901,353							$	5,772,044
Net Interest Income and Net Yield on Interest-Earning Assets				$	49,387		3.75	%				$	49,399		3.87	%

(a) Income on interest-earning assets has been computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the 35% federal income tax statutory rate.

(b) Income on nonaccrual loans is accounted for on the cash basis, and the loan balances are included in interest-earning assets.

(c) Loan income includes loan fees earned.

(d) Average balances do not include reallocations from noninterest-bearing demand deposits and interest-bearing demand deposits into savings deposits, which were made for regulatory purposes.

46

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Net Interest Income (Continued)

The following table shows the effect of changes in volumes and rates on interest income and interest expense for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 compared with March 31, 2011:

	Analysis of Year-to-Year Changes in Net Interest  Income
	Total Change			Change Due To Volume			Change Due To Rate (a)
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	$	(8	)	$	(6	)	$	(2	)
Tax-free investment securities		(278	)		(279	)		1
Taxable investment securities		179			1,667			(1,488	)
Loans		(3,059	)		(698	)		(2,361	)
Total interest income (b)		(3,166	)		684			(3,850	)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(38	)		9			(47	)
Savings deposits		(661	)		91			(752	)
Time deposits		(2,590	)		(1,354	)		(1,236	)
Short-term borrowings		42			172			(130	)
Long-term debt		93			225			(132	)
Total interest expense		(3,154	)		(857	)		(2,297	)
Net interest income	$	(12	)	$	1,541		$	(1,553	)

(a) Changes in interest income or expense not arising solely as a result of volume or rate variances are allocated to rate variances.

(b) Changes in interest income have been computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis using the 35% federal income tax statutory rate.

Provision for Credit Losses

The provision for credit losses is determined based on management’s estimates of the appropriate level of allowance for credit losses needed to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, after giving consideration to charge-offs and recoveries for the period. The provision for credit losses is an amount added to the allowance against which credit losses are charged.

47

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Provision for Credit Losses (Continued)

The table below provides a breakout of the provision for credit losses by loan category for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012						2011
	Dollars			Percentage			Dollars			Percentage
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,619			43	%	$	1,592			11	%
Real estate construction		(195	)		(5	)		5,776			42
Residential real estate		44			1			2,313			17
Commercial real estate		487			13			3,951			29
Loans to individuals		831			22			270			2
Unallocated		1,001			26			(85	)		(1	)
Total	$	3,787			100	%	$	13,817			100	%

The provision for credit losses for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 decreased in comparison to the three-months ended March 31, 2011, by $10.0 million or 73%. The provision for credit losses for the three-months ended March 31, 2012, was slightly less than the $4.3 million in net credit losses for the period, primarily due to a $15.0 million, or 8%, decline in classified loans compared to December 31, 2011 and a $1.3 million decrease in the amount of specific reserves on impaired loans compared to December 31, 2011.

During the three-months ended March 31, 2012, there was no significant provision for credit losses related to any individual loan or loan category. The $1.0 million unallocated provision for credit losses is a result of management’s analysis of certain qualitative factors impacting the reserve for credit losses. This analysis included factors related to portfolio risk, economic conditions and recent industry underwriting trends.

The allowance for credit losses was $60.7 million, or 1.47% of total loans outstanding at March 31, 2012, compared to $61.2 million, or 1.51% at December 31, 2011 and $76.8 million, or 1.88% at March 31, 2011. The decline from 1.88% at March 31, 2011, can be attributed to a $235.8 million, or 47%, decline in criticized loans. Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans decreased to 2.17% at March 31, 2012 from 2.76% at December 31, 2011 and 3.45% as of March 31, 2011. The allowance to nonperforming loans is 74%, 62% and 55% as of March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Improvement in these ratios contributed to the lower level of provision for credit losses for the three-months ended March 31, 2012.

Net credit losses were $4.3 million in the three-months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $8.3 million for the same period in 2011. The most significant credit loss recognized during the quarter was a $1.2 million partial charge-off of a commercial, financial, agricultural and other loan relationship. Net credit losses during the three-month period did not include any other significant individual charge-offs.

48

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Provision for Credit Losses(Continued)

Below is an analysis of the consolidated allowance for credit losses for the three-months ended:

	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
	2012			2011			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	61,234	(a)	$	72,117	(a)	$	71,229	(a)
Loans charged off:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		1,914			3,472			960
Real estate construction		190			14,316			4,999
Residential real estate		1,712			1,421			1,104
Commercial real estate		235			17,943			766
Loans to individuals		941			993			779
Total loans charged off		4,992			38,145			8,608
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		238			138			104
Real estate construction		56			955			0
Residential real estate		133			14			19
Commercial real estate		158			110			76
Loans to individuals		118			133			155
Total recoveries		703			1,350			354
Net credit losses		4,289			36,795			8,254
Provision charged to expense		3,787			25,912			13,817
Balance, end of period	$	60,732		$	61,234		$	76,792

(a) The balance at the beginning of the period represents December 31, 2011, September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

49

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Noninterest Income

The following table presents the components of noninterest income for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011		$ Change			% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest Income:
Trust income	$	1,542	$	1,718	$	(176	)		(10	)%
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,502		3,426		76			2
Insurance and retail brokerage commissions		1,424		1,562		(138	)		(9	)
Income from bank owned life insurance		1,445		1,357		88			6
Income from other real estate owned		964		0		964			—
Card related interchange income		3,114		2,800		314			11
Other income		3,274		2,657		617			23
Subtotal		15,265		13,520		1,745			13
Net securities gain		0		577		(577	)		(100	)
Gain on sale of assets		2,115		231		1,884			816
Total noninterest income	$	17,380	$	14,328	$	3,052			21	%

Noninterest income, excluding net securities gains and gains on sale of assets increased $1.7 million or 13% for the first quarter of 2012 compared to 2011. The most notable change is the income from other real estate owned which includes rental income received from a western Pennsylvania office complex foreclosed on at the end of the first quarter of 2011. This property was sold in March 2012. In addition, other income increased $0.6 million compared to the prior period. This increase can be attributed to $0.6 million in derivative mark-to-market income recorded and $0.4 million in fees recognized for interest rate swaps originated this quarter.

Total noninterest income increased $3.1 million in comparison to the three-months ended March 31, 2011. The most significant change in noninterest income was the increase in gain on sale of assets of $1.9 million. This increase is primarily the result of the sale of a loan that was transferred to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2011. The sale of this loan was completed in March 2012 resulting in a $1.7 million gain.

50

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Noninterest Expense

The following table presents the components of noninterest expense for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011			$ Change			% Change
	(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	21,758	$	21,128		$	630			3	%
Net occupancy expense		3,404		3,732			(328	)		(9	)
Furniture and equipment expense		3,184		3,180			4			0
Data processing expense		1,563		1,424			139			10
Pennsylvania shares tax expense		1,183		1,178			5			0
Intangible amortization		371		390			(19	)		(5	)
Collection and repossession expense		2,699		1,316			1,383			105
Other professional fees and services		1,199		1,125			74			7
FDIC Insurance		1,237		1,835			(598	)		(33	)
Unfunded commitment reserve		913		(357	)		1,270			356
Other operating expenses		5,952		6,177			(225	)		(4	)
Subtotal		43,463		41,128			2,335			6
Loss on sale or write-down of assets		3,289		301			2,988			993
Total noninterest expense	$	46,752	$	41,429		$	5,323			13	%

The 2012 increase in noninterest expense is largely attributable to expenses incurred to resolve several problem commercial credits. Compared to the first quarter of 2011, credit collection costs increased $1.4 million, the reserve for unfunded commitment reserves increased $1.3 million and loss on sale or write-down of assets increased $3.0 million.

Salary and employee benefits expense reflects an increase compared to the first quarter of 2011 primarily due to normal merit increases, the hiring of additional business development professionals and a higher level of employee incentives as a result of increased loan and deposit volumes. New loans originated during the first quarter of 2012 totaled $421.3 million compared to $163.6 million in the first quarter of 2011. The number of full-time equivalent employees decreased 93 positions from 1,519 at March 31, 2011 to 1,426 at March 31, 2012.

Collection and repossession expense increased when comparing first quarter 2012 to the same period in 2011, primarily as a result of $1.2 million in expenses to maintain one OREO property. This property was sold in March 2012. Also, during the three-months ended March 31, 2012, legal and consulting expenses increased as a result of our continuous efforts to resolve problem credits.

FDIC insurance expense decreased due to changes made by the FDIC in the calculation of this expense. The FDIC revised its assessment methodology effective April 1, 2011. The revised calculation is based on net assets as opposed to total assets and resulted in favorable effects for us.

51

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Results of Operations (Continued)

Noninterest Expense (Continued)

The unfunded commitment reserve for the period is based on a calculation using outstanding commitments at period end, expected loss and expected usage. During the first quarter of 2012, this expense was impacted by increased commitments and changes in expected utilization rates.

The most significant increase in noninterest expense is the increase on loss on sale or write-down of assets. In March 2012, an updated appraisal was received for one OREO property in central Pennsylvania resulting in a $2.8 million write-down. The previous appraisal on this property was obtained in March 2011.

Income Tax

The provision for income taxes increased $2.3 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the corresponding period in 2011. The higher provision for income taxes was primarily due to the increase in net income before tax of $8.1 million as well as a decrease in tax-exempt income of $0.6 million due to the sale of tax-exempt investment securities during the first quarter of 2011.

We applied the “annual effective tax rate approach” to determine the provision for income taxes, which applies an annual forecast of tax expense as a percentage of expected full year income for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

We generate an annual effective tax rate that is less than the statutory rate of 35% due to benefits resulting from tax-exempt interest, income from bank owned life insurance and tax benefits associated with low income housing tax credits, which are relatively consistent regardless of the level of pretax income. The level of tax benefits that reduce our tax rate below the 35% statutory rate produced an annual effective tax rate of 26.4% and 24.5% for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of March 31, 2012, our deferred tax assets totaled $66.5 million. Based on our evaluation as of March 31, 2012, we determined that it is more likely than not that all of these assets will be realized. As a result, we did not record a valuation allowance against these assets. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we estimate future taxable income based on management approved forecasts, evaluation of historical earning levels and consideration of potential tax strategies. If future events differ from our current forecasts, we may need to establish a valuation allowance, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Liquidity

Liquidity refers to our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers as well as our operating cash needs with cost-effective funding. We generate funds to meet these needs primarily through the core deposit base of First Commonwealth Bank and the maturity or repayment of loans and other interest-earning assets, including investments. During the first three months of 2012, liquidity provided from the $129.2 million increase in deposits and the net decrease of $62.9 million in investment securities provided funds to originate loans. We also have available unused wholesale sources of liquidity, including overnight federal funds and repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB of Pittsburgh, borrowings through the discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) of Cleveland and access to certificates of deposit through brokers.

52

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Liquidity (Continued)

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to meet our financial obligations and operating cash needs or may become overly reliant upon external funding sources. In order to manage this risk, our Board of Directors has established an Asset and Liability Management Policy that identifies primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity and quantifies minimum liquidity requirements based on limits approved by our Board. This policy designates our Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives. The ALCO, which includes members of executive management, reviews liquidity on a periodic basis and approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions. Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by our Treasury Department who monitors liquidity using such measures as liquidity coverage ratios, liquidity gap ratios and noncore funding ratios.

In order to increase and diversify our funding sources, we participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Services (“CDARS”) program as part of an ALCO strategy to increase and diversify funding sources. As of March 31, 2012, our maximum borrowing capacity under this program was $887.1 million and as of that date there was $56.4 million outstanding. We also participate in a reciprocal program which allows our depositors to receive expanded FDIC coverage by placing multiple certificates of deposit at other CDARS member banks. As of March 31, 2012, our outstanding certificates of deposits from this program have an average weighted rate of 0.29% and an average original term of 96 days.

An additional source of liquidity is the FRB Borrower-in-Custody of Collateral program which enables us to pledge certain loans, not being used as collateral at the FHLB, as collateral for borrowings at the FRB. At March 31, 2012, the borrowing capacity under this program totaled $772.5 million and there were no amounts outstanding.

Additionally, as of March 31, 2012, our maximum borrowing capacity at the FHLB of Pittsburgh was $1.2 billion and as of that date amounts used against this capacity included $245.8 million in outstanding borrowings and $15.1 million in letter of credit commitments used for pledging public funds.

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation has an unsecured $15.0 million line of credit with another financial institution and as of March 31, 2012 there are no amounts outstanding on this line. Additionally, we guarantee a $1.1 million ESOP loan. For this loan we are currently not meeting the debt covenant related to return on average assets. We are working with the lender and expect to obtain a waiver or modification for this covenant.

First Commonwealth’s long-term liquidity source is its core deposit base. Core deposits are the most stable source of liquidity a bank can have due to the long-term relationship with a deposit customer. The level of deposits during any period is influenced by factors outside of management’s control, such as the level of short-term and long-term market interest rates and yields offered on competing investments, such as money market mutual funds. During the first three months of 2012, total deposits increased $129.1 million. The following table shows a breakdown of the components of First Commonwealth’s deposits:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	818,896	$	780,377
Interest-bearing demand deposits		122,320		95,945
Savings deposits		2,469,736		2,430,802
Time deposits		1,222,879		1,197,560
Total	$	4,633,831	$	4,504,684

53

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Liquidity (Continued)

At March 31, 2012, noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased by $38.5 million and interest-bearing deposits increased $90.6 million compared to December 31, 2011. The growth in interest-bearing deposits is consistent across deposit types and represents positive results of marketing promotions aimed at attracting new and retaining existing customers.

Market Risk

Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. Our market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is comprised of repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and options risk. Repricing risk arises from differences in the cash flow or repricing between asset and liability portfolios. Basis risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different market rate indices, which do not always change by the same amount. Yield curve risk arises when asset and liability portfolios are related to different maturities on a given yield curve; when the yield curve changes shape, the risk position is altered. Options risk arises from “embedded options” within asset and liability products as certain borrowers have the option to prepay their loans when rates fall, while certain depositors can redeem their certificates early when rates rise.

The process by which we manage our interest rate risk is called asset/liability management. The goals of our asset/liability management are increasing net interest income without taking undue interest rate risk or material loss of net market value of our equity, while maintaining adequate liquidity. Net interest income is increased by widening the interest spread and increasing earning assets. Liquidity is measured by the ability to meet both depositors’ and credit customers’ requirements.

We use an asset/liability model to measure our interest rate risk. Interest rate risk measures include earnings simulation and gap analysis. Gap analysis is a static measure that does not incorporate assumptions regarding future business. Gap analysis, while a helpful diagnostic tool, displays cash flows for only a single rate environment. Net interest income simulations explicitly measure the exposure to earnings from changes in market rates of interest. Our current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding future business to calculate net interest income under various hypothetical rate scenarios. Our net interest income simulations assume a level balance sheet whereby new volumes equal run-offs. The ALCO reviews earnings simulations over multiple years under various interest rate scenarios. Reviewing these various measures provides us with a reasonably comprehensive view of our interest rate profile.

The following gap analysis compares the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities subject to repricing over a period of time. The ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities repricing within a one-year period was 0.75 at March 31, 2012 and 0.76 at December 31, 2011. A ratio of less than one indicates a higher level of repricing liabilities over repricing assets over the next twelve months.

Gap analysis has limitations due to the static nature of the model that holds volumes and consumer behaviors constant in all economic and interest rate scenarios. Rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities repricing in one year would indicate reduced net interest income in a rising interest rate scenario, and conversely, increased net interest income in a declining interest rate scenario. Following is the gap analysis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

54

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Market Risk (Continued)

	March 31, 2012
	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			181-365 Days			Cumulative 0-365 Days			Over 1 Year Through 5 Years			Over 5 Years
	(dollars in thousands)
Loans	$	1,898,801		$	154,370		$	346,379		$	2,399,550		$	1,474,208		$	176,735
Investments		109,762			78,169			196,143			384,074			490,138			364,127
Other interest-earning assets		6,663			0			0			6,663			0			0
Total interest-sensitive assets (ISA)		2,015,226			232,539			542,522			2,790,287			1,964,346			540,862
Certificates of Deposit		265,312			251,887			199,217			716,416			495,937			10,526
Other deposits		2,592,056			0			0			2,592,056			0			0
Borrowings		407,787			149			302			408,238			68,281			39,622
Total interest-sensitive liabilitites (ISL)		3,265,155			252,036			199,519			3,716,710			564,218			50,148
Gap	$	(1,249,929	)	$	(19,497	)	$	343,003		$	(926,423	)	$	1,400,128		$	490,714
ISA/ISL		0.62			0.92			2.72			0.75			3.48			10.79
Gap/Total assets		20.94	%		0.33	%		5.75	%		15.52	%		23.46	%		8.22	%

	December 31, 2011
	0-90 Days			91-180 Days			181-365 Days			Cumulative 0-365 Days			Over 1 Year Through 5 Years			Over 5 Years
	(dollars in thousands)
Loans	$	1,859,623		$	156,447		$	287,873		$	2,303,943		$	1,486,729		$	174,495
Investments		125,112			107,723			205,335			438,170			418,413			320,739
Other interest-earning assets		3,511			0			0			3,511			0			0
Total interest-sensitive assets (ISA)		1,988,246			264,170			493,208			2,745,624			1,905,142			495,234
Certificates of Deposit		154,218			192,154			323,085			669,457			517,572			10,531
Other deposits		2,526,747			0			0			2,526,747			0			0
Borrowings		386,683			25,147			299			412,129			68,334			39,728
Total interest-sensitive liabilitites (ISL)		3,067,648			217,301			323,384			3,608,333			585,906			50,259
Gap	$	(1,079,402	)	$	46,869		$	169,824		$	(862,709	)	$	1,319,236		$	444,975
ISA/ISL		0.65			1.22			1.53			0.76			3.25			9.85
Gap/Total assets		18.48	%		0.80	%		2.91	%		14.77	%		22.59	%		7.62	%

55

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Market Risk (Continued)

The following table presents an analysis of the potential sensitivity of our annual net interest income to gradual changes in interest rates over a 12 month time frame versus if rates remained unchanged utilizing a flat balance sheet.

	Net interest income change (12 months)
	-200			-100			+100		+200
	(dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2012	$	(8,332	)	$	(4,067	)	$	530	$	1,971
December 31, 2011		(7,787	)		(3,997	)		704		2,324

The analysis and model used to quantify the sensitivity of our net interest income becomes less reliable in a decreasing 200 basis point scenario given the current low interest rate environment. Results of the 100 and 200 basis point decline in interest rate scenario are affected by the fact that many of our interest-bearing liabilities are at rates below 1% and therefore cannot decline 100 or 200 basis points, yet our interest-sensitive assets are able to decline by these amounts. In the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities averaged 0.79% and 1.10%, respectively, and the yield on our average interest-earning assets, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, averaged 4.39% and 4.77%, respectively.

The ALCO is responsible for the identification and management of interest rate risk exposure. As such, the ALCO continuously evaluates strategies to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

Asset/liability models require certain assumptions be made, such as prepayment rates on earning assets and pricing impact on non-maturity deposits, which may differ from actual experience. These business assumptions are based upon our experience, business plans and published industry experience. While management believes such assumptions to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that modeled results will approximate actual results.

Credit Risk

First Commonwealth maintains an allowance for credit losses at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the date of each statement of financial condition. Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis to ensure that the provision for credit losses has been charged against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is appropriate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses.

First Commonwealth’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses consists of several key elements. These elements include an assessment of individual impaired loans with a balance greater than $0.1 million, loss experience trends, delinquency and other relevant factors. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of loans, the total allowance is available for all loan losses.

Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and loans classified as troubled debt restructurings. Nonaccrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued. Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternative financing sources. In the first quarter of 2012, one relationship totaling $0.1 million was identified as troubled debt restructuring. Please refer to Note 10 “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses” for additional information on troubled debt restructuring.

56

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Credit Risk (Continued)

We discontinue interest accruals on a loan when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to fully collect principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan. A loan is also placed in nonaccrual status when, based on regulatory definitions, the loan is maintained on a “cash basis” due to the weakened financial condition of the borrower. The bank excludes from nonaccrual status any loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments if they are well secured and in the process of collection.

Nonperforming loans are closely monitored on an ongoing basis as part of our loan review and work-out process. The probable risk of loss on these loans is evaluated by comparing the loan balance to the fair value of any underlying collateral or the present value of projected future cash flows. Losses or specifically assigned allowance for loan losses are recognized where appropriate.

The allowance for credit losses was $60.7 million at March 31, 2012 or 1.47% of total loans outstanding compared to 1.51% reported at December 31, 2011 and 1.88% at March 31, 2011. The stability in the March 31, 2012 ratio when compared to December 31, 2011 can be primarily attributable to a $1.3 million decrease in specific reserves resulting from an $17.2 million decrease in nonperforming loans coupled with $84.9 million in loan growth, particularly in commercial loans. Complementing the decrease in nonaccrual loans is a decrease in other credits measures. The level of criticized loans improved as of March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011, as criticized loans decreased $26.5 million, or 9% and delinquency on accruing loans for the same period declined $10.2 million, or 29%.

The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 74% as of March 31, 2012 compared to 62% at December 31, 2011 and 55% at March 31, 2011. The amount of allowance related to nonperforming loans was determined by using fair values obtained from current appraisals and updated discounted cash flow analyses. The allowance for credit losses includes specific allocations of $11.9 million related to nonperforming loans covering 15% of the total nonperforming balance. Management believes that the allowance for credit losses

57

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Credit Risk (Continued)

is at a level deemed sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio at March 31, 2012.

The following table identifies amounts of loan losses and nonperforming loans and securities:

	March 31,						December 31,
	2012			2011			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming Loans:
Loans on nonaccrual basis	$	36,405		$	94,896		$	33,635
Loans held for sale on a nonaccrual basis		8,076			0			13,412
Troubled debt restructured loans on nonaccrual basis		41,690			33,844			44,841
Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual basis		3,482			11,724			20,276
Total nonperforming loans	$	89,653		$	140,464		$	112,164
Loans past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing	$	8,126		$	15,202		$	11,015
Other real estate owned	$	21,335		$	28,768		$	30,035
Loans outstanding at end of period	$	4,136,664		$	4,074,270		$	4,057,055
Average loans outstanding	$	4,115,483	(a)	$	4,171,083	(a)	$	4,061,822	(b)
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans		2.17	%		3.45	%		2.76	%
Provision for credit losses	$	3,787	(a)	$	13,817	(a)	$	55,816	(b)
Allowance for credit losses	$	60,732		$	76,792		$	61,234
Net charge-offs	$	4,289	(a)	$	8,254	(a)	$	65,811	(b)
Net charge-offs as a percentage of averge loans outstanding (annualized)		0.42	%		0.80	%		1.62	%
Provision for credit losses as a percentage of net charge-offs		88.30	%(a)		167.40	%(a)		84.81	%(b)
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of end-of-period loans outstanding (c)		1.47	%		1.88	%		1.51	%
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (c)		74.45	%		54.67	%		62.01	%
Nonperforming Securities:
Nonaccrual securities at market value	$	0		$	17,214		$	0

(a) For the three-month period ended.

(b) For the twelve-month period ended.

(c) End of period loans and nonperforming loans exclude loans held for sale.

During the first quarter of 2012, accruing troubled debt restructured loans decreased $16.8 million from December 31, 2012. During the first quarter of 2012, an $11.3 million loan to a waste management company in Pennsylvania paid off due to the sale of the business. In addition, a $2.2 million loan to a retail development company in western Pennsylvania paid off during the first quarter.

The nonaccrual securities included in the above table are pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. At June 30, 2011, all of these securities were returned to accrual status because of management’s expectation that all remaining principal and interest will be received. Evidence supporting management’s estimates related to timing and amount of future cash flows include no other-than-temporary impairment charges have been recorded since the third quarter of 2010 and improvement in the underlying collateral of these bonds has occurred, evidenced by a continued decline in new interest payment deferrals and principal defaults as well as an increase in actual cures of deferring collateral.

58

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Credit Risk (Continued)

The following tables show the outstanding balances of our loan portfolio and the breakdown of net charge-offs and nonperforming loans by loan type as of and for the periods presented:

	March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
	Amount		%			Amount		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,051,209		25	%	$	996,739		25	%
Real estate construction		64,158		2			76,564		2
Residential real estate		1,174,572		28			1,137,059		28
Commercial real estate		1,264,060		31			1,267,432		31
Loans to individuals		574,589		14			565,849		14
Total loans and leases net of unearned income	$	4,128,588		100	%	$	4,043,643		100	%

	For the three-months ending March 31, 2012								As of March 31, 2012
	Net Charge-offs		% of Total  Net Charge-offs			Net Charge- offs as a % of Average Loans			Nonperforming Loans (a)		% of Total Nonperforming Loans			Nonperforming Loans as  a % of Total Loans
						(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,676		39.08	%		0.16	%	$	32,421		39.74	%		0.78	%
Real estate construction		134		3.12			0.01			13,951		17.10			0.34
Residential real estate		1,579		36.81			0.16			4,871		5.97			0.12
Commercial real estate		77		1.80			0.01			30,334		37.19			0.73
Loans to individuals		823		19.19			0.08			0		0.00			0.00
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	4,289		100.00	%		0.42	%	$	81,577		100.00	%		1.97	%

(a) Nonperforming loan balances do not include loans held for sale.

As the above table illustrates, three categories of loans – commercial, financial, agricultural and other, real estate construction and commercial real estate – were a significant portion of the nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2012. See discussions related to the provision for credit losses and loans for more information.

Capital Resources

At March 31, 2012, shareholders’ equity was $767.4 million, an increase of $8.8 million from December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily the result of $11.1 million net income offset by $3.1 million of dividends paid to shareholders. Additionally, other comprehensive income increased $1.0 million due to changes in the fair value of available for sale investments and unearned ESOP shares decreased $0.5 million. Cash dividends declared per common share were $0.03 for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

59

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations (Continued)

Capital Resources (Continued)

First Commonwealth is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on First Commonwealth's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, First Commonwealth and its banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of First Commonwealth's assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. First Commonwealth's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require First Commonwealth to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (common and certain other “core” equity capital) to risk weighted assets, and of Tier I capital to average assets. As of March 31, 2012, First Commonwealth and its banking subsidiary met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

The table below presents First Commonwealth’s capital position at March 31, 2012.

	Actual					Regulatory Minimum					Well Capitalized Regulatory
	Capital Amount		Ratio			Capital Amount		Ratio			Capital Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
First Commonwealth Financial Corporation	$	731,105		14.8	%	$	395,921		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
First Commonwealth Bank		699,963		14.2			394,462		8.0		$	493,077		10.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
First Commonwealth Financial Corporation	$	669,226		13.5	%	$	197,960		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
First Commonwealth Bank		638,309		13.0			197,231		4.0		$	295,846		6.0	%
Tier I Capital to Average Assets
First Commonwealth Financial Corporation	$	669,226		11.7	%	$	228,016		4.0	%		N/A		N/A
First Commonwealth Bank		638,309		11.3			226,160		4.0		$	282,700		5.0	%

On April 24, 2012, First Commonwealth Financial Corporation declared a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share payable on May 18, 2012. This dividend represents a 67% increase over the previous quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Whether to increase the dividend level in the future will be dependent on both consistent earnings and continued improvement in economic conditions.

60

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Information appearing in Item 2 of this report under the caption “Market Risk” is incorporated by reference in response to this item.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In addition, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the current fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. No such changes were identified in connection with this evaluation.

61

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
	The information required by this Item is set forth in the “Legal proceedings” section in Part I, Item 1, Note 6 “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” which is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS
	There were no material changes to the risk factors described in Item 1A in First Commonwealth’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011.
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
	None
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
	None
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
	Not applicable
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION
	None

62

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference to
10.1	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2012 among First Commonwealth Financial Corporation, First Commonwealth Bank and T. Michael Price	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012
10.2	Restricted Stock Agreement dated January 1, 2012 between First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and T. Michael Price	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 5, 2012
10.3	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for service-based restricted stock	Filed herewith
10.4	2012 Annual Incentive Plan	Filed herewith
10.5	2012-2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan	Filed herewith
31.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
31.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
101	Interactive Data File (XBRL)	Furnished herewith

63

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Registrant)

DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ T. Michael Price
	T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer
DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ Robert E. Rout
	Robert E. Rout Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

64

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT

This Restricted Stock Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of the      day of                 ,             (the “Effective Date”) between First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and the “Grantee” identified on the signature page of this Agreement. The Restricted Stock awarded pursuant to this Agreement is subject to the terms set forth herein and in all respects are subject to the terms and provisions of the First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) applicable to Restricted Stock, which terms and provisions are incorporated herein by this reference. Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms defined in the Plan shall have the same meanings herein.

1. Award of Stock. The Company hereby grants to the Grantee              shares of Restricted Stock (the “Shares”).

2. Forfeiture of Shares. The Shares are subject to forfeiture to the Company until such time as they become nonforfeitable as set forth below in this Section 2.

(a) All of the Shares will become nonforfeitable on the third anniversary of the Effective Date, provided that the Grantee remains an Employee through such anniversary.

(b) If the Grantee ceases to be an Employee for any reason other than the Grantee’s death or Disability, any Shares which have not as of the termination of Grantee’s employment become nonforfeitable will immediately and automatically be forfeited.

(c) If the Grantee ceases to be an Employee due to the Grantee’s death or Disability, any Shares which have not as of the termination of Grantee’s employment become nonforfeitable will immediately and automatically, without any action on the part of the Company, become nonforfeitable.

Notwithstanding the foregoing schedule, if a Change in Control occurs while the Grantee is an Employee, then any Shares which have not become nonforfeitable will immediately and automatically, without any action on the part of the Company, become nonforfeitable as of the date of the Change in Control.

3. Share Legends. The following legend will be placed on any certificates evidencing all Shares subject to forfeiture in accordance with Section 2, in addition to any other legends that may be required to be placed on such certificates pursuant to applicable law, the Plan or otherwise:

THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN AND A RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SHAREHOLDER NAMED ON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE AND FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION (WHICH TERMS AND

1

CONDITIONS MAY INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, FORFEITURE CONDITIONS AND TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS). A COPY OF THAT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE PRINCIPAL OFFICES OF FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE WITHOUT CHARGE UPON REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION.

Where a book-entry system is used with respect to the issuance of Shares, appropriate notation of such forfeiture possibility and transfer restrictions will be made on the system with respect to the account or accounts to which the Shares are credited.

4. Escrow of Shares.

(a) All Shares issued under this Agreement will be held in escrow by the Secretary of the Company or his or her designee (the “Escrow Holder”) until such Shares cease to be subject to forfeiture in accordance with Section 2, at which time the Escrow Holder will deliver such nonforfeitable Shares to the Grantee; provided, however, that no Shares will be delivered to the Grantee until appropriate arrangements have been made with the Company for the withholding or payment of any taxes that may be due with respect to such Shares.

(b) If any of the Shares are forfeited by the Grantee under Section 2, upon request by the Company, the Escrow Holder will deliver those Shares to the Company, which will then have the right to retain and transfer those Shares to its own name free and clear of any rights of the Grantee under this Agreement or otherwise.

(c) The Escrow Holder is hereby directed to permit transfer of the Shares only in accordance with this Agreement or in accordance with instructions which are consistent with this Agreement which are signed by both parties. In the event further instructions are reasonably desired by the Escrow Holder, he or she shall be entitled to conclusively rely upon directions given by a majority of the members of the Board. The Escrow Holder shall have no liability for any act or omissions hereunder while acting in good faith in the exercise of his or her own judgment.

5. Rights of Grantee. The Grantee shall have the right to vote the Shares and to receive dividends with respect to the Shares.

6. Stock Splits, etc. If, while any of the Shares remain subject to forfeiture, there occurs any merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, combination or exchange of shares, or other similar change in the Company’s common stock, then any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other consideration to which the Grantee is entitled by reason of the Grantee’s ownership of the Shares will be immediately subject to this escrow, deposited with the Escrow Holder and included thereafter as “Shares” for purpose of this Agreement.

7. Tax Withholding. Grantee shall be required to deposit with the Company an amount of cash equal to the amount determined by the Company to be required with respect to any withholding taxes, FICA contributions, or the like under any federal, state, or local statute, ordinance, rule, or regulation in connection with the vesting or award of the Shares. Alternatively, the Company may, at Grantee’s election, (i) withhold the required amounts from

2

Grantee’s pay during the pay periods next following the date on which any such applicable tax liability otherwise arises, or (ii) withhold a number of Shares otherwise deliverable having a Fair Market Value sufficient to satisfy the statutory minimum of all or part of Grantee’s estimated total federal, state, and local tax obligations associated with the vesting or award of the Shares.

8. Restriction on Transfer. Except for the escrow described in Section 4 hereof or the transfer of the Shares to the Company as contemplated by this Agreement, none of the Shares or any beneficial interest therein shall be transferred, encumbered, pledged or otherwise alienated or disposed of in any way until the Shares become nonforfeitable in accordance with Section 2 of this Agreement.

9. Grantee Covenants.

(a) General. Grantee and the Company acknowledge and agree that Grantee has received adequate consideration with respect to enforcement of the provisions of this Section 9 by virtue of receiving the Shares (regardless of whether the Shares are subsequently forfeited); that such provisions are reasonable and properly required for the adequate protection of the business of the Company and its subsidiaries; and that enforcement of such provisions will not prevent Grantee from earning a living.

(b) Non-Solicitation; No-Hire. Grantee agrees to comply with the provisions of subsections (i) and (ii) of this Section 9(b) while employed by the Company and for a period of one year after the last day of Grantee’s employment with the Company or any subsidiary (such last day being the “Termination Date”) regardless of the reason for such termination of employment.

(i) Non-Solicitation. Grantee shall not, directly or indirectly, either for Grantee’s own benefit or purpose or for the benefit or purpose of any Person other than the Company or any of its subsidiaries, solicit, call on, do business with, or actively interfere with the Company’s or any subsidiary’s relationship with, or attempt to divert or entice away, any Person that Grantee should reasonably know (A) is a customer of the Company or any subsidiary for which the Company or any subsidiary provides any services as of the Termination Date, or (B) was a customer of the Company or any subsidiary for which the Company or any subsidiary provided any services at any time during the twelve (12) months preceding the Termination Date, or (C) was, as of the Termination Date, considering retention of the Company or any subsidiary to provide any services.

(ii) No-Hire. Grantee shall not, directly or indirectly, either for Grantee’s own benefit or purpose or for the benefit or purpose of any Person other than the Company or any of its subsidiaries, employ or offer to employ, call on, or actively interfere with the Company’s or any subsidiary’s relationship with, or attempt to divert or entice away, any employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor shall Grantee assist any other Person in such activities.

(c) Confidentiality. During Grantee’s employment with the Company, and thereafter regardless of the reason for termination of such employment, Grantee will not disclose or use in any way any confidential business or technical information or trade secret acquired in the course of such employment, all of which is the exclusive and valuable property of the Company whether or not conceived of or prepared by Grantee, other than (1) information generally known in the Company’s industry or acquired from public sources, (2) as required in the course of employment by the Company, (3) as required by any court, supervisory authority, administrative agency or applicable law, or (4) with the prior written consent of the Company.

3

(d) Ownership of Inventions. Grantee shall promptly and fully disclose to the Company any and all inventions, discoveries, improvements, ideas or other works of inventorship or authorship, whether or not patentable, that have been or will be conceived and/or reduced to practice by Grantee during the term of Grantee’s employment with the Company, whether alone or with others, and that are (1) related directly or indirectly to the business or activities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (2) developed with the use of any time, material, facilities or other resources of the Company or any subsidiary (“Developments”). Grantee agrees to assign and hereby does assign to the Company or its designee all of Grantee’s right, title and interest, including copyrights and patent rights, in and to all Developments. Grantee shall perform all actions and execute all instruments that the Company or any subsidiary shall deem necessary to protect or record the Company’s or its designee’s interests in the Developments. The obligations of this Section 9(d) shall be performed by Grantee without further compensation and will continue beyond the Termination Date.

10. Acceptance of Award; the Company’s Right to Cancel. If Grantee does not accept the Award by executing and delivering a copy of this Agreement to the Company, without altering or changing the terms thereof in any way, within thirty (30) days of receipt by Grantee of a copy of the Agreement, the Company may, in its sole discretion, withdraw its offer and cancel the Award at any time prior to Grantee’s delivery to the Company of a copy of the Agreement executed by Grantee. Otherwise, upon execution and delivery of the Agreement by both the Company and Grantee, the Agreement is effective as of the Effective Date and the Shares will be issued as soon thereafter as administratively practicable.

11. 83(b) Election. Grantee hereby acknowledges that he may file an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed currently on the fair market value of the Shares (less any purchase price paid for the Shares), provided that such election must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service no later than thirty (30) days after the grant of such Shares. Grantee will seek the advice of his own tax advisors as to the advisability of making such a Section 83(b) election, the potential consequences of making such an election, the requirements for making such an election, and the other tax consequences of this Award under federal, state, and any other laws that may be applicable. The Company and its Subsidiaries and agents have not and are not providing any tax advice to Grantee.

12. Limitation on Rights; No Right to Future Grants; Extraordinary Item. By entering into this Agreement and accepting the Award, Grantee acknowledges that: (a) Grantee’s participation in the Plan is voluntary; and (b) the Award is not part of normal or expected compensation for any purpose, including without limitation for calculating any benefits, severance, resignation, termination, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments, and Grantee will not be entitled to compensation or damages as a consequence of Grantee’s forfeiture of any unvested portion of the Award as a result of Grantee’s separation from service with the Company or any Subsidiary for any reason.

4

13. General Provisions:

(a) This Agreement, together with the Plan, constitutes the entire agreement between the Company and the Grantee regarding the grant of the Shares.

(b) The Committee may modify this Agreement to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory government regulation or exchange listing requirement. This Agreement may also be amended by the Committee with the consent of the Grantee. Any such amendment shall be in writing and signed by the Company and the Grantee.

(c) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to require the Company and its Subsidiaries to continue the Grantee’s relationship as an Employee or to modify any agreement between the Grantee and the Company or its Subsidiaries relating thereto.

(d) The Committee may from time to time impose any conditions on the Shares as it deems reasonably necessary to ensure that the Plan and this Award satisfy the conditions of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that Shares are issued and resold in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

(e) The Grantee agrees upon request execute any further documents or instruments necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes or intent of this Agreement.

(f) Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof. The terms of the Plan as it presently exists, and as it may hereafter be amended, are deemed incorporated herein by reference, and in the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of this Agreement.

(g) This Agreement shall be governed by, and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without regard to the application of the principals of conflicts or choice of laws.

(h) This Agreement may be executed, including execution by facsimile signature, in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.

Signature page follows.

5

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Restricted Stock Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above.

GRANTEE:	COMPANY:
	FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Signature
	By:
Printed Name	Name:	T. Michael Price
	Title:	President and CEO

6

EX-10.4

Exhibit 10.4

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation

2012 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

1. Purpose; Effective Date.

This 2012 Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is designed to enable the Company and its subsidiaries to attract and retain key employees and to align the interests of such key employees with the interests of shareholders by promoting and rewarding the achievement of annual performance goals. This Plan was approved by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) on February 24, 2012, for the fiscal 2012 performance period. Each Award granted under this Plan shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Master Plan”). Each capitalized term which is not otherwise defined in this Plan shall have the meaning given to such term in the Master Plan.

2. Administration.

The Plan shall be administered by the Committee in accordance with Article 3 of the Master Plan.

3. Participants and Performance Goals.

(a) Exhibit A identifies the Employees who have been selected by the Committee to become Participants in the Plan and the Target Award and Performance Goals for each Participant. The Performance Goals will consist of the Corporate Performance Goals identified in paragraph (b) below, and, if applicable, one or more individual Performance Goals which shall be approved by the Committee and specified in the notice of Award delivered to the Participant (collectively, the “Individual Performance Component”). Corporate Performance Goals shall be calculated from the Company’s publicly reported financial statements as of and for the twelve months ending December 31, 2012 (the “Performance Period”). The achievement of the Individual Performance Component shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(b) The Corporate Performance Goals for the Plan shall consist of the following:

(i) Return on Equity is defined as net income divided by the average daily shareholders equity.

(ii) Efficiency Ratio is defined as noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income (fully taxable equivalent) and noninterest income excluding gains from securities transactions and impairment losses.

(iii) Earnings Per Share is defined as the sum of disclosed fully diluted earnings per share for each of the four fiscal quarters in the Performance Period.

4. Calculation of Actual Awards.

(a) A Participant’s payout for each Performance Goal shall be determined according to the following formula:

Award Percentage X Weight X Base Salary

For purposes of this formula:

“Award Percentage” shall mean the percentage shown for the Participant in the “Award Percentage” column of Table 1 on Exhibit A at the Performance Level which is achieved for the applicable Performance Goal as reflected in the “Performance Level” column of Table 2 on Exhibit A. If the actual performance for a Performance Goal falls between the Threshold and Target Performance Levels or between the Target and Superior Performance Levels, the Award Percentage shall be interpolated between the Award Percentage for the Threshold and Target Performance Levels or between the Target and Superior Performance Levels, as the case may be, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Award Percentage for the Individual Performance Component will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion based in part on the Chief Executive Officer’s subjective assessment of the Participant’s broad contribution to the organization as a whole, provided that the Award Percentage for an the Individual Performance Component will not exceed the Target Award Percentage.

“Weight” shall mean the percentage shown for the measure in the “Weight” column of Table 2 on Exhibit A for the applicable Performance Goal.

“Base Salary” shall mean base salary of the Participant on the last day of the Performance Period.

(b) The aggregate amount payable to the Participant shall be the sum total of the payouts for the Participant’s Performance Goals calculated in accordance with Section 4(a) and shall be referred to as the Participant’s “Actual Award.” The Committee, in its sole discretion, may increase or decrease the Award Percentages used to calculate any Participant’s Actual Award by up to 25 percentage points if the Committee finds such an adjustment appropriate to recognize the impact of the Participant’s performance or impact on the organization outside of the range of expected performance and impact. Any such adjustment cannot increase the Participant’s total payout above 150% of the Target Award assigned to the participant (the “Superior” level of payout).

5. Payment of Actual Awards.

(a) Actual Awards shall be paid in cash, and as specified below, in Restricted Stock, as soon as practicable following the certification by the Committee of results for the Performance Period. However, in any event, all payments shall be made no later than March 15, 2013, such that the payments will be exempt from Section 409A of the Code,

under the “short term deferral” exemption specified in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4). The Actual Award will be paid in cash up to the amount of the Target Award. Any portion of an Actual Award in excess of the Target Award will be paid in shares of Restricted Stock based upon the Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Stock on the last day of the Performance Period. All Actual Awards are subject to withholding tax and any other normal deduction consistent with the Company’s practices.

(b) Any shares of Restricted Stock issued pursuant to this Plan (i) may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the first to occur of (x) December 31, 2014, (y) the death of the Participant, or (z) a Change in Control; and (ii) shall be automatically forfeited and returned to the Company or cancelled if the Participant’s employment terminates for any reason prior to the occurrence of one of the events described in clause (i) of this Section 5(b). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may cause all or any portion of a Participant’s shares of Restricted Stock to vest prior to the occurrence of one of the events described in the preceding sentence.

6. Termination of Employment.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Master Plan, if the Participant ceases to be a full-time employee of the Company for any reason prior to December 31, 2012, the Participant will cease to be a participant in this Plan and will not be eligible to receive any Actual Award pursuant to this Plan.

7. Miscellaneous Provisions.

(a) Claw-Back Rights. The Committee will have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any Awards paid to Participants where the payment was predicated upon the achievement of erroneous financial or strategic business results or conduct which the Committee determines, in its sole discretion, created unnecessary or excessive risk to the Company or constituted dishonest or unethical conduct for the purposes of increasing the amount of the Participant’s Award. Where applicable, the Company will seek to recover any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by a Participant under the Plan.

(b) Regulatory Approvals. The Plan and any Award made hereunder shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any government or regulatory agency as may be required.

(c) No Effect on Employment or Service. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment or service at any time, with or without cause.

(d) No Right to Participation. No employee or officer of the Company or any subsidiary shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, have the right to receive a future Award.

(e) Nontransferability of Awards. No Award granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will, by the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to an Award granted to a Participant shall be available during his or her lifetime only to the Participant.

(f) Section 409A. The Plan will be administered, interpreted and construed in compliance with Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder (“Section 409A”), including any exemption therunder. To the maximum extent permitted by Section 409A, all payments under the Plan are intended to be exempt from Section 409A pursuant to the exemption for short-term deferrals as specified in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4), the exemption for restricted shares under Section 409A and any other exemptions available under Section 409A. Neither the Company, any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their respective predecessors, successors or affiliates (collectively, the “Company Group”) shall be liable for, and nothing provided or contained in the Plan shall obligate or cause any member of the Company Group to be liable for, any tax, interest or penalties imposed on the Participant related to or arising with respect to any violation Section 409A.

EX-10.5

Exhibit 10.5

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation

2012-2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

1. Purpose; Effective Date.

This 2012-2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is designed to provide an incentive for the executive team to undertake efforts that are ultimately reflected in superior company performance relative to its Pennsylvania peers. The Plan is intended to be a key part of providing a competitive and attractive pay package necessary to attract and retain superior executive talent, and to build executive ownership in the Company. This Plan was approved by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) on February 24, 2012, for the January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014 performance period (the “Performance Period”). Each Award granted under this Plan shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Master Plan”). Each capitalized term which is not otherwise defined in this Plan shall have the meaning given to such term in the Master Plan.

2. Administration.

The Plan shall be administered by the Committee in accordance with Article 3 of the Master Plan.

3. Plan Awards.

(a) Awards under the Plan shall consist of (i) Restricted Stock Units, which shall be settled in shares of Restricted Stock upon the later of achievement of the Performance Goals and the last day of the Performance Period; and (ii) to the extent indicated on Exhibit A, shares of Restricted Stock, which shall vest in a single installment on the last day of the Performance Period in accordance with a Restricted Stock Agreement to be entered into between the Company and each recipient of Restricted Stock under this Plan.

(b) Exhibit A identifies the Employees who have been selected by the Committee to become Participants in the Plan, each Participant’s Target Restricted Stock Unit Award and Restricted Stock Award, and the Plan Performance Goals.

(c) The Performance Goals shall be calculated from the Company’s publicly reported financial statements and shall be defined as follows:

i. Return on Equity (ROE) Relative to Peers shall mean the Company’s ROE during the fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, as publicly reported, relative to the Company’s Peer Group, as reported through SNL Financial or other reporting service for each such fiscal year. For purposes of calculating this Performance Goal, the relative ROE for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 shall be weighted 50% and the relative ROE for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 shall be weighted 50%. ROE is calculated for purposes of this Plan as the Company’s net income divided by the average daily shareholders equity.

ii. Total Return to Shareholders (TRS) Relative to Peers is defined as the Company’s cumulative TRS relative to the Company’s Peer Group, as reported through SNL Financial or other reporting service. TRS is defined for purposes of this Plan as the total change in the value of a share of Company stock over the Performance Period, plus the value of immediately reinvested dividends over the same period.

(d) The “Peer Group” for purposes of this Plan shall mean the Pennsylvania Peer Group designated by the Committee as of January 1, 2012 and disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. The Committee may add or remove members from the Peer Group from time to time during the Performance Period if a member merges, is acquired or closed or otherwise ceases to be a meaningful comparator for the Company, in each case, as determined by the Committee. The Committee shall have discretion to adjust the relative performance of the Peer Group as necessary to account for changes in the composition of the Peer Group during the Performance Period.

4. Determination of Restricted Stock Units.

A Participant’s Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be determined according to the following formula:

(Target RSU Award X ROE Payout) + (Target RSU Award X TRS Payout)

For purposes of this formula:

“Target RSU Award” shall mean the number of shares shown for the Participant in the “Target Restricted Stock Unit Award” column of Table 1 on Exhibit A.

“ROE Payout” means the percentage shown in the “ROE Payout” column of Table 2 on Exhibit A at the performance level for the ROE Relative to Peers Performance Goal. If the actual performance for ROE Relative to Peers falls between the Threshold and Target performance levels or between the Target and Superior performance levels, the ROE Payout shall be interpolated between the percentage shown for the Threshold and Target performance levels or between the percentage shown for the Target and Superior performance levels, as the case may be, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

“TRS Payout” means the percentage shown in the “TRS Payout” column of Table 2 on Exhibit A at the performance level for the TRS Relative to Peers Performance Goal. If the actual performance for TRS Relative to Peers falls between the Threshold and Target performance levels or between the Target and Superior performance levels, the

2

TRS Payout shall be interpolated between the percentage shown for the Threshold and Target performance levels or between the percentage shown for the Target and Superior performance levels, as the case may be, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

5. Settlement of Restricted Stock Units.

(a) Restricted Stock Units shall be paid and settled in Restricted Stock as soon as practicable following the certification by the Committee of results for the Performance Period. However, in any event, all Restricted Stock Units shall be paid and settled in Restricted Stock no later than March 15, 2015, or such earlier date as is provided in the immediately succeeding sentence, such that the payments will be exempt from Section 409A of the Code, under the “short term deferral” exemption specified in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may cause all or any portion of a Participant’s Restricted Stock Units to be paid and settled in Restricted Stock prior to March 15, 2015 in the event of (i) the death of the Participant or (ii) a Change of Control, provided that any such earlier payment or settlement shall be made no later than March 15 of the year following the year of such death or Change of Control.

(b) Any shares of Restricted Stock paid and issued in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units (i) may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the first to occur of (x) December 31, 2015, (y) the death of the Participant, or (z) a Change in Control; and (ii) shall be automatically forfeited and returned to the Company or cancelled if the Participant’s employment terminates for any reason prior to the occurrence of one of the events described in clause (i) of this Section 5(b). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may cause all or any portion of a Participant’s shares of Restricted Stock to vest prior to the occurrence of one of the events described in the preceding sentence. The Participant shall be required to enter into a Restricted Stock Agreement in a form approved by the Committee as a condition to receiving shares of Restricted Stock pursuant to this Section 5.

6. Termination of Employment.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Master Plan, if the Participant ceases to be a full-time employee of the Company for any reason prior to the end of the Performance Period, the Participant will cease to be a participant in this Plan and will not be eligible to receive any Awards pursuant to this Plan.

7. Miscellaneous Provisions.

(a) Claw-Back Rights. The Committee will have the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments to any Awards paid to Participants where the payment was predicated upon the achievement of erroneous financial or strategic business results or conduct which the Committee determines, in its sole discretion, created unnecessary or excessive risk to the Company or constituted dishonest or unethical conduct for the purposes of increasing the amount of the Participant’s Award. Where applicable, the Company will seek to recover any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by a Participant under the Plan.

3

(b) Amendment or Termination. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Master Plan, the Committee has full power to amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan or the Awards granted under the Plan to the extent the Committee deems necessary or advisable, in its sole discretion, to promote the safety and soundness of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, to comply with changes to applicable laws, regulations and regulatory guidance or under other extraordinary circumstances arising after the effective date of the Plan.

(c) Regulatory Approvals. The Plan and any Award made hereunder shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any government or regulatory agency as may be required.

(d) No Effect on Employment or Service. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company to terminate any Participant’s employment or service at any time, with or without cause.

(e) No Right to Participation. No employee or officer of the Company or any subsidiary shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, have the right to receive a future Award.

(f) Nontransferability of Awards. No Award granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will, by the laws of descent and distribution. All rights with respect to an Award granted to a Participant shall be available during his or her lifetime only to the Participant.

(g) Section 409A. The Plan will be administered, interpreted and construed in compliance with Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder (“Section 409A”), including any exemption thereunder. To the maximum extent permitted by Section 409A, all payments under the Plan are intended to be exempt from Section 409A pursuant to the exemption for short-term deferrals as specified in Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-1(b)(4), the exemption for restricted shares under Section 409A and any other exemptions available under Section 409A. Neither the Company, any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their respective predecessors, successors or affiliates (collectively, the “Company Group”) shall be liable for, and nothing provided or contained in the Plan shall obligate or cause any member of the Company Group to be liable for, any tax, interest or penalties imposed on the Participant related to or arising with respect to any violation Section 409A.

4

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Michael Price, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ T. Michael Price
	T. Michael Price President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Rout, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ Robert E. Rout
	Robert E. Rout Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Michael Price, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.

DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ T. Michael Price
	T. Michael Price
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Rout, of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (“First Commonwealth”), certify that the Quarterly Report of First Commonwealth on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Commonwealth at the end of such period and the results of operations of First Commonwealth for such period.

DATED: May 8, 2012	/s/ Robert E. Rout
	Robert E. Rout Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

XML

Basis Of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis Of Presentation

Note 1 Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of First Commonwealth Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries ("First Commonwealth" or "Company") conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual realized amounts could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of First Commonwealth's financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in shareholders' equity as of and for the periods presented.

The results of operations for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year of 2012. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with First Commonwealth's 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K which is available on First Commonwealth's website at http://www.fcbanking.com.

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing bank deposits. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Operating Activities
Net income	$ 11,051	$ 5,246
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses	3,787	13,817
Deferred tax expense	671	14
Depreciation and amortization	1,520	2,407
Net losses (gains) on securities and other assets	567	(535)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities	287	215
Net accretion of premiums and discounts on long-term debt	(28)	(42)
Income from increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance	(1,445)	(1,357)
Decrease in interest receivable	352	78
Decrease in interest payable	(1,177)	(1,098)
Increase in income taxes payable	9,569	1,587
Other-net	(5,439)	(970)
Net cash provided by operating activities	19,715	19,362
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales	0	54,965
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions	149,201	69,702
Purchases	(212,061)	(165,377)
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock	1,990	2,443
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance	0	88
Proceeds from sale of loans	6,809	4,402
Proceeds from sales of other assets	8,135	2,076
Net (increase) decrease in loans	(90,600)	124,940
Purchases of premises and equipment	(2,804)	(1,470)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(139,330)	91,769
Financing Activities
Net decrease in federal funds purchased	(43,800)	(12,800)
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings	40,396	(19,719)
Net increase in deposits	129,163	12,143
Repayments of other long-term debt	(118)	(24,213)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases	(16)	(16)
Dividends paid	(3,147)	(3,138)
Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock	210	73
Stock option tax benefit	1	0
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	122,689	(47,670)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	3,074	63,461
Cash and cash equivalents at January 1	78,478	69,858
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31	$ 81,552	$ 133,319

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Financial Condition (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$ 74,889	$ 74,967
Interest-bearing bank deposits	6,663	3,511
Securities available for sale, at fair value	1,206,943	1,142,776
Other investments	37,806	39,796
Loans held for sale	8,076	13,412
Loans:
Portfolio loans	4,128,588	4,043,643
Allowance for credit losses	(60,732)	(61,234)
Net loans	4,067,856	3,982,409
Premises and equipment, net	67,482	66,755
Other real estate owned	21,335	30,035
Goodwill	159,956	159,956
Amortizing intangibles, net	3,472	3,843
Other assets	314,166	323,662
Total assets	5,968,644	5,841,122
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing	818,896	780,377
Interest-bearing	3,814,935	3,724,307
Total deposits	4,633,831	4,504,684
Short-term borrowings	309,373	312,777
Subordinated debentures	105,750	105,750
Other long-term debt	101,018	101,664
Total long-term debt	206,768	207,414
Other liabilities	51,314	57,704
Total liabilities	5,201,286	5,082,579
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, none issued	0	0
Common stock, $1 par value per share, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 105,563,455 shares issued at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and 105,050,018 and 104,916,994 shares outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	105,563	105,563
Additional paid-in capital	365,707	365,868
Retained earnings	301,194	294,056
Accumulated other comprehensive income , net	3,040	2,001
Treasury stock (513,437 and 646,461 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)	(7,046)	(7,345)
Unearned ESOP shares	(1,100)	(1,600)
Total shareholders' equity	767,358	758,543
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 5,968,644	$ 5,841,122

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Changes In Shareholders' Equity (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Unearned ESOP Shares [Member]	Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	$ 105,515	$ 366,488	$ 291,492	$ (2,458)	$ (7,660)	$ (3,600)	$ 749,777
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2010	104,846,194
Net income			5,246				5,246
Other comprehensive loss (income)				(211)			(211)
Cash dividends declared			(3,138)				(3,138)
Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares						500	500
ESOP market value adjustment		(147)					(147)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases		(16)					(16)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		6					6
Treasury stock reissued			(82)		156		74
Treasury stock reissued, shares	13,760
Restricted stock		7			34		41
Balance at Mar. 31, 2011	105,515	366,338	293,518	(2,669)	(7,470)	(3,100)	752,132
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2011	104,859,954
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	105,563	365,868	294,056	2,001	(7,345)	(1,600)	758,543
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2011	104,916,994						104,916,994
Net income			11,051				11,051
Other comprehensive loss (income)				1,039			1,039
Cash dividends declared			(3,147)				(3,147)
Net decrease in unearned ESOP shares						500	500
ESOP market value adjustment		(157)					(157)
Discount on dividend reinvestment plan purchases		(16)					(16)
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		1					1
Treasury stock reissued		0	(163)		373		210
Treasury stock reissued, shares	33,024
Restricted stock		11	(603)		(74)		(666)
Restricted stock, shares	100,000
Balance at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 105,563	$ 365,707	$ 301,194	$ 3,040	$ (7,046)	$ (1,100)	$ 767,358
Balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2012	105,050,018						105,050,018

XML

Goodwill

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Goodwill [Abstract]

Goodwill

Note 14 Goodwill

FASB ASC Topic 350-20, "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other" requires an annual valuation of the fair value of a reporting unit that has goodwill and a comparison of the fair value to the book value of equity to determine whether the goodwill has been impaired. Goodwill is also required to be tested on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has been incurred. When triggering events or circumstances indicate goodwill testing is required, an assessment of qualitative factors can be completed before performing the two step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 provides that if an assessment of qualitative factors determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, then the two step goodwill impairment test is not required.

First Commonwealth is considered to be one reporting unit. The carrying amount of goodwill as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $159.9 million. No impairment charges on goodwill or other intangible assets were incurred in 2012 or 2011.

We test goodwill for impairment as of November 30th each year and again at any quarter-end if any material events occur during a quarter that may affect goodwill. An assessment of qualitative factors was completed as of March 31, 2012 and indicated that it is more likely than not that the fair value of First Commonwealth exceeds its carrying amount, therefore the two step goodwill impairment test was not considered necessary. The assessment of qualitative factors incorporated the results of the step 2 goodwill impairment test completed as of December 31, 2011 as well as macroeconomic factors, industry and market considerations, the company's overall financial performance, and other company specific events occurring during the first quarter of 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, goodwill was not considered impaired; however, changing economic conditions that may adversely affect our performance, fair value of our assets and liabilities, or stock price could result in impairment, which could adversely affect earnings in future periods. Management will continue to monitor events that could impact this conclusion in the future.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Changes In Shareholders' Equity (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Changes In Shareholders' Equity [Abstract]
Cash dividends declared per common share	$ 0.03	$ 0.03
ESOP market value adjustment, gross	$ 242	$ 226
ESOP market value adjustment, tax benefit	$ 85	$ 79

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Financial Condition (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Financial Condition [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Preferred stock, shares authorized	3,000,000	3,000,000
Preferred stock, issued	0	0
Common stock, par value	$ 1	$ 1
Common stock, shares authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	105,563,455	105,563,455
Common stock, shares outstanding	105,050,018	104,916,994
Treasury stock, shares	513,437	646,461

XML

Impairment Of Investment Securities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Impairment Of Investment Securities [Abstract]

Impairment Of Investment Securities

Note 9 Impairment of Investment Securities

As required by FASB ASC Topic 320, "Investments – Debt and Equity Securities," credit related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities is recognized in earnings while non-credit related other-than-temporary impairment on debt securities not expected to be sold is recognized in OCI. In the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, no other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized and $1.5 and $1.9 million, respectively, in non-credit related gains on our trust preferred collateralized debt obligations that were determined to be impaired in previous periods was recorded in OCI. All of the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded were classified as available for sale securities.

First Commonwealth utilizes the specific identification method to determine the net gain or loss on debt securities and the average cost method to determine the net gain or loss on equity securities.

In the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, the "Changes in fair value on impaired securities" line represents the change in fair value of securities impaired in the current or previous periods. The change in fair value includes both non-credit and credit related gains or losses. Credit related losses occur when the entire amortized cost of the security will not be recovered. The "Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)" line represents the gains and losses on the securities resulting from factors other than credit. The non-credit related gain or loss is disclosed in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and recognized through other comprehensive income. The "Net impairment losses" line represents the credit related losses recognized in total noninterest income for the related period.

We review our investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and whether we are more likely than not to sell the security. We evaluate whether we are more likely than not to sell debt securities based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy, tax position and interest rate risk position. In addition, the risk of future other-than-temporary impairment may be influenced by additional bank failures, weakness in the U.S. economy, changes in real estate values and additional interest deferrals in our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are beneficial interests in securitized financial assets within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325, "Investments – Other," and are therefore evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment using management's best estimate of future cash flows. If these estimated cash flows indicate that it is probable that an adverse change in cash flows has occurred, then other-than-temporary impairment would be recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 320. There is a risk that First Commonwealth will record other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future. See Note 12, "Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities," for additional information.

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values at March 31, 2012 by investment category and time frame for which securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	2,186	$	(12	)	$	16	$	0	(a)	$	2,202	$	(12	)
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	75,998	$	(319	)	$	0	$	0		$	75,998	$	(319	)
Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises		83,490		(110	)		0		0			83,490		(110	)
Corporate Securities		5,032		(60	)		0		0			5,032		(60	)
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0			24,106		(30,075	)		24,106		(30,075	)
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	166,706	$	(501	)	$	24,122	$	(30,075	)	$	190,828	$	(30,576	)

(a) Gross unrealized losses related to these types of securities are less than $1 thousand.

At March 31, 2012, pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations accounted for 98% of total unrealized losses, fixed income securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises accounted for 2% and corporate fixed income comprised less than one percent of unrealized losses. There were no equity securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, our corporate securities had an amortized cost and an estimated fair value of $11.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and were comprised of single issue trust preferred securities issued primarily by money center and large regional banks. As of December 31, 2011, the same portion of the portfolio had an amortized cost of $11.8 million and an estimated fair value of $11.4 million. Included in the corporate securities portfolio are investments which had a gross unrealized loss of $60 thousand as of March 31, 2012 and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2011. After a review of each of the issuer's asset quality, earnings trend and capital position, it was determined that none of the issues in an unrealized loss position were other-than-temporarily impaired. Additionally, all interest payments on these securities are being made as contractually required.

The following table presents the gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values at December 31, 2011 by investment category and time frame for which securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More						Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	1,086	$	(6	)	$	16		$	0	(a)	$	1,102	$	(6	)
Obligations of U.S. Government- Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		25		0			0	(a)		0			25		0
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		151		(1	)		0			0			151		(1	)
Other Government-Sponsored Enterprises		55,969		(132	)		0			0			55,969		(132	)
Corporate Securities		4,536		(562	)		0			0			4,536		(562	)
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0			22,927			(31,785	)		22,927		(31,785	)
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	61,767	$	(701	)	$	22,943		$	(31,785	)	$	84,710	$	(32,486	)

(a) Gross unrealized losses related to these types of securities are less than $1 thousand.

As of March 31, 2012, the book value of our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations totaled $54.5 million with an estimated fair value of $24.5 million, which includes securities comprised of 348 banks and other financial institutions. Two of our pooled securities are senior tranches and the remainders are mezzanine tranches, three of which have no senior class remaining in the issue. Two of the pooled issues, representing $5.3 million of the $54.5 million book value, remain above investment grade. At the time of initial issue, the subordinated tranches ranged in size from approximately 7% to 35% of the total principal amount of the respective securities and no more than 5% of any pooled security consisted of a security issued by any one institution. As of March 31, 2012, after taking into account management's best estimates of future interest deferrals and defaults, seven of our securities had no excess subordination in the tranches we own and seven of our securities had excess subordination which ranged from 5% to 263% of the current performing collateral.

The following table provides information related to our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations as of March 31, 2012:

Deal	Class	Book Value		Fair Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Moody's/ Fitch Ratings	Number of Banks		Deferrals and Defaults as a % of Current Collateral			Excess Subordination as a % of Current Performing Collateral
(dollars in thousands)
Pre TSL I	Senior	$	1,581	$	1,519	$	(62	)	Aa3/BBB		20		39.50	%		218.93	%
Pre TSL IV	Mezzanine		1,830		664		(1,166	)	Ca/CCC		6		27.07			96.28
Pre TSL V	Mezzanine		50		50		0		Caa3/D		3		100.00			0.00
Pre TSL VI	Mezzanine		240		352		112		Ca/D		5		12.27			205.63
Pre TSL VII	Mezzanine		4,026		3,070		(956	)	Ca/C		17		52.13			0.00
Pre TSL VIII	Mezzanine		1,715		968		(747	)	C/C		35		45.91			0.00
Pre TSL IX	Mezzanine		2,241		812		(1,429	)	Ca/C		48		26.21			7.25
Pre TSL X	Mezzanine		1,377		909		(468	)	C/C		53		44.67			0.00
Pre TSL XII	Mezzanine		5,502		2,960		(2,542	)	Ca/C		76		31.86			0.00
Pre TSL XIII	Mezzanine		12,121		4,241		(7,880	)	Ca/C		63		35.82			0.00
Pre TSL XIV	Mezzanine		12,819		4,302		(8,517	)	Ca/C		63		38.55			24.36
MMCap I	Senior		3,766		3,470		(296	)	A3/BBB		21		37.69			262.60
MMCap I	Mezzanine		842		437		(405	)	Ca/C		21		37.69			5.47
MM Comm IX	Mezzanine		6,361		754		(5,607	)	Ca/D		31		46.50			0.00
Total		$	54,471	$	24,508	$	(29,963	)

Lack of liquidity in the market for trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, credit rating downgrades and market uncertainties related to the financial industry are factors contributing to the impairment on these securities.

On a quarterly basis we evaluate our debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment. During the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations. When evaluating these investments we determine a credit related portion and a non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment. The credit related portion is recognized in earnings and represents the difference between book value and the present value of future cash flows. The non-credit related portion is recognized in OCI and represents the difference between the fair value of the security and the amount of credit related impairment. A discounted cash flow analysis provides the best estimate of credit related other-than-temporary impairment for these securities.

Additional information related to the discounted cash flow analysis follows:

Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are measured for other-than-temporary impairment within the scope of FASB ASC Topic 325 by determining whether it is probable that an adverse change in estimated cash flows has occurred. Determining whether there has been an adverse change in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected involves comparing the present value of remaining cash flows previously projected against the present value of the cash flows estimated at March 31, 2012. We consider the discounted cash flow analysis to be our primary evidence when determining whether credit related other-than-temporary impairment exists.

Results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows, credit worthiness of the underlying banks and determination of probability of default of the underlying collateral. The following provides additional information for each of these variables:

• Estimate of Future Cash Flows – Cash flows are constructed in an INTEX cash flow model which includes each deal's structural features. For collateral issued by financial institutions with over $15 billion in asset size, we consider the alternative cost of funding and if that rate is less than the current rate being paid, we incorporate a prepayment in our estimate of future cash flows. The prepayment rates used are 20% in years 2 and 3 and a 2% prepayment rate thereafter. The modeled cash flows are then used to estimate if all the scheduled principal and interest payments of our investments will be returned.

• Credit Analysis – A quarterly credit evaluation is performed for each of the 348 banks comprising the collateral across the various pooled trust preferred securities. Our credit evaluation considers all evidence available to us and includes the nature of the issuer's business, its years of operating history, corporate structure, loan composition, loan concentrations, deposit mix, asset growth rates, geographic footprint and local economic environment. Our analysis focuses on profitability, return on assets, shareholders' equity, net interest margin, credit quality ratios, operating efficiency, capital adequacy and liquidity.

• Probability of Default – A probability of default is determined for each bank and is used to calculate the expected impact of future deferrals and defaults on our expected cash flows. Each bank in the collateral pool is assigned a probability of default for each year until maturity. Currently, any bank that is in default is assigned a 100% probability of default and a 0% projected recovery rate. All other banks in the pool are assigned a probability of default based on their unique credit characteristics and market indicators with a 10% projected recovery rate. For the majority of banks currently in deferral we assume the bank continues to defer and will eventually default and, therefore, a 100% probability of default is assigned. However, for some deferring collateral there is the possibility that they become current on interest or principal payments at some point in the future and in those cases a probability that the deferral will ultimately cure is assigned. The probability of default is updated quarterly. As of March 31, 2012, default probabilities for performing collateral ranged from 0.33% to 75%.

Our credit evaluation provides a basis for determining deferral and default probabilities for each underlying piece of collateral. Using the results of the credit evaluation, the next step of the process is to look at pricing of senior debt or credit default swaps for the issuer (or where such information is unavailable, for companies having similar credit profiles as the issuer). The pricing of these market indicators provides the information necessary to determine appropriate default probabilities for each bank.

In addition to the above factors, our evaluation of impairment also includes a stress test analysis which provides an estimate of excess subordination for each tranche. We stress the cash flows of each pool by increasing current default assumptions to the level of defaults which results in an adverse change in estimated cash flows. This stressed breakpoint is then used to calculate excess subordination levels for each pooled trust preferred security. The results of the stress test allows management to identify those pools that are at a greater risk for a future break in cash flows so that we can monitor banks in those pools more closely for potential deterioration of credit quality.

Our cash flow analysis as of March 31, 2012, indicates that no credit related other-than-temporary impairment has occurred on our pooled trust preferred securities since December 31, 2011. Based upon the analysis performed by management, it is probable that seven of our pooled trust preferred securities will experience principal and interest shortfalls and therefore appropriate other-than-temporary charges were recorded in prior years. These securities are identified in the table on page 18 with 0% "Excess Subordination as a Percentage of Current Performing Collateral." For the remaining securities listed in that table, our analysis as of March 31, 2012 indicates it is probable that we will collect all contractual principal and interest payments.

During 2008, 2009 and 2010, other-than-temporary impairment charges were recognized on all of our pooled trust preferred securities, except for PreTSL I, PreTSL IV and MMCap I-Senior. Our cash flow analysis as of March 31, 2012, for all of these impaired securities indicates that it is now probable we will collect principal and interest in excess of what was estimated at the time other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded. This change can be attributed to improvement in the underlying collateral for these securities and has resulted in our current book value being below the present value of estimated future principal and interest payments. The excess for each bond of the present value of future cash flows over our current book value ranges from 19% to 136% and will be recognized as an adjustment to yield over the remaining life of these securities. During the three-months ended March 31, 2012, $0.2 million of the excess was recognized as an adjustment to yield on these securities.

The following provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized in earnings for debt securities held and not intended to be sold for the three-months ended March 31:

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning (a)	$	44,736		$	44,850
Credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		0			0
Additional credit losses on debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized		0			0
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected, recognized over the remaining life of the security (b)		(235	)		0
Balance, ending	$	44,501		$	44,850

(a) The beginning balance represents credit related losses included in other-than-temporary impairment charges recognized on debt securities in prior periods.

(b) Represents the increase in cash flows recognized in interest income during the period.

In the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, no other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded on equity securities. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates equity securities for other-than-temporary impairment by reviewing the severity and duration of decline in estimated fair value, research reports, analysts' recommendations, credit rating changes, news stories, annual reports, regulatory filings, impact of interest rate changes and other relevant information. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, there are no equity securities in an unrealized loss position.

XML

Document And Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 04, 2012
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Entity Registrant Name	FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP /PA/
Entity Central Index Key	0000712537
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		105,198,546

XML

Loans And Allowance For Credit Losses

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Loans And Allowance For Credit Losses [Abstract]

Loans And Allowance For Credit Losses

Note 10 Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The following table provides outstanding balances related to each of our loan types:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,051,209	$	996,739
Real estate construction		64,158		76,564
Residential real estate		1,174,572		1,137,059
Commercial real estate		1,264,060		1,267,432
Loans to individuals		574,589		565,849
Total loans and leases net of unearned income		4,128,588	$	4,043,643

During the three-months ended March 31, 2012, loans increased $84.9 million or 2% compared to balances outstanding at December 31, 2011. Decreases in the real estate construction and commercial real estate categories can be attributed to our continued focus of managing down our large credit exposures while increases in residential real estate and loans to individuals are primarily due to growth in home equity loans and indirect auto lending.

Credit Quality Information

As part of the on-going monitoring of credit quality within the loan portfolio, the following credit worthiness categories are used in grading our loans:

Pass	Acceptable levels of risk exist in the relationship. Includes all loans not adversely classified as OAEM, substandard or doubtful.
Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM)
	Potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. The potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects or weaken the Bank's credit position at some future date. The credit risk may be relatively minor, yet constitute an undesirable risk in light of the circumstances surrounding the specific credit. No loss of principal or interest is expected.
Substandard	Well-defined weakness or a weakness that jeopardizes the repayment of the debt. A loan may be classified as substandard as a result of deterioration of the borrower's financial condition and repayment capacity. Loans for which repayment plans have not been met or collateral equity margins do not protect the Company may also be classified as substandard.
Doubtful	Loans with the characteristics of substandard loans with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of presently existing facts and conditions, is highly improbable.

The use of creditworthiness categories to grade loans permits management's use of migration analysis to estimate a portion of credit risk. The Company's internal creditworthiness grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans. Category ratings are reviewed each quarter, at which time management analyzes the results, as well as other external statistics and factors, to track the migration of loan performance. Loans that migrate towards higher risk rating levels generally have an increased risk of default, whereas, loans that migrate toward lower risk ratings generally will result in a lower risk factor being applied to those related loan balances.

The following tables represent our credit risk profile by creditworthiness:

	March 31, 2012
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		Real estate construction		Residential real estate		Commercial real estate		Loans to individuals		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Pass	$	956,928	$	36,011	$	1,162,979	$	1,132,559	$	574,585	$	3,863,062
Non-Pass
OAEM		27,792		798		5,213		53,898		4		87,705
Substandard		62,138		21,638		6,380		77,603		0		167,759
Doubtful		4,351		5,711		0		0		0		10,062
Total Non-Pass		94,281		28,147		11,593		131,501		4		265,526
Total	$	1,051,209	$	64,158	$	1,174,572	$	1,264,060	$	574,589	$	4,128,588

	December 31, 2011
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		Real estate construction		Residential real estate		Commercial real estate		Loans to individuals		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Pass	$	904,057	$	44,914	$	1,126,143	$	1,110,664	$	565,842	$	3,751,620
Non-Pass
OAEM		27,627		4,238		5,484		61,855		7		99,211
Substandard		60,114		21,701		5,432		94,913		0		182,160
Doubtful		4,941		5,711		0		0		0		10,652
Total Non-Pass		92,682		31,650		10,916		156,768		7		292,023
Total	$	996,739	$	76,564	$	1,137,059	$	1,267,432	$	565,849	$	4,043,643

Portfolio Risks

Credit quality measures as of March 31, 2012 improved compared to December 31, 2011 as criticized loans decreased $26.5 million, or 9%, to $265.5 million. Further indications of improvement in credit quality can be seen in the $10.2 million, or 29% decrease in delinquency on accruing loans. For this same period, nonaccrual loans decreased $0.4 million as a result of payments and charge-offs during the quarter.

Charge-offs for the three-months ended March 31, 2012 totaled $5.0 million compared to $8.6 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. The most significant charge-off during the three months ended March 31, 2012 was a $1.2 million charge taken on a $2.0 million commercial loan. During the three-months ended March 31, 2011, the most significant charge-offs totaled $4.9 million and related to construction loan projects in Florida, western Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Criticized loans, or loans designated OAEM, substandard or doubtful, totaled $265.5 million at March 31, 2012 and represented 6% of the loan portfolio, compared to 7% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2011. These loans have been evaluated when determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, which we believe is adequate at this time. However, changes in economic conditions, interest rates, borrower financial condition, delinquency trends or previously established fair values of collateral factors could significantly change those judgmental estimates.

Credit quality of our loan portfolio represents significant risk to our earnings, capital, regulatory agency relationships, investment community and shareholder returns. First Commonwealth devotes a substantial amount of resources to managing this risk primarily through our credit administration department that develops and administers policies and procedures for underwriting, maintaining, monitoring and collecting activities. Credit administration is independent of lending departments and oversight is provided by the Credit Committee of the First Commonwealth Board of Directors.

Risk factors associated with commercial real estate and construction related loans are monitored closely since this is an area that represents the most significant portion of the loan portfolio and has experienced the most stress during the economic downturn and evidenced little recovery strength.

In addition, during the first three months of 2012, one relationship consisting of two loans, was classified as troubled debt restructuring. These loans increased the nonperforming loan balance by $53 thousand with no increase in specific reserves.

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans by Segment

The following tables delineate the aging analysis of the recorded investments in past due loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also included in these tables are loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing because they are well-secured and in the process of collection.

	March 31, 2012
	30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		90 days and greater and still accruing		Nonaccrual		Total past due and nonaccrual		Current		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	1,517	$	670	$	410	$	31,921	$	34,518	$	1,016,691	$	1,051,209
Real estate construction		0		0		0		13,951		13,951		50,207		64,158
Residential real estate		6,378		1,521		5,353		3,995		17,247		1,157,325		1,174,572
Commercial real estate		3,389		1,257		620		28,228		33,494		1,230,566		1,264,060
Loans to individuals		1,866		563		1,743		0		4,172		570,417		574,589
Total	$	13,150	$	4,011	$	8,126	$	78,095	$	103,382	$	4,025,206	$	4,128,588

	December 31, 2011
	30-59 Days past due		60-89 Days past due		90 days and greater and still accruing		Nonaccrual		Total past due and nonaccrual		Current		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	5,433	$	824	$	287	$	33,459	$	40,003	$	956,736	$	996,739
Real estate construction		0		180		0		14,911		15,091		61,473		76,564
Residential real estate		7,144		2,100		8,767		3,153		21,164		1,115,895		1,137,059
Commercial real estate		3,671		1,241		157		26,953		32,022		1,235,410		1,267,432
Loans to individuals		2,952		962		1,804		0		5,718		560,131		565,849
Total	$	19,200	$	5,307	$	11,015	$	78,476	$	113,998	$	3,929,645	$	4,043,643

The previous tables summarizes nonaccrual loans by loan segment. The Company generally places loans on nonaccrual status when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred or the loans reach a certain number of days past due. Generally, loans 90 days or more past due are placed on nonaccrual status.

Nonaccrual Loans

When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, the accrued unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income and all future payments received are applied as a reduction to the loan principal. Generally, the loan is returned to accrual status when (a) all delinquent interest and principal become current under the terms of the loan agreement or (b) the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection and collectability is no longer doubtful.

Impaired Loans

Management considers loans to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan contract, including scheduled interest payments. Determination of impairment is treated the same across all loan segments. When management identifies a loan as impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except when the sole source or repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of collateral. When the loan is collateral dependent, the appraised value less cost to sell is utilized. If management determines the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.

When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal, under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is not in doubt and the loan is on nonaccrual status, contractual interest is credited to interest income when received, under the cash basis method.

Nonperforming loans, excluding loans held for sale, decreased $17.2 million to $81.6 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $98.8 million at December 31, 2011. Contributing to this decrease was the payoff of an $11.3 million loan to a waste management company and the transfer to OREO of collateral for a $1.2 million loan. The most significant loans placed into nonperforming status during the first quarter of 2012 included $1.3 million for a consumer mortgage loan and $1.0 million for a western Pennsylvania commercial real estate loan.

The specific allowance for nonperforming loans decreased by $1.3 million at March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Unfunded commitments related to nonperforming loans were $10.0 million at March 31, 2012 and an off balance sheet reserve of $0.2 million has been established for these commitments.

Loans held for sale totaled $8.1 million and $13.4 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The entire balance of loans held for sale in both of these periods was considered nonperforming. While these loans are considered to be nonperforming, they are not taken into consideration when determining the allowance for credit losses as they are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.

Significant nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2012, include the following;

• $19.6 million, the remaining portion of a $44.1 million unsecured loan to a western Pennsylvania real estate developer. This loan was originated in the first quarter of 2004 and was placed in nonaccrual status in the fourth quarter of 2009. A settlement plan with the borrower and three other lenders was reached in the fourth quarter of 2010 and resulted in an $8.0 million principal payment and a $15.4 million partial charge-off.

• $16.6 million commercial real estate loan for a real estate developer in eastern Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in the third quarter of 2007 and restructured in the fourth quarter of 2011 and resulted in a charge-off of $4.2 million. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the third quarter of 2011.

• $9.1 million to an information technology company in Maryland. This loan was originated in the fourth quarter of 2007 and was placed in nonaccrual in the second quarter of 2011.

• $5.7 million, the remaining portion of a $20.8 million construction loan for a Florida condominium project. This loan was originated in the second quarter of 2007. Charge-offs of $15.1 million have been recorded on this loan. The most recent appraisal for the real estate collateral was completed in the fourth quarter of 2011.

• $4.1 million commercial real estate loan for retail development in western Pennsylvania. This loan was originated in the third quarter of 2008 and transferred to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2011. When transferred to held for sale, the fair value of this loan was determined by a discounted cash flow analysis. The sale of this loan was completed in April 2012 and resulted in a gain of $1.2 million which will be reflected in the Company's second quarter net income.

Compared to December 31, 2011, there were no changes in the composition of the most significant nonaccrual loans.

The following tables include the recorded investment and unpaid principal balance for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Also presented are the average recorded investment in impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized while the loan was considered impaired. Average balances are calculated based on month-end balances of the loans of the period reported.

	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	2,282	$	3,267	$	0	$	2,010	$	3,418	$	0
Real estate construction		3,571		6,546		0		10,814		20,161		0
Residential real estate		3,048		3,479		0		3,125		3,513		0
Commercial real estate		23,702		24,950		0		36,777		41,974		0
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		32,603		38,242		0		52,726		69,066		0

	March 31, 2012						December 31, 2011
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(dollars in thousands)
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		30,139		31,457		7,555		34,056		34,341		9,069
Real estate construction		10,380		31,375		2,891		6,298		21,402		2,960
Residential real estate		1,823		1,823		553		955		955		93
Commercial real estate		6,632		8,295		921		4,717		4,863		1,114
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		48,974		72,950		11,920		46,026		61,561		13,236
Total	$	81,577	$	111,192	$	11,920	$	98,752	$	130,627	$	13,236

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31,
	2012				2011
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other	$	3,258	$	18	$	1,408	$	3
Real estate construction		3,646		0		15,738		0
Residential real estate		3,354		5		1,938		1
Commercial real estate		24,275		23		18,989		11
Loans to individuals		0		0		25		0
Subtotal		34,533		46		38,098		15
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		30,350		3		25,911		2
Real estate construction		10,432		0		30,061		1
Residential real estate		952		7		375		0
Commercial real estate		5,889		9		32,242		13
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0
Subtotal		47,623		19		88,589		16
Total	$	82,156	$	65	$	126,687	$	31

Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest as a result of the financial difficulties experienced by the borrower, who could not obtain comparable terms from alternate financing sources.

The following table provides detail as to the total troubled debt restructured loans and total commitments outstanding on troubled debt restructured loans:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Troubled debt restructured loans
Accrual status	$	3,482	$	20,276
Nonaccrual status		41,690		44,841
Total	$	45,172	$	65,117
Commitments
Letters of credit	$	2	$	12,580
Unused lines of credit		0		42
Total	$	2	$	12,622

At March 31, 2012, troubled debt restructured loans on accruing status decreased $16.8 million compared to December 31, 2011 and commitments related to troubled debt restructured loans decreased $12.6 million for the same period. These decreases are primarily a result of the payoff of an $11.3 million loan to a waste management company in Pennsylvania as a result of the sale of the business. In addition, a $2.2 million loan to a retail development company in western Pennsylvania paid off during the first quarter. During 2012, a $42 thousand charge-off was recorded as part of the restructuring for one borrower. The remainder of changes in loan balances for 2012 between the pre-modification balance and the post-modification balance is due to customer payments.

During 2011, the changes between pre-modification balances and post-modification balances are due to customer payments.

The following tables provide detail, including specific reserve and reasons for modification, related to loans identified as troubled debt restructurings during the three-months ended March 31:

	2012
			Type of Modification
	Number of Contracts		Extend Maturity		Modify Rate		Modify Payments		Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Specific Reserve
									(dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate		2	$	0	$	97	$	0	$	97	$	53	$	0

	2011
			Type of Modification
	Number of Contracts		Extend Maturity		Modify Rate		Modify Payments		Total Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Specific Reserve
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		9	$	100	$	105	$	2,168	$	2,373	$	2,372	$	708
Real estate construction		3		354		0		0		354		364		18
Residential real estate		1		0		12		0		12		12		0
Commercial real estate		11		7,130		199		648		7,977		7,972		1,554
Total		24	$	7,584	$	316	$	2,816	$	10,716	$	10,720	$	2,280

The troubled debt restructurings included in the above tables are also included in the impaired loan tables provided earlier in this footnote. Loans defined as modified due to a change in rate include loans that were modified for a change in rate as well as a reamortization of the principal and an extension of the maturity. For the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of total rate modifications represent loans with modifications to the rate as well as payment due to reamortization.

A troubled debt restructuring is considered to be in default when a restructured loan is 90 days or more past due. The following restructured loans were considered to default during the three-months ended March 31:

	2012				2011
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
	(dollars in thousands)
Commercial, financial, agricultural and other		0	$	0		1	$	150
Real estate construction		0		0		1		88
Residential real estate		0		0		0		0
Commercial real estate		2		980		0		0
Loans to individuals		0		0		0		0
Total		2	$	980		2	$	238

The following tables provide detail related to the allowance for credit losses:

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other			Real estate construction			Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Loans to individuals			Unallocated		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	18,200		$	6,756		$	8,237		$	18,961		$	4,244		$	4,836	$	61,234
Charge-offs		(1,914	)		(190	)		(1,712	)		(235	)		(941	)		0		(4,992	)
Recoveries		238			56			133			158			118			0		703
Provision		1,619			(195	)		44			487			831			1,001		3,787
Ending Balance	$	18,143		$	6,427		$	6,702		$	19,371		$	4,252		$	5,837	$	60,732
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired	$	7,555		$	2,891		$	553		$	921		$	0		$	0	$	11,920
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		10,588			3,536			6,149			18,450			4,252			5,837		48,812
Loans:
Ending balance		1,051,209			64,158			1,174,572			1,264,060			574,589					4,128,588
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired		31,599			13,800			3,217			28,874			0					77,490
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		1,019,610			50,358			1,171,355			1,235,186			574,589					4,051,098

	For the Three-Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Commercial, financial, agricultural and other			Real estate construction			Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Loans to individuals			Unallocated			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	21,700		$	18,002		$	5,454		$	16,913		$	4,215		$	4,945		$	71,229
Charge-offs		(960	)		(4,999	)		(1,104	)		(766	)		(779	)		0			(8,608	)
Recoveries		104			0			19			76			155			0			354
Provision		1,592			5,776			2,313			3,951			270			(85	)		13,817
Ending Balance	$	22,436		$	18,779		$	6,682		$	20,174		$	3,861		$	4,860		$	76,792
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired	$	8,280		$	14,168		$	2		$	9,915		$	0		$	0		$	32,365
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		14,156			4,611			6,680			10,259			3,861			4,860			44,427
Loans:
Ending balance		906,824			184,904			1,102,459			1,336,903			543,180						4,074,270
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impaired		29,165			45,915			946			60,941			0						136,967
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impaired		877,659			138,989			1,101,513			1,275,962			543,180						3,937,303

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Income (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans	$ 48,040	$ 50,883
Interest and dividends on investments:
Taxable interest	8,549	8,374
Interest exempt from federal income taxes	5	186
Dividends	21	17
Interest on bank deposits	1	9
Total interest income	56,616	59,469
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	6,247	9,536
Interest on short-term borrowings	227	185
Interest on subordinated debentures	1,433	1,383
Interest on other long-term debt	539	496
Total interest on long-term debt	1,972	1,879
Total interest expense	8,446	11,600
Net Interest Income	48,170	47,869
Provision for credit losses	3,787	13,817
Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses	44,383	34,052
Noninterest Income
Changes in fair value on impaired securities	1,498	1,869
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)	(1,498)	(1,869)
Net impairment losses	0	0
Net securities gains	0	577
Trust income	1,542	1,718
Service charges on deposit accounts	3,502	3,426
Insurance and retail brokerage commissions	1,424	1,562
Income from bank owned life insurance	1,445	1,357
Income from other real estate owned	964	0
Gain on sale of assets	2,115	231
Card related interchange income	3,114	2,800
Other income	3,274	2,657
Total noninterest income	17,380	14,328
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	21,758	21,128
Net occupancy expense	3,404	3,732
Furniture and equipment expense	3,184	3,180
Data processing expense	1,563	1,424
Pennsylvania shares tax expense	1,183	1,178
Intangible amortization	371	390
Collection and repossession expense	2,699	1,316
Other professional fees and services	1,199	1,125
FDIC insurance	1,237	1,835
Loss on sale or write-down of assets	3,289	301
Unfunded commitments reserve	913	(357)
Other operating expenses	5,952	6,177
Total noninterest expense	46,752	41,429
Income Before Income Taxes	15,011	6,951
Income tax provision	3,960	1,705
Net Income	$ 11,051	$ 5,246
Average Shares Outstanding	104,810,727	104,618,499
Average Shares Outstanding Assuming Dilution	104,816,442	104,623,518
Per Share Data:
Basic Earnings per Share	$ 0.11	$ 0.05
Diluted Earnings per Share	$ 0.11	$ 0.05
Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share	$ 0.03	$ 0.03

XML

Earnings Per Share

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

Note 4 Earnings per Share

The following table summarizes the composition of the weighted-average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Weighted average common shares issued		105,563,455			105,515,079
Average treasury shares		(542,326	)		(663,993	)
Averaged unearned ESOP shares		(84,989	)		(214,917	)
Average unearned nonvested shares		(125,413	)		(17,670	)
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic earnings per share		104,810,727			104,618,499
Additional common stock equivalents (nonvested stock) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		5,715			0
Additional common stock equivalents (stock options) used to calculate diluted earnings per share		0			5,019
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate diluted earnings per share		104,816,442			104,623,518

The following table shows the number of shares and the price per share related to common stock equivalents that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-months ended March 31, because to do so would have been antidilutive.

	2012						2011
			Price Range						Price Range
	Shares		From		To		Shares		From		To
Stock Options		380,677	$	6.36	$	14.55		484,439	$	6.90	$	14.55
Restricted Stock		68,995		5.96		6.82		12,550		5.70		5.70

XML

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures [Abstract]

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

Note 3 Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The following table presents information related to cash paid during the period for interest and income taxes as well as detail on non-cash investing and financing activities for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	9,668		$	12,765
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
ESOP loan reductions	$	500		$	500
Loans transferred to other real estate owned and repossessed assets		2,561			6,197
Other real estate owned sold and settled out of period		(48	)		0
Gross increase (decrease) in market value adjustment to securities available for sale		1,597			(334	)

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Note 11 Income Taxes

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, First Commonwealth had no material unrecognized tax benefits or accrued interest and penalties. If applicable, First Commonwealth will record interest and penalties as a component of noninterest expense. Federal and state tax years 2008 through 2011 were open for examination as of March 31, 2012.

XML

Investment Securities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Investment Securities [Abstract]

Investment Securities

Note 7 Investment Securities

Below is an analysis of the amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available for sale at:

	March 31, 2012									December 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
								(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	31,994	$	4,026	$	(12	)	$	36,008	$	32,139	$	4,061	$	(6	)	$	36,194
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		834,125		29,678		(319	)		863,484		771,196		29,835		0			801,031
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		185		1		0			186		193		1		(1	)		193
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		267,904		732		(110	)		268,526		267,807		973		(132	)		268,648
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		443		11		0			454		444		15		0			459
Corporate Securities		11,803		174		(60	)		11,917		11,811		162		(562	)		11,411
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		54,471		112		(30,075	)		24,508		54,762		3		(31,785	)		22,980
Total Debt Securities		1,200,925		34,734		(30,576	)		1,205,083		1,138,352		35,050		(32,486	)		1,140,916
Equities		1,860		0		0			1,860		1,860		0		0			1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	1,202,785	$	34,734	$	(30,576	)	$	1,206,943	$	1,140,212	$	35,050	$	(32,486	)	$	1,142,776

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale at March 31, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Due within 1 year	$	7,364	$	7,384
Due after 1 but within 5 years		260,983		261,596
Due after 5 but within 10 years		0		0
Due after 10 years		66,274		36,425
		334,621		305,405
Mortgage-Backed Securities (a)		866,304		899,678
Total Debt Securities	$	1,200,925	$	1,205,083

(a) Mortgage Backed Securities include an amortized cost of $32.0 million and a fair value of $36.0 million for Obligations of U.S. Government agencies issued by Ginnie Mae and Obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which had an amortized cost of $834.3 million and a fair value of $863.7 million.

Proceeds from sale, gross gains (losses) realized on sales, maturities and other-than-temporary impairment charges related to securities available for sale were as follows for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Proceeds from sale	$	0	$	54,965
Gross gains (losses) realized:
Sales Transactions:
Gross gains	$	0	$	832
Gross losses		0		(258	)
		0		574
Maturities and impairment
Gross gains		0		3
Gross losses		0		0
Other-than-temporary impairment		0		0
		0		3
Net gains and impairment	$	0	$	577

Securities available for sale with a fair value of $647.6 million and $668.8 million were pledged as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

There were no held-to-maturity debt securities as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were no gains or losses for debt securities held-to-maturity.

XML

Variable Interest Entities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Variable Interest Entities [Abstract]

Variable Interest Entities

Note 5 Variable Interest Entities

As defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810-10, a Variable Interest Entity ("VIE") is a corporation, partnership, trust or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. Under ASC 810-10, an entity that holds a variable interest in a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE if the entity is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, which generally means it is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the VIE's activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns, or both.

First Commonwealth's VIEs are evaluated under the guidance included in FASB Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-17. These VIEs include qualified affordable housing projects that First Commonwealth has invested in as part of its community reinvestment initiatives. We periodically assess whether or not our variable interests in the VIE, based on qualitative analysis, provide us with a controlling interest in the VIE. The analysis includes an assessment of the characteristics of the VIE. We do not have a controlling financial interest in the VIE, which would require consolidation of the VIE, as we do not have the following characteristics: (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance; and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

First Commonwealth's maximum potential exposure is equal to its carrying value and is summarized in the table below:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Low Income Housing Limited Partnership Investments	$	556	$	667

XML

Commitments And Contingent Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Commitments And Contingent Liabilities [Abstract]

Commitments And Contingent Liabilities

Note 6 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Commitments and letters of credit

Standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by First Commonwealth to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The contract or notional amount of these instruments reflects the maximum amount of future payments that First Commonwealth could be required to pay under the guarantees if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties, without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. In addition, many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The following table identifies the notional amount of those instruments at:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	1,571,673	$	1,495,009
Financial standby letters of credit		54,164		53,689
Performance standby letters of credit		64,045		76,371
Commercial letters of credit		769		1,297

The current notional amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2012 include financial standby letters of credit of $0.1 million, and performance standby letters of credit of $3.6 million, issued during the first three months of 2012. A liability of $0.2 million and $0.1 million has been recorded as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, which represents the estimated fair value of letters of credit issued. The fair value of letters of credit is estimated based on the unrecognized portion of fees received at the time the commitment was issued.

Unused commitments and letters of credit provide exposure to future credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the borrower or guaranteed parties. Management's evaluation of the credit risk in these commitments resulted in the recording of a liability of $2.4 million as of March 31, 2012 and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2011. The credit risk evaluation incorporated probability of default, loss given default and estimated utilization for the next twelve months for each loan category and the letters of credit.

Legal proceedings

McGrogan v. First Commonwealth Bank is a class action that was filed on January 12, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The action alleges that First Commonwealth Bank (the "Bank") promised class members a minimum interest rate of 8% on its IRA Market Rate Savings Account for as long as the class members kept their money on deposit in the IRA account. The class asserts that the Bank committed fraud, breached its modified contract with the class members, and violated the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law when it resigned as custodian of the IRA Market Rate Savings Accounts in 2008 and offered the class members a roll-over IRA account with a 3.5% interest rate. At that time, there were 237 account holders with an average age of 64, and the aggregate balances in the IRA Market Rate Savings accounts totaled approximately $11.5 million. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages for the alleged breach of contract, punitive damages for the alleged fraud and Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law violations and attorney's fees. On July 27, 2011, the court granted class certification as to the breach of modified contract claim and denied class certification as to the fraud and Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Law claims. The breach of contract claim is predicated upon a letter sent to customers in 1998 which reversed an earlier decision by the Bank to reduce the rate paid on the accounts. The letter stated, in relevant part, "This letter will serve as notification that a decision has been made to re-establish the rate on your account to eight percent (8%). This rate will be retroactive to your most recent maturity date and will continue going forward on deposits presently in the account and on annual additions." In granting class certification, the court found that the letter could constitute a modification of the original IRA contract that would obligate the Bank to pay a minimum rate of 8% until the accounts are closed. Plaintiffs and the Bank have filed motions for summary judgment. In support of its motion, the Bank has asserted that the 1998 letter did not alter the Bank's right to resign as custodian and close the accounts, which the Bank exercised in 2008. Oral argument on the motions for summary judgment was held on April 4, 2012, and a decision is currently pending. The amount of the Bank's liability, if any, will depend upon information which is not presently known to the Bank, including the court's interpretation of the 1998 letter, each class member's life expectancy and pace of distributions from the IRA account, and the extent to which damages were or could have been mitigated through alternative investments. Accordingly, the Company is unable to estimate the amount or range of a reasonably possible loss.

Other matters

There are no other material legal proceedings to which First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries are a party, or of which their property is the subject, except proceedings which arise in the normal course of business and, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations or financial position of First Commonwealth or its subsidiaries.

XML

Other Investments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Other Investments [Abstract]

Other Investments

Note 8 Other Investments

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"), First Commonwealth is required to purchase and hold stock in the FHLB to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. This stock is restricted in that it can only be sold to the FHLB or to another member institution, and all sales of FHLB stock must be at par. As a result of these restrictions, FHLB stock is unlike other investment securities insofar as there is no trading market for FHLB stock and the transfer price is determined by FHLB membership rules and not by market participants. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our FHLB stock totaled $37.8 million and $39.8 million, respectively and is included in "Other investments" on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

During the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the FHLB repurchased excess stock from its members by repurchasing the lessor of 5% of the members' total capital stock outstanding or its total excess capital stock. As a result, during the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, stock repurchases occurred in the amounts of $2.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. In addition, the FHLB paid a cash dividend of $0.10 per share, or $10 thousand, during the first quarter 2012. This was the first dividend paid by FHLB since December 2008. Decisions regarding any future repurchases of excess capital stock and dividend payments will be made by the FHLB on a quarterly basis. Management reviewed the FHLB's Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 5, 2012.

FHLB stock is held as a long-term investment and its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. First Commonwealth evaluates impairment quarterly. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that reflects our view of the FHLB's long-term performance, which includes factors such as the following:

• its operating performance;

• the severity and duration of declines in the fair value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount;

• its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance;

• the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the FHLB, and accordingly, on the members of FHLB; and

• its liquidity and funding position.

After evaluating all of these considerations, First Commonwealth concluded that the par value of its investment in FHLB stock will be recovered. Accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded on these securities for the three-months ended March 31, 2012. Our evaluation of the factors described above in future periods could result in the recognition of impairment charges on FHLB stock.

XML

Derivatives

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Derivatives [Abstract]

Derivatives

Note 13 Derivatives

First Commonwealth is a party to interest rate derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivatives relate to interest rate swaps that First Commonwealth enters into with customers to allow customers to convert variable rate loans to a fixed rate. First Commonwealth pays interest to the customer at a floating rate on the notional amount and receives interest from the customer at a fixed rate for the same notional amount. At the same time the interest rate swap is entered into with the customer, an offsetting interest rate swap is entered into with another financial institution. First Commonwealth pays the other financial institution interest at the same fixed rate on the same notional amount as the swap entered into with the customer, and receives interest from the financial institution for the same floating rate on the same notional amount. The changes in the fair value of the swaps offset each other, except for the credit risk of the counterparties, which is determined by taking into consideration the risk rating, probability of default and loss of given default for all counterparties.

We have nine risk participation agreements with financial institution counterparties for interest rate swaps related to loans in which we are a participant. The risk participation agreements provide credit protection to the financial institution should the borrower fail to perform on its interest rate derivative contract with the financial institution.

The fee received, less the estimate of the loss for the credit exposure, was recognized in earnings at the time of the transaction.

The following table depicts the credit value adjustment recorded related to the notional amount of derivatives outstanding as well as the notional amount of risk participation agreements participated to other banks:

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Credit value adjustment	$	(2,356	)	$	(2,963	)
Notional Amount:
Interest rate derivatives		176,106			187,368
Risk participation agreements		146,166			128,098
Sold credit protection on risk participation agreements		(22,049	)		(22,147	)

The table below presents the amount representing the change in the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities attributable to credit risk included in other income on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012		2011
	(dollars in thousands)
Non-hedging interest rate derivatives:
Increase in other income	$	606	$	209

During 2012, total credit risk income of $0.9 million was recognized, offset by $0.3 million in expense relates to three interest rate swaps that were downgraded during the first quarter to a below investment grade rating. As a result of the deterioration of credit risk related to the counterparty, a larger mark-to-market adjustment was recorded. The fair value of our derivatives is included in a table in Note 12 "Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities," in the line items other assets and other liabilities.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net income	$ 11,051	$ 5,246
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax expense (benefit):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities arising during the period	99	(1,616)
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold	1,498	1,869
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses on securities included in net income	0	(577)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax expense (benefit)	1,597	(324)
Income tax expense (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)	558	(113)
Comprehensive Income	$ 12,090	$ 5,035

XML

Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures [Abstract]

Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures

Note 2 Supplemental Comprehensive Income Disclosures

The following table identifies the related tax effects allocated to each component of other comprehensive income ("OCI") in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012							2011
	Pretax Amount		Tax (Expense) Benefit			Net of Tax Amount		Pretax Amount			Tax (Expense) Benefit			Net of Tax Amount
	(dollars in thousands)
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities arising during the period	$	99	$	(34	)	$	65	$	(1,616	)	$	565		$	(1,051	)
Non-credit related gains on securities not expected to be sold		1,498		(524	)		974		1,869			(654	)		1,215
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses on securities included in net income		0		0			0		(577	)		202			(375	)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities		1,597		(558	)		1,039		(324	)		113			(211	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,597	$	(558	)	$	1,039	$	(324	)	$	113		$	(211	)

XML

Fair Values Of Assets And Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Fair Values Of Assets And Liabilities [Abstract]

Fair Values Of Assets And Liabilities

Note 12 Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" requires disclosures for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). All non-financial assets are included either as a separate line item on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition or in the "Other assets" category of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Currently, First Commonwealth does not have any non-financial liabilities to disclose.

FASB ASC Topic 825, "Financial Instruments" permits entities to irrevocably elect to measure select financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The unrealized gains and losses are required to be included in earnings each reporting period for the items that fair value measurement is elected. First Commonwealth has elected not to measure any existing financial instruments at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825; however, in the future we may elect to adopt this guidance for select financial instruments.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, First Commonwealth groups financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value in three levels based on the principal markets in which the assets and liabilities are transacted and the observability of the data points used to determine fair value. These levels are:

• Level 1 – Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"). Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 securities include equity holdings comprised of publicly traded bank stocks which were priced using quoted market prices.

• Level 2 – Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained for identical or comparable assets or liabilities from alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Level 2 includes Obligations of U.S. Government securities issued by Agencies and Sponsored Enterprises, Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, certain corporate securities, certain equity securities, FHLB stock, interest rate derivatives that include interest rate swaps and risk participation agreements, certain other real estate owned and certain impaired loans.

Level 2 investment securities are valued by a recognized third party pricing service using observable inputs. The model used by the pricing service varies by asset class and incorporates available market, trade and bid information as well as cash flow information when applicable. Because many fixed-income investment securities do not trade on a daily basis, the model uses available information such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like investment securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. The model will also use processes such as an option adjusted spread to assess the impact of interest rates and to develop prepayment estimates. Market inputs normally used in the pricing model include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications.

Management validates the market values provided by the third party service by having another recognized pricing service price a random sample of securities each quarter, monthly monitoring of variances from prior period pricing and, on a monthly basis, evaluating pricing changes compared to expectations based on changes in the financial markets.

The equity investments included in Level 2 are based on broker prices and are included in Level 2 because they are not traded on an active exchange market.

Other investments are comprised of FHLB stock whose fair value is based on its par value. Additional information on FHLB stock is provided in Note 8, "Other Investments."

Interest rate derivatives are reported at an estimated fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs and are included in other assets and other liabilities and consist of interest rate swaps where there is no significant deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit risk since origination of the interest rate swap. First Commonwealth values its interest rate swap positions using a yield curve by taking market prices/rates for an appropriate set of instruments. The set of instruments currently used to determine the U.S. Dollar yield curve includes cash LIBOR rates from overnight to three months, Eurodollar futures contracts and swap rates from three years to thirty years. These yield curves determine the valuations of interest rate swaps. Interest rate derivatives are further described in Note 13, "Derivatives."

For purposes of potential valuation adjustments to our derivative positions, First Commonwealth evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties as well as our own credit risk. Accordingly, we have considered factors such as the likelihood of default, expected loss given default, net exposures and remaining contractual life, among other things, in determining if any fair value adjustments related to credit risk are required. We review our counterparty exposure quarterly, and when necessary, appropriate adjustments are made to reflect the exposure.

We also utilize this approach to estimate our own credit risk on derivative liability positions. In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparty's inability to pay any net uncollateralized position.

The fair value for other real estate owned included in Level 2 is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less costs to sell or an executed sales agreement.

• Level 3 – Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. If the inputs used to provide the valuation are unobservable and/or there is very little, if any, market activity for the security or similar securities, the securities would be considered Level 3 securities. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. The assets included in Level 3 are pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, non-marketable equity investments, loans held for sale and certain interest rate derivatives.

Our pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are collateralized by the trust preferred securities of individual banks, thrifts and bank holding companies in the U.S. There has been little or no active trading in these securities since 2009; therefore it was more appropriate to determine fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis. Detail on our process for determining the appropriate cash flows for this analysis is provided in Note 9, "Impairment of Investment Securities." The discount rate applied to the cash flows is determined by evaluating the current market yields for comparable corporate and structured credit products along with an evaluation of the risks associated with the cash flows of the comparable security. Due to the fact that there is no active market for the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, one key reference point is the market yield for the single issue trust preferred securities issued by banks and thrifts for which there is more activity than for the pooled securities. Adjustments are then made to reflect the credit and structural differences between these two security types.

Management validates the fair value of the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations by monitoring the performance of the underlying collateral, discussing the discount rate, cash flow assumptions and general market trends with the specialized third party and confirming changes in the underlying collateral to the trustee reports. Management's monitoring of the underlying collateral includes deferrals of interest payments, payment defaults, cures of previously deferred interest payments, any regulatory filings or actions and general news related to the underlying collateral. Management also evaluates fair value changes compared to expectations based on changes in the interest rates used in determining the discount rate and general financial markets.

The estimated fair value of the non-marketable equity investments included in level 3 is based on par value.

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value with the fair value being the expected sales price of the loan. The estimated fair value of the loans currently held for sale was determined by calculating the discounted expected future cash flows of the loan. The discount rate applied to the future cash flows was determined based on a risk based expected return and capital structure of potential buyers. If a sales agreement has been executed, the fair value is equal to the sales price.

For interest rate derivatives included in Level 3, the fair value incorporates credit risk by considering such factors as likelihood of default and expected loss given default based on the credit quality of the underlying counterparties (loan customers).

In 2012, we have not realized any losses due to a counterparty's inability to pay any net uncollateralized position. However, as the result of deterioration in the counterparties (loan customers) credit quality for certain interest rate derivatives, future amounts previously believed to be collectible under the terms of the interest rate derivative have now been deemed to be uncollectible.

In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides information related to quantitative inputs and assumptions used in Level 3 fair value measurements.

	Fair Value (in thousands)	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range/ (weighted average)
Pooled Trust Preferred Securities	$24,508	Discounted Cash Flow	Probability of default		0% -100% - (35.23%)
			Prepayment rates		0% - 100% (10.51%)
			Discount rates		6.75% - 20%(a)
Loans Held for Sale	$ 3,959(b)	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate		16%(c)
Other Investments	$1,420	Par Value	N/A		N/A
Interest Rate Swap	$0	Option model	Counterparty credit risk		62.80% - 197.43%(d)
Impaired Loans	$ 20,157(e)	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount rate		8.42% - 21%
Other Real Estate Owned	$596	Internal Valuation	N/A		N/A

(a) incorporates premium related to credit quality and illiquidity of securities.

(b) the remainder of the balance of loans held for sale is not included in this disclosure as that balance represents loans valued at cost, which is lower than fair value.

(c) incorporates premium related to credit quality of loans.

(d) represents the range of the credit spread curve used in valuation.

(e) the remainder of impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs are not included in this disclosure as the values of those loans are based on bankruptcy agreement documentation.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of pooled trust preferred securities are the probability of default, discount rates and prepayment rates. Significant increases in the probability of default or discount rate used would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of these securities while decreases in these variables would result in higher fair value measurements. In general, a change in the assumption of probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the discount rate. In most cases, increases in the prepayment rate assumptions would result in a higher estimated fair value for these securities while decreases would provide for a lower value. The direction of this change is somewhat dependent on the structure of the investment and the amount of the investment tranches senior to our position.

The discount rate is the significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of loans held for sale and impaired loans. Significant increases in this rate would result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the loans, while a decrease in this rate would result in higher fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of interest rate swaps classified as Level 3 is counterparty credit risk and the resulting range of the credit spread curve used in the valuation. Higher credit risk would result in an increased credit spread, which would reduce the fair value of the interest rate swap.

The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	0	$	36,008	$	0	$	36,008
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		0		863,484		0		863,484
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		0		186		0		186
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		0		268,526		0		268,526
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		0		454		0		454
Corporate Securities		0		11,917		0		11,917
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0		24,508		24,508
Total Debt Securities		0		1,180,575		24,508		1,205,083
Equities		440		0		1,420		1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale		440		1,180,575		25,928		1,206,943
Other Investments		0		37,806		0		37,806
Loans Held for Sale		0		0		8,076		8,076
Other Assets (a)		0		15,303		0		15,303
Total Assets	$	440	$	1,233,684	$	34,004	$	1,268,128
Other Liabilities (a)	$	0	$	17,686	$	0	$	17,686
Total Liabilities	$	0	$	17,686	$	0	$	17,686

(a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives

	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Obligations of U.S. Government Agencies:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential	$	0	$	36,194	$	0	$	36,194
Obligations of U.S. Government – Sponsored Enterprises:
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Residential		0		801,031		0		801,031
Mortgage-Backed Securities – Commercial		0		193		0		193
Other Government – Sponsored Enterprises		0		268,648		0		268,648
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions		0		459		0		459
Corporate Securities		0		11,411		0		11,411
Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations		0		0		22,980		22,980
Total Debt Securities		0		1,117,936		22,980		1,140,916
Equities		440		0		1,420		1,860
Total Securities Available for Sale		440		1,117,936		24,400		1,142,776
Other Investments		0		39,796		0		39,796
Loans Held for Sale		0		0		13,412		13,412
Other Assets (a)		0		16,064		0		16,064
Total Assets	$	440	$	1,173,796	$	37,812	$	1,212,048
Other Liabilities (a)	$	0	$	18,986	$	0	$	18,986
Total Liabilities	$	0	$	18,986	$	0	$	18,986

(a) Non-hedging interest rate derivatives

For the three-month periods ended March 31, changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

	2012
	Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations			Equities		Loans Held for Sale			Other Assets			Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	22,980		$	1,420	$	13,412		$	0		$	37,812
Total gains or losses
Included in earnings		0			0		1,768			(461	)		1,307
Included in other comprehensive income		2,268			0		0			0			2,268
Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements
Purchases		0			0		0			0			0
Issuances		0			0		0			0			0
Sales		0			0		(6,809	)		0			(6,809	)
Settlements		(740	)		0		(295	)		0			(1,035	)
Transfers into Level 3		0			0		0			461			461
Balance, end of period	$	24,508		$	1,420	$	8,076		$	0			34,004

	2011
	Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions			Corporate Securities			Pooled Trust Preferred Collateralized Debt Obligations			Equities		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	343		$	21,376		$	26,352		$	1,570	$	49,641
Total gains or losses
Included in earnings		4			314			0			0		318
Included in other comprehensive income		(20	)		(175	)		2,122			0		1,927
Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements
Purchases		0			0			0			0		0
Issuances		0			0			0			0		0
Sales		(327	)		(6,700	)		0			0		(7,027	)
Settlements		0			0			(809	)		0		(809	)
Transfers from Level 3		0			0			0			0		0
Balance, end of period	$	0		$	14,815		$	27,665		$	1,570	$	44,050

For the three-months ended March 31, 2012, there were no transfers between fair value Levels 1 and 2. However, $0.5 million of interest rate swaps were transferred into Level 3 from Level 2 due to deterioration of the counterparty's credit risk. Because the credit quality of the underlying counterparty declined below investment grade, the swaps were valued utilizing more than interest rate yield curves. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 for the three-months ended March 31, 2011. There were no gains or losses included in earnings for the periods presented that are attributable to the change in realized gains (losses) relating to assets held at March 31, 2012 and 2011.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at:

	March 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	0	$	44,112	$	25,545	$	69,657
Other real estate owned		0		21,398		596		21,994
Total Assets	$	0	$	65,510	$	26,141	$	91,651

	December 31, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	0	$	73,783	$	26,349	$	100,132
Other real estate owned		0		31,232		438		31,670
Total Assets	$	0	$	105,015	$	26,787	$	131,802

The following losses were realized on the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis for the three-months ended March 31:

	2012			2011
Impaired loans	$	(376	)	$	(13,261	)
Other real estate owned		(2,909	)		0
Total losses	$	(3,285	)	$	(13,261	)

Impaired loans over $0.1 million are individually reviewed to determine the amount of each loan considered to be at risk of non-collection. The fair value for impaired loans that are collateral based is determined by reviewing real property appraisals, equipment valuations, accounts receivable listings and other financial information. A discounted cash flow analysis is performed to determine fair value for impaired loans when an observable market price or a current appraisal is not available. First Commonwealth's loan policy requires updated appraisals be obtained at least every twelve months on all impaired loans with balances of $250 thousand and over.

The fair value for other real estate owned is determined by either an independent market based appraisal less costs to sell or an executed sales agreement and is classified as Level 2. Other real estate owned has a book cost of $21.3 million as of March 31, 2012 and consisted primarily of a manufacturing plant in northern Pennsylvania, residential real estate in eastern Pennsylvania and a hotel/resort in Illinois. During the first quarter of 2012, the sale of an office building in western Pennsylvania which was previously in OREO for $6.8 million was completed and resulted in a $0.3 million loss at the time of sale. We review whether events and circumstances subsequent to a transfer to other real estate owned have occurred that indicate the balance of those assets may not be recoverable. If events and circumstances indicate further impairment we will record a charge to the extent that the carrying value of the assets exceed their fair values, less cost to sell, as determined by valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstances.

Certain other assets and liabilities, including goodwill and core deposit intangibles, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances. Additional information related to goodwill is provided in Note 14, "Goodwill." There were no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three-months ended March 31, 2012.

FASB ASC 825-10, "Transition Related to FSP FAS 107-1" and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are as discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below.

Cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank deposits: The carrying amounts for cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank deposits approximate the estimated fair values of such assets.

Securities: Fair values for securities available for sale are based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments. Pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations values are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker traded transactions. These valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to each instrument. The carrying value of other investments, which includes FHLB stock, is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated utilizing a present value of future discounted cash flows of the loan utilizing a risk based expected return to discount the value unless a sales agreement has been executed, in which case the sales price would equal fair value.

Loans: The fair values of all loans are estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using interest rates currently offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality adjusted for past due and nonperforming loans, which is not an exit price under FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures."

Off-balance sheet instruments: Many of First Commonwealth's off-balance sheet instruments, primarily loan commitments and standby letters of credit, are expected to expire without being drawn upon; therefore, the commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. FASB ASC Topic 460, "Guarantees" clarified that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The carrying amount and fair value for standby letters of credit was $0.2 million at March 31, 2012 and $0.1 million at December 31, 2011. See Note 6, "Commitments and Contingent Liabilities," for additional information.

Deposit liabilities: Management estimates that the fair value of deposits is based on a market valuation of similar deposits. The carrying value of variable rate time deposit accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the report date. Also, fair values of fixed rate time deposits for both periods are estimated by discounting the future cash flows using interest rates currently being offered and a schedule of aggregated expected maturities.

Short-term borrowings: The fair values of borrowings from the FHLB were estimated based on the estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowings. The carrying amounts of other short-term borrowings such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase were used to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the borrowings.

Long-term debt and subordinated debt: The fair value of long-term debt and subordinated debt is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using First Commonwealth's estimated incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

The following table presents carrying amounts and fair values of First Commonwealth's financial instruments:

	March 31, 2012
			Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Amount		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	74,889	$	74,889	$	74,889	$	0	$	0
Interest-bearing deposits		6,663		6,663		6,663		0		0
Securities available for sale		1,206,943		1,206,943		440		1,180,575		25,928
Other investments		37,806		37,806		0		37,806		0
Loans held for sale		8,076		9,231		0		5,272		3,959
Loans		4,128,588		4,198,278		0		44,112		4,154,166
Financial liabilities
Deposits		4,633,831		4,577,192		0		4,577,192		0
Short-term borrowings		309,373		309,368		0		309,368		0
Long-term debt		101,018		103,470		0		103,470		0
Subordinated debt		105,750		76,812		0		0		76,812

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	74,967	$	74,967
Interest-bearing deposits		3,511		3,511
Securities available for sale		1,142,776		1,142,776
Other investments		39,796		39,796
Loans held for sale		13,412		13,412
Loans		4,043,643		4,113,525
Financial liabilities
Deposits		4,504,684		4,452,235
Short-term borrowings		312,777		312,777
Long-term debt		101,664		103,749
Subordinated debt		105,750		75,310