The Company

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

The Company

Note 1

The Company:

Background

FC Global Realty Incorporated (and its subsidiaries) (the “Company”), re-incorporated in Nevada on December 30, 2010, originally formed in Delaware in 1980, is a real estate investment company holding or in the process of acquiring investments in a variety of current and future real estate projects, including residential developments, commercial properties such as gas station sites, and hotels and resort communities, as described further in this report.

Under its previous name, PhotoMedex, Inc., the Company was, until the recent sale of the Company’s last significant business unit (its consumer products division which was sold to ICTV Brands, Inc. on January 23, 2017), as described below and in other sections of this report, a Global Skin Health company providing integrated disease management and aesthetic solutions to dermatologists, professional aestheticians and consumers. The Company provided proprietary products and services that addressed skin diseases and conditions including psoriasis, acne, actinic keratosis (a precursor to certain types of skin cancer), photo damage and unwanted hair. Starting in August 2014, the Company began to restructure its operations and redirect its efforts in a manner that management expected would result in improved results of operations and address certain defaults in its then commercial bank loan covenants. As part of such redirected efforts, management maintained comprehensive efforts to minimize the Company’s operational costs and capital expenditures. During this time the Company also sold off certain business units and product lines to support this restructuring and on January 23, 2017, sold the last remaining major product line, its consumer products division. The Company did not present the consumer products segment as a discontinued operation, since the consumer products represented the entire remaining major operations of the Company at that time.

On March 31, 2017, the Company and its newly-formed subsidiary FC Global Realty Operating Partnership, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Acquiror”) entered into an Interest Contribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with First Capital Real Estate Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Contributor”), and First Capital Real Estate Trust Incorporated, a Maryland corporation, (the “Contributor Parent” and, together with Contributor, the “Contributor Parties”), under which the Contributor will contribute mostly certain real estate assets (the “Contributed Properties”) to the Company’s subsidiary in a series of up to three installments which will conclude no later than December 31, 2017. In exchange, the Contributor will receive shares of the Company’s Common Stock and/or newly designated Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as described below.

As a result of this transaction, the Company has primarily become a real estate investment company for the purpose of investing in a diversified portfolio of quality commercial and residential real estate properties and other real estate investments located both throughout the United States and in various international locales. The first installment of contributed assets (the “First Contribution”) closed on May 17, 2017 (the “Initial Closing”). The main provisions of the Agreement are summarized below.

First Contribution

In the Initial Closing, the Contributor transferred certain assets comprising the Contributed Properties to the Company. On the Initial Closing date, the Contributor transferred to the Acquiror four vacant land sites set for development into gas stations, which are located in Atwater and Merced, northern California, and which have an agreed upon value of approximately $2.6 million. The Contributor then completed the transfer to the Acquiror of its 17.9% passive interest in a limited liability company that is constructing a single family residential development located in Los Lunas, New Mexico (the “Avalon Property”) on June 26, 2017. This residential development in New Mexico consists of 251, non-contiguous, single family residential lots and a 10,000 square foot club house. 37 of the lots have been finished, and the remaining 214 are platted and engineered lots. The agreed upon value of its share of this property was approximately $7.4 million.

In return for the Contributed Properties, the Company issued to the Contributor 879,234 duly authorized, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), which represented approximately 19.9% of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock immediately prior to the Initial Closing, at an agreed upon Per Share Value (defined below) of $2.5183, or $2,214,175 in the aggregate. These shares of Common Stock are restricted and unregistered. The Company issued the remaining $7,785,825 of the approximately $10 million agreed upon consideration to the Contributor in the form of 123,668 shares of the Company’s newly designated non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A Stock”). Each share of the Series A Stock is convertible into 25 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including stockholder approval in accordance with the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). The shares of Series A Stock are restricted and unregistered. The number of shares of Common Stock issued to the Contributor and to be issued upon conversion of the Series A Stock was determined by dividing the $10 million agreed upon value of the Contributed Assets by $2.5183, a specified price per share value which represents a 7.5% premium above the volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) of all on-exchange transactions in the Company’s Common Stock executed on Nasdaq during the forty-three (43) trading days prior to the trading day immediately prior to the public announcement of the transaction by the Company and the Contributor Parent, as reported by Bloomberg L.P. (the “Per Share Value”). The shares of Common Stock both issued to the Contributor and issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Stock carry certain registration rights as specified in a Registration Rights Agreement dated May 17, 2017.

The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock does not have voting rights; however, the Company may not (a) alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights of that stock, (b) amend or change its certificate of incorporation in a manner that adversely affects that stock, (c) increase the number of shares of preferred stock, or (d) otherwise enter into an agreement that accomplishes any of the foregoing, without the affirmative vote of a majority of the holders of the outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock prior to any such change.

At the Initial Closing, the Company assumed the liabilities associated with the Contributed Properties, except that it did not assume any liabilities with respect to the Avalon Property until that property’s contribution was completed on June 26, 2017. The obligations that the Acquiror assumed at the Initial Closing include the following: Obligations of the Contributor and its affiliates under certain agreements covering the contributed properties, including an Operating Agreement of Central Valley Gas Station Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dated January 28, 2013, and all amendments thereto; and a Construction Contract dated November 19, 2014 between Central Valley Gas Stations Development, LLC, as owner and First Capital Builders, LLC, as Contractor, with respect to the project known commonly as Green Sands and Buhach Rd., Atwater, CA. Once the full interest in the Avalon Property was contributed to the Company, the Company also assumed the Operating Agreement of Avalon Jubilee, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company dated as of May 16, 2012, and all amendments thereto; and a Development Services Agreement dated September 15, 2015 by and between UR-FC Contributed Assets, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Owner, and Land Strategies, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, as Developer, with respect to real property owned by Avalon Jubilee, LLC. As of the Initial Closing, the Company also assumed an installment note dated April 7, 2015 made by First Capital Real Estate Investments, LLC (“FCREI”) in favor of George Zambelli (“Zambelli”) in the original principal amount of $470 (the “Note”) and a Long Form Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents dated April 7, 2015 between FCREI, as Trustor, Fidelity National Title Company, as Trustee (“Trustee”), and Zambelli, as Beneficiary (the “Deed of Trust”), which secures the Note.

The Company is expected to enter into amended agreements with respect to some or all of these agreements.

Finally, the Company assumed all ancillary agreements, commitments and obligations with respect to these properties.

The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business. Accordingly, the determination of whether the transaction represents a business combination was evaluated by applying ASU 2017-01 guidance. The Company has determined that the group of assets assumed in the First Contribution do not include (and also, none of them on a stand-alone basis) include, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and thus it was determined that the First Contribution represents an acquisition of assets rather than a business combination. Accordingly, the total sum of the fair value of consideration given (i.e. the fair value of the equity interests issued) together with the transaction costs and the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities resulting from the Second Contribution (i.e. the fair value of the equity interests issued) and the Optional Contribution (i.e. the fair value of the equity interests issued), was allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the first contribution based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition. Such allocation did not give rise to goodwill. See Note 2 Acquisition of Real Estate Assets.

Second Contribution

Contributor Parent is also required to contribute two additional property interests valued at the agreed upon value amount of $20 million if certain conditions as set forth in the Agreement are satisfied by December 31, 2017. This second installment is mandatory.

Contributor Parent must contribute to the Acquirer its 100% ownership interest in a private hotel that is currently undergoing renovations to convert to a Wyndham Garden Hotel. This 265 room full service hotel is located in Amarillo, Texas and has an agreed upon value of approximately $16 million and outstanding loans of approximately $10.11 million. Before contributing the property to the Acquiror, Contributor Parent must resolve a lawsuit concerning ownership of the property. Only when Contributor Parent has confirmed that it is the full and undisputed owner of the property may it contribute that interest to the Acquiror. If the contribution is made, the Company will account for this transaction as a business combination under ASC 805, Business Combinations.

On July 3, 2017, the Company and the Acquiror entered into an Agreement to Waive Second Closing Deliverables (the “Second Waiver”) with the Contributor Parties, amending the Agreement. The Contributor Parties had received an offer to purchase the Amarillo Hotel from a non-related third party. Under the Second Waiver, the Company and the Acquiror agreed to waive the requirement for the Contributor Parties to contribute to the Acquiror their 100% ownership interest in the Amarillo Hotel, and to accept in its place a contribution in cash of not less than $5.89 million from the Contributor Parties from the sale proceeds of the Amarillo Hotel, after the satisfaction of the outstanding loan, provided that the sale is completed and closed upon not later than August 31, 2017. In exchange the Contributor Parties would receive shares of stock in the Company, such amount to be calculated as set forth in the Second Waiver and Agreement. The sale of the Amarillo Hotel was not completed and closed by August 31, 2017, therefor the waiver of the requirement for the contribution of the interest in the Amarillo Hotel lapsed.

On September 22, 2017, the Company and Acquiror entered into a Second Agreement to Waive Closing Deliverables (the “Second Agreement”) with the Contributor Parties, amending the Contribution Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Second Agreement, the Company and the Acquiror agreed to extend the date for the closing of the sale of the Amarillo Hotel until October 18, 2017, with the contribution of the funds from the sale to be made not later than October 23, 2017. In exchange the Contributor Parties shall receive shares of stock in the Company, such amount to be calculated as set forth in the Contribution Agreement, as amended by the Agreement to Waive Closing Deliverables and the Second Agreement. If the sale of the Amarillo Hotel is not completed and closed by October 18, 2017, the waiver of the requirement for the contribution of the interest in the Amarillo Hotel will lapse. As of the filing of this report, November 14, 2017, the sale of the Amarillo Hotel has not been completed. As the sale was not completed by the stated deadline, the Contributor Parent is now re-evaluating how best to contribute this asset to our company.

In addition, Contributor Parent must contribute to the Acquiror its interest in Dutchman’s Bay and Serenity Bay (referred to as the “Antigua Resort Developments”), two planned full service resort hotel developments located in Antigua and Barbuda in which Contributor Parent owns a 75% interest in coordination with the Antigua government. Serenity Bay is a planned five star resort comprised of five contiguous parcels (28.33 acres) zoned for hotel and residential use that are planned for 246 units and 80 one, two and three bedroom condo units. Dutchman’s Bay is a planned four star condo hotel with 180 guestrooms, 102 two bedroom condos, and 14 three bedroom villas. For the property in Antigua, Contributor Parent must obtain an amendment to its agreement with the government to extend the time for development of these properties and confirm that all development conditions in the original agreement with the government have been either satisfied or waived.

In exchange for each of these properties, the Company will issue to Contributor a number of duly authorized, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock or Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, determined by dividing the $20 million agreed upon value of that contribution by the Per Share Value. The shares shall be comprised entirely of shares of Common Stock if the issuance has been approved by the Company’s stockholders prior to the issuance thereof and shall be comprised entirely of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock if such approval has not yet been obtained.

The Company has determined in accordance with the updated guidance of ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business that the Amarillo property (an operating hotel) represents a business as it is includes an organized workforce with the necessary skills, knowledge and experience to perform the acquired process and an input that the workforce could develop or convert into output. However, it was determined that the Antigua property does not represent a business. Based on the above conclusion it was determined that the Amarillo property component is not required to be analyzed under the provisions of ASC 815-10 - Derivatives and Hedging since such contract between an acquirer and a seller to enter into a business combination are scoped out from its provisions. As for the Antigua property it was determined that such future transaction does not constitute a derivative instrument in accordance with ASC 815-10 - Derivatives and Hedging as the net settlement criteria is not met. Further, the Company considered the provisions of Subtopic ASC 815-40 Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity and determined that such contractual obligations cannot be considered as indexed to an entity’s own stock, as its settlement provisions are not based on a fixed monetary amount or a fixed amount of a debt instrument issued by the entity but rather on the fair value of the Antigua property which represents a real estate asset. Based on the terms of this component, (i.e. the fair value of the Antigua property and the fair value of the shares that the Company is obligated to issue for this asset), it was determined that such freestanding financial instrument represents a financial asset required to be measured upon initial recognition of at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition the financial instrument (which might be a financial asset or a financial liability depending on the fair value of its settlement terms) is required to be re-measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in earnings (within the line item “Revaluation of asset contribution related financial instrument, net”). See Note 2 Acquisition of Real Estate Assets.

Optional Contribution

Contributor Parent has the option to contribute either or both of two additional property interests valued at the agreed upon value of $66.5 million if certain conditions as set forth in the Agreement are satisfied by December 31, 2017. This third installment is optional in Contributor Parent’s sole discretion.

The Contributor Parent may contribute to the Acquiror its interest in a resort development project on an island just south of Hilton Head, South Carolina (“Melrose”). Contributor Parent currently has the property under a Letter of Intent and expects to close on the property by December 31, 2017. Melrose is valued by Contributor Parent at an agreed upon value of $22.5 million, based upon a senior lending position that Contributor Parent holds under the Letter of Intent on this property.

Contributor Parent also may contribute to the Acquiror a golf and surf club development project on the Baja Peninsula in Mexico (“Punta Brava”). Contributor Parent also has this property under a Letter of Intent and expects to close by December 31, 2017. Punta Brava is valued at the agreed upon value by Contributor Parent at $44 million based on Contributor Parent’s commitment of $5 million upon closing on this property, plus a commitment for an additional $5 million and a second commitment of $34 million for construction of the project.

In exchange for each of these properties, the Company will issue to Contributor a number of duly authorized, fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock or Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, determined by dividing an agreed upon value of $86,450 (130% of the value of the agreed upon value of $66,500) by the Per Share Value. The shares shall be comprised entirely of shares of Common Stock if the issuance has been approved by the Company’s stockholders prior to the issuance thereof and shall be comprised entirely of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock if such approval has not yet been obtained. In addition, the Company will issue to Contributor a five (5) year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share that shall vest with respect to the number of underlying shares upon the achievement of the milestone specified in the Agreement. The number of warrant shares and the exercise price will be equitably adjusted in the event of a stock split, stock combination, recapitalization or similar transaction. These optional contributions represent a potential liability to the Company as the number of shares and warrants to be issued is fixed but the market value of the shares fluctuates. It is possible that the share price could rise to a level that upon contribution of the properties causes the Company to give consideration that exceeds the fair value of the assets acquired. This would represent a potential liability to the Company and to quantify the liability the Company has used the Black Scholes formula. The warrants also represent a potential liability in that the Company may be required to issues shares at $3 when the share price is significantly higher.

To estimate the fair value of the liability associated with optionality granted to the Contributor as well as the warrant liability, Management has used the Black Scholes option pricing formula. The key input in the calculation is the assumption of how volatile the Company stock will be over the life of the option. The more volatile the Company is expected to be, the greater its potential liability. Future volatility is unknown, as such Management has used a volatility proxy of 39.45% which equals the average volatility of stocks in the Company’s forward looking peer group of Real Estate Development. After the calculation is performed, additional factors must be considered. It is possible that despite being economically rational to contribute the properties based on the Company stock price relative to the value of the optional properties, the Contributor may not have the ability to contribute. Therefore a 50% discount is applied to the option value produced by the Black Scholes formula to arrive at final liability value for the optionality component. The warrants receive a further 50% discount as they contain a vesting schedule with milestones that must be achieved by the Contributor once the property is contributed. As of September 30, 2017, the fair value of such liability is estimated to be $1,013 and is presented in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company has determined that the Company’s contractual obligations under the optional contributions does not constitute a derivative instrument in accordance with ASC 815-10 - Derivatives and Hedging as the net settlement criteria is not met. Further, the Company considered the provisions of Subtopic ASC 815-40 Contracts in the Entity’s Own Equity and determined that such contractual obligations cannot be considered as indexed to an entity’s own stock, as its settlement provisions are not based on a fixed monetary amount or a fixed amount of a debt instrument issued by the entity but rather on the fair value of certain real estate assets. Thus, such freestanding financial instrument were classified as financial liabilities and were measured upon initial recognition at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition the financial liabilities are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in earnings (within the line item “Revaluation of asset contribution related financial instruments, net”).

Resignation and Appointment of Officers and Directors

Pursuant to the Agreement, there were changes to the Company’s named executive officers and its board of directors that were made on May 17, 2017.

Named Executive Officers

Dr. Dolev Rafaeli and Dennis McGrath resigned from their positions as officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, and Dr. Yoav Ben-Dror resigned from his position as director of the Company and its subsidiaries. Dr. Rafaeli resigned as Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. McGrath resigned as President and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company; following such resignation both employees assumed other positions within the company and their employment terms were remained unchanged.

Suneet Singal was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen Johnson as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Singal had signed an employment agreement with the Company on the date of the First Closing; Mr. Johnson signed an employment agreement with the Company on July 28, 2017. See also Note 14.

Dr. Ben-Dror resigned as a director of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, including Radiancy (Israel) Ltd. and Photo Therapeutics Limited in the United Kingdom. He will not continue his affiliation with those companies.

Board of Directors

At the closing for the First Contribution, certain members of the Company’s board of directors resigned, and the board was expanded, so that the board consists of seven (7) persons, of whom (i) three (3) were designated by the Company’s departing board, (ii) three (3) were designated by Contributor Parent; and (iii) one (1) (the “Nonaffiliated Director”) was selected by the other six (6) directors

At the Closing, Lewis C. Pell, Dr. Yoav Ben-Dror and Stephen P. Connelly each resigned from the Board.

Dr. Rafaeli and Mr. McGrath remained on the Board as the Company’s designees, and Michael R. Stewart was appointed as the Company’s Independent Director Designee.

Suneet Singal, Richard J. Leider and Dr. Bob Froehlich were appointed as the Contributor Parent’s designees (with Richard J. Leider and Dr. Bob Froehlich serving as Independent Directors).

Together, the six board members selected Darrel Menthe as the Nonaffiliated Director. Mr. Menthe also serves as an Independent Director. The Agreement provided that the compensation committee, nominations and corporate governance committee and audit committee of the Company shall each consist of the Company’s designee who is an Independent Director, one of Contributor Parent’s designees who is an Independent Director and the Nonaffiliated Director.

General Conditions

In each case, the Company’s board of directors will determine whether or not the pre-contribution conditions have been satisfied before accepting the property interests and issuing shares of the Company’s stock to Contributor Parent.

The Agreement is subject to the usual pre- and post-closing representations, warranties and covenants, and restricts that the Company’s conduct is in the ordinary course of business between the signing and December 31, 2017.

Payout Notes

Under the Agreement, amounts due to Dr. Dolev Rafaeli and Dennis McGrath under their employment agreements, as well as amounts due to Dr. Yoav Ben-Dror for his services as a board member of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries (see Note 6), were to be converted to convertible secured notes (the “Payout Notes”) after approval from the Company’s stockholders. The Payout Notes would be due one year after the stockholder approval and carry a ten percent (10%) interest rate. The principal would convert to shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the lower of (i) the Per Share Value or (ii) the VWAP with respect to on-exchange transactions in the Company’s Common Stock executed on the NASDAQ during the thirty (30) trading days prior to the maturity date as reported by Bloomberg L.P.; provided, however, that the value of the Company’s Common Stock should in no event be less than $1.75 per share. The Payout Notes would be secured by a security interest in all assets of the Company; provided, however, that such security interest would be subordinated to any (i) claims or liens to the holders of any debt (including mortgage debt) being assumed by the Company as a result of the transaction contemplated by the Agreement, and (ii) all post-closing indebtedness incurred by the Company or its subsidiaries. The holders of the Payout Notes would have demand registration rights which would require the filing of a re-sale registration statement on appropriate form that registers for re-sale the shares of Common Stock underlying the Payout Notes within thirty (30) days of issuance with best efforts to cause the same to become effective within one-hundred twenty (120) days of issuance. The form of those Payout Notes was agreed to at the time of signing of the Contribution Agreement and was attached as an exhibit thereto. In connection with the Payout Notes, the parties also agreed to a form of security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), which was also attached as an exhibit to the Contribution Agreement.

On October 12, 2017, the Company issued the Payout Notes to Dolev Rafaeli, Dennis M. McGrath and Yoav Ben-Dror in the principal amounts of $3,134, $978 and $1,515, respectively. The Payout Notes are due on October 12, 2018 and carry a ten percent (10%) interest rate, payable monthly in arrears commencing on December 1, 2017 (each such payment, a “Monthly Interest Payment” and each date of such payment, an “Interest Payment Date”). As of September 30, 2017 the Company has accrued for the Payout Notes to Dolev Rafaeli, Dennis M. McGrath and Yoav Ben-Dror in the amounts of $1,262, $168 and $1,292, respectively.

The Payout Notes may not be prepaid by the Company without the written consent of the holder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company sells any of its securities, whether equity, equity-linked or debt securities (a “Capital Raising Transaction”), prior to the maturity date, then forty percent (40%) of the funds raised in such Capital Raising Transaction shall be used to pay down the Payout Notes on a pro rata basis based upon the relative principal amounts; provided, however, that if the investors in such Capital Raising Transaction stipulate that the proceeds cannot be used to pay down indebtedness, then none of the proceeds of such Capital Raising Transaction shall be used to pay down the Payout Notes on an accelerated basis; provided further, however, that a committee consisting of board members Michael R. Stewart and Dennis M. McGrath unanimously consent to the use of proceeds from such Capital Raising Transaction.

The principal will convert to shares of the Company’s common stock at maturity at the lower of (i) $2.5183 or (ii) the volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) with respect to on-exchange transactions in the Company’s common stock executed on the Nasdaq Stock Market (or such other market as the Company’s stock may then trade on) during the thirty (30) trading days prior to the maturity date, as reported by Bloomberg L.P.; provided, however, that the value of the Company’s common stock shall in no event be less than $1.75 per share. In addition, each holder of a Payout Note may elect to have a Monthly Interest Payment paid in shares of common stock, at the VWAP with respect to on-exchange transactions in the Company’s common stock executed on the Nasdaq Stock Market (or such other market as the Company’s stock may then trade on) during the thirty (30) trading days ending five (5) trading days prior to the applicable Interest Payment Date, as reported by Bloomberg L.P.

The holders of the Payout Notes have demand registration rights which require the filing of a re-sale registration statement on appropriate form that registers for re-sale the shares of common stock underlying the Payout Notes within thirty (30) days of issuance with best efforts to cause the same to become effective within one-hundred twenty (120) days of issuance.

The Payout Notes contain standard events of default, including: (i) if the Company shall default in the payment of the principal amount or any interest as and when the same shall become due and payable; or (ii) if the Company shall violate or breach to a material extent any of the representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Payout Notes or the Security Agreement and such violation or breach shall continue for thirty (30) days after written notice of such breach shall been received by the Company from the holder; or (iii) in the event of any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy, liquidation or winding up of the Company, as more particularly described in the Payout Notes.

The foregoing summary of the terms and conditions of the Payout Notes does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of those documents filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 18, 2017.

Special Meeting of Stockholders

As promptly as possible following the Initial Closing, the Company was required to file a proxy statement and hold a special meeting of its stockholders to authorize and approve the following matters:

• an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company from fifty million (50,000,000) shares to five hundred million (500,000,000) shares and increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company from five million (5,000,000) shares to fifty million (50,000,000) shares;

• the issuance to the Contributor or its designee or designees of the Company’s common and/or preferred shares in exchange for the contributed assets, and the issuance of the Warrant and, upon exercise of the Warrant, the underlying shares of the Company’s Common Stock in exchange for the contribution of the optional property interests, if any are made;

• the amendment and restatement of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company;

• the approval of the issuance of the Payout Notes and the issuance of the Company’s Common Stock upon conversion thereof; and

• the election of a new Board of Directors as set forth above in Resignation and Appointment of Officers and Directors in this report.

Board members, officers and certain insiders of the Company are subject to a voting agreement under which they were obligated to vote in favor of the proposals at the above mentioned stockholder meeting.

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was convened on September 14, 2017, then adjourned and reconvened on October 12, 2017, at which meeting all of the proposals specified in the Company’s Definitive Proxy and further described in that Proxy and in this filing were approved by the shareholders.

Registration Rights

Promptly following the execution of the Agreement, the Company is required to prepare and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission two registration statements on Form S-3 (or such other form available for this purpose) (the “Registration Statements”) to register (a) the primary offering by the Company (i) to the holders of the Payout Notes the Common Stock underlying the Payout Notes, and (ii) to the unaffiliated shareholders of Contributor Parent the Common Stock distributed to such unaffiliated shareholders as a dividend by Contributor Parent and (b) the secondary offering (i) by the Contributor Parties of all the shares of the Company’s Common Stock (including, without limitation, the shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrant) retained by the Contributor Parties, (ii) by Maxim Group LLC of the shares received by it as compensation for services rendered to Contributor Parent, and (ii) by certain affiliates of the Contributor Parent who receive shares from Contributor Parent. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not filed these registration statements.

Termination Fee

Finally, the transaction is subject to a termination provision under which, in the event of a material breach of the terms of the transaction, the breaching company must pay all out-of-pocket expenses of the non-breaching company incurred up to the date of termination of the transaction.

The Company will conduct most of its building, construction financing and site management activities through various subsidiaries affiliated with the Contributor Parties. The Company will maintain only a small staff of employees to handle its accounting, legal and compliance activities, including a new Chief Executive Officer and a new Chief Financial Officer, who assumed their duties following the close of the First Contribution.

Notification of Delisting of Shares and Resumption of Trading on NASDAQ

The Company received a written notification (the “Original Notice”) on November 18, 2016 from The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) that the Company’s stockholder equity reported on its Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 had fallen below the minimum requirement of $2.5 million, and that the Company was therefore not in compliance with the requirements for continued listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5550(b)(1). The Original Notice provided the Company with a period of 45 calendar days, or until January 2, 2017, to submit a plan to regain compliance with the listing rules; that plan was filed with NASDAQ on January 10, 2017 under a one-week extension due to the holiday period.

NASDAQ granted the Company a combined extension of time to comply with the Rule until March 10, 2017.

On March 15, 2017, in a letter from NASDAQ to the Company (the “NASDAQ March 15th Letter”), NASDAQ granted the Company a further extension until May 17, 2017, to comply with the Continued Listing Rule, subject to (i) the Company having signed a definitive agreement with the Contributor Parent on or before March 31, 2017, which it did (i.e. the Contribution Agreement), and (ii) the Company having closed the transaction contemplated by such definitive agreement on or before May 17, 2017. As a result of the Company’s acquisition of the Contributed Assets in the Initial Closing on May 17, 2017, the Company, as of May 17, 2017, has complied with the requirements of the NASDAQ March 15th Letter and, as of that date, is in compliance with the Continued Listing Rule, including the requirement to maintain shareholder equity of at least $2.5 million.

However, on May 22, 2017, the Company received an additional letter from NASDAQ, notifying the Company that, while it was now in compliance with the Continued Listing Rule, it was not in compliance with Listing Rule 5110(a) because it failed to submit an initial listing application to receive approval to list the post-transaction entities, prior to the Initial Closing. Because of this failure, NASDAQ had determined to delist the Company’s securities from listing and registration on The NASDAQ Stock Market.

Under NASDAQ rules, the Company had the right to appeal NASDAQ’s delisting determination and request a hearing, which it did. At the hearing on June 26, 2917, the Company presented to NASDAQ its request that the delisting determination be set aside and its plan to satisfy all necessary criteria for listing on NASDAQ and to comply with the requirements of an initial listing application. Nevertheless, on July 5, 2017, the Company received another notice (the “July 5th Notice”) from NASDAQ indicating that, based upon the Company’s non-compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5110a, which requires an issuer to file an initial listing application and satisfy the initial listing criteria upon completion of a change of control transaction, the NASDAQ Hearings Panel had determined to delist the Company’s common stock from NASDAQ and that trading of the Company’s common stock would be suspended on NASDAQ effective with the open of business on July 7, 2017.

The Company has appealed the Panel’s determination; however, the appeal does not stay the suspension of trading of the Company’s securities on NASDAQ. The Company has already filed an initial listing application with NASDAQ, and is working to evidence full compliance with the applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules as soon as possible. The Company cannot determine at this time whether NASDAQ will accepts its initial listing application.

Upon the suspension of trading on NASDAQ, the Company’s common stock moved to trade over-the-counter via the OTC Markets’ “Pink” tier. On July 24, 2017, the Company received written notice that its common stock had been up-listed and approved for trading on OTCQB, the higher tier of the OTC Markets, under its existing symbol “PHMD.” The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) considers the OTCQB marketplace to be an “established public market” for the purpose of determining the public market price of a company’s stock when registering securities for resale with the SEC, and the majority of broker-dealers trade stocks on the OTCQB marketplace. Listing on the OTCQB generally provides that a company maintain higher reporting standards and requirements and imposes management certification and compliance requirements.

On September 28, 2017, the Company announced that on September 28, 2017, the Company received formal notice that the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council (the “Listing Council”) had granted the Company’s request for the resumption of trading of the Company’s common stock on NASDAQ, which took effect with the open of the market on, October 2, 2017.

Liquidity and Going Concern

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $119,501. To date, and subsequent to the recent sale of the Company’s last significant business unit, the Company has dedicated most of its financial resources to general and administrative expenses. At present, the Company is not generating any revenues from operating activities.

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2017 were $1,256, including restricted cash of $250. The Company has historically financed its activities with cash from operations, the private placement of equity and debt securities, borrowings under lines of credit and, in the most recent periods with sales of certain assets and business units. The Company will be required to obtain additional liquidity resources in order to support its operations. On January 23, 2017, the Company sold its consumer products division to ICTV Brands, Inc., for a total selling price of $9.5 million. The Company has collected $5 million of that purchase price; the remaining amount of up to $4.5 million was to be payable through a contingent royalty on the sale of consumer products by ICTV Brands.

On July 12, 2017 the Company, along with its subsidiaries Radiancy, Inc. (“Radiancy”); PhotoTherapeutics Ltd. (“PHMD UK”); and Radiancy (Israel) Limited (“Radiancy Israel” and together with the Company, Radiancy and PHMD UK the “Sellers” and each individually a “Seller”) entered into a Termination and Release Agreement (the “Release”) between the Sellers and ICTV Brands Inc. (“ICTV”) and its subsidiary ICTV Holdings, Inc. (“ICTV Holdings”). The Sellers, ICTV and ICTV Holdings are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

Under the terms of the Release, the Asset Purchase Agreement among the Parties, dated October 4, 2016, as amended by the First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 23, 2017 (as so amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), is terminated and of no further force and effect, except for certain surviving rights, obligations and covenants described in the Release. Pursuant to the Release, each of the Sellers, on one hand, and ICTV and ICTV Holdings, on the other hand, fully release, forever discharge and covenant not to sue any other Party, from and with respect to any and all past and present claims arising out of, based upon or relating to the Purchase Agreement (other than the surviving covenants described in the Purchase Agreement) or the transactions contemplated thereby.

Pursuant to the terms of the Release, ICTV paid to the Company, within 3 business days of the date of the Release, $2,000 in cash and in immediately available funds (the “Payment”). Subject to this Payment, neither ICTV nor ICTV Holdings shall have any further royalty or other payment obligations under the Purchase Agreement. The Company received $2,000 on July 13, 2017.

As partial consideration for the releases provided by ICTV Holdings to the Sellers pursuant to the Release and in accordance with the terms therein, on July 12, 2017, the Sellers and ICTV Holdings entered into a Bill of Sale and Assignment (“Bill of Sale”), which provides that each Seller sell, assign, transfer, convey and deliver to ICTV Holdings, and ICTV Holdings purchase and accept from each Seller, all of the right, title and interest, legal or equitable, of each such Seller in and to a deposit in the amount of $210 held by a consumer division vendor, Sigmatron International, Inc. (“Sigmatron”), pursuant to an arrangement between one or more of the Sellers and Sigmatron.

On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into an Interest Contribution Agreement with First Capital Real Estate Operating Partnership, L.P., and its parent, First Capital Real Estate Trust Incorporated, under which certain real estate investment properties will be contributed to the Company in exchange for the issuance of Company stock. The closing on the First Contribution under this pending transaction occurred on May 17, 2017. However, there is no guarantee that additional contributions under the pending transaction with First Capital will close, or will close on time; that the Company will be able to obtain an adequate level of financial resources required for the short and long-term support of its operations or that we will be able to obtain additional financing as needed, or meet the conditions of such financing, or that the costs of such financing may not be prohibitive. As described above the First Contribution was closed at May 2017. However, the assets assumed in such contribution do not represent a business and currently are not producing cash flows and/or revenues. Also, the Second Contribution and the Optional Contribution are not assured and might not be completed.

In light of the Company’s recent operating losses and negative cash flows and the uncertainties related to the completion of such pending transactions, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on recoverability and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

On August 30, 2016, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement for the sale of its Neova product line. The sale was completed on September 15, 2016 resulting in immediate cash proceeds to the Company of $1.5 million and the Company recorded a loss of $1,731 from the transaction during the third quarter ended September 30, 2016, and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The parties entered into several ancillary agreements as part of this transaction, including a Neova Escrow Agreement and a Neova Transition Services Agreement. Under the Neova Escrow Agreement, $250 of the Purchase Price (the "Escrow Amount") was placed into an escrow account held by U.S. Bank National Association as Escrow Agent. The funds were to remain in escrow until September 15, 2017, one year following the closing of the transaction. As of the filing of this report, November 14, 2017, the Company has not received these funds and is considering litigation. If litigation is pursued and fails, the Company will recognize an additional loss on the sales of the Neova product line for the amount of funds withheld from the escrow account.

On October 4, 2016, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement for the sale of its Consumer Division for $9.5 million, including $5 million in cash plus a $4.5 million royalty agreement (which was terminated – see below). On January 23, 2017, the Company entered into a First Amendment (the “First APA Amendment”) to the Asset Purchase Agreement which revised the definition of Business Assets and Assumed Liabilities, provided for the establishment of employee benefit plans by the Purchaser and substituted a new Disclosure Letter for the one delivered concurrently with the signing of the original Asset Purchase Agreement. The amendment also extended the term of the Letter of Credit issued in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement to 100 days after the Closing Date. The Company also entered into a First Amendment (the “First TSA Amendment”) to the Transition Services Agreement between the Company and its subsidiaries and the Purchaser of the Consumer Products division, pursuant to which the Company and its subsidiaries will provide the Purchaser with certain accounting, benefit, payroll, regulatory, IT support and other services for periods ranging from approximately three months to up to one year following the Closing Date, during which time the Purchaser will arrange to transition the services it receives to its own personnel. The First TSA Amendment revised references in the Transition Services Agreement from “Effective Date” to “Closing Date”, and clarified specifications regarding the lease for certain premises in Israel by and between Radiancy Israel and the landlord for those premises. This transaction was completed on January 23, 2017. See background paragraph above.

On July 12, 2017 the Company entered into a Termination and Release Agreement (the “Release”) under which the Asset Purchase Agreement described above was terminated and is of no further force and effect, except for certain surviving rights, obligations and covenants described in the Release. Pursuant to the Release, the purchaser of the Consumer Division paid to the Company $2,000 in cash, received July 13, 2017; the purchaser will have no further royalty or other payment obligations under the Purchase Agreement. The Company derecognized the $4,500 Royalty Receivable (which had been recognized on January 23, 2017) and recognized a total loss of $2,000 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, resulting in an adjustment of $2,000 to the amount of the loss on the disposal of the asset.

The Company had classified the assets of the Consumer Division as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2016.

As part of the sale of the consumer product line which transaction was determined to represent a complete liquidation of a foreign subsidiary the cumulative translation adjustment of $3,228 related to that foreign entity was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported as part of gain or loss from the sale.

On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into an Interest Contribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with First Capital Real Estate Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Contributor”), and First Capital Real Estate Trust Incorporated, a Maryland corporation, the “Contributor Parent” and, together with Contributor, the “Contributor Parties”), under which the Contributor will contribute certain real estate assets to the Company’s subsidiary in a series of three installments which will conclude no later than December 31, 2017. In exchange, the Contributor will receive shares of the Company’s Common Stock and newly designated Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Further details on this transaction and the Company’s transition to a real estate investment company are contained in these notes.

TERMINATION OF PROPOSED TRANSACTION

On February 19, 2016, FC Global Realty Incorporated, then known as PhotoMedex, Inc., Radiancy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Radiancy”), DS Healthcare Group, Inc. (“DSKX”) and PHMD Consumer Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DSKX (“Merger Sub A”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “Radiancy Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which Radiancy will merge with Merger Sub A, with Radiancy as the surviving corporation in such merger (the “Radiancy Merger”). Concurrently, the Company, PTECH, DSKX, and PHMD Professional Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DSKX (“Merger Sub B”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the “P-Tech Merger Agreement” and together with the Radiancy Merger Agreement, the “Merger Agreements”) pursuant to which PTECH will merge with Merger Sub B, with PTECH as the surviving corporation in such merger (the “P-Tech Merger” and together with the Radiancy Merger, the “Mergers”). As a result of the Mergers, DSKX would become the holding company for Radiancy and PTECH. The Mergers are expected to qualify as tax-free transfers of property to DSKX for federal income tax purposes.

On March 23, 2016, DSKX filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “DSKX March 23 Form 8-K”) with the SEC reporting its audit committee, after discussion with its independent registered public accounting firm, concluded that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of DSKX for the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015 should no longer be relied upon because of certain errors in such financial statements. To the knowledge of DSKX’s audit committee, the facts underlying its conclusion include that revenues recognized related to certain customers of DSKX did not meet revenue recognition criteria in the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015. Additionally, certain equity transactions in the two fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015 were not properly recorded in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and also were not properly disclosed.

DSKX reported in the DSKX March 23 Form 8-K that, on March 17, 2016, all members of DSKX’s board of directors other than Mr. Khesin, terminated the employment of Mr. Khesin, as its president and as an employee of DSKX, and also terminated Mr. Khesin’s employment agreement, dated December 16, 2013. DSKX reported in the DSKX March 23 Form 8-K that all members of DSKX’s board of directors other than Mr. Khesin terminated both Mr. Khesin’s employment and employment agreement for cause. In addition, DSKX reported in the DSKX March 23 Form 8-K that all members of DSKX’s board of directors other than Mr. Khesin unanimously removed Mr. Khesin as Chairman and a member of DSKX’s board of directors, also for cause. DSKX reported in the DSKX March 23 Form 8-K that DSKX’s board terminated Mr. Khesin for cause from both his employment and board positions because DSKX’s board believes, based on the results of the investigation as of the date of the DSKX March 23 Form 8-K, that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Mr. Khesin violated his fiduciary duty to DSKX and its subsidiaries.

The Company was not advised of this investigation during its negotiations with DSKX or after signing the Merger Agreements until the evening of March 21, 2016. On April 12, 2016, the Company sent a Reservation of Rights letter to DSKX. The Notice states that, based upon the disclosures set forth in DSKX’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2016 and subsequent press releases and filings by DSKX with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (collectively, the “DSKX Public Disclosure”), DSKX is in material breach of various representations, warranties, covenants and agreements set forth in the Agreements; had failed to provide to the Company the information contained in the DSKX Public Disclosures during the discussions relating to the negotiation and execution of the Agreements; and continues to be in material breach under the Agreements. As a result, the conditions precedent to the closing of these transactions as set forth in the Agreements may not be able to occur.

On May 27, 2016, the Company, Radiancy, and P-Tech, terminated both Agreements and Plans of Merger and Reorganization among the Company and its affiliates and DS Healthcare Group. Given the material breaches identified in the Company’s notice to DSKX, the Company had initiated litigation seeking to recover a termination fee of $3.0 million, an expense reimbursement of up to $750 and its liabilities and damages suffered as a result of DSKX’s failures and breaches in connection with each of the Merger Agreements. On May 27, 2016, the Company, Radiancy and P-Tech filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging breaches of the Merger Agreements by DSKX and seeking the damages described in the foregoing sentence.

On June 23, 2017, the Company and its subsidiaries Radiancy and P-Tech entered into a Confidential Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (the “DS Settlement Agreement”) with DSKX and its subsidiaries.

The terms of the DS Settlement Agreement are confidential; the parties dismissed the suit between them with prejudice on June 23, 2017. The accounting impact of the settlement agreement has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 within operating expenses as “other income, net”.

Reverse Split and Number of Shares Adjustment

On October 29, 2015 the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders in which, among other matters, Company stockholders authorized the board of directors to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with respect to a reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock in a ratio to be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors not to exceed a 1 for 5 ratio.

On September 7, 2016 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a reverse split in a ratio of 1-for-five. The 2016 reverse split was implemented on September 23, 2016 (the “2016 Reverse Split”). The amount of authorized Common Stock as well as the par value for the Common Stock were not effected. Any fractional shares resulting from the 2016 Reverse Split were rounded up to the nearest whole share.

All Common Stock, warrants, options and per share amounts set forth herein are presented to give retroactive effect to the 2016 Reverse Split for all periods presented.

Basis of Presentation:

Accounting Principles

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) related to interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial Statements and related notes included in our Form 10-K for fiscal 2016. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 has been derived from those audited financial statements. As permitted under those rules, certain information and footnote disclosures normally required or included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The financial information contained herein is unaudited; however, management believes all adjustments have been made that are considered necessary to present fairly the results of the Company’s financial position and operating results for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017 or for any other interim period or for any future period.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Held for Sale Classification and Discontinued Operations

A disposal group is reported as held for sale when management has approved or received approval to sell and is committed to a formal plan, the disposal group is available for immediate sale, the business is being actively marketed, the sale is anticipated to occur during the next 12 months and certain other specified criteria are met. A disposal group classified as held for sale is recorded at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less cost to sell. If the carrying value of the business exceeds its estimated fair value less cost to sell, a loss is recognized. However, when disposal group meets the held for sale criteria, the Company first evaluates whether the carrying amounts of the assets not covered by ASC 360-10 included in the disposal group (such as goodwill) are required to be adjusted in accordance with other applicable GAAP before measuring the disposal group at fair value less cost to sell.

 Assets and liabilities related to a disposal group classified as held for sale are segregated in the consolidated balance sheet in the period in which the disposal group is classified as held for sale.

Commencing January 1, 2015 (the effective date of the ASU 2014-08), only disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results shall be reported as discontinued operations. The revised guidance did not change the criteria required to qualify for held for sale presentation. The revised guidance includes several new disclosures and among others, required to reclassify the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations to separate line items in the balance sheets for all periods presented (including comparatives).

In connection with the sale of the Consumer Division to ICTV Brands, Inc., announced on October 4, 2016 and subsequently completed on January 23, 2017, the assets related to this transaction were classified as of December 31, 2016 as Assets Held for Sale, as follows:

Inventory	$	7,336
Property and equipment		911
Other assets		115
Assets held for sale as of December 31, 2016	$	8,362

Revenue Recognition

The following is a description of the revenue recognition policy related to the previous skin care business: The Company recognizes revenues from product sales when the following four criteria have been met: (i) the product has been delivered and the Company has no significant remaining obligations; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (iii) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from product sales are recorded net of provisions for estimated chargebacks, rebates, expected returns and cash discounts.

The Company shipped most of its products FOB shipping point, although from time to time certain customers, for example governmental customers, will be granted FOB destination terms. Among the factors the Company takes into account when determining the proper time at which to recognize revenue are (i) when title to the goods transfers and (ii) when the risk of loss transfers. Shipments to distributors or physicians that do not fully satisfy the collection criteria are recognized when invoiced amounts are fully paid or fully assured and included in deferred revenues until that time.

For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables within a single, contractually binding arrangement (usually sales of products with separately priced extended warranty), each element of the contract was accounted for as a separate unit of accounting when it provides the customer value on a stand-alone basis and there is objective evidence of the fair value of the related unit.

With respect to sales arrangements under which the buyer has a right to return the related product, revenue is recognized only if all the following conditions are met: the price is fixed or determinable at the date of sale; the buyer has paid, or is obligated to pay and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product; the buyer’s obligation would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; the buyer has economic substance; the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer; and the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated.

The Company provided a provision for product returns based on the experience with historical sales returns, in accordance with ASC Topic 605-15 with respect to sales of product when a right of return exists. Reported revenues are shown net of the returns provision. Such allowance for sales returns is included in Other Accrued Liabilities. (See Note 8). Due to the sale of the remainder of the consumer products division in January 2017, there is no remaining allowance for product returns as of September 30, 2017.

Deferred revenue included amounts received with respect to extended warranty maintenance, repairs and other billable services and amounts not yet recognized as revenues. Revenues with respect to such activities were deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the duration of the warranty period, the service period or when service is provided, as applicable to each service.

Functional Currency

The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Company, its U.S. subsidiaries and Radiancy Ltd., its subsidiary in Israel, are conducted is the US dollar (“$” or “dollars”). Thus, the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries (other than the foreign subsidiaries mentioned below) is the dollar (which is also the reporting currency of the Group). The operations of the other foreign subsidiaries are each conducted in the local currency of the subsidiary. These currencies include: Great Britain Pounds (GBP) and Israel (NIS). Substantially all of the Group’s revenues are derived in dollars or in other currencies linked to the dollar. Purchases of most materials and components were carried out in, or linked to the dollar.

Balances denominated in, or linked to, foreign currencies are stated on the basis of the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. For foreign currency transactions included in the statement of comprehensive income (loss), the exchange rates applicable to the relevant transaction dates are used. Transaction gains or losses arising from changes in the exchange rates used in the translation of such balances are carried to financing income or expenses.

Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, whose functional currency is their local currency, are translated from their respective functional currency to U.S. dollars at the balance sheet date exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Deferred taxes are not provided on translation adjustments as the earnings of the subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested.

Upon sale of a foreign subsidiary or upon sale of group of asset within a consolidated foreign subsidiary, in a transaction that was determined to represent a complete liquidation of that foreign subsidiary, the cumulative translation adjustment related to that foreign entity is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported as part of gain or loss from the sale. 

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

● Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

● Level 2 – pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.

● Level 3 – pricing inputs are unobservable for the non-financial asset or liability and only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the non-financial asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair value is determined using comparable market transactions and other valuation methodologies, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are based on its demand value, which is equal to its carrying value. The estimated fair values of notes payable which are based on borrowing rates that are available to the Company for loans with similar terms, collateral and maturity approximate the carrying values. Additionally, the carrying value of all other monetary assets and liabilities is estimated to be equal to their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value, on a recurring basis. The fair value of derivatives generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Group would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting dates, based on the prevailing currency prices and the relevant interest rates. Such measurement is classified within Level 2.

Financial liabilities and financial assets related to the mandatory Second Contribution and the Optional Contribution described in Note 2 Acquisition of Real Estate Assets above were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. The estimated fair value was based on appraised value, such measurement resides within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, there are also assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include certain long-lived assets, including goodwill. As such, we have determined that each of these fair value measurements reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. 

Derivatives

The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. In accordance with ASC Topic 815, all the derivative financial instruments are recognized as either financial assets or financial liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.

From time to time the Company carried out transactions involving foreign exchange derivative financial instruments (mainly forward exchange contracts) which were expected to be paid with respect to forecasted expenses of the Israeli subsidiary (Radiancy) denominated in Israeli local currency (NIS) which is different than its functional currency.

Such derivatives were not designated as hedging instruments, and accordingly they were recognized in the balance sheet at their fair value, with changes in the fair value carried to the Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and included in interest and other financing expenses, net.

At September 30, 2017, the balance of such derivative instruments amounted to $0 in assets and $0 was recognized as financing income in the Statement of Comprehensive (Loss) Income during the three and nine month periods ended that date.

There are no foreign currency derivatives as of September 30, 2017.

Accrued Warranty Costs

The Company offered a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period. The Company provided for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product was sold. Total accrued warranty was included in Other Accrued Liabilities on the balance sheet. The activity in the warranty accrual during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

	September 30,
	2017			2016
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Accrual at beginning of year	$	241		$	331
Additions charged to warranty expense		—			78
Expiring warranties		—			(130	)
Claims satisfied		—			(131	)
Sale of consumer segment		(241	)		—
Total	$	—		$	148

Net Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per common share were calculated using the following weighted-average shares outstanding: 

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic and Diluted number of common shares outstanding		8,299,528		4,157,917		6,296,604		4,173,146
Diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding		8,299,528		4,157,917		6,296,604		4,173,146

Diluted loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, exclude the impact of common stock options and warrants, totaling 64,939,538 and 32,469,769 shares respectively, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, due to the loss from continuing operations for the periods. Diluted loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, exclude the impact of common stock options and warrants, totaling 209,398 shares, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, due to the loss from continuing operations for the periods.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and Related Updates

In May of 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASC Update 2014-09 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement and disclosure of revenue related to the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This update was originally effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, for which early adoption was prohibited.

However, in August of 2015, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” deferring the effective date of ASC Update 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 for the Company), and permitting early adoption of this update, but only for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within that reporting period.

During 2016, the FASB issued several Accounting Standard Updates that focuses on certain implementation issues of the new revenue recognition guidance including Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, Principal versus Agent Considerations and Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.

An entity should apply the amendments in this ASU using one of the following two methods: 1. retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with a possibility to elect certain practical expedients, or, 2. retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If an entity elects the latter transition method, it also should provide certain additional disclosures.

The Company intends to adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2018. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its potential revenue streams, if any, and on its financial reporting and disclosures. Management is expecting to complete the evaluation of the impact of the accounting and disclosure changes on the business processes, controls and systems throughout 2017. Since the company currently does not have any revenue streams, Management believes that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will not have significant impact on its financial statements.

ASU 2016 - 02 “Leases (Topic 842): Section A – Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; Section B – Conforming Amendments Related to Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; Section C – Background Information and Basis for Conclusions”

In February of 2016, the FASB issued ASC Update 2016 - 02, “Leases (Topic 842): Section A – Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; Section B – Conforming Amendments Related to Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; Section C – Background Information and Basis for Conclusions.” ASC Update 2016-02 amends guidance related to the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for lessors and lessees. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including the interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on the results of operations and financial statements, if any.

ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASC Update 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASC Update 2016-13 revised the criteria for the measurement, recognition, and reporting of credit losses on financial instruments to be recognized when expected. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including the interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on the results of operations and financial statements, if any.

ASU 2016-09 “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”

In March 2016, the FASB has issued ASC Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments are intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees.

Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments also simplify two areas specific to private companies.

For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period periods (i.e., in the first quarter of 2017 for calendar year-end companies).

The Company is in the process of assessing the impact, if any, of ASU 2016-09 on its financial statements.

ASU 2017-01 “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”

In January 2017, the FASB has issued ASC Update (ASU) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, clarifying the definition of a business. The amendments affect all companies and other reporting organizations that must determine whether they have acquired or sold a business.

The amendments in ASU 2017-01 are intended to help companies and other organizations evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. They also provide more consistency in applying the guidance, reduce the costs of application, and make the definition of a business more operable.

The amendments in ASU 2017-01 provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated.

If the screen is not met, the amendments in this Update (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments provide a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The framework includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs. Although outputs are not required for a set to be a business, outputs generally are a key element of a business; therefore, the Board has developed more stringent criteria for sets without outputs. Also, ASU 2017- 01 narrows the definition of the term output so that the term is consistent with how outputs are described in Topic 606.

For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early application of the amendments in this Update is allowed for transactions for which the acquisition date occurs before the issuance date or effective date of the amendments, only when the transaction has not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.

The amendments of ASU 2017-01should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. No disclosures are required at transition.

The Company decided to early apply ASU 2017-01, and thus the assets contributed to the Company in connection with the asset contribution described in Note 2 (which its first installment was closed on May 17, 2017) were evaluated in accordance with the updated guidance ASU 2017-01. See Note 2.