Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative)	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Iinfringe Intellectual Property [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Name of plantiff	The Company’s subsidiary, Radiancy, Inc.
Domicile of litigation	U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Description of allegation	The complaint seeks certification of the class, which consists of customers in the State of California who purchased the no!no! hair devices.
Putative class Action [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Name of defendent	Jan Mouzon and twelve other customers residing in ten different states
Domicile of litigation	United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Description of allegation	Alleges various violations of state business and consumer protection codes including false and misleading advertising, unfair trade practices, and breach of express and implied warranties.

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Jan Mouzon and twelve other customers residing in ten different states

Alleges various violations of state business and consumer protection codes including false and misleading advertising, unfair trade practices, and breach of express and implied warranties.