Note 1

The Company:

Background

PhotoMedex, Inc. (and its subsidiaries) (the "Company") is a Global Skin Health company providing integrated disease management and aesthetic solutions to dermatologists, professional aestheticians and consumers. The Company provides proprietary products and services that address skin diseases and conditions including psoriasis, vitiligo, acne, actinic keratosis (a precursor to certain types of skin cancer) and photo damage.

On December 13, 2011, the Company closed the merger with Radiancy, Inc. As of December 13, 2011, immediately after giving effect to the acquisition and the issuance of PhotoMedex, Inc.'s common stock to the former shareholders of Radiancy, Inc., the Company had 18,820,852 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Immediately following the reverse merger, the pre-reverse merger shareholders of PhotoMedex, Inc. ("Pre-merged PhotoMedex") collectively owned approximately 20% of the Company's outstanding common stock, and the former Radiancy, Inc. stockholders owned approximately 80% of the Company's outstanding common stock.

The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition with Radiancy treated for accounting purposes as the acquirer. As such, the financial statements of Radiancy, Inc. are treated as the historical financial statements of the Company, with the results of Pre-merged PhotoMedex, Inc. being included from December 14, 2011 and thereafter. For periods prior to the closing of the reverse acquisition, therefore, our discussion below relates to the historical business and operations of Radiancy, Inc.

As a result of the acquisition, the Company implemented a revised business plan focused on three key components – skilled direct sales force to target Physician and Professional Segments; expertise in global consumer marketing; and a full product-life-cycle model representing the ability to develop and commercialize innovative products from concept through regulatory, physician acceptance, and ultimately marketed directly to the consumer as dictated by normal product-life-cycle evolution. The Company reorganized its business into three operating units to better align its organization based upon the Company's management structure, products and services offered, markets served and types of customers.

Based upon this strategic focus, effective December 13, 2011, management updated the segments that the Company now currently operates. There are now three distinct business units or segments (as described in Note 13): Consumer, Physician Recurring and Professional. The segments are distinguished by the Company's management structure and the markets or customers served.

The Consumer segment, the Company's largest business unit, generates revenues by bringing professional technologies into the home-use arena, through the no!no!® product line. The Physician Recurring segment generates revenues from two product lines: (A) the XTRAC®, a noninvasive, FDA-cleared solution for psoriasis and vitiligo, and (B) NEOVA®, a topical therapy combining DNA repair enzymes and copper peptide complexes to prevent premature skin aging. The Professional segment generates revenues from capital equipment, such as the XTRAC lasers, LHE® brand products and the Omnilux® and Lumière Light Therapy systems.

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 ("fiscal 2011"). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") related to interim financial statements. As permitted under those rules, certain information and footnote disclosures normally required or included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP") have been condensed or omitted. The financial information contained herein is unaudited; however, management believes all adjustments have been made that are considered necessary to present fairly the results of the Company's financial position and operating results for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have material impact on the Company's equity, net assets or cash flows.

The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or for any other interim period or for any future period.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements include the results from the entities defined as Pre-merged PhotoMedex from December 14, 2011 (the day following the closing date of the reverse acquisition) forward. There are, therefore, no corresponding activities in 2011 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

During the measurement period of the reverse acquisition, provisional amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date in connection with certain tax positions of the acquired entity and also with respect to adjustment to the calculation of the acquisition consideration (which was based on the equity interest that the accounting acquirer would have had to issue to the accounting acquiree equity interest holders). As such, the comparative information for the prior periods presented have been revised, specifically for deferred tax asset, other accrued liabilities, goodwill and additional paid in capital.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues from product sales when the following four criteria have been met: (i) the product has been delivered and the Company has no significant remaining obligations; (ii) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (iii) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured. Revenues from product sales are recorded net of provisions for estimated chargebacks, rebates, expected returns and cash discounts.

The Company ships most of its products FOB shipping point, although from time to time certain customers, for example governmental customers, will insist upon FOB destination. Among the factors the Company takes into account when determining the proper time at which to recognize revenue are when title to the goods transfers and when the risk of loss transfers. Shipments to distributors or physicians that do not fully satisfy the collection criteria are recognized when invoiced amounts are fully paid or fully assured.

For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables within a single, contractually binding arrangement (usually sales of products with separately priced extended warranty), each element of the contract is accounted for as a separate unit of accounting when it provides the customer value on a stand-alone basis and there is objective evidence of the fair value of the related unit.

With respect to sales arrangements under which the buyer has a right to return the related product, revenue is recognized only if all the following are met: the price is fixed or determinable at the date of sale; the buyer has paid, or is obligated to pay and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product; the buyer's obligation would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; the buyer has economic substance; the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer; and the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated.

The Company provides a provision for product sales returns based on the experience with historical sales returns, in accordance with ASC Topic 605-15 with respect to sales of products when a right of return exists. Reported revenues are shown net of the returns provision. Such allowance for sales returns is included in Other Accrued Liabilities. (See Note 8).

Deferred revenue includes amounts received with respect to extended warranty maintenance, repairs and other billable services and amounts not yet recognized as revenues. Revenues with respect to such activities are recognized over the duration of the warranty period, the service period or when service is provided, as applicable to each service.

The Company has two distribution channels for its phototherapy treatment equipment. The Company either (i) sells its lasers through a distributor or directly to a physician or (ii) places its lasers in a physician's office (at no charge to the physician) and generally charges the physician a fee for an agreed upon number of treatments. In some cases, the Company and the customer stipulate to a quarterly or other periodic target of procedures to be performed, and accordingly revenue is recognized ratably over the period.

When the Company places a laser in a physician's office, it generally recognizes service revenue based on the number of patient treatments performed, or purchased under a periodic commitment, by the physician. Treatments to be performed through random laser-access codes that are sold to physicians free of a periodic commitment, but not yet used, are deferred and recognized as a liability until the physician performs the treatment. Unused treatments remain an obligation of the Company because the treatments can only be performed on Company-owned equipment. Once the treatments are delivered to a patient, this obligation has been satisfied.

The Company defers substantially all sales of treatment codes ordered by and delivered to its customers within the last two weeks of the period in determining the amount of procedures performed by its physician-customers. Management believes this approach closely approximates the actual amount of unused treatments that existed at the end of a period.

Revenue from maintenance service agreements is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreements. Revenue from billable services, including repair activity, is recognized when the service is provided.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2 – pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data.

Level 3 – pricing inputs are unobservable for the non-financial asset or liability and only used when there is little, if any, market activity for the non-financial asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Fair value is determined using comparable market transactions and other valuation methodologies, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is based on its demand value, which is equal to its carrying value. The fair values of notes payable and long-term debt are based on borrowing rates that are available to the Company for loans with similar terms, collateral and maturity. The estimated fair values of notes payable and long-term debt approximate the carrying values. The fair value of the amounts funded in insurance policies in respect of employee liability for employee rights upon retirement is usually identical or close to their carrying value. Additionally, the carrying value of all other monetary assets and liabilities is estimated to be equal to their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Accrued Warranty Costs

The Company offers a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period. In the case of domestic sales of XTRAC lasers, however, the Company has offered longer warranty periods, ranging from three to four years, in order to meet competition or meet customer demands. The Company provides for the estimated future warranty claims on the date the product is sold. Total accrued warranty is included in Other Accrued Liabilities on the balance sheet.

The activity in the warranty accrual during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is summarized as follows:

	September 30,
	2012			2011
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Accrual at beginning of year	$	1,661		$	260
Additions charged to warranty expense		1,189			277
Expiring warranties		(307	)		(-	)
Claims satisfied		(1,076	)		(191	)
Total		1,467			346
Less: current portion		(1,229	)		(346	)
Accrued extended warranty	$	238		$	-

For extended warranty on the consumer products, see Revenue Recognition above.

Earnings Per Share

Due to the reverse merger on December 13, 2011, the earnings per share for each period before the acquisition date presented in these financial statements were computed based on Radiancy's historical weighted-average number of shares outstanding, multiplied by the exchange ratio that was established in the reverse merger. Therefore, unless otherwise noted, all share and per-share amounts for all periods before the acquisition date have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the exchange ratio.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share were calculated using the following weighted-average shares outstanding:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic number of common shares outstanding		21,205,675		12,342,160		20,001,456		10,951,630
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants		547,170		841,095		547,170		718,925
Diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding		21,752,845		13,183,255		20,548,626		11,670,555

Diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, exclude the impact of common stock options and warrants, totaling 1,949,365 shares, as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") No. 2011-04, which amends Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This ASU clarifies among other things, the FASB's intent with respect to the application of existing fair value requirements, including those related to highest and best use concepts, and also expands the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This ASU clarifies that a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, this ASU expands the disclosures for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 where a reporting entity is required to include a description of the valuation processes used and the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs, if any. Additional disclosure is also required for any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy of fair value measurements on a gross basis as well as additional disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are not recorded at fair value. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend for this ASU to result in a change in the application of the requirements in FASB ASC Topic 820. This update became effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, which amends FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. This ASU is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income in the financial statements by presenting the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. This ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This update became effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, which amends FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. This ASU permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This update became effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.