UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

Commission File No. 000-49789

HENRY COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Georgia	58-1485511
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4806 N. Henry Boulevard Stockbridge, Georgia	30281
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(770) 474-7293

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:	Name of each exchange on which registered:
COMMON STOCK, $2.50 PAR VALUE	NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  x
Smaller reporting company  ¨	Non-accelerated filer  ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of June 30, 2008: $141,120,236 (based on the stock price of $11.25 as of that date).

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 14,245,690 shares of $2.50 par value common stock as of March 10, 2009.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the information required by Part III of this Annual Report are incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I
Forward Looking Statement Disclosure		3
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	20
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	26
Item 2.	Properties	26
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	27
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	28
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	32
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	33
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	59
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	60
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	61
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	61
Item 9B.	Other Information	64
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	64
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	64
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	64
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	65
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	65
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	65
Signatures		65
Index to Exhibits		67

2

Forward Looking Statement Disclosure

Statements in this Annual Report regarding future events or performance are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”) and are made pursuant to the safe harbors of the PSLRA. Actual results of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) could be quite different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Any statements containing the words “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “expects,” “projections,” “potential,” “continue,” or words of similar import, constitute “forward-looking statements,” as do any other statements that expressly or implicitly predict future events, results, or performance. Factors that could cause results to differ from results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include, among others, risks discussed in the text of this Annual Report as well as the following specific items:

• General economic conditions, whether national or regional, that could affect the demand for loans or lead to increased loan losses;

• Competitive factors, including increased competition with community, regional, and national financial institutions, that may lead to pricing pressures that reduce yields the Company achieves on loans and increase rates the Company pays on deposits, loss of the Company’s most valued customers, defection of key employees or groups of employees, or other losses;

• Increasing or decreasing interest rate environments, including the shape and level of the yield curve, that could lead to decreases in net interest margin, lower net interest and fee income, including lower gains on sales of loans, and changes in the value of the Company’s investment securities;

• Changing business or regulatory conditions or new legislation, affecting the financial services industry that could lead to increased costs, changes in the competitive balance among financial institutions, or revisions to our strategic focus;

• Changes or failures in technology or third party vendor relationships in important revenue production or service areas, or increases in required investments in technology that could reduce our revenues, increase our costs or lead to disruptions in our business.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of the statements. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.

Readers should carefully review all disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

3

Part I

Item 1. BUSINESS

General

Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), headquartered in Stockbridge, Georgia, is a Georgia business corporation which operates as a bank holding company. The Company was incorporated on June 22, 1982 for the purpose of reorganizing The First State Bank (the “Bank”) to operate within a holding company structure. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The Company’s principal activities consist of owning and supervising the Bank, which engages in a full service commercial and consumer banking business, as well as a variety of deposit services provided to its customers. The Company also conducts mortgage lending operations through the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co., which provides the Bank’s customers with a wide range of mortgage banking services and products.

The Company, through the Bank and First Metro Mortgage Co., derives substantially all of its income from the furnishing of banking and banking related services.

The Company directs the policies and coordinates the financial resources of the Bank. The Company provides and performs various technical and advisory services for its subsidiaries, coordinates their general policies and activities, and participates in their major decisions.

The Company’s filings with the SEC, including its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, periodic reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, are accessible free of charge at our website at http://www.firststateonline.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. By making this reference to our website, we do not intend to incorporate into this report any information contained in the website. The website should not be considered part of this report.

The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers including the Company that file electronically with the SEC.

4

The First State Bank, Stockbridge, Georgia

The Bank was chartered by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance in 1964. The Bank operates through its main office at 4806 North Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia, as well as six (6) full service branches located at 1810 Hudson Bridge Road in Stockbridge, 295 Fairview Road in Ellenwood, 114 John Frank Ward Boulevard in McDonough, 4979 Bill Gardner Parkway in Locust Grove, 2316 Highway 155 in McDonough and 1908 Highway 81 East in McDonough. The Bank owns two lots for the construction of future branches, one at the intersection of Chambers Road and Jonesboro Road in Henry County, as well as one in Butts County located at 620 W. Third Street in Jackson. The Bank owns an additional parcel of real estate adjacent to its main office location in Stockbridge, Georgia, upon which is situated a small house leased to an unaffiliated insurance company.

The Bank engages in a full service commercial and consumer banking business in its primary market area of Henry County and surrounding counties, as well as a variety of deposit services provided to its customers. The Bank offers on-line banking services to its customers. Checking, savings, money market accounts and other time deposits are the primary sources of the Bank’s funds for loans and investments. The Bank offers a full complement of lending activities, including commercial, consumer installment, real estate, home equity and second mortgage loans, with particular emphasis on short and medium term obligations. Commercial lending activities are directed principally to businesses whose demands for funds fall within the Bank’s lending limits. Consumer lending is oriented primarily to the needs of the Bank’s customers. Real estate loans include short term acquisition and construction loans. The Bank focuses primarily on residential and commercial construction loans, commercial loans secured by machinery and equipment with a developed resale market, working capital loans on a secured short term basis to established businesses in the primary service area, home equity loans of up to 80% of the current market value of the underlying real estate, residential real estate loans of up to 90% of value with adjustable rates or balloon payments due within five (5) years, and loans secured by savings accounts, other time accounts, cash value of life insurance, readily marketable stocks and bonds, or general use machinery and equipment for which a resale market has developed. The Bank makes both secured and unsecured loans to persons and entities which meet criteria established by the Bank and the executive committee. Approximately 95% of the Bank’s loan portfolio is concentrated in loans secured by real estate, most of which is located in the Bank’s primary market area. The Bank, as a matter of state law and bank policy, does not extend credit to any single borrower or group of related borrowers in excess of 25% of statutory capital, or approximately $12,000.000. The lending policies and procedures of the Bank are periodically reviewed and modified by the Board of Directors of the Bank in order to ensure risks are acceptable and to protect the Bank’s financial position in the market. Among other services offered are drive-up windows, night deposits, safe deposits, traveler’s checks, credit cards, cashier’s checks, notary public and other customary bank services. The Bank does not offer trust services.

The Bank maintains correspondent relationships with Silverton Bank, SunTrust Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, Compass Bank, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. These banks provide certain services to the Bank such as investing excess funds, wire transfer of funds, safekeeping of investment securities, loan participation and investment advice.

5

The banking business in and around Henry County, Georgia is highly competitive which includes certain major banks which have acquired formerly locally owned institutions. These banks have considerably greater resources and lending limits than the Bank. In addition to commercial banks and savings banks, the Bank competes with other financial institutions, such as credit unions, agricultural credit associations, and investment firms which provide services similar to checking accounts and commercial lending. The Bank competes with numerous institutions within the primary service areas, including local branches of Bank of America, SunTrust Bank, Wachovia and BB&T. As of December 31, 2008 the Bank held approximately 26% of the deposit accounts in the Henry County area. Neither the Company nor the Bank generates a material amount of revenue from foreign countries, nor does either have material long-lived assets, customer relationships, mortgages or servicing rights, deferred policy acquisition costs, or deferred tax assets in foreign countries. Thus, the Company has no significant risks attributable to foreign operations.

The Bank relies substantially on personal conduct of its officers, directors and shareholders, as well as a broad product line, competitive services, and an aggressive local advertising campaign and promotional activities to attract business and to acquaint potential customers with the Bank’s personal services. The Bank’s marketing approach emphasizes the advantages of dealing with an independent, locally owned and headquartered commercial bank attuned to the particular needs of small to medium size businesses, professionals and individuals in the community.

As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had 134 full-time employees and 20 part-time employees. None of the Bank’s employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The Bank considers its relationships with the employees to be good.

A history of the Bank’s financial position for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, is as follows:

	Years Ended
	2008			2007		2006
Total Assets	$	656,245,974		$	719,528,021	$	695,051,272
Total Deposits	$	591,106,388		$	626,781,211	$	596,673,741
Net Income	$	(14,165,268	)	$	8,858,040	$	12,556,572

First Metro Mortgage Co.

First Metro Mortgage Co. was formed in 1985 to provide mortgage loan origination services in the same primary market area as the Bank. Its offices are located at the Bank’s branch facility on Hudson Bridge Road in Stockbridge, Georgia. First Metro Mortgage Co. initiates long term mortgage loans but immediately sells those loans in the secondary market to investors pursuant to

6

agreements between the investors and the company prior to funding. All loans are sold without recourse, and the Bank does not retain servicing rights or obligations with respect to those loans. First Metro Mortgage Co. realized a net loss of $149,874 for 2008, a net loss of $121,124 for 2007 and a net loss of $110,029 for 2006. First Metro Mortgage Co. was merged into and became a subsidiary of The First State Bank, effective July 1, 2003.

Supervision and Regulation

Bank Holding Company Regulations—Henry County Bancshares, Inc.

The Company is a registered holding company under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act and the Georgia Bank Holding Company Act and is regulated under such act by the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the “GDB&F”), respectively.

Reporting and Examination

As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve and the GDB&F and provide such additional information as the applicable regulator may require pursuant to the Federal and Georgia Bank Holding Company Acts. The Federal Reserve and the GDB&F may also conduct examinations of the Company to determine whether the Company is in compliance with Bank Holding Company Acts and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Acquisitions

The Federal Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of a bank; and (3) before merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. A bank holding company is also generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring, direct or indirect control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting shares of any company engaged in non-banking activities, unless the Federal Reserve has found those activities to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation to be proper incidents to the business of a bank holding company include making or servicing loans and certain types of leases, engaging in certain insurance and discount brokerage activities, performing certain data processing services, acting in certain circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor, owning savings associations, and making investments in certain corporations for projects designed primarily to promote community welfare.

7

The GDB&F requires similar approval prior to the acquisition of any additional banks. A Georgia bank holding company is generally prohibited from acquiring ownership or control of 5% or more of the voting shares of a bank unless the bank being acquired is either a bank for purposes of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act, or a federal or state savings and loan association or savings bank or federal savings bank whose deposits are insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such bank has been in existence and continuously operating as a bank for a period of three years or more prior to the date of application to the Department for approval of such acquisition.

Source of Strength to Subsidiary Banks

The Federal Reserve (pursuant to regulation and published statements) has maintained that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. In adhering to the Federal Reserve policy, the Company may be required to provide financial support to its subsidiary banks at a time when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, the Company may not deem it advisable to provide such assistance. Similarly, the Federal Reserve also monitors the financial performance and prospects of non-bank subsidiaries with an inspection process to ascertain whether such non-banking subsidiaries enhance or detract from the Company’s ability to serve as a source of strength for its subsidiary banks.

Capital Requirements

The Company is subject to regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve applied on a consolidated basis with banks owned by the Company. Bank holding companies must have capital (as defined in the rules) equal to eight (8) percent of risk-weighted assets. The risk weights assigned to assets are based primarily on credit risk. For example, securities with an unconditional guarantee by the United States government are assigned the least risk category. A risk weight of 50% is assigned to loans secured by owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgages. The aggregate amount of assets assigned to each risk category is multiplied by the risk weight assigned to that category to determine the weighted values, which are added together to determine total risk-weighted assets.

The Federal Reserve also requires the maintenance of minimum capital leverage ratios to be used in tandem with the risk-based guidelines in assessing the overall capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The guidelines define capital as either Tier 1 (primarily shareholder equity) or Tier 2 (certain debt instruments and a portion of the allowance for loan losses). Tier 1 capital for banking organizations includes common equity, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock. (Cumulative perpetual preferred stock is limited to 25 percent of Tier 1 capital.) Tier 1 capital excludes goodwill; amounts of mortgage servicing assets, nonmortgage servicing assets, and purchased credit card relationships that, in the aggregate, exceed 100 percent of Tier 1 capital; nonmortgage servicing assets and purchased credit card relationships that in the aggregate, exceed 25 percent of Tier 1 capital; all other identifiable intangible assets; and deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable income, net of their valuation allowance, in excess of certain limitations.

8

Effective June 30, 1998, the Federal Reserve has established a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3.0 percent for strong bank holding companies (rated composite “1” under the BOPEC rating system of bank holding companies), and for bank holding companies that have implemented the Board’s risk-based capital measure for market risk. For all other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 4.0 percent. Banking organizations with supervisory, financial, operational, or managerial weaknesses, as well as organizations that are anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to maintain capital ratios well above the minimum levels. Higher capital ratios may be required for any bank holding company if warranted by its particular circumstances or risk profile. Bank holding companies are required to hold capital commensurate with the level and nature of the risks, including the volume and severity of problem loans, to which they are exposed.

As of December 31, 2008 the Company maintained Tier 1 and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratios of 10.32% and 11.59%, respectively. A more detailed analysis of the Company’s capital and comparison to regulatory requirements is included in Note 12 in the audited financial statements included herein.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Interstate Banking Act”) regulates the interstate activities of banks and bank holding companies. Generally speaking, under the Interstate Banking Act, a bank holding company located in one state may lawfully acquire a bank located in any other state, subject to deposit-percentage, aging requirements and other restrictions. The Interstate Banking Act also generally provides that national and state-chartered banks may, subject to applicable state law, branch interstate through acquisitions of banks in other states. The Interstate Banking Act and related California laws have increased competition in the environment in which the Bank operates to the extent that out-of-state financial institutions directly or indirectly enter the Bank’s market areas. It appears that the Interstate Banking Act has contributed to the accelerated consolidation of the banking industry.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999

Effective March 11, 2000, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the “Financial Modernization Act,” enabled full affiliations to occur among banks and securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial service providers, and enabled full affiliations to occur between such entities. This legislation permits bank holding companies that are well-capitalized and well-managed and meet other conditions to elect to become “financial holding companies.” As financial holding companies, they and their subsidiaries are permitted to acquire or engage in activities that were not previously allowed by bank holding companies such as insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and distribution, travel agency activities, broad insurance agency activities, merchant banking and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be financial in nature or complementary to these activities. Financial holding companies continue to be subject to the overall

9

oversight and supervision of the Federal Reserve, but the Financial Modernization Act applies the concept of functional regulation to the activities conducted by subsidiaries. For example, insurance activities would be subject to supervision and regulation by state insurance authorities. The Company has no current intention of becoming a financial holding company, but may do so at some point in the future if deemed appropriate in view of opportunities or circumstances at the time.

The Financial Modernization Act also imposed new requirements on financial institutions with respect to consumer privacy. The statute generally prohibits disclosure of consumer information to non-affiliated third parties unless the consumer has been given the opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their privacy policies to consumers annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with state law if it is more protective of consumer privacy than the Financial Modernization Act. The statute also directed federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, to prescribe standards for the security of consumer information. The Company and the Bank are subject to such standards, as well as standards for notifying consumers in the event of a security breach.

Regulation of Subsidiary Banks

As a state-chartered bank, The First State Bank is examined and regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the GDB&F. The major functions of the FDIC with respect to insured banks include paying depositors to the extent provided by law in the event an insured bank is closed without adequately providing for payment of the claim of depositors, acting as a receiver of state banks placed in receivership when so appointed by state authorities, and preventing the continuance or development of unsound and unsafe banking practices. In addition, the FDIC also approves conversions, mergers, consolidations, and assumption of deposit liability transactions between insured banks and noninsured banks or institutions to prevent capital or surplus diminution in such transactions where the resulting, continued or assumed bank is an insured nonmember state bank.

Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Bank Holding Company Act on any extension of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on investment in the stock or other securities thereof and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. In addition, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in-arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services.

The GDB&F regulates all areas of the bank’s banking operations, including mergers, establishment of branches, loans, interest rates, and reserves. The Bank must have the approval of the GDB&F to pay cash dividends, unless at the time of such payment:

a. the total classified assets at the most recent examination of such bank do not exceed 80% of Tier 1 capital plus Allowance for Loan Losses as reflected at such examination;

10

b. the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year does not exceed 50% of the net profits, after taxes but before dividends, for the previous calendar year; and

c. the ratio of Tier 1 Capital to Adjusted Total Assets shall not be less than six (6) percent.

State chartered banks are also subject to State of Georgia banking and usury laws restricting the amount of interest which it may charge in making loans or other extensions of credit.

As a result of the findings of the FDIC in its most recent examination of the Bank, the Bank’s Directors entered into an informal agreement with the FDIC and GDB&F to improve the condition of the Bank. Specifically, the agreement provides for reducing adversely classified assets, upgrading the overall quality of the loan portfolio, maintaining a Tier One Leverage Capital Ratio of not less than 8% and a Total Risk Based Capital Ratio of not less than 10%, maintaining an adequate reserve for loan losses, prohibiting dividends without prior regulatory approval, improving liquidity, and adopting a revised strategic plan covering the next three years. The Bank has agreed to submit certain reports, plans and programs to the regulators for review and comment. Failure to adequately address the provisions contained in the agreement may result in a formal enforcement action by the regulatory agencies. The capital ratios of the Bank currently exceed the minimum required and the board and management are in compliance with the reporting provisions of the agreement.

Expansion through Branching, Merger or Consolidation

With respect to expansion, banks were previously prohibited from establishing branch offices or facilities outside of the county in which their main office was located, except:

(1) in adjacent counties in certain situations, or

(2) by means of merger or consolidation with a bank which has been in existence for at least five years.

In addition, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the acquiring bank must have been in existence for at least 24 months prior to the merger. However, effective July 1, 1998, Georgia law permits, with required regulatory approval, the establishment of de novo branches in an unlimited number of counties within the State of Georgia by the subsidiary bank(s) of bank holding companies then engaged in the banking business in the State of Georgia. This law may result in increased competition in the market area of the Company’s subsidiary bank.

11

Capital Requirements

The FDIC adopted risk-based capital guidelines that went into effect on December 31, 1990 for all FDIC insured state chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Beginning December 31, 1992, all banks were required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of eight (8) percent of which at least four (4) percent must consist of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital of state chartered banks (as defined by the regulation) generally consists of: (i) common stockholders equity; (ii) qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus; and (iii) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. In addition, the FDIC adopted a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of banks, referred to as the leverage capital ratio of three (3) percent if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general is considered a strong banking organization, rated Composite “1” under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMEL rating system) established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. All other financial institutions are required to maintain leverage ratio of four (4) percent.

Effective October 1, 1998, the FDIC amended its risk-based and leverage capital rules as follows: (1) all servicing assets and purchase credit card relationships (“PCCRs”) that are included in capital are each subject to a ninety percent (90%) of fair value limitation (also known as a “ten percent (10%) haircut”); (2) the aggregate amount of all servicing assets and PCCRs included in capital cannot exceed 100% of Tier I capital; (3) the aggregate amount of nonmortgage servicing assets (“NMSAs”) and PCCRS included in capital cannot exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital; and (4) all other intangible assets (other than qualifying PCCRS) must be deducted from Tier 1 capital.

Amounts of servicing assets and PCCRs in excess of the amounts allowable must be deducted in determining Tier 1 capital. Interest-only Strips receivable, whether or not in security form, are not subject to any regulatory capital limitation under the amended rule.

FDIC Insurance Assessments

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), enacted in December 1991, provided for a number of reforms relating to the safety and soundness of the deposit insurance system, supervision of domestic and foreign depository institutions and improvement of accounting standards. One aspect of the act is the requirement that banks will have to meet certain safety and soundness standards. In order to comply with the act, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC implemented regulations defining operational and managerial standards relating to internal controls, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, director and officer compensation, fees and benefits, asset quality, earnings and stock valuation.

The regulations provide for a risk based premium system which requires higher assessment rates for banks which the FDIC determines pose greater risks to the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). Under the regulations, banks pay an assessment depending upon risk classification.

12

To arrive at risk-based assessments, the FDIC places each bank in one of nine risk categories using a two step process based on capital ratios and on other relevant information. Each bank is assigned to one of three groups: (i) well capitalized, (ii) adequately capitalized, or (iii) under capitalized, based on its capital ratios. The FDIC also assigns each bank to one of three subgroups based upon an evaluation of the risk posed by the bank. The three subgroups include (i) banks that are financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses, (ii) banks with weaknesses which, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of the bank and increased risk to the DIF, and (iii) those banks that pose a substantial probability of loss to the DIF unless corrective action is taken. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations management and capital distributions depending on the category in which an institution is classified. As of December 31, 2008, The First State Bank met the definition of a well-capitalized institution.

In 2008, the maximum deposit insurance amount has been increased from $100,000 to $250,000. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each DIF member institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory factors. Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005, the FDIC is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the DIF annually at between 1.15% and 1.50% of estimated insured deposits. The FDIC may increase or decrease the assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. In an effort to restore capitalization levels and to ensure the DIF will adequately cover projected losses from future bank failures, the FDIC, in October 2008, proposed a rule to alter the way in which it differentiates for risk in the risk-based assessment system and to revise deposit insurance assessment rates, including base assessment rates. First quarter 2009 assessment rates were increased to between 12 and 50 cents for every $100 of domestic deposits, with most banks paying between 12 and 14 cents.

On February 27, 2009, the FDIC approved an interim rule to institute a one-time special assessment of 20 cents per $100 in domestic deposits to restore the DIF reserves depleted by recent bank failures. The interim rule additionally reserves the right of the FDIC to charge an additional up-to-10 basis point special premium at a later point if the DIF reserves continue to fall. The FDIC also approved an increase in regular premium rates for the second quarter of 2009. For most banks, this will be between 12 to 16 basis points per $100 in domestic deposits. Premiums for the rest of 2009 have not yet been set.

Additionally, by participating in the TLGP, banks temporarily become subject to “systemic risk special assessments” of 10 basis points for transaction account balances in excess of $250,000 with assessments up to 100 basis points of the amount of TLGP debt issued. Further, all FDIC-insured institutions are required to pay assessments to the FDIC to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”), an agency of the Federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the DIF. The FICO assessment rates, which are determined quarterly, averaged 0.0113% of insured deposits in fiscal 2008. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in 2017.

13

The FDIC may terminate a depository institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices that pose a risk to the DIF or that may prejudice the interest of the bank’s depositors. The termination of deposit insurance for a bank would also result in the revocation of the bank’s charter by the DIF.

Community Reinvestment Act

The Company and the Bank are subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the “CRA”) and the federal banking agencies’ regulations issued thereunder. Under the CRA, all banks and thrifts have a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs for their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA.

The CRA requires a depository institution’s primary federal regulator, in connection with its examination of the institution, to assess the institution’s record of assessing and meeting the credit needs of the community served by that institution, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of the institution’s record is made available to the public. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will assess the records of each subsidiary depository institution of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application.

The evaluation system used to judge an institution’s CRA performance consists of three tests: (1) a lending test; (2) an investment test; and (3) a service test. Each of these tests will be applied by the institution’s primary federal regulator taking into account such factors as: (i) demographic data about the community; (ii) the institution’s capacity and constraints; (iii) the institution’s product offerings and business strategy; and (iv) data on the prior performance of the institution and similarly-situated lenders.

In addition, a financial institution will have the option of having its CRA performance evaluated based on a strategic plan of up to five years in length that it had developed in cooperation with local community groups. In order to be rated under a strategic plan, the institution will be required to obtain the prior approval of its federal regulator.

14

The interagency CRA regulations provide that an institution evaluated under a given test will receive one of five ratings for the test: (1) outstanding; (2) high satisfactory; (3) low satisfactory; (4) needs to improve; and (5) substantial noncompliance. An institution will receive a certain number of points for its rating on each test, and the points are combined to produce an overall composite rating. Evidence of discriminatory or other illegal credit practices would adversely affect an institution’s overall rating. The First State Bank received a satisfactory rating as a result of its most recent CRA examination.

Anti-Terrorism Legislation

In the wake of the tragic events of September 11th, on October 26, 2001, the President signed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) Act of 2001. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and “know your customer” standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. For example, the enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls generally require financial institutions to take reasonable steps:

• to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transaction;

• to ascertain the identity of the nominal and beneficial owners of, and the source of funds deposited into, each account as needed to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transactions;

• to ascertain for any foreign bank, the shares of which are not publicly traded, the identity of the owners of the foreign bank, and the nature and extent of the ownership interest of each such owner; and

• to ascertain whether any foreign bank provides correspondent accounts to other foreign banks and, if so, the identity of those foreign banks and related due diligence information.

The USA PATRIOT Act requires financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering programs. The USA PATRIOT Act sets forth minimum standards for these programs, including:

• the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls;

• the designation of a compliance officer;

• an ongoing employee training program; and

• an independent audit function to test the programs.

15

In addition, the USA PATRIOT Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to adopt rules increasing the cooperation and information sharing between financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities regarding individuals, entities and organizations engaged in, or reasonably suspected based on credible evidence of engaging in, terrorist acts or money laundering activities. Any financial institution complying with these rules will not be deemed to have violated the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as discussed above.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) was enacted to increase corporate responsibility, provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. Sarbanes-Oxley includes important new requirements for public companies in the areas of financial disclosure, corporate governance, and the independence, composition and responsibilities of audit committees. Among other things, Sarbanes-Oxley mandates chief executive and chief financial officer certifications of periodic financial reports, additional financial disclosures concerning off-balance sheet items, and speedier transaction reporting requirements for executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders. In addition, penalties for non-compliance with the Exchange Act were heightened. SEC rules promulgated pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley impose obligations and restrictions on auditors and audit committees intended to enhance their independence from management, and include extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules. Sarbanes-Oxley represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a Board of Directors and Management and between a Board of Directors and its committees.

We have not experienced any significant difficulties in complying with Sarbanes-Oxley. However, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs in connection with compliance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, which requires Management to undertake an assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and requires our auditors to attest to, and report on, Management’s assessment and the operating effectiveness of these controls.

Commercial Real Estate Lending and Concentrations

On December 2, 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released Guidance on Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”) Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices (the “Guidance”). The Guidance, which was issued in response to the agencies’ concern that rising CRE concentrations might expose institutions to unanticipated earnings and capital volatility in the event of adverse changes in the commercial real estate market, reinforces existing regulations and guidelines for real estate lending and loan portfolio management.

16

Highlights of the Guidance include the following:

• The agencies have observed that CRE concentrations have been rising over the past several years with small to mid-size institutions showing the most significant increase in CRE concentrations over the last decade. However, some institutions’ risk management practices are not evolving with their increasing CRE concentrations, and therefore, the Guidance reminds institutions that strong risk management practices and appropriate levels of capital are important elements of a sound CRE lending program.

• The Guidance applies to national banks and state chartered banks and is also broadly applicable to bank holding companies. For purposes of the Guidance, CRE loans include loans for land development and construction, other land loans and loans secured by multifamily and nonfarm residential properties. The definition also extends to loans to real estate investment trusts and unsecured loans to developers if their performance is closely linked to the performance of the general CRE market.

• The agencies recognize that banks serve a vital role in their communities by supplying credit for business and real estate development. Therefore, the Guidance is not intended to limit banks’ CRE lending. Instead, the Guidance encourages institutions to identify and monitor credit concentrations, establish internal concentration limits, and report all concentrations to management and the board of directors on a periodic basis.

• The agencies recognized that different types of CRE lending present different levels of risk, and therefore, institutions are encouraged to segment their CRE portfolios to acknowledge these distinctions. However, the CRE portfolio should not be divided into multiple sections simply to avoid the appearance of risk concentration.

• Institutions should address the following key elements in establishing a risk management framework for identifying, monitoring, and controlling CRE risk: (1) board of directors and management oversight; (2) portfolio management; (3) management information systems; (4) market analysis; (5) credit underwriting standards; (6) portfolio stress testing and sensitivity analysis; and (7) credit review function.

• As part of the ongoing supervisory monitoring processes, the agencies will use certain criteria to identify institutions that are potentially exposed to significant CRE concentration risk. An institution that has experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, has notable exposure to a specific type of CRE, or is approaching or exceeds specified supervisory criteria may be identified for further supervisory analysis.

17

The Company believes that the Guidance is applicable to it, as it has a concentration in CRE loans. The Company and its board of directors have discussed the Guidance and believe that the Company’s underwriting policy, management information systems, independent credit administration process and monthly monitoring of real estate loan concentrations will be sufficient to address the Guidance.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

On December 13, 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”), which revises and replaces the banking agencies’ 1993 policy statement on the ALLL. The revised statement was issued to ensure consistency with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and more recent supervisory guidance. The revised statement extends the applicability of the policy to credit unions. Additionally, the agencies issued 16 FAQs to assist institutions in complying with both GAAP and ALLL supervisory guidance.

Highlights of the revised statement include the following:

• The revised statement emphasizes that the ALLL represents one of the most significant estimates in an institution’s financial statements and regulatory reports and that an assessment of the appropriateness of the ALLL is critical to an institution’s safety and soundness.

• Each institution has a responsibility to develop, maintain, and document a comprehensive, systematic, and consistently applied process for determining the amounts of the ALLL. An institution must maintain an ALLL that is sufficient to cover estimated credit losses on individual impaired loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the portfolio.

• The revised statement updates the previous guidance on the following issues regarding ALLL: (1) responsibilities of the board of directors, management, and bank examiners; (2) factors to be considered in the estimation of ALLL; and (3) objectives and elements of an effective loan review system.

18

The Company and its board of directors have discussed the revised statement and believe that the Company’s ALLL methodology is comprehensive, systematic, and that it is consistently applied across the Company. The Company believes its management information systems, independent credit administration process, policies and procedures are sufficient to address the guidance.

U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program

On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) was enacted that provides the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury with broad authority to implement certain actions to help restore stability and liquidity to U.S. markets. One of the provisions resulting from the legislation is the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), which provides direct equity investment in perpetual preferred stock by the U.S. Treasury Department in qualified financial institutions. The program is voluntary and requires an institution to comply with a number of restrictions and provisions, including limits on executive compensation, stock redemptions and declaration of dividends. The CPP provides for a minimum investment of one percent of total risk-weighted assets and a maximum investment equal to the lesser of three percent of total risk-weighted assets or $25 billion. Participation in the program is not automatic and is subject to approval by the U.S. Treasury Department. The Company has applied to participate in the CPP.

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced a new program – the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program has two components – The Debt Guarantee Program and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program. The Debt Guarantee Program guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt of a participating organization, up to certain limits established for each institution, issued between October 14, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The FDIC will pay the unpaid principal and interest on an FDIC-guaranteed debt instrument upon the uncured failure of the participating entity to make a timely payment of principal or interest in accordance with the terms of the instrument. The guarantee will remain in effect until June 30, 2012. In return for the FDIC’s guarantee, participating institutions will pay the FDIC a fee based on the amount and maturity of the debt. The Bank and the Company have opted to participate in the Debt Guarantee Program. Currently, neither the Bank nor the Company have any qualifying debt outstanding.

The Transaction Account Guarantee Program provides full federal deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, regardless of dollar amount, until December 31, 2009. An annualized 10 basis point assessment on balances in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts that exceed the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000 will be assessed on a quarterly basis to insured depository institutions that have not opted out of this component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The Bank has opted to participate in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program.

19

Other Pending and Proposed Legislation

Other legislative and regulatory initiatives which could affect the Company, the Bank and the banking industry in general are pending, and additional initiatives may be proposed or introduced, before the U.S. Congress, the Georgia legislature and other governmental bodies in the future. Such proposals, if enacted, may further alter the structure, regulation and competitive relationship among financial institutions, and may subject the Bank to increased regulation, disclosure and reporting requirements. In addition, the various banking regulatory agencies often adopt new rules and regulations to implement and enforce existing legislation. It cannot be predicted whether, or in what form, any such legislation or regulations may be enacted or the extent to which the business of the Company or the Bank would be affected thereby.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following are certain risks that management believes are specific to our business. This should not be viewed as an all inclusive list or in any particular order.

Our business is subject to the success of the local economies where we operate

Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in our primary and secondary markets. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may not succeed. We are currently experiencing adverse economic conditions in our market areas, which affect the ability of our customers to repay their loans to us and generally negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations. We are less able than a larger institution to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies and are thus disproportionately impacted.

The market value of the real estate securing our loans as collateral has been adversely affected by the slowing economy and unfavorable changes in economic conditions in our market areas and could be further adversely affected in the future. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 95% of our loans receivable were secured by real estate. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses caused by the adverse market and economic conditions, including the downturn in the real estate market in the State of Georgia will adversely affect the value of our assets, our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Currently, we are experiencing such an economic downturn, and if it continues, our operations could be further adversely affected.

20

We make and hold in our portfolio a significant number of land acquisition and development and construction loans, which in today’s real estate market pose more credit risk than other types of loans typically made by financial institutions

We offer land acquisition and development and construction loans for builders and developers. As of December 31, 2008, approximately $216 million of our loan portfolio represents loans for which the related property is neither presold nor preleased. These land acquisition and development and construction loans are considered more risky than other types of residential mortgage loans. The primary credit risks associated with land acquisition and development and construction lending are underwriting, project risks and market risks. Project risks include cost overruns, borrower credit risk, project completion risk, general contractor credit risk, and environmental and other hazard risks. Market risks are risks associated with the sale of the completed residential units and developed lots. They include affordability risk, which means the risk of affordability of financing by borrowers, product design risk, and risks posed by competing projects. While we believe we have established adequate reserves on our financial statements to cover the credit risk of our land acquisition and development and construction loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that losses will not exceed our reserves, which could adversely impact our earnings. Given the current environment, the non-performing loans in our land acquisition and development and construction portfolio may increase and these non-performing loans could result in a material level of charge-offs, which will negatively impact our capital and earnings. See “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Risk Elements.”

Our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by current conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally

Negative developments in the latter half of 2007 and 2008 in the banking industry have resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets in general and a related general economic downturn, which have continued into 2009. In addition, as a consequence of the recession that the United States now finds itself in, business activity across a broad range of industries faces significant difficulties due to the lack of consumer spending and liquidity concerns in the global credit markets. At the same time we have seen unemployment increase significantly.

As a result of the current economic environment, many financial institutions, including us, have experienced declines in the performance of their loans, including construction, land development and land loans, commercial loans and consumer loans. Consequently, competition among financial institutions for quality loans and deposits has increased significantly. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many real estate dependent loans have declined and may continue to decline. Financial stock prices have been negatively affected, and the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets has become more difficult compared to recent years. As a result, there is potential for new federal or state laws and regulations regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to be very aggressive in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations. The impact of the recession extending for a lengthy time may adversely impact our financial performance and our stock price.

In addition, further negative market developments may affect consumer confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact our charge-offs and provision for loan losses. A worsening of these conditions would likely magnify the adverse effects of these difficult conditions on us and many others in the banking industry.

21

Overall, during the past year, the general business environment has had an adverse effect on our business, and there can be no assurance that the environment will improve anytime soon. Until conditions improve, we expect our business, financial condition and results of operation to be negatively impacted.

Current and anticipated deterioration in the housing market and the homebuilding industry may lead to increased loss severities and further worsening of delinquencies and non-performing assets in our loan portfolios. Consequently, our results of operations may be adversely impacted

There has been substantial industry concern and publicity over asset quality among financial institutions due in large part to issues related to subprime mortgage lending, declining real estate values and general economic concerns. As of December 31, 2008, our nonperforming assets increased significantly to $116 million, or 21.06%, of loans receivable plus other real estate owned. Furthermore, the housing and the residential mortgage markets recently have experienced a variety of difficulties and changed economic conditions. If market conditions continue to deteriorate, they may lead to additional valuation adjustments on our loan portfolios and real estate owned as we continue to reassess the market value of our loan portfolio, the losses associated with the loans in default and the net realizable value of real estate owned.

The homebuilding industry has experienced a significant and sustained decline in demand for new homes and an oversupply of new and existing homes available for sale in various markets, including some of the markets in which we lend. Our customers who are builders and developers face greater difficulty in selling their homes in markets where these trends are more pronounced. Consequently, we are facing increased delinquencies and non-performing assets as these builders and developers default on their loans with us. We do not anticipate that the housing market will improve in the near-term, and accordingly, additional downgrades, provisions for loan losses and charge-offs related to our loan portfolio may occur. See “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Risk Elements.”

Future loan losses may exceed our allowance for loan losses.

We are subject to credit risk, which is the risk of losing principal or interest due to borrowers’ failure to repay loans in accordance with their terms. A downturn in the economy or the real estate market in our market areas or a rapid change in interest rates could have a negative effect on collateral values and borrowers’ ability to repay. This deterioration in economic conditions could result in losses to the Bank in excess of loan loss allowances. To the extent loans are not paid timely by borrowers, the loans are placed on non-accrual, thereby reducing interest income. To the extent loan charge-offs exceed our financial models, increased amounts charged to the provision for loan losses would reduce income. See “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Allowances for Loan Losses.”

22

If our assumptions are wrong, our current allowance may not be sufficient to cover future loan losses, and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease our net income. As a result of a difficult real estate market, we have increased our allowance from $7.65 million as of December 31, 2007 to $17.7 million as of December 31, 2008. We expect to continue to increase our allowance in 2009; however, we can make no assurance that our allowance will be adequate to cover future loan losses given current and future market conditions.

In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of our management. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory agencies would have a negative effect on our operating results.

Rapidly changing interest rate environments could reduce our net interest margin, net interest income, fee income and net income

As a financial institution, our earnings are significantly dependent upon our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income that we earn on interest-earning assets, such as investment securities and loans, and the interest expense that we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Therefore, any change in general market interest rates, including changes resulting from changes in the Federal Reserve’s fiscal and monetary policies, affects us more than non-financial institutions and can have a significant effect on our net interest income and total income. Our assets and liabilities may react differently to changes in overall market rates or conditions because there may be mismatches between the repricing or maturity characteristics of the assets and liabilities. As a result, an increase or decrease in market interest rates could have material adverse effects on our net interest margin and results of operations.

In response to the dramatic deterioration of the subprime, mortgage, credit and liquidity markets, the Federal Reserve recently has taken action on seven occasions to reduce interest rates by a total of 400 basis points since December 2007, which likely will reduce our net interest income during 2009 and the foreseeable future. This reduction in net interest income likely will be exacerbated by the high level of competition that we face in our markets, which requires us to offer more attractive interest rates to borrowers, both on loans and deposits. Any reduction in our net interest income will negatively affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, operating results, cash flows and/or the price of our securities. See “Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

23

Liquidity risk could impact our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition

Liquidity is essential for our business. An inability to raise funds through traditional deposits, brokered deposits, borrowings or the sale of securities or loans could have a significant negative impact on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities on terms which are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the banking industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

We rely on commercial and retail deposits, brokered deposits, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Atlanta and other borrowings to fund our operations. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace such funds in the future if, among other things, our results of operations or financial condition or the results of operations or financial condition of the FHLB of Atlanta or market conditions were to change.

Although we consider these sources of funds adequate for our liquidity needs, there can be no assurance in this regard and we may be compelled to seek additional sources of financing in the future. Likewise, we may seek additional debt in the future to achieve our business strategies, in connection with future acquisitions or for other reasons. There can be no assurance additional borrowings, if sought, would be available to us or, if available, would be on favorable terms. Financial stock prices have been negatively affected by the recent adverse economic environment, as has the ability of the financial services industry to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets compared to recent years. If additional financing sources are unavailable or not available on reasonable terms, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.

We actively review the depository institutions that hold our federal funds sold and due from banks cash balances. We are currently not able to provide assurances that access to our cash equivalents and federal funds sold will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal and we diversify our due from banks and federal funds sold among correspondent banks to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. The financials of the correspondent banks are reviewed routinely as part of our asset/liability management process. Balances in our accounts with financial institutions in the U.S. may exceed the FDIC insurance limits. While we monitor and adjust the balances in our accounts as appropriate, these balances could be impacted if the financial institutions fail and could be subject to other conditions in the financial markets.

24

Our Federal Deposit Insurance Premium could be substantially higher in the future, which could have a material adverse effect

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including the Bank. The FDIC charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund at a certain level. Current economic conditions have increased bank failures and expectations for further failures, in which case the FDIC ensures payments of deposits up to insured limits from the Deposit Insurance Fund.

On October 16, 2008, the FDIC published a restoration plan designed to replenish the Deposit Insurance Fund over a period of five years and to increase the deposit insurance reserve ratio, which decreased to 1.01 percent of insured deposits on June 30, 2008, to the statutory minimum of 1.15 percent of insured deposits by December 31, 2013. In order to implement the restoration plan, the FDIC proposes to change both its risk-based assessment system and its base assessment rates. For the first quarter of 2009 only, the FDIC increased all FDIC deposit assessment rates by 7 basis points. These new rates range from 12-14 basis points for Risk Category I institutions to 50 basis points for Risk Category IV institutions. Under the FDIC’s restoration plan, the FDIC proposes to establish new initial base assessment rates that will be subject to adjustment as described below. Beginning April 1, 2009, the base assessment rates would range from 10-14 basis points for Risk Category I institutions to 45 basis points for Risk Category IV institutions. Changes to the risk-based assessment system would include increasing premiums for institutions that rely on excessive amounts of brokered deposits and CDARS, and for excessive use of secured liabilities, including Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Either an increase in the Risk Category of the Bank or adjustments to the base assessment rates could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

Slower than anticipated growth in new branches and new product and service offerings could result in reduced net income

We have placed a strategic emphasis on expanding our branch network and product offerings. Executing this strategy carries risks of slower than anticipated growth both in new branches and new products. New branches and products require a significant investment of both financial and personnel resources. Lower than expected loan and deposit growth in new investments can decrease anticipated revenues and net income generated by those investments, and opening new branches and introducing new products could result in more additional expenses than anticipated and divert resources from current core operations.

The financial services industry is very competitive

We face competition in attracting and retaining deposits, making loans, and providing other financial services throughout our market area. Our competitors include other community banks, larger banking institutions, and a wide range of other financial institutions such as credit unions, government-sponsored enterprises, mutual fund companies, insurance companies and other non-bank businesses. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources than us. For a more complete discussion of our competitive environment, see “Business” “Competition” in Item 1 above. If we are unable to compete effectively, we will lose market share and income from deposits, loans, and other products may be reduced.

25

Inability to hire or retain certain key professionals, management and staff could adversely affect our revenues and net income

We rely on key personnel to manage and operate our business, including major revenue generating functions such as our loan and deposit portfolios. The loss of key staff may adversely affect our ability to maintain and manage these portfolios effectively, which could negatively affect our revenues. In addition, loss of key personnel could result in increased recruiting and hiring expenses, which could cause a decrease in our net income.

No active trading market for the common stock may ever develop

There is no public market for our common stock and it does not trade on any national securities exchange or over the counter. We can give no assurance that an active trading market will ever develop for the common stock. If an active trading market does not develop, you may not be able to sell your common stock when desired at a price that would be acceptable to you.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

The assets of the Company consist almost entirely of its equity ownership in The First State Bank and First Metro Mortgage Co. The assets of First Metro Mortgage Co. consist almost entirely of loans originated and the proceeds of those loans when sold to investors. The assets of the Bank consist primarily of loans and investment securities. However, it also owns the real estate and improvements thereon from which it conducts its banking operations. Those locations are more particularly described as follows:

4806 N. Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location houses the Bank’s main office, a two-story building containing 20,800 square feet constructed in 1965. It is a full service bank facility equipped with an ATM machine and four lane drive-up service.

4800 N. Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location houses the operations center for the Bank. It is a single story building constructed in 1999, consisting of 20,622 square feet.

295 Fairview Road, Ellenwood, Georgia - This is a full service banking location with ATM and drive-thru service. It is a single story building containing 3,520 square feet.

114 John Frank Ward Boulevard, McDonough, Georgia - This site contains a 4,000 square foot single story building with ATM and drive-thru service.

26

1810 Hudson Bridge Road, Stockbridge, Georgia - This location contains a two-story facility consisting of 4,787 square feet. The lower floor contains a full service banking location with ATM and drive-thru service. The upper floor houses the operations of First Metro Mortgage Co.

4979 Bill Gardner Parkway, Locust Grove, Georgia - This location contains a one-story building consisting of 4,000 square feet with ATM and drive-thru service.

2316 Highway 155, McDonough, Georgia - This full service banking location is a single-story facility consisting of approximately 5,500 square feet with ATM and drive-thru service.

1908 Highway 81 East, McDonough, Georgia - This full service banking location is a single-story facility consisting of approximately 5,500 square feet with ATM and drive-thru service.

The Bank also owns two additional parcels of land, one located in Henry County at the intersection of Chambers Road and Jonesboro Road and one located at 620 W. Third Street in Jackson, Butts County, Georgia.

The Bank conducts its own data processing and owns the equipment used for that purpose. The Bank also owns the furniture, fixtures and equipment located on its premises and several automobiles.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Bank is involved in various legal actions from normal business activities. Management believes that the liability, if any, arising from such actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements. Neither the Bank nor the Company is a party to any proceeding to which any director, officer or affiliate of the issuer, or any owner of more than five percent (5%) of its voting stock is a party adverse to the Bank or the Company.

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

27

Part II

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Stock Price and Dividends

There is no established public trading market for the Company’s common stock. It is not traded on an exchange or in the
over-the-counter market. There is no assurance that an active market will develop for the Company’s common stock in the future. Therefore, management of the Company is furnished with only limited information concerning private trades of the Company’s common stock. The following table sets forth for each quarter during the most two recent fiscal years the number of shares traded and the high and low per share sales price to the extent known to management.

YEAR 2008	NUMBER OF SHARES TRADED	HIGH SALES PRICE (Per Share)		LOW SALES PRICE (Per Share)
First Quarter	102,091	$	13.50	$	11.00
Second Quarter	52,570	$	13.50	$	11.00
Third Quarter	13,121	$	13.50	$	12.00
Fourth Quarter	6,330	$	13.50	$	10.50
YEAR 2007	NUMBER OF SHARES TRADED	HIGH SALES PRICE (Per Share)		LOW SALES PRICE (Per Share)
First Quarter	14,984	$	13.50	$	13.00
Second Quarter	29,724	$	14.00	$	13.50
Third Quarter	20,350	$	14.50	$	13.50
Fourth Quarter	170,683	$	13.50	$	13.50

28

The Company has historically paid dividends on an annual basis. Any declaration and payment of dividends will be based on the Company’s earnings, economic conditions, and the evaluation by the Board of Directors of other relevant factors. The Company’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on cash dividends paid to it by the Bank and by First Metro Mortgage Co. Currently, the Bank is prohibited from paying dividends to the Company without prior regulatory approval. The following table sets forth cash dividends which have been declared and paid by the Company since January 1, 2006:

	Cash Dividends Declared Per Share ($)(1)
Fiscal 2008
First Quarter	$	.06 per share
Second Quarter	$	.06 per share
Third Quarter	$	.03 per share
Fourth Quarter	$	.00 per share
Fiscal 2007
First Quarter	$	.06 per share
Second Quarter	$	.06 per share
Third Quarter	$	.06 per share
Fourth Quarter	$	.10 per share
Fiscal 2006
First Quarter	$	.05 per share
Second Quarter	$	.05 per share
Third Quarter	$	.05 per share
Fourth Quarter	$	.16 per share

(1) All dividends per share have been adjusted to reflect a two for one stock-split effective December 14, 2006.

As of March 1, 2009, 14,245,690 shares of common stock were outstanding and held of record by approximately 604 persons (not including the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee or street name through various brokerage houses).

The holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available. Funds for the payment of dividends of the Company are primarily obtained from dividends paid by the Bank.

There are no shares of the Company’s common stock that are subject to outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or that are convertible into, common equity of the Company.

29

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

	Period Ending
Index	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08
Henry County Bancshares, Inc.	100.00	108.38	123.47	164.51	174.32	156.84
NASDAQ Composite	100.00	108.59	110.08	120.56	132.39	78.72
SNL Southeast Bank Index	100.00	118.59	121.39	142.34	107.23	43.41

30

The graph presented above compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Henry County Bancshares, Inc.’s common stock to the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite and the SNL Southeast Bank Index for the five fiscal years, which commenced January 1, 2004 and ended December 31, 2008. The cumulative total stockholder return assumes the investment of $100 in Henry County Bancshares, Inc.’s common stock and in each index on December 31, 2003 and assumes reinvestment of dividends. Because the Company’s stock is not listed on any exchange and there is no established public trading market, the stock price used for this graph is based solely on the limited information voluntarily furnished to management concerning known private transactions occurring in 2008. The Company, therefore, makes no representations the stock price, which is solely based on this limited information, accurately reflects the actual fair market value of the Company’s common stock. The NASDAQ Composite Index is a publicly available measure of over 3,000 companies including NASDAQ domestic and international based common type stocks listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market. The SNL Southeast Bank Index is a compilation of the total stockholder return of all publicly-traded bank holding companies headquartered in the Southeastern United States.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company did not purchase any of its common stock during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2008.

31

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected historical consolidated financial information for us and our subsidiaries and is derived from the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report. This information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements and related notes. All amounts are in thousands, except per share data.

	As of and For the Year Ended December 31,
	2008			2007		2006		2005		2004
Total Loans	$	533,609		$	569,388	$	561,646	$	518,114	$	486,723
Total Deposits		590,477			625,851		594,873		545,247		470,313
Total Borrowings		2,598			13,424		24,222		19,988		42,058
Total Assets		655,877			718,996		694,311		631,033		570,528
Interest Income		35,410			51,577		48,311		36,602		28,685
Interest Expense		19,628			26,306		20,498		13,859		10,022
Net Interest Income		15,782			25,271		27,813		22,743		18,663
Provision for Loan Losses		24,286			2,959		477		546		443
Net Interest Income (Loss) After Provision		(8,504	)		22,312		27,336		22,197		18,220
Non Interest Income		2,784			3,025		3,296		3,983		4,322
Non Interest Expense		15,198			11,793		10,614		10,239		9,548
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(20,918	)		13,544		20,018		15,941		12,994
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes		(6,572	)		4,835		7,609		5,665		4,611
Net Income (Loss)		(14,346	)		8,709		12,409		10,276		8,383
Net Income (Loss) Per Share		(1.01	)		.61		.87		.72		.59
Cash Dividends Declared		0.15			0.28		0.31		0.245		0.205
Book Value Per Share		4.17			5.30		4,97		4.39		3.93
Weighted Average Shares		14,245,715			14,314,171		14,303,517		14,303,368		14,311,557

32

QUARTERLY DATA

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008											2007
	Fourth Quarter			Third Quarter			Second Quarter			First Quarter		Fourth Quarter		Third Quarter		Second Quarter		First Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest income	$	7,015		$	8,665		$	8,585		$	11,145	$	12,234	$	12,840	$	13,523	$	12,980
Interest expense		4,180			4,557			4,964			5,927		6,809		6,792		6,624		6,081
Net interest income		2,835			4,108			3,621			5,218		5,425		6,048		6,899		6,899
Provision for loan losses		16,000			5,650			1,526			1,110		1,525		1,258		164		12
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses		(13,165	)		(1,542	)		2,095			4,108		3,900		4,790		6,735		6,887
Noninterest income		638			696			738			712		690		762		789		784
Noninterest expenses		4,752			3,585			3,772			3,089		3,221		2,955		2,857		2,760
Income (loss) before income taxes		(17,279	)		(4,431	)		(939	)		1,731		1,369		2,597		4,667		4,911
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(4,891	)		(1,820	)		(502	)		641		326		936		1,705		1,868
Net income (loss)	$	(12,388	)	$	(2,611	)	$	(437	)	$	1,090	$	1,043	$	1,661	$	2,962	$	3,043
Earnings (losses) per share	$	(.88	)	$	(.18	)	$	(.03	)	$	.08	$	.07	$	.12	$	.21	$	.21

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion of our financial condition and the financial condition of our bank subsidiary, The First State Bank and our mortgage subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co. at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of operations for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations that are not otherwise apparent from our audited financial statements. Reference should be made to those statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this report for an understanding of the following discussion and analysis.

33

A Warning About Forward-Looking Statements

We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and reports to stockholders. Statements made by us, other than those concerning historical information, should be considered forward-looking and subject to various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including governmental monetary and fiscal policies, deposit levels, loan demand, loan collateral values, securities portfolio values, interest rate risk management, the effects of competition in the banking business from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other financial institutions operating in our market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating through the Internet, changes in governmental regulation relating to the banking industry, including regulations relating to branching and acquisitions, failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan losses, including the value of collateral underlying delinquent loans and other factors. We caution that these factors are not exclusive. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us, or on our behalf.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Certain accounting policies require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions used are based on historical experience and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and results of operations for the reporting periods.

We believe the following are critical accounting policies in the preparation of our financial statements that require the most significant estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to a significant change.

Allowance for loan losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the fair market value or the estimated net realizable value of underlying collateral on impaired loans, estimated losses on non-impaired loans based on historical loss experience, management’s evaluation of the current loan portfolio, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions. Loan losses are charged against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.

The allowance for loan losses consists of specific and general components. The components of the allowance for loan losses represent an estimate pursuant to either Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, or
SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The

34

allocated component of the allowance for loan losses reflects expected losses resulting from analyses developed through specific credit allocations for individual problem or potential problem loans and general allocations based on historical loss experience for each loan category. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of loan relationships typically in excess of $500,000 but may include a review of other loan relationships on which full collection may not be reasonably assumed. These analyses involve judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with the specific loans, including estimating the underlying collateral values. The historical loss experience used in determining general allocations is determined using the average of actual losses incurred over the most recent five years for each type of loan. The historical loss experience is adjusted for known changes in economic conditions as well as other qualitative factors. The resulting loss allocation factors are applied to the balance of each type of loan after removing the balance of impaired loans from each category.

Although management believes its processes for determining the allowance adequately consider all the potential factors that could potentially result in credit losses, the process includes subjective elements and may be susceptible to significant change. In addition there could be potential problem loans in the portfolio that have not been identified as problems because they continue to perform as set forth in the loan agreements. Continued weaknesses in our market area could cause currently performing credits to deteriorate. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provision for loan losses could be required that could adversely affect earnings or financial position in future periods.

Additional information on the Company’s loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses can be found in the sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis titled “Risk Elements” and “Allowance for Loan Losses” and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the real estate held as collateral to other real estate owned. Subsequently, other real estate owned is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over fair value of the real estate held as collateral is recorded as a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of non-interest expense.

35

Overview

In 2008, Henry County experienced a continued deterioration in the local economy, largely centered on depressed housing sales and real estate values as well as significant local job losses due to reductions in construction and land development activity. The recession currently being experienced nationally is exacerbated in the Company’s market area due to a significant dependence on the housing industry in the south Metropolitan Atlanta area to drive the local economy. The Company’s performance reflects the impact of slowed economic activity, depressed real estate values, reduced sales and a challenging banking environment. An exacerbating factor in attempting to resolve problem assets is the uncertainty of the local real estate market. Housing sales have fallen to approximately 10% of prior year levels. Markets are distorted by liquidation efforts resulting in great uncertainty in property values. The significant increase in distressed properties for sale coupled with a lack of liquidity in the real estate market has depressed property values significantly. The reliability of appraisals is subject to uncertainties, as there are few true arms-length sales for comparison purposes.

This set of circumstances creates two separate but equally significant situations for the Company. The first is that borrowers who depend on sale of real property for retirement of their loans are unable to generate necessary cash flow for their on-going needs. As those borrowers deplete cash reserves and exhaust other resources, it becomes increasingly difficult to meet debt service obligations. This problem results in a rising level of troubled assets. The second impact is that the Company has an increasingly difficult time in evaluating the value of collateral that supports troubled loans and serves as the bank’s last resort recovery source. Current accounting standards require that the Bank identify loans that are considered impaired and evaluate the potential for loss should the loan be satisfied by liquidation of the collateral. This evaluation forms the basis for one of the Company’s most critical accounting decisions, yet it is the most difficult to reliably quantify. The actual market value of real property, which is the underlying collateral in almost all of the Bank’s troubled assets, is exceedingly difficult to determine in the face of an illiquid market. While the Company uses appraisals and evaluations of the real property by knowledgeable individuals, including input from several members of the board of directors, the value of real estate in this market is unstable and is sometimes a moving target.

The Company’s performance in 2008 was characterized by increasing levels of problem loans, necessitating substantial additions to the allowance for loan losses. Coupled with an extremely low interest rate environment and compressed margins, the Company saw earnings decline significantly. The Company operated at a loss of $14,346,711compared to earnings in 2007 of $8,708,726. The largest component of the change in earnings was the provision for loan losses, which totaled $24,285,750 in 2008 compared to $2,959,254 in 2007. The Company elected to charge off those portions of loans that were deemed to be ultimately uncollectible though it continues to actively attempt to collect such loans. In addition, the Company wrote down the value of owned real estate $2,910,836, reflecting the deteriorating nature of real estate values.

Nationally, the country remains in recession, with the banking segment one of the hardest hit sectors of the economy. The Company is not immune to the same issues facing many of the country’s banks. The current actions of the federal government to alleviate the recession have an as yet unknown impact. Most economists do not predict any possibility of recovery in the first half of 2009. The success of the Company in resolving its troubled assets will be largely tied to the stabilization of real property values and the return of our market area to a more viable economy.

36

Financial Condition at December 31, 2008 and 2007

The following is a summary of our balance sheets for the periods indicated:

	December 31,
	2008		2007
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Cash and due from banks	$	14,039	$	16,826
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		1,500		2,732
Federal funds sold		14,300		9,500
Securities		65,460		93,781
Loans held for sale		—		950
Loans, net		515,878		561,730
Premises and equipment		9,776		10,341
Other real estate		18,398		10,394
Other assets		16,526		12,742
	$	655,877	$	718,996
Total deposits	$	590,477	$	625,851
Other borrowings		2,598		13,424
Other liabilities		3,460		4,187
Stockholders’ equity		59,342		75,534
	$	655,877	$	718,996

As of December 31, 2008, we had total assets of $656 million, a decrease of 8.78% from December 31, 2007. Total interest-earning assets were $615 million at December 31, 2008 as compared to $676 million at December 31, 2007 or 94% of total assets, respectively. Our primary interest-earning assets at December 31, 2008 were loans, which made up 87% of total interest-earning assets as compared to 84% at December 31, 2007. Net loans decreased by $45.8 million, primarily due to the transfer of $14.1 million to other real estate owned as a result of foreclosures during 2008 and the charge-off of impaired loans totaling $12.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. The remaining decrease in net outstanding loans is a result of increased allowance for loan losses of $10.0 million, as well as normal pay down activity as we have experienced a slowing of new loan production during 2008. Other real estate owned increased by $8.0 million during 2008 as transfers of loans through foreclosure of $14.1 million was offset by sales of other real estate owned of $3.2 million, and additional write downs during 2008 of $2.9 million.

Decreases in investment securities of $28.3 million, coupled with decreases in cash and due from banks of $2.8 million were primarily used to offset decreases in time deposits during 2008. Total deposits decreased $35.4 million during 2008. The decrease in deposit accounts was primarily a result of decreases in non-brokered retail time deposits of $50.8 million, offset by increases in brokered time deposits of $34.2 million. Brokered time deposits totaled $44.8 million costing a weighted average rate of 3.46% and represented less than 8% of total deposits at December 31, 2008. Interests bearing checking, savings and demand deposits have decreased $18.8 million during 2008.

37

The decrease in retail time deposits reflects a strategic decision by the Company to allow higher-priced time deposits where there were no other customer relationships to be withdrawn upon maturity rather than maintain higher interest rates. The bulk of these deposits matured during the first nine months of 2008, allowing the Company to replace this funding with lower cost brokered time deposits. Other borrowings decreased $10.8 million during 2008, primarily as a result of the retirement of Federal Home Loan Bank advances in the amount of $6.4 million. Our total equity decreased by $16.1 million for 2008 as a result of net losses of $14.3 million, purchases of treasury stock of $61,000, and dividends paid of $2.1 million, offset by increased unrealized gains on securities available for sale of $353,000.

The securities portfolio provides the Company with a source of liquidity and a relatively stable source of income. The Company’s investment policy focuses on the use of the securities portfolio to manage the interest rate risk created by the inherent mismatch of the loan and deposit portfolios. The Company’s asset/liability management committee meets quarterly to review economic trends and makes recommendations as to the structure of the securities portfolio based upon this review and the Company’s projected funding needs.

Our securities portfolio, consisting of U.S. Government and Agency, mortgage-backed, municipal and equity securities amounted to $65.5 million at December 31, 2008. Net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale were $1,194,783 at December 31, 2008 as compared to net unrealized gains of $660,202 at December 31, 2007. Net unrealized losses on securities held-to-maturity were $11,029 at December 31, 2008 as compared to net unrealized losses of $21,289 at December 31, 2007. We have not specifically identified any securities for sale in future periods, which, if so designated, would require a charge to operations if the market value would not be reasonably expected to recover prior to the time of sale.

Since lending activities generate the primary source of revenue, the Company’s main objective is to adhere to sound lending practices. The Board of Directors has delegated loan policy decisions and loan approval authority to the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. The Executive Committee is composed of five outside directors and the Chief Executive Officer. The Executive Committee establishes lending policies that include underwriting guidelines on the various types of loans made as well as guidance on loan terms. The Company employs a loan approval process in which individual loan officers are provided with independent approval authority based upon their experience and training. When prospective loans are analyzed, both interest rate and credit quality objectives are considered in determining whether to make a given loan. Parameters are set on the amount of credit that can be extended to one borrower. The largest amount that can generally be extended to any one borrower without obtaining approval from the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors is $150,000. The Executive Committee is authorized to extend credit to one borrower on an unsecured basis of up to 15% of statutory capital or approximately $7.2 million and on a secured basis of up to 25% of statutory capital or approximately $12 million.

The Bank offers a variety of loans to retail customers in the communities we serve.

Consumer Loans:

Consumer loans in general carry a moderate degree of risk compared to other loans. They are historically more risky than traditional residential real estate but less risky than commercial loans. Risk of default is generally determined by the well being of the national and local economies. During times of economic stress there is usually some level of job loss both nationally and locally, which directly affects the ability of the consumer to repay debt. Risk on consumer type loans is generally managed through policy limitations on debt levels consumer borrowers may carry and limitations on loan terms and amounts depending upon collateral type.

38

Various types of consumer loans include the following:

• Home equity loans - open and closed end

• Vehicle financing

• Loans secured by deposits

• Secured and unsecured personal loans

The various types of consumer loans all carry varying degrees of risk for the Bank. Loans secured by deposits carry little or no risk and in our experience have had a zero default rate. Home equity lines carry additional risk because of the increased difficulty of converting real estate to cash in the event of a default. However, underwriting policy provides mitigation to this risk in the form of a maximum loan to value ratio of 90% on a collateral type that has historically appreciated in value. The Bank also requires the customer to carry adequate insurance coverage to pay all mortgage debt in full if the collateral is destroyed. Vehicle financing carries additional risks over loans secured by real estate in that the collateral is declining in value over the life of the loan and is mobile. Risks inherent in vehicle financing are managed by matching the loan term with the age and remaining useful life of the collateral to ensure the customer always has an equity position and is never “upside down.” Collateral is protected by requiring the customer to carry insurance showing the Bank as loss payee. The Bank also has a blanket policy that covers the Bank in the event of a lapse in the borrower’s coverage and also provides assistance in locating collateral when necessary. Secured personal loans carry additional risks over the previous types in that they are generally smaller and made to borrowers with somewhat limited financial resources and credit histories. These loans are secured by a variety of collateral with varying degrees of marketability in the event of default. Risk on these types of loans is managed primarily at the underwriting level with guidelines for debt to income ratio limitations and conservative collateral valuations. Unsecured personal loans carry the greatest degree of risk in the consumer portfolio. Without collateral, the Bank is completely dependent on the commitment of the borrower to repay and the stability of the borrower’s income stream. Again, primary risk management occurs at the underwriting stage with guidelines for debt to income ratios, time in present job and in industry and policy guidelines relative to loan size as a percentage of net worth and liquid assets.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

The Bank makes loans to small and medium sized businesses in our primary trade area for purposes such as new or upgrades to plant and equipment, inventory acquisition and various working capital purposes. Commercial loans are granted to borrowers based on cash flow, ability to repay and degree of management expertise. This type loan may be subject to many different types of risk, which will differ depending on the particular industry the borrower is involved with. General risks to an industry, or segment of an industry, are monitored by senior management on an ongoing basis, when warranted. Individual borrowers who may be at risk due to an industry condition may be more closely analyzed and reviewed at a Loan Committee or Board of Directors level. On a regular basis, commercial and industrial borrowers are required to submit statements of financial condition relative to their business to the Bank for review. These statements are analyzed for trends and the loan is assigned a credit grade accordingly. Based on this grade the loan may receive an increased degree of scrutiny by management up to and including additional loss reserves being required.

This type loan is almost always collateralized. Generally, business assets are used and may consist of general intangibles, inventory, equipment or real estate. Collateral is subject to risk relative to conversion to a liquid asset if necessary as well as risks associated with degree of specialization, mobility and general collectibility in a default situation. To mitigate this risk to collateral, it is underwritten to strict standards including valuations and general acceptability based on the Bank’s ability to monitor its ongoing health and value.

39

Commercial Real Estate:

The Bank grants loans to borrowers secured by commercial real estate located in our market area. In underwriting these type loans we consider the historic and projected future cash flows of the real estate, we make an assessment of the physical condition and general location of the property and the effect these factors will have on its future desirability from a tenant standpoint. We will generally lend up to a maximum 75% loan to value ratio and require a minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.25 or other compensating factors.

Commercial real estate offers some risks not found in traditional residential real estate lending. Repayment is dependent upon successful management and marketing of properties and on the level of expense necessary to maintain the property. Repayment of these loans may be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate market or the general economy. Also commercial real estate loans typically involve relatively large loan balances to single borrowers. To mitigate these risks, we monitor our loan concentration and loans are reviewed by a third party reviewer. This type loan generally has a shorter maturity than other loan types giving the Bank an opportunity to reprice, restructure or decline to renew the credit. As with other loans, commercial real estate loans are graded depending upon strength of credit and performance. A lower grade will bring increased scrutiny by management and the Board of Directors.

Construction and Development Loans:

The Bank makes residential construction and development loans to customers in our market area. Loans are granted for both speculative projects and those being built with end buyers already secured. This type loan is subject primarily to market and general economic risk caused by inventory build-up in periods of economic prosperity. During times of economic stress this type loan has typically had a greater degree of risk than other loan types. To mitigate that risk, the Board of Directors and management reviews the entire portfolio on a monthly basis. The percentage of our portfolio being built on a speculative basis is tracked very closely. On a quarterly basis the portfolio is segmented by market area to allow analysis of exposure and a comparison to current inventory levels in these areas. To further mitigate risk, this type loan is accorded a larger percentage loan loss allowance than other loan types. Loan policy also provides for limits on speculative lending by borrower and by real estate project.

The development component of the Bank’s lending has seen significant deterioration, beginning in 2007 and continuing through 2008. While the Board and management believe that these loans were soundly underwritten at the time of their inception, the failure of the housing market with the resulting cessation of sales activity is creating an extremely adverse environment for borrowers in this category of loans. Though the Bank has curtailed additional loans to acquire and develop land, the loans contained in this segment of the portfolio continue to represent the greatest risk to the overall loan portfolio of the Bank. The ongoing carrying cost of holding these lots is an increasing burden on the borrower and the Bank. Developments that are incomplete must have stabilization efforts to ensure that environmental conditions do not run afoul of regulatory requirements as well as regular monitoring to prevent vandalism and dumping of construction and other debris. The requirement to pay real property taxes as well as interest further stresses the cash flow of borrowers. As the liquidation of these borrowing obligations is largely dependent upon the sale of vacant developed lots to builders or to retail consumers, the ability of the borrower to retire their debt obligations as well as the ability of the Bank to liquidate collateral through foreclosure and sale is very restricted.

40

Residential construction lending has been influenced by many of the same characteristics as development lending. While there are more opportunities for sales than for vacant developed lots, the sales activity is largely characterized by declining values due to the wholesale liquidation of residential units following foreclosure. Henry County is located in an area characterized by a high level of foreclosures and the number of houses on the market exceeds the demand by a significant number. Housing sales are dominated by investor purchases with buyers at all levels expecting significant discounts to previously established market values as well as significant sales concessions in order to consummate purchases. The Bank has greatly restricted construction lending and generally approves new construction loans where the underlying lot is currently financed by the Bank and the property is “presold” to an approved purchaser.

Loan Participations:

The Bank sells loan participations in the ordinary course of business when an originated loan exceeds its legal lending limit as defined by state banking laws. These loan participations are sold to other financial institutions without recourse. As of December 31, 2008 the Bank had $4.29 million in loan participations sold.

The Bank will also purchase loan participations from time to time from other banks in the ordinary course of business usually without recourse. Purchased loan participations are underwritten in accordance with the Bank’s loan policy and represent a source of loan growth to the Bank. Although the originating financial institution provides much of the initial underwriting documentation, management is responsible for the appropriate underwriting, approval and the on-going evaluation of the loan. One risk associated with purchasing loan participations is that the Bank often relies on information provided by the selling bank regarding collateral value and the borrower’s capacity to pay. To the extent this information is not accurate, the Bank may experience a loss on these participations. Otherwise, the Bank believes that the risk related to purchased loan participations is consistent with other similar type loans in the loan portfolio. If a purchased loan participation defaults, the Bank usually has no recourse against the selling bank but will take other commercially reasonable steps to minimize its loss. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had purchased 35 loan participations. The total principal amount of these participations comprised approximately 4.86% of our total portfolio on December 31, 2008.

At December 31, 2008, the Bank held 14 participation loans, totaling $16.6 million purchased from The Community Bank in Loganville, Georgia. The Community Bank was placed in receivership by the State Department of Banking on November 21, 2008 and all assets are being managed by the FDIC. The Bank is working with the FDIC to collect the underlying indebtedness. Full resolution of these participations may be influenced by the FDIC’s desire to reduce their holdings through liquidation action rather than collection action. Due to these extraordinary circumstances, the Bank has given heightened scrutiny to these loans and has recorded $6.0 million in specifically identified reserves for these loans.

Through the Company’s mortgage subsidiary, First Metro Mortgage Co., first mortgage loans are originated for immediate sale to investors. The loans are sold with servicing rights attached; therefore, no servicing rights are retained by the Company. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recognized at the settlement date and are determined by the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the loans sold.

All loans originated by First Metro Mortgage Co. are classified as loans held for sale on the balance sheet because of the intention to immediately sell these loans. The balance of the loans held for sale represents individual mortgage loans that have been funded for which proceeds from the investor have not yet been received. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. However, because the proceeds from the investors for the sale of these loans are usually received within fourteen days, the aggregate cost and fair value of these loans are the same.

41

For the year ended December 31, 2008, First Metro Mortgage Co. originated 81 loans totaling $12.8 million. These mortgage banking activities are performed exclusively by First Metro Mortgage Co. No similar activities are conducted at the Bank level. All loans originated by the Bank are classified as held for investment.

We have 95% of our loan portfolio collateralized by real estate located in our primary market area of Henry County, Georgia and surrounding counties. Our real estate mortgage portfolio consists of loans collateralized by one to four-family and multifamily residential properties (12%), construction loans to build one to four-family and multifamily residential properties (52%), and nonresidential properties consisting primarily of small business commercial properties (36%).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The purpose of liquidity management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy demands for credit, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A company may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of assets and liabilities and through funds provided by operations. Funds invested in short-term marketable instruments and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from the asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through deposit growth, the maturity structure of liabilities, and accessibility to market sources of funds.

Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates and general economic conditions and competition. We attempt to price deposits to meet asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions.

Management continues to emphasize programs to generate local core deposits as our primary funding source. The stability of our core deposit base is an important factor in our liquidity position. A heavy percentage of the deposit base is comprised of accounts of individuals and small businesses with comprehensive banking relationships and limited volatility. Management regularly monitors deposit flow and evaluates alternate pricing structures to retain and grow deposits as needed. Traditional local deposit funding sources are supplemented by the use of FHLB borrowings as well as brokered deposits.

At December 31, 2008, we had loan commitments outstanding of $68 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed, we have the ability on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase federal funds from other financial institutions. We had an arrangement with one commercial bank for an overnight secured federal funds accommodation line of $12.0 million, of which none had been drawn upon as of December 31, 2008. We also have the ability to borrow up to $65 million, subject to available collateral, from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

At December 31, 2008, our capital ratios were considered well capitalized based on regulatory minimum capital requirements. Stockholders’ equity decreased by $16.1 million for 2008 as a result of net losses of $14.3 million, purchases of treasury stock of $61,000, and dividends paid of $2.1 million, offset by increased unrealized gains on securities available for sale of $353,000. For regulatory purposes, the net unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are excluded in the computation of the capital ratios.

In the future, the primary source of funds available to us will be the payment of dividends by the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of the dividends that may be paid without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency.

42

At December 31, 2008, the Bank could not pay dividends without prior approval of the Bank’s regulatory agency.

The minimum capital requirements to be considered well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions and the actual capital ratios for Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and the Bank as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:

	Actual
	Consolidated		Bank		Regulatory Requirements
Leverage capital ratio	8.43	%	8.40	%	5.00	%
Risk-based capital ratios:
Core capital	10.32		10.28		6.00
Total capital	11.59		11.55		10.00

These ratios may decline as asset growth continues, but are expected to exceed the regulatory minimum requirements to be considered well-capitalized. Any future earnings will assist in keeping these ratios at satisfactory levels above the regulatory minimum requirement to be considered well-capitalized.

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources are adequate and will meet our foreseeable short and long-term needs. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet current loan commitments and to fund or refinance, on a timely basis, our other material commitments and liabilities. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities to raise capital to insure that our capital resources will be sufficient for any future needs.

The Bank believes that it has properly evaluated the loan portfolio for risks and has taken appropriate charges to earnings to provide sufficient reserves in the allowance for loan losses. However, should the Bank experience continued deterioration of asset quality as the recession deepens, additional reserves may be required that could lower capital levels.

Management is not aware of any other known trends, events or uncertainties, other than those discussed herein, that will have or that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources or operations. Management is also not aware of any current recommendations by the regulatory authorities that, if they were implemented, would have such an effect.

Effects of Inflation

The impact of inflation on banks differs from its impact on non-financial institutions. Banks, as financial intermediaries, have assets that are primarily monetary in nature and that tend to fluctuate in concert with inflation. A bank can reduce the impact of inflation if it can manage its rate sensitivity gap. This gap represents the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. We, through our asset-liability committee, attempt to structure the assets and liabilities and manage the rate sensitivity gap, thereby seeking to minimize the potential effects of inflation. For information on the management of the Bank’s interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, see the “Asset/Liability Management” section.

We do not engage in any transactions or have relationships or other arrangements with an unconsolidated entity such as special purpose and similar entities or other off-balance sheet arrangements. We also do not trade in energy, weather or other commodity based contracts.

43

Results of Operations For The Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

The following is a summary of our operations for the years indicated.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008			2007		2006
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income	$	35,410		$	51,577	$	48,311
Interest expense		19,628			26,306		20,498
Net interest income		15,782			25,271		27,813
Provision for loan losses		24,286			2,959		477
Other income		2,784			3,025		3,296
Other expenses		15,198			11,793		10,614
Pretax income (loss)		(20,918	)		13,544		20,018
Income taxes (benefit)		(6,572	)		4,835		7,609
Net income (loss)	$	(14,346	)	$	8,709	$	12,409

Net Interest Income

Our results of operations are determined by our ability to manage interest income and expense effectively, to minimize loan and investment losses, to generate non-interest income, and to control operating expenses. Because interest rates are determined by market forces and economic conditions beyond our control, our ability to generate net interest income depends on our ability to obtain an adequate net interest spread between the rate we pay on interest-bearing liabilities and the rate we earn on interest-earning assets.

The net yield on average interest-earning assets decreased to 2.41% in 2008 from 3.64% in 2007. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 5.42% in 2008 from 7.42 % in 2007. The net cost on average interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 3.60% in 2008 from 4.59 % in 2007. The decrease in net yield on average interest-earning assets is primarily due to a reduction in interest income on loans as a result of a 400 basis point decrease in the Prime lending rate during 2008 and the effect of loans being placed on nonaccrual during 2008.

The net yield on average interest-earning assets decreased to 3.64% in 2007 from 4.31% in 2006. The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 7.42% in 2007 from 7.50% in 2006. The average cost on interest-bearing liabilities increased to 4.59% in 2007 from 3.95% in 2006.

Net interest income decreased by $9.4 million in 2008 as compared to a decrease of $2.5 million in 2007 and an increase of $5.1 million in 2006 compared to 2005. As mentioned above, the decrease in net interest income during 2008 was attributed to a decrease in the Prime lending rate during 2008, as well as the negative affect our increased levels of nonperforming loans had on our net interest margin. Interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans since the end of 2007, including reversals of interest from prior periods, amounted to approximately $5.3 million during 2008, effectively lowering our net yield on average earning assets by 81 basis points during 2008. The decrease in interest expense attributed to average interest-bearing liabilities is largely the result of a lower cost of funds during 2008.

44

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses increased by $21,326,496 to $24,285,750 in 2008 and increased by $2,482,394 to $2,959,254 in 2007. The amounts provided are due primarily to our assessment of the inherent risk in the loan portfolio. Please see the section titled “Allowance for Loan Losses” for a more detailed explanation of our assessment criteria as it relates to providing for loan losses. We believe that the $17.7 million in the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2008, or 3.32% of total net outstanding loans is adequate to absorb known risks in the portfolio based upon our review of the loan portfolio. Our net charge-offs were $14.2 million, or 2.55% of average loans outstanding in 2008. The increase in net charge-offs in 2008 is primarily attributed to $12.5 million in charge-offs of fifteen real estate development loan relationships. The Company had deemed these loans impaired and had set aside specific reserves during 2008 based on collateral values securing the loans.

Our net charge-offs were minimal in 2007, 2006 and 2005 as the ratio of charged-off loans to average loans outstanding was .09%, .04% and .01%, respectively. No assurance can be given, however, that the increasing adverse economic conditions or other circumstances will not result in increased losses in our loan portfolio.

Other Income

Other income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges and fees and mortgage banking income. Other income was $2.8 million in 2008 as compared to $3.0 million in 2007. The decrease is due primarily to decreased mortgage banking income of $223,000, and to a lesser extent, other service charges and fees of $26,000. The decrease in mortgage banking income is attributed to a lesser volume of mortgage originations during 2008 compared to 2007. The decrease in other service charges and fees is primarily attributed to decreases in fees earned on our official check program.

Other income was $3.0 million in 2007 as compared to $3.3 million in 2006. The decrease is due primarily to decreased service charges on demand deposit accounts of $138,000, as well as decreases in mortgage banking income of $103,000, and to a lesser extent, other service charges and fees of $29,000. Decreases in service charges on demand deposit accounts are attributed to decreases in official check fees.

Other Expenses

Other expenses were $15.2 million in 2008 as compared to $11.8 million in 2007, an increase of $3,405,347. Gross salaries and employee benefits decreased by $426,180, primarily as a result of decreases in incentive pay and profit sharing contributions in the amount of $830,872, offset with decreases in capitalized loan fees in the amount of $416,734. The number of full time equivalent employees was 144 at December 31, 2008 as compared to 151 at December 31, 2007. Our equipment and occupancy expenses increased by $60,179 in 2008 as compared to 2007, primarily as a result of increased property tax expenses of $35,959 as well as slight increases of $13,736 in utilities and $10,950 in building repairs and maintenance. Other real estate losses of $3,235,010 were comprised of write downs (subsequent to foreclosure) in other real estate values of $2,910,836 and losses on sales of other real estate of $324,174. Other operating expenses increased by $536,338 primarily as a result of increases in FDIC insurance premiums of $390,208, increased legal expenses of $100,650, and increased expenses attributed to carrying other real estate of $216,718, offset by decreases in advertising expenses of $77,220.

45

Other expenses were $11.8 million in 2007 as compared to $10.6 million in 2006, an increase of $1,148,804. Gross salaries and employee benefits increased by $712,344, primarily as a result of normal salary, incentive and benefits increases of $363,962, coupled with decreases in capitalized loan fees in the amount of $348,382. The number of full time equivalent employees was 151 at December 31, 2007 as compared to 144 at December 31, 2006. Our equipment and occupancy expenses increased by $187,456 in 2007 as compared to 2006, primarily as a result of increased building and fixture depreciation expenses of $65,002 and other occupancy expenses attributed to the opening of our Bethany Road branch in March of 2007. Other operating expenses increased by $249,004 as result of increases in stationery and supplies of $34,240, internet expenses of $31,854, ATM expenses of $48,737 and increased expenses attributed to other real estate owned of $140,969.

Income Tax

Income tax expense (benefit) totaled ($6.6 million) in 2008 as compared to $4.8 million in 2007. The effective tax rates for 2008 and 2007 were approximately (31%) and 36%, respectively. The reduction in the absolute value percentages of the effective tax rates is largely the result of a $1.97 million valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets in 2008.

Income tax expense was $4.8 million in 2007 as compared to $7.6 million in 2006. Income tax expense as a percentage of pretax income was approximately 36% for 2007 and 38% for 2006.

46

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATISTICAL DATA

The tables and schedules on the following pages set forth certain financial information and statistical data with respect to: the distribution of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; interest rates and interest differentials; interest rate sensitivity gap ratios; the securities portfolio; the loan portfolio including types of loans, maturities and sensitivities to changes in interest rates and information on nonperforming loans; summary of the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses; types of deposits; and the return on equity and assets.

The following table sets forth the amount of our interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest yield/rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets.

47

Table 1 - Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Interest Rates and Interest Differentials

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008							2007							2006
	Average Balances(1)			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates		Average Balances(1)			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates		Average Balances(1)			Income/ Expense		Yields/ Rates
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Taxable securities	$	72,698		$	3,641	5.01	%	$	99,206		$	5,255	5.30	%	$	71,923		$	3,077	4.28	%
Nontaxable securities (4)		10,238			355	3.47	%		10,038			378	3.77	%		8,666			332	3.83	%
Federal funds sold		11,355			213	1.88	%		21,641			1,082	5.00	%		15,492			780	5.03	%
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		1,626			38	2.34	%		1,472			74	5.03	%		227			14	6.17	%
Loans (2) (3)		557,646			31,163	5.59	%		562,478			44,788	7.96	%		548,046			44,109	8.05	%
Total interest-earning assets		653,563			35,410	5.42	%		694,835			51,577	7.42	%		644,354			48,312	7.50	%
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities		464							(139	)						(607	)
Allowance for loan losses		(10,181	)						(5,424	)						(5,194	)
Cash and due from banks		14,633							15,669							17,462
Other assets		37,225							26,533							20,054
Total	$	695,704						$	731,474						$	676,069
Interest-bearing demand & savings	$	149,448			1,715	1.15	%	$	154,108			4,262	2.77	%	$	163,912			4,328	2.64	%
Time deposits		389,049			17,656	4.54	%		400,165			21,073	5.27	%		332,730			15,029	4.52	%
Borrowings		6,647			257	3.87	%		19,012			971	5.11	%		22,379			1,141	5.10	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		545,144			19,628	3.60	%		573,285			26,306	4.59	%		519,021			20,498	3.95	%
Noninterest-bearing demand		70,407							76,857							83,922
Other liabilities		5,933							5,798							5,088
Stockholders’ equity		74,220							75,534							68,038
Total	$	695,704						$	731,474						$	676,069
Net interest income				$	15,782						$	25,271						$	27,814
Net interest spread						1.82	%						2.83	%						3.54	%
Net yield on average interest-earning assets						2.41	%						3.64	%						4.31	%

(1) Average balances were determined using the daily average balances.

(2) Average balances of loans include nonaccrual loans.

(3) Interest and fees on loans include $190,000, $208,000, and $220,000 of loan fee income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

(4) Yields on nontaxable securities are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis.

Table 2 - Rate and Volume Analysis

The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and expense during the years indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) change in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); (2) change in rate (change in rate multiplied by old volume); and (3) a combination of change in rate and change in volume. The changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.

48

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008 to 2007									2007 to 2006
	Increase (decrease) due to change in									Increase (decrease) due to change in
	Volume			Rate			Net			Volume			Rate			Net
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Income from interest-earning assets:
Interest and fees on loans	$	(382	)	$	(13,243	)	$	(13,625	)	$	1,153		$	(474	)	$	649
Interest on taxable securities		(1,341	)		(273	)		(1,614	)		1,338			840			2,178
Interest on nontaxable securities		8			(31	)		(23	)		52			(6	)		46
Interest on federal funds sold		(375	)		(494	)		(869	)		307			(5	)		302
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in banks		7			(43	)		(36	)		64			(4	)		60
Total interest income		(2,083	)		(14,084	)		(16,167	)		2,914			351			3,235
Expense from interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest on interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits		(125	)		(2,422	)		(2,547	)		(265	)		199			(66	)
Interest on time deposits		(572	)		(2,845	)		(3,417	)		3,324			2,720			6,044
Interest on borrowings		(520	)		(194	)		(714	)		(172	)		2			(170	)
Total interest expense		(1,217	)		(5,461	)		(6,678	)		2,887			2,921			5,808
Net interest income	$	(866	)	$	(8,623	)	$	(9,489	)	$	27		$	(2,570	)	$	(2,573	)

Asset/Liability Management

Our asset/liability mix is monitored on a regular basis and a report evaluating the interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities is prepared and presented to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. The objective of this policy is to monitor interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities so as to minimize the impact of substantial movements in interest rates on earnings. An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate-sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed, usually one year or less. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.

49

A simple interest rate “gap” analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we also evaluate how the repayment of particular assets and liabilities is impacted by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as “interest rate caps and floors”) that limit the amount of changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the interest rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates.

Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and it is management’s intention to continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.

At December 31, 2008 our cumulative one year interest rate sensitivity gap ratio was 104%. Our targeted ratio is 80% to 120% in this time horizon. This indicates that our interest-earning assets will reprice during this period at a rate slightly more than our interest-bearing liabilities.

The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2008, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets less interest rate sensitive liabilities), the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap, the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio.

The table also sets forth the time periods in which interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at different rates.

50

	Within Three Months		After Three Months But Within One Year			After One Year But Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	$	1,500	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	1,500
Federal funds sold		14,300		—			—		—		14,300
Securities		2,820		2,999			25,784		32,662		64,265
Loans		327,010		61,290			140,983		4,325		533,608
Total interest-earning assets		345,630		64,289			166,767		36,987		613,673
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand and savings	$	132,388	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	132,388
Time deposits		88,534		171,824			129,378		26		389,762
Repurchase agreements		—		—			—		—		—
Other borrowings		955		—			1,643		—		2,598
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	221,877	$	171,824		$	131,021	$	26	$	524,748
Interest rate sensitivity gap	$	123,753	$	(107,535	)	$	35,746	$	36,961	$	88,925
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap	$	123,753	$	16,218		$	51,964	$	88,925
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		1.56		.37			1.27		142.2
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		1.56		1.04			1.10		1.17

We actively manage the mix of asset and liability maturities to control the effects of changes in the general level of interest rates on net interest income. Except for its effect on the general level of interest rates, inflation does not have a material impact on us due to the rate variability and short-term maturities of our earning assets. In particular, approximately 59% of the loan portfolio is comprised of loans that have variable rate terms or mature within one year. Most mortgage loans are made on a variable rate basis with rates being adjusted every one to five years.

51

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

Types of Investments

The carrying amounts of securities at the dates indicated are summarized as follows:

	December 31,
	2008		2007		2006
	(Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—	$	—	$	—
Government-sponsored agencies		26,063		58,414		71,262
Mortgage-backed securities		28,272		24,723		7,947
Municipal securities		9,482		8,745		9,498
		63,817		91,882		88,707
Equity securities		1,643		1,898		2,370
	$	65,460	$	93,780	$	91,077

Maturities

The amounts of debt securities, including the weighted average yield in each category as of December 31, 2008 are shown in the following table according to contractual maturity classifications (1) one year or less, (2) after one through five years, (3) after five through ten years and (4) after ten years. Equity securities are not included in the table because they have no contractual maturity.

	One year or less				After one through five years				After five through ten years
	Amount		Yield (1)		Amount		Yield (1)		Amount		Yield (1)
Government-sponsored agencies	$	2,206	3.76	%	$	20,815	4.01	%	$	3,042	4.82	%
Mortgage-backed securities		5	2.09			1,025	4.16			9,382	5.04
Municipal securities		3,628	3.80			4,253	3.38			1,079	4.03
	$	5,839	3.78		$	26,093	3.91		$	13,503	4.91

	After ten years				Total
	Amount		Yield (1)		Amount		Yield (1)
Government-sponsored agencies	$	—	—	%	$	26,063	4.08	%
Mortgage-backed securities		17,860	5.22			28,272	5.12
Municipal securities		522	5.41			9,482	3.73
	$	18,382	5.23		$	63,817	4.49

(1) The weighted average yields were computed using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security.

(2) The weighted average yields for municipal securities are not stated on a tax-equivalent basis.

52

LOAN PORTFOLIO

Types of Loans

Loans by type of collateral are presented below:

	December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial	$	21,181		$	23,752		$	32,765		$	36,349		$	47,246
Real estate - construction		263,052			325,151			309,565			260,912			223,907
Real estate - mortgage		243,235			212,786			210,368			210,366			203,598
Consumer installment and other		6,140			7,698			8,948			10,487			11,972
		533,608			569,387			561,646			518,114			486,723
Less allowance for loan losses		(17,730	)		(7,657	)		(5,230	)		(4,972	)		(4,489	)
Net loans	$	515,878		$	561,730		$	556,416		$	513,142		$	482,234

Maturities and Sensitivities to Changes in Interest Rates

Total loans as of December 31, 2008 are shown in the following table according to contractual maturity classifications (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years.

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial
One year or less	$	16,117
After one through five years		4,493
After five years		571
		21,181
Construction
One year or less		241,832
After one through five years		9,040
After five years		12,180
		263,052
Other
One year or less		106,260
After one through five years		121,851
After five years		21,264
		249,375
	$	533,608

53

The following table summarizes loans at December 31, 2008 with the due dates after one year for predetermined and floating or adjustable interest rates.

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Predetermined interest rates	$	127,452
Floating or adjustable interest rates		41,947
	$	169,399

Risk Elements

The following table presents the aggregate of nonperforming assets for the categories indicated.

	December 31,
	2008		2007		2006		2005		2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis	$	77,804	$	32,744	$	416	$	782	$	498
Loans contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing		20,066		4,714		1,001		4,173		3,251
Restructured loans		—		—		—		—		—
Total nonperforming loans	$	97,870	$	37,458	$	1,417	$	4,955	$	3,749
Other real estate		18,398		10,394		1,411		194		5
Total non performing assets	$	116,268	$	47,852	$	2,828	$	5,149	$	3,754

The reduction in interest income associated with nonaccrual loans during 2008 is as follows:

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans under original terms	$	6,154
Interest income that was recorded on nonaccrual loans	$	875

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans restructured due to the debtors’ financial difficulties, loans past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal and still accruing, and other real estate owned, which is real estate acquired through foreclosure or otherwise in satisfaction of loans. Nonaccrual loans are those loans on which recognition of interest income has been discontinued. Restructured loans generally allow for an extension of the original repayment period or a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower.

When management believes there is sufficient doubt to the collectibility of principal or interest on any loan on its contractual terms, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due, the accrual of interest is discontinued and the loan is designated as nonaccrual, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are either applied against principal or reported as income according to management’s judgment as to the collectibility of principal. Loans are returned to an accrual status when those factors that indicated doubtful collectibility on a timely basis no longer exist.

54

Nonperforming assets at December 31, 2008 amounted to approximately $116.3 million, or 20.33% of total loans and other real estate. This compares to approximately $47.8 million, or 8.25% of total loans and other real estate at December 31, 2007 and $2.8 million, or .50% of total loans and other real estate at December 31, 2006.

The increase in nonperforming assets is primarily attributed to the significant slowdown in residential real estate sales that began in the summer of 2007 and has continued to deteriorate through 2008. Nonperforming loans are concentrated in our residential construction and land development portfolio, comprising 84% of total nonperforming loans. The amount of residential construction and development loans as a percentage of our total portfolio is approximately 49%, leaving a large percentage of our loan portfolio performing. With the significant slowing of home and lot sales, the prices of homes and lots have declined. Therefore, many of our customers who develop and sell residential real estate cannot service their loans because they are not generating sufficient revenue, resulting in the significant increase in nonaccrual loans.

Nonaccrual loans increased by $45.1 million or 138% during the year ended December 31, 2008. There was significant movement within these loans during 2008, as $84.6 million went on nonaccrual status, $14.1 million went into foreclosure, and $7.6 million returned to accrual status through the repayment of previously accrued interest. In addition to these changes, the Company charged off $12.6 million in nonaccrual loans during the fourth quarter of 2008 on which specific reserves had been estasblished. We also received $4.8 million in principal reductions in these loans during 2008. The ten largest nonaccrual loan relationships comprise $56.4 million or 72% of the total and all are collateralized by residential real estate.

Loans contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing at December 31, 2008 was $20.0 million and were comprised of three loan relationships totaling approximately $12.3 million that have been paid current subsequent to the end of 2008.

Other real estate owned increased by $8.0 million, or 77% during the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year, we foreclosed on $11.2 million, net of writedowns and sold $3.2 million of real estate. The total balance of $18.4 million is distributed as follows; residential development (46%), homes and lots (44%) and commercial real estate (10%).

The level of nonperforming assets is a matter of significant concern to the Company, which is actively working to resolve problem credits and to liquidate Bank owned real estate as appropriate purchasers can be found. The Company is represented by experienced legal counsel who is working to ensure that its interests are protected and that the Company achieves maximum collection. The senior management of the Company meets with loan officers on a weekly basis to review nonperforming loans and to ensure that the Company is following its most effective plan for reduction or restructuring of these credits. An additional committee of the Board of Directors has been formed to assist management in the evaluation and liquidation of owned real estate. With a declining housing sales market and lowering real property values, liquidation of real estate at prices favorable to the Company is difficult. The Company continues to write down property or record reserves as required by ongoing evaluations or property values.

We believe that the performance problems existing in our real estate portfolio are a direct result of softening real estate activity and not indicative of a weakness in previous or current underwriting standards regarding real estate lending.

During the third quarter of 2008, the Company took additional action with regard to the administration of nonperforming assets. The Bank created a Special Assets Division to manage and administer the Bank’s portfolio of nonperforming loans and to enhance the liquidation of owned real estate. The Bank has engaged an experienced manager for this department who has over 35 years of banking experience, including substantial time spent in special asset administration.

55

SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE

The following table summarizes average loan balances for each year determined using the daily average balances during the year; changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from loans charged off and recoveries on loans previously charged off; additions to the allowance which have been charged to expense; and the ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average loans.

	December 31,
	2008			2007			2006			2005			2004
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Average amount of loans outstanding	$	557,646		$	562,478		$	548,046		$	510,733		$	455,993
Balance of allowance for loan losses at beginning of year	$	7,657		$	5,230		$	4,972		$	4,489		$	4,178
Loans charged off:
Real estate		(14,039	)		(466	)		(5	)		(21	)		(17	)
Commercial		(128	)		(33	)		(148	)		(12	)		(45	)
Consumer installment		(53	)		(51	)		(88	)		(53	)		(91	)
		(14,220	)		(550	)		(241	)		(86	)		(153	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Real estate		4			1			—			9			6
Commercial		1			1			—			1			—
Consumer installment		2			16			22			13			15
		7			18			22			23			21
Net loans charged off during the year		(14,213	)		(532	)		(219	)		(63	)		(132	)
Additions to allowance charged to expense during year		24,286			2,959			477			546			443
Balance of allowance for loan losses at end of year	$	17,730		$	7,657		$	5,230		$	4,972		$	4,489
Ratio of net loans charged off during the year to average loans outstanding		2.55	%		0.09	%		0.04	%		0.01	%		0.03	%

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation and assessment of the allowance for loan losses. This assessment includes procedures to estimate probable losses and determine the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting allowance balance. The allowance for loan losses consists of two components: (1) a specific amount representative of identified credit exposures for each impaired loan based on an evaluation of the borrower and underlying collateral (SFAS No. 114 component); and (2) a general amount based upon historical losses that have been adjusted to estimate current probable losses based on the use of eight specific risk factors representative of various economic conditions and characteristics of the loan portfolio, as well as additional general qualitative factors (SFAS No. 5 component).

56

We establish the specific amount by examining all impaired loans. Under generally accepted accounting principles, we may measure the loss either by (1) the observable market price of the loan; or (2) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Because the significant majority of our impaired loans are collateral dependent, nearly all of our specific allowances are calculated on the fair value of the collateral. As of December 31, 2008, our impaired loans totaled $94.4 million of which $46.8 million have specific loss allocations of $12.5 million recorded. As of December 31, 2007, our impaired loans totaled $37.5 million of which $29.5 million had specific loss allocations of $3.4 million recorded. These increases in nonperforming loans contributed significantly to the increases in the loan loss provision for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008. During the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008, changes in collateral values for impaired loans resulted in increased provisions of $21.6 million. Other changes in impaired loan allowances during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 are the result of certain impaired loans being foreclosed upon and transferred to other real estate owned as well as any changes as a result of changes in loans considered to be impaired. Nonperforming loans are concentrated in our residential construction and land development portfolio.

The general amount of the allowance is based upon historical losses that are adjusted to estimate current probable losses using eight specific risk factors. The risk factors consist of: (1) economic factors including such matters as changes in the general economic conditions; (2) changes in local economic conditions; (3) concentrations of credit; (4) deterioration in asset values; (5) slowing pace of housing sales; (6) deterioration in lot values; (7) higher loan to values given risk; and (8) level of loans secured by real estate. These risk factors are evaluated and assigned percentages to be allocated to the portfolio, exclusive of SFAS No. 114 component, on a quarterly basis. The weighting of these risk factors varies from period to period and will impact the allowance for loan losses as changes in the risk factors increase or decrease from quarter to quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2008, changes in all risk factors resulted in an increase of approximately $2.7 million in the general amount of the allowance.

The Company has originated construction and land development loans where a component of the cost of the project was the interest required to service the debt during the construction period of the loan, sometimes known as interest reserves. The Company allows disbursements of this interest component as long as the project is progressing as originally projected and if there has been no deterioration of the financial standing of the borrower or the underlying project. If the Company makes a determination that there is such deterioration, or if the loan becomes nonperforming, the Company halts any disbursement of those funds identified for use in paying interest. In some cases, additional interest reserves may be taken by use of deposited funds or through credit lines secured by separate and additional collateral.

57

As of the indicated dates, we have made allocations of our allowance for loan losses to specifically correspond to the categories of loans listed below. Based on our best estimate, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses to types of loans, as of the indicated dates, is as follows:

	December 31,
	2008				2007				2006				2005				2004
	Amount		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Amount		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Amount		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Amount		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans		Amount		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial	$	62	3.97	%	$	637	4.17	%	$	499	5.83	%	$	554	7.01	%	$	647	9.71	%
Real estate-construction		15,051	49.30			5,625	57.10			2,911	55.12			2,066	50.35			1,698	46.00
Real estate-mortgage		2,549	45.58			1,310	37.37			1,570	37.45			1,827	40.60			1,526	41.83
Consumer installment and other		68	1.15			85	1.36			250	1.60			525	2.04			618	2.46
Total allowance		17,730	100.00	%		7,657	100.00	%	$	5,230	100.00	%	$	4,972	100.00	%	$	4,489	100.00	%

DEPOSITS

Average amounts of deposits and average rates paid thereon, classified as to noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing demand and savings deposits and time deposits, are presented below. (1)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2008				2007				2006
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	70,407	—	%	$	76,857	—	%	$	83,922	—	%
Interest-bearing demand and savings deposits		149,448	1.15			154,108	2.77			163,912	2.64
Time deposits		389,049	4.54			400,165	5.27			332,730	4.52
Total deposits	$	608,904			$	631,130			$	580,564

(1) Average balances were determined using the daily average balances.

The amounts of time certificates of deposit issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2008 are shown below by category, which is based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over three through six months (3) over six through twelve months, and (4) over twelve months.

	(Dollars in Thousands)
Three months or less	$	27,084
Over three through six months		23,818
Over six through twelve months		35,728
Over twelve months		48,086
Total	$	134,716

58

RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS

The following rate of return information for the periods indicated is presented below.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008		2007		2006
Return on assets (1)	(2.06	)%	1.19	%	1.84	%
Return on equity (2)	(19.33	)	11.53		18.24
Dividend payout ratio (3)	N/A		45.90		35.63
Equity to assets ratio (4)	10.67		10.33		10.06

(1) Net income divided by average total assets.

(2) Net income divided by average equity.

(3) Dividends declared per share divided by earnings per share.

(4) Average equity divided by average total assets.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed only to U.S. dollar interest rate changes and accordingly, we manage exposure by considering the possible changes in the net interest margin. We do not have any trading instruments nor do we classify any portion of the investment portfolio as held for trading. We do not engage in any hedging activities or enter into any derivative instruments with a higher degree of risk than mortgage-backed securities that are commonly pass through securities. Finally, we have no exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, and other market risks. Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as “interest rate risk.” The repricing of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net interest income. As part of our asset/liability management program, the timing of repriced assets and liabilities is referred to as Gap management. It is our policy to maintain a Gap ratio in the one-year time horizon of .80 to 1.20.

GAP management alone is not enough to properly manage interest rate sensitivity, because interest rates do not respond at the same speed or at the same level to market rate changes. For example, savings and money market rates are more stable than loans tied to a “Prime” rate and thus respond with less volatility to a market rate change.

We use a third party simulation model to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market rates. The model of rising, falling and stable interest rate scenarios allow management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of market rate swings. The analysis of impact on net interest margins as well as market value of equity over a twelve-month period is subjected to a 200 basis point increase and decrease in rate. The 4^th quarter model reflects an increase of 29% in net interest income and a 7% increase in economic value of equity for a 200 basis point increase in rates. The same model shows a 10% decrease in net interest income and a 17% decrease in economic value of equity for a 200 basis point decrease in rates. Our investment committee monitors changes on a quarterly basis, measures the changing values based on the model’s performance and determines an appropriate interest rate policy for management to follow in order to minimize the impact on earnings and market value of equity in the projected rate environment.

59

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are included on Exhibit 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2008 and 2007

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

60

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENT WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The Company’s principal accountant has not changed during the Company’s two (2) most recent fiscal years or any subsequent interim period. There has been no Form 8-K filed within 24 months prior to the date of the most recent financial statements reporting a change of accounting or reporting disagreements on any matter of accounting principle, practice, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could affect internal controls subsequent to the date of this evaluation, and there have been no corrective actions with respect to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.

See the Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. This internal control system has been designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

61

The management of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. To make this assessment, we used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting met those criteria and is effective.

Our independent auditors have issued an attestation report on our assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. You may find this report below.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Henry County Bancshares, Inc.

Stockbridge, Georgia

We have audited Henry County Bancshares, Inc, and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

62

In our opinion, Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries’ as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and our report dated March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 16, 2009

63

Item 9B OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Part III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Code of Ethics

Henry County Bancshares, Inc. has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officers. A copy of the Henry County Bancshares, Inc. Code of Ethics will be provided to any person, without charge, upon written request made to Thomas L. Redding, Henry County Bancshares, Inc., 4806 N. Henry Boulevard, Stockbridge, Georgia 30281.

The remaining information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

64

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Part IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial statements: The consolidated balance sheets of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), statements of stockholders’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, together with the related notes and the independent auditor’s report of Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC, independent accountants.

(2) Financial statement schedules: All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.

(3) Exhibits: A list of the Exhibits as required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K to be filed as part of this Annual Report is shown on the “Exhibit Index” filed herewith.

Signatures

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	HENRY COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.
Date: March 16, 2009	By:	/s/ David H. Gill
		David H. Gill
		President and Chief Executive Officer

65

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints David H. Gill, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on March 16, 2009.

/s/ Paul J. Cates, Jr.
PAUL J. CATES, JR.	Director
/s/ Phillip H. Cook
PHILLIP H. COOK	Director
/s/ H. K. Elliott, Jr.
H. K. ELLIOTT, JR.	Director
/s/ G. R. Foster, III
G. R. FOSTER, III	Director and Chairman of the Board
/s/ David H. Gill
DAVID H. GILL	President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
/s/ Edwin C. Kelley, Jr.
EDWIN C. KELLEY, JR.	Director
/s/ Mary Lynn E. Lambert
MARY LYNN E. LAMBERT	Director
/s/ Robert O. Linch
ROBERT O. LINCH	Director
/s/ William C. Strom
WILLIAM C. STROM	Director and Executive Vice President
/s/ Ronald M. Turpin
RONALD M. TURPIN	Director
/s/ James C. Waggoner
JAMES C. WAGGONER	Director
/s/ Thomas L. Redding
THOMAS L. REDDING	Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

66

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789 dated July 30, 2002.)
3.2	Articles of Correction dated June 24, 1982 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
3.3	Articles of Amendment dated May 27, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(iii) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
3.4	Articles of Amendment dated September 16, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(iv) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
3.5	Bylaws of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. dated May 2, 1983 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(v) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
3.6	Amendment to Bylaws of Henry County Bancshares, Inc. dated December 12, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(vi) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
3.7	Articles of Amendment dated December 14, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 of the Registrant’s Current Report filed on Form 8-K, File No. 000-49789, dated December 18, 2006).
3.8	Articles of Amendment dated March 11, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 000-49789, dated March 12, 2008.)
10.1	Participation Agreement - Executive Salary Continuation Plan - David H. Gill (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
10.2	Participation Agreement - Executive Salary Continuation Plan - William C. Strom (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ii) of the Registration Statement, Amendment No. 2, on Form 10, File No. 000-49789, dated July 30, 2002.)
13	Consolidated Financial Statements of Registrant as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
21	Schedule of subsidiaries of the Registrant
24	Power of Attorney relating to this Form 10-K is set forth on the signature page of this Form 10-K
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of the Registrant’s Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
32	Section 1350 Certifications

67