Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
May 31, 2026
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
The Company	The Company National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“CFC”) is a tax-exempt member-owned cooperative association incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia in April 1969. CFC’s principal purpose is to provide its members with financing to supplement the loan programs of the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). CFC makes loans to its rural electric members so they can acquire, construct and operate electric distribution systems, electric generation and transmission (“power supply”) systems and related facilities. CFC also provides its members and associates with credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and guarantees of debt obligations. As a cooperative, CFC is owned by and exclusively serves its membership, which consists of not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities. National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”), doing business as Utility Capital Solutions, is a taxable cooperative incorporated in 1981 in the District of Columbia as a member-owned cooperative association. NCSC’s principal purpose is to provide financing to its members and associates, which consists of two classes: NCSC electric and NCSC telecommunications. NCSC electric members and associates consist of members of CFC, entities eligible to be members of CFC, government or quasi-government entities that own electric utility systems that meet the Rural Electrification Act definition of “rural,” and the for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide significant benefit to, certain members of CFC. NCSC telecommunication (“telecom”) members and associates consist of rural telecommunications members and their affiliates. CFC is the primary source of funding for NCSC and manages NCSC’s business operations under a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. NCSC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses NCSC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As a taxable cooperative, NCSC pays income tax based on its reported taxable income and deductions. NCSC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia. Cooperative Securities LLC (“Cooperative Securities”) is a limited liability company organized and incorporated in 2021 in Delaware and a wholly owned subsidiary of NCSC. Cooperative Securities is a broker-dealer registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Cooperative Securities provides institutional debt placement services, which may include advising, arranging and structuring private debt financing transactions, for NCSC’s members, and for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide a significant benefit to, certain rural utility providers.
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
Use of Estimates	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures during the period. Management’s most significant estimates and assumptions involve determining the allowance for credit losses. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. While management makes its best judgments, actual amounts or results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to the presentation of information in prior periods to conform to the current-period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on prior years’ net income (loss) or equity. Our fiscal year begins on June 1 and ends on May 31. References to “FY2026,” “FY2025” and “FY2024” refer to the fiscal years ended May 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Principles of Consolidation	Principles of Consolidation These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CFC and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where CFC is the primary beneficiary, which are discussed below. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities.
Variable Interest Entities	Variable Interest Entities A VIE is an entity that has a total equity investment at risk that is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by another party, or where the group of equity holders does not have (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance; (ii) the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses; or (iii) the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns. When evaluating an entity for possible consolidation, we must determine whether or not we have a variable interest in the entity. If it is determined that we do not have a variable interest in the entity, no further analysis is required and we do not consolidate the entity. If we have a variable interest in the entity, we must evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary based on an assessment of quantitative and qualitative factors. We are considered the primary beneficiary holder if we have a controlling financial interest in the VIE that provides (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. NCSC meets the definition of a VIE because it does not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance its activities without additional financial support. We consolidate the results of NCSC with CFC because CFC is the primary beneficiary.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash, certificates of deposit due from banks and other investments with original maturities of less than 90 days are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash	Restricted Cash Restricted cash, which consists primarily of member funds held in escrow for certain specifically designed cooperative programs
Investment Securities	Investment Securities Our investment securities portfolio consists of equity and debt securities. We record purchases and sales of securities on a trade-date basis. The accounting and measurement framework for investment securities differs depending on the security type and the classification. Equity securities are reported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of other non-interest income. All of our debt securities were classified as trading as of May 31, 2026 and 2025. Accordingly, we also report our debt securities at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets and record unrealized gains and losses as a component of non-interest income. Interest income is generally recognized over the contractual life of the securities based on the effective yield method.
Loans to Members	Loans to Members We originate loans to members and classify loans as held for investment or held for sale based on management’s intent and ability to sell or hold the loan for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Loans that we have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are classified as held for investment and are reported based on the unpaid principal balance, net of principal charge-offs, and deferred loan origination costs. Loans that we intend to sell or for which we do not have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are classified as held for sale and are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. These loan sales are made at par value, concurrently or within a short period of time with the closing of the loan or participation agreement.
Accrued Interest Receivable	Accrued Interest Receivable Accrued interest receivable amounts generally represent three months or less of accrued interest on loans outstanding, investments and derivative instruments. As permitted by the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, we elected to continue reporting accrued interest on loans separately on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of the line item accrued interest receivable rather than as a component of loans to members. Because our policy is to write off past-due accrued interest receivable in a timely manner, we elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable on loans outstanding, which totaled $240 million and $237 million as of May 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We also elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the credit quality disclosures required under CECL.
Interest Income	Interest Income Interest income is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Deferred loan origination costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method into interest income over the life of the loan. Nonrefundable loan fees that meet the definition of loan origination fees are deferred and generally recognized in interest income as yield adjustments over the period to maturity of the loan using the effective interest method.
Placement Agent Fees	Placement Agent Fees Cooperative Securities is compensated through a placement agent fee for private placement of securities, which is recognized as an income at a point in time when the performance obligation is satisfied, typically the closing of the sale of securities of the nonpublic companies. We recognized an immaterial amount of private placement fee income during FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, which was included in fee and other income in our consolidated statements of operations.
Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty	Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty As part of our loss-mitigation efforts, we may provide modifications to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty to improve long-term collectability of the loan and to avoid the need for exercising remedies. Loan modifications to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty include principal forgiveness, an interest rate reduction, payment deferrals or a term extension. As modifications offered to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are typically not at market terms, such modifications are generally accounted for as a continuation of the existing loan. As discussed below under “Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio—Asset-Specific Allowance,” loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are evaluated on an individual basis in estimating expected credit losses. If a loan is current at the time of modification, it may remain on accrual status and its performance is monitored for 12 months following the modification. If the borrower fails to perform under the modified terms and applicable nonaccrual criteria are met, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. The accrual of interest on these loans may be resumed, if the borrower performs under the modified terms and we expect the borrower to continue to perform in accordance with the modified terms.
Loans on Nonaccrual Status	Loans on Nonaccrual Status We place a loan on nonaccrual status when: (i) interest or principal payments on the loan are 90 days or more past due, unless management concludes, based on the borrower's financial condition and other relevant facts, that all contractual principal and interest remain fully collectible; (ii) management determines that collection of interest or principal in accordance with the contractual terms is not reasonably assured; (iii) the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or legal action has been initiated; or (iv) the loan is in foreclosure or other legal proceedings. A loan is not placed on nonaccrual status solely because it has passed its contractual maturity date where the loan is in the process of renewal or extension, the delay is administrative or attributable to factors other than borrower credit deterioration, and management concludes that collection of all contractual principal and interest is not in doubt. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only upon the receipt of cash payments. However, if we believe the ultimate collectability of the loan principal is in doubt, cash received is applied against the principal balance of the loan. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when the principal and interest have become current; and when repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured. Charge-Offs We charge off loans or a portion of a loan when we determine that the loan is uncollectible. The charge-off of uncollectible principal amounts results in a reduction to the allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio. Recoveries of previously charged off principal amounts result in an increase to the allowance.
Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio	Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio Allowance Methodology The allowance for credit losses is determined based on management’s current estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term, adjusted as appropriate for estimated prepayments, of loans in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. The allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio is reported on our consolidated balance sheet as a valuation account that is deducted from loans to members to present the net amount we expect to collect over the life of our loans. We immediately recognize an allowance for expected credit losses upon origination of a loan. Adjustments to the allowance each period for changes in our estimate of lifetime expected credit losses are recognized in earnings through the provision for credit losses presented in our consolidated statements of operations. We estimate our allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for our loan portfolio using a probability of default/loss given default methodology. Our allowance for credit losses consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are therefore evaluated on a collective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses. Expected credit losses are estimated based on historical experience, current conditions and forecasts, if applicable, that affect the collectability of the reported amount. Since inception in 1969, CFC has experienced limited defaults and losses as the utility sector generally tends to be less sensitive to changes in the economy than other sectors largely due to the essential nature of the service provided. The losses we have incurred were not tied to economic factors, but rather to distinct operating issues related to each borrower. Given that our borrowers’ creditworthiness, and accordingly our loss experience, has not correlated to specific underlying macroeconomic variables, such as U.S. unemployment rates or gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth, we have not made adjustments to our historical loss rates for any economic forecast. We consider the need, however, to adjust our historical loss information for differences in the specific characteristics of our existing loan portfolio based on an evaluation of relative qualitative factors, such as differences in the composition of our loan portfolio, our underwriting standards, problem loan trends, the quality of our credit review function, as well as changes in the regulatory environment and other pertinent external factors that may impact the amount of future credit losses. Collective Allowance We employ a quantitative methodology and a qualitative framework to measure the collective component of our allowance for expected credit losses. The first element in our quantitative methodology involves the segmentation of our loan portfolio into loan pools that share similar risk characteristics. We disaggregate our loan portfolio into segments that reflect the member borrower type, which is based on the utility sector of the borrower because the key operational, infrastructure, regulatory, environmental, customer and financial risks of each sector are similar in nature. Our primary member borrower types consist of CFC electric distribution, CFC electric power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC electric and NCSC telecom. Our portfolio segments align with the sectors generally seen in the utilities industry. We further stratify each portfolio into loan pools based on our internal borrower risk ratings, as our borrower risk ratings provide important information on the collectability of each of our loan portfolio segments. We then apply loss factors, consisting of the probability of default and loss given default, to the scheduled loan-level amortization amounts over the life of the loans for each of our loan pools. Below we discuss the source and basis for the key inputs, which include borrower risk ratings and the loss factors, in measuring expected credit losses for our loan portfolio. •Borrower Risk Ratings: We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. During FY2026, we enhanced our borrower risk rating methodology to increase the weighting of quantitative factors and to refine the qualitative factors framework, resulting in improved consistency and comparability of borrower credit risk assessments across portfolios, while maintaining alignment with evolving industry practices and internal credit risk assessment objectives. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. We use our internal borrower risk ratings, which we map to the equivalent credit ratings by external rating agencies, to differentiate risk within each of our portfolio segments and loan pools. We provide additional information on our borrower risk ratings below in “Note 4—Loans.” •Probability of Default: The probability of default, or default rate, represents the likelihood that a borrower will default over a particular time horizon. Because of our limited default history, we utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate default rates for each of our loan pools. The third-party default data provide historical default rates, based on credit ratings and remaining maturities of outstanding bonds, for the utility sector. Based on the mapping and alignment of our internal borrower risk ratings to equivalent credit ratings provided in the third-party utility default table, we apply the corresponding cumulative default rates to the scheduled amortization amounts over the remaining term of the loans in each of our loan pools. •Loss Given Default: The loss given default, or loss severity, represents the estimated loss, net of recoveries, on a loan that would be realized in the event of a borrower default. While we utilize third-party default data, we utilize our lifetime historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments. We believe our internal historical loss severity rates provide a more reliable estimate than third-party loss severity data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the investment our member-borrowers have in CFC and the collaborative approach we generally take in working with members in the event that a default occurs. In addition to the quantitative methodology used in our collective measurement of expected credit losses, management performs a qualitative evaluation and analyses of relevant factors, such as changes in risk-management practices, current and past underwriting standards, specific industry issues and trends and other subjective factors. Based on our assessment, we did not make a qualitative adjustment to the collective allowance for credit losses measured under our quantitative methodology as of May 31, 2026 and 2025. Asset-Specific Allowance We generally consider nonaccrual loans as well as loans that have been modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans. Factors we consider in measuring the extent of expected credit loss include the payment status, the collateral value, the borrower’s financial condition, guarantor support, the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. We generally measure the expected credit loss as the difference between the amortized cost basis in the loan and the present value of the expected future cash flows from the borrower, which is generally discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent.
Unadvanced Loan Commitments	Unadvanced Loan Commitments Unadvanced commitments represent amounts for which we have approved and executed loan contracts, but the funds have not been advanced. The majority of the unadvanced commitments reported represent amounts that are subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of the loan advance. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we would confirm there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. The remaining unadvanced commitments relate to line of credit loans that are not subject to a material adverse change clause at the time of each loan advance. As such, we would be required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the loan commitment. Unadvanced loan commitments related to line of credit loans are typically for periods not to exceed five years and are generally revolving facilities used for working capital and backup liquidity purposes. Historically, we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, whether or not there is a material adverse change clause. Since we generally do not charge a fee on the unadvanced portion of the majority of our loan facilities, our borrowers will typically request long-term facilities to fund construction work plans and other capital expenditures for periods of up to five years and draw down on the facility over that time. These factors contribute to our expectation that the majority of the unadvanced line of credit loan commitments will expire without being fully drawn upon and that the total unadvanced amount does not represent future cash funding requirements.
Reserve for Credit Losses—Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk	Reserve for Credit Losses—Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures We also maintain a reserve for credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures related to unadvanced loan commitments and financial guarantees. Because our business processes and credit risks associated with our off-balance sheet credit exposures are essentially the same as for our loans, we measure expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet exposures, after adjusting for the probability of funding these exposures, consistent with the methodology used for our funded outstanding exposures. We include the reserve for expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures as a component of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our member-borrowers. These financial instruments include committed lines of credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of members’ obligations.
Leases	Leases Our lease program is intended to provide equipment financing for leased assets, such as vehicles, to our members. We determine whether an arrangement is a lease and the lease classification under ASC Topic 842, Leases at lease inception for all lease transactions with an initial term greater than one year. NCSC began entering into lease agreements (“head lease agreements”) with a third party to lease vehicles in FY2023. At the inception date of the head lease agreements, NCSC also entered into sublease agreements (“sublease agreements”) to sublease these vehicles to its members. Both the head lease and sublease agreements provide our members the option to terminate the lease by buying the vehicle for a terminal rental adjustment clause value at the end of the lease term. In addition, these agreements include a residual value deficiency provision in the event the member does not purchase the vehicle at the end of the lease. The head lease and sublease have the same lease term ranging from three to 10 years. We classified the head leases as finance leases and subleases as sales-type leases. Lessee Arrangements For the finance leases in which we are the lessee, right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The lease term is estimated based on the economic life of the vehicles. We use the rate implicit in the lease to determine the present value of the lease payments when the rate is readily determinable or we use our incremental borrowing rate. The lease liabilities are included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense for finance lease liabilities is included in the interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease costs for head leases, including property and sales taxes, are recognized as lease expenses when incurred, and are included in the other non-interest expense line item in the consolidated statements of operations. Total finance lease liability was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest expenses and variable lease cost from the finance leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024. Sublessor Arrangements For the sales-type lease in which we are the sublessor, we derecognize the ROU asset of the head lease and record net investment in leases at the commencement date of the sublease, which is included in the other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest income from the net investment in leases is included in interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease payments, including property and sales tax payments reimbursed by the subleasee, are included in fee and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. Total net investment in leases was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest income and variable lease payment income from the sales-type leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024.
Leases	Leases Our lease program is intended to provide equipment financing for leased assets, such as vehicles, to our members. We determine whether an arrangement is a lease and the lease classification under ASC Topic 842, Leases at lease inception for all lease transactions with an initial term greater than one year. NCSC began entering into lease agreements (“head lease agreements”) with a third party to lease vehicles in FY2023. At the inception date of the head lease agreements, NCSC also entered into sublease agreements (“sublease agreements”) to sublease these vehicles to its members. Both the head lease and sublease agreements provide our members the option to terminate the lease by buying the vehicle for a terminal rental adjustment clause value at the end of the lease term. In addition, these agreements include a residual value deficiency provision in the event the member does not purchase the vehicle at the end of the lease. The head lease and sublease have the same lease term ranging from three to 10 years. We classified the head leases as finance leases and subleases as sales-type leases. Lessee Arrangements For the finance leases in which we are the lessee, right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The lease term is estimated based on the economic life of the vehicles. We use the rate implicit in the lease to determine the present value of the lease payments when the rate is readily determinable or we use our incremental borrowing rate. The lease liabilities are included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense for finance lease liabilities is included in the interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease costs for head leases, including property and sales taxes, are recognized as lease expenses when incurred, and are included in the other non-interest expense line item in the consolidated statements of operations. Total finance lease liability was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest expenses and variable lease cost from the finance leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024. Sublessor Arrangements For the sales-type lease in which we are the sublessor, we derecognize the ROU asset of the head lease and record net investment in leases at the commencement date of the sublease, which is included in the other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest income from the net investment in leases is included in interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease payments, including property and sales tax payments reimbursed by the subleasee, are included in fee and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. Total net investment in leases was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest income and variable lease payment income from the sales-type leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024.
Fixed Assets	Fixed Assets Fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. We recognize depreciation expense for each category of our depreciable fixed assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, which ranges from three to 40 years. We recognized depreciation expense of $8 million, $8 million and $7 million in FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, respectively. We perform a fixed assets impairment assessment annually or more frequently, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.
Cloud Computing Arrangements—Implementation Costs	Cloud Computing Arrangements—Implementation Costs Eligible implementation costs associated with cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts are capitalized and amortized over future periods. These costs are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize amortization expense for these capitalized implementation costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the hosting arrangements related to the cloud computing service contracts when ready for the intended use, and we include it in other general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. We perform an impairment assessment annually or more frequently, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount for the capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts may not be recoverable. Based on our annual impairment assessment for FY2026 and FY2025, management determined that there were no indicators of impairment of our capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts as of May 31, 2026 and 2025. We had $51 million of net unamortized capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts, which are net of accumulated amortization of $15 million related to these costs as of May 31, 2026. In comparison, we had $48 million of net unamortized capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts, which are net of accumulated amortization of $9 million related to these costs as of May 31, 2025. We recognized amortization expense of $6 million, $5 million and $3 million in FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, respectively, for the capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts.
Debt	Debt We report debt at cost net of unamortized issuance costs and discounts or premiums. Issuance costs, discounts and premiums are deferred and amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method or a method approximating the effective interest method over the legal maturity of each bond issue. Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.
Derivative Instruments	Derivative Instruments We are an end user of derivative financial instruments and do not engage in derivative trading. We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps and Treasury rate locks, to manage interest rate risk. Derivatives may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions. In accordance with the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging activities, we record derivative instruments at fair value as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. We report derivative asset and liability amounts on a gross basis based on individual contracts, which does not take into consideration the effects of master netting agreements or collateral netting. Derivatives in a gain position are reported as derivative assets on our consolidated balance sheets, while derivatives in a loss position are reported as derivative liabilities. Accrued interest related to derivatives is reported on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of either accrued interest receivable or accrued interest payable. If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, which consist of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements income or expense and derivative forward value amounts, are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). If we elect hedge accounting treatment for derivatives, we formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of the hedge relationship. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. We generally do not designate interest rate swaps, which represent the substantial majority of our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). Net periodic cash settlements expense related to interest rate swaps are classified as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows. We typically designate treasury rate locks as cash flow hedges of forecasted debt issuances or repricings.
Guarantee Liability	Guarantee Liability We maintain a guarantee liability that represents our contingent and noncontingent exposure related to guarantees and standby liquidity obligations associated with our members’ debt. The guarantee liability is included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheet, and the provision for guarantee liability is reported in non-interest expense as a separate line item on the consolidated statements of operations. The contingent portion of the guarantee liability represents management’s estimate of our exposure to losses within the guarantee portfolio. The methodology used to estimate the contingent guarantee liability is consistent with the methodology used to determine the allowance for credit losses under the CECL model. We record a noncontingent guarantee liability for all new or modified guarantees. Our noncontingent guarantee liability represents our obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of our guarantees and liquidity obligations that we have entered into or modified. Our noncontingent obligation is estimated based on guarantee and liquidity fees charged for guarantees issued and represents management’s estimate of the fair value of our obligation to stand ready to perform. The fees are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method into fee and other income over the term of the guarantee.
Fair Value Valuation Processes and Fair Value Hierarchy	Fair Value Valuation Processes We present certain financial instruments at fair value, including equity and debt securities, and derivatives. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). We consider observable prices in the principal market in our valuations where possible. Fair value estimates were developed at the reporting date and may not necessarily be indicative of amounts that could ultimately be realized in a market transaction at a future date. With the exception of redeeming debt under early redemption provisions, terminating derivative instruments under early-termination provisions and allowing borrowers to prepay their loans, we held and intend to hold all financial instruments to maturity, excluding common stock investments that have no stated maturity and our trading debt securities. Fair Value Hierarchy The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. This hierarchy is based on the markets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Fair value measurement of a financial asset or liability is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2: Observable market-based inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 3: Unobservable inputs The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value.
Membership Fees	Membership Fees Members are charged a one-time membership fee based on member class. CFC distribution system members, power supply system members and national associations of cooperatives pay a $1,000 membership fee. CFC service organization members pay a $200 membership fee and CFC associates pay a $1,000 fee. NCSC members pay a $100 membership fee. Membership fees are accounted for as members’ equity.
Early Extinguishment of Debt	Early Extinguishment of Debt We redeem outstanding debt early from time to time to manage liquidity and interest rate risk. When we redeem outstanding debt early, we recognize a gain or loss related to the difference between the amount paid to redeem the debt and the net book value of the extinguished debt as a component of other non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes While CFC is exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, it is subject to tax on unrelated business taxable income. NCSC is a taxable cooperative that pays income tax on the full amount of its reportable taxable income and allowable deductions. The income tax benefit (expense) recorded in the consolidated statements of operations represents the income tax benefit (expense) at the applicable combined federal and state income tax rates resulting from a statutory tax rate. The federal statutory tax rate for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024 was 21%. Substantially all of the income tax expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations relates to NCSC. We recorded an immaterial amount of deferred tax assets as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025.
New Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2026 and New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted	New Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2026 Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The ASU requires public business entities to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a specific quantitative threshold. There is a further requirement that public business entities will need to disclose a tabular reconciliation, using both percentages and reporting currency amounts. The guidance also requires entities to disclose, on an annual basis, income taxes paid (net of refunds received), disaggregated by federal, state and foreign jurisdictions, and further disaggregated by individual jurisdiction when quantitative thresholds are met. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 for public business entities, with early adoption permitted. The ASU should be applied on a prospective basis, while retrospective application is also permitted. We adopted the guidance effective May 31, 2026 on a prospective basis. The adoption of the guidance did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the guidance pertains to disclosure only. We evaluated the disclosure requirements under ASU 2023‑09 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2026 and prior periods presented. Due to the immateriality of total income tax expense and income taxes paid (net of refunds received), a rate reconciliation and disaggregated income taxes paid disclosures have not been presented. We continue to present total income taxes paid as a single amount in our consolidated statements of cash flows, with the substantial majority attributable to federal income taxes. New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans. The ASU amends ASC Topic 326 to require entities to apply the gross-up approach to all “purchased seasoned loans.” Purchased seasoned loans are loans (excluding purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, credit card receivables, debt securities and trade receivables) that are (i) acquired in a business combination or (ii) obtained through a transfer that is not a business combination or initially recognized through the consolidation of a VIE, if certain seasoning criteria are met. A loan is considered seasoned if it is obtained more than 90 days after its origination date and the transferee was not involved in the origination. ASU 2025-08 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The ASU must be applied prospectively. We plan to adopt the guidance on June 1, 2027, and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures. Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This ASU updates the accounting guidance for internal-use software by eliminating references to software development project stages, thereby requiring companies to start capitalizing software costs when (i) management has authorized and committed to funding the project, and (ii) it is probable the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform its intended function. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The ASU can be applied either (i) prospectively, (ii) through a modified transition approach, or (iii) retrospectively. We expect to adopt the guidance on June 1, 2028 and are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-06 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Income Statement—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendments require public entities to disclose, in interim and annual reporting periods, additional information about certain expenses in notes to financial statements, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization and other specific expense categories. ASU 2024-03 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, ASU 2024-03 should be applied on a prospective basis, while retrospective application is also permitted. We expect to adopt the guidance in our annual report for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2028, and the interim disclosure requirements in the quarterly report for the quarter ended August 31, 2028. We are currently in the process of reviewing the guidance and evaluating its impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Disclosure Improvements—Codification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements—Codification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure or presentation requirements of a variety of topics in the ASC in response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative, and align the ASC’s requirements with the SEC’s regulations. For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of that related disclosure from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K becomes effective. However, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the related disclosure from its regulations, the amendments will be removed from the Codification and not become effective. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of the amendments is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
Transfers Between Levels	Transfers Between Levels We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy and transfer between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data include but are not limited to quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may result in changes in the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between levels. We did not have any transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during fiscal years ended May 31, 2026 and 2025.
Basis of Presentation and Business Segment Reporting Methodology	Basis of Presentation We present the results of our business segments on the basis in which management internally evaluates operating performance to establish short- and long-term performance goals, develop budgets and forecasts, identify potential trends, allocate resources and make compensation decisions. This presentation is aligned with how results are reviewed internally by our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), which we determined to be our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The primary measure used regularly by our CODM to evaluate segment financial performance and allocate resources accordingly between segments is the net income adjusted to exclude derivative forward value gains (losses), which represent the effects of fair value fluctuations in our interest rate swaps. The CODM reviews and analyzes on a monthly basis the budget-to-actual variances for the adjusted net income and its components, to inform his decisions regarding the business segment allocation of capital and resources, in order to ensure alignment with our performance goals. The CODM also looks at changes in our total loans outstanding to assess the performance of the segments. Business Segment Reporting Methodology The results of our business segments are intended to present the separate results for each of the reportable segments included in our consolidated financial statements. As discussed in “Note 15—Variable Interest Entities,” all of NCSC’s funding is either provided by CFC or guaranteed by CFC, the terms and conditions of which are stipulated in a loan and security agreement and a guarantee agreement between CFC and NCSC. Pursuant to the guarantee agreement, CFC unconditionally guarantees full indemnification to NCSC for any credit losses. In addition, CFC manages the business operations of NCSC under a management agreement that automatically renews on an annual basis unless the agreement is terminated by either party. We report loans, and interest and fees earned on loans, based on the entity that holds the loans. CFC borrows from various sources to fund the operations of CFC and NCSC, the cost of which is reflected in CFC’s interest expense. NCSC borrows from CFC to fund loans to its members, the cost of which is reported as interest expense by NCSC. CFC charges NCSC a management fee, which CFC reports as a component of fee and other income. NCSC reports the management fee charged by CFC as a component of non-interest expense. CFC and NCSC use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk. Because we generally do not elect to apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps, changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings in our consolidated total results of operations. However, management excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses) and includes the net periodic derivative cash settlement interest income or expense amounts as a component of interest expense in reporting our segment results of operations, which represents the only difference between the accounting and reporting for our business segment results of operations and our consolidated total results of operations.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

May 31, 2026

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“CFC”) is a tax-exempt member-owned cooperative association incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia in April 1969. CFC’s principal purpose is to provide its members with financing to supplement the loan programs of the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). CFC makes loans to its rural electric members so they can acquire, construct and operate electric distribution systems, electric generation and transmission (“power supply”) systems and related facilities. CFC also provides its members and associates with credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and guarantees of debt obligations. As a cooperative, CFC is owned by and exclusively serves its membership, which consists of not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities.

National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”), doing business as Utility Capital Solutions, is a taxable cooperative incorporated in 1981 in the District of Columbia as a member-owned cooperative association. NCSC’s principal purpose is to provide financing to its members and associates, which consists of two classes: NCSC electric and NCSC telecommunications. NCSC electric members and associates consist of members of CFC, entities eligible to be members of CFC, government or quasi-government entities that own electric utility systems that meet the Rural Electrification Act definition of “rural,” and the for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide significant benefit to, certain members of CFC. NCSC telecommunication (“telecom”) members and associates consist of rural telecommunications members and their affiliates. CFC is the primary source of funding for NCSC and manages NCSC’s business operations under a management agreement that is automatically renewable on an annual basis unless terminated by either party. NCSC pays CFC a fee and, in exchange, CFC reimburses NCSC for loan losses under a guarantee agreement. As a taxable cooperative, NCSC pays income tax based on its reported taxable income and deductions. NCSC is headquartered with CFC in Dulles, Virginia.

Cooperative Securities LLC (“Cooperative Securities”) is a limited liability company organized and incorporated in 2021 in Delaware and a wholly owned subsidiary of NCSC. Cooperative Securities is a broker-dealer registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Cooperative Securities provides institutional debt placement services, which may include advising, arranging and structuring private debt financing transactions, for NCSC’s members, and for-profit and not-for-profit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide a significant benefit to, certain rural utility providers.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures during the period. Management’s most significant estimates and assumptions involve determining the allowance for credit losses. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. While management makes its best judgments, actual amounts or results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to the presentation of information in prior periods to conform to the current-period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on prior years’ net income (loss) or equity. Our fiscal year begins on June 1 and ends on May 31. References to “FY2026,” “FY2025” and “FY2024” refer to the fiscal years ended May 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CFC and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where CFC is the primary beneficiary, which are discussed below. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities.

Variable Interest Entities

A VIE is an entity that has a total equity investment at risk that is not sufficient to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by another party, or where the group of equity holders does not have (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities that most significantly impact its economic performance; (ii) the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses; or (iii) the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns. When evaluating an entity for possible consolidation, we must determine whether or not we have a variable interest in the entity. If it is determined that we do not have a variable interest in the entity, no further analysis is required and we do not consolidate the entity. If we have a variable interest in the entity, we must evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary based on an assessment of quantitative and qualitative factors. We are considered the primary beneficiary holder if we have a controlling financial interest in the VIE that provides (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

NCSC meets the definition of a VIE because it does not have sufficient equity investment at risk to finance its activities without additional financial support. We consolidate the results of NCSC with CFC because CFC is the primary beneficiary.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash, certificates of deposit due from banks and other investments with original maturities of less than 90 days are classified as cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash, which consists primarily of member funds held in escrow for certain specifically designed cooperative programs

Investment Securities

Our investment securities portfolio consists of equity and debt securities. We record purchases and sales of securities on a trade-date basis. The accounting and measurement framework for investment securities differs depending on the security type and the classification. Equity securities are reported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of other non-interest income. All of our debt securities were classified as trading as of May 31, 2026 and 2025. Accordingly, we also report our debt securities at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets and record unrealized gains and losses as a component of non-interest income. Interest income is generally recognized over the contractual life of the securities based on the effective yield method.

Loans to Members

We originate loans to members and classify loans as held for investment or held for sale based on management’s intent and ability to sell or hold the loan for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Loans that we have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are classified as held for investment and are reported based on the unpaid principal balance, net of principal charge-offs, and deferred loan origination costs. Loans that we intend to sell or for which we do not have the ability and intent to hold for the foreseeable future are classified as held for sale and are recorded at the lower of

cost or fair value. These loan sales are made at par value, concurrently or within a short period of time with the closing of the loan or participation agreement.

Accrued Interest Receivable

Accrued interest receivable amounts generally represent three months or less of accrued interest on loans outstanding, investments and derivative instruments. As permitted by the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, we elected to continue reporting accrued interest on loans separately on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of the line item accrued interest receivable rather than as a component of loans to members. Because our policy is to write off past-due accrued interest receivable in a timely manner, we elected not to measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable on loans outstanding, which totaled $240 million and $237 million as of May 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We also elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the credit quality disclosures required under CECL.

Interest Income

Interest income is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Deferred loan origination costs are amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method into interest income over the life of the loan. Nonrefundable loan fees that meet the definition of loan origination fees are deferred and generally recognized in interest income as yield adjustments over the period to maturity of the loan using the effective interest method.

Placement Agent Fees

Cooperative Securities is compensated through a placement agent fee for private placement of securities, which is recognized as an income at a point in time when the performance obligation is satisfied, typically the closing of the sale of securities of the nonpublic companies. We recognized an immaterial amount of private placement fee income during FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, which was included in fee and other income in our consolidated statements of operations.

Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

As part of our loss-mitigation efforts, we may provide modifications to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty to improve long-term collectability of the loan and to avoid the need for exercising remedies. Loan modifications to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty include principal forgiveness, an interest rate reduction, payment deferrals or a term extension. As modifications offered to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are typically not at market terms, such modifications are generally accounted for as a continuation of the existing loan.

As discussed below under “Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio—Asset-Specific Allowance,” loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are evaluated on an individual basis in estimating expected credit losses.

If a loan is current at the time of modification, it may remain on accrual status and its performance is monitored for 12 months following the modification. If the borrower fails to perform under the modified terms and applicable nonaccrual criteria are met, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. The accrual of interest on these loans may be resumed, if the borrower performs under the modified terms and we expect the borrower to continue to perform in accordance with the modified terms.

Loans on Nonaccrual Status

We place a loan on nonaccrual status when: (i) interest or principal payments on the loan are 90 days or more past due, unless management concludes, based on the borrower's financial condition and other relevant facts, that all contractual principal and interest remain fully collectible; (ii) management determines that collection of interest or principal in

accordance with the contractual terms is not reasonably assured; (iii) the borrower has filed for bankruptcy or legal action has been initiated; or (iv) the loan is in foreclosure or other legal proceedings.

A loan is not placed on nonaccrual status solely because it has passed its contractual maturity date where the loan is in the process of renewal or extension, the delay is administrative or attributable to factors other than borrower credit deterioration, and management concludes that collection of all contractual principal and interest is not in doubt.

Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against earnings. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only upon the receipt of cash payments. However, if we believe the ultimate collectability of the loan principal is in doubt, cash received is applied against the principal balance of the loan.

Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when the principal and interest have become current; and when repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured.

Charge-Offs

We charge off loans or a portion of a loan when we determine that the loan is uncollectible. The charge-off of uncollectible principal amounts results in a reduction to the allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio. Recoveries of previously charged off principal amounts result in an increase to the allowance.

Allowance for Credit Losses—Loan Portfolio

Allowance Methodology

The allowance for credit losses is determined based on management’s current estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term, adjusted as appropriate for estimated prepayments, of loans in our loan portfolio as of each balance sheet date. The allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio is reported on our consolidated balance sheet as a valuation account that is deducted from loans to members to present the net amount we expect to collect over the life of our loans. We immediately recognize an allowance for expected credit losses upon origination of a loan. Adjustments to the allowance each period for changes in our estimate of lifetime expected credit losses are recognized in earnings through the provision for credit losses presented in our consolidated statements of operations.

We estimate our allowance for lifetime expected credit losses for our loan portfolio using a probability of default/loss given default methodology. Our allowance for credit losses consists of a collective allowance and an asset-specific allowance. The collective allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that share similar risk characteristics and are therefore evaluated on a collective, or pool, basis in measuring expected credit losses. The asset-specific allowance is established for loans in our portfolio that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans in our portfolio and are therefore evaluated on an individual basis in measuring expected credit losses. Expected credit losses are estimated based on historical experience, current conditions and forecasts, if applicable, that affect the collectability of the reported amount.

Since inception in 1969, CFC has experienced limited defaults and losses as the utility sector generally tends to be less sensitive to changes in the economy than other sectors largely due to the essential nature of the service provided. The losses we have incurred were not tied to economic factors, but rather to distinct operating issues related to each borrower. Given that our borrowers’ creditworthiness, and accordingly our loss experience, has not correlated to specific underlying macroeconomic variables, such as U.S. unemployment rates or gross domestic product (“GDP”) growth, we have not made adjustments to our historical loss rates for any economic forecast. We consider the need, however, to adjust our historical loss information for differences in the specific characteristics of our existing loan portfolio based on an evaluation of relative qualitative factors, such as differences in the composition of our loan portfolio, our underwriting standards, problem loan trends, the quality of our credit review function, as well as changes in the regulatory environment and other pertinent external factors that may impact the amount of future credit losses.

Collective Allowance

We employ a quantitative methodology and a qualitative framework to measure the collective component of our allowance for expected credit losses. The first element in our quantitative methodology involves the segmentation of our loan portfolio into loan pools that share similar risk characteristics. We disaggregate our loan portfolio into segments that reflect the member borrower type, which is based on the utility sector of the borrower because the key operational, infrastructure, regulatory, environmental, customer and financial risks of each sector are similar in nature. Our primary member borrower types consist of CFC electric distribution, CFC electric power supply, CFC statewide and associate, NCSC electric and NCSC telecom. Our portfolio segments align with the sectors generally seen in the utilities industry. We further stratify each portfolio into loan pools based on our internal borrower risk ratings, as our borrower risk ratings provide important information on the collectability of each of our loan portfolio segments. We then apply loss factors, consisting of the probability of default and loss given default, to the scheduled loan-level amortization amounts over the life of the loans for each of our loan pools. Below we discuss the source and basis for the key inputs, which include borrower risk ratings and the loss factors, in measuring expected credit losses for our loan portfolio.

•Borrower Risk Ratings: We evaluate each borrower and loan facility in our loan portfolio and assign internal borrower and loan facility risk ratings based on consideration of a number of quantitative and qualitative factors. During FY2026, we enhanced our borrower risk rating methodology to increase the weighting of quantitative factors and to refine the qualitative factors framework, resulting in improved consistency and comparability of borrower credit risk assessments across portfolios, while maintaining alignment with evolving industry practices and internal credit risk assessment objectives. Each risk rating is reassessed annually following receipt of the borrower’s audited financial statements; however, interim risk-rating adjustments may occur as a result of updated information affecting a borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations or other significant developments and trends. Our internally assigned borrower risk ratings are intended to assess the general creditworthiness of the borrower and probability of default. We use our internal borrower risk ratings, which we map to the equivalent credit ratings by external rating agencies, to differentiate risk within each of our portfolio segments and loan pools. We provide additional information on our borrower risk ratings below in “Note 4—Loans.”

•Probability of Default: The probability of default, or default rate, represents the likelihood that a borrower will default over a particular time horizon. Because of our limited default history, we utilize third-party default data for the utility sector as a proxy to estimate default rates for each of our loan pools. The third-party default data provide historical default rates, based on credit ratings and remaining maturities of outstanding bonds, for the utility sector. Based on the mapping and alignment of our internal borrower risk ratings to equivalent credit ratings provided in the third-party utility default table, we apply the corresponding cumulative default rates to the scheduled amortization amounts over the remaining term of the loans in each of our loan pools.

•Loss Given Default: The loss given default, or loss severity, represents the estimated loss, net of recoveries, on a loan that would be realized in the event of a borrower default. While we utilize third-party default data, we utilize our lifetime historical loss experience to estimate loss given default, or the recovery rate, for each of our loan portfolio segments. We believe our internal historical loss severity rates provide a more reliable estimate than third-party loss severity data due to the organizational structure and operating environment of rural utility cooperatives, our lending practice of generally requiring a senior security position on the assets and revenue of borrowers for long-term loans, the investment our member-borrowers have in CFC and the collaborative approach we generally take in working with members in the event that a default occurs.

In addition to the quantitative methodology used in our collective measurement of expected credit losses, management performs a qualitative evaluation and analyses of relevant factors, such as changes in risk-management practices, current and past underwriting standards, specific industry issues and trends and other subjective factors. Based on our assessment, we did not make a qualitative adjustment to the collective allowance for credit losses measured under our quantitative methodology as of May 31, 2026 and 2025.

Asset-Specific Allowance

We generally consider nonaccrual loans as well as loans that have been modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for individual evaluation given the risk characteristics of such loans. Factors we consider in measuring the extent of expected credit loss include the payment status, the collateral value, the borrower’s financial condition, guarantor support, the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. We generally measure the expected credit loss as the difference between the amortized cost basis in the loan and the present value of the expected future cash flows from the borrower, which is generally discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent.

Unadvanced Loan Commitments

Unadvanced commitments represent amounts for which we have approved and executed loan contracts, but the funds have not been advanced. The majority of the unadvanced commitments reported represent amounts that are subject to material adverse change clauses at the time of the loan advance. Prior to making an advance on these facilities, we would confirm there has been no material adverse change in the business or condition, financial or otherwise, of the borrower since the time the loan was approved and confirm the borrower is currently in compliance with loan terms and conditions. The remaining unadvanced commitments relate to line of credit loans that are not subject to a material adverse change clause at the time of each loan advance. As such, we would be required to advance amounts on these committed facilities as long as the borrower is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the loan commitment.

Unadvanced loan commitments related to line of credit loans are typically for periods not to exceed five years and are generally revolving facilities used for working capital and backup liquidity purposes. Historically, we have experienced a very low utilization rate on line of credit loan facilities, whether or not there is a material adverse change clause. Since we generally do not charge a fee on the unadvanced portion of the majority of our loan facilities, our borrowers will typically request long-term facilities to fund construction work plans and other capital expenditures for periods of up to five years and draw down on the facility over that time. These factors contribute to our expectation that the majority of the unadvanced line of credit loan commitments will expire without being fully drawn upon and that the total unadvanced amount does not represent future cash funding requirements.

Reserve for Credit Losses—Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

Reserve for Credit Losses—Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures

We also maintain a reserve for credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures related to unadvanced loan commitments and financial guarantees. Because our business processes and credit risks associated with our off-balance sheet credit exposures are essentially the same as for our loans, we measure expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet exposures, after adjusting for the probability of funding these exposures, consistent with the methodology used for our funded outstanding exposures. We include the reserve for expected credit losses for our off-balance sheet credit exposures as a component of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.

Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our member-borrowers. These financial instruments include committed lines of credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of members’ obligations.

Leases

Our lease program is intended to provide equipment financing for leased assets, such as vehicles, to our members. We determine whether an arrangement is a lease and the lease classification under ASC Topic 842, Leases at lease inception for all lease transactions with an initial term greater than one year. NCSC began entering into lease agreements (“head lease agreements”) with a third party to lease vehicles in FY2023. At the inception date of the head lease agreements, NCSC also entered into sublease agreements (“sublease agreements”) to sublease these vehicles to its members. Both the head lease and sublease agreements provide our members the option to terminate the lease by buying the vehicle for a terminal rental adjustment clause value at the end of the lease term. In addition, these agreements include a residual value deficiency provision in the event the member does not purchase the vehicle at the end of the lease. The head lease and sublease have the same lease term ranging from three to 10 years. We classified the head leases as finance leases and subleases as sales-type leases.

Lessee Arrangements

For the finance leases in which we are the lessee, right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The lease term is estimated based on the economic life of the vehicles. We use the rate implicit in the lease to determine the present value of the lease payments when the rate is readily determinable or we use our incremental borrowing rate. The lease liabilities are included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense for finance lease liabilities is included in the interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease costs for head leases, including property and sales taxes, are recognized as lease expenses when incurred, and are included in the other non-interest expense line item in the consolidated statements of operations. Total finance lease liability was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest expenses and variable lease cost from the finance leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024.

Sublessor Arrangements

For the sales-type lease in which we are the sublessor, we derecognize the ROU asset of the head lease and record net investment in leases at the commencement date of the sublease, which is included in the other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Interest income from the net investment in leases is included in interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. Variable lease payments, including property and sales tax payments reimbursed by the subleasee, are included in fee and other income in the consolidated statements of operations. Total net investment in leases was $7 million as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025. Interest income and variable lease payment income from the sales-type leases were not material for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024.

Leases

Lessee Arrangements

Sublessor Arrangements

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. We recognize depreciation expense for each category of our depreciable fixed assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, which ranges from three to 40 years. We recognized depreciation expense of $8 million, $8 million and $7 million in FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, respectively. We perform a fixed assets impairment assessment annually or more frequently, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.

Cloud Computing Arrangements—Implementation Costs

Eligible implementation costs associated with cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts are capitalized and amortized over future periods. These costs are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize amortization expense for these capitalized implementation costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the hosting arrangements related to the cloud computing service contracts when ready for the intended use, and we include it in other general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. We perform an impairment assessment annually or more frequently, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount for the capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts may not be recoverable. Based on our annual impairment assessment for FY2026 and FY2025, management determined that there were no indicators of impairment of our capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts as of May 31, 2026 and 2025.

We had $51 million of net unamortized capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts, which are net of accumulated amortization of $15 million related to these costs as of May 31, 2026. In comparison, we had $48 million of net unamortized capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts, which are net of accumulated amortization of $9 million related to these costs as of May 31, 2025. We recognized amortization expense of $6 million, $5 million and $3 million in FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024, respectively, for the capitalized implementation costs for cloud computing service contracts.

Debt

We report debt at cost net of unamortized issuance costs and discounts or premiums. Issuance costs, discounts and premiums are deferred and amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method or a method approximating the effective interest method over the legal maturity of each bond issue. Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings with an original contractual maturity of one year or less and do not include the current portion of long-term debt. Borrowings with an original contractual maturity of greater than one year are classified as long-term debt.

Derivative Instruments

We are an end user of derivative financial instruments and do not engage in derivative trading. We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps and Treasury rate locks, to manage interest rate risk. Derivatives may be privately negotiated contracts, which are often referred to as over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, or they may be listed and traded on an exchange. We generally engage in OTC derivative transactions.

In accordance with the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging activities, we record derivative instruments at fair value as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our consolidated balance sheets. We report derivative asset and liability amounts on a gross basis based on individual contracts, which does not take into consideration the effects of master netting agreements or collateral netting. Derivatives in a gain position are reported as derivative assets on our consolidated balance sheets, while derivatives in a loss position are reported as derivative liabilities. Accrued interest related to derivatives is reported on our consolidated balance sheets as a component of either accrued interest receivable or accrued interest payable.

If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, which consist of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements income or expense and derivative forward value amounts, are recognized in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). If we elect hedge accounting treatment for derivatives, we formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of the hedge relationship. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings.

We generally do not designate interest rate swaps, which represent the substantial majority of our derivatives, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). Net periodic cash settlements expense related to interest rate swaps are classified as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

We typically designate treasury rate locks as cash flow hedges of forecasted debt issuances or repricings.

Guarantee Liability

We maintain a guarantee liability that represents our contingent and noncontingent exposure related to guarantees and standby liquidity obligations associated with our members’ debt. The guarantee liability is included in the other liabilities line item on the consolidated balance sheet, and the provision for guarantee liability is reported in non-interest expense as a separate line item on the consolidated statements of operations.

The contingent portion of the guarantee liability represents management’s estimate of our exposure to losses within the guarantee portfolio. The methodology used to estimate the contingent guarantee liability is consistent with the methodology used to determine the allowance for credit losses under the CECL model.

We record a noncontingent guarantee liability for all new or modified guarantees. Our noncontingent guarantee liability represents our obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of our guarantees and liquidity obligations that we have entered into or modified. Our noncontingent obligation is estimated based on guarantee and liquidity fees charged for guarantees issued and represents management’s estimate of the fair value of our obligation to stand ready to perform. The fees are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method into fee and other income over the term of the guarantee.

Fair Value Valuation Processes and Fair Value Hierarchy

Fair Value Valuation Processes

We present certain financial instruments at fair value, including equity and debt securities, and derivatives. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (also referred to as an exit price). We consider observable prices in the principal market in our valuations where possible. Fair value estimates were developed at the reporting date and may not necessarily be indicative of amounts that could ultimately be realized in a market transaction at a future date. With the exception of redeeming debt under early redemption provisions, terminating derivative instruments under early-termination provisions and allowing borrowers to prepay their loans, we held and intend to hold all financial instruments to maturity, excluding common stock investments that have no stated maturity and our trading debt securities.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The fair value accounting guidance provides a three-level fair value hierarchy for classifying financial instruments. This hierarchy is based on the markets in which the assets or liabilities trade and whether the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are observable or unobservable. Fair value measurement of a financial asset or liability is assigned a level based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 3: Unobservable inputs

The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of a financial instrument is dependent upon the availability of quoted prices in active markets or observable market parameters. When quoted prices and observable data in active markets are not fully available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. Changes in market

conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value.

Membership Fees

Members are charged a one-time membership fee based on member class. CFC distribution system members, power supply system members and national associations of cooperatives pay a $1,000 membership fee. CFC service organization members pay a $200 membership fee and CFC associates pay a $1,000 fee. NCSC members pay a $100 membership fee. Membership fees are accounted for as members’ equity.

Early Extinguishment of Debt

We redeem outstanding debt early from time to time to manage liquidity and interest rate risk. When we redeem outstanding debt early, we recognize a gain or loss related to the difference between the amount paid to redeem the debt and the net book value of the extinguished debt as a component of other non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

While CFC is exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, it is subject to tax on unrelated business taxable income. NCSC is a taxable cooperative that pays income tax on the full amount of its reportable taxable income and allowable deductions.

The income tax benefit (expense) recorded in the consolidated statements of operations represents the income tax benefit (expense) at the applicable combined federal and state income tax rates resulting from a statutory tax rate. The federal statutory tax rate for FY2026, FY2025 and FY2024 was 21%. Substantially all of the income tax expense recorded in our consolidated statements of operations relates to NCSC. We recorded an immaterial amount of deferred tax assets as of both May 31, 2026 and 2025.

New Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2026 and New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

New Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2026

Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The ASU requires public business entities to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a specific quantitative threshold. There is a further requirement that public business entities will need to disclose a tabular reconciliation, using both percentages and reporting currency amounts. The guidance also requires entities to disclose, on an annual basis, income taxes paid (net of refunds received), disaggregated by federal, state and foreign jurisdictions, and further disaggregated by individual jurisdiction when quantitative thresholds are met. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 for public business entities, with early adoption permitted. The ASU should be applied on a prospective basis, while retrospective application is also permitted.

We adopted the guidance effective May 31, 2026 on a prospective basis. The adoption of the guidance did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the guidance pertains to disclosure only. We evaluated the disclosure requirements under ASU 2023‑09 for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2026 and prior periods

presented. Due to the immateriality of total income tax expense and income taxes paid (net of refunds received), a rate reconciliation and disaggregated income taxes paid disclosures have not been presented. We continue to present total income taxes paid as a single amount in our consolidated statements of cash flows, with the substantial majority attributable to federal income taxes.

New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans. The ASU amends ASC Topic 326 to require entities to apply the gross-up approach to all “purchased seasoned loans.” Purchased seasoned loans are loans (excluding purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, credit card receivables, debt securities and trade receivables) that are (i) acquired in a business combination or (ii) obtained through a transfer that is not a business combination or initially recognized through the consolidation of a VIE, if certain seasoning criteria are met. A loan is considered seasoned if it is obtained more than 90 days after its origination date and the transferee was not involved in the origination. ASU 2025-08 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The ASU must be applied prospectively. We plan to adopt the guidance on June 1, 2027, and do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This ASU updates the accounting guidance for internal-use software by eliminating references to software development project stages, thereby requiring companies to start capitalizing software costs when (i) management has authorized and committed to funding the project, and (ii) it is probable the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform its intended function. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The ASU can be applied either (i) prospectively, (ii) through a modified transition approach, or (iii) retrospectively. We expect to adopt the guidance on June 1, 2028 and are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-06 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Income Statement—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendments require public entities to disclose, in interim and annual reporting periods, additional information about certain expenses in notes to financial statements, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization and other specific expense categories. ASU 2024-03 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, ASU 2024-03 should be applied on a prospective basis, while retrospective application is also permitted. We expect to adopt the guidance in our annual report for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2028, and the interim disclosure requirements in the quarterly report for the quarter ended August 31, 2028. We are currently in the process of reviewing the guidance and evaluating its impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Disclosure Improvements—Codification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative

In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements—Codification Amendment in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. The amendments in this update modify the disclosure or presentation requirements of a variety of topics in the ASC in response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and

Simplification Initiative, and align the ASC’s requirements with the SEC’s regulations. For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of that related disclosure from Regulation S-X or Regulation S-K becomes effective. However, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the related disclosure from its regulations, the amendments will be removed from the Codification and not become effective. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of the amendments is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Transfers Between Levels

We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy and transfer between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data include but are not limited to quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may result in changes in the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between levels. We did not have any transfers into or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during fiscal years ended May 31, 2026 and 2025.

Basis of Presentation and Business Segment Reporting Methodology

Basis of Presentation

We present the results of our business segments on the basis in which management internally evaluates operating performance to establish short- and long-term performance goals, develop budgets and forecasts, identify potential trends, allocate resources and make compensation decisions. This presentation is aligned with how results are reviewed internally by our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), which we determined to be our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The primary measure used regularly by our CODM to evaluate segment financial performance and allocate resources accordingly between segments is the net income adjusted to exclude derivative forward value gains (losses), which represent the effects of fair value fluctuations in our interest rate swaps. The CODM reviews and analyzes on a monthly basis the budget-to-actual variances for the adjusted net income and its components, to inform his decisions regarding the business segment allocation of capital and resources, in order to ensure alignment with our performance goals. The CODM also looks at changes in our total loans outstanding to assess the performance of the segments.

Business Segment Reporting Methodology

The results of our business segments are intended to present the separate results for each of the reportable segments included in our consolidated financial statements. As discussed in “Note 15—Variable Interest Entities,” all of NCSC’s funding is either provided by CFC or guaranteed by CFC, the terms and conditions of which are stipulated in a loan and security agreement and a guarantee agreement between CFC and NCSC. Pursuant to the guarantee agreement, CFC unconditionally guarantees full indemnification to NCSC for any credit losses. In addition, CFC manages the business operations of NCSC under a management agreement that automatically renews on an annual basis unless the agreement is terminated by either party.

We report loans, and interest and fees earned on loans, based on the entity that holds the loans. CFC borrows from various sources to fund the operations of CFC and NCSC, the cost of which is reflected in CFC’s interest expense. NCSC borrows from CFC to fund loans to its members, the cost of which is reported as interest expense by NCSC. CFC charges NCSC a management fee, which CFC reports as a component of fee and other income. NCSC reports the management fee charged by CFC as a component of non-interest expense. CFC and NCSC use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk. Because we generally do not elect to apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps, changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings in our consolidated total results of operations. However, management excludes the impact of derivative forward value gains (losses) and includes the net periodic derivative cash settlement interest income or expense amounts as a component of interest expense in reporting our segment results of operations, which represents the only difference between the accounting and reporting for our business segment results of operations and our consolidated total results of operations.