XML 39 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Nov. 30, 2019
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
The Company
The Company

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation (“CFC”) is a member-owned cooperative association incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia in April 1969. CFC’s principal purpose is to provide its members with financing to supplement the loan programs of the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). CFC makes loans to its rural electric members so they can acquire, construct and operate electric distribution systems, generation and transmission (“power supply”) systems and related facilities. CFC also provides its members with credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and guarantees of debt obligations. As a cooperative, CFC is owned by and exclusively serves its membership, which consists of not-for-profit entities or subsidiaries or affiliates of not-for-profit entities. CFC is exempt from federal income taxes.
Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures during the period. Management’s most significant estimates and assumptions involve determining the allowance for loan losses and the fair value of financial assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We believe these financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the interim period. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the current presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CFC, variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where CFC is the primary beneficiary and subsidiary entities created and controlled by CFC to hold foreclosed assets. CFC did not have any entities that held foreclosed assets as of November 30, 2019 or May 31, 2019. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. National Cooperative Services Corporation (“NCSC”) and Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (“RTFC”) are VIEs that are required to be consolidated by CFC. NCSC is a taxable member-owned cooperative that may provide financing to members of CFC, government or quasi-government entities which own electric utility systems that meet the Rural Electrification Act definition of “rural,” and for-profit and nonprofit entities that are owned, operated or controlled by, or provide significant benefits to certain members of CFC. RTFC is a taxable Subchapter T cooperative association that provides financing for its rural telecommunications members and their affiliates. Unless stated otherwise, references to “we,” “our” or “us” relate to CFC and its consolidated entities.

Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash

Restricted cash, which consists primarily of member funds held in escrow for certain specifically designed cooperative programs, totaled $11 million and $8 million as of November 30, 2019 and May 31, 2019, respectively.


Assets Held for Sale
Assets Held for Sale

On March 14, 2018, CFC entered into a purchase and sale agreement (“the agreement”), which was subsequently amended, for the sale of a parcel of land, consisting of approximately 28 acres, located in Loudoun County, Virginia. We designated the property, which had a carrying value of $14 million, as held for sale and reclassified it from fixed assets, net to other assets on our consolidated balance sheet. On July 22, 2019, we closed on the sale of the land and received net proceeds of $22 million, resulting in a gain of $8 million on the sale of this property, which is reported in other non-interest income (expense) on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Interest income
The following table presents interest income, by interest-earning asset category, for the three and six months ended November 30, 2019 and 2018.

 
 
Three Months Ended November 30,
 
Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2019
 
2018
 
2019

2018
Interest income by interest-earning asset type:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term fixed-rate loans(1)
 
$
260,714

 
$
253,340

 
$
519,192

 
$
505,141

Long-term variable-rate loans
 
8,131

 
10,066

 
17,887

 
19,447

Line of credit loans
 
12,678

 
11,752

 
28,711

 
23,385

TDR loans(2)
 
212

 
211

 
418

 
429

Other income, net(3)
 
(287
)
 
(251
)
 
(571
)
 
(576
)
Total loans
 
281,448

 
275,118

 
565,637

 
547,826

Cash, time deposits and investment securities
 
5,589

 
6,135

 
11,415

 
11,918

Total interest income
 
$
287,037

 
$
281,253

 
$
577,052

 
$
559,744

____________________________ 
(1)Includes loan conversion fees, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest income using the effective interest method.
(2)Troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) loans.
(3)Consists of late payment fees, commitment fees and net amortization of deferred loan fees and loan origination costs.

Deferred income of $54 million and $58 million as of November 30, 2019 and May 31, 2019, respectively, consists primarily of deferred loan conversion fees totaling $48 million and $52 million, respectively. Deferred loan conversion fees are recognized in interest income using the effective interest method.

Interest Expense
The following table presents interest expense, by debt product type, for the three and six months ended November 30, 2019 and 2018.
 
 
Three Months Ended November 30,
 
Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2019
 
2018
 
2019
 
2018
Interest expense by debt product type:(1)(2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
$
22,112

 
$
22,619

 
$
44,934

 
$
42,038

Medium-term notes
 
31,440

 
33,816

 
63,516

 
66,226

Collateral trust bonds
 
64,523

 
68,934

 
129,904

 
146,639

Guaranteed Underwriter Program notes payable
 
39,786

 
35,014

 
80,219

 
70,348

Farmer Mac notes payable
 
22,654

 
19,697

 
47,728

 
40,808

Other notes payable
 
230

 
322

 
484

 
644

Subordinated deferrable debt
 
12,884

 
9,417

 
25,766

 
18,834

Subordinated certificates
 
14,242

 
14,347

 
28,591

 
28,860

Total interest expense
 
$
207,871

 
$
204,166

 
$
421,142

 
$
414,397

____________________________ 
(1) Includes amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, which are generally deferred and recognized as interest expense using the effective interest method. Issuance costs related to dealer commercial paper, however, are recognized as interest expense immediately as incurred.
(2) Includes fees related to funding arrangements, such as up-front fees paid to banks participating in our committed bank revolving line of credit agreements. Depending on the nature of the fee, amounts may be deferred and recognized as interest expense ratably over the term of the arrangement or recognized immediately as incurred. 

Recent Accounting Changes and Other Developments
Recent Accounting Changes and Other Developments

Accounting Standards Adopted in Fiscal Year 2020

Derivatives and Hedging—Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging—Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which expands the types of risk management strategies that qualify for hedge accounting treatment to more closely align the results of hedge accounting with the economics of certain risk management activities and simplifies certain hedge documentation and assessment requirement. It also eliminates the concept of separately recording hedge ineffectiveness and expands disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2019. Hedge accounting is elective, and we currently apply hedge accounting on a limited basis, specifically when we enter into treasury rate lock agreements. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows. If we continue to elect not to apply hedge accounting to our interest rate swaps, the guidance will not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Cost

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, which shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain callable debt securities to the earliest call date rather the maturity date. The guidance is applicable to any individual debt security, purchased at a premium, with an explicit and noncontingent call feature with a fixed price on a preset date. The guidance does not impact the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount. The guidance is effective for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.


Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which provides new guidance that is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. The new guidance requires the recognition of a right-of use asset and lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. It also requires new disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We adopted this guidance on June 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Measurement—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements as part of its disclosure framework project. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. The guidance is effective for us beginning June 1, 2020. We do not expect that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or cash flows.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the existing incurred credit loss model and establishes a single credit loss framework based on a current expected credit loss model for financial assets carried at amortized cost, including loans and held-to- maturity debt securities. The current expected loss model requires an entity to estimate credit losses expected over the life of the credit exposure upon initial recognition of that exposure when the financial asset is originated or acquired, which will generally result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The guidance also amends the other-than-temporary model for available-for-sale debt securities by requiring the use of an allowance, rather than directly reducing the carrying value of the security. The new guidance also requires expanded credit quality disclosures. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. This guidance is effective for us on June 1, 2020. While early adoption is permitted, we have decided not to elect that option. We are continuing to evaluate the impact of the guidance on our consolidated financial statements, including assessing and evaluating assumptions and models to estimate losses. Upon adoption of the guidance on June 1, 2020, we will be required to record a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings for the impact as of the date of adoption. The impact will depend on our portfolio composition and credit quality at the date of adoption, as well as forecasts at that time.
Derivatives
Accounting for Derivatives

In accordance with the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging activities, we record derivative instruments at fair value as either a derivative asset or derivative liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We report derivative asset and liability amounts on a gross basis based on individual contracts, which does not take into consideration the effects of master netting agreements or collateral netting. Our derivatives transactions are not collateralized and do not include collateralization agreements with counterparties. Derivatives in a gain position are reported as derivative assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, while derivatives in a loss position are reported as derivative liabilities. Accrued interest related to derivatives is reported on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of either accrued interest receivable or accrued interest payable.

If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, which consist of net accrued periodic derivative cash settlements expense and derivative forward value amounts, are recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). If we elect hedge accounting treatment for derivatives, we formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of the hedge relationship. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying fair value hedges are recognized in the same line item on our condensed consolidated statements of operations as the earnings effect of the related hedged item. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of AOCI. Those amounts are reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the forecasted transaction impacts earnings and presented in the same line item on our condensed consolidated statements of operations as the earnings effect of the related hedged item.

We generally do not designate interest rate swaps, which represented all of our outstanding derivatives as of November 30, 2019, for hedge accounting. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations under derivative gains (losses). Net periodic cash settlements expense related to interest rate swaps are classified as an operating activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows.
Fair Value Measurement

We use fair value measurements for the initial recording of certain assets and liabilities and periodic remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The levels of the fair value hierarchy, in priority order, include Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3. For additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy and a description of the methodologies we use to measure fair value, see “Note 14—Fair Value Measurement” to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2019 Form 10-K.
Nonrecurring Fair Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as in the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or when we evaluate for impairment. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and still held during the six months ended November 30, 2019 and 2018 consisted of certain impaired loans. Fair value measurement adjustments for individually impaired loans are recorded in the provision for loan losses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of these assets is determined based on the use of significant unobservable inputs, which are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. We did not have any nonrecurring fair value measurement adjustments recorded in earnings attributable to these assets during the three and six months ended November 30, 2019 and 2018.

Transfer between levels
Transfers Between Levels

We monitor the availability of observable market data to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy and transfer between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 accordingly. Observable market data includes but is not limited to quoted prices and market transactions. Changes in economic conditions or market liquidity generally will drive changes in availability of observable market data. Changes in availability of observable market data, which also may result in changes in the valuation technique used, are generally the cause of transfers between levels. We did not have any transfers between levels for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the six months ended November 30, 2019 and 2018.
Impaired loans
Impaired Loans

The fair value of impaired loans is typically measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows. Our estimate of expected future cash flows incorporates, among other items, assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, the amounts and timing of prepayments, as well as the characteristics of the loan. If we expect repayment to be provided solely by the continued operation or sale of the underlying collateral, the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell is used as the basis for measuring fair value. We employ various approaches and techniques to determine the fair value of collateral-dependent loans, including developing market multiples and obtaining valuations from third-party specialists. The significant unobservable inputs used in measuring the fair value of collateral-dependent loans include estimated cash flows before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and market multiples for comparable companies. Our Credit Risk Management group reviews the unobservable inputs to assess the reasonableness of the assumptions used and the accuracy of the work performed. We did not have any impaired collateral-dependent loans as of November 30, 2019 or May 31, 2019.