XML 39 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
7.           Fair Value Measurements

We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value.  Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, assuming the transaction occurs in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability.
 
Fair Value Hierarchy

The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

 
Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
 
 
Level 2:  Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-based valuation techniques in which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
 
 
Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and typically reflect management's estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2011 and 2010:

 
(In 000s)
December 31, 2011
   
 
 
 
Level 2
   
 
Gross Fair Value
   
 
 
 
Netting (1)
   
 
 
Net Fair Value
     
 
Assets:
                             
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
$
315
 
$
315
 
$
(212
)
$
103
     
 
Liabilities:
                             
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
$
321
 
$
321
 
$
(212
)
$
109
     
 
Interest rate swap agreements
   
4,235
   
4,235
   
-
   
4,235
     

 
(In 000s)
December 31, 2010
   
 
 
 
Level 2
   
 
Gross Fair Value
   
 
 
 
Netting (1)
   
 
 
Net Fair Value
     
 
Assets:
                             
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
$
136
 
$
136
 
$
(116
)
$
20
     
 
Liabilities:
                             
 
Foreign currency exchange contracts
 
$
245
 
$
245
 
$
(116
)
$
129
     
 
Interest rate swap agreements
   
7,058
   
7,058
   
-
   
7,058
     

(1) This column reflects the impact of netting derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.

The fair values of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued using broker quotations of similar assets or liabilities in active markets.  The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are primarily determined based on the present value of future cash flows using internal models and third-party pricing services with observable inputs, including interest rates, yield curves and applicable credit spreads.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

We measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, including the following:

·  
reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test; and
·  
indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

Each of the assets above is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.  Based on their estimated fair values, we recorded an impairment loss of $183.3 million during the three months ended December 31, 2011 (see Notes 3 and 4).

During the fourth quarter of 2011, we reviewed goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment).  The fair value of a reporting unit is the price that would be received to sell the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  We estimated the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow model and a market-based approach, and we reconciled the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our consolidated market capitalization.  Estimating fair value requires significant judgments, including management's estimate of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term growth rate for our business, the useful life over which cash flows will occur, determination of our weighted average cost of capital, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based approach.  Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the estimate of fair value and goodwill impairment for each reporting unit.

We determined that the carrying value of goodwill was impaired based upon the impairment review and calculated the impairment using a fair-value-based goodwill impairment test as required by U.S. GAAP.

As a result of changes in our long-term projections related to the wind-down of our contract with CIGNA, we performed a quantitative goodwill impairment review during the fourth quarter of 2011 and recorded a $182.4 million goodwill impairment loss.

Also during the fourth quarter of 2011, we estimated the fair value of indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consisted of trade names, using a present value technique, which required management's estimate of future revenues attributable to these trade names, estimation of the long-term growth rate for these revenues, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital.  Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the estimate of fair value for the trade names.  In the fourth quarter of 2011, we decided to discontinue the use of one of our trade names. As a result of this decision, we recorded an impairment loss of $0.9 million in December 2011 to write off this intangible asset.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

In addition to foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements, the estimated fair values of which are disclosed above, the estimated fair value of each class of financial instruments at December 31, 2011 was as follows:
 
 
·
Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount of $0.9 million approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments (less than three months).
 
 
·
Long-term debt – The estimated fair value of outstanding borrowings under the Fourth Amended Credit Agreement is based on the average of the prices set by the issuing bank given current market conditions and is not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange. The estimated fair value and carrying amount of outstanding borrowings under the Fourth Amended Credit Agreement (see Note 8) at December 31, 2011 are $250.9 million and $266.0 million, respectively.