Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2015

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures

Fair Value Measurements

The following table provides a summary of the carrying value and fair value of long-term debt as of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014:

	January 31, 2015		February 1, 2014
	(in millions)
Carrying Value	$	4,765	$	4,976
Fair Value (a)	5,305		5,333

________________

(a) The estimated fair value of the Company’s publicly traded debt is based on reported transaction prices which are considered Level 2 inputs in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

The following table provides a summary of assets and liabilities measured in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2015 and February 1, 2014:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in millions)
As of January 31, 2015
Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	1,681	$	—	$	—	$	1,681
Interest Rate Designated Fair Value Hedges	—		12		—		12
Cross-currency Cash Flow Hedges	—		21		—		21
Liabilities:
Lease Guarantees	—		—		1		1
As of February 1, 2014
Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	1,519	$	—	$	—	$	1,519
Interest Rate Designated Fair Value Hedges	—		5		—		5
Liabilities:
Cross-currency Cash Flow Hedges	—		13		—		13
Lease Guarantees	—		—		1		1

The Company’s Level 2 fair value measurements are measured using market approach valuation techniques. The primary inputs to these techniques include benchmark interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, as applicable to the underlying instruments.

The Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements are measured using income approach valuation techniques. The primary inputs to these techniques include the guaranteed lease payments, discount rates, as well as the Company’s assessment of the risk of default on guaranteed leases.

Management believes that the carrying values of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturity.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the Company’s lease guarantees measured at fair value on a recurring basis using unobservable inputs (Level 3) for 2014 and 2013:

	2014		2013
	(in millions)
Beginning Balance	$	1	$	2
Change in Estimated Fair Value Reported in Earnings	—		(1		)
Ending Balance	$	1	$	1

The Company’s lease guarantees include minimum rent and additional payments covering taxes, common area costs and certain other expenses and relate to leases that commenced prior to the disposition of certain businesses. The fair value of these lease guarantees is impacted by economic conditions, probability of rent obligation payments, period of obligation as well as the discount rate utilized. For additional information, see Note 16, “Commitments and Contingencies.”