XML 27 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS [Abstract]  
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS

NOTE 10 – RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS



In September 2014, the FASB issued an ASU regarding accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. This ASU implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (i)identify the contract(s)with a customer, (ii)identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii)determine the transaction price, (iv)allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as)the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 was originally going to be effective on January 1, 2017; however, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)–Deferral of the Effective Date" which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to January 1, 2018.    The Company has conducted its initial assessment and is currently evaluating contracts to assess and quantify accounting methodology changes resulting from the adoption of ASU 2014-09.  The Company’s revenues are comprised of net interest income of financial assets and financial liabilities, which are explicitly excluded from the scope of the new standard and noninterest revenue.  As the majority of the Company’ revenues are derived from net interest revenue, the ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.  The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the new standard on the components of noninterest revenue as well as the most appropriate transition method of application.

In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU regarding accounting for leases. ASU 2016-02 requires all leases, except short-term leases, to be recognized on the lessee’s balance sheet at commencement date as a lease liability for the obligation of lease payments and a right-of-use asset for the right to use/control a specified asset for the lease term. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU regarding stock compensation and improvements to employee share-based payment accounting.  This ASU changes five aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including 1) accounting for income taxes; 2) classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows; 3) forfeitures; 4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements; 5) classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes.  Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted provisions of this ASU which makes several revisions to equity compensation accounting.  Under the new guidance all excess tax benefits and deficiencies that occur when an award vests, is exercised, or expires are recognized in income tax expense as discrete period items.  Previously, these transactions were typically recorded directly within equity.  Consistent with this change, excess tax benefits and deficiencies are no longer included within estimated proceeds when performing the calculation for diluted earnings per share.  The presentation of excess tax benefits in the statement of cash flows shifted to an operating activity from the prior classification as a financing activity.

ASU 2016-09 also provides an accounting policy election to recognize forfeitures of awards as they occur when estimating stock-based compensation expense rather than the previous requirement to estimate forfeitures from inception.  Transition to the new guidance was accomplished through a combination of retrospective, cumulative-effect adjustment to equity and prospective methodologies.  The Company estimates based on currently enacted tax rates, that adoption of ASU 2016-09 in 2017 will result in an incremental effect on tax provision ranging from approximately $412,000 to approximately $840,000 of tax benefit.  The actual effects of adoption in 2017 will primarily depend upon the share price of the Company’ stock, which affects the vesting of certain performance awards, probability of exercise of certain stock options and the magnitude of windfalls for all awards upon either vesting or exercise.  The effects on earnings per share calculations and election to account for forfeitures as incurred have not been significant.

In June 2016, the FASB issued an ASU regarding credit losses on financial instruments.  This ASU will provide financial statement users with more information regarding the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit at each reporting date rather than the incurred loss impairment method. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on the financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued an ASU regarding how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows.  The update addresses eight specific cash flow items whose objective is to reduce existing diversity in practice.  This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2017.  The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU regarding how goodwill is tested annually.  This ASU will simplify the measurement of goodwill which will reduce cost and complexity of the evaluating process.  This ASU is effective beginning after December 15, 2019.  The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations ofthe Company.

In March 2017, the FASB issued an ASU in order to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium.  This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2018.  As the Company already uses the earliest call date for debt securities, the adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

In March 2017, the FASB issued an ASU to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the financial statements.  This ASU will be effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2017.   As the Company already includes service cost from pension benefits in employee benefits expense, the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.