XML 19 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Note 3 - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts receivable related party, accounts payable, accounts payable related party and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amount reported for the Company’s capital lease approximate fair value because the underlying instrument has an interest rate with current market rates. This instrument is not held for trading purposes.

 

Earnings Per Share

 

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to holders of the Company’s common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted earnings per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants outstanding determined using the treasury stock method.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires entities to recognize revenue using the following five-step model: identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue as the entity satisfies each performance obligation. Adoption of this standard could result in retrospective application, either in the form of recasting all prior periods presented or a cumulative adjustment to equity in the period of adoption. The guidance was effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.

 

On January 1, 2018 we adopted ASU 2014-09 using the full retrospective method. The Copmany completed its review of its material revenue streams and determined that there will be no impact to its consolidated financial statements, results of operations or liquidity. When comparing the Company’s current revenue recognition to the new applied revenue recognition under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, there was no change to the amount or timing of revenue recognized. Therefore, no quantitative adjustment was required to be made to the prior periods presented on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements after the adoption of ASC 606.

 

On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued its new lease accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is evaluating the financial statement implications of adopting ASU 2016-02.