XML 119 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Contracts
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits Disclosure [Abstract]  
Guaranteed minimum death benefit contracts

Note 7 Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Contracts

 

As discussed in Note 25, the Company reinsured the guaranteed minimum death benefit (“GMDB) business on February 4, 2013.

 

The Company's reinsurance operations, that were discontinued in 2000 and are now an inactive business in run-off mode, reinsured a GMDB, also known as variable annuity death benefits (VADBe), under certain variable annuities issued by other insurance companies.  These variable annuities are essentially investments in mutual funds combined with a death benefit.  The Company has equity and other market exposures as a result of this product. In periods of declining equity markets and in periods of flat equity markets following a decline, the Company's liabilities for these guaranteed minimum death benefits increase. Conversely, in periods of rising equity markets, the Company's liabilities for these guaranteed minimum death benefits decrease.

 

In 2000, the Company determined that the GMDB reinsurance business was premium deficient because the recorded future policy benefit reserve was less than the expected present value of future claims and expenses less the expected present value of future premiums and investment income using revised assumptions based on actual and expected experience. The Company tests for premium deficiency by reviewing its reserve each quarter using current market conditions and its long-term assumptions. Under premium deficiency accounting, if the recorded reserve is determined to be insufficient, an increase to the reserve is reflected as a charge to current period income. Consistent with GAAP, the Company does not recognize gains on premium deficient long duration products.

 

See Note 13 for further information on the Company's dynamic hedge programs. These programs were used to reduce certain equity and interest rate exposures associated with this business and were discontinued after February 4, 2013.

 

The determination of liabilities for GMDB requires the Company to make critical accounting estimates.  The Company estimates its liabilities for GMDB exposures with an internal model using many scenarios and based on assumptions regarding lapse, future partial surrenders, claim mortality (deaths that result in claims), interest rates (mean investment performance and discount rate) and volatility. These assumptions are based on the Company's experience and future expectations over the long-term period, consistent with the long-term nature of this product. The Company regularly evaluates these assumptions and changes its estimates if actual experience or other evidence suggests that assumptions should be revised. 

The following provides information about the Company's reserving methodology and assumptions for GMDB as of December 31, 2012:

 

  • The reserves represent estimates of the present value of net amounts expected to be paid, less the present value of net future premiums.  Included in net amounts expected to be paid is the excess of the guaranteed death benefits over the values of the contractholders' accounts (based on underlying equity and bond mutual fund investments).
  • The reserves include an estimate for partial surrenders (that allow most contractholders to withdraw substantially all of their mutual fund investments while retaining the death benefit coverage in effect at the time of the withdrawal, essentially locking in the death benefit for a particular policy) based on annual election rates that vary from 0% to 13% depending on the net amount at risk for each policy and whether surrender charges apply.
  • The assumed mean investment performance (“growth interest rate”) for the underlying equity mutual funds for the portion of the liability that is covered by the Company's growth interest rate hedge program is based on the market-observable LIBOR swap curve. The assumed mean investment performance for the remainder of the underlying equity mutual funds considers the Company's GMDB equity hedge program using futures contracts, and is based on the Company's view that short-term interest rates will average 4% over future periods, but considers that current short-term rates are less than 4%.  The mean investment performance assumption for the underlying fixed income mutual funds (bonds and money market) is 5% based on a review of historical returns. The investment performance for underlying equity and fixed income mutual funds is reduced by fund fees ranging from 1% to 3% across all funds.  
  • Market volatility refers to market fluctuation. The volatility assumption is based on a review of historical monthly returns for each key index (e.g. S&P 500) over a period of at least ten years. Volatility represents the dispersion of historical returns compared to the average historical return (standard deviation) for each index. The assumption is 18% to 24%, varying by equity fund type; 5% to 7%, varying by bond fund type; and 0% to 1% for money market funds. These volatility assumptions are used along with the mean investment performance assumption to project future return scenarios.
  • The discount rate is 5.75%, which is determined based on the underlying and projected yield of the portfolio of assets supporting the GMDB liability.
  • The claim mortality assumption is 65% to 89% of the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality table, with 1% annual improvement beginning January 1, 2000. The assumption reflects that for certain contracts, a spousal beneficiary is allowed to elect to continue a contract by becoming its new owner, thereby postponing the death claim rather than receiving the death benefit currently. For certain issuers of these contracts, the claim mortality assumption depends on age, gender, and net amount at risk for the policy.

     

  • The lapse rate assumption (full surrender of an annuity prior to a contractholder's death) is 0% to 11%, depending on contract type, policy duration and the ratio of the net amount at risk to account value.

 

Reserve Strengthening: In each of the three years presented, the Company completed its normal review of reserves (including assumptions), and recorded additional other benefits expense to strengthen GMDB reserves. The amounts and primary drivers of the reserve strengthening in each year were:

 

2012: Reserve strengthening of $43 million ($27 million after-tax) was primarily due to reductions to the lapse rate assumptions, adverse interest rate impacts, and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the volatility and correlation assumptions, partially offset by favorable equity market conditions. The adverse interest rate impacts reflect management's consideration of the anticipated impact of continued low short-term interest rates. This evaluation also led management to lower the mean investment performance for equity funds from 4.75% to 4.00% for those funds not subject to the growth interest rate hedge program.

2011: Reserve strengthening of $70 million ($45 million after-tax) was driven primarily by volatility-related impacts due to turbulent equity market conditions, adverse interest rate impacts, and adverse impacts of overall market declines in the third quarter that include an increase in the provision for expected future partial surrenders and declines in the value of contractholders' non-equity investments.

 

2010: Reserve strengthening of $52 million pre-tax ($34 million after-tax) was primarily due to adverse interest rate impacts, and to a lesser extent, an update to the lapse assumption for policies that have already taken or may take a significant partial withdrawal.

 

Activity in future policy benefit reserves for these GMDB contracts was as follows:

(In millions)201220112010
Balance at January 1, $ 1,170$ 1,138$ 1,285
Add: Unpaid claims  40  37  36
Less: Reinsurance and other amounts recoverable  53  51  53
Balance at January 1, net  1,157  1,124  1,268
Add: Incurred benefits  17  138  (20)
Less: Paid benefits  102  105  124
Ending balance, net  1,072  1,157  1,124
Less: Unpaid claims  24  40  37
Add: Reinsurance and other amounts recoverable  42  53  51
Balance at December 31,$ 1,090$ 1,170$ 1,138

Benefits paid and incurred are net of ceded amounts.  Incurred benefits reflect the favorable or unfavorable impact of a rising or falling equity market on the liability, and include the charges discussed above.  Losses or gains have been recorded in other revenues as a result of the GMDB equity and growth interest rate hedge programs to reduce equity market and certain interest rate exposures.

 

The majority of the Company's exposure arises under annuities that guarantee that the benefit received at death will be no less than the highest historical account value of the related mutual fund investments on a contractholder's anniversary date. Under this type of death benefit, the Company is liable to the extent the highest historical anniversary account value exceeds the fair value of the related mutual fund investments at the time of a contractholder's death. Other annuity designs that the Company reinsured guarantee that the benefit received at death will be:

 

  • the contractholder's account value as of the last anniversary date (anniversary reset); or
  • no less than net deposits paid into the contract accumulated at a specified rate or net deposits paid into the contract.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The table below presents the account value, net amount at risk and average attained age of underlying contractholders for guarantees in the event of death, by type of benefit as of December 31. The net amount at risk is the death benefit coverage in force or the amount that the Company would have to pay if all contractholders died as of the specified date, and represents the excess of the guaranteed benefit amount over the fair value of the underlying mutual fund investments. This data does not reflect the impacts of reinsurance in place as of December 31, 2012 nor the reinsurance placed on February 4, 2013.

(Dollars in millions, excludes impact of reinsurance ceded)20122011
Highest anniversary annuity value    
Account value$ 10,485$ 10,801
Net amount at risk$ 3,303$ 4,487
Average attained age of contractholders (weighted by exposure)  72  71
Anniversary value reset    
Account value$ 1,183$ 1,184
Net amount at risk$ 22$ 56
Average attained age of contractholders (weighted by exposure)  65  63
Other    
Account value$ 1,635$ 1,768
Net amount at risk$ 693$ 834
Average attained age of contractholders (weighted by exposure)  71  70
Total    
Account value$ 13,303$ 13,753
Net amount at risk$ 4,018$ 5,377
Average attained age of contractholders (weighted by exposure)  72  71
Number of contractholders (approx.)  435,000  480,000

The Company has also written reinsurance contracts with issuers of variable annuity contracts that provide annuitants with certain guarantees related to minimum income benefits. All reinsured GMIB policies also have a GMDB benefit reinsured by the Company. See Note 11 for further information.