-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, NiEmGTXN9OPtUXHZQqwtuwNezcWvWY9yUc99++Txfr6eBg57sDEhYtlqxShEr1mz NYkTyHU0RuoQH3sjGqzTMw== 0000700800-96-000008.txt : 19961016 0000700800-96-000008.hdr.sgml : 19961016 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000700800-96-000008 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19960630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19961015 SROS: NASD FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: LARCAN TTC INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000700800 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: RADIO & TV BROADCASTING & COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT [3663] IRS NUMBER: 520854061 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0630 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12249 FILM NUMBER: 96642939 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 650 S TAYLOR AVE CITY: LOUISVILLE STATE: CO ZIP: 80027 BUSINESS PHONE: 303-665-8000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 2: 650 S. TAYLOR AVE. SUITE 4 CITY: LOUISVILLE STATE: CO ZIP: 80027 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: TELEVISION TECHNOLOGY CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703 10-K 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED] For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File No. 0-11359 LARCAN-TTC INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 52-0854061 State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization Identification No.) 650 South Taylor Avenue, Louisville, Colorado 80027 State or other jurisdiction of (Zip Code) incorporation or organization Registrant's telephone number, including area code (303) 665-8000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered None. None. Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.04 par value NASDAQ - Over the Counter Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or fm such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _____ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrants as of June 30, 1996 was $661,500 (based on the average of the closing bid and asked prices on June 30, 1996) The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.04, as of June 30, 1996 was 11,543,934 shares. This Form 10-K consists of 43 pages . INDEX PART I Page Item 1 Business 3 Item 2 Properties 12 Item 3 Legal Proceedings 13 Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 13 PART II Item 5 Market for Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters 13 Item 6 Selected Financial Data 14 Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 15 Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 17 Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 17 PART III Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 18 Item 11 Executive Compensation 20 Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 22 Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 24 PART IV Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, f and Reports on Form 8-K 25 PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS INTRODUCTION LARCAN-TTC INC. (the Company) is a Delaware Corporation whose executive offices and manufacturing plant are located at 650 South Taylor Avenue, Louisville, Colorado 80027. The Company's principal telephone number is (303) 665-8000, and its fax number is (303) 673-9900. The Company has been in existence continuously since 1967 when it was incorporated as a Maryland corporation. It was reincorporated in 1983 under the laws of the State of Delaware. On October 15, 1993, Television Technology Corporation (TTC) sold to LARCAN INC. (LARCAN) of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, 3,636,364 shares of the Company's authorized but previously unissued common stock for $1,000,000. In addition, LARCAN acquired an additional 416,831 shares of the Company's common stock from existing shareholders. As a condition of this purchase and by vote of the shareholders of the Corporation at their annual meeting on February 3, 1994, the TTC name was changed to LARCAN-TTC INC. During June, 1995 LARCAN INC. subscribed for an additional 5,000,000 common shares for $500,000 and for 500,000, 5% cumulative convertible, preferred shares for $500,000. The subscribed shares were issued in October 1995. LARCAN controls approximately 78 percent of the company's outstanding common stock as of June 30, 1996. LARCAN was established in 1981 when the employees of Canadian General Electric (CGE), in association with LeBlanc & Royle Enterprises Inc., purchased CGE's broadcast operation. LARCAN and its predecessor have been a major supplier of VHF (Channels 2-13) television transmitters for over 35 years. LARCAN designs, manufactures, sells, and services VHF solid state television transmitters with powers from 10 watts to 60,000 watts and has recently manufactured and delivered (newly developed) 10,000 watt solid state UHF transmitters. It is believed by the Company's management that ,with the LARCAN investment,the Company will be in a much better position to serve the broadcast industry worldwide, as both companies now have a complete product line to meet the users' needs. The Company is a fully integrated producer of television (TV) and FM radio transmission equipment. At its Louisville, Colorado facility, the Company designs, develops, and manufactures a variety of FM and television broadcast transmitters/translators including low power television (LPTV) equipment and high power UHF television equipment. The Company also provides system design services, sells accessory items manufactured by the Company and others, and performs installation as requested by its customers. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) The Company operates in one market segment both internationally and domestically. The ratio of international and domestic sales to the Company's total sales for each of the last three fiscal years is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Percent of Sales by Market Fiscal Years Ended June 1996 1995 1994 International 37% 21% 47% Domestic 63% 79% 53% The Company's major products and markets are described below. TRANSLATORS AND LOW POWER TELEVISION (LPTV) Translators (sometimes known as transposers in the international marketplace) function to rebroadcast the signal of a regular (primary) radio or TV station automatically. They operate unattended, and retransmit the signal of the primary station on a different (translated) channel. They are commonly financed as a public service by local organizations or governmental entities. They may also be owned and operated by primary stations to extend their signal into areas which are not able to receive a clean signal. In contrast, LPTV stations have Federal Communication Commission (FCC) authority to originate programs. Some of these stations operate a small general purpose studio, while others maintain no studio, but continuously transmit programs obtained from external sources. These purchased programs may be delivered directly to the transmitter by satellite. While the low transmitter power restricts the coverage area, LPTV stations operate under much more flexible and less complex rules than traditional "full servce TV stations.LPTV stations typically have much smaller start-up costs and operating budgets. As a result, they are feasible as either commercial or non-profit stations serving a small community or a specialized audience with an interest in a particular programming format. The state of the Low Power and translator market is shown in Table 2. Table 2. State of Low Power TV Industry Construction Permits Issued Licensed (Pre-Licensed) Translators 5,622 550 Low Power TV 1,877 1,512 Source: Television & Cable Action Update (August 19, 1996) ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) The Company believes that there may be pent-up demand in this market since holders of Construction Permits (CP's) risk losing their right to build and license the station if the station is not built and licensed within 18 months of the issuance date of the CP. The Company believes that its continued commitment to the domestic LPTV/Translator market has allowed the Company to maintain its market share. In addition the introduction in fiscal 1997 of the RMS1000 will generate market penetration at the 1kW level. In the international market, more and more countries are looking at LPTV/Transposers as a methos of extending television service into small villages and rural communities. The Company continues to actively pursue this market. One watt to 1kW television products are normally considered by the Company to be in the low power transmitter/translator class. The range of list prices for the Company's line of translators and LPTV transmitters is $4,195 to $42,500. This price is dependent primarily on the power level of the transmitter, with special features, if any, also having an impact. The percentage of net sales that this product group accounted for is shown on line 1 of Table 3. Table 3. Percent of Net Sales by Product Category Fiscal Year Ended June 1996 1995 1994 LPTV/Translators 40% 56% 50% High Power TV 40% 16% 30% FM Radio 18% 23% 18% Other 2% 5% 2% UHF HIGH POWER TELEVISION Around the world, television broadcasting exists primarily in two bands, Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF). The VHF band which came into use first, consists in the U.S. of Channels 2-13. The Company does not manufacture VHF high power transmitters, however our parent company, LARCAN INC. does. The Company does manufacture UHF High Power transmitters. The UHF band consists, in the U.S., of Channels 14 - 69. The current state of the U.S. television industry can be seen in Table 4. Table 4. State of TV Industry VHF UHF TOTAL Stations Operating 684 879 1,563 Construction Permits 12 86 98 Applications on File 66 323 389 Source: Television & Cable Action Update (August 26, 1996) ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) The Company believes those agencies responsible for telecommunications around the world will continue to authorize a steady expansion of the number of UHF television stations. Transmitters rated at greater than 1kW constitute the Company's UHF high power television broadcasting line. In major metropolitan areas, UHF transmitters may be rated as high as 280kW. In fiscal 1991 the Company completed the development of an "Inductive Output Tube" (IOT) UHF transmitter. This transmitter uses an "IOT/Klystrode type" tube to deliver RF energy to the antenna. Much of the engineering effort during fiscal 1996 has gone into refining the second generation of the IOT/Klystrode transmitter, known as the HDR Series. One of the primary advantages of the "IOT/Klystrode type" is that power consumption is reduced by approximately 60 percent over the more conventional "klystron type" transmiter. The Company currently markets "IOT/Klystrode type" tranmitters ranging in power from 10kW to 240kW. In addition, during fiscal 1996 the Company continued to devote substantial resources and talent to the development of product for the High Definition Television (HDTV) Standard that will be adopted for the next generation of U.S. television service. Company employees participated as members of the FCC subcommittees which are supervising both the laboratory and field testing of the various proposed HDTV systems. During fiscal 1993, the FCC delayed the HDTV development schedule in order to create a standardized digital format that could be used in the HDTV system that will eventually be adopted by the FCC.During fiscal 1994, this standardization was accomplished. Testing was reinstituted with the first stage of field test completed in June 1994. The Company believes its low power solid-state products will successfully pass a digital HDTV signal and that the "IOT/Klystrode type" transmitter will be an ideal originating transmitter for higher power primary stations broadcasting digital HDTV signal. Under proposed FCC HDTV rules, each primary broadcaster in the U.S. will be offered a second channel to be used for a simultaneous broadcast of HDTV while continuing to broadcast in NTSC (National Television Systems Committee) , the current broadcast standard, on their present channel. Virtually, all of these channel allocations will be in the UHF band. Broadcasters would have three years to apply for the HDTV channel and three years to construct the new broadcast facility (including the purchase of a new transmitter and begin broadcasting. The Company believes the potential demand created by most of the current 1,563 broadcasters (Table 4) purchasing a second transmitter for simulcast broadcast of HDTV signals offers a unique market opportunity to increase Company sales of its high power UHF products over the next several years. Accordingly, the Company continues in the development and advancement of products that are intended to position the Company to take full advantage of High Definition Television. The current high power product line of the Company starts with a 10kW IOT/Klystrode; and extends to 60kW cabinets which can be combined to make transmitters of 240kW or more using IOT/ Klystrode tubes. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) This range of products enables the Company to position itself in the marketplace to capture significant high power business. The range of list prices for the Company's line of UHF high power transmitters ranges from $250,000 to $2,000,000. The price is based primarily on the power level of the equipment with special features and design configurations also having an impact. The percentage of the Company's net sales that this product group accounts for is shown on Line 2 of Table 3. FM RADIO TRANSMITTERS The Company offers a full range of solid-state FM radio transmitters/transposers. This product line satisfies the technical requirements of the broadcast regulatory authorities of most countries and sales are made throughout the world. The FM transmitter generates the necessary power to carry the station's program to the listening public on the assigned frequency. These transmitters range in power from 30 watts to 12kW. Customers include commercial and non-commercial broadcast organizations and governmental entities worldwide. The range of list prices for the Company's FM radio transmitters/transposers is from $4,700 to $103,000. These prices are based primarily on the power level of the equipment. The Company's radio product line includes a power line surge protector offered for use in all types of electronic installations. It also includes an FM broadcast exciter which can be sold as a stand-alone 30-watt transmitter or as an upgrade for older FM transmitters, regardless of manufacturer. The current sales volume in these products continues to be small but consistent. The percentage of net sales that this product group accounted for is shown on Line 3 of Table 3. SUPPLEMENTARY PRODUCTS AND ACCESSORIES A number of products purchased by the Company from other manufacturers are offered to complement the Company's own products. Typical items are pre-amplifiers, filters, antennas, transmission line, studio equipment, and test equipment. These products are obtained from a number of different sources and no one supplier is considered critical. The Company estimates that less than 10 percent of its sales for the fiscal year ended June 1996 was derived from the resale of these products, exclusive of products sold as components of the Company's products or as part of an installed broadcast system. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) From time to time, at the specific request of the customer, the Company will perform system design and/or coverage design services. The Company has in-house expertise, or can obtain the necessary expertise, to perform these services. Additionally, the Company acts as its own installer when contracted to do so and has the equipment, knowledge, and personnel to complete these installations. These system and coverage design services generally contribute less than ten percent of sales. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION Suppliers of broadcast transmitters intended for use in the more developed countries are generally required to obtain approval of the technical characteristics of their transmitters from the appropriate regulatory authority in their country. In the U.S., the Company must have FCC Type Acceptance/Notice of its transmitters. FCC requirements are generally less stringent than those imposed by competitive forces and, accordingly, the Company generally does not experience difficulties obtaining Type Acceptance rable acceptances in Canada for products sold in that country. Customers of the Company constructing new broadcast stations of any class in the U.S. generally must obtain a permit from the FCC. Such a permit is granted to an applicant for an available channel based on an application showing that the proposed station would meet the technical, legal, and financial requirements of the FCC. MARKETING During fiscal 1996, the Company continued to refine its internal Sales and Marketing Department and its technical service and support capabilities, with the goal of exceeding industry standards. The Company continues to investigate new ways to enhance its marketing effort and maximize its market penetration. Domestic The Company's rural translator business depends heavily on a network of dealers who buy the Company's products, related supplementary products and accessories at a discount and resell the equipment to an end user. This is usually done as part of an installed system. In some instances, business relationships between these dealers and employees of the Company have continued for more than 20 years. The Company acts as its own installer when contracted to do so and has the equipment, knowledge, and personnel to complete these installations. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) In the LPTV sector, equipment is sold both directly to an end user and through distributors, some of whom focus on certain areas of interest (i.e. religious, educational, etc.), rather than strictly on geographic areas. The Company's internal sales/marketing staff coordinates, motivates, and assists dealers/distributors as necessary, and makes direct sales to the Company's end user customers when appropriate. Beginning in fiscal 1994, the Company primarily focused its sales efforts for high power transmitters in the United States through the efforts of LDL Communications, Inc. (LDL) an affiliate company of LARCAN. LDL functions as a dealer, and buys and resells LARCAN-TTC UHF high power transmitters for resale in a stand-alone configuration or as a part of larger systems containing materials from other manufacturers. The Company's FM radio products are sold through a network of dealers and representatives, and when appropriate, directly to end users. International On a regular basis the Company receives requests for quotations and proposals from many parts of the world. There continues to be an upward trend in the number of such requests which the Company believes is due to the increasing breadth of the Company's product line and its increasing reputation in the world market. The Company exports directly to both end users and to dealers or agents. Some of these dealers/agents are based in the destination country and others concentrate on particular countries from a business location in the United States. Internationally, the Company sells its high power transmitters to end users directly paying a commission to independent manufacturers' representatives where appropriate. One of the major goals of the Company has been to achieve significant penetration of the international low power and high power television markets by making major sales to customers in developing countries. The company will continue to emphasize quality and customer satisfaction in expanding its market share. The Company's export sales for each of the last three fiscal years are shown in Note 10 of the Notes to Financial Statements. The Company's export sales by significant geographic region as a percentage of total sales for each of the last three fiscal years are shown in Table 5. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) Table 5. Export Sales by Significant Geographic Region Fiscal Years Ended June 30 1996 1995 1994 Middle East 25% 12% 0% Far East 2% 0% 0% Africa 0% 0% 25% Other 10% 9% 22% Total 37% 21% 47% Backlog The Company's backlog of unfilled orders for its major product lines is shown in Table 6. Table 6. Order Backlog Order Backlog at June 30 1996 1995 LPTV/ Translators $639,000 $914,000 High Power TV 667,000 89,000 FM Radio 42,000 96,000 Total $1,348,000 $1,099,000 Substantially all of these orders are expected to be filled. Under the Company's sales terms and industry practice, some orders may be subject to cancellation by the customer. However the Company does not expect that a significant portion of the orders shown in the above table will be cancelled. SEASONAL VARIATION The Company believes that there is a nominal seasonal variation in the demand for its products (see Table 7). Table 7. Percent of Sales per Quarter Fiscal Quarter Ending September December March June Fiscal 1996 14% 27% 30% 29% Fiscal 1995 27% 28% 19% 26% Fiscal 1994 19% 31% 27% 23% ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) COMPETITION The Company's products compete in the marketplace on the basis of their performance characteristics, price, and the Company's reputation for the quality of its products and service to its customers. In the translator and LPTV market, the Company and its three domestic competitors ( Acrodyne, ADC/ITS, and EMCEE ) account for most of the sales of television tranlators and LPTV transmitters in the United States. In the UHF high power transmitter market, the Company competes against two domestic manufacturers (Harris and Comark). The Company believes these domestic competitors each have greater sales volume than the Company. Additionally, there are other minor manufacturers of directly competing equipment which the Company believes account for less than 5 percent of the domestic market. In the international market, large companies such as NEC, Thomcast, Marconi, and Rohde & Schwarz dominate in most developed countries due to their long-standing and well-established direct sales organizations. Developing countries currently offer the greatest potential for the Company's products. The growing emergence of non-state controlled broadcast stations, both FM and TV, continues to represent new and growing opportunities for the Company's products. The Company estimates there are more than 25 FM radio transmitter manufacturers worldwide, several of which are substantially larger than the Company. Almost half of these firms actively compete with the Company. The Company believes several competitors have significantly greater sales volume of these products than the Company. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT The Company's engineering and support group pursues product development efforts aimed at improving current products and developing new products. Only a small effort is made toward applied research and none towards fundamental research. The Company expended $898,000, $615,000, and $623,000 respectively, for research and development during fiscal 1996, 1995, and 1994. Research and development on High Definition Television continues to be an on going expenditure commitment. SINGLE SUPPLIER Most materials and equipment used in manufacturing the Company's products are available from more than one supplier and many are available from numerous suppliers. Some materials and equipment are available from single source suppliers, however, the Company strives to maintain good relationships with these suppliers and is not aware of any plans that any of these suppliers have to discontinue supplying these materials and equipment. ITEM 1. BUSINESS (Continued) CUSTOMERS With the exception of Saudi Arabia and Canada, no individual region accounted for more than 10% of the company's sales in fiscal 1996. Sales in Saudi Arabia accounted for $1,800,000 or 25% of total sales in fiscal 1996 while sales to Canada through an affiliate company, LARCAN, were $792,000 or 11% of sales. Sales to foreign customers are subject to unique risks which are not present in sales to domestic customers. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by carefully considering the political and economic conditions in a foreign country along with the financial viability of its customer before doing business there. Generally, sales to foreign customers are priced in U.S. dollars to avoid currency fluctuations and are sold under irrevocable letters of credit, confirmed by a major U.S. bank, when the political, economic, or fiancial viability is uncertain. EMPLOYEES The comparison of the labor force for fiscal years 1996, 1995, and 1994 is shown in Table 7. Table 7. Employee Mix Fiscal Years Ended June 1996 1995 1994 Executive & Administrative 8 6 13 Manufacturing & Manufacturing Support 35 37 48 Sales & Marketing 7 7 5 Engineering & Support 12 12 9 Customer Service 4 5 6 Total 66 67 81 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company occupies a 43,000 square foot facility in Louisville, Colorado under a five-year non-cancelable operating lease, expiring on April 30, 1998. The lease on the primary facility currently carries an annual lease cost of $334,000, subject to an annual increase based on the Consumer Price Index. In addition, the lease is on a triple-net basis whereby the Company also reimburses the landlord for property taxes, property insurance, and property maintenance. The current facility will be sufficient for the Company's operation for the foreseeable future. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The litigation reported in prior year's 10K has been settled with no financial consequence to the company. There are no other legal issues outstanding. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS During the quarter ended June 30, 1996, the following matters were submitted for a vote of the shareholders at their annual meeting: NONE PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The Company's common stock is traded on The OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol LTTC. The high and low bid price for the Company's common stock for each quarter of the last two fiscal years is shown in Table 9. Table 9. Market Value of Common Stock Quarter Ending High Low September 30, 1994 4/16 4/16 December 31, 1994 4/16 4/16 March 31, 1995 3/16 3/16 June 30, 1995 3/16 3/16 September 30, 1995 3/16 3/16 December 31, 1995 3/16 3/16 March 31, 1996 4/16 3/16 June 30, 1996 4/16 3/16 Source: Monthly Statistical Reports, NASD (June 30, 1996) ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS (Continued) The prices in Table 9 represent quotations between dealers and do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs, or commissions and do not necessarily represent actual transactions. At June 30, 1996, the approximate number of holders of the Company's common stock was 480, including both record and beneficial shareholders in security position listings. The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock and has no present intention of declaring such dividend in the future. The Company intends to retain all earnings, if any, for use in development and expansion of its business. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Table 10, which has been derived from the Company's audited financial statements, shows selected financial data for the Company over the last five fiscal years. The financial statements of the Company for each of the three years in the periods ended June 30, 1996 are included at Item 8 of this document. The selected financial data as of the fiscal years ended June 1996, 1995, and 1994 should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document Table 10. Five Year Summary Data (000's, except per share amounts) Fiscal Year Ended June 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 Sales $7,474 $6,228 $8,649 $6,526 $9,645 Net (Loss) Income (2,326) (1,562) (1,451) (1,198) 78 Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share (.23) (.24) (.27) (.41) .03 Total Assets 3,339 2,248 3,105 2,871 3,707 Net Working Capital (Deficiency) (3,717) (1,331) (845) (409) 606 Long Term Obligations 0 0 2 6 21 Cash Dividends Per Common Share None None None None None ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 the Company reported a net loss of $2,326,000. This compares to net loss of $1,562,000 and a net loss of $1,451,000 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1995 and June 30, 1994, respectively. Overall sales increased 20% from 1995. The increase was due to domestic shipments of high power television. Sales of high power products became the company's largest product line for the first time. It is expected that this trend will continue as the company expands its market presence in this area. Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, decreased in fiscal 1996 to 2 percent from 13 percent in fiscal 1995, which decreased from 18 percent in fiscal 1994. The decrease for fiscal 1996 was primarily due to insufficient sales volume to overcome fixed overhead costs, caused by (1) increased competition, (2) the Company's product mix . Because the ratio of material cost to labor cost and its contribution to margin varies from product to product, changes in product mix can have a significant impact on the gross margin. This was especially apparent in fiscal 1996 as the Company continues to penetrate the power market arena where price competition is stiff. However this situation should change in the near future as market acceptance of the high power product line broadens. In the meantime the Company continues its efforts to reduce its manufacturing costs and improve its margins in all product lines. Selling, general, and administrative (SG & A) expenses decreased to 21 percent of net sales as compared to 27 percent in both fiscal 1995 and fiscal 1994. The budgeting process that the Company instituted in fiscal 1996 helped to reduce costs an additional $122,000 or 7% from prior year spending in spite of increased sales. The Company is continuing to refine its budgeting process to ensure that future sales increases do not lead to higher overhead in this area. Research and product development costs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996 were 12 percent of sales compared to 10 percent for fiscal 1995 and 7 percent for fiscal 1994. The percentage increase from 1995 was due to increased expenditures for new product development. In addition to efforts in high power products the Rocky Mountain Series of low power products continues to be aggressively funded. In actual dollars spending levels increased 46% from prior year. An energetic research and development program is considered by management to be the future foundation upon which revenue growth will be based. Continued efforts in high definition television and improved documentation will be management priorities requiring an on going commitment in expenditures. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued) Interest expense as a percentage of sales remained at 1 percent as it has in each of the three preceding fiscal years. There was a decrease in actual dollars, however, for the third straight year. The decrease in 1996 was due to the continuing payoff of the bank line of credit. As in fiscal 1995 the Company received non-interest bearing advances from LARCAN (see Note 6 of the Company's audited financial statements included else-where in the document). LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company's liquidity continues to be adversely impacted by low sales volumes and constrained margins. The sales volumes in fiscal 1996 as in 1995 were not adequate to improve the Company's margins. However, several factors will contribute to an improving outlook for the Company's operational performance in fiscal 1997: (1) The continued emphasis on the Company's high powered transmitter product line along with a sharper focus on higher margin products in all product lines. (2) The introduction in fiscal 1997 of the RMS1000 will generate market excitement at the 1kW level for the Company's RMS series line. (3) A continued emphasis on cost containment especially in overhead areas is expected to have a positive impact on operating margins. At June 30, 1996 the Company had approximately $2,108,000 in trade accounts payable, compared to $735,000 on June 30, 1995. This represents a 187 percent increase in fiscal 1996. A large portion of the increase ($600,000) was due to intercompany advances for inventory purchases from LARCAN. The remainder was due to inventory purchases for high power projects and are current payables. The deficiency in working capital grew to $3,717,000 from $1,331,000 in fiscal 1995 primarily due to the Company's net loss from operations of $2,326,000. This deficit continues to be financed primarily with loans from LARCAN. Subsequent to fiscal 1996 the Company renegotiated its bank line of credit reducing the outstanding balance to $150,000 with an additional $50,000 term note. This represents a $50,000 decrease in current liabilities from June 30, 1996. The Company's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) at June 30, 1996, was .46, compared to .61 at June 30, 1995, and its quick ratio (cash and cash equivalent plus trade accounts receivable divided by current liabilities) was .19 at June 30, 1996 as compared to .14 at June 30, 1995. The Company's debt to equity ratio was (1.97) at June 30, 1996 as compared to (3.00) at June 30, 1995. Due to the Company's current cash flow constraints, there are no current plans for significant capital expenditures. In addition, until the Company's operations provide adequate working capital, the Company will be dependent on its affiliates for its cash needs. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued) This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. These statements include the plans and objectives of management for future operations based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. These plans involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking staements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking staements included in this prospectus will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives and plans of the Company will be acheived. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The financial statements required by this item are included in Part IV of this report. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE There are no changes in nor disagreements with accountants on any matters of accounting and financial disclosure. PART III On October 15, 1993, LARCAN purchased 3,636,364 shares of previously-authorized but unissued shares of the Company's voting common stock. In addition, LARCAN purchased 416,831 shares of the Company's voting common stock from existing stockholders. On May 18, 1995 the shareholders voted in favor of issuing 5,000,000 common shares to LARCAN INC. at a price of $.10 each for a cash consideration of $500,000. On this same date, the shareholders also voted in favor of issuing 500,000, 5% cumulative, convertible preferred shares at a price of $1.00 each to LARCAN INC. also for a cash consideration. The cumulative number of shares of voting common stock purchased and subscribed by LARCAN is 9,053,195. The effect of these transactions is that LARCAN became the registrant's major stockholder. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The following are the six members of the Company's Board of Directors. The Directors listed herein with the exception of James Adamson became the Company's Directors effective October 15, 1993. James Adamson was appointed a Director on May 9, 1996 to replace P. Clyde Turner who retired March 30, 1996. MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Paul A. Dickie, age 54, has been a Director of the Company since October 15, 1993. He joined LeBlanc & Royle Telcom Inc. as Controller in 1972. During his years at LeBlanc & Royle, he rose steadily through the corporate ranks to his current position as President of LeBlanc & Royle Enterprises Inc. He oversees the operations of several of the companies in the LeBlanc Group and is a member of the Board of Directors of LeBlanc & Royle Enterprises Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries. Prior to joining LeBlanc & Royale, Mr. Dickie was employed by Touche Ross & Co., Chartered Accountants. While at Touche Ross, he received his CA designation. Dirk B. Freeman, age 61, has been a Director of the Company since March 31, 1990. He has a 36-year engineering and management history in the broadcast industry. During the period from March 1987 to October 1988, he was the Vice President of Marketing at the Company. Mr. Freeman started as a Broadcast Engineer in the U.S. Army. After the service, he spent a four-year period on the staff of the University of Michigan. In 1961, Mr. Freeman joined the Broadcast Division of RCA. In the next 21 years, he held a number of increasingly responsible engineering,sales,operations and marketing positions at RCA. In 1982, Mr. Freeman left RCA to form Blair Media, Inc., a management consulting firm. After founding Blair Media, Mr. Freeman was engaged in a number of successful projects in broadcast management. In March 1990 Mr. Freeman was elected to the Board of Directors. From March 1990 to October 1994 he served as President of the Company. In October of 1995 Mr. Freeman resumed his activities with Blair Media. Mr. Freeman attended Virginia Polytechnic Institute majoring in Business Administration. He is also a graduate of the U.S. Army War College and a retired Colonel in the U.S.Army Reserve. Nancy E. McGee, age 44, has been a Director of the Company since October 15, 1993. She joined LeBlanc & Royle in 1978 as Controller. Since that time, as the company grew and invested in various other businesses, she assumed the role of Senior Vice President. She is actively involved in the finance and management areas of several companies in the LeBlanc group. Before joining LeBlanc & Royle, Mrs. McGee was employed by Touche Ross & Co. where she received her designation as a chartered accountant. Mrs. McGee serves on the Boards ofLeBlanc & Royle Enterprises Inc. and a number of its subsidiaries. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT (Continued) Byron W. St. Clair, Ph.D., age 71, has been a Director of the Company since its inception in 1967, Chairman of the Board since March 1986 and, additionally, serves as Secretary. Dr. St. Clair was Chief Executive Officer from the inception of the Company to March 1988 and from January 1990 to March 1990. Since March 1988, he has been active full-time in the Company's sales and engineering areas. He was one of the founders and, from 1960 to 1965, the first President of Electronics, Missiles and Communications, Inc. From 1957 to 1960, he was the Director of Research and Development for Adler Electronics, Inc. In thes respective time periods, these two companies were the dominant manufaturers of translators. From 1965 to 1967, he was General Manager of Hammarlund Mfg. Company and from 1967 to 1970, Vice-president of Racal Communications, Inc. Dr. St. Clair received his B.S. and M.A. degrees from Columbia University and a PH.D in physics from Saracuse University. James D. Adamson, age 50, has been a Director of the company since May 9, 1996. He joined LARCAN INC. in 1982 after serving in various capacities within Canadian General Electric. In April 1993 he became Vice President of Marketing for LARCAN INC. and in April 1996 he succeeded P. Clyde Turner as President. Also in April 1996 he was appointed to the Board of Directors of LARCAN INC.. G. James Wilson, age 62, was appointed President and CEO in late fiscal year 1995 and has been a Director of the Company since October 15, 1993. He has been associated with the Broadcast Industry since 1962. Prior to joining the LeBlanc Organization, he was with Andrew Corporation in the position of Canadian sales manager. He joined LeBlanc and Royle in 1977 as Sales Manager. As the company grew, his responsibilities increased, and he assumed the role of Vice President, Sales and Marketing. In 1984, a decision was made to form a U.S. sales and marketing organization to focus on the U.S. broadcast market. LDL Communications was formed, and Mr. Wilson was appointed to the position of President. LDL is responsible for the sales and marketing of the products manufactured by LARCAN, LeBlanc, the Alan Dick Company, and LARCAN-TTC. Mr. Wilson serves on the board of LeBlanc & Royale Enterprises Inc., and other boards within the organization. OFFICERS AND SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION WHO ARE NOT ALSO MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS None. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table provides information concerning compensation for the fiscal years 1995 and 1994, paid to Mr. Dirk B. Freeman, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. No corporate officers or employees received compensation exceeding $100,000 during any of these fiscal years. ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM COMPENSATION AWARDS PAYOUTS NAME AND Fiscal Salary Bonus Other Restricted Options LTIP All Other PRINCIPAL Year Stock Awards /SARS Payouts POSITION ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) Dirk B. Freeman (CEO) 1995 (through April 15) 65,500 -0- - 0- - 0- -0- -0- - 0- 1994 80,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- At June 30, 1996, Mr. Freeman did not hold any options to purchase any securities of the Company, he was not granted any such options during the fiscal year, and he did not exercise any options during the fiscal year. During late fiscal 1995 and all of fiscal 1996, James Wilson was compensated through an affiliated entity. Compensation expense allocated from the affiliate was deemed immaterial to the Company. OPTIONS/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR There were no options granted to executive officers in fiscal 1996. AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR VALUES There are no aggregated options or options exercised by executive officers as of and during the year ended June 30, 1996. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS None. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (Continued) PENSION PLAN BENEFITS None. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS The Company paid no compensation to non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS None. REPORT ON REPRICING OF OPTIONS/SARs None in 1996. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS (1) Compensation Committee Name Position Held Paul A. Dickie Director G. James Wilson Director (2) Not applicable. (3) Not applicable. BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Not applicable. PERFORMANCE GRAPH Not applicable. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table displays certain information, as of June 30, 1996 with respect to (a) each person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company's Common Stock (voting securities) and/or Preferred shares, (b) each director of the Company and all nominees for director, and (c) all officers and directors of the Company as a group. All stock ownership shown below is direct unless otherwise indicated. Number of Shares Percent Name and Address Owned Beneficially of Class LARCAN INC. 1) 9,053,195 78.42 228 Ambassador Drive Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5T 2J2 Paul A. Dickie None ----- Director 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 Dirk B. Freeman 905,803 7.85 Director/President 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 Nancy E. McGee None ------ Director 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 James Adamson None ------ Director 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 Dr. Byron W. St. Clair 517,379 4.48 Chairman of the Board/Officer 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 G. James Wilson None ------ Director 650 South Taylor Avenue Louisville, CO 80027 _____________ ____________ Total officers and Directors 10,476,377 90.75 All Others 1,067,557 9.25 Total Outstanding Shares 11,543,934 100.00 All Officers and Directors as a Group 10,476,377 90.75 Series A, 5% Cumulative, Convertible Preferred shares Number of Shares Percent Owned Beneficially of Class LARCAN INC. 2) 500,000 100.00 228 Ambassador Drive Missauga, Ontario Canada L5T 2J2 1) On May 18, 1995 the shareholders voted in favor of issuing an additional 5,000,000 Common Stock to LARCAN INC. for $500,000. The proceeds were then used for the purpose of repaying some of the Company's indebtedness to LARCAN INC. for advances made to cover operating expenses during last year. 2) On May 18, 1995, the shareholders voted in favor of issuing preferred shares to LARCAN INC. also for the purpose of repaying debt to LARCAN INC. as described above. In June 1995, the board of Directors created Series A, 5% cumulative (Convertible Preferred) stock value at $1.00 per share. The maximum issuable shares under the series is 500,000 shares. The Convertible Preferred stock is redeemable at the sole discretion of the Company. Subsequent to January 1, 1997, each Convertible Preferred share is convertible into common stock by multiplying the number of shares times the "liquidation value" divided by $.10. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS In June of 1995, LARCAN subscribed for 500,000 shares of the Convertible Preferred stock for $500,000 cash. Subsequent to January 1, 1997 should these shares be converted, LARCAN INC. would own 84.94% of the outstanding common stock. On October 15, 1993, LARCAN acquired 3,636,364 of authorized but unissued shares of the Company's common stock for $1,000,000 and 416,831 shares of the Company's common stock from existing shareholders. During June, 1995 LARCAN INC. subscribed for an additional 5,000,000 common shares for $500,000 and for 500,000, 5% cumulative convertible, preferred shares for $500,000. The Company receives advances from LARCAN for working capital and other purposes. The Company had total borrowings from LARCAN of $3,825,000 outstanding (after the issuance of common and preferred shares) as of June 30, 1996. Subsequent to June 30, 1996, an additional $650,000 has been received from LARCAN INC.. Sales to affiliated companies of LARCAN were approximately $792,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996. PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 10-K (a) 1. The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K: Page Independent Auditors' Report on Financial Statements ...............F-1,F-2 Balance Sheets as of June 30, 1996 and June 30, 1995 ...............F-3 Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1996 .................................................F-4 Statement of Stockholders' Deficit for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1996 ..................................................F-5 Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 1996 ............................................F-6 Notes to Financial Statements .........................................F-7 2. The financial statement schedules required to be filed as part of this Form 10-K are listed below: NONE 3. Exhibits required to be filed are listed below and immediately follow the signature page of this Form 10-K. NONE SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Date: September 30, 1996 LARCAN-TTC INC. (Registrant) By: ss\ G.James Wilson G. James Wilson President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Date ss\ Paul A. Dickie 9/30/96 Paul A. Dickie Chairman of the Board ss\ Byron W. St. Clair 9/30/96 Byron W. St. Clair Chairman of the Board Emeritus ss/ James D. Adamson 9/30/96 James D. Adamson Director ss/ Dirk B. Freeman 9/30/96 Dirk B. Freeman Director ss/ Nancy McGee 9/30/96 Nancy McGee Director ss/ G. James Wilson 9/30/96 G. James Wilson Director Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors' Report F - 1 Financial Statements Balance Sheets F - 3 Statements of Operations F - 4 Statement of Stockholders' Deficit F - 5 Statements of Cash Flows F - 6 Notes to Financial Statements F - 7 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders LARCAN-TTC, INC. Louisville, Colorado We have audited the balance sheets of LARCAN-TTC, INC. as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the oveall financial staement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LARCAN-TTC, INC. as of June 30, 1996 and 1995 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC August 22, 1996 Denver, Colorado INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholders LARCAN-TTC, INC. Louisville, Colorado We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows of LARCAN-TTC INC. (formerly Television Technology Corporation) for the year ended June 30, 1994. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of LARCAN-TTC INC. for the year ended June 30, 1994 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Denver, Colorado September 19, 1994 Balance Sheets June 30, 1996 1995 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 98,000 $ 118,000 Accounts receivable - trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $154,000 (1996) and $203,000 (1995) (Note 5) 363,000 299,000 Accounts receivable - related party 792,000 51,000 Inventories, net (Notes 2 and 5) 1,797,000 1,564,000 Other 23,000 10,000 Total current assets 3,073,000 2,042,000 Equipment and improvements (Notes 4 and 5) 1,923,000 1,788,000 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,695,000) (1,601,000) 228,000 187,000 Note receivable (Note 3) 19,000 - Other assets 19,000 19,000 Total assets $ 3,339,000 $ 2,248,000 Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit Current liabilities Line-of-credit (Note 5) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Note payable (Note 5) - 70,000 Accounts payable-trade 1,410,000 650,000 Account's payable-related party 698,000 85,000 Salaries, wages and employee benefits 181,000 177,000 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 142,000 100,000 Accrued warranty and other reserves 32,000 34,000 Customer advances 302,000 482,000 Total current liabilities 2,965,000 1,798,000 Advances from stockholder (Note 6) 3,825,000 1,575,000 Commitments (Note 8) Stockholders' deficit (Notes 6 and 9) Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized Series A 5% cumulative convertible, 500,000 (1996) shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $1.05 per share 500,000 - Series A subscribed, 500,000 shares - 500,000 Common stock, $.04 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 11,543,934 (1996) and 6,543,934 (1995) shares issued 462,000 262,000 Common stock subscribed, 5,000,000 shares - 200,000 Additional paid-in capital 4,744,000 4,744,000 Accumulated deficit (9,147,000) (6,821,000) Common stock held in treasury, at cost; 1,796 shares (10,000) (10,000) Total stockholders' deficit (3,451,000) (1,125,000) Total liabilities and stockholders'deficit $3,339,000 $2,248,000 Statements of Operations Fiscal Years Ended June 1996 1995 1994 Sales (Notes 6 and 10) $ 7,474,000 $ 6,228,000 $ 8,649,000 Operating expenses Cost of sales 7,293,000 5,423,000 7,057,000 Selling, general and administrative 1,573,000 1,695,000 2,361,000 Research and development 898,000 615,000 623,000 Total operating expenses 9,764,000 7,733,000 10,041,000 Loss from operations (2,290,000) (1,505,000) (1,392,000) Other expense Interest (21,000) (36,000) (50,000) Other (15,000) (21,000) ( 9,000) Total other expense (36,000) (57,000) (59,000) Net loss $(2,326,000) $(1,562,000) $(1,451,000) Net loss per common share $ (.23) $ (.24) $ (.27) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding 10,293,561 6,543,561 5,450,229 Statement of Stockholders' Deficit For the Years Ended June 1996, 1995, and 1994 Preferred Stock, Series A Common Stock Subscribed Subscribed Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Year ended June 25, 1993 - $ - - $- 2,906,570 117,000 - $- Issuance of common stock for cash (Note 9 - - - - 3,636,364 145,000 - - Net loss - - - - - - - - Year ended June 30, 1994 - - - - 6,542,934 262,000 - - Issuance of common stock for cash (Note 9) - - - - 1,000 - - - Subcription of Series A Preferred Stock (note 9) - - 500,000 500,000 - - - - Subscription of Common Stock (Note 9) - - - - - - 5,000,000 200,000 Net loss - - - - - - - - Year Ended June 30, 1995 - - 500,000 500,000 6,543,934 262,000 5,000,000 200,000 Issuance of subscribed common stock (Note 9) - - - - 5,000,000 200,000(5,000,000)(200,00) Issuance of subscribed preferred stock for cash (Note 9) 500,000 500,000 (500,000)(500,000) - - - - - Net loss - - - - - - - - - Year ended December 30, 1996 500,000 $ 500,000 - $ - 11,543,934 $ 462,000 - $ - Statement of Shareholders' Deficit For the Years Ended June 1996, 1995, and 1994 Additional Paid In Accumulated Treasury Stock Capital Deficit Shares Amount Year ended June 25, 1993 $3,589,000 $(3,808,000) 1,796 $(10,000) Issuance of Common Stock for Cash (Note 9) 855,000 - - - Net Loss - (1,451,000) - - Year Ended June 30, 1994 4,444,000 (5,259,000) 1,796 (10,000) Issuance of Common Stock for Cash (Note 9) - - - - Subscription of Series A Preferred Stock (Note 9) - - - - Subscription pf Common Stock (note 9) 300,000 - - - Net Loss - (1,562,000) - - Year Ended June 30, 1995 4,744,000 (6,821,000) 1,796 (10,000) Issuance of Subscribed Common Stock (Note 9) - - - - Issuance of subcribed preferred stock for cash - - - - Net Loss - (2,326,000) - - Year Ended June 30, 1996 $ 4,744,000 $(9,147,000) 1,796 $(10,000) Statements of Cash Flows Fiscal Years Ended June 1996 1995 1994 Cash flows from operating activities Net loss $ (2,326,000) $ (1,562,000) $ (1,451,000) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities Depreciation and amortization 94,000 122,000 123,000 Provision for losses on accounts receivable (49,000) 72,000 48,000 Provision for inventory reserves 72,000 104,000 120,000 Change in assets and liabilities Accounts Recievable-Trade (76,000) (40,000) 484,000 Inventories (305,000) 558,000 (834,000) Other current assets (13,000) 8,000 55,000 Accounts payable - trade 1,373,000 (119,000) (445,000) Salaries, wages and employee benefits 4,000 (67,000) 17,000 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 42,000 (164,000) 198,000 Accrued warranty and other reserves (2,000) (100,000) 43,000 Customer advances (180,000) 137,000 (131,000) 280,000 511,000 (322,000) Net cash used in operating activities (2,046,000) (1,051,000) (1,773,000) Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of equipment and improvements (135,000) (45,000) (91,000) Issuance of note recievable (19,000) - - Decrease (increase) in other assets - 1,000 13,000 Net cash used in investing activities (154,000) (44,000) (104,000) Cash flows from financing activities Borrowings on note payable and line-of-credit - 70,000 3,360,000 Payments on note payable and line-of-credit (70,000) (500,000) (3,478,000) Borrowings from stockholder 2,250,000 1,450,000 2,275,000 Payments to stockholder - (1,000,000) (650,000) Principal payments on capital lease obligations - (2,000) (4,000) Proceeds from issuance of common stock and preferred stock - 1,000,000 500,000 Net cash provided by financing activities 2,180,000 1,018,000 2,003,000 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (20,000) (77,000) 126,000 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 118,000 195,000 69,000 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 98,000 118,000 195,000 Supplemental disclosures of csh flow information: Cash paid for interest was $21,000, $36,000, and $58,000 for 1996, 1995, and 1994 respectively. Notes to Financial Statements Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Organization LARCAN-TTC, INC. (the Company), is a fully integrated producer of television and FM radio transmission equipment. The Company designs, develops and manufactures a variety of FM and television broadcast transmitters/translators including low power television equipment and high power UHF television equipment. The Company also provides system design services, sells accessory items manufactured by the Company and others, and performs installation as requested by its customers. LARCAN, INC> (a Canadian Corporation) (LARCAN) controlls approximately 78 percent of the Company's outstanding common stock as of June 30, 1996. The Company continues to be partially dependent on continued funding from LARCAN. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company, at times, maintains cash balances in depository accounts in excess of FDIC insurable limits. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Equipment and Improvements Equipment and improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight line method over the estimated useful life of the related assets, or the related lease term for leasehold improvements. Revenue Recognition Sales are recognized when the product is shipped, or pursuant to the terms of sales contracts when manufacturing is completed. Revenues from services are recognized when the services are rendered. Warranty Costs The Company generally provides a limited warranty for its products of one to two years. Included in cost of sales are projected future costs of providing such warranties on products which have been sold. Research and Development Research and product development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Net loss per common share Loss per share of common stock was computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents are not included as their effect would be antidilutive. Reclassification Certain amounts in the June 30, 1995 balance sheet have been reclassified to conform with the June 30, 1996 presentation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, receivable, note receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value as of June 30, 1996 and 1995, because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the advances from stockholder due to the inability to estimate fair value with out incurring excessive costs. Due to rates currently available to the Company for debt which are similar to terms on the remaining maturities, the fair value of existing debt approximate carrying value. Note 2- Inventories Inventories consist of the following: June 30, 1996 1995 Parts, raw materials and sub-assemblies $ 1,930,000 $ 1,676,000 Work in process 163,000 112,000 2,093,000 1,788,000 Less inventory reserves (296,000) (224,000) $ 1,797,000 $ 1,564,000 Note 3 - Note Receivable Note receivable consists of the following: June 30, 1996 1995 Note receivable related to the conversion of trade accounts receivable,interest at 7% monthly, principal and interest payments of approximately $618 through May 1999. Secured by equipment. $ 19,000 $ - Note 4 - Equipment and Improvements Equipment and improvements consist of the following: June 30, 1996 1995 Manufacturing equipment $ 1,045,000 $ 993,000 Furniture and fixtures 714,000 666,000 Leasehold Improvements 123,000 88,000 Transportation Equipment 41,000 41,000 1,923,000 1,788,000 Less Accumulated Depreciation and amortization (1,695,000)(1,601,000) 228,000 187,000 Note 5 - Note Payable and Line-of-Credit Note payable and line-of credit consist of the following: June 30 1996 1995 Bank revolving line-of-credit, interest at prime plus 1.5% (9.75% at June 30, 1996), matures June 1, 1997 collateralized by trade accounts receivable, inventories,and equipment $200,000 $200,000 Bank term loan, paid in full during 1996 - 70,000 In August, 1996, the line-of-credit was restructured into a $150,000 line-of-credit with interest at prime plus 1.5% maturing July 1, 1997, cross collateralized by trade accounts receivable, inventories and equipment and a $50,000 term loan at prime plus 1.5%, monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $4,000 through July 1, 1997. Note 6 - Related Parties The following is a summary of significant transactions with affiliated companies: Advances from Stockholder The Company receives advances from its major stockholder, LARCAN, for working capital and other purposes. These advances are subordinate to the bank debt (Note 5), are non-interest-bearing, unsecured, and have no fixed terms of repayment. The Company had total borrowings from LARCAN of $3,825,000 and $1,575,000 at June 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively. In August 1996, LARCAN formalized its advances into a $10,000,000 note payable ($6,175,000 unused at June 30, 1996) with interest at 8%, collateralized by sunstantially all the assets of the company, subject to the bank debt (Note 5). This note is due August 1, 1998. As further discussed in Note 9, during the year ended June 30, 1995, LARCAN subscribed 500,000 shares of the Company's Series A preferred stock and 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock for $1,000,000. The proceeds from the stock subscription were used to pay down the advances received from LARCAN. All of the subscribed shares were issued in the current year. Sales to Affiliates Sales to an affiliate of the Company's major stockholder, LARCAN, were approximately $792,000, $572,000, and $55,000 for the years ended June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Note 7 - Income Taxes Income Taxes The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which differences are expected to reverse. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced if necessary, by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. Deferred income taxes at a tax rate of 37% are comprised of the following: June 30 1996 1995 Deferred tax assets Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 57,000 $ 75,000 Inventory 283,000 257,000 Accrued vacation and other liabilities 60,000 68,000 Accrued warranty and other reserves 12,000 12,000 Research and development 84,000 84,000 Net operating loss carryforwards 2,714,000 1,953,000 3,210,000 2,449,000 Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets (3,186,000) (2,434,000) Net deferred tax asset 24,000 15,000 A valuation allowance of $3,186,000 and $2,434,000 as of June 30, 1996 and 1995, respectively, has been recognized to offset the related deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of these items. The Company has avialable, for federal income tax purposes, net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $7,900,000 which expire in varying amounts through 2009. The Company's net operating loss carryforwards, computed under the provisions of the alternative minimum tax, are not significantly different from the Company's regular net operating loss carryforwards. In addition, due to the change in control of stock ownership of the Company (Note 9), the Company's utilization of its net operating losses, which were incurred prior to the change in control may be limited due to the change in control. The income tax benefit at the statutory rate wouls approximate $860,000 in 1996. The benefit is not recognized due to the valuation allowance described above. Note 8 - Commitments Leases The Company has a noncancelable operating lease for its office and manufacturing facility. The lease, which expires April, 1998, provides for an increase in rental payments based on increases in the Consumer Price Index. In addition, the Company is required to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs relating to the leased facility. The Company has also entered into certain other noncancelable operating leases extending through 1998. As of June 30, 1996, the Company's future minimum rental commitments under these operating leases are as follows: Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 1997 $ 361,000 1998 276,000 Total minimum lease payments $ 637,000 Total rental expense under operating leases for the fiscal years ended June 1996, 1995, and 1994 was $378,000, $356,000, and $360,000, respectively. Note 9 - Stockholders' Deficit Preferred Stock During 1995, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $1.00 par value, with such rights, preferences, designations and to be issued in such series as to be determined by the Company's Board of Directors. In June 1995, the Board of Directors created Series A, 5% cumulative convertible preferred (Convertible Preferred) stock value at $1.00 per share. The maximum issuable shares under the series is 500,000 shares. Holders of the Convertible Preferred shares shall be entitled to dividends as declared by the Board of Directors at $.05 per share. The non-declared cumulative dividend was $25,000 at June 30, 1996. he Convertible Preferred stockholders, in the event of liquidation of the Company, will receive an amount equal to $1.00 per share plus declared and unpaid dividends before any holder of common stock receives any amount. The Convertible Preferred stock is redeemable at the sole discretion of the Company. Subsequent to January 1, 1997, each Convertible Preferred share is convertible into common stock by multiplying the number of shares times the "liquidation value" divided by $.10. In June 1995, the Company's majority stockholder subscribed 500,000 shares of the Converible Preferred stock for $500,000 cash. The subscribed shares were issued in October 1995. Issuance of Common Stock In 1993, LARCAN acquired 3,636,364 of authorized but unissued shares of the Company's common stock for $1,000,000 and 416,831 shares of the Company's common stock from existing shareholders. In June 1995, the Company's majority stockholder subscribed 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock for $500,000. The subscribed shares were issued in October 1995. Stock Option Plan The Company adopted an Incentive Stock Option Plan (the Plan) which, as amended in February 1986, allowed the issuance of up to 687,500 shares of both incentive stock options (ISOs), as amended, and non-qualified options (NQOs), which are options that do not qualify as ISOs. Under the Plan, any employee of the Company, including salaried officers and directors, could be granted options to purchase common stock of the Company. The Plan expired in June 1993. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the Plan continue to be governed by the Plan's provisions. Note 9 - Stockholders' Deficit (continued) Stock Option Plan (continued) The following is a summary of changes in the qualified options for the last three years: Number of Option Price Shares Range Per Share Outstanding at June 25, 1993 309,020 $ .44 - 2.50 Canceled (158,688) .28 - .64 Outstanding at June 30, 1994 150,332 .28 Canceled (38,566) .28 Exercised (1,000) .28 Outstanding at June 30, 1995 110,766 .28 Canceled (36,219) .28 Outstanding at June 30, 1996 74,547 $ .28 Total exercisable at June 30, 1996 74,547 $ .28 Effective October 15, 1993, the Board of Directors authorized a resolution which reset all qualified options to $.28 per share. Note 10 -Concentration of Credit Risk The Company operates in one industry segment and sells some products in foreign markets. Export sales totaled $2,699,000, $1,322,000, and $4,047,000 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994 respectively. During the year ended June 30, 1996 and 1995, 67 percent and 59 percent of export sales were to Saudi Arabia, respectively. In fiscal 1994, 54 percent of export sales were to Nigeria. Sales to international customers are subject to unique risks which are not present in sales to domestic customers. The Company attempts to mitigate these risks by carefully considering the political and economic conditions in a foreign country along with the financial viability of its customer before doing business there. For international customers, sales are priced in U.S. dollars to avoid currency fluctuations and are sold under irrevocable letters of credit, which are usually confirmed by a major U.S. bank when the political, economic, or financial viability is uncertain. Note 10 - Concentration of Credit Risk (continued Generally, it is the Company's policy to obtain a cash advance from its domestic customers of approximately 35 percent of the sales price prior to commencement of production. Subsequently, progress payments are received during the production of the equipment. The Company had individual customers whose sales accounted for 48, 12, and 25 percent of total sales during the years ended June 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----